Earle psychoceramic Robert Wagoner,StanleyWojcicki,Mason Yearian,Marc Tessier-Lavigne,Persis Drell,Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure-- can they ever, ever ask the simple question, of which is the atom's true real electron, the muon or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.
> > >
> > > Earle Jones, no wonder the new particle accelerator is moving to Michigan State Univ. because in all the time 40 years SLAC, the fools of Stanford physics could never even ask the question, much less confirm real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside 840MeV proton torus doing Faraday law. Which is worse the flake idiot Earle Jones or the physicists of Stanford, is about the only questions running in the minds of the Physics dept of Stanford. A failed school of science.
> > >
> > >
> > > President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> > > Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
> > >
> > > Stanford physics dept.
> > >
> > > Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > CalTech math dept
> > > >
> > > > Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari
> > > > Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris
> > > > Alexei Kitaev, Matilde Marcolli, Nikolai Makarov, Vladimir Markovic, Hiroshi Oguri, Eric Rains, Dinakar Ramakrishnan
> > > > Barry Simon, Richard Wilson, Tom Graber, Sergei Gukov,
> > > > Elena Mantovan, Yi NI,
> > > >
> > > > President Thomas F. Rosenbaum (physics)
> > > > Caltech Physics Dept
> > > >
> > > > Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
> > > > Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
> > > > John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
> > > > Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
> > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #1-1, 148th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > Last revision was 30Nov2021. And this is AP's 148th published science book.
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface:
> > > > > Physics book that explains what the universe is, and how it works.. This is a continuation of the Atomic Theory by Democritus in Ancient Greek times. It adds one more fact to the Atomic Theory picture. That the Universe itself is one gigantic big atom. The picture is that of the Universe, in total, is one big atom that contains more atoms, inside itself. It completes the logic of science that Dr. Feynman wrote-- all things are made up of atoms -- and so, to complete that idea -- all things and the universe itself is an atom.
> > > > >
> > > > > In this edition of year 2021, AP actually proves the Atom Totality theory, and therefore, a simultaneously _disproof_ of the Big Bang theory.. The proof is simple, in that the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but rather, instead, shine from the Faraday law going on inside each and every proton in the Sun or star, or, in the Universe. The muon is the true electron of atoms and is the bar magnet in Faraday's law while the proton is a 840MeV particle in the geometry shape of 8 ring coil torus that is the closed loop coil in Faraday's Law. NASA scientists have discovered the Sun is a yearly increase in radiation of 0.005% yearly, and is why 25% of all insects have perished in the last decade 2010-2020. Stars and Sun shine from Faraday law, not from fusion and that is how the Universe itself grows. So, we cannot logically have two different mechanisms for the creation of the Universe. We cannot have electricity magnetism of Faraday law and then some silly "explosion of Big Bang" to create and grow the universe.
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, in the course of providing supporting evidence of the Atom Totality theory, my research had to revise and correct the entire Maxwell Equations, and revise and correct the theory, the quantum electrodynamics theory.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover Picture: Again I used 8 rings from plumbing hardware to represent the 8 rings of a proton torus, and visualize each ring as a dot cloud pattern instead of a continuous ring, and the holes in some of those rings helps facilitate that image. Notice the muon ring is inside the proton torus rings, and perpendicular, and situated at the equator, going around and around the proton torus at nearly the speed of light in the Faraday law; producing electricity. Atoms are designed to produce maximum electricity, given their masses.
> > > > > Length: 329 pages
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN : B08T82M2LP
> > > > > • Publication date : January 16, 2021
> > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > • File size : 872 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > • Print length : 329 pages
> > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #1-2, 48th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, Atom Totality Series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --------------------------
> > > > > Table of Contents
> > > > > --------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) A visual image of a Atom Totality
> > > > >
> > > > > 2) Simply multiply 9 times 105MeV and there you get the rest mass of proton and neutron.
> > > > >
> > > > > 3) The tau-electron 1777MeV is merely 105MeV multiply by 17 is 1785 with Sigma Error of 0.4%.
> > > > >
> > > > > 4) Particle in the 840MeV range so that we can say we discovered the proton particle isolated of its internal muon.
> > > > >
> > > > > 5) Found a 840MeV particle in experimental physics, but, is it the proton torus without its interior occupied by a muon?
> > > > >
> > > > > 6) The theory of 9s, as help in physics.
> > > > >
> > > > > 7) How we picture the interior of Atoms, and the Atom Totality.
> > > > >
> > > > > 8) The Principle of Scooting-Over, applied.
> > > > >
> > > > > 9) An ongoing commentary of the geometry of atoms, both interior and exterior.
> > > > >
> > > > > 10) Galaxies form Rings in Faraday Coil, and Faraday bar-magnet // Cosmic Proton, Cosmic Muon.
> > > > >
> > > > > 11) Is there a Cosmic Faraday Law going on?
> > > > > Length: 148 pages
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > File Size: 2370 KB
> > > > > Print Length: 148 pages
> > > > > Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
> > > > > Publication Date: June 10, 2019
> > > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > > > Language: English
> > > > > ASIN: B07SW87BF5
> > > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> > > > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> > > > > Word Wise: Enabled
> > > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > > Screen Reader: Supported 
> > > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #285,417 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > #826 in Astronomy (Books)
> > > > > #166 in Astronomy (Kindle Store)
> > > > > #671 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #1-3, 74th published book
> > > > > 
> > > > >
> > > > > HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV..
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> > > > > Length: 17 pages
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > • Print Length : 17 pages
> > > > > • File Size : 698 KB
> > > > > • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > > #1-4, 105th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
> > > > > Length: 39 pages
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • Publication Date : March 24, 2020
> > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > • ASIN : B086BGSNXN
> > > > > • Print Length : 39 pages
> > > > > • File Size : 935 KB
> > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > #6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > #315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > #4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > 

> > > > >
> > > > > #1-5, 112th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
> > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
> > > > > Length: 20 pages
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN : B0875SVDC7
> > > > > • Publication date : April 15, 2020
> > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > • File size : 1134 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > • Print length : 20 pages
> > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > ◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > > ◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > >
> > > > > #1-6, 135th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) 

> > > > > Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0..5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN : B08K47K5BB
> > > > > • Publication date : September 25, 2020
> > > > > • Language : English
> > > > > • File size : 587 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > • Print length : 25 pages
> > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > ◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > > ◦ #334 in General Chemistry
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #1-7, 138th published book
> > > > > The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry.. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
> > > > > Length: 41 pages
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • Publication Date : October 9, 2020
> > > > > • File Size : 828 KB
> > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > • Print Length : 41 pages
> > > > > • ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
> > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > > #1-8, 1st published book
> > > > >
> > > > > Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.
> > > > >
> > > > > Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.
> > > > >
> > > > > Foreward:
> > > > > I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
> > > > > Length: 632 pages
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > File Size: 1132 KB
> > > > > Print Length: 632 pages
> > > > > Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> > > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > > > Language: English
> > > > > ASIN: B07PLP9NDR
> > > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> > > > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> > > > > Word Wise: Enabled
> > > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > > Screen Reader: Supported 
> > > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > #1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > #8526 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > #18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #1-9, 163rd published book
> > > > > Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.
> > > > > Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09NQ65H9F
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 15, 2021
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 999 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 60 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #1-10, 161st published book
> > > > >
> > > > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface:
> > > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > > > 
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > y z
> > > > > | /
> > > > > | /
> > > > > |/______ x
> > > > >
> > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > > >
> > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > > >
> > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > > >
> > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > > >
> > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > > Archimedes Plutonium

2Earle psychoceramic John Turneaure,Robert Wagoner,StanleyWojcicki,Mason Yearian,Marc Tessier-Lavigne,Persis Drell,Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman-- can they ever, ever ask the simple question, of which is the atom's true real electron, the muon or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.
> > > >
> > > > Earle Jones, no wonder the new particle accelerator is moving to Michigan State Univ. because in all the time 40 years SLAC, the fools of Stanford physics could never even ask the question, much less confirm real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside 840MeV proton torus doing Faraday law. Which is worse the flake idiot Earle Jones or the physicists of Stanford, is about the only questions running in the minds of the Physics dept of Stanford. A failed school of science.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> > > > Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
> > > >
> > > > Stanford physics dept.
> > > >
> > > > Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > CalTech math dept
> > > > >
> > > > > Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari
> > > > > Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris
> > > > > Alexei Kitaev, Matilde Marcolli, Nikolai Makarov, Vladimir Markovic, Hiroshi Oguri, Eric Rains, Dinakar Ramakrishnan
> > > > > Barry Simon, Richard Wilson, Tom Graber, Sergei Gukov,
> > > > > Elena Mantovan, Yi NI,
> > > > >
> > > > > President Thomas F. Rosenbaum (physics)
> > > > > Caltech Physics Dept
> > > > >
> > > > > Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
> > > > > Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
> > > > > John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
> > > > > Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
> > > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #1-1, 148th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Last revision was 30Nov2021. And this is AP's 148th published science book.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > Physics book that explains what the universe is, and how it works. This is a continuation of the Atomic Theory by Democritus in Ancient Greek times. It adds one more fact to the Atomic Theory picture. That the Universe itself is one gigantic big atom. The picture is that of the Universe, in total, is one big atom that contains more atoms, inside itself. It completes the logic of science that Dr. Feynman wrote-- all things are made up of atoms -- and so, to complete that idea -- all things and the universe itself is an atom.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In this edition of year 2021, AP actually proves the Atom Totality theory, and therefore, a simultaneously _disproof_ of the Big Bang theory. The proof is simple, in that the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but rather, instead, shine from the Faraday law going on inside each and every proton in the Sun or star, or, in the Universe. The muon is the true electron of atoms and is the bar magnet in Faraday's law while the proton is a 840MeV particle in the geometry shape of 8 ring coil torus that is the closed loop coil in Faraday's Law. NASA scientists have discovered the Sun is a yearly increase in radiation of 0.005% yearly, and is why 25% of all insects have perished in the last decade 2010-2020. Stars and Sun shine from Faraday law, not from fusion and that is how the Universe itself grows. So, we cannot logically have two different mechanisms for the creation of the Universe. We cannot have electricity magnetism of Faraday law and then some silly "explosion of Big Bang" to create and grow the universe.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Also, in the course of providing supporting evidence of the Atom Totality theory, my research had to revise and correct the entire Maxwell Equations, and revise and correct the theory, the quantum electrodynamics theory.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover Picture: Again I used 8 rings from plumbing hardware to represent the 8 rings of a proton torus, and visualize each ring as a dot cloud pattern instead of a continuous ring, and the holes in some of those rings helps facilitate that image. Notice the muon ring is inside the proton torus rings, and perpendicular, and situated at the equator, going around and around the proton torus at nearly the speed of light in the Faraday law; producing electricity. Atoms are designed to produce maximum electricity, given their masses.
> > > > > > Length: 329 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN : B08T82M2LP
> > > > > > • Publication date : January 16, 2021
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • File size : 872 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length : 329 pages
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #1-2, 48th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, Atom Totality Series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --------------------------
> > > > > > Table of Contents
> > > > > > --------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1) A visual image of a Atom Totality
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2) Simply multiply 9 times 105MeV and there you get the rest mass of proton and neutron.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 3) The tau-electron 1777MeV is merely 105MeV multiply by 17 is 1785 with Sigma Error of 0.4%.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 4) Particle in the 840MeV range so that we can say we discovered the proton particle isolated of its internal muon.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 5) Found a 840MeV particle in experimental physics, but, is it the proton torus without its interior occupied by a muon?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 6) The theory of 9s, as help in physics.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 7) How we picture the interior of Atoms, and the Atom Totality.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 8) The Principle of Scooting-Over, applied.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 9) An ongoing commentary of the geometry of atoms, both interior and exterior.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 10) Galaxies form Rings in Faraday Coil, and Faraday bar-magnet // Cosmic Proton, Cosmic Muon.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 11) Is there a Cosmic Faraday Law going on?
> > > > > > Length: 148 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > File Size: 2370 KB
> > > > > > Print Length: 148 pages
> > > > > > Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
> > > > > > Publication Date: June 10, 2019
> > > > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > > > > Language: English
> > > > > > ASIN: B07SW87BF5
> > > > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> > > > > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> > > > > > Word Wise: Enabled
> > > > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > > > Screen Reader: Supported 
> > > > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #285,417 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > #826 in Astronomy (Books)
> > > > > > #166 in Astronomy (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > #671 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #1-3, 74th published book
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >
> > > > > > HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> > > > > > Length: 17 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print Length : 17 pages
> > > > > > • File Size : 698 KB
> > > > > > • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #1-4, 105th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
> > > > > > Length: 39 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • Publication Date : March 24, 2020
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • ASIN : B086BGSNXN
> > > > > > • Print Length : 39 pages
> > > > > > • File Size : 935 KB
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > #6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > #315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > #4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > 

> > > > > >
> > > > > > #1-5, 112th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
> > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
> > > > > > Length: 20 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN : B0875SVDC7
> > > > > > • Publication date : April 15, 2020
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • File size : 1134 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length : 20 pages
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > ◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > > > ◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #1-6, 135th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) 

> > > > > > Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN : B08K47K5BB
> > > > > > • Publication date : September 25, 2020
> > > > > > • Language : English
> > > > > > • File size : 587 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length : 25 pages
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > ◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > > > ◦ #334 in General Chemistry
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #1-7, 138th published book
> > > > > > The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops.. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
> > > > > > Length: 41 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • Publication Date : October 9, 2020
> > > > > > • File Size : 828 KB
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Print Length : 41 pages
> > > > > > • ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #1-8, 1st published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Foreward:
> > > > > > I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
> > > > > > Length: 632 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > File Size: 1132 KB
> > > > > > Print Length: 632 pages
> > > > > > Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> > > > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > > > > Language: English
> > > > > > ASIN: B07PLP9NDR
> > > > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> > > > > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> > > > > > Word Wise: Enabled
> > > > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > > > Screen Reader: Supported 
> > > > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > #1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > #8526 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > > #18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #1-9, 163rd published book
> > > > > > Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.
> > > > > > Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09NQ65H9F
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 15, 2021
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 999 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 60 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #1-10, 161st published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > y z
> > > > > > | /
> > > > > > | /
> > > > > > |/______ x
> > > > > >
> > > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci..math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup.. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium

3Earle psychoceramic H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure,Robert Wagoner,StanleyWojcicki,Mason Yearian,Marc Tessier-Lavigne,Persis Drell,Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, -- can they ever, ever ask the simple question, of which is the atom's true real electron, the muon or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.
> > > > >
> > > > > Earle Jones, no wonder the new particle accelerator is moving to Michigan State Univ. because in all the time 40 years SLAC, the fools of Stanford physics could never even ask the question, much less confirm real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside 840MeV proton torus doing Faraday law. Which is worse the flake idiot Earle Jones or the physicists of Stanford, is about the only questions running in the minds of the Physics dept of Stanford. A failed school of science.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> > > > > Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
> > > > >
> > > > > Stanford physics dept.
> > > > >
> > > > > Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > CalTech math dept
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari
> > > > > > Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris
> > > > > > Alexei Kitaev, Matilde Marcolli, Nikolai Makarov, Vladimir Markovic, Hiroshi Oguri, Eric Rains, Dinakar Ramakrishnan
> > > > > > Barry Simon, Richard Wilson, Tom Graber, Sergei Gukov,
> > > > > > Elena Mantovan, Yi NI,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > President Thomas F. Rosenbaum (physics)
> > > > > > Caltech Physics Dept
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
> > > > > > Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
> > > > > > John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
> > > > > > Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
> > > > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #1-1, 148th published book
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Last revision was 30Nov2021. And this is AP's 148th published science book.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > > Physics book that explains what the universe is, and how it works. This is a continuation of the Atomic Theory by Democritus in Ancient Greek times. It adds one more fact to the Atomic Theory picture. That the Universe itself is one gigantic big atom. The picture is that of the Universe, in total, is one big atom that contains more atoms, inside itself. It completes the logic of science that Dr. Feynman wrote-- all things are made up of atoms -- and so, to complete that idea -- all things and the universe itself is an atom.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In this edition of year 2021, AP actually proves the Atom Totality theory, and therefore, a simultaneously _disproof_ of the Big Bang theory. The proof is simple, in that the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but rather, instead, shine from the Faraday law going on inside each and every proton in the Sun or star, or, in the Universe. The muon is the true electron of atoms and is the bar magnet in Faraday's law while the proton is a 840MeV particle in the geometry shape of 8 ring coil torus that is the closed loop coil in Faraday's Law. NASA scientists have discovered the Sun is a yearly increase in radiation of 0.005% yearly, and is why 25% of all insects have perished in the last decade 2010-2020. Stars and Sun shine from Faraday law, not from fusion and that is how the Universe itself grows. So, we cannot logically have two different mechanisms for the creation of the Universe. We cannot have electricity magnetism of Faraday law and then some silly "explosion of Big Bang" to create and grow the universe.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Also, in the course of providing supporting evidence of the Atom Totality theory, my research had to revise and correct the entire Maxwell Equations, and revise and correct the theory, the quantum electrodynamics theory.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cover Picture: Again I used 8 rings from plumbing hardware to represent the 8 rings of a proton torus, and visualize each ring as a dot cloud pattern instead of a continuous ring, and the holes in some of those rings helps facilitate that image. Notice the muon ring is inside the proton torus rings, and perpendicular, and situated at the equator, going around and around the proton torus at nearly the speed of light in the Faraday law; producing electricity. Atoms are designed to produce maximum electricity, given their masses.
> > > > > > > Length: 329 pages
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > • ASIN : B08T82M2LP
> > > > > > > • Publication date : January 16, 2021
> > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > • File size : 872 KB
> > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > • Print length : 329 pages
> > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #1-2, 48th published book
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, Atom Totality Series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --------------------------
> > > > > > > Table of Contents
> > > > > > > --------------------------
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1) A visual image of a Atom Totality
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2) Simply multiply 9 times 105MeV and there you get the rest mass of proton and neutron.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 3) The tau-electron 1777MeV is merely 105MeV multiply by 17 is 1785 with Sigma Error of 0.4%.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 4) Particle in the 840MeV range so that we can say we discovered the proton particle isolated of its internal muon.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 5) Found a 840MeV particle in experimental physics, but, is it the proton torus without its interior occupied by a muon?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 6) The theory of 9s, as help in physics.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 7) How we picture the interior of Atoms, and the Atom Totality.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 8) The Principle of Scooting-Over, applied.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 9) An ongoing commentary of the geometry of atoms, both interior and exterior.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 10) Galaxies form Rings in Faraday Coil, and Faraday bar-magnet // Cosmic Proton, Cosmic Muon.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 11) Is there a Cosmic Faraday Law going on?
> > > > > > > Length: 148 pages
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > File Size: 2370 KB
> > > > > > > Print Length: 148 pages
> > > > > > > Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
> > > > > > > Publication Date: June 10, 2019
> > > > > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > > > > > Language: English
> > > > > > > ASIN: B07SW87BF5
> > > > > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> > > > > > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> > > > > > > Word Wise: Enabled
> > > > > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > > > > Screen Reader: Supported 
> > > > > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> > > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #285,417 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > #826 in Astronomy (Books)
> > > > > > > #166 in Astronomy (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > #671 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #1-3, 74th published book
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> > > > > > > Length: 17 pages
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > • Print Length : 17 pages
> > > > > > > • File Size : 698 KB
> > > > > > > • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #1-4, 105th published book
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
> > > > > > > Length: 39 pages
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > • Publication Date : March 24, 2020
> > > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • ASIN : B086BGSNXN
> > > > > > > • Print Length : 39 pages
> > > > > > > • File Size : 935 KB
> > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > #6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > #315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > #4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > 

> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #1-5, 112th published book
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
> > > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0..0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
> > > > > > > Length: 20 pages
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > • ASIN : B0875SVDC7
> > > > > > > • Publication date : April 15, 2020
> > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > • File size : 1134 KB
> > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > • Print length : 20 pages
> > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > ◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > ◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > > > > ◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #1-6, 135th published book
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) 

> > > > > > > Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > • ASIN : B08K47K5BB
> > > > > > > • Publication date : September 25, 2020
> > > > > > > • Language : English
> > > > > > > • File size : 587 KB
> > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Print length : 25 pages
> > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > ◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > ◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > > > > ◦ #334 in General Chemistry
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #1-7, 138th published book
> > > > > > > The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
> > > > > > > Length: 41 pages
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > • Publication Date : October 9, 2020
> > > > > > > • File Size : 828 KB
> > > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Print Length : 41 pages
> > > > > > > • ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
> > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #1-8, 1st published book
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Foreward:
> > > > > > > I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
> > > > > > > Length: 632 pages
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > File Size: 1132 KB
> > > > > > > Print Length: 632 pages
> > > > > > > Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> > > > > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > > > > > Language: English
> > > > > > > ASIN: B07PLP9NDR
> > > > > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> > > > > > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> > > > > > > Word Wise: Enabled
> > > > > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > > > > Screen Reader: Supported 
> > > > > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> > > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > #1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > #8526 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > > > #18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #1-9, 163rd published book
> > > > > > > Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.
> > > > > > > Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09NQ65H9F
> > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 15, 2021
> > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 999 KB
> > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 60 pages
> > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #1-10, 161st published book
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > > > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > > > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > y z
> > > > > > > | /
> > > > > > > | /
> > > > > > > |/______ x
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium

4Earle psychoceramic David Ritson,H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure,Robert Wagoner,StanleyWojcicki,Mason Yearian,Marc Tessier-Lavigne,Persis Drell,Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff -- can they ever, ever ask the simple question, of which is the atom's true real electron, the muon or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Earle Jones, no wonder the new particle accelerator is moving to Michigan State Univ. because in all the time 40 years SLAC, the fools of Stanford physics could never even ask the question, much less confirm real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside 840MeV proton torus doing Faraday law. Which is worse the flake idiot Earle Jones or the physicists of Stanford, is about the only questions running in the minds of the Physics dept of Stanford. A failed school of science.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> > > > > > Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Stanford physics dept.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > CalTech math dept
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari
> > > > > > > Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris
> > > > > > > Alexei Kitaev, Matilde Marcolli, Nikolai Makarov, Vladimir Markovic, Hiroshi Oguri, Eric Rains, Dinakar Ramakrishnan
> > > > > > > Barry Simon, Richard Wilson, Tom Graber, Sergei Gukov,
> > > > > > > Elena Mantovan, Yi NI,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > President Thomas F. Rosenbaum (physics)
> > > > > > > Caltech Physics Dept
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
> > > > > > > Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
> > > > > > > John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
> > > > > > > Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
> > > > > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1-1, 148th published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Last revision was 30Nov2021. And this is AP's 148th published science book.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > > > Physics book that explains what the universe is, and how it works. This is a continuation of the Atomic Theory by Democritus in Ancient Greek times. It adds one more fact to the Atomic Theory picture. That the Universe itself is one gigantic big atom. The picture is that of the Universe, in total, is one big atom that contains more atoms, inside itself. It completes the logic of science that Dr. Feynman wrote-- all things are made up of atoms -- and so, to complete that idea -- all things and the universe itself is an atom.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In this edition of year 2021, AP actually proves the Atom Totality theory, and therefore, a simultaneously _disproof_ of the Big Bang theory. The proof is simple, in that the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but rather, instead, shine from the Faraday law going on inside each and every proton in the Sun or star, or, in the Universe. The muon is the true electron of atoms and is the bar magnet in Faraday's law while the proton is a 840MeV particle in the geometry shape of 8 ring coil torus that is the closed loop coil in Faraday's Law. NASA scientists have discovered the Sun is a yearly increase in radiation of 0.005% yearly, and is why 25% of all insects have perished in the last decade 2010-2020. Stars and Sun shine from Faraday law, not from fusion and that is how the Universe itself grows. So, we cannot logically have two different mechanisms for the creation of the Universe. We cannot have electricity magnetism of Faraday law and then some silly "explosion of Big Bang" to create and grow the universe.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Also, in the course of providing supporting evidence of the Atom Totality theory, my research had to revise and correct the entire Maxwell Equations, and revise and correct the theory, the quantum electrodynamics theory.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture: Again I used 8 rings from plumbing hardware to represent the 8 rings of a proton torus, and visualize each ring as a dot cloud pattern instead of a continuous ring, and the holes in some of those rings helps facilitate that image. Notice the muon ring is inside the proton torus rings, and perpendicular, and situated at the equator, going around and around the proton torus at nearly the speed of light in the Faraday law; producing electricity. Atoms are designed to produce maximum electricity, given their masses.
> > > > > > > > Length: 329 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B08T82M2LP
> > > > > > > > • Publication date : January 16, 2021
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • File size : 872 KB
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print length : 329 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1-2, 48th published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, Atom Totality Series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --------------------------
> > > > > > > > Table of Contents
> > > > > > > > --------------------------
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 1) A visual image of a Atom Totality
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2) Simply multiply 9 times 105MeV and there you get the rest mass of proton and neutron.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 3) The tau-electron 1777MeV is merely 105MeV multiply by 17 is 1785 with Sigma Error of 0.4%.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 4) Particle in the 840MeV range so that we can say we discovered the proton particle isolated of its internal muon.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 5) Found a 840MeV particle in experimental physics, but, is it the proton torus without its interior occupied by a muon?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 6) The theory of 9s, as help in physics.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 7) How we picture the interior of Atoms, and the Atom Totality.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 8) The Principle of Scooting-Over, applied.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 9) An ongoing commentary of the geometry of atoms, both interior and exterior.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 10) Galaxies form Rings in Faraday Coil, and Faraday bar-magnet // Cosmic Proton, Cosmic Muon.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 11) Is there a Cosmic Faraday Law going on?
> > > > > > > > Length: 148 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > File Size: 2370 KB
> > > > > > > > Print Length: 148 pages
> > > > > > > > Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
> > > > > > > > Publication Date: June 10, 2019
> > > > > > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > > > > > > Language: English
> > > > > > > > ASIN: B07SW87BF5
> > > > > > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> > > > > > > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> > > > > > > > Word Wise: Enabled
> > > > > > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > > > > > Screen Reader: Supported 
> > > > > > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> > > > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #285,417 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > #826 in Astronomy (Books)
> > > > > > > > #166 in Astronomy (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > #671 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1-3, 74th published book
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> > > > > > > > Length: 17 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print Length : 17 pages
> > > > > > > > • File Size : 698 KB
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1-4, 105th published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
> > > > > > > > Length: 39 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • Publication Date : March 24, 2020
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B086BGSNXN
> > > > > > > > • Print Length : 39 pages
> > > > > > > > • File Size : 935 KB
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > #6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > #315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > > #4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > 

> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1-5, 112th published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
> > > > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072..
> > > > > > > > Length: 20 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B0875SVDC7
> > > > > > > > • Publication date : April 15, 2020
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • File size : 1134 KB
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print length : 20 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > > ◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > > > > > ◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1-6, 135th published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) 

> > > > > > > > Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B08K47K5BB
> > > > > > > > • Publication date : September 25, 2020
> > > > > > > > • Language : English
> > > > > > > > • File size : 587 KB
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print length : 25 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > > ◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > > > > > ◦ #334 in General Chemistry
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1-7, 138th published book
> > > > > > > > The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
> > > > > > > > Length: 41 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • Publication Date : October 9, 2020
> > > > > > > > • File Size : 828 KB
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print Length : 41 pages
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1-8, 1st published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Foreward:
> > > > > > > > I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
> > > > > > > > Length: 632 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > File Size: 1132 KB
> > > > > > > > Print Length: 632 pages
> > > > > > > > Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> > > > > > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > > > > > > Language: English
> > > > > > > > ASIN: B07PLP9NDR
> > > > > > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> > > > > > > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> > > > > > > > Word Wise: Enabled
> > > > > > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > > > > > Screen Reader: Supported 
> > > > > > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> > > > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > #1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > #8526 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > > > > #18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1-9, 163rd published book
> > > > > > > > Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09NQ65H9F
> > > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 15, 2021
> > > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 999 KB
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 60 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1-10, 161st published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > > > > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > > > > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > y z
> > > > > > > > | /
> > > > > > > > | /
> > > > > > > > |/______ x
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium

5Earle psychoceramic Douglas Osheroff,David Ritson,H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure,Robert Wagoner,StanleyWojcicki,Mason Yearian,Marc Tessier-Lavigne,Persis Drell,Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little -- can they ever, ever ask the simple question, of which is the atom's true real electron, the muon or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole..
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Earle Jones, no wonder the new particle accelerator is moving to Michigan State Univ. because in all the time 40 years SLAC, the fools of Stanford physics could never even ask the question, much less confirm real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside 840MeV proton torus doing Faraday law. Which is worse the flake idiot Earle Jones or the physicists of Stanford, is about the only questions running in the minds of the Physics dept of Stanford. A failed school of science.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> > > > > > > Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Stanford physics dept.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > CalTech math dept
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari
> > > > > > > > Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris
> > > > > > > > Alexei Kitaev, Matilde Marcolli, Nikolai Makarov, Vladimir Markovic, Hiroshi Oguri, Eric Rains, Dinakar Ramakrishnan
> > > > > > > > Barry Simon, Richard Wilson, Tom Graber, Sergei Gukov,
> > > > > > > > Elena Mantovan, Yi NI,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > President Thomas F. Rosenbaum (physics)
> > > > > > > > Caltech Physics Dept
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
> > > > > > > > Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
> > > > > > > > John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
> > > > > > > > Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
> > > > > > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > #1-1, 148th published book
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Last revision was 30Nov2021. And this is AP's 148th published science book.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > > > > Physics book that explains what the universe is, and how it works. This is a continuation of the Atomic Theory by Democritus in Ancient Greek times. It adds one more fact to the Atomic Theory picture. That the Universe itself is one gigantic big atom. The picture is that of the Universe, in total, is one big atom that contains more atoms, inside itself. It completes the logic of science that Dr. Feynman wrote-- all things are made up of atoms -- and so, to complete that idea -- all things and the universe itself is an atom.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > In this edition of year 2021, AP actually proves the Atom Totality theory, and therefore, a simultaneously _disproof_ of the Big Bang theory. The proof is simple, in that the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but rather, instead, shine from the Faraday law going on inside each and every proton in the Sun or star, or, in the Universe. The muon is the true electron of atoms and is the bar magnet in Faraday's law while the proton is a 840MeV particle in the geometry shape of 8 ring coil torus that is the closed loop coil in Faraday's Law. NASA scientists have discovered the Sun is a yearly increase in radiation of 0.005% yearly, and is why 25% of all insects have perished in the last decade 2010-2020. Stars and Sun shine from Faraday law, not from fusion and that is how the Universe itself grows. So, we cannot logically have two different mechanisms for the creation of the Universe. We cannot have electricity magnetism of Faraday law and then some silly "explosion of Big Bang" to create and grow the universe.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Also, in the course of providing supporting evidence of the Atom Totality theory, my research had to revise and correct the entire Maxwell Equations, and revise and correct the theory, the quantum electrodynamics theory.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cover Picture: Again I used 8 rings from plumbing hardware to represent the 8 rings of a proton torus, and visualize each ring as a dot cloud pattern instead of a continuous ring, and the holes in some of those rings helps facilitate that image. Notice the muon ring is inside the proton torus rings, and perpendicular, and situated at the equator, going around and around the proton torus at nearly the speed of light in the Faraday law; producing electricity. Atoms are designed to produce maximum electricity, given their masses.
> > > > > > > > > Length: 329 pages
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > > • ASIN : B08T82M2LP
> > > > > > > > > • Publication date : January 16, 2021
> > > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > > • File size : 872 KB
> > > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • Print length : 329 pages
> > > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > #1-2, 48th published book
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, Atom Totality Series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --------------------------
> > > > > > > > > Table of Contents
> > > > > > > > > --------------------------
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 1) A visual image of a Atom Totality
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2) Simply multiply 9 times 105MeV and there you get the rest mass of proton and neutron.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 3) The tau-electron 1777MeV is merely 105MeV multiply by 17 is 1785 with Sigma Error of 0.4%.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 4) Particle in the 840MeV range so that we can say we discovered the proton particle isolated of its internal muon.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 5) Found a 840MeV particle in experimental physics, but, is it the proton torus without its interior occupied by a muon?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 6) The theory of 9s, as help in physics.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 7) How we picture the interior of Atoms, and the Atom Totality.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 8) The Principle of Scooting-Over, applied.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 9) An ongoing commentary of the geometry of atoms, both interior and exterior.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 10) Galaxies form Rings in Faraday Coil, and Faraday bar-magnet // Cosmic Proton, Cosmic Muon.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 11) Is there a Cosmic Faraday Law going on?
> > > > > > > > > Length: 148 pages
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > > File Size: 2370 KB
> > > > > > > > > Print Length: 148 pages
> > > > > > > > > Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
> > > > > > > > > Publication Date: June 10, 2019
> > > > > > > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > > > > > > > Language: English
> > > > > > > > > ASIN: B07SW87BF5
> > > > > > > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> > > > > > > > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> > > > > > > > > Word Wise: Enabled
> > > > > > > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > > > > > > Screen Reader: Supported 
> > > > > > > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> > > > > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #285,417 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > > #826 in Astronomy (Books)
> > > > > > > > > #166 in Astronomy (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > > #671 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > #1-3, 74th published book
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> > > > > > > > > Length: 17 pages
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > > • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> > > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • Print Length : 17 pages
> > > > > > > > > • File Size : 698 KB
> > > > > > > > > • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> > > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > #1-4, 105th published book
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
> > > > > > > > > Length: 39 pages
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > > • Publication Date : March 24, 2020
> > > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • ASIN : B086BGSNXN
> > > > > > > > > • Print Length : 39 pages
> > > > > > > > > • File Size : 935 KB
> > > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > > #6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > > #315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > > > #4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > > 

> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > #1-5, 112th published book
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
> > > > > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
> > > > > > > > > Length: 20 pages
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > > • ASIN : B0875SVDC7
> > > > > > > > > • Publication date : April 15, 2020
> > > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > > • File size : 1134 KB
> > > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • Print length : 20 pages
> > > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > > ◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > > > ◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > > > > > > ◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > #1-6, 135th published book
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) 

> > > > > > > > > Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > > • ASIN : B08K47K5BB
> > > > > > > > > • Publication date : September 25, 2020
> > > > > > > > > • Language : English
> > > > > > > > > • File size : 587 KB
> > > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • Print length : 25 pages
> > > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > > ◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > > > ◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > > > > > > ◦ #334 in General Chemistry
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > #1-7, 138th published book
> > > > > > > > > The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
> > > > > > > > > Length: 41 pages
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > > • Publication Date : October 9, 2020
> > > > > > > > > • File Size : 828 KB
> > > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • Print Length : 41 pages
> > > > > > > > > • ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
> > > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > #1-8, 1st published book
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Foreward:
> > > > > > > > > I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
> > > > > > > > > Length: 632 pages
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > > File Size: 1132 KB
> > > > > > > > > Print Length: 632 pages
> > > > > > > > > Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> > > > > > > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > > > > > > > Language: English
> > > > > > > > > ASIN: B07PLP9NDR
> > > > > > > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> > > > > > > > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> > > > > > > > > Word Wise: Enabled
> > > > > > > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > > > > > > Screen Reader: Supported 
> > > > > > > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> > > > > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > > #1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > > #8526 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > > > > > #18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > #1-9, 163rd published book
> > > > > > > > > Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.
> > > > > > > > > Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09NQ65H9F
> > > > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 15, 2021
> > > > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 999 KB
> > > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 60 pages
> > > > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > #1-10, 161st published book
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > > > > > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > > > > > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > y z
> > > > > > > > > | /
> > > > > > > > > | /
> > > > > > > > > |/______ x
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > > > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium

Earle Jones pining for a big dick to suck on at Stanford Univ as shown in his logo picture, alone with his fuckdog sidekick Kibo Parry M. with his science failureship that 938 is 12% short of 945-- and Rensselaer Polytech graduates crumbs like Kibo Parry M. Suggesting the entire science department at Rensselaer are too dumb to do percentage arithmetic.

Earle Jones, attacks AP for nonstop 27 years, for the tyke is insane, now the payback, Earle, as I shove your attacking shit up your arse, sideways, for the next 27 years. There was a lull in your attacks when you agreed that a slant cut in cone was truly a oval, and asked for a Nobel prize for that.. But that soon faded away, as everything from a insane person quickly returns to attack attack, and your insane attacking resumed. So no, a insane idiot like you Earle needs a daily fix of repetition. Why not submit your brain to Stanford Univ to study a insane brain that needs constant daily repetition. Why not roll a boulder up a hill at Stanford, only see it roll down again and you repeat the process.

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon..
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.





> Rochus Vogt,Eliezer Rabinovici,CERN Fabiola Gianotti,Fermi Lab: Lia Merminga, Dartmouth president Dr. Hanlon,SLAC: Chi-Chung Kao, far too stupid in physics to ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> > Earle Jones confused in his old age with a dishwasher machine and a particle accelerator. Earle has yet to learn what Ohm's law is, because Ohm's law fried Earle's brains 30 years ago, and his voltage fried brains are getting worse and worse in every one of his posts.
> > >
> > > Earle, may as well, for Dr. Hanlon sure cannot teach math with his Boole logic of 2 OR 1 = 3, with AND as subtraction, but almost as bad, Dr. Hanlon, dolt of mathematics still teaches slant conic section is a ellipse,for the dolt cannot add 1 axes is symmetry is cone and oval, but ellipse requires 2. This is Earle Jones complaint-- the failure and burnt out at Stanford Univ, who failed even Ohm's law-- duh, dolt Earle, why cannot you understand Ohm's law needs the AP generalization of V= iR to that of V= iB*E. Were you born, not yesterday, but 2 centuries backward in time?
> > >
> > > Kibo Parry M why is Eliezer Rabinovici a imp of physics? Is it because he thinks a ellipse is the slant cut in single cone when in reality it is the oval?
> > > On Saturday, January 22, 2022 at 1:37:26 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > >"psychoceramic"
> > > >"imp of physics"
> > > > fails at math and science:
> Stanford physics dept.
>
> Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
>
>
> Caltech Physics Dept
>
> Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
> Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
> John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
> Rochus Vogt, Michael E. Brown,
> Konstantin Batygin

On Tuesday, July 26, 2022 at 4:23:26 PM UTC-5, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> Where am I AP? I worked with Murray Gell Mann before he died.
> Aren't you going to make me more popular?
> Light is the magnetic monopole.

MitchR > Where am I AP?
AP: I don't know, ... some crackpot church called gravity = God?

MitchR > I worked with Murray Gell Mann before he died.
AP: such a shame, for I could have taught Murray what the real true electron of atoms was-- the muon, and given Murray a glimpse of what real true physics was and is, instead of his clown view of physics.

MitchR > Aren't you going to make me more popular?
AP : I don't need to, clowns like you make people laugh all the time.

MitchR > Light is the magnetic monopole.
AP : Ah ha, Mitch back to his stealing ways, for AP was the first to discover the 0.5MeV particle is the Dirac magnetic monopole and is the units of electricity. And so MitchR is in another kleptomaniac force to try to steal another AP discovery. MitchR, you really are a demon of stealing from others. Did you learn from Porat, on how to steal steal steal??

Jim Jordan,Mitch McConnell,John Roberts,Carolyn D.Meadows,Wayne LaPierre,Republican party please forgib us, for the few marbles in our brain are insufficient to see that without a assault rifle ban in the USA, that we have destroyed the ability to police the USA, as seen in Uvalde Texas with 8 armed police standing around in the hallways-- jaywalking--fearful of confronting the teenager with a assault rifle. That we idiots in power Roberts,Jordan,McConnell have caused the needless death of Kentucky police officers, wiping out a entire police force because of assault rifles. Please forgib us for we have no commonsense to understand if assault rifles are freely had, we destroy policing in the USA. Please forgib us Jim Jordan,Mitch McConnell,John Roberts,Carolyn D.Meadows,Wayne LaPierre,Republican party for our 1/2 marble brains are not enough to understand that freely accessible assault rifles destroys policing the USA, for idiots like Jim Jordan just wants to get into office and gives a dam about the rest of society.

Roberts,Alito,Kavanaugh,Barrett,Thomas,Gorsuch do not want abortions for they must grow up to be fodder from those who buy assault rifles by age 18 so that they can have target practice. No abortion for white rhinos for there are only 2 remaining in the entire world, and no abortion for humans for there are only 8 billion in the entire world, and we need more Zika babies and thalidomide babies for study in Roberts Supreme Court. We need no abortion for the 10 year old Ohio girl raped, for there are only 8 billion humans.. And the USA Supreme Court with their "contextualism philosophy of Scalia" is oblivious to a commonsense philosophy-- every ruling should make USA society be the better. And so Campaign financing, gun regulation, abortion by Roberts court are rulings that makes the USA society far worse than previous. Because antiscience Donald Trump wants to build a quack quack University to research, how an insane person is able to become the president of the USA. And Earle Jones of Stanford University wants to train them in the art of dishwashing.

Peter Higgs,Kibo Parry,General Nakasone,Sheldon Glashow,Eliezer Rabinovici, Marcelo de Sousa,Tessaleno Campos Devezas ever ask the question which is the atom's real electron-- the muon at 105MeV or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole, not the electron of atoms.
> 
> > > >
> > > > > Never any physics in this mountain of spam out of Portugal, just flooding sci.physics day and night.
> > > > > On Tuesday, January 28, 2020 at 3:08:23 PM UTC-6, _ wrote:
> > > > > > forgib me im sick i cry
> > > > >
> > > > Why? Portugal President Marcelo de Sousa, Prime Minister Antonio Costa
> > > >

> > > > CERN: Eliezer Rabinovici, Fabiola Gianotti
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Portuguese physicists distracted from doing physics by this crazy spamming robot.
> > > > >
> > > > > Portuguese physicists need to confirm real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law and the 0.5MeV particle is what AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.
> > > > >
> > > > > Tessaleno Campos Devezas, Univ of Beira
> > > > >
> > > > > Elvira Fortunato, NOVA School of Science and Technology
> > > > >
> > > > > Joao Magueijo, University of Lisbon
> > > > >
> > > > > Jose F.F. Mendes, Univ of Aveiro, Universidade do Porto
> > > > >
> > > > > Joao Penedones, Universidade do Porto
> > > > >
> > > > > Jorge Crispim Romao, Instituto Superior Tecnico
> > > > >
> > > > > Rogerio Colaco, University Lisbon
> > > > >
> > > > > HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV..
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> > > > > Length: 17 pages
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > • Print Length : 17 pages
> > > > > • File Size : 698 KB
> > > > > • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > 2nd published book
> > > > >
> > > > > True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
> > > > > Length: 1150 pages
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • File Size : 2167 KB
> > > > > • ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
> > > > > • Publication Date : March 11, 2019
> > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > • Print Length : 1150 pages
> > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > #181 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > > #1324 in General Chemistry
> > > > > #1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > William Alfred Fowler,Kenneth G. Wilson,James Watson Cronin far too stupid in physics to ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> > > > > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > > > > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > > > > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > > > > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > > > David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > > > Francois Englert
> > > > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > > > Adam G. Riess
> > > > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > > > Toshihide Maskawa
> > > > > Yoichiro Nambu
> > > > > John C. Mather
> > > > > George F. Smoot
> > > > > Roy J. Glauber
> > > > > David J. Gross
> > > > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > > > Frank Wilczek
> > > > > Raymond Davis Jr.
> > > > > Masatoshi Koshiba
> > > > > Riccardo Giacconi
> > > > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman
> > > > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > > > Henry W. Kendall
> > > > > Richard E. Taylor
> > > > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > > > Simon van der Meer
> > > > > William Alfred Fowler
> > > > > Kenneth G. Wilson
> > > > > James Watson Cronin
> > > > > Val Logsdon Fitch
> > > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > > > Steven Weinberg

> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > little fishes
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > > > >
> > > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > Edward Witten
> > > > > John Baez
> > > > > Brian Greene
> > > > > Lisa Randall
> > > > > Alan H. Guth
> > > > > Michael E. Brown
> > > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > > Ben Bullock
> > > > > Larry Harson
> > > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > > > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > > > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > >
> > > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > > > >
> > > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > > > Length: 64 pages
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1035 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-5, 174th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).
> > > > > Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09TKL4HMC
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 27, 2022
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 675 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 41 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > > > >
> > > > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-9, 161st published book
> > > > >
> > > > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface:
> > > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > > >
> > > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > > >
> > > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > y z
> > > > > | /
> > > > > | /
> > > > > |/______ x
> > > > >
> > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > > >
> > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > > >
> > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > > >
> > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > > >
> > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > > Archimedes Plutonium

Psychoceramics- Ruth Charney, Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Thomas Hales, from the script sheets of Toby Howard Univ Manchester and Earle Jones (failed or unfailed engineer) Stanford Univ. Why Toby and Earle? Is it because they are blithering math idiots who cannot follow a simple geometry proof? Is that why they are psychoceramics???

--- quoting Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section of a single cone, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition// Student teaches professor series, book 5

By Archimedes Plutonium

Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.

ARRAY, Analytic Geometry Proof, Cylinder Section is a Ellipse::
 
 
                E
               __
        .-'              `-.
      .'                    `.
    /                         \
   ;                           ;
  | G          c              | H
   ;                           ;
    \                         /
     `.                     .'
        `-.    _____  .-'
                  F
 

Alright, focus on the distance from c to F in the cone-cut compared to the distance from c to E

In a Cylinder cut, those two distances are the same because a cylinder has two axes of symmetry.

The side view of a cylinder is this

|    |
|    |
|    |

That allows cE to be the same distance as cF

But the side view of the cone is

     /\E
    /c \
F /     \

The distance c to E is shorter because the slant of the side walls of the cone are in the direction of shortening cE, whereas the slant opposite c in cF makes that distance larger than cE.

--- end quote ---

Ruth Charney,Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Ken Ribet, Andrew Beal, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Gerald Edgar, AMS, no-one there can do a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, all they can offer is a limit analysis, so shoddy in logic they never realized that "analyzing" is not the same as "proving" for analyzing is much in the same as "measuring but not proving". And yet, none can do a geometry proof and the reason is quite clear for none can even see that the slant cut in single right-circular cone is a Oval, never the ellipse. So they could never do a geometry proof of FTC even if they wanted to. For they have no logical geometry brain to begin to do anything geometrical. Is it that Andrew Wiles and Terence Tao cannot understand the slant cut in single cone is an Oval, never the ellipse, or is it the foolish Boole logic they teach of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction? Not having a Logical brain to do math, for any rational person would be upset by Wiles, Tao saying truth table of AND is TFFF when it actually is TTTF. Is that why neither Terence Tao or Andrew Wiles can do a geometry proof Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?

Maybe they need to take up Earle Jones offer to wash dishes or pots at Stanford Univ or where ever, for they sure cannot do mathematics.
Why are these people failures of Math?? For none can even contemplate these 4 questions.

1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.

Is Jim Holt, Virginia Klenk, David Agler, Susanne K. Langer, Gary M. Hardegree, Raymond M. Smullyan,
John Venn, William Gustason, Richmond H. Thomason, more of propagandists and belong in "Abnormal Psychology" dept than in the department of logic, like Dan Christensen a laugh a minute logician? Probably because none can admit slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse, due to axes of symmetry for cone and oval have 1 while ellipse has 2. Why they cannot even count beyond 1. Yet their minds were never good enough to see the error nor admit to their mistakes. They failed logic so badly they accept Boole's insane AND truth table of TFFF when it is TTTF avoiding the painful 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. Or is it because none of these logicians has a single marble of logic in their entire brain to realize calculus requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, not a "limit analysis" for analysis is like a measurement, not a proving exercise. Analysis does not prove, only adds data and facts, but never is a proof of itself. I analyze things daily, and none of which is a proof. So are all these logicians like what Clutterfreak the propaganda stooge says they are.

