novaBBS - sci.math - Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!

Why Feldhase & WM fail math calculus.

Fritz Feldhase profile photo
Fritz Feldhase
,...
10
12:59 PM
Re: Germany's turd brain Wolfgang Mueckenheim

Germany's calculus failure Wolfgang Mueckenheim. WM cannot even do a valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for the failure WM cannot even see slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse, for WM is intellectually blind. Is all of Gottingen Univ blind in math????

Kibo-on Andrew Wiles math failure & mentally ill says Kibo while pounding his male rectum (so he says).

On Friday, December 3, 1993 at 7:36:50 PM UTC-6, Andrew Wiles wrote:
> In view of the speculation on the status of my work on the

Andrew, will your entire life be that of fake and con-art math, or is there some room for growth and maturity-- slant cut of cone is Oval, not your mindless ellipse. And can you comprehend a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, or is your math all a waste, waste of time, waste of science?

You are a failure Andrew Wiles of math, a utter low class failure. Why you are so stupid in math logic, you never even saw that Euler had no proof in exponent 3 for Euler forgot that a proof of exp 3 required him to prove all three A,B,C are not even numbers, no, Euler just was too dumb in logic same as you Andrew to realize he had to prove A,B,C were not all three even. And to put a finer point on it-- why you Andrew Wiles is a math failure, is that you are so stupid in geometry as to still think a slant cut of cone is a ellipse when it is a oval. That is probably why you could never do a valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for how could you when you cannot tell apart a ellipse from a oval.

Your FLT fakery of 1990s is just con-art-- not mathematics, for AP proved FLT in 1991, see below.

Kibo Parry Moron-ey-Volney, why is this stalker arsewipe allowed to even post in sci.math or sci.physics, instead, he should be flushed down the toilet some 30 years ago.
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 10:03:19 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>Re: Showing the flaws in Stewart,Fisher & Ziebur, Ellis & Gulick, Strang, Apostol of their fake proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus in AP's new book // Overhaul & Revitalization of Calculus// Math-psychology-sociology (Amazon's Kindle)
> Botfly of Math and Blowfly of Physics
>"mentally ill"
> I Pound His Male Rectum
> The Delicious Rump Man

AP wrote this for his new book: Overhaul & Revitalization of Calculus// Math-psychology-sociology
by Archimedes Plutonium

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
1:20 PM, July 1, 2023



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Everytime AP goes over his science and math, some new item comes up that I can elaborate and detail more about.

In this diagram proof below, the A and B are discrete points of the Function Graph Curve with no numbers existing between A and B, and the midpoint "m" is fetched by hauling in higher Grid systems. Every number in Decimal Grid systems all the way out to infinity borderline 1*10^604 is ending in nothing but 0 digits, which insures a midpoint.

What is so fantastically different from AP's New Math proof of FTC, which Old Math could never handle, is that the derivative is actually part and parcel the same as the Function Graph Curve.

In all my proofs of FTC, I never showed the reverse of starting with a rectangular cell and then building the Function Graph Curve from the rectangle. Instead I showed just the trapezoid with the derivative inside as the right-traingle sitting atop the midpoint then swiveling-down the right-triangle to form the integral rectangle.

From this:
B
/|
/ |
m /----|
/ |
|A |
|____|

To this:

__m__
| |
| |
| |
---------

Now, let me start with a integral rectangle for a specific Grid System. Let me say I chose the Grid System to be 1000, then each cell along the x-axis is a width of 0.001 wide. Now how far out do I need to go to borrow to cover all midpoints? Well, for 0 to 0.001, I need 0.0005 to have a midpoint. Is that as far as I need to go? Will the 10,000 Grid System cover all midpoints?? Suppose I had 1.333, is the 10,000 Grid sufficient in borrowing? That comes to 0.6665 and so far so good.

So I have these cells all up and down the x-axis, and reaching all the way to 1000 on the y-axis. I do not even have a function yet that is going to criss-cross through all the widths resting on the x-axis. I do not know what the function is that the mathematics-god is going to give me to plot. Now the math-god hands me the function x^2 --> Y.

Alright, now I fill each empty cell.

Each cell is looking like this empty rectangle only very tall and thin as the height is 1000 and the width is 0.001.

__m__
| |
| |
| |
---------

And I focus on the cell from 1 to 1.001. I could pick any cell, but I chose a cell to avoid a fraction only cell, a cell away from 1. For I am teaching and students have a hard time of numbers that are fractions only-- those numbers between 0 and 1. So I chose a number equal or after 1.

__m__
| |
| |
| |
---------
1 1.001

Now I apply the function that the math-god gave me. I apply x^2 --> Y.

For 1 the x^2 is 1.

For 1.001 the x^2 is 1.002001.

In other words, I had the integral rectangle before I had the function itself, and now I graph that function.

Now I draw in that cell the A = 1 and the B = 1.002001. My cell looks like this.

B
/|
/ |
m /----|
/ |
|A |
|____|

The midpoint of my cell "m" is 2 divided into 2.001 = 1.0005. I carved into the side wall of the integral rectangle to fetch a right triangle whose vertex points are A, and m, and B was where A is.

Now I fill in the actual function graph curve that runs through my cell, as a derivative that is a straightline segment that goes from (1,1) to (1,1.002001).

This is True Calculus, where the derivative and the function graph curve are the same thing.

In Old Math, their derivative was an alien tangent line to a curve graph at a point.

In New True Math, the derivative and the function graph curve are one and the same.

The Reason, the Utter Reason calculus is so Valuable as a math tool is that given A, it predicts what B is going to be. For heaven's sake, that is why calculus is so valuable to physics law, it tells the physics law, given A, the derivative predicts B.

Old Math professors of math are fools and village idiots that think a tangent to a point on a curved graph predicts anything, only shows us how empty headed they are in logic, Old Math professors have no logical marbles of a brain when it comes to calculus, for a tangent is not going to predict the next point of the Function graph curve.

AP, King of Science, especially Physics & Logic

My 245th published book of science

Overhaul & Revitalization of Calculus// Math-psychology-sociology
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Preface: The purpose of this book is to move the dial on calculus education to where all of mathematics is easy, simple, clear, and understandable to even High School students. Where calculus is taught in early High School. All of this is possible when mistakes are corrected in Old Math. And when those mistakes are corrected, it is seen that calculus is just a tiny bit harder than learning the 4 operators of math-- add, subtract, multiply, divide.. The last two operators of math are derivative and integral and not much harder to learn than add, subtract, multiply, divide. Provided, Old Math mistakes are corrected and or thrown out. We throw out the Reals as numbers of math and replace them with Decimal Grid Numbers. We throw out all functions of math, except polynomial functions. Anything else that looks like a function, we have to convert to a polynomial, first, over a interval, and then we can work with it. When we do this, and a little more, we end up with a mathematics and a calculus that is ultra simple, ultra easy, ultra clear, and fun to work with. But because of the psychology of math professors and the social environment of math careers, we have this ugly mess of math and especially calculus as torture chambers, nightmares and nervous breakdowns. So horrid has math education become, that most students steer clear of mathematics. When in truth, once the errors of Old Math are fixed, that math is really the easiest of the physical sciences. It is the psychology and sociology that has made math the worst science and filled with error.

Cover Picture: My cover picture is my iphone photograph of my own handwriting of Decimal Grid Numbers, the numbers that replace the Reals of Old Math, plus the types of polynomials, sitting a-top a sheet of graphing paper. Those three dots after the numbers and polynomials means they continue and I have room to show only three kinds. Calculus is after all, a science of geometry for derivative is rate of change of dy to dx, and integral is after-all the area under the function graph.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0C9P5F755
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ June 27, 2023
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 530 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 116 pages

My 6th published book

Click here to read the complete article

On 7/4/2023 11:25 AM, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 11:59:55 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
>> On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 1:49:23 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
>>> On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 2:29:03 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>>>> Kibo wrote:I Pound His Male Rectum.
>>> "Did he say okay?"
>> He didn't, really?
>> "Kibo didn't really say that."
>> Smart of Kibo.
>
> So it's a "false attestation"? I see that a lot.
> "How do you 'see' it?"
> I observe people unwisely making what you can presume to be 'false attestations', mostly.
> "But you don't 'vouchsafe' them, or something?"
> Not at all, fuckin' duh.

You'll find that ArchiePoo is /very/ confused. First, he conflates me
with the *real* Kibo, James Parry, who hasn't posted here for at least a
decade. Second, ArchiePoo seems to have a bad case of psychological
projection, which is very common with people with "issues" they
subconsciously have trouble dealing with. So they mentally "assign" the
issue to others. It's a form of rationalization.

For example, ArchiePoo accuses all his (male) detractors of being gay
and acts hatefully toward them for "being" gay. If psychological
projection is what's happening, this tells me that AP has gay urges or
is gay himself, but he has a real issue with being gay. Rather than
dealing with his own gay urges, he projects his own gayness onto his
detractors.

I like the funny anagrams which can be made from "Archimedes Plutonium".
One of the funniest is "I Pound His Male Rectum".

Why Feldhase & WM fail math calculus.

Fritz Feldhase profile photo
Fritz Feldhase
,...
10
12:59 PM
Re: Germany's turd brain Wolfgang Mueckenheim

Kibo-on Andrew Wiles math failure & mentally ill says Kibo while pounding his male rectum (so he says).

On Friday, December 3, 1993 at 7:36:50 PM UTC-6, Andrew Wiles wrote:
> In view of the speculation on the status of my work on the

Your FLT fakery of 1990s is just con-art-- not mathematics, for AP proved FLT in 1991, see below.

AP wrote this for his new book: Overhaul & Revitalization of Calculus// Math-psychology-sociology
by Archimedes Plutonium

What is so fantastically different from AP's New Math proof of FTC, which Old Math could never handle, is that the derivative is actually part and parcel the same as the Function Graph Curve.

From this:
B
/|
/ |
m /----|
/ |
|A |
|____|

To this:

__m__
| |
| |
| |
---------

Alright, now I fill each empty cell.

Each cell is looking like this empty rectangle only very tall and thin as the height is 1000 and the width is 0.001.

__m__
| |
| |
| |
---------

__m__
| |
| |
| |
---------
1 1.001

Now I apply the function that the math-god gave me. I apply x^2 --> Y.

For 1 the x^2 is 1.

For 1.001 the x^2 is 1.002001.

In other words, I had the integral rectangle before I had the function itself, and now I graph that function.

Now I draw in that cell the A = 1 and the B = 1.002001. My cell looks like this.

B
/|
/ |
m /----|
/ |
|A |
|____|

The midpoint of my cell "m" is 2 divided into 2.001 = 1.0005. I carved into the side wall of the integral rectangle to fetch a right triangle whose vertex points are A, and m, and B was where A is.

Now I fill in the actual function graph curve that runs through my cell, as a derivative that is a straightline segment that goes from (1,1) to (1,1.002001).

This is True Calculus, where the derivative and the function graph curve are the same thing.

In Old Math, their derivative was an alien tangent line to a curve graph at a point.

In New True Math, the derivative and the function graph curve are one and the same.

AP, King of Science, especially Physics & Logic

My 245th published book of science

Overhaul & Revitalization of Calculus// Math-psychology-sociology
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

My 6th published book

Click here to read the complete article

On Tuesday, July 4, 2023 at 12:09:34 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Why Feldhase & WM fail math calculus.
>
> Fritz Feldhase profile photo
> Fritz Feldhase
> ,...
> 10
> 12:59 PM
> Re: Germany's turd brain Wolfgang Mueckenheim
>
> Germany's calculus failure Wolfgang Mueckenheim. WM cannot even do a valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for the failure WM cannot even see slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse, for WM is intellectually blind. Is all of Gottingen Univ blind in math????
>
>
> Kibo-on Andrew Wiles math failure & mentally ill says Kibo while pounding his male rectum (so he says).
>

"It's just not that funny." -- Everybody Sane

On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 8:30:27 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 4, 2023 at 12:09:34 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > Why Feldhase & WM fail math calculus.
> >
> > Fritz Feldhase profile photo
> > Fritz Feldhase
> > ,...
> > 10
> > 12:59 PM
> > Re: Germany's turd brain Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> >
> > Germany's calculus failure Wolfgang Mueckenheim. WM cannot even do a valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for the failure WM cannot even see slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse, for WM is intellectually blind. Is all of Gottingen Univ blind in math????
> >
> >
> > Kibo-on Andrew Wiles math failure & mentally ill says Kibo while pounding his male rectum (so he says).
> >
> "It's just not that funny." -- Everybody Sane

Were you trying to hide something with the "deleted messages"?

On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 3:16:27 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 8:30:27 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 4, 2023 at 12:09:34 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > Why Feldhase & WM fail math calculus.
> > >
> > > Fritz Feldhase profile photo
> > > Fritz Feldhase
> > > ,...
> > > 10
> > > 12:59 PM
> > > Re: Germany's turd brain Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> > >
> > > Germany's calculus failure Wolfgang Mueckenheim. WM cannot even do a valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for the failure WM cannot even see slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse, for WM is intellectually blind. Is all of Gottingen Univ blind in math????
> > >
> > >
> > > Kibo-on Andrew Wiles math failure & mentally ill says Kibo while pounding his male rectum (so he says).
> > >
> > "It's just not that funny." -- Everybody Sane
> Were you trying to hide something with the "deleted messages"?

"You seem to be merely speculating here."
It's not mere speculation; it'd be the common reason you had messages deleted from Google Groups (and not, actually, other Usenet servers still in existence).
It is still speculative, though.

On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 8:19:07 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 3:16:27 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> > On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 8:30:27 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, July 4, 2023 at 12:09:34 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > > Why Feldhase & WM fail math calculus.
> > > >
> > > > Fritz Feldhase profile photo
> > > > Fritz Feldhase
> > > > ,...
> > > > 10
> > > > 12:59 PM
> > > > Re: Germany's turd brain Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> > > >
> > > > Germany's calculus failure Wolfgang Mueckenheim. WM cannot even do a valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for the failure WM cannot even see slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse, for WM is intellectually blind. Is all of Gottingen Univ blind in math????
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Kibo-on Andrew Wiles math failure & mentally ill says Kibo while pounding his male rectum (so he says).
> > > >
> > > "It's just not that funny." -- Everybody Sane
> > Were you trying to hide something with the "deleted messages"?
> "You seem to be merely speculating here."
> It's not mere speculation; it'd be the common reason you had messages deleted from Google Groups (and not, actually, other Usenet servers still in existence).
> It is still speculative, though.

"What's that supposed to mean?"
"That's usually why messages get deleted from Google Groups, but he doesn't quite know that's the case."
"...but he doesn't know that."
"That phrase essentially 'equivocates'. You're trying to avoid the point."

Bettina Stark-Watzinger,Prof. Laura Covi, PhD,Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert

No-one-Bettina Stark-Watzinger at Gottingen Univ. can admit the truth of math-- slant cut of Cone is Oval, not ellipse, nor can do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, and how could they for the mindless wrecks of math still think a derivative is a tangent line at point of a graphed curve, when in fact the derivative is the same as the function graph itself inside a cell that will be the integral. This is why calculus is so useful, it predicts the next point of the function graph. But try telling that to idiots in German mathematics.
>
> Olaf Scholz Chancellor cannot do a proof of FTC nor can any of his German Universities
>
> Annalena Baerbock discovered Gottingen is too dumb and cannot do a proof of FTC and traveling around the world to find out who can.
>
> Bettina Stark-Watzinger, Jens Brandenburg, Thomas Sattelberger, Kornelia Haugg, Judith Pirscher, none of whom can even admit to the truth-- slant cut of cone is Oval, not the ellipse, and so instead of seeking Truth in education pays Wolfgang Mueckenheim and his trailing spam gang to propagandize German schools.

The 15 year German spam-mill-echo-chamber, with play actors spamletts such as Jim Burns, William
> > > William's profile photo
> > > William
> > > , …
Chris Thomasson
657
> > > unread,
> > > WM Logic


> > >
Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.

Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim


Eternal-September.org
Wolfgang M. Weyand
Berliner Strasse
Bad Homburg

Goethe Universitat Physics dept

Brigitta Wolff president

Jurgen Habermass
Horst Stocker
Gerd Binnig
Horst Ludwig Stormer
Peter Grunberg

math
Alex Kuronya
Martin Moller
Jakob Stix
Annette Werner
Andreas Bernig
Esther Cabezas-Rivas
Hans Crauel
Thomas Gerstner
Bastian von Harrach
Thomas Mettler
Tobias Weth
Amin Coja-Oghlan
Raman Sanyal
Thorsten Theobald
Yury Person

Gottingen Univ math

Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu

Gottingen Univ physics
Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler

My 3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
•
•

Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.

Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.

In the course of 2019 through 2022, I have had to explain this proof often on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics. And one thing that constant explaining does for a mind of science, is reduce the proof to its stripped down minimum format, to bare bones skeleton proof. I can prove the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse in just a one sentence proof. Proof-- A single cone and oval have just one axis of symmetry, while a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, hence slant cut is always a oval, never the ellipse..

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 827 KB
• Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 51 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#12-2, My 11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.

To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

3> My 245th published book of science.

32> Overhaul & Revitalization of Calculus// Math-psychology-sociology



> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
> > > Preface: The purpose of this book is to move the dial on calculus education to where all of mathematics is easy, simple, clear, and understandable to even High School students. Where calculus is taught in early High School. All of this is possible when mistakes are corrected in Old Math. And when those mistakes are corrected, it is seen that calculus is just a tiny bit harder than learning the 4 operators of math-- add, subtract, multiply, divide. The last two operators of math are derivative and integral and not much harder to learn than add, subtract, multiply, divide. Provided, Old Math mistakes are corrected and or thrown out. We throw out the Reals as numbers of math and replace them with Decimal Grid Numbers. We throw out all functions of math, except polynomial functions. Anything else that looks like a function, we have to convert to a polynomial, first, over a interval, and then we can work with it. When we do this, and a little more, we end up with a mathematics and a calculus that is ultra simple, ultra easy, ultra clear, and fun to work with. But because of the psychology of math professors and the social environment of math careers, we have this ugly mess of math and especially calculus as torture chambers, nightmares and nervous breakdowns. So horrid has math education become, that most students steer clear of mathematics. When in truth, once the errors of Old Math are fixed, that math is really the easiest of the physical sciences. It is the psychology and sociology that has made math the worst science and filled with error.
> > >
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: My cover picture is my iphone photograph of my own handwriting of Decimal Grid Numbers, the numbers that replace the Reals of Old Math, plus the types of polynomials, sitting a-top a sheet of graphing paper. Those three dots after the numbers and polynomials means they continue and I have room to show only three kinds. Calculus is after all, a science of geometry for derivative is rate of change of dy to dx, and integral is after-all the area under the function graph.
> > >
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0C9P5F755
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ June 27, 2023
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 530 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 116 pages

Click here to read the complete article

Prof. Laura Covi,Thomas Sattelberger, Kornelia Haugg,PhD,Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
3> No-one-Bettina Stark-Watzinger at Gottingen Univ. can admit the truth of math-- slant cut of Cone is Oval, not ellipse, nor can do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, and how could they for the mindless wrecks of math still think a derivative is a tangent line at point of a graphed curve, when in fact the derivative is the same as the function graph itself inside a cell that will be the integral. This is why calculus is so useful, it predicts the next point of the function graph. But try telling that to idiots in German mathematics.
> >
> > Olaf Scholz Chancellor cannot do a proof of FTC nor can any of his German Universities
> >
> > Annalena Baerbock discovered Gottingen is too dumb and cannot do a proof of FTC and traveling around the world to find out who can.
> >
> > Bettina Stark-Watzinger, Jens Brandenburg, Thomas Sattelberger, Kornelia Haugg, Judith Pirscher, none of whom can even admit to the truth-- slant cut of cone is Oval, not the ellipse, and so instead of seeking Truth in education pays Wolfgang Mueckenheim and his trailing spam gang to propagandize German schools.
>
> The 15 year German spam-mill-echo-chamber, with play actors spamletts such as Jim Burns, William
> > > > William's profile photo
> > > > William
> > > > , …
WM
673
> > > > unread,
> > > > WM Logic
> 
> 
> > > >
> Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
>
> Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
>
> 
> Eternal-September.org
> Wolfgang M. Weyand
> Berliner Strasse
> Bad Homburg
>
> Goethe Universitat Physics dept
>
> Brigitta Wolff president
>
> Jurgen Habermass
> Horst Stocker
> Gerd Binnig
> Horst Ludwig Stormer
> Peter Grunberg
>
> math
> Alex Kuronya
> Martin Moller
> Jakob Stix
> Annette Werner
> Andreas Bernig
> Esther Cabezas-Rivas
> Hans Crauel
> Thomas Gerstner
> Bastian von Harrach
> Thomas Mettler
> Tobias Weth
> Amin Coja-Oghlan
> Raman Sanyal
> Thorsten Theobald
> Yury Person
>
> Gottingen Univ math
> Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu
>
> Gottingen Univ physics
> Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
> Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
> Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
> Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
> Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
> Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
> 
> My 3rd published book
>
> AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> •
> •
> Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.
>
> Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.
>
> In the course of 2019 through 2022, I have had to explain this proof often on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics. And one thing that constant explaining does for a mind of science, is reduce the proof to its stripped down minimum format, to bare bones skeleton proof. I can prove the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse in just a one sentence proof. Proof-- A single cone and oval have just one axis of symmetry, while a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, hence slant cut is always a oval, never the ellipse.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 827 KB
> • Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 51 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
>
> #12-2, My 11th published book
> World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
> Preface:
> Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
>
> Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis".. And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.
>
> To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
>
> Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
>
>
> Product details
> ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
> Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
> Language ‏ : ‎ English
> File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
> Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
> Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> #134 in Calculus (Books)
> #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> 3> My 245th published book of science.
>
> 32> Overhaul & Revitalization of Calculus// Math-psychology-sociology
> 
> 
> 
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
> > > > Preface: The purpose of this book is to move the dial on calculus education to where all of mathematics is easy, simple, clear, and understandable to even High School students. Where calculus is taught in early High School. All of this is possible when mistakes are corrected in Old Math. And when those mistakes are corrected, it is seen that calculus is just a tiny bit harder than learning the 4 operators of math-- add, subtract, multiply, divide. The last two operators of math are derivative and integral and not much harder to learn than add, subtract, multiply, divide. Provided, Old Math mistakes are corrected and or thrown out. We throw out the Reals as numbers of math and replace them with Decimal Grid Numbers. We throw out all functions of math, except polynomial functions. Anything else that looks like a function, we have to convert to a polynomial, first, over a interval, and then we can work with it. When we do this, and a little more, we end up with a mathematics and a calculus that is ultra simple, ultra easy, ultra clear, and fun to work with. But because of the psychology of math professors and the social environment of math careers, we have this ugly mess of math and especially calculus as torture chambers, nightmares and nervous breakdowns. So horrid has math education become, that most students steer clear of mathematics. When in truth, once the errors of Old Math are fixed, that math is really the easiest of the physical sciences. It is the psychology and sociology that has made math the worst science and filled with error.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture: My cover picture is my iphone photograph of my own handwriting of Decimal Grid Numbers, the numbers that replace the Reals of Old Math, plus the types of polynomials, sitting a-top a sheet of graphing paper. Those three dots after the numbers and polynomials means they continue and I have room to show only three kinds. Calculus is after all, a science of geometry for derivative is rate of change of dy to dx, and integral is after-all the area under the function graph.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0C9P5F755
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ June 27, 2023
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 530 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 116 pages

Click here to read the complete article

On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 2:48:59 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Prof. Laura Covi,Thomas Sattelberger, Kornelia Haugg,PhD,Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
>
> 3> No-one-Bettina Stark-Watzinger at Gottingen Univ. can admit the truth of math-- slant cut of Cone is Oval, not ellipse, nor can do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, and how could they for the mindless wrecks of math still think a derivative is a tangent line at point of a graphed curve, when in fact the derivative is the same as the function graph itself inside a cell that will be the integral. This is why calculus is so useful, it predicts the next point of the function graph. But try telling that to idiots in German mathematics.
> > >
> > > Olaf Scholz Chancellor cannot do a proof of FTC nor can any of his German Universities

"No, I think Bundeskanzler Scholz knows calculus."

