*
Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester.)

Our friend Archie (AP) has been famous for more years than we imagined! He is the first-mentioned example psychoceramicist -- see paragraph two.

http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~toby/writing/Guardian/ceramics.htm

Enjoy!

earle
*

Time to pull the plug on Stanford stalker Earle Jones, hate stalking spews for 25 years. Or is Jones a anon name for Persis Drell or Marc Tessier-Lavigne

The hate mongering moron of Earle Jones-- Georgia tech, Stanford alleged electrical engineer. Although I asked my Stanford friend if he ever heard of Earle Jones, and answer is no.

Time to pull the plug on the hate spewing shithead Jones, who never does any math in sci.math, nor physics in sci.physics.

On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 12:00:31 AM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> *
> Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester.)
>
> Our friend Archie (AP) has been famous for more years than we imagined! He is the first-mentioned example psychoceramicist -- see paragraph two.
>
> http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~toby/writing/Guardian/ceramics.htm
>
> Enjoy!
>
> earle
> *

On 6/11/2021 1:00 AM, Earle Jones wrote:
> *
> Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester.)
>
> Our friend Archie (AP) has been famous for more years than we imagined! He is the first-mentioned example psychoceramicist -- see paragraph two.
>
> http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~toby/writing/Guardian/ceramics.htm
>
> Enjoy!
>
> earle
> *

ArchiePoo is the first "psychoceramic" I encountered on Usenet way back
when. Back then Usenet was a very different place, with access limited
to universities, certain large (mostly computer) corporations and
government agencies. That's how ArchiePoo got access - he worked for
Dartmouth College who had the advanced foresight to grant internet
access to all of their students, faculty and staff, and Archie started
spewing from there. After years of warnings ignored by Archie,
Dartmouth finally fired his ass for dragging their reputation through
the mud.

Time to pull the plug on Stanford stalker Earle Jones, hate stalking spews for 25 years. Or is Jones a anon name for Persis Drell or Marc Tessier-Lavigne

The hate mongering moron of Earle Jones-- Georgia tech, Stanford alleged electrical engineer. Although I asked my Stanford friend if he ever heard of Earle Jones, and answer is no.

Time to pull the plug on the hate spewing shithead Jones, who never does any math in sci.math, nor physics in sci.physics.

On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 7:13:52 AM UTC+1, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 6/11/2021 1:00 AM, Earle Jones wrote:
> > *
> > Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester.)
> >
> > Our friend Archie (AP) has been famous for more years than we imagined! He is the first-mentioned example psychoceramicist -- see paragraph two.
> >
> > http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~toby/writing/Guardian/ceramics.htm
> >
> > Enjoy!
> >
> > earle
> > *
> ArchiePoo is the first "psychoceramic" I encountered on Usenet way back
> when. Back then Usenet was a very different place, with access limited
> to universities, certain large (mostly computer) corporations and
> government agencies. That's how ArchiePoo got access - he worked for
> Dartmouth College who had the advanced foresight to grant internet
> access to all of their students, faculty and staff, and Archie started
> spewing from there. After years of warnings ignored by Archie,
> Dartmouth finally fired his ass for dragging their reputation through
> the mud.

Is it known what his role was at the college?

Kind Regards

On 6/10/2021 10:00 PM, Earle Jones wrote:
> *
> Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester.)
>
> Our friend Archie (AP) has been famous for more years than we imagined! He is the first-mentioned example psychoceramicist -- see paragraph two.
>
> http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~toby/writing/Guardian/ceramics.htm
>
> Enjoy!

WOW!

On 6/11/2021 3:31 AM, Quantum Bubbles wrote:
> On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 7:13:52 AM UTC+1, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> On 6/11/2021 1:00 AM, Earle Jones wrote:
>>> *
>>> Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester.)
>>>
>>> Our friend Archie (AP) has been famous for more years than we imagined! He is the first-mentioned example psychoceramicist -- see paragraph two.
>>>
>>> http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~toby/writing/Guardian/ceramics.htm
>>>
>>> Enjoy!
>>>
>>> earle
>>> *
>> ArchiePoo is the first "psychoceramic" I encountered on Usenet way back
>> when. Back then Usenet was a very different place, with access limited
>> to universities, certain large (mostly computer) corporations and
>> government agencies. That's how ArchiePoo got access - he worked for
>> Dartmouth College who had the advanced foresight to grant internet
>> access to all of their students, faculty and staff, and Archie started
>> spewing from there. After years of warnings ignored by Archie,
>> Dartmouth finally fired his ass for dragging their reputation through
>> the mud.
>
>
> Is it known what his role was at the college?
>
> Kind Regards
>

Iirc, something to do with making dishes cleaner?

Quantum Bubbles presented the following explanation :
> On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 7:13:52 AM UTC+1, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> On 6/11/2021 1:00 AM, Earle Jones wrote:
>>> *
>>> Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline
>>> crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University of
>>> Manchester.)
>>>
>>> Our friend Archie (AP) has been famous for more years than we imagined! He
>>> is the first-mentioned example psychoceramicist -- see paragraph two.
>>>
>>> http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~toby/writing/Guardian/ceramics.htm
>>>
>>> Enjoy!
>>>
>>> earle
>>> *
>> ArchiePoo is the first "psychoceramic" I encountered on Usenet way back
>> when. Back then Usenet was a very different place, with access limited
>> to universities, certain large (mostly computer) corporations and
>> government agencies. That's how ArchiePoo got access - he worked for
>> Dartmouth College who had the advanced foresight to grant internet
>> access to all of their students, faculty and staff, and Archie started
>> spewing from there. After years of warnings ignored by Archie,
>> Dartmouth finally fired his ass for dragging their reputation through
>> the mud.
>
>
> Is it known what his role was at the college?
>
> Kind Regards

KP

On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 11:41:00 AM UTC+1, FromTheRafters wrote:
> Quantum Bubbles presented the following explanation :
> > On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 7:13:52 AM UTC+1, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >> On 6/11/2021 1:00 AM, Earle Jones wrote:
> >>> *
> >>> Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline
> >>> crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University of
> >>> Manchester.)
> >>>
> >>> Our friend Archie (AP) has been famous for more years than we imagined! He
> >>> is the first-mentioned example psychoceramicist -- see paragraph two.
> >>>
> >>> http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~toby/writing/Guardian/ceramics.htm
> >>>
> >>> Enjoy!
> >>>
> >>> earle
> >>> *
> >> ArchiePoo is the first "psychoceramic" I encountered on Usenet way back
> >> when. Back then Usenet was a very different place, with access limited
> >> to universities, certain large (mostly computer) corporations and
> >> government agencies. That's how ArchiePoo got access - he worked for
> >> Dartmouth College who had the advanced foresight to grant internet
> >> access to all of their students, faculty and staff, and Archie started
> >> spewing from there. After years of warnings ignored by Archie,
> >> Dartmouth finally fired his ass for dragging their reputation through
> >> the mud.
> >
> >
> > Is it known what his role was at the college?
> >
> > Kind Regards
> KP

Ah I see, so not 'former university lecturer who really went off the rails', which would at least be mildly interesting.

Archimedes Plutonium, if you are reading this, with all the time you have spent on various forums over the years you could have slowly but surely put yourself through part time education, starting off with high school catch up (many countries have adult learning centres for such situations) perhaps even eventually getting yourself an undergrad degree via the Open University or something. But unless your pension or other income is rather generous that might be a bit tough this late in the game. Still that's no excuse to let this sterile fantasy play itself out until the hour glass has run through.

Is there really nothing else you would rather do with your time? Do you really want to be remembered as little more than the thinking man's John Gabriel? You must want more for yourself than that surely? Try some volunteer work, or some gardening. Get yourself outside in the sun for a bit. Can't hurt.

Kind Regards

On 6/11/2021 8:08 AM, Quantum Bubbles wrote:
> On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 11:41:00 AM UTC+1, FromTheRafters wrote:
>> Quantum Bubbles presented the following explanation :
>>> On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 7:13:52 AM UTC+1, Michael Moroney wrote:
>>>> On 6/11/2021 1:00 AM, Earle Jones wrote:
>>>>> *
>>>>> Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline
>>>>> crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University of
>>>>> Manchester.)
>>>>>
>>>>> Our friend Archie (AP) has been famous for more years than we imagined! He
>>>>> is the first-mentioned example psychoceramicist -- see paragraph two.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~toby/writing/Guardian/ceramics.htm
>>>>>
>>>>> Enjoy!
>>>>>
>>>>> earle
>>>>> *
>>>> ArchiePoo is the first "psychoceramic" I encountered on Usenet way back
>>>> when. Back then Usenet was a very different place, with access limited
>>>> to universities, certain large (mostly computer) corporations and
>>>> government agencies. That's how ArchiePoo got access - he worked for
>>>> Dartmouth College who had the advanced foresight to grant internet
>>>> access to all of their students, faculty and staff, and Archie started
>>>> spewing from there. After years of warnings ignored by Archie,
>>>> Dartmouth finally fired his ass for dragging their reputation through
>>>> the mud.
>>>
>>>
>>> Is it known what his role was at the college?
>>>
>>> Kind Regards
>> KP
>
> Ah I see, so not 'former university lecturer who really went off the rails', which would at least be mildly interesting.

Specifically, he was a potwasher at the Hanover Inn, owned by Dartmouth
College. When I mentioned "students, faculty and staff" it included all
staff, including janitors, the guys who shoveled snow from sidewalks and
potwashers.

But if you want interesting, there was a gruesome murder of two
professors at Dartmouth about a year after Plutonium was fired. Because
the police had nothing to go on for a while, and because Plutonium made
vague threats against Dartmouth after being fired, the police
investigated him, too. He had nothing to do with it, of course.

Earle Jones & Kibo Parry Moroney, not much different than Donald Trump stirring up the hatred to storm the Capital Building, and now we have Jones & Parry whipping up the hatred for 28 years to what? Violence on Stanford Univ or AP? Stalkers are too dumb to know, their endgame is violence especially as they recruit young ones to join their stalker hate team.

If it is Stanford Univ or even Dartmouth College, would it be a first for those institutions? I mean, this is 2021, and Kibo Parry Moroney is still lost in 1990s with "Dartmouth finally fired his ass". And then the Kibo Parry along with Jan Burse maps out a mapp to AP's home-- as to say-- like Donald Trump-- "down Pennsylvania Ave".

Or like Earle Jones setting up psychoceramics all over Stanford Univ for what Earle? For target practice, Earle being such a oaf, not realizing his ratcheted hatred ends up in violence.

FBI, Google, Stanford Univ, Dartmouth College, you have the power to stop this hatred ratcheting from these fools of 28 years of stalking AP, for if not stopped, I hate to see the end result of this 28 year long nonstop hatred of AP.

A few years back, on my doorstep was a crowd of 3 college youngsters, laughing and giggling and knocking on the door. I know the mentality of young people out on a prank, and they wanted me to come out, but, knowing that fools like Parry and Jones have whipped up so much hatred in the last 28 years, that something told me, --- talk to them through the window pane, because in all likelihood, this crowd of 3 maybe a whipped up crowd like the hatemongers who stormed the Capitol under the Trump hatred. So, I kept asking the one, what was his name and what did he want, and never any direct answer, so I told the bunch, leave or I call the police.

But, as Earle Jones psychoceramic hatred and Kibo Parry Moroney "fire his ass" continue to spew hatred in sci.math and sci.physics, someday, that hatred leads to Violence. Luckily, 28 years of nonstop Parry hatred has averted violence, but none of us are getting any younger and the continued Parry and Jones hate stirrings is more than likely to end up in a bad ending.

On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 12:00:31 AM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> *
> Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester.)
>
> Our friend Archie (AP) has been famous for more years than we imagined! He is the first-mentioned example psychoceramicist -- see paragraph two.
>
> http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~toby/writing/Guardian/ceramics.htm
>
> Enjoy!
>
> earle
> *

Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 11, 2021, 1:30:05 AM (2 days ago)



to
Two insane stalkers of sci.math, Kibo for 28 years, terribly insane, and Jones on and off for 25 years. Both insane, for their game is hatred, never any math in sci.math, never any physics in sci.physics. Maybe both were failures in science, and this is how they repay society, by stalking hatred in newsgroups.

And is the reason why one of kibo Parry's second page hit in a Google Search talks about---

What made the Internet bad 30 years ago still applies today --- Quartz

.... Influencers, famous for nothing but their fame? Consider James "Kibo" Parry...

AP writes: I did not read the full website as to what made it bad, but I suspect it is "stalkers". When you have a free access and freedom of speech, it tends to degenerate into "stalkers of an insane mind take over."

