On Tuesday, March 1, 2022 at 11:39:41 PM UTC-6, John B. wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 19:59:15 -0800 (PST), Frank Krygowski
> <frkr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Tuesday, March 1, 2022 at 8:38:58 PM UTC-5, AMuzi wrote:
> >> On 3/1/2022 7:28 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
> >> > On 3/1/2022 7:56 PM, AMuzi wrote:
> >> >> On 3/1/2022 6:40 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
> >> >>> On 3/1/2022 4:34 PM, AMuzi wrote:
> >> >>>> On 3/1/2022 2:52 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
> >> >>>>> On 3/1/2022 3:44 PM, AMuzi wrote:
> >> >>>>>> On 3/1/2022 1:40 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
> >> >>>>>>> On 3/1/2022 11:47 AM, AMuzi wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>> On 3/1/2022 10:04 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>>>>> When you explain to me _why_ you think Canadians
> >> >>>>>>>>> are ...
> >> >>>>>>>>> inherently? genetically? ... more civilized than
> >> >>>>>>>>> Americans,
> >> >>>>>>>>> you'll have a point.
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> BTW, your explanation should also apply to Brits,
> >> >>>>>>>>> Irish,
> >> >>>>>>>>> French, Swedes and so many other countries that
> >> >>>>>>>>> have far
> >> >>>>>>>>> fewer gun deaths than the U.S. (Since you brought
> >> >>>>>>>>> up the
> >> >>>>>>>>> subject, I'll rely on you to look up their rates of
> >> >>>>>>>>> rape and
> >> >>>>>>>>> other violent crimes.)
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Until you come up with a better explanation, I'm
> >> >>>>>>>>> going to
> >> >>>>>>>>> assume that differences in gun death rates have a lot
> >> >>>>>>>>> to do
> >> >>>>>>>>> with their national policies, as implemented by their
> >> >>>>>>>>> laws,
> >> >>>>>>>>> etc.
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Briefly, my view is that national policies make a big
> >> >>>>>>>>> difference in how people behave.
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Your view is, apparently, "Americans are just bad."
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Feel free to restate your view if it's different. And
> >> >>>>>>>>> don't
> >> >>>>>>>>> change the subject, John. This is what we are talking
> >> >>>>>>>>> about
> >> >>>>>>>>> _now_.
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> When Andrew Cuomo was Mr Cinton's HUD Secretary, he
> >> >>>>>>>> announced a firearm buyback program for residents of
> >> >>>>>>>> public housing. Reporter asked if firearms made public
> >> >>>>>>>> housing dangerous or if residents felt a need to arm
> >> >>>>>>>> themselves for  protection because their
> >> >>>>>>>> hallways
> >> >>>>>>>> and
> >> >>>>>>>> neighborhoods had become more dangerous.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Which doesn't address John's implication that Americans
> >> >>>>>>> are
> >> >>>>>>> just fundamentally evil. I guess that's his way of
> >> >>>>>>> saying
> >> >>>>>>> that laws and policies make no difference.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> But I wonder what those public housing residents are
> >> >>>>>>> afraid
> >> >>>>>>> of? Is it punks with slingshots? Or punks with some
> >> >>>>>>> different weaponry?
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> What do people in violent neighborhoods fear? Knives,
> >> >>>>>> beatings, assaults of various severity and yes firearms.
> >> >>>>>> Get rid of firearms and you have the same vicious people
> >> >>>>>> then add in an incitement to tyranny of an unarmed
> >> >>>>>> population.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> For an elderly woman with some guy coming through her
> >> >>>>>> bedroom window, a knife or club is of limited utility.
> >> >>>>>> When seconds matter, 911 is just twenty minutes away.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> As usual, I wonder about other countries. Do they not have
> >> >>>>> the problems you describe to the degree Americans do? If
> >> >>>>> they don't, why not? Is it genetics? Or is it laws and
> >> >>>>> policies?
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> If they do have the problems, how do they manage them
> >> >>>>> without every elderly woman owning an AR rifle or rapid
> >> >>>>> fire
> >> >>>>> handgun?
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> What do you mean by 'rapid fire' ? Typical home defense
> >> >>>> pistols are revolvers and striker type 9mm (or .380 /.40).
> >> >>>> Those all fire at the same speed[1].
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I'll bet you can't find even one police or news report in
> >> >>>> the past year in USA where a full-auto pistol was used for
> >> >>>> home self-defense.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I did not say "full auto." And I'd say even nine rounds at
> >> >>> two rounds per second qualifies as "rapid fire." Hunters
> >> >>> don't do that. Target shooters do that only if they're
> >> >>> pretending to be in combat.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> OTOH which of these scenarios would you prefer for your
> >> >>>> relative or yourself?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> A) This common crime?
> >> >>>> https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/breaking/ct-wordle-mother-saved-lincolnwood-20220211-ecz5istdfrhvzdin4kibdwyrmi-story.html
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> B) or more like this?
> >> >>>> https://www.foxnews.com/us/elderly-man-shoots-kills-half-naked-home-intruder-who-assaulted-his-wife
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> "Common crime"?? Talk about a "Danger! Danger!" statement!
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Somehow, the universe I live in is not nearly so scary, at
> >> >>> least to me and mine.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> But yet again: Why is it necessary for each U.S. household
> >> >>> to be armed for protection? Why is it not necessary in
> >> >>> Canada, Britain, Norway, Portugal...
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> {1} in the real world.
> >> >>>> In TeeVee world, firearms are magic lead-spraying devices
> >> >>>> which always hit the intended target such as the bad guy's
> >> >>>> wrist when wielded by good guy. Bad guy firearms also
> >> >>>> spray huge quantities just over good guy's head with magic
> >> >>>> sound effects.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I'm well aware of that silly glorification of gun culture.
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >> Hunters ideally stalk in stealth, carefully positioned
> >> >> downwind and from occlusion, and take great pains to
> >> >> accurately sight in a lethal shot at the right moment[1].
> >> >>
> >> >> A woman awakened to the sound of breaking glass at 3 in
> >> >> the morning needs the second, third, nth shot. Utterly
> >> >> different situation.
> >> >
> >> > That's as imaginary as the TV show you referenced.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "Bureau of Justice Statistics’ National Crime
> >> > Victimization Survey (NCVS). Among the findings of the most
> >> > recent edition of the study are the following:
> >> >
> >> > In 2017, the FBI reports there were only 298
> >> > justifiable homicides involving a private citizen using a
> >> > firearm. That same year, there were 10,380 criminal gun
> >> > homicides. Guns were used in 35 criminal homicides for every
> >> > justifiable homicide.
> >> > Intended victims of violent crimes engaged in
> >> > self-protective behavior that involved a firearm in 1.1
> >> > percent of attempted and completed incidents between 2014
> >> > and 2016.
> >> > Intended victims of property crimes engaged in
> >> > self-protective behavior that involved a firearm in 0.3
> >> > percent of attempted and completed incidents between 2014
> >> > and 2016.
> >> >
> >> > When analyzing the most reliable data available, what is
> >> > most striking is that in a nation of more than 300 million
> >> > guns, how rarely firearms are used in self-defense."
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Oh by the way do you have some fixation with hunting? I'm
> >> >> not a hunter myself but you sure reference that a lot.
> >> >
> >> > Hunting is a legitimate and non-fictional use of firearms,
> >> > one I heartily approve of. I'm not a hunter, but I know many
> >> > hunters and would have been one if my life were just a tiny
> >> > bit different - that is, if I'd had the time to accept some
> >> > invitations.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> To my point, we agree that home invaders are often shot at,
> >> and to some degree wounded but _seldom fatally_, as you
> >> note. Unlike hunters, there's a lack of calm deliberate
> >> setup and preparation. I noted that difference earlier.
> >
> >Sorry, I do NOT agree "home invaders are often shot at." Not by any rational definition of "often." First,
> >home invasions are far, far from common - although I can talk about two examples I'm familiar with.
> >
> >One happened about two years ago maybe five miles from me. I don't know if they've figured out the
> >motivation, but it seemed weird. A punk broke in the front door in the dead of night and started shooting
> >at several people (not family members) gathered in the living room. He killed a little kid, apparently
> >not the intended target, and immediately ran off. Nobody shot back, because how would you know
> >to be "Quick Draw McGraw" at the ready?
> >
> >The other event I knew about involved the vice president of the manufacturing firm I worked at as
> >an engineer. He had a very nice house with glass panels aside the front door. A punk pounded on the
> >door at night, and the VP came to the door in his pajamas. He opened the door, saw the punk had a
> >gun and turned around to run up the stairs for his own gun. The punk broke a glass panel and shot
> >him as he ran, killing him.
> >
> >Whipping out a gun for defense is as imaginary as the TV action shootings.
> >
> >> https://fee.org/articles/more-people-use-a-gun-in-self-defense-each-year-than-die-in-car-accidents/
> >
> >"More People Use a Gun in Self-Defense Each Year Than Die in Car Accidents"?? That's very unlikely!
> >I put it in the same category as "This pill can help you lose up to 50 pounds in a month!"
> >
> >https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/12/podcasts/daily-newsletter-self-defense-gun-use.html
> >
> >"But how often are guns used in self-defense, really?
> >
> >“It’s pretty rare,” David Hemenway, director of the Harvard Injury Control Research Center, said, despite the fact that gun violence in the U.S. is exceptionally common. There are more guns in the country than people, and nearly 40,000 Americans died because of gun violence in 2019. A majority of those deaths were suicides. From 2007 to 2011, only about 1 percent of people who were crime victims claimed to have used a gun to protect themselves — and the average person had “basically no chance in their lifetime ever to use a gun in self-defense,” Dr. Hemenway told NPR in 2018.
> >
> >"Still, getting exact numbers on the prevalence of what researchers call “self-defense gun use” is tricky. A study cited by the C.D..C. indicates a “range of 60,000 to 2.5 million defensive gun uses each year.” A large majority of firearms researchers, however, “think that’s a wild overestimate for two reasons,” Dr.. Hemenway said. First, survey respondents are often shown to report the timing and frequencies of events inaccurately, a phenomenon known as the telescoping effect.
> >
> >"Additionally, people involved in gun violence often claim self-defense, even if the facts of the case don’t support that claim — a self-presentation bias that can make data unreliable. And when trying to measure rare events, any margin of survey error can create huge variables in the results."
> >
> >Again: "A large majority of firearms researchers, however, think that’s a wild overestimate."
> >
> >And even if it were true, how many developed countries does that apply to? Why?
> >
> >- Frank Krygowski

John, I expected far better of you. I hate to even insinuate it, but you did a Tommy. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/03/29/12-times-guns-saved-lives/
I think this is a right wing nut website. Below are some of the titles they had at the top of the page when I clicked on it:
‘Too Little, Too Late’: Gov. Kim Reynolds Responds to Biden’s State of the Union Address
Biden’s Biggest State of the Union Blunders
Fact-Checking 10 Claims From Biden’s State of the Union Address
Don’t Buy Democrats’ Cries of GOP ‘Racism’ and ‘Misogyny’ on Biden’s Supreme Court Pick
And in your link above it has this statement "Here are 12 such instances in the past 12 years."
One per year? Volcanoes erupt more often than that. Hurricanes happen more often than that. Earthquakes happen more often than that.
And in the #3 in your link above is about a gun wielding hero who saw a man being knifed so he ran to his house to get his AR-15 rifle. But by the time he returned to the scene of the crime, the assailant had run off and was later caught by police. So I don't quite understand how the hero having a gun changed much.

> https://fee.org/articles/guns-prevent-thousands-of-crimes-every-day-research-show/
I am familiar with the thinking, idea expressed in this story. Having a gun prevents the crime from ever happening. Or the possibility of there being a gun prevents anything from happening. Kind of like keeping the door locked prevents theft. And I am sure there is some validity to this thought. Kind of like the USA keeps any big wars from happening by just having such a big military and missiles. No one dares to start too much trouble. Somewhat valid. OK.

> http://thinkaboutnow.com/2016/06/study-guns-stop-crime-2-5-million-times-each-year/
This one and the link at the bottom are the exact same. You could have, should have, eliminated one of them. The bottom one most likely. Its similar thinking to the link above about the fact that there are guns present stops criminals. Even when the guns are never shown or used. OK.

> https://stories.avvo.com/crime/8-horrible-crimes-stopped-by-legal-gun-owners.html
A list of eight times guns supposedly were used to save people. You can find supporting evidence for anything. Playing the lottery makes you RICH!!!!!!!!!!!!! I am sure you can find eight lottery winners and they are now rich.

> https://www.gunowners.org/sk0802htm/
> (:-)
> --
> Cheers,
>
> John B.