On 9/26/2022 3:56 AM, NoBody wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 14:35:11 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
> Sherman) wrote:
>
>> David Hartung <david@Hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 9/25/22 09:18, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>> David Hartung <david@Hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 9/25/22 08:58, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>>> Kremlin Girl <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | Trump Made N.Y. Attorney General's Fraud Case Virtually
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | Unbeatable
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> What does your blathering have to do with the fact the state of NY was
>>>>>>> unable to make a legal case against Trump?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What part of "Fraud Case" do you not understand?
>>>>>
>>>>> They have yet to make that case.
>>>>
>>>> Wrong again, David. Chapter and verse:
>>>> <https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22670311-nyag-v-trump-et-al>
>>>
>>> They have filed a complaint, they have not yet proven their case in court.
>>
>> That's not what Kremlin Girl said. She said "make a legal case."
>> They have done that.
>>
>> --bks
>
> Legal case not made which was why they are suing in civl court.

Because you're terminally stupid, you falsely think that "legal case"
exclusively means "criminal case." You're wrong...because you're stupid.

OrigInfoJunkie wrote:

> On 9/24/2022 6:11 AM, NoBody wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 16:27:25 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
> > Sherman) wrote:
> >
> >>David Hartung <david@Hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On 9/23/22 09:00, Alan Bond wrote:
> > > > > On 9/23/2022 4:04 AM, NoBody wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Trump Made N.Y. Attorney General's Fraud Case Virtually
> > > > > > > > Unbeatable
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > He should have settled early, but he got boxed into
> > > > > > > > taking the Fifth -- and that can be used against him
> > > > > > > > now. ...
> > > > > > > > But taking the Fifth has severe consequences in this
> > > > > > > > case. Unlike in a criminal case, in a civil
> > > > > > > > proceeding like the suit brought by James, the jury
> > > > > > > > will likely be instructed they can infer that when
> > > > > > > > Trump took the Fifth, his answer would have been
> > > > > > > > adverse to him. Trump's repeated insistence that
> > > > > > > > James' politically motivated suit left him no choice
> > > > > > > > will not withstand the effect of the jury inferring
> > > > > > > > that Trump broke the law and has no good answer to the
> > > > > > > > questions he was asked. ...
> > > > ...
> > > > > > Look at you being in favor of political persecution of
> > > > > > one's enemies.
> > > > > No.  That's not what's happening.
> > > > Oh?
> > >
> > > Look at you, standing up for fraud.
> > >
> >
> > Look at you, standing up for political persecution
>
> No, that's a lie. There is no "political persecution" of Trump. He
> committed numerous real offenses. It's time to hold him accountable.

Ever notice how the "lock her up!" crowd
is now touting "no charges = no crime"?

On 9/26/2022 8:48 AM, Lee wrote:
> OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
>
>> On 9/24/2022 6:11 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 16:27:25 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>>> Sherman) wrote:
>>>
>>>> David Hartung <david@Hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 9/23/22 09:00, Alan Bond wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/23/2022 4:04 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Trump Made N.Y. Attorney General's Fraud Case Virtually
>>>>>>>>> Unbeatable
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He should have settled early, but he got boxed into
>>>>>>>>> taking the Fifth -- and that can be used against him
>>>>>>>>> now. ...
>>>>>>>>> But taking the Fifth has severe consequences in this
>>>>>>>>> case. Unlike in a criminal case, in a civil
>>>>>>>>> proceeding like the suit brought by James, the jury
>>>>>>>>> will likely be instructed they can infer that when
>>>>>>>>> Trump took the Fifth, his answer would have been
>>>>>>>>> adverse to him. Trump's repeated insistence that
>>>>>>>>> James' politically motivated suit left him no choice
>>>>>>>>> will not withstand the effect of the jury inferring
>>>>>>>>> that Trump broke the law and has no good answer to the
>>>>>>>>> questions he was asked. ...
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> Look at you being in favor of political persecution of
>>>>>>> one's enemies.
>>>>>> No.  That's not what's happening.
>>>>> Oh?
>>>>
>>>> Look at you, standing up for fraud.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Look at you, standing up for political persecution
>>
>> No, that's a lie. There is no "political persecution" of Trump. He
>> committed numerous real offenses. It's time to hold him accountable.
>
>
>
> Ever notice how the "lock her up!" crowd
> is now touting "no charges = no crime"?

