On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 2:17:50 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> [STARMAKER[
> I discovered at a very early age that there is no God.
>
[HAMMOND, MS Physics]
So did I – and BOTH OF US WERE WRONG
..... What we didn't know is that "GOD" IS A PSYCHOLOGICAL PHENOMENON
..... But it causes an OBJECTIVELY REAL EFFECT
>
>[STARMAKER]
> I had the biggest collection of comic books on my block!
>
[HAMMOND, MS Physics]]
I only read "The Lone Ranger" comic books.
>
>[STARMAKER]
> There is no God.
> --
[HAMMOND, MS Physics]
You're DEAD WRONG and I have proved it.
..
The problem is you don't have any qualifications
in PHYSICS, MATH or RELATIVITY to say nothing
of the fact that you have no qualifications in
PSYCHOMETRY.
..
Without that expertise it is an absolute waste of
time to even talk to you!
..
You apparently have some deep-seated interest
in the subject of GOD – but without any scientific
credentials that is absolutely worthless under the
present circumstances.
George

George Hammond wrote:

>>[STARMAKER]
>> There is no God.
>> --
> [HAMMOND, MS Physics]
> You're DEAD WRONG and I have proved it.

let us hear.

On Saturday, November 19, 2022 at 10:08:54 AM UTC-5, Jules Scotti wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:
> >>[STARMAKER]
> >> There is no God.
> > [HAMMOND, MS Physics]
> > You're DEAD WRONG and I have proved it.
>
>[Jules Scotti, academic credentials unknown]
> let us hear.
..
[George Hammond MS Physics (1967)]
..... If you have any Academic or other professional credentials
now is the time to mention it. You don't have to give names, dates,
addresses – I'll take you at your word – since at age 80 and a
lifelong intellectual and scientific researcher – I'll know if you're
lying in 5 minutes flat!
..... I'm looking for any EDUCATED person to discuss this
"Worlds First Discovery Of a Scientific Proof of God"
..
Yours, George

George Hammond wrote:
>
> On Saturday, November 19, 2022 at 10:08:54 AM UTC-5, Jules Scotti wrote:
> > George Hammond wrote:
> > >>[STARMAKER]
> > >> There is no God.
> > > [HAMMOND, MS Physics]
> > > You're DEAD WRONG and I have proved it.
> >
> >[Jules Scotti, academic credentials unknown]
> > let us hear.
> .
> [George Hammond MS Physics (1967)]
> .... If you have any Academic or other professional credentials
> now is the time to mention it. You don't have to give names, dates,
> addresses – I'll take you at your word – since at age 80 and a
> lifelong intellectual and scientific researcher – I'll know if you're
> lying in 5 minutes flat!
> .... I'm looking for any EDUCATED person to discuss this
> "Worlds First Discovery Of a Scientific Proof of God"
> .
> Yours, George

"Worlds First Discovery..."????

"Discovery"?

Let me explain something to you...here's the thing..

You made a discovery
there are two realities
the visible reality and
the invisible reality..

Your discovery was made
in the invisible reality..

meaning, you dreamt it up.

Your discovery occured in
your mind while sleeping.

You're dreaming! Wake Up!

Tech support! Tech support!!

I mean, I understand...
sometimes I have trouble
figuring out am I dreaming
or am i awake.

So, what I do to test
whether I'm draming or
not is I reach over the light switch
and turn it off or on..

In a dream, the light switch doesn't work.

Have you tried this metric of God formula
using paper and pencil only?

In a visible reality, I mean...

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

On Saturday, November 19, 2022 at 2:50:16 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> [STARMAKER]
> Let me explain something to you...here's the thing..
> there are two realities
> the visible reality and
> the invisible reality..
>
[George E Hammond MS physics]
.... Let me explains something to YOU: –
there is no "INVISIBLE REALITY" (dreaming) nvolved in
my "Scientific Proof of God"
..... Both OBJECTIVE and SUBJECTIVE space-time
I are absolutely physically real REALITIES.
..
1 – SUBJECTIVE reality is what we ACTUALLY SEE
2 – OBJECTIVE reality is what we ACTUALLY MEASURE
.......(with clocks and rulers)
..
They are NOT THE SAME SIZE OR SPEED DUE to the fact
that no human being is actually "100% fully grown" – and this
makes us SEE a size and speed of actual "measurable" reality
that is 10 to 20% LARGER THAN IT ACTUALLY MEASURES !
(Some people more, some people less)
..
IT HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do WITH DREAMING !!!!!
..
.... You don't even understand what the theory is about.
You're not a qualified scientist.
..
..... Go read some more Comic Books for chrissakes !
..
George

Il giorno lunedì 24 ottobre 2022 alle 06:56:00 UTC+2 Sylvia Else ha scritto:
> On 24-Oct-22 3:13 pm, George Hammond wrote:
> > On Sunday, October 23, 2022 at 11:25:13 PM UTC-4, Sylvia Else wrote:
> >
> >> To the extent that God exists, He would be part of the real universe.
> >> Science does not purport to prove things about the real universe, but
> >> rather to describe the behaviour of the universe using mathematical
> >> models. So science can no more prove the existence of God that it proves
> >> anything else about the universe.
> >>
> >> Sylvia.
> > .
> > [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
> > ..... Yours is not the majority opinion. I am only interested in the majority opinion.
> > Majority opinion at present believes that there is a God – but believes that
> > unlike other facts of life, Science cannot prove it.
> > ..... Well – for 5000 years they were CORRECT – but as of right now they are
> > SCIENTIFICALLY WRONG – because as of right now – what is popularly described
> > as a "scientific proof of God" – has been discovered by SCIENCE..
> > .... The existence of God is no longer a Philosophy argument, or a Theological
> > argument – it is now a "SCIENTIFIC FACT" – measurable to 2 decimal point accuracy !
> > .... Popular opinion agrees that if you can measure something in SI units,
> > then it EXISTS !! The "Curvature of God" can be measured in MKS units.
> > George
> Either God exists, or He doesn't. One way or another, it's a fact.
> Depending on whether the majority opinion accords with the fact, it is
> either right, or wrong.
>
> Facts are not determined by democracy.
>
> Sylvia.

God is not is not?
there is one more realistic hypothesis:
God is the ultimate goeò of the evolution of the intelligences

Il giorno lunedì 24 ottobre 2022 alle 06:56:00 UTC+2 Sylvia Else ha scritto:
> On 24-Oct-22 3:13 pm, George Hammond wrote:
> > On Sunday, October 23, 2022 at 11:25:13 PM UTC-4, Sylvia Else wrote:
> >
> >> To the extent that God exists, He would be part of the real universe.
> >> Science does not purport to prove things about the real universe, but
> >> rather to describe the behaviour of the universe using mathematical
> >> models. So science can no more prove the existence of God that it proves
> >> anything else about the universe.
> >>
> >> Sylvia.
> > .
> > [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
> > ..... Yours is not the majority opinion. I am only interested in the majority opinion.
> > Majority opinion at present believes that there is a God – but believes that
> > unlike other facts of life, Science cannot prove it.
> > ..... Well – for 5000 years they were CORRECT – but as of right now they are
> > SCIENTIFICALLY WRONG – because as of right now – what is popularly described
> > as a "scientific proof of God" – has been discovered by SCIENCE..
> > .... The existence of God is no longer a Philosophy argument, or a Theological
> > argument – it is now a "SCIENTIFIC FACT" – measurable to 2 decimal point accuracy !
> > .... Popular opinion agrees that if you can measure something in SI units,
> > then it EXISTS !! The "Curvature of God" can be measured in MKS units.
> > George
> Either God exists, or He doesn't. One way or another, it's a fact.
> Depending on whether the majority opinion accords with the fact, it is
> either right, or wrong.
>
> Facts are not determined by democracy.
>
> Sylvia.
beda
God is or is not?
there is a more realistic hypothesis:
the evolution of human intelligence into God like power,
unless we destroy ourself before.
This may be the task of any intelligence existing in the universe,

Likely extremely low are the chance of succeeding in such a goal.

Does not a tree produce millions of seeds just to make sure that maybe just one
will succeed in its scope???

cheers, and regards
beda pietanza

George Hammond wrote:
>
> On Saturday, November 19, 2022 at 2:50:16 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > [STARMAKER]
> > Let me explain something to you...here's the thing..
> > there are two realities
> > the visible reality and
> > the invisible reality..
> >
> [George E Hammond MS physics]
> ... Let me explains something to YOU: –
> there is no "INVISIBLE REALITY" (dreaming) nvolved in
> my "Scientific Proof of God"
> .... Both OBJECTIVE and SUBJECTIVE space-time
> I are absolutely physically real REALITIES.
> .
> 1 – is what we ACTUALLY SEE
> 2 – OBJECTIVE reality is what we ACTUALLY MEASURE
> ......(with clocks and rulers)
> .
> They are NOT THE SAME SIZE OR SPEED DUE to the fact
> that no human being is actually "100% fully grown" – and this
> makes us SEE a size and speed of actual "measurable" reality
> that is 10 to 20% LARGER THAN IT ACTUALLY MEASURES !
> (Some people more, some people less)
> .
> IT HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do WITH DREAMING !!!!!
> .
> ... You don't even understand what the theory is about.
> You're not a qualified scientist.
> .
> .... Go read some more Comic Books for chrissakes !
> .
> George

SUBJECTIVE reality
OBJECTIVE reality

it's all dreamworld..

https://stevepavlina.com/blog/2007/09/subjective-reality-simplified/

Maybe this will help you make your numbers more simple for others to understand...

Here are the numbers to : Proof that God Exist
950
0950
91950
4-30-34-45-51 19
18-35-56-58-64 9

Just convert your dreams to numbers!

https://lotterypredictor.com/wordtranslator
https://lotterytexts.com/blog/lottery-dream-numbers/
https://www.numerando.it/en/dreams-interpretation-numbers.php

I bet your grandmother used to play the numbers...

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

On Saturday, November 19, 2022 at 6:57:06 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> >[George Hammond MS Physics]
> > IT HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do WITH DREAMING !!!!!
> > .... Go read some more Comic Books !
> > .
> [STARMAKER]
> it's all dreamworld..
> Just convert your dreams to numbers!
>
[George E Hammond MS Physics]
Listen PUTZ – if a 6-month-old child looks up at the bottom
of a kitchen table while a 20-year-old looks down at the top
of the table –
..
THE TABLE LOOKS 4 TIMES LARGER TO THE
CHILD THAN IT DOES TO THE 20-YEAR-OLD
..
Are you so FRIGGIN STUPID t or something – it's caused by
human growth !
..
The child's "subjective space" is magnified by 400% compared to
the subjective space of the 20-year-old..
..
Dummy up SCHMUCK – that isn't hard to understand !.
..
And excuse my Yiddish – I know damn well you're half
Jewish or something – which is making you tick !
..
George

On Sunday, November 20, 2022 at 2:32:37 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > [George E Hammond MS Physics]
> > A TABLE LOOKS 4 TIMES LARGER TO A
> > CHILD THAN IT DOES TO A 20-YEAR-OLD
> > George
> >
>[STARMAKER]
> what is this obsession you have with...kitchen tables????
>
[GEORGE E HAMMOND MS Physics]
..... Nothing special about tables – here's the same story for –
WINDMILLS: –
.....DUTCH WINDMILL POST (sci.physics.relativity)
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/lkvb-IXoFyA/m/VnhEVHBAAQAJ
..... Windmills are better than tables because they involve
BOTH SIZE AND SPEED !!! – – They not only look LARGER to a child –
they look like they are going FASTER to a child ALSO !
................... THIS IS THE PHENOMENON OF GOD !
........................... TRY AND UNDERSTAND IT !
...................... DON'T BE AN IGNORANT PERSON
Are you confessing. that you can't UNDERSTAND the SIMPLE BASIC principle
of the world's first "Scientific Proof of God" ?
..... IF SO what the hell are you doing on sci.physics.relativity ????
..
After all – we're here to show that this effect causes the
GOD METRIC : –
..
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE RELATIVISTIC METRIC OF GOD.
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
..
That is the ENTIRE POINT of this THREAD !
..
George

On 2022-11-20 22:02:28 +0000, George Hammond said:

> On Sunday, November 20, 2022 at 2:32:37 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>
>>> [George E Hammond MS Physics]> > A TABLE LOOKS 4 TIMES LARGER TO A> >
>>> CHILD THAN IT DOES TO A 20-YEAR-OLD> > George
> > >
>> [STARMAKER]
>> what is this obsession you have with...kitchen tables????> [GEORGE E
>> HAMMOND MS Physics]
> .... Nothing special about tables – here's the same story for –
> WINDMILLS: –
> ....DUTCH WINDMILL POST (sci.physics.relativity)
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/lkvb-IXoFyA/m/VnhEVHBAAQAJ
> .... Windmills are better than tables because they involve
> BOTH SIZE AND SPEED !!! – – They not only look LARGER to a child –
> they look like they are going FASTER to a child ALSO !
> .................. THIS IS THE PHENOMENON OF GOD !
> .......................... TRY AND UNDERSTAND IT !
> ..................... DON'T BE AN IGNORANT PERSON
> Are you confessing. that you can't UNDERSTAND the SIMPLE BASIC principle
> of the world's first "Scientific Proof of God" ?
> .... IF SO what the hell are you doing on sci.physics.relativity ????
> .
> After all – we're here to show that this effect causes the
> GOD METRIC : –
> .
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | = THE RELATIVISTIC METRIC OF GOD.
> |o o a² o. |
> |ooo-1/a²|
> .
> That is the ENTIRE POINT of this THREAD !
> .
> George

39 words all in capitals, so 5 x 39 = 195 points in the crackpot index.
You leave Dolan and all the others far behind.

--
Athel -- French and British, living mainly in England until 1987.

On Monday, 21 November 2022 at 09:03:24 UTC+1, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
> On 2022-11-20 22:02:28 +0000, George Hammond said:
>
> > On Sunday, November 20, 2022 at 2:32:37 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>
> >>> [George E Hammond MS Physics]> > A TABLE LOOKS 4 TIMES LARGER TO A> >
> >>> CHILD THAN IT DOES TO A 20-YEAR-OLD> > George
> > > >
> >> [STARMAKER]
> >> what is this obsession you have with...kitchen tables????> [GEORGE E
> >> HAMMOND MS Physics]
> > .... Nothing special about tables – here's the same story for –
> > WINDMILLS: –
> > ....DUTCH WINDMILL POST (sci.physics.relativity)
> > https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/lkvb-IXoFyA/m/VnhEVHBAAQAJ
> > .... Windmills are better than tables because they involve
> > BOTH SIZE AND SPEED !!! – – They not only look LARGER to a child –
> > they look like they are going FASTER to a child ALSO !
> > .................. THIS IS THE PHENOMENON OF GOD !
> > .......................... TRY AND UNDERSTAND IT !
> > ..................... DON'T BE AN IGNORANT PERSON
> > Are you confessing. that you can't UNDERSTAND the SIMPLE BASIC principle
> > of the world's first "Scientific Proof of God" ?
> > .... IF SO what the hell are you doing on sci.physics.relativity ????
> > .
> > After all – we're here to show that this effect causes the
> > GOD METRIC : –
> > .
> > |a² o o o. |
> > |o a² o o. | = THE RELATIVISTIC METRIC OF GOD.
> > |o o a² o. |
> > |ooo-1/a²|
> > .
> > That is the ENTIRE POINT of this THREAD !
> > .
> > George
> 39 words all in capitals, so 5 x 39 = 195 points in the crackpot index.
> You leave Dolan and all the others far behind.

