>Lene Hau 🤡 of Math and Sheldon Glashow 🃏 of Physics Harvard "bozo"
On Friday, November 11, 2022 at 10:02:52 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> fails at math and science:

Re: Zelos asks why Harvard's Dr. Hau wants to fail in physics, by not turning off the light to see if light wave is a closed loop pencil ellipse that AP predicts. Is Dr.Hau stubborn and too ignorant to finish her experiment??
by Michael Moroney Jan 18, 2021, 2:06:24 PM

Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
By Michael Moroney 1/23/18, 44 posts 461 views
Why Kibo Parry M. do you have such a low opinion of Harvard and Dr. Hau?? Is it because she cannot turn a light switch off in "slow light experiment" and prove AP correct???
>
> My 53rd published book
>
> Quantum Entanglement, Physics series for High School, book 7 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Revised on 29Aug2021. This is AP's 53rd published book of science.
>
> Since this is for High School, I need to keep it as simple as possible, for students in High School are just barely getting acquainted with physics. So I must come down to their level of understanding and comprehending. I write this for High School since NOVA did a TV program on the subject of Quantum Entanglement and once it appears on NOVA, we have to be able, in science, to explain the topic to High School students. For sure enough, many High School students will be watching that program. This book will explain Quantum Entanglement for them.
>
> To explain Quantum Entanglement we have to start with what light is. And light comes in two forms, one is wave, and one is particle. Light is both these forms put together at all times. Light is both a wave and a particle simultaneously. In physics this is called a duality.
>
> Cover picture is a picture taken by my iphone of a web search of Slow Light Experiments.
>
> Product details
> ASIN : B07VMZ698G
> Publication date : July 26, 2019
> Language : English
> File size : 1801 KB
> Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited
> Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> Screen Reader : Supported
> Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> X-Ray : Not Enabled
> Word Wise : Enabled
> Print length : 22 pages
> Lending : Enabled
> Best Sellers Rank: #214,475 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #2 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #375 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #1,960 in Physics (Books) 

> My 102nd published book
>
> Constant Maximum Speed of Light explained// Teaching Special Relativity to Grade School students//Student teaches professor series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 16Sept2022. And this is AP's 102nd published book of science.
>
>
> Preface: So many discoveries in March of 2020, that I have to rush and publish this book especially for it is the foundation of all books on the subject of Special Relativity, not just my books but all books written on Special Relativity. There is a key underlying _Fundamental Principle of Special Relativity_, and that is the fact that a ray of light is not a single arrow moving in a direction but rather is a closed loop that always has a contact with its source of origin, whether the Sun or a flashlight, the light rays are closed loops; are circuits, and if you turn the flashlight off, (we cannot turn the Sun off) or the laser light in the Harvard BEC experiment, the BEC experiments with a laser light beam, if you switch off the light source, all the light instantly disappears. Whether the "slow light or the normal light, all vanishes at the same time when the light switch is turned off. So, the _Fundamental Principle of Special Relativity_, is that light comes in closed loops circuits, where you take a circle and you make it into a ray, and I call it a pencil ellipse, and we can best see and understand this fact from a electric extension cord. That cord looks like a straightline arrow, but if you look deeper, you will find it started out as a circle that has been shaped into a long looking straightline ray, a pencil ellipse.
>
> Cover Picture is my demonstration table at home where I took some shoe-laces of equal length. I took 3 shoelaces of length 400 millimeters, or if you prefer 40 centimeters. Three shoe-laces are all the same length. In one of them I tried to make a circle using a clip fastener to hold the ends together. My circle has a diameter of 127 millimeters or 12.7 centimeters. The second object below the circle is that same circle, only it is reformed so that it is a circle-line-ray, called a pencil ellipse, just like your electric extension cord is a circle-line-ray of copper wire, closed loop copper wire. The copper wire started out as a circle but was reformed into being a pencil ellipse. Now the third picture is that same shoe-lace length marked off by 3.14 diameters. Now be careful here. For the circumference of the circle divided by the diameter is the value of pi as a number 3.14. So when I say 3.14 diameters, that means 3 diameters plus a snippet of a diameter of 0.14. Notice the short segment, of a 0.14 piece of the diameter with 3 diameters each of 12.7 centimeters. The original circle was diameter 127 millimeters, or 12.7 centimeters. Caution: do not mistake any shadows in the demonstration. There are shadows in the third figure.
>
>
> Product details
> ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0863L3X1Y
> Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 18, 2020
> Language ‏ : ‎ English
> File size ‏ : ‎ 522 KB
> Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
> Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> Best Sellers Rank: #3,443,925 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #460 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #11,559 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #64,321 in Physics (Books)
> 

>
> President Larry Summers
> President now Lawrence Bacow
>
> Harvard Physics dept
> Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner, Adam Cohen, Eugene Demler, Michael Desai
> Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin, Gary Feldman, Douglas Finkbeiner, Melissa Franklin, Gerald Gabrielse, Howard Georgi, Sheldon Glashow, Roy Glauber, Jene Golovchenko, Markus Greiner, Roxanne Guenette, Girma Hailu, Bertrand Halperin, Lene Hau
> Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, Efthimios Kaxiras, Philip Kim, John Kovac, Erel Levine
> Mikhail Lukin, Logan McCarty, L. Mahadevan, Vinothan Manoharan, Eric Mazur, Masahiro Morii
> David Morin, Julia Mundy, Cherry Murray, David Nelson, Kang Ni, Hongkun Park, William Paul
> Peter Pershan, Mara Prentiss, Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, Isaac Silvera, Andrew Strominger, Christopher Stubbs, Cumrun Vafa, Ronald Walsworth, David Weitz, Robert Westervelt, Richard Wilson
> Tai Wu, Amir Yacoby, Susanne Yelin, Xi Yin

Lene Hau🤡Ross&Dan of Math and Sheldon Glashow 🃏 of Physics Harvard "bozo"
> On Friday, November 11, 2022 at 10:02:52 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > fails at math and science:
> Re: Zelos asks why Harvard's Dr. Hau wants to fail in physics, by not turning off the light to see if light wave is a closed loop pencil ellipse that AP predicts. Is Dr.Hau stubborn and too ignorant to finish her experiment??
> by Michael Moroney Jan 18, 2021, 2:06:24 PM
>
> Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
> By Michael Moroney 1/23/18, 44 posts 461 views
>
> Why Kibo Parry M. do you have such a low opinion of Harvard and Dr. Hau?? Is it because she cannot turn a light switch off in "slow light experiment" and prove AP correct???
> >
> > My 53rd published book
> >
> > Quantum Entanglement, Physics series for High School, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Revised on 29Aug2021. This is AP's 53rd published book of science.
> >
> > Since this is for High School, I need to keep it as simple as possible, for students in High School are just barely getting acquainted with physics. So I must come down to their level of understanding and comprehending. I write this for High School since NOVA did a TV program on the subject of Quantum Entanglement and once it appears on NOVA, we have to be able, in science, to explain the topic to High School students. For sure enough, many High School students will be watching that program. This book will explain Quantum Entanglement for them.
> >
> > To explain Quantum Entanglement we have to start with what light is. And light comes in two forms, one is wave, and one is particle. Light is both these forms put together at all times. Light is both a wave and a particle simultaneously. In physics this is called a duality.
> >
> > Cover picture is a picture taken by my iphone of a web search of Slow Light Experiments.
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN : B07VMZ698G
> > Publication date : July 26, 2019
> > Language : English
> > File size : 1801 KB
> > Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited
> > Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > Screen Reader : Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > Word Wise : Enabled
> > Print length : 22 pages
> > Lending : Enabled
> > Best Sellers Rank: #214,475 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #2 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > ◦ #375 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #1,960 in Physics (Books) 

> > My 102nd published book
> >
> > Constant Maximum Speed of Light explained// Teaching Special Relativity to Grade School students//Student teaches professor series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 16Sept2022. And this is AP's 102nd published book of science.
> >
> >
> > Preface: So many discoveries in March of 2020, that I have to rush and publish this book especially for it is the foundation of all books on the subject of Special Relativity, not just my books but all books written on Special Relativity. There is a key underlying _Fundamental Principle of Special Relativity_, and that is the fact that a ray of light is not a single arrow moving in a direction but rather is a closed loop that always has a contact with its source of origin, whether the Sun or a flashlight, the light rays are closed loops; are circuits, and if you turn the flashlight off, (we cannot turn the Sun off) or the laser light in the Harvard BEC experiment, the BEC experiments with a laser light beam, if you switch off the light source, all the light instantly disappears. Whether the "slow light or the normal light, all vanishes at the same time when the light switch is turned off. So, the _Fundamental Principle of Special Relativity_, is that light comes in closed loops circuits, where you take a circle and you make it into a ray, and I call it a pencil ellipse, and we can best see and understand this fact from a electric extension cord. That cord looks like a straightline arrow, but if you look deeper, you will find it started out as a circle that has been shaped into a long looking straightline ray, a pencil ellipse.
> >
> > Cover Picture is my demonstration table at home where I took some shoe-laces of equal length. I took 3 shoelaces of length 400 millimeters, or if you prefer 40 centimeters. Three shoe-laces are all the same length. In one of them I tried to make a circle using a clip fastener to hold the ends together. My circle has a diameter of 127 millimeters or 12.7 centimeters. The second object below the circle is that same circle, only it is reformed so that it is a circle-line-ray, called a pencil ellipse, just like your electric extension cord is a circle-line-ray of copper wire, closed loop copper wire. The copper wire started out as a circle but was reformed into being a pencil ellipse. Now the third picture is that same shoe-lace length marked off by 3.14 diameters. Now be careful here. For the circumference of the circle divided by the diameter is the value of pi as a number 3.14. So when I say 3.14 diameters, that means 3 diameters plus a snippet of a diameter of 0.14. Notice the short segment, of a 0.14 piece of the diameter with 3 diameters each of 12.7 centimeters. The original circle was diameter 127 millimeters, or 12.7 centimeters. Caution: do not mistake any shadows in the demonstration. There are shadows in the third figure.
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0863L3X1Y
> > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 18, 2020
> > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > File size ‏ : ‎ 522 KB
> > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
> > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Best Sellers Rank: #3,443,925 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #460 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > ◦ #11,559 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #64,321 in Physics (Books)
> > 

> >
> > President Larry Summers
> > President now Lawrence Bacow
> >
> > Harvard Physics dept
> > Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner, Adam Cohen, Eugene Demler, Michael Desai
> > Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin, Gary Feldman, Douglas Finkbeiner, Melissa Franklin, Gerald Gabrielse, Howard Georgi, Sheldon Glashow, Roy Glauber, Jene Golovchenko, Markus Greiner, Roxanne Guenette, Girma Hailu, Bertrand Halperin, Lene Hau
> > Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, Efthimios Kaxiras, Philip Kim, John Kovac, Erel Levine
> > Mikhail Lukin, Logan McCarty, L. Mahadevan, Vinothan Manoharan, Eric Mazur, Masahiro Morii
> > David Morin, Julia Mundy, Cherry Murray, David Nelson, Kang Ni, Hongkun Park, William Paul
> > Peter Pershan, Mara Prentiss, Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, Isaac Silvera, Andrew Strominger, Christopher Stubbs, Cumrun Vafa, Ronald Walsworth, David Weitz, Robert Westervelt, Richard Wilson
> > Tai Wu, Amir Yacoby, Susanne Yelin, Xi Yin

Michael Moroney wrote:

> 🤡 of Math and 🃏 of Physics Archimedes "bozo" Plutonium
> <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
> > Subject: .Shitheads of math and science
>
> 1) Ludwig Poehlmann 2) Ludwig Hansen

nevermind this boolshit, the khazar zelesnke is doing well during the war.
Just bought big capitalist properties, and lamborghinis, in the shithole
named switzerland. The *fake_money* shithole switzerland is the khazars
best friend.

the short gypsy khazar Zelensky is America's 'welfare queen'
https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/19eacN4qVClV/

khazar Zelensky a ‘Black Hole’ — American Museum of Natural History
https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/FWpJIYroLnhs/

Jim Burns,Jan Burse,ETH Zurich,Tristan Riviere,Dietmar Salamon,Janusz Adamus,Tatyana Barron, keep polluting the minds of young with 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction.
>

Jim Burns who cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse spams sci..math 238 "Smullyan..." 2:05PM
> Jan Burse play act spamming everyday yet cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse,and his mindless 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction for Jan failed logic, unable to see Boole mixed up OR with AND truth tables.
>
> Jan Burse 61 "Smullyan's Proof...."
> 
>
> 
> > Fritz Feldhase 239 "Oh the Ambigarse 0^0..."
> > > fuckdog spammer Fritz Feldhase 96 8:49 PM "An interesting defect..."
> > > > Fuckdog spammer Dan Christensen & Jan Burse "An interesting defect in..." 87 on 6:12PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Why have these one line spammers in sci.math, day after day-- Mostowski Collapse (ETH Jan Burse) "An interesting defect in DC Proof". Is it to deflect the attention that ETH and Univ Western Ontario teach fake Logic 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction or is it to deflect ETH is too stupid to ask the question which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle and so ETH and Univ Western Ontario and Toronto daily spam sci.math to hog the front page with fake science.
> > > > >
> > > > > Why does Univ Western Ontario Dan Christensen and Jan Burse Zurich ETH have such a dumb stupid mind in physics? Never able to investigate the question-- what if we take the electron of atoms as the muon and subtract 105 from 945MeV and then take the 0.5MeV particle as Dirac's magnetic monopole. No, the dumb stupid worthless mind of Dan Christensen and Jan Burse in physics is never able to do such mental construction for they failed physics. For they failed physics because they failed LOGIC in that their pea sized brian still accepts the error filled Boole logic of 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mostowski Collapse aka Jan Burse spam-- 4/11/22 -- "An interesting defect in DC proof"
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > My 5th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
> > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > File Size: 773 KB
> > > > > > Print Length: 72 pages
> > > > > > Publication Date: March 12, 2019
> > > > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > > > > Language: English
> > > > > > ASIN: B07PMB69F5
> > > > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> > > > > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 

> > > > > > Word Wise: Not Enabled
> > > > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > > > Screen Reader: Supported
> > > > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> > > > > > ETH Zurich
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Paul Biran, Marc Burger, Patrick Cheridito, Manfred Einsiedler, Paul Embrechts
> > > > > > Giovanni Felder, Alessio Figalli, Norbert Hungerbuhler, Tom Ilmanen, Horst Knorrer
> > > > > > Emmanuel Kowalski
> > > > > > Urs Lang
> > > > > > Rahul Pandharipande
> > > > > > Richard Pink
> > > > > > Tristan Riviere
> > > > > > Dietmar Salamon
> > > > > > Martin Schweizer
> > > > > > Mete Soner
> > > > > > Michael Struwe
> > > > > > Benjamin Sudakov
> > > > > > Alain Sznitman
> > > > > > Josef Teichmann
> > > > > > Wendelin Werner
> > > > > > Thomas Willwacher
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Zurich ETH, physics dept
> > > > > > Charalampos Anastasiou, Niklas Beisert, Adrian Biland, Gianni Blatter, Marcella Carollo, Christian Degen, Leonardo Degiorgi, Gunther Dissertori, Klaus Ensslin, Tilman Esslinger, Jerome Faist, Matthias Gaberdiel, Aude Gehrmann-De Ridder, Vadim Geshkenbein, Christophorus Grab, Michele Graf, Jonathan Home, Roland Horisberger, Sebastian Huber, Thomas Markus Ihn, Atac Imamoglu, Steven Johnson, Ursula Keller, Klaus Kirch, Simon Lilly, Joel Mesot, Renatto Renner, Andre Rubbia, Werner Schmutz, Thomas Schulthess, Manfred Sigrist, Hans-Arno Synal, Matthias Troyer, Andreas Vaterlaus, Rainer Wallny, Andreas Wallraff, Werner Wegscheider, Audrey Zheludev, Oded Zilberberg
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > University Bern
> > > > > > Christian Leumann
> > > > > > Walter Benjamin
> > > > > > Emil Theodor Kocher
> > > > > > Kurt Wuthrich
> > > > > > Daniel Vassella
> > > > > > Rene Fasel
> > > > > > Mani Matter
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker, Henry M.. Van Driel, David J. Rowe, John W. Moffat, John F. Martin, Robert K. Logan, Albert E. Litherland, Roland List, Philipp Kronberg, James King, Anthony W. Key, Bob Holdom, Ron M. Farquhar, R. Nigel Edwards, David J. Dunlop, James Drummond, Tom E. Drake, R.Fraser Code, Richard C. Bailey, Robin Armstrong
> > > > >
> > > > > Chancellor Rose M. Patten
> > > > > Pres. Meric Gertler
> > > > >
> > > > > Univ Toronto math dept
> > > > > Mustafa Akcoglu, Spyros Alexakis, Edward Barbeau, Thomas Bloom, Man-Duen Choi, Stephen Cook, Chandler Davis, Nicholas Derzko, Eric Ellers, Ilya Gekhtman, Ian Graham, Steve Halpern, Wahidul Haque, Abe Igelfeld, Velimir Jurdjevic, Ivan Kupka, Anthony Lam, Michael Lorimer, James McCool, Eric Mendelsohn, Kunio Murasugi, Jeremy Quastel, Peter Rosenthal, Paul Selick, Dipak Sen, Rick Sharpe, Stuart Smith, Frank Tall, Steve Tanny
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Univ Western Ontario math dept
> > > > > Janusz Adamus, Tatyana Barron, Dan Christensen, Graham Denham, Ajneet Dhillon, Matthias Franz, John Jardine, Massoud Khalkhali, Nicole Lemire, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon
> > > > >
> > > > > Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz
> > > > > President Alan Shepard
> > > > > Amit Chakma (chem engr)
> > > > >
> > > > > Univ. Western Ontario physics dept
> > > > > Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang

2Jim Burns,Jan Burse,ETH Zurich,Tristan Riviere,Dietmar Salamon,Janusz Adamus,Tatyana Barron, keep polluting the minds of young with 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction.
> >
>
> Jim Burns who cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse spams sci.math 238 "Smullyan..." 2:05PM + 5:15PM
> > Jan Burse play act spamming everyday yet cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse,and his mindless 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction for Jan failed logic, unable to see Boole mixed up OR with AND truth tables.
> >
> > Jan Burse 61 "Smullyan's Proof...."
> > 
> >
> > 
> > > Fritz Feldhase 239 "Oh the Ambigarse 0^0..."
> > > > fuckdog spammer Fritz Feldhase 96 8:49 PM "An interesting defect..."
> > > > > Fuckdog spammer Dan Christensen & Jan Burse "An interesting defect in..." 87 on 6:12PM
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Why have these one line spammers in sci.math, day after day-- Mostowski Collapse (ETH Jan Burse) "An interesting defect in DC Proof". Is it to deflect the attention that ETH and Univ Western Ontario teach fake Logic 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction or is it to deflect ETH is too stupid to ask the question which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle and so ETH and Univ Western Ontario and Toronto daily spam sci.math to hog the front page with fake science.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why does Univ Western Ontario Dan Christensen and Jan Burse Zurich ETH have such a dumb stupid mind in physics? Never able to investigate the question-- what if we take the electron of atoms as the muon and subtract 105 from 945MeV and then take the 0.5MeV particle as Dirac's magnetic monopole. No, the dumb stupid worthless mind of Dan Christensen and Jan Burse in physics is never able to do such mental construction for they failed physics. For they failed physics because they failed LOGIC in that their pea sized brian still accepts the error filled Boole logic of 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Mostowski Collapse aka Jan Burse spam-- 4/11/22 -- "An interesting defect in DC proof"
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > My 5th published book
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
> > > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > > First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > File Size: 773 KB
> > > > > > > Print Length: 72 pages
> > > > > > > Publication Date: March 12, 2019
> > > > > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > > > > > Language: English
> > > > > > > ASIN: B07PMB69F5
> > > > > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> > > > > > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 

> > > > > > > Word Wise: Not Enabled
> > > > > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > > > > Screen Reader: Supported
> > > > > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> > > > > > > ETH Zurich
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Paul Biran, Marc Burger, Patrick Cheridito, Manfred Einsiedler, Paul Embrechts
> > > > > > > Giovanni Felder, Alessio Figalli, Norbert Hungerbuhler, Tom Ilmanen, Horst Knorrer
> > > > > > > Emmanuel Kowalski
> > > > > > > Urs Lang
> > > > > > > Rahul Pandharipande
> > > > > > > Richard Pink
> > > > > > > Tristan Riviere
> > > > > > > Dietmar Salamon
> > > > > > > Martin Schweizer
> > > > > > > Mete Soner
> > > > > > > Michael Struwe
> > > > > > > Benjamin Sudakov
> > > > > > > Alain Sznitman
> > > > > > > Josef Teichmann
> > > > > > > Wendelin Werner
> > > > > > > Thomas Willwacher
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Zurich ETH, physics dept
> > > > > > > Charalampos Anastasiou, Niklas Beisert, Adrian Biland, Gianni Blatter, Marcella Carollo, Christian Degen, Leonardo Degiorgi, Gunther Dissertori, Klaus Ensslin, Tilman Esslinger, Jerome Faist, Matthias Gaberdiel, Aude Gehrmann-De Ridder, Vadim Geshkenbein, Christophorus Grab, Michele Graf, Jonathan Home, Roland Horisberger, Sebastian Huber, Thomas Markus Ihn, Atac Imamoglu, Steven Johnson, Ursula Keller, Klaus Kirch, Simon Lilly, Joel Mesot, Renatto Renner, Andre Rubbia, Werner Schmutz, Thomas Schulthess, Manfred Sigrist, Hans-Arno Synal, Matthias Troyer, Andreas Vaterlaus, Rainer Wallny, Andreas Wallraff, Werner Wegscheider, Audrey Zheludev, Oded Zilberberg
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > University Bern
> > > > > > > Christian Leumann
> > > > > > > Walter Benjamin
> > > > > > > Emil Theodor Kocher
> > > > > > > Kurt Wuthrich
> > > > > > > Daniel Vassella
> > > > > > > Rene Fasel
> > > > > > > Mani Matter
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker, Henry M. Van Driel, David J. Rowe, John W. Moffat, John F. Martin, Robert K. Logan, Albert E. Litherland, Roland List, Philipp Kronberg, James King, Anthony W. Key, Bob Holdom, Ron M. Farquhar, R. Nigel Edwards, David J. Dunlop, James Drummond, Tom E. Drake, R.Fraser Code, Richard C. Bailey, Robin Armstrong
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Chancellor Rose M. Patten
> > > > > > Pres. Meric Gertler
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Univ Toronto math dept
> > > > > > Mustafa Akcoglu, Spyros Alexakis, Edward Barbeau, Thomas Bloom, Man-Duen Choi, Stephen Cook, Chandler Davis, Nicholas Derzko, Eric Ellers, Ilya Gekhtman, Ian Graham, Steve Halpern, Wahidul Haque, Abe Igelfeld, Velimir Jurdjevic, Ivan Kupka, Anthony Lam, Michael Lorimer, James McCool, Eric Mendelsohn, Kunio Murasugi, Jeremy Quastel, Peter Rosenthal, Paul Selick, Dipak Sen, Rick Sharpe, Stuart Smith, Frank Tall, Steve Tanny
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Univ Western Ontario math dept
> > > > > > Janusz Adamus, Tatyana Barron, Dan Christensen, Graham Denham, Ajneet Dhillon, Matthias Franz, John Jardine, Massoud Khalkhali, Nicole Lemire, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz
> > > > > > President Alan Shepard
> > > > > > Amit Chakma (chem engr)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Univ. Western Ontario physics dept
> > > > > > Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang

DC,Burse,ETH Zurich,Tristan Riviere,Dietmar Salamon,Janusz Adamus,Tatyana Barron, keep polluting the minds of young with 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction.
>

