Ricky <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote in news:d9f367bc-5209-
47ee-8e7c-aba045ffe468n@googlegroups.com:

>> What sort of crazy thinks you are better than everyone else are you
>> using?
>
> Sorry? Can you say that again in English?

You're a fucking idiot.

What sort of "crazy (asswipe) that thinks you are better than
everyone else" are you using.

There, fucktard. I didn't realize that you can spout retarded stupid
shit, but cannot grasp when the same retarded phrase you use is used to
point out that you ain't all that. Damn you're stupid, boy.

English enough for you, twerp? CCAD, dipshit.

Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
> On Friday, April 15, 2022 at 7:24:58 AM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
>> Bertrand Sindri <bertran...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > In sci.electronics.design John Doe <alway...@message.header> wrote:
>> >> And I have observed a radical decrease in nym-shifting over a
>> >> long period of time. They love(d) the masquerade. I love(d) the
>> >> mystery.
>> >
>> > Coorelation is not causation. Your "observed radical decrease"
>> > could just as easily be explained by the gradual reduction in use
>> > of USENET with the resulting few remaining members simply not
>> > being the ones that nym-shifted (i.e., the nym-shifting trolls
>> > abandoned USENET for Reddit or other web locales). And in fact, a
>> > reduction in nym-shifting being caused by a substantial reduction
>> > in USENET usage is much more likely the cause than anything you
>> > did, or did not, do yourself.
>> >
>
>>When you refute its lies, it simply makes up more lies to cover those
>>prior lies. It's fiction never end...
>
> John Doe has never refuted any lie here. He has claimed that any
> number of factually correct statements are lies - which lying about
> them, rather than refuting them. Granting that he's an obviously
> deluded idiot, he may think that he is "refuting lies" rather than
> denying that he's wrong, but he is still a liar, even if he too dim
> to realise it.

And he seems to retreat to name calling anytime he is cornered and has
no way out, such as the above. It is quite conceited of him to assert
that his 'exposing' nym-shifting is somehow singularly responsible for
his supposed observation of a reduction in the same. If anything, his
observation is more likely confirmation bias than anything. He started
expending effort in 'exposing nym-shifting'. As a result, in order to
not feel he was wasting his time, his sub-conscious believed it also
witnessed a reduction in nym-shifting. Actual reality is his one
person jihad on 'nym-shifting' likely had zero impact on anything, and
when presented with a logical argument to that effect, he immediately
retreats to name calling to avoid believing that he has been needlessly
expending effort for naught over all this time.

On 4/15/22 06:07, Bertrand Sindri wrote:
> Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
>> On Friday, April 15, 2022 at 7:24:58 AM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
>>> Bertrand Sindri <bertran...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> In sci.electronics.design John Doe <alway...@message.header> wrote:
>>>>> And I have observed a radical decrease in nym-shifting over a
>>>>> long period of time. They love(d) the masquerade. I love(d) the
>>>>> mystery.
>>>>
>>>> Coorelation is not causation. Your "observed radical decrease"
>>>> could just as easily be explained by the gradual reduction in use
>>>> of USENET with the resulting few remaining members simply not
>>>> being the ones that nym-shifted (i.e., the nym-shifting trolls
>>>> abandoned USENET for Reddit or other web locales). And in fact, a
>>>> reduction in nym-shifting being caused by a substantial reduction
>>>> in USENET usage is much more likely the cause than anything you
>>>> did, or did not, do yourself.
>>>>
>>
>>> When you refute its lies, it simply makes up more lies to cover those
>>> prior lies. It's fiction never end...
>>
>> John Doe has never refuted any lie here. He has claimed that any
>> number of factually correct statements are lies - which lying about
>> them, rather than refuting them. Granting that he's an obviously
>> deluded idiot, he may think that he is "refuting lies" rather than
>> denying that he's wrong, but he is still a liar, even if he too dim
>> to realise it.
>
> And he seems to retreat to name calling anytime he is cornered and has
> no way out, such as the above. It is quite conceited of him to assert
> that his 'exposing' nym-shifting is somehow singularly responsible for
> his supposed observation of a reduction in the same. If anything, his
> observation is more likely confirmation bias than anything. He started
> expending effort in 'exposing nym-shifting'. As a result, in order to
> not feel he was wasting his time, his sub-conscious believed it also
> witnessed a reduction in nym-shifting. Actual reality is his one
> person jihad on 'nym-shifting' likely had zero impact on anything, and
> when presented with a logical argument to that effect, he immediately
> retreats to name calling to avoid believing that he has been needlessly
> expending effort for naught over all this time.

The netcop wannabe is also a nym-shifting troll, banned by Google.

OT: Easiest way to make new anonymous YouTube accounts?
http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3Crrdplt%249r9%241%40dont-email.me%3E

On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 20:28:59 -0000 (UTC), Bertrand Sindri
<bertrand.sindri@yahoo.com> wrote:

>In sci.electronics.design John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:
>> It's simple logic. If you expose nym-shifting, it's less likely to
>> continue.
>
>The logic does not follow from what little evidence/argument you have
>presented.

Really, there is an infinite supply of these nymby old hens who are
only here to cluck and pollute an electronic design group.

Ignore them!

--

If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end with doubts,
but if he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties.
Francis Bacon

Cydrome Leader wrote:
> jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 17:09:10 +0100, Martin Brown
>> <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> On 13/04/2022 16:01, John Doe wrote:
>>>> Is there a single key calculation for the reciprocal of a number on a typical
>>>> scientific calculator?
>>>
>>> Usually. On mine "1/x" is next to sin, cos, tan.
>>>
>>> InverseTrig "1/x" is cuberoot!
>>>>
>>>> Is there some symbol besides "1/x" to look for?
>>>
>>> divide = =
>>>
>>> Will get you a functional equivalent for a single number.
>>
>> My first calc was an HP35 ($400 at the time, the cost of a Honda S90
>> motorcycle) so I'm a RPN slave. I buy old 32S2's now.
>
> I use a new 35s. RPN really is cool, and prevents people from borrowing
> your calculator.
>
>> I need a good HP emulator for my Samsung phone. Any recommendations?
>
> I can't put my finger on why, but the samsung calculator is annoying.
>
I just keep buying HP41s of various flavours. I'm on my third since
1979, not bad.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

(Who wrote a lot of calculator code between 1976 and about 1983.)

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com

On Friday, April 15, 2022 at 9:07:37 AM UTC-4, Bertrand Sindri wrote:
> Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
> > On Friday, April 15, 2022 at 7:24:58 AM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
> >> Bertrand Sindri <bertran...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> > In sci.electronics.design John Doe <alway...@message.header> wrote:
> >> >> And I have observed a radical decrease in nym-shifting over a
> >> >> long period of time. They love(d) the masquerade. I love(d) the
> >> >> mystery.
> >> >
> >> > Coorelation is not causation. Your "observed radical decrease"
> >> > could just as easily be explained by the gradual reduction in use
> >> > of USENET with the resulting few remaining members simply not
> >> > being the ones that nym-shifted (i.e., the nym-shifting trolls
> >> > abandoned USENET for Reddit or other web locales). And in fact, a
> >> > reduction in nym-shifting being caused by a substantial reduction
> >> > in USENET usage is much more likely the cause than anything you
> >> > did, or did not, do yourself.
> >> >
> >
> >>When you refute its lies, it simply makes up more lies to cover those
> >>prior lies. It's fiction never end...
> >
> > John Doe has never refuted any lie here. He has claimed that any
> > number of factually correct statements are lies - which lying about
> > them, rather than refuting them. Granting that he's an obviously
> > deluded idiot, he may think that he is "refuting lies" rather than
> > denying that he's wrong, but he is still a liar, even if he too dim
> > to realise it.
> And he seems to retreat to name calling anytime he is cornered and has
> no way out, such as the above. It is quite conceited of him to assert
> that his 'exposing' nym-shifting is somehow singularly responsible for
> his supposed observation of a reduction in the same. If anything, his
> observation is more likely confirmation bias than anything. He started
> expending effort in 'exposing nym-shifting'. As a result, in order to
> not feel he was wasting his time, his sub-conscious believed it also
> witnessed a reduction in nym-shifting. Actual reality is his one
> person jihad on 'nym-shifting' likely had zero impact on anything, and
> when presented with a logical argument to that effect, he immediately
> retreats to name calling to avoid believing that he has been needlessly
> expending effort for naught over all this time.

Why does anyone care? Bill has some disorder that means a primary form of entertainment for him is to argue with some of the stupidest people in this group on the Internet. His posts are seldom interesting, and are typically personal attacks on people who not only deserve such attacks (if anyone cares enough to make them), but seem to relish such attacks, since they provide an opportunity to show their intellect by responding with the Internet equivalent of "Oh, yeah?" Not much of a conversation usually.

John Doe has been the same twit as he presently is, for some time now. Once in a great while he posts something worth reading. The only value I get from his posts are when he shows how irritated he gets from Edward's bot posts in response to his one silly top posting that would seem to be what he considers a personal insult, a show of lack of respect, somehow. An inside joke with himself, perhaps?

So, why do you care about the conversation of the absurd between these two?

--

Rick C.

+- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

On Friday, April 15, 2022 at 1:17:43 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 20:28:59 -0000 (UTC), Bertrand Sindri
> <bertran...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >In sci.electronics.design John Doe <alway...@message.header> wrote:
> >> It's simple logic. If you expose nym-shifting, it's less likely to
> >> continue.
> >
> >The logic does not follow from what little evidence/argument you have
> >presented.
> Really, there is an infinite supply of these nymby old hens who are
> only here to cluck and pollute an electronic design group.

Many of us do ignore you, but you keep clucking away anyhow.

--

Rick C.

++ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
++ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

I have never nym-shifted on USENET, or anywhere else to hide my persona,
but only to circumvent CENSORSHIP.

Here I'm being bashed by a nym-shifting stalker troll, for a post I made
to a DIFFERENT group...

see also...
=?UTF-8?Q?C=c3=b6rvid?= <bl@ckbirds.org>
=?UTF-8?B?8J+QriBDb3dzIGFyZSBOaWNlIPCfkK4=?= <nice@cows.moo>
Banders <snap@mailchute.com>
Covid-19 <always.look@message.header>
corvid <bl@ckb.ird>
Corvid <bl@ckbirds.net>
Corvid <bl@ckbirds.org>
Cows Are Nice <cows@nice.moo>
Cows are nice <moo@cows.org>
Cows are Nice <nice@cows.moo>
dogs <dogs@home.com>
Great Pumpkin <pumpkin@patch.net>
Jose Curvo <jcurvo@mymail.com>
Local Favorite <how2recycle@palomar.info>
Sea <freshness@coast.org>
Standard Poodle <standard@poodle.com>
triangles <build@home.com>
and others...

--
corvid <bl@ckb.ird> wrote:

> Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!xUOiStaTX9GQDNXPji0+sg.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
> From: corvid <bl@ckb.ird>
> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
> Subject: Re: OT: Calculators: Where is the reciprocal key?
> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 10:08:43 -0700
> Organization: The 27 Club
> Message-ID: <t3c8qs$1r8k$1@gioia.aioe.org>
> References: <t36oka$9pm$3@dont-email.me> <t3774i$c6d$2@gioia.aioe.org> <t3788u$vv3$1@gioia.aioe.org> <f9ce5hl86hr1u32vu7rm4s2i2hh73jq70l@4ax.com> <t37l0p$ep4$1@dont-email.me> <t37ndg$g49$1@gioia.aioe.org> <t37r8q$o64$2@dont-email.me> <CgK5K.204432$I_K3.106036@usenetxs.com> <t39nap$nh2$1@dont-email.me> <t39qng$17ec$1@gioia.aioe.org> <t39toc$3tr$2@dont-email.me> <t3a06b$1hk3$3@gioia.aioe.org> <t3a3f2$qro$1@dont-email.me> <a23d0da4-02f1-4820-b10d-c7130313a150n@googlegroups.com> <t3bqmi$p7h$1@gioia.aioe.org>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="60692"; posting-host="xUOiStaTX9GQDNXPji0+sg.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.0
> X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
> Content-Language: en-US
> Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:666312
>
> On 4/15/22 06:07, Bertrand Sindri wrote:
>> Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
>>> On Friday, April 15, 2022 at 7:24:58 AM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
>>>> Bertrand Sindri <bertran...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>> In sci.electronics.design John Doe <alway...@message.header> wrote:
>>>>>> And I have observed a radical decrease in nym-shifting over a
>>>>>> long period of time. They love(d) the masquerade. I love(d) the
>>>>>> mystery.
>>>>>
>>>>> Coorelation is not causation. Your "observed radical decrease"
>>>>> could just as easily be explained by the gradual reduction in use
>>>>> of USENET with the resulting few remaining members simply not
>>>>> being the ones that nym-shifted (i.e., the nym-shifting trolls
>>>>> abandoned USENET for Reddit or other web locales). And in fact, a
>>>>> reduction in nym-shifting being caused by a substantial reduction
>>>>> in USENET usage is much more likely the cause than anything you
>>>>> did, or did not, do yourself.
>>>>>
>>>
>>>> When you refute its lies, it simply makes up more lies to cover those
>>>> prior lies. It's fiction never end...
>>>
>>> John Doe has never refuted any lie here. He has claimed that any
>>> number of factually correct statements are lies - which lying about
>>> them, rather than refuting them. Granting that he's an obviously
>>> deluded idiot, he may think that he is "refuting lies" rather than
>>> denying that he's wrong, but he is still a liar, even if he too dim
>>> to realise it.
>>
>> And he seems to retreat to name calling anytime he is cornered and has
>> no way out, such as the above. It is quite conceited of him to assert
>> that his 'exposing' nym-shifting is somehow singularly responsible for
>> his supposed observation of a reduction in the same. If anything, his
>> observation is more likely confirmation bias than anything. He started
>> expending effort in 'exposing nym-shifting'. As a result, in order to
>> not feel he was wasting his time, his sub-conscious believed it also
>> witnessed a reduction in nym-shifting. Actual reality is his one
>> person jihad on 'nym-shifting' likely had zero impact on anything, and
>> when presented with a logical argument to that effect, he immediately
>> retreats to name calling to avoid believing that he has been needlessly
>> expending effort for naught over all this time.
>
> The netcop wannabe is also a nym-shifting troll, banned by Google.
>
> OT: Easiest way to make new anonymous YouTube accounts?
> http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3Crrdplt%249r9%241%40dont-email.me%3E
>
>

Bozo Bill Sloman, the most frequent troll in this group, is an
attention-craving chronic liar who cannot be reasoned with...

"the user has posted under the same name in other places, so not
nym-shifting" (Bozo sucks at logic)

"the Mueller investigation was about Trump only because Trump made it so"
(Bozo lying)

"the concepts "male" and "female" are essentially social constructions"
(Bozo being weird)

Ricky <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:

> John Doe has been the same twit as he presently is, for some time now.
> Once in a great while he posts something worth reading. The only value
> I get from his posts are when he shows how irritated he gets from
> Edward's bot posts

You might enjoy the disruption, but in fact it does not bother me either
way. The fact he puts no thought into his replies, or rather into whether
he replies (or not), makes coping with him easy.

I don't like the disruption, but I am not responsible for anybody else's
speech on USENET.

It certainly is pointless.

But you can ignore any thread branch...

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
> breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
> CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly
formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
Sat, 16 Apr 2022 04:52:26 -0000 (UTC) in message-id
<t3di2a$59t$1@dont-email.me>).

NOBODY likes the John Doe troll's contentless spam.

Further, Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
(UTC):

> Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
> except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe's post ratio
to USENET (**) has been 57.1% of its posts contributing "nothing except
insults" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe has posted at
least 1032 articles to USENET. Of which 123 have been pure insults and
466 have been Troll Doe "troll format" postings.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.

NVEtJrDaBwrF

Eddie wants so badly to nym-shift. That's a no-no here, Eddie!

Eddie has never posted anything NORMAL except when it got a spanking...

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.electronics.repair/c/MesPLcGU4BE

See also...
John Doe <always.look@message.header> (astraweb)
Peter Weiner <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
Edward H. <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>

Eddie is an example for all newbies. Don't get spanked!

Spanked Eddie...

--
Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com> wrote:

> Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.mixmin.net!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx13.ams4.POSTED!not-for-mail
> From: Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: OT: Calculators: Where is the reciprocal key?
> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,free.spam
> References: <t36oka$9pm$3@dont-email.me> <t3774i$c6d$2@gioia.aioe.org> <t3788u$vv3$1@gioia.aioe.org> <f9ce5hl86hr1u32vu7rm4s2i2hh73jq70l@4ax.com> <t37l0p$ep4$1@dont-email.me> <t37ndg$g49$1@gioia.aioe.org> <t37r8q$o64$2@dont-email.me> <CgK5K.204432$I_K3.106036@usenetxs.com> <t39nap$nh2$1@dont-email.me> <t39qng$17ec$1@gioia.aioe.org> <t39toc$3tr$2@dont-email.me> <t3a06b$1hk3$3@gioia.aioe.org> <t3a3f2$qro$1@dont-email.me> <a23d0da4-02f1-4820-b10d-c7130313a150n@googlegroups.com> <t3bqmi$p7h$1@gioia.aioe.org> <t3c8qs$1r8k$1@gioia.aioe.org> <t3di2a$59t$1@dont-email.me>
> Lines: 40
> Message-ID: <ils6K.1066990$5u1.644841@usenetxs.com>
> X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 05:19:10 UTC
> Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 05:19:10 GMT
> X-Received-Bytes: 2557
> Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:666382 free.spam:17955
>
> The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
> <sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:
>
>> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...
>
> And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
> <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:
>
>> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
>> breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
>> CLUELESS...
>
> And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly
> formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
> Sat, 16 Apr 2022 04:52:26 -0000 (UTC) in message-id
> <t3di2a$59t$1@dont-email.me>).
>
> NOBODY likes the John Doe troll's contentless spam.
>
> Further, Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
> <svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
> (UTC):
>
>> Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
>> except insults to this group.
>
> Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe's post ratio
> to USENET (**) has been 57.1% of its posts contributing "nothing except
> insults" to USENET.
>
> ** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe has posted at
> least 1032 articles to USENET. Of which 123 have been pure insults and
> 466 have been Troll Doe "troll format" postings.
>
> This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
> readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
> follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.
>
> NVEtJrDaBwrF
>
>

Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com> wrote in
news:ils6K.1066990$5u1.644841@usenetxs.com:

DUDE! STOP FOLLOWING DOE'S POSTS AND THEN POSTING BEHIND THEM.
THAT IS THE NOST RETARDED BEHAVIOR THERE IS.

You are like Putin. STOP PILING YOUR RETARDED SHIT POSTS INTO OUR
GROUP, YOU RETARDED SHIT STUPID FUCK!!!

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
> breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
> CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly
formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
Sat, 16 Apr 2022 05:22:47 -0000 (UTC) in message-id
<t3djr7$59t$7@dont-email.me>).

NOBODY likes the John Doe troll's contentless spam.

Further, Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
(UTC):

> Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
> except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe's post ratio
to USENET (**) has been 57.1% of its posts contributing "nothing except
insults" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe has posted at
least 1035 articles to USENET. Of which 123 have been pure insults and
468 have been Troll Doe "troll format" postings.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.

K6tHo3yDW7R7

On 4/13/2022 8:21 PM, Bertrand Sindri wrote:
> In sci.electronics.design John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:
>> At least 90% of calculator apps on Google Play do not use "1/x", instead
>> they use "X-1".
>
> And why are 'apps' relevant. Up until this post, you mentioned:
>
> "normal (scientific) calculators"
> "a typical scientific calculator"
>
> Neither of which relate to calculator apps on google play.
>
>> points to Wikishit (for some strange reason)
>
> Because they have lots of images that are publicly available.
>
>> and mostly Hewlett-Packard calculators,
>
> Three HP calculators out of five total is hardly "mostly". But in any
> case, there were photos of a TI and a photo of a Casio calculator
> referenced, both of which have 1/x as the label for reciprocal.
>
>> after I said "normal calculators".
>
> Which to everyone sane means: "calculators" not "apps on google play".
>
>> Everybody knows HP calculators have never been considered NORMAL.
>
> HP calculators are just as normal as TI or Casio calculators. Do not
> confuse less common or expensive with normal, they do not mean what you
> think they mean.
>
>

Love RPN . Can't stand the =

On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 06:28:14 -0500, g_wolf <g_wolf@howl.com> wrote:

>On 4/13/2022 8:21 PM, Bertrand Sindri wrote:
>> In sci.electronics.design John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:
>>> At least 90% of calculator apps on Google Play do not use "1/x", instead
>>> they use "X-1".
>>
>> And why are 'apps' relevant. Up until this post, you mentioned:
>>
>> "normal (scientific) calculators"
>> "a typical scientific calculator"
>>
>> Neither of which relate to calculator apps on google play.
>>
>>> points to Wikishit (for some strange reason)
>>
>> Because they have lots of images that are publicly available.
>>
>>> and mostly Hewlett-Packard calculators,
>>
>> Three HP calculators out of five total is hardly "mostly". But in any
>> case, there were photos of a TI and a photo of a Casio calculator
>> referenced, both of which have 1/x as the label for reciprocal.
>>
>>> after I said "normal calculators".
>>
>> Which to everyone sane means: "calculators" not "apps on google play".
>>
>>> Everybody knows HP calculators have never been considered NORMAL.
>>
>> HP calculators are just as normal as TI or Casio calculators. Do not
>> confuse less common or expensive with normal, they do not mean what you
>> think they mean.
>>
>>
>
>Love RPN . Can't stand the =

Parenthesis are even worse.

--

I yam what I yam - Popeye

DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:
> Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:ils6K.1066990$5u1.644841@usenetxs.com:
>
>
> DUDE! STOP FOLLOWING DOE'S POSTS AND THEN POSTING BEHIND THEM.
> THAT IS THE NOST RETARDED BEHAVIOR THERE IS.
>
> You are like Putin. STOP PILING YOUR RETARDED SHIT POSTS INTO OUR
> GROUP, YOU RETARDED SHIT STUPID FUCK!!!

Use the newsreader Luke:

User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25

http://usenethelp.codeccorner.com/XNews_Primer.html#filters

XNews has several predefined filters you can apply. They are:

The "Plonk" or "Kill" filter.

Highlight an offending poster, and hit "k". XNews will killfile
all posts from this poster, in all groups. Use with caution; if
you plonk someone by accident, you can remove them from the
killfile by [CTRL-K] or the menu-bar commands "Special" "View Plonk
File".

And you'll never again see one of my posts.

4/15/22, 21:52, alt-right QAnon screwball John Doe writes:
> I have never nym-shifted on USENET, or anywhere else to hide my
> persona,

List the nyms you've used here, previous to "John Doe". Go ahead.

> but only to circumvent CENSORSHIP.

"I just want to comment under videos" and your sig "but posting under
YouTube videos is fun" tells what you're really there for.

http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3Crrdplt%249r9%241%40dont-email.me%3E

On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 15:49:49 -0000 (UTC), John Doe
<always.look@message.header> wrote:

>I wonder if there is a psychoanalytical name for people who cannot speak
>to others without insulting them at the same time. With some people, like
>Bozo, it's obtuse...

KF 'im, then.
What I find annoying about the newer sci calculators is they seem to
give the answers to everything as fractions by default. No idea if
there's a setting one can change to deal with that. I have to press a
button labelled (S<>D) to get the format I prefer. So whereas with my
30+ year old Casio I got a reciprocal from just a single key press of
(1/x) I now have to press three different keys to get the answer:
(x^-1), (=) and (S<>D). And they call *that* progress.

Bozo the Clown.

Bozo Bill Sloman, the most frequent troll in this group, is an
attention-craving chronic liar who cannot be reasoned with...

"the user has posted under the same name in other places, so not
nym-shifting" (Bozo sucks at logic)

"the Mueller investigation was about Trump only because Trump made it so"
(Bozo lying)

"the concepts "male" and "female" are essentially social constructions"
(Bozo being weird)

Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com> wrote in
news:t3eurt$pcp$1@gioia.aioe.org:

> DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:
>> Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com> wrote in
>> news:ils6K.1066990$5u1.644841@usenetxs.com:
>>
>>
>> DUDE! STOP FOLLOWING DOE'S POSTS AND THEN POSTING BEHIND THEM.
>> THAT IS THE NOST RETARDED BEHAVIOR THERE IS.
>>
>> You are like Putin. STOP PILING YOUR RETARDED SHIT POSTS INTO
>> OUR
>> GROUP, YOU RETARDED SHIT STUPID FUCK!!!
>
> Use the newsreader Luke:

STOP POSTING YOUR STUPID SHIT, YOU RETARDED PUKE!
>

> And you'll never again see one of my posts.
>
>
Except, you retarded dumbfuck, the mechanism that makes that happen
should be YOU DISCONTINUING TO POST IN OUR GROUP which you do NOT
participate in. Not me filtering your utter stupidity.

So,the phrase of the day, you puke fuck, is get the fuck out and
stay the fuck out, and stop clutering our group with your inane,
retarded baby bullshit "call out" posts. You are even more stupid
than the DOPE you are "calling out". Consider this to be YOU being
called out to GROW THE FUCK UP. Damn! Retarded little "gamer"
fucktards like you deserve a fucking basesball bat upside the head at
90MPH.

On Sunday, April 17, 2022 at 11:33:59 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
> Edward Hernandez <dtga...@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:t3eurt$pcp$1...@gioia.aioe.org:
> > DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
> >> Edward Hernandez <dtga...@gmail.com> wrote in
> >> news:ils6K.1066990$5u1.6...@usenetxs.com:
> >>
> >>
> >> DUDE! STOP FOLLOWING DOE'S POSTS AND THEN POSTING BEHIND THEM.
> >> THAT IS THE NOST RETARDED BEHAVIOR THERE IS.
> >>
> >> You are like Putin. STOP PILING YOUR RETARDED SHIT POSTS INTO
> >> OUR
> >> GROUP, YOU RETARDED SHIT STUPID FUCK!!!
> >
> > Use the newsreader Luke:
> STOP POSTING YOUR STUPID SHIT, YOU RETARDED PUKE!
> >
>
> > And you'll never again see one of my posts.
> >
> >
> Except, you retarded dumbfuck, the mechanism that makes that happen
> should be YOU DISCONTINUING TO POST IN OUR GROUP which you do NOT
> participate in. Not me filtering your utter stupidity.
>
> So,the phrase of the day, you puke fuck, is get the fuck out and
> stay the fuck out, and stop clutering our group with your inane,
> retarded baby bullshit "call out" posts. You are even more stupid
> than the DOPE you are "calling out". Consider this to be YOU being
> called out to GROW THE FUCK UP. Damn! Retarded little "gamer"
> fucktards like you deserve a fucking basesball bat upside the head at
> 90MPH.

You are just so funny. John Doe is a troll, polluting the group. Edward has a bot replying to JD's posts that are top posted (which I find amusing, especially when the idiot JD responds to them). Then out of the Aether comes you, raging about a bot replying to an idiot, claiming they are ruining the group. At this point you are contributing 33% of that pollution.

But you will never understand that, will you?

--

Rick C.

--- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
--- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

Ricky <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote in
news:b0137626-e636-4efc-a6e0-5b6daf34fbb2n@googlegroups.com:

> You are just so funny. John Doe is a troll, polluting the group.
> Edward has a bot replying to JD's posts that are top posted (which
> I find amusing, especially when the idiot JD responds to them).

He responded to me personally, so is NOT a bot, and most certainly CAN
stop the stupid shit.

AND I do not need a USENET primer from you. I have been watching
many folks' stupid shit behavior for decades. I know what is taking
place. He needs to turn his retarded bot off.

I do not need you to tell me ANYTHING about Usenet.

Ricky <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote in
news:b0137626-e636-4efc-a6e0-5b6daf34fbb2n@googlegroups.com:

> Then out of the Aether comes you, raging about a bot replying to
> an idiot, claiming they are ruining the group. At this point
> you are contributing 33% of that pollution.
>
> But you will never understand that, will you?

Nope. maybe near 15%. Because you joined in and got some.

D'Oh! Decideedly it is you failing to understand.