On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:37:00 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 08:40:37 -0700 (PDT), Anthony William Sloman
> <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
>
> Crap. Again.

Cursitor Doom is starting to look a lot like John Doe. Brain rot must be progressing rapidly, not that there was even much there to rot.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

"the concepts "male" and "female" are essentially social constructions" (Bill Sloman)

Bozo the Clown...

--
Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

> X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5de4:: with SMTP id jn4mr7752253qvb.41.1625387109420; Sun, 04 Jul 2021 01:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
> X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1352:: with SMTP id w18mr7671974qtk.247.1625387109253; Sun, 04 Jul 2021 01:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
> Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
> Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2021 01:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
> In-Reply-To: <8hb1egt68v3gtsmnht5q4e9s2qq1u1qjaf@4ax.com>
> Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=14.202.161.14; posting-account=SJ46pgoAAABuUDuHc5uDiXN30ATE-zi-
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 14.202.161.14
> References: <krfsdg93u7j06hveden22iapt6b280s96m@4ax.com> <6qgsdgdgkq4i7g5n58srgt1teuc64ru5rb@4ax.com> <tscheppe.1kub1z5iscjzl@nntp.aioe.org> <r5r0eg9cqu3r3va5vrm43joc5gva86pv5b@4ax.com> <bb608768-40f3-4ddd-96ae-3ea3dc885a43n@googlegroups.com> <8hb1egt68v3gtsmnht5q4e9s2qq1u1qjaf@4ax.com>
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Message-ID: <47e1a466-260e-45c7-a7de-ba1e0350d519n@googlegroups.com>
> Subject: Re: OT: Latest Tesla Goes BOOOOOM!!!!!
> From: Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
> Injection-Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2021 08:25:09 +0000
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:636076
>
> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:37:00 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>> On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 08:40:37 -0700 (PDT), Anthony William Sloman
>> <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
>>
>> Crap. Again.
>
> Cursitor Doom is starting to look a lot like John Doe. Brain rot must be progressing rapidly, not that there was even much there to rot.
>
> --
> Bill Sloman, Sydney
>
>

On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 16:35:52 -0700 (PDT), Rick C
<gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:

>Wow! You must never drive any car then. I believe it was a Jeep Cherokee that hackers ran into a ditch. No one has ever hacked a Tesla other than having direct wired access to the car interior. Even that did not access anything that could be used to crash the car. Your video starts off saying "they may never know..." and offers no evidence of any wrong doing at all. What's more, the car Michael Hastings was driving was a Mercedes-Benz C250!
>
>As these features become more and more universal, even cars without the features will have the hardware and the software with the feature disabled. So any hacking vulnerabilities will be present in all versions. So more likely than not in the next 10 years you WILL buy one whether you like it or not.

I can promise you I will not. I'm *already* in the process of
switching over entirely to classic cars with ZERO electronics. I don't
even like the level of computerisation there has been increasing in
cars generally over the last 30 years, let alone what may come in the
future!

TurdSipper Dumb <td@nowhere.com> wrote in
news:16t2egdksnfnfausehntgi3kil6cien1g2@4ax.com:

> On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 16:35:52 -0700 (PDT), Rick C
> <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Wow! You must never drive any car then. I believe it was a Jeep
>>Cherokee that hackers ran into a ditch. No one has ever hacked a
>>Tesla other than having direct wired access to the car interior.
>>Even that did not access anything that could be used to crash the
>>car. Your video starts off saying "they may never know..." and
>>offers no evidence of any wrong doing at all. What's more, the
>>car Michael Hastings was driving was a Mercedes-Benz C250!
>>
>>As these features become more and more universal, even cars
>>without the features will have the hardware and the software with
>>the feature disabled. So any hacking vulnerabilities will be
>>present in all versions. So more likely than not in the next 10
>>years you WILL buy one whether you like it or not.
>
> I can promise you I will not. I'm *already* in the process of
> switching over entirely to classic cars with ZERO electronics. I
> don't even like the level of computerisation there has been
> increasing in cars generally over the last 30 years, let alone
> what may come in the future!
>

Not that anyone gives a fat flying fuck what you have problems with
already, but hopefully you will die soon, and finally your retarded
ass will be auto-filtered from the group and the world. Be sure to
refrain from ordering the electronic coffin and find a horse drawn
hearse and make them dig the grave by hand. No cell phones or quartz
watches on the crews.

You're a joke on intelligent men.

On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 6:47:18 PM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 16:35:52 -0700 (PDT), Rick C
> <gnuarm.del...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Wow! You must never drive any car then. I believe it was a Jeep Cherokee that hackers ran into a ditch. No one has ever hacked a Tesla other than having direct wired access to the car interior. Even that did not access anything that could be used to crash the car. Your video starts off saying "they may never know..." and offers no evidence of any wrong doing at all. What's more, the car Michael Hastings was driving was a Mercedes-Benz C250!
> >
> >As these features become more and more universal, even cars without the features will have the hardware and the software with the feature disabled. So any hacking vulnerabilities will be present in all versions. So more likely than not in the next 10 years you WILL buy one whether you like it or not.
>
> I can promise you I will not.

This is a promise given by an anonymous troll.

> I'm *already* in the process of switching over entirely to classic cars with ZERO electronics.

He hasn't actually got any kind of car, so the switch is confined to the kind of car he'd like us to think that he would drive, if his area of residence had roads.

> I don't even like the level of computerisation there has been increasing in cars generally over the last 30 years, let alone what may come in the future!

Of course he doesn't. Cursitor Doom resents anything that is smarter than he is.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:47:18 AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 16:35:52 -0700 (PDT), Rick C
> <gnuarm.del...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Wow! You must never drive any car then. I believe it was a Jeep Cherokee that hackers ran into a ditch. No one has ever hacked a Tesla other than having direct wired access to the car interior. Even that did not access anything that could be used to crash the car. Your video starts off saying "they may never know..." and offers no evidence of any wrong doing at all. What's more, the car Michael Hastings was driving was a Mercedes-Benz C250!
> >
> >As these features become more and more universal, even cars without the features will have the hardware and the software with the feature disabled. So any hacking vulnerabilities will be present in all versions. So more likely than not in the next 10 years you WILL buy one whether you like it or not.
> I can promise you I will not. I'm *already* in the process of
> switching over entirely to classic cars with ZERO electronics. I don't
> even like the level of computerisation there has been increasing in
> cars generally over the last 30 years, let alone what may come in the
> future!

At some point the older cars that can't be brought into compliance with emissions will either be limited in the distance they can be driven or will be taxed heavily. Yeah, you will change because you won't have an affordable choice.

--

Rick C.

+- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

On Sun, 4 Jul 2021 01:25:09 -0700 (PDT), Anthony William Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

>On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:37:00 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>> On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 08:40:37 -0700 (PDT), Anthony William Sloman
>> <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
>>
>> Crap. Again.
>
>Cursitor Doom is starting to look a lot like John Doe. Brain rot must be progressing rapidly, not that there was even much there to rot.
--

Britain: do the right thing and hand Australia back to China.

On Sun, 4 Jul 2021 06:56:51 -0700 (PDT), Rick C
<gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:47:18 AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>> On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 16:35:52 -0700 (PDT), Rick C
>> <gnuarm.del...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Wow! You must never drive any car then. I believe it was a Jeep Cherokee that hackers ran into a ditch. No one has ever hacked a Tesla other than having direct wired access to the car interior. Even that did not access anything that could be used to crash the car. Your video starts off saying "they may never know..." and offers no evidence of any wrong doing at all. What's more, the car Michael Hastings was driving was a Mercedes-Benz C250!
>> >
>> >As these features become more and more universal, even cars without the features will have the hardware and the software with the feature disabled. So any hacking vulnerabilities will be present in all versions. So more likely than not in the next 10 years you WILL buy one whether you like it or not.
>> I can promise you I will not. I'm *already* in the process of
>> switching over entirely to classic cars with ZERO electronics. I don't
>> even like the level of computerisation there has been increasing in
>> cars generally over the last 30 years, let alone what may come in the
>> future!
>
>At some point the older cars that can't be brought into compliance with emissions will either be limited in the distance they can be driven or will be taxed heavily. Yeah, you will change because you won't have an affordable choice.

I'll be dead before then, anyway. My 'three score and ten' is well
behind me so I'm on borrowed time as it is!
I'm not wedded to the petrol engine. I would not object in principle
to switching to electric motors, if only the battery problem and one
or two other aspecs concerning supply infrastructure and generating
capacity could be addressed. EVs are the future - NOT the present!

On Sun, 4 Jul 2021 12:54:21 -0000 (UTC), John Doe
<always.look@message.header> wrote:

>Foulmouthed reactionary troll AlwaysWrong bitching and moaning
>about the original poster...

Destitutedrugabuser has done so much dope over the years, he has
scarcely a single functioning cell remaining in his ossified brain.
I'm left wondering if he and Sloman and Alison are all one and the
same poster.
--

Britain: do the right thing and hand Australia back to China.

On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 3:24:26 PM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jul 2021 06:56:51 -0700 (PDT), Rick C
> <gnuarm.del...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:47:18 AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
> >> On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 16:35:52 -0700 (PDT), Rick C
> >> <gnuarm.del...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Wow! You must never drive any car then. I believe it was a Jeep Cherokee that hackers ran into a ditch. No one has ever hacked a Tesla other than having direct wired access to the car interior. Even that did not access anything that could be used to crash the car. Your video starts off saying "they may never know..." and offers no evidence of any wrong doing at all. What's more, the car Michael Hastings was driving was a Mercedes-Benz C250!
> >> >
> >> >As these features become more and more universal, even cars without the features will have the hardware and the software with the feature disabled. So any hacking vulnerabilities will be present in all versions. So more likely than not in the next 10 years you WILL buy one whether you like it or not.
> >> I can promise you I will not. I'm *already* in the process of
> >> switching over entirely to classic cars with ZERO electronics. I don't
> >> even like the level of computerisation there has been increasing in
> >> cars generally over the last 30 years, let alone what may come in the
> >> future!
> >
> >At some point the older cars that can't be brought into compliance with emissions will either be limited in the distance they can be driven or will be taxed heavily. Yeah, you will change because you won't have an affordable choice.
> I'll be dead before then, anyway. My 'three score and ten' is well
> behind me so I'm on borrowed time as it is!
> I'm not wedded to the petrol engine. I would not object in principle
> to switching to electric motors, if only the battery problem and one
> or two other aspecs concerning supply infrastructure and generating
> capacity could be addressed. EVs are the future - NOT the present!

Obviously a man living in a cave where he can't see the two million EVs on US roads and the thousands of charging facilities.

It's a hoot to see him talking about "generating capacity" as if he had some understanding of the issue. Basically a troll.

--

Rick C.

++ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
++ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 3:32:58 PM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jul 2021 12:54:21 -0000 (UTC), John Doe
> <alway...@message.header> wrote:
>
> >Foulmouthed reactionary troll AlwaysWrong bitching and moaning
> >about the original poster...
> Destitutedrugabuser has done so much dope over the years, he has
> scarcely a single functioning cell remaining in his ossified brain.
> I'm left wondering if he and Sloman and Alison are all one and the
> same poster.

I think there are two people who post here who can not possibly be confused with anyone else. One is Phil Alison and the other is you.

--

Rick C.

--- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
--- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

On 04/07/21 20:45, Rick C wrote:
> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 3:24:26 PM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>> On Sun, 4 Jul 2021 06:56:51 -0700 (PDT), Rick C
>> <gnuarm.del...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:47:18 AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 16:35:52 -0700 (PDT), Rick C
>>>> <gnuarm.del...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Wow! You must never drive any car then. I believe it was a Jeep Cherokee that hackers ran into a ditch. No one has ever hacked a Tesla other than having direct wired access to the car interior. Even that did not access anything that could be used to crash the car. Your video starts off saying "they may never know..." and offers no evidence of any wrong doing at all. What's more, the car Michael Hastings was driving was a Mercedes-Benz C250!
>>>>>
>>>>> As these features become more and more universal, even cars without the features will have the hardware and the software with the feature disabled. So any hacking vulnerabilities will be present in all versions. So more likely than not in the next 10 years you WILL buy one whether you like it or not.
>>>> I can promise you I will not. I'm *already* in the process of
>>>> switching over entirely to classic cars with ZERO electronics. I don't
>>>> even like the level of computerisation there has been increasing in
>>>> cars generally over the last 30 years, let alone what may come in the
>>>> future!
>>>
>>> At some point the older cars that can't be brought into compliance with emissions will either be limited in the distance they can be driven or will be taxed heavily. Yeah, you will change because you won't have an affordable choice.
>> I'll be dead before then, anyway. My 'three score and ten' is well
>> behind me so I'm on borrowed time as it is!
>> I'm not wedded to the petrol engine. I would not object in principle
>> to switching to electric motors, if only the battery problem and one
>> or two other aspecs concerning supply infrastructure and generating
>> capacity could be addressed. EVs are the future - NOT the present!
>
> Obviously a man living in a cave where he can't see the two million EVs on US roads and the thousands of charging facilities.

Whereas you live on a savannah and can't see the myriad places
where charging points aren't going to happen.

> It's a hoot to see him talking about "generating capacity" as if he had some understanding of the issue. Basically a troll.

I'm not going to argue with that.

On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:13:25 PM UTC-4, Tom Gardner wrote:
> On 04/07/21 20:45, Rick C wrote:
> >
> > Obviously a man living in a cave where he can't see the two million EVs on US roads and the thousands of charging facilities.
> Whereas you live on a savannah and can't see the myriad places
> where charging points aren't going to happen.
> > It's a hoot to see him talking about "generating capacity" as if he had some understanding of the issue. Basically a troll.
> I'm not going to argue with that.

Actually I now live in a very EV unfriendly location, Puerto Rico. Not many charging facilities here. I don't know if I'm going to buy an EV or not. Not that charging is the issue, but because I'd like to try something other than a Tesla and there aren't many EV options here other than buying a new car. I need to explore more and investigate. But the econobox seems to be the universal solution to parking and narrow roads. Not a great place for a model X.

So I might get a small ICE until the new breeds of EVs are out in a year or two. Electricity is expensive here too, $0.25/kWh, wow! So it's only half the cost of gasoline rather than a much larger ratio like in Virginia.

--

Rick C.

--+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
--+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

On 04/07/21 21:23, Rick C wrote:
> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:13:25 PM UTC-4, Tom Gardner wrote:
>> On 04/07/21 20:45, Rick C wrote:
>>>
>>> Obviously a man living in a cave where he can't see the two million EVs
>>> on US roads and the thousands of charging facilities.
>> Whereas you live on a savannah and can't see the myriad places where
>> charging points aren't going to happen.
>>> It's a hoot to see him talking about "generating capacity" as if he had
>>> some understanding of the issue. Basically a troll.
>> I'm not going to argue with that.
>
> Actually I now live in a very EV unfriendly location, Puerto Rico. Not many
> charging facilities here.

I've no idea what it is like in Puerto Rico, but I was
referring to the impracticality of ever having charging
points in many locations.

Here many city houses and roads were built before people
even had shared vehicles - and that includes horse drawn
vehicles, let alone bicycles.

In some places the shape of properties built within the
last century were constrained in 1086, i.e. 935 years ago.
Yup, the shape of housing estates was determined by the
shape of fields in the Domesday Book :)

> I don't know if I'm going to buy an EV or not.
> Not that charging is the issue, but because I'd like to try something other
> than a Tesla and there aren't many EV options here other than buying a new
> car. I need to explore more and investigate. But the econobox seems to be
> the universal solution to parking and narrow roads. Not a great place for a
> model X.
>
> So I might get a small ICE until the new breeds of EVs are out in a year or
> two. Electricity is expensive here too, $0.25/kWh, wow! So it's only half
> the cost of gasoline rather than a much larger ratio like in Virginia.

On Sun, 04 Jul 2021 20:15:38 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@nowhere.com>
wrote:

>On Sun, 4 Jul 2021 01:25:09 -0700 (PDT), Anthony William Sloman
><bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
>
>>On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:37:00 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>>> On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 08:40:37 -0700 (PDT), Anthony William Sloman
>>> <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Crap. Again.
>>
>>Cursitor Doom is starting to look a lot like John Doe. Brain rot must be progressing rapidly, not that there was even much there to rot.

>Britain: do the right thing and hand Australia back to China.

Yes. They need the coal.

--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

The best designs are necessarily accidental.

On Sun, 4 Jul 2021 21:48:16 +0100, Tom Gardner
<spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

>On 04/07/21 21:23, Rick C wrote:
>> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:13:25 PM UTC-4, Tom Gardner wrote:
>>> On 04/07/21 20:45, Rick C wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Obviously a man living in a cave where he can't see the two million EVs
>>>> on US roads and the thousands of charging facilities.
>>> Whereas you live on a savannah and can't see the myriad places where
>>> charging points aren't going to happen.
>>>> It's a hoot to see him talking about "generating capacity" as if he had
>>>> some understanding of the issue. Basically a troll.
>>> I'm not going to argue with that.
>>
>> Actually I now live in a very EV unfriendly location, Puerto Rico. Not many
>> charging facilities here.
>
>I've no idea what it is like in Puerto Rico, but I was
>referring to the impracticality of ever having charging
>points in many locations.
>
>Here many city houses and roads were built before people
>even had shared vehicles - and that includes horse drawn
>vehicles, let alone bicycles.

Rural charging stations would be easy. Just use diesel generators.

--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

The best designs are necessarily accidental.

On 04/07/21 22:28, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jul 2021 21:48:16 +0100, Tom Gardner
> <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 04/07/21 21:23, Rick C wrote:
>>> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:13:25 PM UTC-4, Tom Gardner wrote:
>>>> On 04/07/21 20:45, Rick C wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Obviously a man living in a cave where he can't see the two million EVs
>>>>> on US roads and the thousands of charging facilities.
>>>> Whereas you live on a savannah and can't see the myriad places where
>>>> charging points aren't going to happen.
>>>>> It's a hoot to see him talking about "generating capacity" as if he had
>>>>> some understanding of the issue. Basically a troll.
>>>> I'm not going to argue with that.
>>>
>>> Actually I now live in a very EV unfriendly location, Puerto Rico. Not many
>>> charging facilities here.
>>
>> I've no idea what it is like in Puerto Rico, but I was
>> referring to the impracticality of ever having charging
>> points in many locations.
>>
>> Here many city houses and roads were built before people
>> even had shared vehicles - and that includes horse drawn
>> vehicles, let alone bicycles.
>
> Rural charging stations would be easy. Just use diesel generators.

Alternatively you could put all your prisoners to work, e.g.
https://iiif.wellcomecollection.org/image/V0031241.jpg/full/full/0/default.jpg

On 03/07/2021 15.59, Cursitor Doom wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Jul 2021 14:41:11 +0200, Klaus Kragelund
> <klauskvik@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 02.07.21 00:36, John Larkin wrote:
>>> On Thu, 01 Jul 2021 23:21:13 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@nowhere.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Special offer: a free cremation to every new owner.
>>>>
>>>> https://tinyurl.com/3wy6e8ua
>>>
>>> Gosh, that burned-out Tesla is even uglier than they usually look.
>>>
>> I actually like it, then again I just bought a Tesla model 3
>>
>> Faster than a Porche 911, 4 times lower cost, runs smooth, very safe, self driving, cheap in service, cheap consumables (electric vs gasoline)
>
> Well, if it's worth saying once it's worth saying 3 times I guess. ;-)
>

Sorry, using Thunderbird newsreader, and sometimes it misfires, or
rather fires extra :-)

Ricky missed the point... Bitching and moaning about the original poster
is at best pointless. Don't like it, don't participate...

--
Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:

> X-Received: by 2002:ae9:f704:: with SMTP id s4mr10620658qkg.249.1625428412920; Sun, 04 Jul 2021 12:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
> X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:14b7:: with SMTP id x23mr10675179qkj.451.1625428412794; Sun, 04 Jul 2021 12:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
> Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
> Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2021 12:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
> In-Reply-To: <4o24eg54nl83uuqh0jit6nlkk3ev65dkle@4ax.com>
> Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=72.50.0.28; posting-account=I-_H_woAAAA9zzro6crtEpUAyIvzd19b
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 72.50.0.28
> References: <krfsdg93u7j06hveden22iapt6b280s96m@4ax.com> <6qgsdgdgkq4i7g5n58srgt1teuc64ru5rb@4ax.com> <tscheppe.1kub1z5iscjzl@nntp.aioe.org> <r5r0eg9cqu3r3va5vrm43joc5gva86pv5b@4ax.com> <8d6def63-073b-407e-b9d4-090499c8f8e7n@googlegroups.com> <16t2egdksnfnfausehntgi3kil6cien1g2@4ax.com> <sbs4pr$ijn$1@gioia.aioe.org> <sbsb1s$etm$1@dont-email.me> <4o24eg54nl83uuqh0jit6nlkk3ev65dkle@4ax.com>
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Message-ID: <8a65b10d-1d3a-4e9f-8ef0-9bd475a83981n@googlegroups.com>
> Subject: Re: OT: Latest Tesla Goes BOOOOOM!!!!!
> From: Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com>
> Injection-Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2021 19:53:32 +0000
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:636155
>
> On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 3:32:58 PM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>> On Sun, 4 Jul 2021 12:54:21 -0000 (UTC), John Doe
>> <alway...@message.header> wrote:
>>
>> >Foulmouthed reactionary troll AlwaysWrong bitching and moaning
>> >about the original poster...
>> Destitutedrugabuser has done so much dope over the years, he has
>> scarcely a single functioning cell remaining in his ossified brain.
>> I'm left wondering if he and Sloman and Alison are all one and the
>> same poster.
>
> I think there are two people who post here who can not possibly be confused with anyone else. One is Phil Alison and the other is you.
>
> --
>
> Rick C.
>
> --- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
> --- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
>
>

Klaus Kragelund <klauskvik@hotmail.com> wrote:

> John Larkin wrote:
>> Cursitor Doom wrote:

>>> Special offer: a free cremation to every new owner.
>>>
>>> https://tinyurl.com/3wy6e8ua
>>
>> Gosh, that burned-out Tesla is even uglier than they usually look.

> I actually like it, then again I just bought a Tesla model 3
>
> Faster than a Porche 911, 4 times lower cost, runs smooth, very safe,
> self driving, cheap in service, cheap consumables (electric vs gasoline)

Speaking of electricity prices in Germany...

Why is Germany destroying its nuclear energy?

Preparing to start another war?

On Sun, 04 Jul 2021 14:25:47 -0700, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:

>On Sun, 04 Jul 2021 20:15:38 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@nowhere.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 4 Jul 2021 01:25:09 -0700 (PDT), Anthony William Sloman
>><bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sunday, July 4, 2021 at 4:37:00 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 08:40:37 -0700 (PDT), Anthony William Sloman
>>>> <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Crap. Again.
>>>
>>>Cursitor Doom is starting to look a lot like John Doe. Brain rot must be progressing rapidly, not that there was even much there to rot.
>
>>Britain: do the right thing and hand Australia back to China.
>
>Yes. They need the coal.

It's also strategically advantageous to their security. Not to mention
all the living space for the 1.4bn population.
--

Britain: do the right thing and hand Australia back to China.

On Sun, 4 Jul 2021 23:20:49 -0000 (UTC), John Doe
<always.look@message.header> wrote:

>Klaus Kragelund <klauskvik@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> John Larkin wrote:
>>> Cursitor Doom wrote:
>
>>>> Special offer: a free cremation to every new owner.
>>>>
>>>> https://tinyurl.com/3wy6e8ua
>>>
>>> Gosh, that burned-out Tesla is even uglier than they usually look.
>
>> I actually like it, then again I just bought a Tesla model 3
>>
>> Faster than a Porche 911, 4 times lower cost, runs smooth, very safe,
>> self driving, cheap in service, cheap consumables (electric vs gasoline)
>
>Speaking of electricity prices in Germany...
>
>Why is Germany destroying its nuclear energy?
>
>Preparing to start another war?

All this switching to electric - and not just for cars - will require
generation capacity from some source and nuclear is the obvious
candidate. I wonder if the Greenies considered that conundrum.

Cursitor Doom <cd@nowhere.com> wrote:

> John Doe wrote:
>> Klaus Kragelund <klauskvik@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> John Larkin wrote:
>>>> Cursitor Doom wrote:
>>
>>>>> Special offer: a free cremation to every new owner.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://tinyurl.com/3wy6e8ua
>>>>
>>>> Gosh, that burned-out Tesla is even uglier than they usually look.
>>
>>> I actually like it, then again I just bought a Tesla model 3
>>>
>>> Faster than a Porche 911, 4 times lower cost, runs smooth, very safe,
>>> self driving, cheap in service, cheap consumables (electric vs
>>> gasoline)
>>
>> Speaking of electricity prices in Germany...
>>
>> Why is Germany destroying its nuclear energy?
>>
>> Preparing to start another war?
>
> All this switching to electric - and not just for cars - will require
> generation capacity from some source and nuclear is the obvious
> candidate. I wonder if the Greenies considered that conundrum.

They aren't stupid. Albert Einstein made nuclear energy possible. He also
fled Germany. With his allegiance, they probably would have ruled the
world. Their current rejection of nuclear energy has at least two possible
motives, disregarding the pseudo-idiotic Fukushima excuse... Hatred for
traitor Albert Einstein. But the most likely is preparing for war. Nuclear
reactors are easy targets. What other motive makes sense? In reality,
there is no chance Germany destroying its own nuclear energy is a reaction
to Fukushima.

On Monday, July 5, 2021 at 9:20:54 AM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
> Klaus Kragelund <klau...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > John Larkin wrote:
> >> Cursitor Doom wrote:
>
> >>> Special offer: a free cremation to every new owner.
> >>>
> >>> https://tinyurl.com/3wy6e8ua
> >>
> >> Gosh, that burned-out Tesla is even uglier than they usually look.
>
> > I actually like it, then again I just bought a Tesla model 3
> >
> > Faster than a Porche 911, 4 times lower cost, runs smooth, very safe,
> > self driving, cheap in service, cheap consumables (electric vs gasoline)
> Speaking of electricity prices in Germany...
>
> Why is Germany destroying its nuclear energy?

It has noticed that renewable energy sources provide cheaper electricity, even when you figure in the grid storage required to deliver power when the sun isn't shining and the wind isn't blowing.
> Preparing to start another war?

Probably not.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

On Monday, July 5, 2021 at 10:29:40 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jul 2021 23:20:49 -0000 (UTC), John Doe
> <alway...@message.header> wrote:
> >Klaus Kragelund <klau...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> John Larkin wrote:
> >>> Cursitor Doom wrote:
> >
> >>>> Special offer: a free cremation to every new owner.
> >>>>
> >>>> https://tinyurl.com/3wy6e8ua
> >>>
> >>> Gosh, that burned-out Tesla is even uglier than they usually look.
> >
> >> I actually like it, then again I just bought a Tesla model 3
> >>
> >> Faster than a Porche 911, 4 times lower cost, runs smooth, very safe,
> >> self driving, cheap in service, cheap consumables (electric vs gasoline)
> >
> >Speaking of electricity prices in Germany...

<snipped John Doe being persistently moronic>

> All this switching to electric - and not just for cars - will require generation capacity from some source and nuclear is the obvious candidate.

Only to people who are as ill-informed as Cursitor Doom and John Doe. Solar cells only became the cheapest source of electric power a few years ago - some people at the University of NSW invented a high output solar cell which could be made cheaply, and the Chinese invested the money to mass produce them in ten times the volume that anybody had before, which halved the unit price. Australian utility companies won't now invest in any other power source, which is up-setting Australia's mining interests, who are leaning on Australia's more right-wing politicians to try to get them to change their minds - which is a bit silly.

> I wonder if the Greenies considered that conundrum.

It was mentioned in a tolerably prescient paper in the Proceedings of the IEEE some forty years ago.

George Monbiot's "Heat" - published in 2006 - is the kind of thing Greenies would read

https://www.monbiot.com/books/heat/

so the answer is the Greenies have considered the point, even if Cursitor Doom has only just woken up to it.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney