Shitheads of math and science, Dan Christensen & Jan Burse need to be thrown out of sci.math-- go to sci.logic where they can ramble their mindless of ellipse a conic, of 2 OR 1 = 3, AND as subtraction, of 0.5MeV particle as electron when it is the muon

Shitheads of math and science, Dan Christensen & Jan Burse need to be thrown out of sci.math-- go to sci.logic where they can ramble their mindless shitmanure all day and night Two imbeciles of logic-- Dan Christensen & Jan Burse. Who can never
5 views
Skip to first unread message
Subscribe

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Oct 26, 2022, 11:36:39 PM (14 hours ago)



to
Shitheads of math and science, Dan Christensen & Jan Burse need to be thrown out of sci.math-- go to sci.logic where they can ramble their mindless shitmanure all day and night

Two imbeciles of logic-- Dan Christensen & Jan Burse. Who can never understand Boole and Jevons mixed up the connectors AND with OR, and their truth tables.

AND truth table is TTTF, not what the idiot Boole and future idiots Christensen and Burse believe in as TFFF.

Proof: Computers can only use OR for addition 2 OR 1 = 3, all because the idiots Boole and Jevons mixed the two connectors and picked the wrong truth table.

The arsewipe Christensen and Burse are not helping the world in correcting the thoroughly wrong Boole & Jevons logic.

5th published book

Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
Preface:
First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.

The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.

My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.

Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.

Product details
File Size: 773 KB
Print Length: 72 pages
Publication Date: March 12, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PMB69F5
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled


Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
3:22 PM (1 hour ago)



to
Paul Biran, Marc Burger, Patrick Cheridito, Manfred Einsiedler, is it easier for you to send Jan Burse to spam sci.math than to admit the truth, slant cut of cone is a Oval, never the ellipse. And to admit Boole screwed up on logic for the truth table of AND is TTTF, not TFFF. Or even to ask the question-- which is the Atom's true electron?? The muon or the 0.5MeV particle.. So you send the idiot fool Jan Burse to distract everyone.

> ETH Zurich
>
> Paul Biran, Marc Burger, Patrick Cheridito, Manfred Einsiedler, Paul Embrechts
> Giovanni Felder, Alessio Figalli, Norbert Hungerbuhler, Tom Ilmanen, Horst Knorrer
> Emmanuel Kowalski
> Urs Lang
> Rahul Pandharipande
> Richard Pink
> Tristan Riviere
> Dietmar Salamon
> Martin Schweizer
> Mete Soner
> Michael Struwe
> Benjamin Sudakov
> Alain Sznitman
> Josef Teichmann
> Wendelin Werner
> Thomas Willwacher
>
> Zurich ETH, physics dept
> Charalampos Anastasiou, Niklas Beisert, Adrian Biland, Gianni Blatter, Marcella Carollo, Christian Degen, Leonardo Degiorgi, Gunther Dissertori, Klaus Ensslin, Tilman Esslinger, Jerome Faist, Matthias Gaberdiel, Aude Gehrmann-De Ridder, Vadim Geshkenbein, Christophorus Grab, Michele Graf, Jonathan Home, Roland Horisberger, Sebastian Huber, Thomas Markus Ihn, Atac Imamoglu, Steven Johnson, Ursula Keller, Klaus Kirch, Simon Lilly, Joel Mesot, Renatto Renner, Andre Rubbia, Werner Schmutz, Thomas Schulthess, Manfred Sigrist, Hans-Arno Synal, Matthias Troyer, Andreas Vaterlaus, Rainer Wallny, Andreas Wallraff, Werner Wegscheider, Audrey Zheludev, Oded Zilberberg
>
>
> University Bern
> Christian Leumann
> Walter Benjamin
> Emil Theodor Kocher
> Kurt Wuthrich
> Daniel Vassella
> Rene Fasel
> Mani Matter
>

Univ Western Ontario math dept
Janusz Adamus, Tatyana Barron, Dan Christensen, Graham Denham, Ajneet Dhillon, Matthias Franz, John Jardine, Massoud Khalkhali, Nicole Lemire, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon

Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz
President Alan Shepard
Amit Chakma (chem engr)

Univ. Western Ontario physics dept
Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang

Jan, is Mostowski Collapse a apt name for shooting down GLONASS satellites, and is Dan Christensen a pussy at handling laser rifles?

Mostowski Collapse
3:30 AM (19 minutes ago)

Dang you are stupid. Dan Christensen claimed: > Just about any proof in any textbook on algebra,

to
Jan Burse with satellite-rifle laser beam with telescope - scope is trying to shoot down GLONASS satellites in a Smullyan liquor proof at his home near Zurich. Any luck Jan?

Jan are you catching the satellites missed by Dan Christensen overhead in Ontario Canada?

Jan, is Mostowski Collapse a apt name for shooting down GLONASS satellites, and is Dan Christensen a pansy at handling laser rifles? Jan, how many GLONASS satellites have you shoot down today???

Mostowski Collapse
3:30 AM (19 minutes ago)

Dang you are stupid. Dan Christensen claimed: > Just about any proof in any textbook on algebra,

to
Jan Burse with satellite-rifle laser beam with telescope - scope is trying to shoot down GLONASS satellites in a Smullyan liquor proof at his home near Zurich. Any luck Jan?

Jan are you catching the satellites missed by Dan Christensen overhead in Ontario Canada?

Fritz Feldhase,Dan Christensen, Drinkers principle firing the Satellite Rifle to take down GLONASS and BeiDou//Armondikov--Feb 6, 2013 - Via PsyGremlin via PZ Myers, this is Archimedes Plutonium, my new favourite crank hat. SATELLITE LASER RIFLE--bring down GLONASS
On Saturday, October 29, 2022 at 12:38:13 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
>Drinking Principle in the notation

Fritz Feldhase,Dan Christensen,Sergey Lavrov what would Russia do, once it sees their GLONASS satellites falling out of the sky? Would they exit Ukraine?
Easiest way to disable and make ICBMs obsolete is to make their navigation system obsolete.
Easiest way to make navigation systems obsolete is to down satellites.
Easiest way to down satellites is a Laser beam zapping for 5 seconds on a "satellite panel". And so, down falls the satellite.
Now are the satellites coordinated in GLONASS? For if coordinated and synchronized, there is the physical possibility of "if we down one of the satellites, all of GLONASS satellites are downed".
Jan Burse with satellite-rifle laser beam with telescope - scope is trying to shoot down GLONASS satellites in a Smullyan liquor proof at his home near Zurich. Any luck Jan?
Jan are you catching the satellites missed by Dan Christensen overhead in Ontario Canada?
More on Jan Burse, aka, Mostowski Collapse can be found on his website of liaring hate-spew --
ARCHIMEDES PLUTONIUM BANNED - Google Groups
https://groups.google.com › comp.lang.prolog
https://groups.google.com › comp.lang.prolog
ARCHIMEDES PLUTONIUM BANNED from. Dartmouth canteen. His wheelchair is too wide, he doesn't pass the entrance. Mostowski Collapse's profile photo ...


> Armondikov
Archimedes Plutonium | Spherical Bullshit
sphericalbullshit.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/archimedes-plutonium/‎
◦ Cached
Feb 6, 2013 - Via PsyGremlin via PZ Myers, this is Archimedes Plutonium, my new favourite crank hat. I was really fucking surprised to have taken this long to ...
Nomen Nescio artwork in use:

NATO's most reliable LASER SATELLITE RIFLE

███۞███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▃
▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂
I███████████████████].
◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤...


Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart Award:
[ ]
                /                                  
               /               .'                  
              /              .'                    
             /   ______.   .'                      
            /   / __/_//  '  OWOWOWOWOOWOWW        
           /   / /  @"@    OWOWOWOWOWOWOWOW        
          /    \ G  ' >'  OWOWOWOWOWOWOWO  _.-'    
         /      \/.  C '  OWOWOWOWOW   _.-'        
        /     .---\  / --.         _.-'            
       /     /     \(     \    _.-'    HOLY GOD    
      /     /  \    \  (.  )  '    THE RAPE RAYS    
     /     /   /\       \ /                        
    /      \  |  \       \               __..--''  
   /   .'   \_\   )     )\      __..--''          
  /  .'      ) \  |    /   \  -''                  
 / .'   _   '///` (   /\    \                      
/.' _.-'  __     /    ) )    )                      
'.-'..--''      /   ,' /    /                      
 .__---------- /__./  /    / --------------------
    ``--..  __//  /   )   /                      
           /    _J)   /)`-\                        
           `-__/-'  ` \  |(                        
                       `\   \  -..__                
                         `--'       ``--..__        
                                            ``--  
[ ] Careful when you aim the Satellite Laser Rifle. We want to save our young virgin sharpshooters.
[ ]
                            ___________________________
                   /|  /|  |                          |
                   ||__||  |       Please don't       |
                  /   O O\__           feed           |
                 /          \       GLONASS satellites a Glurrrgz sock?     |
                /      \     \                        |
               /   _    \     \ ----------------------
              /    |\____\     \     ||                
             /     | | | |\____/     ||                
            /       \|_|_|/   |    __||                
           /  /  \            |____| ||                
          /   |   | /|        |      --|              
          |   |   |//         |____  --|              
   * _    |  |_|_|_|          |     \-/                
*-- _--\ _ \     //           |                        
  /  _     \\ _ //   |        /                        
*  /   \_ /- | -     |       |                        
  *      ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________

[ ] Why didn't
In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
      |^|^|  |^|^|
      | | |  | | |
  >. <| | |  | | |
 (x  x)"  "----" |
  \/\/\         @ --------.
       "----------''''''''
           

[ ]
 ____    _                   _      _   _   _
|  _ \  | |   ___    _ __   | | __ | | | | | |
| |_) | | |  / _ \  | '_ \  | |/ / | | | | | |
|  __/  | | | (_) | | | | | |   <  |_| |_| |_|
|_|     |_|  \___/  |_| |_| |_|\_\ (_) (_) (_)
                                             
  I'M NEW TO SATELLITE DOWNING !!!!!!!!!!!

