On 1/11/2022 8:30 AM, Oval Curd wrote:
> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>
>>> There's probably an entire team of idiots behind the troll. It probably
>>> operates elsewhere in other newsgroups/forums/chat rooms, I don't know.
>>> The real question is does it (do they) work for Putin or the CCP? Since
>>> the troll's poor English seems to have a slavic accent I'm guessing
>>> they are Kremlin stooges.
>>
>> Well, humm... Would the CCP even hire a hardcore massive moron?
>> Interesting, thanks Michael. :^) AI Bot called:
>
> just you a fucking imbecile, wannabe a "programmer", proclaiming CPUs and
> MCUs are working in decimal negative numbers. You disgusting piece of
> shit.

Plonk! Oh shit, should I keep a ledger, indexing:

nymshift[0] = plonk
nymshift[1] = plonk
nymshift[2] = plonk
nymshift[3] = plonk

LOL!

Carl Smith wrote:

>>>> Zero math wins... yours is just imaginary...
>>>>
>>> Explain the Mandelbrot Set without any references to either imaginary
>>> or negative numbers. You may start with the way it's plotted.
>>
>> nothing imaginary plotting numbers in computers, all real. And the
>> negative are the registered data you subtract from the present, the
>> difference. But without a buffer, here memory, there are no negative
>> numbers, nor differences. You think like an ass.
>
> Learn math you ass.

Yet another imbecile not knowing what is going on in mathematics done by
a computer. You fucking uneducated imbecile. Asking these morons about
math modelling and scientific computation, numeric analysis, errors etc,
just a waste of time.

you crackpot trolls around here are braindead imbeciles.

Michael Moroney wrote:

> On 1/11/2022 11:34 AM, Oval Curd tarded:
>> inbreed cretin Chris M. Thomasson evacuated:
>
>>> Plonking another nymshift! God damn it! Binary is just an encoding
>>
>> you fucking lying imbecile, which bit in that bit-stream is negative?
>> you
>
> And so the nymshifter nymshifts yet again to evade the plonk.

the loser of the argument is plonking, you uneducated wannabe math
imbecile. Your fucking brain is a failure.

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

>>> Well, humm... Would the CCP even hire a hardcore massive moron?
>>> Interesting, thanks Michael. :^) AI Bot called:
>>
>> just you a fucking imbecile, wannabe a "programmer", proclaiming CPUs
>> and MCUs are working in decimal negative numbers. You disgusting piece
>> of shit.
>
> Plonk! Oh shit, should I keep a ledger, indexing:

the proven crack, uneducated braindead imbecile is plonking, sensing the
crackpot he is, fucked up in the discussion.

that's troll's job to plonk, you fucking stupid. You lose, you plonk. You
repugnant bag of rocks.

On 1/12/2022 7:51 AM, Oval Curd wrote:
> Carl Smith wrote:
>
>>>>> Zero math wins... yours is just imaginary...
>>>>>
>>>> Explain the Mandelbrot Set without any references to either imaginary
>>>> or negative numbers. You may start with the way it's plotted.
>>>
>>> nothing imaginary plotting numbers in computers, all real. And the
>>> negative are the registered data you subtract from the present, the
>>> difference. But without a buffer, here memory, there are no negative
>>> numbers, nor differences. You think like an ass.
>>
>> Learn math you ass.
>
> Yet another imbecile not knowing what is going on in mathematics done by
> a computer. You fucking uneducated imbecile. Asking these morons about
> math modelling and scientific computation, numeric analysis, errors etc,
> just a waste of time.
>
> you crackpot trolls around here are braindead imbeciles.

Rolling eyes. Plonking yet another nymshift, Oval Curd lol. Take your
med's man!

Over and out.

On 1/11/2022 2:26 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 1/11/2022 11:34 AM, Oval Curd tarded:
>> inbreed cretin Chris M. Thomasson evacuated:
>
>>> Plonking another nymshift! God damn it! Binary is just an encoding
>>
>> you fucking lying imbecile, which bit in that bit-stream is negative? you
>
> And so the nymshifter nymshifts yet again to evade the plonk.

There is something wrong here. I wonder if it's some sort of
MORON_ai_BOT_2000? The ai is in lowercase for emphasis... ;^) Btw, this
should really piss it off... lol.

2-ary encoding can be accomplished with any two glyphs, as long as they
look different, so:

- and + can be the two glyphs used to encode binary.

0 and 1 can be used as well. ;^)

Oh, and I bet the "MORON_ai_BOT_2000" has never heard of arithmetic
encoding...

lol!

inbreed troll, crank Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

>> And so the nymshifter nymshifts yet again to evade the plonk.
>
> 2-ary encoding can be accomplished with any two glyphs, as long as they
> look different, so:

you two fucking braindead imbeciles, which bit inside that 2-complement
bit-stream is negative? CPUs and MCUs works in bits, you unemployable
idiot. Not in decimal negative numbers. Now piss off, cretin.