I see now how this particular group-platform (using Google Groups) "top posts" rather than "bottom posts."

Meanwhile, even apples and oranges both express the concept of "fruit," just as "free speech" may involve "healthy" speech as well as logorrhea (which reflects the concept of spam, discussed earlier.)

Meanwhile, hope y'all had a Merry Christmas (or Solstice, or equivalent) and thanks for the chat :-)

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 3:22:03 PM UTC-6, Dan Marotta wrote:
> Turds and free speech. Apples and oranges.
>
> Dan
> 5J
> On 12/26/22 13:54, Richard Silk wrote:
> > On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 11:28:34 AM UTC-6, Jon wrote:
> > <snip>
> >>> On 12/21/22 18:00, Jon wrote:
> > <snip>
> >> Maybe you're fine with seeing spam advertisements, but most people
> >> aren't. That's what I'm talking about deleting. I'm not talking about
> >> banning someone because they have someone an opinion others disagree with.
> >
> > Right: while everyone has the right to defecate, others have the right to a clean environment (thus the right to clean up where others may have failed to do so.)
> >
> > I mean, surely, when walking into a stall and seeing a classic floater, who does NOT flush ***first***???

Let's see...

Right click on address field
Select "Create Rule From"
Accept "Sender equals dicksilk@gmail.com"
Accept "Delete Message"

There! I won't be seeing your "logorrhea/Jesus" messages any more.
Rebut all you want; I won't see it. BTW, your email address is still
not on my allowed senders list at my ISP so, See Ya!

Dan
5J

On 12/26/22 14:27, Richard Silk wrote:
> I see now how this particular group-platform (using Google Groups) "top posts" rather than "bottom posts."
>
> Meanwhile, even apples and oranges both express the concept of "fruit," just as "free speech" may involve "healthy" speech as well as logorrhea (which reflects the concept of spam, discussed earlier.)
>
> Meanwhile, hope y'all had a Merry Christmas (or Solstice, or equivalent) and thanks for the chat :-)
>
> On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 3:22:03 PM UTC-6, Dan Marotta wrote:
>> Turds and free speech. Apples and oranges.
>>
>> Dan
>> 5J
>> On 12/26/22 13:54, Richard Silk wrote:
>>> On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 11:28:34 AM UTC-6, Jon wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>>>> On 12/21/22 18:00, Jon wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>>> Maybe you're fine with seeing spam advertisements, but most people
>>>> aren't. That's what I'm talking about deleting. I'm not talking about
>>>> banning someone because they have someone an opinion others disagree with.
>>>
>>> Right: while everyone has the right to defecate, others have the right to a clean environment (thus the right to clean up where others may have failed to do so.)
>>>
>>> I mean, surely, when walking into a stall and seeing a classic floater, who does NOT flush ***first***???

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 3:48:23 PM UTC-6, Dan Marotta wrote:
> Let's see...
>
<snip>
>
> There! I won't be seeing your "logorrhea/Jesus" messages any more.

"Judge NOT" [lest ye be judged likewise]
> Rebut all you want; I won't see it.

LOL! "Reality conforms to thought," although the spiritually blind never see to begin with, eh? (That can be a *fatal* condition when airborne!)

> BTW, your email address is still
> not on my allowed senders list at my ISP so, See Ya!

It was never asked for it to be added. (Hmmmm...!)
> Dan
> 5J

Like I said, "thanks for the chat :-)"

> On 12/26/22 14:27, Richard Silk wrote:
> > I see now how this particular group-platform (using Google Groups) "top posts" rather than "bottom posts."
> >
> > Meanwhile, even apples and oranges both express the concept of "fruit," just as "free speech" may involve "healthy" speech as well as logorrhea (which reflects the concept of spam, discussed earlier.)
> >
> > Meanwhile, hope y'all had a Merry Christmas (or Solstice, or equivalent) and thanks for the chat :-)
> >
> > On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 3:22:03 PM UTC-6, Dan Marotta wrote:
> >> Turds and free speech. Apples and oranges.
> >>
> >> Dan
> >> 5J
> >> On 12/26/22 13:54, Richard Silk wrote:
> >>> On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 11:28:34 AM UTC-6, Jon wrote:
> >>> <snip>
> >>>>> On 12/21/22 18:00, Jon wrote:
> >>> <snip>
> >>>> Maybe you're fine with seeing spam advertisements, but most people
> >>>> aren't. That's what I'm talking about deleting. I'm not talking about
> >>>> banning someone because they have someone an opinion others disagree with.
> >>>
> >>> Right: while everyone has the right to defecate, others have the right to a clean environment (thus the right to clean up where others may have failed to do so.)
> >>>
> >>> I mean, surely, when walking into a stall and seeing a classic floater, who does NOT flush ***first***???

