Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

The autodecrement is not magical. -- Larry Wall in the perl man page


tech / sci.physics.relativity / Which RH is supider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?

SubjectAuthor
* Which RH is supider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?Dono.
+* Re: Which RH is supider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?Paparios
|`- Re: Which RH is supider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?Odd Bodkin
+* Re: Which RH is supider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?Richard Hertz
|`* Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?Dono.
| `- Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?Richard Hertz
+* Re: Which RH is supider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?Sylvia Else
|+- Re: Which RH is supider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?patdolan
|+- Re: Which RH is supider? Richard Hertz or Richard HRichard Hachel
|`* Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?Dono.
| +* Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?Richard Hertz
| |`- Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?Dono.
| `* Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?Sylvia Else
|  `* Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?Dono.
|   +- Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or RichardRichard Hachel
|   `* Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?Richard Hertz
|    +* Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?Dono.
|    |`* Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?Richard Hertz
|    | +* Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?Michael Moroney
|    | |+* Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?Maciej Wozniak
|    | ||`- Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?Emmet Buchs
|    | |`- Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?Emmet Buchs
|    | `- Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?Dono.
|    `* Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?Paul B. Andersen
|     `- Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?Richard Hertz
`* Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?Michael Moroney
 `- Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?Dono.

Pages:12
Which RH is supider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?

<e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=73784&group=sci.physics.relativity#73784

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:29e9:: with SMTP id jv9mr17513326qvb.67.1639067238950;
Thu, 09 Dec 2021 08:27:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:205:: with SMTP id b5mr19333250qtx.643.1639067238631;
Thu, 09 Dec 2021 08:27:18 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 08:27:18 -0800 (PST)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:647:4f80:21c0:a1ef:452e:8f2a:aad3;
posting-account=vma-PgoAAABrctSmMdefNKZ-c5S8buvP
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:647:4f80:21c0:a1ef:452e:8f2a:aad3
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Which RH is supider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?
From: eggy2001...@gmail.com (Dono.)
Injection-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2021 16:27:18 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 0
 by: Dono. - Thu, 9 Dec 2021 16:27 UTC

My vote goes for Hertz.

Re: Which RH is supider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?

<fead374e-1ebc-4866-a25d-024bd5924274n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=73785&group=sci.physics.relativity#73785

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:4107:: with SMTP id kc7mr17451327qvb.57.1639069041251;
Thu, 09 Dec 2021 08:57:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a37:745:: with SMTP id 66mr14429820qkh.11.1639069040999;
Thu, 09 Dec 2021 08:57:20 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 08:57:20 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2800:150:125:359e:1e8:2d7c:d1ef:9632;
posting-account=KA67VQoAAAABNtRUVf2Wh-jHtkEfmXxT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2800:150:125:359e:1e8:2d7c:d1ef:9632
References: <e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <fead374e-1ebc-4866-a25d-024bd5924274n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Which RH is supider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?
From: mri...@ing.puc.cl (Paparios)
Injection-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2021 16:57:21 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 4
 by: Paparios - Thu, 9 Dec 2021 16:57 UTC

El jueves, 9 de diciembre de 2021 a las 13:27:20 UTC-3, Dono. escribió:
> My vote goes for Hertz.

Me too

Re: Which RH is supider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?

<sotecr$l7e$1@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=73787&group=sci.physics.relativity#73787

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!Of0kprfJVVw2aVQefhvR6Q.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bodkin...@gmail.com (Odd Bodkin)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Which RH is supider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 17:28:59 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <sotecr$l7e$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com>
<fead374e-1ebc-4866-a25d-024bd5924274n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="21742"; posting-host="Of0kprfJVVw2aVQefhvR6Q.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:HoTtbz1RB8dZAx0ThJLTr2wT9l8=
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Odd Bodkin - Thu, 9 Dec 2021 17:28 UTC

Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> wrote:
> El jueves, 9 de diciembre de 2021 a las 13:27:20 UTC-3, Dono. escribió:
>> My vote goes for Hertz.
>
> Me too
>

Hachel is quietly nuts.

Hertz is loudly nuts.

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Re: Which RH is supider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?

<9bb88896-dbe1-4554-b78e-b1747dad1c7fn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=73789&group=sci.physics.relativity#73789

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:120e:: with SMTP id y14mr19120018qtx.671.1639072588097;
Thu, 09 Dec 2021 09:56:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5742:: with SMTP id 2mr19372695qtx.554.1639072587957;
Thu, 09 Dec 2021 09:56:27 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 09:56:27 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=181.81.82.178; posting-account=blnzJwoAAAA-82jKM1F-uNmKbbRkrU6D
NNTP-Posting-Host: 181.81.82.178
References: <e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <9bb88896-dbe1-4554-b78e-b1747dad1c7fn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Which RH is supider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?
From: hertz...@gmail.com (Richard Hertz)
Injection-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2021 17:56:28 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 11
 by: Richard Hertz - Thu, 9 Dec 2021 17:56 UTC

On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 1:27:20 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
> My vote goes for Hertz.

Supider?

IMBECILE!

https://www.ancestry.com/name-origin?surname=supider

There are 1,000 military records available for the last name Supider. For the veterans among your Supider ancestors,
military collections provide insights into where and when they served, and even physical descriptions.

Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?

<d57499ef-8ad2-4693-945a-59a41f8d9f5bn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=73792&group=sci.physics.relativity#73792

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4107:: with SMTP id j7mr15521282qko.645.1639076365905;
Thu, 09 Dec 2021 10:59:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4244:: with SMTP id w4mr15209880qko.569.1639076365629;
Thu, 09 Dec 2021 10:59:25 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 10:59:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <9bb88896-dbe1-4554-b78e-b1747dad1c7fn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:647:4f80:21c0:a1ef:452e:8f2a:aad3;
posting-account=vma-PgoAAABrctSmMdefNKZ-c5S8buvP
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:647:4f80:21c0:a1ef:452e:8f2a:aad3
References: <e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com> <9bb88896-dbe1-4554-b78e-b1747dad1c7fn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d57499ef-8ad2-4693-945a-59a41f8d9f5bn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?
From: eggy2001...@gmail.com (Dono.)
Injection-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2021 18:59:25 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 5
 by: Dono. - Thu, 9 Dec 2021 18:59 UTC

On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 9:56:29 AM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 1:27:20 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
> > My vote goes for Hertz.
> Supider?
>
Stupider. The vote is unanimous : you are.

Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?

<5199f25e-8d07-4e1d-ac33-50ecc02c86c6n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=73799&group=sci.physics.relativity#73799

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:b01:: with SMTP id u1mr18429390qvj.37.1639079439813;
Thu, 09 Dec 2021 11:50:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5703:: with SMTP id 3mr20637255qtw.113.1639079439687;
Thu, 09 Dec 2021 11:50:39 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 11:50:39 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <d57499ef-8ad2-4693-945a-59a41f8d9f5bn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=181.81.82.178; posting-account=blnzJwoAAAA-82jKM1F-uNmKbbRkrU6D
NNTP-Posting-Host: 181.81.82.178
References: <e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com>
<9bb88896-dbe1-4554-b78e-b1747dad1c7fn@googlegroups.com> <d57499ef-8ad2-4693-945a-59a41f8d9f5bn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5199f25e-8d07-4e1d-ac33-50ecc02c86c6n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?
From: hertz...@gmail.com (Richard Hertz)
Injection-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2021 19:50:39 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 16
 by: Richard Hertz - Thu, 9 Dec 2021 19:50 UTC

On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 3:59:27 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
> On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 9:56:29 AM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 1:27:20 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
> > > My vote goes for Hertz.
> > Supider?
> >
> Stupider. The vote is unanimous : you are.

LOL!

Two cretins with the greatest load of craps in their heads and Paul Draper 2.0 is unanimous?

See, reptilian lifeform (AKA Dono)? That's why you are an incurable imbecile of third order, beyond any chance to be normal.

The other chilean idiot is one order lower, but still impossible to get a cure.

And about PD 2.0, well, still PD 1.0 but less gifted on his mental abilities.

Re: Which RH is supider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?

<j1fefgFs81bU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=73811&group=sci.physics.relativity#73811

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: syl...@email.invalid (Sylvia Else)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Which RH is supider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 09:32:16 +1100
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <j1fefgFs81bU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net ENf1ZIoAEdItfYgI4W99aALtGoL1eQ5RfPkOxap+3VLnq1u88L
Cancel-Lock: sha1:t8bWiI0zF7zZQWQKRimIR7WINJc=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.3.2
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com>
 by: Sylvia Else - Thu, 9 Dec 2021 22:32 UTC

On 10-Dec-21 3:27 am, Dono. wrote:
> My vote goes for Hertz.
>

It's a harder question than most asked on here. I'm going to sit on the
fence.

Sylvia.

Re: Which RH is supider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?

<3c1234df-bbe6-4e41-9e41-1f0b88776bf5n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=73815&group=sci.physics.relativity#73815

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5aeb:: with SMTP id c11mr21231430qvh.69.1639090083302;
Thu, 09 Dec 2021 14:48:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:e47:: with SMTP id o7mr20664896qvc.61.1639090083176;
Thu, 09 Dec 2021 14:48:03 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 14:48:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <j1fefgFs81bU1@mid.individual.net>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:602:9603:ea10:bc29:f0e0:78b8:9d76;
posting-account=9sfziQoAAAD_UD5NP4mC4DjcYPHqoIUc
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:602:9603:ea10:bc29:f0e0:78b8:9d76
References: <e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com> <j1fefgFs81bU1@mid.individual.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <3c1234df-bbe6-4e41-9e41-1f0b88776bf5n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Which RH is supider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?
From: patdo...@comcast.net (patdolan)
Injection-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2021 22:48:03 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 8
 by: patdolan - Thu, 9 Dec 2021 22:48 UTC

On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 2:32:19 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 10-Dec-21 3:27 am, Dono. wrote:
> > My vote goes for Hertz.
> >
> It's a harder question than most asked on here. I'm going to sit on the
> fence.
>
> Sylvia.
Sylvia, you damned coward. Respond to Critical Relativity Theory!

Re: Which RH is supider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?

<GWkj14mzVmvm_QdU3LQ6YOe8XtM@jntp>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=73821&group=sci.physics.relativity#73821

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!usenet.pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <GWkj14mzVmvm_QdU3LQ6YOe8XtM@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Which RH is supider? Richard Hertz or Richard H
achel?
References: <e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com> <j1fefgFs81bU1@mid.individual.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: SBl3m3JtI3OpZoprvhinBIsYHps
JNTP-ThreadID: e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=GWkj14mzVmvm_QdU3LQ6YOe8XtM@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 21 23:27:12 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/96.0.4664.93 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="a315c7cd87d693ccffffa8499cd0c1d0dd3397b6"; logging-data="2021-12-09T23:27:12Z/6361662"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="newsmaster@news2.nemoweb.net"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: r.hac...@tiscali.fr (Richard Hachel)
 by: Richard Hachel - Thu, 9 Dec 2021 23:27 UTC

Le 09/12/2021 à 23:32, Sylvia Else a écrit :
> It's a harder question than most asked on here. I'm going to sit on the
> fence.
>
> Sylvia.

The question is not difficult. You drown in a glass of water.
I even wonder if there is a question, after all.

Did you try to answer my two little relativistic exercises?
It is for you that I concocted them.
Because for me, I know the answers.

R.H.

Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?

<c197e132-b53d-4d93-b480-3a73b91c9f9en@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=73829&group=sci.physics.relativity#73829

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5fc4:: with SMTP id k4mr22482536qta.472.1639095114837;
Thu, 09 Dec 2021 16:11:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:205:: with SMTP id b5mr23332912qtx.643.1639095114602;
Thu, 09 Dec 2021 16:11:54 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 16:11:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <j1fefgFs81bU1@mid.individual.net>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:647:4f80:21c0:a1ef:452e:8f2a:aad3;
posting-account=vma-PgoAAABrctSmMdefNKZ-c5S8buvP
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:647:4f80:21c0:a1ef:452e:8f2a:aad3
References: <e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com> <j1fefgFs81bU1@mid.individual.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <c197e132-b53d-4d93-b480-3a73b91c9f9en@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?
From: eggy2001...@gmail.com (Dono.)
Injection-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 00:11:54 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 8
 by: Dono. - Fri, 10 Dec 2021 00:11 UTC

On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 2:32:19 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 10-Dec-21 3:27 am, Dono. wrote:
> > My vote goes for Hertz.
> >
> It's a harder question than most asked on here. I'm going to sit on the
> fence.
>
> Sylvia.
:-)

Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?

<38ecc6f1-3715-4474-80e7-7a134af71413n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=73830&group=sci.physics.relativity#73830

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:29e1:: with SMTP id jv1mr21130391qvb.114.1639096862869;
Thu, 09 Dec 2021 16:41:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:2609:: with SMTP id gu9mr22517102qvb.97.1639096862774;
Thu, 09 Dec 2021 16:41:02 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 16:41:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <c197e132-b53d-4d93-b480-3a73b91c9f9en@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=181.81.82.178; posting-account=blnzJwoAAAA-82jKM1F-uNmKbbRkrU6D
NNTP-Posting-Host: 181.81.82.178
References: <e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com>
<j1fefgFs81bU1@mid.individual.net> <c197e132-b53d-4d93-b480-3a73b91c9f9en@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <38ecc6f1-3715-4474-80e7-7a134af71413n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?
From: hertz...@gmail.com (Richard Hertz)
Injection-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 00:41:02 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 21
 by: Richard Hertz - Fri, 10 Dec 2021 00:41 UTC

On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 9:11:56 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:

> :-)

The reptilian lifeform is happy!

Good for it as it doesn't have memory and don't recall how many threads were written here, only in the last decade,
about how despicable and imbecile is, posting his cretinism, insults, antisemitism, nazi attitudes, idiocies and results
of his Mathematica software to discuss with others, because it has no aptitudes for mathematics (his alleged BsC) or,
even less, for physics. In particular, anything related to SR or GR.

I remember reading his first post here, by 2006, humbling asking help to solve an stupid differential equation. I also
remember it kissing the ass of Tom Roberts, every time Tom was willing to directly address to the giant lizard. It was
happier than a dog with two tails.

But the fanatic einstenian suffers like an Einstein's bitch with any attempt to question his master, his pagan god.

I'll give something for it to choke again, to cry, spit and retort like an slug under salt in the next days.

Dono, the Einstein's bitch. I like that. Fits almost perfectly, except that bitches don't profit from his defensive actions.
This one does.

Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?

<d122fdc7-146c-48f8-9544-cdf8f7c12a02n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=73831&group=sci.physics.relativity#73831

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5fc1:: with SMTP id k1mr22190295qta.303.1639097479797;
Thu, 09 Dec 2021 16:51:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5742:: with SMTP id 2mr22684588qtx.554.1639097479544;
Thu, 09 Dec 2021 16:51:19 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 16:51:19 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <38ecc6f1-3715-4474-80e7-7a134af71413n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:647:4f80:21c0:a1ef:452e:8f2a:aad3;
posting-account=vma-PgoAAABrctSmMdefNKZ-c5S8buvP
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:647:4f80:21c0:a1ef:452e:8f2a:aad3
References: <e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com>
<j1fefgFs81bU1@mid.individual.net> <c197e132-b53d-4d93-b480-3a73b91c9f9en@googlegroups.com>
<38ecc6f1-3715-4474-80e7-7a134af71413n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d122fdc7-146c-48f8-9544-cdf8f7c12a02n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?
From: eggy2001...@gmail.com (Dono.)
Injection-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 00:51:19 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 12
 by: Dono. - Fri, 10 Dec 2021 00:51 UTC

On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 4:41:04 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 9:11:56 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
>
> > :-)

> I don't recall how many threads were written here, only in the last decade,
> about how despicable and imbecile I am, posting my cretinisms, insults, antisemitism, nazi attitudes, idiocies and results
> of my Excel spreadsheets to discuss with others, because I have no aptitudes for mathematics or,
> even less, for physics. In particular, anything related to SR or GR.
>

Yep, you described yourself accurately, Dick.

Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?

<soui17$s4p$2@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=73835&group=sci.physics.relativity#73835

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!0iLeGuCTVrmPADYNWie6iw.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 22:37:17 -0500
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <soui17$s4p$2@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="28825"; posting-host="0iLeGuCTVrmPADYNWie6iw.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.14.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Michael Moroney - Fri, 10 Dec 2021 03:37 UTC

On 12/9/2021 11:27 AM, Dono. wrote:
> My vote goes for Hertz.
>

Once again, we're comparing two infinitesimal amount of smarts to each
other, trying to decide which infinitesimal is smaller (who is
stupider). Does it matter?

Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?

<f7b5820c-fa2c-4bff-a89a-8e9fe019602fn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=73837&group=sci.physics.relativity#73837

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:702:: with SMTP id 2mr8881806qkc.333.1639112728013;
Thu, 09 Dec 2021 21:05:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:100a:: with SMTP id d10mr24229874qte.548.1639112727728;
Thu, 09 Dec 2021 21:05:27 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 21:05:27 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <soui17$s4p$2@gioia.aioe.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=73.241.30.145; posting-account=vma-PgoAAABrctSmMdefNKZ-c5S8buvP
NNTP-Posting-Host: 73.241.30.145
References: <e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com> <soui17$s4p$2@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <f7b5820c-fa2c-4bff-a89a-8e9fe019602fn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?
From: eggy2001...@gmail.com (Dono.)
Injection-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 05:05:28 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 9
 by: Dono. - Fri, 10 Dec 2021 05:05 UTC

On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 7:37:15 PM UTC-8, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 12/9/2021 11:27 AM, Dono. wrote:
> > My vote goes for Hertz.
> >
> Once again, we're comparing two infinitesimal amount of smarts to each
> other, trying to decide which infinitesimal is smaller (who is
> stupider). Does it matter?

No, it doesn't but it is so much fun to wind up Dick.

Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?

<j1i9v1FeclcU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=73949&group=sci.physics.relativity#73949

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.szaf.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: syl...@email.invalid (Sylvia Else)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 11:33:36 +1100
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <j1i9v1FeclcU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com>
<j1fefgFs81bU1@mid.individual.net>
<c197e132-b53d-4d93-b480-3a73b91c9f9en@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net GHhVODuKez+749qRBvn2pgANnVqFjwEu9KQW9uorA4yH3Vb9sM
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VOJNmXdx4sqkGdI8i52RzpqEkUM=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.3.2
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <c197e132-b53d-4d93-b480-3a73b91c9f9en@googlegroups.com>
 by: Sylvia Else - Sat, 11 Dec 2021 00:33 UTC

On 10-Dec-21 11:11 am, Dono. wrote:
> On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 2:32:19 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 10-Dec-21 3:27 am, Dono. wrote:
>>> My vote goes for Hertz.
>>>
>> It's a harder question than most asked on here. I'm going to sit on the
>> fence.
>>
>> Sylvia.
> :-)
>

Mind you, with his most recent contribution, Hachel is hastening my fall
onto his side of the fence. But perhaps Hertz will post something that
restores my balance.

Sylvia.

Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?

