Everly Segreti wrote:
>
> George Hammond wrote:
>
> > Hence it turns out I have discovered the world's first Scientific Proof
> > of God (SPOG) and that: –
> > GOD IS A (large) EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME
>
> I would not be that sure. What on earth is a *subjective_spacetime*, as
> different from *objective*?? ?

*subjective_spacetime* is Philosophy not physics. George Hammond is more into ...Philosophy, which is a dead science field.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

On Wednesday, November 9, 2022 at 5:33:31 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> *subjective_spacetime* is Philosophy not physics. George Hammond is more into ...Philosophy, which is a dead science field.
> --
>
[George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
..
WRONG: – – STARMAKER – "SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME" can be measured
to 2 decimal point accuracy in SI units (MKS units).
..
That means "Subjective Space-Time" is a PHYSICS MEASUREMENT,
and not a "Philosophical Quantity".
..
George

George Hammond wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, November 9, 2022 at 5:33:31 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > *subjective_spacetime* is Philosophy not physics. George Hammond is more into ...Philosophy, which is a dead science field.
> > --
> >
> [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
> .
> WRONG: – – STARMAKER – "SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME" can be measured
> to 2 decimal point accuracy in SI units (MKS units).
> .
> That means "Subjective Space-Time" is a PHYSICS MEASUREMENT,
> and not a "Philosophical Quantity".
> .
> George

Maybe you no speaky good inglish...so let's start wit de furst werd...

Subjective...
have you ever looked up the meaning?

Subjective:

based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions.
"his views are highly subjective"
synonyms: personal, personalized, individual, internal, emotional, instinctive, intuitive, impressionistic, biased, prejudiced, bigoted, idiosyncratic, irrational, gut, gut reaction

https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gbv=2&sxsrf=ALiCzsa6VcWdmdeJ-cjoKm7_vq90b8UyKA%3A1668040636721&q=define+subjective

1 - philosophy : relating to the way a person experiences things in his or her own mind

subjective reality
Dreaming is a subjective experience.

https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/subjective

You're dreaming. WAKEUP WAKEUP! TECH SUPPORT, TECH SUPPORT!!

Physics, in general, can define, explain and measure only the objective component. The subjective component is not a subject of physics and similar sciences.

Subjective means making assumptions, making interpretations based on personal opinions without any verifiable facts.

Subjective measurement is more of an opinion.

In other words, you need to take your "Subjective Space-Time" and throw it where it belongs...in the garbage can. It's garbage!

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

The Starmaker wrote:
> Everly Segreti wrote:
>> George Hammond wrote:
>> > Hence it turns out I have discovered the world's first Scientific
>> > Proof of God (SPOG) and that: – GOD IS A (large) EINSTEINIAN
>> > CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME
>>
>> I would not be that sure. What on earth is a *subjective_spacetime*, as
>> different from *objective*?? ?
>
> *subjective_spacetime* is Philosophy not physics. George Hammond is more
> into ...Philosophy, which is a dead science field.

sure. The WEF’s Stakeholder Capitalism Is Just Global Fascism By Another Name
https://%7a%65%72%6f%68%65%64%67%65.com/geopolitical/wefs-stakeholder-capitalism-just-global-fascism-another-name

Mussolini’s fascism is at the root of the very corporate governance that leftists applaud and lust after today. They have far more in common with fascists than they realize.

The Allied Holocaust in Dresden
https://%76%65%74%65%72%61%6e%73%74%6f%64%61%79.com/2022/11/08/the-allied-holocaust-in-dresden/

Revealed: Documents Show Bill Gates Has Given $319 Million to Media Outlets
https://%74%68%65%74%72%75%74%68%73%65%65%6b%65r.co.uk/?p=260949

On Thursday, November 10, 2022 at 2:42:57 AM UTC-5, Everly Segreti wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > Everly Segreti wrote:
> >> George Hammond wrote:
> >> > Hence it turns out I have discovered the world's first Scientific
> >> > Proof of God (SPOG) and that: – GOD IS A (large) EINSTEINIAN
> >> > CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME
> >>
> >> I would not be that sure. What on earth is a *subjective_spacetime*, as
> >> different from *objective*?? ?
> >
> > *subjective_spacetime* is Philosophy not physics. George Hammond is more
> > into ...Philosophy, which is a dead science field.
>
>
>
[George E Hammond MS physics]
..
Okay, we have (above) 2 comments: –
..
one comment by – EVERLY SEGRETI
and
one comment by – STARMAKER
..
.... Note that Srgreti's comment is "Scientific"
while Starmaker's comment is "Philosophical"
..
To be noted here is that "Starmaker" takes his Pseudonym
from Olaf Stapledon's famous 1937 Science-Fiction Bible
entitled "Star Maker" – so he's a Science-Fiction buff
and not a scientist !
..... On the other hand Segreti's question indicates that he
has some classical Scientific education !
..
So let me scientifically answer Segreti's question: –
..
WHAT ON EARTH IS "SUBJFECTIVE SPACETIME" ?
..
...... And I have already illustrated what "SUBJECTIVE SPACE"
is by pointing out the difference between a 6 month old child
looking up at the BOTTOM of a kitchen table as compared to
an 18-year-old looking down at the TOP of the table !
..... Obviously – the TABLE looks 3 or 4 times LARGER to the
6-month-old than it does to the 18-year-old ! That is an
illustration of "Subjective Space".
..
Okay – so much for "Subjective Space: – now we turn to
"Subjective Time".
..... Subjective time was first measured by Thomas Edison
a 120 years ago when he invented the Movie Projector !
He first discovered that the average adult of average intelligence
required a "frame rate" of 16 frames/sec – proving that the
"perceptual speed" of the average adult is 16 bits/sec.
..... He also discovered that the speed is "age-dependent"
for children under 20 years of age. And like INTELLIGENCE
it has to be "divided by age" for people under 20 !
..... This was the first scientific proof that "SUBJECTIVE TIME"
is age-dependent under 20 years of age – IOW just like
SUBJECTIVE SPACE time "contracts" or "slows" with age
just like SPACE does – up until the age of 20 !
..
OKAY – there you have an explanation, a measurement, and
a SCIENTIFIC PROOF of what "SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME"
actually is !
..
I HOPE THAT ANSWERS YOUR QUESTION !
..
And as a further final note, I point out that NO ONE EVER
REACHES FULL GROWTH – in fact the world average for
adults is only about 85% full growth (according to WHO,
UNESCO, and many other world health organizations).
..
Now: 1/.85 = 1.18 which means that the AVERAGE ADULT
actually SEES a World that is 18% LARGER and 18% FASTER
then it ACTUALLY IS – –
And it is this effect that causes the universal FEAR, TERROR,
and ANXIETY universally experienced by every person in the
World !
..
and this phenomenon is historically
referred to as "GOD" – therefore we have now discovered the
world's first scientific proof of God !.
..
George

On Sunday, October 23, 2022 at 8:25:13 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 24-Oct-22 12:11 pm, George Hammond wrote:
> > FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God
> >
> > .... By 1922 Albert Einstein's Static Universe was troubled !
> > It was obvious that iy would collapse.
> > ..A young Russian mathematician – Alexander Friedman –
> > to use Einstein's words – "Found a way out of this".
> > .... Friedman proposed the Universe was EXPANDING
> > He said you could simply multiply the spatial part of Einstein's
> > Metric by an "Expansion Factor a(t)", so that: –
> > .
> > ds²= a(t)²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - c²dt²
> > .
> > .... Finally by 1931 Einstein accepted the idea and today it is
> > known as the FLRW Metric, confirmed by Hubble's red shift
> > measurements – and today the Friedman metric rules all of
> > Modern Astrophysics!
> > .... Tragically, the heroic Friedman died of typhus due to the constant
> > wars in Russia at the time. But recently the polymathic genius American
> > Physicist George E Hammond has discovered that a generalization
> > of the Friedman Metric – actually yields the world's first and only –
> > SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD: .
> > .
> > |a² o o o. |
> > |o a² o o. | = Generalized Friedman Metric
> > |o o a² o. |
> > |ooo-1/a²|
> > .
> > .... The FLRW metric expands space – but it does not affect time!
> > .
> > .... The Generalized Friedman Metric expands BOTH time and space !!
> > .
> > So that it is considerably different from the original1922 Friedman metric
> > – it is simply a 4 dimensional Generalization of it !
> > .
> > OKAY – I sometimes refer to this metric as the DUTCH WINDMILL METRIC
> > and I have posted this before on SPR –
> > .
> > ....DUTCH WINDMILL POST (sci.physics.relativity)
> > https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/lkvb-IXoFyA/m/VnhEVHBAAQAJ
> > .
> > .... And as this above post demonstrates Generalized Friedman Metric describes the effect that human growth has on human SUBJECTIVE
> > SPACETIME – and in fact my 10 minute YouTube video:
> > . –
> > WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
> > ........https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk
> > ................. (YouTube 12-min)
> > .
> > Demonstrates how 1,000 academic Psychometrician's using desktop
> > computers worldwide in 20 languages, for 50 years, have discovered
> > that the top eigenvector in human SUBJECTIVE SPACEATIME (the so-called
> > GFP) is actually the God of the Bible,
> > EVEN THOUGH THEY DON'T REALIZE IT !
> > .
> > And finally, it is obvious that the above "Generalized Friedman Metric"
> > explains the enigmatic "GFP" of psychology – and proves that it is the
> > God of the Bible – and in fact demonstrates that –
> > .
> > Scientifically prove that there is a REAL GOD
> > – measurable to 2 decimal point accuracy, and –
> > .
> > GOD IS AN EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE OF HUMAN SUBJECTIVE REALITY
> > .
> > George
> To the extent that God exists, He would be part of the real universe.
> Science does not purport to prove things about the real universe, but
> rather to describe the behaviour of the universe using mathematical

That math about physics back at the Big Bang happened before man's mind. This is a proof of God that
is no accident. Man can only discover God by his math after.

