On Fri, 24 Dec 2021 11:08:49 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" <nothere@noland.com>
wrote:

>On 12/24/2021 9:25 AM, John H wrote:
>> On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 15:34:08 -0800, Mr Robot <robot@mr_robot.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 07:41:32 -0500, John H <jherring@cox.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 12:13:30 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" <nothere@noland.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 12/17/2021 9:55 AM, John H wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:02:45 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" <nothere@noland.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/13/2021 3:28 PM, waynebatrecdotboats@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sunday, December 12, 2021 at 12:25:29 PM UTC-5, gfre...@aol.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 07:12:47 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" <not...@noland.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This question popped into my head after I received
>>>>>>>>>> a covid "booster" shot.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I got the first, two dose regiment vaccinations
>>>>>>>>>> last February and March. After the first
>>>>>>>>>> I was given the covid vaccination card that
>>>>>>>>>> everyone gets with the first dose indicated
>>>>>>>>>> and then the second dose a month later.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Back then, there was no talk of a "booster" being
>>>>>>>>>> contemplated. There were questions of how long
>>>>>>>>>> the vaccine would remain effective, with most
>>>>>>>>>> experts saying at least a year.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But, the covid card has room for *four* vaccine
>>>>>>>>>> records. The first two lines are for "Dose 1 and
>>>>>>>>>> Dose 2". The next two lines are reserved for "other".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The card is not a record for other types of vaccinations
>>>>>>>>>> like flu. It's specifically for anti covid vaccinations.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So, does this mean that even then, when covid vaccinations
>>>>>>>>>> first started, that it was anticipated that additional
>>>>>>>>>> shots or doses would be required? If so, the public
>>>>>>>>>> was never informed of this.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Not sure I trust the big pharmaceutical companies. It
>>>>>>>>>> is very possible they anticipated a federal program
>>>>>>>>>> (i.e. - taxpayer funded) goldmine.
>>>>>>>>> I said when this whole thing started drug companies do not build this
>>>>>>>>> kind of infrastructure for a one shot deal.
>>>>>>>>> It was confirmed when they said "Don't laminate the card" after the
>>>>>>>>> second dose.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ===
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ahh, yet another Covid conspiracy theory. Can we find out who designed that multi entry card and see if they are in on it too? And what about the hospitals and ER folks? Surely they are profiting big time also, at least the ones that haven't been worked to mental and physical exhaustion. Let's call up Tucker Carlson and give him more fodder for his unfounded rumor and innuendo machine.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Personally I'm just glad that semi-effective vaccines were developed and distributed in near record time, and that the majority of my friends and relatives are not anti-vaxers. The statistics show that at least some of the former anti-vaxers have finally gotten religion and signed up for shots.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For the record, I am certainly not an "anti-vaxer" Both Mrs.E. and I
>>>>>>> received the two-dose Moderna vaccine and also both received the booster.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Heck, I even still wear a mask when I go to the supermarket or other
>>>>>>> place with a lot of people milling around.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just find it interesting that very early on in the vaccination program
>>>>>>> that someone or some group seemed to think additional shots may be
>>>>>>> required. Turns out they were.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Having spent many years as a government employee, I think I could make
>>>>>> a good guess as to why the extra lines are there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The card was probably designed by some underling at the directions of
>>>>>> his boss. After meeting all the requirements of his boss, the
>>>>>> underling was left with some extra space at the bottom of the card.
>>>>>> What would you have done, left it blank or filled it with something?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know. "Other" seems a little ambiguous.
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe:
>>>>>
>>>>> "For Future Use"
>>>>>
>>>>> - signed, A. Fauci
>>>>
>>>> LOL!
>>>
>
>>> Unlike your signature... I'm a dumbass.
>>
>
>> Yes, you seem to be.
>
>
>Confession is good for the soul but we already knew that.

Says the guy without one..