AP writes: so, why not pull the plug on stalkers, especially Jones and Parry-- never any math in sci.math, never any physics in sci.physics, just attack after attack after attack is all these insane knuckleheads do.

The MASTER in Dr. Who: Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha,,,, ha ha ha ha ha

"Psychoceramics"
4 views
Skip to first unread message
Subscribe
Earle Jones's profile photo
Earle Jones
Jun 11, 2021, 12:00 AM
to sci.math
*
Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester.)

Our friend Archie (AP) has been famous for more years than we imagined! He is the first-mentioned example psychoceramicist -- see paragraph two.

http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~toby/writing/Guardian/ceramics.htm

Enjoy!

earle
*

Michael Moroney's profile photo
Michael Moroney wrote:
Jun 11, 2021, 1:13 AM
to sci.math
ArchiePoo is the first "psychoceramic" I encountered on Usenet way back
when. Back then Usenet was a very different place, with access limited
to universities, certain large (mostly computer) corporations and
government agencies. That's how ArchiePoo got access - he worked for
Dartmouth College who had the advanced foresight to grant internet
access to all of their students, faculty and staff, and Archie started
spewing from there. After years of warnings ignored by Archie,
Dartmouth finally fired his ass for dragging their reputation through
the mud.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 11, 2021, 8:44:55 AM (2 days ago)



to
Stanford Univ & Google, where is this heading for, for Earle Jones & Kibo Parry Moroney, is it heading for Violence on Stanford Univ or AP, for it only keeps escalating higher and higher. FBI, please make a gun check on Kibo and Earle Jones.
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Subscribe
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
unread,
8:35 AM (1 minute ago)



to
Stanford Univ & Google, where is this heading for, for Earle Jones & Kibo Parry Moroney, is it heading for Violence on Stanford Univ or AP, for it only keeps escalating higher and higher. FBI, please make a gun check on Kibo and Earle Jones.

AP is currently working on the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with a Geometry proof, the first valid proof of FTC, in fact. And working in sci.math.

AP is currently working on TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 1st year College, in sci.physics, along with books on the drought in Western USA.

Yet for 28 years of stalking by Kibo Parry Moroney and his many gang of stalkers-- Earle Jones, Dan Christensen, Jan Burse, recently Ross.

Attack attack each and every day for 28 years. Never a post on math in sci.math, never a post on physics in sci.physics, just a 28 year long demonization of AP, with the aim of kicking AP out of sci.math and sci.physics.

Just yesterday Earle Jones titles a thread Psychoceramics on AP, and Kibo follows up with "Dartmouth finally fired his ass"

So, I ask Stanford Univ-- where is this hatred by Earle Jones going? Certainly no contribution to sci.math or sci.physics, which leads me to believe the only clear direction is that Earle Jones does violence. Can Stanford or the FBI check to see if Earle Jones is violent, is he buying guns and ammunition, for he sure is not posting math to sci.math nor physics to sci.physics. Could he be violent on the Stanford campus?

Same question-- and more so for Kibo Parry Moroney who spent 28 years of bad mouthing AP, and just yesterday raised the sceptre of "Dartmouth finally fired his ass". An event that occurred in the 1990s and here it is 2021. Kibo never does math in sci.math, never does physics in sci.physics. And where is all that hatred going? Is it going to where Kibo stocks up on guns and ammo. For Stalking behavior of 28 years nonstop is insanity, and insanity can lead to violence. FBI, can you please check up on Kibo Parry Moroney, for I certainly never want to see him show up on my backdoor.

Google, what sort of definition do you have for ABUSE. I mean, is not stalking a person for 28 years nonstop, is that not abuse to the maximum? And can this stalking ever stop or will it end in Kibo Parry Moroney violence. When stalkers never get their way on victimizing other people, they end up committing violence on their victims.

AP is doing Calculus and Physics and Weather Drought. Earle Jones is doing pyschoceramics in sci.math and Kibo Parry Moroney is doing 1990s "Dartmouth finally fired his ass" in sci.math on Jun 11, 2021.

Google, Stanford, FBI, I can only see one direction of this ugly stalking-- Violence by these stalkers, perhaps on Stanford Univ, perhaps on AP.

"Psychoceramics"
20 views

Skip to first unread message
Subscribe



Earle Jones

Jun 11, 2021, 12:00 AM (8 hours ago)






to
*
Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester.)

Our friend Archie (AP) has been famous for more years than we imagined! He is the first-mentioned example psychoceramicist -- see paragraph two.

http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~toby/writing/Guardian/ceramics.htm

Enjoy!

earle
*

Michael Moroney

Jun 11, 2021, 1:13 AM (7 hours ago)






to


ArchiePoo is the first "psychoceramic" I encountered on Usenet way back
when. Back then Usenet was a very different place, with access limited
to universities, certain large (mostly computer) corporations and
government agencies. That's how ArchiePoo got access - he worked for
Dartmouth College who had the advanced foresight to grant internet
access to all of their students, faculty and staff, and Archie started
spewing from there. After years of warnings ignored by Archie,
Dartmouth finally fired his ass for dragging their reputation through
the mud.

On Fri Jun 11 03:31:54 2021 Quantum Bubbles wrote:
> On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 7:13:52 AM UTC+1, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > On 6/11/2021 1:00 AM, Earle Jones wrote:
> > > *
> > > Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester.)
> > >
> > > Our friend Archie (AP) has been famous for more years than we imagined! He is the first-mentioned example psychoceramicist -- see paragraph two.
> > >
> > > http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~toby/writing/Guardian/ceramics.htm
> > >
> > > Enjoy!
> > >
> > > earle
> > > *
> > ArchiePoo is the first "psychoceramic" I encountered on Usenet way back
> > when. Back then Usenet was a very different place, with access limited
> > to universities, certain large (mostly computer) corporations and
> > government agencies. That's how ArchiePoo got access - he worked for
> > Dartmouth College who had the advanced foresight to grant internet
> > access to all of their students, faculty and staff, and Archie started
> > spewing from there. After years of warnings ignored by Archie,
> > Dartmouth finally fired his ass for dragging their reputation through
> > the mud.
>
>
> Is it known what his role was at the college?
>
> Kind Regards

*
QB:

Yes, it is well known what his role was at Dartmouth.
He worked at Hanover Inn, a residence house at the college. He was a pot-washer. (I once referred to him as a dishwasher and I was immediately corrected. Evidently there is some social status difference.)
He took this job to get an email address with "@Dartmouth.edu" which was available for all staff. With an email address like that, one might begin to believe that you know what you are talking about!

Cheers!

earle
*

Earle Jones steady 24 year long hate spew wants Stanford Univ become a "shooting school" target practice first on psychoceramics at student union.

On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 12:00:31 AM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> *
> Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester.)
>
> Our friend Archie (AP) has been famous for more years than we imagined! He is the first-mentioned example psychoceramicist -- see paragraph two.
>
> http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~toby/writing/Guardian/ceramics.htm
>
> Enjoy!
>
> earle
> *

Death threats by Stanford Univ Earle Jones & Dartmouth's Kibo Parry Moroney, death threats on AP.

On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 11:22:23 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >>>> Dartmouth finally fired his ass

Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP.

On Monday, June 14, 2021 at 2:35:38 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "Village Idiot of
> fails at math and science:

Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP.

Donald Trump, the stalker in chief with constant hate spew causing the Capitol Building be stormed and 3 police officer deaths as a result, and now, the constant hate spew, 28 years nonstop worth of Kibo Parry Moroney & Earle Jones, inciting unhinged people to threaten the life of AP, looking for some deranged follower to laugh at a kibo joke then storm AP. That is why Kibo delighted in talking to Governor of South Dakota Kristi Noem from kibo postings for the exact address of AP and where the other stalker Jan Burse started to post houses for sale nearby to AP, so as to instruct the deranged unhinged Kibo wannabe gang member.

On Wednesday, May 29, 2019 at 4:43:20 PM UTC-5, j4n bur53 wrote:
> Spamming dumb fuck, will your wheelchair
> have hexadecimal or decimal wheels?
>
> This one:
>
> |__
> |__|
> * *
>
> Or this one:
>
> |__
> |__|
> o o

Jan Burse is a different type of bully stalker for he tore down AP's Wikipedia page in 2017 and then participated in condoning the forgery of AP to Math Stack Exchange in 2017 along with Dan Christensen, and then has continued to post graphic pictures of bodily violence on AP and then Burse has posted the real-estate near AP in order to incite violence upon AP. Burse is a new type of bully stalker with overt violence in his posts and I recommend that he be permanently banned from sci.math and sci.physics before someone gets hurt from all his over-testosterone bullying and violence association.

       o-:^>___?
       `~~c--^c'
Navy dog says: Jan Burse, --- brain in the sewer, never any math or science, just a sewer kook

Joel Mesot,Christophorus Grab, Michele Graf, Jonathan Home, Roland Horisberger,Sarah M. Springman

Joel Mesot, President
Sarah M. Springman, Rector

Zurich ETH, physics dept
Charalampos Anastasiou, Niklas Beisert, Adrian Biland,
Gianni Blatter, Marcella Carollo, Christian Degen, Leonardo Degiorgi, Gunther Dissertori, Klaus Ensslin,
Tilman Esslinger, Jerome Faist, Matthias Gaberdiel,
Aude Gehrmann-De Ridder, Vadim Geshkenbein, Christophorus Grab, Michele Graf, Jonathan Home,
Roland Horisberger, Sebastian Huber, Thomas Markus Ihn, Atac Imamoglu, Steven Johnson, Ursula Keller, Klaus Kirch, Simon Lilly, Joel Mesot, Renatto Renner,
Andre Rubbia, Werner Schmutz, Thomas Schulthess, Manfred Sigrist, Hans-Arno Synal, Matthias Troyer, Andreas Vaterlaus, Rainer Wallny, Andreas Wallraff,
Werner Wegscheider, Audrey Zheludev, Oded Zilberberg

On Friday, May 24, 2019 at 4:27:48 PM UTC-5, j4n bur53 wrote:
> 12:00 AM) ?
> 　　∧_∧
> 　(　·ω·)
> ＿|　⊃／(＿＿
> ／　└-(＿＿＿／
> ￣￣￣￣￣￣￣
>
> (12:01 AM) zzz
> ＜⌒／ヽ-、_＿_
> ／＜_/＿＿＿＿／
>
> AP brain farto = not viagra, rather valium
>

3- Burse says on valium, ETH, Michael Struwe,Benjamin Sudakov,Alain Sznitman,Josef Teichmann,Wendelin Werner,Thomas Willwacher never able to confirm ellipse is not a conic//true proton is 840MeV not 938

Walter Thurnherr, ETH,Michele Graf,Jonathan Home,Ursula Keller,Klaus Kirch,Simon Lilly,Joel Mesot---- is the reason none of you have confirmed real proton = 840MeV, real electron is the muon and .5MeV was Dirac monopole-- too busy on ads??

AP writes: as long as Jan Burse is allowed to post to Google newsgroups is as long as that petty criminal defiles and wrecks whatever is in sight. Now he resorts to graffiti ads just to push others off the front page. When the world does not need another ad, but rather CONFIRM real proton is 840MeV.

Stop the petty criminal Jan Burse before he gets someone hurt Re: one of my most important proofs-- Disproof of Riemann Hypothesis Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

On Friday, April 5, 2019 at 2:11:36 PM UTC-5, j4n bur53 wrote:
> Here is a picture of APs home:
>

AP writes: stop this petty criminal Burse before he hurts someone. He tore down AP's Wikipedia page one year and forged AP to Math Stack Exchange. If let to his own devices, someone is probably going to be hurt for now he is posting arbitrary homes. It is a sin to post other peoples telephones, here Burse is committing a sin of posting homes.

On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 at 3:00:19 PM UTC-5, j4n bur53 wrote:
> for his willful criminal behavior. The criminal

Re: Plea to the Governor Kristi Noem of South Dakota, by Archimedes Plutonium, concerning building fences in public roads
503 views
by Michael Moroney
Michael Moroney wrote:
Aug 14, 2019, 8:27:32 AM
to sci.math
>Trying to figure out things from online maps plus satellite view/street view
>is a strong interest of mine.

AP writes: I am sure it is, when you try to direct some unhinged person to threaten the life of AP.

And thankfully Google banned Jan Burse, I mean the audacity of posting real estate near AP, is only the devil in Jan to map direct a unhinged assault threatening the life of AP.

And shortly after these Google postings, AP had three unwelcomed young persons at his backdoor. But AP spoke to them through the window pane telling them leave or I call the police.