Mitchell Raemsch

> models. So science can no more prove the existence of God that it proves
> anything else about the universe.
>
> Sylvia.

On Thursday, November 10, 2022 at 4:17:57 PM UTC-5, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, October 23, 2022 at 8:25:13 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote:

> > To the extent that God exists, He would be part of the real universe.
> > Science does not purport to prove things about the real universe, but
> > rather to describe the behaviour of the universe using mathematical
>
> That math about physics back at the Big Bang happened before man's mind. This is a proof of God that
> is no accident. Man can only discover God by his math after.
>
> Mitchell Raemsch
>
> > models. So science can no more prove the existence of God that it proves
> > anything else about the universe.
> >
> > Sylvia.
..
..
[George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
..
Dear Sylvia – THANK GOD FOR WOMEN ! – I can't stand talking to Men –
men are so utterly STUPID – maybe it is because women have babies
and therefore inherently comprehend more about LIFE !
..
Michael Ramesh's statement: –
..
"That math about physics back at the Big Bang happened before man's
mind. This is a proof of God that is no accident. Man can only discover
God by his math after." (Michael Ramesh)
..
THIS IS ONE OF THE STUPIDEST, MOST ASININE REMARKS EVER MADE
(says George Hammond) !!!!!!!
..
Michael Ramesh has YET to realize that there are 2 "Creations"
..
1. – The physical creation of the universe (Big Bang)
2. – The creation of the Human Mind (approximately a few million years ago)
..
They actually occurred SIMULTANEOUSLY !
..
The UNIVERSE only EXISTS In the Human Mind (including the Big Bang) – if all
humans (all sentieny life) died tomorrow at 9 AM – THE UNIVERSE WOULD CEASE
TO EXIST at 9 AM ALSO!.
.... In fact – the "physical creation (Big Bang)" WOULD ALSO CEASE TO EXIST !
The HUMAN MIND IS GOD – therefore GOD and the HUMAN MIND came into
existence simultaneously!
..
This is because the EXISTENCE of anything – can only be confirmed by a
Human Observer ! If there is no human observer then even existence itself
does not exist – and NOTHING EVEN THE UNIVERSE ITSELF EXISTS !
..
Michael Ramesh has an immature lacuna in his education !
..
Thanks for your support Sylvia – without it we'd be dead !
..
George

George Hammond wrote:
>
> On Thursday, November 10, 2022 at 2:42:57 AM UTC-5, Everly Segreti wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Everly Segreti wrote:
> > >> George Hammond wrote:
> > >> > Hence it turns out I have discovered the world's first Scientific
> > >> > Proof of God (SPOG) and that: – GOD IS A (large) EINSTEINIAN
> > >> > CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME
> > >>
> > >> I would not be that sure. What on earth is a *subjective_spacetime*, as
> > >> different from *objective*?? ?
> > >
> > > *subjective_spacetime* is Philosophy not physics. George Hammond is more
> > > into ...Philosophy, which is a dead science field.
> >
> >
> >
> [George E Hammond MS physics]
> .
> Okay, we have (above) 2 comments: –
> .
> one comment by – EVERLY SEGRETI
> and
> one comment by – STARMAKER
> .
> ... Note that Srgreti's comment is "Scientific"
> while Starmaker's comment is "Philosophical"
> .
> To be noted here is that "Starmaker" takes his Pseudonym
> from Olaf Stapledon's famous 1937 Science-Fiction Bible
> entitled "Star Maker" – so he's a Science-Fiction buff
> and not a scientist !
>

everyone knows here i don't read fiction books or any sci-fiction books.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

George Hammond wrote:
>
> On Thursday, November 10, 2022 at 2:42:57 AM UTC-5, Everly Segreti wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Everly Segreti wrote:
> > >> George Hammond wrote:
> > >> > Hence it turns out I have discovered the world's first Scientific
> > >> > Proof of God (SPOG) and that: – GOD IS A (large) EINSTEINIAN
> > >> > CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME
> > >>
> > >> I would not be that sure. What on earth is a *subjective_spacetime*, as
> > >> different from *objective*?? ?
> > >
> > > *subjective_spacetime* is Philosophy not physics. George Hammond is more
> > > into ...Philosophy, which is a dead science field.
> >
> >
> >
> [George E Hammond MS physics]
> .
> Okay, we have (above) 2 comments: –
> .
> one comment by – EVERLY SEGRETI
> and
> one comment by – STARMAKER
> .
> ... Note that Srgreti's comment is "Scientific"
> while Starmaker's comment is "Philosophical"
> .
> To be noted here is that "Starmaker" takes his Pseudonym
> from Olaf Stapledon's famous 1937 Science-Fiction Bible
> entitled "Star Maker" – so he's a Science-Fiction buff
> and not a scientist !
> .... On the other hand Segreti's question indicates that he
> has some classical Scientific education !
> .
> So let me scientifically answer Segreti's question: –
> .
> WHAT ON EARTH IS "SUBJFECTIVE SPACETIME" ?
> .
> ..... And I have already illustrated what "SUBJECTIVE SPACE"
> is by pointing out the difference between a 6 month old child
> looking up at the BOTTOM of a kitchen table as compared to
> an 18-year-old looking down at the TOP of the table !
> .... Obviously – the TABLE looks 3 or 4 times LARGER to the
> 6-month-old than it does to the 18-year-old ! That is an
> illustration of "Subjective Space".
> .
> Okay – so much for "Subjective Space: – now we turn to
> "Subjective Time".
> .... Subjective time was first measured by Thomas Edison
> a 120 years ago when he invented the Movie Projector !
> He first discovered that the average adult of average intelligence
> required a "frame rate" of 16 frames/sec – proving that the
> "perceptual speed" of the average adult is 16 bits/sec.
> .... He also discovered that the speed is "age-dependent"
> for children under 20 years of age. And like INTELLIGENCE
> it has to be "divided by age" for people under 20 !
> .... This was the first scientific proof that "SUBJECTIVE TIME"
> is age-dependent under 20 years of age – IOW just like
> SUBJECTIVE SPACE time "contracts" or "slows" with age
> just like SPACE does – up until the age of 20 !
> .
> OKAY – there you have an explanation, a measurement, and
> a SCIENTIFIC PROOF of what "SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME"
> actually is !
> .
> I HOPE THAT ANSWERS YOUR QUESTION !
> .
> And as a further final note, I point out that NO ONE EVER
> REACHES FULL GROWTH – in fact the world average for
> adults is only about 85% full growth (according to WHO,
> UNESCO, and many other world health organizations).
> .
> Now: 1/.85 = 1.18 which means that the AVERAGE ADULT
> actually SEES a World that is 18% LARGER and 18% FASTER
> then it ACTUALLY IS – –
> And it is this effect that causes the universal FEAR, TERROR,
> and ANXIETY universally experienced by every person in the
> World !
> .
> and this phenomenon is historically
> referred to as "GOD" – therefore we have now discovered the
> world's first scientific proof of God !.
> .
> George

This reeks of confirmation bias.

i'm under a kitchen...

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

George Hammond wrote:
>
dis thing you call 'the God of the Bible'...wat is dat mean?

Have you George
ever, ever..
read the whole
bible from
front to back,
ever?

You know, read the whole thing?

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

On Friday, November 11, 2022 at 1:03:36 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:
> >
> dis thing you call 'the God of the Bible'...wat is dat mean?
>
> Have you George
> ever, ever..
> read the whole
> bible from
> front to back,
> ever?
>
> You know, read the whole thing?
> --
>
[George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
...... I've only read 50 pages of it: – if you already know
what it is, how and why it was written, and who wrote it: –
you don't have to read any more of it than that to know
what it is !
..
Meanwhile: – IF YOU HAVE NOTHING TO SAY ABOUT THIS: –
..
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
..
..... The FLRW metric expands space – but it does not affect time!
..... The God Metric expands BOTH time and space !!
..
Then you really don't understand what this thread is ABOUT !.
..
George

George Hammond wrote:
>
> On Friday, November 11, 2022 at 1:03:36 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > George Hammond wrote:
> > >
> > dis thing you call 'the God of the Bible'...wat is dat mean?
> >
> > Have you George
> > ever, ever..
> > read the whole
> > bible from
> > front to back,
> > ever?
> >
> > You know, read the whole thing?
> > --
> >
> [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
> ..... I've only read 50 pages of it: – if you already know
> what it is, how and why it was written, and who wrote it: –
> you don't have to read any more of it than that to know
> what it is !

Wait a minute, help me understand...

You talk about the 'God of the Bible' many times..

You spent over twenty years coming up with proof that God exist..

Here is what I don't understand...

If you believe in God

and you say you only read "50 pages" of the bible...

You don't sound you are really interested
in what God has to say..
otherwise you would have read the whole bible.

I mean, I just don't get it. I simply don't have the
ability to understand.

Why would you spend over twenty years coming up with
some formula to prove God exist if you're
not even interested in what
God has to say???

I just don't get it. I simply don't have the
ability to understand. Help me to understand.

Why are you not interested in what God has to say?

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

On Friday, November 11, 2022 at 3:00:21 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> and you say you only read "50 pages" of the bible...
>
[George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
..... Look StarMaker – the Bible is a "PSYCHOLOGY book" –
it is not a "PHYSICS book".
..
..... The Bible is a lecture on the dangers of the Psychotic
personality. All criminals are psychotics in some degree.
And the Bible is a history of Civilization's struggle
against evil.
..
We are now in a scientific age – and it turns out that a
Scientific Proof of God has been discovered.
..
Therefore the now (large) scientific world can
leave the Bible for the use of the scientifically illiterate,
and deduce the psychology ramifications of God directly
from the scientific explanation of God.
..
The Bible will never go out of date as long as there are
scientifically illiterate people in the world – however
now the scientifically literate can skip the psychology
lecture and get the full description of the phenomenon
of God Scientifically..
..
George

