Sorry, but I do not have time to respond to all the idiots who post drivel on my threads. I have chosen Malum as the one I make a fool of, but rest assured that he represent all you stupids. Chuckle.

Now, if any of you had anything to say that actually mattered, I might respond, but as you all know, I am a genius and don't have time for morons (exception of Malum). On occasion I respond to the psychopath Jean Pierre Messager (aka Python).

I don't even read your drivel because my only good eye hurts after 15 minutes of being on computer. So if you are a visitor and you want to get my attention, then you have to write an exceptionally good subject line to catch my attention, but this does not mean I shall necessarily respond. Chuckle.

STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of JG's fake math

On Tuesday, August 24, 2021 at 6:49:29 PM UTC-4, I am Super Rectum (aka John Gabriel, Troll Boy) wrote:

> Sorry, but I do not have time to respond to all the idiots who post drivel on my threads. I have chosen Malum as the one I make a fool of, but rest assured that he represent all you stupids. Chuckle.
>
> Now, if any of you had anything to say that actually mattered, I might respond, but as you all know, I am a genius and don't have time for morons (exception of Malum). On occasion I respond to the psychopath Jean Pierre Messager (aka Python).
>

But, but... WHAT ABOUT ME, MR. RECTUM????? OH, NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!

HA, HA, HA!!

Mr. Rectum (JG) here claims to have a discovered as shortcut to mastering calculus without using limits. Unfortunately for him, this means he has no workable a definition of the derivative of a function. It blows up for functions as simple f(x)=|x|. Or even f(x)=0. As a result, he has had to ban 0, negative numbers and instantaneous rates of change rendering his goofy little system quite useless. What a moron!

Forget calculus. JG has also banned all axioms because he cannot even derive the most elementary results of basic arithmetic, e.g. 2+2=4. Such results require the use of axioms, so he must figure he's now off the hook. Again, what a moron!

Even at his advanced age (60+?), John Gabriel is STILL struggling with basic, elementary-school arithmetic. As he has repeatedly posted here:

"There are no points on a line."
--April 12, 2021

"Pi is NOT a number of ANY kind!"
--July 10, 2020

"1/2 not equal to 2/4"
--October 22, 2017

“1/3 does NOT mean 1 divided by 3 and never has meant that”
-- February 8, 2015

"3 =< 4 is nonsense.”
--October 28, 2017

"Zero is not a number."
-- Dec. 2, 2019

"0 is not required at all in mathematics, just like negative numbers."
-- Jan. 4, 2017

“There is no such thing as an empty set.”
--Oct. 4, 2019

“3 <=> 2 + 1 or 3 <=> 8 - 5, etc, are all propositions” (actually all are meaningless gibberish)
--Oct. 22, 2019

No math genius our JG, though he actually lists his job title as “mathematician” at Linkedin.com. Apparently, they do not verify your credentials.

Though really quite disturbing, interested readers should see: “About the spamming troll John Gabriel in his own words...” (lasted updated March 10, 2020) at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.math/PcpAzX5pDeY/1PDiSlK_BwAJ

Dan

Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com
Visit my Math Blog a http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com

On Wednesday, 25 August 2021 at 01:09:34 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> >Sorry, but I do not have time to respond to all the idiots who post drivel on my threads. I have chosen Malum as the one I make a fool of, but rest assured that he represent all you stupids. Chuckle.

> You have yet to make a fool out of me :) You do however demonstrate yourself like a fool all the time.

Do you honestly believe what you scribbled in the above sentence? Chuckle.

> >I don't even read your drivel because my only good eye hurts after 15 minutes of being on computer. So if you are a visitor and you want to get my attention, then you have to write an exceptionally good subject line to catch my attention, but this does not mean I shall necessarily respond. Chuckle.

> You don't because you do not understand it.

Sonny, before you were born I understood better than anyone back then and still better than anyone now. :)

That's the problem with being a genius - you don't sleep properly, you don't get along with most people, you can be insufferable and some other things too. Would I rather have been an ordinary man? Meh. I think not. I wouldn't change anything even though it's been a roller coaster ride since 2007 and also in my youth.

>Do you honestly believe what you scribbled in the above sentence? Chuckle.

Given it is accurate, yes.

>Sonny, before you were born I understood better than anyone back then and still better than anyone now. :)

Yet you cannot understand the most basic of things in notation and much else.

>That's the problem with being a genius

What would you know? You ain't one.

On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 01:49:35 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> >Do you honestly believe what you scribbled in the above sentence? Chuckle.
> Given it is accurate, yes.

You believe it because you are a crank. Only a crank can make statements like:

"c=f+g <=> g=c-f is CIRCULAR"

- Zelos Malum (master math graduate from public Swedish university Oops-Allah (Uppsala).

On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 06:25:36 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 01:49:35 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >Do you honestly believe what you scribbled in the above sentence? Chuckle.
> > Given it is accurate, yes.
> You believe it because you are a crank. Only a crank can make statements like:
>
> "c=f+g <=> g=c-f is CIRCULAR"
>
> - Zelos Malum (master math graduate from public Swedish university Oops-Allah (Uppsala).

I should be fair and mention that Jean Pierre Messager (aka YBM aka JPM aka Python) is the idiot who helped you reach such a conclusion. See Malum, this is what happens when drink and draw conclusions based on Messager's drivel.

On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 06:31:05 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 06:25:36 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 01:49:35 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >Do you honestly believe what you scribbled in the above sentence? Chuckle.
> > > Given it is accurate, yes.
> > You believe it because you are a crank. Only a crank can make statements like:
> >
> > "c=f+g <=> g=c-f is CIRCULAR"
> >
> > - Zelos Malum (master math graduate from public Swedish university Oops-Allah (Uppsala).
> I should be fair and mention that Jean Pierre Messager (aka YBM aka JPM aka Python) is the idiot who helped you reach such a conclusion. See Malum, this is what happens when drink and draw conclusions based on Messager's drivel.

Searched for you here, but could not find your anything on you:

https://www2.uu.se/en

I guess you were lying about being a graduate of Oops-Allah? LMAO.

torsdag 26 augusti 2021 kl. 12:25:36 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 01:49:35 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >Do you honestly believe what you scribbled in the above sentence? Chuckle.
> > Given it is accurate, yes.
> You believe it because you are a crank. Only a crank can make statements like:
>
> "c=f+g <=> g=c-f is CIRCULAR"
>
> - Zelos Malum (master math graduate from public Swedish university Oops-Allah (Uppsala).

Reread what I wrote again, I said that is what you think circularity means, not saying that is circular.

On Friday, August 27, 2021 at 6:03:09 AM UTC+1, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> torsdag 26 augusti 2021 kl. 12:25:36 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 01:49:35 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >Do you honestly believe what you scribbled in the above sentence? Chuckle.
> > > Given it is accurate, yes.
> > You believe it because you are a crank. Only a crank can make statements like:
> >
> > "c=f+g <=> g=c-f is CIRCULAR"
> >
> > - Zelos Malum (master math graduate from public Swedish university Oops-Allah (Uppsala).
> Reread what I wrote again, I said that is what you think circularity means, not saying that is circular.

It is worth noting that written language comprehension is a component of the classical Mensa IQ tests (e.g. Cattell III B). Was it a Culture Fair test that you claim to have taken John? I am willing to accept the culture fair variant offered by Mensa US as evidence, or are you going to wuss out regardless?

Regards

QB

On Friday, 27 August 2021 at 01:03:09 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> torsdag 26 augusti 2021 kl. 12:25:36 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 01:49:35 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >Do you honestly believe what you scribbled in the above sentence? Chuckle.
> > > Given it is accurate, yes.
> > You believe it because you are a crank. Only a crank can make statements like:
> >
> > "c=f+g <=> g=c-f is CIRCULAR"
> >
> > - Zelos Malum (master math graduate from public Swedish university Oops-Allah (Uppsala).
> Reread what I wrote again, I said that is what you think circularity means, not saying that is circular.

That is what YOU said! You are a crank! Here it is again with link following:

***************************************************************
> > He think that stuff you point out is circular
> >
> > if c=f+g
> > then g=c-f
> > so circular!
***************************************************************

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.math/c/QMhqLZH1434/m/vAEmniRtBwAJ

torsdag 26 augusti 2021 kl. 12:34:59 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 06:31:05 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 06:25:36 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 01:49:35 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > >Do you honestly believe what you scribbled in the above sentence? Chuckle.
> > > > Given it is accurate, yes.
> > > You believe it because you are a crank. Only a crank can make statements like:
> > >
> > > "c=f+g <=> g=c-f is CIRCULAR"
> > >
> > > - Zelos Malum (master math graduate from public Swedish university Oops-Allah (Uppsala).
> > I should be fair and mention that Jean Pierre Messager (aka YBM aka JPM aka Python) is the idiot who helped you reach such a conclusion. See Malum, this is what happens when drink and draw conclusions based on Messager's drivel.
> Searched for you here, but could not find your anything on you:
>
> https://www2.uu.se/en
>
> I guess you were lying about being a graduate of Oops-Allah? LMAO.
Why would the university post the names of graduates? Almost no uni does this lol

On Friday, 27 August 2021 at 16:59:16 UTC-4, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> torsdag 26 augusti 2021 kl. 12:34:59 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 06:31:05 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 06:25:36 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 01:49:35 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > >Do you honestly believe what you scribbled in the above sentence? Chuckle.
> > > > > Given it is accurate, yes.
> > > > You believe it because you are a crank. Only a crank can make statements like:
> > > >
> > > > "c=f+g <=> g=c-f is CIRCULAR"
> > > >
> > > > - Zelos Malum (master math graduate from public Swedish university Oops-Allah (Uppsala).
> > > I should be fair and mention that Jean Pierre Messager (aka YBM aka JPM aka Python) is the idiot who helped you reach such a conclusion. See Malum, this is what happens when drink and draw conclusions based on Messager's drivel.
> > Searched for you here, but could not find your anything on you:
> >
> > https://www2.uu.se/en
> >
> > I guess you were lying about being a graduate of Oops-Allah? LMAO.
> Why would the university post the names of graduates? Almost no uni does this lol

They do post names of alumni or at least they used to.

fredag 27 augusti 2021 kl. 23:08:38 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Friday, 27 August 2021 at 16:59:16 UTC-4, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > torsdag 26 augusti 2021 kl. 12:34:59 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 06:31:05 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 06:25:36 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 01:49:35 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > >Do you honestly believe what you scribbled in the above sentence? Chuckle.
> > > > > > Given it is accurate, yes.
> > > > > You believe it because you are a crank. Only a crank can make statements like:
> > > > >
> > > > > "c=f+g <=> g=c-f is CIRCULAR"
> > > > >
> > > > > - Zelos Malum (master math graduate from public Swedish university Oops-Allah (Uppsala).
> > > > I should be fair and mention that Jean Pierre Messager (aka YBM aka JPM aka Python) is the idiot who helped you reach such a conclusion. See Malum, this is what happens when drink and draw conclusions based on Messager's drivel.
> > > Searched for you here, but could not find your anything on you:
> > >
> > > https://www2.uu.se/en
> > >
> > > I guess you were lying about being a graduate of Oops-Allah? LMAO.
> > Why would the university post the names of graduates? Almost no uni does this lol
> They do post names of alumni or at least they used to.
You can see all master theses from Uppsala here: http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/resultList.jsf?dswid=-8399&language=sv&searchType=UNDERGRADUATE&query=&af=%5B%5D&aq=%5B%5B%5D%5D&aq2=%5B%5B%7B%22educationalProgramId%22%3A%226960%22%7D%2C%7B%22thesisLevel%22%3A%22H2%22%7D%5D%5D&aqe=%5B%5D&noOfRows=50&sortOrder=author_sort_asc&sortOrder2=title_sort_asc&onlyFullText=false&sf=all

On Friday, 27 August 2021 at 21:15:16 UTC-4, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> fredag 27 augusti 2021 kl. 23:08:38 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Friday, 27 August 2021 at 16:59:16 UTC-4, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > torsdag 26 augusti 2021 kl. 12:34:59 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 06:31:05 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 06:25:36 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > > > > On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 01:49:35 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > >Do you honestly believe what you scribbled in the above sentence? Chuckle.
> > > > > > > Given it is accurate, yes.
> > > > > > You believe it because you are a crank. Only a crank can make statements like:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "c=f+g <=> g=c-f is CIRCULAR"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Zelos Malum (master math graduate from public Swedish university Oops-Allah (Uppsala).
> > > > > I should be fair and mention that Jean Pierre Messager (aka YBM aka JPM aka Python) is the idiot who helped you reach such a conclusion. See Malum, this is what happens when drink and draw conclusions based on Messager's drivel.
> > > > Searched for you here, but could not find your anything on you:
> > > >
> > > > https://www2.uu.se/en
> > > >
> > > > I guess you were lying about being a graduate of Oops-Allah? LMAO.
> > > Why would the university post the names of graduates? Almost no uni does this lol
> > They do post names of alumni or at least they used to.
> You can see all master theses from Uppsala here: http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/resultList.jsf?dswid=-8399&language=sv&searchType=UNDERGRADUATE&query=&af=%5B%5D&aq=%5B%5B%5D%5D&aq2=%5B%5B%7B%22educationalProgramId%22%3A%226960%22%7D%2C%7B%22thesisLevel%22%3A%22H2%22%7D%5D%5D&aqe=%5B%5D&noOfRows=50&sortOrder=author_sort_asc&sortOrder2=title_sort_asc&onlyFullText=false&sf=all

I've looked at some of the hilarious drivel. Oops-Allah! LMAO.

lördag 28 augusti 2021 kl. 14:52:24 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Friday, 27 August 2021 at 21:15:16 UTC-4, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > fredag 27 augusti 2021 kl. 23:08:38 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > On Friday, 27 August 2021 at 16:59:16 UTC-4, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > torsdag 26 augusti 2021 kl. 12:34:59 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 06:31:05 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > > > > On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 06:25:36 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > > > > > On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 01:49:35 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail..com wrote:
> > > > > > > > >Do you honestly believe what you scribbled in the above sentence? Chuckle.
> > > > > > > > Given it is accurate, yes.
> > > > > > > You believe it because you are a crank. Only a crank can make statements like:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "c=f+g <=> g=c-f is CIRCULAR"
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - Zelos Malum (master math graduate from public Swedish university Oops-Allah (Uppsala).
> > > > > > I should be fair and mention that Jean Pierre Messager (aka YBM aka JPM aka Python) is the idiot who helped you reach such a conclusion. See Malum, this is what happens when drink and draw conclusions based on Messager's drivel.
> > > > > Searched for you here, but could not find your anything on you:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www2.uu.se/en
> > > > >
> > > > > I guess you were lying about being a graduate of Oops-Allah? LMAO..
> > > > Why would the university post the names of graduates? Almost no uni does this lol
> > > They do post names of alumni or at least they used to.
> > You can see all master theses from Uppsala here: http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/resultList.jsf?dswid=-8399&language=sv&searchType=UNDERGRADUATE&query=&af=%5B%5D&aq=%5B%5B%5D%5D&aq2=%5B%5B%7B%22educationalProgramId%22%3A%226960%22%7D%2C%7B%22thesisLevel%22%3A%22H2%22%7D%5D%5D&aqe=%5B%5D&noOfRows=50&sortOrder=author_sort_asc&sortOrder2=title_sort_asc&onlyFullText=false&sf=all
> I've looked at some of the hilarious drivel. Oops-Allah! LMAO.

It's never too late to learn, Gabriel. :)

On Saturday, August 28, 2021 at 11:39:32 AM UTC-4, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> lördag 28 augusti 2021 kl. 14:52:24 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Friday, 27 August 2021 at 21:15:16 UTC-4, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > fredag 27 augusti 2021 kl. 23:08:38 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > On Friday, 27 August 2021 at 16:59:16 UTC-4, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > torsdag 26 augusti 2021 kl. 12:34:59 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > > On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 06:31:05 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > > > > > On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 06:25:36 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 01:49:35 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >Do you honestly believe what you scribbled in the above sentence? Chuckle.
> > > > > > > > > Given it is accurate, yes.
> > > > > > > > You believe it because you are a crank. Only a crank can make statements like:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > "c=f+g <=> g=c-f is CIRCULAR"
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > - Zelos Malum (master math graduate from public Swedish university Oops-Allah (Uppsala).
> > > > > > > I should be fair and mention that Jean Pierre Messager (aka YBM aka JPM aka Python) is the idiot who helped you reach such a conclusion. See Malum, this is what happens when drink and draw conclusions based on Messager's drivel.
> > > > > > Searched for you here, but could not find your anything on you:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://www2.uu.se/en
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I guess you were lying about being a graduate of Oops-Allah? LMAO.
> > > > > Why would the university post the names of graduates? Almost no uni does this lol
> > > > They do post names of alumni or at least they used to.
> > > You can see all master theses from Uppsala here: http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/resultList.jsf?dswid=-8399&language=sv&searchType=UNDERGRADUATE&query=&af=%5B%5D&aq=%5B%5B%5D%5D&aq2=%5B%5B%7B%22educationalProgramId%22%3A%226960%22%7D%2C%7B%22thesisLevel%22%3A%22H2%22%7D%5D%5D&aqe=%5B%5D&noOfRows=50&sortOrder=author_sort_asc&sortOrder2=title_sort_asc&onlyFullText=false&sf=all
> > I've looked at some of the hilarious drivel. Oops-Allah! LMAO.
> It's never too late to learn, Gabriel. :)

You're right! Perhaps you should start now! :)

fredag 27 augusti 2021 kl. 12:30:21 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Friday, 27 August 2021 at 01:03:09 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > torsdag 26 augusti 2021 kl. 12:25:36 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 01:49:35 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > >Do you honestly believe what you scribbled in the above sentence? Chuckle.
> > > > Given it is accurate, yes.
> > > You believe it because you are a crank. Only a crank can make statements like:
> > >
> > > "c=f+g <=> g=c-f is CIRCULAR"
> > >
> > > - Zelos Malum (master math graduate from public Swedish university Oops-Allah (Uppsala).
> > Reread what I wrote again, I said that is what you think circularity means, not saying that is circular.
> That is what YOU said! You are a crank! Here it is again with link following:
>
> ***************************************************************
> > > He think that stuff you point out is circular
> > >
> > > if c=f+g
> > > then g=c-f
> > > so circular!
> ***************************************************************
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.math/c/QMhqLZH1434/m/vAEmniRtBwAJ
I pointed out that is how YOU think. Not that I think it you dishonest lying sack of shit :)

lördag 28 augusti 2021 kl. 14:52:24 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Friday, 27 August 2021 at 21:15:16 UTC-4, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > fredag 27 augusti 2021 kl. 23:08:38 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > On Friday, 27 August 2021 at 16:59:16 UTC-4, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > torsdag 26 augusti 2021 kl. 12:34:59 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 06:31:05 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > > > > On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 06:25:36 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > > > > > On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 01:49:35 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail..com wrote:
> > > > > > > > >Do you honestly believe what you scribbled in the above sentence? Chuckle.
> > > > > > > > Given it is accurate, yes.
> > > > > > > You believe it because you are a crank. Only a crank can make statements like:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "c=f+g <=> g=c-f is CIRCULAR"
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - Zelos Malum (master math graduate from public Swedish university Oops-Allah (Uppsala).
> > > > > > I should be fair and mention that Jean Pierre Messager (aka YBM aka JPM aka Python) is the idiot who helped you reach such a conclusion. See Malum, this is what happens when drink and draw conclusions based on Messager's drivel.
> > > > > Searched for you here, but could not find your anything on you:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www2.uu.se/en
> > > > >
> > > > > I guess you were lying about being a graduate of Oops-Allah? LMAO..
> > > > Why would the university post the names of graduates? Almost no uni does this lol
> > > They do post names of alumni or at least they used to.
> > You can see all master theses from Uppsala here: http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/resultList.jsf?dswid=-8399&language=sv&searchType=UNDERGRADUATE&query=&af=%5B%5D&aq=%5B%5B%5D%5D&aq2=%5B%5B%7B%22educationalProgramId%22%3A%226960%22%7D%2C%7B%22thesisLevel%22%3A%22H2%22%7D%5D%5D&aqe=%5B%5D&noOfRows=50&sortOrder=author_sort_asc&sortOrder2=title_sort_asc&onlyFullText=false&sf=all
> I've looked at some of the hilarious drivel. Oops-Allah! LMAO.

As always, you are so jealous Gerbil.

On Monday, 30 August 2021 at 05:24:49 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> fredag 27 augusti 2021 kl. 12:30:21 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Friday, 27 August 2021 at 01:03:09 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > torsdag 26 augusti 2021 kl. 12:25:36 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 01:49:35 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > >Do you honestly believe what you scribbled in the above sentence? Chuckle.
> > > > > Given it is accurate, yes.
> > > > You believe it because you are a crank. Only a crank can make statements like:
> > > >
> > > > "c=f+g <=> g=c-f is CIRCULAR"
> > > >
> > > > - Zelos Malum (master math graduate from public Swedish university Oops-Allah (Uppsala).
> > > Reread what I wrote again, I said that is what you think circularity means, not saying that is circular.
> > That is what YOU said! You are a crank! Here it is again with link following:
> >
> > ***************************************************************
> > > > He think that stuff you point out is circular
> > > >
> > > > if c=f+g
> > > > then g=c-f
> > > > so circular!
> > ***************************************************************
> >
> > https://groups.google.com/g/sci.math/c/QMhqLZH1434/m/vAEmniRtBwAJ
> I pointed out that is how YOU think. Not that I think it you dishonest lying sack of shit :)

The lying sack of SHIT is YOU, you vile bastard.

I said the exact opposite of what you and Python were saying.

IF [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h = f'(x) + Q(x,h) THEN f'(x)= [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h - Q(x,h)

and then the two fucking morons (YOU and Python) tried to insinuate that it was circular. LMAO.

You're the world's greatest mainstream crank!

on 8/30/2021, zelos...@gmail.com supposed :
> fredag 27 augusti 2021 kl. 12:30:21 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
>> On Friday, 27 August 2021 at 01:03:09 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> torsdag 26 augusti 2021 kl. 12:25:36 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
>>>> On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 01:49:35 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> Do you honestly believe what you scribbled in the above sentence?
>>>>>> Chuckle.
>>>>> Given it is accurate, yes.
>>>> You believe it because you are a crank. Only a crank can make statements
>>>> like:
>>>>
>>>> "c=f+g <=> g=c-f is CIRCULAR"
>>>>
>>>> - Zelos Malum (master math graduate from public Swedish university
>>>> Oops-Allah (Uppsala).
>>> Reread what I wrote again, I said that is what you think circularity means,
>>> not saying that is circular.
>> That is what YOU said! You are a crank! Here it is again with link
>> following:
>>
>> ***************************************************************
>>>> He think that stuff you point out is circular
>>>>
>>>> if c=f+g
>>>> then g=c-f
>>>> so circular!
>> ***************************************************************
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.math/c/QMhqLZH1434/m/vAEmniRtBwAJ
> I pointed out that is how YOU think. Not that I think it you dishonest lying
> sack of shit :)

I hope that you don't plan on doing the same one line fullquoting
response for much longer.

On Monday, 30 August 2021 at 08:32:33 UTC-4, FromTheRafters wrote:
> on 8/30/2021, zelos...@gmail.com supposed :
> > fredag 27 augusti 2021 kl. 12:30:21 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> >> On Friday, 27 August 2021 at 01:03:09 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> torsdag 26 augusti 2021 kl. 12:25:36 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> >>>> On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 01:49:35 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>>>> Do you honestly believe what you scribbled in the above sentence?
> >>>>>> Chuckle.
> >>>>> Given it is accurate, yes.
> >>>> You believe it because you are a crank. Only a crank can make statements
> >>>> like:
> >>>>
> >>>> "c=f+g <=> g=c-f is CIRCULAR"
> >>>>
> >>>> - Zelos Malum (master math graduate from public Swedish university
> >>>> Oops-Allah (Uppsala).
> >>> Reread what I wrote again, I said that is what you think circularity means,
> >>> not saying that is circular.
> >> That is what YOU said! You are a crank! Here it is again with link
> >> following:
> >>
> >> ***************************************************************
> >>>> He think that stuff you point out is circular
> >>>>
> >>>> if c=f+g
> >>>> then g=c-f
> >>>> so circular!
> >> ***************************************************************
> >>
> >> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.math/c/QMhqLZH1434/m/vAEmniRtBwAJ
> > I pointed out that is how YOU think. Not that I think it you dishonest lying
> > sack of shit :)
> I hope that you don't plan on doing the same one line fullquoting
> response for much longer.

What? I never once said any crap like "if c=f+g then g=c-f so circular!"

I've being saying that

IF [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h = f'(x) + Q(x,h) THEN f'(x) = [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h - Q(x,h)

So if indeed I were suggesting MAlum's and Messager's (Python) drivel, then I would be contradicting myself. I am not a moron like all of you are, so I would never make a statement like Malum's gibberish. But that's what a PHD gets you at Oops-Allah university (Uppsala). LMAO

tisdag 31 augusti 2021 kl. 00:03:54 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Monday, 30 August 2021 at 08:32:33 UTC-4, FromTheRafters wrote:
> > on 8/30/2021, zelos...@gmail.com supposed :
> > > fredag 27 augusti 2021 kl. 12:30:21 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > >> On Friday, 27 August 2021 at 01:03:09 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >>> torsdag 26 augusti 2021 kl. 12:25:36 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > >>>> On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 01:49:35 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >>>>>> Do you honestly believe what you scribbled in the above sentence?
> > >>>>>> Chuckle.
> > >>>>> Given it is accurate, yes.
> > >>>> You believe it because you are a crank. Only a crank can make statements
> > >>>> like:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> "c=f+g <=> g=c-f is CIRCULAR"
> > >>>>
> > >>>> - Zelos Malum (master math graduate from public Swedish university
> > >>>> Oops-Allah (Uppsala).
> > >>> Reread what I wrote again, I said that is what you think circularity means,
> > >>> not saying that is circular.
> > >> That is what YOU said! You are a crank! Here it is again with link
> > >> following:
> > >>
> > >> ***************************************************************
> > >>>> He think that stuff you point out is circular
> > >>>>
> > >>>> if c=f+g
> > >>>> then g=c-f
> > >>>> so circular!
> > >> ***************************************************************
> > >>
> > >> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.math/c/QMhqLZH1434/m/vAEmniRtBwAJ
> > > I pointed out that is how YOU think. Not that I think it you dishonest lying
> > > sack of shit :)
> > I hope that you don't plan on doing the same one line fullquoting
> > response for much longer.
> What? I never once said any crap like "if c=f+g then g=c-f so circular!"
>
> I've being saying that
> IF [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h = f'(x) + Q(x,h) THEN f'(x) = [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h - Q(x,h)
> So if indeed I were suggesting MAlum's and Messager's (Python) drivel, then I would be contradicting myself. I am not a moron like all of you are, so I would never make a statement like Malum's gibberish. But that's what a PHD gets you at Oops-Allah university (Uppsala). LMAO
You did when we discussed D and T, derivative and tangent, functions.

D was defined in terms of limit
T was defined in terms of D

yet you claim it was circular because D uses T after some re-arrangement. Just like the illustration I gave.

On Tuesday, 31 August 2021 at 00:56:37 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> tisdag 31 augusti 2021 kl. 00:03:54 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Monday, 30 August 2021 at 08:32:33 UTC-4, FromTheRafters wrote:
> > > on 8/30/2021, zelos...@gmail.com supposed :
> > > > fredag 27 augusti 2021 kl. 12:30:21 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > >> On Friday, 27 August 2021 at 01:03:09 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >>> torsdag 26 augusti 2021 kl. 12:25:36 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > >>>> On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 01:49:35 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >>>>>> Do you honestly believe what you scribbled in the above sentence?
> > > >>>>>> Chuckle.
> > > >>>>> Given it is accurate, yes.
> > > >>>> You believe it because you are a crank. Only a crank can make statements
> > > >>>> like:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> "c=f+g <=> g=c-f is CIRCULAR"
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> - Zelos Malum (master math graduate from public Swedish university
> > > >>>> Oops-Allah (Uppsala).
> > > >>> Reread what I wrote again, I said that is what you think circularity means,
> > > >>> not saying that is circular.
> > > >> That is what YOU said! You are a crank! Here it is again with link
> > > >> following:
> > > >>
> > > >> ***************************************************************
> > > >>>> He think that stuff you point out is circular
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> if c=f+g
> > > >>>> then g=c-f
> > > >>>> so circular!
> > > >> ***************************************************************
> > > >>
> > > >> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.math/c/QMhqLZH1434/m/vAEmniRtBwAJ
> > > > I pointed out that is how YOU think. Not that I think it you dishonest lying
> > > > sack of shit :)
> > > I hope that you don't plan on doing the same one line fullquoting
> > > response for much longer.
> > What? I never once said any crap like "if c=f+g then g=c-f so circular!"
> >
> > I've being saying that
> > IF [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h = f'(x) + Q(x,h) THEN f'(x) = [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h - Q(x,h)
> > So if indeed I were suggesting MAlum's and Messager's (Python) drivel, then I would be contradicting myself. I am not a moron like all of you are, so I would never make a statement like Malum's gibberish. But that's what a PHD gets you at Oops-Allah university (Uppsala). LMAO
> You did when we discussed D and T, derivative and tangent, functions.

Lying again, crank? Nowhere did I say this. Provide the link, you vile bastard!

>
> D was defined in terms of limit

I have NEVER defined the derivative in terms of a limit. Newsflash: I do not use the bullshit of limit theory in my historic geometric theorem. It is 100% geometry:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj

> T was defined in terms of D

That's EXACTLY what YOU do in your bullshit MAINSTREAM calculus and it is CIRCULAR.

>
> yet you claim it was circular because D uses T after some re-arrangement. Just like the illustration I gave.

Your drivel was nothing of the sort. You imagined that you were agreeing with your fellow asswipe Jean Pierre Messager (aka Python) and I made a fool of you yet again! LMAO.

tisdag 31 augusti 2021 kl. 13:57:38 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Tuesday, 31 August 2021 at 00:56:37 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > tisdag 31 augusti 2021 kl. 00:03:54 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > On Monday, 30 August 2021 at 08:32:33 UTC-4, FromTheRafters wrote:
> > > > on 8/30/2021, zelos...@gmail.com supposed :
> > > > > fredag 27 augusti 2021 kl. 12:30:21 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > >> On Friday, 27 August 2021 at 01:03:09 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > >>> torsdag 26 augusti 2021 kl. 12:25:36 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > >>>> On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 01:49:35 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > >>>>>> Do you honestly believe what you scribbled in the above sentence?
> > > > >>>>>> Chuckle.
> > > > >>>>> Given it is accurate, yes.
> > > > >>>> You believe it because you are a crank. Only a crank can make statements
> > > > >>>> like:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> "c=f+g <=> g=c-f is CIRCULAR"
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> - Zelos Malum (master math graduate from public Swedish university
> > > > >>>> Oops-Allah (Uppsala).
> > > > >>> Reread what I wrote again, I said that is what you think circularity means,
> > > > >>> not saying that is circular.
> > > > >> That is what YOU said! You are a crank! Here it is again with link
> > > > >> following:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> ***************************************************************
> > > > >>>> He think that stuff you point out is circular
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> if c=f+g
> > > > >>>> then g=c-f
> > > > >>>> so circular!
> > > > >> ***************************************************************
> > > > >>
> > > > >> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.math/c/QMhqLZH1434/m/vAEmniRtBwAJ
> > > > > I pointed out that is how YOU think. Not that I think it you dishonest lying
> > > > > sack of shit :)
> > > > I hope that you don't plan on doing the same one line fullquoting
> > > > response for much longer.
> > > What? I never once said any crap like "if c=f+g then g=c-f so circular!"
> > >
> > > I've being saying that
> > > IF [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h = f'(x) + Q(x,h) THEN f'(x) = [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h - Q(x,h)
> > > So if indeed I were suggesting MAlum's and Messager's (Python) drivel, then I would be contradicting myself. I am not a moron like all of you are, so I would never make a statement like Malum's gibberish. But that's what a PHD gets you at Oops-Allah university (Uppsala). LMAO
> > You did when we discussed D and T, derivative and tangent, functions.
> Lying again, crank? Nowhere did I say this. Provide the link, you vile bastard!
> >
> > D was defined in terms of limit
> I have NEVER defined the derivative in terms of a limit. Newsflash: I do not use the bullshit of limit theory in my historic geometric theorem. It is 100% geometry:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj
> > T was defined in terms of D
> That's EXACTLY what YOU do in your bullshit MAINSTREAM calculus and it is CIRCULAR.
> >
> > yet you claim it was circular because D uses T after some re-arrangement. Just like the illustration I gave.
> Your drivel was nothing of the sort. You imagined that you were agreeing with your fellow asswipe Jean Pierre Messager (aka Python) and I made a fool of you yet again! LMAO.

>Lying again, crank? Nowhere did I say this. Provide the link, you vile bastard!

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.math/c/5NjpX0It60I/m/nLvlglEMCQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.math/c/bxHjnK8_00o/m/L5t27UkMCQAJ
Right in this post :)

>I have NEVER defined the derivative in terms of a limit.

I didn't say you did, I said I did. D was defiend in terms of limit, T in terms of D, and you cry circular which is not it.

To be circular T is defined in terms of D, and D in terms of T, but it isn't. D is defined independently of T

>That's EXACTLY what YOU do in your bullshit MAINSTREAM calculus and it is CIRCULAR.

See, right here you do claim it is circular just like I said you do.

D defined in terms of limit
T defined in terms of D
Is not circular. It is a linear progression of definitions.

>Your drivel was nothing of the sort. You imagined that you were agreeing with your fellow asswipe Jean Pierre Messager (aka Python) and I made a fool of you yet again! LMAO.

You didn't, you did however manage to confirm in this post exactly what I said you did while denying it. That is quite foolish.

On Wednesday, 1 September 2021 at 01:02:45 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> tisdag 31 augusti 2021 kl. 13:57:38 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Tuesday, 31 August 2021 at 00:56:37 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > tisdag 31 augusti 2021 kl. 00:03:54 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > On Monday, 30 August 2021 at 08:32:33 UTC-4, FromTheRafters wrote:
> > > > > on 8/30/2021, zelos...@gmail.com supposed :
> > > > > > fredag 27 augusti 2021 kl. 12:30:21 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > >> On Friday, 27 August 2021 at 01:03:09 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > >>> torsdag 26 augusti 2021 kl. 12:25:36 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > > >>>> On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 01:49:35 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>> Do you honestly believe what you scribbled in the above sentence?
> > > > > >>>>>> Chuckle.
> > > > > >>>>> Given it is accurate, yes.
> > > > > >>>> You believe it because you are a crank. Only a crank can make statements
> > > > > >>>> like:
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> "c=f+g <=> g=c-f is CIRCULAR"
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> - Zelos Malum (master math graduate from public Swedish university
> > > > > >>>> Oops-Allah (Uppsala).
> > > > > >>> Reread what I wrote again, I said that is what you think circularity means,
> > > > > >>> not saying that is circular.
> > > > > >> That is what YOU said! You are a crank! Here it is again with link
> > > > > >> following:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> ***************************************************************
> > > > > >>>> He think that stuff you point out is circular
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> if c=f+g
> > > > > >>>> then g=c-f
> > > > > >>>> so circular!
> > > > > >> ***************************************************************
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.math/c/QMhqLZH1434/m/vAEmniRtBwAJ
> > > > > > I pointed out that is how YOU think. Not that I think it you dishonest lying
> > > > > > sack of shit :)
> > > > > I hope that you don't plan on doing the same one line fullquoting
> > > > > response for much longer.
> > > > What? I never once said any crap like "if c=f+g then g=c-f so circular!"
> > > >
> > > > I've being saying that
> > > > IF [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h = f'(x) + Q(x,h) THEN f'(x) = [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h - Q(x,h)
> > > > So if indeed I were suggesting MAlum's and Messager's (Python) drivel, then I would be contradicting myself. I am not a moron like all of you are, so I would never make a statement like Malum's gibberish. But that's what a PHD gets you at Oops-Allah university (Uppsala). LMAO
> > > You did when we discussed D and T, derivative and tangent, functions.
> > Lying again, crank? Nowhere did I say this. Provide the link, you vile bastard!
> > >
> > > D was defined in terms of limit
> > I have NEVER defined the derivative in terms of a limit. Newsflash: I do not use the bullshit of limit theory in my historic geometric theorem. It is 100% geometry:
> >
> > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RDulODvgncItTe7qNI1d8KTN5bl0aTXj
> > > T was defined in terms of D
> > That's EXACTLY what YOU do in your bullshit MAINSTREAM calculus and it is CIRCULAR.
> > >
> > > yet you claim it was circular because D uses T after some re-arrangement. Just like the illustration I gave.
> > Your drivel was nothing of the sort. You imagined that you were agreeing with your fellow asswipe Jean Pierre Messager (aka Python) and I made a fool of you yet again! LMAO.
>
> >Lying again, crank? Nowhere did I say this. Provide the link, you vile bastard!
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.math/c/5NjpX0It60I/m/nLvlglEMCQAJ
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.math/c/bxHjnK8_00o/m/L5t27UkMCQAJ
> Right in this post :)
> >I have NEVER defined the derivative in terms of a limit.
> I didn't say you did, I said I did. D was defiend in terms of limit, T in terms of D, and you cry circular which is not it.
>
> To be circular T is defined in terms of D, and D in terms of T, but it isn't. D is defined independently of T
> >That's EXACTLY what YOU do in your bullshit MAINSTREAM calculus and it is CIRCULAR.
> See, right here you do claim it is circular just like I said you do.
>
> D defined in terms of limit
> T defined in terms of D
> Is not circular. It is a linear progression of definitions.
> >Your drivel was nothing of the sort. You imagined that you were agreeing with your fellow asswipe Jean Pierre Messager (aka Python) and I made a fool of you yet again! LMAO.
> You didn't, you did however manage to confirm in this post exactly what I said you did while denying it. That is quite foolish.

Tired of responding to the idiot Malum and his fellow idiots.

Essentially what the Baboons of mainstream academia will have you believe is that:

t(c+h)-t(c)]/h = Lim (h->0)[f(c+h)-f(c)]/h = f'(c) + Q(c,h) and is possible ONLY if Q(c,h)=0, but this happens only in the case of the straight line t(x). It NEVER happens with the finite difference quotients. The mainstream want you to believe that there is some finite difference ratio hovering at infinity which produces f'(c):

t(c+h)-t(c)]/h = [f(c+h_1)-f(c)]/h_1 ; [f(c+h_2)-f(c)]/h_2 ; [f(c+h_3)-f(c)]/h_3 ; ... ; [f(c+h_3n-f(c)]/h_n ...; [f(c+h_oo)-f(c)]/h_oo

Can you imagine how embarrassed Newton and Leibniz would be at these idiots today?! They knew that they could not solve the tangent line problem - this had to wait for the great John Gabriel. It is I who revealed to the entire world that:

[f(x+h)-f(x)]/h = f'(x) + Q(x,h)

It usually takes a genius to realise the most simple concepts that escape the syphilitic brains of highly educated idiots in the mainstream.