That's been their absurd gag for a long time. And then they threaten to riot
and engage in insurrection at the mere thought of *bringing* charges against
Trump. Here's how they think:

"Trump hasn't been charged, so that 'means' he has committed no crime. But
if he is charged, that will mean charges are being brought against an
innocent man (because he hasn't been charged yet), and so if he is charged,
we will riot and overthrow the government."

That is *exactly* the (il)logic of the America-haters' so-called "thinking."

OrigInfoJunkie <bumfuck@att.net> wrote in
news:82kYK.688298$BKL8.299495@fx15.iad:

> On 9/26/2022 8:48 AM, Lee wrote:
>> OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/24/2022 6:11 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 16:27:25 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>>>> Sherman) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> David Hartung <david@Hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/23/22 09:00, Alan Bond wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/23/2022 4:04 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Trump Made N.Y. Attorney General's Fraud Case Virtually
>>>>>>>>>> Unbeatable
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He should have settled early, but he got boxed into
>>>>>>>>>> taking the Fifth -- and that can be used against him
>>>>>>>>>> now. ...
>>>>>>>>>> But taking the Fifth has severe consequences in this
>>>>>>>>>> case. Unlike in a criminal case, in a civil
>>>>>>>>>> proceeding like the suit brought by James, the jury
>>>>>>>>>> will likely be instructed they can infer that when
>>>>>>>>>> Trump took the Fifth, his answer would have been
>>>>>>>>>> adverse to him. Trump's repeated insistence that
>>>>>>>>>> James' politically motivated suit left him no choice
>>>>>>>>>> will not withstand the effect of the jury inferring
>>>>>>>>>> that Trump broke the law and has no good answer to the
>>>>>>>>>> questions he was asked. ...
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> Look at you being in favor of political persecution of
>>>>>>>> one's enemies.
>>>>>>> No.  That's not what's happening.
>>>>>> Oh?
>>>>>
>>>>> Look at you, standing up for fraud.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Look at you, standing up for political persecution
>>>
>>> No, that's a lie. There is no "political persecution" of Trump. He
>>> committed numerous real offenses. It's time to hold him
>>> accountable.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ever notice how the "lock her up!" crowd
>> is now touting "no charges = no crime"?
>
> That's been their absurd gag for a long time. And then they threaten
> to riot and engage in insurrection at the mere thought of *bringing*
> charges against Trump. Here's how they think:
>
> "Trump hasn't been charged, so that 'means' he has committed no
> crime. But if he is charged, that will mean charges are being
> brought against an innocent man (because he hasn't been charged
> yet), and so if he is charged, we will riot and overthrow the
> government."
>
> That is *exactly* the (il)logic of the America-haters' so-called
> "thinking."
>
>
>

If the FBI is investigating Hillary
that proves she is corrupt.

If the FBI is investigating Trump
that proves THEY are corrupt.

Even if the FBI Director is a
Trump appointee..........

On 9/26/2022 10:59 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> OrigInfoJunkie <bumfuck@att.net> wrote in
> news:82kYK.688298$BKL8.299495@fx15.iad:
>
>> On 9/26/2022 8:48 AM, Lee wrote:
>>> OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 9/24/2022 6:11 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 16:27:25 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>>>>> Sherman) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> David Hartung <david@Hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/23/22 09:00, Alan Bond wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 9/23/2022 4:04 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Trump Made N.Y. Attorney General's Fraud Case Virtually
>>>>>>>>>>> Unbeatable
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He should have settled early, but he got boxed into
>>>>>>>>>>> taking the Fifth -- and that can be used against him
>>>>>>>>>>> now. ...
>>>>>>>>>>> But taking the Fifth has severe consequences in this
>>>>>>>>>>> case. Unlike in a criminal case, in a civil
>>>>>>>>>>> proceeding like the suit brought by James, the jury
>>>>>>>>>>> will likely be instructed they can infer that when
>>>>>>>>>>> Trump took the Fifth, his answer would have been
>>>>>>>>>>> adverse to him. Trump's repeated insistence that
>>>>>>>>>>> James' politically motivated suit left him no choice
>>>>>>>>>>> will not withstand the effect of the jury inferring
>>>>>>>>>>> that Trump broke the law and has no good answer to the
>>>>>>>>>>> questions he was asked. ...
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>> Look at you being in favor of political persecution of
>>>>>>>>> one's enemies.
>>>>>>>> No.  That's not what's happening.
>>>>>>> Oh?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Look at you, standing up for fraud.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Look at you, standing up for political persecution
>>>>
>>>> No, that's a lie. There is no "political persecution" of Trump. He
>>>> committed numerous real offenses. It's time to hold him
>>>> accountable.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ever notice how the "lock her up!" crowd
>>> is now touting "no charges = no crime"?
>>
>> That's been their absurd gag for a long time. And then they threaten
>> to riot and engage in insurrection at the mere thought of *bringing*
>> charges against Trump. Here's how they think:
>>
>> "Trump hasn't been charged, so that 'means' he has committed no
>> crime. But if he is charged, that will mean charges are being
>> brought against an innocent man (because he hasn't been charged
>> yet), and so if he is charged, we will riot and overthrow the
>> government."
>>
>> That is *exactly* the (il)logic of the America-haters' so-called
>> "thinking."
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> If the FBI is investigating Hillary
> that proves she is corrupt.
>
> If the FBI is investigating Trump
> that proves THEY are corrupt.
>
> Even if the FBI Director is a
> Trump appointee..........

Excellent points.

On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 07:24:55 -0700, OrigInfoJunkie <bumfuck@att.net>
wrote:

>On 9/26/2022 3:56 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 14:35:11 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>> Sherman) wrote:
>>
>>> David Hartung <david@Hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 9/25/22 09:18, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>> David Hartung <david@Hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/25/22 08:58, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>>>> Kremlin Girl <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | Trump Made N.Y. Attorney General's Fraud Case Virtually
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | Unbeatable
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> What does your blathering have to do with the fact the state of NY was
>>>>>>>> unable to make a legal case against Trump?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What part of "Fraud Case" do you not understand?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They have yet to make that case.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wrong again, David. Chapter and verse:
>>>>> <https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22670311-nyag-v-trump-et-al>
>>>>
>>>> They have filed a complaint, they have not yet proven their case in court.
>>>
>>> That's not what Kremlin Girl said. She said "make a legal case."
>>> They have done that.
>>>
>>> --bks
>>
>> Legal case not made which was why they are suing in civl court.
>
>Because you're terminally stupid, you falsely think that "legal case"
>exclusively means "criminal case." You're wrong...because you're stupid.
>

Poor Rudely, as usual, has no idea of what he speaking.

On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:48:48 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com> wrote:

>OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
>
>> On 9/24/2022 6:11 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> > On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 16:27:25 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>> > Sherman) wrote:
>> >
>> >>David Hartung <david@Hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > On 9/23/22 09:00, Alan Bond wrote:
>> > > > > On 9/23/2022 4:04 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Trump Made N.Y. Attorney General's Fraud Case Virtually
>> > > > > > > > Unbeatable
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > He should have settled early, but he got boxed into
>> > > > > > > > taking the Fifth -- and that can be used against him
>> > > > > > > > now. ...
>> > > > > > > > But taking the Fifth has severe consequences in this
>> > > > > > > > case. Unlike in a criminal case, in a civil
>> > > > > > > > proceeding like the suit brought by James, the jury
>> > > > > > > > will likely be instructed they can infer that when
>> > > > > > > > Trump took the Fifth, his answer would have been
>> > > > > > > > adverse to him. Trump's repeated insistence that
>> > > > > > > > James' politically motivated suit left him no choice
>> > > > > > > > will not withstand the effect of the jury inferring
>> > > > > > > > that Trump broke the law and has no good answer to the
>> > > > > > > > questions he was asked. ...
>> > > > ...
>> > > > > > Look at you being in favor of political persecution of
>> > > > > > one's enemies.
>> > > > > No.  That's not what's happening.
>> > > > Oh?
>> > >
>> > > Look at you, standing up for fraud.
>> > >
>> >
>> > Look at you, standing up for political persecution
>>
>> No, that's a lie. There is no "political persecution" of Trump. He
>> committed numerous real offenses. It's time to hold him accountable.
>
>
>
> Ever notice how the "lock her up!" crowd
>is now touting "no charges = no crime"?
>

Oh look, another idiot (I'm not surprised) who doesn't understand the
difference between charging someone with a criminal offense and
pursuing someone in a civil lawsuit.
>
>
>
>
>

On Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 11:57:49 AM UTC-5, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
> On 9/26/22 2:01 PM, OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
> > On 9/26/2022 10:59 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> >> OrigInfoJunkie <bum...@att.net> wrote in
> >> news:82kYK.688298$BKL8....@fx15.iad:
> >>
> >>> On 9/26/2022 8:48 AM, Lee wrote:
> >>>> OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 9/24/2022 6:11 AM, NoBody wrote:
> >>>>>> On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 16:27:25 -0000 (UTC), b...@panix.com (Bradley K.
> >>>>>> Sherman) wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> David Hartung <da...@Hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 9/23/22 09:00, Alan Bond wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On 9/23/2022 4:04 AM, NoBody wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Trump Made N.Y. Attorney General's Fraud Case Virtually
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Unbeatable
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> He should have settled early, but he got boxed into
> >>>>>>>>>>>> taking the Fifth -- and that can be used against him
> >>>>>>>>>>>> now. ...
> >>>>>>>>>>>> But taking the Fifth has severe consequences in this
> >>>>>>>>>>>> case. Unlike in a criminal case, in a civil
> >>>>>>>>>>>> proceeding like the suit brought by James, the jury
> >>>>>>>>>>>> will likely be instructed they can infer that when
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Trump took the Fifth, his answer would have been
> >>>>>>>>>>>> adverse to him. Trump's repeated insistence that
> >>>>>>>>>>>> James' politically motivated suit left him no choice
> >>>>>>>>>>>> will not withstand the effect of the jury inferring
> >>>>>>>>>>>> that Trump broke the law and has no good answer to the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> questions he was asked. ...
> >>>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>>>>> Look at you being in favor of political persecution of
> >>>>>>>>>> one's enemies.
> >>>>>>>>> No. That's not what's happening.
> >>>>>>>> Oh?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Look at you, standing up for fraud.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Look at you, standing up for political persecution
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No, that's a lie. There is no "political persecution" of Trump. He
> >>>>> committed numerous real offenses. It's time to hold him
> >>>>> accountable.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Ever notice how the "lock her up!" crowd
> >>>> is now touting "no charges = no crime"?
> >>>
> >>> That's been their absurd gag for a long time. And then they threaten
> >>> to riot and engage in insurrection at the mere thought of *bringing*
> >>> charges against Trump. Here's how they think:
> >>>
> >>> "Trump hasn't been charged, so that 'means' he has committed no
> >>> crime. But if he is charged, that will mean charges are being
> >>> brought against an innocent man (because he hasn't been charged
> >>> yet), and so if he is charged, we will riot and overthrow the
> >>> government."
> >>>
> >>> That is *exactly* the (il)logic of the America-haters' so-called
> >>> "thinking."
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> If the FBI is investigating Hillary
> >> that proves she is corrupt.
> >>
> >> If the FBI is investigating Trump
> >> that proves THEY are corrupt.
> >>
> >> Even if the FBI Director is a
> >> Trump appointee..........
> >
> > Excellent points.
> >
> >
> You ignore the proof, the FBI said Hillary violated the law...
>
> Then the Inspector General proved that the FBI fabricated and used fake
> evidence to smear and try to entrap TRUMP.

The Storm is coming!
We await President Trump's inevitable reinstatement and the beginning of a new Reich!

J Young
jdyo...@ymail.com
https://www.facebook.com/jon.young.10420

In reply to "jdyoung" who wrote the following:

> On Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 11:57:49 AM UTC-5, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
> > On 9/26/22 2:01 PM, OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
> > > On 9/26/2022 10:59 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> > > > OrigInfoJunkie <bum...@att.net> wrote in
> > > > news:82kYK.688298$BKL8....@fx15.iad:
> > > >
> > > > > On 9/26/2022 8:48 AM, Lee wrote:
> > > > > > OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 9/24/2022 6:11 AM, NoBody wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 16:27:25 -0000 (UTC), b...@panix.com
> > > > > > > > (Bradley K.
> > > > > > > > Sherman) wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > David Hartung <da...@Hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On 9/23/22 09:00, Alan Bond wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On 9/23/2022 4:04 AM, NoBody wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trump Made N.Y. Attorney General's Fraud Case
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Virtually
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unbeatable
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > He should have settled early, but he got boxed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > into
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > taking the Fifth -- and that can be used against
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > him
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > now. ...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > But taking the Fifth has severe consequences in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > case. Unlike in a criminal case, in a civil
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > proceeding like the suit brought by James, the jury
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > will likely be instructed they can infer that when
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trump took the Fifth, his answer would have been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > adverse to him. Trump's repeated insistence that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > James' politically motivated suit left him no choice
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > will not withstand the effect of the jury inferring
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > that Trump broke the law and has no good answer to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > questions he was asked. ...
> > > > > > > > > > ...
> > > > > > > > > > > > Look at you being in favor of political persecution of
> > > > > > > > > > > > one's enemies.
> > > > > > > > > > > No.� That's not what's happening.
> > > > > > > > > > Oh?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Look at you, standing up for fraud.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Look at you, standing up for political persecution
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > No, that's a lie. There is no "political persecution" of Trump.
> > > > > > > He
> > > > > > > committed numerous real offenses. It's time to hold him
> > > > > > > accountable.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ever notice how the "lock her up!" crowd
> > > > > > is now touting "no charges = no crime"?
> > > > >
> > > > > That's been their absurd gag for a long time. And then they threaten
> > > > > to riot and engage in insurrection at the mere thought of *bringing*
> > > > > charges against Trump. Here's how they think:
> > > > >
> > > > > "Trump hasn't been charged, so that 'means' he has committed no
> > > > > crime. But if he is charged, that will mean charges are being
> > > > > brought against an innocent man (because he hasn't been charged
> > > > > yet), and so if he is charged, we will riot and overthrow the
> > > > > government."
> > > > >
> > > > > That is *exactly* the (il)logic of the America-haters' so-called
> > > > > "thinking."
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > If the FBI is investigating Hillary
> > > > that proves she is corrupt.
> > > >
> > > > If the FBI is investigating Trump
> > > > that proves THEY are corrupt.
> > > >
> > > > Even if the FBI Director is a
> > > > Trump appointee..........
> > >
> > > Excellent points.
> > >
> > >
> > You ignore the proof, the FBI said Hillary violated the law...
> >
> > Then the Inspector General proved that the FBI fabricated and used fake
> > evidence to smear and try to entrap TRUMP.
>
> The Storm is coming!
> We await President Trump's inevitable reinstatement and the beginning of a new
> Reich!
>
> J Young
> jdyo...@ymail.com
> https://www.facebook.com/jon.young.10420

Fortunately, patriots in the USA outnumber traitors like this.