George Hammond wrote:
>
> On Friday, November 11, 2022 at 3:00:21 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > and you say you only read "50 pages" of the bible...
> >
> [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
> .... Look StarMaker – the Bible is a "PSYCHOLOGY book" –
> it is not a "PHYSICS book".
> .
> .... The Bible is a lecture on the dangers of the Psychotic
> personality. All criminals are psychotics in some degree.
> And the Bible is a history of Civilization's struggle
> against evil.
> .
> We are now in a scientific age – and it turns out that a
> Scientific Proof of God has been discovered.
> .
> Therefore the now (large) scientific world can
> leave the Bible for the use of the scientifically illiterate,
> and deduce the psychology ramifications of God directly
> from the scientific explanation of God.
> .
> The Bible will never go out of date as long as there are
> scientifically illiterate people in the world – however
> now the scientifically literate can skip the psychology
> lecture and get the full description of the phenomenon
> of God Scientifically..
> .
> George

Maybe you don't understand...
Math is not Science..

and your so-called "proof of God" is based on Math...(an algebra program
on your mac computer)

So, your 'proof of God' is not...Scientifically.

It is Mathematically.

And math does not exist except in the mind of...men.

There is no other place in the universe where math resides.

So, go back to the drawing board and come up with proof without using
Math.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

On Sunday, November 13, 2022 at 1:55:47 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:

> Maybe you don't understand...
> Math is not Science..
>
> and your so-called "proof of God" is based on Math...(an algebra program
> on your mac computer)
>
> So, your 'proof of God' is not...Scientifically.
>
> It is Mathematically.
>
> And math does not exist except in the mind of...men.
>
> There is no other place in the universe where math resides.
>
> So, go back to the drawing board and come up with proof without using
> Math.
> --
..
[George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
..... Listen you goddamed moron idiot... The only reason I'm talking to you
is because apparently you're not afraid of "world opinion" which universally
condemns even "pseudo-" anti-Semitic verbiage which occasionally you post
..
While I'm not afraid of the world either – but for a different reason – because
I'm aware that I'm holding a "ROYAL STRAIGHT FLUSH IN SPADES scientifically
speaking – and no qualified scientist dares confront me !
..
The problem with you is – your lazy and don't pay attention – if you weren't
you would recognize that I didn't make this discovery – a 1, 000 man army of
PhD Psychologists, using desktop computers worldwide in 20 languages,
FOR 50 YEARS testing millions of people DISCOVERED IT
..
The problem is THEY DON'T REALIZE IT –
BECAUSE NONE OF THEM HAS A DEGREE IN PHYSICS
..
I'm a physicist and I took the time TO SPEND 20 YEARS studying PSYCHOMETRY
so I have DISCOVERED that what they are calling the "GFP" (general factor of Psychology)
is actually the GOD OF THE BIBLE
..
So listen you FRIGGIN MORON – I have simply added RELATIVITY MATHEMATICS
TO massive STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY PSYCHOMETRICS to make this discovery
..
And it is way over your head !.
..
George

George Hammond wrote:
>
> On Sunday, November 13, 2022 at 1:55:47 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
>
> > Maybe you don't understand...
> > Math is not Science..
> >
> > and your so-called "proof of God" is based on Math...(an algebra program
> > on your mac computer)
> >
> > So, your 'proof of God' is not...Scientifically.
> >
> > It is Mathematically.
> >
> > And math does not exist except in the mind of...men.
> >
> > There is no other place in the universe where math resides.
> >
> > So, go back to the drawing board and come up with proof without using
> > Math.
> > --
> .
> [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
> .... Listen you goddamed moron idiot... The only reason I'm talking to you
> is because apparently you're not afraid of "world opinion" which universally
> condemns even "pseudo-" anti-Semitic verbiage which occasionally you post
> .
> While I'm not afraid of the world either – but for a different reason – because
> I'm aware that I'm holding a "ROYAL STRAIGHT FLUSH IN SPADES scientifically
> speaking – and no qualified scientist dares confront me !
> .
> The problem with you is – your lazy and don't pay attention – if you weren't
> you would recognize that I didn't make this discovery – a 1, 000 man army of
> PhD Psychologists, using desktop computers worldwide in 20 languages,
> FOR 50 YEARS testing millions of people DISCOVERED IT
> .
> The problem is THEY DON'T REALIZE IT –
> BECAUSE NONE OF THEM HAS A DEGREE IN PHYSICS
> .
> I'm a physicist and I took the time TO SPEND 20 YEARS studying PSYCHOMETRY
> so I have DISCOVERED that what they are calling the "GFP" (general factor of Psychology)
> is actually the GOD OF THE BIBLE
> .
> So listen you FRIGGIN MORON – I have simply added RELATIVITY MATHEMATICS
> TO massive STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY PSYCHOMETRICS to make this discovery
> .
> And it is way over your head !.
> .
> George

you spent 20 YEARS studying PSYCHOMETRY????
There is no scientific evidence that psychometry exists..
is a form of extrasensory perception characterized by the claimed
ability to make relevant associations from an object of unknown history
by making physical contact with that object
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychometry_(paranormal)

are you joking?

dis is gettin more insane by the day....

i bet you got a crystal ball at home that you plug into the wall...

I tell you a secret George...your friends and associates are whispering
behind your back sayin you're a retard. Do you hear the whispers? I can
hear it..
turn around quickly...watch their face change.

You need to call tech support.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

On Sunday, November 13, 2022 at 8:16:10 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> you spent 20 YEARS studying PSYCHOMETRY????
> There is no scientific evidence that psychometry exists..
> is a form of extrasensory perception characterized by the claimed
> ability to make relevant associations from an object of unknown history
>
>
[George E Hammond MS physics]
..... Listen you MORONIC FOOL – there are
..
TWO DEFINITIONS of "PSYCHOMETRY"
..
– and every educated person in
the world is aware of this – BUT YOU !!
..
1 – PSYCHOMETRY =
the statistical analysis of Intelligence
and Personality tests In Psychology
..
2 – PSYCHOMETRY =
an archaic and now thoroughly
debunked theory of Divination
..
Modern PSYCHOMETRY is the leading academic tool used in
modern Psychology.
..
And by the way – here's a picture of me with HANS EYSENCK
the world's most famous living PSYCHOMETRIST taken in
Montréal in 1996 at the XXVI International Conference of
Psychology where we were both invited speakers to the same
podium and the same audience!
..
https://www.academia.edu/10591150/How_George_Hammond_discovered_the_worlds_first_Scientific_Proof_of_God
..
George

George Hammond wrote:
>
> On Sunday, November 13, 2022 at 8:16:10 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > you spent 20 YEARS studying PSYCHOMETRY????
> > There is no scientific evidence that psychometry exists..
> > is a form of extrasensory perception characterized by the claimed
> > ability to make relevant associations from an object of unknown history
> >
> >
> [George E Hammond MS physics]
> .... Listen you MORONIC FOOL – there are
> .
> TWO DEFINITIONS of "PSYCHOMETRY"
> .
> – and every educated person in
> the world is aware of this – BUT YOU !!
> .
> 1 – PSYCHOMETRY =
> the statistical analysis of Intelligence
> and Personality tests In Psychology
> .
> 2 – PSYCHOMETRY =
> an archaic and now thoroughly
> debunked theory of Divination
> .
> Modern PSYCHOMETRY is the leading academic tool used in
> modern Psychology.
> .
> And by the way – here's a picture of me with HANS EYSENCK
> the world's most famous living PSYCHOMETRIST taken in
> Montréal in 1996 at the XXVI International Conference of
> Psychology where we were both invited speakers to the same
> podium and the same audience!
> .
> https://www.academia.edu/10591150/How_George_Hammond_discovered_the_worlds_first_Scientific_Proof_of_God
> .
> George

a person (such as a clinical psychologist) who is skilled in the
administration and interpretation of *objective* psychological tests.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/psychometrician

You're into 'subjective', that is the COMPLETE opposite of 'objective'!

you spent 20 YEARS studying PSYCHOMETRY...dats Paranormal,
non-scientific bodies of knowledge!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychometry_(paranormal)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranormal

You're into ...Exorcism!

Astral projection Astrology Aura Bilocation Breatharianism
Clairvoyance Close encounter Cold spot Crystal gazing
Conjuration Cryptozoology Demonic possession Demonology Ectoplasm
Electronic voice phenomenon Exorcism Extrasensory perception
Forteana Fortune-telling Ghost hunting Indigo children Magic Mediumship
Miracle Occult Orb Ouija Paranormal fiction Paranormal television
Precognition Preternatural Psychic Psychic reading Psychokinesis
Psychometry Reincarnation Remote viewing Retrocognition Spirit
photography Spirit possession
Spirit world Spiritualism Stone Tape Supernatural Telepathy
Table-turning Ufology

Crystal gazing...

Are you Romanian??? a Gypsy?

A pickpocket??

non-scientific

HOW DARE YOU COME HERE AND USE THE WORD...Scientifically.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

On Tuesday, November 15, 2022 at 12:00:33 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:
> > [George E Hammond MS physics]
> > .....THERE ARE TWO DEFINITIONS of "PSYCHOMETRY"
> > 1 – PSYCHOMETRY =
> > the statistical analysis of Intelligence
> > and Personality tests In Psychology
> > 2 – PSYCHOMETRY =
> > an archaic and now thoroughly
> > debunked theory of Divination
> >
> > And by the way – here's a picture of me with HANS EYSENCK
> > the world's most famous living PSYCHOMETRIST taken in
> > Montréal in 1996 at the XXVI International Conference of
> > Psychology where we were both invited speakers to the same
> > podium and the same audience!
> > .
https://www.academia.edu/10591150/How_George_Hammond_discovered_the_worlds_first_Scientific_Proof_of_God
> > .
>[STARMAKER]
> You're into 'subjective', that is the COMPLETE opposite of 'objective'!
> You're into ...Exorcism!
> Crystal gazing...
> Are you Romanian??? a Gypsy?
> HOW DARE YOU COME HERE AND USE THE WORD...Scientifically.
> --
[GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS]
..... Listen you FRIGGIN MORON I'm a "Swamp Yankee Protestant"
and 13 generations of my New England ancestors are buried in the
Newburyport Cemetery. My great uncle was police chief of the town of
Newbury!
..... That picture of me with Hans Eysenck (URL above) was taken by
Prof. Peter F Miranda then chairman of the APA in Rhode Island and a
personal friend of mine.
..... Throwing this WELL-KNOWN CANARD about the 2 dictionary
definitions of "Psychometry" is a STALE CANARD that only an
uneducated FIGGIN MORON like you would think is funny !
..... I know you're half Jewish – and a classic SON OF SAM stereotype
personality – but you better wise up and realized that while you
HAVE THE STAGE and are talking to a qualified physicist – you better
start making sense and talk physics – especially about something like this:
..
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE METRIC OF GOD (according to Hammond)
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
..
Which is a HISTORY MAKING DISCOVERY !!!!!
..
George

On Tuesday, November 15, 2022 at 7:31:25 AM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
> .
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | = THE METRIC OF GOD (according to Hammond)
> |o o a² o. |
> |ooo-1/a²|
> .
> Which is a HISTORY MAKING DISCOVERY !!!!!
> .
> George
>
POST SCRIPT ---- TO STARMAKER
POST SCRIPT ---- TO STARMAKER
..... Look STARMAKER – if you're so goddamed interested in this
"Scientific Proof of God" – why don't you take 10 MINUTES to
watch this video – which I made – and I am shown in person
narrating it – and which explains the ENTIRE SCIENTIFIC BASIS
for the scientific proof of God: –
..
WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
...... https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk
................ (YouTube 12-min)
..
UNTIL YOU WATCH THIS VIDEO YOU HAVE NO IDEA
WHAT THIS IS DISCOVERY IS ALL ABOUT !!!
..
George

George Hammond wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, November 15, 2022 at 12:00:33 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > George Hammond wrote:
> > > [George E Hammond MS physics]
> > > .....THERE ARE TWO DEFINITIONS of "PSYCHOMETRY"
> > > 1 – PSYCHOMETRY =
> > > the statistical analysis of Intelligence
> > > and Personality tests In Psychology
> > > 2 – PSYCHOMETRY =
> > > an archaic and now thoroughly
> > > debunked theory of Divination
> > >
> > > And by the way – here's a picture of me with HANS EYSENCK
> > > the world's most famous living PSYCHOMETRIST taken in
> > > Montréal in 1996 at the XXVI International Conference of
> > > Psychology where we were both invited speakers to the same
> > > podium and the same audience!
> > > .
> https://www.academia.edu/10591150/How_George_Hammond_discovered_the_worlds_first_Scientific_Proof_of_God
> > > .
> >[STARMAKER]
> > You're into 'subjective', that is the COMPLETE opposite of 'objective'!
> > You're into ...Exorcism!
> > Crystal gazing...
> > Are you Romanian??? a Gypsy?
> > HOW DARE YOU COME HERE AND USE THE WORD...Scientifically.
> > --
> [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS]
> .... Listen you FRIGGIN MORON I'm a "Swamp Yankee Protestant"
> and 13 generations of my New England ancestors are buried in the
> Newburyport Cemetery. My great uncle was police chief of the town of
> Newbury!
> .... That picture of me with Hans Eysenck (URL above) was taken by
> Prof. Peter F Miranda then chairman of the APA in Rhode Island and a
> personal friend of mine.
> .... Throwing this WELL-KNOWN CANARD about the 2 dictionary
> definitions of "Psychometry" is a STALE CANARD that only an
> uneducated FIGGIN MORON like you would think is funny !
> .... I know you're half Jewish – and a classic SON OF SAM stereotype
> personality – but you better wise up and realized that while you
> HAVE THE STAGE and are talking to a qualified physicist – you better
> start making sense and talk physics – especially about something like this:
> .
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | = THE METRIC OF GOD (according to Hammond)
> |o o a² o. |
> |ooo-1/a²|
> .
> Which is a HISTORY MAKING DISCOVERY !!!!!
> .
> George

Yeahhhh, but you haven't mentioned any Physics At All!

Just a lot of psycho stuff..
PSYCHOMETRY
PSYCHOMETRIST
Psychology
Psychometrician's
massive STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY PSYCHOMETRICS!!!!
1, 000 man army of PhD Psychologists!

You're a PSYCHO!!!!

noun, plural psy·chos.
a psychopathic or psychotic person.
a crazy or mentally unstable person.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/psycho

A MASSIVE PSYCHO!!!!

Where is the physics?
https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond
I no see no physics there? Where is the physics?

and btw, dis guy already came out wit a
https://bahai-library.com/pdf/h/hatcher_proof_existence_god.pdf

and he uses the same arguement as you do but WITHOUT math...

Here is what 'other's say about you...

"Crazier than a sack of tomcats. Bet Roger Penrose would have a good laugh at the guy's microtubule "airbag" theory. "

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

On Tuesday, November 15, 2022 at 4:07:38 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> massive STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY PSYCHOMETRICS!!!!
> 1, 000 man army of PhD Psychologists!
> Where is the physics?
>
[GE Hammond MS Physics]
POST SCRIPT ---- TO STARMAKER
..... Look STARMAKER – if you're so goddamed interested in this
"Scientific Proof of God" – why don't you take 10 MINUTES to
watch this video – which I made – and I am shown in person
narrating it – and which explains the ENTIRE "PSYCH" BASIS
for the scientific proof of God: – we can't get to she Physics until you
can understand this first !!!
... then we can explain:
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
WHICH IS THE "PHYSICS"... ....ASSHOLE !! !
..
WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
....... https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk
................ (YouTube 12-min)
..
UNTIL YOU WATCH THIS VIDEO YOU HAVE NO IDEA
WHAT THIS IS DISCOVERY IS ALL ABOUT !!!
..
You can only comprehend the PHYSICS of this, AFTER
you understand the PSYCHOLOGY of it... I'm not kust
a PHYSICS GENIUS... I'm a PSYCHOLOGY genius also..
Friggin wake up... DUMMY UP for chrissakes... this isn't
KID STUFF... HOLOCAUST, ATOM BOMBS, GLOBAL WARMING
..... MAN UP for chrissakes... AND SHOW SOME INTELLIGENCE
George

George Hammond wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, November 15, 2022 at 4:07:38 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > massive STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY PSYCHOMETRICS!!!!
> > 1, 000 man army of PhD Psychologists!
> > Where is the physics?
> >
> [GE Hammond MS Physics]
> POST SCRIPT ---- TO STARMAKER
> .... Look STARMAKER – if you're so goddamed interested in this
> "Scientific Proof of God" – why don't you take 10 MINUTES to
> watch this video – which I made – and I am shown in person
> narrating it – and which explains the ENTIRE "PSYCH" BASIS
> for the scientific proof of God: – we can't get to she Physics until you
> can understand this first !!!
> ... then we can explain:
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | = THE METRIC OF GOD
> |o o a² o. |
> |ooo-1/a²|
> WHICH IS THE "PHYSICS"... ....ASSHOLE !! !
> .
> WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
> ...... https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk
> ............... (YouTube 12-min)
> .
> UNTIL YOU WATCH THIS VIDEO YOU HAVE NO IDEA
> WHAT THIS IS DISCOVERY IS ALL ABOUT !!!
> .
> You can only comprehend the PHYSICS of this, AFTER
> you understand the PSYCHOLOGY of it... I'm not kust
> a PHYSICS GENIUS... I'm a PSYCHOLOGY genius also..
> Friggin wake up... DUMMY UP for chrissakes... this isn't
> KID STUFF... HOLOCAUST, ATOM BOMBS, GLOBAL WARMING
> .... MAN UP for chrissakes... AND SHOW SOME INTELLIGENCE
> George

Okay, i heard you like to hold up the fort against attacking indians..

Over hundred thousands results for "scientific proof of God"
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q="scientific+proof+of+God"

'All in Title' brings you these results -- Get your "scientific proof of God" at Amazon, Walmart or Ebay...(and hundreds of other places)
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=allintitle%3A"scientific+proof+of+God"

"My publisher told me that the number of readers of this book will be inversely proportional to the number of equations it contains." --Stephen Hawking ,

In other words, get someone to Translate your 'God formula' math language into the English language. Then you'll be on your way on the book shelves at Walmart too!

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 1:24:54 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
..
[George Hammond MS physics]
..... STATE YOUR ACADEMIC CREDENTIALS
..
I don't believe YOU HAVE ANY SCIENTIFIC CREDENTIALS
..
NONE IN MATH, NONE IN SCIENCE AND NONE IN RELATIVITY
..
SCREW... TAKE YOU'RE HECKLING SOMEWHERE ELSE !!
.. George

George Hammond wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 1:24:54 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> .
> [George Hammond MS physics]
> .... STATE YOUR ACADEMIC CREDENTIALS
> .
> I don't believe YOU HAVE ANY SCIENTIFIC CREDENTIALS
> .
> NONE IN MATH, NONE IN SCIENCE AND NONE IN RELATIVITY
> .
> SCREW... TAKE YOU'RE HECKLING SOMEWHERE ELSE !!
> . George

Badges? We ain't got no badges! We don't need no badges! I don't have to show you any stinking badges!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VqomZQMZQCQ

Boston MA, USAPh.D. Candidate

A Moderator online said this about your credentials..."I'd say there is a reason why he did not go beyond the point of a PhD candidate."

I discovered at a very early age that there is no God. Scientific proof by Observation.

There was a newsstand where a blind man was selling newspapers and comic books.
I stole a few comic books from him but I stood there next to the newsstand
and waited for some kind of consequences...I even looked up to
see if God was going to do anything about it.

Nothing. Not even bird poop.

I had the biggest collection of comic books on my block!

There is no God.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.