Kibo Parry Moroney, Jan Burse, Earle Jones are all too charged up in hatred to ever realize that their constant hate spew is going to lead to an unhinged groupie follower to threaten the life of AP. AP does not want to be a statistic number that these 3 police officers were for Donald Trump hate spew.

AP should not have to live where anyday a unhinged Kibo goofball is stalking out AP.

Kibo is an immense threat to the life of AP, for his aim along with his gang of Jan Burse, Dan Christensen, Earle Jones, Ross is to tap into some young lost loner that is unhinged.



On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "FireD your ass"

Kibo Parry Moroney along with his gang of stalkers, 28 years nonstop threatening the life of AP, with his nonstop Hate Spew. I do not want to have to meet with a twisted recruit caused by Kibo Parry Moroney, Earle Jones, Jan Burse, Dan Christensen, Ross, at my backdoor. And just as Donald Trump stirred hatred for 4 years causing the Capitol Building to be stormed, Kibo Parry Moroney is stirring hatred for a assault on Dartmouth College, Earle Jones psychoceramics target practice at Stanford Univ.

On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:49:59 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> FailurePlutonium, Psychoceramics
> "FireD your ass"

Earle Jones & Kibo Parry Moroney, not much different than Donald Trump stirring up the hatred to storm the Capital Building, and now we have Jones & Parry whipping up the hatred for 28 years to what? Violence on Stanford Univ or AP? Stalkers are too dumb to know, their endgame is violence especially as they recruit young ones to join their stalker hate team.

If it is Stanford Univ or even Dartmouth College, would it be a first for those institutions? I mean, this is 2021, and Kibo Parry Moroney is still lost in 1990s with "Dartmouth finally fired his ass". And then the Kibo Parry along with Jan Burse maps out a mapp to AP's home-- as to say-- like Donald Trump-- "down Pennsylvania Ave".

Or like Earle Jones setting up psychoceramics all over Stanford Univ for what Earle? For target practice, Earle being such a oaf, not realizing his ratcheted hatred ends up in violence.

FBI, Google, Stanford Univ, Dartmouth College, you have the power to stop this hatred ratcheting from these fools of 28 years of stalking AP, for if not stopped, I hate to see the end result of this 28 year long nonstop hatred of AP.

A few years back, on my doorstep was a crowd of 3 college youngsters, laughing and giggling and knocking on the door. I know the mentality of young people out on a prank, and they wanted me to come out, but, knowing that fools like Parry and Jones have whipped up so much hatred in the last 28 years, that something told me, --- talk to them through the window pane, because in all likelihood, this crowd of 3 maybe a whipped up crowd like the hatemongers who stormed the Capitol under the Trump hatred. So, I kept asking the one, what was his name and what did he want, and never any direct answer, so I told the bunch, leave or I call the police.

But, as Earle Jones psychoceramic hatred and Kibo Parry Moroney "fire his ass" continue to spew hatred in sci.math and sci.physics, someday, that hatred leads to Violence. Luckily, 28 years of nonstop Parry hatred has averted violence, but none of us are getting any younger and the continued Parry and Jones hate stirrings is more than likely to end up in a bad ending.

Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 11, 2021, 1:30:05 AM (2 days ago)



to
Two insane stalkers of sci.math, Kibo for 28 years, terribly insane, and Jones on and off for 25 years. Both insane, for their game is hatred, never any math in sci.math, never any physics in sci.physics. Maybe both were failures in science, and this is how they repay society, by stalking hatred in newsgroups.

🤡 Earle Jones, and Toby Howard 🤯 of journalism

Earle Jones on Stanford Univ
🤡 Alexander Fetter, and John Lipa 🤯 of Physics

Stanford deserves the name SickFuck Univ as it continues to fan hatred by Earle Jones Re: "Psychoceramics"
Earle Jones says Stanford Univ should be renamed as SickFuck Univ Re: Silliness
Earle Jones whines and complains that Stanford Univ physics department is a waste dump where no-one there can even ask the question of which is the real electron of Atoms. Is it the muon or the 0.5MeV particle. Is Fetter & Lipa as insane as Earle Jones?

Stanford Univ through the deranged eyes of Earle Jones
Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu

President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
Provost: Persis Drell (physics)

Stanford physics dept.

Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
On Friday, June 18, 2021 at 5:25:31 PM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> *
> Q; What is the silliest thing that AP (Archie) ever published?
>
> My vote goes for:
>
> "Now we are at the final law of the series of AP- EM laws of physics. In Old Physics, their Ohm's law was V = iR for Voltage = current x Resistance, and it was not a law of physics at all because it broke down with high voltage, or high current. But when we replace Resistance with the magnetic field times electric field we make the ohm's law be "in general" to cover high voltage, high current."
>
> Get that: Ohm's Law (V = IR) breaks down and does not work for high voltage.
>
> So Archie's new "Ohm's Law" is V = CBE
>
> Do you have a better example.
>
> NOTE: I avoid his religious beliefs: the Atom Totality Theory.
>
> earle
> *

74th published book

HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.

Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
Length: 17 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : December 18, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 17 pages
• File Size : 698 KB
• ASIN : B082WYGVNG
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled

#1-4, 105th published book

Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.

Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
Length: 39 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : March 24, 2020
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• ASIN : B086BGSNXN
• Print Length : 39 pages
• File Size : 935 KB
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
#315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
#4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)



#1-5, 112th published book

New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.

Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book.. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
Length: 20 pages

Product details
• ASIN : B0875SVDC7
• Publication date : April 15, 2020
• Language: : English
• File size : 1134 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 20 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#1-6, 135th published book

QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) 

Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.

Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.

Product details
• ASIN : B08K47K5BB
• Publication date : September 25, 2020
• Language : English
• File size : 587 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print length : 25 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #334 in General Chemistry

Earle Jones on Stanford Univ
🤡 Alexander Fetter, and John Lipa 🤯 of Physics

fanning hatred by Earle Jones Re: "Psychoceramics"
Earle Jones says Stanford Univ should be renamed as SickFuck Univ or Silliness Univ
Earle Jones whines and complains that Stanford Univ physics department is a waste dump where no-one there can even ask the question of which is the real electron of Atoms. Is it the muon or the 0.5MeV particle. Is Fetter & Lipa as insane as Earle Jones?

🤡 Earle Jones, and Toby Howard 🤯 of journalism
Stanford Univ through the deranged eyes of Earle Jones
Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu

President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
Provost: Persis Drell (physics)

Stanford physics dept.

Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
On Friday, June 18, 2021 at 5:25:31 PM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> *
> Q; What is the silliest thing that AP (Archie) ever published?
>
> My vote goes for:
>
> "Now we are at the final law of the series of AP- EM laws of physics. In Old Physics, their Ohm's law was V = iR for Voltage = current x Resistance, and it was not a law of physics at all because it broke down with high voltage, or high current. But when we replace Resistance with the magnetic field times electric field we make the ohm's law be "in general" to cover high voltage, high current."
>
> Get that: Ohm's Law (V = IR) breaks down and does not work for high voltage.
>
> So Archie's new "Ohm's Law" is V = CBE
>
> Do you have a better example.
>
> NOTE: I avoid his religious beliefs: the Atom Totality Theory.
>
> earle
> *

74th published book

HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.

Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
Length: 17 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : December 18, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 17 pages
• File Size : 698 KB
• ASIN : B082WYGVNG
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled

#1-4, 105th published book

Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.

Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
Length: 39 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : March 24, 2020
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• ASIN : B086BGSNXN
• Print Length : 39 pages
• File Size : 935 KB
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
#315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
#4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)



#1-5, 112th published book

New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.

Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book.. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
Length: 20 pages

Product details
• ASIN : B0875SVDC7
• Publication date : April 15, 2020
• Language: : English
• File size : 1134 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 20 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#1-6, 135th published book

QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) 

Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.

Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.

Product details
• ASIN : B08K47K5BB
• Publication date : September 25, 2020
• Language : English
• File size : 587 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print length : 25 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #334 in General Chemistry

Earle Jones says psychoceramics Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer,. Why Earle? Because they cannot do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and fail to see slant cut in cone is oval, never ellipse?
On Monday, June 14, 2021 at 7:23:17 PM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> On Fri Jun 11 03:31:54 2021 Quantum Bubbles wrote:
> > On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 7:13:52 AM UTC+1, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > On 6/11/2021 1:00 AM, Earle Jones wrote:
> > > > *
> > > > Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester.)

On Saturday, October 30, 2021 at 4:52:09 PM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> *
> AP: Your mathematics is not as accurate as the mathematics of John Gabriel.
>
> earle
> *

Stanford University, math dept.

Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu

President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
Provost: Persis Drell (physics)

Stanford physics dept.

Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian

3Stanford's finest scientist says a cylinder has one axis of symmetry//Rensselaer's finest says 938 is 12% short of 945//Univ Western Ontario finest says vertex has a derivative; and says 2 OR 1=3 with AND as subtraction//UCLA's finest runs and hides

Archimedes Plutonium

3:22 PM (1 hour ago) 






to

Stanford's finest scientist says a cylinder has one axis of symmetry//Rensselaer's finest scientist says 938 is 12% short of 945//Univ Western Ontario finest scientist says vertex has a derivative

Stanford's Earle Jones this morning pontificated that "hear me hear me, a cylinder has but one axis of symmetry."

No wonder the muon is discovered at Caltech, never Stanford, for Stanford's finest in science pontificate about axis of symmetry when the mindless fools of Stanford never understood what a axis of symmetry is in the first place. Stanford Univ is the mouth-off school, while Caltech gets the job done, especially the muon-- Anderson, Neddermeyer.

I would have no trouble from Caltech knowing a cylinder has 2 axes of symmetry while cone only 1.

Stanford Univ, a mouth-off school of spamming jackarses like Earle Jones.



> On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 3:49:52 PM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > AP writes: So so stupid in math and logic is Terence Tao and Andrew Wiles, why, he knows, he knows a cone has but 1 axis of symmetry, yet that mindless fool thinks a slant cut in cone is going to deliver 2 axes of symmetry ellipse.
> >
> > *
> > Note to AP:
> >
> > A cylinder has only one axis of symmetry.
> > A slant cut into a cylinder produces an ellipse with two axes of symmerty.
> >
> > earle
> > *

Rensselaer's finest scientist and loud mouth combined into one package unit had this to say in the marbled halls of Rensselaer.

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon..
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

Then there is the great oaf and imp of Canadian outdoors standing like a bull moose on the Red Green show of towering intelligence that University of Western Ontario, Dan Christensen has become in the last decades saying that distinct is not distinct, saying that 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction as Boole logic, and saying that the vertex in a graph has a derivative.

No wonder Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz had to hop on a plane ride to Bahamas or Hawaii in the middle of lockdown, for the covid she could bear, but not another day with Dan Christensen oaf blairing imp remarks on the bull horn of Univ Western Ontario. Linda, I too would take the next available plane out of Canada just to escape Dan.

On Monday, October 21, 2019 at 1:29:49 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
>
> Are you ready, kids??? Bend over, er...
>
> Dan

Dan, was that just an audition for the Red Green show, or is that your opening remarks to a Freshman class in Calculus?

Here is an example of Dan Christensen fumbling with the most simple of logic reasoning, and yet Canada keeps allowing this misfit to dig deeper into logic.

The stupid Dan Christensen always chokes up when it comes to logic or even just plain commonsense with his 2 OR 1 = 3 and his AND as subtraction.

On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 10:08:09 AM UTC-6, Peter Percival wrote:
> Dan Christensen wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 9:47:32 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 8:27:19 AM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 9:16:52 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> >>>> PAGE58, 8-3, True Geometry / correcting axioms, 1by1 tool, angles of logarithmic spiral, conic sections unified regular polyhedra, Leaf-Triangle, Unit Basis Vector
> >>>>
> >>>> The axioms that are in need of fixing is the axiom that between any two points lies a third new point.
> >>>
> >>> The should be "between and any two DISTINCT points."
> >>>
> >>
> >> What a monsterous fool you are
> >>
> >
> > OMG. You are serious. Stupid and proud of it.
>
> And yet Mr Plutonium is right. Two points are distinct (else they would
> be one) and it is not necessary to say so.
>

Apparently Dan Christensen never took calculus or flunked it with this statement.
On Tuesday, June 2, 2015 at 8:57:54 AM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 2, 2015 at 2:32:51 AM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > The nonexistence of a curved angle because there is no way to measure the angle if either one of the rays is not a straightline segment at the vertex,
>
> From the derivative of each curve at the point of contact you have the slopes of their respective tangents there. (Assuming derivatives are defined there.) From these slopes, you should be able to calculate angle formed.
>
>
> Dan

UCLA's finest scientist of Terence Tao and why perhaps he won medals in mathematics for running and hiding and keeping his mouth completely shut on the most urgent issues in math facing us today.

1) Geometry proof of Fundamental theorem of Calculus
2) slant cut in cone is Oval, never ellipse
3) fix the error laden Boole logic of its hideous mistakes like 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction.
4) Terry was forever too dumb to recognize a 6th Regular Polyhedron exists.
Run Terry, hide Terry and win more math awards for your con-artist fakeries..

Some of Terry's colleagues are not as generous towards Terry's prowess in math, as shown--

Re: 3-Google we need you to have a Balanced Search hit on Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, where none can do a valid, let alone geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, on the first page of a search for them..
by Dave Richardson
May 26, 2021, 3:17 PM 

Re: 2Terence Tao flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
by Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse)
Jun 9, 2018, 6:35:36 PM

Re: Terence Tao flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
By Jan 88 posts 2645 views updated 2:20 PM
Is this the Swiss Jan Burse or is it Jan Bielawski or some other Jan????

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says of Dr. Tao "ant of Math" and a pandemic shit mule// Perhaps because Dr. Tao is such a failure of math, he believed primes are real when Naturals have no division-- and failures of math overlook even the most obvious
by Professor Wordsmith Jul 25, 2020, 8:23:21 PM

3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Jones says psychoceramics Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller. Why Earle? Because they cannot do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and fail to see slant cut in cone is oval, never ellipse?

Frenchman Lacassagne 1885: "Every society has the criminals it deserves"
AP 2021: "Every University is responsible for the filthy stalker who attended that school and is now a insane nonstop stalker"

Stanford Univ produced the insane filthy stalker Earle Jones, and time for Stanford to unplug the filthy stalker.

> Earle Jones says psychoceramics Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer,. Why Earle? Because they cannot do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and fail to see slant cut in cone is oval, never ellipse?
> On Monday, June 14, 2021 at 7:23:17 PM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> > On Fri Jun 11 03:31:54 2021 Quantum Bubbles wrote:
> > > On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 7:13:52 AM UTC+1, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > On 6/11/2021 1:00 AM, Earle Jones wrote:
> > > > > *
> > > > > Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester.)
> On Saturday, October 30, 2021 at 4:52:09 PM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> > *
> > AP: Your mathematics is not as accurate as the mathematics of John Gabriel.
> >
> > earle
> > *
>
> Stanford University, math dept.
>
> Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
>
>
> President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
>
> Stanford physics dept.
>
> Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian

> 3Stanford's finest scientist says a cylinder has one axis of symmetry//Rensselaer's finest says 938 is 12% short of 945//Univ Western Ontario finest says vertex has a derivative; and says 2 OR 1=3 with AND as subtraction//UCLA's finest runs and hides
>
> Archimedes Plutonium
>
> 3:22 PM (1 hour ago)
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
> to
>
> Stanford's finest scientist says a cylinder has one axis of symmetry//Rensselaer's finest scientist says 938 is 12% short of 945//Univ Western Ontario finest scientist says vertex has a derivative
>
> Stanford's Earle Jones this morning pontificated that "hear me hear me, a cylinder has but one axis of symmetry."
>
> No wonder the muon is discovered at Caltech, never Stanford, for Stanford's finest in science pontificate about axis of symmetry when the mindless fools of Stanford never understood what a axis of symmetry is in the first place. Stanford Univ is the mouth-off school, while Caltech gets the job done, especially the muon-- Anderson, Neddermeyer.
>
> I would have no trouble from Caltech knowing a cylinder has 2 axes of symmetry while cone only 1.
>
> Stanford Univ, a mouth-off school of spamming jackarses like Earle Jones.
>
> 
>
> > On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 3:49:52 PM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> > > >
> > > > AP writes: So so stupid in math and logic is Terence Tao and Andrew Wiles, why, he knows, he knows a cone has but 1 axis of symmetry, yet that mindless fool thinks a slant cut in cone is going to deliver 2 axes of symmetry ellipse.
> > >
> > > *
> > > Note to AP:
> > >
> > > A cylinder has only one axis of symmetry.
> > > A slant cut into a cylinder produces an ellipse with two axes of symmerty.
> > >
> > > earle
> > > *
>
>
>
> Rensselaer's finest scientist and loud mouth combined into one package unit had this to say in the marbled halls of Rensselaer.
>
> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
>
>
> Then there is the great oaf and imp of Canadian outdoors standing like a bull moose on the Red Green show of towering intelligence that University of Western Ontario, Dan Christensen has become in the last decades saying that distinct is not distinct, saying that 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction as Boole logic, and saying that the vertex in a graph has a derivative.
>
> No wonder Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz had to hop on a plane ride to Bahamas or Hawaii in the middle of lockdown, for the covid she could bear, but not another day with Dan Christensen oaf blairing imp remarks on the bull horn of Univ Western Ontario. Linda, I too would take the next available plane out of Canada just to escape Dan.
>
> On Monday, October 21, 2019 at 1:29:49 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> >
> > Are you ready, kids??? Bend over, er...
> >
> > Dan
>
> Dan, was that just an audition for the Red Green show, or is that your opening remarks to a Freshman class in Calculus?
>
> Here is an example of Dan Christensen fumbling with the most simple of logic reasoning, and yet Canada keeps allowing this misfit to dig deeper into logic.
>
> The stupid Dan Christensen always chokes up when it comes to logic or even just plain commonsense with his 2 OR 1 = 3 and his AND as subtraction.
>
> On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 10:08:09 AM UTC-6, Peter Percival wrote:
> > Dan Christensen wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 9:47:32 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > >> On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 8:27:19 AM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote:
> > >>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 9:16:52 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > >>>> PAGE58, 8-3, True Geometry / correcting axioms, 1by1 tool, angles of logarithmic spiral, conic sections unified regular polyhedra, Leaf-Triangle, Unit Basis Vector
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The axioms that are in need of fixing is the axiom that between any two points lies a third new point.
> > >>>
> > >>> The should be "between and any two DISTINCT points."
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> What a monsterous fool you are
> > >>
> > >
> > > OMG. You are serious. Stupid and proud of it.
> >
> > And yet Mr Plutonium is right. Two points are distinct (else they would
> > be one) and it is not necessary to say so.
> >
>
>
> Apparently Dan Christensen never took calculus or flunked it with this statement.
> On Tuesday, June 2, 2015 at 8:57:54 AM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> > On Tuesday, June 2, 2015 at 2:32:51 AM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > The nonexistence of a curved angle because there is no way to measure the angle if either one of the rays is not a straightline segment at the vertex,
> >
> > From the derivative of each curve at the point of contact you have the slopes of their respective tangents there. (Assuming derivatives are defined there.) From these slopes, you should be able to calculate angle formed.
> >
> >
> > Dan
>
> UCLA's finest scientist of Terence Tao and why perhaps he won medals in mathematics for running and hiding and keeping his mouth completely shut on the most urgent issues in math facing us today.
>
> 1) Geometry proof of Fundamental theorem of Calculus
> 2) slant cut in cone is Oval, never ellipse
> 3) fix the error laden Boole logic of its hideous mistakes like 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction.
> 4) Terry was forever too dumb to recognize a 6th Regular Polyhedron exists.
> Run Terry, hide Terry and win more math awards for your con-artist fakeries.
>
> Some of Terry's colleagues are not as generous towards Terry's prowess in math, as shown--
>
> Re: 3-Google we need you to have a Balanced Search hit on Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, where none can do a valid, let alone geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, on the first page of a search for them.
> by Dave Richardson
> May 26, 2021, 3:17 PM
>
> Re: 2Terence Tao flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
> by Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse)
> Jun 9, 2018, 6:35:36 PM
>
> Re: Terence Tao flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
> By Jan 88 posts 2645 views updated 2:20 PM
> Is this the Swiss Jan Burse or is it Jan Bielawski or some other Jan????
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says of Dr. Tao "ant of Math" and a pandemic shit mule// Perhaps because Dr. Tao is such a failure of math, he believed primes are real when Naturals have no division-- and failures of math overlook even the most obvious
> by Professor Wordsmith Jul 25, 2020, 8:23:21 PM
>
>
> 3rd published book
>
> AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
>
> Length: 21 pages
>
> File Size: 1620 KB
> Print Length: 21 pages
> Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07PLSDQWC
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> X-Ray: Not Enabled
> Word Wise: Not Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
>
>
> #8-2, 11th published book
>
> World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 19May2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
> Preface:
> Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
>
> Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis".. To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
>
> Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
>
> Length: 137 pages
>
> Product details
> ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
> Publication date : March 14, 2019
> Language : English
> File size : 1307 KB
> Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> Screen Reader : Supported
> Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> X-Ray : Not Enabled
> Word Wise : Not Enabled
> Print length : 137 pages
> Lending : Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> #134 in Calculus (Books)
> #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
>
> 5th published book
>
> Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
> Preface:
> First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.
>
> The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.
>
> My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.
>
> Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.
>
> Length: 72 pages
>
> File Size: 773 KB
> Print Length: 72 pages
> Publication Date: March 12, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07PMB69F5
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 

> Word Wise: Not Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> 

>
> 152nd published book
> The 6th Regular Polyhedron-- hexagonal faces at infinity// Math proof series, book 12 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
>
> Preface: This is my 152nd book of science an exciting book, and it came out of the clear blue. The writing of it took a mere week's time and it is a byproduct of my 151st book of science, TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 1st year College. Although my 151st book took me over a year to write, this book took just 1 week to write. Difference being that of a textbook versus that of a book on a specific topic, is 50 times more difficult because a textbook takes so much time in organizing, order, and fitting together pieces, each chapter in fact, whereas a single topic science book is like writing a prose story and is 50 times easier to write than a textbook.
> While I was doing 151st, I noticed and emphasized that all of physics is determined by 6 laws of physics, and the first principle of physics is All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. Then we notice that 6 laws cover all of physics, 6 laws of electricity and magnetism. We notice that all of logic and math is covered by 6 operators. And then we look at geometry's regular polyhedrons and find there are only 5 known regular polyhedron with a proof in Old Math that a 6th Regular Polyhedron cannot exist. An actual proof in Old Math that a 6th cannot exist.
> Well, AP knows better. For AP knows that if all of Physics is written in the language of just 6 laws and all of logic and mathematics are covered by 6 operators. That AP knows Old Math made a mistake in thinking they proved 5 regular polyhedron were all that exist as regular polyhedron. So Old Math made some or several mistakes in their so called proof that 5 and only 5 regular polyhedron exist, and that is what this book covers, the 6th regular polyhedron of the world, what it is, and what it looks like.
> Warning: the entire book is written from a sequential dated notebook, so if you read something early on, I may have changed my mind on the idea near the end. This is not a textbook, but a notebook of discovery and read it for its history.
> Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of a soccer ball of 20 hexagons, 12 pentagons; and a glass ball covered by netting of tiny hexagons. Both objects I use in experiments of proving the 6th Regular Polyhedron.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09K4PWKVK
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 21, 2021
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 828 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 61 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
>
>
>
>
> y z
> | /
> | /
> |/______ x
>
> More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci..physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
>
> In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
>
> I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
>
> There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
>
> Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> Archimedes Plutonium

Earle's anagrams -- Thomas F Rosenbaum CalTech "I pound his male rectum"
> Jones says psychoceramics Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller. Why Earle? Because they cannot do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and fail to see slant cut in cone is oval, never ellipse?
>
> Frenchman Lacassagne 1885: "Every society has the criminals it deserves"
> AP 2021: "Every University is responsible for the filthy stalker who attended that school and is now a insane nonstop stalker"
>
> Stanford Univ produced the insane filthy stalker Earle Jones, and time for Stanford to unplug the filthy stalker.

On Friday, November 12, 2004 at 7:30:12 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> In article <nsDjd.19015$6q2....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,
> "Efftard K. Donglemeier" <hu...@humor.net> wrote:
>
> > Remember, the letters in "Archimedes Plutonium"
> > can be re-arranged to spell
> > "The Delicious Rump Man"
> > "I Pound His Male Rectum"
> > "Penis Could Mature Him"
> > "Old-Time U.S. Urine Champ"
> > and many other delightful phrases
> >
> > "Archimedes Plutonium" <a_plu...@iw.net> wrote in message
> > news:418E7777...@iw.net...
> > > I am an idiot.
>
> *
> Yes, Archy's name is very anagrammable.
>
> My favorite: Mr. Meticulous Pinhead.
>
> earle
> *

Stanford University, math dept.

Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu

President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
Provost: Persis Drell (physics)

Stanford physics dept.

Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian

>
>
> CalTech math dept
>
> Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari
> Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris
> Alexei Kitaev, Matilde Marcolli, Nikolai Makarov, Vladimir Markovic, Hiroshi Oguri, Eric Rains, Dinakar Ramakrishnan
> Barry Simon, Richard Wilson, Tom Graber, Sergei Gukov,
> Elena Mantovan, Yi NI,
>
> President Thomas F. Rosenbaum (physics)
> Caltech Physics Dept
>
> Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
> Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
> John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
> Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
> Konstantin Batygin

On Saturday, December 19, 1998 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> In article <75fntt$b...@sjx-ixn9.ix.netcom.com>,
> sbha...@ix.netcom.com(Steven B. Harris) wrote:
>
> >In <367a7e2c$0$2...@nntp1.ba.best.com> "MacMillan"
> ><theresal...@hotmail.com> writes:
> >>
> >>"Archimedes Plutonium" anagram:
> >>
> >>"I am the purloined scum"
>
> --
>
> More anagrams:
>
> Archimedes Plutonium =
> SUPREME HOMICIDAL NUT
> MR. METICULOUS PINHEAD
> RECOMPUTED HIS ALUMNI
> IMPORT EUCLIDIAN MUSH
> POUND HEURISTIC LEMMA
> HILARIOUS CEMENT DUMP
> LUDICROUS HEMP INMATE
> MODULATES CHIMP URINE
> MULTI-MENU P-ADICS HERO
>
> ...enough?
>
> earle
> --
> __
> __/\_\
> /\_\/_/
> \/_/\_\ earle
> \/_/ jones
>

> > Earle Jones says psychoceramics Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer,. Why Earle? Because they cannot do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and fail to see slant cut in cone is oval, never ellipse?
> > On Monday, June 14, 2021 at 7:23:17 PM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri Jun 11 03:31:54 2021 Quantum Bubbles wrote:
> > > > On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 7:13:52 AM UTC+1, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > On 6/11/2021 1:00 AM, Earle Jones wrote:
> > > > > > *
> > > > > > Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester.)
> > On Saturday, October 30, 2021 at 4:52:09 PM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> > > *
> > > AP: Your mathematics is not as accurate as the mathematics of John Gabriel.
> > >
> > > earle
> > > *
> >
> > Stanford University, math dept.
> >
> > Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
> >
> >
> > President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> > Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
> >
> > Stanford physics dept.
> >
> > Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
>
> > 3Stanford's finest scientist says a cylinder has one axis of symmetry//Rensselaer's finest says 938 is 12% short of 945//Univ Western Ontario finest says vertex has a derivative; and says 2 OR 1=3 with AND as subtraction//UCLA's finest runs and hides
> >
> > Archimedes Plutonium
> >
> > 3:22 PM (1 hour ago)
> >
> > 
> >
> > 
> >
> > 
> > to
> >
> > Stanford's finest scientist says a cylinder has one axis of symmetry//Rensselaer's finest scientist says 938 is 12% short of 945//Univ Western Ontario finest scientist says vertex has a derivative
> >
> > Stanford's Earle Jones this morning pontificated that "hear me hear me, a cylinder has but one axis of symmetry."
> >
> > No wonder the muon is discovered at Caltech, never Stanford, for Stanford's finest in science pontificate about axis of symmetry when the mindless fools of Stanford never understood what a axis of symmetry is in the first place. Stanford Univ is the mouth-off school, while Caltech gets the job done, especially the muon-- Anderson, Neddermeyer.
> >
> > I would have no trouble from Caltech knowing a cylinder has 2 axes of symmetry while cone only 1.
> >
> > Stanford Univ, a mouth-off school of spamming jackarses like Earle Jones.
> >
> > 
> >
> > > On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 3:49:52 PM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > AP writes: So so stupid in math and logic is Terence Tao and Andrew Wiles, why, he knows, he knows a cone has but 1 axis of symmetry, yet that mindless fool thinks a slant cut in cone is going to deliver 2 axes of symmetry ellipse.
> > > >
> > > > *
> > > > Note to AP:
> > > >
> > > > A cylinder has only one axis of symmetry.
> > > > A slant cut into a cylinder produces an ellipse with two axes of symmerty.
> > > >
> > > > earle
> > > > *
> >
> >
> >
> > Rensselaer's finest scientist and loud mouth combined into one package unit had this to say in the marbled halls of Rensselaer.
> >
> > On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> > Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
> >
> >
> > Then there is the great oaf and imp of Canadian outdoors standing like a bull moose on the Red Green show of towering intelligence that University of Western Ontario, Dan Christensen has become in the last decades saying that distinct is not distinct, saying that 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction as Boole logic, and saying that the vertex in a graph has a derivative..
> >
> > No wonder Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz had to hop on a plane ride to Bahamas or Hawaii in the middle of lockdown, for the covid she could bear, but not another day with Dan Christensen oaf blairing imp remarks on the bull horn of Univ Western Ontario. Linda, I too would take the next available plane out of Canada just to escape Dan.
> >
> > On Monday, October 21, 2019 at 1:29:49 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> > >
> > > Are you ready, kids??? Bend over, er...
> > >
> > > Dan
> >
> > Dan, was that just an audition for the Red Green show, or is that your opening remarks to a Freshman class in Calculus?
> >
> > Here is an example of Dan Christensen fumbling with the most simple of logic reasoning, and yet Canada keeps allowing this misfit to dig deeper into logic.
> >
> > The stupid Dan Christensen always chokes up when it comes to logic or even just plain commonsense with his 2 OR 1 = 3 and his AND as subtraction..
> >
> > On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 10:08:09 AM UTC-6, Peter Percival wrote:
> > > Dan Christensen wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 9:47:32 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > >> On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 8:27:19 AM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote:
> > > >>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 9:16:52 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > >>>> PAGE58, 8-3, True Geometry / correcting axioms, 1by1 tool, angles of logarithmic spiral, conic sections unified regular polyhedra, Leaf-Triangle, Unit Basis Vector
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> The axioms that are in need of fixing is the axiom that between any two points lies a third new point.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The should be "between and any two DISTINCT points."
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> What a monsterous fool you are
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > OMG. You are serious. Stupid and proud of it.
> > >
> > > And yet Mr Plutonium is right. Two points are distinct (else they would
> > > be one) and it is not necessary to say so.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Apparently Dan Christensen never took calculus or flunked it with this statement.
> > On Tuesday, June 2, 2015 at 8:57:54 AM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, June 2, 2015 at 2:32:51 AM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > > The nonexistence of a curved angle because there is no way to measure the angle if either one of the rays is not a straightline segment at the vertex,
> > >
> > > From the derivative of each curve at the point of contact you have the slopes of their respective tangents there. (Assuming derivatives are defined there.) From these slopes, you should be able to calculate angle formed..
> > >
> > >
> > > Dan
> >
> > UCLA's finest scientist of Terence Tao and why perhaps he won medals in mathematics for running and hiding and keeping his mouth completely shut on the most urgent issues in math facing us today.
> >
> > 1) Geometry proof of Fundamental theorem of Calculus
> > 2) slant cut in cone is Oval, never ellipse
> > 3) fix the error laden Boole logic of its hideous mistakes like 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction.
> > 4) Terry was forever too dumb to recognize a 6th Regular Polyhedron exists.
> > Run Terry, hide Terry and win more math awards for your con-artist fakeries.
> >
> > Some of Terry's colleagues are not as generous towards Terry's prowess in math, as shown--
> >
> > Re: 3-Google we need you to have a Balanced Search hit on Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, where none can do a valid, let alone geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, on the first page of a search for them.
> > by Dave Richardson
> > May 26, 2021, 3:17 PM
> >
> > Re: 2Terence Tao flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
> > by Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse)
> > Jun 9, 2018, 6:35:36 PM
> >
> > Re: Terence Tao flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
> > By Jan 88 posts 2645 views updated 2:20 PM
> > Is this the Swiss Jan Burse or is it Jan Bielawski or some other Jan????
> >
> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says of Dr. Tao "ant of Math" and a pandemic shit mule// Perhaps because Dr. Tao is such a failure of math, he believed primes are real when Naturals have no division-- and failures of math overlook even the most obvious
> > by Professor Wordsmith Jul 25, 2020, 8:23:21 PM
> >
> >
> > 3rd published book
> >
> > AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
> >
> > Length: 21 pages
> >
> > File Size: 1620 KB
> > Print Length: 21 pages
> > Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > Language: English
> > ASIN: B07PLSDQWC
> > Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> > X-Ray: Not Enabled
> > Word Wise: Not Enabled
> > Lending: Enabled
> > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> >
> >
> > #8-2, 11th published book
> >
> > World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 19May2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
> > Preface:
> > Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
> >
> > Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
> >
> > Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
> >
> > Length: 137 pages
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
> > Publication date : March 14, 2019
> > Language : English
> > File size : 1307 KB
> > Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > Screen Reader : Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > Print length : 137 pages
> > Lending : Enabled
> > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > #134 in Calculus (Books)
> > #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> >
> > 5th published book
> >
> > Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science..
> > Preface:
> > First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.
> >
> > The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.
> >
> > My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.
> >
> > Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.
> >
> > Length: 72 pages
> >
> > File Size: 773 KB
> > Print Length: 72 pages
> > Publication Date: March 12, 2019
> > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > Language: English
> > ASIN: B07PMB69F5
> > Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 

> > Word Wise: Not Enabled
> > Lending: Enabled
> > Screen Reader: Supported
> > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> > 

> >
> > 152nd published book
> > The 6th Regular Polyhedron-- hexagonal faces at infinity// Math proof series, book 12 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
> >
> > Preface: This is my 152nd book of science an exciting book, and it came out of the clear blue. The writing of it took a mere week's time and it is a byproduct of my 151st book of science, TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 1st year College. Although my 151st book took me over a year to write, this book took just 1 week to write. Difference being that of a textbook versus that of a book on a specific topic, is 50 times more difficult because a textbook takes so much time in organizing, order, and fitting together pieces, each chapter in fact, whereas a single topic science book is like writing a prose story and is 50 times easier to write than a textbook.
> > While I was doing 151st, I noticed and emphasized that all of physics is determined by 6 laws of physics, and the first principle of physics is All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. Then we notice that 6 laws cover all of physics, 6 laws of electricity and magnetism. We notice that all of logic and math is covered by 6 operators. And then we look at geometry's regular polyhedrons and find there are only 5 known regular polyhedron with a proof in Old Math that a 6th Regular Polyhedron cannot exist. An actual proof in Old Math that a 6th cannot exist.
> > Well, AP knows better. For AP knows that if all of Physics is written in the language of just 6 laws and all of logic and mathematics are covered by 6 operators. That AP knows Old Math made a mistake in thinking they proved 5 regular polyhedron were all that exist as regular polyhedron. So Old Math made some or several mistakes in their so called proof that 5 and only 5 regular polyhedron exist, and that is what this book covers, the 6th regular polyhedron of the world, what it is, and what it looks like.
> > Warning: the entire book is written from a sequential dated notebook, so if you read something early on, I may have changed my mind on the idea near the end. This is not a textbook, but a notebook of discovery and read it for its history.
> > Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of a soccer ball of 20 hexagons, 12 pentagons; and a glass ball covered by netting of tiny hexagons. Both objects I use in experiments of proving the 6th Regular Polyhedron.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09K4PWKVK
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 21, 2021
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 828 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 61 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > y z
> > | /
> > | /
> > |/______ x
> >
> > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> >
> > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> >
> > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> >
> > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> >
> > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > Archimedes Plutonium

Jones, is that Kibo's dick your sucking on in logo picture?

#4-1, 32nd published book
Physics Superdeterminism replaces Darwin Evolution // biophysics series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

When I graduated from college in 1972, I set myself upon a journey task mission of life-- that I was going to mathematize the biology theory of evolution. What I mean by that is -- I was going to make evolution a mathematical theory. And so from 1972 until 1990, I was working on this project, with never really expecting to solve it. But then, to my delight and joy of life, I did solve it in 7 November 1990 with the discovery of the Plutonium Atom Totality. A bigger theory than even mathematizing Darwin Evolution. And one structure of the Atom Totality is quantum mechanics of Superdeterminism, which is a mathematical basis of evolution. What the below writings and posts are, is my notebook, research notebook pertaining to Evolution theory of Biology BET from 1990 on through 2010. A personal memoir of my research notes on Darwin Evolution and how it relates to Atom Totality. In summary form, Darwin Evolution is not a true theory of science for it was replaced by Quantum Mechanics Superdeterminism. NOVA, the tv show recently had a feature program only they called it "quantum entanglement". So Evolution theory is no longer a valid science theory but has been replaced by Superdeterminism. And what Darwin Evolution is-- is a rule or algorithm that captures the essence of what goes on sometimes, but misses vast parts of science of life.. A rule, an algorithm of science is not science truth, but sort of like a model.