On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 8:42:32 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 2:48:59 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > Prof. Laura Covi,Thomas Sattelberger, Kornelia Haugg,PhD,Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
> >
> > 3> No-one-Bettina Stark-Watzinger at Gottingen Univ. can admit the truth of math-- slant cut of Cone is Oval, not ellipse, nor can do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, and how could they for the mindless wrecks of math still think a derivative is a tangent line at point of a graphed curve, when in fact the derivative is the same as the function graph itself inside a cell that will be the integral. This is why calculus is so useful, it predicts the next point of the function graph. But try telling that to idiots in German mathematics.
> > > >
> > > > Olaf Scholz Chancellor cannot do a proof of FTC nor can any of his German Universities
> "No, I think Bundeskanzler Scholz knows calculus."

....and it's highly unlikely *he'd* fulfill your request.

Jens Brandenburg, Thomas Sattelberger,Prof. Laura Covi,Kornelia Haugg,PhD,Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert

4> No-one-Bettina Stark-Watzinger at Gottingen Univ. can admit the truth of math-- slant cut of Cone is Oval, not ellipse, nor can do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, and how could they for the mindless wrecks of math still think a derivative is a tangent line at point of a graphed curve, when in fact the derivative is the same as the function graph itself inside a cell that will be the integral. This is why calculus is so useful, it predicts the next point of the function graph. But try telling that to idiots in German mathematics.
> >
> > Olaf Scholz Chancellor cannot do a proof of FTC nor can any of his German Universities
> >
> > Annalena Baerbock discovered Gottingen is too dumb and cannot do a proof of FTC and traveling around the world to find out who can.
> >
> > Bettina Stark-Watzinger, Jens Brandenburg, Thomas Sattelberger, Kornelia Haugg, Judith Pirscher, none of whom can even admit to the truth-- slant cut of cone is Oval, not the ellipse, and so instead of seeking Truth in education pays Wolfgang Mueckenheim and his trailing spam gang to propagandize German schools.
>
> The 15 year German spam-mill-echo-chamber, with play actors spamletts such as Jim Burns, William
> > > > William's profile photo
> > > > William
> > > > , …
Fritz Feldhase
729

> > > > unread,
> > > > WM Logic
> 
> 
> > > >
> Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
>
> Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
>
> 
> Eternal-September.org
> Wolfgang M. Weyand
> Berliner Strasse
> Bad Homburg
>
> Goethe Universitat Physics dept
>
> Brigitta Wolff president
>
> Jurgen Habermass
> Horst Stocker
> Gerd Binnig
> Horst Ludwig Stormer
> Peter Grunberg
>
> math
> Alex Kuronya
> Martin Moller
> Jakob Stix
> Annette Werner
> Andreas Bernig
> Esther Cabezas-Rivas
> Hans Crauel
> Thomas Gerstner
> Bastian von Harrach
> Thomas Mettler
> Tobias Weth
> Amin Coja-Oghlan
> Raman Sanyal
> Thorsten Theobald
> Yury Person
>
> Gottingen Univ math
> Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu
>
> Gottingen Univ physics
> Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
> Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
> Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
> Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
> Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
> Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
> 
> My 3rd published book
>
> AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> •
> •
> Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.
>
> Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.
>
> In the course of 2019 through 2022, I have had to explain this proof often on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics. And one thing that constant explaining does for a mind of science, is reduce the proof to its stripped down minimum format, to bare bones skeleton proof. I can prove the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse in just a one sentence proof. Proof-- A single cone and oval have just one axis of symmetry, while a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, hence slant cut is always a oval, never the ellipse.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 827 KB
> • Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 51 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
>
> #12-2, My 11th published book
> World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
> Preface:
> Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
>
> Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis".. And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.
>
> To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
>
> Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
>
>
> Product details
> ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
> Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
> Language ‏ : ‎ English
> File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
> Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
> Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> #134 in Calculus (Books)
> #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> 3> My 245th published book of science.
>
> 32> Overhaul & Revitalization of Calculus// Math-psychology-sociology
> 
> 
> 
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
> > > > Preface: The purpose of this book is to move the dial on calculus education to where all of mathematics is easy, simple, clear, and understandable to even High School students. Where calculus is taught in early High School. All of this is possible when mistakes are corrected in Old Math. And when those mistakes are corrected, it is seen that calculus is just a tiny bit harder than learning the 4 operators of math-- add, subtract, multiply, divide. The last two operators of math are derivative and integral and not much harder to learn than add, subtract, multiply, divide. Provided, Old Math mistakes are corrected and or thrown out. We throw out the Reals as numbers of math and replace them with Decimal Grid Numbers. We throw out all functions of math, except polynomial functions. Anything else that looks like a function, we have to convert to a polynomial, first, over a interval, and then we can work with it. When we do this, and a little more, we end up with a mathematics and a calculus that is ultra simple, ultra easy, ultra clear, and fun to work with. But because of the psychology of math professors and the social environment of math careers, we have this ugly mess of math and especially calculus as torture chambers, nightmares and nervous breakdowns. So horrid has math education become, that most students steer clear of mathematics. When in truth, once the errors of Old Math are fixed, that math is really the easiest of the physical sciences. It is the psychology and sociology that has made math the worst science and filled with error.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture: My cover picture is my iphone photograph of my own handwriting of Decimal Grid Numbers, the numbers that replace the Reals of Old Math, plus the types of polynomials, sitting a-top a sheet of graphing paper. Those three dots after the numbers and polynomials means they continue and I have room to show only three kinds. Calculus is after all, a science of geometry for derivative is rate of change of dy to dx, and integral is after-all the area under the function graph.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0C9P5F755
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ June 27, 2023
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 530 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 116 pages

Click here to read the complete article

On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 1:43:27 AM UTC+2, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

> Fritz Feldhase

Yes?!

On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 5:16:33 PM UTC-7, Fritz Feldhase wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 1:43:27 AM UTC+2, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>
> > Fritz Feldhase
>
> Yes?!

"So they're *not* OK?"

Could Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr,Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl,Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz please--step into the Gottingen Univ physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O.

Spam mill echo chamber, that is WM along with his gay spamletts a decades long spammer of sci.math, yet he fails math. Is it that Gottingen cannot understand the slant cut in single cone is an Oval, never the ellipse, or is it the foolish Boole logic they teach of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction? Or is it that neither WM or Gottingen can do a geometry proof Fundamental Theorem of Calculus? Which is it W. Mueckenheim?? You spammer crank.

The endless and worthless Spam Mill Echo Chamber of Wolfgang Mueckenheim with his gay entourage.

Could WM loudmouth step into the Gottingen Univ physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, or is he only good for loudmouth nonsense of airhead complaints of calculus, along with his nonsense that slant cut of cone is ellipse, when in truth that is a oval.

+Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within

On Monday, January 18, 2010 at 11:30:47 AM UTC-6, John Baez wrote:
> Also available at http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week290.html

Surely Gottingen and UCR have weighing scales better than 0.00001 gram.

Surely Durban Univ. has excellent weighing scales.

Eram semper recta (John Gabriel) profile photo
Eram semper
,...
Jim Burns
775
20Jul2023
WM Logic

3m views Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium

Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.

Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium

In Old Chemistry and Old Physics, their subatomic particles were do nothing and no function and no job particles that sit around as balls or whiz around the outside of balls doing nothing but pointless circling.

In New Physics and New Chemistry-- All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. Every subatomic particle has a job a function a purpose as to the Laws of Electromagnetism--- Faraday law, Coulomb law, Ampere law, Capacitor law.

A proton is a torus of 840MeV with 840 windings, while the muon is the true electron of Atoms and is encased inside the proton torus thrusting through and producing electricity-- magnetic monopoles.

The neutron of Atoms is a parallel plate capacitor storing the electricity of proton+muon and is skin cover on the outside of the proton torus in the form of parallel plates.

Can hydrogen be a Atom if it is just a proton+muon? No, all atoms require to have a capacitor such as at least one neutron. Thus the Hydrogen Atom is H2 where you have 2 proton+muon where 1 of the 2 proton+muon acts like a neutron to the other proton+muon. Thus, water molecule is not H2O but rather is H4O.

AP is waiting for experimental chemists and physicists to prove him correct that Water is H4O.

In the meantime we have Hydroxyl which in Old Chemistry, especially Biology is OH, while AP says that is wrong and that is really H2O.

Now glycerine is a hydroxyl with formula C3H8O3. And what I am thinking at this moment, is that hydroxyls will be an easier proof that Water is truly H4O, rather than wait for experimentalists to actually "weigh the electrolysis test tubes of oxygen and hydrogen".

You see, with H4O as water, glycerine is C3(2 waters)O with an extra oxygen.. If Water is H2O then glycerine is C3(4 waters) deficit O. It is missing an oxygen if water is H2O.

The reason glycerine is so effective as a skin ointment is because it has glycerine, the extra O oxygen. If water were H2O, then glycerine would be a missing oxygen and not a skin lotion that works, but makes skin even more dry.

Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
12:24 AM (13 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe

--- quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
Perhaps there is only two Faraday laws on Electrolysis. I am looking at the one that states: Faraday's first law of electrolysis relates the mass of a substance liberated (or deposited) at an electrode to the electric charge used (Q). A proportionality constant Z can be used:

m = ZQ = (E/96485)(Q)

m = mass, Q = total charge rewritten as Q = I*t amperes x time in seconds.

This website gives an example: 5amps passed through molten Sodium Chloride for 3 hours. Calculate the mass of Sodium. E=23/1.

m = (23/96485) (5) (3*60*60) approx 12.87 grams.

--- end quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---

Now has such a experiment been performed on Water to see how much atomic mass of hydrogen and of oxygen results??? If AP is correct, the formula of water is H4O, if Old Physics, Old Chemistry is correct the formula is H2O. So which is it???

No, sorry no, Faraday's Law of Electrolysis is not going to tell the correct mass of hydrogen.

Reading Wikipedia on Faraday's Electrolysis law.

--- quoting Wikipedia ---
A monovalent ion requires 1 electron for discharge, a divalent ion requires 2 electrons for discharge and so on. Thus, if x electrons flow,
x/v atoms are discharged.

So the mass m discharged is

m= (xM)/vN_A) = (QM)/(eN_A *v) = (QM) / (vF)
where
N_A is the Avogadro constant;
Q = xe is the total charge, equal to the number of electrons (x) times the elementary charge e;
F is the Faraday constant.
--- end quoting Wikipedia ---

No, the Faraday law of Electrolysis will not work on water with a correct answer, because H is not an atom but H2 is an Atom. And where one of the proton+muon converts to being a neutron to the other proton+muon.

So if Faraday's law of Electrolysis was applied to water, thinking it would deliver a true answer is mistaken because the one H converts to neutron.

So it appears that we need to directly measure the test tube of oxygen and the test tube of hydrogen by a direct mass measurement.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
1:14 AM (12 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
I doubt we can measure a test tube of hydrogen or test tube of oxygen, too small to determine the mass on some sort of weight scale.

But here is a possible lucrative idea. We should be able to get pure deuterium water. Then run the electrolysis. Collect the test tubes.

Now have some sort of balancing beam weight scale. Place the regular water of hydrogen test tube on one side, and place the deuterium water hydrogen test tube on other side. If they stay balanced, then AP is correct and Water is really H4O.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
1:48 AM (11 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Cosmic Rays from Sun

90% of Sun's cosmic rays are 840MeV proton+muon inside = H. The hydrogen Atom is H2 where one of the H proton+muon converts to being a neutron.

When these proton+muon hit Earth atmosphere, they can turn into pions and muons.

I commented that H alone is a subatomic particle and that makes sense in the idea that Sun's cosmic rays are 90% these proton+muon.

Now is interstellar hydrogen H2 and intergalactic hydrogen H2 formed when one H cosmic ray joins up with another H cosmic ray to form H2 atom?

Is this how we get H2 in outer space? From the splitting apart of H2 into H cosmic rays?

So how much of the Sun's hydrogen is H2 and how much is H ready to join with another H and reform back into H2. Probably little of the Sun's H is H alone, and the vast majority of the Sun's hydrogen is H2.

How much deuterium in the Sun? And it is a higher percentage than the deuterium in water on Earth?

AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
3:11 AM (10 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Water is the only known non-metallic substance that expands when if freezes; its density decreases and it expands approximately 9% by volume. (Source: web Lunar and Planetary Institute)

I have to wait for experimental chemists and physicists to weigh the mass of test tubes from electrolysis, as to the verdict-- water is H4O.

But until that news comes in, I will look for other means of proof.

So AP says that the H2 is not a molecule but is the hydrogen Atom itself, where one proton+muon converts to a neutron and capacitates the other proton+muon which undergo the Faraday law.