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 3:13:51 PM UTC-8, Richard Silk wrote:
> On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 3:48:23 PM UTC-6, Dan Marotta wrote:
> > Let's see...
> >
> <snip>
> >
> > There! I won't be seeing your "logorrhea/Jesus" messages any more.
> "Judge NOT" [lest ye be judged likewise]
> > Rebut all you want; I won't see it.
> LOL! "Reality conforms to thought," although the spiritually blind never see to begin with, eh? (That can be a *fatal* condition when airborne!)
> > BTW, your email address is still
> > not on my allowed senders list at my ISP so, See Ya!
> It was never asked for it to be added. (Hmmmm...!)
>
> > Dan
> > 5J
>
> Like I said, "thanks for the chat :-)"
> > On 12/26/22 14:27, Richard Silk wrote:
> > > I see now how this particular group-platform (using Google Groups) "top posts" rather than "bottom posts."
> > >
> > > Meanwhile, even apples and oranges both express the concept of "fruit," just as "free speech" may involve "healthy" speech as well as logorrhea (which reflects the concept of spam, discussed earlier.)
> > >
> > > Meanwhile, hope y'all had a Merry Christmas (or Solstice, or equivalent) and thanks for the chat :-)
> > >
> > > On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 3:22:03 PM UTC-6, Dan Marotta wrote:
> > >> Turds and free speech. Apples and oranges.
> > >>
> > >> Dan
> > >> 5J
> > >> On 12/26/22 13:54, Richard Silk wrote:
> > >>> On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 11:28:34 AM UTC-6, Jon wrote:
> > >>> <snip>
> > >>>>> On 12/21/22 18:00, Jon wrote:
> > >>> <snip>
> > >>>> Maybe you're fine with seeing spam advertisements, but most people
> > >>>> aren't. That's what I'm talking about deleting. I'm not talking about
> > >>>> banning someone because they have someone an opinion others disagree with.
> > >>>
> > >>> Right: while everyone has the right to defecate, others have the right to a clean environment (thus the right to clean up where others may have failed to do so.)
> > >>>
> > >>> I mean, surely, when walking into a stall and seeing a classic floater, who does NOT flush ***first***???

You guys are just feeding the troll.

Tom

On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 1:12:50 AM UTC-6, 2G wrote:
<snip>
> You guys are just feeding the troll.

.... he wrote, as he fed the troll.

Meanwhile, "Happy New Year!" (even though it's a number of hours in the future, as of this writing.)

On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:06:57 AM UTC-8, Richard Silk wrote:
> On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 1:12:50 AM UTC-6, 2G wrote:
> <snip>
> > You guys are just feeding the troll.
> ... he wrote, as he fed the troll.
>
> Meanwhile, "Happy New Year!" (even though it's a number of hours in the future, as of this writing.)

Well, then SO ARE YOU!
This guy is a psycho. Example of his posts:

A post to the parents of a 15-year-old boy killed in an accident reads: “Well now I shit on you, I rejoice in your loss of (name withheld) and pray for the loss of (your daughter).”

To the parents of another young Saskatoon resident who died, Kabatoff writes: “What you God-damned filthy assholes paid for (your son’s) funeral could have supported me overseas for months.”

On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 2:28:25 PM UTC-6, 2G wrote:
> On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:06:57 AM UTC-8, Richard Silk wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 1:12:50 AM UTC-6, 2G wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > You guys are just feeding the troll.
> > ... he wrote, as he fed the troll.
> >
> > Meanwhile, "Happy New Year!" (even though it's a number of hours in the future, as of this writing.)
> Well, then SO ARE YOU!
> This guy is a psycho. Example of his posts:
<snip>

<sigh> So would you like the honor of feeding the troll another bite?

Meanwhile, all accusation as well as all judgment reflects duality.
"Judge NOT" [lest ye be judged as you judge others.] (Matthew 7, Luke 6, et al.)