<58d64d59-f221-4d3c-9c4b-02df65cd08a9n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=73952&group=sci.physics.relativity#73952

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1a04:: with SMTP id f4mr31336514qtb.476.1639184108127;
Fri, 10 Dec 2021 16:55:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5bc8:: with SMTP id b8mr30787798qtb.247.1639184107815;
Fri, 10 Dec 2021 16:55:07 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 16:55:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <j1i9v1FeclcU1@mid.individual.net>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=73.241.30.145; posting-account=vma-PgoAAABrctSmMdefNKZ-c5S8buvP
NNTP-Posting-Host: 73.241.30.145
References: <e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com>
<j1fefgFs81bU1@mid.individual.net> <c197e132-b53d-4d93-b480-3a73b91c9f9en@googlegroups.com>
<j1i9v1FeclcU1@mid.individual.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <58d64d59-f221-4d3c-9c4b-02df65cd08a9n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?
From: eggy2001...@gmail.com (Dono.)
Injection-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 00:55:08 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 17
 by: Dono. - Sat, 11 Dec 2021 00:55 UTC

On Friday, December 10, 2021 at 4:33:41 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 10-Dec-21 11:11 am, Dono. wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 2:32:19 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
> >> On 10-Dec-21 3:27 am, Dono. wrote:
> >>> My vote goes for Hertz.
> >>>
> >> It's a harder question than most asked on here. I'm going to sit on the
> >> fence.
> >>
> >> Sylvia.
> > :-)
> >
> Mind you, with his most recent contribution, Hachel is hastening my fall
> onto his side of the fence. But perhaps Hertz will post something that
> restores my balance.
>
> Sylvia.
Hachel is like a benign tumor, Hertz is like a malignant one.

Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?

<JxFFKFK69OUXGP8LnOQ-if4ANRM@jntp>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=73962&group=sci.physics.relativity#73962

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!usenet.pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <JxFFKFK69OUXGP8LnOQ-if4ANRM@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard
Hachel?
References: <e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com> <j1fefgFs81bU1@mid.individual.net>
<c197e132-b53d-4d93-b480-3a73b91c9f9en@googlegroups.com> <j1i9v1FeclcU1@mid.individual.net>
<58d64d59-f221-4d3c-9c4b-02df65cd08a9n@googlegroups.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: dJTErO9IglVIprx3-sXdOLk1yoM
JNTP-ThreadID: e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=JxFFKFK69OUXGP8LnOQ-if4ANRM@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 21 01:17:55 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/96.0.4664.93 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="840660836a7c761e86fea5e51cddb0a42ad048c3"; logging-data="2021-12-11T01:17:55Z/6366066"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="newsmaster@news2.nemoweb.net"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: r.hac...@tiscali.fr (Richard Hachel)
 by: Richard Hachel - Sat, 11 Dec 2021 01:17 UTC

Le 11/12/2021 à 01:55, "Dono." a écrit :
> On Friday, December 10, 2021 at 4:33:41 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 10-Dec-21 11:11 am, Dono. wrote:
>> > On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 2:32:19 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> >> On 10-Dec-21 3:27 am, Dono. wrote:
>> >>> My vote goes for Hertz.
>> >>>
>> >> It's a harder question than most asked on here. I'm going to sit on the
>> >> fence.
>> >>
>> >> Sylvia.
>> > :-)
>> >
>> Mind you, with his most recent contribution, Hachel is hastening my fall
>> onto his side of the fence. But perhaps Hertz will post something that
>> restores my balance.
>>
>> Sylvia.
> Hachel is like a benign tumor

Really?

I'm not sure you would say that if you understood what I do and why I do
it.

R.H.

Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?

<ab0ff005-59d3-4907-9e61-29d2f304c146n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=73968&group=sci.physics.relativity#73968

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:50d:: with SMTP id l13mr30935387qtx.75.1639186325421;
Fri, 10 Dec 2021 17:32:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4687:: with SMTP id bq7mr23729106qkb.540.1639186325316;
Fri, 10 Dec 2021 17:32:05 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 17:32:05 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <58d64d59-f221-4d3c-9c4b-02df65cd08a9n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=181.84.183.144; posting-account=blnzJwoAAAA-82jKM1F-uNmKbbRkrU6D
NNTP-Posting-Host: 181.84.183.144
References: <e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com>
<j1fefgFs81bU1@mid.individual.net> <c197e132-b53d-4d93-b480-3a73b91c9f9en@googlegroups.com>
<j1i9v1FeclcU1@mid.individual.net> <58d64d59-f221-4d3c-9c4b-02df65cd08a9n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <ab0ff005-59d3-4907-9e61-29d2f304c146n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?
From: hertz...@gmail.com (Richard Hertz)
Injection-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 01:32:05 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 12
 by: Richard Hertz - Sat, 11 Dec 2021 01:32 UTC

On Friday, December 10, 2021 at 9:55:09 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:

<snip>

> Hachel is like a benign tumor, Hertz is like a malignant one.

Because you can't beat me, fucking retarded. Only hate me.

You don't have the required abilities for rhetoric, mathematics, physics, philosophy, humor, wit and life in general.

You are only a disgraced little being that suffers heavily and bites, spit and curses anyone near you, unhappy son of a bitch.

Nobody can store so much hate as you and don't suffer consequences. Your life should be a torture for you, even when sleeping.

Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?