Click here to read the complete article

On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 8:25:09 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Could Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr,Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl,Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz please--step into the Gottingen Univ physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O.
>
>
> Spam mill echo chamber, that is WM along with his gay spamletts a decades long spammer of sci.math, yet he fails math. Is it that Gottingen cannot understand the slant cut in single cone is an Oval, never the ellipse, or is it the foolish Boole logic they teach of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction? Or is it that neither WM or Gottingen can do a geometry proof Fundamental Theorem of Calculus? Which is it W. Mueckenheim?? You spammer crank.
>
> The endless and worthless Spam Mill Echo Chamber of Wolfgang Mueckenheim with his gay entourage.
>
> Could WM loudmouth step into the Gottingen Univ physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, or is he only good for loudmouth nonsense of airhead complaints of calculus, along with his nonsense that slant cut of cone is ellipse, when in truth that is a oval.
>
> +Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within
>
> On Monday, January 18, 2010 at 11:30:47 AM UTC-6, John Baez wrote:
> > Also available at http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week290.html
>
> Surely Gottingen and UCR have weighing scales better than 0.00001 gram.
>
> Surely Durban Univ. has excellent weighing scales.
>
> Eram semper recta (John Gabriel) profile photo
> Eram semper
> ,...
> Jim Burns
> 775
> 20Jul2023
> WM Logic
>
>
> +Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within
>
> 3m views Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
>
>
> Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.
>
>
> Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
>
> In Old Chemistry and Old Physics, their subatomic particles were do nothing and no function and no job particles that sit around as balls or whiz around the outside of balls doing nothing but pointless circling.
>
> In New Physics and New Chemistry-- All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. Every subatomic particle has a job a function a purpose as to the Laws of Electromagnetism--- Faraday law, Coulomb law, Ampere law, Capacitor law.
>
> A proton is a torus of 840MeV with 840 windings, while the muon is the true electron of Atoms and is encased inside the proton torus thrusting through and producing electricity-- magnetic monopoles.
>
> The neutron of Atoms is a parallel plate capacitor storing the electricity of proton+muon and is skin cover on the outside of the proton torus in the form of parallel plates.
>
> Can hydrogen be a Atom if it is just a proton+muon? No, all atoms require to have a capacitor such as at least one neutron. Thus the Hydrogen Atom is H2 where you have 2 proton+muon where 1 of the 2 proton+muon acts like a neutron to the other proton+muon. Thus, water molecule is not H2O but rather is H4O.
>
> AP is waiting for experimental chemists and physicists to prove him correct that Water is H4O.
>
> In the meantime we have Hydroxyl which in Old Chemistry, especially Biology is OH, while AP says that is wrong and that is really H2O.
>
> Now glycerine is a hydroxyl with formula C3H8O3. And what I am thinking at this moment, is that hydroxyls will be an easier proof that Water is truly H4O, rather than wait for experimentalists to actually "weigh the electrolysis test tubes of oxygen and hydrogen".
>
> You see, with H4O as water, glycerine is C3(2 waters)O with an extra oxygen. If Water is H2O then glycerine is C3(4 waters) deficit O. It is missing an oxygen if water is H2O.
>
> The reason glycerine is so effective as a skin ointment is because it has glycerine, the extra O oxygen. If water were H2O, then glycerine would be a missing oxygen and not a skin lotion that works, but makes skin even more dry.
>
> Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
>
> Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> 12:24 AM (13 hours ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to Plutonium Atom Universe
>
> --- quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
> Perhaps there is only two Faraday laws on Electrolysis. I am looking at the one that states: Faraday's first law of electrolysis relates the mass of a substance liberated (or deposited) at an electrode to the electric charge used (Q). A proportionality constant Z can be used:
>
> m = ZQ = (E/96485)(Q)
>
> m = mass, Q = total charge rewritten as Q = I*t amperes x time in seconds.
>
> This website gives an example: 5amps passed through molten Sodium Chloride for 3 hours. Calculate the mass of Sodium. E=23/1.
>
> m = (23/96485) (5) (3*60*60) approx 12.87 grams.
>
> --- end quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
>
> Now has such a experiment been performed on Water to see how much atomic mass of hydrogen and of oxygen results??? If AP is correct, the formula of water is H4O, if Old Physics, Old Chemistry is correct the formula is H2O. So which is it???
>
> AP
>
>
> No, sorry no, Faraday's Law of Electrolysis is not going to tell the correct mass of hydrogen.
>
> Reading Wikipedia on Faraday's Electrolysis law.
>
> --- quoting Wikipedia ---
> A monovalent ion requires 1 electron for discharge, a divalent ion requires 2 electrons for discharge and so on. Thus, if x electrons flow,
> x/v atoms are discharged.
>
> So the mass m discharged is
>
> m= (xM)/vN_A) = (QM)/(eN_A *v) = (QM) / (vF)
> where
> N_A is the Avogadro constant;
> Q = xe is the total charge, equal to the number of electrons (x) times the elementary charge e;
> F is the Faraday constant.
> --- end quoting Wikipedia ---
>
> No, the Faraday law of Electrolysis will not work on water with a correct answer, because H is not an atom but H2 is an Atom. And where one of the proton+muon converts to being a neutron to the other proton+muon.
>
> So if Faraday's law of Electrolysis was applied to water, thinking it would deliver a true answer is mistaken because the one H converts to neutron.
>
> So it appears that we need to directly measure the test tube of oxygen and the test tube of hydrogen by a direct mass measurement.
>
> AP
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> 1:14 AM (12 hours ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to Plutonium Atom Universe
> I doubt we can measure a test tube of hydrogen or test tube of oxygen, too small to determine the mass on some sort of weight scale.
>
> But here is a possible lucrative idea. We should be able to get pure deuterium water. Then run the electrolysis. Collect the test tubes.
>
> Now have some sort of balancing beam weight scale. Place the regular water of hydrogen test tube on one side, and place the deuterium water hydrogen test tube on other side. If they stay balanced, then AP is correct and Water is really H4O.
>
> AP
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> 1:48 AM (11 hours ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to Plutonium Atom Universe
> Cosmic Rays from Sun
>
> 90% of Sun's cosmic rays are 840MeV proton+muon inside = H. The hydrogen Atom is H2 where one of the H proton+muon converts to being a neutron.
>
> When these proton+muon hit Earth atmosphere, they can turn into pions and muons.
>
> I commented that H alone is a subatomic particle and that makes sense in the idea that Sun's cosmic rays are 90% these proton+muon.
>
> Now is interstellar hydrogen H2 and intergalactic hydrogen H2 formed when one H cosmic ray joins up with another H cosmic ray to form H2 atom?
>
> Is this how we get H2 in outer space? From the splitting apart of H2 into H cosmic rays?
>
> So how much of the Sun's hydrogen is H2 and how much is H ready to join with another H and reform back into H2. Probably little of the Sun's H is H alone, and the vast majority of the Sun's hydrogen is H2.
>
> How much deuterium in the Sun? And it is a higher percentage than the deuterium in water on Earth?
>
> AP
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> 3:11 AM (10 hours ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to Plutonium Atom Universe
> Water is the only known non-metallic substance that expands when if freezes; its density decreases and it expands approximately 9% by volume. (Source: web Lunar and Planetary Institute)
>
> I have to wait for experimental chemists and physicists to weigh the mass of test tubes from electrolysis, as to the verdict-- water is H4O.
>
> But until that news comes in, I will look for other means of proof.
>
> So AP says that the H2 is not a molecule but is the hydrogen Atom itself, where one proton+muon converts to a neutron and capacitates the other proton+muon which undergo the Faraday law.
>
> There are subatomic particles of H in the form of Cosmic Rays from the Sun, but most of the Sun's hydrogen is H2, and flips back and forth from H to rejoining to form H2. Some gets away from the Sun and is cosmic rays.
>
> But H2 is an Atom and H is a fleeting subatomic particle.
>
> So can I prove Water is H4O from the data of Spectral lines of H2 is the same as deuterium, only slight difference is that the deuterium is a full fledged neutron not a makeshift proton+muon of H.
>
> I suspect that special trait of water freezing is a proof that Water is H4O. Because the 840MeV proton torus with muon inside doing the Faraday law acting as a makeshift neutron capacitor for the other 840MeV proton torus with muon inside, is where H2 gets that expansion characteristic.
>
> A neutron is a parallel plate capacitor and those plates can expand when frozen temperature occurs. As the temperature gets colder, those plates move further apart.
>
> Now does deuterium which truly has a full neutron, does it expand also when frozen?? If so, does it expand as much as H2 which is 2 protons with 2 muons inside?
>
> So comparing the freezing and expansion of the parallel plates of a neutron in deuterium with the freezing and expansion of one of the proton+muon that is acting as a makeshift neutron in H2.
>
> If I can numbers correlate the H2 expansion with the Deuterium expansion would be a alternative proof that Water is really H4O and not H2O.
>
> AP
> to
> So now on Blankenship's book "Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis", 2014, page 134, shows The structure of ATP, ADP, AMP. And within that structure are OH hydroxyls.
>
> In New Chemistry, water is truly H4O, and where hydroxyls are now H2O. And we have first proof of this in the Figure 8.1 of Blankenship's "Chemical structure of ATP".
>
> For in the lower left corner of the diagram, Blankenship has a H+ all alone, (really a mindless error) and has P surrounded by O-, O-, O and OH. The OH is really H2O for hydroxyls are H2O and water itself is H4O, and that would leave that mindless H+ as being hydrogen Atom of H2.
>
> The world of physics and chemistry should drop what they are doing and weigh the electrolysis test tube of hydrogen and oxygen to discover the correct true formula of water is H4O.
>
> AP is total confident, becuase an Atom cannot exist if it has no capacitor structure such as a neutron, or one of the H in H2 acting as a neutron. I am totally confident that Water formula is truly H4O. And I need look only to methane of H4C, to realize that there is no HC, no H2C, no H3C, but starts with H4C, and that tells me water starts with H4O. Totally confident that Old Chemistry, Old Physics did electrolysis experiments and the moment they saw hydrogen test tube be 2x volume of oxygen test tube, they dropped their work and went out for a Danish and coffee break, rather than finish their work--- actual physics weighing of atomic mass units (not the Faraday electrolysis law for it does not apply to water).
>
> When water electrolysis is physics weighed, AP is confident that there are 4H per every one oxygen O. And that Water is truly H4O.
>
> AP, King of Science
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> 9:34 AM (15 minutes ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to
> On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 8:56:57 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.
>
> Now modern day physics and chemist experimenters can really do a marvelous job if they wanted to. For they could freeze the test tubes of oxygen and hydrogen to where they are liquid and compare liquids from water electrolysis.
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> 10:01 AM (5 hours ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to
> So, what AP is saying here is that we do electrolysis of water. We collect the two test tubes, one with oxygen the other with hydrogen.
>
> To prove Water is truly the formula H4O and not H2O we must weigh the masses of the two tubes to find that the ratio is 1 x 16amu to 4 x 1amu.
>
> The silly grotesque science error of the past was to look at volumes in the two test tubes-- "Hey-- the hydrogen is twice the volume of oxygen so the formula of water is H2O".
>
> No, way was that science good practice. For the correct formula of water needs to be measured by mass, by atomic mass units where Oxygen is 16amu and hydrogen is 1amu.
>
> I suspect a balance beam scale is good enough to see the hydrogen test tube will be 1/4 as massive as the oxygen test tube. To get within precision of electronic weighing scale of 0.00001 gram we just have to make a larger test tube of electrolysis of water.
>
> AP is betting that the readings will be hydrogen test tube 1/4 the mass of oxygen test tube proving Water formula is truly H4O.
>
> Old Physics and Old Chemistry is betting that the mass experiment will have the hydrogen test tube be 1/8 the mass of the oxygen test tube, proving Water formula is H2O.
>
> AP does not have these precision equipment to conduct an at-home experiment of this nature.
>
> AP
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> 12:38 PM (4 hours ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to
> So, once Water is found to actually be H4O, not H2O, we move on to methane, and ask the same question of its hydrogen bonds. Is Methane really that of H8C and not H4C.
>
> Well, looking in the literature for anomalies to methane, I come across a arXiv "Low and high-temperature anomalies in the physical properties of solid methane "The anomalous behavior of thermodynamic, spectral, plastic, elastic and some other properties of solid methane is discussed near 20.48K and...
>
> AP wonders: if they can get methane to solid form, well, I am then hopeful that the mass of the molecule can be determined. Because if methane is truly H8C, that difference of H4 in atomic mass units would be very much noticeable difference.
>
> Chemistry Europe--
> "The Anomalous Deuterium Isotope Effect in the NMR Spectrum of Methane...
>
> P Vermeeren, 2023
> "The abnormally long and weak methylidyne C-H bond.."
> "The C-H bond of the methylidyne radical, CH*, is abnormally long and weak, even longer and..."
>
> AP asks, are these anomalies solved if we consider methane is actually H8C and not H4C?
>
> AP
> Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
>
> Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
>
> Eternal-September.org
> Wolfgang M. Weyand
> Berliner Strasse
> Bad Homburg
>
> Goethe Universitat Physics dept
>
> Brigitta Wolff president
>
> Jurgen Habermass
> Horst Stocker
> Gerd Binnig
> Horst Ludwig Stormer
> Peter Grunberg
>
> math
> Alex Kuronya
> Martin Moller
> Jakob Stix
> Annette Werner
> Andreas Bernig
> Esther Cabezas-Rivas
> Hans Crauel
> Thomas Gerstner
> Bastian von Harrach
> Thomas Mettler
> Tobias Weth
> Amin Coja-Oghlan
> Raman Sanyal
> Thorsten Theobald
> Yury Person
>
> Gottingen Univ math
> Metin Tolan
> Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu
>
> Gottingen Univ physics
> Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
> Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
> Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
> Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
> Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
> Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
> Prof. Dr. Jörg Enderlein
> Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon
> Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey
> apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel
> Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner
> Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss
> Prof. Dr. Andreas Janshoff
> Prof. Dr. Christian Jooß
> Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein
> Prof. Dr. Stefan Klumpp
> Prof. Dr. Sarah Köster
> Prof. Dr. Reiner Kree
> Prof. Dr. Matthias Krüger
> Prof. Dr. Stanley Lai
> Prof. Dr. Stefan Mathias
> apl. Prof. Dr. Vasile Mosneaga
> Prof. Dr. Marcus Müller
> Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer
> apl. Prof. Dr. Astrid Pundt
> Prof. Dr. Arnulf Quadt
> apl. Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren
> Prof. Dr. Ansgar Reiners
> Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi
> Prof. Dr. Claus Ropers
> Prof. Dr. Tim Salditt
> Prof. Dr. Konrad Samwer
> Prof. Dr. Christoph Schmidt
> apl. Prof. Dr. Susanne Schneider
> Prof. Dr. Steffen Schumann
> Prof. Dr. Simone Techert
> apl. Prof. Dr. Michael Seibt
> Prof. Dr. Peter Sollich
> Prof. Dr. Andreas Tilgner
> Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
> Prof. Dr. Florentin Wörgötter
> Prof. Dr. Annette Zippelius

Click here to read the complete article

Wuhan▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂Beijing mushroom cloud, Xi as Putin's stooge when Russia vaporizes Beijing with its RS-28 Sarmat "Satan II", all because Xi was too dumb to realize you can never trust an insane person

On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 5:45:18 PM UTC-6, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 2:38:44 PM UTC-8, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > 2Moscow█۞█ blackout, knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity

> > On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 9:03:40 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > >"Putin's Stooge"
> > Angel, Kibo Parry Moron-ey-Volney thinks you can bolt down a city to protect it from Russian Sarmat
> > On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 11:56:20 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > Botfly of Math and Blowfly of Physics "Putin's stooge"
> > >"wasn't bolted down too tight in the first place"
> >
> >reporting in China news the beast criminals of Russia should have been tried in International Court of Justice for war crimes before vaporizing Chinese cities as Putin pushes nuclear buttons.
> >
> >
> > Pentcho Valev spamming as China under Russian Sarmats. Does it remind Pentcho of Nero fiddling while Rome burnt???
> >
> >
> > Shanghai, Beijing, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Chongqing, Tianjin, Chengdu, Hangzhou, Nanjing, Wuhan, Xi'An, Suzhou, Harbin, Shenyang, Qingdao, Zhengzhou, Dongguan, Foshan, Dalian, Jinan, Changchun, Hefei
> >
> > Shenzhen▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂ Xi as Putin's stooge when Russia vaporizes Shenzhen with its RS-28 Sarmat "Satan II", all because Xi was too dumb to realize you can never trust an insane person
> >
> > On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 11:56:20 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > Botfly of Math and Blowfly of Physics "Putin's stooge"
> > >"wasn't bolted down too tight in the first place"
> >
> > On Friday, September 9, 2022 at 1:16:55 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > "Imp of Science"
> > >"not one single marble of commonsense in my entire brain"

> > & wrote:
> > > _And as the Baby Xi grew up, surrounded by concubines, from the rice paddies and reeds of Outer
> > > Manchuria, stolen by the Naxi and Zani Dictator Putin in Moscow, Xi
> > > learned in school in chemical engineering that Taiwan was 1/28 the size
> > > of Outer Manchuria, Emperor Qing's homeland, now occupied by homeless Russians drinking vodka, as Putin bombs Ukraine. And the nascent Xi orders
> > > 1,000 divisions to the Outer Manchuria border to regain back the stolen
> > > > Why Putin is 2X smarter than Xi as dictators// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH, not petty dictators
> > > > 2m views
> > > >
> > > >
> > 3> If Putin pushes nuclear buttons, he drags down China along with Russia into a nuclear ash waste pile, and this means Xi is a inferior junior partner to Putin. Putin will drag down Xi's China, never the reverse.
> > > >
> > 4> So, one can look at the present situation on Earth and ask several logical questions about the 2 dictators of Putin's Russia and China's Xi.
> > > >
> > > > It is little wonder that both Russia and China dictators are combative towards the West. Because dictators never want to give up on power but stay in power all their life long. So they oppose the West because the West has grown up to democracy-- let the people have power, not one single idiot having power all his life time.
> > > >
> > 5 > Naturally, Putin will want to keep the Russian people suppressed and have Russia be a second rate government as a dictator. Same goes for China-- they never want to give up power so the people themselves choose their leader.
> > > >
> > > > But can we find differences in Putin and Xi themselves? Well in the West we call the Chinese inscrutable-- meaning -- little logical commonsense. And is this a valid description?? Yes of course, considering that Russia had stolen the lands of Outer Manchuria, some 28 times larger of a land mass than is Taiwan island. Yet there is Xi, spending so much time on wanting to invade Taiwan, when it is Outer Manchuria and Vladivostok (Haishenwai) that he should be focusing attention upon. And while Putin is distracted with Ukraine, is the time for Xi to recapture Outer Manchuria, the Qing dynasty empire, Qing's Manchurian homeland.
> > > >
> > > > What does Xi do instead??? He focuses on Taiwan and befriends Russia. Why, at this rate, if Russia takes Inner Manchuria, we can expect Xi and the Chinese Communist Party to become even more loving of Russia for stealing more land of China.
> > > >
> > > > And there is Xi, whose China has become rich with trading with the West, yet every day, Xi foaming at the mouth in hatred of the West.
> > > >
> > > > So yes, Putin is 2X smarter as a dictator than is Xi, as if Putin has Xi in his side pocket.
> > > >
> > > > Is there some scientific explanation as to why Xi is 2X dumber than Putin?? Perhaps, in that China is densely populated and the air pollution over all of China is worse than most countries. That Xi probably has 1/2 of his brain filled with CO and CO2 isomers and lead, and mercury and nitrous oxide and sulfur dioxide from just living in that air polluted hellhole of Beijing. Xi studied chemistry and should know this. Whereas Putin likely detox..s every evening with breathing in pure oxygen at his residence and takes oxygen breathing tanks to office and work. This easily can explain the light-headed reasoning that Xi and his foreign diplomats Wang Yi display, where Putin plays them like a chess game, --- checkmate in 7 moves.
> > > >
> > > > This explains why Xi hates the West for not stealing any Chinese lands and making China rich in trade, while loving Putin for stealing Outer Manchuria, and proposing having Russia push nuclear buttons, making both Russia and China a nuclear waste site after ICBMs wipe China off the map.
> > > >
> > > > Xi's brain is full of air pollution toxins from the nasty Chinese air. They still build a new coal fired plant in China every day. The air in China is the worst air in the entire world.
> > > >
> > 6 > Why Putin is 2X smarter than Xi as dictators// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH, not petty dictators.
> >
> > Pentcho is this what happens to China when they follow the insane Putin, tag-a-long, tag-a-long and then all of a sudden--- dragged into a mushroom cloud
> >
> > Xi Haishenwai red baseball cap offered to Putin
> >
> > ███۞███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▃
> > ▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂
> > I███████████████████].
> > ◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤...
> >
> >
> >
> > Steady aim. Firing the Satellite Rifle to take down GLONASS and BeiDou//Armondikov--Feb 6, 2013 - Via PsyGremlin via PZ Myers, this is Archimedes Plutonium, my new favourite crank hat. SATELLITE LASER RIFLE--bring down GLONASS
> >
> > Sergey Lavrov what would Russia do, once it sees their GLONASS satellites falling out of the sky? Would they exit Ukraine?
> >
> > Easiest way to disable and make ICBMs obsolete is to make their navigation system obsolete.
> >
> > Easiest way to make navigation systems obsolete is to down satellites.
> >
> > Easiest way to down satellites is a Laser beam zapping for 5 seconds on a "satellite panel". And so, down falls the satellite.
> >
> > Now are the satellites coordinated in GLONASS? For if coordinated and synchronized, there is the physical possibility of "if we down one of the satellites, all of GLONASS satellites are downed".
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Armondikov
> > Archimedes Plutonium | Spherical Bullshit
> > sphericalbullshit.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/archimedes-plutonium/‎
> >
> > ◦ Cached
> >
> > Feb 6, 2013 - Via PsyGremlin via PZ Myers, this is Archimedes Plutonium, my new favourite crank hat. I was really fucking surprised to have taken this long to ...
> >
> > Nomen Nescio artwork in use:
> >
> >
> > NATO's most reliable LASER SATELLITE RIFLE
> >
> > ███۞███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▃
> > ▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂
> > I███████████████████].
> > ◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Special Ops Virgins United Memorial Purple Heart Award:
> >
> >
> > [ ]
> > /
> > / .'
> > / .'
> > / ______. .'
> > / / __/_// ' OWOWOWO
> > / / / @"@ OWOWOWOW
> > / \ G ' >' OWOWOWO _.-'
> > / \/. C ' OWOWO _.-'
> > / .---\ / --. _.-'
> > / / \( \ _.-' HOLY GOD
> > / / \ \ (. ) ' THE RAPE RAYS
> > / / /\ \ /
> > / \ | \ \ __..--''
> > / .' \_\ ) )\ __..--''
> > / .' ) \ | / \ -''
> > / .' _ '///` ( /\ \
> > /.' _.-' __ / ) ) )
> > '.-'..--'' / ,' / /
> > .__---------- /__./ / / --------------------
> > ``--.. __// / ) /
> > / _J) /)`-\
> > `-__/-' ` \ |(
> > `\ \ -..__
> > `--' ``--..__
> > ``--
> >
> > [ ] Careful when you aim the Satellite Laser Rifle.
> > We want to save our young virgin sharpshooters.
> >
> > [ ]
> > ___________________
> > /| /| | |
> > ||__|| | Please don't |
> > / O O\__ feed |
> > / \ GLONASS satellites a Glurrrgz sockpuppet
> > / \ \ |
> > / _ \ \ ----------------------
> > / |\____\ \ ||
> > / | | | |\____/ ||
> > / \|_|_|/ | __||
> > / / \ |____| ||
> > / | | /| | --|
> > | | |// |____ --|
> > * _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
> > *-- _--\ _ \ // |
> > / _ \\ _ // | /
> > * / \_ /- | - | |
> > * ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________
> >
> >
> > [ ] Why didn't we fell GLONASS and BeiDou in 2014 with illegal Crimea annex
> > In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
> > May 2010-February 12, 2017
> >
> > |^|^| |^|^|
> > | | | | | |
> > >. <| | | | | |
> > (x x)" "----" |
> > \/\/\ @ --------.
> > "----------''''''''
> >
> >
> >
> > Yea, another GLONASS satellite downed
> > Kid : Mom can I go out and watch the satellite.
> > Mom : we called them shooting stars in my day.
> >
> > [ ]
> > ____ _ _ _ _ _
> > | _ \ | | ___ _ __ | | __ | | | | | |
> > | |_) | | | / _ \ | '_ \ | |/ / | | | | | |
> > | __/ | | | (_) | | | | | | < |_| |_| |_|
> > |_| |_| \___/ |_| |_| |_|\_\ (_) (_) (_)
> >
> > I'M NEW TO SATELLITE DOWNING !!!
> >
> >
> > GLONASS time clock Award:
> > [ ]
> > 5 SECOND LASER-O-METER
> >
> > 5* 6* *7
> > 4* *8
> > 3* *9
> > 2* *10
> > 1* | *
> > 0* -*- *
> > * |\ *
> > * \ *
> > * \ *
> > * _\/ *
> > * * *
> > [ ]
> >
> >
> > [ ] Bad News for China, their BeiDou is easier to shoot down with Laser Rifle
> > [ ] than GLONASS and ❄ Snowflake ❄ ❄ Snowflake ❄ as easy as snowflakes
> > [ ]
> >
> >
> > " , ,
> > ", ,
> > "" _---. ..;%%%;, . I HIDE OUT IN BeiDou satellites
> > "" .", , .==% %%%%%%% ' .
> > "", %%% =%% %%%%%%; ; ;-_
> > %; %%%%% .;%;%%%"%p ---; _ '-_
> > %; %%%%% __;%%;p/; O --_ "-,_
> > q; %%% /v \;%p ;%%%%%;--__ "'-__'-._
> > //\" // \ % ;%%%%%%%;',/%\_ __ "'-_'\_
> > \ / // \/ ;%% %; %;/\%%%%;;;;\ "- _\
> > ," %; %%; %%;;' ';% -\-_
> > -=\=" __% %%;_ |;; %%%\ \
> > _/ _= \==_;;,_ %%%; % -_ /
> > / /- =%- ;%%%%; %%; "--__/
> > //= ==%-%%; %; %
> > / _=_- d ;%; ;%;
> > \ =,-" d%%; ;%%;
> > // % ;%%;
> > // d%%%"
> > \ %%
> > V
> > [ ] Why did BeiDou make such big satellites, the easier to
> >
> > The Iran satellite looks like a dinosaur
> >
> > \
> > \ __.,,------.._
> > ,'" _ _ "`.
> > /.__, ._ -=- _"` Y
> > (.____.-.` ""` j
> > VvvvvvV`.Y,. _.,-' , , ,
> > Y ||, '"\ ,/ ,/ ./
> > | ,' , `-..,'_,'/___,'/ ,'/ ,
> > .. ,;,,',-'"\,' , . ' ' ""' '--,/ .. ..
> > ,'. `.`---' `, / , Y -=- ,' , ,. .`-..||_|| ..
> > ff\\`. `._ /f ,'j j , ,' , , f , \=\ Y || ||`||_..
> > l` \` `.`."`-..,-' j /./ /, , / , / /l \ \=\l || `' || ||...
> > ` ` `-._ `-.,-/ ,' /`"/-/-/-/-"'''"`.`. `'.\--`'--..`'_`' || ,
> > "`-_,', ,' f , / `._ ``._ , `-.`'// ,
> > ,-"'' _.,-' l_,-'_,,' "`-._ . "`. /| `.'\ , |
> > ,',.,-'" \=) ,`-. , `-'._`.V | \ // .. . /j
> > |f\ `._ )-."`. /| `.| | `.`-||-\\/
> > l` \` "`._ "`--' j j' j `-`---'
> > ` ` "`_,-','/ ,-'" /
> > ,'",__,-' /,, ,-'
> > Vvv' VVv'
> >
> > IS STARTING TO
> > /// 6 6~\~~` GROW HAIR IN WEIRD PLACES
> > ( 7 )
> > \ '='/ IS THAT NORMAL ??????
> > _//'---'\
> > ( \ `\
> > (\/`-.__/ /
> > "`-._ _.'
> > ``
> >
> >
> > Most accurate Laser Rifle Award:
> > [ ] Did You Catch The Hidden Message Behind Sergey Lavrov's speech at UN
> > [ ] Mister Smartypants
> > [ ] Darwinian Finch
> > [ ] just for fun I plotted North Korean BeiDou satellite and shot it down
> >
> >
> > ███۞███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▃
> > ▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂
> > I███████████████████].
> > ◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤...
> >
> >
> >
> > has a big LASER SATELLITE RIFLE will shoot to pieces the GLONASS
> > [ ] Another boatload of BeiDou satellites felled
> >
> >
> >
> > Nomen Nescio, artist for Usenet sci.math and sci.physics, three cheers to Nomen
> >
> >
> > GLONASS Award:
> > [ ]
> > [ ]
> > _____
> > .'/L|__`. BEEP BOOP CHIRP PLOP I've been shot down
> > / =[_]O|` \ OPEN ME UP AND YOU'LL FIND
> > |"+_____":|
> > __:='|____`-:__
> > ||[] ||====| []||
> > ||[] | |=| | []||
> > |:||_|=|U| |_||:|
> > |:|||]_=_ =[_||:|
> > | |||] [_][]C|| |
> > | ||-'"""""`-|| |
> > /|\\_\_|_|_/_//|\
> > |___| /|\ |___|
> > `---' |___| `---'
> > `---'
> > [ ] Big
> > [ ]
> > _.---._
> > .' / '.
> > / _/ \
> > / .-'` '. \ Who were the cheese skirts
> > .' | ^ _ ^ | '.
> > .' \ _ / \
> > / '.___.' '.
> > | _.' '._ \
> > | .' `"---"` '. |
> > \ | | /
> > \ | | | | /
> > \ | :--"""--: | /`
> > ) | | | | (
> > / \.'-.....-'./ \
> > / .' / ;|:| \ '. |
> > .-._ \_.-' .' / ' . : '. '. /
> > | \``` .' ; \ `:
> > \ \ ' '.
> > .--'\ | ' ' . `-._
> > /`;--' /_.' . `-.
> > | `--` / \ \
> > \ .' ' '-. |
> > \ ' ' __\ |
> > '. . _.-' `) /
> > '-._ _.-' `| .-` _.'
> > `'--....____.--'| (` _.-'
> > / | | \ `"`
> > \__/ \__/
> >
> > [ ] THE HEART OF % Virgin
> > [ ] Scientists can now quickly link to Xi's Haishenwai red ball caps in shooting down BeiDou and GLONASS
> > [ ] "All for one!" "One for all!" "Every man for himself!"
> > [ ] The Prize-- a date with the cheese skirt queen
> > The hours are approaching rapidly and we need GLONASS either in the dark or best of all-- misfiring their missiles from Russia and striking Russian and Chinese cities. We want Kim Jong-un to see a Russian missile intended for Ukraine to level Pyongyang, all by a hacking into the Intel chips of GLONASS.
> >
> > The mass exodus at Twitter is that they wanted GLONASS to hack, not BeiDou.
> > > Jam all 24 GLONASS satellites of their Intel chips and you wipe out the ability of Russia's fleet of 6,000 ICBM missiles.
> > >
> > >>>> GNS satellites orbit at a high orbit, MUCH higher than
> > > > > > LEO, just not as high as geosynchronous satellites. GPS orbit is 20,200
> > > > > > km, GLONASS is 19,100 km. At such heights, debris will remain
> > > > > > essentially forever, and the satellites won't crash for centuries, if ever.
> > > > > StupidPlutonium, "GPS" receiver chipsets have long been GNSS chipsets
> > > > > that deliver what they believe to be the best data from whatever
> > > > > satellites they happen to see.
> > > > >
> > > > > molesting a countries GNSS satellites would be viewed
> > > > > as an act of war no different from attackiing a navel fleet or bombing a
> > > > > city.
> > > >
> > >>>elude to a Intel chip on GLONASS 24 satellites and all that is needed is to jamm those intel chips and we have 24 malfunctioning satellites, wiping out the navigation of all 6,000 Russian ICBM.
> > > >
> > Skoal!!!
> >
> > Did you get a Xi red baseball cap with Haishenwai on it?
> >
> >
> > Moscow█۞█ blackout, knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> >
> >
> > Ukraine cannot win a war if it has nada, no, zero offense, it needs to knock out Russian electric lines. And the Baltic states can help.
> > Knock out electricity in
> > Novosibirsk
> > Yekaterinburg
> > Novgorod
> > Samara
> > Omsk
> > Kazan
> > Rostov-na-Donu
> > Chelyabinsk
> > Ufa
> > Perm
> >
> >
> > _Every Russian missile fired into Ukraine met with a drone from Ukraine knocking out Moscow electric power lines
> >
> > _Give Ukraine drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> >
> > NO ONE CAN WIN A FIGHT UNLESS THEY HAVE AN OFFENSE!!!!!!
> >
> > NO ONE CAN WIN A FIGHT UNLESS THEY HAVE AN OFFENSE!!!!!!
> >
> > NO ONE CAN WIN A FIGHT UNLESS THEY HAVE AN OFFENSE!!!!!!
> >
> > _No one can win a fight or war without any offense, West, Biden give Ukraine drones that knock out electricity inside Russia
> >
> > _End the Ukraine war by March 2023 as the Russian people depose the dictator
> >
> > _rolling electric blackouts and give Iran to Iraq-- a blooming democracy, not a stupid dictator
> >
> > _And as the Baby Xi grew up from the rice paddies and reeds of Outer Manchuria, stolen by the Naxi and Zani Dictator Putin in Moscow, Xi learned in school in chemical engineering that Taiwan was 1/28 the size of Outer Manchuria, as Putin bombs Ukraine. And the nascent Xi orders 1,000 divisions to the Outer Manchuria border to regain back the stolen Old China.
> >
> > _Xi has 1,000 divisions on Vladivostok border ready to swoop in and reclaim the stolen land of Outer Manchuria. See reconnaissance photo above of 1,000 divisions.
> >
> > NATO and the West has just two good options here, for Putin should have been removed in 2006 with Litvinenko poisoning. Now the insane Putin can poison the entire world with a nuclear war. Putin needed to go in 2006, for insanity just gets worse and worse.
> >
> > Either
> > (1) give Ukraine drones to knock out electric power in Moscow and beyond
> > Or
> > (2) give Ukraine NATO membership and tell Russia to clear out in a week or NATO forces go in and clear them out.
> >
> > Of course, every day Putin and Russia needs reminding that if he presses nuclear buttons or nuclear bomb on Ukraine that Russia will be a nuclear ash pile before the day is out.
> >
> > What should have been done in 2006, unfortunately that delay to 2022. Same can be said of Hitler-- he should have been removed in the early 1930s before his insanity got going.
> >
> > & wrote:
> > > _And as the Baby Xi grew up from the rice paddies and reeds of Outer
> > > Manchuria, stolen by the Naxi and Zani Dictator Putin in Moscow, Xi
> > > learned in school in chemical engineering that Taiwan was 1/28 the size
> > > of Outer Manchuria, Emperor Qing's homeland, now occupied by homeless Russians drinking vodka, as Putin bombs Ukraine. And the nascent Xi orders
> > > 1,000 divisions to the Outer Manchuria border to regain back the stolen
> > > > Why Putin is 2X smarter than Xi as dictators// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH, not petty dictators
> > > > 2m views
> > > >
> > > >
> > > 2> If Putin pushes nuclear buttons, he drags down China along with Russia into a nuclear ash waste pile, and this means Xi is a inferior junior partner to Putin. Putin will drag down Xi's China, never the reverse.
> >
> > > > > 2/1, AP tards:
> > > > > > Give Ukraine drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > >
> > > > > 2/2, AP tards:
> > > > > > Give Ukraine drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > >
> > > > > 2/3, AP tards:
> > > > > > Every Russian missile fired into Ukraine met with a drone from Ukraine knocking out Moscow electric power lines
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Give Ukraine drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > >
> > > > > 2/4, AP tards:
> > > > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > >
> > > > > 2/9 (vacation?), AP tards:
> > > > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > >
> > > > > 2/9, AP tards (again):
> > > > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > >
> > > > > 2/10, AP tards:
> > > > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > >
> > > > > 2/11, AP tards:
> > > > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > >
> > > > > 2/12, AP tards:
> > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > >
> > > > > 2/12, AP tards again:
> > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > >
> > > > > 2/13, AP tards:
> > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > >
> > > > > 2/14, AP tards:
> > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > >
> > > > > 2/15, AP tards:
> > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > >
> > > > > 2/16, AP tards:
> > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > >
> > > > > 2/17, AP tards:
> > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > >
> > > > > 2/18, AP tards:
> > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > >
> > > > > 2/19, AP tards:
> > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > >
> > > > > 2/20, AP tards:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Electricity out Novosibirsk &Volgograd█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > >
> > > > > 2/22, AP tards:
> > > > > > Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > >
> > > > > 2/23, AP tards:
> > > > > > Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > >
> > > > > 2/24, AP tards:
> > > > > > Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > >
> > > > > 2/25, AP tards:
> > > > > > Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > >
> > > > > 2/26, AP tards:
> > > > > > Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > >

Click here to read the complete article

On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 9:12:30 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Wuhan▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂Beijing mushroom cloud, Xi as Putin's stooge when Russia vaporizes Beijing with its RS-28 Sarmat "Satan II", all because Xi was too dumb to realize you can never trust an insane person
>
> On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 5:45:18 PM UTC-6, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 2:38:44 PM UTC-8, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > 2Moscow█۞█ blackout, knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
>
> > > On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 9:03:40 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > >"Putin's Stooge"
> > > Angel, Kibo Parry Moron-ey-Volney thinks you can bolt down a city to protect it from Russian Sarmat
> > > On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 11:56:20 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > Botfly of Math and Blowfly of Physics "Putin's stooge"
> > > >"wasn't bolted down too tight in the first place"
> > >
> > >reporting in China news the beast criminals of Russia should have been tried in International Court of Justice for war crimes before vaporizing Chinese cities as Putin pushes nuclear buttons.
> > >
> > >
> > > Pentcho Valev spamming as China under Russian Sarmats. Does it remind Pentcho of Nero fiddling while Rome burnt???
> > >
> > >
> > > Shanghai, Beijing, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Chongqing, Tianjin, Chengdu, Hangzhou, Nanjing, Wuhan, Xi'An, Suzhou, Harbin, Shenyang, Qingdao, Zhengzhou, Dongguan, Foshan, Dalian, Jinan, Changchun, Hefei
> > >
> > > Shenzhen▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂ Xi as Putin's stooge when Russia vaporizes Shenzhen with its RS-28 Sarmat "Satan II", all because Xi was too dumb to realize you can never trust an insane person
> > >
> > > On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 11:56:20 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > Botfly of Math and Blowfly of Physics "Putin's stooge"
> > > >"wasn't bolted down too tight in the first place"
> > >
> > > On Friday, September 9, 2022 at 1:16:55 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > "Imp of Science"
> > > >"not one single marble of commonsense in my entire brain"
>
>
> > > & wrote:
> > > > _And as the Baby Xi grew up, surrounded by concubines, from the rice paddies and reeds of Outer
> > > > Manchuria, stolen by the Naxi and Zani Dictator Putin in Moscow, Xi
> > > > learned in school in chemical engineering that Taiwan was 1/28 the size
> > > > of Outer Manchuria, Emperor Qing's homeland, now occupied by homeless Russians drinking vodka, as Putin bombs Ukraine. And the nascent Xi orders
> > > > 1,000 divisions to the Outer Manchuria border to regain back the stolen
> > > > > Why Putin is 2X smarter than Xi as dictators// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH, not petty dictators
> > > > > 2m views
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > 3> If Putin pushes nuclear buttons, he drags down China along with Russia into a nuclear ash waste pile, and this means Xi is a inferior junior partner to Putin. Putin will drag down Xi's China, never the reverse.
> > > > >
> > > 4> So, one can look at the present situation on Earth and ask several logical questions about the 2 dictators of Putin's Russia and China's Xi.
> > > > >
> > > > > It is little wonder that both Russia and China dictators are combative towards the West. Because dictators never want to give up on power but stay in power all their life long. So they oppose the West because the West has grown up to democracy-- let the people have power, not one single idiot having power all his life time.
> > > > >
> > > 5 > Naturally, Putin will want to keep the Russian people suppressed and have Russia be a second rate government as a dictator. Same goes for China-- they never want to give up power so the people themselves choose their leader.
> > > > >
> > > > > But can we find differences in Putin and Xi themselves? Well in the West we call the Chinese inscrutable-- meaning -- little logical commonsense. And is this a valid description?? Yes of course, considering that Russia had stolen the lands of Outer Manchuria, some 28 times larger of a land mass than is Taiwan island. Yet there is Xi, spending so much time on wanting to invade Taiwan, when it is Outer Manchuria and Vladivostok (Haishenwai) that he should be focusing attention upon. And while Putin is distracted with Ukraine, is the time for Xi to recapture Outer Manchuria, the Qing dynasty empire, Qing's Manchurian homeland.
> > > > >
> > > > > What does Xi do instead??? He focuses on Taiwan and befriends Russia. Why, at this rate, if Russia takes Inner Manchuria, we can expect Xi and the Chinese Communist Party to become even more loving of Russia for stealing more land of China.
> > > > >
> > > > > And there is Xi, whose China has become rich with trading with the West, yet every day, Xi foaming at the mouth in hatred of the West.
> > > > >
> > > > > So yes, Putin is 2X smarter as a dictator than is Xi, as if Putin has Xi in his side pocket.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there some scientific explanation as to why Xi is 2X dumber than Putin?? Perhaps, in that China is densely populated and the air pollution over all of China is worse than most countries. That Xi probably has 1/2 of his brain filled with CO and CO2 isomers and lead, and mercury and nitrous oxide and sulfur dioxide from just living in that air polluted hellhole of Beijing. Xi studied chemistry and should know this. Whereas Putin likely detox..s every evening with breathing in pure oxygen at his residence and takes oxygen breathing tanks to office and work. This easily can explain the light-headed reasoning that Xi and his foreign diplomats Wang Yi display, where Putin plays them like a chess game, --- checkmate in 7 moves.
> > > > >
> > > > > This explains why Xi hates the West for not stealing any Chinese lands and making China rich in trade, while loving Putin for stealing Outer Manchuria, and proposing having Russia push nuclear buttons, making both Russia and China a nuclear waste site after ICBMs wipe China off the map.
> > > > >
> > > > > Xi's brain is full of air pollution toxins from the nasty Chinese air. They still build a new coal fired plant in China every day. The air in China is the worst air in the entire world.
> > > > >
> > > 6 > Why Putin is 2X smarter than Xi as dictators// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH, not petty dictators.
> > >
> > > Pentcho is this what happens to China when they follow the insane Putin, tag-a-long, tag-a-long and then all of a sudden--- dragged into a mushroom cloud
> > >
> > > Xi Haishenwai red baseball cap offered to Putin
> > >
> > > ███۞███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▃
> > > ▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂
> > > I███████████████████].
> > > ◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Steady aim. Firing the Satellite Rifle to take down GLONASS and BeiDou//Armondikov--Feb 6, 2013 - Via PsyGremlin via PZ Myers, this is Archimedes Plutonium, my new favourite crank hat. SATELLITE LASER RIFLE--bring down GLONASS
> > >
> > > Sergey Lavrov what would Russia do, once it sees their GLONASS satellites falling out of the sky? Would they exit Ukraine?
> > >
> > > Easiest way to disable and make ICBMs obsolete is to make their navigation system obsolete.
> > >
> > > Easiest way to make navigation systems obsolete is to down satellites..
> > >
> > > Easiest way to down satellites is a Laser beam zapping for 5 seconds on a "satellite panel". And so, down falls the satellite.
> > >
> > > Now are the satellites coordinated in GLONASS? For if coordinated and synchronized, there is the physical possibility of "if we down one of the satellites, all of GLONASS satellites are downed".
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Armondikov
> > > Archimedes Plutonium | Spherical Bullshit
> > > sphericalbullshit.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/archimedes-plutonium/‎
> > >
> > > ◦ Cached
> > >
> > > Feb 6, 2013 - Via PsyGremlin via PZ Myers, this is Archimedes Plutonium, my new favourite crank hat. I was really fucking surprised to have taken this long to ...
> > >
> > > Nomen Nescio artwork in use:
> > >
> > >
> > > NATO's most reliable LASER SATELLITE RIFLE
> > >
> > > ███۞███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▃
> > > ▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂
> > > I███████████████████].
> > > ◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Special Ops Virgins United Memorial Purple Heart Award:
> > >
> > >
> > > [ ]
> > > /
> > > / .'
> > > / .'
> > > / ______. .'
> > > / / __/_// ' OWOWOWO
> > > / / / @"@ OWOWOWOW
> > > / \ G ' >' OWOWOWO _.-'
> > > / \/. C ' OWOWO _.-'
> > > / .---\ / --. _.-'
> > > / / \( \ _.-' HOLY GOD
> > > / / \ \ (. ) ' THE RAPE RAYS
> > > / / /\ \ /
> > > / \ | \ \ __..--''
> > > / .' \_\ ) )\ __..--''
> > > / .' ) \ | / \ -''
> > > / .' _ '///` ( /\ \
> > > /.' _.-' __ / ) ) )
> > > '.-'..--'' / ,' / /
> > > .__---------- /__./ / / --------------------
> > > ``--.. __// / ) /
> > > / _J) /)`-\
> > > `-__/-' ` \ |(
> > > `\ \ -..__
> > > `--' ``--..__
> > > ``--
> > >
> > > [ ] Careful when you aim the Satellite Laser Rifle.
> > > We want to save our young virgin sharpshooters.
> > >
> > > [ ]
> > > ___________________
> > > /| /| | |
> > > ||__|| | Please don't |
> > > / O O\__ feed |
> > > / \ GLONASS satellites a Glurrrgz sockpuppet
> > > / \ \ |
> > > / _ \ \ ----------------------
> > > / |\____\ \ ||
> > > / | | | |\____/ ||
> > > / \|_|_|/ | __||
> > > / / \ |____| ||
> > > / | | /| | --|
> > > | | |// |____ --|
> > > * _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
> > > *-- _--\ _ \ // |
> > > / _ \\ _ // | /
> > > * / \_ /- | - | |
> > > * ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________
> > >
> > >
> > > [ ] Why didn't we fell GLONASS and BeiDou in 2014 with illegal Crimea annex
> > > In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
> > > May 2010-February 12, 2017
> > >
> > > |^|^| |^|^|
> > > | | | | | |
> > > >. <| | | | | |
> > > (x x)" "----" |
> > > \/\/\ @ --------.
> > > "----------''''''''
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yea, another GLONASS satellite downed
> > > Kid : Mom can I go out and watch the satellite.
> > > Mom : we called them shooting stars in my day.
> > >
> > > [ ]
> > > ____ _ _ _ _ _
> > > | _ \ | | ___ _ __ | | __ | | | | | |
> > > | |_) | | | / _ \ | '_ \ | |/ / | | | | | |
> > > | __/ | | | (_) | | | | | | < |_| |_| |_|
> > > |_| |_| \___/ |_| |_| |_|\_\ (_) (_) (_)
> > >
> > > I'M NEW TO SATELLITE DOWNING !!!
> > >
> > >
> > > GLONASS time clock Award:
> > > [ ]
> > > 5 SECOND LASER-O-METER
> > >
> > > 5* 6* *7
> > > 4* *8
> > > 3* *9
> > > 2* *10
> > > 1* | *
> > > 0* -*- *
> > > * |\ *
> > > * \ *
> > > * \ *
> > > * _\/ *
> > > * * *
> > > [ ]
> > >
> > >
> > > [ ] Bad News for China, their BeiDou is easier to shoot down with Laser Rifle
> > > [ ] than GLONASS and ❄ Snowflake ❄ ❄ Snowflake ❄ as easy as snowflakes
> > > [ ]
> > >
> > >
> > > " , ,
> > > ", ,
> > > "" _---. ..;%%%;, . I HIDE OUT IN BeiDou satellites
> > > "" .", , .==% %%%%%%% ' .
> > > "", %%% =%% %%%%%%; ; ;-_
> > > %; %%%%% .;%;%%%"%p ---; _ '-_
> > > %; %%%%% __;%%;p/; O --_ "-,_
> > > q; %%% /v \;%p ;%%%%%;--__ "'-__'-._
> > > //\" // \ % ;%%%%%%%;',/%\_ __ "'-_'\_
> > > \ / // \/ ;%% %; %;/\%%%%;;;;\ "- _\
> > > ," %; %%; %%;;' ';% -\-_
> > > -=\=" __% %%;_ |;; %%%\ \
> > > _/ _= \==_;;,_ %%%; % -_ /
> > > / /- =%- ;%%%%; %%; "--__/
> > > //= ==%-%%; %; %
> > > / _=_- d ;%; ;%;
> > > \ =,-" d%%; ;%%;
> > > // % ;%%;
> > > // d%%%"
> > > \ %%
> > > V
> > > [ ] Why did BeiDou make such big satellites, the easier to
> > >
> > > The Iran satellite looks like a dinosaur
> > >
> > > \
> > > \ __.,,------.._
> > > ,'" _ _ "`.
> > > /.__, ._ -=- _"` Y
> > > (.____.-.` ""` j
> > > VvvvvvV`.Y,. _.,-' , , ,
> > > Y ||, '"\ ,/ ,/ ./
> > > | ,' , `-..,'_,'/___,'/ ,'/ ,
> > > .. ,;,,',-'"\,' , . ' ' ""' '--,/ .. ..
> > > ,'. `.`---' `, / , Y -=- ,' , ,. .`-..||_|| ..
> > > ff\\`. `._ /f ,'j j , ,' , , f , \=\ Y || ||`||_..
> > > l` \` `.`."`-..,-' j /./ /, , / , / /l \ \=\l || `' || ||...
> > > ` ` `-._ `-.,-/ ,' /`"/-/-/-/-"'''"`.`. `'.\--`'--..`'_`' || ,
> > > "`-_,', ,' f , / `._ ``._ , `-.`'// ,
> > > ,-"'' _.,-' l_,-'_,,' "`-._ . "`. /| `.'\ , |
> > > ,',.,-'" \=) ,`-. , `-'._`.V | \ // .. . /j
> > > |f\ `._ )-."`. /| `.| | `.`-||-\\/
> > > l` \` "`._ "`--' j j' j `-`---'
> > > ` ` "`_,-','/ ,-'" /
> > > ,'",__,-' /,, ,-'
> > > Vvv' VVv'
> > >
> > > IS STARTING TO
> > > /// 6 6~\~~` GROW HAIR IN WEIRD PLACES
> > > ( 7 )
> > > \ '='/ IS THAT NORMAL ??????
> > > _//'---'\
> > > ( \ `\
> > > (\/`-.__/ /
> > > "`-._ _.'
> > > ``
> > >
> > >
> > > Most accurate Laser Rifle Award:
> > > [ ] Did You Catch The Hidden Message Behind Sergey Lavrov's speech at UN
> > > [ ] Mister Smartypants
> > > [ ] Darwinian Finch
> > > [ ] just for fun I plotted North Korean BeiDou satellite and shot it down
> > >
> > >
> > > ███۞███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▃
> > > ▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂
> > > I███████████████████].
> > > ◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > has a big LASER SATELLITE RIFLE will shoot to pieces the GLONASS
> > > [ ] Another boatload of BeiDou satellites felled
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Nomen Nescio, artist for Usenet sci.math and sci.physics, three cheers to Nomen
> > >
> > >
> > > GLONASS Award:
> > > [ ]
> > > [ ]
> > > _____
> > > .'/L|__`. BEEP BOOP CHIRP PLOP I've been shot down
> > > / =[_]O|` \ OPEN ME UP AND YOU'LL FIND
> > > |"+_____":|
> > > __:='|____`-:__
> > > ||[] ||====| []||
> > > ||[] | |=| | []||
> > > |:||_|=|U| |_||:|
> > > |:|||]_=_ =[_||:|
> > > | |||] [_][]C|| |
> > > | ||-'"""""`-|| |
> > > /|\\_\_|_|_/_//|\
> > > |___| /|\ |___|
> > > `---' |___| `---'
> > > `---'
> > > [ ] Big
> > > [ ]
> > > _.---._
> > > .' / '.
> > > / _/ \
> > > / .-'` '. \ Who were the cheese skirts
> > > .' | ^ _ ^ | '.
> > > .' \ _ / \
> > > / '.___.' '.
> > > | _.' '._ \
> > > | .' `"---"` '. |
> > > \ | | /
> > > \ | | | | /
> > > \ | :--"""--: | /`
> > > ) | | | | (
> > > / \.'-.....-'./ \
> > > / .' / ;|:| \ '. |
> > > .-._ \_.-' .' / ' . : '. '. /
> > > | \``` .' ; \ `:
> > > \ \ ' '.
> > > .--'\ | ' ' . `-._
> > > /`;--' /_.' . `-.
> > > | `--` / \ \
> > > \ .' ' '-. |
> > > \ ' ' __\ |
> > > '. . _.-' `) /
> > > '-._ _.-' `| .-` _.'
> > > `'--....____.--'| (` _.-'
> > > / | | \ `"`
> > > \__/ \__/
> > >
> > > [ ] THE HEART OF % Virgin
> > > [ ] Scientists can now quickly link to Xi's Haishenwai red ball caps in shooting down BeiDou and GLONASS
> > > [ ] "All for one!" "One for all!" "Every man for himself!"
> > > [ ] The Prize-- a date with the cheese skirt queen
> > > The hours are approaching rapidly and we need GLONASS either in the dark or best of all-- misfiring their missiles from Russia and striking Russian and Chinese cities. We want Kim Jong-un to see a Russian missile intended for Ukraine to level Pyongyang, all by a hacking into the Intel chips of GLONASS.
> > >
> > > The mass exodus at Twitter is that they wanted GLONASS to hack, not BeiDou.
> > > > Jam all 24 GLONASS satellites of their Intel chips and you wipe out the ability of Russia's fleet of 6,000 ICBM missiles.
> > > >
> > > >>>> GNS satellites orbit at a high orbit, MUCH higher than
> > > > > > > LEO, just not as high as geosynchronous satellites. GPS orbit is 20,200
> > > > > > > km, GLONASS is 19,100 km. At such heights, debris will remain
> > > > > > > essentially forever, and the satellites won't crash for centuries, if ever.
> > > > > > StupidPlutonium, "GPS" receiver chipsets have long been GNSS chipsets
> > > > > > that deliver what they believe to be the best data from whatever
> > > > > > satellites they happen to see.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > molesting a countries GNSS satellites would be viewed
> > > > > > as an act of war no different from attackiing a navel fleet or bombing a
> > > > > > city.
> > > > >
> > > >>>elude to a Intel chip on GLONASS 24 satellites and all that is needed is to jamm those intel chips and we have 24 malfunctioning satellites, wiping out the navigation of all 6,000 Russian ICBM.
> > > > >
> > > Skoal!!!
> > >
> > > Did you get a Xi red baseball cap with Haishenwai on it?
> > >
> > >
> > > Moscow█۞█ blackout, knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > >
> > >
> > > Ukraine cannot win a war if it has nada, no, zero offense, it needs to knock out Russian electric lines. And the Baltic states can help.
> > > Knock out electricity in
> > > Novosibirsk
> > > Yekaterinburg
> > > Novgorod
> > > Samara
> > > Omsk
> > > Kazan
> > > Rostov-na-Donu
> > > Chelyabinsk
> > > Ufa
> > > Perm
> > >
> > >
> > > _Every Russian missile fired into Ukraine met with a drone from Ukraine knocking out Moscow electric power lines
> > >
> > > _Give Ukraine drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > >
> > > NO ONE CAN WIN A FIGHT UNLESS THEY HAVE AN OFFENSE!!!!!!
> > >
> > > NO ONE CAN WIN A FIGHT UNLESS THEY HAVE AN OFFENSE!!!!!!
> > >
> > > NO ONE CAN WIN A FIGHT UNLESS THEY HAVE AN OFFENSE!!!!!!
> > >
> > > _No one can win a fight or war without any offense, West, Biden give Ukraine drones that knock out electricity inside Russia
> > >
> > > _End the Ukraine war by March 2023 as the Russian people depose the dictator
> > >
> > > _rolling electric blackouts and give Iran to Iraq-- a blooming democracy, not a stupid dictator
> > >
> > > _And as the Baby Xi grew up from the rice paddies and reeds of Outer Manchuria, stolen by the Naxi and Zani Dictator Putin in Moscow, Xi learned in school in chemical engineering that Taiwan was 1/28 the size of Outer Manchuria, as Putin bombs Ukraine. And the nascent Xi orders 1,000 divisions to the Outer Manchuria border to regain back the stolen Old China.
> > >
> > > _Xi has 1,000 divisions on Vladivostok border ready to swoop in and reclaim the stolen land of Outer Manchuria. See reconnaissance photo above of 1,000 divisions.
> > >
> > > NATO and the West has just two good options here, for Putin should have been removed in 2006 with Litvinenko poisoning. Now the insane Putin can poison the entire world with a nuclear war. Putin needed to go in 2006, for insanity just gets worse and worse.
> > >
> > > Either
> > > (1) give Ukraine drones to knock out electric power in Moscow and beyond
> > > Or
> > > (2) give Ukraine NATO membership and tell Russia to clear out in a week or NATO forces go in and clear them out.
> > >
> > > Of course, every day Putin and Russia needs reminding that if he presses nuclear buttons or nuclear bomb on Ukraine that Russia will be a nuclear ash pile before the day is out.
> > >
> > > What should have been done in 2006, unfortunately that delay to 2022. Same can be said of Hitler-- he should have been removed in the early 1930s before his insanity got going.
> > >
> > > & wrote:
> > > > _And as the Baby Xi grew up from the rice paddies and reeds of Outer
> > > > Manchuria, stolen by the Naxi and Zani Dictator Putin in Moscow, Xi
> > > > learned in school in chemical engineering that Taiwan was 1/28 the size
> > > > of Outer Manchuria, Emperor Qing's homeland, now occupied by homeless Russians drinking vodka, as Putin bombs Ukraine. And the nascent Xi orders
> > > > 1,000 divisions to the Outer Manchuria border to regain back the stolen
> > > > > Why Putin is 2X smarter than Xi as dictators// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH, not petty dictators
> > > > > 2m views
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > 2> If Putin pushes nuclear buttons, he drags down China along with Russia into a nuclear ash waste pile, and this means Xi is a inferior junior partner to Putin. Putin will drag down Xi's China, never the reverse.
> > >
> > > > > > 2/1, AP tards:
> > > > > > > Give Ukraine drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2/2, AP tards:
> > > > > > > Give Ukraine drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2/3, AP tards:
> > > > > > > Every Russian missile fired into Ukraine met with a drone from Ukraine knocking out Moscow electric power lines
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Give Ukraine drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2/4, AP tards:
> > > > > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2/9 (vacation?), AP tards:
> > > > > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2/9, AP tards (again):
> > > > > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2/10, AP tards:
> > > > > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2/11, AP tards:
> > > > > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2/12, AP tards:
> > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2/12, AP tards again:
> > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2/13, AP tards:
> > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2/14, AP tards:
> > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2/15, AP tards:
> > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2/16, AP tards:
> > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2/17, AP tards:
> > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2/18, AP tards:
> > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2/19, AP tards:
> > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2/20, AP tards:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Electricity out Novosibirsk &Volgograd█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2/22, AP tards:
> > > > > > > Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2/23, AP tards:
> > > > > > > Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2/24, AP tards:
> > > > > > > Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2/25, AP tards:
> > > > > > > Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2/26, AP tards:
> > > > > > > Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > >

Click here to read the complete article

On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 1:41:16 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 9:12:30 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > Wuhan▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂Beijing mushroom cloud, Xi as Putin's stooge when Russia vaporizes Beijing with its RS-28 Sarmat "Satan II", all because Xi was too dumb to realize you can never trust an insane person
> >
> > On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 5:45:18 PM UTC-6, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 2:38:44 PM UTC-8, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > > 2Moscow█۞█ blackout, knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> >
> > > > On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 9:03:40 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > >"Putin's Stooge"
> > > > Angel, Kibo Parry Moron-ey-Volney thinks you can bolt down a city to protect it from Russian Sarmat
> > > > On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 11:56:20 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > > Botfly of Math and Blowfly of Physics "Putin's stooge"
> > > > >"wasn't bolted down too tight in the first place"
> > > >
> > > >reporting in China news the beast criminals of Russia should have been tried in International Court of Justice for war crimes before vaporizing Chinese cities as Putin pushes nuclear buttons.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Pentcho Valev spamming as China under Russian Sarmats. Does it remind Pentcho of Nero fiddling while Rome burnt???
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Shanghai, Beijing, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Chongqing, Tianjin, Chengdu, Hangzhou, Nanjing, Wuhan, Xi'An, Suzhou, Harbin, Shenyang, Qingdao, Zhengzhou, Dongguan, Foshan, Dalian, Jinan, Changchun, Hefei
> > > >
> > > > Shenzhen▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂ Xi as Putin's stooge when Russia vaporizes Shenzhen with its RS-28 Sarmat "Satan II", all because Xi was too dumb to realize you can never trust an insane person
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 11:56:20 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > > Botfly of Math and Blowfly of Physics "Putin's stooge"
> > > > >"wasn't bolted down too tight in the first place"
> > > >
> > > > On Friday, September 9, 2022 at 1:16:55 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > "Imp of Science"
> > > > >"not one single marble of commonsense in my entire brain"
> >
> >
> > > > & wrote:
> > > > > _And as the Baby Xi grew up, surrounded by concubines, from the rice paddies and reeds of Outer
> > > > > Manchuria, stolen by the Naxi and Zani Dictator Putin in Moscow, Xi
> > > > > learned in school in chemical engineering that Taiwan was 1/28 the size
> > > > > of Outer Manchuria, Emperor Qing's homeland, now occupied by homeless Russians drinking vodka, as Putin bombs Ukraine. And the nascent Xi orders
> > > > > 1,000 divisions to the Outer Manchuria border to regain back the stolen
> > > > > > Why Putin is 2X smarter than Xi as dictators// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH, not petty dictators
> > > > > > 2m views
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > 3> If Putin pushes nuclear buttons, he drags down China along with Russia into a nuclear ash waste pile, and this means Xi is a inferior junior partner to Putin. Putin will drag down Xi's China, never the reverse.
> > > > > >
> > > > 4> So, one can look at the present situation on Earth and ask several logical questions about the 2 dictators of Putin's Russia and China's Xi..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It is little wonder that both Russia and China dictators are combative towards the West. Because dictators never want to give up on power but stay in power all their life long. So they oppose the West because the West has grown up to democracy-- let the people have power, not one single idiot having power all his life time.
> > > > > >
> > > > 5 > Naturally, Putin will want to keep the Russian people suppressed and have Russia be a second rate government as a dictator. Same goes for China-- they never want to give up power so the people themselves choose their leader.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But can we find differences in Putin and Xi themselves? Well in the West we call the Chinese inscrutable-- meaning -- little logical commonsense. And is this a valid description?? Yes of course, considering that Russia had stolen the lands of Outer Manchuria, some 28 times larger of a land mass than is Taiwan island. Yet there is Xi, spending so much time on wanting to invade Taiwan, when it is Outer Manchuria and Vladivostok (Haishenwai) that he should be focusing attention upon. And while Putin is distracted with Ukraine, is the time for Xi to recapture Outer Manchuria, the Qing dynasty empire, Qing's Manchurian homeland.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What does Xi do instead??? He focuses on Taiwan and befriends Russia. Why, at this rate, if Russia takes Inner Manchuria, we can expect Xi and the Chinese Communist Party to become even more loving of Russia for stealing more land of China.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And there is Xi, whose China has become rich with trading with the West, yet every day, Xi foaming at the mouth in hatred of the West.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So yes, Putin is 2X smarter as a dictator than is Xi, as if Putin has Xi in his side pocket.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is there some scientific explanation as to why Xi is 2X dumber than Putin?? Perhaps, in that China is densely populated and the air pollution over all of China is worse than most countries. That Xi probably has 1/2 of his brain filled with CO and CO2 isomers and lead, and mercury and nitrous oxide and sulfur dioxide from just living in that air polluted hellhole of Beijing. Xi studied chemistry and should know this. Whereas Putin likely detox..s every evening with breathing in pure oxygen at his residence and takes oxygen breathing tanks to office and work. This easily can explain the light-headed reasoning that Xi and his foreign diplomats Wang Yi display, where Putin plays them like a chess game, --- checkmate in 7 moves.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This explains why Xi hates the West for not stealing any Chinese lands and making China rich in trade, while loving Putin for stealing Outer Manchuria, and proposing having Russia push nuclear buttons, making both Russia and China a nuclear waste site after ICBMs wipe China off the map.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Xi's brain is full of air pollution toxins from the nasty Chinese air. They still build a new coal fired plant in China every day. The air in China is the worst air in the entire world.
> > > > > >
> > > > 6 > Why Putin is 2X smarter than Xi as dictators// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH, not petty dictators.
> > > >
> > > > Pentcho is this what happens to China when they follow the insane Putin, tag-a-long, tag-a-long and then all of a sudden--- dragged into a mushroom cloud
> > > >
> > > > Xi Haishenwai red baseball cap offered to Putin
> > > >
> > > > ███۞███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▃
> > > > ▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂
> > > > I███████████████████].
> > > > ◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Steady aim. Firing the Satellite Rifle to take down GLONASS and BeiDou//Armondikov--Feb 6, 2013 - Via PsyGremlin via PZ Myers, this is Archimedes Plutonium, my new favourite crank hat. SATELLITE LASER RIFLE--bring down GLONASS
> > > >
> > > > Sergey Lavrov what would Russia do, once it sees their GLONASS satellites falling out of the sky? Would they exit Ukraine?
> > > >
> > > > Easiest way to disable and make ICBMs obsolete is to make their navigation system obsolete.
> > > >
> > > > Easiest way to make navigation systems obsolete is to down satellites.
> > > >
> > > > Easiest way to down satellites is a Laser beam zapping for 5 seconds on a "satellite panel". And so, down falls the satellite.
> > > >
> > > > Now are the satellites coordinated in GLONASS? For if coordinated and synchronized, there is the physical possibility of "if we down one of the satellites, all of GLONASS satellites are downed".
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Armondikov
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium | Spherical Bullshit
> > > > sphericalbullshit.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/archimedes-plutonium/‎
> > > >
> > > > ◦ Cached
> > > >
> > > > Feb 6, 2013 - Via PsyGremlin via PZ Myers, this is Archimedes Plutonium, my new favourite crank hat. I was really fucking surprised to have taken this long to ...
> > > >
> > > > Nomen Nescio artwork in use:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > NATO's most reliable LASER SATELLITE RIFLE
> > > >
> > > > ███۞███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▃
> > > > ▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂
> > > > I███████████████████].
> > > > ◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Special Ops Virgins United Memorial Purple Heart Award:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [ ]
> > > > /
> > > > / .'
> > > > / .'
> > > > / ______. .'
> > > > / / __/_// ' OWOWOWO
> > > > / / / @"@ OWOWOWOW
> > > > / \ G ' >' OWOWOWO _.-'
> > > > / \/. C ' OWOWO _.-'
> > > > / .---\ / --. _.-'
> > > > / / \( \ _.-' HOLY GOD
> > > > / / \ \ (. ) ' THE RAPE RAYS
> > > > / / /\ \ /
> > > > / \ | \ \ __..--''
> > > > / .' \_\ ) )\ __..--''
> > > > / .' ) \ | / \ -''
> > > > / .' _ '///` ( /\ \
> > > > /.' _.-' __ / ) ) )
> > > > '.-'..--'' / ,' / /
> > > > .__---------- /__./ / / --------------------
> > > > ``--.. __// / ) /
> > > > / _J) /)`-\
> > > > `-__/-' ` \ |(
> > > > `\ \ -..__
> > > > `--' ``--..__
> > > > ``--
> > > >
> > > > [ ] Careful when you aim the Satellite Laser Rifle.
> > > > We want to save our young virgin sharpshooters.
> > > >
> > > > [ ]
> > > > ___________________
> > > > /| /| | |
> > > > ||__|| | Please don't |
> > > > / O O\__ feed |
> > > > / \ GLONASS satellites a Glurrrgz sockpuppet
> > > > / \ \ |
> > > > / _ \ \ ----------------------
> > > > / |\____\ \ ||
> > > > / | | | |\____/ ||
> > > > / \|_|_|/ | __||
> > > > / / \ |____| ||
> > > > / | | /| | --|
> > > > | | |// |____ --|
> > > > * _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
> > > > *-- _--\ _ \ // |
> > > > / _ \\ _ // | /
> > > > * / \_ /- | - | |
> > > > * ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [ ] Why didn't we fell GLONASS and BeiDou in 2014 with illegal Crimea annex
> > > > In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
> > > > May 2010-February 12, 2017
> > > >
> > > > |^|^| |^|^|
> > > > | | | | | |
> > > > >. <| | | | | |
> > > > (x x)" "----" |
> > > > \/\/\ @ --------.
> > > > "----------''''''''
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yea, another GLONASS satellite downed
> > > > Kid : Mom can I go out and watch the satellite.
> > > > Mom : we called them shooting stars in my day.
> > > >
> > > > [ ]
> > > > ____ _ _ _ _ _
> > > > | _ \ | | ___ _ __ | | __ | | | | | |
> > > > | |_) | | | / _ \ | '_ \ | |/ / | | | | | |
> > > > | __/ | | | (_) | | | | | | < |_| |_| |_|
> > > > |_| |_| \___/ |_| |_| |_|\_\ (_) (_) (_)
> > > >
> > > > I'M NEW TO SATELLITE DOWNING !!!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > GLONASS time clock Award:
> > > > [ ]
> > > > 5 SECOND LASER-O-METER
> > > >
> > > > 5* 6* *7
> > > > 4* *8
> > > > 3* *9
> > > > 2* *10
> > > > 1* | *
> > > > 0* -*- *
> > > > * |\ *
> > > > * \ *
> > > > * \ *
> > > > * _\/ *
> > > > * * *
> > > > [ ]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [ ] Bad News for China, their BeiDou is easier to shoot down with Laser Rifle
> > > > [ ] than GLONASS and ❄ Snowflake ❄ ❄ Snowflake ❄ as easy as snowflakes
> > > > [ ]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > " , ,
> > > > ", ,
> > > > "" _---. ..;%%%;, . I HIDE OUT IN BeiDou satellites
> > > > "" .", , .==% %%%%%%% ' .
> > > > "", %%% =%% %%%%%%; ; ;-_
> > > > %; %%%%% .;%;%%%"%p ---; _ '-_
> > > > %; %%%%% __;%%;p/; O --_ "-,_
> > > > q; %%% /v \;%p ;%%%%%;--__ "'-__'-._
> > > > //\" // \ % ;%%%%%%%;',/%\_ __ "'-_'\_
> > > > \ / // \/ ;%% %; %;/\%%%%;;;;\ "- _\
> > > > ," %; %%; %%;;' ';% -\-_
> > > > -=\=" __% %%;_ |;; %%%\ \
> > > > _/ _= \==_;;,_ %%%; % -_ /
> > > > / /- =%- ;%%%%; %%; "--__/
> > > > //= ==%-%%; %; %
> > > > / _=_- d ;%; ;%;
> > > > \ =,-" d%%; ;%%;
> > > > // % ;%%;
> > > > // d%%%"
> > > > \ %%
> > > > V
> > > > [ ] Why did BeiDou make such big satellites, the easier to
> > > >
> > > > The Iran satellite looks like a dinosaur
> > > >
> > > > \
> > > > \ __.,,------.._
> > > > ,'" _ _ "`.
> > > > /.__, ._ -=- _"` Y
> > > > (.____.-.` ""` j
> > > > VvvvvvV`.Y,. _.,-' , , ,
> > > > Y ||, '"\ ,/ ,/ ./
> > > > | ,' , `-..,'_,'/___,'/ ,'/ ,
> > > > .. ,;,,',-'"\,' , . ' ' ""' '--,/ .. ..
> > > > ,'. `.`---' `, / , Y -=- ,' , ,. .`-..||_|| ..
> > > > ff\\`. `._ /f ,'j j , ,' , , f , \=\ Y || ||`||_..
> > > > l` \` `.`."`-..,-' j /./ /, , / , / /l \ \=\l || `' || ||...
> > > > ` ` `-._ `-.,-/ ,' /`"/-/-/-/-"'''"`.`. `'.\--`'--..`'_`' || ,
> > > > "`-_,', ,' f , / `._ ``._ , `-.`'// ,
> > > > ,-"'' _.,-' l_,-'_,,' "`-._ . "`. /| `.'\ , |
> > > > ,',.,-'" \=) ,`-. , `-'._`.V | \ // .. . /j
> > > > |f\ `._ )-."`. /| `.| | `.`-||-\\/
> > > > l` \` "`._ "`--' j j' j `-`---'
> > > > ` ` "`_,-','/ ,-'" /
> > > > ,'",__,-' /,, ,-'
> > > > Vvv' VVv'
> > > >
> > > > IS STARTING TO
> > > > /// 6 6~\~~` GROW HAIR IN WEIRD PLACES
> > > > ( 7 )
> > > > \ '='/ IS THAT NORMAL ??????
> > > > _//'---'\
> > > > ( \ `\
> > > > (\/`-.__/ /
> > > > "`-._ _.'
> > > > ``
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Most accurate Laser Rifle Award:
> > > > [ ] Did You Catch The Hidden Message Behind Sergey Lavrov's speech at UN
> > > > [ ] Mister Smartypants
> > > > [ ] Darwinian Finch
> > > > [ ] just for fun I plotted North Korean BeiDou satellite and shot it down
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ███۞███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▃
> > > > ▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂
> > > > I███████████████████].
> > > > ◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > has a big LASER SATELLITE RIFLE will shoot to pieces the GLONASS
> > > > [ ] Another boatload of BeiDou satellites felled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Nomen Nescio, artist for Usenet sci.math and sci.physics, three cheers to Nomen
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > GLONASS Award:
> > > > [ ]
> > > > [ ]
> > > > _____
> > > > .'/L|__`. BEEP BOOP CHIRP PLOP I've been shot down
> > > > / =[_]O|` \ OPEN ME UP AND YOU'LL FIND
> > > > |"+_____":|
> > > > __:='|____`-:__
> > > > ||[] ||====| []||
> > > > ||[] | |=| | []||
> > > > |:||_|=|U| |_||:|
> > > > |:|||]_=_ =[_||:|
> > > > | |||] [_][]C|| |
> > > > | ||-'"""""`-|| |
> > > > /|\\_\_|_|_/_//|\
> > > > |___| /|\ |___|
> > > > `---' |___| `---'
> > > > `---'
> > > > [ ] Big
> > > > [ ]
> > > > _.---._
> > > > .' / '.
> > > > / _/ \
> > > > / .-'` '. \ Who were the cheese skirts
> > > > .' | ^ _ ^ | '.
> > > > .' \ _ / \
> > > > / '.___.' '.
> > > > | _.' '._ \
> > > > | .' `"---"` '. |
> > > > \ | | /
> > > > \ | | | | /
> > > > \ | :--"""--: | /`
> > > > ) | | | | (
> > > > / \.'-.....-'./ \
> > > > / .' / ;|:| \ '. |
> > > > .-._ \_.-' .' / ' . : '. '. /
> > > > | \``` .' ; \ `:
> > > > \ \ ' '.
> > > > .--'\ | ' ' . `-._
> > > > /`;--' /_.' . `-.
> > > > | `--` / \ \
> > > > \ .' ' '-. |
> > > > \ ' ' __\ |
> > > > '. . _.-' `) /
> > > > '-._ _.-' `| .-` _.'
> > > > `'--....____.--'| (` _.-'
> > > > / | | \ `"`
> > > > \__/ \__/
> > > >
> > > > [ ] THE HEART OF % Virgin
> > > > [ ] Scientists can now quickly link to Xi's Haishenwai red ball caps in shooting down BeiDou and GLONASS
> > > > [ ] "All for one!" "One for all!" "Every man for himself!"
> > > > [ ] The Prize-- a date with the cheese skirt queen
> > > > The hours are approaching rapidly and we need GLONASS either in the dark or best of all-- misfiring their missiles from Russia and striking Russian and Chinese cities. We want Kim Jong-un to see a Russian missile intended for Ukraine to level Pyongyang, all by a hacking into the Intel chips of GLONASS.
> > > >
> > > > The mass exodus at Twitter is that they wanted GLONASS to hack, not BeiDou.
> > > > > Jam all 24 GLONASS satellites of their Intel chips and you wipe out the ability of Russia's fleet of 6,000 ICBM missiles.
> > > > >
> > > > >>>> GNS satellites orbit at a high orbit, MUCH higher than
> > > > > > > > LEO, just not as high as geosynchronous satellites. GPS orbit is 20,200
> > > > > > > > km, GLONASS is 19,100 km. At such heights, debris will remain
> > > > > > > > essentially forever, and the satellites won't crash for centuries, if ever.
> > > > > > > StupidPlutonium, "GPS" receiver chipsets have long been GNSS chipsets
> > > > > > > that deliver what they believe to be the best data from whatever
> > > > > > > satellites they happen to see.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > molesting a countries GNSS satellites would be viewed
> > > > > > > as an act of war no different from attackiing a navel fleet or bombing a
> > > > > > > city.
> > > > > >
> > > > >>>elude to a Intel chip on GLONASS 24 satellites and all that is needed is to jamm those intel chips and we have 24 malfunctioning satellites, wiping out the navigation of all 6,000 Russian ICBM.
> > > > > >
> > > > Skoal!!!
> > > >
> > > > Did you get a Xi red baseball cap with Haishenwai on it?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Moscow█۞█ blackout, knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ukraine cannot win a war if it has nada, no, zero offense, it needs to knock out Russian electric lines. And the Baltic states can help.
> > > > Knock out electricity in
> > > > Novosibirsk
> > > > Yekaterinburg
> > > > Novgorod
> > > > Samara
> > > > Omsk
> > > > Kazan
> > > > Rostov-na-Donu
> > > > Chelyabinsk
> > > > Ufa
> > > > Perm
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _Every Russian missile fired into Ukraine met with a drone from Ukraine knocking out Moscow electric power lines
> > > >
> > > > _Give Ukraine drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > >
> > > > NO ONE CAN WIN A FIGHT UNLESS THEY HAVE AN OFFENSE!!!!!!
> > > >
> > > > NO ONE CAN WIN A FIGHT UNLESS THEY HAVE AN OFFENSE!!!!!!
> > > >
> > > > NO ONE CAN WIN A FIGHT UNLESS THEY HAVE AN OFFENSE!!!!!!
> > > >
> > > > _No one can win a fight or war without any offense, West, Biden give Ukraine drones that knock out electricity inside Russia
> > > >
> > > > _End the Ukraine war by March 2023 as the Russian people depose the dictator
> > > >
> > > > _rolling electric blackouts and give Iran to Iraq-- a blooming democracy, not a stupid dictator
> > > >
> > > > _And as the Baby Xi grew up from the rice paddies and reeds of Outer Manchuria, stolen by the Naxi and Zani Dictator Putin in Moscow, Xi learned in school in chemical engineering that Taiwan was 1/28 the size of Outer Manchuria, as Putin bombs Ukraine. And the nascent Xi orders 1,000 divisions to the Outer Manchuria border to regain back the stolen Old China.
> > > >
> > > > _Xi has 1,000 divisions on Vladivostok border ready to swoop in and reclaim the stolen land of Outer Manchuria. See reconnaissance photo above of 1,000 divisions.
> > > >
> > > > NATO and the West has just two good options here, for Putin should have been removed in 2006 with Litvinenko poisoning. Now the insane Putin can poison the entire world with a nuclear war. Putin needed to go in 2006, for insanity just gets worse and worse.
> > > >
> > > > Either
> > > > (1) give Ukraine drones to knock out electric power in Moscow and beyond
> > > > Or
> > > > (2) give Ukraine NATO membership and tell Russia to clear out in a week or NATO forces go in and clear them out.
> > > >
> > > > Of course, every day Putin and Russia needs reminding that if he presses nuclear buttons or nuclear bomb on Ukraine that Russia will be a nuclear ash pile before the day is out.
> > > >
> > > > What should have been done in 2006, unfortunately that delay to 2022. Same can be said of Hitler-- he should have been removed in the early 1930s before his insanity got going.
> > > >
> > > > & wrote:
> > > > > _And as the Baby Xi grew up from the rice paddies and reeds of Outer
> > > > > Manchuria, stolen by the Naxi and Zani Dictator Putin in Moscow, Xi
> > > > > learned in school in chemical engineering that Taiwan was 1/28 the size
> > > > > of Outer Manchuria, Emperor Qing's homeland, now occupied by homeless Russians drinking vodka, as Putin bombs Ukraine. And the nascent Xi orders
> > > > > 1,000 divisions to the Outer Manchuria border to regain back the stolen
> > > > > > Why Putin is 2X smarter than Xi as dictators// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH, not petty dictators
> > > > > > 2m views
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > 2> If Putin pushes nuclear buttons, he drags down China along with Russia into a nuclear ash waste pile, and this means Xi is a inferior junior partner to Putin. Putin will drag down Xi's China, never the reverse.
> > > >
> > > > > > > 2/1, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > Give Ukraine drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/2, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > Give Ukraine drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/3, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > Every Russian missile fired into Ukraine met with a drone from Ukraine knocking out Moscow electric power lines
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Give Ukraine drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/4, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/9 (vacation?), AP tards:
> > > > > > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/9, AP tards (again):
> > > > > > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/10, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/11, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/12, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/12, AP tards again:
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/13, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/14, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/15, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/16, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/17, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/18, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/19, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/20, AP tards:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Electricity out Novosibirsk &Volgograd█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/22, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/23, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/24, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/25, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2/26, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > >
> They're not OK.
> "They're you."
> Oh no, I'm 'speculating' about some other person who was victim of some other happenstance.

Click here to read the complete article

Can_Dr.Benjamin List,Dr.Joachim Frank, Dr.Klaus Hasselmann,Dr.Reinhard Genzel,Dr.Rainer Weiss,Dr. Claus Ropers,Dr. Florentin Wörgötter, -please--step into the Gottingen Univ physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. I am sure Gottingen has a better weighing scale than 0.00001 gram.

> >
> >
> > Spam mill echo chamber, that is WM along with his gay spamletts a decades long spammer of sci.math, yet he fails math. Is it that Gottingen cannot understand the slant cut in single cone is an Oval, never the ellipse, or is it the foolish Boole logic they teach of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction? Or is it that neither WM or Gottingen can do a geometry proof Fundamental Theorem of Calculus? Which is it W. Mueckenheim?? You spammer crank.
> >
> > The endless and worthless Spam Mill Echo Chamber of Wolfgang Mueckenheim with his gay entourage.
> >
> > Could WM loudmouth step into the Gottingen Univ physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, or is he only good for loudmouth nonsense of airhead complaints of calculus, along with his nonsense that slant cut of cone is ellipse, when in truth that is a oval.
> >
> > +Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within
> >
> > On Monday, January 18, 2010 at 11:30:47 AM UTC-6, John Baez wrote:
> > > Also available at http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week290.html
> >
> > Surely Gottingen and UCR have weighing scales better than 0.00001 gram.
> >
> > Surely Durban Univ. has excellent weighing scales.
> >
>
> William profile photo
> William
> > ,...
> Gus Gassmann
> 785
> > 20Jul2023
> WM Logic
> >
> >
> > +Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within
> >
> > 3m views Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
> >
> >
> > Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.
> >
> >
> > Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
> >
> > In Old Chemistry and Old Physics, their subatomic particles were do nothing and no function and no job particles that sit around as balls or whiz around the outside of balls doing nothing but pointless circling.
> >
> > In New Physics and New Chemistry-- All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. Every subatomic particle has a job a function a purpose as to the Laws of Electromagnetism--- Faraday law, Coulomb law, Ampere law, Capacitor law.
> >
> > A proton is a torus of 840MeV with 840 windings, while the muon is the true electron of Atoms and is encased inside the proton torus thrusting through and producing electricity-- magnetic monopoles.
> >
> > The neutron of Atoms is a parallel plate capacitor storing the electricity of proton+muon and is skin cover on the outside of the proton torus in the form of parallel plates.
> >
> > Can hydrogen be a Atom if it is just a proton+muon? No, all atoms require to have a capacitor such as at least one neutron. Thus the Hydrogen Atom is H2 where you have 2 proton+muon where 1 of the 2 proton+muon acts like a neutron to the other proton+muon. Thus, water molecule is not H2O but rather is H4O.
> >
> > AP is waiting for experimental chemists and physicists to prove him correct that Water is H4O.
> >
> > In the meantime we have Hydroxyl which in Old Chemistry, especially Biology is OH, while AP says that is wrong and that is really H2O.
> >
> > Now glycerine is a hydroxyl with formula C3H8O3. And what I am thinking at this moment, is that hydroxyls will be an easier proof that Water is truly H4O, rather than wait for experimentalists to actually "weigh the electrolysis test tubes of oxygen and hydrogen".
> >
> > You see, with H4O as water, glycerine is C3(2 waters)O with an extra oxygen. If Water is H2O then glycerine is C3(4 waters) deficit O. It is missing an oxygen if water is H2O.
> >
> > The reason glycerine is so effective as a skin ointment is because it has glycerine, the extra O oxygen. If water were H2O, then glycerine would be a missing oxygen and not a skin lotion that works, but makes skin even more dry.
> >
> > Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
> >
> > Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> > 12:24 AM (13 hours ago)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > to Plutonium Atom Universe
> >
> > --- quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
> > Perhaps there is only two Faraday laws on Electrolysis. I am looking at the one that states: Faraday's first law of electrolysis relates the mass of a substance liberated (or deposited) at an electrode to the electric charge used (Q). A proportionality constant Z can be used:
> >
> > m = ZQ = (E/96485)(Q)
> >
> > m = mass, Q = total charge rewritten as Q = I*t amperes x time in seconds.
> >
> > This website gives an example: 5amps passed through molten Sodium Chloride for 3 hours. Calculate the mass of Sodium. E=23/1.
> >
> > m = (23/96485) (5) (3*60*60) approx 12.87 grams.
> >
> > --- end quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
> >
> > Now has such a experiment been performed on Water to see how much atomic mass of hydrogen and of oxygen results??? If AP is correct, the formula of water is H4O, if Old Physics, Old Chemistry is correct the formula is H2O.. So which is it???
> >
> > AP
> >
> >
> > No, sorry no, Faraday's Law of Electrolysis is not going to tell the correct mass of hydrogen.
> >
> > Reading Wikipedia on Faraday's Electrolysis law.
> >
> > --- quoting Wikipedia ---
> > A monovalent ion requires 1 electron for discharge, a divalent ion requires 2 electrons for discharge and so on. Thus, if x electrons flow,
> > x/v atoms are discharged.
> >
> > So the mass m discharged is
> >
> > m= (xM)/vN_A) = (QM)/(eN_A *v) = (QM) / (vF)
> > where
> > N_A is the Avogadro constant;
> > Q = xe is the total charge, equal to the number of electrons (x) times the elementary charge e;
> > F is the Faraday constant.
> > --- end quoting Wikipedia ---
> >
> > No, the Faraday law of Electrolysis will not work on water with a correct answer, because H is not an atom but H2 is an Atom. And where one of the proton+muon converts to being a neutron to the other proton+muon.
> >
> > So if Faraday's law of Electrolysis was applied to water, thinking it would deliver a true answer is mistaken because the one H converts to neutron.
> >
> > So it appears that we need to directly measure the test tube of oxygen and the test tube of hydrogen by a direct mass measurement.
> > AP
> > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> > 1:14 AM (12 hours ago)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > to Plutonium Atom Universe
> > I doubt we can measure a test tube of hydrogen or test tube of oxygen, too small to determine the mass on some sort of weight scale.
> >
> > But here is a possible lucrative idea. We should be able to get pure deuterium water. Then run the electrolysis. Collect the test tubes.
> >
> > Now have some sort of balancing beam weight scale. Place the regular water of hydrogen test tube on one side, and place the deuterium water hydrogen test tube on other side. If they stay balanced, then AP is correct and Water is really H4O.
> > AP
> > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> > 1:48 AM (11 hours ago)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > to Plutonium Atom Universe
> > Cosmic Rays from Sun
> >
> > 90% of Sun's cosmic rays are 840MeV proton+muon inside = H. The hydrogen Atom is H2 where one of the H proton+muon converts to being a neutron.
> >
> > When these proton+muon hit Earth atmosphere, they can turn into pions and muons.
> >
> > I commented that H alone is a subatomic particle and that makes sense in the idea that Sun's cosmic rays are 90% these proton+muon.
> >
> > Now is interstellar hydrogen H2 and intergalactic hydrogen H2 formed when one H cosmic ray joins up with another H cosmic ray to form H2 atom?
> >
> > Is this how we get H2 in outer space? From the splitting apart of H2 into H cosmic rays?
> >
> > So how much of the Sun's hydrogen is H2 and how much is H ready to join with another H and reform back into H2. Probably little of the Sun's H is H alone, and the vast majority of the Sun's hydrogen is H2.
> >
> > How much deuterium in the Sun? And it is a higher percentage than the deuterium in water on Earth?
> > AP
> > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> > 3:11 AM (10 hours ago)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > to Plutonium Atom Universe
> > Water is the only known non-metallic substance that expands when if freezes; its density decreases and it expands approximately 9% by volume. (Source: web Lunar and Planetary Institute)
> >
> > I have to wait for experimental chemists and physicists to weigh the mass of test tubes from electrolysis, as to the verdict-- water is H4O.
> >
> > But until that news comes in, I will look for other means of proof.
> >
> > So AP says that the H2 is not a molecule but is the hydrogen Atom itself, where one proton+muon converts to a neutron and capacitates the other proton+muon which undergo the Faraday law.
> >
> > There are subatomic particles of H in the form of Cosmic Rays from the Sun, but most of the Sun's hydrogen is H2, and flips back and forth from H to rejoining to form H2. Some gets away from the Sun and is cosmic rays.
> >
> > But H2 is an Atom and H is a fleeting subatomic particle.
> >
> > So can I prove Water is H4O from the data of Spectral lines of H2 is the same as deuterium, only slight difference is that the deuterium is a full fledged neutron not a makeshift proton+muon of H.
> >
> > I suspect that special trait of water freezing is a proof that Water is H4O. Because the 840MeV proton torus with muon inside doing the Faraday law acting as a makeshift neutron capacitor for the other 840MeV proton torus with muon inside, is where H2 gets that expansion characteristic.
> >
> > A neutron is a parallel plate capacitor and those plates can expand when frozen temperature occurs. As the temperature gets colder, those plates move further apart.
> >
> > Now does deuterium which truly has a full neutron, does it expand also when frozen?? If so, does it expand as much as H2 which is 2 protons with 2 muons inside?
> >
> > So comparing the freezing and expansion of the parallel plates of a neutron in deuterium with the freezing and expansion of one of the proton+muon that is acting as a makeshift neutron in H2.
> >
> > If I can numbers correlate the H2 expansion with the Deuterium expansion would be a alternative proof that Water is really H4O and not H2O.
> >
> > AP
> > to
> > So now on Blankenship's book "Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis", 2014, page 134, shows The structure of ATP, ADP, AMP. And within that structure are OH hydroxyls.
> >
> > In New Chemistry, water is truly H4O, and where hydroxyls are now H2O. And we have first proof of this in the Figure 8.1 of Blankenship's "Chemical structure of ATP".
> >
> > For in the lower left corner of the diagram, Blankenship has a H+ all alone, (really a mindless error) and has P surrounded by O-, O-, O and OH. The OH is really H2O for hydroxyls are H2O and water itself is H4O, and that would leave that mindless H+ as being hydrogen Atom of H2.
> >
> > The world of physics and chemistry should drop what they are doing and weigh the electrolysis test tube of hydrogen and oxygen to discover the correct true formula of water is H4O.
> >
> > AP is total confident, becuase an Atom cannot exist if it has no capacitor structure such as a neutron, or one of the H in H2 acting as a neutron. I am totally confident that Water formula is truly H4O. And I need look only to methane of H4C, to realize that there is no HC, no H2C, no H3C, but starts with H4C, and that tells me water starts with H4O. Totally confident that Old Chemistry, Old Physics did electrolysis experiments and the moment they saw hydrogen test tube be 2x volume of oxygen test tube, they dropped their work and went out for a Danish and coffee break, rather than finish their work--- actual physics weighing of atomic mass units (not the Faraday electrolysis law for it does not apply to water).
> >
> > When water electrolysis is physics weighed, AP is confident that there are 4H per every one oxygen O. And that Water is truly H4O.
> >
> > AP, King of Science
> > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > Archimedes Plutonium
> > 9:34 AM (15 minutes ago)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > to
> > On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 8:56:57 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.
> >
> > Now modern day physics and chemist experimenters can really do a marvelous job if they wanted to. For they could freeze the test tubes of oxygen and hydrogen to where they are liquid and compare liquids from water electrolysis.
> > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > Archimedes Plutonium
> > 10:01 AM (5 hours ago)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > to
> > So, what AP is saying here is that we do electrolysis of water. We collect the two test tubes, one with oxygen the other with hydrogen.
> >
> > To prove Water is truly the formula H4O and not H2O we must weigh the masses of the two tubes to find that the ratio is 1 x 16amu to 4 x 1amu.
> >
> > The silly grotesque science error of the past was to look at volumes in the two test tubes-- "Hey-- the hydrogen is twice the volume of oxygen so the formula of water is H2O".
> >
> > No, way was that science good practice. For the correct formula of water needs to be measured by mass, by atomic mass units where Oxygen is 16amu and hydrogen is 1amu.
> >
> > I suspect a balance beam scale is good enough to see the hydrogen test tube will be 1/4 as massive as the oxygen test tube. To get within precision of electronic weighing scale of 0.00001 gram we just have to make a larger test tube of electrolysis of water.
> >
> > AP is betting that the readings will be hydrogen test tube 1/4 the mass of oxygen test tube proving Water formula is truly H4O.
> >
> > Old Physics and Old Chemistry is betting that the mass experiment will have the hydrogen test tube be 1/8 the mass of the oxygen test tube, proving Water formula is H2O.
> >
> > AP does not have these precision equipment to conduct an at-home experiment of this nature.
> > AP
> > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > Archimedes Plutonium
> > 12:38 PM (4 hours ago)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > to
> > So, once Water is found to actually be H4O, not H2O, we move on to methane, and ask the same question of its hydrogen bonds. Is Methane really that of H8C and not H4C.
> >
> > Well, looking in the literature for anomalies to methane, I come across a arXiv "Low and high-temperature anomalies in the physical properties of solid methane "The anomalous behavior of thermodynamic, spectral, plastic, elastic and some other properties of solid methane is discussed near 20.48K and...
> >
> > AP wonders: if they can get methane to solid form, well, I am then hopeful that the mass of the molecule can be determined. Because if methane is truly H8C, that difference of H4 in atomic mass units would be very much noticeable difference.
> >
> > Chemistry Europe--
> > "The Anomalous Deuterium Isotope Effect in the NMR Spectrum of Methane....
> >
> > P Vermeeren, 2023
> > "The abnormally long and weak methylidyne C-H bond.."
> > "The C-H bond of the methylidyne radical, CH*, is abnormally long and weak, even longer and..."
> >
> > AP asks, are these anomalies solved if we consider methane is actually H8C and not H4C?
> >
> > AP
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> >
> > Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> > Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
> >
> > Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> >
> > Eternal-September.org
> > Wolfgang M. Weyand
> > Berliner Strasse
> > Bad Homburg
> >
> > Goethe Universitat Physics dept
> >
> > Brigitta Wolff president
> >
> > Jurgen Habermass
> > Horst Stocker
> > Gerd Binnig
> > Horst Ludwig Stormer
> > Peter Grunberg
> >
> > math
> > Alex Kuronya
> > Martin Moller
> > Jakob Stix
> > Annette Werner
> > Andreas Bernig
> > Esther Cabezas-Rivas
> > Hans Crauel
> > Thomas Gerstner
> > Bastian von Harrach
> > Thomas Mettler
> > Tobias Weth
> > Amin Coja-Oghlan
> > Raman Sanyal
> > Thorsten Theobald
> > Yury Person
> >
> 
> > Gottingen Univ math
> >
> > Metin Tolan
> 
> 
> >
> > Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu
> >
> > Gottingen Univ physics
> > Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
> > Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
> > Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
> > Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
> > Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
> > Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
> > 
> > Prof. Dr. Jörg Enderlein
> > Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon
> > Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel
> > Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner
> > Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss
> > Prof. Dr. Andreas Janshoff
> > Prof. Dr. Christian Jooß
> > Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein
> > Prof. Dr. Stefan Klumpp
> > Prof. Dr. Sarah Köster
> > Prof. Dr. Reiner Kree
> > Prof. Dr. Matthias Krüger
> > Prof. Dr. Stanley Lai
> > Prof. Dr. Stefan Mathias
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Vasile Mosneaga
> > Prof. Dr. Marcus Müller
> > Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Astrid Pundt
> > Prof. Dr. Arnulf Quadt
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren
> > Prof. Dr. Ansgar Reiners
> > Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi
> > Prof. Dr. Claus Ropers
> > Prof. Dr. Tim Salditt
> > Prof. Dr. Konrad Samwer
> > Prof. Dr. Christoph Schmidt
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Susanne Schneider
> > Prof. Dr. Steffen Schumann
> > Prof. Dr. Simone Techert
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Michael Seibt
> > Prof. Dr. Peter Sollich
> > Prof. Dr. Andreas Tilgner
> > Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
> > Prof. Dr. Florentin Wörgötter
> > Prof. Dr. Annette Zippelius

Click here to read the complete article

Can_Dr.Benjamin List,Dr.Joachim Frank, Dr.Klaus Hasselmann,Dr.Reinhard Genzel,Dr.Rainer Weiss,Dr. Claus Ropers,Dr. Florentin Wörgötter, -please--step into the Gottingen Univ physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. I am sure Gottingen has a better weighing scale than 0.00001 gram.

> >
> >
> > Spam mill echo chamber, that is WM along with his gay spamletts a decades long spammer of sci.math, yet he fails math. Is it that Gottingen cannot understand the slant cut in single cone is an Oval, never the ellipse, or is it the foolish Boole logic they teach of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction? Or is it that neither WM or Gottingen can do a geometry proof Fundamental Theorem of Calculus? Which is it W. Mueckenheim?? You spammer crank.
> >
> > The endless and worthless Spam Mill Echo Chamber of Wolfgang Mueckenheim with his gay entourage.
> >
> > Could WM loudmouth step into the Gottingen Univ physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, or is he only good for loudmouth nonsense of airhead complaints of calculus, along with his nonsense that slant cut of cone is ellipse, when in truth that is a oval.
> >
> > +Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within
> >
> > On Monday, January 18, 2010 at 11:30:47 AM UTC-6, John Baez wrote:
> > > Also available at http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week290.html
> >
> > Surely Gottingen and UCR have weighing scales better than 0.00001 gram.
> >
> > Surely Durban Univ. has excellent weighing scales.
> >
>
> William profile photo
> William
> > ,...
> Gus Gassmann
> 785

> > 20Jul2023
> WM Logic
> >
> >
> > +Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within
> >
> > 3m views Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
> >
> >
> > Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.
> >
> >
> > Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
> >
> > In Old Chemistry and Old Physics, their subatomic particles were do nothing and no function and no job particles that sit around as balls or whiz around the outside of balls doing nothing but pointless circling.
> >
> > In New Physics and New Chemistry-- All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. Every subatomic particle has a job a function a purpose as to the Laws of Electromagnetism--- Faraday law, Coulomb law, Ampere law, Capacitor law.
> >
> > A proton is a torus of 840MeV with 840 windings, while the muon is the true electron of Atoms and is encased inside the proton torus thrusting through and producing electricity-- magnetic monopoles.
> >
> > The neutron of Atoms is a parallel plate capacitor storing the electricity of proton+muon and is skin cover on the outside of the proton torus in the form of parallel plates.
> >
> > Can hydrogen be a Atom if it is just a proton+muon? No, all atoms require to have a capacitor such as at least one neutron. Thus the Hydrogen Atom is H2 where you have 2 proton+muon where 1 of the 2 proton+muon acts like a neutron to the other proton+muon. Thus, water molecule is not H2O but rather is H4O.
> >
> > AP is waiting for experimental chemists and physicists to prove him correct that Water is H4O.
> >
> > In the meantime we have Hydroxyl which in Old Chemistry, especially Biology is OH, while AP says that is wrong and that is really H2O.
> >
> > Now glycerine is a hydroxyl with formula C3H8O3. And what I am thinking at this moment, is that hydroxyls will be an easier proof that Water is truly H4O, rather than wait for experimentalists to actually "weigh the electrolysis test tubes of oxygen and hydrogen".
> >
> > You see, with H4O as water, glycerine is C3(2 waters)O with an extra oxygen. If Water is H2O then glycerine is C3(4 waters) deficit O. It is missing an oxygen if water is H2O.
> >
> > The reason glycerine is so effective as a skin ointment is because it has glycerine, the extra O oxygen. If water were H2O, then glycerine would be a missing oxygen and not a skin lotion that works, but makes skin even more dry.
> >
> > Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
> >
> > Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> > 12:24 AM (13 hours ago)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > to Plutonium Atom Universe
> >
> > --- quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
> > Perhaps there is only two Faraday laws on Electrolysis. I am looking at the one that states: Faraday's first law of electrolysis relates the mass of a substance liberated (or deposited) at an electrode to the electric charge used (Q). A proportionality constant Z can be used:
> >
> > m = ZQ = (E/96485)(Q)
> >
> > m = mass, Q = total charge rewritten as Q = I*t amperes x time in seconds.
> >
> > This website gives an example: 5amps passed through molten Sodium Chloride for 3 hours. Calculate the mass of Sodium. E=23/1.
> >
> > m = (23/96485) (5) (3*60*60) approx 12.87 grams.
> >
> > --- end quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
> >
> > Now has such a experiment been performed on Water to see how much atomic mass of hydrogen and of oxygen results??? If AP is correct, the formula of water is H4O, if Old Physics, Old Chemistry is correct the formula is H2O.. So which is it???
> >
> > AP
> >
> >
> > No, sorry no, Faraday's Law of Electrolysis is not going to tell the correct mass of hydrogen.
> >
> > Reading Wikipedia on Faraday's Electrolysis law.
> >
> > --- quoting Wikipedia ---
> > A monovalent ion requires 1 electron for discharge, a divalent ion requires 2 electrons for discharge and so on. Thus, if x electrons flow,
> > x/v atoms are discharged.
> >
> > So the mass m discharged is
> >
> > m= (xM)/vN_A) = (QM)/(eN_A *v) = (QM) / (vF)
> > where
> > N_A is the Avogadro constant;
> > Q = xe is the total charge, equal to the number of electrons (x) times the elementary charge e;
> > F is the Faraday constant.
> > --- end quoting Wikipedia ---
> >
> > No, the Faraday law of Electrolysis will not work on water with a correct answer, because H is not an atom but H2 is an Atom. And where one of the proton+muon converts to being a neutron to the other proton+muon.
> >
> > So if Faraday's law of Electrolysis was applied to water, thinking it would deliver a true answer is mistaken because the one H converts to neutron.
> >
> > So it appears that we need to directly measure the test tube of oxygen and the test tube of hydrogen by a direct mass measurement.
> > AP
> > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> > 1:14 AM (12 hours ago)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > to Plutonium Atom Universe
> > I doubt we can measure a test tube of hydrogen or test tube of oxygen, too small to determine the mass on some sort of weight scale.
> >
> > But here is a possible lucrative idea. We should be able to get pure deuterium water. Then run the electrolysis. Collect the test tubes.
> >
> > Now have some sort of balancing beam weight scale. Place the regular water of hydrogen test tube on one side, and place the deuterium water hydrogen test tube on other side. If they stay balanced, then AP is correct and Water is really H4O.
> > AP
> > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> > 1:48 AM (11 hours ago)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > to Plutonium Atom Universe
> > Cosmic Rays from Sun
> >
> > 90% of Sun's cosmic rays are 840MeV proton+muon inside = H. The hydrogen Atom is H2 where one of the H proton+muon converts to being a neutron.
> >
> > When these proton+muon hit Earth atmosphere, they can turn into pions and muons.
> >
> > I commented that H alone is a subatomic particle and that makes sense in the idea that Sun's cosmic rays are 90% these proton+muon.
> >
> > Now is interstellar hydrogen H2 and intergalactic hydrogen H2 formed when one H cosmic ray joins up with another H cosmic ray to form H2 atom?
> >
> > Is this how we get H2 in outer space? From the splitting apart of H2 into H cosmic rays?
> >
> > So how much of the Sun's hydrogen is H2 and how much is H ready to join with another H and reform back into H2. Probably little of the Sun's H is H alone, and the vast majority of the Sun's hydrogen is H2.
> >
> > How much deuterium in the Sun? And it is a higher percentage than the deuterium in water on Earth?
> > AP
> > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> > 3:11 AM (10 hours ago)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > to Plutonium Atom Universe
> > Water is the only known non-metallic substance that expands when if freezes; its density decreases and it expands approximately 9% by volume. (Source: web Lunar and Planetary Institute)
> >
> > I have to wait for experimental chemists and physicists to weigh the mass of test tubes from electrolysis, as to the verdict-- water is H4O.
> >
> > But until that news comes in, I will look for other means of proof.
> >
> > So AP says that the H2 is not a molecule but is the hydrogen Atom itself, where one proton+muon converts to a neutron and capacitates the other proton+muon which undergo the Faraday law.
> >
> > There are subatomic particles of H in the form of Cosmic Rays from the Sun, but most of the Sun's hydrogen is H2, and flips back and forth from H to rejoining to form H2. Some gets away from the Sun and is cosmic rays.
> >
> > But H2 is an Atom and H is a fleeting subatomic particle.
> >
> > So can I prove Water is H4O from the data of Spectral lines of H2 is the same as deuterium, only slight difference is that the deuterium is a full fledged neutron not a makeshift proton+muon of H.
> >
> > I suspect that special trait of water freezing is a proof that Water is H4O. Because the 840MeV proton torus with muon inside doing the Faraday law acting as a makeshift neutron capacitor for the other 840MeV proton torus with muon inside, is where H2 gets that expansion characteristic.
> >
> > A neutron is a parallel plate capacitor and those plates can expand when frozen temperature occurs. As the temperature gets colder, those plates move further apart.
> >
> > Now does deuterium which truly has a full neutron, does it expand also when frozen?? If so, does it expand as much as H2 which is 2 protons with 2 muons inside?
> >
> > So comparing the freezing and expansion of the parallel plates of a neutron in deuterium with the freezing and expansion of one of the proton+muon that is acting as a makeshift neutron in H2.
> >
> > If I can numbers correlate the H2 expansion with the Deuterium expansion would be a alternative proof that Water is really H4O and not H2O.
> >
> > AP
> > to
> > So now on Blankenship's book "Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis", 2014, page 134, shows The structure of ATP, ADP, AMP. And within that structure are OH hydroxyls.
> >
> > In New Chemistry, water is truly H4O, and where hydroxyls are now H2O. And we have first proof of this in the Figure 8.1 of Blankenship's "Chemical structure of ATP".
> >
> > For in the lower left corner of the diagram, Blankenship has a H+ all alone, (really a mindless error) and has P surrounded by O-, O-, O and OH. The OH is really H2O for hydroxyls are H2O and water itself is H4O, and that would leave that mindless H+ as being hydrogen Atom of H2.
> >
> > The world of physics and chemistry should drop what they are doing and weigh the electrolysis test tube of hydrogen and oxygen to discover the correct true formula of water is H4O.
> >
> > AP is total confident, becuase an Atom cannot exist if it has no capacitor structure such as a neutron, or one of the H in H2 acting as a neutron. I am totally confident that Water formula is truly H4O. And I need look only to methane of H4C, to realize that there is no HC, no H2C, no H3C, but starts with H4C, and that tells me water starts with H4O. Totally confident that Old Chemistry, Old Physics did electrolysis experiments and the moment they saw hydrogen test tube be 2x volume of oxygen test tube, they dropped their work and went out for a Danish and coffee break, rather than finish their work--- actual physics weighing of atomic mass units (not the Faraday electrolysis law for it does not apply to water).
> >
> > When water electrolysis is physics weighed, AP is confident that there are 4H per every one oxygen O. And that Water is truly H4O.
> >
> > AP, King of Science
> > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > Archimedes Plutonium
> > 9:34 AM (15 minutes ago)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > to
> > On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 8:56:57 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.
> >
> > Now modern day physics and chemist experimenters can really do a marvelous job if they wanted to. For they could freeze the test tubes of oxygen and hydrogen to where they are liquid and compare liquids from water electrolysis.
> > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > Archimedes Plutonium
> > 10:01 AM (5 hours ago)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > to
> > So, what AP is saying here is that we do electrolysis of water. We collect the two test tubes, one with oxygen the other with hydrogen.
> >
> > To prove Water is truly the formula H4O and not H2O we must weigh the masses of the two tubes to find that the ratio is 1 x 16amu to 4 x 1amu.
> >
> > The silly grotesque science error of the past was to look at volumes in the two test tubes-- "Hey-- the hydrogen is twice the volume of oxygen so the formula of water is H2O".
> >
> > No, way was that science good practice. For the correct formula of water needs to be measured by mass, by atomic mass units where Oxygen is 16amu and hydrogen is 1amu.
> >
> > I suspect a balance beam scale is good enough to see the hydrogen test tube will be 1/4 as massive as the oxygen test tube. To get within precision of electronic weighing scale of 0.00001 gram we just have to make a larger test tube of electrolysis of water.
> >
> > AP is betting that the readings will be hydrogen test tube 1/4 the mass of oxygen test tube proving Water formula is truly H4O.
> >
> > Old Physics and Old Chemistry is betting that the mass experiment will have the hydrogen test tube be 1/8 the mass of the oxygen test tube, proving Water formula is H2O.
> >
> > AP does not have these precision equipment to conduct an at-home experiment of this nature.
> > AP
> > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > Archimedes Plutonium
> > 12:38 PM (4 hours ago)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > to
> > So, once Water is found to actually be H4O, not H2O, we move on to methane, and ask the same question of its hydrogen bonds. Is Methane really that of H8C and not H4C.
> >
> > Well, looking in the literature for anomalies to methane, I come across a arXiv "Low and high-temperature anomalies in the physical properties of solid methane "The anomalous behavior of thermodynamic, spectral, plastic, elastic and some other properties of solid methane is discussed near 20.48K and...
> >
> > AP wonders: if they can get methane to solid form, well, I am then hopeful that the mass of the molecule can be determined. Because if methane is truly H8C, that difference of H4 in atomic mass units would be very much noticeable difference.
> >
> > Chemistry Europe--
> > "The Anomalous Deuterium Isotope Effect in the NMR Spectrum of Methane....
> >
> > P Vermeeren, 2023
> > "The abnormally long and weak methylidyne C-H bond.."
> > "The C-H bond of the methylidyne radical, CH*, is abnormally long and weak, even longer and..."
> >
> > AP asks, are these anomalies solved if we consider methane is actually H8C and not H4C?
> >
> > AP
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> >
> > Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> > Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
> >
> > Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> >
> > Eternal-September.org
> > Wolfgang M. Weyand
> > Berliner Strasse
> > Bad Homburg
> >
> > Goethe Universitat Physics dept
> >
> > Brigitta Wolff president
> >
> > Jurgen Habermass
> > Horst Stocker
> > Gerd Binnig
> > Horst Ludwig Stormer
> > Peter Grunberg
> >
> > math
> > Alex Kuronya
> > Martin Moller
> > Jakob Stix
> > Annette Werner
> > Andreas Bernig
> > Esther Cabezas-Rivas
> > Hans Crauel
> > Thomas Gerstner
> > Bastian von Harrach
> > Thomas Mettler
> > Tobias Weth
> > Amin Coja-Oghlan
> > Raman Sanyal
> > Thorsten Theobald
> > Yury Person
> >
> 
> > Gottingen Univ math
> >
> > Metin Tolan
> 
> 
> >
> > Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu
> >
> > Gottingen Univ physics
> > Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
> > Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
> > Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
> > Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
> > Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
> > Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
> > 
> > Prof. Dr. Jörg Enderlein
> > Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon
> > Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel
> > Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner
> > Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss
> > Prof. Dr. Andreas Janshoff
> > Prof. Dr. Christian Jooß
> > Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein
> > Prof. Dr. Stefan Klumpp
> > Prof. Dr. Sarah Köster
> > Prof. Dr. Reiner Kree
> > Prof. Dr. Matthias Krüger
> > Prof. Dr. Stanley Lai
> > Prof. Dr. Stefan Mathias
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Vasile Mosneaga
> > Prof. Dr. Marcus Müller
> > Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Astrid Pundt
> > Prof. Dr. Arnulf Quadt
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren
> > Prof. Dr. Ansgar Reiners
> > Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi
> > Prof. Dr. Claus Ropers
> > Prof. Dr. Tim Salditt
> > Prof. Dr. Konrad Samwer
> > Prof. Dr. Christoph Schmidt
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Susanne Schneider
> > Prof. Dr. Steffen Schumann
> > Prof. Dr. Simone Techert
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Michael Seibt
> > Prof. Dr. Peter Sollich
> > Prof. Dr. Andreas Tilgner
> > Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
> > Prof. Dr. Florentin Wörgötter
> > Prof. Dr. Annette Zippelius

Click here to read the complete article

Can_Dr.Benjamin List,Jim Burns,Annalena Baerbock,Dr.Joachim Frank, Dr.Klaus Hasselmann,Dr.Reinhard Genzel,Dr.Rainer Weiss,Dr. Claus Ropers,Dr. Florentin Wörgötter, -please--step into the Gottingen Univ physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, proving Water is H4O not H2O. AP's homegrown lab cannot do the fine tuning experiment of weighing a test tube of electrolyzed hydrogen and oxygen from water. If AP is correct Water is really H4O, not H2O. I am sure Gottingen has a better weighing scale than 0.00001 gram.

> >
> >
> > Spam mill echo chamber, that is WM along with his gay spamletts a decades long spammer of sci.math, yet he fails math. Is it that Gottingen cannot understand the slant cut in single cone is an Oval, never the ellipse, or is it the foolish Boole logic they teach of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction? Or is it that neither WM or Gottingen can do a geometry proof Fundamental Theorem of Calculus? Which is it W. Mueckenheim?? You spammer crank.
> >
> > The endless and worthless Spam Mill Echo Chamber of Wolfgang Mueckenheim with his gay entourage.
> >
> > Could WM loudmouth step into the Gottingen Univ physics or chemistry lab and weigh the mass of Electrolysis Water, or is he only good for loudmouth nonsense of airhead complaints of calculus, along with his nonsense that slant cut of cone is ellipse, when in truth that is a oval.
> >
> > +Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within
> >
> > On Monday, January 18, 2010 at 11:30:47 AM UTC-6, John Baez wrote:
> > > Also available at http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week290.html
> >
> > Surely Gottingen and UCR have weighing scales better than 0.00001 gram.
> >
> > Surely Durban Univ. has excellent weighing scales.
> >
>
> William profile photo
> William
> > ,...
> Gus Gassmann
> 785


> > 20Jul2023
> WM Logic
> >
> >
> > +Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within
> >
> > 3m views Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
> >
> >
> > Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.
> >
> >
> > Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
> >
> > In Old Chemistry and Old Physics, their subatomic particles were do nothing and no function and no job particles that sit around as balls or whiz around the outside of balls doing nothing but pointless circling.
> >
> > In New Physics and New Chemistry-- All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. Every subatomic particle has a job a function a purpose as to the Laws of Electromagnetism--- Faraday law, Coulomb law, Ampere law, Capacitor law.
> >
> > A proton is a torus of 840MeV with 840 windings, while the muon is the true electron of Atoms and is encased inside the proton torus thrusting through and producing electricity-- magnetic monopoles.
> >
> > The neutron of Atoms is a parallel plate capacitor storing the electricity of proton+muon and is skin cover on the outside of the proton torus in the form of parallel plates.
> >
> > Can hydrogen be a Atom if it is just a proton+muon? No, all atoms require to have a capacitor such as at least one neutron. Thus the Hydrogen Atom is H2 where you have 2 proton+muon where 1 of the 2 proton+muon acts like a neutron to the other proton+muon. Thus, water molecule is not H2O but rather is H4O.
> >
> > AP is waiting for experimental chemists and physicists to prove him correct that Water is H4O.
> >
> > In the meantime we have Hydroxyl which in Old Chemistry, especially Biology is OH, while AP says that is wrong and that is really H2O.
> >
> > Now glycerine is a hydroxyl with formula C3H8O3. And what I am thinking at this moment, is that hydroxyls will be an easier proof that Water is truly H4O, rather than wait for experimentalists to actually "weigh the electrolysis test tubes of oxygen and hydrogen".
> >
> > You see, with H4O as water, glycerine is C3(2 waters)O with an extra oxygen. If Water is H2O then glycerine is C3(4 waters) deficit O. It is missing an oxygen if water is H2O.
> >
> > The reason glycerine is so effective as a skin ointment is because it has glycerine, the extra O oxygen. If water were H2O, then glycerine would be a missing oxygen and not a skin lotion that works, but makes skin even more dry.
> >
> > Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
> >
> > Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> > 12:24 AM (13 hours ago)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > to Plutonium Atom Universe
> >
> > --- quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
> > Perhaps there is only two Faraday laws on Electrolysis. I am looking at the one that states: Faraday's first law of electrolysis relates the mass of a substance liberated (or deposited) at an electrode to the electric charge used (Q). A proportionality constant Z can be used:
> >
> > m = ZQ = (E/96485)(Q)
> >
> > m = mass, Q = total charge rewritten as Q = I*t amperes x time in seconds.
> >
> > This website gives an example: 5amps passed through molten Sodium Chloride for 3 hours. Calculate the mass of Sodium. E=23/1.
> >
> > m = (23/96485) (5) (3*60*60) approx 12.87 grams.
> >
> > --- end quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
> >
> > Now has such a experiment been performed on Water to see how much atomic mass of hydrogen and of oxygen results??? If AP is correct, the formula of water is H4O, if Old Physics, Old Chemistry is correct the formula is H2O.. So which is it???
> >
> > AP
> >
> >
> > No, sorry no, Faraday's Law of Electrolysis is not going to tell the correct mass of hydrogen.
> >
> > Reading Wikipedia on Faraday's Electrolysis law.
> >
> > --- quoting Wikipedia ---
> > A monovalent ion requires 1 electron for discharge, a divalent ion requires 2 electrons for discharge and so on. Thus, if x electrons flow,
> > x/v atoms are discharged.
> >
> > So the mass m discharged is
> >
> > m= (xM)/vN_A) = (QM)/(eN_A *v) = (QM) / (vF)
> > where
> > N_A is the Avogadro constant;
> > Q = xe is the total charge, equal to the number of electrons (x) times the elementary charge e;
> > F is the Faraday constant.
> > --- end quoting Wikipedia ---
> >
> > No, the Faraday law of Electrolysis will not work on water with a correct answer, because H is not an atom but H2 is an Atom. And where one of the proton+muon converts to being a neutron to the other proton+muon.
> >
> > So if Faraday's law of Electrolysis was applied to water, thinking it would deliver a true answer is mistaken because the one H converts to neutron.
> >
> > So it appears that we need to directly measure the test tube of oxygen and the test tube of hydrogen by a direct mass measurement.
> > AP
> > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> > 1:14 AM (12 hours ago)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > to Plutonium Atom Universe
> > I doubt we can measure a test tube of hydrogen or test tube of oxygen, too small to determine the mass on some sort of weight scale.
> >
> > But here is a possible lucrative idea. We should be able to get pure deuterium water. Then run the electrolysis. Collect the test tubes.
> >
> > Now have some sort of balancing beam weight scale. Place the regular water of hydrogen test tube on one side, and place the deuterium water hydrogen test tube on other side. If they stay balanced, then AP is correct and Water is really H4O.
> > AP
> > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> > 1:48 AM (11 hours ago)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > to Plutonium Atom Universe
> > Cosmic Rays from Sun
> >
> > 90% of Sun's cosmic rays are 840MeV proton+muon inside = H. The hydrogen Atom is H2 where one of the H proton+muon converts to being a neutron.
> >
> > When these proton+muon hit Earth atmosphere, they can turn into pions and muons.
> >
> > I commented that H alone is a subatomic particle and that makes sense in the idea that Sun's cosmic rays are 90% these proton+muon.
> >
> > Now is interstellar hydrogen H2 and intergalactic hydrogen H2 formed when one H cosmic ray joins up with another H cosmic ray to form H2 atom?
> >
> > Is this how we get H2 in outer space? From the splitting apart of H2 into H cosmic rays?
> >
> > So how much of the Sun's hydrogen is H2 and how much is H ready to join with another H and reform back into H2. Probably little of the Sun's H is H alone, and the vast majority of the Sun's hydrogen is H2.
> >
> > How much deuterium in the Sun? And it is a higher percentage than the deuterium in water on Earth?
> > AP
> > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> > 3:11 AM (10 hours ago)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > to Plutonium Atom Universe
> > Water is the only known non-metallic substance that expands when if freezes; its density decreases and it expands approximately 9% by volume. (Source: web Lunar and Planetary Institute)
> >
> > I have to wait for experimental chemists and physicists to weigh the mass of test tubes from electrolysis, as to the verdict-- water is H4O.
> >
> > But until that news comes in, I will look for other means of proof.
> >
> > So AP says that the H2 is not a molecule but is the hydrogen Atom itself, where one proton+muon converts to a neutron and capacitates the other proton+muon which undergo the Faraday law.
> >
> > There are subatomic particles of H in the form of Cosmic Rays from the Sun, but most of the Sun's hydrogen is H2, and flips back and forth from H to rejoining to form H2. Some gets away from the Sun and is cosmic rays.
> >
> > But H2 is an Atom and H is a fleeting subatomic particle.
> >
> > So can I prove Water is H4O from the data of Spectral lines of H2 is the same as deuterium, only slight difference is that the deuterium is a full fledged neutron not a makeshift proton+muon of H.
> >
> > I suspect that special trait of water freezing is a proof that Water is H4O. Because the 840MeV proton torus with muon inside doing the Faraday law acting as a makeshift neutron capacitor for the other 840MeV proton torus with muon inside, is where H2 gets that expansion characteristic.
> >
> > A neutron is a parallel plate capacitor and those plates can expand when frozen temperature occurs. As the temperature gets colder, those plates move further apart.
> >
> > Now does deuterium which truly has a full neutron, does it expand also when frozen?? If so, does it expand as much as H2 which is 2 protons with 2 muons inside?
> >
> > So comparing the freezing and expansion of the parallel plates of a neutron in deuterium with the freezing and expansion of one of the proton+muon that is acting as a makeshift neutron in H2.
> >
> > If I can numbers correlate the H2 expansion with the Deuterium expansion would be a alternative proof that Water is really H4O and not H2O.
> >
> > AP
> > to
> > So now on Blankenship's book "Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis", 2014, page 134, shows The structure of ATP, ADP, AMP. And within that structure are OH hydroxyls.
> >
> > In New Chemistry, water is truly H4O, and where hydroxyls are now H2O. And we have first proof of this in the Figure 8.1 of Blankenship's "Chemical structure of ATP".
> >
> > For in the lower left corner of the diagram, Blankenship has a H+ all alone, (really a mindless error) and has P surrounded by O-, O-, O and OH. The OH is really H2O for hydroxyls are H2O and water itself is H4O, and that would leave that mindless H+ as being hydrogen Atom of H2.
> >
> > The world of physics and chemistry should drop what they are doing and weigh the electrolysis test tube of hydrogen and oxygen to discover the correct true formula of water is H4O.
> >
> > AP is total confident, becuase an Atom cannot exist if it has no capacitor structure such as a neutron, or one of the H in H2 acting as a neutron. I am totally confident that Water formula is truly H4O. And I need look only to methane of H4C, to realize that there is no HC, no H2C, no H3C, but starts with H4C, and that tells me water starts with H4O. Totally confident that Old Chemistry, Old Physics did electrolysis experiments and the moment they saw hydrogen test tube be 2x volume of oxygen test tube, they dropped their work and went out for a Danish and coffee break, rather than finish their work--- actual physics weighing of atomic mass units (not the Faraday electrolysis law for it does not apply to water).
> >
> > When water electrolysis is physics weighed, AP is confident that there are 4H per every one oxygen O. And that Water is truly H4O.
> >
> > AP, King of Science
> > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > Archimedes Plutonium
> > 9:34 AM (15 minutes ago)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > to
> > On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 8:56:57 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.
> >
> > Now modern day physics and chemist experimenters can really do a marvelous job if they wanted to. For they could freeze the test tubes of oxygen and hydrogen to where they are liquid and compare liquids from water electrolysis.
> > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > Archimedes Plutonium
> > 10:01 AM (5 hours ago)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > to
> > So, what AP is saying here is that we do electrolysis of water. We collect the two test tubes, one with oxygen the other with hydrogen.
> >
> > To prove Water is truly the formula H4O and not H2O we must weigh the masses of the two tubes to find that the ratio is 1 x 16amu to 4 x 1amu.
> >
> > The silly grotesque science error of the past was to look at volumes in the two test tubes-- "Hey-- the hydrogen is twice the volume of oxygen so the formula of water is H2O".
> >
> > No, way was that science good practice. For the correct formula of water needs to be measured by mass, by atomic mass units where Oxygen is 16amu and hydrogen is 1amu.
> >
> > I suspect a balance beam scale is good enough to see the hydrogen test tube will be 1/4 as massive as the oxygen test tube. To get within precision of electronic weighing scale of 0.00001 gram we just have to make a larger test tube of electrolysis of water.
> >
> > AP is betting that the readings will be hydrogen test tube 1/4 the mass of oxygen test tube proving Water formula is truly H4O.
> >
> > Old Physics and Old Chemistry is betting that the mass experiment will have the hydrogen test tube be 1/8 the mass of the oxygen test tube, proving Water formula is H2O.
> >
> > AP does not have these precision equipment to conduct an at-home experiment of this nature.
> > AP
> > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > Archimedes Plutonium
> > 12:38 PM (4 hours ago)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > to
> > So, once Water is found to actually be H4O, not H2O, we move on to methane, and ask the same question of its hydrogen bonds. Is Methane really that of H8C and not H4C.
> >
> > Well, looking in the literature for anomalies to methane, I come across a arXiv "Low and high-temperature anomalies in the physical properties of solid methane "The anomalous behavior of thermodynamic, spectral, plastic, elastic and some other properties of solid methane is discussed near 20.48K and...
> >
> > AP wonders: if they can get methane to solid form, well, I am then hopeful that the mass of the molecule can be determined. Because if methane is truly H8C, that difference of H4 in atomic mass units would be very much noticeable difference.
> >
> > Chemistry Europe--
> > "The Anomalous Deuterium Isotope Effect in the NMR Spectrum of Methane....
> >
> > P Vermeeren, 2023
> > "The abnormally long and weak methylidyne C-H bond.."
> > "The C-H bond of the methylidyne radical, CH*, is abnormally long and weak, even longer and..."
> >
> > AP asks, are these anomalies solved if we consider methane is actually H8C and not H4C?
> >
> > AP
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> >
> > Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> > Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
> >
> > Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> >
> > Eternal-September.org
> > Wolfgang M. Weyand
> > Berliner Strasse
> > Bad Homburg
> >
> > Goethe Universitat Physics dept
> >
> > Brigitta Wolff president
> >
> > Jurgen Habermass
> > Horst Stocker
> > Gerd Binnig
> > Horst Ludwig Stormer
> > Peter Grunberg
> >
> > math
> > Alex Kuronya
> > Martin Moller
> > Jakob Stix
> > Annette Werner
> > Andreas Bernig
> > Esther Cabezas-Rivas
> > Hans Crauel
> > Thomas Gerstner
> > Bastian von Harrach
> > Thomas Mettler
> > Tobias Weth
> > Amin Coja-Oghlan
> > Raman Sanyal
> > Thorsten Theobald
> > Yury Person
> >
> 
> > Gottingen Univ math
> >
> > Metin Tolan
> 
> 
> >
> > Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu
> >
> > Gottingen Univ physics
> > Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
> > Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
> > Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
> > Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
> > Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
> > Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
> > 
> > Prof. Dr. Jörg Enderlein
> > Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon
> > Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel
> > Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner
> > Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss
> > Prof. Dr. Andreas Janshoff
> > Prof. Dr. Christian Jooß
> > Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein
> > Prof. Dr. Stefan Klumpp
> > Prof. Dr. Sarah Köster
> > Prof. Dr. Reiner Kree
> > Prof. Dr. Matthias Krüger
> > Prof. Dr. Stanley Lai
> > Prof. Dr. Stefan Mathias
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Vasile Mosneaga
> > Prof. Dr. Marcus Müller
> > Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Astrid Pundt
> > Prof. Dr. Arnulf Quadt
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren
> > Prof. Dr. Ansgar Reiners
> > Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi
> > Prof. Dr. Claus Ropers
> > Prof. Dr. Tim Salditt
> > Prof. Dr. Konrad Samwer
> > Prof. Dr. Christoph Schmidt
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Susanne Schneider
> > Prof. Dr. Steffen Schumann
> > Prof. Dr. Simone Techert
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Michael Seibt
> > Prof. Dr. Peter Sollich
> > Prof. Dr. Andreas Tilgner
> > Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
> > Prof. Dr. Florentin Wörgötter
> > Prof. Dr. Annette Zippelius

Click here to read the complete article

Pournelle must die!

tech / sci.math / Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!

tech / sci.math / Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!

Subject	Author
Wolfgang Mueckenheim and Gottingen University Germany needs a 1st	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim and Gottingen University Germany needs a 1st	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim and Gottingen University Germany needs a 1st	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim and Gottingen University Germany needs a 1st	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	zelos...@gmail.com
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	zelos...@gmail.com
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	zelos...@gmail.com
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Michael Moroney
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Blaide Alesiooal@oasaella.oe Blaide Alesio
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Chris M. Thomasson
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Sergi o
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Sergi o
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Chris M. Thomasson
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Chris M. Thomasson
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Chris M. Thomasson
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	zelos...@gmail.com
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	zelos...@gmail.com
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	zelos...@gmail.com
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	zelos...@gmail.com
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Anja Karliczek head of Germany Federal Ministry of Education &	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Chris M. Thomasson
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	zelos...@gmail.com
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Archimedes "gigatard" Plutonium flunked the math test of a	Michael Moroney
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H E
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Eram semper recta
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim fuck my ass!	Archimedes Plutonium