On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 11:07:30 AM UTC-7, tjrob137 wrote:

> You are apparently confusing elapsed proper time with "time dilation".
> Yes, the elapsed proper time of a clock is always monotonically
> increasing and never stops.
>
I already told the rabid crank exactly this , right at the top of the thread. Not that will make any difference.

On April 26, Richard Hertz wrote:
> You can't shrink biological entities, except in movies.

If every atom in your body shrunk by half, would it matter?
No problem, unless you play NBA.

So go ahead, buy a McLaren, you'll survive.

> I wonder how Darwin theory works on relativists.

Male peacocks grow large tails to compete for females.
But this behavior is inefficient, as it wastes calories. If they
all agreed to cut their tail lengths by half, they'd save calories,
while getting the same results.

So Darwin, with Einstein, tells us that length contraction can prove
selectively favorable.

Happily for homo sapiens, we have invented money, prices, and market
economics, which produces exactly such efficiency.

Except for the fact that much of the political class is ignorant of the
subject... which is understandable, as such learning is not to their profit -

--
Rich

On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 3:07:30 PM UTC-3, tjrob137 wrote:
> On 4/26/22 7:44 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > [...]
>
> ["reversible" is the wrong word, but I think I know what
> you mean.]
>
> "length contraction" and "time dilation" both go to zero when the
> relative velocity between object and observer/frame goes to zero.
>
> "Length contraction" is the difference in length measured by an
> observer/frame co-moving with a ruler and the length measured by an
> observer/frame relative to which the ruler is moving (along its length).
>
> "Time dilation" is the difference in tick interval of a clock measured
> by an observer/frame co-moving with the clock and its tick interval
> measured by an observer/frame relative to which the clock is moving.
>
> You are apparently confusing elapsed proper time with "time dilation".
> Yes, the elapsed proper time of a clock is always monotonically
> increasing and never stops.
>
> Here's a rather loose analogy: in your car, the speedometer
> measures a quantity analogous to "time dilation", while
> the odometer measures a quantity analogous to elapsed
> proper time.
>
> Tom Roberts

The problem with your post is that you seem to forget that any clock (mechanical or electronic)
has MEMORY, so even when it's used to measure the pass of time, what register is TIME DURATION, not TIME.

And unless some sort of universal genius can enlight to us, in the years to come, what TIME is, we are stuck with
Einstein's definition in 1905: TIME IS WHAT MY CLOCK SHOWS.

And this immortal definition ruins any attempt to apply SR, elapsed time or not, proper time or not.

So, relativists have to live with this SINGLE ASSERTION of what time is, derailing any meaningful application of relativity.

What is time IS NOT KNOWN, so you can't measure the unkown.

Now, if we are talking about TIME DURATION, we can use a mediating device like A CLOCK (of any kind).

On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 2:41:42 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 5:32:24 PM UTC-3, rotchm wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 12:59:56 PM UTC-4, Richard Hertz wrote:
> <snip>
> > > It's that OR you are completely DRUNK or very HIGH on heavy drugs, fucking junkie.
> > Do not project your faults onto others. That, you can discuss with your therapist.
> >
> > Seeing that everybody is against you in this thread, doesn't that show you that maybe perhaps you are the one who has the severe problem? Seriously, stop wasting time with me and go consult. That would be an efficient way for you to better yourself.
> Let me assert some subjects, many of which I've repeated many times:
>
> 1) Both SR and GR are pure metaphysics,

No, it's a common amateur error.

> with derivations assumed as if a pure mathematical development could have physical
> meanings,

And so is this. You simply don't know what special relativity is based on,
experimentally, and what went on before, for several decades.

> which have been proven false and based on delusional concepts,

No, none of those that went into relativity were.

> like working on space void of any matter/energy,
> which is clearly ridiculous.

The rest of your post is pure nonsense.