From 2010 until present day March 2019, I made more discoveries of physics and biology so that the below is sort of out of date and needs a second edition. Discoveries of what is First Life, is a important subject in Evolution theory and I discovered that circa 2016 that a physics capacitor is a lifeform. All life evolved from capacitors, and the plant and animal and one celled organisms when reduced to bare minimum are capacitors. My body, your body is simply a advanced and complex physics capacitor. Then in 2017, I discovered that the real electron of atoms is the muon at 105MeV, real proton is 840MeV and that little particle we thought was the electron of .5MeV turns out to be Dirac's Magnetic Monopole. That discovery changes very much everything in biology, even evolution theory. And finally, throughout 2010 to 2019 I have been reducing all of physics to be a subject based upon electromagnetism. And so when I write the second edition (if ever) about Evolution theory, it has to be written as if you are in a electricity magnetism classroom.

So, below is my memoir of evolution theory of biology from 1990 to 2010.

Cover picture: Me and two of my cats. Sure, they evolved, but more to the truth, they were fated. Both died from coyotes. Coyotes have to eat, too.
Length: 181 pages

Product details
• File size : 2407 KB
• Publication date : March 30, 2019
• Print length : 181 pages
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• ASIN : B07Q5NV3C5
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #143,708 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #123 in Evolution (Kindle Store)
◦ #239 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #1,220 in Evolution (Books)

#4-2, 18th published book

First Life = Capacitor of Physics // biophysics series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
#1 New Release in Molecular Biology


All Life comes from a capacitor of physics. Life starts as a capacitor and evolves into more advanced capacitor. Whether a given capacitor evolves into and harbors a DNA molecule and becomes a DNA capacitor life depends. And all life forms, when reduced, is a reduction to a capacitor. For a human body or the body of any plant or animal is a very advanced and complex capacitor. All life in the Universe starts as a Capacitor of Physics.

Product details
File Size: 1574 KB
Print Length: 155 pages
Publication Date: March 15, 2019
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PNT5SRT
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #4,177,228 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#427 in Biophysics (Kindle Store)
#1389 in Molecular Biology (Kindle Store)
#2359 in Biophysics (Books)



#4-3, 34th published book

Photons and Neutrinos have "perfect DNA/RNA" packaged inside them// biophysics series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 18Feb2021. This is AP's 34th published book.
Preface: Part of this is my history on the subject. And part is my current ongoing research into the geometry of the interior of photons and neutrinos.. Many changes have occurred from 1995 to present 2019. Until 2018, I imagined the interior of atoms as the Rutherford Model with nucleus and electrons as dot-clouds. However in 2017 when I discovered the real electron is the muon at 105MeV and real proton is 840MeV and the neutron is 945MeV leaving that little .5MeV particle as the Dirac Magnetic Monopole, changes not only physics and chemistry but every hard science is changed. The big change is that subatomic particles have jobs, tasks, work to do and the proton is the coil in Faraday's law, the muon is the bar magnet in Faraday's law, the neutron is a capacitor and the photon, neutrino are wires in the interior of atoms. This changes the geometry of the interior of atoms to where Rutherford model is thrown out the window. So we have the AP-Faraday model of the interior of atoms and that means closed loops or rings. That new perspective also means photons have an interior geometry as well as neutrinos. And so, the double helix of DNA, RNA, is the same as two intertwined springs. The only thing I have missing is what is the A,T, C,G of a photon or neutrino?

Currently as of 2021, I still need to solve the geometry of the interior of atoms and photons included. A spring with rings is the geometry, but I have a few more difficulties to iron out.

Cover Photo: Is a picture of a stretched slinky toy spring and I tried to intertwine them as a double helix. Looks like I came close. But sadly, when I pulled the toy spring down off, I found I had knotted the spring and had to take 15 minutes to unknot the spring.
Length: 42 pages

Product details
ASIN : B07Q4ZY7PZ
Publication date : April 1, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1472 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled
Print length : 42 pages
Lending : Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #138,981 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #4 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #6 in Biophysics (Kindle Store)
◦ #8 in Molecular Biology (Kindle Store)






#4-4, 51st published book
DNA transportation mechanism hypothesis, DNA-Capacitor// biophysics series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface: Now let me warn the reader up front here, that this is a hypothesis of science, a conjecture of science, a speculation of science and has not been proven in science. Some people do not know the difference between proven science and hypothesis. So do not read this book, thinking this is a proven topic of science. What started me on this topic was a question of how the animal body gets calcium atoms moved to sites the cells want, or move any atom that is needed at a location of the body or cell, or move any molecule that is needed at a specific location. So the question was, what transportation system of moving specific atoms or molecules to sites in the cell or body and what is the mechanism of that system.

Cover Picture shows the nucleotides of DNA of adenine, thymine and cytosine, guanine off my computer along with a model of DNA.

Length: 18 pages

Product details
File Size: 2857 KB
Print Length: 18 pages
Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
Publication Date: July 23, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07VLC51BS

#4-5, 67th published book

Evolution of Animals and Organs from Plants //biophysics series, book 5 (biology series) Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface: Strange how a little exploration for me in 10 Oct 2019 would end up landing me with a whole theory of how animals evolved from plants and the order in which animal organs evolved, all in the space of a few days in October 2019. Below in this text is a history of that discovery.

Cover: The cover is my camera photo of my computer of a Google search for "blue-green algae anatomy". We can see quite clearly how blue-green algae is a capacitor of physics!

Product details
File Size: 1025 KB
Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
Publication Date: October 18, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07ZBNKBPY
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #487,284 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#15649 in Biological Sciences (Books)
#4070 in Evolution (Books)
#494 in Evolution (Kindle Store)

Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall,Peter Higgs, Lene Hau, Brad Smith, Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Jill Pipher, Lisa Randall, Andrea Ghez, Bill Gates, Satya Nadella, Brad Smith, Lawrence Yaffe-- please, please can you ever, ever ask the simple question, of which is the atom's true real electron, the muon or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.

#1-1, 148th published book

Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 30Nov2021. And this is AP's 148th published science book.

Preface:
Physics book that explains what the universe is, and how it works. This is a continuation of the Atomic Theory by Democritus in Ancient Greek times. It adds one more fact to the Atomic Theory picture. That the Universe itself is one gigantic big atom. The picture is that of the Universe, in total, is one big atom that contains more atoms, inside itself. It completes the logic of science that Dr. Feynman wrote-- all things are made up of atoms -- and so, to complete that idea -- all things and the universe itself is an atom.

In this edition of year 2021, AP actually proves the Atom Totality theory, and therefore, a simultaneously _disproof_ of the Big Bang theory. The proof is simple, in that the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but rather, instead, shine from the Faraday law going on inside each and every proton in the Sun or star, or, in the Universe. The muon is the true electron of atoms and is the bar magnet in Faraday's law while the proton is a 840MeV particle in the geometry shape of 8 ring coil torus that is the closed loop coil in Faraday's Law. NASA scientists have discovered the Sun is a yearly increase in radiation of 0.005% yearly, and is why 25% of all insects have perished in the last decade 2010-2020. Stars and Sun shine from Faraday law, not from fusion and that is how the Universe itself grows. So, we cannot logically have two different mechanisms for the creation of the Universe. We cannot have electricity magnetism of Faraday law and then some silly "explosion of Big Bang" to create and grow the universe.

Also, in the course of providing supporting evidence of the Atom Totality theory, my research had to revise and correct the entire Maxwell Equations, and revise and correct the theory, the quantum electrodynamics theory.

Cover Picture: Again I used 8 rings from plumbing hardware to represent the 8 rings of a proton torus, and visualize each ring as a dot cloud pattern instead of a continuous ring, and the holes in some of those rings helps facilitate that image. Notice the muon ring is inside the proton torus rings, and perpendicular, and situated at the equator, going around and around the proton torus at nearly the speed of light in the Faraday law; producing electricity. Atoms are designed to produce maximum electricity, given their masses.
Length: 329 pages

Product details
• ASIN : B08T82M2LP
• Publication date : January 16, 2021
• Language: : English
• File size : 872 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 329 pages
• Lending : Enabled

#1-2, 48th published book

Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, Atom Totality Series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

--------------------------
Table of Contents
--------------------------

1) A visual image of a Atom Totality

2) Simply multiply 9 times 105MeV and there you get the rest mass of proton and neutron.

3) The tau-electron 1777MeV is merely 105MeV multiply by 17 is 1785 with Sigma Error of 0.4%.

4) Particle in the 840MeV range so that we can say we discovered the proton particle isolated of its internal muon.

5) Found a 840MeV particle in experimental physics, but, is it the proton torus without its interior occupied by a muon?

6) The theory of 9s, as help in physics.

7) How we picture the interior of Atoms, and the Atom Totality.

8) The Principle of Scooting-Over, applied.

9) An ongoing commentary of the geometry of atoms, both interior and exterior.

10) Galaxies form Rings in Faraday Coil, and Faraday bar-magnet // Cosmic Proton, Cosmic Muon.

11) Is there a Cosmic Faraday Law going on?
Length: 148 pages

Product details
File Size: 2370 KB
Print Length: 148 pages
Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
Publication Date: June 10, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07SW87BF5
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #285,417 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#826 in Astronomy (Books)
#166 in Astronomy (Kindle Store)
#671 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#1-3, 74th published book


HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.

Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
Length: 17 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : December 18, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 17 pages
• File Size : 698 KB
• ASIN : B082WYGVNG
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled

#1-4, 105th published book

Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.

Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
Length: 39 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : March 24, 2020
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• ASIN : B086BGSNXN
• Print Length : 39 pages
• File Size : 935 KB
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
#315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
#4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)



#1-5, 112th published book

New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.

Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book.. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
Length: 20 pages

Jill Pipher, Lisa Randall,Sheldon Glashow,Peter Higgs, Lene Hau, Brad Smith, Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Andrea Ghez, Bill Gates, Satya Nadella, Brad Smith, Lawrence Yaffe-- please, please can you ever, ever ask the simple question, of which is the atom's true real electron, the muon or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.
>
>
> #1-1, 148th published book
>
> Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 30Nov2021. And this is AP's 148th published science book.
>
> Preface:
> Physics book that explains what the universe is, and how it works. This is a continuation of the Atomic Theory by Democritus in Ancient Greek times. It adds one more fact to the Atomic Theory picture. That the Universe itself is one gigantic big atom. The picture is that of the Universe, in total, is one big atom that contains more atoms, inside itself. It completes the logic of science that Dr. Feynman wrote-- all things are made up of atoms -- and so, to complete that idea -- all things and the universe itself is an atom.
>
> In this edition of year 2021, AP actually proves the Atom Totality theory, and therefore, a simultaneously _disproof_ of the Big Bang theory. The proof is simple, in that the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but rather, instead, shine from the Faraday law going on inside each and every proton in the Sun or star, or, in the Universe. The muon is the true electron of atoms and is the bar magnet in Faraday's law while the proton is a 840MeV particle in the geometry shape of 8 ring coil torus that is the closed loop coil in Faraday's Law. NASA scientists have discovered the Sun is a yearly increase in radiation of 0.005% yearly, and is why 25% of all insects have perished in the last decade 2010-2020. Stars and Sun shine from Faraday law, not from fusion and that is how the Universe itself grows. So, we cannot logically have two different mechanisms for the creation of the Universe. We cannot have electricity magnetism of Faraday law and then some silly "explosion of Big Bang" to create and grow the universe.
>
> Also, in the course of providing supporting evidence of the Atom Totality theory, my research had to revise and correct the entire Maxwell Equations, and revise and correct the theory, the quantum electrodynamics theory.
>
> Cover Picture: Again I used 8 rings from plumbing hardware to represent the 8 rings of a proton torus, and visualize each ring as a dot cloud pattern instead of a continuous ring, and the holes in some of those rings helps facilitate that image. Notice the muon ring is inside the proton torus rings, and perpendicular, and situated at the equator, going around and around the proton torus at nearly the speed of light in the Faraday law; producing electricity. Atoms are designed to produce maximum electricity, given their masses.
> Length: 329 pages
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B08T82M2LP
> • Publication date : January 16, 2021
> • Language: : English
> • File size : 872 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print length : 329 pages
> • Lending : Enabled
>
>
>
>
> #1-2, 48th published book
>
> Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, Atom Totality Series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
>
> --------------------------
> Table of Contents
> --------------------------
>
> 1) A visual image of a Atom Totality
>
> 2) Simply multiply 9 times 105MeV and there you get the rest mass of proton and neutron.
>
> 3) The tau-electron 1777MeV is merely 105MeV multiply by 17 is 1785 with Sigma Error of 0.4%.
>
> 4) Particle in the 840MeV range so that we can say we discovered the proton particle isolated of its internal muon.
>
> 5) Found a 840MeV particle in experimental physics, but, is it the proton torus without its interior occupied by a muon?
>
> 6) The theory of 9s, as help in physics.
>
> 7) How we picture the interior of Atoms, and the Atom Totality.
>
> 8) The Principle of Scooting-Over, applied.
>
> 9) An ongoing commentary of the geometry of atoms, both interior and exterior.
>
> 10) Galaxies form Rings in Faraday Coil, and Faraday bar-magnet // Cosmic Proton, Cosmic Muon.
>
> 11) Is there a Cosmic Faraday Law going on?
> Length: 148 pages
>
> Product details
> File Size: 2370 KB
> Print Length: 148 pages
> Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
> Publication Date: June 10, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07SW87BF5
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> Word Wise: Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported 
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #285,417 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #826 in Astronomy (Books)
> #166 in Astronomy (Kindle Store)
> #671 in Physics (Kindle Store)
>
>
> #1-3, 74th published book
> 
>
> HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
>
> Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> Length: 17 pages
>
> Product details
> • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print Length : 17 pages
> • File Size : 698 KB
> • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
>
> #1-4, 105th published book
>
> Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.
>
> Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
> Length: 39 pages
>
> Product details
> • Publication Date : March 24, 2020
> • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> • ASIN : B086BGSNXN
> • Print Length : 39 pages
> • File Size : 935 KB
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> #315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> #4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> 

