On Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:44:15 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:ha3pdhtu82jpkal6na929qi275f2p16osc@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 00:40:16 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:3ph0bhthvaa2a51pnba866vrhtj1kknojo@4ax.com...
>>>> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
>>>> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
>>>> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
>>>> when he wrote the following:
>>>>>
>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>message
>>>>>news:iqb88ht0hskpl9rk4fsl3qp42dcil5b3kn@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Tue, 17 May 2022 19:24:26 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>If you want to consider this a victory
>>>>>>>on your part, go right head.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course I will.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then why snip out the argument?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You have no argument to snip.
>>>
>>>Then why snip it?
>>>
>>
>> Why snip what?
>>
>> If you have an argument, post it.
>
>I DID post it. You SNIPPED it.

Wrong. You had no argument.

All you had, and all you have, is your ceaseless, illogical
blathering.

You had a chance to post your argument again and you didn't. PROOF you
didn't have one.

Once again, you suffer another ignominious defeat at my hands.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5to1ih1spst5c2tth2co0okdlub6a74ne0@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:44:15 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:ha3pdhtu82jpkal6na929qi275f2p16osc@4ax.com...
>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 00:40:16 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>message
>>>>news:3ph0bhthvaa2a51pnba866vrhtj1kknojo@4ax.com...
>>>>> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
>>>>> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
>>>>> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
>>>>> when he wrote the following:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>message
>>>>>>news:iqb88ht0hskpl9rk4fsl3qp42dcil5b3kn@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 May 2022 19:24:26 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>If you want to consider this a victory
>>>>>>>>on your part, go right head.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Of course I will.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then why snip out the argument?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You have no argument to snip.
>>>>
>>>>Then why snip it?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why snip what?
>>>
>>> If you have an argument, post it.
>>
>>I DID post it. You SNIPPED it.
>
> Wrong. You had no argument.
>
> All you had, and all you have, is your ceaseless, illogical
> blathering.

Ah, the classic klous snip'n'screech argument. Every time you "lose" and
argumnet, you snip the relvant text, then screech about how I'm a liar and
had no argument.

And as usual, not actually facing the ARGUMNET AT HAND.

"KWills" <a@b.c> wrote in message
news:k633ihhjp1gq5d1op8mfkschmm462qg2o2@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:44:15 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:ha3pdhtu82jpkal6na929qi275f2p16osc@4ax.com...
>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 00:40:16 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>message news:3ph0bhthvaa2a51pnba866vrhtj1kknojo@4ax.com...
>>>>> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
>>>>> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
>>>>> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
>>>>> when he wrote the following:
>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>message news:iqb88ht0hskpl9rk4fsl3qp42dcil5b3kn@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 May 2022 19:24:26 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>If you want to consider this a victory on your part, go right head.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Of course I will.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then why snip out the argument?
>>>>>
>>>>> You have no argument to snip.
>>>>
>>>>Then why snip it?
>>>
>>> Why snip what?
>>>
>>> If you have an argument, post it.
>>
>>I DID post it. You SNIPPED it. as Usual when yu face a argument you
>>can't
>>respond to.
>
> As of the time I write this, you've never offered an argument to
> snip.

THEN WHY DID KLOUS SNIP MY ARGUMENTS????!!!!!!

Gawd I feel good right now...........

On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 02:55:20 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:5to1ih1spst5c2tth2co0okdlub6a74ne0@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:44:15 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:ha3pdhtu82jpkal6na929qi275f2p16osc@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 00:40:16 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>message
>>>>>news:3ph0bhthvaa2a51pnba866vrhtj1kknojo@4ax.com...
>>>>>> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
>>>>>> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
>>>>>> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
>>>>>> when he wrote the following:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>message
>>>>>>>news:iqb88ht0hskpl9rk4fsl3qp42dcil5b3kn@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 May 2022 19:24:26 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>If you want to consider this a victory
>>>>>>>>>on your part, go right head.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Of course I will.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then why snip out the argument?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You have no argument to snip.
>>>>>
>>>>>Then why snip it?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why snip what?
>>>>
>>>> If you have an argument, post it.
>>>
>>>I DID post it. You SNIPPED it.
>>
>> Wrong. You had no argument.
>>
>> All you had, and all you have, is your ceaseless, illogical
>> blathering.
>
>Ah, the classic klous snip'n'screech argument.

