On Sunday, August 8, 2021 at 1:27:33 PM UTC-7, Lamar Hesslen wrote:
> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, August 8, 2021 at 12:47:26 PM UTC-7, Lamar Hesslen wrote:
> >> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>
> >> > Heat has its EM energy critical to begin to push the atom
> >> >
> >> > Look at a rocket waiting to lift. It waits to be pushed by enough
> >> > heat overcoming the primary G.
> >> Still, it's NOT the heat.
> >
> > Sure it is. Heat energy pushes. There is no opposite gravity pushing...
> That's oval. What can you say in your defense?
>
> French Health Pass Poster Shows Government Printed them in January 2020
> https://www.bitchute.com/video/R70SvvW88C4L/
>
> Heat can't push. What pushes is *work*.
>
> Newton's third law
>
> The third law states that all forces between two objects exist in equal
> magnitude and opposite direction:

How is that pushing the rocket where enough heat comes from fuel?

Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, August 7, 2021 at 8:11:28 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thursday, August 5, 2021 at 11:58:51 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Thursday, August 5, 2021 at 10:45:30 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 5:15:34 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, August 3, 202 at 4:38:08 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin <bodk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 3:19:53 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The paper in the following link shows how the concept of absolute motion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is capable of unifying all the forces (including gravity) of nature.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2019unification.pdf
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If anyone doesn’t know who the author is, ask yourself whether you want to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> download anything written by a loon who couldn’t pass the first quiz of a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> first-year physics class.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLOL.....The SR fanatic is afraid of people reading my paper.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Heck no. I’m not afraid of magnetic insoles and copper bracelets and
>>>>>>>>>>> penis-growth pills, either. I just think it’s something people should be
>>>>>>>>>>> advised are scams and to not waste attention on.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There is a guy down the street from me who has a ramshackle used tire
>>>>>>>>>> business. It is known to the locals as being a horrible place that has
>>>>>>>>>> scammed numerous people, and it’s a wonder it’s still in business. Every
>>>>>>>>>> community message board in the entire town has citizens posting warnings to
>>>>>>>>>> not do business with this crook.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yeah Odd we all know that you are full of shit. You are wasting your life
>>>>>>>>> cruising the internet.
>>>>>>>> Does bitching like this get any of your questions answered?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ever consider reading a physics book?
>>>>>>>> You DO know how to read, don’t you? Or are you not allowed to have one in
>>>>>>>> the facility?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Moron, why would I want to waste time to study obsolete physics and
>>>>>>> become a SR fanfic like you?
>>>>>> Heard that excuse many times before. “I don’t want to learn any physics
>>>>>
>>>>> No idiot I don’t want to waste time to study obsolete physics when I
>>>>> already formulated MM and MM is a superior theory of physics.
>>>> That is, of course, your choice. The result of that choice (not learning
>>>> even first-year physics) will be that no physicist will ever pay any
>>>> attention to any of your ideas.
>>>
>>> I don’t expect indoctrinated physicists to endorse my theory. I think
>>> that some future unindoctrianted physicists will. Why because they will
>>> be tired of banging their head against the stone wall.
>> And that’s insanity.
>>
>> Just like others here before you, your digital footprint will die with you.
>>
>> Go ahead. Look for Koobee Wublee’s published “thesis”. Or NoEinstein’s. Or
>> any of a half dozen others who said the same thing as you, died, and
>> disappeared without a trace. Why do you think your trace will be more
>> durable?
>
> Because MM is the true theory of everything?

So said the others with their self-published treatises. All said they would
be vindicated decades or centuries in the future. All their self-published
treatises have fallen to digital dust. Yours will too, and there’s not one
thing you can do to stop it.

> 1. MM has a new theory of gravity.
> 2. MM is able to unify all the forces of nature.
> 3. MM explains the origin of the universe and origin of matters.
> 4. MM have a new theory of relativity.
> 5. MM advanced experiments to detect absolute motions.
> 6. MM explains all the results of quantum experiments.
>>>>
>>>> Learning first-year physics is and will always be a firm expectation for
>>>> anyone putting forward new ideas in physics.
>>>>
>>>> Anybody who doesn’t do that is AUTOMATICALLY a wannabe crank.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> because reading is brainwashing. Better to just start fresh as an outsider,
>>>>>> because all original thinking comes from outsiders.”
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Except that none of that is true and it’s all insane self-delusion.
>>>>>>> I already formulated MM, a superior theory of physics. MM has the
>>>>>>> following features:
>>>>>>> 1. It has a new valid theory of gravity.
>>>>>>> 2. It can unify all the forces of nature (including gravity).
>>>>>>> 3. It describes a valid origin of the universe .
>>>>>>> 4. It describes the origin of matters.
>>>>>>> 5. So why are you wasting time defending SR? Are you an idiot?
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>> d become
>>>>>>>>>> Why, Ken Seto might ask, don’t the locals let people judge for themselves
>>>>>>>>>> and find out for themselves whether the guy is a crook or not?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That’s what one scam artist might say to defend another.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You, Ken Seto, are in the same category as that low-life with the used tire
>>>>>>>>>> business. Except he makes a little money off innocent people, and you can’t
>>>>>>>>>> make a penny off your efforts.
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, August 7, 2021 at 8:11:28 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thursday, August 5, 2021 at 11:58:51 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Thursday, August 5, 2021 at 10:45:30 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 5:15:34 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, August 3, 202 at 4:38:08 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin <bodk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 3:19:53 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The paper in the following link shows how the concept of absolute motion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is capable of unifying all the forces (including gravity) of nature.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2019unification.pdf
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If anyone doesn’t know who the author is, ask yourself whether you want to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> download anything written by a loon who couldn’t pass the first quiz of a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> first-year physics class.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLOL.....The SR fanatic is afraid of people reading my paper.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Heck no. I’m not afraid of magnetic insoles and copper bracelets and
>>>>>>>>>>> penis-growth pills, either. I just think it’s something people should be
>>>>>>>>>>> advised are scams and to not waste attention on.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There is a guy down the street from me who has a ramshackle used tire
>>>>>>>>>> business. It is known to the locals as being a horrible place that has
>>>>>>>>>> scammed numerous people, and it’s a wonder it’s still in business. Every
>>>>>>>>>> community message board in the entire town has citizens posting warnings to
>>>>>>>>>> not do business with this crook.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yeah Odd we all know that you are full of shit. You are wasting your life
>>>>>>>>> cruising the internet.
>>>>>>>> Does bitching like this get any of your questions answered?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ever consider reading a physics book?
>>>>>>>> You DO know how to read, don’t you? Or are you not allowed to have one in
>>>>>>>> the facility?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Moron, why would I want to waste time to study obsolete physics and
>>>>>>> become a SR fanfic like you?
>>>>>> Heard that excuse many times before. “I don’t want to learn any physics
>>>>>
>>>>> No idiot I don’t want to waste time to study obsolete physics when I
>>>>> already formulated MM and MM is a superior theory of physics.
>>>> That is, of course, your choice. The result of that choice (not learning
>>>> even first-year physics) will be that no physicist will ever pay any
>>>> attention to any of your ideas.
>>>
>>> I don’t expect indoctrinated physicists to endorse my theory. I think
>>> that some future unindoctrianted physicists will. Why because they will
>>> be tired of banging their head against the stone wall.
>> And that’s insanity.
>>
>> Just like others here before you, your digital footprint will die with you.
>>
>> Go ahead. Look for Koobee Wublee’s published “thesis”. Or NoEinstein’s. Or
>> any of a half dozen others who said the same thing as you, died, and
>> disappeared without a trace. Why do you think your trace will be more
>> durable?
>
> Because MM is the true theory of everything?