<a7271318-66e5-4f53-bd32-f4be2da920c8n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=73972&group=sci.physics.relativity#73972

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2545:: with SMTP id s5mr24723116qko.48.1639187784612;
Fri, 10 Dec 2021 17:56:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1389:: with SMTP id o9mr30842079qtk.109.1639187784355;
Fri, 10 Dec 2021 17:56:24 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 17:56:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <ab0ff005-59d3-4907-9e61-29d2f304c146n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=73.241.30.145; posting-account=vma-PgoAAABrctSmMdefNKZ-c5S8buvP
NNTP-Posting-Host: 73.241.30.145
References: <e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com>
<j1fefgFs81bU1@mid.individual.net> <c197e132-b53d-4d93-b480-3a73b91c9f9en@googlegroups.com>
<j1i9v1FeclcU1@mid.individual.net> <58d64d59-f221-4d3c-9c4b-02df65cd08a9n@googlegroups.com>
<ab0ff005-59d3-4907-9e61-29d2f304c146n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <a7271318-66e5-4f53-bd32-f4be2da920c8n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?
From: eggy2001...@gmail.com (Dono.)
Injection-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 01:56:24 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 7
 by: Dono. - Sat, 11 Dec 2021 01:56 UTC

On Friday, December 10, 2021 at 5:32:06 PM UTC-8, demented Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Friday, December 10, 2021 at 9:55:09 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
>
> <snip>
> > Hachel is like a benign tumor, Hertz is like a malignant one.
> Because you can't beat me,

I beat the crap out of you, crank. On a regular basis. As soon as you post your imbecilities, you get exposed.

Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?

<626e34e0-d45b-45e5-a3e1-ca7fa04478f4n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=73983&group=sci.physics.relativity#73983

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5aaa:: with SMTP id u10mr29747656qvg.90.1639203899651;
Fri, 10 Dec 2021 22:24:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a37:cd1:: with SMTP id 200mr24630451qkm.106.1639203899514;
Fri, 10 Dec 2021 22:24:59 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 22:24:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <a7271318-66e5-4f53-bd32-f4be2da920c8n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=181.84.183.144; posting-account=blnzJwoAAAA-82jKM1F-uNmKbbRkrU6D
NNTP-Posting-Host: 181.84.183.144
References: <e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com>
<j1fefgFs81bU1@mid.individual.net> <c197e132-b53d-4d93-b480-3a73b91c9f9en@googlegroups.com>
<j1i9v1FeclcU1@mid.individual.net> <58d64d59-f221-4d3c-9c4b-02df65cd08a9n@googlegroups.com>
<ab0ff005-59d3-4907-9e61-29d2f304c146n@googlegroups.com> <a7271318-66e5-4f53-bd32-f4be2da920c8n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <626e34e0-d45b-45e5-a3e1-ca7fa04478f4n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?
From: hertz...@gmail.com (Richard Hertz)
Injection-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 06:24:59 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 42
 by: Richard Hertz - Sat, 11 Dec 2021 06:24 UTC

On Friday, December 10, 2021 at 10:56:25 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:

<snip>
> > > Hachel is like a benign tumor, Hertz is like a malignant one.
> > Because you can't beat me,

> I beat the crap out of you, crank. On a regular basis. As soon as you post your imbecilities, you get exposed.

See, imbecile, how easy you make me to reply your idiotic posts? (when I'm in a mood to do so).

Crank: a person who holds an unshakable belief that MOST of their contemporaries consider to be false.

Idiot, you can't even defend yourself at distance, and having HOURS to think what shit to post.

Out of 7.5 billions inhabitants, roughly 6 billions are adults having more than 15 years.

About 5.95 billions (99.2 %) don't care about science in general, and about 5.998 billions (99.97 %) don't give
a shit about physics in any way after high school (if they ever are taught on the basics).

It left only about 2 million people who do care about physics, of which 10% are RETARDED amateur or professional relativists.

It gives less than 200,000 idiots (you, for example) vs. 1,800,000 rational persons who work with physics, one way or the other.

I'm in the 90% population of non believers or dissidents, and you are in the 10% of brainwashed or uber fanatics about relativity.

Who is the fucking CRANK here? You, disgusting slug.

And from the 1,800,000 rational persons group, 90% believe that argue against relativity is a waste of time and/or effort.

It left 200,000 die hard idiots vs. 200,000 enlightened bright persons. The 200,000 die hard relativist is the market from wich
publishing houses profits, because they play with the hype of relativity and Einstein.

Who's the CRANK? You are the crank, imbecile.

And, besides, an amateur crank, which is easier to convince of whichever shit comes out, if a "voice of authority" says something.

That would be Tom Roberts for you, cretin.

You, in the world, are almost NOTHING. And an ignorant with poor parental and academic education, who's filled with hate
because how life was so hard to you. And you live here to vent some of your HATE at the slightest chance.

I despise you, reptilian lifeform, and feel sorry for you at the same time. Well, I'm human. You are not.

Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?

<ZvYsJ.934676$Ah33.381946@fx04.ams4>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=73984&group=sci.physics.relativity#73984

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx04.ams4.POSTED!not-for-mail
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.4.0
Subject: Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?
Content-Language: en-GB
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com>
<j1fefgFs81bU1@mid.individual.net>
<c197e132-b53d-4d93-b480-3a73b91c9f9en@googlegroups.com>
<j1i9v1FeclcU1@mid.individual.net>
<58d64d59-f221-4d3c-9c4b-02df65cd08a9n@googlegroups.com>
<ab0ff005-59d3-4907-9e61-29d2f304c146n@googlegroups.com>
From: paul.b.a...@paulba.no (Paul B. Andersen)
In-Reply-To: <ab0ff005-59d3-4907-9e61-29d2f304c146n@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <ZvYsJ.934676$Ah33.381946@fx04.ams4>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@eweka.nl
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 07:34:17 UTC
Organization: Eweka Internet Services
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 08:34:16 +0100
X-Received-Bytes: 1889
 by: Paul B. Andersen - Sat, 11 Dec 2021 07:34 UTC

Den 11.12.2021 02:32, skrev Richard Hertz:
> On Friday, December 10, 2021 at 9:55:09 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> Hachel is like a benign tumor, Hertz is like a malignant one.
>
> Because you can't beat me, fucking retarded. Only hate me.
>
> You don't have the required abilities for rhetoric, mathematics, physics, philosophy, humor, wit and life in general.
>
> You are only a disgraced little being that suffers heavily and bites, spit and curses anyone near you, unhappy son of a bitch.
>
> Nobody can store so much hate as you and don't suffer consequences. Your life should be a torture for you, even when sleeping.

You must suffer a lot, even when sleeping.

--
Paul

https://paulba.no/

Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?

<a508d69a-2957-4fbb-9435-c579d093696cn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=73985&group=sci.physics.relativity#73985

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a37:d4f:: with SMTP id 76mr24725865qkn.525.1639209580594;
Fri, 10 Dec 2021 23:59:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:647:: with SMTP id a7mr31538907qtb.593.1639209580448;
Fri, 10 Dec 2021 23:59:40 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 23:59:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <ZvYsJ.934676$Ah33.381946@fx04.ams4>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=181.84.183.144; posting-account=blnzJwoAAAA-82jKM1F-uNmKbbRkrU6D
NNTP-Posting-Host: 181.84.183.144
References: <e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com>
<j1fefgFs81bU1@mid.individual.net> <c197e132-b53d-4d93-b480-3a73b91c9f9en@googlegroups.com>
<j1i9v1FeclcU1@mid.individual.net> <58d64d59-f221-4d3c-9c4b-02df65cd08a9n@googlegroups.com>
<ab0ff005-59d3-4907-9e61-29d2f304c146n@googlegroups.com> <ZvYsJ.934676$Ah33.381946@fx04.ams4>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <a508d69a-2957-4fbb-9435-c579d093696cn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?
From: hertz...@gmail.com (Richard Hertz)
Injection-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 07:59:40 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 22
 by: Richard Hertz - Sat, 11 Dec 2021 07:59 UTC

On Saturday, December 11, 2021 at 4:34:20 AM UTC-3, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
> Den 11.12.2021 02:32, skrev Richard Hertz:
> > On Friday, December 10, 2021 at 9:55:09 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >> Hachel is like a benign tumor, Hertz is like a malignant one.
> >
> > Because you can't beat me, fucking retarded. Only hate me.
> >
> > You don't have the required abilities for rhetoric, mathematics, physics, philosophy, humor, wit and life in general.
> >
> > You are only a disgraced little being that suffers heavily and bites, spit and curses anyone near you, unhappy son of a bitch.
> >
> > Nobody can store so much hate as you and don't suffer consequences. Your life should be a torture for you, even when sleeping.
> You must suffer a lot, even when sleeping.
>
> --
> Paul
>
> https://paulba.no/

Showing your teeth again, Paul? Really?

Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?

<sp2cbe$jeu$1@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=73998&group=sci.physics.relativity#73998

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!0iLeGuCTVrmPADYNWie6iw.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 09:24:51 -0500
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <sp2cbe$jeu$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com>
<j1fefgFs81bU1@mid.individual.net>
<c197e132-b53d-4d93-b480-3a73b91c9f9en@googlegroups.com>
<j1i9v1FeclcU1@mid.individual.net>
<58d64d59-f221-4d3c-9c4b-02df65cd08a9n@googlegroups.com>
<ab0ff005-59d3-4907-9e61-29d2f304c146n@googlegroups.com>
<a7271318-66e5-4f53-bd32-f4be2da920c8n@googlegroups.com>
<626e34e0-d45b-45e5-a3e1-ca7fa04478f4n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="19934"; posting-host="0iLeGuCTVrmPADYNWie6iw.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.14.0
Content-Language: en-US
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Michael Moroney - Sat, 11 Dec 2021 14:24 UTC

On 12/11/2021 1:24 AM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Friday, December 10, 2021 at 10:56:25 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
>
> <snip>
>>>> Hachel is like a benign tumor, Hertz is like a malignant one.
>>> Because you can't beat me,
>
>> I beat the crap out of you, crank. On a regular basis. As soon as you post your imbecilities, you get exposed.
>
> See, imbecile, how easy you make me to reply your idiotic posts? (when I'm in a mood to do so).

Poor Dick Hertz. He yelps whenever his chain is yanked and manages to
claim he caused Dono to yank his chain at his will. Should we rename
Dick to Feelings Hertz?

[snip made-up nonsense]

> I'm in the 90% population of non believers or dissidents, and you are in the 10% of brainwashed or uber fanatics about relativity.
>
> Who is the fucking CRANK here? You, disgusting slug.

This is fun to watch. Poor Dick doesn't like to be called a crank so he
makes up numbers so he is not in the minority of cranks but amazingly,
he places himself in the majority and that must make him a non-crank.
Hard to argue against made-up numbers!

> You, in the world, are almost NOTHING. And an ignorant with poor parental and academic education, who's filled with hate
> because how life was so hard to you. And you live here to vent some of your HATE at the slightest chance.
>
> I despise you, reptilian lifeform, and feel sorry for you at the same time. Well, I'm human. You are not.
>
And then he feels the need to project his hate and poor education.

Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?

<d3451153-e325-499e-b489-f31f8373e818n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=73999&group=sci.physics.relativity#73999

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a37:5cc:: with SMTP id 195mr25522502qkf.680.1639233636504;
Sat, 11 Dec 2021 06:40:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:91:: with SMTP id o17mr33112622qtw.48.1639233636217;
Sat, 11 Dec 2021 06:40:36 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 06:40:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <626e34e0-d45b-45e5-a3e1-ca7fa04478f4n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=73.241.30.145; posting-account=vma-PgoAAABrctSmMdefNKZ-c5S8buvP
NNTP-Posting-Host: 73.241.30.145
References: <e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com>
<j1fefgFs81bU1@mid.individual.net> <c197e132-b53d-4d93-b480-3a73b91c9f9en@googlegroups.com>
<j1i9v1FeclcU1@mid.individual.net> <58d64d59-f221-4d3c-9c4b-02df65cd08a9n@googlegroups.com>
<ab0ff005-59d3-4907-9e61-29d2f304c146n@googlegroups.com> <a7271318-66e5-4f53-bd32-f4be2da920c8n@googlegroups.com>
<626e34e0-d45b-45e5-a3e1-ca7fa04478f4n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d3451153-e325-499e-b489-f31f8373e818n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?
From: eggy2001...@gmail.com (Dono.)
Injection-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 14:40:36 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 13
 by: Dono. - Sat, 11 Dec 2021 14:40 UTC

On Friday, December 10, 2021 at 10:25:01 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:

> Who's the CRANK?

Dick Hertz. Was that a rhetoric question?


> And an ignorant with poor parental and academic education, who's filled with hate
> because how life was so hard to you. And you live here to vent some of your HATE at the slightest chance.
>

Yep, you described yourself accurately, Dick.

Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?

<3632b0fc-1a09-417a-a2a6-337427f87bbfn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=74000&group=sci.physics.relativity#74000

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:20e3:: with SMTP id 3mr31474312qvk.47.1639233779871;
Sat, 11 Dec 2021 06:42:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:c42:: with SMTP id u2mr25300770qki.115.1639233779694;
Sat, 11 Dec 2021 06:42:59 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 06:42:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <sp2cbe$jeu$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.206.14.16; posting-account=I3DWzAoAAACOmZUdDcZ-C0PqAZGVsbW0
NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.206.14.16
References: <e3dbf6e4-a475-45f5-955c-14fb6bdac3c3n@googlegroups.com>
<j1fefgFs81bU1@mid.individual.net> <c197e132-b53d-4d93-b480-3a73b91c9f9en@googlegroups.com>
<j1i9v1FeclcU1@mid.individual.net> <58d64d59-f221-4d3c-9c4b-02df65cd08a9n@googlegroups.com>
<ab0ff005-59d3-4907-9e61-29d2f304c146n@googlegroups.com> <a7271318-66e5-4f53-bd32-f4be2da920c8n@googlegroups.com>
<626e34e0-d45b-45e5-a3e1-ca7fa04478f4n@googlegroups.com> <sp2cbe$jeu$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <3632b0fc-1a09-417a-a2a6-337427f87bbfn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Which RH is stupider? Richard Hertz or Richard Hachel?
From: maluwozn...@gmail.com (Maciej Wozniak)
Injection-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 14:42:59 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 16
 by: Maciej Wozniak - Sat, 11 Dec 2021 14:42 UTC

On Saturday, 11 December 2021 at 15:24:49 UTC+1, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 12/11/2021 1:24 AM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > On Friday, December 10, 2021 at 10:56:25 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >>>> Hachel is like a benign tumor, Hertz is like a malignant one.
> >>> Because you can't beat me,
> >
> >> I beat the crap out of you, crank. On a regular basis. As soon as you post your imbecilities, you get exposed.
> >
> > See, imbecile, how easy you make me to reply your idiotic posts? (when I'm in a mood to do so).
> Poor Dick Hertz. He yelps whenever his chain is yanked and manages to
> claim he caused Dono to yank his chain at his will. Should we rename
> Dick to Feelings Hertz?

Poor stupid Mike, having no arguments barks and
spit and slanders. As expected from relativistic trash.

Pages:12
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor