Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

A modem is a baudy house.


tech / sci.math / Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics.

SubjectAuthor
* More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physicArchimedes Plutonium
+* Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewingDan Christensen
|+* Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewingArchimedes Plutonium
||+* Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.phArchimedes Plutonium
|||`- Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.phArchimedes Plutonium
||`- Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewingArchimedes Plutonium
|+- Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewingArchimedes Plutonium
|+* Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewingArchimedes Plutonium
||`- Re: Archimedes "gigatard" Plutonium flunked the math test of aMichael Moroney
|+- Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewingArchimedes Plutonium
|+* Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewingArchimedes Plutonium
||`- Re: Archimedes "tard" Plutonium flunked the math test of aMichael Moroney
|+* Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewingArchimedes Plutonium
||+- Re: Archimedes "irrelevant" Plutonium flunked the math test of aMichael Moroney
||`* Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.phArchimedes Plutonium
|| `- Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewingArchimedes Plutonium
|+* Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewingArchimedes Plutonium
||`- WARNING TO STUDENTS: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and scienceDan Christensen
|+- Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewingArchimedes Plutonium
|+- Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewingArchimedes Plutonium
|+- Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewingArchimedes Plutonium
|+* Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewingArchimedes Plutonium
||`* Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewingArchimedes Plutonium
|| `- Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewingDr. Anagram
|+* Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewingArchimedes Plutonium
||`* Re: Archimedes "megatard" Plutonium flunked the math test of aMichael Moroney
|| `- Re: Archimedes "megatard" Plutonium flunked the math test of aArchimedes Plutonium
|+- Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewingArchimedes Plutonium
|+- So long as NSF & dept Educ pay to have sci.math & sci.physicsArchimedes Plutonium
|`* Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewingArchimedes Plutonium
| `- Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewingArchimedes Plutonium
`- Re: Archimedes "irrelevant" Plutonium flunked the math test of aMichael Moroney

Pages:12
Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics.

<684c2bc0-df57-45da-bd07-6e0ece17f23en@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=69226&group=sci.math#69226

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:430a:: with SMTP id z10mr966745qtm.303.1627943824232;
Mon, 02 Aug 2021 15:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:71d4:: with SMTP id m203mr23580563ybc.112.1627943823987;
Mon, 02 Aug 2021 15:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 15:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <f0066bde-e2ef-4784-a0f0-f9cce2eef661n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:387:b:f:0:0:0:a1;
posting-account=fsC03QkAAAAwkSNcSEKmlcR-W_HNitEd
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:387:b:f:0:0:0:a1
References: <b8b57fb6-4a34-4c67-97c8-2e54030653e1n@googlegroups.com>
<d833bdca-b98e-42e6-a07a-55d0cd2f22a0n@googlegroups.com> <f0066bde-e2ef-4784-a0f0-f9cce2eef661n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <684c2bc0-df57-45da-bd07-6e0ece17f23en@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing
sci.math, sci.physics.
From: plutoniu...@gmail.com (Archimedes Plutonium)
Injection-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2021 22:37:04 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 37401
 by: Archimedes Plutonium - Mon, 2 Aug 2021 22:37 UTC

MATHOPEDIA-- List of 72 fakes and mistakes of Old Math. AP's 174th book.

Last revision was 2Aug2021. The concept of vector is part of the unit concept and the derivative concept. So vector is duplicity.

Preface: I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds question of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).

Some of these can be found in AP's TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS series, but the entries keep changing and added on new, means I need to have a separate book for these fakes, mistakes and errors of Old Math.

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for ages 18-19 Freshperson College, math textbook series, book 3
Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
Listing the Errors of Old Math, list of 1 to 50.

Alright, well, mathematics is a closed subject. What I mean by that is due to the textbook series of Archimedes Plutonium TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, that once you learn the polynomial transform and learn the two Power Rules of Calculus, you reached the peak, the pinnacle of all of mathematics, and anything further in math is just details of what you learn in that textbook series. Math is a completed science because it has this "peak of calculus", unlike the other 5 hard sciences of physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy. Those other five will continue to find new ideas, new things, while math remains static and complete to its peak of calculus understanding. Mathematics is finished complete as far as a science goes because the peak of math is going nowhere. And even though Physics will find new science such as how the proton toruses inside of atoms are configured in geometry, the geometry and calculus used in that configuration, that new science does not change nor does it create or require a new math peak/summit to handle the new physics.

Now I do need to discuss the Errors of Math in General and the errors of math in geometry in particular. I have the feeling that Geometry is the more important of the two-- algebra - geometry. This list appears in most of AP's Teaching True Mathematics textbook series by Archimedes Plutonium, meant to be a guide and orientation, and a organizing of what must be covered before graduating from College, and what math to steer clear of.

Errors mostly, but not always, for some are included because too much time spent on them.

The listings in Mathopedia of errors, mistakes and fakes is based on the idea that Calculus is the supreme achievement of all of mathematics for it is the essential math of doing Physics electricity and magnetism. And in order to have a proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, we must clean up and clean out all the mistakes, fakes and errors of Old Math, erst, we have no Calculus. So calculus is the consistency maker for the rest of all of mathematics.

1) Calculus requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, a proof that derivative and integral are inverses of one another, just as addition and subtraction are inverses, or, multiplication and division are inverses. The only way to obtain a geometry proof is to clean up and clean out all the fakes, mistakes and errors of Old Math, such as their fake numbers-- the Reals. Their fake definition of function allowing anything be a function. Their fakery of a continuum when even physics by 1900 with Planck onwards in Quantum Mechanics proving the Universe is discrete Space not a continuum, yet by 1900 onwards those in mathematics following the idiotic continuum in the Continuum Hypothesis with even more avid interest, when they should have thrown the continuum on a trashpile of shame.