--
Jan

On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 5:01:19 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 8:43:17 PM UTC-3, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > On 4/27/2022 1:31 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 2:17:38 PM UTC-3, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > >> Must *really* suck to be you, obsessing over Einstein all the time.
> > >
> > > Moroney: I don't have dreams where I'm parading carrying the rainbow flag PROUDLY, as you do have for the last decade.
> > > Every night. And probably mounting an unicorn.
> > >
> > > Have you chosen your gender by now? Didn't your buddies at your gay bar advised what to do yet?
> > >
> > > Or you keep insisting into trying every gender combination, experimentally, until you make a choice?
> > >
> > > That's what guides your life. How come do you pretend to have a word on obsessions, technician?
> > >
> > As they say, insults are the last refuge when one has no more arguments.
> >
> > These are elementary school level insults anyway, just accuse your
> > opponent of being gay and therefore abnormal. For the record, my gender
> > is the one I was born with, male.
> >
> > You, on the other hand, do have a fixation on Einstein. From your posts,
> > you hate him, irrationally so, although he never did anything to harm
> > you. It is my opinion you should seek professional help for this
> > problem, and I do think it is a problem (obsession) for you whether
> > you'll admit it or not. I am not a professional myself, so all I have
> > are my opinions. But my #1 opinion is to just seek help.
> I have endless amount of arguments. I could write a fucking book just by editing relevant posts of mine in the last year.

Yes, it's called junk science. Many science cranks suffer from graphomania.

> But I find it much more entertaining to mock and troll imbeciles (and gays like you, Moroney).
>
> Regarding Einstein, I dispise the undeserved hype around the cretin, for 100 years.

He was a genius and you are a guy suffering from an obsession. It's not
anything terribly uncommon.

> But, as Heaviside said, Einstein is a cretin but he can't control einsteinichs, which are really fanatics. It's not Einstein's fault (1912).
>
> And Heaviside knew. After all, he derived SR and E:mc2 years before the cretin, and threw away all his work because he believed
> it was PURE CRAP. Same thing happened with Larmor, JJ Thomson, Rutherford....
>
> Hey, all of them anglo-saxons. Did they know relativity was a shitty thing years before the cretin?

You suffer from the OCD, just like the late Koobee here and a few other maniacs:
note, for example, that you cannot write the word "Einstein" without at the
same time inserting the word "cretin" nearby, no matter how often you have to do it.
Repetition of magic incantations like this is very characteristic.

That's why several people here recommend you seeing a doctor. What you suffer
from is benign in terms of its symptoms but it could have a more important underlying
cause. I'd check it out if I were you.

--
Jan

JanPB wrote:

>> Regarding Einstein, I dispise the undeserved hype around the cretin,
>> for 100 years.
>
> He was a genius and you are a guy suffering from an obsession. It's not
> anything terribly uncommon.

a "genius" that couldn't pass an exam in physics, engineering and
mathematics. No PhD or anything related. He stole the whole thing from the
patent office. Ink and paper included. Then his wife wrote done the whole
thing.

On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 5:08:13 PM UTC-3, Henry Sone wrote:
> JanPB wrote:
>
> >> Regarding Einstein, I dispise the undeserved hype around the cretin,
> >> for 100 years.
> >
> > He was a genius and you are a guy suffering from an obsession. It's not
> > anything terribly uncommon.
> a "genius" that couldn't pass an exam in physics, engineering and
> mathematics. No PhD or anything related. He stole the whole thing from the
> patent office. Ink and paper included. Then his wife wrote done the whole
> thing.

It's well known that his first wife, Mileva Maric, did write the 1905 papers and she was tutored by Willy Wien,
the arch-enemy of Planck and Chief Advisor of the Annalen der Physik in Berlin. She could travel to Berlin to
meet Wien, while the retarded was working at the patent office.

In the years after 1905, Einstein leaned toward leftist movements that supported the nascent LGTBQP front.
He couldn't help to be persuaded by such movement and secretly, actively, embraced a gayish position.

His second stage, around 1912, involved his other "wife" (Marcel Grossman), who had felt in love with him
at the Polytechnic (the same with Michell Besso).

They both wrote the backbone of General Relativity, even when Besso failed (along with Einstein) to use it
on the Mercury's problem, around 1913. Curiously, and feeling betrayed by Einstein, Besso hide the 54 pages
manuscript of the calculations of Mercury perihelion advance until his death, in 1954.

Grossman felt betrayed too, but both kept it secret until their deaths. Einstein RUN to Berlin in March 1914, leaving
both into the dust left by his escape, and then WWI began.

Einstein turned into Schwarzschild, as his tutor, Lorentz as his PR Director and Planck as his main supporter. They
arranged the connections to Levi-Civita (at Northern Italy) and Hilbert (by Schwarzschild, at Goettingen), whom
provided Einstein 99% of the corrections of Grossman's 1913-1914 Entwurf.

I showed here, about 1 year ago, which was the stupid content of the Besso Manuscript (which he hide on purpose),
as a proof that what Einstein presented in November 1915 is like something written by an entirely different person
(which was Schwarzschild, his tutor and patron in Berlin).

At any case, in both theories (SR and GR) two different sexual partners were involved (Mileva and Marcel). Einstein
was a corrupt, ambitious and degenerate person, who didn't had limits to pursue his goals of fame and money.

He sold his soul to the devil (the cabal), and they buried any inconvenient fact. They needed a fucking icon. They even
designed Einstein's look since 1911, like Brian Epstein designed the look of The Beatles 50 years later. Another sex affair.

To save face, Einstein "married" his first cousin, prior to his world tour. Being homo was very unpopular for someone
that was going to be the spokesperson of the cabal.

But I stop here, because I'm bored with this shit,

Moroney is the expert in this sort of things, so he could explain this much better, only if he could get out of his "online closet".

On 4/27/2022 8:01 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 8:43:17 PM UTC-3, Michael Moroney wrote:

>> You, on the other hand, do have a fixation on Einstein. From your posts,
>> you hate him, irrationally so, although he never did anything to harm
>> you. It is my opinion you should seek professional help for this
>> problem, and I do think it is a problem (obsession) for you whether
>> you'll admit it or not. I am not a professional myself, so all I have
>> are my opinions. But my #1 opinion is to just seek help.
>
> I have endless amount of arguments. I could write a fucking book just by editing relevant posts of mine in the last year.

That doesn't help with your obsession with Einstein. In fact, it would
make it worse.
>
> Regarding Einstein, I dispise the undeserved hype around the cretin, for 100 years.

And that's your problem. And blame the media for the hype, they tripped
over each other praising him for the 1919 eclipse results.
>
> But, as Heaviside said, Einstein is a cretin but he can't control einsteinichs, which are really fanatics. It's not Einstein's fault (1912).
>
> And Heaviside knew. After all, he derived SR and E:mc2 years before the cretin, and threw away all his work because he believed
> it was PURE CRAP. Same thing happened with Larmor, JJ Thomson, Rutherford....
>
> Hey, all of them anglo-saxons. Did they know relativity was a shitty thing years before the cretin?
>
>
> P.S.: writing this, I saw your last post. Still gayish.
>
>
>
>

On 4/28/2022 3:25 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 3:07:30 PM UTC-3, tjrob137 wrote:
>> On 4/26/22 7:44 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>> ["reversible" is the wrong word, but I think I know what
>> you mean.]
>>
>> "length contraction" and "time dilation" both go to zero when the
>> relative velocity between object and observer/frame goes to zero.
>>
>> "Length contraction" is the difference in length measured by an
>> observer/frame co-moving with a ruler and the length measured by an
>> observer/frame relative to which the ruler is moving (along its length).
>>
>> "Time dilation" is the difference in tick interval of a clock measured
>> by an observer/frame co-moving with the clock and its tick interval
>> measured by an observer/frame relative to which the clock is moving.
>>
>> You are apparently confusing elapsed proper time with "time dilation".
>> Yes, the elapsed proper time of a clock is always monotonically
>> increasing and never stops.
>>
>> Here's a rather loose analogy: in your car, the speedometer
>> measures a quantity analogous to "time dilation", while
>> the odometer measures a quantity analogous to elapsed
>> proper time.
>>
>> Tom Roberts
>
> The problem with your post is that you seem to forget that any clock (mechanical or electronic)
> has MEMORY, so even when it's used to measure the pass of time, what register is TIME DURATION, not TIME.

Which is like the odometer of a car, as Tom stated. The odometer has a
memory and is constantly incrementing like a clock.
Meanwhile the speedometer has no memory of the speed 10 seconds ago,
even if it shows the contribution to the miles racked up on the odometer.
>
> And unless some sort of universal genius can enlight to us, in the years to come, what TIME is, we are stuck with
> Einstein's definition in 1905: TIME IS WHAT MY CLOCK SHOWS.

And distance is what the odometer shows.
Clock time isn't time dilation.
>
> And this immortal definition ruins any attempt to apply SR, elapsed time or not, proper time or not.
>
> So, relativists have to live with this SINGLE ASSERTION of what time is, derailing any meaningful application of relativity.
>
> What is time IS NOT KNOWN, so you can't measure the unkown.
>
> Now, if we are talking about TIME DURATION, we can use a mediating device like A CLOCK (of any kind).
>

As I just stated, you make up your own "facts" as to what relativity
states, and then attack these false "facts".

Dono. wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 9:01:43 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Dono. wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, April 26, 2022 at 10:45:54 PM UTC-7, odious kapo Richard Hertz ate some more shit:
> > >
> > > > I don't confuse shit!
> > >
> > > You get to eat it, Dick. Every time you open your mouth.
> > You have to watch out Dono who you go after...
> >
> > Richard Hertz has a German aggresive mentality (according to eistein's
> > study of german people's mentality).
> >
>
> I get the Dick odious kapo (he's Jewish, not German) to swallow shit every time he opens his mouth. This is fun.

i thought You were a Kike....will the real Kike please stand up?

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 2:11:21 PM UTC-7, odious kapo Richard Hertz kept licking nazi boots:

> It's well known that his first wife, Mileva Maric, did write the 1905 papers".

This is an old trope propagated by nazis. Odious kapo Dick Hertz enjoys licking nazi boots.

On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 8:20:59 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:

<snip>

> > It's well known that his first wife, Mileva Maric, did write the 1905 papers".
>
> This is an old trope propagated by nazis. Odious kapo Dick Hertz enjoys licking nazi boots.

Tell me Dono(Adrian), and I write this WITH MUCH CARE:

How do you feel about Zelensky, the nazi jew king at Ukraine?

Because he's a fucking nazi, a despicable "meat grinder" nazi who doesn't care about how many Ukranians is sending to death, and he's
a proud Jew, with 800 MM$ in caribean banks (Pandora's papers).

Do you call him a kapo? A nazi and a Jew.

Tell me what do you think about him, a Bandera's worshipper.

Is he a kapo?

Or he's a fucking neonazi?

On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 6:55:23 PM UTC-3, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 4/28/2022 3:25 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 3:07:30 PM UTC-3, tjrob137 wrote:
> >> On 4/26/22 7:44 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> >>> [...]
> >>
> >> ["reversible" is the wrong word, but I think I know what
> >> you mean.]
> >>
> >> "length contraction" and "time dilation" both go to zero when the
> >> relative velocity between object and observer/frame goes to zero.
> >>
> >> "Length contraction" is the difference in length measured by an
> >> observer/frame co-moving with a ruler and the length measured by an
> >> observer/frame relative to which the ruler is moving (along its length).
> >>
> >> "Time dilation" is the difference in tick interval of a clock measured
> >> by an observer/frame co-moving with the clock and its tick interval
> >> measured by an observer/frame relative to which the clock is moving.
> >>
> >> You are apparently confusing elapsed proper time with "time dilation".
> >> Yes, the elapsed proper time of a clock is always monotonically
> >> increasing and never stops.
> >>
> >> Here's a rather loose analogy: in your car, the speedometer
> >> measures a quantity analogous to "time dilation", while
> >> the odometer measures a quantity analogous to elapsed
> >> proper time.
> >>
> >> Tom Roberts
> >
> > The problem with your post is that you seem to forget that any clock (mechanical or electronic)
> > has MEMORY, so even when it's used to measure the pass of time, what register is TIME DURATION, not TIME.
> Which is like the odometer of a car, as Tom stated. The odometer has a
> memory and is constantly incrementing like a clock.
> Meanwhile the speedometer has no memory of the speed 10 seconds ago,
> even if it shows the contribution to the miles racked up on the odometer.
> >
> > And unless some sort of universal genius can enlight to us, in the years to come, what TIME is, we are stuck with
> > Einstein's definition in 1905: TIME IS WHAT MY CLOCK SHOWS.
> And distance is what the odometer shows.
> Clock time isn't time dilation.
> >
> > And this immortal definition ruins any attempt to apply SR, elapsed time or not, proper time or not.
> >
> > So, relativists have to live with this SINGLE ASSERTION of what time is, derailing any meaningful application of relativity.
> >
> > What is time IS NOT KNOWN, so you can't measure the unkown.
> >
> > Now, if we are talking about TIME DURATION, we can use a mediating device like A CLOCK (of any kind).
> >
> As I just stated, you make up your own "facts" as to what relativity
> states, and then attack these false "facts".

IMBECILE!

Any clock resets itself to 00:00:00.00000000 after 86,400.00000 seconds (or 43,200.0000 seconds),
as a clock DOESN'T ACCUMULATE TIME as an odometer accumulates distance. A clock measures TIME DURATION, not TIME.

Go back in time and tell to your pagan god Einstein that he fucked up his 1905 paper just at the beginning, when he wrote:

"TIME IS WHAT YOUR CLOCK SHOWS".

And he fucked up even more a couple of pages after, when he wrote about clocks OUT OF SYNC in the moving frame.

I can't believe that I have to rub your nose with such fundamental assertions that the imbecile that you worship wrote 117 years ago.

But, as a relativist, you'll LIE, DENY, TWIST, RETORT THINGS. You'll deceive and be kept deceived before admitting that relativity
is an ABSOLUTE pile of metaphysical crap. A fucking PSEUDOSCIENCE, with no real value in our world. NEVER, EVER.

On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 1:08:13 PM UTC-7, Henry Sone wrote:
> JanPB wrote:
>
> >> Regarding Einstein, I dispise the undeserved hype around the cretin,
> >> for 100 years.
> >
> > He was a genius and you are a guy suffering from an obsession. It's not
> > anything terribly uncommon.
> a "genius" that couldn't pass an exam in physics, engineering and
> mathematics. No PhD or anything related. He stole the whole thing from the
> patent office. Ink and paper included.

Nobody cares about that. Freeman Dyson did not have a PhD either.
What counts is the results he got.

> Then his wife wrote done the whole thing.

No, this has been debunked. Besides, she was out of the picture when he
worked out general relativity which required a lot of inspiration and
genius at the time.

When you have to make up lies just to keep your emotions in balance,
something is wrong.

--
Jan

On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 4:56:46 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 8:20:59 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
>
> <snip>
> > > It's well known that his first wife, Mileva Maric, did write the 1905 papers".
> >
> > This is an old trope propagated by nazis. Odious kapo Dick Hertz enjoys licking nazi boots.

Dick,

You tried to change the subject, the subject is that you lied about "Mileva writing Einstein's 1905 papers". Keep licking nazi boots, odious kapo. Does your rabbi know? How about the Buenos Aires Jewish community? Do they know what a piece of shit you are?

On 4/28/2022 8:11 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 6:55:23 PM UTC-3, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> On 4/28/2022 3:25 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
>>> On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 3:07:30 PM UTC-3, tjrob137 wrote:
>>>> On 4/26/22 7:44 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> ["reversible" is the wrong word, but I think I know what
>>>> you mean.]
>>>>
>>>> "length contraction" and "time dilation" both go to zero when the
>>>> relative velocity between object and observer/frame goes to zero.
>>>>
>>>> "Length contraction" is the difference in length measured by an
>>>> observer/frame co-moving with a ruler and the length measured by an
>>>> observer/frame relative to which the ruler is moving (along its length).
>>>>
>>>> "Time dilation" is the difference in tick interval of a clock measured
>>>> by an observer/frame co-moving with the clock and its tick interval
>>>> measured by an observer/frame relative to which the clock is moving.
>>>>
>>>> You are apparently confusing elapsed proper time with "time dilation".
>>>> Yes, the elapsed proper time of a clock is always monotonically
>>>> increasing and never stops.
>>>>
>>>> Here's a rather loose analogy: in your car, the speedometer
>>>> measures a quantity analogous to "time dilation", while
>>>> the odometer measures a quantity analogous to elapsed
>>>> proper time.
>>>>
>>>> Tom Roberts
>>>
>>> The problem with your post is that you seem to forget that any clock (mechanical or electronic)
>>> has MEMORY, so even when it's used to measure the pass of time, what register is TIME DURATION, not TIME.
>> Which is like the odometer of a car, as Tom stated. The odometer has a
>> memory and is constantly incrementing like a clock.
>> Meanwhile the speedometer has no memory of the speed 10 seconds ago,
>> even if it shows the contribution to the miles racked up on the odometer.
>>>
>>> And unless some sort of universal genius can enlight to us, in the years to come, what TIME is, we are stuck with
>>> Einstein's definition in 1905: TIME IS WHAT MY CLOCK SHOWS.
>> And distance is what the odometer shows.
>> Clock time isn't time dilation.
>>>
>>> And this immortal definition ruins any attempt to apply SR, elapsed time or not, proper time or not.
>>>
>>> So, relativists have to live with this SINGLE ASSERTION of what time is, derailing any meaningful application of relativity.
>>>
>>> What is time IS NOT KNOWN, so you can't measure the unkown.
>>>
>>> Now, if we are talking about TIME DURATION, we can use a mediating device like A CLOCK (of any kind).
>>>
>> As I just stated, you make up your own "facts" as to what relativity
>> states, and then attack these false "facts".
>
> IMBECILE!

Why yes, that's what you are!
>
> Any clock resets itself to 00:00:00.00000000 after 86,400.00000 seconds (or 43,200.0000 seconds),

Not "any" clock, only the common 24/12 hour clocks. Any clock which
also maintains the date does not completely reset every 24 hours, as it
increments the date. (and yes, the date is part of the time). Special
purpose clocks have their own, umm, special purposes.

I help develop a computer operating system. It has a binary clock which
could run for millennia. I have to deal with it occasionally.

All a clock is is a counter of some sort connected to a very stable
oscillator. Didn't you claim to be an EE? This is actually foreign to you?

> as a clock DOESN'T ACCUMULATE TIME

But they do!

> as an odometer accumulates distance.

When I was a kid, a car's odometer would reset to 00000.0 miles after
99999.9 miles. It was often an event to watch the odometer "roll over"
to 00000.0 miles. These days almost all cars won't "roll over" until 1
million miles, and few cars ever make it that far.

> A clock measures TIME DURATION, not TIME.

Isn't that the point? Of course NTP powered clocks can get the
time/date and are always accurate.

Anyway, time dilation applies to a clock's tick rate, not the
accumulated time. Just as length contraction applies to the length of a
measuring rod, not to an odometer (accumulated distance).
>
> Go back in time and tell to your pagan god Einstein that he fucked up his 1905 paper just at the beginning, when he wrote:
>
> "TIME IS WHAT YOUR CLOCK SHOWS".

With a caveat of, as long as your clock doesn't reset/have its hour hand
go all the way around before you're done with it. As long as that's the
case, he's 100% correct, as usual.
>
> And he fucked up even more a couple of pages after, when he wrote about clocks OUT OF SYNC in the moving frame.

Ummm, that was part of what he was proving! Apparently you don't even
understand that. No wonder you're so confused!
>
> I can't believe that I have to rub your nose with such fundamental assertions that the imbecile that you worship wrote 117 years ago.
>
> But, as a relativist, you'll LIE, DENY, TWIST, RETORT THINGS. You'll deceive and be kept deceived before admitting that relativity
> is an ABSOLUTE pile of metaphysical crap. A fucking PSEUDOSCIENCE, with no real value in our world. NEVER, EVER.
>

As an OCD sufferer, you'll LIE, DENY, TWIST, RETORT THINGS. You'll
deceive and be kept deceived before admitting that relativity is an
excellent science. A fucking REAL SCIENCE, with real value in our world.
All because of something wrong in your head where you hate Einstein for
no reason whatsoever.

On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 11:01:32 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:

<snip>

> Dick,
>
> You tried to change the subject, the subject is that you lied about "Mileva writing Einstein's 1905 papers". Keep licking nazi boots, odious kapo. Does your rabbi know? How about the Buenos Aires Jewish community? Do they know what a piece of shit you are?

ARE YOU THREATENING ME, FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT?

ARE YOU REALLY THREATENING ME?

ARE YOU GOING TO PUT "A CONTRACT" ON ME, SCUMBAG?

GIVEN WHO YOU ARE, THIS IS A CLEAR AND PRESENT MENACE.

DIPSHIT.

On 4/28/2022 11:15 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 11:01:32 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> Dick,
>>
>> You tried to change the subject, the subject is that you lied about "Mileva writing Einstein's 1905 papers". Keep licking nazi boots, odious kapo. Does your rabbi know? How about the Buenos Aires Jewish community? Do they know what a piece of shit you are?
>
> ARE YOU THREATENING ME, FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT?
>
> ARE YOU REALLY THREATENING ME?
>
> ARE YOU GOING TO PUT "A CONTRACT" ON ME, SCUMBAG?
>
> GIVEN WHO YOU ARE, THIS IS A CLEAR AND PRESENT MENACE.
>
> DIPSHIT.

What the devil is this?????????

On Friday, 29 April 2022 at 05:11:15 UTC+2, Michael Moroney wrote:

> Anyway, time dilation applies to a clock's tick rate, not the
> accumulated time.

Imagined by your idiot guru and described in your
Holy Scripts time dilation is opposite, stupid Mike.
And any of your fellow idiots can explain you that
time dilation means differences in elapsed time.

Your mind is - simply - polluted with some common
sense prejudices.

On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 9:15:44 PM UTC-7, odious kapo Richard Hertz blew a gasket:
> On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 11:01:32 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
>
> <snip>
> > Dick,
> >
> > You tried to change the subject, the subject is that you lied about "Mileva writing Einstein's 1905 papers". Keep licking nazi boots, odious kapo. Does your rabbi know? How about the Buenos Aires Jewish community? Do they know what a piece of shit you are?
> ARE YOU THREATENING ME, FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT?
>
> ARE YOU REALLY THREATENING ME?
>
> ARE YOU GOING TO PUT "A CONTRACT" ON ME, SCUMBAG?
>
Easy, Dick, easy

You are going to have a conniption once again. Nurse, impatient Richard Hertz needs his meds.

On 4/29/2022 12:15 AM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 11:01:32 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> Dick,
>>
>> You tried to change the subject, the subject is that you lied about "Mileva writing Einstein's 1905 papers". Keep licking nazi boots, odious kapo. Does your rabbi know? How about the Buenos Aires Jewish community? Do they know what a piece of shit you are?
>
> ARE YOU THREATENING ME, FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT?
>
> ARE YOU REALLY THREATENING ME?
>
> ARE YOU GOING TO PUT "A CONTRACT" ON ME, SCUMBAG?
>
> GIVEN WHO YOU ARE, THIS IS A CLEAR AND PRESENT MENACE.
>
> DIPSHIT.

Quick! Get the tranquilizer dart gun and the rhinoceros tranquilizer
darts! Richard's having another autism meltdown again!

On Friday, April 29, 2022 at 1:26:16 AM UTC-7, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 4/29/2022 12:15 AM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 11:01:32 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >> Dick,
> >>
> >> You tried to change the subject, the subject is that you lied about "Mileva writing Einstein's 1905 papers". Keep licking nazi boots, odious kapo.. Does your rabbi know? How about the Buenos Aires Jewish community? Do they know what a piece of shit you are?
> >
> > ARE YOU THREATENING ME, FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT?
> >
> > ARE YOU REALLY THREATENING ME?

> Quick! Get the tranquilizer dart gun and the rhinoceros tranquilizer
> darts! Richard's having another autism meltdown again!
I'd say we leave Dick alone, to froth at the mouth and choke on his bile.

Dono. <eggy20011951@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, April 29, 2022 at 1:26:16 AM UTC-7, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> On 4/29/2022 12:15 AM, Richard Hertz wrote:
>>> On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 11:01:32 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>> Dick,
>>>>
>>>> You tried to change the subject, the subject is that you lied about
>>>> "Mileva writing Einstein's 1905 papers". Keep licking nazi boots,
>>>> odious kapo. Does your rabbi know? How about the Buenos Aires Jewish
>>>> community? Do they know what a piece of shit you are?
>>>
>>> ARE YOU THREATENING ME, FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT?
>>>
>>> ARE YOU REALLY THREATENING ME?
>
>> Quick! Get the tranquilizer dart gun and the rhinoceros tranquilizer
>> darts! Richard's having another autism meltdown again!
> I'd say we leave Dick alone, to froth at the mouth and choke on his bile.
>

I don’t know…. It’s an awfully big red button … hard not to poke it just to
see what it does.

--
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

On Friday, April 29, 2022 at 7:09:55 AM UTC-7, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> Dono. <eggy20...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Friday, April 29, 2022 at 1:26:16 AM UTC-7, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >> On 4/29/2022 12:15 AM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 11:01:32 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
> >>>
> >>> <snip>
> >>>
> >>>> Dick,
> >>>>
> >>>> You tried to change the subject, the subject is that you lied about
> >>>> "Mileva writing Einstein's 1905 papers". Keep licking nazi boots,
> >>>> odious kapo. Does your rabbi know? How about the Buenos Aires Jewish
> >>>> community? Do they know what a piece of shit you are?
> >>>
> >>> ARE YOU THREATENING ME, FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT?
> >>>
> >>> ARE YOU REALLY THREATENING ME?
> >
> >> Quick! Get the tranquilizer dart gun and the rhinoceros tranquilizer
> >> darts! Richard's having another autism meltdown again!
> > I'd say we leave Dick alone, to froth at the mouth and choke on his bile.
> >
> I don’t know…. It’s an awfully big red button … hard not to poke it just to
> see what it does.
>
> --
> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Nuclear meltdown. Fun to watch.

On Friday, April 29, 2022 at 11:44:35 AM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
> On Friday, April 29, 2022 at 7:09:55 AM UTC-7, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Dono. <eggy20...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Friday, April 29, 2022 at 1:26:16 AM UTC-7, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > >> On 4/29/2022 12:15 AM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > >>> On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 11:01:32 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:

<snip>

> > >>>> Dick,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> You tried to change the subject, the subject is that you lied about
> > >>>> "Mileva writing Einstein's 1905 papers". Keep licking nazi boots,
> > >>>> odious kapo. Does your rabbi know? How about the Buenos Aires Jewish
> > >>>> community? Do they know what a piece of shit you are?
> > >>>
> > >>> ARE YOU THREATENING ME, FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT?
> > >>>
> > >>> ARE YOU REALLY THREATENING ME?
> > >
> > >> Quick! Get the tranquilizer dart gun and the rhinoceros tranquilizer
> > >> darts! Richard's having another autism meltdown again!
> > > I'd say we leave Dick alone, to froth at the mouth and choke on his bile.
> > >
> > I don’t know…. It’s an awfully big red button … hard not to poke it just to
> > see what it does.
> >
> > --
> > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

> Nuclear meltdown. Fun to watch.

Be careful with what you write, Romanian ex-pat.

Did you manage to "design" your 4D graphic subsystem in order to render space-time crap around the Sun?

Fucking faggot, keep worshiping your pagan god like the other members of the hyena's pack do (Bodkin and Moroney).

Your psychopath meltdowns are stored here by the hundred. Remember accusing me of impersonating Wooble Kooble?
Or the Italian guy C. Corda?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Piece of shit Richard Hertz impersonates Christian Corda
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/vgr-cISF14Y/m/tjHQPLrvCQAJ

Dono., Sep 16, 2021, 11:32:27 AM
Richard,

You just reached a new low by creating a fake persona and pretending to be Christian Corda. You did the same thing before, by resurrecting Koobee Wublee from the dead. You are the lowest scumbag and you are not fooling anybody.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Paranoid psychopath, always on a brink of a nervous breakdown, because you live a life of lies and deceptions.

And I insist, your fucking pagan god was a fraudster and didn't write any of the 1905 papers. He was a fucking puppet of the cabal.

Mileva IQ was far above Albert's one. That's why he stuck with her for years, until he left her dry of will, while he enjoyed the good life.

Why do you identify with such a scumbag? Because of similarities in behavior?

Old useless fart, venting your hate at this site for 16 years. But things never last forever.

You are clearly declining. Tired or frustrated for aging badly?