On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 3:40:23 PM UTC-8, Richard Silk wrote:
> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 2:28:25 PM UTC-6, 2G wrote:
> > On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:06:57 AM UTC-8, Richard Silk wrote:
> > > On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 1:12:50 AM UTC-6, 2G wrote:
> > > <snip>
> > > > You guys are just feeding the troll.
> > > ... he wrote, as he fed the troll.
> > >
> > > Meanwhile, "Happy New Year!" (even though it's a number of hours in the future, as of this writing.)
> > Well, then SO ARE YOU!
> > This guy is a psycho. Example of his posts:
> <snip>
>
> <sigh> So would you like the honor of feeding the troll another bite?
>
> Meanwhile, all accusation as well as all judgment reflects duality.
> "Judge NOT" [lest ye be judged as you judge others.] (Matthew 7, Luke 6, et al.)

Right - and you're NOT judging. Get REAL!

So the quotes were getting a bit deep, so here's a top post to "catch up to speed" what's "in focus""
I (RCS) wrote:
> > Meanwhile, all accusation as well as all judgment reflects duality.
> > "Judge NOT" [lest ye be judged as you judge others.] (Matthew 7, Luke 6, et al.)
to which
2G wrote:> Right - and you're NOT judging. Get REAL!

The difference in "flow" which may be observed involves the difference between "observing" and "participating":

One who *observes* that "all judgment (as in [A judges B]) reflects duality" teaches that of which one "truly observes."

Meanwhile, the individual who says "you're [X]" reflects duality, only in the form of "duality of ad hominem fallacy" (rather than duality of judgment) which (if interested) I'll be happy to "unpack," however, for a *succinct* "definition,"duality reflects the condition that 'speaks falsely'."
There's a bit of a write-up available on the Topic of Unity/duality at: https://tinyurl.com/itta-topic-ud (if interested.)

On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 9:47:38 PM UTC-6, 2G wrote:
> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 3:40:23 PM UTC-8, Richard Silk wrote:
> > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 2:28:25 PM UTC-6, 2G wrote:
> > > On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:06:57 AM UTC-8, Richard Silk wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 1:12:50 AM UTC-6, 2G wrote:
> > > > <snip>
> > > > > You guys are just feeding the troll.
> > > > ... he wrote, as he fed the troll.
> > > >
> > > > Meanwhile, "Happy New Year!" (even though it's a number of hours in the future, as of this writing.)
> > > Well, then SO ARE YOU!
> > > This guy is a psycho. Example of his posts:
> > <snip>
> >
> > <sigh> So would you like the honor of feeding the troll another bite?
> >
> > Meanwhile, all accusation as well as all judgment reflects duality.
> > "Judge NOT" [lest ye be judged as you judge others.] (Matthew 7, Luke 6, et al.)

On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 11:20:54 AM UTC-8, Richard Silk wrote:
> So the quotes were getting a bit deep, so here's a top post to "catch up to speed" what's "in focus""
> I (RCS) wrote:
> > > Meanwhile, all accusation as well as all judgment reflects duality.
> > > "Judge NOT" [lest ye be judged as you judge others.] (Matthew 7, Luke 6, et al.)
> to which
> 2G wrote:> Right - and you're NOT judging. Get REAL!
>
> The difference in "flow" which may be observed involves the difference between "observing" and "participating":
>
> One who *observes* that "all judgment (as in [A judges B]) reflects duality" teaches that of which one "truly observes."
>
> Meanwhile, the individual who says "you're [X]" reflects duality, only in the form of "duality of ad hominem fallacy" (rather than duality of judgment) which (if interested) I'll be happy to "unpack," however, for a *succinct* "definition,"duality reflects the condition that 'speaks falsely'."
> There's a bit of a write-up available on the Topic of Unity/duality at: https://tinyurl.com/itta-topic-ud (if interested.)
> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 9:47:38 PM UTC-6, 2G wrote:
> > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 3:40:23 PM UTC-8, Richard Silk wrote:
> > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 2:28:25 PM UTC-6, 2G wrote:
> > > > On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:06:57 AM UTC-8, Richard Silk wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 1:12:50 AM UTC-6, 2G wrote:
> > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > You guys are just feeding the troll.
> > > > > ... he wrote, as he fed the troll.
> > > > >
> > > > > Meanwhile, "Happy New Year!" (even though it's a number of hours in the future, as of this writing.)
> > > > Well, then SO ARE YOU!
> > > > This guy is a psycho. Example of his posts:
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > <sigh> So would you like the honor of feeding the troll another bite?
> > >
> > > Meanwhile, all accusation as well as all judgment reflects duality.
> > > "Judge NOT" [lest ye be judged as you judge others.] (Matthew 7, Luke 6, et al.)

You have a LONG WAY to go before you GET REAL! Your first post:
"he wrote, as he fed the troll"
is, in fact, a JUDGMENT, in violation of your own Biblical ramblings. The other posts are just pure crap (which IS feeding the troll).

On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 2:29:41 PM UTC-6, 2G wrote:
> On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 11:20:54 AM UTC-8, Richard Silk wrote:
<snip>
> You have a LONG WAY to go before you GET REAL! Your first post:
> "he wrote, as he fed the troll"
> is, in fact, a JUDGMENT, in violation of your own Biblical ramblings. The other posts are just pure crap (which IS feeding the troll).

No. An observation is simply an observation. One need not "judge" if the sun is visible outside when it may clearly be seen (or not) in the sky.

Judging comes often in the form of opinion, such as when you wrote:> "The other posts are just pure crap" which judges [X] as "pure crap" rather than dealing with the logic (or lack thereof) within what is written.

The essence of your post (that started this discussion / sub-thread) involves the concept that [replying to anything relating to Daryl Kabatoff feeds the troll] which is exactly what occurred when you posted something relating to Daryl Kabatoff.

Meanwhile, as I have *zero* concept of what nation or political dogma you may favor, please keep in mind that the "logically challenged" believe "0"="1" and *always* accuse 1 of being 0.

On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 1:43:02 PM UTC-8, Richard Silk wrote:
> On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 2:29:41 PM UTC-6, 2G wrote:
> > On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 11:20:54 AM UTC-8, Richard Silk wrote:
> <snip>
> > You have a LONG WAY to go before you GET REAL! Your first post:
> > "he wrote, as he fed the troll"
> > is, in fact, a JUDGMENT, in violation of your own Biblical ramblings. The other posts are just pure crap (which IS feeding the troll).
> No. An observation is simply an observation. One need not "judge" if the sun is visible outside when it may clearly be seen (or not) in the sky.
>
> Judging comes often in the form of opinion, such as when you wrote:> "The other posts are just pure crap" which judges [X] as "pure crap" rather than dealing with the logic (or lack thereof) within what is written.
>
> The essence of your post (that started this discussion / sub-thread) involves the concept that [replying to anything relating to Daryl Kabatoff feeds the troll] which is exactly what occurred when you posted something relating to Daryl Kabatoff.
>
> Meanwhile, as I have *zero* concept of what nation or political dogma you may favor, please keep in mind that the "logically challenged" believe "0"="1" and *always* accuse 1 of being 0.

What I get out of this is just pure BULLSHIT - you ARE "feeding the troll" exactly as much as I am, whether you believe it or not.

And, YES, you are more of a JUDGE than I am.

Tom

On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 2:29:41 PM UTC-6, 2G wrote:
> On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 11:20:54 AM UTC-8, Richard Silk wrote:
> > So the quotes were getting a bit deep, so here's a top post to "catch up to speed" what's "in focus""
> > I (RCS) wrote:
> > > > Meanwhile, all accusation as well as all judgment reflects duality.
> > > > "Judge NOT" [lest ye be judged as you judge others.] (Matthew 7, Luke 6, et al.)
> > to which
> > 2G wrote:> Right - and you're NOT judging. Get REAL!
> >
> > The difference in "flow" which may be observed involves the difference between "observing" and "participating":
> >
> > One who *observes* that "all judgment (as in [A judges B]) reflects duality" teaches that of which one "truly observes."
> >
> > Meanwhile, the individual who says "you're [X]" reflects duality, only in the form of "duality of ad hominem fallacy" (rather than duality of judgment) which (if interested) I'll be happy to "unpack," however, for a *succinct* "definition,"duality reflects the condition that 'speaks falsely'."
> > There's a bit of a write-up available on the Topic of Unity/duality at: https://tinyurl.com/itta-topic-ud (if interested.)
> > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 9:47:38 PM UTC-6, 2G wrote:
> > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 3:40:23 PM UTC-8, Richard Silk wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 2:28:25 PM UTC-6, 2G wrote:
> > > > > On Friday, December 30, 2022 at 9:06:57 AM UTC-8, Richard Silk wrote:
> > > > > > On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 1:12:50 AM UTC-6, 2G wrote:
> > > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > > You guys are just feeding the troll.
> > > > > > ... he wrote, as he fed the troll.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Meanwhile, "Happy New Year!" (even though it's a number of hours in the future, as of this writing.)
> > > > > Well, then SO ARE YOU!
> > > > > This guy is a psycho. Example of his posts:
> > > > <snip>
> > > >
> > > > <sigh> So would you like the honor of feeding the troll another bite?
> > > >
> > > > Meanwhile, all accusation as well as all judgment reflects duality.
> > > > "Judge NOT" [lest ye be judged as you judge others.] (Matthew 7, Luke 6, et al.)
> You have a LONG WAY to go before you GET REAL! Your first post:
> "he wrote, as he fed the troll"
> is, in fact, a JUDGMENT, in violation of your own Biblical ramblings. The other posts are just pure crap (which IS feeding the troll).

Matthews intent wasn't to bar Christians from judging but rather, to caution them that if they judged hypocritically that they should expect the same. See Matthew 7:2-3.

If *I* were mayor of Saskatoon, why, I'd make everybody who quotes only Matthew 7:-1 actually bring out their Bible and read the next few sentences :)

On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 9:19:10 AM UTC-6, shaunw<snip> wrote:
> If *I* were mayor of Saskatoon, why, I'd make everybody who quotes only Matthew 7:-1 actually bring out their Bible and read the next few sentences :)

Right, especially Matthew 7:2, along with John 7:24, Luke 6:37-38, et al. ✞

However, please *also* consider how Jesus teaches the vital essence of "EVERY WORD" in Matthew 4:4, which is where the *Light* of the teaching of Jesus *really* begins to *SHINE!* ☀️

For example, "EVERY WORD" encompasses the simple concept: "Judge NOT". As all judgment (as in A judges B) reflects duality, thus, [duality NOT] = Unity, and *Only* Love Creates Unity, which Jesus teaches in Matthew 5:44, "Love thine enemies," aka [1❤️0].

Something *super* interesting may be diagrammed (logically) from His verse in John 7:24,
[μὴ] [κρίνετε] [κατ’] [ὄψιν] [ἀλλὰ] [τὴν] [δικαίαν] [κρίσιν] [κρίνετε]
[mē] [krinete] [kat’] [opsin] [alla] [tēn] [dikaian] [krisin] [krinete]
[[Judge] [not]] [according to] [appearance] [but] [the] [righteous] [judgment] [judge]
which translates logically as:
1∩(0∩(0∩(0)))
and diagrams out (amazingly!) as an *like* an arrow sinlessly intersecting a 3-D bull's-eye
(See https://photos.app.goo.gl/bvu5NjbQoXwH5SFv8 for illustration.)

Meanwhile, thanks for the discussion ✞
As to whatever that 2G individual write, someone once advised: "Never argue with a fool— people may not be able to tell the difference." 😊

Politics and personality rants are bad enough, but when the Bible thumpers start posting, it is definitely time to go.

On Friday, January 6, 2023 at 9:05:12 AM UTC-6, Mark Mocho wrote:
> Politics and personality rants are bad enough, but when the Bible thumpers start posting, it is definitely time to go.

There's actually a certain element of truth within that statement— Those who use the Bible as a club do so incorrectly.

Personally, I was more interested in "WHY" do people follow *any* particular belief or idea? (Why do birds follow the updrafts beneath the clouds on a sunny day?)

Eventually, answers started to appear to answer the question(s).

(Reality Conforms to Thought.)

On Friday, January 6, 2023 at 6:13:39 AM UTC-8, Richard Silk wrote:
> On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 9:19:10 AM UTC-6, shaunw<snip> wrote:
>
> > If *I* were mayor of Saskatoon, why, I'd make everybody who quotes only Matthew 7:-1 actually bring out their Bible and read the next few sentences :)
> Right, especially Matthew 7:2, along with John 7:24, Luke 6:37-38, et al. ✞
>
> However, please *also* consider how Jesus teaches the vital essence of "EVERY WORD" in Matthew 4:4, which is where the *Light* of the teaching of Jesus *really* begins to *SHINE!* ☀️
>
> For example, "EVERY WORD" encompasses the simple concept: "Judge NOT". As all judgment (as in A judges B) reflects duality, thus, [duality NOT] = Unity, and *Only* Love Creates Unity, which Jesus teaches in Matthew 5:44, "Love thine enemies," aka [1❤️0].
>
> Something *super* interesting may be diagrammed (logically) from His verse in John 7:24,
> [μὴ] [κρίνετε] [κατ’] [ὄψιν] [ἀλλὰ] [τὴν] [δικαίαν] [κρίσιν] [κρίνετε]
> [mē] [krinete] [kat’] [opsin] [alla] [tēn] [dikaian] [krisin] [krinete]
> [[Judge] [not]] [according to] [appearance] [but] [the] [righteous] [judgment] [judge]
> which translates logically as:
> 1∩(0∩(0∩(0)))
> and diagrams out (amazingly!) as an *like* an arrow sinlessly intersecting a 3-D bull's-eye
> (See https://photos.app.goo.gl/bvu5NjbQoXwH5SFv8 for illustration.)
>
> Meanwhile, thanks for the discussion ✞
> As to whatever that 2G individual write, someone once advised: "Never argue with a fool— people may not be able to tell the difference." 😊

Thou hast becomest thy Troll....

On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 12:04:11 AM UTC-6, 2G wrote:
<snip>
> Thou hast becomest thy Troll....

Matthew 7:1–2, biblegateway.com/passage?search=Matthew+7:1-2&version=KJV;NIV
1 “Do not judge, or you too will be judged. 2 For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you."

(Meanwhile, the "logically challenged" believe "0"="1" and *always* accuse 1 of being 0.)

On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 10:21:35 AM UTC-8, Richard Silk wrote:
> On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 12:04:11 AM UTC-6, 2G wrote:
> <snip>
> > Thou hast becomest thy Troll....
> Matthew 7:1–2, biblegateway.com/passage?search=Matthew+7:1-2&version=KJV;NIV
> 1 “Do not judge, or you too will be judged. 2 For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you."
>
> (Meanwhile, the "logically challenged" believe "0"="1" and *always* accuse 1 of being 0.)

Hey Richard, this is the sound of me disconnecting you .... <click>

On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 1:11:45 AM UTC-6, 2G wrote:
> On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 10:21:35 AM UTC-8, Richard Silk wrote:
> > On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 12:04:11 AM UTC-6, 2G wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > Thou hast becomest thy Troll....
> > Matthew 7:1–2, biblegateway.com/passage?search=Matthew+7:1-2&version=KJV;NIV
> > 1 “Do not judge, or you too will be judged. 2 For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you."
> >
> > (Meanwhile, the "logically challenged" believe "0"="1" and *always* accuse 1 of being 0.)
> Hey Richard, this is the sound of me disconnecting you .... <click>

Matthew 25:40, "...whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of Mine, you did for Me."
[whatsoever one does unto others, so one does unto oneself.]

On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 9:38:09 AM UTC-8, Richard Silk wrote:
> On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 1:11:45 AM UTC-6, 2G wrote:
> > On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 10:21:35 AM UTC-8, Richard Silk wrote:
> > > On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 12:04:11 AM UTC-6, 2G wrote:
> > > <snip>
> > > > Thou hast becomest thy Troll....
> > > Matthew 7:1–2, biblegateway.com/passage?search=Matthew+7:1-2&version=KJV;NIV
> > > 1 “Do not judge, or you too will be judged. 2 For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you."
> > >
> > > (Meanwhile, the "logically challenged" believe "0"="1" and *always* accuse 1 of being 0.)
> > Hey Richard, this is the sound of me disconnecting you .... <click>
> Matthew 25:40, "...whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of Mine, you did for Me."
> [whatsoever one does unto others, so one does unto oneself.]

<click>

On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 7:00:37 PM UTC-6, 2G wrote:
> On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 9:38:09 AM UTC-8, Richard Silk wrote:
> > On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 1:11:45 AM UTC-6, 2G wrote:
> > > On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 10:21:35 AM UTC-8, Richard Silk wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 12:04:11 AM UTC-6, 2G wrote:
> > > > <snip>
> > > > > Thou hast becomest thy Troll....
> > > > Matthew 7:1–2, biblegateway.com/passage?search=Matthew+7:1-2&version=KJV;NIV
> > > > 1 “Do not judge, or you too will be judged. 2 For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you."
> > > >
> > > > (Meanwhile, the "logically challenged" believe "0"="1" and *always* accuse 1 of being 0.)
> > > Hey Richard, this is the sound of me disconnecting you .... <click>
> > Matthew 25:40, "...whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of Mine, you did for Me."
> > [whatsoever one does unto others, so one does unto oneself.]

> <click>

Is there an echo in here? Hmmm.....