So say the others, whose self published treatises have vanished from the
earth. And they too all said that their insight would last for generations
or even centuries until they were rediscovered and redeemed.

And yet they are all digital dust.

And you think you are somehow protected from the same decay.

You are insane.

> 1. MM has a new theory of gravity.
> 2. MM is able to unify all the forces of nature.
> 3. MM explains the origin of the universe and origin of matters.
> 4. MM have a new theory of relativity.
> 5. MM advanced experiments to detect absolute motions.
> 6. MM explains all the results of quantum experiments.
>>>>
>>>> Learning first-year physics is and will always be a firm expectation for
>>>> anyone putting forward new ideas in physics.
>>>>
>>>> Anybody who doesn’t do that is AUTOMATICALLY a wannabe crank.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> because reading is brainwashing. Better to just start fresh as an outsider,
>>>>>> because all original thinking comes from outsiders.”
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Except that none of that is true and it’s all insane self-delusion.
>>>>>>> I already formulated MM, a superior theory of physics. MM has the
>>>>>>> following features:
>>>>>>> 1. It has a new valid theory of gravity.
>>>>>>> 2. It can unify all the forces of nature (including gravity).
>>>>>>> 3. It describes a valid origin of the universe .
>>>>>>> 4. It describes the origin of matters.
>>>>>>> 5. So why are you wasting time defending SR? Are you an idiot?
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>> d become
>>>>>>>>>> Why, Ken Seto might ask, don’t the locals let people judge for themselves
>>>>>>>>>> and find out for themselves whether the guy is a crook or not?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That’s what one scam artist might say to defend another.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You, Ken Seto, are in the same category as that low-life with the used tire
>>>>>>>>>> business. Except he makes a little money off innocent people, and you can’t
>>>>>>>>>> make a penny off your efforts.
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>

--
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 8:56:10 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Saturday, August 7, 2021 at 8:11:28 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, August 5, 2021 at 11:58:51 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On Thursday, August 5, 2021 at 10:45:30 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 5:15:34 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, August 3, 202 at 4:38:08 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin <bodk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 3:19:53 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The paper in the following link shows how the concept of absolute motion
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is capable of unifying all the forces (including gravity) of nature.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2019unification.pdf
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> If anyone doesn’t know who the author is, ask yourself whether you want to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> download anything written by a loon who couldn’t pass the first quiz of a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> first-year physics class.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLOL.....The SR fanatic is afraid of people reading my paper.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Heck no. I’m not afraid of magnetic insoles and copper bracelets and
> >>>>>>>>>>> penis-growth pills, either. I just think it’s something people should be
> >>>>>>>>>>> advised are scams and to not waste attention on.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> There is a guy down the street from me who has a ramshackle used tire
> >>>>>>>>>> business. It is known to the locals as being a horrible place that has
> >>>>>>>>>> scammed numerous people, and it’s a wonder it’s still in business. Every
> >>>>>>>>>> community message board in the entire town has citizens posting warnings to
> >>>>>>>>>> not do business with this crook.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Yeah Odd we all know that you are full of shit. You are wasting your life
> >>>>>>>>> cruising the internet.
> >>>>>>>> Does bitching like this get any of your questions answered?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Ever consider reading a physics book?
> >>>>>>>> You DO know how to read, don’t you? Or are you not allowed to have one in
> >>>>>>>> the facility?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Moron, why would I want to waste time to study obsolete physics and
> >>>>>>> become a SR fanfic like you?
> >>>>>> Heard that excuse many times before. “I don’t want to learn any physics
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No idiot I don’t want to waste time to study obsolete physics when I
> >>>>> already formulated MM and MM is a superior theory of physics.
> >>>> That is, of course, your choice. The result of that choice (not learning
> >>>> even first-year physics) will be that no physicist will ever pay any
> >>>> attention to any of your ideas.
> >>>
> >>> I don’t expect indoctrinated physicists to endorse my theory. I think
> >>> that some future unindoctrianted physicists will. Why because they will
> >>> be tired of banging their head against the stone wall.
> >> And that’s insanity.
> >>
> >> Just like others here before you, your digital footprint will die with you.
> >>
> >> Go ahead. Look for Koobee Wublee’s published “thesis”. Or NoEinstein’s. Or
> >> any of a half dozen others who said the same thing as you, died, and
> >> disappeared without a trace. Why do you think your trace will be more
> >> durable?
> >
> > Because MM is the true theory of everything?
> So say the others, whose self published treatises have vanished from the
> earth. And they too all said that their insight would last for generations
> or even centuries until they were rediscovered and redeemed.

No body published a TOE like I did. My book is in the Library of Congress. So it will last for centuries....live with it.
>
> And yet they are all digital dust.
>
> And you think you are somehow protected from the same decay.

Idiot no protection is needed for a true TOE.
>
> You are insane.
> > 1. MM has a new theory of gravity.
> > 2. MM is able to unify all the forces of nature.
> > 3. MM explains the origin of the universe and origin of matters.
> > 4. MM have a new theory of relativity.
> > 5. MM advanced experiments to detect absolute motions.
> > 6. MM explains all the results of quantum experiments.
> >>>>
> >>>> Learning first-year physics is and will always be a firm expectation for
> >>>> anyone putting forward new ideas in physics.
> >>>>
> >>>> Anybody who doesn’t do that is AUTOMATICALLY a wannabe crank..
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> because reading is brainwashing. Better to just start fresh as an outsider,
> >>>>>> because all original thinking comes from outsiders.”
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Except that none of that is true and it’s all insane self-delusion.
> >>>>>>> I already formulated MM, a superior theory of physics. MM has the
> >>>>>>> following features:
> >>>>>>> 1. It has a new valid theory of gravity.
> >>>>>>> 2. It can unify all the forces of nature (including gravity).
> >>>>>>> 3. It describes a valid origin of the universe .
> >>>>>>> 4. It describes the origin of matters.
> >>>>>>> 5. So why are you wasting time defending SR? Are you an idiot?
> >>>>>>>> .
> >>>>>>>>>> d become
> >>>>>>>>>> Why, Ken Seto might ask, don’t the locals let people judge for themselves
> >>>>>>>>>> and find out for themselves whether the guy is a crook or not?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> That’s what one scam artist might say to defend another.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> You, Ken Seto, are in the same category as that low-life with the used tire
> >>>>>>>>>> business. Except he makes a little money off innocent people, and you can’t
> >>>>>>>>>> make a penny off your efforts.
> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> >
> --
> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 8:56:10 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Saturday, August 7, 2021 at 8:11:28 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Thursday, August 5, 2021 at 11:58:51 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thursday, August 5, 2021 at 10:45:30 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 5:15:34 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, August 3, 202 at 4:38:08 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin <bodk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 3:19:53 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The paper in the following link shows how the concept of absolute motion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is capable of unifying all the forces (including gravity) of nature.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2019unification.pdf
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If anyone doesn’t know who the author is, ask yourself whether you want to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> download anything written by a loon who couldn’t pass the first quiz of a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first-year physics class.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLOL.....The SR fanatic is afraid of people reading my paper.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Heck no. I’m not afraid of magnetic insoles and copper bracelets and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> penis-growth pills, either. I just think it’s something people should be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> advised are scams and to not waste attention on.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a guy down the street from me who has a ramshackle used tire
>>>>>>>>>>>> business. It is known to the locals as being a horrible place that has
>>>>>>>>>>>> scammed numerous people, and it’s a wonder it’s still in business. Every
>>>>>>>>>>>> community message board in the entire town has citizens posting warnings to
>>>>>>>>>>>> not do business with this crook.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah Odd we all know that you are full of shit. You are wasting your life
>>>>>>>>>>> cruising the internet.
>>>>>>>>>> Does bitching like this get any of your questions answered?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ever consider reading a physics book?
>>>>>>>>>> You DO know how to read, don’t you? Or are you not allowed to have one in
>>>>>>>>>> the facility?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Moron, why would I want to waste time to study obsolete physics and
>>>>>>>>> become a SR fanfic like you?
>>>>>>>> Heard that excuse many times before. “I don’t want to learn any physics
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No idiot I don’t want to waste time to study obsolete physics when I
>>>>>>> already formulated MM and MM is a superior theory of physics.
>>>>>> That is, of course, your choice. The result of that choice (not learning
>>>>>> even first-year physics) will be that no physicist will ever pay any
>>>>>> attention to any of your ideas.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don’t expect indoctrinated physicists to endorse my theory. I think
>>>>> that some future unindoctrianted physicists will. Why because they will
>>>>> be tired of banging their head against the stone wall.
>>>> And that’s insanity.
>>>>
>>>> Just like others here before you, your digital footprint will die with you.
>>>>
>>>> Go ahead. Look for Koobee Wublee’s published “thesis”. Or NoEinstein’s. Or
>>>> any of a half dozen others who said the same thing as you, died, and
>>>> disappeared without a trace. Why do you think your trace will be more
>>>> durable?
>>>
>>> Because MM is the true theory of everything?
>> So say the others, whose self published treatises have vanished from the
>> earth. And they too all said that their insight would last for generations
>> or even centuries until they were rediscovered and redeemed.
>
> No body published a TOE like I did.

