Further, John Dope stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me>
(http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=164904625100) posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022
08:01:09 -0000 (UTC):

> Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
> except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Dope's post ratio
to USENET (**) has been 59.2% of its posts contributing "nothing except
insults" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Dope has posted at
least 1528 articles to USENET. Of which 165 have been pure insults and
740 have been John Dope "troll format" postings.

The John Dope troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Dope troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
> breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
> CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Dope troll has continued to post incorrectly
formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
Thu, 2 Jun 2022 18:01:24 -0000 (UTC) in message-id
<t7attj$csi$1@dont-email.me>).

NOBODY likes the John Doe troll's contentless spam.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that John Dope does not even follow
the rules it uses to troll other posters.

PK2Zaa+dsM7V

This porn-sucking retard is a nym-shifting stalker troll now.

Eddie has never posted anything NORMAL except when it got a spanking...

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.electronics.repair/c/MesPLcGU4BE

See also...
John Doe <always.look_message.header> (Astraweb, Aioe.org)
Peter Weiner <dtgamer99_gmail.com>
Edward H. <dtgamer99_gmail.com>
Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99_gmail.com>

Eddie is an example for all newbies. Don't get spanked!

Spanked Eddie...

--
Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com> wrote:

> Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx05.ams4.POSTED!not-for-mail
> From: Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: OT: Russia-Trump collusion hoax judge rules against Hillary attorney-client privilege
> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,free.spam
> References: <t5ktjk$hi4$1@dont-email.me> <t5sko2$ng$1@dont-email.me> <t5t2qh$md8$1@dont-email.me> <42b798b8-8a52-4ae1-9b4a-442a3a1bbfffn@googlegroups.com> <6bc570d2-39dd-476d-90a0-5d098d5a12fan@googlegroups.com> <t6j0mr$1d8l$2@gioia.aioe.org> <t6j8ja$61v$2@dont-email.me> <t7a950$14ot$1@gioia.aioe.org> <t7attj$csi$1@dont-email.me>
> Lines: 41
> Message-ID: <b87mK.29204$j01.10961@usenetxs.com>
> X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 18:16:39 UTC
> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 18:16:39 GMT
> X-Received-Bytes: 2396
> Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:670401 free.spam:18485
>
> Further, John Dope stated the following in message-id
> <svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me>
> (http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=164904625100) posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022
> 08:01:09 -0000 (UTC):
>
>> Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
>> except insults to this group.
>
> Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Dope's post ratio
> to USENET (**) has been 59.2% of its posts contributing "nothing except
> insults" to USENET.
>
> ** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Dope has posted at
> least 1528 articles to USENET. Of which 165 have been pure insults and
> 740 have been John Dope "troll format" postings.
>
> The John Dope troll stated the following in message-id
> <sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:
>
>> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...
>
> And the John Dope troll stated the following in message-id
> <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:
>
>> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
>> breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
>> CLUELESS...
>
> And yet, the clueless John Dope troll has continued to post incorrectly
> formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
> Thu, 2 Jun 2022 18:01:24 -0000 (UTC) in message-id
> <t7attj$csi$1@dont-email.me>).
>
> NOBODY likes the John Doe troll's contentless spam.
>
> This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
> readers who happen by to point out that John Dope does not even follow
> the rules it uses to troll other posters.
>
> PK2Zaa+dsM7V
>
>
>

Further, John Doe stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me>
(http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=164904625100) posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022
08:01:09 -0000 (UTC):

> Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
> except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe's post ratio to
USENET (**) has been 59.2% of its posts contributing "nothing except
insults" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe has posted at
least 1530 articles to USENET. Of which 165 have been pure insults and
741 have been John Doe "troll format" postings.

The Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

And the Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
> breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
> CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless Troll Doe has itself posted yet another
incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Thu, 2 Jun 2022 18:43:42 -0000
(UTC) in message-id <t7b0ct$1u4$2@dont-email.me>.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that John Doe does not even follow
the rules it uses to troll other posters.

6i0MsPAUwQpX

On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 4:56:39 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Saturday, May 28, 2022 at 4:14:49 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
> > On Tuesday, May 24, 2022 at 1:56:18 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, May 24, 2022 at 12:50:03 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, May 22, 2022 at 9:04:16 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > > > On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 6:43:04 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
> > > > > > The day before, the Washington Post made up an opinion article pleading
> > > > > > with their sheep to ignore their prior lies about "Trump-Russia
> > > > > > collusion"...
> > > > > John Doe seems to think that his unsupported that some statement is "a lie" is worth posting.
> > > > >
> > > > > The Washington Post is a well-reputed newspaper with a long history of getting stuff right. John Doe is a idiot who seems to take Donald Trump seriously. The Washington Post has a lot more credibility.
> > > >
> > > > WRONG AGAIN, Sloman. The WaPo spent YEARS pandering the totally fake Trump Russian collusion hoax, which has been completely exposed in the Sussmann trial (which the WaPo REFUSES to cover!).
> > >
> > > Flyguy imagines that Mueller Inquiry never happened, or perhaps just doesn't understand what it meant.
> >
> > On the contrary, Sloman - Mueller showed BEYOND ANY DOUBT that the Shrillary Trump Russian collusion was a complete hoax perpetrated on the American public.
>
> Mueller showed beyond doubt that the Russians interfered in the 2016 presidential election to Trump's benefit. Trump was clearly grateful for the advantage he got, but probably couldn't be shown to be an active collaborator.. That doesn't make the Mueller Inquiry any kind of hoax, much through Trymp might have liked it to have been.
>
> > > The Durham investigation isn't about the pro-Trump Russian intervention in the 2016 presidential election but rather about exactly what Suusmann said about his affiliations when he was drawing the attention of the FBI to some of the Trump-Russia interactions. Trump has always claimed that he didn't collaborate with the Russians - which is perfectly credible, since he lacks the attention span to collaborate with anybody - and seems to think that nothing else else could matter.
> >
> > Hey SNIPPERMAN, you should proofread your garbage before posting. Durham is investigating Shrillary's manipulation of Mueller's investigation, with two indictments so far. The Sussmann trial is now before the jury.
>
> There's nothing in the Durham investigation about Hillary Clinton telling Sussmann what he should say to the FBI. Durham is merely claiming that Sussmann should have told the FBI that the Clinton election team was one of Sussmann's cleints when he talked to the FBI.

Which is also called LYING to the FBI. Hey SNIPPERMAN, AGAIN, try proofreading your shit before posting. This makes you the laughing stock whenever you call me a "moron," you idiot.

> > > > > > https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/11/18/even-if-steele-dossier-is-discredited-theres-plenty-evidence-trumps-collusion-with-russia/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "...the Senate Intelligence Committee report on Russia's election
> > > > > > interference. The committee, then led by [warmonger supreme] Marco Rubio,
> > > > > > issued last year its fifth and final volume detailing even more extensive
> > > > > > links between the Kremlin and the Trump campaign"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That's the way chronic liars do it... "We have a new set of lies for you!"
> > > > > > Their fiction never ends.
> > > >.
> > > > > Except that it is well known that there were links between the Kremlin and the Trump campaign. Phone calls from Russia to the Trump campaign team end up getting monitored because all calls from the relevant bits of the Russian intelligence to anybody in the Us were always monitored.
> > > >
> > > > LOL! There have been calls between Joe Biden and the Kremlin - is he, too, a part of this infamous collusion? Maybe...
> > >
> > > After Biden got elected. It is part of his presidential duty.
> > > > > > There will be LOTS of denial and fiction from the cannibal left in coming months,
> > > > >
> > > > > Only John Doe knows what he means by the "cannibal left", so it's not a useful forecast.
> > > > >
> > > > > > assuming they don't blow us all up by World War III.
> > > > > John Doe's plan to avoid WW III seems to be to give Putin anything he might possibly want. It's not an attractive policy.
> > > >
> > > > SNIPPERMAN's policy is to continue to promulgate a totally discredited Russian collusion hoax.
>
> I certainly don't think that the Russians were silly enough to enroll Trump as co-conspirator. They merely thought - correctly - that Trump would be a rotten president.

There, even YOU think that the Russian Collusion was a HOAX!

> > > Flyguy doesn't understand what I have been saying, and has decided that he can claim that I'm saying something that he'd like me to say. He's wrong, but incapable of recognising it.
> >
> > To the contrary, I understand what you are saying better than you do, moron.
> Flyguy would think that . He really is a moron.

See, SNIPPERMAN agrees with me, but has to call me a "moron" because he is at a LOSS FOR INTELLIGENT WORDS who can't even spell HIS OWN NAME!

> >Of course, what do you expect from someone who thinks that FIREBOMBING and NUKING their OWN COUNTRY is a good idea?
> Which is what Flyguy decided that I had in mind. He was wrong, but is much too dumb to realise it.

No, YOU said it, NOT me!

> > > > > <snipped John Doe's earlier idiocy>
>
> --
> SNIPPERMAN, Sydney (but sitting in Nijmegen in the Netherlands at the moment)

On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 9:34:21 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
> On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 4:56:39 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:

> > There's nothing in the Durham investigation about Hillary Clinton telling Sussmann what he should say to the FBI. Durham is merely claiming that Sussmann should have told the FBI that the Clinton election team was one of Sussmann's cleints when he talked to the FBI.

> Which is also called LYING to the FBI.

That's a stretch (lie-of-omission, relating to matters unrelated to Russia's actions)
that the jury didn't approve. As long as it's just words, maybe 'lying' isn't completely
inappropriate terminology, but as the legal standard is related to deliberate misdirection
of criminal investigation, it was a clear 'not-guilty' scenario. Short trial, after
very long investigation; probably politically motivated. Durham is back to doing
honest work now, one hopes.

There was more than ample evidence that Michael Sussmann lied to FBI
General Counsel James Baker on the day of the meeting.

Besides all of the evidence proving that, there was Sussmann's text
message the night before that CLEARLY was a lie. The only reason it wasn't
charged is because the statute of limitations had expired. A mere
technicality.

Several FBI witnesses testified that Sussmann's lie was material. The
standard for materiality is that it is "capable" or has a "tendency" to
mislead, not that it actually misleads.

Trump team members were convicted of lying even though the FBI was fully
AWARE they were lying. That's how they were convicted, they were set up.

As expected, the twelve swamp creatures ignored the evidence.

THE VERDICT MAKES LITTLE DIFFERENCE. The twelve swamp creatures' opinion
doesn't matter. What (doesn't) happen to Michael Sussmann is no big deal.

THE MAIN THING WE LOST WITH THE NOT GUILTY VERDICT IS POSSIBLE PRESSURE ON
SUSSMANN TO SPILL THE BEANS.

John Durham's indictments and other court filings are telling a big story.
We won't even need a special counsel's report, unless Durham is stopped.
Thanks to Durham's court filings, by the time the final case is tried, we
will have WAY more information than any final report could ever provide.

The cannibal left's only hope is that Durham is stopped.

Time will tell.

Anybody who does not have time to read the court filings, check out Margot
Cleveland's articles in The Federalist.

On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 1:18:56 PM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
> There was more than ample evidence that ...
> As expected, the twelve swamp creatures ignored the evidence.

You expected it, because you knew that the 'evidence' didn't
indicate any crime. Calling a jury 'swamp creatures' is
offensive, uncalled-for, and this isn't your first such offense.

You picked a losing side in a court battle.

Like I predicted (before Margot Cleveland did!) in the "OT: First Trump-
Russia hoax trial..." thread, fans of Sussmann and the Swamp Creatures would
come pouring out of the woodwork after the acquittal.

The only thing we lost is pressure on Sussmann to spill the beans.

The Durham team will be publishing VOLUMES about the swamp in court filings
with the upcoming Igor Danchenko trial. Probably more than the massive amount
of information revealed in the Sussmann trial.

We also expect Durham will indict Rodney Joffe, and probably others. Rodney
is tightlipped as he can be. Apparently the researchers have lawyered-up.

Your only hope is that somehow Durham is stopped.

There are spinoff investigations going on now, thanks to the work Durham has
already done.