DC & Burse, decades long spamming shitheads of math-- 117 "Smullyan's Proof...." when these two math shitheads cannot even admit slant cut of cone is Oval never ellipse. And this includes Zurich ETH as agreeing with losers Christensen & Burse
Jim Burns who cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse spams sci..math 238 "Smullyan..." 2:05PM

> Jan Burse play act spamming everyday yet cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse,and his mindless 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction for Jan failed logic, unable to see Boole mixed up OR with AND truth tables.
>
> Jan Burse 61 "Smullyan's Proof...."
> 
>
> 
> > Fritz Feldhase 239 "Oh the Ambigarse 0^0..."
> > > fuckdog spammer Fritz Feldhase 96 8:49 PM "An interesting defect..."
> > > > Fuckdog spammer Dan Christensen & Jan Burse "An interesting defect in..." 87 on 6:12PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Why have these one line spammers in sci.math, day after day-- Mostowski Collapse (ETH Jan Burse) "An interesting defect in DC Proof". Is it to deflect the attention that ETH and Univ Western Ontario teach fake Logic 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction or is it to deflect ETH is too stupid to ask the question which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle and so ETH and Univ Western Ontario and Toronto daily spam sci.math to hog the front page with fake science.
> > > > >
> > > > > Why does Univ Western Ontario Dan Christensen and Jan Burse Zurich ETH have such a dumb stupid mind in physics? Never able to investigate the question-- what if we take the electron of atoms as the muon and subtract 105 from 945MeV and then take the 0.5MeV particle as Dirac's magnetic monopole. No, the dumb stupid worthless mind of Dan Christensen and Jan Burse in physics is never able to do such mental construction for they failed physics. For they failed physics because they failed LOGIC in that their pea sized brian still accepts the error filled Boole logic of 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mostowski Collapse aka Jan Burse spam-- 4/11/22 -- "An interesting defect in DC proof"
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > My 5th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
> > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > File Size: 773 KB
> > > > > > Print Length: 72 pages
> > > > > > Publication Date: March 12, 2019
> > > > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > > > > Language: English
> > > > > > ASIN: B07PMB69F5
> > > > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> > > > > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 

> > > > > > Word Wise: Not Enabled
> > > > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > > > Screen Reader: Supported
> > > > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> > > > > > ETH Zurich
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Paul Biran, Marc Burger, Patrick Cheridito, Manfred Einsiedler, Paul Embrechts
> > > > > > Giovanni Felder, Alessio Figalli, Norbert Hungerbuhler, Tom Ilmanen, Horst Knorrer
> > > > > > Emmanuel Kowalski
> > > > > > Urs Lang
> > > > > > Rahul Pandharipande
> > > > > > Richard Pink
> > > > > > Tristan Riviere
> > > > > > Dietmar Salamon
> > > > > > Martin Schweizer
> > > > > > Mete Soner
> > > > > > Michael Struwe
> > > > > > Benjamin Sudakov
> > > > > > Alain Sznitman
> > > > > > Josef Teichmann
> > > > > > Wendelin Werner
> > > > > > Thomas Willwacher
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Zurich ETH, physics dept
> > > > > > Charalampos Anastasiou, Niklas Beisert, Adrian Biland, Gianni Blatter, Marcella Carollo, Christian Degen, Leonardo Degiorgi, Gunther Dissertori, Klaus Ensslin, Tilman Esslinger, Jerome Faist, Matthias Gaberdiel, Aude Gehrmann-De Ridder, Vadim Geshkenbein, Christophorus Grab, Michele Graf, Jonathan Home, Roland Horisberger, Sebastian Huber, Thomas Markus Ihn, Atac Imamoglu, Steven Johnson, Ursula Keller, Klaus Kirch, Simon Lilly, Joel Mesot, Renatto Renner, Andre Rubbia, Werner Schmutz, Thomas Schulthess, Manfred Sigrist, Hans-Arno Synal, Matthias Troyer, Andreas Vaterlaus, Rainer Wallny, Andreas Wallraff, Werner Wegscheider, Audrey Zheludev, Oded Zilberberg
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > University Bern
> > > > > > Christian Leumann
> > > > > > Walter Benjamin
> > > > > > Emil Theodor Kocher
> > > > > > Kurt Wuthrich
> > > > > > Daniel Vassella
> > > > > > Rene Fasel
> > > > > > Mani Matter
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker, Henry M.. Van Driel, David J. Rowe, John W. Moffat, John F. Martin, Robert K. Logan, Albert E. Litherland, Roland List, Philipp Kronberg, James King, Anthony W. Key, Bob Holdom, Ron M. Farquhar, R. Nigel Edwards, David J. Dunlop, James Drummond, Tom E. Drake, R.Fraser Code, Richard C. Bailey, Robin Armstrong
> > > > >
> > > > > Chancellor Rose M. Patten
> > > > > Pres. Meric Gertler
> > > > >
> > > > > Univ Toronto math dept
> > > > > Mustafa Akcoglu, Spyros Alexakis, Edward Barbeau, Thomas Bloom, Man-Duen Choi, Stephen Cook, Chandler Davis, Nicholas Derzko, Eric Ellers, Ilya Gekhtman, Ian Graham, Steve Halpern, Wahidul Haque, Abe Igelfeld, Velimir Jurdjevic, Ivan Kupka, Anthony Lam, Michael Lorimer, James McCool, Eric Mendelsohn, Kunio Murasugi, Jeremy Quastel, Peter Rosenthal, Paul Selick, Dipak Sen, Rick Sharpe, Stuart Smith, Frank Tall, Steve Tanny
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Univ Western Ontario math dept
> > > > > Janusz Adamus, Tatyana Barron, Dan Christensen, Graham Denham, Ajneet Dhillon, Matthias Franz, John Jardine, Massoud Khalkhali, Nicole Lemire, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon
> > > > >
> > > > > Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz
> > > > > President Alan Shepard
> > > > > Amit Chakma (chem engr)
> > > > >
> > > > > Univ. Western Ontario physics dept
> > > > > Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang

DC,Burse,ETH Zurich,Tristan Riviere,Dietmar Salamon,Janusz Adamus,Tatyana Barron, keep polluting the minds of young with 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction.
>

DC & Burse, decades long spamming shitheads of math-- 117 "Smullyan's Proof...." when these two math shitheads cannot even admit slant cut of cone is Oval never ellipse. And this includes Zurich ETH as agreeing with losers Christensen & Burse
Jim Burns who cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse spams sci..math 238 "Smullyan..." 2:05PM
2> Jan Burse play act spamming everyday yet cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse,and his mindless 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction for Jan failed logic, unable to see Boole mixed up OR with AND truth tables.
>
> Jan Burse 61 "Smullyan's Proof...."

3> > Fritz Feldhase 239 "Oh the Ambigarse 0^0..."
> > > fuckdog spammer Fritz Feldhase 96 8:49 PM "An interesting defect..."
> > > > Fuckdog spammer Dan Christensen & Jan Burse "An interesting defect in..." 87 on 6:12PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Why have these one line spammers in sci.math, day after day-- Mostowski Collapse (ETH Jan Burse) "An interesting defect in DC Proof". Is it to deflect the attention that ETH and Univ Western Ontario teach fake Logic 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction or is it to deflect ETH is too stupid to ask the question which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle and so ETH and Univ Western Ontario and Toronto daily spam sci.math to hog the front page with fake science.
> > > > >
4> > > > > Why does Univ Western Ontario Dan Christensen and Jan Burse Zurich ETH have such a dumb stupid mind in physics? Never able to investigate the question-- what if we take the electron of atoms as the muon and subtract 105 from 945MeV and then take the 0.5MeV particle as Dirac's magnetic monopole. No, the dumb stupid worthless mind of Dan Christensen and Jan Burse in physics is never able to do such mental construction for they failed physics. For they failed physics because they failed LOGIC in that their pea sized brian still accepts the error filled Boole logic of 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mostowski Collapse aka Jan Burse spam-- 4/11/22 -- "An interesting defect in DC proof"
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > My 5th published book
> > > > > >
5> > > > > > Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
> > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > File Size: 773 KB
> > > > > > Print Length: 72 pages
> > > > > > Publication Date: March 12, 2019
> > > > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > > > > Language: English
> > > > > > ASIN: B07PMB69F5
> > > > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> > > > > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 

> > > > > > Word Wise: Not Enabled
> > > > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > > > Screen Reader: Supported

> > > > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
6> > > > > > ETH Zurich
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Paul Biran, Marc Burger, Patrick Cheridito, Manfred Einsiedler, Paul Embrechts
> > > > > > Giovanni Felder, Alessio Figalli, Norbert Hungerbuhler, Tom Ilmanen, Horst Knorrer
> > > > > > Emmanuel Kowalski
> > > > > > Urs Lang
> > > > > > Rahul Pandharipande
> > > > > > Richard Pink
> > > > > > Tristan Riviere
> > > > > > Dietmar Salamon
> > > > > > Martin Schweizer
> > > > > > Mete Soner
> > > > > > Michael Struwe
> > > > > > Benjamin Sudakov
> > > > > > Alain Sznitman
> > > > > > Josef Teichmann
> > > > > > Wendelin Werner
> > > > > > Thomas Willwacher
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Zurich ETH, physics dept
> > > > > > Charalampos Anastasiou, Niklas Beisert, Adrian Biland, Gianni Blatter, Marcella Carollo, Christian Degen, Leonardo Degiorgi, Gunther Dissertori, Klaus Ensslin, Tilman Esslinger, Jerome Faist, Matthias Gaberdiel, Aude Gehrmann-De Ridder, Vadim Geshkenbein, Christophorus Grab, Michele Graf, Jonathan Home, Roland Horisberger, Sebastian Huber, Thomas Markus Ihn, Atac Imamoglu, Steven Johnson, Ursula Keller, Klaus Kirch, Simon Lilly, Joel Mesot, Renatto Renner, Andre Rubbia, Werner Schmutz, Thomas Schulthess, Manfred Sigrist, Hans-Arno Synal, Matthias Troyer, Andreas Vaterlaus, Rainer Wallny, Andreas Wallraff, Werner Wegscheider, Audrey Zheludev, Oded Zilberberg
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > University Bern
> > > > > > Christian Leumann
> > > > > > Walter Benjamin
> > > > > > Emil Theodor Kocher
> > > > > > Kurt Wuthrich
> > > > > > Daniel Vassella
> > > > > > Rene Fasel
> > > > > > Mani Matter
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker, Henry M.. Van Driel, David J. Rowe, John W. Moffat, John F. Martin, Robert K. Logan, Albert E. Litherland, Roland List, Philipp Kronberg, James King, Anthony W. Key, Bob Holdom, Ron M. Farquhar, R. Nigel Edwards, David J. Dunlop, James Drummond, Tom E. Drake, R.Fraser Code, Richard C. Bailey, Robin Armstrong
> > > > >
> > > > > Chancellor Rose M. Patten
> > > > > Pres. Meric Gertler
> > > > >
> > > > > Univ Toronto math dept
> > > > > Mustafa Akcoglu, Spyros Alexakis, Edward Barbeau, Thomas Bloom, Man-Duen Choi, Stephen Cook, Chandler Davis, Nicholas Derzko, Eric Ellers, Ilya Gekhtman, Ian Graham, Steve Halpern, Wahidul Haque, Abe Igelfeld, Velimir Jurdjevic, Ivan Kupka, Anthony Lam, Michael Lorimer, James McCool, Eric Mendelsohn, Kunio Murasugi, Jeremy Quastel, Peter Rosenthal, Paul Selick, Dipak Sen, Rick Sharpe, Stuart Smith, Frank Tall, Steve Tanny
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
7> > > > > Univ Western Ontario math dept
> > > > > Janusz Adamus, Tatyana Barron, Dan Christensen, Graham Denham, Ajneet Dhillon, Matthias Franz, John Jardine, Massoud Khalkhali, Nicole Lemire, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon
> > > > >
> > > > > Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz
> > > > > President Alan Shepard
> > > > > Amit Chakma (chem engr)
> > > > >
> > > > > Univ. Western Ontario physics dept
> > > > > Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang

>Harvard's Dr Hau 🤡 of Math and Sheldon Glashow 🃏 of Physics Harvard "bozo"
> On Friday, November 11, 2022 at 10:02:52 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > fails at math and science:
> Re: Zelos asks why Harvard's Dr. Hau wants to fail in physics, by not turning off the light to see if light wave is a closed loop pencil ellipse that AP predicts. Is Dr.Hau stubborn and too ignorant to finish her experiment??
> by Michael Moroney Jan 18, 2021, 2:06:24 PM
>
> Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
> By Michael Moroney 1/23/18, 44 posts 461 views
>
> Why Kibo Parry M. do you have such a low opinion of Harvard and Dr. Hau?? Is it because she cannot turn a light switch off in "slow light experiment" and prove AP correct???
> >
> > My 53rd published book
> >
> > Quantum Entanglement, Physics series for High School, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Revised on 29Aug2021. This is AP's 53rd published book of science.
> >
> > Since this is for High School, I need to keep it as simple as possible, for students in High School are just barely getting acquainted with physics. So I must come down to their level of understanding and comprehending. I write this for High School since NOVA did a TV program on the subject of Quantum Entanglement and once it appears on NOVA, we have to be able, in science, to explain the topic to High School students. For sure enough, many High School students will be watching that program. This book will explain Quantum Entanglement for them.
> >
> > To explain Quantum Entanglement we have to start with what light is. And light comes in two forms, one is wave, and one is particle. Light is both these forms put together at all times. Light is both a wave and a particle simultaneously. In physics this is called a duality.
> >
> > Cover picture is a picture taken by my iphone of a web search of Slow Light Experiments.
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN : B07VMZ698G
> > Publication date : July 26, 2019
> > Language : English
> > File size : 1801 KB
> > Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited
> > Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > Screen Reader : Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > Word Wise : Enabled
> > Print length : 22 pages
> > Lending : Enabled
> > Best Sellers Rank: #214,475 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #2 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > ◦ #375 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #1,960 in Physics (Books) 

> > My 102nd published book
> >
> > Constant Maximum Speed of Light explained// Teaching Special Relativity to Grade School students//Student teaches professor series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 16Sept2022. And this is AP's 102nd published book of science.
> >
> >
> > Preface: So many discoveries in March of 2020, that I have to rush and publish this book especially for it is the foundation of all books on the subject of Special Relativity, not just my books but all books written on Special Relativity. There is a key underlying _Fundamental Principle of Special Relativity_, and that is the fact that a ray of light is not a single arrow moving in a direction but rather is a closed loop that always has a contact with its source of origin, whether the Sun or a flashlight, the light rays are closed loops; are circuits, and if you turn the flashlight off, (we cannot turn the Sun off) or the laser light in the Harvard BEC experiment, the BEC experiments with a laser light beam, if you switch off the light source, all the light instantly disappears. Whether the "slow light or the normal light, all vanishes at the same time when the light switch is turned off. So, the _Fundamental Principle of Special Relativity_, is that light comes in closed loops circuits, where you take a circle and you make it into a ray, and I call it a pencil ellipse, and we can best see and understand this fact from a electric extension cord. That cord looks like a straightline arrow, but if you look deeper, you will find it started out as a circle that has been shaped into a long looking straightline ray, a pencil ellipse.
> >
> > Cover Picture is my demonstration table at home where I took some shoe-laces of equal length. I took 3 shoelaces of length 400 millimeters, or if you prefer 40 centimeters. Three shoe-laces are all the same length. In one of them I tried to make a circle using a clip fastener to hold the ends together. My circle has a diameter of 127 millimeters or 12.7 centimeters. The second object below the circle is that same circle, only it is reformed so that it is a circle-line-ray, called a pencil ellipse, just like your electric extension cord is a circle-line-ray of copper wire, closed loop copper wire. The copper wire started out as a circle but was reformed into being a pencil ellipse. Now the third picture is that same shoe-lace length marked off by 3.14 diameters. Now be careful here. For the circumference of the circle divided by the diameter is the value of pi as a number 3.14. So when I say 3.14 diameters, that means 3 diameters plus a snippet of a diameter of 0.14. Notice the short segment, of a 0.14 piece of the diameter with 3 diameters each of 12.7 centimeters. The original circle was diameter 127 millimeters, or 12.7 centimeters. Caution: do not mistake any shadows in the demonstration. There are shadows in the third figure.
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0863L3X1Y
> > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 18, 2020
> > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > File size ‏ : ‎ 522 KB
> > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
> > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Best Sellers Rank: #3,443,925 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #460 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > ◦ #11,559 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #64,321 in Physics (Books)
> > 

> >
> > President Larry Summers
> > President now Lawrence Bacow
> >
> > Harvard Physics dept
> > Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner, Adam Cohen, Eugene Demler, Michael Desai
> > Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin, Gary Feldman, Douglas Finkbeiner, Melissa Franklin, Gerald Gabrielse, Howard Georgi, Sheldon Glashow, Roy Glauber, Jene Golovchenko, Markus Greiner, Roxanne Guenette, Girma Hailu, Bertrand Halperin, Lene Hau
> > Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, Efthimios Kaxiras, Philip Kim, John Kovac, Erel Levine
> > Mikhail Lukin, Logan McCarty, L. Mahadevan, Vinothan Manoharan, Eric Mazur, Masahiro Morii
> > David Morin, Julia Mundy, Cherry Murray, David Nelson, Kang Ni, Hongkun Park, William Paul
> > Peter Pershan, Mara Prentiss, Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, Isaac Silvera, Andrew Strominger, Christopher Stubbs, Cumrun Vafa, Ronald Walsworth, David Weitz, Robert Westervelt, Richard Wilson
> > Tai Wu, Amir Yacoby, Susanne Yelin, Xi Yin

>Harvard's Dr Hau 🤡 of Math and Sheldon Glashow 🃏 of Physics Harvard "bozo"

> On Friday, November 11, 2022 at 10:02:52 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > fails at math and science:
> Re: Zelos asks why Harvard's Dr. Hau wants to fail in physics, by not turning off the light to see if light wave is a closed loop pencil ellipse that AP predicts. Is Dr.Hau stubborn and too ignorant to finish her experiment??
> by Michael Moroney Jan 18, 2021, 2:06:24 PM
>
> Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
> By Michael Moroney 1/23/18, 44 posts 461 views
>
> Why Kibo Parry M. do you have such a low opinion of Harvard and Dr. Hau?? Is it because she cannot turn a light switch off in "slow light experiment" and prove AP correct???
> >
> > My 53rd published book
> >
> > Quantum Entanglement, Physics series for High School, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Revised on 29Aug2021. This is AP's 53rd published book of science.
> >
> > Since this is for High School, I need to keep it as simple as possible, for students in High School are just barely getting acquainted with physics. So I must come down to their level of understanding and comprehending. I write this for High School since NOVA did a TV program on the subject of Quantum Entanglement and once it appears on NOVA, we have to be able, in science, to explain the topic to High School students. For sure enough, many High School students will be watching that program. This book will explain Quantum Entanglement for them.
> >
> > To explain Quantum Entanglement we have to start with what light is. And light comes in two forms, one is wave, and one is particle. Light is both these forms put together at all times. Light is both a wave and a particle simultaneously. In physics this is called a duality.
> >
> > Cover picture is a picture taken by my iphone of a web search of Slow Light Experiments.
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN : B07VMZ698G
> > Publication date : July 26, 2019
> > Language : English
> > File size : 1801 KB
> > Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited
> > Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > Screen Reader : Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > Word Wise : Enabled
> > Print length : 22 pages
> > Lending : Enabled
> > Best Sellers Rank: #214,475 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #2 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > ◦ #375 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #1,960 in Physics (Books) 

> > My 102nd published book
> >
> > Constant Maximum Speed of Light explained// Teaching Special Relativity to Grade School students//Student teaches professor series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 16Sept2022. And this is AP's 102nd published book of science.
> >
> >
> > Preface: So many discoveries in March of 2020, that I have to rush and publish this book especially for it is the foundation of all books on the subject of Special Relativity, not just my books but all books written on Special Relativity. There is a key underlying _Fundamental Principle of Special Relativity_, and that is the fact that a ray of light is not a single arrow moving in a direction but rather is a closed loop that always has a contact with its source of origin, whether the Sun or a flashlight, the light rays are closed loops; are circuits, and if you turn the flashlight off, (we cannot turn the Sun off) or the laser light in the Harvard BEC experiment, the BEC experiments with a laser light beam, if you switch off the light source, all the light instantly disappears. Whether the "slow light or the normal light, all vanishes at the same time when the light switch is turned off. So, the _Fundamental Principle of Special Relativity_, is that light comes in closed loops circuits, where you take a circle and you make it into a ray, and I call it a pencil ellipse, and we can best see and understand this fact from a electric extension cord. That cord looks like a straightline arrow, but if you look deeper, you will find it started out as a circle that has been shaped into a long looking straightline ray, a pencil ellipse.
> >
> > Cover Picture is my demonstration table at home where I took some shoe-laces of equal length. I took 3 shoelaces of length 400 millimeters, or if you prefer 40 centimeters. Three shoe-laces are all the same length. In one of them I tried to make a circle using a clip fastener to hold the ends together. My circle has a diameter of 127 millimeters or 12.7 centimeters. The second object below the circle is that same circle, only it is reformed so that it is a circle-line-ray, called a pencil ellipse, just like your electric extension cord is a circle-line-ray of copper wire, closed loop copper wire. The copper wire started out as a circle but was reformed into being a pencil ellipse. Now the third picture is that same shoe-lace length marked off by 3.14 diameters. Now be careful here. For the circumference of the circle divided by the diameter is the value of pi as a number 3.14. So when I say 3.14 diameters, that means 3 diameters plus a snippet of a diameter of 0.14. Notice the short segment, of a 0.14 piece of the diameter with 3 diameters each of 12.7 centimeters. The original circle was diameter 127 millimeters, or 12.7 centimeters. Caution: do not mistake any shadows in the demonstration. There are shadows in the third figure.
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0863L3X1Y
> > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 18, 2020
> > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > File size ‏ : ‎ 522 KB
> > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
> > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Best Sellers Rank: #3,443,925 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #460 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > ◦ #11,559 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #64,321 in Physics (Books)
> > 

> >
> > President Larry Summers
> > President now Lawrence Bacow
> >
> > Harvard Physics dept
> > Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner, Adam Cohen, Eugene Demler, Michael Desai
> > Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin, Gary Feldman, Douglas Finkbeiner, Melissa Franklin, Gerald Gabrielse, Howard Georgi, Sheldon Glashow, Roy Glauber, Jene Golovchenko, Markus Greiner, Roxanne Guenette, Girma Hailu, Bertrand Halperin, Lene Hau
> > Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, Efthimios Kaxiras, Philip Kim, John Kovac, Erel Levine
> > Mikhail Lukin, Logan McCarty, L. Mahadevan, Vinothan Manoharan, Eric Mazur, Masahiro Morii
> > David Morin, Julia Mundy, Cherry Murray, David Nelson, Kang Ni, Hongkun Park, William Paul
> > Peter Pershan, Mara Prentiss, Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, Isaac Silvera, Andrew Strominger, Christopher Stubbs, Cumrun Vafa, Ronald Walsworth, David Weitz, Robert Westervelt, Richard Wilson
> > Tai Wu, Amir Yacoby, Susanne Yelin, Xi Yin

>Harvard's Dr Hau 🤡 of Math and Sheldon Glashow 🃏 of Physics Harvard "bozo"
> On Friday, November 11, 2022 at 10:02:52 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > fails at math and science:
Why Kibo Parry M. do you have such a low opinion of Harvard and Dr. Hau?? Is it because she cannot turn a light switch off in "slow light experiment" and prove AP correct???