Why yes, yes they did. That’s EXACTLY what NoEinstein and Wublee and others
claimed to do. Exactly the same thing.

> My book is in the Library of Congress. So it will last for centuries....live with it.

That’s what they said too. Now try and find those things.

>>
>> And yet they are all digital dust.
>>
>> And you think you are somehow protected from the same decay.
>
> Idiot no protection is needed for a true TOE.
>>
>> You are insane.
>>> 1. MM has a new theory of gravity.
>>> 2. MM is able to unify all the forces of nature.
>>> 3. MM explains the origin of the universe and origin of matters.
>>> 4. MM have a new theory of relativity.
>>> 5. MM advanced experiments to detect absolute motions.
>>> 6. MM explains all the results of quantum experiments.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Learning first-year physics is and will always be a firm expectation for
>>>>>> anyone putting forward new ideas in physics.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anybody who doesn’t do that is AUTOMATICALLY a wannabe crank.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> because reading is brainwashing. Better to just start fresh as an outsider,
>>>>>>>> because all original thinking comes from outsiders.”
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Except that none of that is true and it’s all insane self-delusion.
>>>>>>>>> I already formulated MM, a superior theory of physics. MM has the
>>>>>>>>> following features:
>>>>>>>>> 1. It has a new valid theory of gravity.
>>>>>>>>> 2. It can unify all the forces of nature (including gravity).
>>>>>>>>> 3. It describes a valid origin of the universe .
>>>>>>>>> 4. It describes the origin of matters.
>>>>>>>>> 5. So why are you wasting time defending SR? Are you an idiot?
>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>> d become
>>>>>>>>>>>> Why, Ken Seto might ask, don’t the locals let people judge for themselves
>>>>>>>>>>>> and find out for themselves whether the guy is a crook or not?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That’s what one scam artist might say to defend another.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You, Ken Seto, are in the same category as that low-life with the used tire
>>>>>>>>>>>> business. Except he makes a little money off innocent people, and you can’t
>>>>>>>>>>>> make a penny off your efforts.
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>
>> --
>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>

On 8/9/2021 10:58 AM, Ken Seto wrote:
> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 8:56:10 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Saturday, August 7, 2021 at 8:11:28 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:

>>>> Just like others here before you, your digital footprint will die with you.
>>>>
>>>> Go ahead. Look for Koobee Wublee’s published “thesis”. Or NoEinstein’s. Or
>>>> any of a half dozen others who said the same thing as you, died, and
>>>> disappeared without a trace. Why do you think your trace will be more
>>>> durable?
>>>
>>> Because MM is the true theory of everything?
>> So say the others, whose self published treatises have vanished from the
>> earth. And they too all said that their insight would last for generations
>> or even centuries until they were rediscovered and redeemed.
>
> No body published a TOE like I did. My book is in the Library of Congress. So it will last for centuries....live with it.

Thousands have published a "TOE" just like you did. Including
NoEinstein and Koobee. Your kookbook resides in a section of the
Library of Congress with thousands of other kookbooks, with more added
every week.

Why would your kookbook stand out from all the other "treatises" filling
the same rack?

EM forces energy participate in gravity.

Mitchell Raemsch

On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 11:41:23 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 8:56:10 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Saturday, August 7, 2021 at 8:11:28 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On Thursday, August 5, 2021 at 11:58:51 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Thursday, August 5, 2021 at 10:45:30 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 5:15:34 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail..com wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, August 3, 202 at 4:38:08 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin <bodk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 3:19:53 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The paper in the following link shows how the concept of absolute motion
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is capable of unifying all the forces (including gravity) of nature.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2019unification.pdf
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If anyone doesn’t know who the author is, ask yourself whether you want to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> download anything written by a loon who couldn’t pass the first quiz of a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first-year physics class.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLOL.....The SR fanatic is afraid of people reading my paper.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Heck no. I’m not afraid of magnetic insoles and copper bracelets and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> penis-growth pills, either. I just think it’s something people should be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> advised are scams and to not waste attention on.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> There is a guy down the street from me who has a ramshackle used tire
> >>>>>>>>>>>> business. It is known to the locals as being a horrible place that has
> >>>>>>>>>>>> scammed numerous people, and it’s a wonder it’s still in business. Every
> >>>>>>>>>>>> community message board in the entire town has citizens posting warnings to
> >>>>>>>>>>>> not do business with this crook.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Yeah Odd we all know that you are full of shit. You are wasting your life
> >>>>>>>>>>> cruising the internet.
> >>>>>>>>>> Does bitching like this get any of your questions answered?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Ever consider reading a physics book?
> >>>>>>>>>> You DO know how to read, don’t you? Or are you not allowed to have one in
> >>>>>>>>>> the facility?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Moron, why would I want to waste time to study obsolete physics and
> >>>>>>>>> become a SR fanfic like you?
> >>>>>>>> Heard that excuse many times before. “I don’t want to learn any physics
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> No idiot I don’t want to waste time to study obsolete physics when I
> >>>>>>> already formulated MM and MM is a superior theory of physics.
> >>>>>> That is, of course, your choice. The result of that choice (not learning
> >>>>>> even first-year physics) will be that no physicist will ever pay any
> >>>>>> attention to any of your ideas.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I don’t expect indoctrinated physicists to endorse my theory. I think
> >>>>> that some future unindoctrianted physicists will. Why because they will
> >>>>> be tired of banging their head against the stone wall.
> >>>> And that’s insanity.
> >>>>
> >>>> Just like others here before you, your digital footprint will die with you.
> >>>>
> >>>> Go ahead. Look for Koobee Wublee’s published “thesis”. Or NoEinstein’s. Or
> >>>> any of a half dozen others who said the same thing as you, died, and
> >>>> disappeared without a trace. Why do you think your trace will be more
> >>>> durable?
> >>>
> >>> Because MM is the true theory of everything?
> >> So say the others, whose self published treatises have vanished from the
> >> earth. And they too all said that their insight would last for generations
> >> or even centuries until they were rediscovered and redeemed.
> >
> > No body published a TOE like I did.
> Why yes, yes they did. That’s EXACTLY what NoEinstein and Wublee and others
> claimed to do. Exactly the same thing.