> On Friday, July 2, 2021 at 9:47:42 AM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> > You may be giving him too much credit here. Judging by his bizarre antics here, he has given up obtaining any kind of positive recognition.
> >
> > Dan
>
> Partial List of the World's Crackpot Logicians-- should be in a college Abnormal-Psychology department, not Logic//
>
> Peter Bruce Andrews, Lennart Aqvist, Henk Barendregt, John Lane Bell, Nuel Belnap,
> Paul Benacerraf, Jean Paul Van Bendegem, Johan van Benthem, Jean-Yves Beziau,
> Andrea Bonomi, Nicolas Bourbaki (a group of logic fumblers), Alan Richard Bundy, Gregory Chaitin,
> Jack Copeland, John Corcoran, Dirk van Dalen, Martin Davis, Michael A.E. Dummett, John Etchemendy, Hartry Field, Kit Fine, Melvin Fitting, Matthew Foreman, Michael Fourman,
> Harvey Friedman, Dov Gabbay, L.T.F. Gamut (group of logic fumblers), Sol Garfunkel, Jean-Yves Girard, Siegfried Gottwald, Jeroen Groenendijk, Susan Haack, Leo Harrington, William Alvin Howard,
> Ronald Jensen, Dick de Jongh, David Kaplan, Alexander S. Kechris, Howard Jerome Keisler,
> Robert Kowalski, Georg Kreisel, Saul Kripke, Kenneth Kunen, Karel Lambert, Penelope Maddy,
> David Makinson, Isaac Malitz, Gary R. Mar, Donald A. Martin, Per Martin-Lof,Yiannis N. Moschovakis, Jeff Paris, Charles Parsons, Solomon Passy, Lorenzo Pena, Dag Prawitz,
> Graham Priest, Michael O. Rabin, Gerald Sacks, Dana Scott, Stewart Shapiro, Theodore Slaman,
> Robert M. Solovay, John R. Steel, Martin Stokhof, Anne Sjerp Troelstra, Alasdair Urquhart,
> Moshe Y. Vardi, W. Hugh Woodin, John Woods
>
> Now I should include the authors of Logic textbooks for they, more than most, perpetuate and crank the error filled logic, the Horrible Error of 2 OR 1 = 3 with 2 AND 1 = 1, that is forced down the throats of young students, making them cripples of ever thinking straight and clearly.
>
> Many of these authors have passed away but their error filled books are a scourge to modern education
>
> George Boole, William Jevons, Bertrand Russell, Kurt Godel, Rudolf Carnap,
> Ludwig Wittgenstein, Willard Quine, Alfred North Whitehead, Irving Copi, Michael Withey,
> Patrick Hurley, Harry J Gensler, David Kelley, Jesse Bollinger, Theodore Sider,
> David Barker-Plummer, I. C. Robledo, John Nolt, Peter Smith, Stan Baronett, Jim Holt,
> Virginia Klenk, David Agler, Susanne K. Langer, Gary M. Hardegree, Raymond M. Smullyan,
> John Venn, William Gustason, Richmond H. Thomason,

> > #5-1, 134th published book
> >
> > > > > Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already written the series of TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS in a 7 volume, 8 book set. This would be the first book in that 8 book set (one of the books is a companion book to 1st year college). But I suppose that I needed to write the full series before I could write the Introduction and know what I had to talk about and talk about in a logical progression order. Sounds paradoxical in a sense, that I needed to write the full series first and then go back and write the Introduction. But in another sense, hard to write an introduction on something you have not really fully done and completed. For example to know what is error filled Old Math and to list those errors in a logical order requires me to write the full 7 volumes in order to list in order the mistakes.
> >
> > Cover Picture: Mathematics begins with counting, with numbers, with quantity. But counting numbers needs geometry for something to count in the first place. So here in this picture of the generalized Hydrogen atom of chemistry and physics is a torus geometry of 8 rings of a proton torus and one ring where my fingers are, is a equator ring that is the muon and thrusting through the proton torus at the equator of the torus. So we count 9 rings in all. So math is created by atoms and math numbers exist because atoms have many geometry figures to count. And geometry exists because atoms have shapes and different figures.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08K2XQB4M
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ September 24, 2020
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 576 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 23 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Best Sellers Rank: #224,974 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #3 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > ◦ #23 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #182 in Calculus (Books)
> >
> >
> >
> > #5-2, 45th published book
> >
> > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > #1 New Releasein General Geometry
> >
> >
> > Last revision was 2NOV2020. And this is AP's 45th published book of science.
> > Preface: Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education.
> >
> > This is a textbook series in several volumes that carries every person through all his/her math education starting age 5 up to age 26. Volume 2 is for age 5 year old to that of senior in High School, that is needed to do both science and math. Every other math book is incidental to this series of Teaching True Mathematics.
> >
> > It is a journal-textbook because Amazon's Kindle offers me the ability to edit overnight, and to change the text, almost on a daily basis. A unique first in education textbooks-- almost a continual overnight editing. Adding new text, correcting text. Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education. Volume 3 carries the Freshperson in College for their math calculus education.
> >
> > Cover Picture: The Numbers as Integers from 0 to 100, and 10 Grid when dividing by 10, and part of the 100 Grid when dividing by 100. Decimal Grid Numbers are the true numbers of mathematics. The Reals, the rationals & irrationals, the algebraic & transcendentals, the imaginary & Complex, and the negative-numbers are all fake numbers. For, to be a true number, you have to "be counted" by mathematical induction. The smallest Grid system is the Decimal 10 Grid.
> >
> > Length: 399 pages
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07RG7BVZW
> > Publication date ‏ : ‎ May 2, 2019
> > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > File size ‏ : ‎ 2023 KB
> > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Print length ‏ : ‎ 399 pages
> > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Best Sellers Rank: #235,426 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > #15 in General Geometry
> > #223 in Geometry & Topology (Books)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > #5-3, 55th published book
> >
> > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 25Jun2021. And this is AP's 55th published book of science.
> >
> > Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
> >
> > Preface: This is volume 3, book 3 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Freshperson students, 1st year college students of age 18-19. It is the continuation of volume 2 for ages 5 through 18 years old.
> >
> > The main major topic is the AP-EM equations of electricity and magnetism, the mathematics for the laws of electricity and magnetism; what used to be called the Maxwell Equations of Physics. The 1st Year College Math has to prepare all students with the math for all the sciences. So 1st year college Math is like a huge intersection station that has to prepare students with the math they need to do the hard sciences such as physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, geology, etc. What this means is, 1st year college is calculus that allows the student to work with electricity and magnetism. All the math that is needed to enable students to do electricity and magnetism.. In Old Math before this textbook, those Old Math textbooks would end in 1/3 of the text about Arclength, vector space, div, curl, Line Integral, Green's, Stokes, Divergence theorem trying to reach and be able to teach Maxwell Equations. But sadly, barely any Old Math classroom reached that 1/3 ending of the textbook, and left all those college students without any math to tackle electricity and magnetism. And most of Old Math was just muddle headed wrong even if they covered the last 1/3 of the textbook. And that is totally unacceptable in science. This textbook fixes that huge hole and gap in Old Math education.
> >
> > And there is no way around it, that a course in 1st year College Calculus is going to do a lot of hands on experiment with electricity and magnetism, and is required of the students to buy a list of physics apparatus-- multimeter, galvanometer, coil, bar magnet, alligator clip wires, electromagnet, iron filing case, and possibly even a 12 volt transformer, all shown in the cover picture. The beginning of this textbook and the middle section all leads into the ending of this textbook-- we learn the AP-EM Equations and how to use those equations. And there is no escaping the fact that it has to be hands on physics experiments in the classroom of mathematics.
> >
> > But, do not be scared, for this is all easy easy easy. For if you passed and enjoyed Volume 2 TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, then I promise you, you will not be stressed with Volume 3, for I go out of my way to make it clear and understandable.
> >
> > Warning: this is a Journal Textbook, meaning that I am constantly adding new material, constantly revising, constantly fixing mistakes or making things more clear. So if you read this book in August of 2019, chances are it is different when you read it in September 2019. Ebooks allow authors the freedom to improve their textbooks on a ongoing basis.
> >
> > The 1st year college math should be about the math that prepares any and all students for science, whether they branch out into physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, or math, they should have all the math in 1st year college that will carry them through those science studies. I make every attempt possible to make math easy to understand, easy to learn and hopefully fun.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07WN9RVXD
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ August 16, 2019
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1390 KB
> > • Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 236 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Best Sellers Rank: #1,377,070 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #411 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #2,480 in Calculus (Books)
> >
> >
> > 

> >
> > #5-4, 56th published book
> >
> > COLLEGE CALCULUS GUIDE to help students recognize math professor spam from math truth & reality// math textbook series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> >
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> >
> > #1 New Releasein 15-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> >
> >
> > This textbook is the companion guide book to AP's Teaching True Mathematics, 1st year College. It is realized that Old Math will take a long time in removing their fake math, so in the interim period, this Guide book is designed to speed up the process of removing fake Calculus out of the education system, the fewer students we punish with forcing them with fake Calculus, the better we are.
> > Cover Picture: This book is part comedy, for when you cannot reason with math professors that they have many errors to fix, that 90% of their Calculus is in error, you end up resorting to comedy, making fun of them, to prod them to fix their errors. To prod them to "do right by the students of the world" not their entrenched propaganda.
> > Length: 54 pages
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > File Size: 1035 KB
> > Print Length: 64 pages
> > Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
> > Publication Date: August 18, 2019
> > Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
> > Language: English
> > ASIN: B07WNGLQ85
> > Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 

> > Word Wise: Not Enabled
> > Lending: Enabled
> > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #253,425 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > #38 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > #318 in Calculus (Books)
> > #48 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > 

> > #5-5, 72nd published book
> >
> > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 4 for age 19-20 Sophomore-year College, math textbook series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Preface: This is volume 4, book 5 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Sophomore-year students, students of age 19-20. It is the continuation of volume 3 in the end-goal of learning how to do the mathematics of electricity and magnetism, because everything in physics is nothing but atoms and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. To know math, you have to know physics. We learned the Calculus of 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. But we did not learn the calculus of those equations for 3rd dimension. So, you can say that Sophomore year College math is devoted to 3D Calculus. This sophomore year college we fill in all the calculus, and we start over on all of Geometry, for geometry needs a modern day revision. And pardon me for this book is mostly reading, and the students doing less calculations. The classroom of this textbook has the teacher go through page by page to get the students comprehending and understanding of what is being taught. There are many hands on experiments also.
> >
> > Cover Picture shows some toruses, some round some square, torus of rings, thin strips of rings or squares and shows them laid flat. That is Calculus of 3rd dimension that lays a ring in a torus to be flat in 2nd dimension..
> > Length: 105 pages
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0828M34VL
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2019
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 952 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 105 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Best Sellers Rank: #242,037 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #36 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #219 in Calculus (Books)
> >
> >
> > #5-6, 75th published book
> >
> > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 5 for age 20-21 Junior-year of College, math textbook series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
> >
> > This is volume 5, book 6 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Junior-year students, students of age 20-21. In first year college Calculus we learned calculus of the 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. And in sophomore year we learned calculus of 3rd dimension to complete our study of the mathematics needed to do the physics of electricity and magnetism. Now, junior year college, we move onto something different, for we focus mostly on logic now and especially the logic of what is called the "mathematical proof". Much of what the student has learned about mathematics so far has been given to her or him as stated knowledge, accept it as true because I say so. But now we are going to do math proofs. Oh, yes, we did prove a few items here and there, such as why the Decimal Grid Number system is so special, such as the Pythagorean Theorem, such as the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with its right-triangle hinged up or down. But many ideas we did not prove, we just stated them and expected all students to believe them true. And you are now juniors in college and we are going to start to prove many of those ideas and teach you "what is a math proof". Personally, I myself feel that the math proof is overrated, over hyped. But the math proof is important for one reason-- it makes you better scientists of knowing what is true and what is a shaky idea. A math proof is the same as "thinking straight and thinking clearly". And all scientists need to think straight and think clearly. But before we get to the Mathematics Proof, we have to do Probability and Statistics.. What you learned in Grade School, then High School, then College, called Sigma Error, now becomes Probability and Statistics. It is important because all sciences including mathematics needs and uses Probability and Statistics. So, our job for junior-year of college mathematics is all cut out and ahead for us, no time to waste, let us get going.
> >
> > Cover Picture: is a sample of the Array Proof, a proof the ellipse is not a conic but rather a cylinder cut wherein the oval is the slant cut of a cone, not the ellipse.
> >
> > Length: 175 pages
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN : B0836F1YF6
> > Publication date : December 26, 2019
> > Language : English
> > File size : 741 KB
> > Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > Screen Reader : Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > Print length : 175 pages
> > Lending : Enabled
> > Best Sellers Rank: #3,768,255 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #3,591 in Probability & Statistics (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #19,091 in Probability & Statistics (Books)
> >
> >
> >
> > #5-7, 89th published book
> >
> > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 6 for age 21-22 Senior-year of College, math textbook series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium 2020
> >
> > Last revision was 6Feb2021.
> > Preface: This is the last year of College for mathematics and we have to mostly summarize all of mathematics as best we can. And set a new pattern to prepare students going on to math graduate school. A new pattern of work habits, because graduate school is more of research and explore on your own. So in this final year, I am going to eliminate tests, and have it mostly done as homework assignments.
> >
> > Cover Picture: Again and again, many times in math, the mind is not good enough alone to think straight and clear, and you need tools to hands-on see how it works. Here is a collection of tools for this senior year college classes. There is a pencil, clipboard, graph paper, compass, divider, protractor, slide-ruler. And for this year we spend a lot of time on the parallelepiped, showing my wood model, and showing my erector set model held together by wire loops in the corners. The plastic square is there only to hold up the erector set model.
> >
> > Length: 110 pages
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B084V11BGY
> > Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 15, 2020
> > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > File size ‏ : ‎ 826 KB
> > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Print length ‏ : ‎ 110 pages
> > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Best Sellers Rank: #224,965 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #345 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #373 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #2,256 in Physics (Books)
> >
> > #5-8, 90th published book
> >
> > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 7 for age 22-26 Graduate school, math textbook series, book 8 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium 2020
> >
> > Last revised 1NOV2020. This was AP's 90th published book of science.
> >
> > Preface: This is College Graduate School mathematics. Congratulations, you made it this far. To me, graduate school is mostly research, research mathematics and that means also physics. So it is going to be difficult to do math without physics. Of course, we focus on the mathematics of these research projects.
> >
> > My textbook for Graduate school is just a template and the professors teaching the graduate students are free of course to follow their own projects, but in terms of being physics and math combined. What I list below is a template for possible projects.
> >
> > So, in the below projects, I list 36 possible research projects that a graduate student my like to undertake, or partake. I list those 36 projects with a set of parentheses like this (1), (2), (3), etc. Not to be confused with the chapters listing as 1), 2), 3), etc. I list 36 projects but the professor can offer his/her own list, and I expect students with their professor, to pick a project and to monitor the student as to his/her progresses through the research. I have listed each project then cited some of my own research into these projects, below each project is an entry. Those entries are just a help or helper in getting started or acquainted with the project. The entry has a date time group and a newsgroup that I posted to such as sci.math or plutonium-atom-universe Google newsgroups. Again the entry is just a help or helper in getting started.
> >
> > Now instead of picking one or two projects for your Graduate years of study, some may select all 36 projects where you write a short paper on each project. Some may be bored with just one or two projects and opt for all 36.
> >
> > Cover Picture: A photo by my iphone of a page on Permutations of the Jacobs book Mathematics: A Human Endeavor, 1970. One of the best textbooks ever written in Old Math, not for its contents because there are many errors, but for its teaching style. It is extremely rare to find a math textbook written for the student to learn. Probably because math professors rarely learned how to teach in the first place; only learned how to unintentionally obfuscate. The page I photographed is important because it is the interface between geometry's perimeter or surface area versus geometry's area or volume, respectively. Or, an interface of pure numbers with that of geometry. But I have more to say on this below.
> > Length: 296 pages
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B085DF8R7V
> > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 1, 2020
> > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > File size ‏ : ‎ 828 KB
> > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Print length ‏ : ‎ 296 pages
> > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Best Sellers Rank: #224,981 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #13 in General Geometry
> > ◦ #213 in Geometry & Topology (Books)
> >
> >
> >
> > #5-8, 160th published book
> >
> > MATHOPEDIA-- List of 80 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 28Apr2022. And this is AP's 160th book of Science.
> > Preface:
> > A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.
> > The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.
> > The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.
> > Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.
> > I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09MZTLRL5
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2021
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1149 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 65 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

Psychoceramic Sam Alito, Roberts,Kavanaugh,Barrett,Thomas,Gorsuch

--- quoting BBC ---
A conservative member of the US Supreme Court has mocked world leaders who criticised last month's ruling that overturned American abortion rights.
Justice Samuel Alito, who wrote the ruling, dismissed criticism from a host of prominent figures, including UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson.
He joked that Mr Johnson, who leaves office in September, had "paid the price" for arguing against the verdict.
Mr Alito, a devout Catholic, was speaking at a conference in Rome.
"I had the honour this term of writing I think the only supreme court decision in the history of that institution that has been lambasted by a whole string of foreign leaders who felt perfectly fine commenting on American law," Mr Alito said.
--- end quoting BBC ---

UK leader Boris Johnson, and many others, please forgive our dumb justice Sam Alito, for he must have spent his youth sucking on tailpipes of cars for that "high feeling" instead of studying Pragmatism philosophy or biology or logic in school. Explaining why his abortion ruling makes America backward in time. And Sam Alito is so vapid in logic that he never realized the reason for his job is that in every ruling, using the Constitution as a reference, to improve USA society. For Alito with Campaign finance, abortion, NY gun regulation, EPA oversight of coal power plants, Alito has not improved USA society but rather set it back by 200 years. Alito is not a justice improving USA society, but setting it back by 200 years. Maybe Alito is under the same delusions as was Scalia-- the obnoxious contextualism, for which sucking on tailpipes makes one attached to bozo ideas as contextualism. All leaders-- please forgive our clown Sam Alito

Roberts,Alito,Kavanaugh,Barrett,Thomas,Gorsuch do not want abortions for they must grow up to be fodder from those who buy assault rifles by age 18 so that they can have target practice. No abortion for white rhinos for there are only 2 remaining in the entire world, and no abortion for humans for there are only 8 billion in the entire world, and we need more Zika babies and thalidomide babies for study in Roberts Supreme Court. We need no abortion for the 10 year old Ohio girl raped, for there are only 8 billion humans.. And the USA Supreme Court with their "contextualism philosophy of Scalia" is oblivious to a commonsense philosophy-- every ruling should make USA society be the better. And so Campaign financing, gun regulation, abortion by Roberts court are rulings that makes the USA society far worse than previous. Because antiscience Donald Trump wants to build a quack quack University to research, how an insane person is able to become the president of the USA. And Earle Jones of Stanford University wants to train them in the art of dishwashing.

Jim Jordan,Mitch McConnell,John Roberts,Carolyn D.Meadows,Wayne LaPierre,Republican party please forgib us, for the few marbles in our brain are insufficient to see that without a assault rifle ban in the USA, that we have destroyed the ability to police the USA, as seen in Uvalde Texas with 8 armed police standing around in the hallways-- jaywalking--fearful of confronting the teenager with a assault rifle. That we idiots in power Roberts,Jordan,McConnell have caused the needless death of Kentucky police officers, wiping out a entire police force because of assault rifles. Please forgib us for we have no commonsense to understand if assault rifles are freely had, we destroy policing in the USA. Please forgib us Jim Jordan,Mitch McConnell,John Roberts,Carolyn D.Meadows,Wayne LaPierre,Republican party for our 1/2 marble brains are not enough to understand that freely accessible assault rifles destroys policing the USA, for idiots like Jim Jordan just wants to get into office and gives a dam about the rest of society.

> Peter Higgs,Kibo Parry,General Nakasone,Sheldon Glashow,Eliezer Rabinovici, Marcelo de Sousa,Tessaleno Campos Devezas ever ask the question which is the atom's real electron-- the muon at 105MeV or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole, not the electron of atoms.
> > 
> > > > >
> > > > > > Never any physics in this mountain of spam out of Portugal, just flooding sci.physics day and night.
> > > > > > On Tuesday, January 28, 2020 at 3:08:23 PM UTC-6, _ wrote:
> > > > > > > forgib me im sick i cry
> > > > > >
> > > > > Why? Portugal President Marcelo de Sousa, Prime Minister Antonio Costa
> > > > >
> 
> > > > > CERN: Eliezer Rabinovici, Fabiola Gianotti
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Portuguese physicists distracted from doing physics by this crazy spamming robot.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Portuguese physicists need to confirm real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law and the 0.5MeV particle is what AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tessaleno Campos Devezas, Univ of Beira
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Elvira Fortunato, NOVA School of Science and Technology
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Joao Magueijo, University of Lisbon
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jose F.F. Mendes, Univ of Aveiro, Universidade do Porto
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Joao Penedones, Universidade do Porto
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jorge Crispim Romao, Instituto Superior Tecnico
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rogerio Colaco, University Lisbon
> > > > > >
> > > > > > HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> > > > > > Length: 17 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print Length : 17 pages
> > > > > > • File Size : 698 KB
> > > > > > • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > 2nd published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
> > > > > > Length: 1150 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • File Size : 2167 KB
> > > > > > • ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
> > > > > > • Publication Date : March 11, 2019
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print Length : 1150 pages
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > #181 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > > > #1324 in General Chemistry
> > > > > > #1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > William Alfred Fowler,Kenneth G. Wilson,James Watson Cronin far too stupid in physics to ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> > > > > > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > > > > > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > > > > > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > > > > > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > > > > David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > > > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > > > > Francois Englert
> > > > > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > > > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > > > > Adam G. Riess
> > > > > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > > > > Toshihide Maskawa
> > > > > > Yoichiro Nambu
> > > > > > John C. Mather
> > > > > > George F. Smoot
> > > > > > Roy J. Glauber
> > > > > > David J. Gross
> > > > > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > > > > Frank Wilczek
> > > > > > Raymond Davis Jr.
> > > > > > Masatoshi Koshiba
> > > > > > Riccardo Giacconi
> > > > > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman
> > > > > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > > > > Henry W. Kendall
> > > > > > Richard E. Taylor
> > > > > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > > > > Simon van der Meer
> > > > > > William Alfred Fowler
> > > > > > Kenneth G. Wilson
> > > > > > James Watson Cronin
> > > > > > Val Logsdon Fitch
> > > > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > > > > Steven Weinberg
> 
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > little fishes
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > Edward Witten
> > > > > > John Baez
> > > > > > Brian Greene
> > > > > > Lisa Randall
> > > > > > Alan H. Guth
> > > > > > Michael E. Brown
> > > > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > > > Ben Bullock
> > > > > > Larry Harson
> > > > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > > > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > > > > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > > > > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > > > > Length: 64 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1035 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > > ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-5, 174th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).
> > > > > > Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09TKL4HMC
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 27, 2022
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 675 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 41 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > > > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-9, 161st published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > y z
> > > > > > | /
> > > > > > | /
> > > > > > |/______ x
> > > > > >
> > > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci..math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup.. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium

Psychoceramic Sam Alito, Roberts,Kavanaugh,Barrett,Thomas,Gorsuch

Interesting question to ask. For the USA democracy was so good, being invented in 1776 by men who for the most part were scientists with a scientific mind-- Ben Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, Hamilton. But is the opposite to be said about the USA Supreme Court, its 6 justices who hate science, fail science and why their rulings are so awful. No improvement to life in USA but a backslide. Was there ever a time in the history of the Supreme Court where science minds presided over the court, or has it been as awful as the Roberts court, anti science.

--- quoting BBC ---
A conservative member of the US Supreme Court has mocked world leaders who criticised last month's ruling that overturned American abortion rights.
Justice Samuel Alito, who wrote the ruling, dismissed criticism from a host of prominent figures, including UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson.
He joked that Mr Johnson, who leaves office in September, had "paid the price" for arguing against the verdict.
Mr Alito, a devout Catholic, was speaking at a conference in Rome.
"I had the honour this term of writing I think the only supreme court decision in the history of that institution that has been lambasted by a whole string of foreign leaders who felt perfectly fine commenting on American law," Mr Alito said.
--- end quoting BBC ---

UK leader Boris Johnson, and many others, please forgive our dumb justice Sam Alito, for he must have spent his youth sucking on tailpipes of cars for that "high feeling" instead of studying Pragmatism philosophy or biology or logic in school. Explaining why his abortion ruling makes America backward in time. And Sam Alito is so vapid in logic that he never realized the reason for his job is that in every ruling, using the Constitution as a reference, to improve USA society. For Alito with Campaign finance, abortion, NY gun regulation, EPA oversight of coal power plants, Alito has not improved USA society but rather set it back by 200 years. Alito is not a justice improving USA society, but setting it back by 200 years. Maybe Alito is under the same delusions as was Scalia-- the obnoxious contextualism, for which sucking on tailpipes makes one attached to bozo ideas as contextualism. All leaders-- please forgive our clown Sam Alito


Roberts,Alito,Kavanaugh,Barrett,Thomas,Gorsuch do not want abortions for they must grow up to be fodder from those who buy assault rifles by age 18 so that they can have target practice. No abortion for white rhinos for there are only 2 remaining in the entire world, and no abortion for humans for there are only 8 billion in the entire world, and we need more Zika babies and thalidomide babies for study in Roberts Supreme Court. We need no abortion for the 10 year old Ohio girl raped, for there are only 8 billion humans.. And the USA Supreme Court with their "contextualism philosophy of Scalia" is oblivious to a commonsense philosophy-- every ruling should make USA society be the better. And so Campaign financing, gun regulation, abortion by Roberts court are rulings that makes the USA society far worse than previous. Because antiscience Donald Trump wants to build a quack quack University to research, how an insane person is able to become the president of the USA. And Earle Jones of Stanford University wants to train them in the art of dishwashing.

Jim Jordan,Mitch McConnell,John Roberts,Carolyn D.Meadows,Wayne LaPierre,Republican party please forgib us, for the few marbles in our brain are insufficient to see that without a assault rifle ban in the USA, that we have destroyed the ability to police the USA, as seen in Uvalde Texas with 8 armed police standing around in the hallways-- jaywalking--fearful of confronting the teenager with a assault rifle. That we idiots in power Roberts,Jordan,McConnell have caused the needless death of Kentucky police officers, wiping out a entire police force because of assault rifles. Please forgib us for we have no commonsense to understand if assault rifles are freely had, we destroy policing in the USA. Please forgib us Jim Jordan,Mitch McConnell,John Roberts,Carolyn D.Meadows,Wayne LaPierre,Republican party for our 1/2 marble brains are not enough to understand that freely accessible assault rifles destroys policing the USA, for idiots like Jim Jordan just wants to get into office and gives a dam about the rest of society.

