On Monday, February 14, 2022 at 2:01:04 PM UTC-8, funkma...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, February 14, 2022 at 3:07:28 PM UTC-5, cycl...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Sunday, February 13, 2022 at 8:35:53 PM UTC-8, russell...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > On Sunday, February 13, 2022 at 11:13:52 AM UTC-6, cycl...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > On Saturday, February 12, 2022 at 8:45:39 PM UTC-8, russell...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > > > On Saturday, February 12, 2022 at 7:00:49 PM UTC-6, cycl...@gmail..com wrote:
> > > > > > On Saturday, February 12, 2022 at 4:42:11 PM UTC-8, jeff.li...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > On Sat, 12 Feb 2022 15:07:23 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
> > > > > > > <cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >On Saturday, February 12, 2022 at 10:06:41 AM UTC-8, jeff.li....@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > >> On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 07:28:13 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
> > > > > > > >> <cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> >There's the genius using Fact Checks again. I have yet to find one of them telling the entire truth.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Tom. That's progress. I didn't know that you actually read fact
> > > > > > > >> check sites. I would have thought that if you find such sites to be
> > > > > > > >> faulty, you would register your protest by not reading them. I guess
> > > > > > > >> your opinion is more important than the content, so reading a fact
> > > > > > > >> check site might be useful so that you can render a opinion. If
> > > > > > > >> that's the case, you're forgiven.
> > > > > > > >> >But that doesn't matter to little Jeffy who is in the business
> > > > > > > >> >of lying to support his position.
> > > > > > > >> Three problems here:
> > > > > > > >> 1. Why are your statements always in two disconnected phrases?
> > > > > > > >> There's no connection between being in business and fact checking.
> > > > > > > >> This is one form of a comma splice, where two unrelated thoughts are
> > > > > > > >> glued together with a comma in order to make then appear to be
> > > > > > > >> related.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> 2. Business is the art of separating customers from their money.
> > > > > > > >> Lying to paying customers is generally bad idea because no customer
> > > > > > > >> would pay me if they even suspected that I was lying. However, there
> > > > > > > >> is one area where you might be able to lie and still be in business.
> > > > > > > >> You can be an author of fiction, which is basically lying with a thin
> > > > > > > >> veneer of entertainment. I believe you would do very well at writing
> > > > > > > >> scientific fiction, how not to do it books, political fantasy novels,
> > > > > > > >> and history re-written fiction. Self publishing might be a good way
> > > > > > > >> to start. Instead of lying for the readers of RBT, you should
> > > > > > > >> consider writing your lies for profit.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> 3. I've been very careful not to call you names or modify your name
> > > > > > > >> into something objectionable. I've always referred to you as "Tom".
> > > > > > > >> For the most part, you've afforded me the same courtesy. Suddenly,
> > > > > > > >> you now find it necessary to belittle me by butchering my name and
> > > > > > > >> prefixing it with the diminutive "little". I haven't changed my style
> > > > > > > >> so something must have changed at your end. My guess is that you're
> > > > > > > >> very proud of being rather tall, which is certainly beneficial in many
> > > > > > > >> areas including cycling. My guess(tm) is that you decided to measure
> > > > > > > >> your height and discovered that you were shrinking. Loss in height
> > > > > > > >> due to spinal disk compression and loss of muscle mass is common past
> > > > > > > >> age of about 50. I've lost about 2 inches in the past 20 years. I
> > > > > > > >> assume your immediate reaction was to blame all the usual political
> > > > > > > >> culprits for your reduction in stature. I suspect that conferring the
> > > > > > > >> title of "title" to everyone you find disagreeable might be a suitable
> > > > > > > >> compensation for your loss of altitude. Or, perhaps you were born
> > > > > > > >> with a prejudice against short people that is only now appearing.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> "Is height related to longevity?"
> > > > > > > >> <https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12586217/>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> "Evidence That Short People Live Longer"
> > > > > > > >> <https://www.healthline.com/health/do-short-people-live-longer#the-science>
> > > > > > > >> >Tell us Jeffy, since they haven't even yet shown that SARS-Cov-2 exists, how do they know that this was what caused raised levels of Factor V? What they KNOW is that some sort of respiratory disease that puts people on ventilators might or might not cause a rise in Factor V. And the ventilator itself may cause this since they were so fast to put people on ventilators even before they were required and almost no people on ventilators got off. And this is NOT unusual for people put on ventilators. This is why they now use methods other than ventilators unless it is absolutely necessary.
> > > > > > > >> Nice change of topic. I've noticed that most of your rants, which are
> > > > > > > >> longer than one sentence, tend to include an attempt to change the
> > > > > > > >> subject to your favorite topics which allow you more flexibility for
> > > > > > > >> lying, insulting, rewriting history, misinterpreting events and
> > > > > > > >> demonstrating your vast knowledge. The problem with throwing bait
> > > > > > > >> like this at your audience is that they eventually catch on and refuse
> > > > > > > >> to bite.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Good luck with your career in fiction writing.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> [ I enjoyed writing this. 45 minutes not totally wasted. ]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >Jeffy, you're a stupid piece of shit. If you look through the first dozens of Google searches they tell you that fact checkers are the most reliable and honest people around. But did into the depths and you find the real truth. https://www.acsh.org/news/2019/11/04/debunkers-debunked-who-fact-checks-fact-checkers-14378 - What does the American Council on Science and Health have to say? "We’ve found that PolitiFact often rates statements that are largely true but come from a GOP sources [sic] as 'mostly false' by focusing on sentence alterations, simple mis-statements, fact-checking the wrong fact, and even taking a statement, rewording it, and fact-checking the re-worded statement instead of the original quoted statement.
> > > > > > > Congratulations. You found a URL with a relevant comment. That might
> > > > > > > be a first. As I mentioned, I'll wait for more fact checking from
> > > > > > > other fact checkers. PolitiFact was the only site that commented on
> > > > > > > Richard Hirschman and claims of unusual clotting.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Small problem. The only thing my initial comment has to do with fact
> > > > > > > checkering is the possibility that you actually read the fact checker
> > > > > > > article I had mentioned (from PolitiFact). Now, I'm wondering if you
> > > > > > > read what I wrote as most of it had nothing to do with fact checking.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Also, if everything from PolitiFact comes from GOP sources, why did
> > > > > > > they rate an article that favors the anti vax point of view with a
> > > > > > > "Mostly False"?
> > > > > > > "How the Anti-Vax Movement Is Taking Over the Right"
> > > > > > > <https://time.com/6141699/anti-vaccine-mandate-movement-rally/>
> > > > > > > Hint: Your ACSH article is from Nov 2019 (2.3 years ago) which is
> > > > > > > before Covid-19 became an issue. Something may have changed at ACSH
> > > > > > > between when the article you mentioned was written and today.
> > > > > > > >"Doing this takes time and many, many words."
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >You haven't the intellect to judge anything and yet that is what you try to convince people with every posting.
> > > > > > > It doesn't take much "intellect" to pass judgment on your lack of
> > > > > > > ability. I also don't try to convince readers of your lack of
> > > > > > > ability. You do that quite nicely without any additional assistance.
> > > > > > > All I do is identify your mistakes and the readers can easily judge
> > > > > > > your abilities for themselves.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm only trying to convince people of one thing. That you are
> > > > > > > consistently wrong and should be ignored. I've already succeeded in
> > > > > > > demonstrating that by pointing out your numerous factual and
> > > > > > > arithmetic errors. I don't need (or want) to tell people what to
> > > > > > > think. I only provide the evidence and they can make their own
> > > > > > > decisions. You do the opposite and only provide your opinion. Note
> > > > > > > that there are others in RBT doing an equal or better job of pointing
> > > > > > > out your errors.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >Let's Go Jeffy!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The original was "Let my people go".
> > > > > > There you go again Jeffy - the slave owners before the civil war and the Democrat Party after the civil war opposed every single civil right legislation without question. They then emasculated every bill they could starting with Eisenhower's Civil Rights Act of 1957 to the one of 1964 that Lyndon Johnson tried everything to stop and then when he couldn't he took credit for it passing. You little racist asses cannot escape the fate of history and each year more and more people are aware of history and you're right where you belong - in the trash can.
> > > > > Congratulations Tommy. You made a semi factual statement. Up through the middle of the 20th century or so, 1950s-1960s, the Democratic party controlled the states in the southeastern part of the USA. They were the slave states. And then in the 1860s Republican Abraham Lincoln came along and started the Civil War and freed the slaves. All of that was 50 to 150 years ago. But today is 50+ years from then. And the two political parties in the USA have changed drastically. One could even factually say they are 100% opposite of the past.
> > > > Again you show almost total inability with the English Language. I wonder if you really do have a job. No CEO in his right mind would allow reports across his desk with the nonsensical English you use.
> > > What is nonsensical about the paragraph, explanation, I wrote? I reread my posting, and it seems fairly straight forward what I wrote. The facts and points I wanted to put forth were clearly explained and enumerated. What do you not understand? And I use the term understand. I did not use the term disagree with. Those are two separate things.
> > Plainly you think that "All of that was 50 to 150 years ago. But today is 50+ years from then. And the two political parties in the USA have changed drastically. One could even factually say they are 100% opposite of the past." is English. "50+ years from then"? firstly it is 150+ years from then and secondly it was the White Democrat northern states that became so racist that a black man could not even get a normal job. The Unions wouldn't allow blacks or other minorities in and the best jobs they could get were manual labor of the grossest kinds.
> Yeah, they had it soooo much better in the Jim Crow south.
> "Magazines available up to 30 rounds for visiting gay bath houses" - Tom Kunich

Maye it will frighten you into staying away from those disease sites. On those questionnaires I had to fill out was the question "Do you have Herpes Simplex" and every queer answered "yes". And most of them had the antibiotic resistant mutation. Did you ever wonder why you had that rash?