GLONASS time clock Award:
[ ]
                    5 SECOND LASER-O-METER
 
                      5*    6*   *7
                 4*                  *8
              3*                        *9
             2*                          *10
            1*              |             *
            0*             -*-            *
             *              |\            *
              *               \          *
               *               \        *
                 *             _\/    *
                     *     *     *
[ ] dolf

[ ] Bad News for Cad Kooks
[ ] ❄ Snowflake ❄ OK, now this is seriously fucked up... ❄ Snowflake ❄
[ ]
" ,  ,                                                              
   ", ,                                                            
      ""     _---.    ..;%%%;, .        I HIDE OUT IN BeiDou satellites look like this
        "" .",  ,  .==% %%%%%%% ' .                                
          "", %%%   =%% %%%%%%;  ; ;-_                              
          %; %%%%%  .;%;%%%"%p ---; _  '-_                          
          %; %%%%% __;%%;p/; O        --_ "-,_                      
           q; %%% /v \;%p ;%%%%%;--__    "'-__'-._                  
           //\" // \  % ;%%%%%%%;',/%\_  __  "'-_'\_              
           \  / //   \/   ;%% %; %;/\%%%%;;;;\    "- _\            
              ,"             %;  %%;  %%;;'  ';%       -\-_        
         -=\="             __%    %%;_ |;;    %%%\          \      
                         _/ _=      \==_;;,_ %%%; % -_      /      
                        / /-          =%- ;%%%%; %%;  "--__/        
                       //=             ==%-%%;  %; %                
                       /             _=_-  d  ;%; ;%;        
                       \            =,-"    d%%; ;%%;              
                                   //        %  ;%%;                
                                  //          d%%%"                
                                   \           %%                  
                                               V
[ ] Why did Since it was revealed that apparently Who

Click here to read the complete article

On 11/1/2022 6:43 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>
> Fritz Feldhase,Dan Christensen, Drinkers principle firing the Satellite Rifle to take down GLONASS and BeiDou//Armondikov--Feb 6, 2013 - Via PsyGremlin via PZ Myers, this is Archimedes Plutonium, my new favourite crank hat. SATELLITE LASER RIFLE--bring down GLONASS
>
> On Saturday, October 29, 2022 at 12:38:13 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
>> Drinking Principle in the notation
>
>
> Fritz Feldhase,Dan Christensen,Sergey Lavrov what would Russia do, once it sees their GLONASS satellites falling out of the sky? Would they exit Ukraine?
>
> Easiest way to disable and make ICBMs obsolete is to make their navigation system obsolete.
>
> Easiest way to make navigation systems obsolete is to down satellites.
>
> Easiest way to down satellites is a Laser beam zapping for 5 seconds on a "satellite panel". And so, down falls the satellite.
>
> Now are the satellites coordinated in GLONASS? For if coordinated and synchronized, there is the physical possibility of "if we down one of the satellites, all of GLONASS satellites are downed".
>
> Jan Burse with satellite-rifle laser beam with telescope - scope is trying to shoot down GLONASS satellites in a Smullyan liquor proof at his home near Zurich. Any luck Jan?
>
> Jan are you catching the satellites missed by Dan Christensen overhead in Ontario Canada?
>
> More on Jan Burse, aka, Mostowski Collapse can be found on his website of liaring hate-spew --
>
> ARCHIMEDES PLUTONIUM BANNED - Google Groups
> https://groups.google.com › comp.lang.prolog
> https://groups.google.com › comp.lang.prolog
>
> ARCHIMEDES PLUTONIUM BANNED from. Dartmouth canteen. His wheelchair is too wide, he doesn't pass the entrance. Mostowski Collapse's profile photo ...
>
>
>
>
>> Armondikov
> Archimedes Plutonium | Spherical Bullshit
> sphericalbullshit.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/archimedes-plutonium/‎
>
> ◦ Cached
>
> Feb 6, 2013 - Via PsyGremlin via PZ Myers, this is Archimedes Plutonium, my new favourite crank hat. I was really fucking surprised to have taken this long to ...
>
> Nomen Nescio artwork in use:
>
>
> NATO's most reliable LASER SATELLITE RIFLE
>
> ███۞███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▃
> ▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂
> I███████████████████].
> ◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤...
>
>
> 
>
> Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart Award:
> [ ]
>                 /
>                /               .'
>               /              .'
>              /   ______.   .'
>             /   / __/_//  '  OWOWOWOWOOWOWW
>            /   / /  @"@    OWOWOWOWOWOWOWOW
>           /    \ G  ' >'  OWOWOWOWOWOWOWO  _.-'
>          /      \/.  C '  OWOWOWOWOW   _.-'
>         /     .---\  / --.         _.-'
>        /     /     \(     \    _.-'    HOLY GOD
>       /     /  \    \  (.  )  '    THE RAPE RAYS
>      /     /   /\       \ /
>     /      \  |  \       \               __..--''
>    /   .'   \_\   )     )\      __..--''
>   /  .'      ) \  |    /   \  -''
>  / .'   _   '///` (   /\    \
> /.' _.-'  __     /    ) )    )
> '.-'..--''      /   ,' /    /
>  .__---------- /__./  /    / --------------------
>     ``--..  __//  /   )   /
>            /    _J)   /)`-\
>            `-__/-'  ` \  |(
>                        `\   \  -..__
>                          `--'       ``--..__
>                                             ``--
>
> [ ] Careful when you aim the Satellite Laser Rifle. We want to save our young virgin sharpshooters.
>
> [ ]
>                             ___________________________
>                    /|  /|  |                          |
>                    ||__||  |       Please don't       |
>                   /   O O\__           feed           |
>                  /          \       GLONASS satellites a Glurrrgz sock?     |
>                 /      \     \                        |
>                /   _    \     \ ----------------------
>               /    |\____\     \     ||
>              /     | | | |\____/     ||
>             /       \|_|_|/   |    __||
>            /  /  \            |____| ||
>           /   |   | /|        |      --|
>           |   |   |//         |____  --|
>    * _    |  |_|_|_|          |     \-/
> *-- _--\ _ \     //           |
>   /  _     \\ _ //   |        /
> *  /   \_ /- | -     |       |
>   *      ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________
>
>
> [ ] Why didn't
> In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
> May 2010-February 12, 2017
>
>       |^|^|  |^|^|
>       | | |  | | |
>   >. <| | |  | | |
>  (x  x)"  "----" |
>   \/\/\         @ --------.
>        "----------''''''''
>
>
>
> [ ]
>  ____    _                   _      _   _   _
> |  _ \  | |   ___    _ __   | | __ | | | | | |
> | |_) | | |  / _ \  | '_ \  | |/ / | | | | | |
> |  __/  | | | (_) | | | | | |   <  |_| |_| |_|
> |_|     |_|  \___/  |_| |_| |_|\_\ (_) (_) (_)
>
>   I'M NEW TO SATELLITE DOWNING !!!!!!!!!!!
>
>
> GLONASS time clock Award:
> [ ]
>                     5 SECOND LASER-O-METER
>
>                       5*    6*   *7
>                  4*                  *8
>               3*                        *9
>              2*                          *10
>             1*              |             *
>             0*             -*-            *
>              *              |\            *
>               *               \          *
>                *               \        *
>                  *             _\/    *
>                      *     *     *
> [ ] dolf
>
>
> [ ] Bad News for Cad Kooks
> [ ] ❄ Snowflake ❄ OK, now this is seriously fucked up... ❄ Snowflake ❄
> [ ]
> " ,  ,
>    ", ,
>       ""     _---.    ..;%%%;, .        I HIDE OUT IN BeiDou satellites look like this
>         "" .",  ,  .==% %%%%%%% ' .
>           "", %%%   =%% %%%%%%;  ; ;-_
>           %; %%%%%  .;%;%%%"%p ---; _  '-_
>           %; %%%%% __;%%;p/; O        --_ "-,_
>            q; %%% /v \;%p ;%%%%%;--__    "'-__'-._
>            //\" // \  % ;%%%%%%%;',/%\_  __  "'-_'\_
>            \  / //   \/   ;%% %; %;/\%%%%;;;;\    "- _\
>               ,"             %;  %%;  %%;;'  ';%       -\-_
>          -=\="             __%    %%;_ |;;    %%%\          \
>                          _/ _=      \==_;;,_ %%%; % -_      /
>                         / /-          =%- ;%%%%; %%;  "--__/
>                        //=             ==%-%%;  %; %
>                        /             _=_-  d  ;%; ;%;
>                        \            =,-"    d%%; ;%%;
>                                    //        %  ;%%;
>                                   //          d%%%"
>                                    \           %%
>                                                V
> [ ] Why did Since it was revealed that apparently Who
>
> The Iran satellite looks like a dinosaur
>
>   \
>    \   __.,,------.._
>      ,'"   _      _   "`.
>     /.__, ._  -=- _"`    Y
>    (.____.-.`      ""`   j
>     VvvvvvV`.Y,.    _.,-'       ,     ,     ,
>         Y    ||,   '"\         ,/    ,/    ./
>         |   ,'  ,     `-..,'_,'/___,'/   ,'/   ,
>    ..  ,;,,',-'"\,'  ,  .     '     ' ""' '--,/    .. ..
>  ,'. `.`---'     `, /  , Y -=-    ,'   ,   ,. .`-..||_|| ..
> ff\\`. `._        /f ,'j j , ,' ,   , f ,  \=\ Y   || ||`||_..
> l` \` `.`."`-..,-' j  /./ /, , / , / /l \   \=\l   || `' || ||...
>  `  `   `-._ `-.,-/ ,' /`"/-/-/-/-"'''"`.`.  `'.\--`'--..`'_`' || ,
>             "`-_,',  ,'  f    ,   /      `._    ``._     ,  `-.`'//         ,
>           ,-"'' _.,-'    l_,-'_,,'          "`-._ . "`. /|     `.'\ ,       |
>         ,',.,-'"          \=) ,`-.         ,    `-'._`.V |       \ // .. . /j
>         |f\               `._ )-."`.     /|         `.| |        `.`-||-\\/
>         l` \`                 "`._   "`--' j          j' j          `-`---'
>          `  `                     "`_,-','/       ,-'"  /
>                                  ,'",__,-'       /,, ,-'
>                                  Vvv'            VVv'
>
>   IS STARTING TO
>         /// 6 6~\~~` GROW HAIR IN WEIRD PLACES
>         (    7  )
>          \  '='/    IS THAT NORMAL ??????
>        _//'---'\
>       ( \       `\
>       (\/`-.__/  /
>        "`-._  _.'
>             ``
>
>
> Most accurate Laser Rifle Award:
[...]

Thanks Chris. Do you have a fractal for any chess pieces. How about a fractal for all the chess pieces-- pawn, rook, bishop, queen, knight, King. I believe Harold Jacobs on his cover book has the knight fractal

On 11/1/2022 6:56 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Thanks Chris. Do you have a fractal for any chess pieces. How about a fractal for all the chess pieces-- pawn, rook, bishop, queen, knight, King. I believe Harold Jacobs on his cover book has the knight fractal

Humm... I have some fractals that have a nice symmetry that can induce
somebody to see a face or two... Humm...

Here is a possible King piece, in 3d:

https://fractalforums.org/gallery/1612-150422031430.jpeg

Not sure what piece this would be:

https://fractalforums.org/gallery/1612-240522051422.png

Or this:

https://fractalforums.org/gallery/1612-200522031824.png

Humm... A Pawn:

https://fractalforums.org/gallery/1612-160422050437.png

;^)

Good question AP! Thanks. Actually, my volumetric can be 3d printed.
Humm... What piece would this solid piece be:

3d models you can explore in VR:

https://skfb.ly/oqPIU

Or this one:

https://skfb.ly/oqQEV

or:

https://skfb.ly/6TuEV

Yes. I have enough 3d models to make a chess set.

On 11/1/2022 7:09 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 11/1/2022 6:56 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>> Thanks Chris. Do you have a fractal for any chess pieces. How about a
>> fractal for all the chess pieces-- pawn, rook, bishop, queen, knight,
>> King. I believe Harold Jacobs on his cover book has the knight fractal
>
> Humm... I have some fractals that have a nice symmetry that can induce
> somebody to see a face or two... Humm...
>
> Here is a possible King piece, in 3d:
>
> https://fractalforums.org/gallery/1612-150422031430.jpeg
[...]

Btw, for some reason this looks like the castle in the Dark Crystal.

On 11/1/2022 6:56 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Thanks Chris. Do you have a fractal for any chess pieces. How about a fractal for all the chess pieces-- pawn, rook, bishop, queen, knight, King. I believe Harold Jacobs on his cover book has the knight fractal

Oh, you just made me think of something really interesting. Humm...

Have a look at Harold Jacobs Mathematics a Human Endeavor cover. Amazon has pictures of this book. You will see a tessellation of a knight covering the entire plane.

So the question is-- is there a tessellation of the King, Queen, Bishop, and pawn. If there is a tessellation of KIng or Queen or Pawn, then there is one for all three. The bishop should be the easiest to tessellat as mostly a prism.

Of course the chessboard itself is a tessellation.

On 11/1/2022 10:03 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Have a look at Harold Jacobs Mathematics a Human Endeavor cover. Amazon has pictures of this book. You will see a tessellation of a knight covering the entire plane.
[...]

Are you talking about creating 3d models of fractals and using them as
chess pieces, or about playing chess? Or, tiling the plane with a pieces
valid moves as if it was the only piece on the plane?

Why are these two failures still here in sci.math with their 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.

My 5th published book

Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
Preface:
First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.

The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.

My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.

Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.

Product details
File Size: 773 KB
Print Length: 72 pages
Publication Date: March 12, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PMB69F5
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 



Why are these two logic morons still in sci.math polluting the minds of our young folk with their 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.

My 5th published book

Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
Preface:
First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.

The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.

My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.

Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.

Product details
File Size: 773 KB
Print Length: 72 pages
Publication Date: March 12, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PMB69F5
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 



Christensen
24
unread,
An interesting defect in DC Proof
On Thursday, November 3, 2022 at 7:51:25 PM UTC-4, Mostowski Collapse wrote: > DC Proof would be a
7:44 PM

Mostowski Collapse's profile photo
Mostowski Collapse
, …
Dan Christensen
197
unread,
DC Proofs waterloo is Russells definite descriptions
On Thursday, November 3, 2022 at 7:36:37 PM UTC-4, Mostowski Collapse wrote: > Dan Christensen
7:38 PM

simonro...@gmail.com's profile photo
simonro...@gmail.com
, …
Fritz Feldhase
4 unread,
Please name English verbs that end in ER

Why does Univ Western Ontario Dan Christensen and idiot Jan Burse Zurich ETH have such a dumb stupid mind in physics? Never able to investigate the question-- what if we take the electron of atoms as the muon and subtract 105 from 945MeV and then take the 0.5MeV particle as Dirac's magnetic monopole.. No, the dumb stupid worthless mind of Dan Christensen and Jan Burse in physics is never able to do such mental construction for they failed physics. For they failed physics because they failed LOGIC in that their pea sized brian still accepts the error filled Boole logic of 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction.

Mostowski Collapse aka Jan Burse spam-- 4/11/22 -- "An interesting defect in DC proof"

My 5th published book

Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
Preface:
First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.

The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.

My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.

Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.

Product details
File Size: 773 KB
Print Length: 72 pages
Publication Date: March 12, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PMB69F5
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 



Why does Univ Western Ontario Dan Christensen and idiot Jan Burse Zurich ETH have such a dumb stupid mind in physics? Never able to investigate the question-- what if we take the electron of atoms as the muon and subtract 105 from 945MeV and then take the 0.5MeV particle as Dirac's magnetic monopole.. No, the dumb stupid worthless mind of Dan Christensen and Jan Burse in physics is never able to do such mental construction for they failed physics. For they failed physics because they failed LOGIC in that their pea sized brian still accepts the error filled Boole logic of 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction.

Mostowski Collapse aka Jan Burse spam-- 4/11/22 -- "An interesting defect in DC proof"


My 5th published book

Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
Preface:
First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.

The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.

My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.

Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.

Product details
File Size: 773 KB
Print Length: 72 pages
Publication Date: March 12, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PMB69F5
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 



ETH Zurich,Paul Biran, Marc Burger,Janusz Adamus,Tatyana  Barron, why have these one line spammers in sci.math, day after day-- Mostowski Collapse (ETH Jan Burse) "An interesting defect in DC Proof". Is it to deflect the attention that ETH and Univ Western Ontario teach fake Logic 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction or is it to deflect ETH is too stupid to ask the question which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle and so ETH and Univ Western Ontario and Toronto daily spam sci.math to hog the front page with fake science.

Why does Univ Western Ontario Dan Christensen and Jan Burse Zurich ETH have such a dumb stupid mind in physics? Never able to investigate the question-- what if we take the electron of atoms as the muon and subtract 105 from 945MeV and then take the 0.5MeV particle as Dirac's magnetic monopole. No, the dumb stupid worthless mind of Dan Christensen and Jan Burse in physics is never able to do such mental construction for they failed physics. For they failed physics because they failed LOGIC in that their pea sized brian still accepts the error filled Boole logic of 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction.
>
> Mostowski Collapse aka Jan Burse spam-- 4/11/22 -- "An interesting defect in DC proof"
> 
> My 5th published book
>
> Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
> Preface:
> First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.
>
> The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.
>
> My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.
>
> Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.
>
> Product details
> File Size: 773 KB
> Print Length: 72 pages
> Publication Date: March 12, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07PMB69F5
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> Word Wise: Not Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported 
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 

> ETH Zurich
>
> Paul Biran, Marc Burger, Patrick Cheridito, Manfred Einsiedler, Paul Embrechts
> Giovanni Felder, Alessio Figalli, Norbert Hungerbuhler, Tom Ilmanen, Horst Knorrer
> Emmanuel Kowalski
> Urs Lang
> Rahul Pandharipande
> Richard Pink
> Tristan Riviere
> Dietmar Salamon
> Martin Schweizer
> Mete Soner
> Michael Struwe
> Benjamin Sudakov
> Alain Sznitman
> Josef Teichmann
> Wendelin Werner
> Thomas Willwacher
>
> Zurich ETH, physics dept
> Charalampos Anastasiou, Niklas Beisert, Adrian Biland, Gianni Blatter, Marcella Carollo, Christian Degen, Leonardo Degiorgi, Gunther Dissertori, Klaus Ensslin, Tilman Esslinger, Jerome Faist, Matthias Gaberdiel, Aude Gehrmann-De Ridder, Vadim Geshkenbein, Christophorus Grab, Michele Graf, Jonathan Home, Roland Horisberger, Sebastian Huber, Thomas Markus Ihn, Atac Imamoglu, Steven Johnson, Ursula Keller, Klaus Kirch, Simon Lilly, Joel Mesot, Renatto Renner, Andre Rubbia, Werner Schmutz, Thomas Schulthess, Manfred Sigrist, Hans-Arno Synal, Matthias Troyer, Andreas Vaterlaus, Rainer Wallny, Andreas Wallraff, Werner Wegscheider, Audrey Zheludev, Oded Zilberberg
>
>
> University Bern
> Christian Leumann
> Walter Benjamin
> Emil Theodor Kocher
> Kurt Wuthrich
> Daniel Vassella
> Rene Fasel
> Mani Matter
>

Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker, Henry M. Van Driel, David J. Rowe, John W. Moffat, John F. Martin, Robert K. Logan, Albert E.. Litherland, Roland List, Philipp Kronberg, James King, Anthony W. Key, Bob Holdom, Ron M. Farquhar, R. Nigel Edwards, David J. Dunlop, James Drummond, Tom E. Drake, R.Fraser Code, Richard C. Bailey, Robin Armstrong

Chancellor Rose M. Patten
Pres. Meric Gertler

Univ Toronto math dept
Mustafa Akcoglu, Spyros Alexakis, Edward Barbeau, Thomas Bloom, Man-Duen Choi, Stephen Cook, Chandler Davis, Nicholas Derzko, Eric Ellers, Ilya Gekhtman, Ian Graham, Steve Halpern, Wahidul Haque, Abe Igelfeld, Velimir Jurdjevic, Ivan Kupka, Anthony Lam, Michael Lorimer, James McCool, Eric Mendelsohn, Kunio Murasugi, Jeremy Quastel, Peter Rosenthal, Paul Selick, Dipak Sen, Rick Sharpe, Stuart Smith, Frank Tall, Steve Tanny

Univ Western Ontario math dept
Janusz Adamus, Tatyana  Barron,   Dan Christensen, Graham Denham, Ajneet Dhillon, Matthias  Franz, John Jardine, Massoud Khalkhali, Nicole Lemire, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon

Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz
President Alan Shepard
Amit Chakma (chem engr)

Univ. Western Ontario physics dept
Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang

ETH Zurich,Tristan Riviere,Dietmar Salamon,Janusz Adamus,Tatyana Barron, keep polluting the minds of young with 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction.

Fuckdog spammer Dan Christensen & Jan Burse "An interesting defect in..." 87 on 6:12PM

Why have these one line spammers in sci.math, day after day-- Mostowski Collapse (ETH Jan Burse) "An interesting defect in DC Proof". Is it to deflect the attention that ETH and Univ Western Ontario teach fake Logic 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction or is it to deflect ETH is too stupid to ask the question which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle and so ETH and Univ Western Ontario and Toronto daily spam sci.math to hog the front page with fake science.
>
> Why does Univ Western Ontario Dan Christensen and Jan Burse Zurich ETH have such a dumb stupid mind in physics? Never able to investigate the question-- what if we take the electron of atoms as the muon and subtract 105 from 945MeV and then take the 0.5MeV particle as Dirac's magnetic monopole. No, the dumb stupid worthless mind of Dan Christensen and Jan Burse in physics is never able to do such mental construction for they failed physics. For they failed physics because they failed LOGIC in that their pea sized brian still accepts the error filled Boole logic of 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction.
> >
> > Mostowski Collapse aka Jan Burse spam-- 4/11/22 -- "An interesting defect in DC proof"
> > 
> > My 5th published book
> >
> > Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science..
> > Preface:
> > First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.
> >
> > The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.
> >
> > My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.
> >
> > Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.
> >
> > Product details
> > File Size: 773 KB
> > Print Length: 72 pages
> > Publication Date: March 12, 2019
> > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > Language: English
> > ASIN: B07PMB69F5
> > Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> > Word Wise: Not Enabled
> > Lending: Enabled
> > Screen Reader: Supported 
> > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> > ETH Zurich
> >
> > Paul Biran, Marc Burger, Patrick Cheridito, Manfred Einsiedler, Paul Embrechts
> > Giovanni Felder, Alessio Figalli, Norbert Hungerbuhler, Tom Ilmanen, Horst Knorrer
> > Emmanuel Kowalski
> > Urs Lang
> > Rahul Pandharipande
> > Richard Pink
> > Tristan Riviere
> > Dietmar Salamon
> > Martin Schweizer
> > Mete Soner
> > Michael Struwe
> > Benjamin Sudakov
> > Alain Sznitman
> > Josef Teichmann
> > Wendelin Werner
> > Thomas Willwacher
> >
> > Zurich ETH, physics dept
> > Charalampos Anastasiou, Niklas Beisert, Adrian Biland, Gianni Blatter, Marcella Carollo, Christian Degen, Leonardo Degiorgi, Gunther Dissertori, Klaus Ensslin, Tilman Esslinger, Jerome Faist, Matthias Gaberdiel, Aude Gehrmann-De Ridder, Vadim Geshkenbein, Christophorus Grab, Michele Graf, Jonathan Home, Roland Horisberger, Sebastian Huber, Thomas Markus Ihn, Atac Imamoglu, Steven Johnson, Ursula Keller, Klaus Kirch, Simon Lilly, Joel Mesot, Renatto Renner, Andre Rubbia, Werner Schmutz, Thomas Schulthess, Manfred Sigrist, Hans-Arno Synal, Matthias Troyer, Andreas Vaterlaus, Rainer Wallny, Andreas Wallraff, Werner Wegscheider, Audrey Zheludev, Oded Zilberberg
> >
> >
> > University Bern
> > Christian Leumann
> > Walter Benjamin
> > Emil Theodor Kocher
> > Kurt Wuthrich
> > Daniel Vassella
> > Rene Fasel
> > Mani Matter
> >
>
>
> Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker, Henry M. Van Driel, David J. Rowe, John W. Moffat, John F. Martin, Robert K. Logan, Albert E. Litherland, Roland List, Philipp Kronberg, James King, Anthony W. Key, Bob Holdom, Ron M. Farquhar, R. Nigel Edwards, David J. Dunlop, James Drummond, Tom E. Drake, R.Fraser Code, Richard C. Bailey, Robin Armstrong
>
> Chancellor Rose M. Patten
> Pres. Meric Gertler
>
> Univ Toronto math dept
> Mustafa Akcoglu, Spyros Alexakis, Edward Barbeau, Thomas Bloom, Man-Duen Choi, Stephen Cook, Chandler Davis, Nicholas Derzko, Eric Ellers, Ilya Gekhtman, Ian Graham, Steve Halpern, Wahidul Haque, Abe Igelfeld, Velimir Jurdjevic, Ivan Kupka, Anthony Lam, Michael Lorimer, James McCool, Eric Mendelsohn, Kunio Murasugi, Jeremy Quastel, Peter Rosenthal, Paul Selick, Dipak Sen, Rick Sharpe, Stuart Smith, Frank Tall, Steve Tanny
>
>
>
> Univ Western Ontario math dept
> Janusz Adamus, Tatyana Barron, Dan Christensen, Graham Denham, Ajneet Dhillon, Matthias Franz, John Jardine, Massoud Khalkhali, Nicole Lemire, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon
>
> Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz
> President Alan Shepard
> Amit Chakma (chem engr)
>
> Univ. Western Ontario physics dept
> Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang

2-ETH Zurich,Tristan Riviere,Dietmar Salamon,Janusz Adamus,Tatyana Barron, keep polluting the minds of young with 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction.

fuckdog spammer Fritz Feldhase 96 8:49 PM "An interesting defect..."
> Fuckdog spammer Dan Christensen & Jan Burse "An interesting defect in..." 87 on 6:12PM
>
>
>
> Why have these one line spammers in sci.math, day after day-- Mostowski Collapse (ETH Jan Burse) "An interesting defect in DC Proof". Is it to deflect the attention that ETH and Univ Western Ontario teach fake Logic 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction or is it to deflect ETH is too stupid to ask the question which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle and so ETH and Univ Western Ontario and Toronto daily spam sci.math to hog the front page with fake science.
> >
> > Why does Univ Western Ontario Dan Christensen and Jan Burse Zurich ETH have such a dumb stupid mind in physics? Never able to investigate the question-- what if we take the electron of atoms as the muon and subtract 105 from 945MeV and then take the 0.5MeV particle as Dirac's magnetic monopole. No, the dumb stupid worthless mind of Dan Christensen and Jan Burse in physics is never able to do such mental construction for they failed physics. For they failed physics because they failed LOGIC in that their pea sized brian still accepts the error filled Boole logic of 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction.
> > >
> > > Mostowski Collapse aka Jan Burse spam-- 4/11/22 -- "An interesting defect in DC proof"
> > > 
> > > My 5th published book
> > >
> > > Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
> > > Preface:
> > > First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.
> > >
> > > The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.
> > >
> > > My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.
> > >
> > > Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > File Size: 773 KB
> > > Print Length: 72 pages
> > > Publication Date: March 12, 2019
> > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > Language: English
> > > ASIN: B07PMB69F5
> > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> > > Word Wise: Not Enabled
> > > Lending: Enabled
> > > Screen Reader: Supported 
> > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> > > ETH Zurich
> > >
> > > Paul Biran, Marc Burger, Patrick Cheridito, Manfred Einsiedler, Paul Embrechts
> > > Giovanni Felder, Alessio Figalli, Norbert Hungerbuhler, Tom Ilmanen, Horst Knorrer
> > > Emmanuel Kowalski
> > > Urs Lang
> > > Rahul Pandharipande
> > > Richard Pink
> > > Tristan Riviere
> > > Dietmar Salamon
> > > Martin Schweizer
> > > Mete Soner
> > > Michael Struwe
> > > Benjamin Sudakov
> > > Alain Sznitman
> > > Josef Teichmann
> > > Wendelin Werner
> > > Thomas Willwacher
> > >
> > > Zurich ETH, physics dept
> > > Charalampos Anastasiou, Niklas Beisert, Adrian Biland, Gianni Blatter, Marcella Carollo, Christian Degen, Leonardo Degiorgi, Gunther Dissertori, Klaus Ensslin, Tilman Esslinger, Jerome Faist, Matthias Gaberdiel, Aude Gehrmann-De Ridder, Vadim Geshkenbein, Christophorus Grab, Michele Graf, Jonathan Home, Roland Horisberger, Sebastian Huber, Thomas Markus Ihn, Atac Imamoglu, Steven Johnson, Ursula Keller, Klaus Kirch, Simon Lilly, Joel Mesot, Renatto Renner, Andre Rubbia, Werner Schmutz, Thomas Schulthess, Manfred Sigrist, Hans-Arno Synal, Matthias Troyer, Andreas Vaterlaus, Rainer Wallny, Andreas Wallraff, Werner Wegscheider, Audrey Zheludev, Oded Zilberberg
> > >
> > >
> > > University Bern
> > > Christian Leumann
> > > Walter Benjamin
> > > Emil Theodor Kocher
> > > Kurt Wuthrich
> > > Daniel Vassella
> > > Rene Fasel
> > > Mani Matter
> > >
> >
> >
> > Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker, Henry M. Van Driel, David J. Rowe, John W. Moffat, John F. Martin, Robert K. Logan, Albert E. Litherland, Roland List, Philipp Kronberg, James King, Anthony W. Key, Bob Holdom, Ron M. Farquhar, R. Nigel Edwards, David J. Dunlop, James Drummond, Tom E. Drake, R.Fraser Code, Richard C. Bailey, Robin Armstrong
> >
> > Chancellor Rose M. Patten
> > Pres. Meric Gertler
> >
> > Univ Toronto math dept
> > Mustafa Akcoglu, Spyros Alexakis, Edward Barbeau, Thomas Bloom, Man-Duen Choi, Stephen Cook, Chandler Davis, Nicholas Derzko, Eric Ellers, Ilya Gekhtman, Ian Graham, Steve Halpern, Wahidul Haque, Abe Igelfeld, Velimir Jurdjevic, Ivan Kupka, Anthony Lam, Michael Lorimer, James McCool, Eric Mendelsohn, Kunio Murasugi, Jeremy Quastel, Peter Rosenthal, Paul Selick, Dipak Sen, Rick Sharpe, Stuart Smith, Frank Tall, Steve Tanny
> >
> >
> >
> > Univ Western Ontario math dept
> > Janusz Adamus, Tatyana Barron, Dan Christensen, Graham Denham, Ajneet Dhillon, Matthias Franz, John Jardine, Massoud Khalkhali, Nicole Lemire, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon
> >
> > Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz
> > President Alan Shepard
> > Amit Chakma (chem engr)
> >
> > Univ. Western Ontario physics dept
> > Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang

3-ETH Zurich,Tristan Riviere,Dietmar Salamon,Janusz Adamus,Tatyana Barron, keep polluting the minds of young with 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction.

Fritz Feldhase 239 "Oh the Ambigarse 0^0..."
> fuckdog spammer Fritz Feldhase 96 8:49 PM "An interesting defect..."
> > Fuckdog spammer Dan Christensen & Jan Burse "An interesting defect in...." 87 on 6:12PM
> >
> >
> >
> > Why have these one line spammers in sci.math, day after day-- Mostowski Collapse (ETH Jan Burse) "An interesting defect in DC Proof". Is it to deflect the attention that ETH and Univ Western Ontario teach fake Logic 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction or is it to deflect ETH is too stupid to ask the question which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle and so ETH and Univ Western Ontario and Toronto daily spam sci.math to hog the front page with fake science.
> > >
> > > Why does Univ Western Ontario Dan Christensen and Jan Burse Zurich ETH have such a dumb stupid mind in physics? Never able to investigate the question-- what if we take the electron of atoms as the muon and subtract 105 from 945MeV and then take the 0.5MeV particle as Dirac's magnetic monopole.. No, the dumb stupid worthless mind of Dan Christensen and Jan Burse in physics is never able to do such mental construction for they failed physics. For they failed physics because they failed LOGIC in that their pea sized brian still accepts the error filled Boole logic of 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction.
> > > >
> > > > Mostowski Collapse aka Jan Burse spam-- 4/11/22 -- "An interesting defect in DC proof"
> > > > 
> > > > My 5th published book
> > > >
> > > > Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
> > > > Preface:
> > > > First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.
> > > >
> > > > The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.
> > > >
> > > > My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.
> > > >
> > > > Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > File Size: 773 KB
> > > > Print Length: 72 pages
> > > > Publication Date: March 12, 2019
> > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > > Language: English
> > > > ASIN: B07PMB69F5
> > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> > > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> > > > Word Wise: Not Enabled
> > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > Screen Reader: Supported 
> > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> > > > ETH Zurich
> > > >
> > > > Paul Biran, Marc Burger, Patrick Cheridito, Manfred Einsiedler, Paul Embrechts
> > > > Giovanni Felder, Alessio Figalli, Norbert Hungerbuhler, Tom Ilmanen, Horst Knorrer
> > > > Emmanuel Kowalski
> > > > Urs Lang
> > > > Rahul Pandharipande
> > > > Richard Pink
> > > > Tristan Riviere
> > > > Dietmar Salamon
> > > > Martin Schweizer
> > > > Mete Soner
> > > > Michael Struwe
> > > > Benjamin Sudakov
> > > > Alain Sznitman
> > > > Josef Teichmann
> > > > Wendelin Werner
> > > > Thomas Willwacher
> > > >
> > > > Zurich ETH, physics dept
> > > > Charalampos Anastasiou, Niklas Beisert, Adrian Biland, Gianni Blatter, Marcella Carollo, Christian Degen, Leonardo Degiorgi, Gunther Dissertori, Klaus Ensslin, Tilman Esslinger, Jerome Faist, Matthias Gaberdiel, Aude Gehrmann-De Ridder, Vadim Geshkenbein, Christophorus Grab, Michele Graf, Jonathan Home, Roland Horisberger, Sebastian Huber, Thomas Markus Ihn, Atac Imamoglu, Steven Johnson, Ursula Keller, Klaus Kirch, Simon Lilly, Joel Mesot, Renatto Renner, Andre Rubbia, Werner Schmutz, Thomas Schulthess, Manfred Sigrist, Hans-Arno Synal, Matthias Troyer, Andreas Vaterlaus, Rainer Wallny, Andreas Wallraff, Werner Wegscheider, Audrey Zheludev, Oded Zilberberg
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > University Bern
> > > > Christian Leumann
> > > > Walter Benjamin
> > > > Emil Theodor Kocher
> > > > Kurt Wuthrich
> > > > Daniel Vassella
> > > > Rene Fasel
> > > > Mani Matter
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker, Henry M. Van Driel, David J. Rowe, John W. Moffat, John F. Martin, Robert K. Logan, Albert E. Litherland, Roland List, Philipp Kronberg, James King, Anthony W. Key, Bob Holdom, Ron M. Farquhar, R. Nigel Edwards, David J. Dunlop, James Drummond, Tom E. Drake, R.Fraser Code, Richard C. Bailey, Robin Armstrong
> > >
> > > Chancellor Rose M. Patten
> > > Pres. Meric Gertler
> > >
> > > Univ Toronto math dept
> > > Mustafa Akcoglu, Spyros Alexakis, Edward Barbeau, Thomas Bloom, Man-Duen Choi, Stephen Cook, Chandler Davis, Nicholas Derzko, Eric Ellers, Ilya Gekhtman, Ian Graham, Steve Halpern, Wahidul Haque, Abe Igelfeld, Velimir Jurdjevic, Ivan Kupka, Anthony Lam, Michael Lorimer, James McCool, Eric Mendelsohn, Kunio Murasugi, Jeremy Quastel, Peter Rosenthal, Paul Selick, Dipak Sen, Rick Sharpe, Stuart Smith, Frank Tall, Steve Tanny
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Univ Western Ontario math dept
> > > Janusz Adamus, Tatyana Barron, Dan Christensen, Graham Denham, Ajneet Dhillon, Matthias Franz, John Jardine, Massoud Khalkhali, Nicole Lemire, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon
> > >
> > > Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz
> > > President Alan Shepard
> > > Amit Chakma (chem engr)
> > >
> > > Univ. Western Ontario physics dept
> > > Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang

Jan Burse,ETH Zurich,Tristan Riviere,Dietmar Salamon,Janusz Adamus,Tatyana Barron, keep polluting the minds of young with 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction.

Jan Burse play act spamming everyday yet cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse,and his mindless 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction for Jan failed logic, unable to see Boole mixed up OR with AND truth tables.

Jan Burse 61 "Smullyan's Proof...."
> Fritz Feldhase 239 "Oh the Ambigarse 0^0..."
> > fuckdog spammer Fritz Feldhase 96 8:49 PM "An interesting defect..."
> > > Fuckdog spammer Dan Christensen & Jan Burse "An interesting defect in...." 87 on 6:12PM
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Why have these one line spammers in sci.math, day after day-- Mostowski Collapse (ETH Jan Burse) "An interesting defect in DC Proof". Is it to deflect the attention that ETH and Univ Western Ontario teach fake Logic 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction or is it to deflect ETH is too stupid to ask the question which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle and so ETH and Univ Western Ontario and Toronto daily spam sci.math to hog the front page with fake science.
> > > >
> > > > Why does Univ Western Ontario Dan Christensen and Jan Burse Zurich ETH have such a dumb stupid mind in physics? Never able to investigate the question-- what if we take the electron of atoms as the muon and subtract 105 from 945MeV and then take the 0.5MeV particle as Dirac's magnetic monopole. No, the dumb stupid worthless mind of Dan Christensen and Jan Burse in physics is never able to do such mental construction for they failed physics. For they failed physics because they failed LOGIC in that their pea sized brian still accepts the error filled Boole logic of 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction.
> > > > >
> > > > > Mostowski Collapse aka Jan Burse spam-- 4/11/22 -- "An interesting defect in DC proof"
> > > > > 
> > > > > My 5th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
> > > > > Preface:
> > > > > First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.
> > > > >
> > > > > The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.
> > > > >
> > > > > My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > File Size: 773 KB
> > > > > Print Length: 72 pages
> > > > > Publication Date: March 12, 2019
> > > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > > > Language: English
> > > > > ASIN: B07PMB69F5
> > > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> > > > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> > > > > Word Wise: Not Enabled
> > > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > > Screen Reader: Supported 
> > > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> > > > > ETH Zurich
> > > > >
> > > > > Paul Biran, Marc Burger, Patrick Cheridito, Manfred Einsiedler, Paul Embrechts
> > > > > Giovanni Felder, Alessio Figalli, Norbert Hungerbuhler, Tom Ilmanen, Horst Knorrer
> > > > > Emmanuel Kowalski
> > > > > Urs Lang
> > > > > Rahul Pandharipande
> > > > > Richard Pink
> > > > > Tristan Riviere
> > > > > Dietmar Salamon
> > > > > Martin Schweizer
> > > > > Mete Soner
> > > > > Michael Struwe
> > > > > Benjamin Sudakov
> > > > > Alain Sznitman
> > > > > Josef Teichmann
> > > > > Wendelin Werner
> > > > > Thomas Willwacher
> > > > >
> > > > > Zurich ETH, physics dept
> > > > > Charalampos Anastasiou, Niklas Beisert, Adrian Biland, Gianni Blatter, Marcella Carollo, Christian Degen, Leonardo Degiorgi, Gunther Dissertori, Klaus Ensslin, Tilman Esslinger, Jerome Faist, Matthias Gaberdiel, Aude Gehrmann-De Ridder, Vadim Geshkenbein, Christophorus Grab, Michele Graf, Jonathan Home, Roland Horisberger, Sebastian Huber, Thomas Markus Ihn, Atac Imamoglu, Steven Johnson, Ursula Keller, Klaus Kirch, Simon Lilly, Joel Mesot, Renatto Renner, Andre Rubbia, Werner Schmutz, Thomas Schulthess, Manfred Sigrist, Hans-Arno Synal, Matthias Troyer, Andreas Vaterlaus, Rainer Wallny, Andreas Wallraff, Werner Wegscheider, Audrey Zheludev, Oded Zilberberg
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > University Bern
> > > > > Christian Leumann
> > > > > Walter Benjamin
> > > > > Emil Theodor Kocher
> > > > > Kurt Wuthrich
> > > > > Daniel Vassella
> > > > > Rene Fasel
> > > > > Mani Matter
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker, Henry M. Van Driel, David J. Rowe, John W. Moffat, John F. Martin, Robert K. Logan, Albert E. Litherland, Roland List, Philipp Kronberg, James King, Anthony W. Key, Bob Holdom, Ron M. Farquhar, R. Nigel Edwards, David J. Dunlop, James Drummond, Tom E. Drake, R.Fraser Code, Richard C. Bailey, Robin Armstrong
> > > >
> > > > Chancellor Rose M. Patten
> > > > Pres. Meric Gertler
> > > >
> > > > Univ Toronto math dept
> > > > Mustafa Akcoglu, Spyros Alexakis, Edward Barbeau, Thomas Bloom, Man-Duen Choi, Stephen Cook, Chandler Davis, Nicholas Derzko, Eric Ellers, Ilya Gekhtman, Ian Graham, Steve Halpern, Wahidul Haque, Abe Igelfeld, Velimir Jurdjevic, Ivan Kupka, Anthony Lam, Michael Lorimer, James McCool, Eric Mendelsohn, Kunio Murasugi, Jeremy Quastel, Peter Rosenthal, Paul Selick, Dipak Sen, Rick Sharpe, Stuart Smith, Frank Tall, Steve Tanny
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Univ Western Ontario math dept
> > > > Janusz Adamus, Tatyana Barron, Dan Christensen, Graham Denham, Ajneet Dhillon, Matthias Franz, John Jardine, Massoud Khalkhali, Nicole Lemire, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon
> > > >
> > > > Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz
> > > > President Alan Shepard
> > > > Amit Chakma (chem engr)
> > > >
> > > > Univ. Western Ontario physics dept
> > > > Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang

STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science

On Friday, November 11, 2022 at 2:25:06 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> ... Dan Christensen ...

[snip]

Time for another spanking, Archie Poo? When will you learn? Once again...

From his antics here at sci.math, it is obvious that AP has abandoned all hope being recognized as a credible personality. He is a malicious internet troll who now wants only to mislead and confuse students. He may not be all there, but his fake math and science can only be meant to promote failure in schools. One can only guess at his motives. Is it revenge for his endless string of personal failures in life? Who knows.

In AP's OWN WORDS here that, over the years, he has NEVER renounced or withdrawn:

“Primes do not exist, because the set they were borne from has no division.”
--June 29, 2020

“The last and largest finite number is 10^604.”
--June 3, 2015

“0 appears to be the last and largest finite number”
--June 9, 2015

“0/0 must be equal to 1.”
-- June 9, 2015

“0 is an infinite irrational number.”
--June 28, 2015

“No negative numbers exist.”
--December 22, 2018

“Rationals are not numbers.”
--May 18, 2019

According to AP's “chess board math,” an equilateral triangle is a right-triangle.
--December 11, 2019

Which could explain...

“The value of sin(45 degrees) = 1.” (Actually 0.707)
--May 31, 2019

AP deliberately and repeatedly presented the truth table for OR as the truth table for AND:

“New Logic
AND
T & T = T
T & F = T
F & T = T
F & F = F”
--November 9, 2019

AP seeks aid of Russian agents to promote failure in schools:

"Please--Asking for help from Russia-- russian robots-- to create a new, true mathematics [sic]. What I like for the robots to do, is list every day, about 4 Colleges ( of the West) math dept, and ask why that math department is teaching false and fake math, and if unable to change to the correct true math, well, simply fire that math department until they can find professors who recognize truth in math from fakery...."
--November 9, 2017

And if that wasn't weird enough...

“The totality, everything that there is [the universe], is only 1 atom of plutonium [Pu]. There is nothing outside or beyond this one atom of plutonium.”
--April 4, 1994

“The Universe itself is one gigantic big atom.”
--November 14, 2019

AP's sinister Atom God Cult of Failure???

“Since God-Pu is marching on.
Glory! Glory! Atom Plutonium!
Its truth is marching on.
It has sounded forth the trumpet that shall never call retreat;
It is sifting out the hearts of people before its judgment seat;
Oh, be swift, my soul, to answer it; be jubilant, my feet!
Our God-Pu is marching on.”
--December 15, 2018 (Note: Pu is the atomic symbol for plutonium)

Dan

Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com
Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com

Jan Burse,ETH Zurich,Tristan Riviere,Dietmar Salamon,Janusz Adamus,Tatyana Barron, keep polluting the minds of young with 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction.

Jan Burse play act spamming everyday yet cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse,and his mindless 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction for Jan failed logic, unable to see Boole mixed up OR with AND truth tables.

Jan Burse 61 "Smullyan's Proof...."

> Fritz Feldhase 239 "Oh the Ambigarse 0^0..."
> > fuckdog spammer Fritz Feldhase 96 8:49 PM "An interesting defect..."
> > > Fuckdog spammer Dan Christensen & Jan Burse "An interesting defect in...." 87 on 6:12PM
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Why have these one line spammers in sci.math, day after day-- Mostowski Collapse (ETH Jan Burse) "An interesting defect in DC Proof". Is it to deflect the attention that ETH and Univ Western Ontario teach fake Logic 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction or is it to deflect ETH is too stupid to ask the question which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle and so ETH and Univ Western Ontario and Toronto daily spam sci.math to hog the front page with fake science.
> > > >
> > > > Why does Univ Western Ontario Dan Christensen and Jan Burse Zurich ETH have such a dumb stupid mind in physics? Never able to investigate the question-- what if we take the electron of atoms as the muon and subtract 105 from 945MeV and then take the 0.5MeV particle as Dirac's magnetic monopole. No, the dumb stupid worthless mind of Dan Christensen and Jan Burse in physics is never able to do such mental construction for they failed physics. For they failed physics because they failed LOGIC in that their pea sized brian still accepts the error filled Boole logic of 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction.
> > > > >
> > > > > Mostowski Collapse aka Jan Burse spam-- 4/11/22 -- "An interesting defect in DC proof"
> > > > > 
> > > > > My 5th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
> > > > > Preface:
> > > > > First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.
> > > > >
> > > > > The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.
> > > > >
> > > > > My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > File Size: 773 KB
> > > > > Print Length: 72 pages
> > > > > Publication Date: March 12, 2019
> > > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > > > Language: English
> > > > > ASIN: B07PMB69F5
> > > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> > > > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> > > > > Word Wise: Not Enabled
> > > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > > Screen Reader: Supported 
> > > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> > > > > ETH Zurich
> > > > >
> > > > > Paul Biran, Marc Burger, Patrick Cheridito, Manfred Einsiedler, Paul Embrechts
> > > > > Giovanni Felder, Alessio Figalli, Norbert Hungerbuhler, Tom Ilmanen, Horst Knorrer
> > > > > Emmanuel Kowalski
> > > > > Urs Lang
> > > > > Rahul Pandharipande
> > > > > Richard Pink
> > > > > Tristan Riviere
> > > > > Dietmar Salamon
> > > > > Martin Schweizer
> > > > > Mete Soner
> > > > > Michael Struwe
> > > > > Benjamin Sudakov
> > > > > Alain Sznitman
> > > > > Josef Teichmann
> > > > > Wendelin Werner
> > > > > Thomas Willwacher
> > > > >
> > > > > Zurich ETH, physics dept
> > > > > Charalampos Anastasiou, Niklas Beisert, Adrian Biland, Gianni Blatter, Marcella Carollo, Christian Degen, Leonardo Degiorgi, Gunther Dissertori, Klaus Ensslin, Tilman Esslinger, Jerome Faist, Matthias Gaberdiel, Aude Gehrmann-De Ridder, Vadim Geshkenbein, Christophorus Grab, Michele Graf, Jonathan Home, Roland Horisberger, Sebastian Huber, Thomas Markus Ihn, Atac Imamoglu, Steven Johnson, Ursula Keller, Klaus Kirch, Simon Lilly, Joel Mesot, Renatto Renner, Andre Rubbia, Werner Schmutz, Thomas Schulthess, Manfred Sigrist, Hans-Arno Synal, Matthias Troyer, Andreas Vaterlaus, Rainer Wallny, Andreas Wallraff, Werner Wegscheider, Audrey Zheludev, Oded Zilberberg
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > University Bern
> > > > > Christian Leumann
> > > > > Walter Benjamin
> > > > > Emil Theodor Kocher
> > > > > Kurt Wuthrich
> > > > > Daniel Vassella
> > > > > Rene Fasel
> > > > > Mani Matter
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker, Henry M. Van Driel, David J. Rowe, John W. Moffat, John F. Martin, Robert K. Logan, Albert E. Litherland, Roland List, Philipp Kronberg, James King, Anthony W. Key, Bob Holdom, Ron M. Farquhar, R. Nigel Edwards, David J. Dunlop, James Drummond, Tom E. Drake, R.Fraser Code, Richard C. Bailey, Robin Armstrong
> > > >
> > > > Chancellor Rose M. Patten
> > > > Pres. Meric Gertler
> > > >
> > > > Univ Toronto math dept
> > > > Mustafa Akcoglu, Spyros Alexakis, Edward Barbeau, Thomas Bloom, Man-Duen Choi, Stephen Cook, Chandler Davis, Nicholas Derzko, Eric Ellers, Ilya Gekhtman, Ian Graham, Steve Halpern, Wahidul Haque, Abe Igelfeld, Velimir Jurdjevic, Ivan Kupka, Anthony Lam, Michael Lorimer, James McCool, Eric Mendelsohn, Kunio Murasugi, Jeremy Quastel, Peter Rosenthal, Paul Selick, Dipak Sen, Rick Sharpe, Stuart Smith, Frank Tall, Steve Tanny
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Univ Western Ontario math dept
> > > > Janusz Adamus, Tatyana Barron, Dan Christensen, Graham Denham, Ajneet Dhillon, Matthias Franz, John Jardine, Massoud Khalkhali, Nicole Lemire, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon
> > > >
> > > > Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz
> > > > President Alan Shepard
> > > > Amit Chakma (chem engr)
> > > >
> > > > Univ. Western Ontario physics dept
> > > > Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang

Jan Burse,ETH Zurich,Tristan Riviere,Dietmar Salamon,Janusz Adamus,Tatyana Barron, keep polluting the minds of young with 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction.

Jan Burse play act spamming everyday yet cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse,and his mindless 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction for Jan failed logic, unable to see Boole mixed up OR with AND truth tables.

Jan Burse 61 "Smullyan's Proof...."



> Fritz Feldhase 239 "Oh the Ambigarse 0^0..."
> > fuckdog spammer Fritz Feldhase 96 8:49 PM "An interesting defect..."
> > > Fuckdog spammer Dan Christensen & Jan Burse "An interesting defect in...." 87 on 6:12PM
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Why have these one line spammers in sci.math, day after day-- Mostowski Collapse (ETH Jan Burse) "An interesting defect in DC Proof". Is it to deflect the attention that ETH and Univ Western Ontario teach fake Logic 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction or is it to deflect ETH is too stupid to ask the question which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle and so ETH and Univ Western Ontario and Toronto daily spam sci.math to hog the front page with fake science.
> > > >
> > > > Why does Univ Western Ontario Dan Christensen and Jan Burse Zurich ETH have such a dumb stupid mind in physics? Never able to investigate the question-- what if we take the electron of atoms as the muon and subtract 105 from 945MeV and then take the 0.5MeV particle as Dirac's magnetic monopole. No, the dumb stupid worthless mind of Dan Christensen and Jan Burse in physics is never able to do such mental construction for they failed physics. For they failed physics because they failed LOGIC in that their pea sized brian still accepts the error filled Boole logic of 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction.
> > > > >
> > > > > Mostowski Collapse aka Jan Burse spam-- 4/11/22 -- "An interesting defect in DC proof"
> > > > > 
> > > > > My 5th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
> > > > > Preface:
> > > > > First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.
> > > > >
> > > > > The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.
> > > > >
> > > > > My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > File Size: 773 KB
> > > > > Print Length: 72 pages
> > > > > Publication Date: March 12, 2019
> > > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > > > Language: English
> > > > > ASIN: B07PMB69F5
> > > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> > > > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 

> > > > > Word Wise: Not Enabled
> > > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > > Screen Reader: Supported
> > > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> > > > > ETH Zurich
> > > > >
> > > > > Paul Biran, Marc Burger, Patrick Cheridito, Manfred Einsiedler, Paul Embrechts
> > > > > Giovanni Felder, Alessio Figalli, Norbert Hungerbuhler, Tom Ilmanen, Horst Knorrer
> > > > > Emmanuel Kowalski
> > > > > Urs Lang
> > > > > Rahul Pandharipande
> > > > > Richard Pink
> > > > > Tristan Riviere
> > > > > Dietmar Salamon
> > > > > Martin Schweizer
> > > > > Mete Soner
> > > > > Michael Struwe
> > > > > Benjamin Sudakov
> > > > > Alain Sznitman
> > > > > Josef Teichmann
> > > > > Wendelin Werner
> > > > > Thomas Willwacher
> > > > >
> > > > > Zurich ETH, physics dept
> > > > > Charalampos Anastasiou, Niklas Beisert, Adrian Biland, Gianni Blatter, Marcella Carollo, Christian Degen, Leonardo Degiorgi, Gunther Dissertori, Klaus Ensslin, Tilman Esslinger, Jerome Faist, Matthias Gaberdiel, Aude Gehrmann-De Ridder, Vadim Geshkenbein, Christophorus Grab, Michele Graf, Jonathan Home, Roland Horisberger, Sebastian Huber, Thomas Markus Ihn, Atac Imamoglu, Steven Johnson, Ursula Keller, Klaus Kirch, Simon Lilly, Joel Mesot, Renatto Renner, Andre Rubbia, Werner Schmutz, Thomas Schulthess, Manfred Sigrist, Hans-Arno Synal, Matthias Troyer, Andreas Vaterlaus, Rainer Wallny, Andreas Wallraff, Werner Wegscheider, Audrey Zheludev, Oded Zilberberg
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > University Bern
> > > > > Christian Leumann
> > > > > Walter Benjamin
> > > > > Emil Theodor Kocher
> > > > > Kurt Wuthrich
> > > > > Daniel Vassella
> > > > > Rene Fasel
> > > > > Mani Matter
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker, Henry M. Van Driel, David J. Rowe, John W. Moffat, John F. Martin, Robert K. Logan, Albert E. Litherland, Roland List, Philipp Kronberg, James King, Anthony W. Key, Bob Holdom, Ron M. Farquhar, R. Nigel Edwards, David J. Dunlop, James Drummond, Tom E. Drake, R.Fraser Code, Richard C. Bailey, Robin Armstrong
> > > >
> > > > Chancellor Rose M. Patten
> > > > Pres. Meric Gertler
> > > >
> > > > Univ Toronto math dept
> > > > Mustafa Akcoglu, Spyros Alexakis, Edward Barbeau, Thomas Bloom, Man-Duen Choi, Stephen Cook, Chandler Davis, Nicholas Derzko, Eric Ellers, Ilya Gekhtman, Ian Graham, Steve Halpern, Wahidul Haque, Abe Igelfeld, Velimir Jurdjevic, Ivan Kupka, Anthony Lam, Michael Lorimer, James McCool, Eric Mendelsohn, Kunio Murasugi, Jeremy Quastel, Peter Rosenthal, Paul Selick, Dipak Sen, Rick Sharpe, Stuart Smith, Frank Tall, Steve Tanny
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Univ Western Ontario math dept
> > > > Janusz Adamus, Tatyana Barron, Dan Christensen, Graham Denham, Ajneet Dhillon, Matthias Franz, John Jardine, Massoud Khalkhali, Nicole Lemire, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon
> > > >
> > > > Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz
> > > > President Alan Shepard
> > > > Amit Chakma (chem engr)
> > > >
> > > > Univ. Western Ontario physics dept
> > > > Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang

🤡 of Math and 🃏 of Physics Archimedes "bozo" Plutonium
<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

> Subject: .Shitheads of math and science

1) Ludwig Poehlmann
2) Ludwig Hansen
3) Ludwig van Ludvig
4) Ludwig Plutonium
5) Archimedes Plutonium

On Friday, November 11, 2022 at 10:02:52 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>Harvard 🤡 of Math and Lene Hau, Sheldon Glashow 🃏 of Physics
> fails at math and science:

Re: Zelos asks why Harvard's Dr. Hau wants to fail in physics, by not turning off the light to see if light wave is a closed loop pencil ellipse that AP predicts. Is Dr.Hau stubborn and too ignorant to finish her experiment??
by Michael Moroney Jan 18, 2021, 2:06:24 PM

Why Kibo Parry M. do you have such a low opinion of Harvard and Dr. Hau?? Is it because she cannot turn a light switch off in "slow light experiment" and prove AP correct???

My 53rd published book

Quantum Entanglement, Physics series for High School, book 7 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Revised on 29Aug2021. This is AP's 53rd published book of science.

Since this is for High School, I need to keep it as simple as possible, for students in High School are just barely getting acquainted with physics. So I must come down to their level of understanding and comprehending. I write this for High School since NOVA did a TV program on the subject of Quantum Entanglement and once it appears on NOVA, we have to be able, in science, to explain the topic to High School students. For sure enough, many High School students will be watching that program. This book will explain Quantum Entanglement for them.

To explain Quantum Entanglement we have to start with what light is. And light comes in two forms, one is wave, and one is particle. Light is both these forms put together at all times. Light is both a wave and a particle simultaneously. In physics this is called a duality.

Cover picture is a picture taken by my iphone of a web search of Slow Light Experiments.

Product details
ASIN : B07VMZ698G
Publication date : July 26, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1801 KB
Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled
Print length : 22 pages
Lending : Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #214,475 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #2 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #375 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #1,960 in Physics (Books) 

My 102nd published book
Constant Maximum Speed of Light explained// Teaching Special Relativity to Grade School students//Student teaches professor series, book 7 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 16Sept2022. And this is AP's 102nd published book of science.

Preface: So many discoveries in March of 2020, that I have to rush and publish this book especially for it is the foundation of all books on the subject of Special Relativity, not just my books but all books written on Special Relativity. There is a key underlying _Fundamental Principle of Special Relativity_, and that is the fact that a ray of light is not a single arrow moving in a direction but rather is a closed loop that always has a contact with its source of origin, whether the Sun or a flashlight, the light rays are closed loops; are circuits, and if you turn the flashlight off, (we cannot turn the Sun off) or the laser light in the Harvard BEC experiment, the BEC experiments with a laser light beam, if you switch off the light source, all the light instantly disappears. Whether the "slow light or the normal light, all vanishes at the same time when the light switch is turned off.. So, the _Fundamental Principle of Special Relativity_, is that light comes in closed loops circuits, where you take a circle and you make it into a ray, and I call it a pencil ellipse, and we can best see and understand this fact from a electric extension cord. That cord looks like a straightline arrow, but if you look deeper, you will find it started out as a circle that has been shaped into a long looking straightline ray, a pencil ellipse.

Cover Picture is my demonstration table at home where I took some shoe-laces of equal length. I took 3 shoelaces of length 400 millimeters, or if you prefer 40 centimeters. Three shoe-laces are all the same length. In one of them I tried to make a circle using a clip fastener to hold the ends together. My circle has a diameter of 127 millimeters or 12.7 centimeters. The second object below the circle is that same circle, only it is reformed so that it is a circle-line-ray, called a pencil ellipse, just like your electric extension cord is a circle-line-ray of copper wire, closed loop copper wire. The copper wire started out as a circle but was reformed into being a pencil ellipse. Now the third picture is that same shoe-lace length marked off by 3.14 diameters. Now be careful here. For the circumference of the circle divided by the diameter is the value of pi as a number 3.14. So when I say 3.14 diameters, that means 3 diameters plus a snippet of a diameter of 0.14. Notice the short segment, of a 0.14 piece of the diameter with 3 diameters each of 12.7 centimeters. The original circle was diameter 127 millimeters, or 12.7 centimeters. Caution: do not mistake any shadows in the demonstration. There are shadows in the third figure.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0863L3X1Y
Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 18, 2020
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 522 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #3,443,925 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #460 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #11,559 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #64,321 in Physics (Books)



President Larry Summers
President now Lawrence Bacow

Harvard Physics dept
Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner, Adam Cohen, Eugene Demler, Michael Desai
Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin, Gary Feldman, Douglas Finkbeiner, Melissa Franklin, Gerald Gabrielse, Howard Georgi, Sheldon Glashow, Roy Glauber, Jene Golovchenko, Markus Greiner, Roxanne Guenette, Girma Hailu, Bertrand Halperin, Lene Hau
Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, Efthimios Kaxiras, Philip Kim, John Kovac, Erel Levine
Mikhail Lukin, Logan McCarty, L. Mahadevan, Vinothan Manoharan, Eric Mazur, Masahiro Morii
David Morin, Julia Mundy, Cherry Murray, David Nelson, Kang Ni, Hongkun Park, William Paul
Peter Pershan, Mara Prentiss, Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, Isaac Silvera, Andrew Strominger, Christopher Stubbs, Cumrun Vafa, Ronald Walsworth, David Weitz, Robert Westervelt, Richard Wilson
Tai Wu, Amir Yacoby, Susanne Yelin, Xi Yin