> Re: Zelos asks why Harvard's Dr. Hau wants to fail in physics, by not turning off the light to see if light wave is a closed loop pencil ellipse that AP predicts. Is Dr.Hau stubborn and too ignorant to finish her experiment??
> by Michael Moroney Jan 18, 2021, 2:06:24 PM
>
> Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
> By Michael Moroney 1/23/18, 44 posts 461 views
>
> >
> > My 53rd published book
> >
> > Quantum Entanglement, Physics series for High School, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Revised on 29Aug2021. This is AP's 53rd published book of science.
> >
> > Since this is for High School, I need to keep it as simple as possible, for students in High School are just barely getting acquainted with physics. So I must come down to their level of understanding and comprehending. I write this for High School since NOVA did a TV program on the subject of Quantum Entanglement and once it appears on NOVA, we have to be able, in science, to explain the topic to High School students. For sure enough, many High School students will be watching that program. This book will explain Quantum Entanglement for them.
> >
> > To explain Quantum Entanglement we have to start with what light is. And light comes in two forms, one is wave, and one is particle. Light is both these forms put together at all times. Light is both a wave and a particle simultaneously. In physics this is called a duality.
> >
> > Cover picture is a picture taken by my iphone of a web search of Slow Light Experiments.
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN : B07VMZ698G
> > Publication date : July 26, 2019
> > Language : English
> > File size : 1801 KB
> > Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited
> > Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > Screen Reader : Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > Word Wise : Enabled
> > Print length : 22 pages
> > Lending : Enabled
> > Best Sellers Rank: #214,475 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #2 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > ◦ #375 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #1,960 in Physics (Books) 

> > My 102nd published book
> >
> > Constant Maximum Speed of Light explained// Teaching Special Relativity to Grade School students//Student teaches professor series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 16Sept2022. And this is AP's 102nd published book of science.
> >
> >
> > Preface: So many discoveries in March of 2020, that I have to rush and publish this book especially for it is the foundation of all books on the subject of Special Relativity, not just my books but all books written on Special Relativity. There is a key underlying _Fundamental Principle of Special Relativity_, and that is the fact that a ray of light is not a single arrow moving in a direction but rather is a closed loop that always has a contact with its source of origin, whether the Sun or a flashlight, the light rays are closed loops; are circuits, and if you turn the flashlight off, (we cannot turn the Sun off) or the laser light in the Harvard BEC experiment, the BEC experiments with a laser light beam, if you switch off the light source, all the light instantly disappears. Whether the "slow light or the normal light, all vanishes at the same time when the light switch is turned off. So, the _Fundamental Principle of Special Relativity_, is that light comes in closed loops circuits, where you take a circle and you make it into a ray, and I call it a pencil ellipse, and we can best see and understand this fact from a electric extension cord. That cord looks like a straightline arrow, but if you look deeper, you will find it started out as a circle that has been shaped into a long looking straightline ray, a pencil ellipse.
> >
> > Cover Picture is my demonstration table at home where I took some shoe-laces of equal length. I took 3 shoelaces of length 400 millimeters, or if you prefer 40 centimeters. Three shoe-laces are all the same length. In one of them I tried to make a circle using a clip fastener to hold the ends together. My circle has a diameter of 127 millimeters or 12.7 centimeters. The second object below the circle is that same circle, only it is reformed so that it is a circle-line-ray, called a pencil ellipse, just like your electric extension cord is a circle-line-ray of copper wire, closed loop copper wire. The copper wire started out as a circle but was reformed into being a pencil ellipse. Now the third picture is that same shoe-lace length marked off by 3.14 diameters. Now be careful here. For the circumference of the circle divided by the diameter is the value of pi as a number 3.14. So when I say 3.14 diameters, that means 3 diameters plus a snippet of a diameter of 0.14. Notice the short segment, of a 0.14 piece of the diameter with 3 diameters each of 12.7 centimeters. The original circle was diameter 127 millimeters, or 12.7 centimeters. Caution: do not mistake any shadows in the demonstration. There are shadows in the third figure.
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0863L3X1Y
> > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 18, 2020
> > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > File size ‏ : ‎ 522 KB
> > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

> > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
> > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Best Sellers Rank: #3,443,925 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #460 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > ◦ #11,559 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #64,321 in Physics (Books)
> > 

> >
> > President Larry Summers
> > President now Lawrence Bacow
> >
> > Harvard Physics dept
> > Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner, Adam Cohen, Eugene Demler, Michael Desai
> > Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin, Gary Feldman, Douglas Finkbeiner, Melissa Franklin, Gerald Gabrielse, Howard Georgi, Sheldon Glashow, Roy Glauber, Jene Golovchenko, Markus Greiner, Roxanne Guenette, Girma Hailu, Bertrand Halperin, Lene Hau
> > Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, Efthimios Kaxiras, Philip Kim, John Kovac, Erel Levine
> > Mikhail Lukin, Logan McCarty, L. Mahadevan, Vinothan Manoharan, Eric Mazur, Masahiro Morii
> > David Morin, Julia Mundy, Cherry Murray, David Nelson, Kang Ni, Hongkun Park, William Paul
> > Peter Pershan, Mara Prentiss, Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, Isaac Silvera, Andrew Strominger, Christopher Stubbs, Cumrun Vafa, Ronald Walsworth, David Weitz, Robert Westervelt, Richard Wilson
> > Tai Wu, Amir Yacoby, Susanne Yelin, Xi Yin

On 10/31/2022 9:15 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Shitheads of math and science, Dan Christensen & Jan Burse need to be thrown out of sci.math-- go to sci.logic where they can ramble their mindless of ellipse a conic, of 2 OR 1 = 3, AND as subtraction, of 0.5MeV particle as electron when it is the muon

"Pale-Hued Mini-Scrotum"

UWO Linda Hasenfratz 🤡 of Math and Rose M.Patten Toronto Uni 🃏 of Physics "bozo"
> On Friday, November 11, 2022 at 10:02:52 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > fails at math and science:

Rose and Linda, why can no professor at your schools admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse, or even admit that 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction is mindless idiocy, yet your schools, especially the imbecile Dan Christensen keeps teaching this Anti-science.

Chancellor Rose M. Patten
Pres. Meric Gertler

Univ Toronto math dept
Mustafa Akcoglu, Spyros Alexakis, Edward Barbeau, Thomas Bloom, Man-Duen Choi, Stephen Cook, Chandler Davis, Nicholas Derzko, Eric Ellers, Ilya Gekhtman, Ian Graham, Steve Halpern, Wahidul Haque, Abe Igelfeld, Velimir Jurdjevic, Ivan Kupka, Anthony Lam, Michael Lorimer, James McCool, Eric Mendelsohn, Kunio Murasugi, Jeremy Quastel, Peter Rosenthal, Paul Selick, Dipak Sen, Rick Sharpe, Stuart Smith, Frank Tall, Steve Tanny

Univ Western Ontario math dept
Janusz Adamus, Tatyana  Barron,   Dan Christensen, Graham Denham, Ajneet Dhillon, Matthias  Franz, John Jardine, Massoud Khalkhali, Nicole Lemire, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon

Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz
President Alan Shepard
Amit Chakma (chem engr)

Univ. Western Ontario physics dept
Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang

Ruth Charney, Ken Ribet, Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Ken Ribet, Andrew Beal, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Gerald Edgar, AMS, no-one there can do a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, all they can offer is a limit analysis, so shoddy in logic they never realized that "analyzing" is not the same as "proving" for analyzing is much in the same as "measuring but not proving". And yet, none can do a geometry proof and the reason is quite clear for none can even see that the slant cut in single right-circular cone is a Oval, never the ellipse. So they could never do a geometry proof of FTC even if they wanted to. For they have no logical geometry brain to begin to do anything geometrical. Is it that Andrew Wiles and Terence Tao cannot understand the slant cut in single cone is an Oval, never the ellipse, or is it the foolish Boole logic they teach of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction? Not having a Logical brain to do math, for any rational person would be upset by Wiles, Tao saying truth table of AND is TFFF when it actually is TTTF. Is that why neither Terence Tao or Andrew Wiles can do a geometry proof Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?

Maybe they need to take up Earle Jones offer to wash dishes or pots at Stanford Univ or where ever, for they sure cannot do mathematics.
Why are these people failures of Math?? For none can even contemplate these 4 questions.

1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.

Is Jim Holt, Virginia Klenk, David Agler, Susanne K. Langer, Gary M. Hardegree, Raymond M. Smullyan,
John Venn, William Gustason, Richmond H. Thomason, more of propagandists and belong in "Abnormal Psychology" dept than in the department of logic, like Dan Christensen a laugh a minute logician? Probably because none can admit slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse, due to axes of symmetry for cone and oval have 1 while ellipse has 2. Why they cannot even count beyond 1. Yet their minds were never good enough to see the error nor admit to their mistakes. They failed logic so badly they accept Boole's insane AND truth table of TFFF when it is TTTF avoiding the painful 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. Or is it because none of these logicians has a single marble of logic in their entire brain to realize calculus requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, not a "limit analysis" for analysis is like a measurement, not a proving exercise. Analysis does not prove, only adds data and facts, but never is a proof of itself. I analyze things daily, and none of which is a proof. So are all these logicians like what Clutterfreak the propaganda stooge says they are.

> On Friday, July 2, 2021 at 9:47:42 AM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> > You may be giving him too much credit here. Judging by his bizarre antics here, he has given up obtaining any kind of positive recognition.
> >
> > Dan
>
> Partial List of the World's Crackpot Logicians-- should be in a college Abnormal-Psychology department, not Logic//
>
> Peter Bruce Andrews, Lennart Aqvist, Henk Barendregt, John Lane Bell, Nuel Belnap,
> Paul Benacerraf, Jean Paul Van Bendegem, Johan van Benthem, Jean-Yves Beziau,
> Andrea Bonomi, Nicolas Bourbaki (a group of logic fumblers), Alan Richard Bundy, Gregory Chaitin,
> Jack Copeland, John Corcoran, Dirk van Dalen, Martin Davis, Michael A.E. Dummett, John Etchemendy, Hartry Field, Kit Fine, Melvin Fitting, Matthew Foreman, Michael Fourman,
> Harvey Friedman, Dov Gabbay, L.T.F. Gamut (group of logic fumblers), Sol Garfunkel, Jean-Yves Girard, Siegfried Gottwald, Jeroen Groenendijk, Susan Haack, Leo Harrington, William Alvin Howard,
> Ronald Jensen, Dick de Jongh, David Kaplan, Alexander S. Kechris, Howard Jerome Keisler,
> Robert Kowalski, Georg Kreisel, Saul Kripke, Kenneth Kunen, Karel Lambert, Penelope Maddy,
> David Makinson, Isaac Malitz, Gary R. Mar, Donald A. Martin, Per Martin-Lof,Yiannis N. Moschovakis, Jeff Paris, Charles Parsons, Solomon Passy, Lorenzo Pena, Dag Prawitz,
> Graham Priest, Michael O. Rabin, Gerald Sacks, Dana Scott, Stewart Shapiro, Theodore Slaman,
> Robert M. Solovay, John R. Steel, Martin Stokhof, Anne Sjerp Troelstra, Alasdair Urquhart,
> Moshe Y. Vardi, W. Hugh Woodin, John Woods
>
> Now I should include the authors of Logic textbooks for they, more than most, perpetuate and crank the error filled logic, the Horrible Error of 2 OR 1 = 3 with 2 AND 1 = 1, that is forced down the throats of young students, making them cripples of ever thinking straight and clearly.
>
> Many of these authors have passed away but their error filled books are a scourge to modern education
>
> George Boole, William Jevons, Bertrand Russell, Kurt Godel, Rudolf Carnap,
> Ludwig Wittgenstein, Willard Quine, Alfred North Whitehead, Irving Copi, Michael Withey,
> Patrick Hurley, Harry J Gensler, David Kelley, Jesse Bollinger, Theodore Sider,
> David Barker-Plummer, I. C. Robledo, John Nolt, Peter Smith, Stan Baronett, Jim Holt,
> Virginia Klenk, David Agler, Susanne K. Langer, Gary M. Hardegree, Raymond M. Smullyan,
> John Venn, William Gustason, Richmond H. Thomason,

> > #5-1, 134th published book
> >
> > > > > Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already written the series of TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS in a 7 volume, 8 book set. This would be the first book in that 8 book set (one of the books is a companion book to 1st year college). But I suppose that I needed to write the full series before I could write the Introduction and know what I had to talk about and talk about in a logical progression order. Sounds paradoxical in a sense, that I needed to write the full series first and then go back and write the Introduction. But in another sense, hard to write an introduction on something you have not really fully done and completed. For example to know what is error filled Old Math and to list those errors in a logical order requires me to write the full 7 volumes in order to list in order the mistakes.
> >
> > Cover Picture: Mathematics begins with counting, with numbers, with quantity. But counting numbers needs geometry for something to count in the first place. So here in this picture of the generalized Hydrogen atom of chemistry and physics is a torus geometry of 8 rings of a proton torus and one ring where my fingers are, is a equator ring that is the muon and thrusting through the proton torus at the equator of the torus. So we count 9 rings in all. So math is created by atoms and math numbers exist because atoms have many geometry figures to count. And geometry exists because atoms have shapes and different figures.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08K2XQB4M
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ September 24, 2020
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 576 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 23 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Best Sellers Rank: #224,974 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #3 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > ◦ #23 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #182 in Calculus (Books)
> >
> >
> >
> > #5-2, 45th published book
> >
> > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > #1 New Releasein General Geometry
> >
> >
> > Last revision was 2NOV2020. And this is AP's 45th published book of science.
> > Preface: Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education.
> >
> > This is a textbook series in several volumes that carries every person through all his/her math education starting age 5 up to age 26. Volume 2 is for age 5 year old to that of senior in High School, that is needed to do both science and math. Every other math book is incidental to this series of Teaching True Mathematics.
> >
> > It is a journal-textbook because Amazon's Kindle offers me the ability to edit overnight, and to change the text, almost on a daily basis. A unique first in education textbooks-- almost a continual overnight editing. Adding new text, correcting text. Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education. Volume 3 carries the Freshperson in College for their math calculus education.
> >
> > Cover Picture: The Numbers as Integers from 0 to 100, and 10 Grid when dividing by 10, and part of the 100 Grid when dividing by 100. Decimal Grid Numbers are the true numbers of mathematics. The Reals, the rationals & irrationals, the algebraic & transcendentals, the imaginary & Complex, and the negative-numbers are all fake numbers. For, to be a true number, you have to "be counted" by mathematical induction. The smallest Grid system is the Decimal 10 Grid.
> >
> > Length: 399 pages
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07RG7BVZW
> > Publication date ‏ : ‎ May 2, 2019
> > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > File size ‏ : ‎ 2023 KB
> > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Print length ‏ : ‎ 399 pages
> > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Best Sellers Rank: #235,426 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > #15 in General Geometry
> > #223 in Geometry & Topology (Books)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > #5-3, 55th published book
> >
> > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 25Jun2021. And this is AP's 55th published book of science.
> >
> > Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
> >
> > Preface: This is volume 3, book 3 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Freshperson students, 1st year college students of age 18-19. It is the continuation of volume 2 for ages 5 through 18 years old.
> >
> > The main major topic is the AP-EM equations of electricity and magnetism, the mathematics for the laws of electricity and magnetism; what used to be called the Maxwell Equations of Physics. The 1st Year College Math has to prepare all students with the math for all the sciences. So 1st year college Math is like a huge intersection station that has to prepare students with the math they need to do the hard sciences such as physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, geology, etc. What this means is, 1st year college is calculus that allows the student to work with electricity and magnetism. All the math that is needed to enable students to do electricity and magnetism.. In Old Math before this textbook, those Old Math textbooks would end in 1/3 of the text about Arclength, vector space, div, curl, Line Integral, Green's, Stokes, Divergence theorem trying to reach and be able to teach Maxwell Equations. But sadly, barely any Old Math classroom reached that 1/3 ending of the textbook, and left all those college students without any math to tackle electricity and magnetism. And most of Old Math was just muddle headed wrong even if they covered the last 1/3 of the textbook. And that is totally unacceptable in science. This textbook fixes that huge hole and gap in Old Math education.
> >
> > And there is no way around it, that a course in 1st year College Calculus is going to do a lot of hands on experiment with electricity and magnetism, and is required of the students to buy a list of physics apparatus-- multimeter, galvanometer, coil, bar magnet, alligator clip wires, electromagnet, iron filing case, and possibly even a 12 volt transformer, all shown in the cover picture. The beginning of this textbook and the middle section all leads into the ending of this textbook-- we learn the AP-EM Equations and how to use those equations. And there is no escaping the fact that it has to be hands on physics experiments in the classroom of mathematics.
> >
> > But, do not be scared, for this is all easy easy easy. For if you passed and enjoyed Volume 2 TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, then I promise you, you will not be stressed with Volume 3, for I go out of my way to make it clear and understandable.
> >
> > Warning: this is a Journal Textbook, meaning that I am constantly adding new material, constantly revising, constantly fixing mistakes or making things more clear. So if you read this book in August of 2019, chances are it is different when you read it in September 2019. Ebooks allow authors the freedom to improve their textbooks on a ongoing basis.
> >
> > The 1st year college math should be about the math that prepares any and all students for science, whether they branch out into physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, or math, they should have all the math in 1st year college that will carry them through those science studies. I make every attempt possible to make math easy to understand, easy to learn and hopefully fun.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07WN9RVXD
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ August 16, 2019
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1390 KB
> > • Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 236 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Best Sellers Rank: #1,377,070 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #411 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #2,480 in Calculus (Books)
> >
> >
> > 

> >
> > #5-4, 56th published book
> >
> > COLLEGE CALCULUS GUIDE to help students recognize math professor spam from math truth & reality// math textbook series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> >
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> >
> > #1 New Releasein 15-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> >
> >
> > This textbook is the companion guide book to AP's Teaching True Mathematics, 1st year College. It is realized that Old Math will take a long time in removing their fake math, so in the interim period, this Guide book is designed to speed up the process of removing fake Calculus out of the education system, the fewer students we punish with forcing them with fake Calculus, the better we are.
> > Cover Picture: This book is part comedy, for when you cannot reason with math professors that they have many errors to fix, that 90% of their Calculus is in error, you end up resorting to comedy, making fun of them, to prod them to fix their errors. To prod them to "do right by the students of the world" not their entrenched propaganda.
> > Length: 54 pages
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > File Size: 1035 KB
> > Print Length: 64 pages
> > Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
> > Publication Date: August 18, 2019
> > Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
> > Language: English
> > ASIN: B07WNGLQ85
> > Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 

> > Word Wise: Not Enabled
> > Lending: Enabled
> > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #253,425 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > #38 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > #318 in Calculus (Books)
> > #48 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > 

> > #5-5, 72nd published book
> >
> > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 4 for age 19-20 Sophomore-year College, math textbook series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Preface: This is volume 4, book 5 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Sophomore-year students, students of age 19-20. It is the continuation of volume 3 in the end-goal of learning how to do the mathematics of electricity and magnetism, because everything in physics is nothing but atoms and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. To know math, you have to know physics. We learned the Calculus of 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. But we did not learn the calculus of those equations for 3rd dimension. So, you can say that Sophomore year College math is devoted to 3D Calculus. This sophomore year college we fill in all the calculus, and we start over on all of Geometry, for geometry needs a modern day revision. And pardon me for this book is mostly reading, and the students doing less calculations. The classroom of this textbook has the teacher go through page by page to get the students comprehending and understanding of what is being taught. There are many hands on experiments also.
> >
> > Cover Picture shows some toruses, some round some square, torus of rings, thin strips of rings or squares and shows them laid flat. That is Calculus of 3rd dimension that lays a ring in a torus to be flat in 2nd dimension..
> > Length: 105 pages
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0828M34VL
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2019
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 952 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 105 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Best Sellers Rank: #242,037 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #36 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #219 in Calculus (Books)
> >
> >
> > #5-6, 75th published book
> >
> > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 5 for age 20-21 Junior-year of College, math textbook series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
> >
> > This is volume 5, book 6 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Junior-year students, students of age 20-21. In first year college Calculus we learned calculus of the 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. And in sophomore year we learned calculus of 3rd dimension to complete our study of the mathematics needed to do the physics of electricity and magnetism. Now, junior year college, we move onto something different, for we focus mostly on logic now and especially the logic of what is called the "mathematical proof". Much of what the student has learned about mathematics so far has been given to her or him as stated knowledge, accept it as true because I say so. But now we are going to do math proofs. Oh, yes, we did prove a few items here and there, such as why the Decimal Grid Number system is so special, such as the Pythagorean Theorem, such as the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with its right-triangle hinged up or down. But many ideas we did not prove, we just stated them and expected all students to believe them true. And you are now juniors in college and we are going to start to prove many of those ideas and teach you "what is a math proof". Personally, I myself feel that the math proof is overrated, over hyped. But the math proof is important for one reason-- it makes you better scientists of knowing what is true and what is a shaky idea. A math proof is the same as "thinking straight and thinking clearly". And all scientists need to think straight and think clearly. But before we get to the Mathematics Proof, we have to do Probability and Statistics.. What you learned in Grade School, then High School, then College, called Sigma Error, now becomes Probability and Statistics. It is important because all sciences including mathematics needs and uses Probability and Statistics. So, our job for junior-year of college mathematics is all cut out and ahead for us, no time to waste, let us get going.
> >
> > Cover Picture: is a sample of the Array Proof, a proof the ellipse is not a conic but rather a cylinder cut wherein the oval is the slant cut of a cone, not the ellipse.
> >
> > Length: 175 pages
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN : B0836F1YF6
> > Publication date : December 26, 2019
> > Language : English
> > File size : 741 KB
> > Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > Screen Reader : Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > Print length : 175 pages
> > Lending : Enabled
> > Best Sellers Rank: #3,768,255 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #3,591 in Probability & Statistics (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #19,091 in Probability & Statistics (Books)
> >
> >
> >
> > #5-7, 89th published book
> >
> > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 6 for age 21-22 Senior-year of College, math textbook series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium 2020
> >
> > Last revision was 6Feb2021.
> > Preface: This is the last year of College for mathematics and we have to mostly summarize all of mathematics as best we can. And set a new pattern to prepare students going on to math graduate school. A new pattern of work habits, because graduate school is more of research and explore on your own. So in this final year, I am going to eliminate tests, and have it mostly done as homework assignments.
> >
> > Cover Picture: Again and again, many times in math, the mind is not good enough alone to think straight and clear, and you need tools to hands-on see how it works. Here is a collection of tools for this senior year college classes. There is a pencil, clipboard, graph paper, compass, divider, protractor, slide-ruler. And for this year we spend a lot of time on the parallelepiped, showing my wood model, and showing my erector set model held together by wire loops in the corners. The plastic square is there only to hold up the erector set model.
> >
> > Length: 110 pages
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B084V11BGY
> > Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 15, 2020
> > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > File size ‏ : ‎ 826 KB
> > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Print length ‏ : ‎ 110 pages
> > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Best Sellers Rank: #224,965 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #345 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #373 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #2,256 in Physics (Books)
> >
> > #5-8, 90th published book
> >
> > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 7 for age 22-26 Graduate school, math textbook series, book 8 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium 2020
> >
> > Last revised 1NOV2020. This was AP's 90th published book of science.
> >
> > Preface: This is College Graduate School mathematics. Congratulations, you made it this far. To me, graduate school is mostly research, research mathematics and that means also physics. So it is going to be difficult to do math without physics. Of course, we focus on the mathematics of these research projects.
> >
> > My textbook for Graduate school is just a template and the professors teaching the graduate students are free of course to follow their own projects, but in terms of being physics and math combined. What I list below is a template for possible projects.
> >
> > So, in the below projects, I list 36 possible research projects that a graduate student my like to undertake, or partake. I list those 36 projects with a set of parentheses like this (1), (2), (3), etc. Not to be confused with the chapters listing as 1), 2), 3), etc. I list 36 projects but the professor can offer his/her own list, and I expect students with their professor, to pick a project and to monitor the student as to his/her progresses through the research. I have listed each project then cited some of my own research into these projects, below each project is an entry. Those entries are just a help or helper in getting started or acquainted with the project. The entry has a date time group and a newsgroup that I posted to such as sci.math or plutonium-atom-universe Google newsgroups. Again the entry is just a help or helper in getting started.
> >
> > Now instead of picking one or two projects for your Graduate years of study, some may select all 36 projects where you write a short paper on each project. Some may be bored with just one or two projects and opt for all 36.
> >
> > Cover Picture: A photo by my iphone of a page on Permutations of the Jacobs book Mathematics: A Human Endeavor, 1970. One of the best textbooks ever written in Old Math, not for its contents because there are many errors, but for its teaching style. It is extremely rare to find a math textbook written for the student to learn. Probably because math professors rarely learned how to teach in the first place; only learned how to unintentionally obfuscate. The page I photographed is important because it is the interface between geometry's perimeter or surface area versus geometry's area or volume, respectively. Or, an interface of pure numbers with that of geometry. But I have more to say on this below.
> > Length: 296 pages
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B085DF8R7V
> > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 1, 2020
> > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > File size ‏ : ‎ 828 KB
> > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Print length ‏ : ‎ 296 pages
> > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Best Sellers Rank: #224,981 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #13 in General Geometry
> > ◦ #213 in Geometry & Topology (Books)
> >
> >
> >
> > #5-8, 160th published book
> >
> > MATHOPEDIA-- List of 80 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 28Apr2022. And this is AP's 160th book of Science.
> > Preface:
> > A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.
> > The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.
> > The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.
> > Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.
> > I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09MZTLRL5
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2021
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1149 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 65 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

Rose M.Patten 🤡 of Math Univ Toronto and Linda Hasenfratz UWO🃏 of Physics "bozo"
> On Friday, November 11, 2022 at 10:02:52 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > fails at math and science:

Rose and Linda, why can no professor at your schools admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse, or even admit that 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction is mindless idiocy, yet your schools, especially the imbecile Dan Christensen keeps teaching this Anti-science.

Chancellor Rose M. Patten
Pres. Meric Gertler

Univ Toronto math dept
Mustafa Akcoglu, Spyros Alexakis, Edward Barbeau, Thomas Bloom, Man-Duen Choi, Stephen Cook, Chandler Davis, Nicholas Derzko, Eric Ellers, Ilya Gekhtman, Ian Graham, Steve Halpern, Wahidul Haque, Abe Igelfeld, Velimir Jurdjevic, Ivan Kupka, Anthony Lam, Michael Lorimer, James McCool, Eric Mendelsohn, Kunio Murasugi, Jeremy Quastel, Peter Rosenthal, Paul Selick, Dipak Sen, Rick Sharpe, Stuart Smith, Frank Tall, Steve Tanny

Univ Western Ontario math dept
Janusz Adamus, Tatyana  Barron,   Dan Christensen, Graham Denham, Ajneet Dhillon, Matthias  Franz, John Jardine, Massoud Khalkhali, Nicole Lemire, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon

Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz
President Alan Shepard
Amit Chakma (chem engr)

Univ. Western Ontario physics dept
Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang

Ruth Charney, Ken Ribet, Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Ken Ribet, Andrew Beal, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Gerald Edgar, AMS, no-one there can do a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, all they can offer is a limit analysis, so shoddy in logic they never realized that "analyzing" is not the same as "proving" for analyzing is much in the same as "measuring but not proving". And yet, none can do a geometry proof and the reason is quite clear for none can even see that the slant cut in single right-circular cone is a Oval, never the ellipse. So they could never do a geometry proof of FTC even if they wanted to. For they have no logical geometry brain to begin to do anything geometrical. Is it that Andrew Wiles and Terence Tao cannot understand the slant cut in single cone is an Oval, never the ellipse, or is it the foolish Boole logic they teach of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction? Not having a Logical brain to do math, for any rational person would be upset by Wiles, Tao saying truth table of AND is TFFF when it actually is TTTF. Is that why neither Terence Tao or Andrew Wiles can do a geometry proof Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?

Maybe they need to take up Earle Jones offer to wash dishes or pots at Stanford Univ or where ever, for they sure cannot do mathematics.
Why are these people failures of Math?? For none can even contemplate these 4 questions.

1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.

Is Jim Holt, Virginia Klenk, David Agler, Susanne K. Langer, Gary M. Hardegree, Raymond M. Smullyan,
John Venn, William Gustason, Richmond H. Thomason, more of propagandists and belong in "Abnormal Psychology" dept than in the department of logic, like Dan Christensen a laugh a minute logician? Probably because none can admit slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse, due to axes of symmetry for cone and oval have 1 while ellipse has 2. Why they cannot even count beyond 1. Yet their minds were never good enough to see the error nor admit to their mistakes. They failed logic so badly they accept Boole's insane AND truth table of TFFF when it is TTTF avoiding the painful 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. Or is it because none of these logicians has a single marble of logic in their entire brain to realize calculus requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, not a "limit analysis" for analysis is like a measurement, not a proving exercise. Analysis does not prove, only adds data and facts, but never is a proof of itself. I analyze things daily, and none of which is a proof. So are all these logicians like what Clutterfreak the propaganda stooge says they are.

> On Friday, July 2, 2021 at 9:47:42 AM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> > You may be giving him too much credit here. Judging by his bizarre antics here, he has given up obtaining any kind of positive recognition.
> >
> > Dan
>
> Partial List of the World's Crackpot Logicians-- should be in a college Abnormal-Psychology department, not Logic//
>
> Peter Bruce Andrews, Lennart Aqvist, Henk Barendregt, John Lane Bell, Nuel Belnap,
> Paul Benacerraf, Jean Paul Van Bendegem, Johan van Benthem, Jean-Yves Beziau,
> Andrea Bonomi, Nicolas Bourbaki (a group of logic fumblers), Alan Richard Bundy, Gregory Chaitin,
> Jack Copeland, John Corcoran, Dirk van Dalen, Martin Davis, Michael A.E. Dummett, John Etchemendy, Hartry Field, Kit Fine, Melvin Fitting, Matthew Foreman, Michael Fourman,
> Harvey Friedman, Dov Gabbay, L.T.F. Gamut (group of logic fumblers), Sol Garfunkel, Jean-Yves Girard, Siegfried Gottwald, Jeroen Groenendijk, Susan Haack, Leo Harrington, William Alvin Howard,
> Ronald Jensen, Dick de Jongh, David Kaplan, Alexander S. Kechris, Howard Jerome Keisler,
> Robert Kowalski, Georg Kreisel, Saul Kripke, Kenneth Kunen, Karel Lambert, Penelope Maddy,
> David Makinson, Isaac Malitz, Gary R. Mar, Donald A. Martin, Per Martin-Lof,Yiannis N. Moschovakis, Jeff Paris, Charles Parsons, Solomon Passy, Lorenzo Pena, Dag Prawitz,
> Graham Priest, Michael O. Rabin, Gerald Sacks, Dana Scott, Stewart Shapiro, Theodore Slaman,
> Robert M. Solovay, John R. Steel, Martin Stokhof, Anne Sjerp Troelstra, Alasdair Urquhart,
> Moshe Y. Vardi, W. Hugh Woodin, John Woods
>
> Now I should include the authors of Logic textbooks for they, more than most, perpetuate and crank the error filled logic, the Horrible Error of 2 OR 1 = 3 with 2 AND 1 = 1, that is forced down the throats of young students, making them cripples of ever thinking straight and clearly.
>
> Many of these authors have passed away but their error filled books are a scourge to modern education
>
> George Boole, William Jevons, Bertrand Russell, Kurt Godel, Rudolf Carnap,
> Ludwig Wittgenstein, Willard Quine, Alfred North Whitehead, Irving Copi, Michael Withey,
> Patrick Hurley, Harry J Gensler, David Kelley, Jesse Bollinger, Theodore Sider,
> David Barker-Plummer, I. C. Robledo, John Nolt, Peter Smith, Stan Baronett, Jim Holt,
> Virginia Klenk, David Agler, Susanne K. Langer, Gary M. Hardegree, Raymond M. Smullyan,
> John Venn, William Gustason, Richmond H. Thomason,

> > #5-1, 134th published book
> >
> > > > > Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already written the series of TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS in a 7 volume, 8 book set. This would be the first book in that 8 book set (one of the books is a companion book to 1st year college). But I suppose that I needed to write the full series before I could write the Introduction and know what I had to talk about and talk about in a logical progression order. Sounds paradoxical in a sense, that I needed to write the full series first and then go back and write the Introduction. But in another sense, hard to write an introduction on something you have not really fully done and completed. For example to know what is error filled Old Math and to list those errors in a logical order requires me to write the full 7 volumes in order to list in order the mistakes.
> >
> > Cover Picture: Mathematics begins with counting, with numbers, with quantity. But counting numbers needs geometry for something to count in the first place. So here in this picture of the generalized Hydrogen atom of chemistry and physics is a torus geometry of 8 rings of a proton torus and one ring where my fingers are, is a equator ring that is the muon and thrusting through the proton torus at the equator of the torus. So we count 9 rings in all. So math is created by atoms and math numbers exist because atoms have many geometry figures to count. And geometry exists because atoms have shapes and different figures.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08K2XQB4M
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ September 24, 2020
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 576 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 23 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Best Sellers Rank: #224,974 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #3 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > ◦ #23 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #182 in Calculus (Books)
> >
> >
> >
> > #5-2, 45th published book
> >
> > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > #1 New Releasein General Geometry
> >
> >
> > Last revision was 2NOV2020. And this is AP's 45th published book of science.
> > Preface: Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education.
> >
> > This is a textbook series in several volumes that carries every person through all his/her math education starting age 5 up to age 26. Volume 2 is for age 5 year old to that of senior in High School, that is needed to do both science and math. Every other math book is incidental to this series of Teaching True Mathematics.
> >
> > It is a journal-textbook because Amazon's Kindle offers me the ability to edit overnight, and to change the text, almost on a daily basis. A unique first in education textbooks-- almost a continual overnight editing. Adding new text, correcting text. Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education. Volume 3 carries the Freshperson in College for their math calculus education.
> >
> > Cover Picture: The Numbers as Integers from 0 to 100, and 10 Grid when dividing by 10, and part of the 100 Grid when dividing by 100. Decimal Grid Numbers are the true numbers of mathematics. The Reals, the rationals & irrationals, the algebraic & transcendentals, the imaginary & Complex, and the negative-numbers are all fake numbers. For, to be a true number, you have to "be counted" by mathematical induction. The smallest Grid system is the Decimal 10 Grid.
> >
> > Length: 399 pages
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07RG7BVZW
> > Publication date ‏ : ‎ May 2, 2019
> > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > File size ‏ : ‎ 2023 KB
> > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Print length ‏ : ‎ 399 pages
> > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Best Sellers Rank: #235,426 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > #15 in General Geometry
> > #223 in Geometry & Topology (Books)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > #5-3, 55th published book
> >
> > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 25Jun2021. And this is AP's 55th published book of science.
> >
> > Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
> >
> > Preface: This is volume 3, book 3 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Freshperson students, 1st year college students of age 18-19. It is the continuation of volume 2 for ages 5 through 18 years old.
> >
> > The main major topic is the AP-EM equations of electricity and magnetism, the mathematics for the laws of electricity and magnetism; what used to be called the Maxwell Equations of Physics. The 1st Year College Math has to prepare all students with the math for all the sciences. So 1st year college Math is like a huge intersection station that has to prepare students with the math they need to do the hard sciences such as physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, geology, etc. What this means is, 1st year college is calculus that allows the student to work with electricity and magnetism. All the math that is needed to enable students to do electricity and magnetism.. In Old Math before this textbook, those Old Math textbooks would end in 1/3 of the text about Arclength, vector space, div, curl, Line Integral, Green's, Stokes, Divergence theorem trying to reach and be able to teach Maxwell Equations. But sadly, barely any Old Math classroom reached that 1/3 ending of the textbook, and left all those college students without any math to tackle electricity and magnetism. And most of Old Math was just muddle headed wrong even if they covered the last 1/3 of the textbook. And that is totally unacceptable in science. This textbook fixes that huge hole and gap in Old Math education.
> >
> > And there is no way around it, that a course in 1st year College Calculus is going to do a lot of hands on experiment with electricity and magnetism, and is required of the students to buy a list of physics apparatus-- multimeter, galvanometer, coil, bar magnet, alligator clip wires, electromagnet, iron filing case, and possibly even a 12 volt transformer, all shown in the cover picture. The beginning of this textbook and the middle section all leads into the ending of this textbook-- we learn the AP-EM Equations and how to use those equations. And there is no escaping the fact that it has to be hands on physics experiments in the classroom of mathematics.
> >
> > But, do not be scared, for this is all easy easy easy. For if you passed and enjoyed Volume 2 TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, then I promise you, you will not be stressed with Volume 3, for I go out of my way to make it clear and understandable.
> >
> > Warning: this is a Journal Textbook, meaning that I am constantly adding new material, constantly revising, constantly fixing mistakes or making things more clear. So if you read this book in August of 2019, chances are it is different when you read it in September 2019. Ebooks allow authors the freedom to improve their textbooks on a ongoing basis.
> >
> > The 1st year college math should be about the math that prepares any and all students for science, whether they branch out into physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, or math, they should have all the math in 1st year college that will carry them through those science studies. I make every attempt possible to make math easy to understand, easy to learn and hopefully fun.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07WN9RVXD
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ August 16, 2019
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1390 KB
> > • Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 236 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Best Sellers Rank: #1,377,070 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #411 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #2,480 in Calculus (Books)
> >
> >
> > 

> >
> > #5-4, 56th published book
> >
> > COLLEGE CALCULUS GUIDE to help students recognize math professor spam from math truth & reality// math textbook series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> >
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> >
> > #1 New Releasein 15-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> >
> >
> > This textbook is the companion guide book to AP's Teaching True Mathematics, 1st year College. It is realized that Old Math will take a long time in removing their fake math, so in the interim period, this Guide book is designed to speed up the process of removing fake Calculus out of the education system, the fewer students we punish with forcing them with fake Calculus, the better we are.
> > Cover Picture: This book is part comedy, for when you cannot reason with math professors that they have many errors to fix, that 90% of their Calculus is in error, you end up resorting to comedy, making fun of them, to prod them to fix their errors. To prod them to "do right by the students of the world" not their entrenched propaganda.
> > Length: 54 pages
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > File Size: 1035 KB
> > Print Length: 64 pages
> > Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
> > Publication Date: August 18, 2019
> > Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
> > Language: English
> > ASIN: B07WNGLQ85
> > Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 

> > Word Wise: Not Enabled
> > Lending: Enabled
> > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #253,425 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > #38 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > #318 in Calculus (Books)
> > #48 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > 

> > #5-5, 72nd published book
> >
> > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 4 for age 19-20 Sophomore-year College, math textbook series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Preface: This is volume 4, book 5 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Sophomore-year students, students of age 19-20. It is the continuation of volume 3 in the end-goal of learning how to do the mathematics of electricity and magnetism, because everything in physics is nothing but atoms and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. To know math, you have to know physics. We learned the Calculus of 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. But we did not learn the calculus of those equations for 3rd dimension. So, you can say that Sophomore year College math is devoted to 3D Calculus. This sophomore year college we fill in all the calculus, and we start over on all of Geometry, for geometry needs a modern day revision. And pardon me for this book is mostly reading, and the students doing less calculations. The classroom of this textbook has the teacher go through page by page to get the students comprehending and understanding of what is being taught. There are many hands on experiments also.
> >
> > Cover Picture shows some toruses, some round some square, torus of rings, thin strips of rings or squares and shows them laid flat. That is Calculus of 3rd dimension that lays a ring in a torus to be flat in 2nd dimension..
> > Length: 105 pages
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0828M34VL
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2019
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 952 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 105 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Best Sellers Rank: #242,037 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #36 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #219 in Calculus (Books)
> >
> >
> > #5-6, 75th published book
> >
> > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 5 for age 20-21 Junior-year of College, math textbook series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
> >
> > This is volume 5, book 6 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Junior-year students, students of age 20-21. In first year college Calculus we learned calculus of the 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. And in sophomore year we learned calculus of 3rd dimension to complete our study of the mathematics needed to do the physics of electricity and magnetism. Now, junior year college, we move onto something different, for we focus mostly on logic now and especially the logic of what is called the "mathematical proof". Much of what the student has learned about mathematics so far has been given to her or him as stated knowledge, accept it as true because I say so. But now we are going to do math proofs. Oh, yes, we did prove a few items here and there, such as why the Decimal Grid Number system is so special, such as the Pythagorean Theorem, such as the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with its right-triangle hinged up or down. But many ideas we did not prove, we just stated them and expected all students to believe them true. And you are now juniors in college and we are going to start to prove many of those ideas and teach you "what is a math proof". Personally, I myself feel that the math proof is overrated, over hyped. But the math proof is important for one reason-- it makes you better scientists of knowing what is true and what is a shaky idea. A math proof is the same as "thinking straight and thinking clearly". And all scientists need to think straight and think clearly. But before we get to the Mathematics Proof, we have to do Probability and Statistics.. What you learned in Grade School, then High School, then College, called Sigma Error, now becomes Probability and Statistics. It is important because all sciences including mathematics needs and uses Probability and Statistics. So, our job for junior-year of college mathematics is all cut out and ahead for us, no time to waste, let us get going.
> >
> > Cover Picture: is a sample of the Array Proof, a proof the ellipse is not a conic but rather a cylinder cut wherein the oval is the slant cut of a cone, not the ellipse.
> >
> > Length: 175 pages
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN : B0836F1YF6
> > Publication date : December 26, 2019
> > Language : English
> > File size : 741 KB
> > Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > Screen Reader : Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > Print length : 175 pages
> > Lending : Enabled
> > Best Sellers Rank: #3,768,255 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #3,591 in Probability & Statistics (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #19,091 in Probability & Statistics (Books)
> >
> >
> >
> > #5-7, 89th published book
> >
> > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 6 for age 21-22 Senior-year of College, math textbook series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium 2020
> >
> > Last revision was 6Feb2021.
> > Preface: This is the last year of College for mathematics and we have to mostly summarize all of mathematics as best we can. And set a new pattern to prepare students going on to math graduate school. A new pattern of work habits, because graduate school is more of research and explore on your own. So in this final year, I am going to eliminate tests, and have it mostly done as homework assignments.
> >
> > Cover Picture: Again and again, many times in math, the mind is not good enough alone to think straight and clear, and you need tools to hands-on see how it works. Here is a collection of tools for this senior year college classes. There is a pencil, clipboard, graph paper, compass, divider, protractor, slide-ruler. And for this year we spend a lot of time on the parallelepiped, showing my wood model, and showing my erector set model held together by wire loops in the corners. The plastic square is there only to hold up the erector set model.
> >
> > Length: 110 pages
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B084V11BGY
> > Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 15, 2020
> > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > File size ‏ : ‎ 826 KB
> > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Print length ‏ : ‎ 110 pages
> > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Best Sellers Rank: #224,965 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #345 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #373 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #2,256 in Physics (Books)
> >
> > #5-8, 90th published book
> >
> > TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 7 for age 22-26 Graduate school, math textbook series, book 8 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium 2020
> >
> > Last revised 1NOV2020. This was AP's 90th published book of science.
> >
> > Preface: This is College Graduate School mathematics. Congratulations, you made it this far. To me, graduate school is mostly research, research mathematics and that means also physics. So it is going to be difficult to do math without physics. Of course, we focus on the mathematics of these research projects.
> >
> > My textbook for Graduate school is just a template and the professors teaching the graduate students are free of course to follow their own projects, but in terms of being physics and math combined. What I list below is a template for possible projects.
> >
> > So, in the below projects, I list 36 possible research projects that a graduate student my like to undertake, or partake. I list those 36 projects with a set of parentheses like this (1), (2), (3), etc. Not to be confused with the chapters listing as 1), 2), 3), etc. I list 36 projects but the professor can offer his/her own list, and I expect students with their professor, to pick a project and to monitor the student as to his/her progresses through the research. I have listed each project then cited some of my own research into these projects, below each project is an entry. Those entries are just a help or helper in getting started or acquainted with the project. The entry has a date time group and a newsgroup that I posted to such as sci.math or plutonium-atom-universe Google newsgroups. Again the entry is just a help or helper in getting started.
> >
> > Now instead of picking one or two projects for your Graduate years of study, some may select all 36 projects where you write a short paper on each project. Some may be bored with just one or two projects and opt for all 36.
> >
> > Cover Picture: A photo by my iphone of a page on Permutations of the Jacobs book Mathematics: A Human Endeavor, 1970. One of the best textbooks ever written in Old Math, not for its contents because there are many errors, but for its teaching style. It is extremely rare to find a math textbook written for the student to learn. Probably because math professors rarely learned how to teach in the first place; only learned how to unintentionally obfuscate. The page I photographed is important because it is the interface between geometry's perimeter or surface area versus geometry's area or volume, respectively. Or, an interface of pure numbers with that of geometry. But I have more to say on this below.
> > Length: 296 pages
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B085DF8R7V
> > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 1, 2020
> > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > File size ‏ : ‎ 828 KB
> > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Print length ‏ : ‎ 296 pages
> > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Best Sellers Rank: #224,981 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #13 in General Geometry
> > ◦ #213 in Geometry & Topology (Books)
> >
> >
> >
> > #5-8, 160th published book
> >
> > MATHOPEDIA-- List of 80 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 28Apr2022. And this is AP's 160th book of Science.
> > Preface:
> > A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.
> > The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.
> > The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.
> > Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.
> > I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09MZTLRL5
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2021
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1149 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 65 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science

On Thursday, November 24, 2022 at 6:48:47 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> ... Dan Christensen...

[snip]

Time for another spanking, Archie Poo? When will you learn? Once again...

From his antics here at sci.math, it is obvious that AP has abandoned all hope of being recognized as a credible personality. He is a malicious internet troll who now wants only to mislead and confuse students. He may not be all there, but his fake math and science can only be meant to promote failure in schools. One can only guess at his motives. Is it revenge for his endless string of personal failures in life? Who knows.

In AP's OWN WORDS here that, over the years, he has NEVER renounced or withdrawn:

“Primes do not exist, because the set they were borne from has no division.”
--June 29, 2020

“The last and largest finite number is 10^604.”
--June 3, 2015

“0 appears to be the last and largest finite number”
--June 9, 2015

“0/0 must be equal to 1.”
-- June 9, 2015

“0 is an infinite irrational number.”
--June 28, 2015

“No negative numbers exist.”
--December 22, 2018

“Rationals are not numbers.”
--May 18, 2019

According to AP's “chess board math,” an equilateral triangle is a right-triangle.
--December 11, 2019

Which could explain...

“The value of sin(45 degrees) = 1.” (Actually 0.707)
--May 31, 2019

AP deliberately and repeatedly presented the truth table for OR as the truth table for AND:

“New Logic
AND
T & T = T
T & F = T
F & T = T
F & F = F”
--November 9, 2019

AP seeks aid of Russian agents to promote failure in schools:

"Please--Asking for help from Russia-- russian robots-- to create a new, true mathematics [sic]. What I like for the robots to do, is list every day, about 4 Colleges ( of the West) math dept, and ask why that math department is teaching false and fake math, and if unable to change to the correct true math, well, simply fire that math department until they can find professors who recognize truth in math from fakery...."
--November 9, 2017

And if that wasn't weird enough...

“The totality, everything that there is [the universe], is only 1 atom of plutonium [Pu]. There is nothing outside or beyond this one atom of plutonium.”
--April 4, 1994

“The Universe itself is one gigantic big atom.”
--November 14, 2019

AP's sinister Atom God Cult of Failure???

“Since God-Pu is marching on.
Glory! Glory! Atom Plutonium!
Its truth is marching on.
It has sounded forth the trumpet that shall never call retreat;
It is sifting out the hearts of people before its judgment seat;
Oh, be swift, my soul, to answer it; be jubilant, my feet!
Our God-Pu is marching on.”
--December 15, 2018 (Note: Pu is the atomic symbol for plutonium)

Dan

Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com
Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com