Tom Roberts is still leading, however.

On 2022-11-21 08:37:42 +0000, Maciej Wozniak said:

> On Monday, 21 November 2022 at 09:03:24 UTC+1, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
>> On 2022-11-20 22:02:28 +0000, George Hammond said:>> > On Sunday,
>> November 20, 2022 at 2:32:37 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:> >>>>> >>>
>> [George E Hammond MS Physics]> > A TABLE LOOKS 4 TIMES LARGER TO A> >>
>> >>> CHILD THAN IT DOES TO A 20-YEAR-OLD> > George> > > >> >>
>> [STARMAKER]> >> what is this obsession you have with...kitchen
>> tables????> [GEORGE E> >> HAMMOND MS Physics]> > .... Nothing special
>> about tables – here's the same story for –> > WINDMILLS: –> >
>> ....DUTCH WINDMILL POST (sci.physics.relativity)> >
>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/lkvb-IXoFyA/m/VnhEVHBAAQAJ>
>> > .... Windmills are better than tables because they involve> > BOTH
>> SIZE AND SPEED !!! – – They not only look LARGER to a child –> >
>> they look like they are going FASTER to a child ALSO !> >
>> .................. THIS IS THE PHENOMENON OF GOD !> >
>> .......................... TRY AND UNDERSTAND IT !> >
>> ..................... DON'T BE AN IGNORANT PERSON> > Are you
>> confessing. that you can't UNDERSTAND the SIMPLE BASIC principle> > of
>> the world's first "Scientific Proof of God" ?> > .... IF SO what the
>> hell are you doing on sci.physics.relativity ????> > .> > After all –
>> we're here to show that this effect causes the> > GOD METRIC : –> >
>> .> > |a² o o o. |> > |o a² o o. | = THE RELATIVISTIC METRIC OF GOD.>
>> > |o o a² o. |> > |ooo-1/a²|> > .> > That is the ENTIRE POINT of this
>> THREAD !> > .> > George
>> 39 words all in capitals, so 5 x 39 = 195 points in the crackpot
>> index.> You leave Dolan and all the others far behind.
> Tom Roberts is still leading, however.

Maybe. I don't usually look at his posts.

--
Athel -- French and British, living mainly in England until 1987.

On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 3:45:41 AM UTC-5, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

> Maybe. I don't usually look at his posts.
> --
[George Hammond MS physics (1967)]
..
Hello Prof. Athel Bowden –
..... Look – the only thing that counts in this discussion is
how much EDUCATION one has.
..
Both you, and me, have spent upwards of 100,000 hours
studying and researching academic Science.
..
You are an CHEMISTRY expert. I am a PHYSICS expert.
In addition to that I happen to be a PSYCHOMETRY expert.
..
All of these accomplishments require an IQ well above 140,
and DECADES of concentrated study.
..
Ad hominem discussion is hardly a substitute for technical
expertise.
..
MEANWHILE – The entire human race is arguing over whether
or not there is a REAL GOD
..
THE EXPERTS (the Vatican for instance) are absolutely convinced
is there is a real God – but they can't SCIENTIFICALLY PROVE IT
..
Many people think That a Scientific Proof of God is IMPOSSIBLE
although Newton, Descartes, Leibniz and many others thought it
possible
..
................... and it certainly is POSSIBLE
..
And it turns out that: –
..
GOD IS AN EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME
..
The proof is SIMPLE in physics terms – but it is massive and expensive
in Psychological terms.
..
Fortunately for us – Hammond has provided the simple scientific
explanation whille ACADEMIC PSYCHOLOGY has spent 50 years
and $50 million dollars funding a worldwide PSYCHOMETRIC ARMY
of 1,000 PhD's in 20 countries using desktop computers DISCOVERING
the top EIGENVECTOR In Personality and Intelligence testing –
and dubbed it the "GFP" (General Factor of Psychology)" – –
and what I have proved is that the GFP is actually The God of the Bible –
– EVEN THOUGH THE PSYCHOLOGISTS DON'T REALIZE IT !!!!
..
For Pete's sake ATHEL – an intelligent and experienced scientific mind
like yours is DESPERATELY NEEDED to help obtain a coherent assessment
of this discovery !.
..
George

George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sunday, November 20, 2022 at 2:32:37 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > [George E Hammond MS Physics]
> > > A TABLE LOOKS 4 TIMES LARGER TO A
> > > CHILD THAN IT DOES TO A 20-YEAR-OLD
> > > George
> > >
> >[STARMAKER]
> > what is this obsession you have with...kitchen tables????
> >
> [GEORGE E HAMMOND MS Physics]
> .... Nothing special about tables – here's the same story for –
> WINDMILLS: –
> ....DUTCH WINDMILL POST (sci.physics.relativity)

Wrong country. It is SPANISH windmills you want to fight against,

Jan

On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 2:16:23 PM UTC-5, J. J. Lodder wrote:
> Wrong country. It is SPANISH windmills you want to fight against,
>
[GEH MS physics]
SNIP SPAM

On Sunday, November 20, 2022 at 10:53:37 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > [GEORGE E HAMMOND MS Physics]
> > .... Nothing special about tables – here's the same story for –
> > WINDMILLS: –
> > ....DUTCH WINDMILL POST (sci.physics.relativity)
> > https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/lkvb-IXoFyA/m/VnhEVHBAAQAJ
> > .... Windmills are better than tables because they involve
> > BOTH SIZE AND SPEED !!! – – They not only look LARGER to a child –
> > they look like they are going FASTER to a child ALSO !
> > .................. THIS IS THE PHENOMENON OF GOD !
> > .......................... TRY AND UNDERSTAND IT !
> > ..................... DON'T BE AN IGNORANT PERSON
>
> [STARMAKER]
> I notice there are a lot of fraudulent science books.
> The Titles of these book are to attract attention to
> get suckers to buy the book.
> You're no different then they are.
>
[George E Hammond MS physics]
..... LOOK – you spent days reading "The Scientific Proof of God"
on my website – THAT PAPER IS 20 YEARS OLD
.... That paper was written only halfway through my 40 year research!
READ SOMETHING UP TO DATE: –
https://tinyurl.com/4jkdd34e
which I wrote within the last year !
..
Look STARMAKER – you are a "POLITICAL FORCE" – I am a "SCIENTIFIC FORCE".
I appreciate the fact that you have single-handedly kept this thread on the
FRONT PAGE of sci.physics.relativity
..
So you work the POLITICAL ANGLE and I'll work the SCIENTIFIC ANGLE
and maybe we can "kick ass" hard enough so some COMPETENT SCIENTIST
will notice the WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD !
I won't challenge you on your political talk – but for chrissakes don't
try to challenge me on the scientifici talk !
..
George

On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 3:35:24 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> A "SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD" is equivalent to a "SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF EVERYTHING"!
> and no one has come up with a theory of everything yet
> You don't expect You can take out your calculator
> and come up with a..."SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD"?
>
[GEORGE E HAMMOND MS PHYSICS, HYANNIS MA USA]
..
You're POLITICALLY SAVVY – because you're not timid about ANTI-SEMITISM
On a scale of 1 to 100 that's worth 90 POINTS.
..
But you only get 5 POINTS for SCIENTIFIC EXPERTISE.
You don't know SHIT about SCIENCE.
..
FYI – – a scientific PROOF OF GOD IS A PROOF OF EVERYTHING !!!
...
LOOK STARMAKER when I say that: –
..
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE (Highly Curved) RELATIVISTIC METRIC OF GOD.
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
..
THAT DOES NOT COME OUT OF A CALCULATOR – YOU IDIOT
It come from taking 2-1/2 Academic degrees in THEORETICAL PHYSICS.
..
I've told you 10 times that the SCIENTIFIC PROOF that this metric describes
GOD – has been supplied by a $50 million dollar, 50 year effort by a 1000 man
PhD Army of Psychometrists – and THIS 10 MINUTE YOUTUBE VIDEO
..
PROVES THAT THE ABOVE METRIC is the GFP – the top EIGENVECTOR of this
50 year, global measurement ! – And therefore is the: –
..
WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
........... https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk
................... (YouTube 12-min)
..
THIS VIDEO DID NOT COME OUT OF A CALCULATOR !!
..
UNTIL YOU WATCH THIS VIDEO YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT
..
George

On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 2:24:47 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > [STARMAKER]
> > So, ...you keep mentioning some other guy named Hammond.
> > "Fortunately for us, Hammond has provided the simple scientific
> > explanation..."
> > Who is this other guy you call Hammond?
> >
[GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS]
..... Cut the bullshit Starmaker – you're supposed to know about writing
in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd PERSON by the time you're outta the 6th grade.
..
LISTEN – I GOT AN IDEA ! I'm thinking about making a NETFLIX MOVIE
about the "WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD".
..
Publishing a paper, writing a book, making a YouTube video – are USELESS –
and the chances of getting it on TELEVISION are zilch. Sosomeone suggested
"MAKE A NETFLIX MOVIE" – – – – AND I THINK THAT'S A GOOD IDEA
..
Do you know anything about NETFLIX ?
..
George

George Hammond wrote:

> On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 2:24:47 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
>> > [STARMAKER]
>> > So, ...you keep mentioning some other guy named Hammond. "Fortunately
>> > for us, Hammond has provided the simple scientific explanation..."
>> > Who is this other guy you call Hammond?
>> >
> [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS]
> .... Cut the bullshit Starmaker – you're supposed to know about writing
> in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd PERSON by the time you're outta the 6th grade.

Americans Are Fat, Lazy, & Have Low Testosterone, Men Are Weak. Useless.

George Hammond wrote:

> On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 2:24:47 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
>> > [STARMAKER]
>> > So, ...you keep mentioning some other guy named Hammond. "Fortunately
>> > for us, Hammond has provided the simple scientific explanation..."
>> > Who is this other guy you call Hammond?
>> >
> [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS]
> .... Cut the bullshit Starmaker – you're supposed to know about writing
> in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd PERSON by the time you're outta the 6th grade.

good news, Turkey is bombing nato "allies", which are nazis and
*state_terrorists* blowing up countries and continents energy pipelines.
Very good news.

Turkish military reacts to claims it endangered US troops
https://%72%74.com/news/567158-t%C3%BCrkiye-us-troops-syria/

Putting the lives of NATO allies at risk is “in of the question,” the
defense minister said. They are sons of the nazi bitches, destroying the
fucking europe.

On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 10:06:05 AM UTC-5, Forest Vaccaro wrote:
[George Hammond MS physics]
Hey NYMSHIFTER "Forest Vaccaro" – keep political trash off this thread
George
..
..
[GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS – – TO PROF. A.C. BOWDEN]
Hello Prof. Athel C. Bowden –
..... Look – the only thing that counts in this discussion is
how much EDUCATION one has.
..
Both you, and me, have spent upwards of 100,000 hours
studying and researching academic Science.
..
You are an CHEMISTRY expert. I am a PHYSICS expert.
In addition to that I happen to be a PSYCHOMETRY expert.
..
All of these accomplishments require an IQ well above 140,
and DECADES of concentrated study.
..
Ad hominem discussion is hardly a substitute for technical
expertise.
..
MEANWHILE – The entire human race is arguing over whether
or not there is a REAL GOD
..
THE EXPERTS (the Vatican for instance) are absolutely convinced
is there is a real God – but they can't SCIENTIFICALLY PROVE IT
..
Many people think That a Scientific Proof of God is IMPOSSIBLE
although Newton, Descartes, Leibniz and many others thought it
possible
..
................... and it certainly is POSSIBLE
..
And it turns out that: –
..
GOD IS AN EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME
..
|a².o...o....o..|
|o..a²..o....o..| = THE (highly curved) RELATIVISTIC METRIC OF GOD.
|o..o...a²...o..|
|o..o...o.-1/a²|
..
The proof is SIMPLE in physics terms – but it is massive and expensive
in Psychological terms.
..
Fortunately for us – Hammond has provided the simple scientific
explanation whille ACADEMIC PSYCHOLOGY has spent 50 years
and $50 million dollars funding a worldwide PSYCHOMETRIC ARMY
of 1,000 PhD's in 20 countries using desktop computers DISCOVERING
the top EIGENVECTOR In Personality and Intelligence testing –
and dubbed it the "GFP" (General Factor of Psychology)" – –
and what I have proved is that the GFP is actually The God of the Bible –
– EVEN THOUGH THE PSYCHOLOGISTS DON'T REALIZE IT !!!!
..
For Pete's sake ATHEL – an intelligent and experienced scientific mind
like yours is DESPERATELY NEEDED to help obtain a coherent assessment
of this discovery !.
..
George

George Hammond wrote:

> On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 10:06:05 AM UTC-5, Forest Vaccaro wrote:
> [George Hammond MS physics]
> Hey NYMSHIFTER "Forest Vaccaro" – keep political trash off this thread
> George . [GEORGE HAMMOND MS PHYSICS – – TO PROF. A.C. BOWDEN]
> Hello Prof. Athel C. Bowden –
> .... Look – the only thing that counts in this discussion is how much
> EDUCATION one has.

it has nothing to do with politics, old friend, but with some real bombs,
as those used by your shithole of a country, destroying energy pipelines
to an entire continent. Can't you see it coming? As those dropped over
Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Hiroshima and Nagasak. You repulsive impertinent
nazi sons of the bitches.

On 2022-11-25 19:26:49 +0000, George Hammond said:

[ … ]

> For Pete's sake ATHEL – an intelligent and experienced scientific mind
> like yours is DESPERATELY NEEDED to help obtain a coherent assessment
> of this discovery !.

I have read the email messages that you've sent to me off-line, but
you're wasting your time. If you have anything to say to me that is
relevant to this group, say it here.

I don't really have anything useful to say about your proof of the
existence of god, in part because I don't believe in the existence of
god. But anyway, that's not my opinion as a mathematician or a
physicist, because I'm neither. I'm not sure that expertise in
chemistry or biochemistry can contribute much.

You remind us of your MS in physics at every opportunity but it isn't
really very impressive -- no PhD, no publications in recognized physics
journals, as far as I can see.

--
Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 36+ years; mainly
in England until 1987.

On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 2:58:30 PM UTC-5, Micheal Agnelli wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:
>
> > On Friday, November 25, 2022 at 10:06:05 AM UTC-5, Forest Vaccaro wrote:
> > [George Hammond MS physics]
> > Hey NYMSHIFTER "Forest Vaccaro" – keep political trash off this thread
> > George .
..
[Micheal Agnelli]
> real bombs, as those used by your shithole of a country, destroying
> energy pipelines to an entire continent.
..
[George Hammond MS physics USA]
..... Listen you technical flunky moron – the Baltic Sea is only 150 FOOT DEEP!
There are thousands of fishing boats with fish finding depth sounder
ONBOARD SONAR that could EASILY locate that 3 foot diameter concrete
encased gas pipeline at 150 feet and drop an easily obtained $500 World War II
surplus DEPTH CHARGE on it – it was OBVIOUSLY done by a single LONE WILDCARD
HOMEGROWN TERRORIST who owns a fishing boat on the Baltic Sea – and he
probably put a 2 or 3 day timer on it to cover his getaway !
...... The idea that ANY NATIONAL GOVERNMENT did it – IS NOT BELIEVABLE !!
Wise up – and get real !
George