> Peter Higgs,Kibo Parry,General Nakasone,Sheldon Glashow,Eliezer Rabinovici, Marcelo de Sousa,Tessaleno Campos Devezas ever ask the question which is the atom's real electron-- the muon at 105MeV or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole, not the electron of atoms.
> > 
> > > > >
> > > > > > Never any physics in this mountain of spam out of Portugal, just flooding sci.physics day and night.
> > > > > > On Tuesday, January 28, 2020 at 3:08:23 PM UTC-6, _ wrote:
> > > > > > > forgib me im sick i cry
> > > > > >
> > > > > Why? Portugal President Marcelo de Sousa, Prime Minister Antonio Costa
> > > > >
> 
> > > > > CERN: Eliezer Rabinovici, Fabiola Gianotti
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Portuguese physicists distracted from doing physics by this crazy spamming robot.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Portuguese physicists need to confirm real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law and the 0.5MeV particle is what AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tessaleno Campos Devezas, Univ of Beira
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Elvira Fortunato, NOVA School of Science and Technology
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Joao Magueijo, University of Lisbon
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jose F.F. Mendes, Univ of Aveiro, Universidade do Porto
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Joao Penedones, Universidade do Porto
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jorge Crispim Romao, Instituto Superior Tecnico
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rogerio Colaco, University Lisbon
> > > > > >
> > > > > > HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> > > > > > Length: 17 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print Length : 17 pages
> > > > > > • File Size : 698 KB
> > > > > > • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > 2nd published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
> > > > > > Length: 1150 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • File Size : 2167 KB
> > > > > > • ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
> > > > > > • Publication Date : March 11, 2019
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print Length : 1150 pages
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > #181 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > > > #1324 in General Chemistry
> > > > > > #1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > William Alfred Fowler,Kenneth G. Wilson,James Watson Cronin far too stupid in physics to ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> > > > > > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > > > > > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > > > > > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > > > > > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > > > > David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > > > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > > > > Francois Englert
> > > > > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > > > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > > > > Adam G. Riess
> > > > > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > > > > Toshihide Maskawa
> > > > > > Yoichiro Nambu
> > > > > > John C. Mather
> > > > > > George F. Smoot
> > > > > > Roy J. Glauber
> > > > > > David J. Gross
> > > > > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > > > > Frank Wilczek
> > > > > > Raymond Davis Jr.
> > > > > > Masatoshi Koshiba
> > > > > > Riccardo Giacconi
> > > > > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman
> > > > > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > > > > Henry W. Kendall
> > > > > > Richard E. Taylor
> > > > > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > > > > Simon van der Meer
> > > > > > William Alfred Fowler
> > > > > > Kenneth G. Wilson
> > > > > > James Watson Cronin
> > > > > > Val Logsdon Fitch
> > > > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > > > > Steven Weinberg
> 
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > little fishes
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > Edward Witten
> > > > > > John Baez
> > > > > > Brian Greene
> > > > > > Lisa Randall
> > > > > > Alan H. Guth
> > > > > > Michael E. Brown
> > > > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > > > Ben Bullock
> > > > > > Larry Harson
> > > > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > > > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > > > > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > > > > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > > > > Length: 64 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1035 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > > ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-5, 174th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).
> > > > > > Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09TKL4HMC
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 27, 2022
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 675 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 41 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > > > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-9, 161st published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > y z
> > > > > > | /
> > > > > > | /
> > > > > > |/______ x
> > > > > >
> > > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci..math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup.. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium

Psychoceramics- John Stillwell,Ruth Charney, Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Thomas Hales, from the script sheets of Toby Howard Univ Manchester and Earle Jones (failed or unfailed engineer) Stanford Univ. Why Toby and Earle? Is it because they are blithering math idiots who cannot follow a simple geometry proof? Is that why they are psychoceramics???
>
>
> --- quoting Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section of a single cone, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition// Student teaches professor series, book 5
>
> By Archimedes Plutonium
>
> Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.
>
> ARRAY, Analytic Geometry Proof, Cylinder Section is a Ellipse::
>
>
> E
> __
> .-' `-.
> .' `.
> / \
> ; ;
> | G c | H
> ; ;
> \ /
> `. .'
> `-. _____ .-'
> F
>
>
>
> Alright, focus on the distance from c to F in the cone-cut compared to the distance from c to E
>
> In a Cylinder cut, those two distances are the same because a cylinder has two axes of symmetry.
>
> The side view of a cylinder is this
>
> | |
> | |
> | |
>
> That allows cE to be the same distance as cF
>
>
> But the side view of the cone is
>
> /\E
> /c \
> F / \
>
>
> The distance c to E is shorter because the slant of the side walls of the cone are in the direction of shortening cE, whereas the slant opposite c in cF makes that distance larger than cE.
>
> --- end quote ---
>
>
>
>
>
> Ruth Charney,Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Ken Ribet, Andrew Beal, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Gerald Edgar, AMS, no-one there can do a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, all they can offer is a limit analysis, so shoddy in logic they never realized that "analyzing" is not the same as "proving" for analyzing is much in the same as "measuring but not proving". And yet, none can do a geometry proof and the reason is quite clear for none can even see that the slant cut in single right-circular cone is a Oval, never the ellipse. So they could never do a geometry proof of FTC even if they wanted to. For they have no logical geometry brain to begin to do anything geometrical. Is it that Andrew Wiles and Terence Tao cannot understand the slant cut in single cone is an Oval, never the ellipse, or is it the foolish Boole logic they teach of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction? Not having a Logical brain to do math, for any rational person would be upset by Wiles, Tao saying truth table of AND is TFFF when it actually is TTTF. Is that why neither Terence Tao or Andrew Wiles can do a geometry proof Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?
>
> Maybe they need to take up Earle Jones offer to wash dishes or pots at Stanford Univ or where ever, for they sure cannot do mathematics.
> Why are these people failures of Math?? For none can even contemplate these 4 questions.
> 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> Is Jim Holt, Virginia Klenk, David Agler, Susanne K. Langer, Gary M. Hardegree, Raymond M. Smullyan,
> John Venn, William Gustason, Richmond H. Thomason, more of propagandists and belong in "Abnormal Psychology" dept than in the department of logic, like Dan Christensen a laugh a minute logician? Probably because none can admit slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse, due to axes of symmetry for cone and oval have 1 while ellipse has 2. Why they cannot even count beyond 1. Yet their minds were never good enough to see the error nor admit to their mistakes. They failed logic so badly they accept Boole's insane AND truth table of TFFF when it is TTTF avoiding the painful 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. Or is it because none of these logicians has a single marble of logic in their entire brain to realize calculus requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, not a "limit analysis" for analysis is like a measurement, not a proving exercise. Analysis does not prove, only adds data and facts, but never is a proof of itself. I analyze things daily, and none of which is a proof. So are all these logicians like what Clutterfreak the propaganda stooge says they are.
>
>
> > On Friday, July 2, 2021 at 9:47:42 AM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> > > You may be giving him too much credit here. Judging by his bizarre antics here, he has given up obtaining any kind of positive recognition.
> > >
> > > Dan
> >
> > Partial List of the World's Crackpot Logicians-- should be in a college Abnormal-Psychology department, not Logic//
> >
> > Peter Bruce Andrews, Lennart Aqvist, Henk Barendregt, John Lane Bell, Nuel Belnap,
> > Paul Benacerraf, Jean Paul Van Bendegem, Johan van Benthem, Jean-Yves Beziau,
> > Andrea Bonomi, Nicolas Bourbaki (a group of logic fumblers), Alan Richard Bundy, Gregory Chaitin,
> > Jack Copeland, John Corcoran, Dirk van Dalen, Martin Davis, Michael A.E.. Dummett, John Etchemendy, Hartry Field, Kit Fine, Melvin Fitting, Matthew Foreman, Michael Fourman,
> > Harvey Friedman, Dov Gabbay, L.T.F. Gamut (group of logic fumblers), Sol Garfunkel, Jean-Yves Girard, Siegfried Gottwald, Jeroen Groenendijk, Susan Haack, Leo Harrington, William Alvin Howard,
> > Ronald Jensen, Dick de Jongh, David Kaplan, Alexander S. Kechris, Howard Jerome Keisler,
> > Robert Kowalski, Georg Kreisel, Saul Kripke, Kenneth Kunen, Karel Lambert, Penelope Maddy,
> > David Makinson, Isaac Malitz, Gary R. Mar, Donald A. Martin, Per Martin-Lof,Yiannis N. Moschovakis, Jeff Paris, Charles Parsons, Solomon Passy, Lorenzo Pena, Dag Prawitz,
> > Graham Priest, Michael O. Rabin, Gerald Sacks, Dana Scott, Stewart Shapiro, Theodore Slaman,
> > Robert M. Solovay, John R. Steel, Martin Stokhof, Anne Sjerp Troelstra, Alasdair Urquhart,
> > Moshe Y. Vardi, W. Hugh Woodin, John Woods
> >
> > Now I should include the authors of Logic textbooks for they, more than most, perpetuate and crank the error filled logic, the Horrible Error of 2 OR 1 = 3 with 2 AND 1 = 1, that is forced down the throats of young students, making them cripples of ever thinking straight and clearly.
> >
> > Many of these authors have passed away but their error filled books are a scourge to modern education
> >
> > George Boole, William Jevons, Bertrand Russell, Kurt Godel, Rudolf Carnap,
> > Ludwig Wittgenstein, Willard Quine, Alfred North Whitehead, Irving Copi, Michael Withey,
> > Patrick Hurley, Harry J Gensler, David Kelley, Jesse Bollinger, Theodore Sider,
> > David Barker-Plummer, I. C. Robledo, John Nolt, Peter Smith, Stan Baronett, Jim Holt,
> > Virginia Klenk, David Agler, Susanne K. Langer, Gary M. Hardegree, Raymond M. Smullyan,
> > John Venn, William Gustason, Richmond H. Thomason,
>
>
>
> > > #5-1, 134th published book
> > >
> > > > > > Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already written the series of TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS in a 7 volume, 8 book set. This would be the first book in that 8 book set (one of the books is a companion book to 1st year college). But I suppose that I needed to write the full series before I could write the Introduction and know what I had to talk about and talk about in a logical progression order. Sounds paradoxical in a sense, that I needed to write the full series first and then go back and write the Introduction. But in another sense, hard to write an introduction on something you have not really fully done and completed. For example to know what is error filled Old Math and to list those errors in a logical order requires me to write the full 7 volumes in order to list in order the mistakes..
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: Mathematics begins with counting, with numbers, with quantity. But counting numbers needs geometry for something to count in the first place. So here in this picture of the generalized Hydrogen atom of chemistry and physics is a torus geometry of 8 rings of a proton torus and one ring where my fingers are, is a equator ring that is the muon and thrusting through the proton torus at the equator of the torus. So we count 9 rings in all. So math is created by atoms and math numbers exist because atoms have many geometry figures to count. And geometry exists because atoms have shapes and different figures.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08K2XQB4M
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ September 24, 2020
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 576 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 23 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #224,974 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #3 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > ◦ #23 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #182 in Calculus (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #5-2, 45th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #1 New Releasein General Geometry
> > >
> > >
> > > Last revision was 2NOV2020. And this is AP's 45th published book of science.
> > > Preface: Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education.
> > >
> > > This is a textbook series in several volumes that carries every person through all his/her math education starting age 5 up to age 26. Volume 2 is for age 5 year old to that of senior in High School, that is needed to do both science and math. Every other math book is incidental to this series of Teaching True Mathematics.
> > >
> > > It is a journal-textbook because Amazon's Kindle offers me the ability to edit overnight, and to change the text, almost on a daily basis. A unique first in education textbooks-- almost a continual overnight editing. Adding new text, correcting text. Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education. Volume 3 carries the Freshperson in College for their math calculus education.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: The Numbers as Integers from 0 to 100, and 10 Grid when dividing by 10, and part of the 100 Grid when dividing by 100. Decimal Grid Numbers are the true numbers of mathematics. The Reals, the rationals & irrationals, the algebraic & transcendentals, the imaginary & Complex, and the negative-numbers are all fake numbers. For, to be a true number, you have to "be counted" by mathematical induction. The smallest Grid system is the Decimal 10 Grid.
> > >
> > > Length: 399 pages
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07RG7BVZW
> > > Publication date ‏ : ‎ May 2, 2019
> > > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > File size ‏ : ‎ 2023 KB
> > > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > Print length ‏ : ‎ 399 pages
> > > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > Best Sellers Rank: #235,426 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > #15 in General Geometry
> > > #223 in Geometry & Topology (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #5-3, 55th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Last revision was 25Jun2021. And this is AP's 55th published book of science.
> > >
> > > Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
> > >
> > > Preface: This is volume 3, book 3 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Freshperson students, 1st year college students of age 18-19. It is the continuation of volume 2 for ages 5 through 18 years old.
> > >
> > > The main major topic is the AP-EM equations of electricity and magnetism, the mathematics for the laws of electricity and magnetism; what used to be called the Maxwell Equations of Physics. The 1st Year College Math has to prepare all students with the math for all the sciences. So 1st year college Math is like a huge intersection station that has to prepare students with the math they need to do the hard sciences such as physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, geology, etc. What this means is, 1st year college is calculus that allows the student to work with electricity and magnetism. All the math that is needed to enable students to do electricity and magnetism. In Old Math before this textbook, those Old Math textbooks would end in 1/3 of the text about Arclength, vector space, div, curl, Line Integral, Green's, Stokes, Divergence theorem trying to reach and be able to teach Maxwell Equations. But sadly, barely any Old Math classroom reached that 1/3 ending of the textbook, and left all those college students without any math to tackle electricity and magnetism. And most of Old Math was just muddle headed wrong even if they covered the last 1/3 of the textbook. And that is totally unacceptable in science. This textbook fixes that huge hole and gap in Old Math education.
> > >
> > > And there is no way around it, that a course in 1st year College Calculus is going to do a lot of hands on experiment with electricity and magnetism, and is required of the students to buy a list of physics apparatus-- multimeter, galvanometer, coil, bar magnet, alligator clip wires, electromagnet, iron filing case, and possibly even a 12 volt transformer, all shown in the cover picture. The beginning of this textbook and the middle section all leads into the ending of this textbook-- we learn the AP-EM Equations and how to use those equations. And there is no escaping the fact that it has to be hands on physics experiments in the classroom of mathematics.
> > >
> > > But, do not be scared, for this is all easy easy easy. For if you passed and enjoyed Volume 2 TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, then I promise you, you will not be stressed with Volume 3, for I go out of my way to make it clear and understandable.
> > >
> > > Warning: this is a Journal Textbook, meaning that I am constantly adding new material, constantly revising, constantly fixing mistakes or making things more clear. So if you read this book in August of 2019, chances are it is different when you read it in September 2019. Ebooks allow authors the freedom to improve their textbooks on a ongoing basis.
> > >
> > > The 1st year college math should be about the math that prepares any and all students for science, whether they branch out into physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, or math, they should have all the math in 1st year college that will carry them through those science studies. I make every attempt possible to make math easy to understand, easy to learn and hopefully fun.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07WN9RVXD
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ August 16, 2019
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1390 KB
> > > • Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 236 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #1,377,070 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #411 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #2,480 in Calculus (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > > 

> > >
> > > #5-4, 56th published book
> > >
> > > COLLEGE CALCULUS GUIDE to help students recognize math professor spam from math truth & reality// math textbook series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> > >
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > >
> > > #1 New Releasein 15-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > >
> > >
> > > This textbook is the companion guide book to AP's Teaching True Mathematics, 1st year College. It is realized that Old Math will take a long time in removing their fake math, so in the interim period, this Guide book is designed to speed up the process of removing fake Calculus out of the education system, the fewer students we punish with forcing them with fake Calculus, the better we are.
> > > Cover Picture: This book is part comedy, for when you cannot reason with math professors that they have many errors to fix, that 90% of their Calculus is in error, you end up resorting to comedy, making fun of them, to prod them to fix their errors. To prod them to "do right by the students of the world" not their entrenched propaganda.
> > > Length: 54 pages
> > >
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > File Size: 1035 KB
> > > Print Length: 64 pages
> > > Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
> > > Publication Date: August 18, 2019
> > > Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
> > > Language: English
> > > ASIN: B07WNGLQ85
> > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 

> > > Word Wise: Not Enabled
> > > Lending: Enabled
> > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #253,425 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > #38 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > #318 in Calculus (Books)
> > > #48 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > > 

> > > #5-5, 72nd published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 4 for age 19-20 Sophomore-year College, math textbook series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Preface: This is volume 4, book 5 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Sophomore-year students, students of age 19-20. It is the continuation of volume 3 in the end-goal of learning how to do the mathematics of electricity and magnetism, because everything in physics is nothing but atoms and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. To know math, you have to know physics. We learned the Calculus of 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. But we did not learn the calculus of those equations for 3rd dimension. So, you can say that Sophomore year College math is devoted to 3D Calculus. This sophomore year college we fill in all the calculus, and we start over on all of Geometry, for geometry needs a modern day revision. And pardon me for this book is mostly reading, and the students doing less calculations. The classroom of this textbook has the teacher go through page by page to get the students comprehending and understanding of what is being taught. There are many hands on experiments also.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture shows some toruses, some round some square, torus of rings, thin strips of rings or squares and shows them laid flat. That is Calculus of 3rd dimension that lays a ring in a torus to be flat in 2nd dimension.
> > > Length: 105 pages
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0828M34VL
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2019
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 952 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 105 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #242,037 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #36 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #219 in Calculus (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > > #5-6, 75th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 5 for age 20-21 Junior-year of College, math textbook series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
> > >
> > > This is volume 5, book 6 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Junior-year students, students of age 20-21. In first year college Calculus we learned calculus of the 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. And in sophomore year we learned calculus of 3rd dimension to complete our study of the mathematics needed to do the physics of electricity and magnetism. Now, junior year college, we move onto something different, for we focus mostly on logic now and especially the logic of what is called the "mathematical proof". Much of what the student has learned about mathematics so far has been given to her or him as stated knowledge, accept it as true because I say so. But now we are going to do math proofs. Oh, yes, we did prove a few items here and there, such as why the Decimal Grid Number system is so special, such as the Pythagorean Theorem, such as the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with its right-triangle hinged up or down. But many ideas we did not prove, we just stated them and expected all students to believe them true. And you are now juniors in college and we are going to start to prove many of those ideas and teach you "what is a math proof". Personally, I myself feel that the math proof is overrated, over hyped. But the math proof is important for one reason-- it makes you better scientists of knowing what is true and what is a shaky idea. A math proof is the same as "thinking straight and thinking clearly". And all scientists need to think straight and think clearly. But before we get to the Mathematics Proof, we have to do Probability and Statistics. What you learned in Grade School, then High School, then College, called Sigma Error, now becomes Probability and Statistics. It is important because all sciences including mathematics needs and uses Probability and Statistics. So, our job for junior-year of college mathematics is all cut out and ahead for us, no time to waste, let us get going.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: is a sample of the Array Proof, a proof the ellipse is not a conic but rather a cylinder cut wherein the oval is the slant cut of a cone, not the ellipse.
> > >
> > > Length: 175 pages
> > >
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > ASIN : B0836F1YF6
> > > Publication date : December 26, 2019
> > > Language : English
> > > File size : 741 KB
> > > Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > Screen Reader : Supported
> > > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > Print length : 175 pages
> > > Lending : Enabled
> > > Best Sellers Rank: #3,768,255 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #3,591 in Probability & Statistics (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #19,091 in Probability & Statistics (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #5-7, 89th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 6 for age 21-22 Senior-year of College, math textbook series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium 2020
> > >
> > > Last revision was 6Feb2021.
> > > Preface: This is the last year of College for mathematics and we have to mostly summarize all of mathematics as best we can. And set a new pattern to prepare students going on to math graduate school. A new pattern of work habits, because graduate school is more of research and explore on your own. So in this final year, I am going to eliminate tests, and have it mostly done as homework assignments.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: Again and again, many times in math, the mind is not good enough alone to think straight and clear, and you need tools to hands-on see how it works. Here is a collection of tools for this senior year college classes. There is a pencil, clipboard, graph paper, compass, divider, protractor, slide-ruler. And for this year we spend a lot of time on the parallelepiped, showing my wood model, and showing my erector set model held together by wire loops in the corners. The plastic square is there only to hold up the erector set model.
> > >
> > > Length: 110 pages
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B084V11BGY
> > > Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 15, 2020
> > > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > File size ‏ : ‎ 826 KB
> > > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > Print length ‏ : ‎ 110 pages
> > > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > Best Sellers Rank: #224,965 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #345 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #373 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #2,256 in Physics (Books)
> > >
> > > #5-8, 90th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 7 for age 22-26 Graduate school, math textbook series, book 8 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium 2020
> > >
> > > Last revised 1NOV2020. This was AP's 90th published book of science.
> > >
> > > Preface: This is College Graduate School mathematics. Congratulations, you made it this far. To me, graduate school is mostly research, research mathematics and that means also physics. So it is going to be difficult to do math without physics. Of course, we focus on the mathematics of these research projects.
> > >
> > > My textbook for Graduate school is just a template and the professors teaching the graduate students are free of course to follow their own projects, but in terms of being physics and math combined. What I list below is a template for possible projects.
> > >
> > > So, in the below projects, I list 36 possible research projects that a graduate student my like to undertake, or partake. I list those 36 projects with a set of parentheses like this (1), (2), (3), etc. Not to be confused with the chapters listing as 1), 2), 3), etc. I list 36 projects but the professor can offer his/her own list, and I expect students with their professor, to pick a project and to monitor the student as to his/her progresses through the research. I have listed each project then cited some of my own research into these projects, below each project is an entry. Those entries are just a help or helper in getting started or acquainted with the project. The entry has a date time group and a newsgroup that I posted to such as sci.math or plutonium-atom-universe Google newsgroups. Again the entry is just a help or helper in getting started.
> > >
> > > Now instead of picking one or two projects for your Graduate years of study, some may select all 36 projects where you write a short paper on each project. Some may be bored with just one or two projects and opt for all 36.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: A photo by my iphone of a page on Permutations of the Jacobs book Mathematics: A Human Endeavor, 1970. One of the best textbooks ever written in Old Math, not for its contents because there are many errors, but for its teaching style. It is extremely rare to find a math textbook written for the student to learn. Probably because math professors rarely learned how to teach in the first place; only learned how to unintentionally obfuscate. The page I photographed is important because it is the interface between geometry's perimeter or surface area versus geometry's area or volume, respectively. Or, an interface of pure numbers with that of geometry.. But I have more to say on this below.
> > > Length: 296 pages
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B085DF8R7V
> > > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 1, 2020
> > > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > File size ‏ : ‎ 828 KB
> > > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > Print length ‏ : ‎ 296 pages
> > > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > Best Sellers Rank: #224,981 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #13 in General Geometry
> > > ◦ #213 in Geometry & Topology (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #5-8, 160th published book
> > >
> > > MATHOPEDIA-- List of 80 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Last revision was 28Apr2022. And this is AP's 160th book of Science.
> > > Preface:
> > > A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.
> > > The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.
> > > The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.
> > > Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book..
> > > I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09MZTLRL5
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2021
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1149 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 65 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> Archimedes Plutonium

Psychoceramics- Thomas Hales,John Stillwell,Ruth Charney, Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, from the script sheets of Toby Howard Univ Manchester and Earle Jones (failed or unfailed engineer) Stanford Univ. Why Toby and Earle? Is it because they are blithering math idiots who cannot follow a simple geometry proof? Is that why they are psychoceramics???
> >
> >
> > --- quoting Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section of a single cone, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition// Student teaches professor series, book 5
> >
> > By Archimedes Plutonium
> >
> > Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.
> >
> > ARRAY, Analytic Geometry Proof, Cylinder Section is a Ellipse::
> >
> >
> > E
> > __
> > .-' `-.
> > .' `.
> > / \
> > ; ;
> > | G c | H
> > ; ;
> > \ /
> > `. .'
> > `-. _____ .-'
> > F
> >
> >
> >
> > Alright, focus on the distance from c to F in the cone-cut compared to the distance from c to E
> >
> > In a Cylinder cut, those two distances are the same because a cylinder has two axes of symmetry.
> >
> > The side view of a cylinder is this
> >
> > | |
> > | |
> > | |
> >
> > That allows cE to be the same distance as cF
> >
> >
> > But the side view of the cone is
> >
> > /\E
> > /c \
> > F / \
> >
> >
> > The distance c to E is shorter because the slant of the side walls of the cone are in the direction of shortening cE, whereas the slant opposite c in cF makes that distance larger than cE.
> >
> > --- end quote ---
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Ruth Charney,Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Ken Ribet, Andrew Beal, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Gerald Edgar, AMS, no-one there can do a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, all they can offer is a limit analysis, so shoddy in logic they never realized that "analyzing" is not the same as "proving" for analyzing is much in the same as "measuring but not proving". And yet, none can do a geometry proof and the reason is quite clear for none can even see that the slant cut in single right-circular cone is a Oval, never the ellipse. So they could never do a geometry proof of FTC even if they wanted to. For they have no logical geometry brain to begin to do anything geometrical. Is it that Andrew Wiles and Terence Tao cannot understand the slant cut in single cone is an Oval, never the ellipse, or is it the foolish Boole logic they teach of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction? Not having a Logical brain to do math, for any rational person would be upset by Wiles, Tao saying truth table of AND is TFFF when it actually is TTTF. Is that why neither Terence Tao or Andrew Wiles can do a geometry proof Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?
> >
> > Maybe they need to take up Earle Jones offer to wash dishes or pots at Stanford Univ or where ever, for they sure cannot do mathematics.
> > Why are these people failures of Math?? For none can even contemplate these 4 questions.
> > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> > Is Jim Holt, Virginia Klenk, David Agler, Susanne K. Langer, Gary M. Hardegree, Raymond M. Smullyan,
> > John Venn, William Gustason, Richmond H. Thomason, more of propagandists and belong in "Abnormal Psychology" dept than in the department of logic, like Dan Christensen a laugh a minute logician? Probably because none can admit slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse, due to axes of symmetry for cone and oval have 1 while ellipse has 2. Why they cannot even count beyond 1. Yet their minds were never good enough to see the error nor admit to their mistakes. They failed logic so badly they accept Boole's insane AND truth table of TFFF when it is TTTF avoiding the painful 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. Or is it because none of these logicians has a single marble of logic in their entire brain to realize calculus requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, not a "limit analysis" for analysis is like a measurement, not a proving exercise. Analysis does not prove, only adds data and facts, but never is a proof of itself. I analyze things daily, and none of which is a proof. So are all these logicians like what Clutterfreak the propaganda stooge says they are.
> >
> >
> > > On Friday, July 2, 2021 at 9:47:42 AM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> > > > You may be giving him too much credit here. Judging by his bizarre antics here, he has given up obtaining any kind of positive recognition.
> > > >
> > > > Dan
> > >
> > > Partial List of the World's Crackpot Logicians-- should be in a college Abnormal-Psychology department, not Logic//
> > >
> > > Peter Bruce Andrews, Lennart Aqvist, Henk Barendregt, John Lane Bell, Nuel Belnap,
> > > Paul Benacerraf, Jean Paul Van Bendegem, Johan van Benthem, Jean-Yves Beziau,
> > > Andrea Bonomi, Nicolas Bourbaki (a group of logic fumblers), Alan Richard Bundy, Gregory Chaitin,
> > > Jack Copeland, John Corcoran, Dirk van Dalen, Martin Davis, Michael A..E. Dummett, John Etchemendy, Hartry Field, Kit Fine, Melvin Fitting, Matthew Foreman, Michael Fourman,
> > > Harvey Friedman, Dov Gabbay, L.T.F. Gamut (group of logic fumblers), Sol Garfunkel, Jean-Yves Girard, Siegfried Gottwald, Jeroen Groenendijk, Susan Haack, Leo Harrington, William Alvin Howard,
> > > Ronald Jensen, Dick de Jongh, David Kaplan, Alexander S. Kechris, Howard Jerome Keisler,
> > > Robert Kowalski, Georg Kreisel, Saul Kripke, Kenneth Kunen, Karel Lambert, Penelope Maddy,
> > > David Makinson, Isaac Malitz, Gary R. Mar, Donald A. Martin, Per Martin-Lof,Yiannis N. Moschovakis, Jeff Paris, Charles Parsons, Solomon Passy, Lorenzo Pena, Dag Prawitz,
> > > Graham Priest, Michael O. Rabin, Gerald Sacks, Dana Scott, Stewart Shapiro, Theodore Slaman,
> > > Robert M. Solovay, John R. Steel, Martin Stokhof, Anne Sjerp Troelstra, Alasdair Urquhart,
> > > Moshe Y. Vardi, W. Hugh Woodin, John Woods
> > >
> > > Now I should include the authors of Logic textbooks for they, more than most, perpetuate and crank the error filled logic, the Horrible Error of 2 OR 1 = 3 with 2 AND 1 = 1, that is forced down the throats of young students, making them cripples of ever thinking straight and clearly.
> > >
> > > Many of these authors have passed away but their error filled books are a scourge to modern education
> > >
> > > George Boole, William Jevons, Bertrand Russell, Kurt Godel, Rudolf Carnap,
> > > Ludwig Wittgenstein, Willard Quine, Alfred North Whitehead, Irving Copi, Michael Withey,
> > > Patrick Hurley, Harry J Gensler, David Kelley, Jesse Bollinger, Theodore Sider,
> > > David Barker-Plummer, I. C. Robledo, John Nolt, Peter Smith, Stan Baronett, Jim Holt,
> > > Virginia Klenk, David Agler, Susanne K. Langer, Gary M. Hardegree, Raymond M. Smullyan,
> > > John Venn, William Gustason, Richmond H. Thomason,
> >
> >
> >
> > > > #5-1, 134th published book
> > > >
> > > > > > > Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already written the series of TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS in a 7 volume, 8 book set. This would be the first book in that 8 book set (one of the books is a companion book to 1st year college). But I suppose that I needed to write the full series before I could write the Introduction and know what I had to talk about and talk about in a logical progression order. Sounds paradoxical in a sense, that I needed to write the full series first and then go back and write the Introduction. But in another sense, hard to write an introduction on something you have not really fully done and completed. For example to know what is error filled Old Math and to list those errors in a logical order requires me to write the full 7 volumes in order to list in order the mistakes.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture: Mathematics begins with counting, with numbers, with quantity. But counting numbers needs geometry for something to count in the first place. So here in this picture of the generalized Hydrogen atom of chemistry and physics is a torus geometry of 8 rings of a proton torus and one ring where my fingers are, is a equator ring that is the muon and thrusting through the proton torus at the equator of the torus. So we count 9 rings in all. So math is created by atoms and math numbers exist because atoms have many geometry figures to count. And geometry exists because atoms have shapes and different figures.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08K2XQB4M
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ September 24, 2020
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 576 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 23 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #224,974 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #3 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > ◦ #23 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #182 in Calculus (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #5-2, 45th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #1 New Releasein General Geometry
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Last revision was 2NOV2020. And this is AP's 45th published book of science.
> > > > Preface: Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education.
> > > >
> > > > This is a textbook series in several volumes that carries every person through all his/her math education starting age 5 up to age 26. Volume 2 is for age 5 year old to that of senior in High School, that is needed to do both science and math. Every other math book is incidental to this series of Teaching True Mathematics.
> > > >
> > > > It is a journal-textbook because Amazon's Kindle offers me the ability to edit overnight, and to change the text, almost on a daily basis. A unique first in education textbooks-- almost a continual overnight editing. Adding new text, correcting text. Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education. Volume 3 carries the Freshperson in College for their math calculus education.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture: The Numbers as Integers from 0 to 100, and 10 Grid when dividing by 10, and part of the 100 Grid when dividing by 100. Decimal Grid Numbers are the true numbers of mathematics. The Reals, the rationals & irrationals, the algebraic & transcendentals, the imaginary & Complex, and the negative-numbers are all fake numbers. For, to be a true number, you have to "be counted" by mathematical induction. The smallest Grid system is the Decimal 10 Grid.
> > > >
> > > > Length: 399 pages
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07RG7BVZW
> > > > Publication date ‏ : ‎ May 2, 2019
> > > > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > File size ‏ : ‎ 2023 KB
> > > > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > Print length ‏ : ‎ 399 pages
> > > > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > Best Sellers Rank: #235,426 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > #15 in General Geometry
> > > > #223 in Geometry & Topology (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #5-3, 55th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Last revision was 25Jun2021. And this is AP's 55th published book of science.
> > > >
> > > > Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
> > > >
> > > > Preface: This is volume 3, book 3 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Freshperson students, 1st year college students of age 18-19. It is the continuation of volume 2 for ages 5 through 18 years old.
> > > >
> > > > The main major topic is the AP-EM equations of electricity and magnetism, the mathematics for the laws of electricity and magnetism; what used to be called the Maxwell Equations of Physics. The 1st Year College Math has to prepare all students with the math for all the sciences. So 1st year college Math is like a huge intersection station that has to prepare students with the math they need to do the hard sciences such as physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, geology, etc. What this means is, 1st year college is calculus that allows the student to work with electricity and magnetism. All the math that is needed to enable students to do electricity and magnetism. In Old Math before this textbook, those Old Math textbooks would end in 1/3 of the text about Arclength, vector space, div, curl, Line Integral, Green's, Stokes, Divergence theorem trying to reach and be able to teach Maxwell Equations. But sadly, barely any Old Math classroom reached that 1/3 ending of the textbook, and left all those college students without any math to tackle electricity and magnetism. And most of Old Math was just muddle headed wrong even if they covered the last 1/3 of the textbook. And that is totally unacceptable in science. This textbook fixes that huge hole and gap in Old Math education.
> > > >
> > > > And there is no way around it, that a course in 1st year College Calculus is going to do a lot of hands on experiment with electricity and magnetism, and is required of the students to buy a list of physics apparatus-- multimeter, galvanometer, coil, bar magnet, alligator clip wires, electromagnet, iron filing case, and possibly even a 12 volt transformer, all shown in the cover picture. The beginning of this textbook and the middle section all leads into the ending of this textbook-- we learn the AP-EM Equations and how to use those equations. And there is no escaping the fact that it has to be hands on physics experiments in the classroom of mathematics.
> > > >
> > > > But, do not be scared, for this is all easy easy easy. For if you passed and enjoyed Volume 2 TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, then I promise you, you will not be stressed with Volume 3, for I go out of my way to make it clear and understandable.
> > > >
> > > > Warning: this is a Journal Textbook, meaning that I am constantly adding new material, constantly revising, constantly fixing mistakes or making things more clear. So if you read this book in August of 2019, chances are it is different when you read it in September 2019. Ebooks allow authors the freedom to improve their textbooks on a ongoing basis.
> > > >
> > > > The 1st year college math should be about the math that prepares any and all students for science, whether they branch out into physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, or math, they should have all the math in 1st year college that will carry them through those science studies. I make every attempt possible to make math easy to understand, easy to learn and hopefully fun.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07WN9RVXD
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ August 16, 2019
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1390 KB
> > > > • Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 236 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #1,377,070 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #411 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #2,480 in Calculus (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 

> > > >
> > > > #5-4, 56th published book
> > > >
> > > > COLLEGE CALCULUS GUIDE to help students recognize math professor spam from math truth & reality// math textbook series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> > > >
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #1 New Releasein 15-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This textbook is the companion guide book to AP's Teaching True Mathematics, 1st year College. It is realized that Old Math will take a long time in removing their fake math, so in the interim period, this Guide book is designed to speed up the process of removing fake Calculus out of the education system, the fewer students we punish with forcing them with fake Calculus, the better we are.
> > > > Cover Picture: This book is part comedy, for when you cannot reason with math professors that they have many errors to fix, that 90% of their Calculus is in error, you end up resorting to comedy, making fun of them, to prod them to fix their errors. To prod them to "do right by the students of the world" not their entrenched propaganda.
> > > > Length: 54 pages
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > File Size: 1035 KB
> > > > Print Length: 64 pages
> > > > Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
> > > > Publication Date: August 18, 2019
> > > > Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
> > > > Language: English
> > > > ASIN: B07WNGLQ85
> > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> > > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 

> > > > Word Wise: Not Enabled
> > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #253,425 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > #38 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > #318 in Calculus (Books)
> > > > #48 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > > > 

> > > > #5-5, 72nd published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 4 for age 19-20 Sophomore-year College, math textbook series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Preface: This is volume 4, book 5 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Sophomore-year students, students of age 19-20. It is the continuation of volume 3 in the end-goal of learning how to do the mathematics of electricity and magnetism, because everything in physics is nothing but atoms and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. To know math, you have to know physics. We learned the Calculus of 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. But we did not learn the calculus of those equations for 3rd dimension. So, you can say that Sophomore year College math is devoted to 3D Calculus. This sophomore year college we fill in all the calculus, and we start over on all of Geometry, for geometry needs a modern day revision. And pardon me for this book is mostly reading, and the students doing less calculations. The classroom of this textbook has the teacher go through page by page to get the students comprehending and understanding of what is being taught. There are many hands on experiments also.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture shows some toruses, some round some square, torus of rings, thin strips of rings or squares and shows them laid flat. That is Calculus of 3rd dimension that lays a ring in a torus to be flat in 2nd dimension.
> > > > Length: 105 pages
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0828M34VL
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2019
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 952 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 105 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #242,037 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #36 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #219 in Calculus (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #5-6, 75th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 5 for age 20-21 Junior-year of College, math textbook series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
> > > >
> > > > This is volume 5, book 6 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Junior-year students, students of age 20-21. In first year college Calculus we learned calculus of the 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. And in sophomore year we learned calculus of 3rd dimension to complete our study of the mathematics needed to do the physics of electricity and magnetism. Now, junior year college, we move onto something different, for we focus mostly on logic now and especially the logic of what is called the "mathematical proof". Much of what the student has learned about mathematics so far has been given to her or him as stated knowledge, accept it as true because I say so. But now we are going to do math proofs. Oh, yes, we did prove a few items here and there, such as why the Decimal Grid Number system is so special, such as the Pythagorean Theorem, such as the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with its right-triangle hinged up or down. But many ideas we did not prove, we just stated them and expected all students to believe them true. And you are now juniors in college and we are going to start to prove many of those ideas and teach you "what is a math proof". Personally, I myself feel that the math proof is overrated, over hyped. But the math proof is important for one reason-- it makes you better scientists of knowing what is true and what is a shaky idea. A math proof is the same as "thinking straight and thinking clearly". And all scientists need to think straight and think clearly. But before we get to the Mathematics Proof, we have to do Probability and Statistics. What you learned in Grade School, then High School, then College, called Sigma Error, now becomes Probability and Statistics. It is important because all sciences including mathematics needs and uses Probability and Statistics. So, our job for junior-year of college mathematics is all cut out and ahead for us, no time to waste, let us get going.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture: is a sample of the Array Proof, a proof the ellipse is not a conic but rather a cylinder cut wherein the oval is the slant cut of a cone, not the ellipse.
> > > >
> > > > Length: 175 pages
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > ASIN : B0836F1YF6
> > > > Publication date : December 26, 2019
> > > > Language : English
> > > > File size : 741 KB
> > > > Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > Print length : 175 pages
> > > > Lending : Enabled
> > > > Best Sellers Rank: #3,768,255 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #3,591 in Probability & Statistics (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #19,091 in Probability & Statistics (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #5-7, 89th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 6 for age 21-22 Senior-year of College, math textbook series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium 2020
> > > >
> > > > Last revision was 6Feb2021.
> > > > Preface: This is the last year of College for mathematics and we have to mostly summarize all of mathematics as best we can. And set a new pattern to prepare students going on to math graduate school. A new pattern of work habits, because graduate school is more of research and explore on your own. So in this final year, I am going to eliminate tests, and have it mostly done as homework assignments.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture: Again and again, many times in math, the mind is not good enough alone to think straight and clear, and you need tools to hands-on see how it works. Here is a collection of tools for this senior year college classes. There is a pencil, clipboard, graph paper, compass, divider, protractor, slide-ruler. And for this year we spend a lot of time on the parallelepiped, showing my wood model, and showing my erector set model held together by wire loops in the corners. The plastic square is there only to hold up the erector set model.
> > > >
> > > > Length: 110 pages
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B084V11BGY
> > > > Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 15, 2020
> > > > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > File size ‏ : ‎ 826 KB
> > > > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > Print length ‏ : ‎ 110 pages
> > > > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > Best Sellers Rank: #224,965 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #345 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #373 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #2,256 in Physics (Books)
> > > >
> > > > #5-8, 90th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 7 for age 22-26 Graduate school, math textbook series, book 8 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium 2020
> > > >
> > > > Last revised 1NOV2020. This was AP's 90th published book of science..
> > > >
> > > > Preface: This is College Graduate School mathematics. Congratulations, you made it this far. To me, graduate school is mostly research, research mathematics and that means also physics. So it is going to be difficult to do math without physics. Of course, we focus on the mathematics of these research projects.
> > > >
> > > > My textbook for Graduate school is just a template and the professors teaching the graduate students are free of course to follow their own projects, but in terms of being physics and math combined. What I list below is a template for possible projects.
> > > >
> > > > So, in the below projects, I list 36 possible research projects that a graduate student my like to undertake, or partake. I list those 36 projects with a set of parentheses like this (1), (2), (3), etc. Not to be confused with the chapters listing as 1), 2), 3), etc. I list 36 projects but the professor can offer his/her own list, and I expect students with their professor, to pick a project and to monitor the student as to his/her progresses through the research. I have listed each project then cited some of my own research into these projects, below each project is an entry. Those entries are just a help or helper in getting started or acquainted with the project. The entry has a date time group and a newsgroup that I posted to such as sci.math or plutonium-atom-universe Google newsgroups. Again the entry is just a help or helper in getting started.
> > > >
> > > > Now instead of picking one or two projects for your Graduate years of study, some may select all 36 projects where you write a short paper on each project. Some may be bored with just one or two projects and opt for all 36.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture: A photo by my iphone of a page on Permutations of the Jacobs book Mathematics: A Human Endeavor, 1970. One of the best textbooks ever written in Old Math, not for its contents because there are many errors, but for its teaching style. It is extremely rare to find a math textbook written for the student to learn. Probably because math professors rarely learned how to teach in the first place; only learned how to unintentionally obfuscate. The page I photographed is important because it is the interface between geometry's perimeter or surface area versus geometry's area or volume, respectively. Or, an interface of pure numbers with that of geometry. But I have more to say on this below.
> > > > Length: 296 pages
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B085DF8R7V
> > > > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 1, 2020
> > > > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > File size ‏ : ‎ 828 KB
> > > > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > Print length ‏ : ‎ 296 pages
> > > > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > Best Sellers Rank: #224,981 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #13 in General Geometry
> > > > ◦ #213 in Geometry & Topology (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #5-8, 160th published book
> > > >
> > > > MATHOPEDIA-- List of 80 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Last revision was 28Apr2022. And this is AP's 160th book of Science..
> > > > Preface:
> > > > A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.
> > > > The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.
> > > > The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.
> > > > Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.
> > > > I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09MZTLRL5
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2021
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1149 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 65 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > Archimedes Plutonium

Thomas Hales,John Stillwell,Ruth Charney, Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, from the script sheets of Toby Howard Univ Manchester and Earle Jones (failed or unfailed engineer) Stanford Univ. Why Toby and Earle? Is it because they are blithering math idiots who cannot follow a simple geometry proof? Is that why they are psychoceramics???

Jones and Howard, which is worse, a hypocrite or a psychoceramic, for Michael Goldberg of polyhedron fame managed to publish figures that tile a sphere surface with 7 regular hexagons, yet the proof that no 6th regular polyhedron exists is the fact that hexagons make 120+120+120 = 360 and no bend, yet there is that fool Goldberg with tiling a sphere with hexagons alone.

> > >
> > >
> > > --- quoting Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section of a single cone, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition// Student teaches professor series, book 5
> > >
> > > By Archimedes Plutonium
> > >
> > > Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.
> > >
> > > ARRAY, Analytic Geometry Proof, Cylinder Section is a Ellipse::
> > >
> > >
> > > E
> > > __
> > > .-' `-.
> > > .' `.
> > > / \
> > > ; ;
> > > | G c | H
> > > ; ;
> > > \ /
> > > `. .'
> > > `-. _____ .-'
> > > F
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Alright, focus on the distance from c to F in the cone-cut compared to the distance from c to E
> > >
> > > In a Cylinder cut, those two distances are the same because a cylinder has two axes of symmetry.
> > >
> > > The side view of a cylinder is this
> > >
> > > | |
> > > | |
> > > | |
> > >
> > > That allows cE to be the same distance as cF
> > >
> > >
> > > But the side view of the cone is
> > >
> > > /\E
> > > /c \
> > > F / \
> > >
> > >
> > > The distance c to E is shorter because the slant of the side walls of the cone are in the direction of shortening cE, whereas the slant opposite c in cF makes that distance larger than cE.
> > >
> > > --- end quote ---
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Ruth Charney,Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Ken Ribet, Andrew Beal, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Gerald Edgar, AMS, no-one there can do a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, all they can offer is a limit analysis, so shoddy in logic they never realized that "analyzing" is not the same as "proving" for analyzing is much in the same as "measuring but not proving". And yet, none can do a geometry proof and the reason is quite clear for none can even see that the slant cut in single right-circular cone is a Oval, never the ellipse. So they could never do a geometry proof of FTC even if they wanted to. For they have no logical geometry brain to begin to do anything geometrical. Is it that Andrew Wiles and Terence Tao cannot understand the slant cut in single cone is an Oval, never the ellipse, or is it the foolish Boole logic they teach of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction? Not having a Logical brain to do math, for any rational person would be upset by Wiles, Tao saying truth table of AND is TFFF when it actually is TTTF. Is that why neither Terence Tao or Andrew Wiles can do a geometry proof Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?
> > >
> > > Maybe they need to take up Earle Jones offer to wash dishes or pots at Stanford Univ or where ever, for they sure cannot do mathematics.
> > > Why are these people failures of Math?? For none can even contemplate these 4 questions.
> > > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> > > Is Jim Holt, Virginia Klenk, David Agler, Susanne K. Langer, Gary M. Hardegree, Raymond M. Smullyan,
> > > John Venn, William Gustason, Richmond H. Thomason, more of propagandists and belong in "Abnormal Psychology" dept than in the department of logic, like Dan Christensen a laugh a minute logician? Probably because none can admit slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse, due to axes of symmetry for cone and oval have 1 while ellipse has 2. Why they cannot even count beyond 1. Yet their minds were never good enough to see the error nor admit to their mistakes. They failed logic so badly they accept Boole's insane AND truth table of TFFF when it is TTTF avoiding the painful 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. Or is it because none of these logicians has a single marble of logic in their entire brain to realize calculus requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, not a "limit analysis" for analysis is like a measurement, not a proving exercise. Analysis does not prove, only adds data and facts, but never is a proof of itself. I analyze things daily, and none of which is a proof. So are all these logicians like what Clutterfreak the propaganda stooge says they are.
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Friday, July 2, 2021 at 9:47:42 AM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> > > > > You may be giving him too much credit here. Judging by his bizarre antics here, he has given up obtaining any kind of positive recognition.
> > > > >
> > > > > Dan
> > > >
> > > > Partial List of the World's Crackpot Logicians-- should be in a college Abnormal-Psychology department, not Logic//
> > > >
> > > > Peter Bruce Andrews, Lennart Aqvist, Henk Barendregt, John Lane Bell, Nuel Belnap,
> > > > Paul Benacerraf, Jean Paul Van Bendegem, Johan van Benthem, Jean-Yves Beziau,
> > > > Andrea Bonomi, Nicolas Bourbaki (a group of logic fumblers), Alan Richard Bundy, Gregory Chaitin,
> > > > Jack Copeland, John Corcoran, Dirk van Dalen, Martin Davis, Michael A.E. Dummett, John Etchemendy, Hartry Field, Kit Fine, Melvin Fitting, Matthew Foreman, Michael Fourman,
> > > > Harvey Friedman, Dov Gabbay, L.T.F. Gamut (group of logic fumblers), Sol Garfunkel, Jean-Yves Girard, Siegfried Gottwald, Jeroen Groenendijk, Susan Haack, Leo Harrington, William Alvin Howard,
> > > > Ronald Jensen, Dick de Jongh, David Kaplan, Alexander S. Kechris, Howard Jerome Keisler,
> > > > Robert Kowalski, Georg Kreisel, Saul Kripke, Kenneth Kunen, Karel Lambert, Penelope Maddy,
> > > > David Makinson, Isaac Malitz, Gary R. Mar, Donald A. Martin, Per Martin-Lof,Yiannis N. Moschovakis, Jeff Paris, Charles Parsons, Solomon Passy, Lorenzo Pena, Dag Prawitz,
> > > > Graham Priest, Michael O. Rabin, Gerald Sacks, Dana Scott, Stewart Shapiro, Theodore Slaman,
> > > > Robert M. Solovay, John R. Steel, Martin Stokhof, Anne Sjerp Troelstra, Alasdair Urquhart,
> > > > Moshe Y. Vardi, W. Hugh Woodin, John Woods
> > > >
> > > > Now I should include the authors of Logic textbooks for they, more than most, perpetuate and crank the error filled logic, the Horrible Error of 2 OR 1 = 3 with 2 AND 1 = 1, that is forced down the throats of young students, making them cripples of ever thinking straight and clearly.
> > > >
> > > > Many of these authors have passed away but their error filled books are a scourge to modern education
> > > >
> > > > George Boole, William Jevons, Bertrand Russell, Kurt Godel, Rudolf Carnap,
> > > > Ludwig Wittgenstein, Willard Quine, Alfred North Whitehead, Irving Copi, Michael Withey,
> > > > Patrick Hurley, Harry J Gensler, David Kelley, Jesse Bollinger, Theodore Sider,
> > > > David Barker-Plummer, I. C. Robledo, John Nolt, Peter Smith, Stan Baronett, Jim Holt,
> > > > Virginia Klenk, David Agler, Susanne K. Langer, Gary M. Hardegree, Raymond M. Smullyan,
> > > > John Venn, William Gustason, Richmond H. Thomason,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > > #5-1, 134th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already written the series of TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS in a 7 volume, 8 book set. This would be the first book in that 8 book set (one of the books is a companion book to 1st year college). But I suppose that I needed to write the full series before I could write the Introduction and know what I had to talk about and talk about in a logical progression order. Sounds paradoxical in a sense, that I needed to write the full series first and then go back and write the Introduction. But in another sense, hard to write an introduction on something you have not really fully done and completed. For example to know what is error filled Old Math and to list those errors in a logical order requires me to write the full 7 volumes in order to list in order the mistakes.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover Picture: Mathematics begins with counting, with numbers, with quantity. But counting numbers needs geometry for something to count in the first place. So here in this picture of the generalized Hydrogen atom of chemistry and physics is a torus geometry of 8 rings of a proton torus and one ring where my fingers are, is a equator ring that is the muon and thrusting through the proton torus at the equator of the torus. So we count 9 rings in all. So math is created by atoms and math numbers exist because atoms have many geometry figures to count. And geometry exists because atoms have shapes and different figures.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08K2XQB4M
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ September 24, 2020
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 576 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 23 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #224,974 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #3 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > ◦ #23 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #182 in Calculus (Books)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #5-2, 45th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #1 New Releasein General Geometry
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Last revision was 2NOV2020. And this is AP's 45th published book of science.
> > > > > Preface: Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a textbook series in several volumes that carries every person through all his/her math education starting age 5 up to age 26. Volume 2 is for age 5 year old to that of senior in High School, that is needed to do both science and math. Every other math book is incidental to this series of Teaching True Mathematics.
> > > > >
> > > > > It is a journal-textbook because Amazon's Kindle offers me the ability to edit overnight, and to change the text, almost on a daily basis. A unique first in education textbooks-- almost a continual overnight editing.. Adding new text, correcting text. Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education. Volume 3 carries the Freshperson in College for their math calculus education.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover Picture: The Numbers as Integers from 0 to 100, and 10 Grid when dividing by 10, and part of the 100 Grid when dividing by 100. Decimal Grid Numbers are the true numbers of mathematics. The Reals, the rationals & irrationals, the algebraic & transcendentals, the imaginary & Complex, and the negative-numbers are all fake numbers. For, to be a true number, you have to "be counted" by mathematical induction. The smallest Grid system is the Decimal 10 Grid.
> > > > >
> > > > > Length: 399 pages
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07RG7BVZW
> > > > > Publication date ‏ : ‎ May 2, 2019
> > > > > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > File size ‏ : ‎ 2023 KB
> > > > > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > Print length ‏ : ‎ 399 pages
> > > > > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > Best Sellers Rank: #235,426 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > #15 in General Geometry
> > > > > #223 in Geometry & Topology (Books)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #5-3, 55th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > Last revision was 25Jun2021. And this is AP's 55th published book of science.
> > > > >
> > > > > Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: This is volume 3, book 3 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Freshperson students, 1st year college students of age 18-19. It is the continuation of volume 2 for ages 5 through 18 years old.
> > > > >
> > > > > The main major topic is the AP-EM equations of electricity and magnetism, the mathematics for the laws of electricity and magnetism; what used to be called the Maxwell Equations of Physics. The 1st Year College Math has to prepare all students with the math for all the sciences. So 1st year college Math is like a huge intersection station that has to prepare students with the math they need to do the hard sciences such as physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, geology, etc. What this means is, 1st year college is calculus that allows the student to work with electricity and magnetism. All the math that is needed to enable students to do electricity and magnetism. In Old Math before this textbook, those Old Math textbooks would end in 1/3 of the text about Arclength, vector space, div, curl, Line Integral, Green's, Stokes, Divergence theorem trying to reach and be able to teach Maxwell Equations. But sadly, barely any Old Math classroom reached that 1/3 ending of the textbook, and left all those college students without any math to tackle electricity and magnetism. And most of Old Math was just muddle headed wrong even if they covered the last 1/3 of the textbook. And that is totally unacceptable in science. This textbook fixes that huge hole and gap in Old Math education.
> > > > >
> > > > > And there is no way around it, that a course in 1st year College Calculus is going to do a lot of hands on experiment with electricity and magnetism, and is required of the students to buy a list of physics apparatus-- multimeter, galvanometer, coil, bar magnet, alligator clip wires, electromagnet, iron filing case, and possibly even a 12 volt transformer, all shown in the cover picture. The beginning of this textbook and the middle section all leads into the ending of this textbook-- we learn the AP-EM Equations and how to use those equations. And there is no escaping the fact that it has to be hands on physics experiments in the classroom of mathematics.
> > > > >
> > > > > But, do not be scared, for this is all easy easy easy. For if you passed and enjoyed Volume 2 TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, then I promise you, you will not be stressed with Volume 3, for I go out of my way to make it clear and understandable.
> > > > >
> > > > > Warning: this is a Journal Textbook, meaning that I am constantly adding new material, constantly revising, constantly fixing mistakes or making things more clear. So if you read this book in August of 2019, chances are it is different when you read it in September 2019. Ebooks allow authors the freedom to improve their textbooks on a ongoing basis.
> > > > >
> > > > > The 1st year college math should be about the math that prepares any and all students for science, whether they branch out into physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, or math, they should have all the math in 1st year college that will carry them through those science studies. I make every attempt possible to make math easy to understand, easy to learn and hopefully fun.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07WN9RVXD
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ August 16, 2019
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1390 KB
> > > > > • Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 236 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #1,377,070 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #411 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #2,480 in Calculus (Books)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 

> > > > >
> > > > > #5-4, 56th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > COLLEGE CALCULUS GUIDE to help students recognize math professor spam from math truth & reality// math textbook series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> > > > >
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #1 New Releasein 15-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > This textbook is the companion guide book to AP's Teaching True Mathematics, 1st year College. It is realized that Old Math will take a long time in removing their fake math, so in the interim period, this Guide book is designed to speed up the process of removing fake Calculus out of the education system, the fewer students we punish with forcing them with fake Calculus, the better we are.
> > > > > Cover Picture: This book is part comedy, for when you cannot reason with math professors that they have many errors to fix, that 90% of their Calculus is in error, you end up resorting to comedy, making fun of them, to prod them to fix their errors. To prod them to "do right by the students of the world" not their entrenched propaganda.
> > > > > Length: 54 pages
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > File Size: 1035 KB
> > > > > Print Length: 64 pages
> > > > > Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
> > > > > Publication Date: August 18, 2019
> > > > > Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
> > > > > Language: English
> > > > > ASIN: B07WNGLQ85
> > > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> > > > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 

> > > > > Word Wise: Not Enabled
> > > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #253,425 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > #38 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > #318 in Calculus (Books)
> > > > > #48 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > > > > 

> > > > > #5-5, 72nd published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 4 for age 19-20 Sophomore-year College, math textbook series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: This is volume 4, book 5 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Sophomore-year students, students of age 19-20. It is the continuation of volume 3 in the end-goal of learning how to do the mathematics of electricity and magnetism, because everything in physics is nothing but atoms and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. To know math, you have to know physics. We learned the Calculus of 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. But we did not learn the calculus of those equations for 3rd dimension. So, you can say that Sophomore year College math is devoted to 3D Calculus. This sophomore year college we fill in all the calculus, and we start over on all of Geometry, for geometry needs a modern day revision. And pardon me for this book is mostly reading, and the students doing less calculations. The classroom of this textbook has the teacher go through page by page to get the students comprehending and understanding of what is being taught. There are many hands on experiments also.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover Picture shows some toruses, some round some square, torus of rings, thin strips of rings or squares and shows them laid flat. That is Calculus of 3rd dimension that lays a ring in a torus to be flat in 2nd dimension.
> > > > > Length: 105 pages
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0828M34VL
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2019
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 952 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 105 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #242,037 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #36 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #219 in Calculus (Books)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #5-6, 75th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 5 for age 20-21 Junior-year of College, math textbook series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
> > > > >
> > > > > This is volume 5, book 6 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Junior-year students, students of age 20-21. In first year college Calculus we learned calculus of the 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. And in sophomore year we learned calculus of 3rd dimension to complete our study of the mathematics needed to do the physics of electricity and magnetism. Now, junior year college, we move onto something different, for we focus mostly on logic now and especially the logic of what is called the "mathematical proof". Much of what the student has learned about mathematics so far has been given to her or him as stated knowledge, accept it as true because I say so. But now we are going to do math proofs. Oh, yes, we did prove a few items here and there, such as why the Decimal Grid Number system is so special, such as the Pythagorean Theorem, such as the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with its right-triangle hinged up or down. But many ideas we did not prove, we just stated them and expected all students to believe them true. And you are now juniors in college and we are going to start to prove many of those ideas and teach you "what is a math proof". Personally, I myself feel that the math proof is overrated, over hyped. But the math proof is important for one reason-- it makes you better scientists of knowing what is true and what is a shaky idea. A math proof is the same as "thinking straight and thinking clearly". And all scientists need to think straight and think clearly. But before we get to the Mathematics Proof, we have to do Probability and Statistics. What you learned in Grade School, then High School, then College, called Sigma Error, now becomes Probability and Statistics. It is important because all sciences including mathematics needs and uses Probability and Statistics. So, our job for junior-year of college mathematics is all cut out and ahead for us, no time to waste, let us get going.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover Picture: is a sample of the Array Proof, a proof the ellipse is not a conic but rather a cylinder cut wherein the oval is the slant cut of a cone, not the ellipse.
> > > > >
> > > > > Length: 175 pages
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > ASIN : B0836F1YF6
> > > > > Publication date : December 26, 2019
> > > > > Language : English
> > > > > File size : 741 KB
> > > > > Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > Print length : 175 pages
> > > > > Lending : Enabled
> > > > > Best Sellers Rank: #3,768,255 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #3,591 in Probability & Statistics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #19,091 in Probability & Statistics (Books)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #5-7, 89th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 6 for age 21-22 Senior-year of College, math textbook series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium 2020
> > > > >
> > > > > Last revision was 6Feb2021.
> > > > > Preface: This is the last year of College for mathematics and we have to mostly summarize all of mathematics as best we can. And set a new pattern to prepare students going on to math graduate school. A new pattern of work habits, because graduate school is more of research and explore on your own. So in this final year, I am going to eliminate tests, and have it mostly done as homework assignments.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover Picture: Again and again, many times in math, the mind is not good enough alone to think straight and clear, and you need tools to hands-on see how it works. Here is a collection of tools for this senior year college classes. There is a pencil, clipboard, graph paper, compass, divider, protractor, slide-ruler. And for this year we spend a lot of time on the parallelepiped, showing my wood model, and showing my erector set model held together by wire loops in the corners. The plastic square is there only to hold up the erector set model.
> > > > >
> > > > > Length: 110 pages
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B084V11BGY
> > > > > Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 15, 2020
> > > > > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > File size ‏ : ‎ 826 KB
> > > > > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > Print length ‏ : ‎ 110 pages
> > > > > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > Best Sellers Rank: #224,965 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #345 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #373 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #2,256 in Physics (Books)
> > > > >
> > > > > #5-8, 90th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 7 for age 22-26 Graduate school, math textbook series, book 8 Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium 2020
> > > > >
> > > > > Last revised 1NOV2020. This was AP's 90th published book of science.
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: This is College Graduate School mathematics. Congratulations, you made it this far. To me, graduate school is mostly research, research mathematics and that means also physics. So it is going to be difficult to do math without physics. Of course, we focus on the mathematics of these research projects.
> > > > >
> > > > > My textbook for Graduate school is just a template and the professors teaching the graduate students are free of course to follow their own projects, but in terms of being physics and math combined. What I list below is a template for possible projects.
> > > > >
> > > > > So, in the below projects, I list 36 possible research projects that a graduate student my like to undertake, or partake. I list those 36 projects with a set of parentheses like this (1), (2), (3), etc. Not to be confused with the chapters listing as 1), 2), 3), etc. I list 36 projects but the professor can offer his/her own list, and I expect students with their professor, to pick a project and to monitor the student as to his/her progresses through the research. I have listed each project then cited some of my own research into these projects, below each project is an entry. Those entries are just a help or helper in getting started or acquainted with the project. The entry has a date time group and a newsgroup that I posted to such as sci.math or plutonium-atom-universe Google newsgroups. Again the entry is just a help or helper in getting started.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now instead of picking one or two projects for your Graduate years of study, some may select all 36 projects where you write a short paper on each project. Some may be bored with just one or two projects and opt for all 36.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover Picture: A photo by my iphone of a page on Permutations of the Jacobs book Mathematics: A Human Endeavor, 1970. One of the best textbooks ever written in Old Math, not for its contents because there are many errors, but for its teaching style. It is extremely rare to find a math textbook written for the student to learn. Probably because math professors rarely learned how to teach in the first place; only learned how to unintentionally obfuscate. The page I photographed is important because it is the interface between geometry's perimeter or surface area versus geometry's area or volume, respectively. Or, an interface of pure numbers with that of geometry. But I have more to say on this below.
> > > > > Length: 296 pages
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B085DF8R7V
> > > > > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 1, 2020
> > > > > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > File size ‏ : ‎ 828 KB
> > > > > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > Print length ‏ : ‎ 296 pages
> > > > > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > Best Sellers Rank: #224,981 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #13 in General Geometry
> > > > > ◦ #213 in Geometry & Topology (Books)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #5-8, 160th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > MATHOPEDIA-- List of 80 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > Last revision was 28Apr2022. And this is AP's 160th book of Science.
> > > > > Preface:
> > > > > A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.
> > > > > The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.
> > > > > The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.
> > > > > Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.
> > > > > I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09MZTLRL5
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2021
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1149 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 65 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > Archimedes Plutonium

Gerald Edgar,Ruth Charney,Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ken Ribet, you can't do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and fail at logic with your Boole nonsense of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, and so dumb in geometry that you fail to see the slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, so why not take up Stanford Univ Earle Jones' offer of washing dishes at Stanford Univ, for you are useless to mathematics...

Earle Jones, if you think Gerald Edgar is psychoceramic, is not Underwood Dudley even more psychoceramic-- and his classic fascist book on crackpots?? Earle, is there some link between a failed mathematician and his propensity to dwell upon ghostly crackpots like Gerald Edgar.

> > Are you interested?
> >
> > earle
> > *
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Ruth Charney,Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ken Ribet, Andrew Beal, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Gerald Edgar, AMS, no-one there can do a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, all they can offer is a limit analysis, so shoddy in logic they never realized that "analyzing" is not the same as "proving" for analyzing is much in the same as "measuring but not proving". And yet, none can do a geometry proof and the reason is quite clear for none can even see that the slant cut in single right-circular cone is a Oval, never the ellipse. So they could never do a geometry proof of FTC even if they wanted to. For they have no logical geometry brain to begin to do anything geometrical. Is it that Andrew Wiles and Terence Tao cannot understand the slant cut in single cone is an Oval, never the ellipse, or is it the foolish Boole logic they teach of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction? Not having a Logical brain to do math, for any rational person would be upset by Wiles, Tao saying truth table of AND is TFFF when it actually is TTTF. Is that why neither Terence Tao or Andrew Wiles can do a geometry proof Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?
>
> Maybe they need to take up Earle Jones offer to wash dishes or pots at Stanford Univ or where ever, for they sure cannot do mathematics.
> Why are these people failures of Math?? For none can even contemplate these 4 questions.
> 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> Is Jim Holt, Virginia Klenk, David Agler, Susanne K. Langer, Gary M. Hardegree, Raymond M. Smullyan,
> John Venn, William Gustason, Richmond H. Thomason, more of propagandists and belong in "Abnormal Psychology" dept than in the department of logic, like Dan Christensen a laugh a minute logician? Probably because none can admit slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse, due to axes of symmetry for cone and oval have 1 while ellipse has 2. Why they cannot even count beyond 1. Yet their minds were never good enough to see the error nor admit to their mistakes. They failed logic so badly they accept Boole's insane AND truth table of TFFF when it is TTTF avoiding the painful 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. Or is it because none of these logicians has a single marble of logic in their entire brain to realize calculus requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, not a "limit analysis" for analysis is like a measurement, not a proving exercise. Analysis does not prove, only adds data and facts, but never is a proof of itself. I analyze things daily, and none of which is a proof. So are all these logicians like what Clutterfreak the propaganda stooge says they are.
>
>
> > On Friday, July 2, 2021 at 9:47:42 AM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> > > You may be giving him too much credit here. Judging by his bizarre antics here, he has given up obtaining any kind of positive recognition.
> > >
> > > Dan
> >
> > Partial List of the World's Crackpot Logicians-- should be in a college Abnormal-Psychology department, not Logic//
> >
> > Peter Bruce Andrews, Lennart Aqvist, Henk Barendregt, John Lane Bell, Nuel Belnap,
> > Paul Benacerraf, Jean Paul Van Bendegem, Johan van Benthem, Jean-Yves Beziau,
> > Andrea Bonomi, Nicolas Bourbaki (a group of logic fumblers), Alan Richard Bundy, Gregory Chaitin,
> > Jack Copeland, John Corcoran, Dirk van Dalen, Martin Davis, Michael A.E.. Dummett, John Etchemendy, Hartry Field, Kit Fine, Melvin Fitting, Matthew Foreman, Michael Fourman,
> > Harvey Friedman, Dov Gabbay, L.T.F. Gamut (group of logic fumblers), Sol Garfunkel, Jean-Yves Girard, Siegfried Gottwald, Jeroen Groenendijk, Susan Haack, Leo Harrington, William Alvin Howard,
> > Ronald Jensen, Dick de Jongh, David Kaplan, Alexander S. Kechris, Howard Jerome Keisler,
> > Robert Kowalski, Georg Kreisel, Saul Kripke, Kenneth Kunen, Karel Lambert, Penelope Maddy,
> > David Makinson, Isaac Malitz, Gary R. Mar, Donald A. Martin, Per Martin-Lof,Yiannis N. Moschovakis, Jeff Paris, Charles Parsons, Solomon Passy, Lorenzo Pena, Dag Prawitz,
> > Graham Priest, Michael O. Rabin, Gerald Sacks, Dana Scott, Stewart Shapiro, Theodore Slaman,
> > Robert M. Solovay, John R. Steel, Martin Stokhof, Anne Sjerp Troelstra, Alasdair Urquhart,
> > Moshe Y. Vardi, W. Hugh Woodin, John Woods
> >
> > Now I should include the authors of Logic textbooks for they, more than most, perpetuate and crank the error filled logic, the Horrible Error of 2 OR 1 = 3 with 2 AND 1 = 1, that is forced down the throats of young students, making them cripples of ever thinking straight and clearly.
> >
> > Many of these authors have passed away but their error filled books are a scourge to modern education
> >
> > George Boole, William Jevons, Bertrand Russell, Kurt Godel, Rudolf Carnap,
> > Ludwig Wittgenstein, Willard Quine, Alfred North Whitehead, Irving Copi, Michael Withey,
> > Patrick Hurley, Harry J Gensler, David Kelley, Jesse Bollinger, Theodore Sider,
> > David Barker-Plummer, I. C. Robledo, John Nolt, Peter Smith, Stan Baronett, Jim Holt,
> > Virginia Klenk, David Agler, Susanne K. Langer, Gary M. Hardegree, Raymond M. Smullyan,
> > John Venn, William Gustason, Richmond H. Thomason,
>
>
>
> > > #5-1, 134th published book
> > >
> > > > > > Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already written the series of TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS in a 7 volume, 8 book set. This would be the first book in that 8 book set (one of the books is a companion book to 1st year college). But I suppose that I needed to write the full series before I could write the Introduction and know what I had to talk about and talk about in a logical progression order. Sounds paradoxical in a sense, that I needed to write the full series first and then go back and write the Introduction. But in another sense, hard to write an introduction on something you have not really fully done and completed. For example to know what is error filled Old Math and to list those errors in a logical order requires me to write the full 7 volumes in order to list in order the mistakes..
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: Mathematics begins with counting, with numbers, with quantity. But counting numbers needs geometry for something to count in the first place. So here in this picture of the generalized Hydrogen atom of chemistry and physics is a torus geometry of 8 rings of a proton torus and one ring where my fingers are, is a equator ring that is the muon and thrusting through the proton torus at the equator of the torus. So we count 9 rings in all. So math is created by atoms and math numbers exist because atoms have many geometry figures to count. And geometry exists because atoms have shapes and different figures.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08K2XQB4M
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ September 24, 2020
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 576 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 23 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #224,974 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #3 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > ◦ #23 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #182 in Calculus (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #5-2, 45th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #1 New Releasein General Geometry
> > >
> > >
> > > Last revision was 2NOV2020. And this is AP's 45th published book of science.
> > > Preface: Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education.
> > >
> > > This is a textbook series in several volumes that carries every person through all his/her math education starting age 5 up to age 26. Volume 2 is for age 5 year old to that of senior in High School, that is needed to do both science and math. Every other math book is incidental to this series of Teaching True Mathematics.
> > >
> > > It is a journal-textbook because Amazon's Kindle offers me the ability to edit overnight, and to change the text, almost on a daily basis. A unique first in education textbooks-- almost a continual overnight editing. Adding new text, correcting text. Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education. Volume 3 carries the Freshperson in College for their math calculus education.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: The Numbers as Integers from 0 to 100, and 10 Grid when dividing by 10, and part of the 100 Grid when dividing by 100. Decimal Grid Numbers are the true numbers of mathematics. The Reals, the rationals & irrationals, the algebraic & transcendentals, the imaginary & Complex, and the negative-numbers are all fake numbers. For, to be a true number, you have to "be counted" by mathematical induction. The smallest Grid system is the Decimal 10 Grid.
> > >
> > > Length: 399 pages
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07RG7BVZW
> > > Publication date ‏ : ‎ May 2, 2019
> > > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > File size ‏ : ‎ 2023 KB
> > > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > Print length ‏ : ‎ 399 pages
> > > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > Best Sellers Rank: #235,426 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > #15 in General Geometry
> > > #223 in Geometry & Topology (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #5-3, 55th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Last revision was 25Jun2021. And this is AP's 55th published book of science.
> > >
> > > Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
> > >
> > > Preface: This is volume 3, book 3 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Freshperson students, 1st year college students of age 18-19. It is the continuation of volume 2 for ages 5 through 18 years old.
> > >
> > > The main major topic is the AP-EM equations of electricity and magnetism, the mathematics for the laws of electricity and magnetism; what used to be called the Maxwell Equations of Physics. The 1st Year College Math has to prepare all students with the math for all the sciences. So 1st year college Math is like a huge intersection station that has to prepare students with the math they need to do the hard sciences such as physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, geology, etc. What this means is, 1st year college is calculus that allows the student to work with electricity and magnetism. All the math that is needed to enable students to do electricity and magnetism. In Old Math before this textbook, those Old Math textbooks would end in 1/3 of the text about Arclength, vector space, div, curl, Line Integral, Green's, Stokes, Divergence theorem trying to reach and be able to teach Maxwell Equations. But sadly, barely any Old Math classroom reached that 1/3 ending of the textbook, and left all those college students without any math to tackle electricity and magnetism. And most of Old Math was just muddle headed wrong even if they covered the last 1/3 of the textbook. And that is totally unacceptable in science. This textbook fixes that huge hole and gap in Old Math education.
> > >
> > > And there is no way around it, that a course in 1st year College Calculus is going to do a lot of hands on experiment with electricity and magnetism, and is required of the students to buy a list of physics apparatus-- multimeter, galvanometer, coil, bar magnet, alligator clip wires, electromagnet, iron filing case, and possibly even a 12 volt transformer, all shown in the cover picture. The beginning of this textbook and the middle section all leads into the ending of this textbook-- we learn the AP-EM Equations and how to use those equations. And there is no escaping the fact that it has to be hands on physics experiments in the classroom of mathematics.
> > >
> > > But, do not be scared, for this is all easy easy easy. For if you passed and enjoyed Volume 2 TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, then I promise you, you will not be stressed with Volume 3, for I go out of my way to make it clear and understandable.
> > >
> > > Warning: this is a Journal Textbook, meaning that I am constantly adding new material, constantly revising, constantly fixing mistakes or making things more clear. So if you read this book in August of 2019, chances are it is different when you read it in September 2019. Ebooks allow authors the freedom to improve their textbooks on a ongoing basis.
> > >
> > > The 1st year college math should be about the math that prepares any and all students for science, whether they branch out into physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, or math, they should have all the math in 1st year college that will carry them through those science studies. I make every attempt possible to make math easy to understand, easy to learn and hopefully fun.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07WN9RVXD
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ August 16, 2019
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1390 KB
> > > • Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 236 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #1,377,070 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #411 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #2,480 in Calculus (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > > 

> > >
> > > #5-4, 56th published book
> > >
> > > COLLEGE CALCULUS GUIDE to help students recognize math professor spam from math truth & reality// math textbook series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> > >
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > >
> > > #1 New Releasein 15-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > >
> > >
> > > This textbook is the companion guide book to AP's Teaching True Mathematics, 1st year College. It is realized that Old Math will take a long time in removing their fake math, so in the interim period, this Guide book is designed to speed up the process of removing fake Calculus out of the education system, the fewer students we punish with forcing them with fake Calculus, the better we are.
> > > Cover Picture: This book is part comedy, for when you cannot reason with math professors that they have many errors to fix, that 90% of their Calculus is in error, you end up resorting to comedy, making fun of them, to prod them to fix their errors. To prod them to "do right by the students of the world" not their entrenched propaganda.
> > > Length: 54 pages
> > >
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > File Size: 1035 KB
> > > Print Length: 64 pages
> > > Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
> > > Publication Date: August 18, 2019
> > > Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
> > > Language: English
> > > ASIN: B07WNGLQ85
> > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 

> > > Word Wise: Not Enabled
> > > Lending: Enabled
> > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #253,425 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > #38 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > #318 in Calculus (Books)
> > > #48 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > > 

> > > #5-5, 72nd published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 4 for age 19-20 Sophomore-year College, math textbook series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Preface: This is volume 4, book 5 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Sophomore-year students, students of age 19-20. It is the continuation of volume 3 in the end-goal of learning how to do the mathematics of electricity and magnetism, because everything in physics is nothing but atoms and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. To know math, you have to know physics. We learned the Calculus of 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. But we did not learn the calculus of those equations for 3rd dimension. So, you can say that Sophomore year College math is devoted to 3D Calculus. This sophomore year college we fill in all the calculus, and we start over on all of Geometry, for geometry needs a modern day revision. And pardon me for this book is mostly reading, and the students doing less calculations. The classroom of this textbook has the teacher go through page by page to get the students comprehending and understanding of what is being taught. There are many hands on experiments also.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture shows some toruses, some round some square, torus of rings, thin strips of rings or squares and shows them laid flat. That is Calculus of 3rd dimension that lays a ring in a torus to be flat in 2nd dimension.
> > > Length: 105 pages
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0828M34VL
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2019
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 952 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 105 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #242,037 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #36 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #219 in Calculus (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > > #5-6, 75th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 5 for age 20-21 Junior-year of College, math textbook series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
> > >
> > > This is volume 5, book 6 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Junior-year students, students of age 20-21. In first year college Calculus we learned calculus of the 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. And in sophomore year we learned calculus of 3rd dimension to complete our study of the mathematics needed to do the physics of electricity and magnetism. Now, junior year college, we move onto something different, for we focus mostly on logic now and especially the logic of what is called the "mathematical proof". Much of what the student has learned about mathematics so far has been given to her or him as stated knowledge, accept it as true because I say so. But now we are going to do math proofs. Oh, yes, we did prove a few items here and there, such as why the Decimal Grid Number system is so special, such as the Pythagorean Theorem, such as the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with its right-triangle hinged up or down. But many ideas we did not prove, we just stated them and expected all students to believe them true. And you are now juniors in college and we are going to start to prove many of those ideas and teach you "what is a math proof". Personally, I myself feel that the math proof is overrated, over hyped. But the math proof is important for one reason-- it makes you better scientists of knowing what is true and what is a shaky idea. A math proof is the same as "thinking straight and thinking clearly". And all scientists need to think straight and think clearly. But before we get to the Mathematics Proof, we have to do Probability and Statistics. What you learned in Grade School, then High School, then College, called Sigma Error, now becomes Probability and Statistics. It is important because all sciences including mathematics needs and uses Probability and Statistics. So, our job for junior-year of college mathematics is all cut out and ahead for us, no time to waste, let us get going.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: is a sample of the Array Proof, a proof the ellipse is not a conic but rather a cylinder cut wherein the oval is the slant cut of a cone, not the ellipse.
> > >
> > > Length: 175 pages
> > >
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > ASIN : B0836F1YF6
> > > Publication date : December 26, 2019
> > > Language : English
> > > File size : 741 KB
> > > Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > Screen Reader : Supported
> > > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > Print length : 175 pages
> > > Lending : Enabled
> > > Best Sellers Rank: #3,768,255 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #3,591 in Probability & Statistics (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #19,091 in Probability & Statistics (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #5-7, 89th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 6 for age 21-22 Senior-year of College, math textbook series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium 2020
> > >
> > > Last revision was 6Feb2021.
> > > Preface: This is the last year of College for mathematics and we have to mostly summarize all of mathematics as best we can. And set a new pattern to prepare students going on to math graduate school. A new pattern of work habits, because graduate school is more of research and explore on your own. So in this final year, I am going to eliminate tests, and have it mostly done as homework assignments.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: Again and again, many times in math, the mind is not good enough alone to think straight and clear, and you need tools to hands-on see how it works. Here is a collection of tools for this senior year college classes. There is a pencil, clipboard, graph paper, compass, divider, protractor, slide-ruler. And for this year we spend a lot of time on the parallelepiped, showing my wood model, and showing my erector set model held together by wire loops in the corners. The plastic square is there only to hold up the erector set model.
> > >
> > > Length: 110 pages
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B084V11BGY
> > > Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 15, 2020
> > > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > File size ‏ : ‎ 826 KB
> > > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > Print length ‏ : ‎ 110 pages
> > > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > Best Sellers Rank: #224,965 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #345 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #373 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #2,256 in Physics (Books)
> > >
> > > #5-8, 90th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 7 for age 22-26 Graduate school, math textbook series, book 8 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium 2020
> > >
> > > Last revised 1NOV2020. This was AP's 90th published book of science.
> > >
> > > Preface: This is College Graduate School mathematics. Congratulations, you made it this far. To me, graduate school is mostly research, research mathematics and that means also physics. So it is going to be difficult to do math without physics. Of course, we focus on the mathematics of these research projects.
> > >
> > > My textbook for Graduate school is just a template and the professors teaching the graduate students are free of course to follow their own projects, but in terms of being physics and math combined. What I list below is a template for possible projects.
> > >
> > > So, in the below projects, I list 36 possible research projects that a graduate student my like to undertake, or partake. I list those 36 projects with a set of parentheses like this (1), (2), (3), etc. Not to be confused with the chapters listing as 1), 2), 3), etc. I list 36 projects but the professor can offer his/her own list, and I expect students with their professor, to pick a project and to monitor the student as to his/her progresses through the research. I have listed each project then cited some of my own research into these projects, below each project is an entry. Those entries are just a help or helper in getting started or acquainted with the project. The entry has a date time group and a newsgroup that I posted to such as sci.math or plutonium-atom-universe Google newsgroups. Again the entry is just a help or helper in getting started.
> > >
> > > Now instead of picking one or two projects for your Graduate years of study, some may select all 36 projects where you write a short paper on each project. Some may be bored with just one or two projects and opt for all 36.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: A photo by my iphone of a page on Permutations of the Jacobs book Mathematics: A Human Endeavor, 1970. One of the best textbooks ever written in Old Math, not for its contents because there are many errors, but for its teaching style. It is extremely rare to find a math textbook written for the student to learn. Probably because math professors rarely learned how to teach in the first place; only learned how to unintentionally obfuscate. The page I photographed is important because it is the interface between geometry's perimeter or surface area versus geometry's area or volume, respectively. Or, an interface of pure numbers with that of geometry.. But I have more to say on this below.
> > > Length: 296 pages
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B085DF8R7V
> > > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 1, 2020
> > > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > File size ‏ : ‎ 828 KB
> > > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > Print length ‏ : ‎ 296 pages
> > > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > Best Sellers Rank: #224,981 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #13 in General Geometry
> > > ◦ #213 in Geometry & Topology (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #5-8, 160th published book
> > >
> > > MATHOPEDIA-- List of 80 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Last revision was 28Apr2022. And this is AP's 160th book of Science.
> > > Preface:
> > > A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.
> > > The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.
> > > The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.
> > > Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book..
> > > I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09MZTLRL5
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2021
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1149 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 65 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

Underwood Dudley,Gerald Edgar,Ruth Charney,Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ken Ribet, you can't do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and fail at logic with your Boole nonsense of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, and so dumb in geometry that you fail to see the slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, so why not take up Stanford Univ Earle Jones' offer of washing dishes at Stanford Univ, for you are useless to mathematics...

Earle is that how they got the expression "stick in the mud" from Underwood Dudley, so dense in math, he believes slant cut in cone is ellipse. Does he believe slant cut in cube is a ellipse?

Earle Jones, if you think Gerald Edgar is psychoceramic, is not Underwood Dudley even more psychoceramic-- and his classic fascist book on crackpots?? Earle, is there some link between a failed mathematician and his propensity to dwell upon ghostly crackpots like Gerald Edgar.
>
>
>
> > > Are you interested?
> > >
> > > earle
> > > *
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Ruth Charney,Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ken Ribet, Andrew Beal, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Gerald Edgar, AMS, no-one there can do a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, all they can offer is a limit analysis, so shoddy in logic they never realized that "analyzing" is not the same as "proving" for analyzing is much in the same as "measuring but not proving". And yet, none can do a geometry proof and the reason is quite clear for none can even see that the slant cut in single right-circular cone is a Oval, never the ellipse. So they could never do a geometry proof of FTC even if they wanted to. For they have no logical geometry brain to begin to do anything geometrical. Is it that Andrew Wiles and Terence Tao cannot understand the slant cut in single cone is an Oval, never the ellipse, or is it the foolish Boole logic they teach of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction? Not having a Logical brain to do math, for any rational person would be upset by Wiles, Tao saying truth table of AND is TFFF when it actually is TTTF. Is that why neither Terence Tao or Andrew Wiles can do a geometry proof Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?
> >
> > Maybe they need to take up Earle Jones offer to wash dishes or pots at Stanford Univ or where ever, for they sure cannot do mathematics.
> > Why are these people failures of Math?? For none can even contemplate these 4 questions.
> > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> > Is Jim Holt, Virginia Klenk, David Agler, Susanne K. Langer, Gary M. Hardegree, Raymond M. Smullyan,
> > John Venn, William Gustason, Richmond H. Thomason, more of propagandists and belong in "Abnormal Psychology" dept than in the department of logic, like Dan Christensen a laugh a minute logician? Probably because none can admit slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse, due to axes of symmetry for cone and oval have 1 while ellipse has 2. Why they cannot even count beyond 1. Yet their minds were never good enough to see the error nor admit to their mistakes. They failed logic so badly they accept Boole's insane AND truth table of TFFF when it is TTTF avoiding the painful 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. Or is it because none of these logicians has a single marble of logic in their entire brain to realize calculus requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, not a "limit analysis" for analysis is like a measurement, not a proving exercise. Analysis does not prove, only adds data and facts, but never is a proof of itself. I analyze things daily, and none of which is a proof. So are all these logicians like what Clutterfreak the propaganda stooge says they are.
> >
> >
> > > On Friday, July 2, 2021 at 9:47:42 AM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> > > > You may be giving him too much credit here. Judging by his bizarre antics here, he has given up obtaining any kind of positive recognition.
> > > >
> > > > Dan
> > >
> > > Partial List of the World's Crackpot Logicians-- should be in a college Abnormal-Psychology department, not Logic//
> > >
> > > Peter Bruce Andrews, Lennart Aqvist, Henk Barendregt, John Lane Bell, Nuel Belnap,
> > > Paul Benacerraf, Jean Paul Van Bendegem, Johan van Benthem, Jean-Yves Beziau,
> > > Andrea Bonomi, Nicolas Bourbaki (a group of logic fumblers), Alan Richard Bundy, Gregory Chaitin,
> > > Jack Copeland, John Corcoran, Dirk van Dalen, Martin Davis, Michael A..E. Dummett, John Etchemendy, Hartry Field, Kit Fine, Melvin Fitting, Matthew Foreman, Michael Fourman,
> > > Harvey Friedman, Dov Gabbay, L.T.F. Gamut (group of logic fumblers), Sol Garfunkel, Jean-Yves Girard, Siegfried Gottwald, Jeroen Groenendijk, Susan Haack, Leo Harrington, William Alvin Howard,
> > > Ronald Jensen, Dick de Jongh, David Kaplan, Alexander S. Kechris, Howard Jerome Keisler,
> > > Robert Kowalski, Georg Kreisel, Saul Kripke, Kenneth Kunen, Karel Lambert, Penelope Maddy,
> > > David Makinson, Isaac Malitz, Gary R. Mar, Donald A. Martin, Per Martin-Lof,Yiannis N. Moschovakis, Jeff Paris, Charles Parsons, Solomon Passy, Lorenzo Pena, Dag Prawitz,
> > > Graham Priest, Michael O. Rabin, Gerald Sacks, Dana Scott, Stewart Shapiro, Theodore Slaman,
> > > Robert M. Solovay, John R. Steel, Martin Stokhof, Anne Sjerp Troelstra, Alasdair Urquhart,
> > > Moshe Y. Vardi, W. Hugh Woodin, John Woods
> > >
> > > Now I should include the authors of Logic textbooks for they, more than most, perpetuate and crank the error filled logic, the Horrible Error of 2 OR 1 = 3 with 2 AND 1 = 1, that is forced down the throats of young students, making them cripples of ever thinking straight and clearly.
> > >
> > > Many of these authors have passed away but their error filled books are a scourge to modern education
> > >
> > > George Boole, William Jevons, Bertrand Russell, Kurt Godel, Rudolf Carnap,
> > > Ludwig Wittgenstein, Willard Quine, Alfred North Whitehead, Irving Copi, Michael Withey,
> > > Patrick Hurley, Harry J Gensler, David Kelley, Jesse Bollinger, Theodore Sider,
> > > David Barker-Plummer, I. C. Robledo, John Nolt, Peter Smith, Stan Baronett, Jim Holt,
> > > Virginia Klenk, David Agler, Susanne K. Langer, Gary M. Hardegree, Raymond M. Smullyan,
> > > John Venn, William Gustason, Richmond H. Thomason,
> >
> >
> >
> > > > #5-1, 134th published book
> > > >
> > > > > > > Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already written the series of TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS in a 7 volume, 8 book set. This would be the first book in that 8 book set (one of the books is a companion book to 1st year college). But I suppose that I needed to write the full series before I could write the Introduction and know what I had to talk about and talk about in a logical progression order. Sounds paradoxical in a sense, that I needed to write the full series first and then go back and write the Introduction. But in another sense, hard to write an introduction on something you have not really fully done and completed. For example to know what is error filled Old Math and to list those errors in a logical order requires me to write the full 7 volumes in order to list in order the mistakes.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture: Mathematics begins with counting, with numbers, with quantity. But counting numbers needs geometry for something to count in the first place. So here in this picture of the generalized Hydrogen atom of chemistry and physics is a torus geometry of 8 rings of a proton torus and one ring where my fingers are, is a equator ring that is the muon and thrusting through the proton torus at the equator of the torus. So we count 9 rings in all. So math is created by atoms and math numbers exist because atoms have many geometry figures to count. And geometry exists because atoms have shapes and different figures.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08K2XQB4M
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ September 24, 2020
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 576 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 23 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #224,974 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #3 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > ◦ #23 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #182 in Calculus (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #5-2, 45th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #1 New Releasein General Geometry
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Last revision was 2NOV2020. And this is AP's 45th published book of science.
> > > > Preface: Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education.
> > > >
> > > > This is a textbook series in several volumes that carries every person through all his/her math education starting age 5 up to age 26. Volume 2 is for age 5 year old to that of senior in High School, that is needed to do both science and math. Every other math book is incidental to this series of Teaching True Mathematics.
> > > >
> > > > It is a journal-textbook because Amazon's Kindle offers me the ability to edit overnight, and to change the text, almost on a daily basis. A unique first in education textbooks-- almost a continual overnight editing. Adding new text, correcting text. Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education. Volume 3 carries the Freshperson in College for their math calculus education.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture: The Numbers as Integers from 0 to 100, and 10 Grid when dividing by 10, and part of the 100 Grid when dividing by 100. Decimal Grid Numbers are the true numbers of mathematics. The Reals, the rationals & irrationals, the algebraic & transcendentals, the imaginary & Complex, and the negative-numbers are all fake numbers. For, to be a true number, you have to "be counted" by mathematical induction. The smallest Grid system is the Decimal 10 Grid.
> > > >
> > > > Length: 399 pages
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07RG7BVZW
> > > > Publication date ‏ : ‎ May 2, 2019
> > > > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > File size ‏ : ‎ 2023 KB
> > > > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > Print length ‏ : ‎ 399 pages
> > > > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > Best Sellers Rank: #235,426 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > #15 in General Geometry
> > > > #223 in Geometry & Topology (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #5-3, 55th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Last revision was 25Jun2021. And this is AP's 55th published book of science.
> > > >
> > > > Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
> > > >
> > > > Preface: This is volume 3, book 3 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Freshperson students, 1st year college students of age 18-19. It is the continuation of volume 2 for ages 5 through 18 years old.
> > > >
> > > > The main major topic is the AP-EM equations of electricity and magnetism, the mathematics for the laws of electricity and magnetism; what used to be called the Maxwell Equations of Physics. The 1st Year College Math has to prepare all students with the math for all the sciences. So 1st year college Math is like a huge intersection station that has to prepare students with the math they need to do the hard sciences such as physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, geology, etc. What this means is, 1st year college is calculus that allows the student to work with electricity and magnetism. All the math that is needed to enable students to do electricity and magnetism. In Old Math before this textbook, those Old Math textbooks would end in 1/3 of the text about Arclength, vector space, div, curl, Line Integral, Green's, Stokes, Divergence theorem trying to reach and be able to teach Maxwell Equations. But sadly, barely any Old Math classroom reached that 1/3 ending of the textbook, and left all those college students without any math to tackle electricity and magnetism. And most of Old Math was just muddle headed wrong even if they covered the last 1/3 of the textbook. And that is totally unacceptable in science. This textbook fixes that huge hole and gap in Old Math education.
> > > >
> > > > And there is no way around it, that a course in 1st year College Calculus is going to do a lot of hands on experiment with electricity and magnetism, and is required of the students to buy a list of physics apparatus-- multimeter, galvanometer, coil, bar magnet, alligator clip wires, electromagnet, iron filing case, and possibly even a 12 volt transformer, all shown in the cover picture. The beginning of this textbook and the middle section all leads into the ending of this textbook-- we learn the AP-EM Equations and how to use those equations. And there is no escaping the fact that it has to be hands on physics experiments in the classroom of mathematics.
> > > >
> > > > But, do not be scared, for this is all easy easy easy. For if you passed and enjoyed Volume 2 TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, then I promise you, you will not be stressed with Volume 3, for I go out of my way to make it clear and understandable.
> > > >
> > > > Warning: this is a Journal Textbook, meaning that I am constantly adding new material, constantly revising, constantly fixing mistakes or making things more clear. So if you read this book in August of 2019, chances are it is different when you read it in September 2019. Ebooks allow authors the freedom to improve their textbooks on a ongoing basis.
> > > >
> > > > The 1st year college math should be about the math that prepares any and all students for science, whether they branch out into physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, or math, they should have all the math in 1st year college that will carry them through those science studies. I make every attempt possible to make math easy to understand, easy to learn and hopefully fun.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07WN9RVXD
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ August 16, 2019
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1390 KB
> > > > • Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 236 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #1,377,070 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #411 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #2,480 in Calculus (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 

> > > >
> > > > #5-4, 56th published book
> > > >
> > > > COLLEGE CALCULUS GUIDE to help students recognize math professor spam from math truth & reality// math textbook series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> > > >
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #1 New Releasein 15-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This textbook is the companion guide book to AP's Teaching True Mathematics, 1st year College. It is realized that Old Math will take a long time in removing their fake math, so in the interim period, this Guide book is designed to speed up the process of removing fake Calculus out of the education system, the fewer students we punish with forcing them with fake Calculus, the better we are.
> > > > Cover Picture: This book is part comedy, for when you cannot reason with math professors that they have many errors to fix, that 90% of their Calculus is in error, you end up resorting to comedy, making fun of them, to prod them to fix their errors. To prod them to "do right by the students of the world" not their entrenched propaganda.
> > > > Length: 54 pages
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > File Size: 1035 KB
> > > > Print Length: 64 pages
> > > > Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
> > > > Publication Date: August 18, 2019
> > > > Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
> > > > Language: English
> > > > ASIN: B07WNGLQ85
> > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> > > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 

> > > > Word Wise: Not Enabled
> > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #253,425 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > #38 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > #318 in Calculus (Books)
> > > > #48 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > > > 

> > > > #5-5, 72nd published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 4 for age 19-20 Sophomore-year College, math textbook series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Preface: This is volume 4, book 5 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Sophomore-year students, students of age 19-20. It is the continuation of volume 3 in the end-goal of learning how to do the mathematics of electricity and magnetism, because everything in physics is nothing but atoms and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. To know math, you have to know physics. We learned the Calculus of 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. But we did not learn the calculus of those equations for 3rd dimension. So, you can say that Sophomore year College math is devoted to 3D Calculus. This sophomore year college we fill in all the calculus, and we start over on all of Geometry, for geometry needs a modern day revision. And pardon me for this book is mostly reading, and the students doing less calculations. The classroom of this textbook has the teacher go through page by page to get the students comprehending and understanding of what is being taught. There are many hands on experiments also.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture shows some toruses, some round some square, torus of rings, thin strips of rings or squares and shows them laid flat. That is Calculus of 3rd dimension that lays a ring in a torus to be flat in 2nd dimension.
> > > > Length: 105 pages
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0828M34VL
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2019
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 952 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 105 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #242,037 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #36 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #219 in Calculus (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #5-6, 75th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 5 for age 20-21 Junior-year of College, math textbook series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
> > > >
> > > > This is volume 5, book 6 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Junior-year students, students of age 20-21. In first year college Calculus we learned calculus of the 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. And in sophomore year we learned calculus of 3rd dimension to complete our study of the mathematics needed to do the physics of electricity and magnetism. Now, junior year college, we move onto something different, for we focus mostly on logic now and especially the logic of what is called the "mathematical proof". Much of what the student has learned about mathematics so far has been given to her or him as stated knowledge, accept it as true because I say so. But now we are going to do math proofs. Oh, yes, we did prove a few items here and there, such as why the Decimal Grid Number system is so special, such as the Pythagorean Theorem, such as the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with its right-triangle hinged up or down. But many ideas we did not prove, we just stated them and expected all students to believe them true. And you are now juniors in college and we are going to start to prove many of those ideas and teach you "what is a math proof". Personally, I myself feel that the math proof is overrated, over hyped. But the math proof is important for one reason-- it makes you better scientists of knowing what is true and what is a shaky idea. A math proof is the same as "thinking straight and thinking clearly". And all scientists need to think straight and think clearly. But before we get to the Mathematics Proof, we have to do Probability and Statistics. What you learned in Grade School, then High School, then College, called Sigma Error, now becomes Probability and Statistics. It is important because all sciences including mathematics needs and uses Probability and Statistics. So, our job for junior-year of college mathematics is all cut out and ahead for us, no time to waste, let us get going.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture: is a sample of the Array Proof, a proof the ellipse is not a conic but rather a cylinder cut wherein the oval is the slant cut of a cone, not the ellipse.
> > > >
> > > > Length: 175 pages
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > ASIN : B0836F1YF6
> > > > Publication date : December 26, 2019
> > > > Language : English
> > > > File size : 741 KB
> > > > Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > Print length : 175 pages
> > > > Lending : Enabled
> > > > Best Sellers Rank: #3,768,255 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #3,591 in Probability & Statistics (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #19,091 in Probability & Statistics (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #5-7, 89th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 6 for age 21-22 Senior-year of College, math textbook series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium 2020
> > > >
> > > > Last revision was 6Feb2021.
> > > > Preface: This is the last year of College for mathematics and we have to mostly summarize all of mathematics as best we can. And set a new pattern to prepare students going on to math graduate school. A new pattern of work habits, because graduate school is more of research and explore on your own. So in this final year, I am going to eliminate tests, and have it mostly done as homework assignments.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture: Again and again, many times in math, the mind is not good enough alone to think straight and clear, and you need tools to hands-on see how it works. Here is a collection of tools for this senior year college classes. There is a pencil, clipboard, graph paper, compass, divider, protractor, slide-ruler. And for this year we spend a lot of time on the parallelepiped, showing my wood model, and showing my erector set model held together by wire loops in the corners. The plastic square is there only to hold up the erector set model.
> > > >
> > > > Length: 110 pages
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B084V11BGY
> > > > Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 15, 2020
> > > > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > File size ‏ : ‎ 826 KB
> > > > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > Print length ‏ : ‎ 110 pages
> > > > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > Best Sellers Rank: #224,965 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #345 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #373 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #2,256 in Physics (Books)
> > > >
> > > > #5-8, 90th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 7 for age 22-26 Graduate school, math textbook series, book 8 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium 2020
> > > >
> > > > Last revised 1NOV2020. This was AP's 90th published book of science..
> > > >
> > > > Preface: This is College Graduate School mathematics. Congratulations, you made it this far. To me, graduate school is mostly research, research mathematics and that means also physics. So it is going to be difficult to do math without physics. Of course, we focus on the mathematics of these research projects.
> > > >
> > > > My textbook for Graduate school is just a template and the professors teaching the graduate students are free of course to follow their own projects, but in terms of being physics and math combined. What I list below is a template for possible projects.
> > > >
> > > > So, in the below projects, I list 36 possible research projects that a graduate student my like to undertake, or partake. I list those 36 projects with a set of parentheses like this (1), (2), (3), etc. Not to be confused with the chapters listing as 1), 2), 3), etc. I list 36 projects but the professor can offer his/her own list, and I expect students with their professor, to pick a project and to monitor the student as to his/her progresses through the research. I have listed each project then cited some of my own research into these projects, below each project is an entry. Those entries are just a help or helper in getting started or acquainted with the project. The entry has a date time group and a newsgroup that I posted to such as sci.math or plutonium-atom-universe Google newsgroups. Again the entry is just a help or helper in getting started.
> > > >
> > > > Now instead of picking one or two projects for your Graduate years of study, some may select all 36 projects where you write a short paper on each project. Some may be bored with just one or two projects and opt for all 36.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture: A photo by my iphone of a page on Permutations of the Jacobs book Mathematics: A Human Endeavor, 1970. One of the best textbooks ever written in Old Math, not for its contents because there are many errors, but for its teaching style. It is extremely rare to find a math textbook written for the student to learn. Probably because math professors rarely learned how to teach in the first place; only learned how to unintentionally obfuscate. The page I photographed is important because it is the interface between geometry's perimeter or surface area versus geometry's area or volume, respectively. Or, an interface of pure numbers with that of geometry. But I have more to say on this below.
> > > > Length: 296 pages
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B085DF8R7V
> > > > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 1, 2020
> > > > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > File size ‏ : ‎ 828 KB
> > > > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > Print length ‏ : ‎ 296 pages
> > > > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > Best Sellers Rank: #224,981 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #13 in General Geometry
> > > > ◦ #213 in Geometry & Topology (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #5-8, 160th published book
> > > >
> > > > MATHOPEDIA-- List of 80 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Last revision was 28Apr2022. And this is AP's 160th book of Science..
> > > > Preface:
> > > > A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.
> > > > The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.
> > > > The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.
> > > > Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.
> > > > I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09MZTLRL5
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2021
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1149 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 65 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

SCIENCE magazine H.Thorp caught stealing AP's dog theory, and Toby Howard, Earle Jones describing Psychoceramics

On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 12:00:31 AM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> *
> Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester.)
>

AP writes: no-one should steal science from the original author, especially SCIENCE AAAS magazine.

H. Holden Thorp fails Chemistry, now tries to steal AP 2004 work on "Dog, first domesticated animal" Kindle book of AP's. Ask Dr. Thorp why in the world he has no brains to do proper chemistry. Ask him why he believes in Lewis 8 Structure, when it..

H. Holden Thorp fails Chemistry, now tries to steal AP 2004 work on "Dog, first domesticated animal" Kindle book of AP's.

Ask Dr. Thorp why in the world he has no brains to do proper chemistry. Ask him why he believes in Lewis 8 Structure, when it has been known for decades that CO then N2 have the highest bonded dissociation energy. Thus, if you had at least one logical marble of a brain, you would understand that the highest dissociation energy tells you what the Lewis Structure must be. It cannot be Lewis 8 Structure but has to be Lewis 6 Arm Structure. If it were Lewis 8, then O2 would have the highest dissociation energy, not CO.

Is this why Dr. Thorp was dismissed out of chemistry? He just does not have one logical marble? But it appears the no logical marble of Dr. Thorp is allowing SCIENCE magazine to steal, and steal away the AP theory of DOG, FIRST DOMESTICATED ANIMAL of year 2004, published in the book of that same title in Amazon's Kindle.

But it appears that SCIENCE is trying very hard to steal AP's theory.

And all I asked for was inclusion on a correction page of SCIENCE, but Dr. Thorp is headstrong in his stealing ways.

Is SCIENCE magazine trying to steal away AP's theory-- Dog-First Domesticated Animal, or, will they do the proper etiquette of a Corrections page in a future edition?

Nov 17, 2020, 12:53 PM
to sci.physics, sci.math, plutonium-atom-universe
In that 30OCT2020 issue of SCIENCE AAAS, on page 523 has a list of references and notes and the oldest date is this.

8. G.H.Perry et al..Nat. Genet. 39. 1256 (2007).

Well, AP's Dog-- First Domesticated Animal has a long long history of Usenet posts going back to 2004. So, no, AP is not going to have his theories, any one of them, stolen from him.

I have asked SCIENCE to include my name in a future corrections page of Dog-First Domesticated Animal.

Is SCIENCE magazine AAAS, trying to steal AP's theory-- Dog-- First Domesticated Animal// Looks like it in 30OCT2020 issue pages 522 & 557. I did not see the name Archimedes Plutonium in the references. There are four major offending words in ....
6 views

Is SCIENCE magazine AAAS, trying to steal AP's theory-- Dog-- First Domesticated Animal// Looks like it in 30OCT2020 issue pages 522 & 557.

I did not see the name Archimedes Plutonium in the references. There are four major offending words in these two articles on pages 522 and 557 and contents page-- " dog, first domesticated animal".

Unless SCIENCE can include the name Archimedes Plutonium in a future edition, saying-- forgot to cite AP in reference to dog domestication. Then AP is forced to include SCIENCE magazine in his book-- Theft and Stealing of Intellectual Property.

22nd published book
Biology: First Domesticated Animal: the Dog Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Amazing that just watching TV of science shows, one can formulate a true theory of science. Now my theory needs research, but it basically says the dog was the first farm animal, the first domesticated animal of the wolf, that became food for early homo sapiens. We tend to think of herbivores being the first domesticated animals, but I tend to think the dog comes as first domesticated animal. Many good lines of research are suggested below in the text.

Cover picture: are three dogs, the light brown one is Indy and her two daughters. Indy comes from the Waziristan mountains as a shephard dog.Indy is very smart.
Length: 50 pages

Product details
File Size: 3076 KB
Print Length: 50 pages
Publication Date: March 17, 2019
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PQ5CPKG
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 

Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #429,006 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#93 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#469 in Evolution (Kindle Store)
#648 in Biology (Kindle Store)

Biology: First Domesticated Animal: the Dog// Anthropology series, book 2
by Archimedes Plutonium

Preface: Amazing that just watching TV of science shows, one can formulate a true theory of science. Now my theory needs research, but it basically says the dog was the first farm animal, the first domesticated animal of the wolf, that became food for early homo sapiens. We tend to think of herbivores being the first domesticated animals, but I tend to think the dog comes as first domesticated animal. Many good lines of research are suggested below in the text.

Cover picture: are three dogs, the light brown one is Indy and her two daughters. Indy comes from the Waziristan mountains as a shepherd dog.Indy is very smart.

From: a_plu...@hotmail.com (Archimedes Plutonium)
Newsgroups: sci.bio.misc,sci.anthropology,sci.anthropology.paleo
Subject: how dogs evolved from wolves; TV NOVA show; 1st domesticated farm animal theory
Date: 5 Feb 2004 15:07:00 -0800
Lines: 76

A few days ago I watched a NOVA program on the variety of dogs with
talk of their evolution from that of wolves. Quite an interesting
program. However there are very many gaps of logic in the discussion
of how dogs came from wolves.

There was proffered the usual old theory that wolf babies make nice
pets and hominids would have come upon wolf babies and raised them in
their living camps.

Then there was a scientist who proffered a different theory suggesting
that dumpsites of early humans was a place to pick up easy food for
those wolves tolerant of human nearby presence.

I am going to offer a third theory which sort of incorporates the
above two. Let me call the above by their main mechanism. The first is
that of "Baby Pet" theory
and the second would be called the "Dumpsite" theory.

My theory would be called the "First Domesticated Farm Animal" theory.

The logical gap in theories one and two is that they confer little to
no advantage to the hominids or early humans involved, unless you want
to say that having a pet confers advantage over disadvantage of the
time spent on the pet, or as in the dumpsite theory that of the
spectacle of semi-wolves near camp is some sort of advantage.

My theory of "First Domesticated Animal" as the mechanism of how dogs
evolved from wolves makes the most sense because it confers the most
advantage to hominids or early humans. Here is how it works. Hominids
or Early Humans found wolf babies and would take them back to their
camp. They are too little and young to eat now, but as they grow older
fed from the snacks around the campsite (the dump) then they would be
large enough for food to eat.

Here I would have to research as to how easy or hard it would be to
have sheep or cattle hang around close to the campsite so that when
they got large enough they would be dinner. You see, I have the
suspicion that wild wolf babies are the animal that has the greatest
tendency to hang around the campsite than any other wild animal baby.
And thus, wolves would have been the first domesticated animal which
is rather surprising because they are carnivores and most of us would
guess that the first domesticated animal would have been a herbivore.
But I doubt that any baby herbivore would have stayed around the human
campsite as steadfast as a pet baby wolf until it grows to enough size
to eat.

Remember we are talking of primitive and savage hominids and early
humans who when looking at pets see them more as future food.

Which brings up very many good questions. Was the Dog the first
domesticated animal? I think it was. I say this because the wild wolf
baby imprints on a human better than a wild-any-other-animal. And
because of this imprinting the baby wolf would have stayed nearby the
humans until it grew of a size wherein one of the hungry hominids or
early humans ate the pet for dinner.

The Dump theory is okay in that the baby wolf would have wandered no
further away than the dump. And when the wolf was of a eatable size
would have been enticed by some scrap food bones and then killed and
eaten. Sounds gory and awful but that is probably the true sequence of
events that lead from wolves to the evolution of dog. And as this
relationship continued, the semi-wild wolf or dog had ears that drooped
and had a disposition to not run away.

We can measure the drooping ears of cattle or other domesticated
animals compared to their wild counterparts. As early man ate more and
more dogs for their dinners they wanted dogs that would hang around
the dumps and had droopy ears and not prone to run away.

Is Dr.Chandler Davis Canada's most famous psychoceramics or does Dan Christensen with his 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction surpass him?

On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 12:00:31 AM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> *
> Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester.)

Chandler Davis of University Toronto as editor of Mathematical Intelligencer. From around 1993 to early 2000, stealing AP's Usenet posted Correcting Euclid Infinitude of Primes Proof in sci.math, later published in his Correcting Math book.

My 14th published book

Correcting Math// Math focus series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

In the 1990s, I took a survey of Math Professors doing a simple math proof of Euclid's Infinitude of Primes Proof, and found that 84% of Math Professors failed to deliver a valid proof in that survey. The reason I believe this poor performance is that math professors for the most part are never required to take Logic courses while in college, to teach them how to think straight, think clearly. As a result, the world is cluttered with their fake mathematics with no hope of cleaning up their messes. And instead of fixing their mistakes and errors, they keep on cluttering the world with more fake math.

I propose that all math professors be required to take Logic in College as a mandatory requirement. Further, I recommend that all math prizes such as Abel, Fields, etc, that all math prizes awarded to those that can show they first fixed errors "fixed something of Old Math" before any of their manuscript of a proof of something else new in math be considered or given a look-over. That is-- prove yourself first -- you can fix math before we want to look at your new offerings. Show yourself as being math intelligent by fixing errors, rather than throw another error filled fake-proof onto mathematics-- Appel & Haken fake 4 Color Mapping, Wiles's fake FLT, Hales's fake Kepler Packing, Tao & Green fake number theory proof. Show us you can fix math, then we can consider anything new you want to offer.

Cover picture: A tractrix formed by a pocket-watch on graph paper, for this is how infinity borderline is determined.

Product details
File Size: 2026 KB
Print Length: 722 pages
Publication Date: March 15, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PQ2CXBY
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

Comparing the stealing of Porat versus MitchR versus Chandler Davis of Math.. Intelligencer magazine

Well it is easy to compare their stealing ways.

Porat would read a "good nice new idea", and really really like it. And so his reaction was to pop up in the author's thread and accuse that author of stealing the new idea from Porat. Such stealing behavior gets old very very fast for the original author.

MitchR stealing ways is less offensive, less in-your-face stealing than Porat, but none-the-less as aggravating. What MitchR does is scout around in sci.math and sci.physics for new ideas. Once he spots one, he rewords the new idea and posts his rewording in a new thread pretending he is the discoverer of a brand new idea of science. Actually, AP has met people like this in real life, where they listen to someone talk about a new idea and reword it so that they feel they have no need of footnoting or citing original source. For there are thousands of people who think that rewording a new idea gives them the right to call it "their new idea".

Chandler Davis when he was editor of Mathematical Intelligencer in Toronto Canada in the 1990s early 2000 printed a article on the mistakes in the Euclid Infinitude of Primes proof, not Chandler but two other authors. Trouble was, the article was almost a pure lifting, a stealing of AP's posts in sci.math over Euclid Infinitude of Primes. And I emailed Chandler asking for a correction page inclusion of my work in a future issue of the magazine. Turns out that Chandler was "stupid old school of thought" thinking that Usenet and Internet are just "for free to steal all you want". So, what AP ended up doing is publishing Chandler Davis's brash stealing of AP's work in AP's book. All that Chandler had to do was simply include a two line cite of Archimedes Plutonium in his magazine, but no, for I guess a thief is always a thief, and looking for a excuse.

So, what turned out in the case of Chandler Davis refusal to publish priority rights of intellectual property, that now, Chandler Davis is published in AP's book of stealing on the Internet. Fair sailing Chandler...

Dr. Chandler Davis when editor of Mathematical Intelligencer, steals the work of AP's Euclid Infinitude of Primes proof, work I had done in early 1990s and there Davis publishes my work under names of different authors in 2009. Davis and Thorp just have not accepted the idea that Internet is "not free stealing grounds".

Quoting from my book-- Theft & Stealing ideas of science in the era of the internet// Ways to prevent and combat stealing// Sociology series, book 10
by Archimedes Plutonium

Newsgroups: sci.physics, soc.history, sci.math
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 11:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Sep 9 2011 1:22 pm
Subject: Scardigli and arXiv, and QM of Titius-Bode rule priority? new book: #9 Usenet sci.newsgroups theft-without-proper-attribute

On Sep 9, 1:17 am, Archimedes Plutonium

<plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote:

(snipped in large part)

Now I need to shorten the title of this book and so far I have adopted
this as the title:
"Usenet sci.newsgroups theft-without-proper-attribute"
Maybe I can improve that even more, along the way
As mentioned often in this book, of the newness of the Internet and 
Usenet and that newness 
will create problems with the old media way of publishing science 
ideas. There were 
numerous problems in old media coverage of science, but when Usenet 
came around circa 1990, 
the proper attribute for new ideas had to be re-examined. And it left 
decades open of 
misappropriation of new ideas.
Now Mr Scardigli mentions above that he inserted a "errors corrected 
and more references cited" 
as a second edition to his first edition. I still do not see where he 
references Archimedes Plutonium 
Usenet posts to sci.physics on the Titius Bode Rule as quantum 
mechanics.
But what Mr. Scardigli has done by using a correction page to update, 
offers us a solution to 
the problem of "theft-without-proper-attribute." And this is what I 
tried to get Chandler Davis 
editor of Mathematical Intelligencer to do with his published article 
of "Prime Simplicity" of 2009 
was to include in a future correction page of Mathematical 
Intelligencer the name of Archimedes Plutonium 
with the referencing of my thousand or so Usenet posts on the subject 
for which I had priority.
So whereas the Usenet science newsgroups offers superior date-time- 
group for new ideas. The Usenet can be 
corrected of theft-by-improper-attribute by the insertion of the 
reference in a "Correction Page".
So that if Mr. Scardigli were to include Archimedes Plutonium, posts 
to sci.physics in a future correction page, then this episode is over 
with and ended. And if Chandler Davis with Mathematical Intelligencer 
in a future correction page of that magazine cites Archimedes 
Plutonium: posts to sci.math on Euclid Infinitude of Primes corrected, 
then that issue is over with.
So we begin to see the problem and it is a huge problem, and we begin 
to see a clearcut solution by authors, that they can correct priority 
rights through a Correction page citing those earlier sources.
Now I want to talk briefly about the opposite and rather insidious 
phenomenon that is occurring on Usenet as a publishing medium, that 
was there also in old media publishing but not so obnoxious and not so 
widespread. It is what can be considered the inverse of not including 
a reference to that of over-including a reference to the detriment of 
the source. What I am talking about is what has been dubbed as 
"bombing, Google bombing or 
search engine bombing." So that when you are reading a article about 
coal, you have reference to old articles written by Archimedes 
Plutonium to the planet Mars and whether Mars has coal.
Science before the Internet was worried about citing original sources. 
With the Internet a new problem arises 
where search engines are hyper-sensitive and will list references to 
authors for which the only element in common was a few words.
So in science, we still have the problem of proper citation to 
scientists with original ideas, but we also have a new problem on our 
hands of drowning authors of science with the pollution of search 
engine bombing 
on those authors. In a sense, this happened in old media science where 
a tabloid press would talk about a 
famous scientist, for which that scientist would rather that the 
tabloid never discussed him or his work, 
at all.

STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science

On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 12:27:37 AM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Is Dr.Chandler Davis Canada's most famous psychoceramics or does Dan Christensen ...

[snip]

AP is a malicious internet troll who wants only to mislead and confuse you. He may not be all there, but his fake math and science can only be meant to promote failure in schools. One can only guess at his motives.

In AP's OWN WORDS here:

“Primes do not exist, because the set they were borne from has no division.”
--June 29, 2020

“The last and largest finite number is 10^604.”
--June 3, 2015

“0 appears to be the last and largest finite number”
--June 9, 2015

“0/0 must be equal to 1.”
-- June 9, 2015

“0 is an infinite irrational number.”
--June 28, 2015

“No negative numbers exist.”
--December 22, 2018

“Rationals are not numbers.”
--May 18, 2019

According to AP's “chess board math,” an equilateral triangle is a right-triangle.
--December 11, 2019

Which could explain...

“The value of sin(45 degrees) = 1.”
--May 31, 2019

AP deliberately and repeatedly presented the truth table for OR as the truth table for AND:

“New Logic
AND
T & T = T
T & F = T
F & T = T
F & F = F”
--November 9, 2019

AP seeks aid of Russian agents to promote failure in schools:

"Please--Asking for help from Russia-- russian robots-- to create a new, true mathematics [sic]. What I like for the robots to do, is list every day, about 4 Colleges ( of the West) math dept, and ask why that math department is teaching false and fake math, and if unable to change to the correct true math, well, simply fire that math department until they can find professors who recognize truth in math from fakery...."
--November 9, 2017

And if that wasn't weird enough...

“The totality, everything that there is [the universe], is only 1 atom of plutonium [Pu]. There is nothing outside or beyond this one atom of plutonium.”
--April 4, 1994

“The Universe itself is one gigantic big atom.”
--November 14, 2019

AP's sinister Atom God Cult of Failure???

“Since God-Pu is marching on.
Glory! Glory! Atom Plutonium!
Its truth is marching on.
It has sounded forth the trumpet that shall never call retreat;
It is sifting out the hearts of people before its judgment seat;
Oh, be swift, my soul, to answer it; be jubilant, my feet!
Our God-Pu is marching on.”
--December 15, 2018 (Note: Pu is the atomic symbol for plutonium)

Dan

Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com
Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com

Corrupt math shithead that Terence Tao is. On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 7:29:15 AM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim

Suspend all Fields and Abel awards along with suspend Nobel prizes in Physics, until corrupt mathematicians Ruth Charney,Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Ken Ribet, Andrew Beal, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Gerald Edgar, AMS, and many others can accept and admit the truth Slant cut in cone is Oval, never the ellipse. Why, even High School Students can prove the slant cut is a Oval, never the ellipse, yet the Nobel prizes are given to idiots of science who too dumb in science, why even our good High School students in geometry class can take a paper cone and drop a Kerr or Ball lid inside, wiggle it around and prove that the slant cut is a Oval never the ellipse. Yet the math community awards the shithead of mathematics Dr. Tao with awards, and he cannot admit the truth about conic sections. High School students are smarter than Dr. Tao in math.

Corrupt morons of math Ruth Charney,Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Ken Ribet, Andrew Beal, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Gerald Edgar, AMS, cannot understand cone has one axis of symmetry, as does Oval, but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry such as a cylinder to provide for a slant cut to be a ellipse. In this ugly situation of mathematics taught in schools, the idiots of Old Math are dumber than the students they teach. For any smart student in High School can show the idiots Ruth Charney,Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Ken Ribet, Andrew Beal, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Gerald Edgar, AMS that ellipse has 2 axes of symmetry impossible to get from any cone cut.


3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
•
•

Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.

Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.

In the course of 2019 through 2022, I have had to explain this proof often on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics. And one thing that constant explaining does for a mind of science, is reduce the proof to its stripped down minimum format, to bare bones skeleton proof. I can prove the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse in just a one sentence proof. Proof-- A single cone and oval have just one axis of symmetry, while a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, hence slant cut is always a oval, never the ellipse..

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 827 KB
• Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 51 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

ARRAY, Analytic Geometry Proof, Cylinder Section is a Ellipse::
 
 
                E
               __
        .-'              `-.
      .'                    `.
    /                         \
   ;                           ;
  | G          c              | H
   ;                           ;
    \                         /
     `.                     .'
        `-.    _____  .-'
                  F
 

Alright, focus on the distance from c to F in the cone-cut compared to the distance from c to E

In a Cylinder cut, those two distances are the same because a cylinder has two axes of symmetry.

The side view of a cylinder is this

|    |
|    |
|    |

That allows cE to be the same distance as cF

But the side view of the cone is

     /\E
    /c \
F /     \

The distance c to E is shorter because the slant of the side walls of the cone are in the direction of shortening cE, whereas the slant opposite c in cF makes that distance larger than cE.

#12-2, 11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.

To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

No-one there can do a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, all they can offer is a limit analysis, so shoddy in logic they never realized that "analyzing" is not the same as "proving" for analyzing is much in the same as "measuring but not proving". And yet, none can do a geometry proof and the reason is quite clear for none can even see that the slant cut in single right-circular cone is a Oval, never the ellipse. So they could never do a geometry proof of FTC even if they wanted to. For they have no logical geometry brain to begin to do anything geometrical. Is it that Andrew Wiles and Terence Tao cannot understand the slant cut in single cone is an Oval, never the ellipse, or is it the foolish Boole logic they teach of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction? Not having a Logical brain to do math, for any rational person would be upset by Wiles, Tao saying truth table of AND is TFFF when it actually is TTTF. Is that why neither Terence Tao or Andrew Wiles can do a geometry proof Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?

Corrupt math shithead that Terence Tao is. On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 7:29:15 AM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim

Say, British Toby Howard, how about a PsychoConic, what Toby is a psychoconic.

Suspend all Fields and Abel awards along with suspend Nobel prizes in Physics, until corrupt mathematicians Ruth Charney,Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Ken Ribet, Andrew Beal, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Gerald Edgar, AMS, and many others can accept and admit the truth Slant cut in cone is Oval, never the ellipse. Why, even High School Students can prove the slant cut is a Oval, never the ellipse, yet the Nobel prizes are given to idiots of science who too dumb in science, why even our good High School students in geometry class can take a paper cone and drop a Kerr or Ball lid inside, wiggle it around and prove that the slant cut is a Oval never the ellipse. Yet the math community awards the shithead of mathematics Dr. Tao with awards, and he cannot admit the truth about conic sections. High School students are smarter than Dr. Tao in math.

Corrupt morons of math Ruth Charney,Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Ken Ribet, Andrew Beal, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Gerald Edgar, AMS, cannot understand cone has one axis of symmetry, as does Oval, but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry such as a cylinder to provide for a slant cut to be a ellipse. In this ugly situation of mathematics taught in schools, the idiots of Old Math are dumber than the students they teach. For any smart student in High School can show the idiots Ruth Charney,Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Ken Ribet, Andrew Beal, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Gerald Edgar, AMS that ellipse has 2 axes of symmetry impossible to get from any cone cut.


3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
•
•

Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.

Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.

In the course of 2019 through 2022, I have had to explain this proof often on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics. And one thing that constant explaining does for a mind of science, is reduce the proof to its stripped down minimum format, to bare bones skeleton proof. I can prove the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse in just a one sentence proof. Proof-- A single cone and oval have just one axis of symmetry, while a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, hence slant cut is always a oval, never the ellipse..

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 827 KB
• Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 51 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

ARRAY, Analytic Geometry Proof, Cylinder Section is a Ellipse::


E
__
.-' `-.
.' `.
/ \
; ;
| G c | H
; ;
\ /
`. .'
`-. _____ .-'
F