Ah, the classic Jenny Avoidance Technique. Address a thread from a
year ago and continue your blathering about things nobody cares about
any more.

On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 02:57:38 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KWills" <a@b.c> wrote in message
>news:k633ihhjp1gq5d1op8mfkschmm462qg2o2@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:44:15 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:ha3pdhtu82jpkal6na929qi275f2p16osc@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 00:40:16 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>message news:3ph0bhthvaa2a51pnba866vrhtj1kknojo@4ax.com...
>>>>>> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
>>>>>> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
>>>>>> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
>>>>>> when he wrote the following:
>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>message news:iqb88ht0hskpl9rk4fsl3qp42dcil5b3kn@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 May 2022 19:24:26 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>If you want to consider this a victory on your part, go right head.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Of course I will.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then why snip out the argument?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You have no argument to snip.
>>>>>
>>>>>Then why snip it?
>>>>
>>>> Why snip what?
>>>>
>>>> If you have an argument, post it.
>>>
>>>I DID post it. You SNIPPED it. as Usual when yu face a argument you
>>>can't
>>>respond to.
>>
>> As of the time I write this, you've never offered an argument to
>> snip.
>
>THEN WHY DID KLOUS SNIP MY ARGUMENTS????!!!!!!
>Gawd I feel good right now...........

How could I snip something that never existed, fool?

On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 04:20:35 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude wrote:

> On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 02:55:20 -0500, "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message news:5to1ih1spst5c2tth2co0okdlub6a74ne0@4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:44:15 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>message news:ha3pdhtu82jpkal6na929qi275f2p16osc@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 00:40:16 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>message news:3ph0bhthvaa2a51pnba866vrhtj1kknojo@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
>>>>>>> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>] "Jerry
>>>>>>> Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again when he wrote the
>>>>>>> following:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>>>>in message news:iqb88ht0hskpl9rk4fsl3qp42dcil5b3kn@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 May 2022 19:24:26 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>If you want to consider this a victory on your part, go right
>>>>>>>>>>head.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Of course I will.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Then why snip out the argument?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You have no argument to snip.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Then why snip it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Why snip what?
>>>>>
>>>>> If you have an argument, post it.
>>>>
>>>>I DID post it. You SNIPPED it.
>>>
>>> Wrong. You had no argument.
>>>
>>> All you had, and all you have, is your ceaseless, illogical
>>> blathering.
>>
>>Ah, the classic klous snip'n'screech argument.
>
> Ah, the classic Jenny Avoidance Technique. Address a thread from a year
> ago and continue your blathering about things nobody cares about any
> more.

Hardly fair.

How can you expect Jerry to take his rightful place
as Burgermeister if you keep running him off?

--
-Frank 🌭

On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 02:55:20 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:5to1ih1spst5c2tth2co0okdlub6a74ne0@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:44:15 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message news:ha3pdhtu82jpkal6na929qi275f2p16osc@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 00:40:16 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>message news:3ph0bhthvaa2a51pnba866vrhtj1kknojo@4ax.com...
>>>>>> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
>>>>>> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
>>>>>> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
>>>>>> when he wrote the following:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>message news:iqb88ht0hskpl9rk4fsl3qp42dcil5b3kn@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 May 2022 19:24:26 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>If you want to consider this a victory
>>>>>>>>>on your part, go right head.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Of course I will.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then why snip out the argument?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You have no argument to snip.
>>>>>
>>>>>Then why snip it?
>>>>
>>>> Why snip what?
>>>>
>>>> If you have an argument, post it.
>>>
>>>I DID post it. You SNIPPED it.
>>
>> Wrong. You had no argument.
>>
>> All you had, and all you have, is your ceaseless, illogical
>> blathering.
>
>Ah, the classic klous snip'n'screech argument. Every time you "lose" and
>argumnet, you snip the relvant text, then screech about how I'm a liar and
>had no argument.
>
>And as usual, not actually facing the ARGUMNET AT HAND.
>

That you waited almost a year to offer your LIE stands as PROOF
that you are LYING.
Please get professional mental health care for your lying.

--
"Hail imp," shouted Vlad, the Imp Hailer.

On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 04:20:35 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 02:55:20 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:5to1ih1spst5c2tth2co0okdlub6a74ne0@4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:44:15 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>message news:ha3pdhtu82jpkal6na929qi275f2p16osc@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 00:40:16 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>message news:3ph0bhthvaa2a51pnba866vrhtj1kknojo@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
>>>>>>> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
>>>>>>> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
>>>>>>> when he wrote the following:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>message news:iqb88ht0hskpl9rk4fsl3qp42dcil5b3kn@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 May 2022 19:24:26 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>If you want to consider this a victory
>>>>>>>>>>on your part, go right head.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Of course I will.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Then why snip out the argument?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You have no argument to snip.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Then why snip it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Why snip what?
>>>>>
>>>>> If you have an argument, post it.
>>>>
>>>>I DID post it. You SNIPPED it.
>>>
>>> Wrong. You had no argument.
>>>
>>> All you had, and all you have, is your ceaseless, illogical
>>> blathering.
>>
>>Ah, the classic klous snip'n'screech argument.
>
>Ah, the classic Jenny Avoidance Technique. Address a thread from a
>year ago and continue your blathering about things nobody cares about
>any more.

Doing so fulfils Jenny's NEED to lie.

--
Bless me, Father, for I have committed an original sin.
I poked a badger with a spoon.

On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 02:57:38 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>"KWills" <a@b.c> wrote in message
>news:k633ihhjp1gq5d1op8mfkschmm462qg2o2@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:44:15 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message news:ha3pdhtu82jpkal6na929qi275f2p16osc@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 00:40:16 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>message news:3ph0bhthvaa2a51pnba866vrhtj1kknojo@4ax.com...
>>>>>> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
>>>>>> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
>>>>>> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
>>>>>> when he wrote the following:
>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>message news:iqb88ht0hskpl9rk4fsl3qp42dcil5b3kn@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 May 2022 19:24:26 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>If you want to consider this a victory on your part, go right head.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Of course I will.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then why snip out the argument?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You have no argument to snip.
>>>>>
>>>>>Then why snip it?
>>>>
>>>> Why snip what?
>>>>
>>>> If you have an argument, post it.
>>>
>>>I DID post it. You SNIPPED it. as Usual when yu face a argument you
>>>can't
>>>respond to.
>>
>> As of the time I write this, you've never offered an argument to
>> snip.
>
>THEN WHY DID KLOUS SNIP MY ARGUMENTS????!!!!!!
>

There is no evidence that he did. Since you offered no argument
to snip, there can never be any evidence that he did.
Add that I posted what you quote on, as proved by the headers:

Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 01:13:01 -0700

and your lie is further exposed. If there was ANY truth to be
found in your claim, you would have addressed my exposing your LIE in
September of 2022.
Your lying is NOT an argument. It's just you lying. Nothing more.

>Gawd I feel good right now...........
>

Your completely inability to be honest, intentionally, being
exposed makes you feel good. Got it. And I'm not the least bit
surprised.
You really should get professional help for your NEED to lie.

--
If Mama ain't happy, ain't nobody happy.
If Daddy ain't happy, don't nobody care!

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:a4i6eitusapk41e0nvbepbu7jd58b9n3qb@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 02:57:38 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KWills" <a@b.c> wrote in message
>>news:k633ihhjp1gq5d1op8mfkschmm462qg2o2@4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:44:15 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>message
>>>>news:ha3pdhtu82jpkal6na929qi275f2p16osc@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 00:40:16 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>message news:3ph0bhthvaa2a51pnba866vrhtj1kknojo@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
>>>>>>> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
>>>>>>> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
>>>>>>> when he wrote the following:
>>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>message news:iqb88ht0hskpl9rk4fsl3qp42dcil5b3kn@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 May 2022 19:24:26 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>If you want to consider this a victory on your part, go right
>>>>>>>>>>head.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Of course I will.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Then why snip out the argument?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You have no argument to snip.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Then why snip it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Why snip what?
>>>>>
>>>>> If you have an argument, post it.
>>>>
>>>>I DID post it. You SNIPPED it. as Usual when yu face a argument you
>>>>can't
>>>>respond to.
>>>
>>> As of the time I write this, you've never offered an argument to
>>> snip.
>>
>>THEN WHY DID KLOUS SNIP MY ARGUMENTS????!!!!!!
>>Gawd I feel good right now...........
>
> How could I snip something that never existed, fool?

Klous, here's your internet lesson for the day. When you snip something,
that doesn't mean that it never existed previously. Anybody who read (or
wrote) what you snipped, as long as they saw it BEFORE you snipped it, will
remember that it existed and what it said. FURTHERMORE, people can back
back to previous message's AND THE SNIPPED TEXT WILL STILL BE THERE IN ALL
IT'S GLORY.

So how this pertains to this discussion is, YES i made the argument. Yes
you snipped it, but the argument STILL EXISTS and you have yet to respond to
it.

On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 13:40:12 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:a4i6eitusapk41e0nvbepbu7jd58b9n3qb@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 02:57:38 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"KWills" <a@b.c> wrote in message
>>>news:k633ihhjp1gq5d1op8mfkschmm462qg2o2@4ax.com...
>>>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:44:15 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>message
>>>>>news:ha3pdhtu82jpkal6na929qi275f2p16osc@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 00:40:16 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>message news:3ph0bhthvaa2a51pnba866vrhtj1kknojo@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
>>>>>>>> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
>>>>>>>> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
>>>>>>>> when he wrote the following:
>>>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>message news:iqb88ht0hskpl9rk4fsl3qp42dcil5b3kn@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 May 2022 19:24:26 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>If you want to consider this a victory on your part, go right
>>>>>>>>>>>head.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Of course I will.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Then why snip out the argument?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You have no argument to snip.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Then why snip it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why snip what?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you have an argument, post it.
>>>>>
>>>>>I DID post it. You SNIPPED it. as Usual when yu face a argument you
>>>>>can't
>>>>>respond to.
>>>>
>>>> As of the time I write this, you've never offered an argument to
>>>> snip.
>>>
>>>THEN WHY DID KLOUS SNIP MY ARGUMENTS????!!!!!!
>>>Gawd I feel good right now...........
>>
>> How could I snip something that never existed, fool?
>
>
>Klous, here's your internet lesson for the day. When you snip something,
>that doesn't mean that it never existed previously.

Jenny, here is your internet lesson for today. When you claim to have
offered an argument, you actually have to offer an argument.

Stamping your feet and shrieking is *not* an argument.

SEE: https://youtu.be/uLlv_aZjHXc?feature=shared&t=75

On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 13:40:12 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 11:21:14 +0000

Sigh...
Your waiting months to PROVE you NEED to lie is not the benefit your
mental illness makes you believe it is.

>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:a4i6eitusapk41e0nvbepbu7jd58b9n3qb@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 02:57:38 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"KWills" <a@b.c> wrote in message
>>>news:k633ihhjp1gq5d1op8mfkschmm462qg2o2@4ax.com...
>>>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:44:15 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>message news:ha3pdhtu82jpkal6na929qi275f2p16osc@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 00:40:16 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>message news:3ph0bhthvaa2a51pnba866vrhtj1kknojo@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
>>>>>>>> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
>>>>>>>> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
>>>>>>>> when he wrote the following:
>>>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>message news:iqb88ht0hskpl9rk4fsl3qp42dcil5b3kn@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 May 2022 19:24:26 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>If you want to consider this a victory on your part, go right
>>>>>>>>>>>head.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Of course I will.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Then why snip out the argument?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You have no argument to snip.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Then why snip it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why snip what?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you have an argument, post it.
>>>>>
>>>>>I DID post it. You SNIPPED it. as Usual when yu face a argument you
>>>>>can't
>>>>>respond to.
>>>>

JENNY! Please restore whatever you messed up in your reader's settings
in regards to attributions. Don't try to divert by demanding I, or
anyone else, tell you what to do. Only you know what you screwed up,
so only you can know what to restore.

>>>> As of the time I write this, you've never offered an argument to
>>>> snip.
>>>
>>>THEN WHY DID KLOUS SNIP MY ARGUMENTS????!!!!!!
>>>Gawd I feel good right now...........
>>
>> How could I snip something that never existed, fool?
>
>Klous, here's your internet lesson for the day. When you snip something,
>that doesn't mean that it never existed previously. Anybody who read (or
>wrote) what you snipped, as long as they saw it BEFORE you snipped it, will
>remember that it existed and what it said.

That's ALMOST funny. You constantly snip things when you reply.
And you do so as a means of altering the context of the discussion.
It's one of the aspects of your mental illness that make
intentional honesty impossible for you.
But do a C&P of the argument(s) you offered that you now claim
were snipped. If you're lying, and you are, nothing but
diversion/avoidance will be offered. If you don't run away from the
truth.

>FURTHERMORE, people can back
>back to previous message's AND THE SNIPPED TEXT WILL STILL BE THERE IN ALL
>IT'S GLORY.

So why, exactly, do you snip away the context of posts when you
reply?

[Crickets]

>
>So how this pertains to this discussion is, YES i made the argument. Yes
>you snipped it, but the argument STILL EXISTS and you have yet to respond to
>it.

Yet no one has seen the argument you reference above. Because, of
course, you offered none to be seen. But you will prove they do/did
exist. Unless you're lying, as you will soon PROVE you are.
Get the professional mental health care you consistently PROVE
you really do NEED in regards to your lying. I am being very serious.

[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2

On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 12:35:03 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 13:40:12 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:a4i6eitusapk41e0nvbepbu7jd58b9n3qb@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>> On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 02:57:38 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"KWills" <a@b.c> wrote in message
>>>>news:k633ihhjp1gq5d1op8mfkschmm462qg2o2@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:44:15 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>message news:ha3pdhtu82jpkal6na929qi275f2p16osc@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 00:40:16 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>message news:3ph0bhthvaa2a51pnba866vrhtj1kknojo@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
>>>>>>>>> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
>>>>>>>>> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
>>>>>>>>> when he wrote the following:
>>>>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>message news:iqb88ht0hskpl9rk4fsl3qp42dcil5b3kn@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 May 2022 19:24:26 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>If you want to consider this a victory on your part, go right
>>>>>>>>>>>>head.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Of course I will.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Then why snip out the argument?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You have no argument to snip.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Then why snip it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why snip what?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you have an argument, post it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I DID post it. You SNIPPED it. as Usual when yu face a argument you
>>>>>>can't respond to.
>>>>>
>>>>> As of the time I write this, you've never offered an argument to
>>>>> snip.
>>>>
>>>>THEN WHY DID KLOUS SNIP MY ARGUMENTS????!!!!!!
>>>>Gawd I feel good right now...........
>>>
>>> How could I snip something that never existed, fool?
>>
>>Klous, here's your internet lesson for the day. When you snip something,
>>that doesn't mean that it never existed previously.
>
>Jenny, here is your internet lesson for today. When you claim to have
>offered an argument, you actually have to offer an argument.
>
>Stamping your feet and shrieking is *not* an argument.
>
>SEE: https://youtu.be/uLlv_aZjHXc?feature=shared&t=75

Giggle.
IACBTP [1]
Cue Jenny either running away from the TRUTH he HATES, or
attempting to divert from it.

[1] It All Comes Back To Python

--
'Veni, Vidi, Velcro'
I came, I saw, I stuck around.

"K Wills" <fun@home.new> wrote in message
news:75p8eihfrjsvrp6ep48oqlv5g9mga7nsbm@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 02:55:20 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>>Ah, the classic klous snip'n'screech argument. Every time you "lose" and
>>argumnet, you snip the relvant text, then screech about how I'm a liar and
>>had no argument.
>>
>>And as usual, not actually facing the ARGUMNET AT HAND.
>
> Please get professional mental health care for your lying.

Yawn.

"K Wills" <fun@home.new> wrote in message
news:p6p8eihuheiqfle829g3vdhackp6ouktg0@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 04:20:35 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
> <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>

>>Ah, the classic Jenny Avoidance Technique. Address a thread from a
>>year ago and continue your blathering about things nobody cares about
>>any more.
>
> Doing so fulfils Jenny's NEED to lie.

Yawn.

On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:18:59 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"K Wills" <fun@home.new> wrote in message
>news:75p8eihfrjsvrp6ep48oqlv5g9mga7nsbm@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 02:55:20 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>>Ah, the classic klous snip'n'screech argument. Every time you "lose" and
>>>argumnet, you snip the relvant text, then screech about how I'm a liar and
>>>had no argument.
>>>
>>>And as usual, not actually facing the ARGUMNET AT HAND.
>>
>> Please get professional mental health care for your lying.
>
>Yawn.
>

Jenny continues to run from his lies.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=1

On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:19:16 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"K Wills" <fun@home.new> wrote in message
>news:p6p8eihuheiqfle829g3vdhackp6ouktg0@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 04:20:35 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>> <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>
>>>Ah, the classic Jenny Avoidance Technique. Address a thread from a
>>>year ago and continue your blathering about things nobody cares about
>>>any more.
>>
>> Doing so fulfils Jenny's NEED to lie.
>
>
>Yawn.
>

Jenny continues to run from his lies.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=1

On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:18:59 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"K Wills" <fun@home.new> wrote in message
>news:75p8eihfrjsvrp6ep48oqlv5g9mga7nsbm@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 02:55:20 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>>Ah, the classic klous snip'n'screech argument. Every time you "lose" and
>>>argumnet, you snip the relvant text, then screech about how I'm a liar and
>>>had no argument.
>>>
>>>And as usual, not actually facing the ARGUMNET AT HAND.
>>
>> Please get professional mental health care for your lying.
>
>Yawn.
>

Ibid.

[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2

On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:19:16 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"K Wills" <fun@home.new> wrote in message
>news:p6p8eihuheiqfle829g3vdhackp6ouktg0@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 04:20:35 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>> <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>Ah, the classic Jenny Avoidance Technique. Address a thread from a
>>>year ago and continue your blathering about things nobody cares about
>>>any more.
>>
>> Doing so fulfils Jenny's NEED to lie.
>
>
>Yawn.

Ibid.

[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7j5bqi50gb0da4nkpq99v2qi3chapn7quj@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 13:40:12 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:a4i6eitusapk41e0nvbepbu7jd58b9n3qb@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>> On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 02:57:38 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"KWills" <a@b.c> wrote in message
>>>>news:k633ihhjp1gq5d1op8mfkschmm462qg2o2@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:44:15 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>message
>>>>>>news:ha3pdhtu82jpkal6na929qi275f2p16osc@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 00:40:16 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>message news:3ph0bhthvaa2a51pnba866vrhtj1kknojo@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>> Chances are very good that the notorious, deceitful, proven liar
>>>>>>>>> [Message-ID: <799jahlhj8q2525ndm4p8tjkvto5rf7i7l@4ax.com>]
>>>>>>>>> "Jerry Sauk" <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> lied yet again
>>>>>>>>> when he wrote the following:
>>>>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>in
>>>>>>>>>>message news:iqb88ht0hskpl9rk4fsl3qp42dcil5b3kn@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 May 2022 19:24:26 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>If you want to consider this a victory on your part, go right
>>>>>>>>>>>>head.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Of course I will.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Then why snip out the argument?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You have no argument to snip.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Then why snip it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why snip what?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you have an argument, post it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I DID post it. You SNIPPED it. as Usual when yu face a argument you
>>>>>>can't
>>>>>>respond to.
>>>>>
>>>>> As of the time I write this, you've never offered an argument to
>>>>> snip.
>>>>
>>>>THEN WHY DID KLOUS SNIP MY ARGUMENTS????!!!!!!
>>>>Gawd I feel good right now...........
>>>
>>> How could I snip something that never existed, fool?
>>
>>
>>Klous, here's your internet lesson for the day. When you snip something,
>>that doesn't mean that it never existed previously.
>
> Jenny, here is your internet lesson for today. When you claim to have
> offered an argument, you actually have to offer an argument.
>
> Stamping your feet and shrieking is *not* an argument.

And another lesson for you, posting "Standard Jenny Responce" saying "This
has already been explained" is not an argument either.

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:08:25 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>And another lesson for you, posting "Standard Jenny Responce" saying "This
>has already been explained" is not an argument either.
>

No, the FIRST time it was explained to you was the argument.

And you lost the argument by lying.