>
> #1-5, 112th published book
>
> New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
> Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.
>
> Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
> Length: 20 pages
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B0875SVDC7
> • Publication date : April 15, 2020
> • Language: : English
> • File size : 1134 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print length : 20 pages
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
> ◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
>
> #1-6, 135th published book
>
> QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) 

> Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.
>
> Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy.. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.
>
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B08K47K5BB
> • Publication date : September 25, 2020
> • Language : English
> • File size : 587 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> • Print length : 25 pages
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
> ◦ #334 in General Chemistry
>
>
>
> #1-7, 138th published book
> The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry.. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
> Length: 41 pages
>
> Product details
> • Publication Date : October 9, 2020
> • File Size : 828 KB
> • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> • Print Length : 41 pages
> • ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
>
> #1-8, 1st published book
>
> Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
>
> Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.
>
> Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.
>
> Foreward:
> I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
> Length: 632 pages
>
>
> Product details
> File Size: 1132 KB
> Print Length: 632 pages
> Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07PLP9NDR
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> Word Wise: Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported 
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> #8526 in Physics (Books)
> #18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)
>
>
> #1-9, 163rd published book
> Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
>
>
> Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.
> Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09NQ65H9F
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 15, 2021
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 999 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 60 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
>
>
>
> #1-10, 161st published book
>
> PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Preface:
> A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> 
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
>
>
> y z
> | /
> | /
> |/______ x
>
> More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci..physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
>
> In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
>
> I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
>
> There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
>
> Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> Archimedes Plutonium

Earle's psychoceramics Marc Tessier-Lavigne,Persis Drell,Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian-- can they ever, ever ask the simple question, of which is the atom's true real electron, the muon or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.

Earle Jones, no wonder the new particle accelerator is moving to Michigan State Univ. because in all the time 40 years SLAC, the fools of Stanford physics could never even ask the question, much less confirm real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside 840MeV proton torus doing Faraday law. Which is worse the flake idiot Earle Jones or the physicists of Stanford, is about the only questions running in the minds of the Physics dept of Stanford. A failed school of science.

President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
Provost: Persis Drell (physics)

Stanford physics dept.

Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian

>
>
> CalTech math dept
>
> Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari
> Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris
> Alexei Kitaev, Matilde Marcolli, Nikolai Makarov, Vladimir Markovic, Hiroshi Oguri, Eric Rains, Dinakar Ramakrishnan
> Barry Simon, Richard Wilson, Tom Graber, Sergei Gukov,
> Elena Mantovan, Yi NI,
>
> President Thomas F. Rosenbaum (physics)
> Caltech Physics Dept
>
> Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
> Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
> John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
> Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
> Konstantin Batygin
> >
> >
> > #1-1, 148th published book
> >
> > Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 30Nov2021. And this is AP's 148th published science book.
> >
> > Preface:
> > Physics book that explains what the universe is, and how it works. This is a continuation of the Atomic Theory by Democritus in Ancient Greek times. It adds one more fact to the Atomic Theory picture. That the Universe itself is one gigantic big atom. The picture is that of the Universe, in total, is one big atom that contains more atoms, inside itself. It completes the logic of science that Dr. Feynman wrote-- all things are made up of atoms -- and so, to complete that idea -- all things and the universe itself is an atom.
> >
> > In this edition of year 2021, AP actually proves the Atom Totality theory, and therefore, a simultaneously _disproof_ of the Big Bang theory. The proof is simple, in that the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but rather, instead, shine from the Faraday law going on inside each and every proton in the Sun or star, or, in the Universe. The muon is the true electron of atoms and is the bar magnet in Faraday's law while the proton is a 840MeV particle in the geometry shape of 8 ring coil torus that is the closed loop coil in Faraday's Law. NASA scientists have discovered the Sun is a yearly increase in radiation of 0.005% yearly, and is why 25% of all insects have perished in the last decade 2010-2020. Stars and Sun shine from Faraday law, not from fusion and that is how the Universe itself grows. So, we cannot logically have two different mechanisms for the creation of the Universe. We cannot have electricity magnetism of Faraday law and then some silly "explosion of Big Bang" to create and grow the universe.
> >
> > Also, in the course of providing supporting evidence of the Atom Totality theory, my research had to revise and correct the entire Maxwell Equations, and revise and correct the theory, the quantum electrodynamics theory.
> >
> > Cover Picture: Again I used 8 rings from plumbing hardware to represent the 8 rings of a proton torus, and visualize each ring as a dot cloud pattern instead of a continuous ring, and the holes in some of those rings helps facilitate that image. Notice the muon ring is inside the proton torus rings, and perpendicular, and situated at the equator, going around and around the proton torus at nearly the speed of light in the Faraday law; producing electricity. Atoms are designed to produce maximum electricity, given their masses.
> > Length: 329 pages
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN : B08T82M2LP
> > • Publication date : January 16, 2021
> > • Language: : English
> > • File size : 872 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > • Print length : 329 pages
> > • Lending : Enabled
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > #1-2, 48th published book
> >
> > Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, Atom Totality Series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> >
> > --------------------------
> > Table of Contents
> > --------------------------
> >
> > 1) A visual image of a Atom Totality
> >
> > 2) Simply multiply 9 times 105MeV and there you get the rest mass of proton and neutron.
> >
> > 3) The tau-electron 1777MeV is merely 105MeV multiply by 17 is 1785 with Sigma Error of 0.4%.
> >
> > 4) Particle in the 840MeV range so that we can say we discovered the proton particle isolated of its internal muon.
> >
> > 5) Found a 840MeV particle in experimental physics, but, is it the proton torus without its interior occupied by a muon?
> >
> > 6) The theory of 9s, as help in physics.
> >
> > 7) How we picture the interior of Atoms, and the Atom Totality.
> >
> > 8) The Principle of Scooting-Over, applied.
> >
> > 9) An ongoing commentary of the geometry of atoms, both interior and exterior.
> >
> > 10) Galaxies form Rings in Faraday Coil, and Faraday bar-magnet // Cosmic Proton, Cosmic Muon.
> >
> > 11) Is there a Cosmic Faraday Law going on?
> > Length: 148 pages
> >
> > Product details
> > File Size: 2370 KB
> > Print Length: 148 pages
> > Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
> > Publication Date: June 10, 2019
> > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > Language: English
> > ASIN: B07SW87BF5
> > Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> > Word Wise: Enabled
> > Lending: Enabled
> > Screen Reader: Supported 
> > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #285,417 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > #826 in Astronomy (Books)
> > #166 in Astronomy (Kindle Store)
> > #671 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> >
> >
> > #1-3, 74th published book
> > 
> >
> > HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
> >
> > Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> > Length: 17 pages
> >
> > Product details
> > • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > • Print Length : 17 pages
> > • File Size : 698 KB
> > • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> > • Language: : English
> > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > • Lending : Enabled
> >
> > #1-4, 105th published book
> >
> > Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.
> >
> > Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
> > Length: 39 pages
> >
> > Product details
> > • Publication Date : March 24, 2020
> > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > • ASIN : B086BGSNXN
> > • Print Length : 39 pages
> > • File Size : 935 KB
> > • Language: : English
> > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > • Lending : Enabled
> > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > #6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> > #315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > #4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > 

> >
> > #1-5, 112th published book
> >
> > New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
> > Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.
> >
> > Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
> > Length: 20 pages
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN : B0875SVDC7
> > • Publication date : April 15, 2020
> > • Language: : English
> > • File size : 1134 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > • Print length : 20 pages
> > • Lending : Enabled
> > • Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > ◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > ◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> >
> > #1-6, 135th published book
> >
> > QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) 

> > Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong.. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.
> >
> > Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN : B08K47K5BB
> > • Publication date : September 25, 2020
> > • Language : English
> > • File size : 587 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > • Print length : 25 pages
> > • Lending : Enabled
> > • Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > ◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > ◦ #334 in General Chemistry
> >
> >
> >
> > #1-7, 138th published book
> > The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
> > Length: 41 pages
> >
> > Product details
> > • Publication Date : October 9, 2020
> > • File Size : 828 KB
> > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > • Print Length : 41 pages
> > • ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
> > • Language: : English
> > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > • Lending : Enabled
> >
> > #1-8, 1st published book
> >
> > Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> >
> > Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.
> >
> > Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.
> >
> > Foreward:
> > I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
> > Length: 632 pages
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > File Size: 1132 KB
> > Print Length: 632 pages
> > Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > Language: English
> > ASIN: B07PLP9NDR
> > Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> > Word Wise: Enabled
> > Lending: Enabled
> > Screen Reader: Supported 
> > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > #1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > #8526 in Physics (Books)
> > #18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)
> >
> >
> > #1-9, 163rd published book
> > Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
> >
> >
> > Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years.. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede.. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.
> > Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09NQ65H9F
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 15, 2021
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 999 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 60 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> >
> >
> >
> > #1-10, 161st published book
> >
> > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Preface:
> > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > 
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> >
> >
> > y z
> > | /
> > | /
> > |/______ x
> >
> > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> >
> > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> >
> > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> >
> > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> >
> > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > Archimedes Plutonium

Earle psychoceramics Mason Yearian,Marc Tessier-Lavigne,Persis Drell,Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki-- can they ever, ever ask the simple question, of which is the atom's true real electron, the muon or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.
>
> Earle Jones, no wonder the new particle accelerator is moving to Michigan State Univ. because in all the time 40 years SLAC, the fools of Stanford physics could never even ask the question, much less confirm real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside 840MeV proton torus doing Faraday law. Which is worse the flake idiot Earle Jones or the physicists of Stanford, is about the only questions running in the minds of the Physics dept of Stanford. A failed school of science.
>
>
> President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
>
> Stanford physics dept.
>
> Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
>
> >
> >
> > CalTech math dept
> >
> > Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari
> > Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris
> > Alexei Kitaev, Matilde Marcolli, Nikolai Makarov, Vladimir Markovic, Hiroshi Oguri, Eric Rains, Dinakar Ramakrishnan
> > Barry Simon, Richard Wilson, Tom Graber, Sergei Gukov,
> > Elena Mantovan, Yi NI,
> >
> > President Thomas F. Rosenbaum (physics)
> > Caltech Physics Dept
> >
> > Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
> > Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
> > John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
> > Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
> > Konstantin Batygin
> > >
> > >
> > > #1-1, 148th published book
> > >
> > > Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Last revision was 30Nov2021. And this is AP's 148th published science book.
> > >
> > > Preface:
> > > Physics book that explains what the universe is, and how it works. This is a continuation of the Atomic Theory by Democritus in Ancient Greek times. It adds one more fact to the Atomic Theory picture. That the Universe itself is one gigantic big atom. The picture is that of the Universe, in total, is one big atom that contains more atoms, inside itself. It completes the logic of science that Dr. Feynman wrote-- all things are made up of atoms -- and so, to complete that idea -- all things and the universe itself is an atom.
> > >
> > > In this edition of year 2021, AP actually proves the Atom Totality theory, and therefore, a simultaneously _disproof_ of the Big Bang theory. The proof is simple, in that the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but rather, instead, shine from the Faraday law going on inside each and every proton in the Sun or star, or, in the Universe. The muon is the true electron of atoms and is the bar magnet in Faraday's law while the proton is a 840MeV particle in the geometry shape of 8 ring coil torus that is the closed loop coil in Faraday's Law. NASA scientists have discovered the Sun is a yearly increase in radiation of 0.005% yearly, and is why 25% of all insects have perished in the last decade 2010-2020. Stars and Sun shine from Faraday law, not from fusion and that is how the Universe itself grows. So, we cannot logically have two different mechanisms for the creation of the Universe.. We cannot have electricity magnetism of Faraday law and then some silly "explosion of Big Bang" to create and grow the universe.
> > >
> > > Also, in the course of providing supporting evidence of the Atom Totality theory, my research had to revise and correct the entire Maxwell Equations, and revise and correct the theory, the quantum electrodynamics theory..
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: Again I used 8 rings from plumbing hardware to represent the 8 rings of a proton torus, and visualize each ring as a dot cloud pattern instead of a continuous ring, and the holes in some of those rings helps facilitate that image. Notice the muon ring is inside the proton torus rings, and perpendicular, and situated at the equator, going around and around the proton torus at nearly the speed of light in the Faraday law; producing electricity. Atoms are designed to produce maximum electricity, given their masses.
> > > Length: 329 pages
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B08T82M2LP
> > > • Publication date : January 16, 2021
> > > • Language: : English
> > > • File size : 872 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Print length : 329 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #1-2, 48th published book
> > >
> > > Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, Atom Totality Series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > >
> > > --------------------------
> > > Table of Contents
> > > --------------------------
> > >
> > > 1) A visual image of a Atom Totality
> > >
> > > 2) Simply multiply 9 times 105MeV and there you get the rest mass of proton and neutron.
> > >
> > > 3) The tau-electron 1777MeV is merely 105MeV multiply by 17 is 1785 with Sigma Error of 0.4%.
> > >
> > > 4) Particle in the 840MeV range so that we can say we discovered the proton particle isolated of its internal muon.
> > >
> > > 5) Found a 840MeV particle in experimental physics, but, is it the proton torus without its interior occupied by a muon?
> > >
> > > 6) The theory of 9s, as help in physics.
> > >
> > > 7) How we picture the interior of Atoms, and the Atom Totality.
> > >
> > > 8) The Principle of Scooting-Over, applied.
> > >
> > > 9) An ongoing commentary of the geometry of atoms, both interior and exterior.
> > >
> > > 10) Galaxies form Rings in Faraday Coil, and Faraday bar-magnet // Cosmic Proton, Cosmic Muon.
> > >
> > > 11) Is there a Cosmic Faraday Law going on?
> > > Length: 148 pages
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > File Size: 2370 KB
> > > Print Length: 148 pages
> > > Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
> > > Publication Date: June 10, 2019
> > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > Language: English
> > > ASIN: B07SW87BF5
> > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> > > Word Wise: Enabled
> > > Lending: Enabled
> > > Screen Reader: Supported 
> > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #285,417 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > #826 in Astronomy (Books)
> > > #166 in Astronomy (Kindle Store)
> > > #671 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > >
> > >
> > > #1-3, 74th published book
> > > 
> > >
> > > HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles..
> > > Length: 17 pages
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Print Length : 17 pages
> > > • File Size : 698 KB
> > > • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> > > • Language: : English
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > >
> > > #1-4, 105th published book
> > >
> > > Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
> > > Length: 39 pages
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • Publication Date : March 24, 2020
> > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > • ASIN : B086BGSNXN
> > > • Print Length : 39 pages
> > > • File Size : 935 KB
> > > • Language: : English
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > #6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> > > #315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > #4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > 

> > >
> > > #1-5, 112th published book
> > >
> > > New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
> > > Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
> > > Length: 20 pages
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B0875SVDC7
> > > • Publication date : April 15, 2020
> > > • Language: : English
> > > • File size : 1134 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Print length : 20 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > ◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > ◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > >
> > > #1-6, 135th published book
> > >
> > > QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) 

> > > Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.
> > >
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B08K47K5BB
> > > • Publication date : September 25, 2020
> > > • Language : English
> > > • File size : 587 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > • Print length : 25 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > ◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > ◦ #334 in General Chemistry
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #1-7, 138th published book
> > > The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
> > > Length: 41 pages
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • Publication Date : October 9, 2020
> > > • File Size : 828 KB
> > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > • Print Length : 41 pages
> > > • ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
> > > • Language: : English
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > >
> > > #1-8, 1st published book
> > >
> > > Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > >
> > > Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.
> > >
> > > Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.
> > >
> > > Foreward:
> > > I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
> > > Length: 632 pages
> > >
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > File Size: 1132 KB
> > > Print Length: 632 pages
> > > Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > Language: English
> > > ASIN: B07PLP9NDR
> > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> > > Word Wise: Enabled
> > > Lending: Enabled
> > > Screen Reader: Supported 
> > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > #1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > #8526 in Physics (Books)
> > > #18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > > #1-9, 163rd published book
> > > Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
> > >
> > >
> > > Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.
> > > Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09NQ65H9F
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 15, 2021
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 999 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 60 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #1-10, 161st published book
> > >
> > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Preface:
> > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > 
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > >
> > >
> > > y z
> > > | /
> > > | /
> > > |/______ x
> > >
> > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > >
> > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > >
> > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > >
> > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > >
> > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > Archimedes Plutonium

Earle psychoceramic StanleyWojcicki,Mason Yearian,Marc Tessier-Lavigne,Persis Drell,Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner -- can they ever, ever ask the simple question, of which is the atom's true real electron, the muon or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.
> >
> > Earle Jones, no wonder the new particle accelerator is moving to Michigan State Univ. because in all the time 40 years SLAC, the fools of Stanford physics could never even ask the question, much less confirm real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside 840MeV proton torus doing Faraday law. Which is worse the flake idiot Earle Jones or the physicists of Stanford, is about the only questions running in the minds of the Physics dept of Stanford. A failed school of science.
> >
> >
> > President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> > Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
> >
> > Stanford physics dept.
> >
> > Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > CalTech math dept
> > >
> > > Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari
> > > Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris
> > > Alexei Kitaev, Matilde Marcolli, Nikolai Makarov, Vladimir Markovic, Hiroshi Oguri, Eric Rains, Dinakar Ramakrishnan
> > > Barry Simon, Richard Wilson, Tom Graber, Sergei Gukov,
> > > Elena Mantovan, Yi NI,
> > >
> > > President Thomas F. Rosenbaum (physics)
> > > Caltech Physics Dept
> > >
> > > Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
> > > Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
> > > John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
> > > Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
> > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #1-1, 148th published book
> > > >
> > > > Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Last revision was 30Nov2021. And this is AP's 148th published science book.
> > > >
> > > > Preface:
> > > > Physics book that explains what the universe is, and how it works. This is a continuation of the Atomic Theory by Democritus in Ancient Greek times. It adds one more fact to the Atomic Theory picture. That the Universe itself is one gigantic big atom. The picture is that of the Universe, in total, is one big atom that contains more atoms, inside itself. It completes the logic of science that Dr. Feynman wrote-- all things are made up of atoms -- and so, to complete that idea -- all things and the universe itself is an atom.
> > > >
> > > > In this edition of year 2021, AP actually proves the Atom Totality theory, and therefore, a simultaneously _disproof_ of the Big Bang theory. The proof is simple, in that the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but rather, instead, shine from the Faraday law going on inside each and every proton in the Sun or star, or, in the Universe. The muon is the true electron of atoms and is the bar magnet in Faraday's law while the proton is a 840MeV particle in the geometry shape of 8 ring coil torus that is the closed loop coil in Faraday's Law. NASA scientists have discovered the Sun is a yearly increase in radiation of 0.005% yearly, and is why 25% of all insects have perished in the last decade 2010-2020. Stars and Sun shine from Faraday law, not from fusion and that is how the Universe itself grows. So, we cannot logically have two different mechanisms for the creation of the Universe. We cannot have electricity magnetism of Faraday law and then some silly "explosion of Big Bang" to create and grow the universe.
> > > >
> > > > Also, in the course of providing supporting evidence of the Atom Totality theory, my research had to revise and correct the entire Maxwell Equations, and revise and correct the theory, the quantum electrodynamics theory.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture: Again I used 8 rings from plumbing hardware to represent the 8 rings of a proton torus, and visualize each ring as a dot cloud pattern instead of a continuous ring, and the holes in some of those rings helps facilitate that image. Notice the muon ring is inside the proton torus rings, and perpendicular, and situated at the equator, going around and around the proton torus at nearly the speed of light in the Faraday law; producing electricity. Atoms are designed to produce maximum electricity, given their masses.
> > > > Length: 329 pages
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN : B08T82M2LP
> > > > • Publication date : January 16, 2021
> > > > • Language: : English
> > > > • File size : 872 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > • Print length : 329 pages
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #1-2, 48th published book
> > > >
> > > > Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, Atom Totality Series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --------------------------
> > > > Table of Contents
> > > > --------------------------
> > > >
> > > > 1) A visual image of a Atom Totality
> > > >
> > > > 2) Simply multiply 9 times 105MeV and there you get the rest mass of proton and neutron.
> > > >
> > > > 3) The tau-electron 1777MeV is merely 105MeV multiply by 17 is 1785 with Sigma Error of 0.4%.
> > > >
> > > > 4) Particle in the 840MeV range so that we can say we discovered the proton particle isolated of its internal muon.
> > > >
> > > > 5) Found a 840MeV particle in experimental physics, but, is it the proton torus without its interior occupied by a muon?
> > > >
> > > > 6) The theory of 9s, as help in physics.
> > > >
> > > > 7) How we picture the interior of Atoms, and the Atom Totality.
> > > >
> > > > 8) The Principle of Scooting-Over, applied.
> > > >
> > > > 9) An ongoing commentary of the geometry of atoms, both interior and exterior.
> > > >
> > > > 10) Galaxies form Rings in Faraday Coil, and Faraday bar-magnet // Cosmic Proton, Cosmic Muon.
> > > >
> > > > 11) Is there a Cosmic Faraday Law going on?
> > > > Length: 148 pages
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > File Size: 2370 KB
> > > > Print Length: 148 pages
> > > > Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
> > > > Publication Date: June 10, 2019
> > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > > Language: English
> > > > ASIN: B07SW87BF5
> > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> > > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> > > > Word Wise: Enabled
> > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > Screen Reader: Supported 
> > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #285,417 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > #826 in Astronomy (Books)
> > > > #166 in Astronomy (Kindle Store)
> > > > #671 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #1-3, 74th published book
> > > > 
> > > >
> > > > HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> > > > Length: 17 pages
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > • Print Length : 17 pages
> > > > • File Size : 698 KB
> > > > • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> > > > • Language: : English
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > >
> > > > #1-4, 105th published book
> > > >
> > > > Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings.. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
> > > > Length: 39 pages
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • Publication Date : March 24, 2020
> > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > • ASIN : B086BGSNXN
> > > > • Print Length : 39 pages
> > > > • File Size : 935 KB
> > > > • Language: : English
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > #6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> > > > #315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > #4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > 

> > > >
> > > > #1-5, 112th published book
> > > >
> > > > New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
> > > > Length: 20 pages
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN : B0875SVDC7
> > > > • Publication date : April 15, 2020
> > > > • Language: : English
> > > > • File size : 1134 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > • Print length : 20 pages
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > ◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > ◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > >
> > > > #1-6, 135th published book
> > > >
> > > > QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) 

> > > > Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN : B08K47K5BB
> > > > • Publication date : September 25, 2020
> > > > • Language : English
> > > > • File size : 587 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > • Print length : 25 pages
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > ◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > ◦ #334 in General Chemistry
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #1-7, 138th published book
> > > > The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
> > > > Length: 41 pages
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • Publication Date : October 9, 2020
> > > > • File Size : 828 KB
> > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > • Print Length : 41 pages
> > > > • ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
> > > > • Language: : English
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > >
> > > > #1-8, 1st published book
> > > >
> > > > Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.
> > > >
> > > > Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.
> > > >
> > > > Foreward:
> > > > I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
> > > > Length: 632 pages
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > File Size: 1132 KB
> > > > Print Length: 632 pages
> > > > Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > > Language: English
> > > > ASIN: B07PLP9NDR
> > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> > > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> > > > Word Wise: Enabled
> > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > Screen Reader: Supported 
> > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > #1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > #8526 in Physics (Books)
> > > > #18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #1-9, 163rd published book
> > > > Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.
> > > > Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09NQ65H9F
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 15, 2021
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 999 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 60 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #1-10, 161st published book
> > > >
> > > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Preface:
> > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > > 
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > y z
> > > > | /
> > > > | /
> > > > |/______ x
> > > >
> > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies..
> > > >
> > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > >
> > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > >
> > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > >
> > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium