On 2022-09-12 08:27:45 +0000, tsbr...@gmail.com said:
> On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 5:20:28 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> In article <tflncp$13ug$1...@gioia.aioe.org>,
>> Your Name <Your...@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>> On 2022-09-11 12:57:30 +0000, Daniel65 said:
>>>> Your Name wrote on 11/9/22 7:45 am:
>>>>> On 2022-09-10 12:09:25 +0000, Daniel65 said:
>>>>>> Your Name wrote on 10/9/22 7:41 am:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Two of the main Freeview TV channels here in New Zealand both dropped
>>>>>>> *all* their regular shows last night for a six hour "news special" and
>>>>>>> they've restarted going on and on about it again this morning.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 'a six hour "news special"'!! Boy, are you getting off easy!!
>>>>>
>>>>> That was simply the first go. It's been going pretty much non-stop
>>>>> since then with regular programming abandoned. Probably the same on the
>>>>> Sky TV BBC News channel.
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course, because it is late changes with no warning, shows set to
>>>>> record are still recording, but what you get is not that show, but
>>>>> stuff about the Queen.
>>>>
>>>> Hmm! I must have an intelligent PVR cause, although I have it set up to
>>>> record our 7:00p.m. National news every night, it decided NOT to record
>>>> it ..... and it had been replaced by Royal News in any case!! ;-P
>>>
>>> It would depend on how qucikly the on-screen guide is / can be updated
>>> and how you get your TV (i.e. over-air broadcast, internet connection,
>>> etc.). With last minute changes, it's not possible for the guide to be
>>> updated, so the recorder doesn't know there has been a programme change
>>> and simply thinks it is recording the correct show.
>>>
>>> It also depends on how good the data entry team on that on-screen guide
>>> are. Sky TV's data entry team are pretty hopeless, so we often get an
>>> incorrect episode recorded (e.g. we set it to record the 5:00pm
>>> episodes, but sometimes it will also record the 11:00am reruns -
>>> whoever did the data entry has included the re-runs in the same 'code'
>>> as the 5:00pm episodes).
>>
>> Southern Hemisphere for you.
>
> Why would the programming data magically get messed up by crossing from
> North to South?

It can't, especially since New Zealand's Sky TV is run from Australia
anyway ... so any data entry errors would be due to Australia. :-)

BUT, it's quite possible they "out-source" their data entry to some
Asian or African country, so maybe the north to south crossing does
cause a problem. ;-)

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:tfoac4$qld$4@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <tfnl2q$29p5d$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:tfme5b$74a$14@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> In article <tfm7lh$260p3$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>> In article <1823a66c-9833-4789-9179-805210bbb843n@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 2:53:49 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <tfl0m4$1vuea$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> BTW ever read "The Servant Queen and the King
>>>>>>>>> she serves"?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No. In it does the Queen describe Jesus as the �?oKing
>>>>>>>> of her life�?�? If not, it isn�?Tt really relevant.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You might want to check out Songs of Praise today.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does someone sing about the Queen describing Jesus
>>>>>> as the King of her life?
>>>>>
>>>>> DW Spotting : Katherine Jenkins aka Abigail from DW : A
>>>>> Christmas Carol wrote and sang a tributary song about
>>>>> this fact.
>>>>
>>>>Gibberish!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes?
>>
>>Liar! Katherine Jenkins aka Abigail from DW: A Christmas Carol did NOT
>>write
>>and sing a tributary song about any fact.
>>
>>
>
> https://twitter.com/KathJenkins/status/1568962831076458499

It does NOT say that Katherine Jenkins wrote a song.
It does NOT say it is a tributary.
It does NOT say the song was about your so-called "fact".

It does show you're a liar.

"The Other Doctor" <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:tfpakl$2hbop$1@dont-email.me...
>
> "The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
> news:tfoac4$qld$4@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> In article <tfnl2q$29p5d$1@dont-email.me>,
>> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>news:tfme5b$74a$14@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>> In article <tfm7lh$260p3$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>> In article <1823a66c-9833-4789-9179-805210bbb843n@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 2:53:49 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <tfl0m4$1vuea$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> BTW ever read "The Servant Queen and the King
>>>>>>>>>> she serves"?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No. In it does the Queen describe Jesus as the �?oKing
>>>>>>>>> of her life�?�? If not, it isn�?Tt really relevant.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You might want to check out Songs of Praise today.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does someone sing about the Queen describing Jesus
>>>>>>> as the King of her life?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> DW Spotting : Katherine Jenkins aka Abigail from DW : A
>>>>>> Christmas Carol wrote and sang a tributary song about
>>>>>> this fact.
>>>>>
>>>>>Gibberish!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes?
>>>
>>>Liar! Katherine Jenkins aka Abigail from DW: A Christmas Carol did NOT
>>>write
>>>and sing a tributary song about any fact.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> https://twitter.com/KathJenkins/status/1568962831076458499
>
> It does NOT say that Katherine Jenkins wrote a song.
> It does NOT say it is a tributary.
> It does NOT say the song was about your so-called "fact".
>
> It does show you're a liar.

Here's what Aled Jones said when introducing the song:
"Using a much-loved hymn tune, songwriter Andy Flanagan penned new words
especially for the occasion as a tribute to her majesty's life."

So, Katherine Jenkins did not write the tune. She did not write the words.
She is not "aka Abigail". She did not sing a tributary song. And she didn't
sing it about your "fact". The only thing you got right was that she sang
the song.

The Doctor wrote on 13/9/22 12:00 am:
> In article <e3d73767-de46-4849-8916-36711753e1e5n@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 5:20:28 PM UTC-7,
>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> In article <tflncp$13ug$1...@gioia.aioe.org>, Your Name
>>> <Your...@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2022-09-11 12:57:30 +0000, Daniel65 said:
>>>>
>>>>> Your Name wrote on 11/9/22 7:45 am:
>>>>>> On 2022-09-10 12:09:25 +0000, Daniel65 said:
>>>>>>> Your Name wrote on 10/9/22 7:41 am:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Two of the main Freeview TV channels here in New
>>>>>>>> Zealand both dropped *all* their regular shows last
>>>>>>>> night for a six hour "news special" and they've
>>>>>>>> restarted going on and on about it again this morning.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 'a six hour "news special"'!! Boy, are you getting off
>>>>>>> easy!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That was simply the first go. It's been going pretty much
>>>>>> non-stop since then with regular programming abandoned.
>>>>>> Probably the same on the Sky TV BBC News channel.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course, because it is late changes with no warning,
>>>>>> shows set to record are still recording, but what you get
>>>>>> is not that show, but stuff about the Queen.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm! I must have an intelligent PVR cause, although I have it
>>>>> set up to record our 7:00p.m. National news every night, it
>>>>> decided NOT to record it ..... and it had been replaced by
>>>>> Royal News in any case!! ;-P
>>>>
>>>> It would depend on how qucikly the on-screen guide is / can be
>>>> updated and how you get your TV (i.e. over-air broadcast,
>>>> internet connection, etc.). With last minute changes, it's not
>>>> possible for the guide to be updated, so the recorder doesn't
>>>> know there has been a programme change and simply thinks it is
>>>> recording the correct show.
>>>>
>>>> It also depends on how good the data entry team on that
>>>> on-screen guide are. Sky TV's data entry team are pretty
>>>> hopeless, so we often get an incorrect episode recorded (e.g.
>>>> we set it to record the 5:00pm episodes, but sometimes it will
>>>> also record the 11:00am reruns - whoever did the data entry has
>>>> included the re-runs in the same 'code' as the 5:00pm
>>>> episodes).
>>>>
>>> Southern Hemisphere for you.
>>
>> Why would the programming data magically get messed up by crossing
>> from North to South?
>
> Time zone differential.
>
Time Zones in Southern Hemisphere are EXACTLY the same as for Northern
Hemisphere, clown!!

Now *IF* you had typed 'Seasonal differential' I might have left YOU,
clown, off!!
--
Daniel

Your Name wrote on 13/9/22 8:17 am:
> On 2022-09-12 07:17:43 +0000, Daniel65 said:
>> Your Name wrote on 12/9/22 4:40 pm:

<Snip>

>>> Our Sky TV recorder only records programmes rather than allowing
>>> specific times. It always starts recording 5mins before the scheduled
>>> time and finishes 10mins after the scheduled time, but you can
>>> extended the end further on scheduled recordings to allow for
>>> overruns of previous shows.
>>
>> My PVR has that function as well (Start/Finish, early/late), but that
>> means if I'm recording two consecutive programs that takes up all my
>> recording ability!!
>
> Our current Sky TV box used to be able to record two shows at the same
> time, plus doing "live" recording (to be able to pause and rewind the
> currently airing show, on a rolling 1hour basis), plus you can be
> watching another pre-recorded show at the same time.
>
> That got a software upgrade a couple of years ago to be able to recored
> three shows at the same time, plus the live recording and watching a
> pre-recorded show.
>
> The new up-coming Sky TV box can record five shows at the same time,
> plus the live recording and watching a pre-recorded show.
>
>
>
>>> There are also some setings which may well let you change those
>>> minutes, but it's been once that we missed the end of a show (which
>>> luckily was recorded by the start of the next one anway), so I've
>>> never bothered to look at them.
>>
>> Yeap, that "Next recording getting the end of previous recording"
>> function comes in handy!!
>
> We tend to find it a bit annoying. If we record two consequetive shows,
> and thn decide to watch the second show first, you often end up
> accidentally seeing the end of the first show, even if you fast forward.
> When you watch a recorded show, it automatically starts playing at the
> 5min mark to skip the front-padding, but that's often not quite enough
> to avoid the previous show.
>
>
>
>>>>> It also depends on how good the data entry team on that on-screen
>>>>> guide are. Sky TV's data entry team are pretty hopeless, so we
>>>>> often get an incorrect episode recorded (e.g. we set it to record
>>>>> the 5:00pm episodes, but sometimes it will also record the 11:00am
>>>>> reruns - whoever did the data entry has included the re-runs in the
>>>>> same 'code' as the 5:00pm episodes).
>>>>
>>>> Yeah!! One of our multi-cultural channels has the habit of running a
>>>> film ten-fifteen times with-in a week, so, if you're not thinking
>>>> when setting up your recording schedule, you could get ten-fifteen
>>>> recordings of the same film ..... and which could also restrict your
>>>> ability to record stuff you actually want!!
>>>
>>> We also have an issue with the live lottery draw which happens within
>>> a show's scheduled time, so that show gets recorded as two parts. Why
>>> they can't move the draw until after the show is beyond all senisble
>>> comprehension - it's always a 1 hour show that gets split at about
>>> the 3/4ths point.  :-\
>>
>> But people want to know they haven't won *NOW* !!
>
> Maybe, but if they had originally simply scheduled the lottery draw a
> little earlier or later, it wouldn't have to interrupt a show. Nobody
> would have known the difference because that would be the time it's
> always on anyway ... instead some fool purposely decided it had to be
> mid-show.  :-\
>
> We have two live lottery draws - one on Saturday and one on Wednesday.
> The Wednesday one is fine, but the Saturday one interrupts another show.
> (There also used to be a daily draw for a different lottery type, but
> that was just a quick thing taking up a spot in an advert break. I
> haven't seen it in a while, so they may have stopped doing it, then
> again we just fast forward through all the adverts anyway.)
>
>

--
Daniel

OPPS!!

Your Name wrote on 13/9/22 8:17 am:
> On 2022-09-12 07:17:43 +0000, Daniel65 said:
>> Your Name wrote on 12/9/22 4:40 pm:

<Snip>

> Our current Sky TV box used to be able to record two shows at the
> same time,

My current box only has two Video channels, so I can record one channel
and watch another or record two channels and switch the T.V. over to
watch another channel direct off-the-air!

> plus doing "live" recording (to be able to pause and rewind the
> currently airing show, on a rolling 1hour basis), plus you can be
> watching another pre-recorded show at the same time.

Nope! Too high tech for me!! ;-P

> That got a software upgrade a couple of years ago to be able to
> recored three shows at the same time, plus the live recording and
> watching a pre-recorded show.

Only 'upgrades' I get is when a PVR dies so I have to buy another!! ;-P

> The new up-coming Sky TV box can record five shows at the same time,
> plus the live recording and watching a pre-recorded show.

I've got about 140 programs recorded on my PVR, 30 or so I want to hang
on to, the other hundred-odd I might get around to watching or, if I'm
running out of space on the Hard-drive, I'll erase the oldest ten or
twenty unwatched programs!!

>>> There are also some setings which may well let you change those
>>> minutes, but it's been once that we missed the end of a show
>>> (which luckily was recorded by the start of the next one anway),
>>> so I've never bothered to look at them.
>>
>> Yeap, that "Next recording getting the end of previous recording"
>> function comes in handy!!
>
> We tend to find it a bit annoying. If we record two consequetive
> shows, and thn decide to watch the second show first, you often end
> up accidentally seeing the end of the first show, even if you fast
> forward.

Yeap! .... lesson to learn .... watch the FIRST one FIRST!!

> When you watch a recorded show, it automatically starts playing at
> the 5min mark to skip the front-padding, but that's often not quite
> enough to avoid the previous show.

What's the use of having the 'front padding' if the device is going to
skip it without any intervention by you??

>>>>> It also depends on how good the data entry team on that
>>>>> on-screen guide are. Sky TV's data entry team are pretty
>>>>> hopeless, so we often get an incorrect episode recorded (e.g.
>>>>> we set it to record the 5:00pm episodes, but sometimes it
>>>>> will also record the 11:00am reruns - whoever did the data
>>>>> entry has included the re-runs in the same 'code' as the
>>>>> 5:00pm episodes).
>>>>
>>>> Yeah!! One of our multi-cultural channels has the habit of
>>>> running a film ten-fifteen times with-in a week, so, if you're
>>>> not thinking when setting up your recording schedule, you could
>>>> get ten-fifteen recordings of the same film ..... and which
>>>> could also restrict your ability to record stuff you actually
>>>> want!!
>>>
>>> We also have an issue with the live lottery draw which happens
>>> within a show's scheduled time, so that show gets recorded as two
>>> parts. Why they can't move the draw until after the show is
>>> beyond all senisble comprehension - it's always a 1 hour show
>>> that gets split at about the 3/4ths point. :-\
>>
>> But people want to know they haven't won *NOW* !!
>
> Maybe, but if they had originally simply scheduled the lottery draw a
> little earlier or later, it wouldn't have to interrupt a show.

Hey, weren't we originally discussing how the T.V. channels DON'T start
programs at the advertised start time .... so once you start watching,
you are, more or less, locked into the channel and THEIR advertising!!

> Nobody would have known the difference because that would be the time
> it's always on anyway ... instead some fool purposely decided it had
> to be mid-show. :-\
>
> We have two live lottery draws - one on Saturday and one on
> Wednesday. The Wednesday one is fine, but the Saturday one interrupts
> another show. (There also used to be a daily draw for a different
> lottery type, but that was just a quick thing taking up a spot in an
> advert break. I haven't seen it in a while, so they may have stopped
> doing it, then again we just fast forward through all the adverts
> anyway.)

I don't know if any channel broadcasts the draws LIVE ... or even delayed!!
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 12/9/22 11:58 pm:
> In article <tfmjqe$26rbq$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 12/9/22 7:53 am:
>>> In article <tfl0m4$1vuea$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>> In article <tfk0v0$1rl30$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2022-09-10 23:27:26 +0000, Idlehands said:
>>>>>>>> On 2022-09-10 7:23 a.m., The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <tfhuri$1da4o$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 9/9/22 11:30 pm:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> She proclaimed Christ as King of her life.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> When did she do that, clown??
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> NEver say the Queen's Christmas broadcat in year
>>>>>>>>> 2000, Dannyboy?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Poor binky, telling more lies, nowhere does she declare
>>>>>>>> Christ as "King of her life".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZbCRN3C_Hs
>>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/queen-elizabeth-ii-christmas-broadcast-speech-transcript-2020
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why oh why do you make Jesus cry with your lies
>>>>>>>> binky boy?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You misread the date ... the village idiot said "2000",
>>>>>>> not "2020". Not that I can be bothered to check whether
>>>>>>> that year's speech says it either. :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.royal.uk/christmas-broadcast-2000
>>>>>> She mentioned Jesus being a source of inspiration
>>>>>> for her, but nothing about him being "King of her life."
>>>>>
>>>>> Rather implicit my dear bird.
>>>>
>>>> Not really. Lots of things can be a source of inspiration.
>>>> Most of them aren’t Kings of someone’s life (whatever
>>>> that means.)
>>>>
>>>>> BTW ever read "The Servant Queen and the King she serves"?
>>>>
>>>> No. In it does the Queen describe Jesus as the “King of
>>>> her life”? If not, it isn’t really relevant.
>>>
>>> You might want to check out Songs of Praise today.
>> Why, clown?? Does/did it show HRH, QE II, saying she declared
>> Christ as "King of her life", clown??

> and that too, Dannyboy.

So, in other words, NO, it did not show HRH, QE II, saying she declared
Christ as "King of her life", clown??

Good to know, clown!!
--
Daniel

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <acff9c3e-c5fe-404b-8647-72e29807a0f4n@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Monday, September 12, 2022 at 2:12:16 PM UTC-7, solar penguin wrote:
>>> The Idiot insisted:
>>>> In article <tfm7lh$260p3$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>>> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>> In article <1823a66c-9833-4789...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 2:53:49 PM UTC-7,
>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You might want to check out Songs of Praise today.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does someone sing about the Queen describing Jesus
>>>>>>> as the King of her life?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> DW Spotting : Katherine Jenkins aka Abigail from DW : A
>>>>>> Christmas Carol wrote and sang a tributary song about
>>>>>> this fact.
>>> Liar! That’s not what you posted!
>>>
>>> And it’s still gibberish. (How can a song be part of a river?)
>>
>> By being part of River Song's name!
>
> Tribute are rivers?

Tributaries are.

--
solar penguin

Tim typed:

> On Monday, September 12, 2022 at 2:12:16 PM UTC-7,
> solar penguin wrote:
>
>> The Idiot insisted:
>>> In article <tfm7lh$260p3$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> The Idiot insisted:
>>>>>
>>>>> DW Spotting : Katherine Jenkins aka Abigail from
>>>>> DW : A Christmas Carol wrote and sang a tributary
>>>>> song about this fact.
>>
>> Liar! That’s not what you posted!
>>
>> And it’s still gibberish. (How can a song be part of a river?)
>
> By being part of River Song's name!
>

LOL! Good one! You win bragging rights for a whole week.

--
solar penguin

On 2022-09-13 11:19:50 +0000, Daniel65 said:
>
> OPPS!!
>
> Your Name wrote on 13/9/22 8:17 am:
>> On 2022-09-12 07:17:43 +0000, Daniel65 said:
>>> Your Name wrote on 12/9/22 4:40 pm:
>
> <Snip>
>
>> Our current Sky TV box used to be able to record two shows at the
>> same time,
>
> My current box only has two Video channels, so I can record one channel
> and watch another or record two channels and switch the T.V. over to
> watch another channel direct off-the-air!
>
>> plus doing "live" recording (to be able to pause and rewind the
>> currently airing show, on a rolling 1hour basis), plus you can be
>> watching another pre-recorded show at the same time.
>
> Nope! Too high tech for me!! ;-P
>
>> That got a software upgrade a couple of years ago to be able to
>> recored three shows at the same time, plus the live recording and
>> watching a pre-recorded show.
>
> Only 'upgrades' I get is when a PVR dies so I have to buy another!! ;-P
>
>> The new up-coming Sky TV box can record five shows at the same time,
>> plus the live recording and watching a pre-recorded show.
>
> I've got about 140 programs recorded on my PVR, 30 or so I want to hang
> on to, the other hundred-odd I might get around to watching or, if I'm
> running out of space on the Hard-drive, I'll erase the oldest ten or
> twenty unwatched programs!!
>
>>>> There are also some setings which may well let you change those
>>>> minutes, but it's been once that we missed the end of a show
>>>> (which luckily was recorded by the start of the next one anway),
>>>> so I've never bothered to look at them.
>>>
>>> Yeap, that "Next recording getting the end of previous recording"
>>> function comes in handy!!
>>
>> We tend to find it a bit annoying. If we record two consequetive
>> shows, and thn decide to watch the second show first, you often end
>> up accidentally seeing the end of the first show, even if you fast
>> forward.
>
> Yeap! .... lesson to learn .... watch the FIRST one FIRST!!
>
>> When you watch a recorded show, it automatically starts playing at
>> the 5min mark to skip the front-padding, but that's often not quite
>> enough to avoid the previous show.
>
> What's the use of having the 'front padding' if the device is going to
> skip it without any intervention by you??

When you play a recording, it starts 5mins in to skip that
front-padding, but you can rewind into those 5mins if necessary. The
reality is shows rarely start early and are more likely to start late,
so we usually end up starting to watch a recording at that 5mins mark
only to then have to fast-forward a few more minutes - that's why we
sometimes see the end of the previous show if there are two in a row.

>>>>>> It also depends on how good the data entry team on that
>>>>>> on-screen guide are. Sky TV's data entry team are pretty
>>>>>> hopeless, so we often get an incorrect episode recorded (e.g.
>>>>>> we set it to record the 5:00pm episodes, but sometimes it
>>>>>> will also record the 11:00am reruns - whoever did the data
>>>>>> entry has included the re-runs in the same 'code' as the
>>>>>> 5:00pm episodes).
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah!! One of our multi-cultural channels has the habit of
>>>>> running a film ten-fifteen times with-in a week, so, if you're
>>>>> not thinking when setting up your recording schedule, you could
>>>>> get ten-fifteen recordings of the same film ..... and which
>>>>> could also restrict your ability to record stuff you actually
>>>>> want!!
>>>>
>>>> We also have an issue with the live lottery draw which happens
>>>> within a show's scheduled time, so that show gets recorded as two
>>>> parts. Why they can't move the draw until after the show is
>>>> beyond all senisble comprehension - it's always a 1 hour show
>>>> that gets split at about the 3/4ths point. :-\
>>>
>>> But people want to know they haven't won *NOW* !!
>>
>> Maybe, but if they had originally simply scheduled the lottery draw a
>> little earlier or later, it wouldn't have to interrupt a show.
>
> Hey, weren't we originally discussing how the T.V. channels DON'T start
> programs at the advertised start time .... so once you start watching,
> you are, more or less, locked into the channel and THEIR advertising!!

We just fast-forward through all advert breaks. The problem is that the
Saturday night lottery draw splits the show we're watching into two
parts, so has two recordings (approximately the first 45mins and then
the last 10mins.). So when the lottery draw comes on, we have to stop
watching the first recording and start the second one, then do two
deletions after we've seen the show.

>> Nobody would have known the difference because that would be the time
>> it's always on anyway ... instead some fool purposely decided it had
>> to be mid-show. :-\
>>
>> We have two live lottery draws - one on Saturday and one on
>> Wednesday. The Wednesday one is fine, but the Saturday one interrupts
>> another show. (There also used to be a daily draw for a different
>> lottery type, but that was just a quick thing taking up a spot in an
>> advert break. I haven't seen it in a while, so they may have stopped
>> doing it, then again we just fast forward through all the adverts
>> anyway.)
>
> I don't know if any channel broadcasts the draws LIVE ... or even delayed!!

The New Zealand lottery draws on Saturday nights and Wednesday nights
are broadcast live.

On the rare occasions there is a problem with the ball machine, they
will still start the live draw presentation only to say "we can't do it
now, the results will be available later", so the draw itself won't be
live.

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:tfq1dr$28tu$26@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <tfpakl$2hbop$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:tfoac4$qld$4@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> In article <tfnl2q$29p5d$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>>news:tfme5b$74a$14@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>> In article <tfm7lh$260p3$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <1823a66c-9833-4789-9179-805210bbb843n@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 2:53:49 PM UTC-7,
>>>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <tfl0m4$1vuea$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> BTW ever read "The Servant Queen and the King
>>>>>>>>>>> she serves"?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No. In it does the Queen describe Jesus as the �?oKing
>>>>>>>>>> of her life�?�? If not, it isn�?Tt really relevant.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You might want to check out Songs of Praise today.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does someone sing about the Queen describing Jesus
>>>>>>>> as the King of her life?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> DW Spotting : Katherine Jenkins aka Abigail from DW : A
>>>>>>> Christmas Carol wrote and sang a tributary song about
>>>>>>> this fact.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Gibberish!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes?
>>>>
>>>>Liar! Katherine Jenkins aka Abigail from DW: A Christmas Carol did NOT
>>>>write
>>>>and sing a tributary song about any fact.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> https://twitter.com/KathJenkins/status/1568962831076458499
>>
>>It does NOT say that Katherine Jenkins wrote a song.
>>It does NOT say it is a tributary.
>>It does NOT say the song was about your so-called "fact".
>>
>>It does show you're a liar.
>>
>>
>
> Lies Wilson from the old Soviet Russia.

Lies Yadallee from the padded room in his mother's basement.

> I guess for Stephen Wilson, the Book The Servant Queen
> and the God she serves is lying fiction.

I guess for Dave Yadalee, Santa Claus is real.

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:tfq1gg$28tu$31@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <tfpl38$2iaja$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Other Doctor" <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:tfpakl$2hbop$1@dont-email.me...
>>>
>>> "The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>> news:tfoac4$qld$4@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>> In article <tfnl2q$29p5d$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>>>news:tfme5b$74a$14@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>>> In article <tfm7lh$260p3$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>> <1823a66c-9833-4789-9179-805210bbb843n@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 2:53:49 PM UTC-7,
>>>>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <tfl0m4$1vuea$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW ever read "The Servant Queen and the King
>>>>>>>>>>>> she serves"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No. In it does the Queen describe Jesus as the �?oKing
>>>>>>>>>>> of her life�?�? If not, it isn�?Tt really relevant.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You might want to check out Songs of Praise today.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Does someone sing about the Queen describing Jesus
>>>>>>>>> as the King of her life?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> DW Spotting : Katherine Jenkins aka Abigail from DW : A
>>>>>>>> Christmas Carol wrote and sang a tributary song about
>>>>>>>> this fact.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Gibberish!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes?
>>>>>
>>>>>Liar! Katherine Jenkins aka Abigail from DW: A Christmas Carol did NOT
>>>>>write
>>>>>and sing a tributary song about any fact.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://twitter.com/KathJenkins/status/1568962831076458499
>>>
>>> It does NOT say that Katherine Jenkins wrote a song.
>>> It does NOT say it is a tributary.
>>> It does NOT say the song was about your so-called "fact".
>>>
>>> It does show you're a liar.
>>
>>Here's what Aled Jones said when introducing the song:
>>"Using a much-loved hymn tune, songwriter Andy Flanagan penned new words
>>especially for the occasion as a tribute to her majesty's life."
>>
>>So, Katherine Jenkins did not write the tune. She did not write the words.
>>She is not "aka Abigail". She did not sing a tributary song. And she
>>didn't
>>sing it about your "fact". The only thing you got right was that she sang
>>the song.
>>
>>
>
> And you still deny God is real, Eh ,SW?

I deny your idea of God is real, Yads.

> And nice to see you caught the episode for once.

Nice to see you apologise for being wrong for once. Oh wait, that never
happened.

"tsbr...@gmail.com" <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:acff9c3e-c5fe-404b-8647-72e29807a0f4n@googlegroups.com...
On Monday, September 12, 2022 at 2:12:16 PM UTC-7, solar penguin wrote:
> The Idiot insisted:
> > In article <tfm7lh$260p3$1...@dont-email.me>,
> > solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> >>> In article <1823a66c-9833-4789...@googlegroups.com>,
> >>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 2:53:49 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You might want to check out Songs of Praise today.
> >>>>
> >>>> Does someone sing about the Queen describing Jesus
> >>>> as the King of her life?
> >>>
> >>> DW Spotting : Katherine Jenkins aka Abigail from DW : A
> >>> Christmas Carol wrote and sang a tributary song about
> >>> this fact.
>> Liar! That's not what you posted!
>>
>> And it's still gibberish. (How can a song be part of a river?)
>
>By being part of River Song's name!

I'm afraid that Yads hasn't a clue that "tribute" and "tributary" are two
different words, with two different meanings. Because he's an idiot.

The Doctor wrote on 13/09/2022 11:45 pm:
> In article <tfpnmo$2ihut$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 13/9/22 12:00 am:
>>> In article <e3d73767-de46-4849-8916-36711753e1e5n@googlegroups.com>,
>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 5:20:28 PM UTC-7,
>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> In article <tflncp$13ug$1...@gioia.aioe.org>, Your Name
>>>>> <Your...@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2022-09-11 12:57:30 +0000, Daniel65 said:
>>>>>>> Your Name wrote on 11/9/22 7:45 am:
>>>>>>>> On 2022-09-10 12:09:25 +0000, Daniel65 said:
>>>>>>>>> Your Name wrote on 10/9/22 7:41 am:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Two of the main Freeview TV channels here in New
>>>>>>>>>> Zealand both dropped *all* their regular shows last
>>>>>>>>>> night for a six hour "news special" and they've
>>>>>>>>>> restarted going on and on about it again this morning.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 'a six hour "news special"'!! Boy, are you getting off
>>>>>>>>> easy!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That was simply the first go. It's been going pretty much
>>>>>>>> non-stop since then with regular programming abandoned.
>>>>>>>> Probably the same on the Sky TV BBC News channel.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Of course, because it is late changes with no warning,
>>>>>>>> shows set to record are still recording, but what you get
>>>>>>>> is not that show, but stuff about the Queen.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hmm! I must have an intelligent PVR cause, although I have it
>>>>>>> set up to record our 7:00p.m. National news every night, it
>>>>>>> decided NOT to record it ..... and it had been replaced by
>>>>>>> Royal News in any case!! ;-P
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It would depend on how qucikly the on-screen guide is / can be
>>>>>> updated and how you get your TV (i.e. over-air broadcast,
>>>>>> internet connection, etc.). With last minute changes, it's not
>>>>>> possible for the guide to be updated, so the recorder doesn't
>>>>>> know there has been a programme change and simply thinks it is
>>>>>> recording the correct show.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It also depends on how good the data entry team on that
>>>>>> on-screen guide are. Sky TV's data entry team are pretty
>>>>>> hopeless, so we often get an incorrect episode recorded (e.g.
>>>>>> we set it to record the 5:00pm episodes, but sometimes it will
>>>>>> also record the 11:00am reruns - whoever did the data entry has
>>>>>> included the re-runs in the same 'code' as the 5:00pm
>>>>>> episodes).
>>>>>>
>>>>> Southern Hemisphere for you.
>>>>
>>>> Why would the programming data magically get messed up by crossing
>>>> from North to South?
>>>
>>> Time zone differential.
>>>
>> Time Zones in Southern Hemisphere are EXACTLY the same as for Northern
>> Hemisphere, clown!!
>>
>> Now *IF* you had typed 'Seasonal differential' I might have left YOU,
>> clown, off!!

> Of course, I doubt Tim's knows that, Dannyboy.

But YOU, clown, showed FOR ALL TO SEE, that YOU, clown, didn't know
that, clown!!
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 14/09/2022 10:16 am:

<Snip>

> adjectivify tribute.

Gobble-de-gook!!
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 13/09/2022 11:46 pm:
> In article <tfppbd$2ilu5$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 12/9/22 11:58 pm:
>>> In article <tfmjqe$26rbq$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 12/9/22 7:53 am:
>>>>> In article <tfl0m4$1vuea$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>>>>> <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <tfk0v0$1rl30$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>>>>>>> <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2022-09-10 23:27:26 +0000, Idlehands said:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-09-10 7:23 a.m., The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <tfhuri$1da4o$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 9/9/22 11:30 pm:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> She proclaimed Christ as King of her life.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> When did she do that, clown??
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> NEver say the Queen's Christmas broadcat in year
>>>>>>>>>>> 2000, Dannyboy?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Poor binky, telling more lies, nowhere does she
>>>>>>>>>> declare Christ as "King of her life".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZbCRN3C_Hs
>>>>>>>>
>> https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/queen-elizabeth-ii-christmas-broadcast-speech-transcript-2020
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Why oh why do you make Jesus cry with your lies
>>>>>>>>>> binky boy?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You misread the date ... the village idiot said
>>>>>>>>> "2000", not "2020". Not that I can be bothered to
>>>>>>>>> check whether that year's speech says it either.
>>>>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.royal.uk/christmas-broadcast-2000 She
>>>>>>>> mentioned Jesus being a source of inspiration for her,
>>>>>>>> but nothing about him being "King of her life."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rather implicit my dear bird.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not really. Lots of things can be a source of inspiration.
>>>>>> Most of them aren’t Kings of
>> > someone’s life (whatever
>>>>>> that means.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BTW ever read "The Servant Queen and the King she
>>>>>>> serves"?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No. In it does the Queen describe Jesus as the
>>>>>> “King of her life”? If not, it
>>>>>> isn’t really relevant.
>>>>>
>>>>> You might want to check out Songs of Praise today.
>>>> Why, clown?? Does/did it show HRH, QE II, saying she declared
>>>> Christ as "King of her life", clown??
>>
>>> and that too, Dannyboy.
>>
>> So, in other words, NO, it did not show HRH, QE II, saying she
>> declared Christ as "King of her life", clown??
>>
>> Good to know, clown!!

> So are you against the Anglicans, Dannyboy.

WHAT ARE YOU ON, clown?? WHERE DID I SUGGEST ANYTHING LIKE THAT, clown??
--
Daniel

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:tfslph$2jjv$41@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <tfs1lt$2rqpm$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>The Doctor wrote on 14/09/2022 10:16 am:
>>
>><Snip>
>>
>>> adjectivify tribute.
>>
>>Gobble-de-gook!!
>
> Adjectify Gobble-de-gook.

"Tribute" and "tributary" are 2 different words, Yads. They do not mean the
same thing. You don't understand what "tribute" means. You don't understand
what "tributary" means. You don't understand what an adjective is.
"Adjecivify" is not a word. "Adjectify" is not a word.

You're an idiot, Yads. You've always been an idiot, and you'll always be an
idiot. The only person here who doesn't know this is you.

tsbr...@gmail.com wrote:

> On Wednesday, September 14, 2022 at 1:22:49 PM UTC-7,
> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
> > In article <tft708$32fhu$1...@dont-email.me>,
> > The Other Doctor <stephen.wils...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > "Tribute" and "tributary" are 2 different words, Yads. They do
> > > not mean the same thing. You don't understand what "tribute"
> > > means. You don't understand what "tributary" means. You don't
> > > understand what an adjective is. "Adjecivify" is not a word.
> > > "Adjectify" is not a word.
> > >
> > > You're an idiot, Yads. You've always been an idiot, and you'll
> > > always be an idiot. The only person here who doesn't know this is
> > > you.
> > >
> > Lies Wilson because Wilson hates Truth!
>
> What do tribute and tributary mean to you?

Probably not what they mean to anybody with a reasonable understanding
of English! ;-)

On 2022-09-10 12:09:25 +0000, Daniel65 said:
> Your Name wrote on 10/9/22 7:41 am:
>
> <Snip>
>
>> Two of the main Freeview TV channels here in New Zealand both dropped
>> *all* their regular shows last night for a six hour "news special" and
>> they've restarted going on and on about it again this morning.
>
> 'a six hour "news special"'!! Boy, are you getting off easy!!
>
> Our Government financed Free-to-Air T.V. station has been 24 hours a
> day for the last, what, two and a half days with no sign of stopping!
> 'm hoping they don't keep it up until the Funeral!
>
> Even several of the Commercial Free-to-Air T.V. stations have been 24
> hours a day for the last, what, two and a half days with no sign of
> stopping!
>
> Of course, they all have subsidiary channels that they can broadcast
> their usual rubbish on!

Now the two main Freeeview networks (at least, I woudn't be surprised
if the third joins in) have announced that they're bumping all their
regular shows to play the funeral. What is the point of having two
channels playing it?? (Technically it's actually four channels, because
both of their the "+1" hour delayed ones will then be playing it as
well.) New Zealand is a piddly little country and everyone can get the
Freeview channels, so playing it on one channel would be enough for
those who want to watch it. :-\

In this digital age, they could even have a specific "po-up" channel
that they use just for such things without needing to bump regular
shows.

Op 8-9-2022 om 20:04 schreef The Doctor:
>
> Long Live King Charles III

Since he's already 73, so it's unlikely he'll manage to "long live".

If he lives to around the same age as his mother and father, he'll only
get 25 years or so as King. That then means Williams would will be in
his 60s when he takes over.

The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:

>
> "The Other Doctor" <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
> news:tfpakl$2hbop$1@dont-email.me...
>>
>> "The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>> news:tfoac4$qld$4@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> In article <tfnl2q$29p5d$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Liar! Katherine Jenkins aka Abigail from DW: A Christmas
>>>> Carol did NOT write
>>>> and sing a tributary song about any fact.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> https://twitter.com/KathJenkins/status/1568962831076458499
>>
>> It does NOT say that Katherine Jenkins wrote a song.
>> It does NOT say it is a tributary.
>> It does NOT say the song was about your so-called "fact".
>>
>> It does show you're a liar.
>
> Here's what Aled Jones said when introducing the song:
> "Using a much-loved hymn tune, songwriter Andy Flanagan penned new words
> especially for the occasion as a tribute to her majesty's life."
>
> So, Katherine Jenkins did not write the tune. She did not write the words.
> She is not "aka Abigail". She did not sing a tributary song. And she didn't
> sing it about your "fact". The only thing you got right was that she sang
> the song.
>

And even if Katherine Jenkins did write a song about the
Idiot’s so-called fact, it still wouldn’t prove the "fact" was
true. People can put untrue things in songs too. (e.g. The
Beatles didn’t really live in a yellow submarine.)

--
solar penguin

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:tftohb$jml$3@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <e599a353-8bcb-483d-827d-95f4fb88ae25n@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>On Wednesday, September 14, 2022 at 1:22:49 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com
>>wrote:
>>> In article <tft708$32fhu$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>> The Other Doctor <stephen.wils...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>> >news:tfslph$2jjv$4...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> >> In article <tfs1lt$2rqpm$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>> >> Daniel65 <dani...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>> >>>The Doctor wrote on 14/09/2022 10:16 am:
>>> >>>
>>> >>><Snip>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> adjectivify tribute.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>Gobble-de-gook!!
>>> >>
>>> >> Adjectify Gobble-de-gook.
>>> >
>>> >"Tribute" and "tributary" are 2 different words, Yads. They do not mean
>>> >the
>>> >same thing. You don't understand what "tribute" means. You don't
>>> >understand
>>> >what "tributary" means. You don't understand what an adjective is.
>>> >"Adjecivify" is not a word. "Adjectify" is not a word.
>>> >
>>> >You're an idiot, Yads. You've always been an idiot, and you'll always
>>> >be an
>>> >idiot. The only person here who doesn't know this is you.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> Lies Wilson because Wilson hates Truth!
>>
>>What do tribute and tributary mean to you?
>
> Tribute as in remembering something.
>
> Tributary is an dajective for tribute as well.

Classic Yads. You had the chance to look the words up before making yourself
look even more stupid. You couldn't even do that. So you've gone ahead and
made yourself look even more stupid. You don't have the intelligence to
understand you might be wrong, so you'd rather call people liars than get an
education do any research, or ask someone with more intelligence than you.

You have just shown that - as I said - that you do NOT understand the words
"tribute", "tributary" or "adjective" (or "dajective"). But go ahead - call
me a liar again. You're only fooling yourself.

Your Name wrote on 15/9/22 8:27 am:
> On 2022-09-10 12:09:25 +0000, Daniel65 said:
>> Your Name wrote on 10/9/22 7:41 am:
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>> Two of the main Freeview TV channels here in New Zealand both dropped
>>> *all* their regular shows last night for a six hour "news special"
>>> and they've restarted going on and on about it again this morning.
>>
>> 'a six hour "news special"'!! Boy, are you getting off easy!!
>>
>> Our Government financed Free-to-Air T.V. station has been 24 hours a
>> day for the last, what, two and a half days with no sign of stopping!
>> 'm hoping they don't keep it up until the Funeral!
>>
>> Even several of the Commercial Free-to-Air T.V. stations have been 24
>> hours a day for the last, what, two and a half days with no sign of
>> stopping!
>>
>> Of course, they all have subsidiary channels that they can broadcast
>> their usual rubbish on!
>
> Now the two main Freeeview networks (at least, I woudn't be surprised if
> the third joins in) have announced that they're bumping all their
> regular shows to play the funeral. What is the point of having two
> channels playing it?? (Technically it's actually four channels, because
> both of their the "+1" hour delayed ones will then be playing it as
> well.) New Zealand is a piddly little country and everyone can get the
> Freeview channels, so playing it on one channel would be enough for
> those who want to watch it.  :-\

The Advertising, Your Name, the advertising .... and, of course, the
revenue that comes from that!!

If you have two Free-to-Air stations, I'm guessing one is Government
funded and the other is Commercial funded.

> In this digital age, they could even have a specific "po-up" channel
> that they use just for such things without needing to bump regular shows.

But how would people get to know that your 'Pop-Up' channel has popped up??
--
Daniel

The Other Doctor wrote on 15/9/22 4:41 am:
> "The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
> news:tfslph$2jjv$41@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> In article <tfs1lt$2rqpm$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote on 14/09/2022 10:16 am:
>>>
>>> <Snip>
>>>
>>>> adjectivify tribute.
>>>
>>> Gobble-de-gook!!
>>
>> Adjectify Gobble-de-gook.
>
> "Tribute" and "tributary" are 2 different words, Yads. They do not
> mean the same thing. You don't understand what "tribute" means. You
> don't understand what "tributary" means. You don't understand what an
> adjective is. "Adjecivify" is not a word. "Adjectify" is not a word.
>
> You're an idiot, Yads. You've always been an idiot, and you'll always
> be an idiot. The only person here who doesn't know this is you.

"You've always been an idiot"!! That would explain why the clown is
soooo good at being an idiot.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 14/9/22 11:44 pm:
> In article <tfs22m$2rsek$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 13/09/2022 11:46 pm:
>>> In article <tfppbd$2ilu5$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 12/9/22 11:58 pm:
>>>>> In article <tfmjqe$26rbq$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 12/9/22 7:53 am:
>>>>>>> In article <tfl0m4$1vuea$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>>>>>>> <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <tfk0v0$1rl30$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>>>>>>>>> <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-09-10 23:27:26 +0000, Idlehands said:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-09-10 7:23 a.m., The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <tfhuri$1da4o$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 9/9/22 11:30 pm:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She proclaimed Christ as King of her life.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When did she do that, clown??
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> NEver say the Queen's Christmas broadcat in year
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2000, Dannyboy?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Poor binky, telling more lies, nowhere does she
>>>>>>>>>>>> declare Christ as "King of her life".
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZbCRN3C_Hs
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/queen-elizabeth-ii-christmas-broadcast-speech-transcript-2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Why oh why do you make Jesus cry with your lies
>>>>>>>>>>>> binky boy?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You misread the date ... the village idiot said
>>>>>>>>>>> "2000", not "2020". Not that I can be bothered to
>>>>>>>>>>> check whether that year's speech says it either.
>>>>>>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.royal.uk/christmas-broadcast-2000 She
>>>>>>>>>> mentioned Jesus being a source of inspiration for her,
>>>>>>>>>> but nothing about him being "King of her life."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rather implicit my dear bird.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not really. Lots of things can be a source of inspiration.
>>>>>>>> Most of them aren’t Kings of
>>>> > someone’s life (whatever
>>>>>>>> that means.)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> BTW ever read "The Servant Queen and the King she
>>>>>>>>> serves"?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No. In it does the Queen describe Jesus as the
>>>>>>>> “King of her
>> life”? If not, it
>>>>>>>> isn’t really relevant.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You might want to check out Songs of Praise today.
>>>>>> Why, clown?? Does/did it show HRH, QE II, saying she declared
>>>>>> Christ as "King of her life", clown??
>>>>
>>>>> and that too, Dannyboy.
>>>>
>>>> So, in other words, NO, it did not show HRH, QE II, saying she
>>>> declared Christ as "King of her life", clown??
>>>>
>>>> Good to know, clown!!
>>
>>> So are you against the Anglicans, Dannyboy.
>>
>> WHAT ARE YOU ON, clown?? WHERE DID I SUGGEST ANYTHING LIKE THAT, clown?

> Look at what you are saying, Dannyboy!

Gee Whiz!! How talented YOU, clown, must be, clown, if YOU, clown, can
see what YOU, clown, are saying, clown!!

Most people can only HEAR what people are saying, clown!
--
Daniel