ROTFLOL.....so your defense is that other have failed and thus my TOE will fail? That’s not
very scientific. I suggest that you point out why my TOE will fail?
> > My book is in the Library of Congress. So it will last for centuries.....live with it.
> That’s what they said too. Now try and find those things.

So according to you their work is in the Library of Congress. Then some day in the future they will be discovered if their work is a true TOE. Live with it. OTOH, if you lied then you have no credibility.
> >>
> >> And yet they are all digital dust.
> >>
> >> And you think you are somehow protected from the same decay.
> >
> > Idiot no protection is needed for a true TOE.
> >>
> >> You are insane.
> >>> 1. MM has a new theory of gravity.
> >>> 2. MM is able to unify all the forces of nature.
> >>> 3. MM explains the origin of the universe and origin of matters.
> >>> 4. MM have a new theory of relativity.
> >>> 5. MM advanced experiments to detect absolute motions.
> >>> 6. MM explains all the results of quantum experiments.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Learning first-year physics is and will always be a firm expectation for
> >>>>>> anyone putting forward new ideas in physics.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Anybody who doesn’t do that is AUTOMATICALLY a wannabe crank.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> because reading is brainwashing. Better to just start fresh as an outsider,
> >>>>>>>> because all original thinking comes from outsiders.”
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Except that none of that is true and it’s all insane self-delusion.
> >>>>>>>>> I already formulated MM, a superior theory of physics. MM has the
> >>>>>>>>> following features:
> >>>>>>>>> 1. It has a new valid theory of gravity.
> >>>>>>>>> 2. It can unify all the forces of nature (including gravity).
> >>>>>>>>> 3. It describes a valid origin of the universe .
> >>>>>>>>> 4. It describes the origin of matters.
> >>>>>>>>> 5. So why are you wasting time defending SR? Are you an idiot?
> >>>>>>>>>> .
> >>>>>>>>>>>> d become
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why, Ken Seto might ask, don’t the locals let people judge for themselves
> >>>>>>>>>>>> and find out for themselves whether the guy is a crook or not?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> That’s what one scam artist might say to defend another.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> You, Ken Seto, are in the same category as that low-life with the used tire
> >>>>>>>>>>>> business. Except he makes a little money off innocent people, and you can’t
> >>>>>>>>>>>> make a penny off your efforts.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> >>>
> >> --
> >> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 11:53:11 AM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 8/9/2021 10:58 AM, Ken Seto wrote:
> > On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 8:56:10 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Saturday, August 7, 2021 at 8:11:28 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >>>> Just like others here before you, your digital footprint will die with you.
> >>>>
> >>>> Go ahead. Look for Koobee Wublee’s published “thesis”. Or NoEinstein’s. Or
> >>>> any of a half dozen others who said the same thing as you, died, and
> >>>> disappeared without a trace. Why do you think your trace will be more
> >>>> durable?
> >>>
> >>> Because MM is the true theory of everything?
> >> So say the others, whose self published treatises have vanished from the
> >> earth. And they too all said that their insight would last for generations
> >> or even centuries until they were rediscovered and redeemed.
> >
> > No body published a TOE like I did. My book is in the Library of Congress. So it will last for centuries....live with it.
> Thousands have published a "TOE" just like you did. Including
> NoEinstein and Koobee. Your kookbook resides in a section of the
> Library of Congress with thousands of other kookbooks, with more added
> every week.
>
> Why would your kookbook stand out from all the other "treatises" filling
> the same rack?

Moron, if my work is a true TOE then it will eventually discovered...so live with it.

On 8/9/2021 3:22 PM, Ken Seto wrote:
> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 11:53:11 AM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> On 8/9/2021 10:58 AM, Ken Seto wrote:

>>> No body published a TOE like I did. My book is in the Library of Congress. So it will last for centuries....live with it.
>> Thousands have published a "TOE" just like you did. Including
>> NoEinstein and Koobee. Your kookbook resides in a section of the
>> Library of Congress with thousands of other kookbooks, with more added
>> every week.
>>
>> Why would your kookbook stand out from all the other "treatises" filling
>> the same rack?
>
> Moron, if my work is a true TOE then it will eventually discovered...so live with it.

Why would a book full of assertions be of any value and stand out among
all the others?

Any future scientists investigating the kookbook section of the Library
of Congress will be looking for lost experiments and observations of
actual theories being developed and lost. A collection of worthless
assertions will still be a book of worthless assertions and will be
tossed aside once they realize it's nothing but useless assertions.

You wasted much of your life on this. Too bad, you possibly could have
accomplished some good over the last several years, but instead you
threw it away.

Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 11:41:23 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 8:56:10 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, August 7, 2021 at 8:11:28 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thursday, August 5, 2021 at 11:58:51 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, August 5, 2021 at 10:45:30 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, August 4, 2021 at 5:15:34 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, August 3, 202 at 4:38:08 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin <bodk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, August 3, 2021 at 3:19:53 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The paper in the following link shows how the concept of absolute motion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is capable of unifying all the forces (including gravity) of nature.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2019unification.pdf
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If anyone doesn’t know who the author is, ask yourself whether you want to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> download anything written by a loon who couldn’t pass the first quiz of a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first-year physics class.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLOL.....The SR fanatic is afraid of people reading my paper.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Heck no. I’m not afraid of magnetic insoles and copper bracelets and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> penis-growth pills, either. I just think it’s something people should be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> advised are scams and to not waste attention on.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a guy down the street from me who has a ramshackle used tire
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business. It is known to the locals as being a horrible place that has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scammed numerous people, and it’s a wonder it’s still in business. Every
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community message board in the entire town has citizens posting warnings to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not do business with this crook.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah Odd we all know that you are full of shit. You are wasting your life
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cruising the internet.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Does bitching like this get any of your questions answered?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ever consider reading a physics book?
>>>>>>>>>>>> You DO know how to read, don’t you? Or are you not allowed to have one in
>>>>>>>>>>>> the facility?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Moron, why would I want to waste time to study obsolete physics and
>>>>>>>>>>> become a SR fanfic like you?
>>>>>>>>>> Heard that excuse many times before. “I don’t want to learn any physics
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No idiot I don’t want to waste time to study obsolete physics when I
>>>>>>>>> already formulated MM and MM is a superior theory of physics.
>>>>>>>> That is, of course, your choice. The result of that choice (not learning
>>>>>>>> even first-year physics) will be that no physicist will ever pay any
>>>>>>>> attention to any of your ideas.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don’t expect indoctrinated physicists to endorse my theory. I think
>>>>>>> that some future unindoctrianted physicists will. Why because they will
>>>>>>> be tired of banging their head against the stone wall.
>>>>>> And that’s insanity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just like others here before you, your digital footprint will die with you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Go ahead. Look for Koobee Wublee’s published “thesis”. Or NoEinstein’s. Or
>>>>>> any of a half dozen others who said the same thing as you, died, and
>>>>>> disappeared without a trace. Why do you think your trace will be more
>>>>>> durable?
>>>>>
>>>>> Because MM is the true theory of everything?
>>>> So say the others, whose self published treatises have vanished from the
>>>> earth. And they too all said that their insight would last for generations
>>>> or even centuries until they were rediscovered and redeemed.
>>>
>>> No body published a TOE like I did.
>> Why yes, yes they did. That’s EXACTLY what NoEinstein and Wublee and others
>> claimed to do. Exactly the same thing.
>
> ROTFLOL.....so your defense is that other have failed and thus my TOE
> will fail? That’s not
> very scientific.

Ken, you wouldn’t know what is scientific if science wore a nametag “Hi,
I’m Scientific” and walked up to you and kissed you on the lips.

You will fail because ALL pretenders uneducated in physics claiming to have
a TOE fail. This has happened hundreds of times, and you are no different.
When you think you are different, this is you being insane and your
insanity is EVEN MORE of a reason you will fail with the rest.

> I suggest that you point out why my TOE will fail?
>>> My book is in the Library of Congress. So it will last for centuries....live with it.
>> That’s what they said too. Now try and find those things.
>
> So according to you their work is in the Library of Congress. Then some
> day in the future they will be discovered if their work is a true TOE.

I just love that you are hanging your legacy on this tiny thread of having
a book in the Library of Congress and that this is how you will be redeemed
by future generations. LOL. Some people say
“If I put it on the internet, it will live forever!” Some people say, “If I
publish it in a paper book, it will live forever!” Some people say, “If I
get it in the Library of Congress, it will live forever!” Some people say,
“If I make xerox copies of everything and bury it in a cylinder deep in my
back yard, it will live forever.” All of those people are nutjobs.

> Live with it. OTOH, if you lied then you have no credibility.
>>>>
>>>> And yet they are all digital dust.
>>>>
>>>> And you think you are somehow protected from the same decay.
>>>
>>> Idiot no protection is needed for a true TOE.
>>>>
>>>> You are insane.
>>>>> 1. MM has a new theory of gravity.
>>>>> 2. MM is able to unify all the forces of nature.
>>>>> 3. MM explains the origin of the universe and origin of matters.
>>>>> 4. MM have a new theory of relativity.
>>>>> 5. MM advanced experiments to detect absolute motions.
>>>>> 6. MM explains all the results of quantum experiments.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Learning first-year physics is and will always be a firm expectation for
>>>>>>>> anyone putting forward new ideas in physics.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Anybody who doesn’t do that is AUTOMATICALLY a wannabe crank.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> because reading is brainwashing. Better to just start fresh as an outsider,
>>>>>>>>>> because all original thinking comes from outsiders.”
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Except that none of that is true and it’s all insane self-delusion.
>>>>>>>>>>> I already formulated MM, a superior theory of physics. MM has the
>>>>>>>>>>> following features:
>>>>>>>>>>> 1. It has a new valid theory of gravity.
>>>>>>>>>>> 2. It can unify all the forces of nature (including gravity).
>>>>>>>>>>> 3. It describes a valid origin of the universe .
>>>>>>>>>>> 4. It describes the origin of matters.
>>>>>>>>>>> 5. So why are you wasting time defending SR? Are you an idiot?
>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d become
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why, Ken Seto might ask, don’t the locals let people judge for themselves
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and find out for themselves whether the guy is a crook or not?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That’s what one scam artist might say to defend another.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You, Ken Seto, are in the same category as that low-life with the used tire
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business. Except he makes a little money off innocent people, and you can’t
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make a penny off your efforts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>

Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 11:53:11 AM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> On 8/9/2021 10:58 AM, Ken Seto wrote:
>>> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 8:56:10 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, August 7, 2021 at 8:11:28 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>>>>> Just like others here before you, your digital footprint will die with you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Go ahead. Look for Koobee Wublee’s published “thesis”. Or NoEinstein’s. Or
>>>>>> any of a half dozen others who said the same thing as you, died, and
>>>>>> disappeared without a trace. Why do you think your trace will be more
>>>>>> durable?
>>>>>
>>>>> Because MM is the true theory of everything?
>>>> So say the others, whose self published treatises have vanished from the
>>>> earth. And they too all said that their insight would last for generations
>>>> or even centuries until they were rediscovered and redeemed.
>>>
>>> No body published a TOE like I did. My book is in the Library of
>>> Congress. So it will last for centuries....live with it.
>> Thousands have published a "TOE" just like you did. Including
>> NoEinstein and Koobee. Your kookbook resides in a section of the
>> Library of Congress with thousands of other kookbooks, with more added
>> every week.
>>
>> Why would your kookbook stand out from all the other "treatises" filling
>> the same rack?
>
> Moron, if my work is a true TOE then it will eventually discovered...so live with it.
>

This is the dreamworld fantasy you cling to, the only thread of hope you
grip tightly.

My father in law left some property in his will to his children, expressing
the faith in his will that they would appreciate the property fondly, keep
it in the family for generations, and that they would think highly of him
because of it. Three months after his death, they sold it, not wanting to
have anything to do with it, and they still don’t like him. He was just as
nuts as you.

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 4:00:20 PM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 8/9/2021 3:22 PM, Ken Seto wrote:
> > On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 11:53:11 AM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >> On 8/9/2021 10:58 AM, Ken Seto wrote:
>
> >>> No body published a TOE like I did. My book is in the Library of Congress. So it will last for centuries....live with it.
> >> Thousands have published a "TOE" just like you did. Including
> >> NoEinstein and Koobee. Your kookbook resides in a section of the
> >> Library of Congress with thousands of other kookbooks, with more added
> >> every week.
> >>
> >> Why would your kookbook stand out from all the other "treatises" filling
> >> the same rack?
> >
> > Moron, if my work is a true TOE then it will eventually discovered...so live with it.
> Why would a book full of assertions be of any value and stand out among
> all the others?
>
> Any future scientists investigating the kookbook section of the Library
> of Congress will be looking for lost experiments and observations of
> actual theories being developed and lost. A collection of worthless
> assertions will still be a book of worthless assertions and will be
> tossed aside once they realize it's nothing but useless assertions.
>
> You wasted much of your life on this. Too bad, you possibly could have
> accomplished some good over the last several years, but instead you
> threw it away.

You wasted most of your life and accomplished nothing.....nota.

On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 4:38:13 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 11:53:11 AM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >> On 8/9/2021 10:58 AM, Ken Seto wrote:
> >>> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 8:56:10 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On Saturday, August 7, 2021 at 8:11:28 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>
> >>>>>> Just like others here before you, your digital footprint will die with you.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Go ahead. Look for Koobee Wublee’s published “thesis”. Or NoEinstein’s. Or
> >>>>>> any of a half dozen others who said the same thing as you, died, and
> >>>>>> disappeared without a trace. Why do you think your trace will be more
> >>>>>> durable?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Because MM is the true theory of everything?
> >>>> So say the others, whose self published treatises have vanished from the
> >>>> earth. And they too all said that their insight would last for generations
> >>>> or even centuries until they were rediscovered and redeemed.
> >>>
> >>> No body published a TOE like I did. My book is in the Library of
> >>> Congress. So it will last for centuries....live with it.
> >> Thousands have published a "TOE" just like you did. Including
> >> NoEinstein and Koobee. Your kookbook resides in a section of the
> >> Library of Congress with thousands of other kookbooks, with more added
> >> every week.
> >>
> >> Why would your kookbook stand out from all the other "treatises" filling
> >> the same rack?
> >
> > Moron, if my work is a true TOE then it will eventually discovered...so live with it.
> >
> This is the dreamworld fantasy you cling to, the only thread of hope you
> grip tightly.

It’s not a dreamworld fantasy. So far MM is the only TOE that accomplishes the following:
1. It unifies all the forces of nature.
2. It does not rely on non-existing mathematical objects.
3. It gives a logical origin of the universe and the origin of all matters.
4. It explains all the processes of nature.
5. Absolute motions of object can be detected experimentally.
6. SR cult member like you: you will die without knowing that your religion is a total failure.
>
> My father in law left some property in his will to his children, expressing
> the faith in his will that they would appreciate the property fondly, keep
> it in the family for generations, and that they would think highly of him
> because of it. Three months after his death, they sold it, not wanting to
> have anything to do with it, and they still don’t like him. He was just as
> nuts as you.
> --
> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 4:00:20 PM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> On 8/9/2021 3:22 PM, Ken Seto wrote:
>>> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 11:53:11 AM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
>>>> On 8/9/2021 10:58 AM, Ken Seto wrote:
>>
>>>>> No body published a TOE like I did. My book is in the Library of
>>>>> Congress. So it will last for centuries....live with it.
>>>> Thousands have published a "TOE" just like you did. Including
>>>> NoEinstein and Koobee. Your kookbook resides in a section of the
>>>> Library of Congress with thousands of other kookbooks, with more added
>>>> every week.
>>>>
>>>> Why would your kookbook stand out from all the other "treatises" filling
>>>> the same rack?
>>>
>>> Moron, if my work is a true TOE then it will eventually discovered...so live with it.
>> Why would a book full of assertions be of any value and stand out among
>> all the others?
>>
>> Any future scientists investigating the kookbook section of the Library
>> of Congress will be looking for lost experiments and observations of
>> actual theories being developed and lost. A collection of worthless
>> assertions will still be a book of worthless assertions and will be
>> tossed aside once they realize it's nothing but useless assertions.
>>
>> You wasted much of your life on this. Too bad, you possibly could have
>> accomplished some good over the last several years, but instead you
>> threw it away.
>
> You wasted most of your life and accomplished nothing.....nota.
>

Word to the wise, Ken. Accomplishments are based on what OTHERS see as
valuable, not what YOU see as valuable.

It’s like a patent. If you patent an original idea for something no one
cares about or would ever use, then the patent is worthless, a
non-accomplishment. It’s only if someone else finds value in the idea and
wants to use it that the patent is worth anything.

Consider the fact that NOBODY considers your ideas about physics as worth
anything. It is then not an accomplishment. Same goes with putting the book
in the Library of Congress. Anybody can put a book in the Library of
Congress. It’s as straightforward as purchasing a car. If nobody finds the
book valuable, it’s not an accomplishment.

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 4:38:13 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 11:53:11 AM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
>>>> On 8/9/2021 10:58 AM, Ken Seto wrote:
>>>>> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 8:56:10 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Saturday, August 7, 2021 at 8:11:28 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just like others here before you, your digital footprint will die with you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Go ahead. Look for Koobee Wublee’s published “thesis”. Or NoEinstein’s. Or
>>>>>>>> any of a half dozen others who said the same thing as you, died, and
>>>>>>>> disappeared without a trace. Why do you think your trace will be more
>>>>>>>> durable?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Because MM is the true theory of everything?
>>>>>> So say the others, whose self published treatises have vanished from the
>>>>>> earth. And they too all said that their insight would last for generations
>>>>>> or even centuries until they were rediscovered and redeemed.
>>>>>
>>>>> No body published a TOE like I did. My book is in the Library of
>>>>> Congress. So it will last for centuries....live with it.
>>>> Thousands have published a "TOE" just like you did. Including
>>>> NoEinstein and Koobee. Your kookbook resides in a section of the
>>>> Library of Congress with thousands of other kookbooks, with more added
>>>> every week.
>>>>
>>>> Why would your kookbook stand out from all the other "treatises" filling
>>>> the same rack?
>>>
>>> Moron, if my work is a true TOE then it will eventually discovered...so live with it.
>>>
>> This is the dreamworld fantasy you cling to, the only thread of hope you
>> grip tightly.
>
> It’s not a dreamworld fantasy. So far MM is the only TOE that accomplishes the following:

That’s not what the other kooks say. They say their ideas do that too.
You’re nothing special.

Their stuff has disintegrated into digital dust. Go ahead, try to find the
book by NoEinstein that claimed all these things. See if you can. Pretend
you’re a frustrated physicist from the future, searching the archives for
lost answers. Can you find it? Can you find Koobee Wublee’s book that
claims the same things? What about Louis Savain’s book? What about Franklin
Hu’s book that claimed the same thing? How about Gerald O’Barr’s book?
They’re all dead. Can you find any of their books? What about Henry
Wilson’s book? He’s still ALIVE, and can you find his book?

> 1. It unifies all the forces of nature.
> 2. It does not rely on non-existing mathematical objects.
> 3. It gives a logical origin of the universe and the origin of all matters.
> 4. It explains all the processes of nature.
> 5. Absolute motions of object can be detected experimentally.
> 6. SR cult member like you: you will die without knowing that your
> religion is a total failure.
>>
>> My father in law left some property in his will to his children, expressing
>> the faith in his will that they would appreciate the property fondly, keep
>> it in the family for generations, and that they would think highly of him
>> because of it. Three months after his death, they sold it, not wanting to
>> have anything to do with it, and they still don’t like him. He was just as
>> nuts as you.
>> --
>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

On Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 9:02:38 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 4:00:20 PM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >> On 8/9/2021 3:22 PM, Ken Seto wrote:
> >>> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 11:53:11 AM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >>>> On 8/9/2021 10:58 AM, Ken Seto wrote:
> >>
> >>>>> No body published a TOE like I did. My book is in the Library of
> >>>>> Congress. So it will last for centuries....live with it.
> >>>> Thousands have published a "TOE" just like you did. Including
> >>>> NoEinstein and Koobee. Your kookbook resides in a section of the
> >>>> Library of Congress with thousands of other kookbooks, with more added
> >>>> every week.
> >>>>
> >>>> Why would your kookbook stand out from all the other "treatises" filling
> >>>> the same rack?
> >>>
> >>> Moron, if my work is a true TOE then it will eventually discovered...so live with it.
> >> Why would a book full of assertions be of any value and stand out among
> >> all the others?
> >>
> >> Any future scientists investigating the kookbook section of the Library
> >> of Congress will be looking for lost experiments and observations of
> >> actual theories being developed and lost. A collection of worthless
> >> assertions will still be a book of worthless assertions and will be
> >> tossed aside once they realize it's nothing but useless assertions.
> >>
> >> You wasted much of your life on this. Too bad, you possibly could have
> >> accomplished some good over the last several years, but instead you
> >> threw it away.
> >
> > You wasted most of your life and accomplished nothing.....nota.
> >
> Word to the wise, Ken. Accomplishments are based on what OTHERS see as
> valuable, not what YOU see as valuable.
>
> It’s like a patent. If you patent an original idea for something no one
> cares about or would ever use, then the patent is worthless, a
> non-accomplishment. It’s only if someone else finds value in the idea and
> wants to use it that the patent is worth anything.
>
> Consider the fact that NOBODY considers your ideas about physics as worth
> anything. It is then not an accomplishment. Same goes with putting the book
> in the Library of Congress. Anybody can put a book in the Library of
> Congress. It’s as straightforward as purchasing a car. If nobody finds the
> book valuable, it’s not an accomplishment.ink you are truly stupid.

If it’s so easy why don’’t you put something in there? I really think that you are stupid.

Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 9:02:38 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 4:00:20 PM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
>>>> On 8/9/2021 3:22 PM, Ken Seto wrote:
>>>>> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 11:53:11 AM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/9/2021 10:58 AM, Ken Seto wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> No body published a TOE like I did. My book is in the Library of
>>>>>>> Congress. So it will last for centuries....live with it.
>>>>>> Thousands have published a "TOE" just like you did. Including
>>>>>> NoEinstein and Koobee. Your kookbook resides in a section of the
>>>>>> Library of Congress with thousands of other kookbooks, with more added
>>>>>> every week.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why would your kookbook stand out from all the other "treatises" filling
>>>>>> the same rack?
>>>>>
>>>>> Moron, if my work is a true TOE then it will eventually discovered...so live with it.
>>>> Why would a book full of assertions be of any value and stand out among
>>>> all the others?
>>>>
>>>> Any future scientists investigating the kookbook section of the Library
>>>> of Congress will be looking for lost experiments and observations of
>>>> actual theories being developed and lost. A collection of worthless
>>>> assertions will still be a book of worthless assertions and will be
>>>> tossed aside once they realize it's nothing but useless assertions.
>>>>
>>>> You wasted much of your life on this. Too bad, you possibly could have
>>>> accomplished some good over the last several years, but instead you
>>>> threw it away.
>>>
>>> You wasted most of your life and accomplished nothing.....nota.
>>>
>> Word to the wise, Ken. Accomplishments are based on what OTHERS see as
>> valuable, not what YOU see as valuable.
>>
>> It’s like a patent. If you patent an original idea for something no one
>> cares about or would ever use, then the patent is worthless, a
>> non-accomplishment. It’s only if someone else finds value in the idea and
>> wants to use it that the patent is worth anything.
>>
>> Consider the fact that NOBODY considers your ideas about physics as worth
>> anything. It is then not an accomplishment. Same goes with putting the book
>> in the Library of Congress. Anybody can put a book in the Library of
>> Congress. It’s as straightforward as purchasing a car. If nobody finds the
>> book valuable, it’s not an accomplishment.ink you are truly stupid.
>
> If it’s so easy why don’’t you put something in there? I really think that you are stupid.
>

I do not need a new car. I do not need to buy a car for you to prove that
buying a car is easy and not an accomplishment.

A fact that may be of interest is that each and every working day, the
Library of Congress receives 15,000 items for addition, and it adds 10,000
of them to the collection. That means that 2 out of every 3 submissions is
accepted to the collection — it is not a high bar. It also means that,
since there are 261 working days per year, then 2.6 MILLION items get added
each and every year to the Library of Congress. So your book being added to
the Library of Congress is something that 2.6 MILLION other people did, and
just in that one year. For scale, this is about half the number of homes
that were purchased each year. Now, if you think that purchasing a home is
not a particularly special accomplishment, then getting something in the
Library of Congress is not a particularly special accomplishment either.

The fact that you squandered some years of effort and spent your entire
nest egg to do something rather ordinary, and that’s ALL you have to hang
your legacy on — that’s your problem.

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

On 8/10/2021 8:06 AM, Ken Seto wrote:
> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 4:00:20 PM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> On 8/9/2021 3:22 PM, Ken Seto wrote:
>>> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 11:53:11 AM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:

>> You wasted much of your life on this. Too bad, you possibly could have
>> accomplished some good over the last several years, but instead you
>> threw it away.
>
> You wasted most of your life and accomplished nothing.....nota.
>

Wrong. I have many accomplishments to be proud of. However you won't see
my name flashing in lights because all of what I did/do is in the
background making things do what they are supposed to do.

Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote:
> On 8/10/2021 8:06 AM, Ken Seto wrote:
>> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 4:00:20 PM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
>>> On 8/9/2021 3:22 PM, Ken Seto wrote:
>>>> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 11:53:11 AM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
>>> You wasted much of your life on this. Too bad, you possibly could have
>>> accomplished some good over the last several years, but instead you
>>> threw it away.
>>
>> You wasted most of your life and accomplished nothing.....nota.
>>
>
> Wrong. I have many accomplishments to be proud of. However you won't see
> my name flashing in lights because all of what I did/do is in the
> background making things do what they are supposed to do.
>

And some people crave fame so much that they will do and say crazy things
in an attempt to garner it.

Ken Seto says he’s already accomplished enough in his own mind, but he also
has a deep and abiding hunger to be more impressive than he is. I don’t
know who he’s trying to impress, but it’s a huge compulsion with him, which
he cannot let go of. To give up on his ambitions now would kill him,
literally kill him.

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

On Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 12:16:02 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 9:02:38 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 4:00:20 PM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >>>> On 8/9/2021 3:22 PM, Ken Seto wrote:
> >>>>> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 11:53:11 AM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >>>>>> On 8/9/2021 10:58 AM, Ken Seto wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> No body published a TOE like I did. My book is in the Library of
> >>>>>>> Congress. So it will last for centuries....live with it.
> >>>>>> Thousands have published a "TOE" just like you did. Including
> >>>>>> NoEinstein and Koobee. Your kookbook resides in a section of the
> >>>>>> Library of Congress with thousands of other kookbooks, with more added
> >>>>>> every week.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Why would your kookbook stand out from all the other "treatises" filling
> >>>>>> the same rack?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Moron, if my work is a true TOE then it will eventually discovered....so live with it.
> >>>> Why would a book full of assertions be of any value and stand out among
> >>>> all the others?
> >>>>
> >>>> Any future scientists investigating the kookbook section of the Library
> >>>> of Congress will be looking for lost experiments and observations of
> >>>> actual theories being developed and lost. A collection of worthless
> >>>> assertions will still be a book of worthless assertions and will be
> >>>> tossed aside once they realize it's nothing but useless assertions.
> >>>>
> >>>> You wasted much of your life on this. Too bad, you possibly could have
> >>>> accomplished some good over the last several years, but instead you
> >>>> threw it away.
> >>>
> >>> You wasted most of your life and accomplished nothing.....nota.
> >>>
> >> Word to the wise, Ken. Accomplishments are based on what OTHERS see as
> >> valuable, not what YOU see as valuable.
> >>
> >> It’s like a patent. If you patent an original idea for something no one
> >> cares about or would ever use, then the patent is worthless, a
> >> non-accomplishment. It’s only if someone else finds value in the idea and
> >> wants to use it that the patent is worth anything.
> >>
> >> Consider the fact that NOBODY considers your ideas about physics as worth
> >> anything. It is then not an accomplishment. Same goes with putting the book
> >> in the Library of Congress. Anybody can put a book in the Library of
> >> Congress. It’s as straightforward as purchasing a car. If nobody finds the
> >> book valuable, it’s not an accomplishment.ink you are truly stupid.
> >
> > If it’s so easy why don’’t you put something in there? I really think that you are stupid.
> >
> I do not need a new car. I do not need to buy a car for you to prove that
> buying a car is easy and not an accomplishment.
>
> A fact that may be of interest is that each and every working day, the
> Library of Congress receives 15,000 items for addition, and it adds 10,000
> of them to the collection. That means that 2 out of every 3 submissions is
> accepted to the collection — it is not a high bar. It also means that,
> since there are 261 working days per year, then 2.6 MILLION items get added
> each and every year to the Library of Congress. So your book being added to
> the Library of Congress is something that 2.6 MILLION other people did, and
> just in that one year. For scale, this is about half the number of homes
> that were purchased each year. Now, if you think that purchasing a home is
> not a particularly special accomplishment, then getting something in the
> Library of Congress is not a particularly special accomplishment either.
hy
The Library of Congress has reviewers and uneducated broke like you will never get your work in. For that matter, you spend all your time cruising the internet you don’t have time writing your trashy knowledge on physics to submit to the Library.
>
> The fact that you squandered some years of effort and spent your entire
> nest egg to do something rather ordinary, and that’s ALL you have to hang
> your legacy on — that’s your problem.
> --
> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

On Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 3:16:56 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> Michael Moroney <mor...@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote:
> > On 8/10/2021 8:06 AM, Ken Seto wrote:
> >> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 4:00:20 PM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >>> On 8/9/2021 3:22 PM, Ken Seto wrote:
> >>>> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 11:53:11 AM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >
> >>> You wasted much of your life on this. Too bad, you possibly could have
> >>> accomplished some good over the last several years, but instead you
> >>> threw it away.
> >>
> >> You wasted most of your life and accomplished nothing.....nota.
> >>
> >
> > Wrong. I have many accomplishments to be proud of. However you won't see
> > my name flashing in lights because all of what I did/do is in the
> > background making things do what they are supposed to do.
> >
> And some people crave fame so much that they will do and say crazy things
> in an attempt to garner it.
>
> Ken Seto says he’s already accomplished enough in his own mind, but he also
> has a deep and abiding hunger to be more impressive than he is.

That’s right.....I have written a book on new physics. What have you done? Nothing!!!!

I don’t
> know who he’s trying to impress, but it’s a huge compulsion with him, which
> he cannot let go of. To give up on his ambitions now would kill him,
> literally kill him.
> --
> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 12:16:02 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 9:02:38 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 4:00:20 PM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/9/2021 3:22 PM, Ken Seto wrote:
>>>>>>> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 11:53:11 AM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/9/2021 10:58 AM, Ken Seto wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No body published a TOE like I did. My book is in the Library of
>>>>>>>>> Congress. So it will last for centuries....live with it.
>>>>>>>> Thousands have published a "TOE" just like you did. Including
>>>>>>>> NoEinstein and Koobee. Your kookbook resides in a section of the
>>>>>>>> Library of Congress with thousands of other kookbooks, with more added
>>>>>>>> every week.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why would your kookbook stand out from all the other "treatises" filling
>>>>>>>> the same rack?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Moron, if my work is a true TOE then it will eventually
>>>>>>> discovered...so live with it.
>>>>>> Why would a book full of
>>>>>>> assertions be of any value and stand out among
>>>>>> all the others?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any future scientists investigating the kookbook section of the Library
>>>>>> of Congress will be looking for lost experiments and observations of
>>>>>> actual theories being developed and lost. A collection of worthless
>>>>>> assertions will still be a book of worthless assertions and will be
>>>>>> tossed aside once they realize it's nothing but useless assertions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You wasted much of your life on this. Too bad, you possibly could have
>>>>>> accomplished some good over the last several years, but instead you
>>>>>> threw it away.
>>>>>
>>>>> You wasted most of your life and accomplished nothing.....nota.
>>>>>
>>>> Word to the wise, Ken. Accomplishments are based on what OTHERS see as
>>>> valuable, not what YOU see as valuable.
>>>>
>>>> It’s like a patent. If you patent an original idea for something no one
>>>> cares about or would ever use, then the patent is worthless, a
>>>> non-accomplishment. It’s only if someone else finds value in the idea and
>>>> wants to use it that the patent is worth anything.
>>>>
>>>> Consider the fact that NOBODY considers your ideas about physics as worth
>>>> anything. It is then not an accomplishment. Same goes with putting the book
>>>> in the Library of Congress. Anybody can put a book in the Library of
>>>> Congress. It’s as straightforward as purchasing a car. If nobody finds the
>>>> book valuable, it’s not an accomplishment.ink you are truly stupid.
>>>
>>> If it’s so easy why don’’t you put something in there? I really think
>>> that you are stupid.
>>>
>> I do not need a new car. I do not need to buy a car for you to prove that
>> buying a car is easy and not an accomplishment.
>>
>> A fact that may be of interest is that each and every working day, the
>> Library of Congress receives 15,000 items for addition, and it adds 10,000
>> of them to the collection. That means that 2 out of every 3 submissions is
>> accepted to the collection — it is not a high bar. It also means that,
>> since there are 261 working days per year, then 2.6 MILLION items get added
>> each and every year to the Library of Congress. So your book being added to
>> the Library of Congress is something that 2.6 MILLION other people did, and
>> just in that one year. For scale, this is about half the number of homes
>> that were purchased each year. Now, if you think that purchasing a home is
>> not a particularly special accomplishment, then getting something in the
>> Library of Congress is not a particularly special accomplishment either.
> hy
> The Library of Congress has reviewers and uneducated broke like you will
> never get your work in.

The reviews that let 2 out of every 3 submissions in? The ones that let 2.6
million submissions in every year?

You still think publishing to the Library of Congress is an elite club?

> For that matter, you spend all your time cruising the internet you don’t
> have time writing your trashy knowledge on physics to submit to the Library.
>>
>> The fact that you squandered some years of effort and spent your entire
>> nest egg to do something rather ordinary, and that’s ALL you have to hang
>> your legacy on — that’s your problem.
>> --
>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 3:16:56 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Michael Moroney <mor...@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote:
>>> On 8/10/2021 8:06 AM, Ken Seto wrote:
>>>> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 4:00:20 PM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
>>>>> On 8/9/2021 3:22 PM, Ken Seto wrote:
>>>>>> On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 11:53:11 AM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
>>>
>>>>> You wasted much of your life on this. Too bad, you possibly could have
>>>>> accomplished some good over the last several years, but instead you
>>>>> threw it away.
>>>>
>>>> You wasted most of your life and accomplished nothing.....nota.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Wrong. I have many accomplishments to be proud of. However you won't see
>>> my name flashing in lights because all of what I did/do is in the
>>> background making things do what they are supposed to do.
>>>
>> And some people crave fame so much that they will do and say crazy things
>> in an attempt to garner it.
>>
>> Ken Seto says he’s already accomplished enough in his own mind, but he also
>> has a deep and abiding hunger to be more impressive than he is.
>
> That’s right.....I have written a book on new physics. What have you done? Nothing!!!!

Doesn’t matter what YOU think about your “accomplishment”. It matters only
what other people think of your “accomplishment”.

Damn, Seto, you are obsessed about improving your legacy. Obsessed!

>
> I don’t
>> know who he’s trying to impress, but it’s a huge compulsion with him, which
>> he cannot let go of. To give up on his ambitions now would kill him,
>> literally kill him.
>> --
>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Everybody has their Big TOE...