2) The true numbers of mathematics are the Decimal Grid Numbers, because you have to need and apply one mechanism only to obtain the true numbers of mathematics-- Mathematical Induction. In Old Math they had just a tiny few intelligent mathematicians, Kronecker, who emerged from the gaggle crowd of kooks to notice that Naturals all come from one single mechanism-- Mathematical Induction. But Old Math never had a crowd of mathematicians with logical brains to say-- all our numbers need to come from the one mechanism of Mathematical Induction.

3) The true numbers of math have empty space between successor and predecessor numbers. For example the 10 Grid is 0, .1, .2, .3, . . . , 9.8, 9.9, 10..0. Where no numbers exist between .1 and .2, etc. Only discrete numbers allow us to give a proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

4) All functions of mathematics must be a polynomial, and if not a polynomial, convert the offering to a polynomial over a specific interval.

5) Space is discrete and all lines in space are strings of attached straight lines.

6) No curves exist in Geometry, only finer and smaller straight line segments attached to one another.
We can still keep the name "curve" as long as we know it is a string of fine tiny straightline segments strung together in what looks like a smooth curve. If curves exist, then the Calculus in Fundamental Theorem of Calculus cannot be proven and thus Calculus does not exist. We all know that we have to have Calculus, and so we throw out onto the trash pile the curve of Old Math. And this is reasonable because starting in 1900 in physics there arose the Quantum Mechanics of Space being discrete. And a discrete space has no continuum, has no curve of Old Math.

7) Space has gaps in between one point and the next point. These gaps are empty space from one point to the next point, for example in 10 Grid there is no number between .1 and .2, and in 100 Grid there exists no number between .01 and .02.

8) Limit analysis was an insane fakery in Old Math, concocted because Old Math needed the excuse of some proof, so they invented the monster con-artist trick that a limit analysis would divert the fact it is no proof at all, but a Non Sequitur argument. Limit analysis is juju totem witchcraft dance around a desire to prove the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Just as idiotic as dancing around a sick person of a virus is going to cure the person.

9) Infinity has a borderline and there is a microinfinity compared to a macroinfinity. For example in 10 Grid, the microinfinity is .1 if we exclude 0 and so there is no number smaller than .1 and no number larger than 10 in 10 Grid, where 10 is macroinfinity.

10) The 1st Quadrant Only in Coordinate System Geometry. Sad that the first coordinate system of Descartes was correct but soon became corrupted with 4 quadrants. See Mathematical Thought, Volume 1, Kline, 1972, page 303. Where Fermat then Descartes starts the Cartesian Coordinate System as 1 axis only and from 0 rightwards, meaning in our modern day math, 1st Quadrant Only. Why did math screw up on coordinate systems? I suppose some clowns thought negative numbers were true and they wanted ease of drawing a circle with center at 0. When they could have just as easily drawn the circle in 1st Quadrant Only.

11) Calculus needed a Geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, but Old Math never provided such, instead they provided some stupid Limit argument. The reason for the creation of the Limit disaster was that the French mathematician Cauchy got sick and tired of hearing his smartest students complain that the width of rectangles in the integral are 0 width, and those smart students could not, for the life of them understand how a rectangle with 0 width has any interior area. So instead of the math community denouncing the limit, instead they elevated the fakery.

12) Further in Calculus, they knew you could do a transform of coordinate points to turn any function into a polynomial function, a method of Lagrange.. However, they in Old Math were too stupid to take this transform to its highest form-- all functions are polynomial functions and only polynomial functions. When you learn that-- the derivative and integral of any and every function of math is a snap breeze simple and easy.

13) With the error filled 4 quadrants, when it should be 1st Quadrant Only, we have Trigonometry's sine and cosine with the fakery of sinusoid wave when it never was that. The sine and cosine are semicircle waves, and no sinusoid wave exists.

14) There is only one Geometry-- Euclidean, and there is not three distinct geometries of elliptical Riemannian or hyperbolic Lobachevsky. Those two are just duals that make up Euclidean.

15) Torus, volume and surface area formulas in Old Math are all screwed up and in error because they imagined bending a cylinder to form a torus. This brings back memories, for I had to do a percentage formula, since I could not follow the fake way of bending a cylinder. Where 78.5% of Disc Torus (pi)R^2h - (pi)r^2h is the volume of Circle Torus, and 78.5% of Disc Torus 2(pi)Rh + 2(pi)rh + 2 ((pi)R^2 - (pi)r^2) is the surface area of Circle Torus..

16) Ellipse is never a single cone slant cut, always a cylinder slant cut. Although you do get an ellipse from double cones of this configuration <> which in Old Math was the hyperbola, but two hyperbolas joined together to form a ellipse.

17) All Parallelepipeds reduced to a Rectangular Box by making 2 cuts and pastes. Volume of the original Parallelepiped is simply a*b*c of the Rectangular Box length*width*depth formed. Old Math never understood that a precise definition of Parallelepiped has two kinds, the parallelepiped that has 90 degree angles and the parallelepiped that has no 90 degree angle.


Click here to read the complete article
Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics.

<sea1qq$t72$1@pcls7.std.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=69233&group=sci.math#69233

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.imp.ch!usenet.csail.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: anagr...@nobody.nowhere (Dr. Anagram)
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing
sci.math, sci.physics.
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 20:15:22 -0400
Organization: The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <sea1qq$t72$1@pcls7.std.com>
References: <b8b57fb6-4a34-4c67-97c8-2e54030653e1n@googlegroups.com>
<d833bdca-b98e-42e6-a07a-55d0cd2f22a0n@googlegroups.com>
<f0066bde-e2ef-4784-a0f0-f9cce2eef661n@googlegroups.com>
<684c2bc0-df57-45da-bd07-6e0ece17f23en@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-98-110-240-235.bstnma.fios.verizon.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1627949722 29922 98.110.240.235 (3 Aug 2021 00:15:22 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 00:15:22 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.9.0
In-Reply-To: <684c2bc0-df57-45da-bd07-6e0ece17f23en@googlegroups.com>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Dr. Anagram - Tue, 3 Aug 2021 00:15 UTC

🐜 of Math and 🐛 of Physics Archimedes "Drag Queen of Science"
Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

> MATHOPEDIA-- List of 72 fakes and mistakes of Old Math. AP's 174th book.

1) Ludwig Poehlmann
2) Ludwig Hansen
3) Ludwig van Ludvig
4) Ludwig Plutonium
5) Archimedes Plutonium
6) Archimedes Plutonium
....
72) Archimedes Plutonium

Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics.

<55da1e66-9c94-49a4-9b01-b9ebcaf68a1an@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=74077&group=sci.math#74077

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a37:a04e:: with SMTP id j75mr1089086qke.98.1630548921714;
Wed, 01 Sep 2021 19:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:b3c9:: with SMTP id x9mr1259838ybf.514.1630548921467;
Wed, 01 Sep 2021 19:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 19:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <d833bdca-b98e-42e6-a07a-55d0cd2f22a0n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:387:b:f:0:0:0:ac;
posting-account=fsC03QkAAAAwkSNcSEKmlcR-W_HNitEd
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:387:b:f:0:0:0:ac
References: <b8b57fb6-4a34-4c67-97c8-2e54030653e1n@googlegroups.com> <d833bdca-b98e-42e6-a07a-55d0cd2f22a0n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <55da1e66-9c94-49a4-9b01-b9ebcaf68a1an@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing
sci.math, sci.physics.
From: plutoniu...@gmail.com (Archimedes Plutonium)
Injection-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 02:15:21 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: Archimedes Plutonium - Thu, 2 Sep 2021 02:15 UTC

More students turning to AP's TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS textbooks because Univ Western Ontario math professors too dumb to acknowledge Calculus is geometry, hence it requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Easily taught by AP to Junior High School. And while they read AP's TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, students learn that math professors are lazy and dumb in not acknowledging oval is the slant cut in cone, not the ellipse, plus, the horrifying dumb propaganda taught in UWO in logic of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, all because UWO math and logic professors are too dumb and lazy to acknowledge Boole made a mistake in his truth tables that the rightful AND truth table is TTTF, and not that of TFFF. Reporter Dan Christensen is keeping a close eye on the abuse to students by colleges that are neck deep in oppression, suppression and propaganda lessons rather than the truth of science.
On Wednesday, September 1, 2021 at 8:36:49 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of

45th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

#1 New Releasein General Geometry

Last revision was 2NOV2020.
Preface: Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education.

This is a textbook series in several volumes that carries every person through all his/her math education starting age 5 up to age 26. Volume 2 is for age 5 year old to that of senior in High School, that is needed to do both science and math. Every other math book is incidental to this series of Teaching True Mathematics.

It is a journal-textbook because Amazon's Kindle offers me the ability to edit overnight, and to change the text, almost on a daily basis. A unique first in education textbooks-- almost a continual overnight editing. Adding new text, correcting text. Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education. Volume 3 carries the Freshperson in College for their math calculus education.

Cover Picture: The Numbers as Integers from 0 to 100, and 10 Grid when dividing by 10, and part of the 100 Grid when dividing by 100. Decimal Grid Numbers are the true numbers of mathematics. The Reals, the rationals & irrationals, the algebraic & transcendentals, the imaginary & Complex, and the negative-numbers are all fake numbers. For, to be a true number, you have to "be counted" by mathematical induction. The smallest Grid system is the Decimal 10 Grid.

Length: 375 pages

Product details
File Size: 2013 KB
Print Length: 375 pages
Publication Date: May 2, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07RG7BVZW
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #274,398 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#27 in General Geometry
#336 in Geometry & Topology (Books)

#4-3, 55th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 25Jun2021. And this is AP's 55th published book of science.

Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019

Preface: This is volume 3, book 3 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Freshperson students, 1st year college students of age 18-19. It is the continuation of volume 2 for ages 5 through 18 years old.

The main major topic is the AP-EM equations of electricity and magnetism, the mathematics for the laws of electricity and magnetism; what used to be called the Maxwell Equations of Physics. The 1st Year College Math has to prepare all students with the math for all the sciences. So 1st year college Math is like a huge intersection station that has to prepare students with the math they need to do the hard sciences such as physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, geology, etc. What this means is, 1st year college is calculus that allows the student to work with electricity and magnetism. All the math that is needed to enable students to do electricity and magnetism. In Old Math before this textbook, those Old Math textbooks would end in 1/3 of the text about Arclength, vector space, div, curl, Line Integral, Green's, Stokes, Divergence theorem trying to reach and be able to teach Maxwell Equations. But sadly, barely any Old Math classroom reached that 1/3 ending of the textbook, and left all those college students without any math to tackle electricity and magnetism. And most of Old Math was just muddle headed wrong even if they covered the last 1/3 of the textbook. And that is totally unacceptable in science. This textbook fixes that huge hole and gap in Old Math education.

And there is no way around it, that a course in 1st year College Calculus is going to do a lot of hands on experiment with electricity and magnetism, and is required of the students to buy a list of physics apparatus-- multimeter, galvanometer, coil, bar magnet, alligator clip wires, electromagnet, iron filing case, and possibly even a 12 volt transformer, all shown in the cover picture. The beginning of this textbook and the middle section all leads into the ending of this textbook-- we learn the AP-EM Equations and how to use those equations. And there is no escaping the fact that it has to be hands on physics experiments in the classroom of mathematics.

But, do not be scared, for this is all easy easy easy. For if you passed and enjoyed Volume 2 TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, then I promise you, you will not be stressed with Volume 3, for I go out of my way to make it clear and understandable.

Warning: this is a Journal Textbook, meaning that I am constantly adding new material, constantly revising, constantly fixing mistakes or making things more clear. So if you read this book in August of 2019, chances are it is different when you read it in September 2019. Ebooks allow authors the freedom to improve their textbooks on a ongoing basis.

The 1st year college math should be about the math that prepares any and all students for science, whether they branch out into physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, or math, they should have all the math in 1st year college that will carry them through those science studies. I make every attempt possible to make math easy to understand, easy to learn and hopefully fun.

Length: 236 pages

Product details
File Size: 1390 KB
Print Length: 236 pages
Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
Publication Date: August 16, 2019
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07WN9RVXD
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,212,707 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2719 in Calculus (Books)
#417 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

#4-4, 56th published book

COLLEGE CALCULUS GUIDE to help students recognize math professor spam from math truth & reality// math textbook series, book 4 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

#1 New Releasein 15-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

This textbook is the companion guide book to AP's Teaching True Mathematics, 1st year College. It is realized that Old Math will take a long time in removing their fake math, so in the interim period, this Guide book is designed to speed up the process of removing fake Calculus out of the education system, the fewer students we punish with forcing them with fake Calculus, the better we are.
Cover Picture: This book is part comedy, for when you cannot reason with math professors that they have many errors to fix, that 90% of their Calculus is in error, you end up resorting to comedy, making fun of them, to prod them to fix their errors. To prod them to "do right by the students of the world" not their entrenched propaganda.
Length: 54 pages

Product details
File Size: 1035 KB
Print Length: 64 pages
Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
Publication Date: August 18, 2019
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07WNGLQ85
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #253,425 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#38 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#318 in Calculus (Books)
#48 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

#4-5, 72nd published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 4 for age 19-20 Sophomore-year College, math textbook series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface: This is volume 4, book 5 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Sophomore-year students, students of age 19-20. It is the continuation of volume 3 in the end-goal of learning how to do the mathematics of electricity and magnetism, because everything in physics is nothing but atoms and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. To know math, you have to know physics. We learned the Calculus of 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. But we did not learn the calculus of those equations for 3rd dimension. So, you can say that Sophomore year College math is devoted to 3D Calculus. This sophomore year college we fill in all the calculus, and we start over on all of Geometry, for geometry needs a modern day revision. And pardon me for this book is mostly reading, and the students doing less calculations. The classroom of this textbook has the teacher go through page by page to get the students comprehending and understanding of what is being taught. There are many hands on experiments also.


Click here to read the complete article
Re: Archimedes "megatard" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

<171ae0bf-7272-4073-bcea-d196bc6debc9n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=75765&group=sci.math#75765

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:ae9:f304:: with SMTP id p4mr6919496qkg.334.1631474287151;
Sun, 12 Sep 2021 12:18:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a5b:408:: with SMTP id m8mr10943553ybp.2.1631474286947;
Sun, 12 Sep 2021 12:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2021 12:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <se7328$7b4$3@gioia.aioe.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:387:b:f:0:0:0:bb;
posting-account=fsC03QkAAAAwkSNcSEKmlcR-W_HNitEd
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:387:b:f:0:0:0:bb
References: <b8b57fb6-4a34-4c67-97c8-2e54030653e1n@googlegroups.com>
<d833bdca-b98e-42e6-a07a-55d0cd2f22a0n@googlegroups.com> <db0dee67-5f12-470a-84c9-c2ff53558262n@googlegroups.com>
<se7328$7b4$3@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <171ae0bf-7272-4073-bcea-d196bc6debc9n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Archimedes "megatard" Plutonium flunked the math test of a
lifetime-generation test
From: plutoniu...@gmail.com (Archimedes Plutonium)
Injection-Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2021 19:18:07 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 104
 by: Archimedes Plutonium - Sun, 12 Sep 2021 19:18 UTC

Kibo Parry M reflects on Markus Klyver & Zelos Malum
On Sunday, August 1, 2021 at 4:18:09 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 🦎 of Math and 🐍 of Physics "Drag Queen of Science"

Ban not only Gabriel but his play acting actors of Markus Klyver and Zelos Malum who keep Gabriel post on the front page all the time
,
markus...@gmail.com
2 unread,
semi-differentiated and integrated graphically with MathHand.com
12:47 PM

New Age Prophet's profile photo
New Age Prophet
, …
markus...@gmail.com
51
unread,
Cranks Zelos Malum and Jean Pierre Messager (aka Python) can't grasp even the simplest of concepts.
12:41 PM

zelos...@gmail.com's profile photo
zelos...@gmail.com
, …
markus...@gmail.com
135
unread,
Re: Andrew Wiles flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
12:40 PM

This conversation has been hidden because you reported it for abuse.
Amine Moulay Ramdane's profile photo
Amine Moulay Ramdane
unread,
More of my philosophy about Moore’s Law and EUV (Extreme ultraviolet lithography)..
12:24 PM

This conversation has been hidden because you reported it for abuse.
ross.pro...@gmx.com's profile photo
ross.pro...@gmx.com
, …
markus...@gmail.com
95
unread,
I'm calling you out Eram Semper Recta
söndag 12 september 2021 kl. 14:20:17 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta: > On Saturday, 11 September
12:14 PM

Eram semper recta's profile photo
Eram semper recta
, …
markus...@gmail.com
55
unread,
John Gabriel said "Let there be light and there was light!"
söndag 12 september 2021 kl. 14:43:31 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta: > On Saturday, 11 September
12:13 PM

This conversation has been hidden because you reported it for abuse.
Eram semper recta's profile photo
Eram semper recta
, …
markus...@gmail.com
42
unread,
Calculus is 100% pure geometry.
söndag 12 september 2021 kl. 14:32:26 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta: > On Saturday, 11 September
12:11 PM

Eram semper recta's profile photo
Eram semper recta
, …
markus...@gmail.com
110
unread,
The Gabriel Polynomial - an advanced concept not possible in mainstream calculus.
12:10 PM

Eram semper recta's profile photo
Eram semper recta
, …
markus...@gmail.com
57
unread,
I am a nice guy, but if you fuck with me, I will end you!
lördag 11 september 2021 kl. 18:07:52 UTC+2 skrev markus...@gmail.com: > lördag 11 september 2021
12:08 PM

This conversation has been hidden because you reported it for abuse.
Eram semper recta's profile photo
Eram semper recta
, …
markus...@gmail.com
8 unread,
Many mainstream math academic idiots have tried to rubbish my theorem, but as usual they came up with nothing but libel.

So long as NSF & dept Educ pay to have sci.math & sci.physics criminally stalked, then you have to go to AP's newsgroup for real true science

<5840c895-6476-47b1-9bde-89e6b95b44e6n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=76963&group=sci.math#76963

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4111:: with SMTP id q17mr29334206qtl.264.1632240209210;
Tue, 21 Sep 2021 09:03:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a5b:507:: with SMTP id o7mr8208514ybp.491.1632240208960;
Tue, 21 Sep 2021 09:03:28 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!rocksolid2!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 09:03:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <d833bdca-b98e-42e6-a07a-55d0cd2f22a0n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:387:b:3:0:0:0:90;
posting-account=fsC03QkAAAAwkSNcSEKmlcR-W_HNitEd
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:387:b:3:0:0:0:90
References: <b8b57fb6-4a34-4c67-97c8-2e54030653e1n@googlegroups.com> <d833bdca-b98e-42e6-a07a-55d0cd2f22a0n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5840c895-6476-47b1-9bde-89e6b95b44e6n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: So long as NSF & dept Educ pay to have sci.math & sci.physics
criminally stalked, then you have to go to AP's newsgroup for real true science
From: plutoniu...@gmail.com (Archimedes Plutonium)
Injection-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 16:03:29 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 303
 by: Archimedes Plutonium - Tue, 21 Sep 2021 16:03 UTC

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

SCI.MATH FAQ, 20Sep2021// Usenet science dead, but AP's newsgroup up and running well-- Today's topic-- how AP is correcting the definition of Natural Logarithm base 2.71... for the Y= 1/x has no relation to the equiangular logarithmic spiral. See AP's 203rd book of science.

Take a look at the only pure science newsgroup, free of spammers, block-spam, and police drag net spam, free of stalkers.

The only thing worth discussing in sci.math and to shift the momentum of the entire Math Community to the TRUTH OF MATHEMATICS is the painful having to throw out cranks and crackpots of mathematics-- Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ken Ribet, and many others who refuse to recognize the single most important math of our times is a GEOMETRY PROOF OF THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF CALCULUS, for in doing such, it cleans out mathematics just like scrubbing and vacuuming to clean out our houses is a necessary function in going forward. And the above listed math fools are trying everything in their power to keep math entrenched in their stupidity.

Another item of huge concern is the correction of the OVAL as the slant cut in Conic Sections, not the ellipse, and we can see how mindless and idiotic is the ship of state of mathematics, when the above list of failed mathematicians even refuses to correct such a simple error.

Also, a third item which reveals that most math professors are good at calculations but mostly mindless fools of logic or just making a proof of mathematics, for all of the above listed fools of math still preach 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. All because their tiny pea brained minds of logic can never understand how Boole screwed up on truth tables and that AND is never TFFF but always TTTF. Yet the above math fools use 2 OR 1= 3 every day in all their proofs of mathematics.

A fourth item is the Correction of SINE curve is SEMICIRCLE, for a sinusoid is a mistaken artifice of having one axis unequal to the other axis.

A fifth item is the error filled definition of Natural Logarithm base 2.71.... for the Y = 1/x has no relation to a logarithmic spiral that demands to be equiangular.

These are just 5 of the errors of Old Math that you can begin to learn in AP's newsgroup and his 150 published books on science.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

XXXXXXXXXXX

Principles of sci.math

1) Above all, do math in sci.math, for at the end of the day, end of the year, end of a life, it is the math that you do in sci.math that only counts.

2) When doing math in sci.math and talking to someone else that is seriously doing math with you-- be polite.

3) Most posters degenerate into ad hominem attackers. Reread (1).

4) Sci.math is open to all, sadly, to even those who never do math in sci.math, but the openness is a blessing in disguise, because the openness more often than not, gets at the truth of science that has been corrupted by other scientists. And sci.math is self-policing, meaning that if you continue to piss and poop, (like Jeff Relf offtopic in sci.physics) if you continue to piss and poop in sci.math, the others who seriously do math in sci.math will self police the miscreant out. For offtopic spammers like Relf is no better than a person invited to dinner and instead of using the bathroom, shits in the middle of the dining room floor.

5) Prime Minister Boris Johnson & President Joe Biden, please call off your police agencies and FBI, CIA, Mi5, Mi6 of their daily "police drag net spam" in sci.physics and sci.math, and leave those two newsgroups completely alone to do just physics and math. Totally inappropriate of govt agencies to ruin sci.math and sci.physics, you may as well have your agents in all church ceremonies applying drag net spam. The spammer "__" is never appropriate in sci.math or sci.physics, nor is the Stonehenge freak, or any of the other drag net spammers. We all thank the USA and British and other governments and agencies like CERN for inventing Usenet, but please, do not destroy what you built, with police drag net spam. Adhere to the tenet, that a forum sci.physics and sci.math are specifically devoted to physics and math, not to a govt bureaucracy chasing after criminals and terrorists with their highly flamed rhetoric and loud noises in sci.math, sci.physics.

6) Criminal-Stalking is defined as constant attacking of another person's character exclusive of science content in his/her threads for more than 1 year. In the case of criminal stalking the attackee, can just shred the attackers post and repost. For stalking is not science, nor academics nor debate nor discussion. Stalking is insanity and criminal behavior.

AP writes: AP no longer tolerates any Criminal Stalker and thus shreds his attack and spits the byproduct back into the lap of the stalker.

XXXXXXXXX
Some of the people responsible for the decline in sci.math and sci.physics.

---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---

When a govt pays people to stalk in science, that science body is going downhill for sure.

Why waste time on sci.math and sci.physics that NSF Dr. Panchanathan pays money? perhaps $100. per stalker post, in fraud waste and abuse hiring criminal stalkers such as Kibo Parry Moroney who was a Rensselaer failure with his 938 is 12% short of 945, or the monster logic fraudster of Canada's Dan Christensen who cannot acknowledge that Boole was wrong with his AND truth table is really TTTF not what Boole has of TFFF.

More people read AP than read sci.math or sci.physics, for who wants to waste time on spammers or paid for bigots like Jan Burse, Dan Christensen, Kibo Parry M, bwr fml, Earle Jones, Alan Mackenzie.
XXXXXXXXX

3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Length: 21 pages

File Size: 1620 KB
Print Length: 21 pages
Publication Date: March 11, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PLSDQWC
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray: Not Enabled
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 19May2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Length: 137 pages

Product details
ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
Publication date : March 14, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1307 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Print length : 137 pages
Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

5th published book

Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)


Click here to read the complete article
Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics.

<e7ef64f6-cef0-4659-acab-201736081ad8n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=76975&group=sci.math#76975

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:14b1:: with SMTP id x17mr31510328qkj.37.1632246088408;
Tue, 21 Sep 2021 10:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:c011:: with SMTP id c17mr37973559ybf.291.1632246088235;
Tue, 21 Sep 2021 10:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 10:41:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <d833bdca-b98e-42e6-a07a-55d0cd2f22a0n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:387:b:3:0:0:0:c1;
posting-account=fsC03QkAAAAwkSNcSEKmlcR-W_HNitEd
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:387:b:3:0:0:0:c1
References: <b8b57fb6-4a34-4c67-97c8-2e54030653e1n@googlegroups.com> <d833bdca-b98e-42e6-a07a-55d0cd2f22a0n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <e7ef64f6-cef0-4659-acab-201736081ad8n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing
sci.math, sci.physics.
From: plutoniu...@gmail.com (Archimedes Plutonium)
Injection-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 17:41:28 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 306
 by: Archimedes Plutonium - Tue, 21 Sep 2021 17:41 UTC

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Today's topic-- how AP is correcting the definition of Natural Logarithm base 2.71... for the Y= 1/x has no relation to the equiangular logarithmic spiral. See AP's 203rd book of science.

SCI.MATH FAQ, 20Sep2021// Usenet science dead, but AP's newsgroup up and running well--

Take a look at the only pure science newsgroup, free of spammers, block-spam, and police drag net spam, free of stalkers.

The only thing worth discussing in sci.math and to shift the momentum of the entire Math Community to the TRUTH OF MATHEMATICS is the painful having to throw out cranks and crackpots of mathematics-- Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ken Ribet, and many others who refuse to recognize the single most important math of our times is a GEOMETRY PROOF OF THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF CALCULUS, for in doing such, it cleans out mathematics just like scrubbing and vacuuming to clean out our houses is a necessary function in going forward. And the above listed math fools are trying everything in their power to keep math entrenched in their stupidity.

Another item of huge concern is the correction of the OVAL as the slant cut in Conic Sections, not the ellipse, and we can see how mindless and idiotic is the ship of state of mathematics, when the above list of failed mathematicians even refuses to correct such a simple error.

Also, a third item which reveals that most math professors are good at calculations but mostly mindless fools of logic or just making a proof of mathematics, for all of the above listed fools of math still preach 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. All because their tiny pea brained minds of logic can never understand how Boole screwed up on truth tables and that AND is never TFFF but always TTTF. Yet the above math fools use 2 OR 1= 3 every day in all their proofs of mathematics.

A fourth item is the Correction of SINE curve is SEMICIRCLE, for a sinusoid is a mistaken artifice of having one axis unequal to the other axis.

A fifth item is the error filled definition of Natural Logarithm base 2.71.... for the Y = 1/x has no relation to a logarithmic spiral that demands to be equiangular.

These are just 5 of the errors of Old Math that you can begin to learn in AP's newsgroup and his 150 published books on science.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

XXXXXXXXXXX

Principles of sci.math

1) Above all, do math in sci.math, for at the end of the day, end of the year, end of a life, it is the math that you do in sci.math that only counts.

2) When doing math in sci.math and talking to someone else that is seriously doing math with you-- be polite.

3) Most posters degenerate into ad hominem attackers. Reread (1).

4) Sci.math is open to all, sadly, to even those who never do math in sci.math, but the openness is a blessing in disguise, because the openness more often than not, gets at the truth of science that has been corrupted by other scientists. And sci.math is self-policing, meaning that if you continue to piss and poop, (like Jeff Relf offtopic in sci.physics) if you continue to piss and poop in sci.math, the others who seriously do math in sci.math will self police the miscreant out. For offtopic spammers like Relf is no better than a person invited to dinner and instead of using the bathroom, shits in the middle of the dining room floor.

5) Prime Minister Boris Johnson & President Joe Biden, please call off your police agencies and FBI, CIA, Mi5, Mi6 of their daily "police drag net spam" in sci.physics and sci.math, and leave those two newsgroups completely alone to do just physics and math. Totally inappropriate of govt agencies to ruin sci.math and sci.physics, you may as well have your agents in all church ceremonies applying drag net spam. The spammer "__" is never appropriate in sci.math or sci.physics, nor is the Stonehenge freak, or any of the other drag net spammers. We all thank the USA and British and other governments and agencies like CERN for inventing Usenet, but please, do not destroy what you built, with police drag net spam. Adhere to the tenet, that a forum sci.physics and sci.math are specifically devoted to physics and math, not to a govt bureaucracy chasing after criminals and terrorists with their highly flamed rhetoric and loud noises in sci.math, sci.physics.

6) Criminal-Stalking is defined as constant attacking of another person's character exclusive of science content in his/her threads for more than 1 year. In the case of criminal stalking the attackee, can just shred the attackers post and repost. For stalking is not science, nor academics nor debate nor discussion. Stalking is insanity and criminal behavior.

AP writes: AP no longer tolerates any Criminal Stalker and thus shreds his attack and spits the byproduct back into the lap of the stalker.

XXXXXXXXX
Some of the people responsible for the decline in sci.math and sci.physics.

---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---

When a govt pays people to stalk in science, that science body is going downhill for sure.

Why waste time on sci.math and sci.physics that NSF Dr. Panchanathan pays money? perhaps $100. per stalker post, in fraud waste and abuse hiring criminal stalkers such as Kibo Parry Moroney who was a Rensselaer failure with his 938 is 12% short of 945, or the monster logic fraudster of Canada's Dan Christensen who cannot acknowledge that Boole was wrong with his AND truth table is really TTTF not what Boole has of TFFF.

More people read AP than read sci.math or sci.physics, for who wants to waste time on spammers or paid for bigots like Jan Burse, Dan Christensen, Kibo Parry M, bwr fml, Earle Jones, Alan Mackenzie.
XXXXXXXXX

3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Length: 21 pages

File Size: 1620 KB
Print Length: 21 pages
Publication Date: March 11, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PLSDQWC
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray: Not Enabled
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 19May2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Length: 137 pages

Product details
ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
Publication date : March 14, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1307 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Print length : 137 pages
Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

5th published book

Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
Preface:
First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.


Click here to read the complete article
Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics.

<749784c0-a3ea-42f5-8360-c87f8c3410c8n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=77049&group=sci.math#77049

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a37:a943:: with SMTP id s64mr24600297qke.422.1632289975275;
Tue, 21 Sep 2021 22:52:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:2283:: with SMTP id i125mr943000ybi.377.1632289975124;
Tue, 21 Sep 2021 22:52:55 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 22:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <e7ef64f6-cef0-4659-acab-201736081ad8n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:387:b:3:0:0:0:b2;
posting-account=fsC03QkAAAAwkSNcSEKmlcR-W_HNitEd
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:387:b:3:0:0:0:b2
References: <b8b57fb6-4a34-4c67-97c8-2e54030653e1n@googlegroups.com>
<d833bdca-b98e-42e6-a07a-55d0cd2f22a0n@googlegroups.com> <e7ef64f6-cef0-4659-acab-201736081ad8n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <749784c0-a3ea-42f5-8360-c87f8c3410c8n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing
sci.math, sci.physics.
From: plutoniu...@gmail.com (Archimedes Plutonium)
Injection-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 05:52:55 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 459
 by: Archimedes Plutonium - Wed, 22 Sep 2021 05:52 UTC

Dan on Univ Western Ontario using TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS so they can learn a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

134th published book

Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already written the series of TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS in a 7 volume, 8 book set. This would be the first book in that 8 book set (one of the books is a companion book to 1st year college). But I suppose that I needed to write the full series before I could write the Introduction and know what I had to talk about and talk about in a logical progression order. Sounds paradoxical in a sense, that I needed to write the full series first and then go back and write the Introduction. But in another sense, hard to write an introduction on something you have not really fully done and completed. For example to know what is error filled Old Math and to list those errors in a logical order requires me to write the full 7 volumes in order to list in order the mistakes.

Cover Picture: Mathematics begins with counting, with numbers, with quantity. But counting numbers needs geometry for something to count in the first place. So here in this picture of the generalized Hydrogen atom of chemistry and physics is a torus geometry of 8 rings of a proton torus and one ring where my fingers are, is a equator ring that is the muon and thrusting through the proton torus at the equator of the torus. So we count 9 rings in all. So math is created by atoms and math numbers exist because atoms have many geometry figures to count. And geometry exists because atoms have shapes and different figures.

Product details
• ASIN : B08K2XQB4M
• Publication date : September 24, 2020
• Language : English
• File size : 576 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print length : 23 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #4,307,085 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #1,241 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #1,345 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
◦ #10,634 in Calculus (Books)

#4-2, 45th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

#1 New Releasein General Geometry

Last revision was 2NOV2020.
Preface: Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education.

This is a textbook series in several volumes that carries every person through all his/her math education starting age 5 up to age 26. Volume 2 is for age 5 year old to that of senior in High School, that is needed to do both science and math. Every other math book is incidental to this series of Teaching True Mathematics.

It is a journal-textbook because Amazon's Kindle offers me the ability to edit overnight, and to change the text, almost on a daily basis. A unique first in education textbooks-- almost a continual overnight editing. Adding new text, correcting text. Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education. Volume 3 carries the Freshperson in College for their math calculus education.

Cover Picture: The Numbers as Integers from 0 to 100, and 10 Grid when dividing by 10, and part of the 100 Grid when dividing by 100. Decimal Grid Numbers are the true numbers of mathematics. The Reals, the rationals & irrationals, the algebraic & transcendentals, the imaginary & Complex, and the negative-numbers are all fake numbers. For, to be a true number, you have to "be counted" by mathematical induction. The smallest Grid system is the Decimal 10 Grid.

Length: 375 pages

Product details
File Size: 2013 KB
Print Length: 375 pages
Publication Date: May 2, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07RG7BVZW
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #274,398 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#27 in General Geometry
#336 in Geometry & Topology (Books)

#4-3, 55th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 25Jun2021. And this is AP's 55th published book of science.

Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019

Preface: This is volume 3, book 3 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Freshperson students, 1st year college students of age 18-19. It is the continuation of volume 2 for ages 5 through 18 years old.

The main major topic is the AP-EM equations of electricity and magnetism, the mathematics for the laws of electricity and magnetism; what used to be called the Maxwell Equations of Physics. The 1st Year College Math has to prepare all students with the math for all the sciences. So 1st year college Math is like a huge intersection station that has to prepare students with the math they need to do the hard sciences such as physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, geology, etc. What this means is, 1st year college is calculus that allows the student to work with electricity and magnetism. All the math that is needed to enable students to do electricity and magnetism. In Old Math before this textbook, those Old Math textbooks would end in 1/3 of the text about Arclength, vector space, div, curl, Line Integral, Green's, Stokes, Divergence theorem trying to reach and be able to teach Maxwell Equations. But sadly, barely any Old Math classroom reached that 1/3 ending of the textbook, and left all those college students without any math to tackle electricity and magnetism. And most of Old Math was just muddle headed wrong even if they covered the last 1/3 of the textbook. And that is totally unacceptable in science. This textbook fixes that huge hole and gap in Old Math education.

And there is no way around it, that a course in 1st year College Calculus is going to do a lot of hands on experiment with electricity and magnetism, and is required of the students to buy a list of physics apparatus-- multimeter, galvanometer, coil, bar magnet, alligator clip wires, electromagnet, iron filing case, and possibly even a 12 volt transformer, all shown in the cover picture. The beginning of this textbook and the middle section all leads into the ending of this textbook-- we learn the AP-EM Equations and how to use those equations. And there is no escaping the fact that it has to be hands on physics experiments in the classroom of mathematics.

But, do not be scared, for this is all easy easy easy. For if you passed and enjoyed Volume 2 TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, then I promise you, you will not be stressed with Volume 3, for I go out of my way to make it clear and understandable.

Warning: this is a Journal Textbook, meaning that I am constantly adding new material, constantly revising, constantly fixing mistakes or making things more clear. So if you read this book in August of 2019, chances are it is different when you read it in September 2019. Ebooks allow authors the freedom to improve their textbooks on a ongoing basis.

The 1st year college math should be about the math that prepares any and all students for science, whether they branch out into physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, or math, they should have all the math in 1st year college that will carry them through those science studies. I make every attempt possible to make math easy to understand, easy to learn and hopefully fun.

Length: 236 pages

Product details
File Size: 1390 KB
Print Length: 236 pages
Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
Publication Date: August 16, 2019
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07WN9RVXD
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,212,707 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2719 in Calculus (Books)
#417 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

#4-4, 56th published book

COLLEGE CALCULUS GUIDE to help students recognize math professor spam from math truth & reality// math textbook series, book 4 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

#1 New Releasein 15-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

This textbook is the companion guide book to AP's Teaching True Mathematics, 1st year College. It is realized that Old Math will take a long time in removing their fake math, so in the interim period, this Guide book is designed to speed up the process of removing fake Calculus out of the education system, the fewer students we punish with forcing them with fake Calculus, the better we are.
Cover Picture: This book is part comedy, for when you cannot reason with math professors that they have many errors to fix, that 90% of their Calculus is in error, you end up resorting to comedy, making fun of them, to prod them to fix their errors. To prod them to "do right by the students of the world" not their entrenched propaganda.
Length: 54 pages

Product details
File Size: 1035 KB
Print Length: 64 pages
Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
Publication Date: August 18, 2019
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07WNGLQ85
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #253,425 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#38 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#318 in Calculus (Books)
#48 in Calculus (Kindle Store)


Click here to read the complete article

tech / sci.math / Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics.

Pages:12
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor