mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> but knew that in the world Hitler Germany
> could gain an absolute advantage
> He didn't want anymore involvement
> beyond his one letter.
>
> Mitchell Raemsch

More lies!

The atomic bomb was dropped on Japan in August, 1945...twice. But Albert Einstein was
notified that the bomb would be dropped on Japan earlier that year in March.

Then after all the bombs were dropped and America celebrated..

Albert Einstein went on to design NEW bombs that would explode and kill more people.

The man was de bomb!

"Woe is me!"

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

On Thursday, August 26, 2021 at 4:55:52 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > but knew that in the world Hitler Germany
> > could gain an absolute advantage
> > He didn't want anymore involvement
> > beyond his one letter.
> >
> > Mitchell Raemsch
> More lies!

The liar lies. and was not Einstein...

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > but knew that in the world Hitler Germany
> > could gain an absolute advantage
> > He didn't want anymore involvement
> > beyond his one letter.
> >
> > Mitchell Raemsch
>

>
> The atomic bomb was dropped on Japan in August, 1945...twice. But Albert Einstein was
> notified that the bomb would be dropped on Japan earlier that year in March.
>
> Then after all the bombs were dropped and America celebrated..
>
> Albert Einstein went on to design NEW bombs that would explode and kill more people.
>
> The man was de bomb!
>
> "Woe is me!"

ENCLOSURE TO MR. ALBERT EINSTEIN'S LETTER OF
MARCH 25, 1945 TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
by
L. Szilard

The work on uranium has now reached a stage which will make it
possible for the Army to detonate atomic bombs in the immediate future.
The "demonstration" of such bombs may be expected rather soon and naturally
the War Department is considering the use of such bombs in the war against
Japan.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E9xHzihVcAUIWHO?format=jpg&name=medium

https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1431098020930592777/photo/1

Don't yous guys want to see the NEW BOMB that Albert Einstein went on to design that would explode and kill more people?

it's yummy!

Albert Einstein just LOVES to kill people!

(from the comfort of his home of course)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E8yGl_HVUAQcmo4?format=jpg&name=900x900

Einstein was soooooooo sad about Japan, ...he wanted to kill Germans instead.

>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> the unchallengeable.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> On Thursday, August 26, 2021 at 4:55:52 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
>> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >
>> > but knew that in the world Hitler Germany could gain an absolute
>> > advantage He didn't want anymore involvement beyond his one letter.
>> >
>> > Mitchell Raemsch
>> More lies!
>
> The liar lies. and was not Einstein...

He got professorship without a PhD, enough lie to me to smell a rat
already.

On Friday, August 27, 2021 at 7:07:58 AM UTC-7, Beek Sneijder wrote:
> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, August 26, 2021 at 4:55:52 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> >> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> >
> >> > but knew that in the world Hitler Germany could gain an absolute
> >> > advantage He didn't want anymore involvement beyond his one letter.
> >> >
> >> > Mitchell Raemsch
> >> More lies!
> >
> > The liar lies. and was not Einstein...
> He got professorship without a PhD, enough lie to me to smell a rat
> already.

He was wrong to get a professorship?
How is that?

Mitchell Raemsch

mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> On Friday, August 27, 2021 at 7:07:58 AM UTC-7, Beek Sneijder wrote:
>> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > The liar lies. and was not Einstein...
>> He got professorship without a PhD, enough lie to me to smell a rat
>> already.
>
> He was wrong to get a professorship? How is that? Mitchell Raemsch

you don't smell a rat?

"According to these discussions and a remark you made yourself when you were visiting me
it seems to be desirable to have a device which automatically brings to explosion
a torpedo passing below a ship at the right moment.
I have an idea for an electro-magnetic device for this purpose which I would like to submit to you for your judgement." -Albert Einstein

(to be continued in whole)

anyway...
'on the electrodynamics of moving bodies' sounds likes the theory of bombs to me.

and his second paper:
"does the inertia of a body depend on its energy content" sounds like the theory of atomic bombs!

In other words, The Theory of Relativity is actually...The Theory of ATOMIC BOMBS!

In 1905 Albert Einstein was thinking..."How can I make an atomic bomb?"

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > but knew that in the world Hitler Germany
> > > could gain an absolute advantage
> > > He didn't want anymore involvement
> > > beyond his one letter.
> > >
> > > Mitchell Raemsch
> >
>
> >
> > The atomic bomb was dropped on Japan in August, 1945...twice. But Albert Einstein was
> > notified that the bomb would be dropped on Japan earlier that year in March.
> >
> > Then after all the bombs were dropped and America celebrated..
> >
> > Albert Einstein went on to design NEW bombs that would explode and kill more people.
> >
> > The man was de bomb!
> >
> > "Woe is me!"
>
> ENCLOSURE TO MR. ALBERT EINSTEIN'S LETTER OF
> MARCH 25, 1945 TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
> by
> L. Szilard
>
> The work on uranium has now reached a stage which will make it
> possible for the Army to detonate atomic bombs in the immediate future.
> The "demonstration" of such bombs may be expected rather soon and naturally
> the War Department is considering the use of such bombs in the war against
> Japan.
>
> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E9xHzihVcAUIWHO?format=jpg&name=medium
>
> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1431098020930592777/photo/1
>
> Don't yous guys want to see the NEW BOMB that Albert Einstein went on to design that would explode and kill more people?
>
> it's yummy!
>
> Albert Einstein just LOVES to kill people!
>
> (from the comfort of his home of course)
>
> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E8yGl_HVUAQcmo4?format=jpg&name=900x900
>
> Einstein was soooooooo sad about Japan, ...he wanted to kill Germans instead.
>
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> the unchallengeable.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

"According to these discussions and a remark you made yourself when you
were visiting me
it seems to be desirable to have a device which automatically brings to
explosion
a torpedo passing below a ship at the right moment.
I have an idea for an electro-magnetic device for this purpose which I
would like to submit to you for your judgement.
S is an electro-magnet producing an alternating magbetic field with
vertical axis. s and s' are two coils with vertical axis connected in
serie with opposite magnetic axis, which are located symmetrically to S.
The current created by induction in those two coils may be multiplied by
tubes (current i). The device is set in function only at a moment when
the torpedo is far enough from the emitting ship to avoid the magnetic
influence of the latter. As long as the torpedo is on the way i will
vanish for reasons of symmetry. The torpedo is supposed to travel deep
enough so that it will not hit the target directly but pass below it.
When the torpedo approaches the target there will be created through the
nearby parts of the ship's hull an additional (induced) alternative
magnetic field which at first will be stronger in s than in s'. There is
now created a current i the intensity of which will change according to
the following diagrams L ' U PV... M corresponds to the moment when
the torpedo passes under the middle of the ship. At this moment i will
again vanish for reasons of symmetry. This is the moment to put the
explosion into action. It will be easy to construct an electrical
contact device which functions if a current is first initiated and goes
again to zero afterwards. " -Albert Einstein

(to be continued in whole with original full document enclosed for
examination)

(of course there are other bombs..)

Albert Einstein just LOVES to kill people!
(from the comfort of his home of course)
(remote work bombing???)

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> "According to these discussions and a remark you made yourself when you were visiting me
> it seems to be desirable to have a device which automatically brings to explosion
> a torpedo passing below a ship at the right moment.
> I have an idea for an electro-magnetic device for this purpose which I would like to submit to you for your judgement." -Albert Einstein
>
> (to be continued in whole)
>
> anyway...
> 'on the electrodynamics of moving bodies' sounds likes the theory of bombs to me.
>
> and his second paper:
> "does the inertia of a body depend on its energy content" sounds like the theory of atomic bombs!
>
> In other words, The Theory of Relativity is actually...The Theory of ATOMIC BOMBS!
>
> In 1905 Albert Einstein was thinking..."How can I make an atomic bomb?"
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > but knew that in the world Hitler Germany
> > > > could gain an absolute advantage
> > > > He didn't want anymore involvement
> > > > beyond his one letter.
> > > >
> > > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > >
> >
> > >
> > > The atomic bomb was dropped on Japan in August, 1945...twice. But Albert Einstein was
> > > notified that the bomb would be dropped on Japan earlier that year in March.
> > >
> > > Then after all the bombs were dropped and America celebrated..
> > >
> > > Albert Einstein went on to design NEW bombs that would explode and kill more people.
> > >
> > > The man was de bomb!
> > >
> > > "Woe is me!"
> >
> > ENCLOSURE TO MR. ALBERT EINSTEIN'S LETTER OF
> > MARCH 25, 1945 TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
> > by
> > L. Szilard
> >
> > The work on uranium has now reached a stage which will make it
> > possible for the Army to detonate atomic bombs in the immediate future.
> > The "demonstration" of such bombs may be expected rather soon and naturally
> > the War Department is considering the use of such bombs in the war against
> > Japan.
> >
> > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E9xHzihVcAUIWHO?format=jpg&name=medium
> >
> > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1431098020930592777/photo/1
> >
> > Don't yous guys want to see the NEW BOMB that Albert Einstein went on to design that would explode and kill more people?
> >
> > it's yummy!
> >
> > Albert Einstein just LOVES to kill people!
> >
> > (from the comfort of his home of course)
> >
> > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E8yGl_HVUAQcmo4?format=jpg&name=900x900
> >
> > Einstein was soooooooo sad about Japan, ...he wanted to kill Germans instead.
> >
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> the unchallengeable.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432121477193613312

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E9_qfAqVUAEEnuH?format=jpg&name=4096x4096

https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432121477193613312/photo/1

photo/2
photo/3

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> "According to these discussions and a remark you made yourself when you
> were visiting me
> it seems to be desirable to have a device which automatically brings to
> explosion
> a torpedo passing below a ship at the right moment.
> I have an idea for an electro-magnetic device for this purpose which I
> would like to submit to you for your judgement.
> S is an electro-magnet producing an alternating magbetic field with
> vertical axis. s and s' are two coils with vertical axis connected in
> serie with opposite magnetic axis, which are located symmetrically to S.
> The current created by induction in those two coils may be multiplied by
> tubes (current i). The device is set in function only at a moment when
> the torpedo is far enough from the emitting ship to avoid the magnetic
> influence of the latter. As long as the torpedo is on the way i will
> vanish for reasons of symmetry. The torpedo is supposed to travel deep
> enough so that it will not hit the target directly but pass below it.
> When the torpedo approaches the target there will be created through the
> nearby parts of the ship's hull an additional (induced) alternative
> magnetic field which at first will be stronger in s than in s'. There is
> now created a current i the intensity of which will change according to
> the following diagrams L ' U PV... M corresponds to the moment when
> the torpedo passes under the middle of the ship. At this moment i will
> again vanish for reasons of symmetry. This is the moment to put the
> explosion into action. It will be easy to construct an electrical
> contact device which functions if a current is first initiated and goes
> again to zero afterwards. " -Albert Einstein
>
> (to be continued in whole with original full document enclosed for
> examination)
>
> (of course there are other bombs..)
>
> Albert Einstein just LOVES to kill people!
> (from the comfort of his home of course)
> (remote work bombing???)
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > "According to these discussions and a remark you made yourself when you were visiting me
> > it seems to be desirable to have a device which automatically brings to explosion
> > a torpedo passing below a ship at the right moment.
> > I have an idea for an electro-magnetic device for this purpose which I would like to submit to you for your judgement." -Albert Einstein
> >
> > (to be continued in whole)
> >
> > anyway...
> > 'on the electrodynamics of moving bodies' sounds likes the theory of bombs to me.
> >
> > and his second paper:
> > "does the inertia of a body depend on its energy content" sounds like the theory of atomic bombs!
> >
> > In other words, The Theory of Relativity is actually...The Theory of ATOMIC BOMBS!
> >
> > In 1905 Albert Einstein was thinking..."How can I make an atomic bomb?"
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > but knew that in the world Hitler Germany
> > > > > could gain an absolute advantage
> > > > > He didn't want anymore involvement
> > > > > beyond his one letter.
> > > > >
> > > > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > The atomic bomb was dropped on Japan in August, 1945...twice. But Albert Einstein was
> > > > notified that the bomb would be dropped on Japan earlier that year in March.
> > > >
> > > > Then after all the bombs were dropped and America celebrated..
> > > >
> > > > Albert Einstein went on to design NEW bombs that would explode and kill more people.
> > > >
> > > > The man was de bomb!
> > > >
> > > > "Woe is me!"
> > >
> > > ENCLOSURE TO MR. ALBERT EINSTEIN'S LETTER OF
> > > MARCH 25, 1945 TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
> > > by
> > > L. Szilard
> > >
> > > The work on uranium has now reached a stage which will make it
> > > possible for the Army to detonate atomic bombs in the immediate future.
> > > The "demonstration" of such bombs may be expected rather soon and naturally
> > > the War Department is considering the use of such bombs in the war against
> > > Japan.
> > >
> > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E9xHzihVcAUIWHO?format=jpg&name=medium
> > >
> > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1431098020930592777/photo/1
> > >
> > > Don't yous guys want to see the NEW BOMB that Albert Einstein went on to design that would explode and kill more people?
> > >
> > > it's yummy!
> > >
> > > Albert Einstein just LOVES to kill people!
> > >
> > > (from the comfort of his home of course)
> > >
> > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E8yGl_HVUAQcmo4?format=jpg&name=900x900
> > >
> > > Einstein was soooooooo sad about Japan, ...he wanted to kill Germans instead.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > > the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> the unchallengeable.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

Wait, there's more!

" Dear Mr.Brunmauer: You have asked me yesterday to submit to you in
writing my proposition to bring about a position of the torpedo
parallel to the wall of the ship, before the explosion. In working this
out,however,I became aware that the realization of this method is quite
impossible. It is impossible,namely, to bring the torpedo to rest in
working on it on such a short length which is available; the forces are
so tremendous that they must mechanically destroy the torpedo. If v
is the speed of a torpedo of the mass m,the negative accelerating force
K, the way of accelerationA, then K is given by the equation , mpur=
Ra If one puts f.instance m=100 kg. =10°% vs 25m = 255 -10°cm sek
sek 4=10 cm one gets E-adeh sueoiute units or 300 weight tons
(3+10°Kg.). It is clear that the structure of the torpedo cannot stand
this. The torpedo has therefore to be brought to explosion pefore
loosing its spneed. In 0,001 second it makes a way of 2,5 cme To be
sure the explosion should be finished before suneunkxrakxparxs
essential parts of the torpedo findergo deformation. It can f.i. be
arranged that the head of the torpedo can undergo a deformation of
appr. 10 om, without the rest of the torpedo being mechanically
deformed. This frontal part should contain empty space ( or a space
containing only air) to avoid that its deformation produces a
compression wave propagating backwards with great speed, The torpedo-
head would then look like this The empty space has the only
purpose to gain a few thousands of a second between the time of contact
with the ship's wall in which the fuse-mechanism comes into function
and the time in which the explosion is finished. " - Albert Einstein

https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432129448841674752

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432121477193613312
>
> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E9_qfAqVUAEEnuH?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
>
> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432121477193613312/photo/1
>
> photo/2
> photo/3
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > "According to these discussions and a remark you made yourself when you
> > were visiting me
> > it seems to be desirable to have a device which automatically brings to
> > explosion
> > a torpedo passing below a ship at the right moment.
> > I have an idea for an electro-magnetic device for this purpose which I
> > would like to submit to you for your judgement.
> > S is an electro-magnet producing an alternating magbetic field with
> > vertical axis. s and s' are two coils with vertical axis connected in
> > serie with opposite magnetic axis, which are located symmetrically to S.
> > The current created by induction in those two coils may be multiplied by
> > tubes (current i). The device is set in function only at a moment when
> > the torpedo is far enough from the emitting ship to avoid the magnetic
> > influence of the latter. As long as the torpedo is on the way i will
> > vanish for reasons of symmetry. The torpedo is supposed to travel deep
> > enough so that it will not hit the target directly but pass below it.
> > When the torpedo approaches the target there will be created through the
> > nearby parts of the ship's hull an additional (induced) alternative
> > magnetic field which at first will be stronger in s than in s'. There is
> > now created a current i the intensity of which will change according to
> > the following diagrams L ' U PV... M corresponds to the moment when
> > the torpedo passes under the middle of the ship. At this moment i will
> > again vanish for reasons of symmetry. This is the moment to put the
> > explosion into action. It will be easy to construct an electrical
> > contact device which functions if a current is first initiated and goes
> > again to zero afterwards. " -Albert Einstein
> >
> > (to be continued in whole with original full document enclosed for
> > examination)
> >
> > (of course there are other bombs..)
> >
> > Albert Einstein just LOVES to kill people!
> > (from the comfort of his home of course)
> > (remote work bombing???)
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > "According to these discussions and a remark you made yourself when you were visiting me
> > > it seems to be desirable to have a device which automatically brings to explosion
> > > a torpedo passing below a ship at the right moment.
> > > I have an idea for an electro-magnetic device for this purpose which I would like to submit to you for your judgement." -Albert Einstein
> > >
> > > (to be continued in whole)
> > >
> > > anyway...
> > > 'on the electrodynamics of moving bodies' sounds likes the theory of bombs to me.
> > >
> > > and his second paper:
> > > "does the inertia of a body depend on its energy content" sounds like the theory of atomic bombs!
> > >
> > > In other words, The Theory of Relativity is actually...The Theory of ATOMIC BOMBS!
> > >
> > > In 1905 Albert Einstein was thinking..."How can I make an atomic bomb?"
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > but knew that in the world Hitler Germany
> > > > > > could gain an absolute advantage
> > > > > > He didn't want anymore involvement
> > > > > > beyond his one letter.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The atomic bomb was dropped on Japan in August, 1945...twice. But Albert Einstein was
> > > > > notified that the bomb would be dropped on Japan earlier that year in March.
> > > > >
> > > > > Then after all the bombs were dropped and America celebrated..
> > > > >
> > > > > Albert Einstein went on to design NEW bombs that would explode and kill more people.
> > > > >
> > > > > The man was de bomb!
> > > > >
> > > > > "Woe is me!"
> > > >
> > > > ENCLOSURE TO MR. ALBERT EINSTEIN'S LETTER OF
> > > > MARCH 25, 1945 TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
> > > > by
> > > > L. Szilard
> > > >
> > > > The work on uranium has now reached a stage which will make it
> > > > possible for the Army to detonate atomic bombs in the immediate future.
> > > > The "demonstration" of such bombs may be expected rather soon and naturally
> > > > the War Department is considering the use of such bombs in the war against
> > > > Japan.
> > > >
> > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E9xHzihVcAUIWHO?format=jpg&name=medium
> > > >
> > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1431098020930592777/photo/1
> > > >
> > > > Don't yous guys want to see the NEW BOMB that Albert Einstein went on to design that would explode and kill more people?
> > > >
> > > > it's yummy!
> > > >
> > > > Albert Einstein just LOVES to kill people!
> > > >
> > > > (from the comfort of his home of course)
> > > >
> > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E8yGl_HVUAQcmo4?format=jpg&name=900x900
> > > >
> > > > Einstein was soooooooo sad about Japan, ...he wanted to kill Germans instead.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > > the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> the unchallengeable.

On Sunday, August 29, 2021 at 4:56:19 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> Wait, there's more!
>
> " Dear Mr.Brunmauer: You have asked me yesterday to submit to you in
> writing my proposition to bring about a position of the torpedo
> parallel to the wall of the ship, before the explosion. In working this
> out,however,I became aware that the realization of this method is quite
> impossible. It is impossible,namely, to bring the torpedo to rest in
> working on it on such a short length which is available; the forces are
> so tremendous that they must mechanically destroy the torpedo. If v
> is the speed of a torpedo of the mass m,the negative accelerating force
> K, the way of accelerationA, then K is given by the equation , mpur=
> Ra If one puts f.instance m=100 kg. =10°% vs 25m = 255 -10°cm sek
> sek 4=10 cm one gets E-adeh sueoiute units or 300 weight tons
> (3+10°Kg.). It is clear that the structure of the torpedo cannot stand
> this. The torpedo has therefore to be brought to explosion pefore
> loosing its spneed. In 0,001 second it makes a way of 2,5 cme To be
> sure the explosion should be finished before suneunkxrakxparxs
> essential parts of the torpedo findergo deformation. It can f.i. be
> arranged that the head of the torpedo can undergo a deformation of
> appr. 10 om, without the rest of the torpedo being mechanically
> deformed. This frontal part should contain empty space ( or a space
> containing only air) to avoid that its deformation produces a
> compression wave propagating backwards with great speed, The torpedo-
> head would then look like this The empty space has the only
> purpose to gain a few thousands of a second between the time of contact
> with the ship's wall in which the fuse-mechanism comes into function
> and the time in which the explosion is finished. " - Albert Einstein
>
>
>
> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432129448841674752
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432121477193613312
> >
> > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E9_qfAqVUAEEnuH?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> >
> > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1432121477193613312/photo/1
> >
> > photo/2
> > photo/3
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > "According to these discussions and a remark you made yourself when you
> > > were visiting me
> > > it seems to be desirable to have a device which automatically brings to
> > > explosion
> > > a torpedo passing below a ship at the right moment.
> > > I have an idea for an electro-magnetic device for this purpose which I
> > > would like to submit to you for your judgement.
> > > S is an electro-magnet producing an alternating magbetic field with
> > > vertical axis. s and s' are two coils with vertical axis connected in
> > > serie with opposite magnetic axis, which are located symmetrically to S.
> > > The current created by induction in those two coils may be multiplied by
> > > tubes (current i). The device is set in function only at a moment when
> > > the torpedo is far enough from the emitting ship to avoid the magnetic
> > > influence of the latter. As long as the torpedo is on the way i will
> > > vanish for reasons of symmetry. The torpedo is supposed to travel deep
> > > enough so that it will not hit the target directly but pass below it.
> > > When the torpedo approaches the target there will be created through the
> > > nearby parts of the ship's hull an additional (induced) alternative
> > > magnetic field which at first will be stronger in s than in s'. There is
> > > now created a current i the intensity of which will change according to
> > > the following diagrams L ' U PV... M corresponds to the moment when
> > > the torpedo passes under the middle of the ship. At this moment i will
> > > again vanish for reasons of symmetry. This is the moment to put the
> > > explosion into action. It will be easy to construct an electrical
> > > contact device which functions if a current is first initiated and goes
> > > again to zero afterwards. " -Albert Einstein
> > >
> > > (to be continued in whole with original full document enclosed for
> > > examination)
> > >
> > > (of course there are other bombs..)
> > >
> > > Albert Einstein just LOVES to kill people!
> > > (from the comfort of his home of course)
> > > (remote work bombing???)
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > "According to these discussions and a remark you made yourself when you were visiting me
> > > > it seems to be desirable to have a device which automatically brings to explosion
> > > > a torpedo passing below a ship at the right moment.
> > > > I have an idea for an electro-magnetic device for this purpose which I would like to submit to you for your judgement." -Albert Einstein
> > > >
> > > > (to be continued in whole)
> > > >
> > > > anyway...
> > > > 'on the electrodynamics of moving bodies' sounds likes the theory of bombs to me.
> > > >
> > > > and his second paper:
> > > > "does the inertia of a body depend on its energy content" sounds like the theory of atomic bombs!
> > > >
> > > > In other words, The Theory of Relativity is actually...The Theory of ATOMIC BOMBS!
> > > >
> > > > In 1905 Albert Einstein was thinking..."How can I make an atomic bomb?"

You read his mind you moron?

> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > but knew that in the world Hitler Germany
> > > > > > > could gain an absolute advantage
> > > > > > > He didn't want anymore involvement
> > > > > > > beyond his one letter.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Mitchell Raemsch

Einstein's participation to prevent Hitler Germany from getting
the bomb is all he wanted to do. He was sad about Japan...

Mitchell Raemsch

mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> Einstein's participation to prevent Hitler Germany from getting the bomb
> is all he wanted to do. He was sad about Japan...

nonsense, hitler never had a proper atomic / nuclear research weaponizing
program. The german main research was in rockets, bio-weapons and
vaccines.

On Monday, August 30, 2021 at 12:18:02 PM UTC-7, bubba wrote:
> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Einstein's participation to prevent Hitler Germany from getting the bomb
> > is all he wanted to do. He was sad about Japan...
> nonsense, hitler never had a proper atomic

Why would anyone in the world take the chance?
Do you like to protect Hitler you moron?
Can you show he would not do it...

Mitchell Raemsch

mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> On Monday, August 30, 2021 at 12:18:02 PM UTC-7, bubba wrote:
>> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> > Einstein's participation to prevent Hitler Germany from getting the
>> > bomb is all he wanted to do. He was sad about Japan...
>> nonsense, hitler never had a proper atomic
>
> Why would anyone in the world take the chance?
> Do you like to protect Hitler you moron?
> Can you show he would not do it...

I think I can do. Hitler's gestapo never arrested, beat and tortured
people the way the *police_state* are doing today with innocent people,
under the pretext of "covid-19". He never want depopulate earth with
lethal injections called "vaccines". The pm of Australia said recently
"you will not be allowed to remove your mask and drink whatever", "you
may not stop and say hello to your neighbour even wearing the mask". etc
etc and etc.

Am I missing something?

On Tuesday, August 31, 2021 at 11:07:33 AM UTC-7, bubba wrote:
> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > On Monday, August 30, 2021 at 12:18:02 PM UTC-7, bubba wrote:
> >> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>
> >> > Einstein's participation to prevent Hitler Germany from getting the
> >> > bomb is all he wanted to do. He was sad about Japan...
> >> nonsense, hitler never had a proper atomic
> >
> > Why would anyone in the world take the chance?
> > Do you like to protect Hitler you moron?
> > Can you show he would not do it...

The liar lies and it was not Einstein...
He cared instead...

Mitchell Raemsch