On Wednesday, December 8, 2021 at 11:42:27 AM UTC-3, Paparios wrote:
> El miércoles, 8 de diciembre de 2021 a las 11:19:25 UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com escribió:
> > Richard Hertz <hert...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021 at 3:02:31 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >> Richard Hertz <hert...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021 at 1:27:05 PM UTC-3, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> <snip>
> > >>>
> > >>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables AND 4 BOOKS PLUS 5 ARTICLES
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hey Odd, I introduce Paul Droper to you. Curiously, you are both 64
> > >>>> y.o., and share the same interests,
> > >>>> except that you don't address religious issues here (as it must be).
> > >>>>
> > >>>> https://alchetron.com/Paul-Draper-(philosopher)
> > >>>> https://philpeople.org/profiles/paul-draper
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Paul Draper (born 1957) is an American philosopher, most known for his
> > >>>> work in the philosophy of religion. His work on the
> > >>>> evidential argument from evil has been widely influential. He is
> > >>>> currently a professor at Purdue University. He is co-editor of
> > >>>> topics in the philosophy of religion for the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Areas of Specialization
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Philosophy of Religion
> > >>>> *** Science and Religion
> > >>>> *** Probabilistic Reasoning
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Areas of Interest
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ** Formal Epistemology
> > >>>> *** General Philosophy of Science
> > >>>> Philosophy of Consciousness
> > >>>> *Metaphysics of Mind
> > >>>> ** Persons
> > >>>> David Hume
> > >>>
> > >>> And let me tell you, Podd, that your mission here is more evident than ever.
> > >>>
> > >>> I told you two years ago, before I left this forum until this July, that
> > >>> you was here with a hidden agenda,
> > >>> which I told you that it was to defend anything against Einstein and
> > >>> Jewish scientists. I thought that you
> > >>> was a paid troll, but now I recognize that I was wrong all the time..
> > >>>
> > >>> You are a very well versed philosopher, with a distinguished career on
> > >>> your fields: Religion, Science and process of mind.
> > >>>
> > >>> I acknowledge the above, as well as the reasons by which you appeared
> > >>> here 8 years ago. Coincidences? MANY.
> > >>>
> > >>> 1) You're opinionated in almost every field of physics (or chemistry).
> > >>> 2) You are an erudite, with a broad knowledge of what is published and a
> > >>> well substantiated wording in your posts. Intellectual type.
> > >>> 3) You don't know squat about mathematics of physics, which is the reason
> > >>> by which you NEVER engage in posts with such content.
> > >>> 4) I believe that you learnt through 100 books. More, make it 300+. Your
> > >>> job/mission depends on your knowledge about what's written.
> > >>> 5) You make considerable efforts to left religion out of this forum, but
> > >>> I caught you writing about deep stuff that only
> > >>> an erudite would know.
> > >>> 6) Your efforts to hide your real identity are incredibly good. I
> > >>> congratulate you for your bright intelligence.
> > >> Might I just comment that I find your vigorous conviction first that I’m
> > >> 42, then 66, then a publisher, then a philosopher, then a Jewish apologist
> > >> — all of it is hysterically funny. And you haven’t even gotten yet to the
> > >> winemaker in his 80s, the magician in his 40s, or the musician in his 50s.
> > >>>
> > >>> But, even when I recognize your personal agenda as TRULY LEGITIMATE, as a
> > >>> deeply religious Jewish, you SHOULD BE more flexible.
> > >>>
> > >>> Einstein was far from perfect, as any other human on this Earth since the dawn of times.
> > >>>
> > >>> For that, you should accept that some of his scientific flaws be exposed,
> > >>> without charging against who is posting.
> > >>>
> > >>> Because one thing is to defend the good things, but to deny the bad
> > >>> things make you an accomplish of anything that's wrong
> > >>> with physics since 1900, starting with Planck (of whom I've found proofs
> > >>> about HOW he fudged his famous equation).
> > >>>
> > >>> Finally, the rotten and deviated world at which we live can not be
> > >>> explained without dirty maneuvers to grab and hold power
> > >>> AT ANY FIELD AND SOCIAL LEVEL: Politics, economy, finance, history,
> > >>> social sciences, hard sciences, HEALTH sciences, etc. (In
> > >>> this EXACT ORDER).
> > >>>
> > >>> Wars, killing millions of persons, domination by money and power
> > >>> submission, lies, conspiracies, etc. It's always the same thing.
> > >>>
> > >>> The order of the jungle.
> > >> Well, you know what they say: when you are filled with poison, you see
> > >> poison running everywhere.
> > >>
> > >> It’s just a shame that you have lit on one particular discipline to vent
> > >> your nihilistic cynicism about a power-grubbing scourge that you see
> > >> running *everywhere*.
> > >>>
> > >>> So, I don't have ANY problem with your personal agenda, nor I pretend
> > >>> that you come out of the "closet".
> > >>>
> > >>> I only like to understand things, and distinguish REAL from fiction..
> > >>>
> > >>> By the way, I don't care if you are Paul Draper or any other. But your
> > >>> attempt to pass as a woodworker is becoming pathetic.
> > >> Oh my. What should I do with my livelihood now and my customers, now that
> > >> you’ve outed me as an imposter at my craft? I mean, I have a whole shop bay
> > >> filled with imposter-created product scheduled for delivery.
> > >>>
> > >>> Do what you want. It's OK with me, but remember that you're afraid of
> > >>> mathematics, because it never was your thing, philosopher.
> > >>>
> > >> --
> > >> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> > >
> > > Come on, this is my first Paul Droper attempt on you.
> > > Don't tell me that it wasn't convincing if I would used any other idiot's
> > > identity if I had the time.
> > >
> > > I just had a couple of minutes while taking a break on some home repairs.
> > >
> > > Give me more time, and I'll "prove" that you're the reincarnation of Maxwell Smart.
> > > Some similarities are striking!
> > >
> > And what, exactly, would be the *value* of “proving” that I’m the
> > reincarnation of Maxwell Smart? For someone who seems to be ranting a lot
> > lately about human survival being on the brink and that we must all focus
> > on practical matters to solve that, you sure seem bent on wasting your time
> > on pointless and prodigious prattling about stupid things.
> > --
> > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> It is quite funny that this "Richard Hertz" character, which is totally unknown (no web pages, publications, patents, etc) minds so much of the personal information of some of us. He recognizes been an argentinian and alledgelly an electrical engineer.
>
> Fortunately, we do not have the same motivation here.

Paparios, speak for yourself only. You are not allowed to generalize.

For instance, I define you as a bitter anal retentive asshole with zero humor (which requires some wit and intelligence).

But I can't think that everyone here has a similar profile.

It's a real zoo here, and I find very entertaining to detect patterns on behaviors here and assign to some
sci.physics.relativity characters general attributes of a given specie.

Aren't we animals after all? IMHO, you can distill essences of every character after analyzing a long run of posts.

And, as being humans mean being a pack of conflicting essences living together in some kind of physical and
mental ecosystem, each one of us have two or three fundamental "axis" by which we behave, depending upon circumstances.

For instance, and making analogies with other animal species at the zoo, you are mostly a monkey (Proboscis monkey).

Dono is, mostly, a giant poisonous lizard (like a Varanus komodoensis).
Moroney is more like a donkey (Equus asinus).
JanPB is very much like a chihuahua (Canis familiaris).
Bodkin is more like a judgemental and opportunistic owl (Western Screech-owl Megascops kennicottii).
Dork is a stalker kitty in disguise (Felis catus Linnaeus).
Tom, the Big Cat here is more like an old P.I. melanochaita.
Paul is like a reflexive albatross (Diomedeidae).

I could find more analogies, but this is enough to mark my point.