On 1/9/2022 2:45 PM, Cody Alba wrote:
> Cody Alba wrote:
>
>>>> yes, you fucking imbecile, I was saying it above. There are no
>>>> negative or imaginary numbers in computers, only higher level of
>>>> interpretation.
>>>> Ie the MSB, most significant bit, a 1, gives you a "negative" number,
>>>> encoded i 1s and 0s. Fucking stupid. The question is about the
>>>> existence of negative numbers in physics, here computers. How can you
>>>> be this stupid, you idiot.
>>>
>>> You are missing still missing the whole point! Wow. Negative numbers
>>> exist, and can be encoded in a lot of different schemes, binary is one
>>> of
>>
>> not in physics, here computers, idiot. You encode them, which related to
>> moving a zero on a scale. But there are negative numbers in this
>> universe. What a fucking idiot we have here, ladies and gentlemen.
>
> "But there are *NO* negative numbers in this universe"

One last response before I plonk...

Tell the Bank that there is no such thing as negative numbers in the
universe...

LOL! Moron. Good bye.

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

>>>> yes, you fucking imbecile, I was saying it above. There are no
>>>> negative or imaginary numbers in computers, only higher level of
>>>> interpretation.
>>>> Ie the MSB, most significant bit, a 1, gives you a "negative" number,
>>>> encoded i 1s and 0s. Fucking stupid. The question is about the
>>>> existence of negative numbers in physics, here computers. How can you
>>>> be this stupid, you idiot.
>>>
>>> You are missing still missing the whole point! Wow. Negative numbers
>>> exist, and can be encoded in a lot of different schemes, binary is one
>>> of
>>
>> not in physics, here computers, idiot. You encode them, which related
>> to moving a zero on a scale. But there are negative numbers in this
>> universe. What a fucking idiot we have here, ladies and gentlemen.
>
> Of course there are negative numbers, computers even need to be able to

if the negative do exists, then no need to encode them, you disgusting
uneducated sack of shit. Even your mother encodes naked, which she might
be not. You uneducated pile of shit. A zero is for instance in TTL, a 0.0
to 0.4V, then a one is considered from say 2.7 to 5V (TTL 5V). Depending
on manufacturer. You uneducated shit. I spit on shit.

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

>>>>> yes, you fucking imbecile, I was saying it above. There are no
>>>>> negative or imaginary numbers in computers, only higher level of
>>>>> interpretation.
>>>>> Ie the MSB, most significant bit, a 1, gives you a "negative"
>>>>> number,
>>>>> encoded i 1s and 0s. Fucking stupid. The question is about the
>>>>> existence of negative numbers in physics, here computers. How can
>>>>> you be this stupid, you idiot.
>>>>
>>>> You are missing still missing the whole point! Wow. Negative numbers
>>>> exist, and can be encoded in a lot of different schemes, binary is
>>>> one of
>>>
>>> not in physics, here computers, idiot. You encode them, which related
>>> to moving a zero on a scale. But there are negative numbers in this
>>> universe. What a fucking idiot we have here, ladies and gentlemen.
>>
>> "But there are *NO* negative numbers in this universe"
>
> One last response before I plonk...
> Tell the Bank that there is no such thing as negative numbers in the
> universe...

keep your stupid mouth shut, you stinking shit. The bank is doing the
same thing with morons like you. It's moving the zero on a scale. You
imbecile.

On 1/9/2022 5:42 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 1/9/2022 2:36 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> On 1/9/2022 5:24 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>
>>> Huh? What the heck are you talking about?
>>
>> You got suckered by the nymshifting troll.  Again.
>> It's only purpose in life is to mess up usenet discussions and create
>> noise.
>
> Yikes! Damn. Need to work on that. This nymshift seems to be dumber than
> the others. Humm...

There's probably an entire team of idiots behind the troll. It probably
operates elsewhere in other newsgroups/forums/chat rooms, I don't know.

The real question is does it (do they) work for Putin or the CCP? Since
the troll's poor English seems to have a slavic accent I'm guessing they
are Kremlin stooges.

Michael Moroney wrote:

>> On 1/9/2022 2:36 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:
>>> On 1/9/2022 5:24 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>
>>>> Huh? What the heck are you talking about?
>>>
>>> You got suckered by the nymshifting troll.  Again.
>>> It's only purpose in life is to mess up usenet discussions and create
>>> noise.
>>
>> Yikes! Damn. Need to work on that. This nymshift seems to be dumber
>> than the others. Humm...
>
> There's probably an entire team of idiots behind the troll. It probably
> operates elsewhere in other newsgroups/forums/chat rooms, I don't know.

Then you most likely have been proved an idiot by them all. Kiss their
asses, in a sentiment of consideration.

On 1/9/2022 5:50 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 1/9/2022 2:45 PM, Cody Alba wrote:
>> Cody Alba wrote:
>>
>>>>> yes, you fucking imbecile, I was saying it above. There are no
>>>>> negative or imaginary numbers in computers, only higher level of
>>>>> interpretation.
>>>>> Ie the MSB, most significant bit, a 1, gives you a "negative" number,
>>>>> encoded i 1s and 0s. Fucking stupid. The question is about the
>>>>> existence of negative numbers in physics, here computers. How can you
>>>>> be this stupid, you idiot.
>>>>
>>>> You are missing still missing the whole point! Wow. Negative numbers
>>>> exist, and can be encoded in a lot of different schemes, binary is one
>>>> of
>>>
>>> not in physics, here computers, idiot. You encode them, which related to
>>> moving a zero on a scale. But there are negative numbers in this
>>> universe. What a fucking idiot we have here, ladies and gentlemen.
>>
>> "But there are *NO* negative numbers in this universe"
>
> One last response before I plonk...

Of course the reason for the nymshifting is to evade the well-deserved
plonkings...
>
> Tell the Bank that there is no such thing as negative numbers in the
> universe...
>
> LOL! Moron. Good bye.

Until the next nymshift.

On 1/9/2022 3:40 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 1/9/2022 5:50 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 1/9/2022 2:45 PM, Cody Alba wrote:
>>> Cody Alba wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> yes, you fucking imbecile, I was saying it above. There are no
>>>>>> negative or imaginary numbers in computers, only higher level of
>>>>>> interpretation.
>>>>>> Ie the MSB, most significant bit, a 1, gives you a "negative" number,
>>>>>> encoded i 1s and 0s. Fucking stupid. The question is about the
>>>>>> existence of negative numbers in physics, here computers. How can you
>>>>>> be this stupid, you idiot.
>>>>>
>>>>> You are missing still missing the whole point! Wow. Negative numbers
>>>>> exist, and can be encoded in a lot of different schemes, binary is one
>>>>> of
>>>>
>>>> not in physics, here computers, idiot. You encode them, which
>>>> related to
>>>> moving a zero on a scale. But there are negative numbers in this
>>>> universe. What a fucking idiot we have here, ladies and gentlemen.
>>>
>>> "But there are *NO* negative numbers in this universe"
>>
>> One last response before I plonk...
>
> Of course the reason for the nymshifting is to evade the well-deserved
> plonkings...
>>
>> Tell the Bank that there is no such thing as negative numbers in the
>> universe...
>>
>> LOL! Moron. Good bye.
>
> Until the next nymshift.

Damn. Well, it seems to post with a pattern. I will try harder to identify.

imbecilic uneducated troll Michael Moroney wrote:

>>>> not in physics, here computers, idiot. You encode them, which related
>>>> to moving a zero on a scale. But there are negative numbers in this
>>>> universe. What a fucking idiot we have here, ladies and gentlemen.
>>>
>>> "But there are *NO* negative numbers in this universe"
>>
>> One last response before I plonk...
>
> Of course the reason for the nymshifting is to evade the well-deserved
> plonkings...

this morony imbecile is so stupid not knowing what he writes. Your stupid
wannabe "programmer" boyfriend is plonking, losing the argument, like the
stupid uneducated troll he is, then Dr. Cody Alba is "evading". You
inbreed imbecile, not knowing that binary is all about positive
quantities. You fool.

imbecilic uneducated troll, math illiterate, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

>>> Tell the Bank that there is no such thing as negative numbers in the
>>> universe...
>>>
>>> LOL! Moron. Good bye.
>>
>> Until the next nymshift.
>
> Damn. Well, it seems to post with a pattern. I will try harder to
> identify.

rather do your mother in she mouth, stupid troll. You are proved above an
imbecile, not even knowing the binaries are all about positive
quantities. You stupid indolent son of a bitch, wannabe a "programmer".

Tommy Read wrote:
> ... not knowing that binary is all about positive
> quantities.

Idiot, ignorant, self-immolating crank:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two%27s_complement

Python wrote:

> Tommy Read wrote:
>> ... not knowing that binary is all about positive quantities.
>
> Idiot, ignorant, self-immolating crank:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two%27s_complement

you fucking imbecile, that's just a shift in registers, all positive TTL
levels. You disgusting uneducated cretin. Everybody knows now what you
are, once again.

amazing the number of imbeciles in this forum.

uneducated frog, crank Python wrote:

> Tommy Read wrote:
>> ... not knowing that binary is all about positive quantities.
>
> Idiot, ignorant, self-immolating crank:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two%27s_complement

Decimal 7-bit notation 8-bit notation
−42  1010110 1101 0110
42  0101010 0010 1010

all positive quantities, cretin. You don't even know the threshold
levels. What a cretin.

Nym-shifting troll, aka Tommy Read wrote:
> uneducated frog, crank Python wrote:
>
>> Tommy Read wrote:
>>> ... not knowing that binary is all about positive quantities.
>>
>> Idiot, ignorant, self-immolating crank:
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two%27s_complement
>
> Decimal 7-bit notation 8-bit notation
> −42  1010110 1101 0110
> 42  0101010 0010 1010
>
> all positive quantities, cretin. You don't even know the threshold
> levels. What a cretin.

You've been kicked in the *ss again. Stop whining. You are
pathetic.

extreme crank, uneducated frog, nymshifting troll JPB, said Python wrote:
>> uneducated frog, crank Python wrote:
>>> Tommy Read wrote:
>>>> ... not knowing that binary is all about positive quantities.
>>>
>>> Idiot, ignorant, self-immolating crank:
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two%27s_complement
>>
>> Decimal 7-bit notation 8-bit notation
>> −42  1010110 1101 0110
>> 42  0101010 0010 1010
>>
>> all positive quantities, cretin. You don't even know the threshold
>> levels. What a cretin.
>
> You've been kicked in the *ss again. Stop whining. You are pathetic.

you fucking uneducated ass liking imbecile. Computers, CPUs, MCUs etc,
are not working on negative, decimal etc numbers. Only binary ONES and
ZEROS. You disgusting uneducated sack of shit. Your ass is kicked right
now by everybody. A register is about binary numbers, not negative, not
decimals.

Nym-shifting troll, aka Tommy Read schwrote:
> extreme crank, uneducated frog, nymshifting troll JPB, said Python wrote:
>>> uneducated frog, crank Python wrote:
>>>> Tommy Read wrote:
>>>>> ... not knowing that binary is all about positive quantities.
>>>>
>>>> Idiot, ignorant, self-immolating crank:
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two%27s_complement
>>>
>>> Decimal 7-bit notation 8-bit notation
>>> −42  1010110 1101 0110
>>> 42  0101010 0010 1010
>>>
>>> all positive quantities, cretin. You don't even know the threshold
>>> levels. What a cretin.
>>
>> You've been kicked in the *ss again. Stop whining. You are pathetic.
>
> [snip whining]

Stop whining, pathetic troll.

uneducated frog, nymshifting troll JPB, said Python, wrote:

>> extreme crank, uneducated frog, nymshifting troll JPB, said Python
>> wrote:
>>>> uneducated frog, crank Python wrote:
>>>>> Tommy Read wrote:
>>>>>> ... not knowing that binary is all about positive quantities.
>>>>>
>>>>> Idiot, ignorant, self-immolating crank:
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two%27s_complement
>>>>
>>>> Decimal 7-bit notation 8-bit notation −42  1010110
>>>> 1101 0110 42  0101010 0010 1010
>>>> all positive quantities, cretin.
>>>
>>> You've been kicked in the *ss agan. Stop whining. You are pathetic.
>>
>> [snip whining] Stop whining, pathetic troll.

you are the one whining, stupid frog. Proven by the stuff you delete. You
don't know what computers, CPUs, MCUs and registers are, you fucking
idiot.

super crank Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

>> not in physics, here computers, idiot. You encode them, which related
>> to moving a zero on a scale. But there are negative numbers in this
>> universe. What a fucking idiot we have here, ladies and gentlemen.
>
> Of course there are negative numbers, computers even need to be able to
> encode them. Blah! You cannot answer the main question, and basically
> hijacked the thread. Go away. Plonk.

amazing the number of imbeciles inhere, thinking CPUs works in decimal
negative numbers.

Shapes don't make you intelligent you moron...

On 1/10/2022 11:29 AM, Tommy Read wrote:
> super crank Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>
>>> not in physics, here computers, idiot. You encode them, which related
>>> to moving a zero on a scale. But there are negative numbers in this
>>> universe. What a fucking idiot we have here, ladies and gentlemen.
>>
>> Of course there are negative numbers, computers even need to be able to
>> encode them. Blah! You cannot answer the main question, and basically
>> hijacked the thread. Go away. Plonk.
>
> amazing the number of imbeciles inhere, thinking CPUs works in decimal
> negative numbers.

Plonking another nymshift! God damn it! Binary is just an encoding
technique! 2-ary. Ever heard of a ternary, or 3-ary computer? Never
mind, you clearly are suffering from something in the "mental" realm of
things... ;^D

On 1/9/2022 3:06 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 1/9/2022 5:42 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 1/9/2022 2:36 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:
>>> On 1/9/2022 5:24 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>
>>>> Huh? What the heck are you talking about?
>>>
>>> You got suckered by the nymshifting troll.  Again.
>>> It's only purpose in life is to mess up usenet discussions and create
>>> noise.
>>
>> Yikes! Damn. Need to work on that. This nymshift seems to be dumber
>> than the others. Humm...
>
> There's probably an entire team of idiots behind the troll. It probably
> operates elsewhere in other newsgroups/forums/chat rooms, I don't know.
>
> The real question is does it (do they) work for Putin or the CCP? Since
> the troll's poor English seems to have a slavic accent I'm guessing they
> are Kremlin stooges.

Well, humm... Would the CCP even hire a hardcore massive moron?
Interesting, thanks Michael. :^)

AI Bot called:

Stupidus Maximus version -56.22.11.2?

On 1/10/2022 10:48 AM, Python wrote:
> Nym-shifting troll, aka Tommy Read schwrote:
>> extreme crank, uneducated frog, nymshifting troll JPB, said Python wrote:
>>>> uneducated frog, crank Python wrote:
>>>>> Tommy Read wrote:
>>>>>> ... not knowing that binary is all about positive quantities.
>>>>>
>>>>> Idiot, ignorant, self-immolating crank:
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two%27s_complement
>>>>
>>>> Decimal     7-bit notation     8-bit notation
>>>> −42      1010110     1101 0110
>>>> 42          0101010     0010 1010
>>>>
>>>> all positive quantities, cretin. You don't even know the threshold
>>>> levels. What a cretin.
>>>
>>> You've been kicked in the *ss again. Stop whining. You are pathetic.
>>
>> [snip whining]
>
> Stop whining, pathetic troll.
>
>

Tommy Read, okay... Still fits the pattern of the radically ignorant
troll. Plonk that shit.

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

>> There's probably an entire team of idiots behind the troll. It probably
>> operates elsewhere in other newsgroups/forums/chat rooms, I don't know.
>> The real question is does it (do they) work for Putin or the CCP? Since
>> the troll's poor English seems to have a slavic accent I'm guessing
>> they are Kremlin stooges.
>
> Well, humm... Would the CCP even hire a hardcore massive moron?
> Interesting, thanks Michael. :^) AI Bot called:

just you a fucking imbecile, wannabe a "programmer", proclaiming CPUs and
MCUs are working in decimal negative numbers. You disgusting piece of
shit.

inbreed cretin Chris M. Thomasson evacuated:

>>>> not in physics, here computers, idiot. You encode them, which related
>>>> to moving a zero on a scale. But there are negative numbers in this
>>>> universe. What a fucking idiot we have here, ladies and gentlemen.
>>>
>>> Of course there are negative numbers, computers even need to be able
>>> to encode them. Blah! You cannot answer the main question, and
>>> basically hijacked the thread. Go away. Plonk.
>>
>> amazing the number of imbeciles inhere, thinking CPUs works in decimal
>> negative numbers.
>
> Plonking another nymshift! God damn it! Binary is just an encoding

you fucking lying imbecile, which bit in that bit-stream is negative? you
repugnant sack of subhuman excrement.

this cretin still believes CPUs and MCUs are working in decimal negative
numbers. *You_fucking_braindead_idiot*.

On 1/11/2022 11:34 AM, Oval Curd tarded:
> inbreed cretin Chris M. Thomasson evacuated:

>> Plonking another nymshift! God damn it! Binary is just an encoding
>
> you fucking lying imbecile, which bit in that bit-stream is negative? you

And so the nymshifter nymshifts yet again to evade the plonk.

On 1/9/2022 12:24 PM, Cody Alba wrote:
> Michael Moroney wrote:
>
>> On 1/9/2022 1:11 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Saturday, January 8, 2022 at 4:27:55 PM UTC-8, Michael Moroney
>>> wrote:
>>>> Funny we have Mitch who denies the existence of negative and imaginary
>>>> numbers, but knows what the Mandelbrot Set is...or does he?
>>>
>>> Zero math wins... yours is just imaginary...
>>>
>> Explain the Mandelbrot Set without any references to either imaginary or
>> negative numbers. You may start with the way it's plotted.
>
> nothing imaginary plotting numbers in computers, all real. And the
> negative are the registered data you subtract from the present, the
> difference. But without a buffer, here memory, there are no negative
> numbers, nor differences. You think like an ass.

Learn math you ass.