On 20/10/2023 03:45, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <ugsecs$kf01$3@dont-email.me>,
> The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>> On 19/10/2023 22:31, Blueshirt wrote:
>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It's time to teach people who to write in English properly and
>>
>> I mean "how" not "who".
>>
>>>> unambiguously.
>>>
>>> I agree. So what times are suitable and where do we send you?!
>>
>> Chibnall needs the lessons more than me. Send him first.
>>
>
> Everyone wants Chibnall to sink to the bottom of the Mersey.

Did the name Mersey come from a combination of the French and English
words for sea?

>> --
>> The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>>
>> "To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>> stands for." -William Shatner
>>
>
>

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

In article <ugspqd$r512$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>On 20/10/2023 02:58, The Last Doctor wrote:
>> ámyalos <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>> On 16/10/2023 20:56, The Last Doctor wrote:
>>>> Agadeluded <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> continued to hallucinate:
>>
>>>>> You said the whole series apart from the TV Move.
>>>>
>>>> Nope. You need to learn how to read English grammar. With just one comma,
>>>> the meaning could have been ambiguous; however there are a series of
>>>> clauses separated by commas, which in English means it’s meant to be read
>>>> as a list:
>>>>
>>>> The complete show apart from the missing episodes
>>>>
>>>> the TV Movie
>>>>
>>>> all the spinoffs (except maybe K9 and Company)
>>>>
>>>> and what sounds like every DVD extra ever released
>>>>
>>>
>>> Nope. You're saying the whole show apart from {the missing episodes, the
>>> TV Movie, all the spinoffs (except maybe K9 and Company), and what
>>> sounds like every DVD extra ever released}. This is equivalent to
>>> saying, "Everyone got on the bus apart from John, Jill, and Nathan."
>>> It's doesn't mean Jill and Nathan got on the bus as well. Your statement
>>> is therefore ambiguous at best.
>>
>> I concede that it’s possible that it would be ambiguous to someone without
>> a firm command of grammar and the English language. But only you seem to
>> have suffered from this “ambiguity” - everyone else knew what was
>intended.
>
>You have not proof that everyone else interpreted it your way or will
>interpret it you way and you have conceded that it was ambiguous as I said.
>
>> Stop trying to tell me what I was saying when what you mean is your unique
>> interpretation of what I was saying, please.
>>
>
>You conceded that it was ambiguous so I am entitled to interpret it any
>way I want within that ambiguity.
>
>>>>>
>>>>> They're not showing the whole series either, it's just selected episodes
>>>>> of the original series such as City of Death and the whole of the new
>>>>> series is already on iPlayer now.
>>>>
>>>> Sources claim the entire available show.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Except they don't. We're not even getting An Unearthly Child the first
>>> every episode like you say below. This is clearly deceptive marketing
>>> bullshit which uses the word available to mean anything it wants. It's
>>> time to teach people who to write in English properly and unambiguously.
>>
>> They didn’t know that would be the case till a few days ago. That only
>> kicked off cos Stef Coburn is a money grabbing jerk. He already had a suit
>> to own the copyright to TARDIS kicked out in 2013. This time the impetus
>> (apart from another landmark anniversary) seems to be that he loathes the
>> idea of a black man as the Doctor.
>>
>
>How do you know it's not because he's gay? We've already had a black
>woman, so why isn't he complaining about that, except for the fact that
>the entire Chibnall era is not canon.
>
>>>
>>>> Sadly the very first serial may be missing for a while, though why the BBC
>>>> are vacillating this way is bizarre: unlike Terry Nation, Anthony Coburn
>>>> was a BBC employee, a staff writer, so copyright in his episodes remains
>>>> vested in the BBC and Stef Coburn hasn’t got a legal leg to stand
>on - it’s
>>>> just an unprincipled money grab by what seems to be a thoroughly unpleasant
>>>> person seeking “Vengeance!” (A direct quote).
>>>
>>> Maybe the Director Waris Hussein wants royalties too for his part in the
>>> writing.
>>
>> Nope. Hussein went on record to point out that he never even met Coburn.
>>
>
>He still inserted stuff including various caveman grunts while he was
>filming it.
>
>>>>> ITVX wants you to pay to watch all of them. They've got to be joking.
>>>>
>>>> To be fair, ITVX wants you to pay for their premium service which includes
>>>> fewer ads (not none though) and all the BritBox content. For most people,
>>>
>>> Oh, so they want you to pay for ads too. They can fuck themselves if
>>> they think I'm paying to watch commercials for tampons and other women's
>>> products.
>>
>> Oh poor you. Sadly they don’t advertise wank toys for incels, so you
>> clearly can’t be targeted with the products you want.
>
>I don't need any wank toys. Maybe you do. What I currently need is an
>RTX 4090. Why can't they advertise one of those at 1/3 of the rip off
>price they are currently being sold at?
>
>>
>>>> classic Doctor Who there is incidental, not its biggest draw. And now it
>>>> will not even be that, just an alternative way to view (in the same way
>>>> that “Billions” can be seen on both Sky Atlantic and Paramount+,
>or “Star
>>>> Trek: Picard” on both Amazon and Paramount+”.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Only the third series is worth watching. The first two totally destroy
>>> the character of Picard and I'm not paying for Paramount+ to watch it a
>>> day earlier and was not happy with people torrenting it a day before I
>>> paid to watch it. Clueless imbeciles. It should have come out on the
>>> same day and time of both.
>>
>> Yawn. I was going to say Star Trek will be a Paramount exclusive going
>> forward, but it won’t - they cancelled Prodigy (the CGI kids Star Trek show
>
>Never watched not. Not even going to waste my time downloading fake Star
>Trek.
>
>> - not bad, actually) and Netflix have paid to get season 2 completed, at
>> least.
>>
>
>Lower Decks is the only thing that comes close to being decent and even
>then it's still garbage, but at least I don't have to waste my time
>torrenting it.
>
>>>>>>> but going by the picture on the BBC
>>>>>>> website featuring two fake female Doctors as if they were cannon,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I assume you meant canon, but the only female Doctors shown were real
>>>>>
>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Doctors from series 11-13 so that’s two points deducted from your sanity
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope. Whittaker and Martin are not canon since the Timeless Child
>>>>> monster is pure degenerate fan fiction. Doctor Who officially ended in
>>>>> 2017.
>>>>
>>>> You cannot legitimately argue from your deluded alternate fan fiction
>>>> universe.
>>>
>>> Everyone say the Doctor die at the end of The Doctor Falls and the
>>> screen go blank. Everything after that is the Doctor hallucinating in
>>> his final milliseconds of life.
>>
>> No, only you and a few other outraged morons claim any of that.
>>
>
>We are not morons and we form the majority given that the viewership of
>the show has fallen from 10 million to only 2.2 million.
>
>>> In the real world, the primary canon of Doctor Who is the whole
>>>> show commissioned by and broadcast by the BBC - note that this includes at
>>>> least some of the Big Finish Eight Doctor audio dramas (two “seasons” of
>>>
>>> Nope, that is not canon either. It totally humiliates the Eight Doctor
>>> by making him Whittaker's lackey and taking his radiance away from him
>>> to make her look better.
>>
>> How do radio episodes from 2007-2008 humiliate the Eighth Doctor and make
>> him Whittaker’s lackey? You’re being obtuse and demented (oh what am I
>> saying, that’s your usual mode).
>
>I was talking about Whittaker's last episode where she was replaced by
>David Tennant. I am not saying regenerated because clothes do not
>regenerate.
>
>>
>>> It's not wonder Tom Baker refused to be in it,
>>> and good job too. It don't want to remember him that way, or any of the
>>> previous Doctors.
>>
>> He wanted to but was ill, actually.
>
>A likely story... I hope he is not really ill.
>
>>He doesn’t want to be seen so frail as
>> the Doctor.
>
>Davison, Colin Baker and McCoy, all of them looked frail, even McGann
>the way they were filmed, they all looked week and distorted.
>
>>
>>>> which were commissioned for and first aired on what was then BBC Radio 7).
>>>> And that includes series 11-13 of the modern show and all the associated
>>>> specials up to and including “The Power of the Doctor”.
>>>
>>> All of which are not canon.
>>
>> Yes they are.
>>
>
>No they are not. They are all fan fiction same as Big Finish unbound or
>whatever it's called.
>
>>> Doctor Who ended in 2017.
>>
>> No it doesn’t.
>
>Yes it did. You saw Capalid die.
>
>>
>>> It belongs to the
>>> fans not the BBC since its original creators are no longer here.
>>
>> No it doesn’t. You’re welcome to produce your deluded alternative universe
>> fan fiction but the show belongs to the BBC (for now) and the episodes they
>> commission are the canon, by definition.
>
>No they are not. The BBC belongs to me and the license fee payers. We
>decide what is canon just like share holders.
>
>>
>>>> You cannot legitimately argue from your deluded alternate fan fiction
>>>> universe.
>>>
>>> Yes I can. If Chibnall can write fan fic then so either you or I.
>>
>> You can write it but you can’t argue from it as the legitimate canon. Only
>
>Yes I can to both. It will be like LibraOffice which is universally
>agreed to be the canonical form of what was OpenOffice which not has to
>call itself OpenOffice.org. The BBC will similarly have to rename the
>series DoctorWho.org to distinguish it from the original when all of the
>forks take over from it because they've been better written and produced
>and do not lecture the ordinance with perverted ideology intended to
>sexually groom children.
>
>> a complete imbecile would believe otherwise - oh wait, I’m mansplaining to
>> you. Sorry.
>>
>
>You are the complete imbecile. No one accepts Disney Star Wars and woke
>Star Trek from J J Abrams, the destroyed of franchises, as being canon.
>
>>> I've
>>> even consider your fan fic series 10 to be canon
>>
>> I wrote a few plot noodles, not a season. And they are totally not canon.
>>
>
>That's up to fans to decide. Given that they were better written and
>plotted out than Chibnall's garbage I consider them canon over what he's
>written.
>
>>> but not anything
>>> written by Chibnall. My series 11 follows not Chibnall's.
>>
>> Thank God that’s not true or it really would have been cancelled.
>>
>
>Nope. My series would not have dropped to only 2.2 million viewers or
>less, because I unlike Chibnall did not destroy the character of the
>Doctor.
>
>>>>> Wrong. It's explicitly stated in Flux and Whittaker's final episode.
>>>>
>>>> No, it’s not. Give a quote to prove me wrong or admit that you’re lying.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I am not going to traumatize my self by watching it again.
>>
>> So you’re a liar. Just admit it and move on.
>>
>
>I told you I am not going to traumatize my self by watching it again.
>They does not make me a liar. You go and watch it if you want to
>traumatize yourself.
>
>>>
>>>>> The Timeless Child monster was willingly recruited into the Division and
>>>>
>>>> Prove it was willing, or that the Division actually engaged in such
>>>> operations. The show only hints at the Division - we’re clearly meant to
>>>
>>> We have Tekteun's speech which says that it was and that it committed
>>> horrendous crimes against all life-forms which is why Jo Martin fled.
>>
>> Where’s the quote to support this fantasy of yours? You don’t have
>to watch
>> - just Google the excellent Chakoteya transcripts and search for all
>> Tectuen’s lines. It’s not rocket science, though perhaps it’s as
>far beyond
>> your capabilities as it is Dave’s?
>>
>> Of course, your main challenge will be finding imaginary lines that don’t
>> exist. Which is the real reason you can’t provide quotes.
>>
>
>I told you I am not going to traumatize my self by watching or reading
>it again. The dialogue is there.
>
>>>> believe that they were conducting distasteful “Black Ops” but it
>would seem
>>>
>>> Distasteful? Stop using stupid woke newspeak. They were hideous, illegal
>>> and genocidal. Tekteun wanted to destroy all life in not only this
>>> universe but in universe 2.0.
>>
>> You’re still just making shit up unless you prove otherwise with quotes.
>>
>
>The dialogue is there.
>
>>>> that once the Doctor realised that, she rebelled against them, leading to
>>>> her memory erasure and total reset (yes, this is fairly poorly explained
>>>> and done. But that’s what we’re meant to believe.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yer, like it took her millions of regenerations and billions of years to
>>> figure that all out, which she stood there doing nothing to stop it.
>>> That makes her willingly complicit.
>>
>> You’re still just making shit up unless you prove otherwise with quotes.
>>
>
>The dialogue is there.
>
>>
>> [SNIP much, much more of the invented crap that seems to have come only
>> from the voices in ámyalos’ head. Quotes, or you’re a liar. End of.]
>>
>
>The dialogue is there. The voices are in your head alone.
>
>>>> Now you’re trying to use your deluded fan fiction to justify your
>desire to
>>>> kill off the show. Just walk away and find something more to your taste.
>>>> Leni Riefenstahl perhaps.
>>>
>>> Chibnall already killed off the show.
>>
>> No. This is an objective lie.
>>
>
>That is an objective fact. The viewing figures plummeted to only 2.2
>million the lowest in the show's entire history.
>
>>> Doctor Who ended in 2017.
>>
>> No. This is an objective lie.
>>
>
>No, this is a fact. The Doctor died in The Doctor Falls and the TARDIS
>blowing up in Twice Upon A Time represents the Doctor's mind being
>scrambled in the moment before brain death.
>
>>> Unless
>>> the Timeless Child monster is recond Doctor Who will remain forever dead.
>>
>> No. This is an objective lie.
>>
>
>No, this an objective fact.
>
>> [SNIP much more bullshit from Aggie.]
>>
>
>Only in your delusions.
>
>>>> All this is the deluded fan fiction in your head. None of that is in the
>>>> show.
>>>
>>> Of course it's not in the show.
>>
>> So why do you keep arguing on the basis of all this shit invented in your
>> head? No one else believes your shit. Write it as fan fiction. Publish it.
>> Tell us all who likes it so we know who is an idiot whose opinions can
>> safely be disregarded by Doctor Who fans.
>
>None of it is in the show because Doctor Who ended in 2017 so how can I
>be referring to Doctor Who. The Adventures of the Timeless Child Monster
>is not Doctor Who, it's fan fiction and I have every right to refute it.
>
>>
>> [SNIP a fuckton more of deranged bullshit based on imagined bollocks not
>> found in the show but coming solely from the schizophrenic voices in Aggies
>> head.]
>
>You are the one suffering from voices in your head.
>
>>
>> You want to discuss anything about Doctor Who? Provide QUOTES FROM THE SHOW
>> to support your position, or expect to be treated like the deluded liar you
>> are.
>>
>> Without QUOTES, you’re done here.
>>
>
>The show ended in 2017. I am not going to provide quotes from fan
>fiction, especially when I have to subject myself to unbearable trauma
>in order to obtain them.
>
>As far as I am conferenced Gallifrey is Free Gaul and the Time Lords
>were never converted to Cyber Lords and there was no Tekteun or Timeless
>Child monster at its foundation or in its history ever. The Shobogans
>were nothing more than saboteurs just as Terrance Dicks intended them to
>be since he created the word from a consonantal shift of the letters and
>it shouldn't even be capitalized, and the Time Lords had mechanical
>regeneration long before they had biological regeneration as stated by
>Terrance Dicks in The Underworld. Who should we believe, the man who
>created the Time Lords or Chibnall's fan fic?
>

On 20/10/2023 03:46, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <ugsefq$kemm$7@dont-email.me>,
> The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>> On 19/10/2023 23:19, The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <ugs8f4$j6c0$1@dont-email.me>,

>>> The Tiemless Child was a low point in DW, lower then the JN-t Era!
>>>
>>
>> The lowest point ever. Doctor Who can never recover from it.
>>
>
> under RTD pulls the retcon!

Unless RTD pulls a retcon and it better be very soon then his second era
will be consider as nothing more than Carry On Doctor.

>
>>>> --
>>>> Jodie Whittaker played the Thirteenth Doctor in Doctor Who.
>>>
>>> #savedoctorwho #retconthetimelesschild #thetimelesschildisantidoctorwho
>>
>> Hear, hear!
>>
>
> Exactly!
>

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

On 20/10/2023 03:47, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <ugskom$m5ol$3@dont-email.me>,
> The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>> On 19/10/2023 23:08, Blueshirt wrote:
>>> The Last Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Apologies - Network at it again, sending but leaving message in outbox.
>>>
>>> That just happened to me!
>>
>> Seems everyone is being affected.
>>
>
> hich server are you using?

Read the header.

>
>> --
>> The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>>
>> "To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>> stands for." -William Shatner
>>
>
>

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

On 20/10/2023 03:43, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <ugscmd$k9me$2@dont-email.me>,
> The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>> On 19/10/2023 17:18, The Last Doctor wrote:
>>> The Usenet Village Idiot <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>> In article <ugpmh0$3tahc$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The topic of discussion, again, was 1989 so you bringing up Chibnall and
>>>>> Whittaker is just you being obsessed with irrelevancies. Your deranged
>>>>> fantasies about sackings and cancellations in the 2010s without a shred of
>>>>> evidence to support them are irrelevant at any time, but even more so when
>>>>> the topic is the show’s first cancellation in 1989.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1989. Got it yet? If you want to discuss that here then please go ahead,
>>>>> but leave your demented rantings about 21st smoo oh κ might possibly be
>>>>> relevant (if you were able to separate reality from
>>>>> your bizarre fantasies, of course).
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Chibnall from his On Air Appearance should have been a warning!!
>>>
>>> Indeed it should. JN-T didn’t pay attention though.
>>>
>>> Bear in mind that when Chibnall became show runner had written some half
>>> decent episodes of Who,
>>
>> And then we later found out that both RTD and Moffat had to make
>> substantial changes to his scripts in order to make them usable because
>> the writing was so bad.
>>
>>> had helmed Torchwood successfully for RTD, and had
>>> recently had the triumph of Broadchurch.
>>
>> Chibnall totally destroyed Torchwood. RTD had to step in in order to
>> stop it from being cancelled. Broadchurch was total shit as can be seen
>> by the collapse of the ratings for the second and third series.
>
> In TWS1, he was dismal. Warning sign!
>
>>
>>>
>>> What the show really needs is a show runner who lets all the episodes be
>>> written by others. The show runners job should be to guide the whole and
>>> tie together the selected stories, if they need it - in my opinion, the ego
>>> driven thing where the showrunner feels they need to write at least the
>>> opening and closing stories of each season, and every special (and in
>>> Chibnall’s case, take at least a couple-writer credit for nearly every
>>> episode) actively harms the overall quality of the show.
>>>
>>
>> What the show really needs is a show runner who doesn't try to use
>> almost every episode in order to spread his own degenerate bigoted
>> one-sided politically motivated woke propaganda and lecture and sexually
>> groom the audience.
>>
>> People are not interested in perverted gender and identity politics
>> being inserted into show that are supposed to be there to entertain
>> them. Since puberty they've already decided what sexuality they are and
>> with who and what they identify. Only a totally sick deranged pervert
>> would try to influence the sexuality or identity of a pre-pubescent child.
>>
>
> Exactly!

And I should have added underage child as well, and that means underage
anywhere in the world not just here.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

On 19/10/2023 23:15, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <ugs2rf$hsc5$3@dont-email.me>,
> The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>> On 19/10/2023 14:37, Blueshirt wrote:
>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>> And you wonder why the show was cancelled and Chibnall and Whittaker
>>>> were sacked.
>>>
>>> Please cite a source that backs up you claim that Chibnall and Whittaker
>>> were sacked.
>>>
>>> I could certainly believe Chris Chibnall was quietly pushed, but IIRC
>>> Jodie always talked of leaving the role after a certain period of time...
>>> and five years is long enough for one Doctor. (IMHO of course.)
>>
>> Given that we know that RTD has already written half of Gatwa's second
>> series and he isn't even half way through filming the first it is clear
>> that half way through filming Whittaker's second series when the BBC saw
>> the degenerate amateur fan fiction that he had written for the third
>> series and the plummeting ratings that they gave him the sack on the
>> spot by not renewing his contract which was up for review. Since
>> Chibnall was sacked Whittaker had to go too as no new show runner would
>> be willing to work with such a talentless actress with no stage
>> presence, gravitas, or charisma, that didn't make any effort at all to
>> learn or understand the character of the Doctor. Jo Martin did a better
>> job than Whittaker wither only 15 minutes of screen time.
>>
>> Chibnall was given his bag and shown through the door and Whittaker
>> followed him knowing she had no future left on the show.
>>
>
> It should have happened in 2018!!
>

It should never have happened at all because Chibnall should never have
been made show runner the moment he suggested a woke female Doctor,
changing the Doctor origin stroy and rebooting the entire series in
order to justify the Doctor being female.

>> --
>> The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>>
>> "To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>> stands for." -William Shatner
>>
>
>

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

The Last Doctor wrote on 20/10/23 4:31 am:

<Snip>

> Apologies - Network at it again, sending but leaving message in outbox.
> Deleted now.
>
Are you referring to 'in home' network rather than the Internet network,
Mike??
--
Daniel

Blueshirt wrote on 20/10/23 8:54 am:
> Blueshirt wrote:
>
>>
>>
>
> Clearly one of my more intelligent posts! :-)
>
Well, no-one could argue with you ..... except for the asswipe, maybe!!
--
Daniel

Blueshirt wrote on 20/10/23 8:50 am:
> Idlehands wrote:
>> On 2023-10-19 7:37 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>> And you wonder why the show was cancelled and Chibnall and
>>>> Whittaker were sacked.
>>>
>>> Please cite a source that backs up your claim that Chibnall and
>>> Whittaker were sacked.
>>>
>>> I could certainly believe Chris Chibnall was quietly pushed, but
>>> IIRC Jodie always talked of leaving the role after a certain
>>> period of time... and five years is long enough for one Doctor.
>>> (IMHO of course.)
>>
>> Using logic and facts with Aggy just isn't fair since they don't
>> exist in whatever universe he resides in.
>
> Agamemnon has access to the same internet that I have and I'm sure
> there was talk of a three/four series and out pact between Jodie
> Whittaker and Chris Chibnall... I just couldn't find the link when I
> wanted to.
>
Yeah! I remember someone suggesting three seasons and out!! Three
seasons seems to be the going rate for new-Who Doctors .... exempt
Chris, of course.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 20/10/23 1:43 pm:
> In article <ugsdat$kemm$2@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor
> <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>> On 19/10/2023 22:23, Blueshirt wrote:

<Snip>

>>> For a show that you claim ended in 2017 you seem to spend a lot
>>> of time worrying about the events since then? Why does anything
>>> that has happened with Doctor Who after 2017 trouble you so
>>> much?
>>
>> Doctor Who ended in 2017. I want it to return from the point it
>> left off.
>
> We shall see under RTD!

No we shan't, asswipe!!

--
Daniel

The True Doctor wrote:

> On 16/10/2023 22:14, Blueshirt wrote:
> > The True Doctor wrote:
> > >
> > > Doctor Who is dead in the water unless the Timeless Child monster is
> > > removed from canon completely and that means that both Whittaker and
> > > Martin must be illusions created by the Celestial Toymaker or
> > > hallucinations.
> >
> > It is entirely possible that your wish turns out to be a good guess
> > and that is the road RTD takes Doctor Who down ... I wouldn't like to
> > be putting any money on it, but we'll soon find out won't we?
>
> We shall see. If RTD has any sense he will erase the entire Chibnall
> era and remove the insult to William Harnell and fans who spent their
> time and money over the years to keep the show alive.

I just hope RTD makes Doctor Who episodes that are entertaining... I'm
not interested in him wasting time undoing the last five years to keep a
few hard-core fans happy. He has an audience eagerly awaiting David
Tennant's return, take the show forward and keep that audience.

The True Doctor wrote:

> On 19/10/2023 22:31, Blueshirt wrote:
> > The True Doctor wrote:
> > >
> > > It's time to teach people who to write in English properly and
>
> I mean "how" not "who".
>
> > > unambiguously.
> >
> > I agree. So what times are suitable and where do we send you?!
>
> Chibnall needs the lessons more than me. Send him first.

Fortunately, Chibnall has gone... so why not just look forward to the new
era of Doctor Who? All this retcon this, retcon that, stuff is
nonsense... out with the old in with the new.

The True Doctor wrote:
>
> Am I having deja vu again?

I don't know about deja vu but there's something odd going on with RADW
in the last few days... <shrugs>

Odder than the usual odd of course! ;-)

The True Doctor wrote:

> On 16/10/2023 22:06, Blueshirt wrote:
> >
> > Don't like Doctor Who? Fine... don't watch it! There is more than one
> > TV programme out there to watch. But continually stating Doctor Who
> > ended six years ago but then watch every episode since then just
> > doesn't make any sense.
>
> I am watching it* so that other people don't have to. As I said in
> either posts I am not watch Chibnall's crap again. I do not want to be
> traumatized by it as second time.

You deserve a medal for your public service duty then! As I certainly
wouldn't waste my time watching TV shows that I don't like.

The True Doctor wrote on 20/10/23 1:50 pm:
> On 20/10/2023 03:45, The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <ugsecs$kf01$3@dont-email.me>,
>> The True Doctor  <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>> On 19/10/2023 22:31, Blueshirt wrote:

<Snip>

>> Everyone wants Chibnall to sink to the bottom of the Mersey.
>
> Did the name Mersey come from a combination of the French and English
> words for sea?

Or is it a mis-heard/mis-spelt 'Merci', as in thankful for actually
making land??
--
Daniel

The True Doctor wrote:

> On 19/10/2023 23:19, The Doctor wrote:
> > In article <ugs8f4$j6c0$1@dont-email.me>,
> >The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
> >>The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
> > > > On 19/10/2023 14:37, Blueshirt wrote:
> > > > > The True Doctor wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And you wonder why the show was cancelled and Chibnall and
> > > > > > Whittaker were sacked.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please cite a source that backs up you claim that Chibnall and
> > > > > Whittaker were sacked.
> > > > >
> > > > > I could certainly believe Chris Chibnall was quietly pushed,
> > > > > but IIRC Jodie always talked of leaving the role after a
> > > > > certain period of time... and five years is long enough for
> > > > > one Doctor. (IMHO of course.)
> > > >
> > > > Given that we know that RTD has already written half of Gatwa's
> > > > second series and he isn't even half way through filming the first
> > >
> > > What you know is wrong. The 60th anniversary specials completed
> > > filming in July 2022: series 14 completed in July 2023: the
> > > Christmas special for 2023 has been completed: and production of
> > > series 15 has begun. Series 15 will be 9 episodes long, one more
> > > than the 8 of series 14.
> > >
> > > > it is clear
> > > > that half way through filming Whittaker's second series when the
> > > > BBC saw the degenerate amateur fan fiction that he had written
> > > > for the third series and the plummeting ratings that they gave
> > > > him the sack on the spot by not renewing his contract which was
> > > > up for review.
> > >
> > > That’s all nonsense made up in your head. Nothing about what Bad
> > > Wolf and RTD are doing make anything clear with regard to
> > > Chibnall’s era. No-one connected to the show has ever suggested
> > > that he be sacked.
> > >
> > >
> > > > Since
> > > > Chibnall was sacked Whittaker had to go too as no new show runner
> > > > would be willing to work with such a talentless actress with no
> > > > stage presence, gravitas, or charisma, that didn't make any
> > > > effort at all to learn or understand the character of the Doctor.
> > >
> > > Nothing but minority opinion. Bafflegab sustaining an utterly
> > > spurious chain of what is definitely not logic or reasoning.
> > >
> > > > Jo Martin did a better
> > > > job than Whittaker wither only 15 minutes of screen time.
> > >
> > > Also opinion, but yes she did do a fair job.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Chibnall was given his bag and shown through the door and
> > > > Whittaker followed him knowing she had no future left on the show.
> > >
> > > Pure speculation with no basis even in rumour other than from a few
> > > snowflake “fans” making it up.
> > >
> >
> > The Tiemless Child was a low point in DW, lower then the JN-t Era!
> >
>
> The lowest point ever. Doctor Who can never recover from it.

But it will recover from it, with new episodes coming in November on the
BBC and streamed worldwide on Disney+ ...

It's entirely possible that Doctor Who could become popular in overseas
countries that have never had Doctor Who available to them before.
Disney+ is available in over 150 different countries, the BBC never sold
Doctor Who to that many countries. So assuming they all get Doctor Who,
that's a massive potential global reach for RTD and his new era of Doctor
Who.

The True Doctor wrote on 20/10/23 12:27 pm:

<Snip>

> I am watching it* so that other people don't have to.

Oh, how self-sacrificial of you, Aggy!!

> As I said in either posts I am not watch Chibnall's crap again. I do
> not want to be traumatized by it as second time.

--
Daniel

Daniel65 wrote:

> Blueshirt wrote on 20/10/23 8:54 am:
> > Blueshirt wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Clearly one of my more intelligent posts! :-)
> >
> Well, no-one could argue with you ..... except for the asswipe, maybe!!

But if he does, I won't see it! ;-)

Daniel65 wrote:

> Blueshirt wrote on 20/10/23 8:50 am:
> >
> > Agamemnon has access to the same internet that I have and I'm sure
> > there was talk of a three/four series and out pact between Jodie
> > Whittaker and Chris Chibnall... I just couldn't find the link when I
> > wanted to.
>
> Yeah! I remember someone suggesting three seasons and out!! Three
> seasons seems to be the going rate for new-Who Doctors .... exempt
> Chris, of course.

For me, I think three or four seasons is most that any Doctor should be
around. A new Doctor every few years keeps it fresh and enables a reset
button.

On 20/10/2023 11:24, Blueshirt wrote:
> The True Doctor wrote:
>
>> On 19/10/2023 23:19, The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <ugs8f4$j6c0$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>> The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>>>> On 19/10/2023 14:37, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And you wonder why the show was cancelled and Chibnall and
>>>>>>> Whittaker were sacked.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please cite a source that backs up you claim that Chibnall and
>>>>>> Whittaker were sacked.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I could certainly believe Chris Chibnall was quietly pushed,
>>>>>> but IIRC Jodie always talked of leaving the role after a
>>>>>> certain period of time... and five years is long enough for
>>>>>> one Doctor. (IMHO of course.)
>>>>>
>>>>> Given that we know that RTD has already written half of Gatwa's
>>>>> second series and he isn't even half way through filming the first
>>>>
>>>> What you know is wrong. The 60th anniversary specials completed
>>>> filming in July 2022: series 14 completed in July 2023: the
>>>> Christmas special for 2023 has been completed: and production of
>>>> series 15 has begun. Series 15 will be 9 episodes long, one more
>>>> than the 8 of series 14.
>>>>
>>>>> it is clear
>>>>> that half way through filming Whittaker's second series when the
>>>>> BBC saw the degenerate amateur fan fiction that he had written
>>>>> for the third series and the plummeting ratings that they gave
>>>>> him the sack on the spot by not renewing his contract which was
>>>>> up for review.
>>>>
>>>> That’s all nonsense made up in your head. Nothing about what Bad
>>>> Wolf and RTD are doing make anything clear with regard to
>>>> Chibnall’s era. No-one connected to the show has ever suggested
>>>> that he be sacked.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Since
>>>>> Chibnall was sacked Whittaker had to go too as no new show runner
>>>>> would be willing to work with such a talentless actress with no
>>>>> stage presence, gravitas, or charisma, that didn't make any
>>>>> effort at all to learn or understand the character of the Doctor.
>>>>
>>>> Nothing but minority opinion. Bafflegab sustaining an utterly
>>>> spurious chain of what is definitely not logic or reasoning.
>>>>
>>>>> Jo Martin did a better
>>>>> job than Whittaker wither only 15 minutes of screen time.
>>>>
>>>> Also opinion, but yes she did do a fair job.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Chibnall was given his bag and shown through the door and
>>>>> Whittaker followed him knowing she had no future left on the show.
>>>>
>>>> Pure speculation with no basis even in rumour other than from a few
>>>> snowflake “fans” making it up.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The Tiemless Child was a low point in DW, lower then the JN-t Era!
>>>
>>
>> The lowest point ever. Doctor Who can never recover from it.
>
> But it will recover from it, with new episodes coming in November on the
> BBC and streamed worldwide on Disney+ ...
>
> It's entirely possible that Doctor Who could become popular in overseas
> countries that have never had Doctor Who available to them before.
> Disney+ is available in over 150 different countries, the BBC never sold
> Doctor Who to that many countries. So assuming they all get Doctor Who,
> that's a massive potential global reach for RTD and his new era of Doctor
> Who.

Disney+ is losing subscribers in their millions by the day. What makes
you think that people in non-woke countries would want to watch a camp
drag show fronted by an effeminate homosexual?

To put things into perspective Disney's fake Star Wars shows barely got
around 6 million viewers per-episode on average world wide.

Disney+ is a joke. It's never going to help Doctor Who sell any
merchandise ever again which is what made the most money for Doctor Who,
after Chibnall alienated and disenfranchised most of its fans because
they were male and heterosexual.

Who is going to want to spend their money on an action-figure of an
effeminate homosexual or a man dressed in drag pretending that he's a
girl? Why would anyone allow their children to watch something like
this? No wonder Disney+ is losing all of its subscribers and it's share
price has halved in the past two years.

Nobody bought any Jodie Whittaker action figures either because the
clueless woke BBC were trying to sell the show to the wrong audience,
uneducated women between the ages of 35 to 44 of low income, C2s, Ds,
and Es, and gays and lesbians who together with transexuals only make up
3% of the population according to the last census.

I think selling merchandise is what you might be getting at since the
BBC sold Doctor Who to Disney+ for less than HBO Max was paying for it
which was less than Amazon was paying and less than Netflix originally
paid, therefore unless it sells lots and lots of merchandise it's not
going to make anything like it did before.

Get Woke, Go Broke!

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

On 20/10/2023 11:19, Daniel65 wrote:
> The True Doctor wrote on 20/10/23 1:50 pm:
>> On 20/10/2023 03:45, The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <ugsecs$kf01$3@dont-email.me>,
>>> The True Doctor  <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>>> On 19/10/2023 22:31, Blueshirt wrote:
>
> <Snip>
>
>>> Everyone wants Chibnall to sink to the bottom of the Mersey.
>>
>> Did the name Mersey come from a combination of the French and English
>> words for sea?
>
> Or is it a mis-heard/mis-spelt 'Merci', as in thankful for actually
> making land??

Possible.

Thames is a corruption and consonantal shift of the Greek word Potamos
which means river. Maybe it's related to the river Po which contains the
part of Potamos that is missing from Thames.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

On 20/10/2023 11:06, Blueshirt wrote:
> The True Doctor wrote:
>
>> On 19/10/2023 22:31, Blueshirt wrote:
>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It's time to teach people who to write in English properly and
>>
>> I mean "how" not "who".
>>
>>>> unambiguously.
>>>
>>> I agree. So what times are suitable and where do we send you?!
>>
>> Chibnall needs the lessons more than me. Send him first.
>
> Fortunately, Chibnall has gone... so why not just look forward to the new
> era of Doctor Who? All this retcon this, retcon that, stuff is
> nonsense... out with the old in with the new.

Unless the Timeless Child is retconed then there can be not out with the
old. The character of the Doctor has been totally destroyed by it and
been turned into a monster. Why would anyone want to traumatize their
children by getting them to watch this degenerate fan-fic. Is this what
you want to teach your children, that when they grow up they can commit
crimes against humanity, civilization, and unlimited mass genocide
against all forms of life, and there will be no repercussions for them
if they just run and hide?

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

Blueshirt wrote on 20/10/23 9:28 pm:
> Daniel65 wrote:
>> Blueshirt wrote on 20/10/23 8:50 am:
>>>
>>> Agamemnon has access to the same internet that I have and I'm
>>> sure there was talk of a three/four series and out pact between
>>> Jodie Whittaker and Chris Chibnall... I just couldn't find the
>>> link when I wanted to.
>>
>> Yeah! I remember someone suggesting three seasons and out!! Three
>> seasons seems to be the going rate for new-Who Doctors .... exempt
>> Chris, of course.
>
> For me, I think three or four seasons is most that any Doctor should
> be around. A new Doctor every few years keeps it fresh and enables a
> reset button.
>
Sounds reasonable to me.
--
Daniel

The True Doctor wrote on 20/10/23 11:11 pm:
> On 20/10/2023 11:06, Blueshirt wrote:
>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>> On 19/10/2023 22:31, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> It's time to teach people who to write in English properly
>>>>> and
>>>
>>> I mean "how" not "who".
>>>
>>>>> unambiguously.
>>>>
>>>> I agree. So what times are suitable and where do we send you?!
>>>
>>> Chibnall needs the lessons more than me. Send him first.
>>
>> Fortunately, Chibnall has gone... so why not just look forward to
>> the new era of Doctor Who? All this retcon this, retcon that, stuff
>> is nonsense... out with the old in with the new.
>
> Unless the Timeless Child is retconed then there can be not out with
> the old. The character of the Doctor has been totally destroyed by it
> and been turned into a monster.

But, hang on, don't you and the asswipe claim that 'Doctor Who' ended in
2017 or there abouts .... and now we've had DoctorDavid come back we can
continue off into Time can't we??

> Why would anyone want to traumatize
> their children by getting them to watch this degenerate fan-fic. Is
> this what you want to teach your children, that when they grow up
> they can commit crimes against humanity, civilization, and unlimited
> mass genocide against all forms of life, and there will be no
> repercussions for them if they just run and hide?
>
--
Daniel

In article <ugsq3e$r512$3@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>On 20/10/2023 03:46, The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <ugsefq$kemm$7@dont-email.me>,
>> The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>> On 19/10/2023 23:19, The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article <ugs8f4$j6c0$1@dont-email.me>,
>
>>>> The Tiemless Child was a low point in DW, lower then the JN-t Era!
>>>>
>>>
>>> The lowest point ever. Doctor Who can never recover from it.
>>>
>>
>> under RTD pulls the retcon!
>
>Unless RTD pulls a retcon and it better be very soon then his second era
>will be consider as nothing more than Carry On Doctor.
>

Correct.

>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jodie Whittaker played the Thirteenth Doctor in Doctor Who.
>>>>
>>>> #savedoctorwho #retconthetimelesschild #thetimelesschildisantidoctorwho
>>>
>>> Hear, hear!
>>>
>>
>> Exactly!
>>
>
>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
Confusion gives protections to evil while ignoring the innocent. -unknown Beware https://mindspring.com