Nyssa <Nyssa@LogicalInsight.net> wrote:
> The Horny Goat wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 04:30:46 -0500, Ubiquitous
>> <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>
>>> “I think we know the core audience and what they love is
>>> exactly how Bill originally built the Hallmark Channel,”
>>> Bure continued. “That was Christmas and those traditional
>>> holidays, so that’s what the focus is going to be. You’ve
>>> got to start somewhere. You can’t do everything at once.”
>>
>> Is this the same Bure who is or was married to hockey star
>> Pavel Bure (who along with Igor Larionov were the first
>> two major Russian stars in the National Hockey League)?
>
> IIRC Pavel is her brother-in-law.
>
> I'm brain-cramping on her husband's name, but he was also
> in the NHL for awhile, but not as flashy a player.

From Ian’s IMDB entry on her:

Husband Valeri Bure was an All-Star hockey player in the NHL and a 2-time
Olympic medalist for the Russian National Team..

Her married last name, Bure, is pronounced "Bur-Ray.".

>
> The only reason I know this much is because my neighbor
> watches her movies, and I recognized the Bure part of her
> name and asked if she were married to an ex-hockey player.
>
> My neighbor would get along fine with Ian since she has
> those Lifetime and Hallmark movies on just about all the
> time. (bleah)
>
> Nyssa, who knows more about hockey players than she does
> about Hallmark or Lifetime movies
>
>

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

In article <181120220547459990%nope@noway.com>,
A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:

> In article <wB2dnfVyzt00mOr-nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>, BTR1701
> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 17, 2022 at 7:49:38 PM PST, "A Friend" <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <atropos-EFD348.19223917112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
> > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> In article <171120222204425407%nope@noway.com>,
> > >> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> In article <vhfdnhhkg8f3gjf1g8atbabt3ivl4oj4jt@4ax.com>, The Horny
> > >>> Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> > On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 04:30:46 -0500, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
> > >>> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> > > "I think we know the core audience and what they love is exactly
> > >>> > > how Bill originally built the Hallmark Channel," Bure continued.
> > >>> > > "That was Christmas and those traditional holidays, so that's
> > >>> > > what the focus is going to be. You've got to start somewhere.
> > >>> > > You can't do everything at once."
> > >> > >
> > >>> > Is this the same Bure who is or was married to hockey star Pavel
> > >>> > Bure (who along with Igor Larionov were the first two major Russian
> > >>> > stars in the National Hockey League)?
> > >>
> > >>> Yes. They're still married.

> > >>> Bure thinks that Christmas and morals are under threat because
> > >>> Hallmark has made a handful of movies about gay people in which
> > >>> none was burned at the stake.
> > >>
> > >> You know better than that. There's no reason to lie about it.
> > >>
> > > How clever. I'm in awe. I'm also right.
> >
> > No, you're not. Bure has never once suggested anyone should be burned at
> > the stake.

> I never said she did, but you're trying to be as cute as a gay Macy's
> parade float about this. That's a sensible approach, as you've brought
> nothing to the table here.

You said she left Hallmark because they weren't burning gays at the
stake in their movies. That's false and you know it. No reason to lie
about it.

In article <atropos-A6AB0F.08420018112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
<atropos@mac.com> wrote:

> In article <181120220547459990%nope@noway.com>,
> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <wB2dnfVyzt00mOr-nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>, BTR1701
> > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Nov 17, 2022 at 7:49:38 PM PST, "A Friend" <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > In article <atropos-EFD348.19223917112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
> > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> In article <171120222204425407%nope@noway.com>,
> > > >> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> In article <vhfdnhhkg8f3gjf1g8atbabt3ivl4oj4jt@4ax.com>, The Horny
> > > >>> Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> > On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 04:30:46 -0500, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
> > > >>> > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> > > "I think we know the core audience and what they love is exactly
> > > >>> > > how Bill originally built the Hallmark Channel," Bure continued.
> > > >>> > > "That was Christmas and those traditional holidays, so that's
> > > >>> > > what the focus is going to be. You've got to start somewhere.
> > > >>> > > You can't do everything at once."
> > > >> > >
> > > >>> > Is this the same Bure who is or was married to hockey star Pavel
> > > >>> > Bure (who along with Igor Larionov were the first two major Russian
> > > >>> > stars in the National Hockey League)?
> > > >>
> > > >>> Yes. They're still married.
>
> > > >>> Bure thinks that Christmas and morals are under threat because
> > > >>> Hallmark has made a handful of movies about gay people in which
> > > >>> none was burned at the stake.
> > > >>
> > > >> You know better than that. There's no reason to lie about it.
> > > >>
> > > > How clever. I'm in awe. I'm also right.
> > >
> > > No, you're not. Bure has never once suggested anyone should be burned at
> > > the stake.
>
> > I never said she did, but you're trying to be as cute as a gay Macy's
> > parade float about this. That's a sensible approach, as you've brought
> > nothing to the table here.
>
> You said she left Hallmark because they weren't burning gays at the
> stake in their movies. That's false and you know it. No reason to lie
> about it.

What I actually said is on the record here. Bure has criticized
Hallmark for running gay-friendly movies. That's beyond dispute. I
presume she left Hallmark because she got a better deal from GAC and
not because of some gay-friendly movies, but she nevertheless delivered
that shot on her way out the door.

In article <181120221227188288%nope@noway.com>,
A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:

> In article <atropos-A6AB0F.08420018112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <181120220547459990%nope@noway.com>,
> > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <wB2dnfVyzt00mOr-nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>, BTR1701
> > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Nov 17, 2022 at 7:49:38 PM PST, "A Friend" <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > In article <atropos-EFD348.19223917112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
> > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> In article <171120222204425407%nope@noway.com>,
> > > > >> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> In article <vhfdnhhkg8f3gjf1g8atbabt3ivl4oj4jt@4ax.com>, The Horny
> > > > >>> Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> > On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 04:30:46 -0500, Ubiquitous
> > > > >>> > <weberm@polaris.net>
> > > > >>> > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> > > "I think we know the core audience and what they love is
> > > > >>> > > exactly how Bill originally built the Hallmark Channel," Bure
> > > > >>> > > continued. "That was Christmas and those traditional holidays,
> > > > >>> > > so that's what the focus is going to be. You've got to start
> > > > >>> > > somewhere. You can't do everything at once."
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >>> > Is this the same Bure who is or was married to hockey star Pavel
> > > > >>> > Bure (who along with Igor Larionov were the first two major
> > > > >>> > Russian stars in the National Hockey League)?
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Yes. They're still married.
> >
> > > > >>> Bure thinks that Christmas and morals are under threat because
> > > > >>> Hallmark has made a handful of movies about gay people in which
> > > > >>> none was burned at the stake.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> You know better than that. There's no reason to lie about it.
> > > > >>
> > > > > How clever. I'm in awe. I'm also right.
> > > >
> > > > No, you're not. Bure has never once suggested anyone should be burned
> > > > at the stake.
> >
> > > I never said she did, but you're trying to be as cute as a gay Macy's
> > > parade float about this. That's a sensible approach, as you've brought
> > > nothing to the table here.
> >
> > You said she left Hallmark because they weren't burning gays at the
> > stake in their movies. That's false and you know it. No reason to lie
> > about it.

> What I actually said is on the record here. Bure has criticized
> Hallmark for running gay-friendly movies. That's beyond dispute. I
> presume she left Hallmark because she got a better deal from GAC and
> not because of some gay-friendly movies, but she nevertheless delivered
> that shot on her way out the door.

And where in all that is there any mention of burning people at stakes,
either literally or in the plots of movies?

In article <atropos-51D98D.09323218112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
<atropos@mac.com> wrote:

> In article <181120221227188288%nope@noway.com>,
> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <atropos-A6AB0F.08420018112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
> > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <181120220547459990%nope@noway.com>,
> > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > In article <wB2dnfVyzt00mOr-nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>, BTR1701
> > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Nov 17, 2022 at 7:49:38 PM PST, "A Friend" <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > In article <atropos-EFD348.19223917112022@news.giganews.com>,
> > > > > > BTR1701
> > > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> In article <171120222204425407%nope@noway.com>,
> > > > > >> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> In article <vhfdnhhkg8f3gjf1g8atbabt3ivl4oj4jt@4ax.com>, The
> > > > > >>> Horny
> > > > > >>> Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> > On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 04:30:46 -0500, Ubiquitous
> > > > > >>> > <weberm@polaris.net>
> > > > > >>> > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> > > "I think we know the core audience and what they love is
> > > > > >>> > > exactly how Bill originally built the Hallmark Channel," Bure
> > > > > >>> > > continued. "That was Christmas and those traditional holidays,
> > > > > >>> > > so that's what the focus is going to be. You've got to start
> > > > > >>> > > somewhere. You can't do everything at once."
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >>> > Is this the same Bure who is or was married to hockey star
> Pavel
> > > > > >>> > Bure (who along with Igor Larionov were the first two major
> > > > > >>> > Russian stars in the National Hockey League)?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> Yes. They're still married.
> > >
> > > > > >>> Bure thinks that Christmas and morals are under threat because
> > > > > >>> Hallmark has made a handful of movies about gay people in which
> > > > > >>> none was burned at the stake.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> You know better than that. There's no reason to lie about it.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > > How clever. I'm in awe. I'm also right.
> > > > >
> > > > > No, you're not. Bure has never once suggested anyone should be burned
> > > > > at the stake.
> > >
> > > > I never said she did, but you're trying to be as cute as a gay Macy's
> > > > parade float about this. That's a sensible approach, as you've brought
> > > > nothing to the table here.
> > >
> > > You said she left Hallmark because they weren't burning gays at the
> > > stake in their movies. That's false and you know it. No reason to lie
> > > about it.
>
> > What I actually said is on the record here. Bure has criticized
> > Hallmark for running gay-friendly movies. That's beyond dispute. I
> > presume she left Hallmark because she got a better deal from GAC and
> > not because of some gay-friendly movies, but she nevertheless delivered
> > that shot on her way out the door.
>
> And where in all that is there any mention of burning people at stakes,
> either literally or in the plots of movies?

<yawn> Again, I didn't quote Bure as having said that. *I* said that.
Try to get at least that much straight.

In article <181120221257240264%nope@noway.com>,
A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:

> In article <atropos-51D98D.09323218112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <181120221227188288%nope@noway.com>,
> > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <atropos-A6AB0F.08420018112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
> > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > In article <181120220547459990%nope@noway.com>,
> > > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > In article <wB2dnfVyzt00mOr-nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>, BTR1701
> > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Nov 17, 2022 at 7:49:38 PM PST, "A Friend" <nope@noway.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > In article <atropos-EFD348.19223917112022@news.giganews.com>,
> > > > > > > BTR1701
> > > > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> In article <171120222204425407%nope@noway.com>,
> > > > > > >> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>> In article <vhfdnhhkg8f3gjf1g8atbabt3ivl4oj4jt@4ax.com>, The
> > > > > > >>> Horny
> > > > > > >>> Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>> > On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 04:30:46 -0500, Ubiquitous
> > > > > > >>> > <weberm@polaris.net>
> > > > > > >>> > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>> > > "I think we know the core audience and what they love is
> > > > > > >>> > > exactly how Bill originally built the Hallmark Channel,"
> > > > > > >>> > > Bure continued. "That was Christmas and those traditional
> > > > > > >>> > > holidays, so that's what the focus is going to be. You've
> > > > > > >>> > > got to start somewhere. You can't do everything at once."
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >>> > Is this the same Bure who is or was married to hockey star
> > > > > > >>> > Pavel Bure (who along with Igor Larionov were the first two
> > > > > > >>> > major Russian stars in the National Hockey League)?
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>> Yes. They're still married.
> > > >
> > > > > > >>> Bure thinks that Christmas and morals are under threat because
> > > > > > >>> Hallmark has made a handful of movies about gay people in which
> > > > > > >>> none was burned at the stake.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> You know better than that. There's no reason to lie about it.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > How clever. I'm in awe. I'm also right.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > No, you're not. Bure has never once suggested anyone should be
> > > > > > burned at the stake.
> > > >
> > > > > I never said she did, but you're trying to be as cute as a gay Macy's
> > > > > parade float about this. That's a sensible approach, as you've
> > > > > brought
> > > > > nothing to the table here.
> > > >
> > > > You said she left Hallmark because they weren't burning gays at the
> > > > stake in their movies. That's false and you know it. No reason to lie
> > > > about it.
> >
> > > What I actually said is on the record here. Bure has criticized
> > > Hallmark for running gay-friendly movies. That's beyond dispute. I
> > > presume she left Hallmark because she got a better deal from GAC and
> > > not because of some gay-friendly movies, but she nevertheless delivered
> > > that shot on her way out the door.
> >
> > And where in all that is there any mention of burning people at stakes,
> > either literally or in the plots of movies?

> <yawn> Again, I didn't quote Bure as having said that. *I* said that.
> Try to get at least that much straight.

<burp> Yes, *you* said that's what *she* thinks. A statement of fact
with no evidence to support it. It's false and you know it. No reason to
lie about it.

In article <atropos-B22814.10041418112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
<atropos@mac.com> wrote:

> In article <181120221257240264%nope@noway.com>,
> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <atropos-51D98D.09323218112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
> > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <181120221227188288%nope@noway.com>,
> > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > In article <atropos-A6AB0F.08420018112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
> > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > In article <181120220547459990%nope@noway.com>,
> > > > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > In article <wB2dnfVyzt00mOr-nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>, BTR1701
> > > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Nov 17, 2022 at 7:49:38 PM PST, "A Friend" <nope@noway.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In article <atropos-EFD348.19223917112022@news.giganews.com>,
> > > > > > > > BTR1701
> > > > > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> In article <171120222204425407%nope@noway.com>,
> > > > > > > >> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>> In article <vhfdnhhkg8f3gjf1g8atbabt3ivl4oj4jt@4ax.com>, The
> > > > > > > >>> Horny
> > > > > > > >>> Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>> > On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 04:30:46 -0500, Ubiquitous
> > > > > > > >>> > <weberm@polaris.net>
> > > > > > > >>> > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>> > > "I think we know the core audience and what they love is
> > > > > > > >>> > > exactly how Bill originally built the Hallmark Channel,"
> > > > > > > >>> > > Bure continued. "That was Christmas and those traditional
> > > > > > > >>> > > holidays, so that's what the focus is going to be. You've
> > > > > > > >>> > > got to start somewhere. You can't do everything at once."
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >>> > Is this the same Bure who is or was married to hockey star
> > > > > > > >>> > Pavel Bure (who along with Igor Larionov were the first two
> > > > > > > >>> > major Russian stars in the National Hockey League)?
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>> Yes. They're still married.
> > > > >
> > > > > > > >>> Bure thinks that Christmas and morals are under threat
> because
> > > > > > > >>> Hallmark has made a handful of movies about gay people in
> which
> > > > > > > >>> none was burned at the stake.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> You know better than that. There's no reason to lie about it.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > How clever. I'm in awe. I'm also right.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > No, you're not. Bure has never once suggested anyone should be
> > > > > > > burned at the stake.
> > > > >
> > > > > > I never said she did, but you're trying to be as cute as a gay
> > > > > > Macy's
> > > > > > parade float about this. That's a sensible approach, as you've
> > > > > > brought
> > > > > > nothing to the table here.
> > > > >
> > > > > You said she left Hallmark because they weren't burning gays at the
> > > > > stake in their movies. That's false and you know it. No reason to lie
> > > > > about it.
> > >
> > > > What I actually said is on the record here. Bure has criticized
> > > > Hallmark for running gay-friendly movies. That's beyond dispute. I
> > > > presume she left Hallmark because she got a better deal from GAC and
> > > > not because of some gay-friendly movies, but she nevertheless delivered
> > > > that shot on her way out the door.
> > >
> > > And where in all that is there any mention of burning people at stakes,
> > > either literally or in the plots of movies?
>
> > <yawn> Again, I didn't quote Bure as having said that. *I* said that.
> > Try to get at least that much straight.
>
> <burp> Yes, *you* said that's what *she* thinks. A statement of fact
> with no evidence to support it. It's false and you know it. No reason to
> lie about it.

Polly want a cracker?

In article <181120221306462864%nope@noway.com>,
A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:

> In article <atropos-B22814.10041418112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <181120221257240264%nope@noway.com>,
> > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <atropos-51D98D.09323218112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
> > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > In article <181120221227188288%nope@noway.com>,
> > > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > In article <atropos-A6AB0F.08420018112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
> > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > In article <181120220547459990%nope@noway.com>,
> > > > > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > In article <wB2dnfVyzt00mOr-nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>,
> > > > > > > BTR1701
> > > > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Nov 17, 2022 at 7:49:38 PM PST, "A Friend" <nope@noway.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > In article <atropos-EFD348.19223917112022@news.giganews.com>,
> > > > > > > > > BTR1701
> > > > > > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> In article <171120222204425407%nope@noway.com>,
> > > > > > > > >> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>> In article <vhfdnhhkg8f3gjf1g8atbabt3ivl4oj4jt@4ax.com>,
> > > > > > > > >>> The
> > > > > > > > >>> Horny
> > > > > > > > >>> Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>> > On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 04:30:46 -0500, Ubiquitous
> > > > > > > > >>> > <weberm@polaris.net>
> > > > > > > > >>> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>> > > "I think we know the core audience and what they love
> > > > > > > > >>> > > is exactly how Bill originally built the Hallmark
> > > > > > > > >>> > > Channel," Bure continued. "That was Christmas and those
> > > > > > > > >>> > > traditional holidays, so that's what the focus is
> > > > > > > > >>> > > going to be. You've got to start somewhere. You can't
> > > > > > > > >>> > > do everything at once."
> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > >>> > Is this the same Bure who is or was married to hockey
> > > > > > > > >>> > star Pavel Bure (who along with Igor Larionov were the
> > > > > > > > >>> > first two major Russian stars in the National Hockey
> > > > > > > > >>> > League)?
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>> Yes. They're still married.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >>> Bure thinks that Christmas and morals are under threat
> > > > > > > > >>> because Hallmark has made a handful of movies about gay
> > > > > > > > >>> people in which none was burned at the stake.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> You know better than that. There's no reason to lie about
> > > > > > > > >> it.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > How clever. I'm in awe. I'm also right.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > No, you're not. Bure has never once suggested anyone should be
> > > > > > > > burned at the stake.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I never said she did, but you're trying to be as cute as a gay
> > > > > > > Macy's parade float about this. That's a sensible approach, as
> > > > > > > you've brought nothing to the table here.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You said she left Hallmark because they weren't burning gays at the
> > > > > > stake in their movies. That's false and you know it. No reason to
> > > > > > lie about it.
> > > >
> > > > > What I actually said is on the record here. Bure has criticized
> > > > > Hallmark for running gay-friendly movies. That's beyond dispute. I
> > > > > presume she left Hallmark because she got a better deal from GAC and
> > > > > not because of some gay-friendly movies, but she nevertheless
> > > > > delivered that shot on her way out the door.
> > > >
> > > > And where in all that is there any mention of burning people at stakes,
> > > > either literally or in the plots of movies?
> >
> > > <yawn> Again, I didn't quote Bure as having said that. *I* said that.
> > > Try to get at least that much straight.
> >
> > <burp> Yes, *you* said that's what *she* thinks. A statement of fact
> > with no evidence to support it. It's false and you know it. No reason to
> > lie about it.
>
> Polly want a cracker?

I accept your concession.

BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> In article <181120220547459990%nope@noway.com>,
> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <wB2dnfVyzt00mOr-nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>, BTR1701
>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 17, 2022 at 7:49:38 PM PST, "A Friend" <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <atropos-EFD348.19223917112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
>>>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <171120222204425407%nope@noway.com>,
>>>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <vhfdnhhkg8f3gjf1g8atbabt3ivl4oj4jt@4ax.com>, The Horny
>>>>>> Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 04:30:46 -0500, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "I think we know the core audience and what they love is exactly
>>>>>>>> how Bill originally built the Hallmark Channel," Bure continued.
>>>>>>>> "That was Christmas and those traditional holidays, so that's
>>>>>>>> what the focus is going to be. You've got to start somewhere.
>>>>>>>> You can't do everything at once."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is this the same Bure who is or was married to hockey star Pavel
>>>>>>> Bure (who along with Igor Larionov were the first two major Russian
>>>>>>> stars in the National Hockey League)?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes. They're still married.
>
>>>>>> Bure thinks that Christmas and morals are under threat because
>>>>>> Hallmark has made a handful of movies about gay people in which
>>>>>> none was burned at the stake.
>>>>>
>>>>> You know better than that. There's no reason to lie about it.
>>>>>
>>>> How clever. I'm in awe. I'm also right.
>>>
>>> No, you're not. Bure has never once suggested anyone should be burned at
>>> the stake.
>
>> I never said she did, but you're trying to be as cute as a gay Macy's
>> parade float about this. That's a sensible approach, as you've brought
>> nothing to the table here.
>
> You said she left Hallmark because they weren't burning gays at the
> stake in their movies. That's false and you know it. No reason to lie
> about it.
>

I had forgotten or never knew that she is the sister of total psychotic
head case Kirk Cameron who had Julie McCullough fired from his show for
having been naked at one point in her life.

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

In article <atropos-45E025.10205318112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
<atropos@mac.com> wrote:

> In article <181120221306462864%nope@noway.com>,
> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <atropos-B22814.10041418112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
> > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <181120221257240264%nope@noway.com>,
> > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > In article <atropos-51D98D.09323218112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
> > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > In article <181120221227188288%nope@noway.com>,
> > > > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > In article <atropos-A6AB0F.08420018112022@news.giganews.com>,
> > > > > > BTR1701
> > > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > In article <181120220547459990%nope@noway.com>,
> > > > > > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In article <wB2dnfVyzt00mOr-nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>,
> > > > > > > > BTR1701
> > > > > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Nov 17, 2022 at 7:49:38 PM PST, "A Friend"
> <nope@noway.com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > In article
> <atropos-EFD348.19223917112022@news.giganews.com>,
> > > > > > > > > > BTR1701
> > > > > > > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >> In article <171120222204425407%nope@noway.com>,
> > > > > > > > > >> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >>> In article <vhfdnhhkg8f3gjf1g8atbabt3ivl4oj4jt@4ax.com>,
> > > > > > > > > >>> The
> > > > > > > > > >>> Horny
> > > > > > > > > >>> Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >>> > On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 04:30:46 -0500, Ubiquitous
> > > > > > > > > >>> > <weberm@polaris.net>
> > > > > > > > > >>> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >>> > > "I think we know the core audience and what they love
> > > > > > > > > >>> > > is exactly how Bill originally built the Hallmark
> > > > > > > > > >>> > > Channel," Bure continued. "That was Christmas and
> those
> > > > > > > > > >>> > > traditional holidays, so that's what the focus is
> > > > > > > > > >>> > > going to be. You've got to start somewhere. You can't
> > > > > > > > > >>> > > do everything at once."
> > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > >>> > Is this the same Bure who is or was married to hockey
> > > > > > > > > >>> > star Pavel Bure (who along with Igor Larionov were the
> > > > > > > > > >>> > first two major Russian stars in the National Hockey
> > > > > > > > > >>> > League)?
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >>> Yes. They're still married.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >>> Bure thinks that Christmas and morals are under threat
> > > > > > > > > >>> because Hallmark has made a handful of movies about gay
> > > > > > > > > >>> people in which none was burned at the stake.
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> You know better than that. There's no reason to lie about
> > > > > > > > > >> it.
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > How clever. I'm in awe. I'm also right.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > No, you're not. Bure has never once suggested anyone should
> be
> > > > > > > > > burned at the stake.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I never said she did, but you're trying to be as cute as a gay
> > > > > > > > Macy's parade float about this. That's a sensible approach, as
> > > > > > > > you've brought nothing to the table here.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You said she left Hallmark because they weren't burning gays at
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > stake in their movies. That's false and you know it. No reason to
> > > > > > > lie about it.
> > > > >
> > > > > > What I actually said is on the record here. Bure has criticized
> > > > > > Hallmark for running gay-friendly movies. That's beyond dispute. I
> > > > > > presume she left Hallmark because she got a better deal from GAC and
> > > > > > not because of some gay-friendly movies, but she nevertheless
> > > > > > delivered that shot on her way out the door.
> > > > >
> > > > > And where in all that is there any mention of burning people at
> > > > > stakes,
> > > > > either literally or in the plots of movies?
> > >
> > > > <yawn> Again, I didn't quote Bure as having said that. *I* said that.
> > > > Try to get at least that much straight.
> > >
> > > <burp> Yes, *you* said that's what *she* thinks. A statement of fact
> > > with no evidence to support it. It's false and you know it. No reason to
> > > lie about it.
> >
> > Polly want a cracker?
>
> I accept your concession.

Thanks for admitting you had nothing here. At least there's that.

In article
<1739775556.690485717.349073.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>,
anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:

> I had forgotten or never knew that she is the sister of total psychotic
> head case Kirk Cameron who had Julie McCullough fired from his show for
> having been naked at one point in her life.

There's a whole bunch of feuds like that one (including that one) here:

https://www.usmagazine.com/entertainment/pictures/biggest-costar-feuds-a
nd-fights-ever-w207187/

On 11/18/22 3:26 PM, A Friend wrote:
> In article <atropos-45E025.10205318112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <181120221306462864%nope@noway.com>,
>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <atropos-B22814.10041418112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
>>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <181120221257240264%nope@noway.com>,
>>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <atropos-51D98D.09323218112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
>>>>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <181120221227188288%nope@noway.com>,
>>>>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <atropos-A6AB0F.08420018112022@news.giganews.com>,
>>>>>>> BTR1701
>>>>>>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In article <181120220547459990%nope@noway.com>,
>>>>>>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <wB2dnfVyzt00mOr-nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>,
>>>>>>>>> BTR1701
>>>>>>>>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2022 at 7:49:38 PM PST, "A Friend"
>> <nope@noway.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In article
>> <atropos-EFD348.19223917112022@news.giganews.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701
>>>>>>>>>>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <171120222204425407%nope@noway.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vhfdnhhkg8f3gjf1g8atbabt3ivl4oj4jt@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Horny
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 04:30:46 -0500, Ubiquitous
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <weberm@polaris.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "I think we know the core audience and what they love
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is exactly how Bill originally built the Hallmark
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Channel," Bure continued. "That was Christmas and
>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> traditional holidays, so that's what the focus is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going to be. You've got to start somewhere. You can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do everything at once."
>>>>>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is this the same Bure who is or was married to hockey
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> star Pavel Bure (who along with Igor Larionov were the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first two major Russian stars in the National Hockey
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> League)?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes. They're still married.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bure thinks that Christmas and morals are under threat
>>>>>>>>>>>>> because Hallmark has made a handful of movies about gay
>>>>>>>>>>>>> people in which none was burned at the stake.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You know better than that. There's no reason to lie about
>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> How clever. I'm in awe. I'm also right.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No, you're not. Bure has never once suggested anyone should
>> be
>>>>>>>>>> burned at the stake.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I never said she did, but you're trying to be as cute as a gay
>>>>>>>>> Macy's parade float about this. That's a sensible approach, as
>>>>>>>>> you've brought nothing to the table here.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You said she left Hallmark because they weren't burning gays at
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> stake in their movies. That's false and you know it. No reason to
>>>>>>>> lie about it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What I actually said is on the record here. Bure has criticized
>>>>>>> Hallmark for running gay-friendly movies. That's beyond dispute. I
>>>>>>> presume she left Hallmark because she got a better deal from GAC and
>>>>>>> not because of some gay-friendly movies, but she nevertheless
>>>>>>> delivered that shot on her way out the door.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And where in all that is there any mention of burning people at
>>>>>> stakes,
>>>>>> either literally or in the plots of movies?
>>>>
>>>>> <yawn> Again, I didn't quote Bure as having said that. *I* said that.
>>>>> Try to get at least that much straight.
>>>>
>>>> <burp> Yes, *you* said that's what *she* thinks. A statement of fact
>>>> with no evidence to support it. It's false and you know it. No reason to
>>>> lie about it.
>>>
>>> Polly want a cracker?
>>
>> I accept your concession.
>
>
> Thanks for admitting you had nothing here. At least there's that.

That's become routine at this point.

On Nov 18, 2022 at 1:26:45 PM PST, "A Friend" <nope@noway.com> wrote:

> In article <atropos-45E025.10205318112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <181120221306462864%nope@noway.com>,
>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>
>> > In article <atropos-B22814.10041418112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
>> > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > In article <181120221257240264%nope@noway.com>,
>> > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > In article <atropos-51D98D.09323218112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
>> > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > In article <181120221227188288%nope@noway.com>,
>> > > > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > In article <atropos-A6AB0F.08420018112022@news.giganews.com>,
>> > > > > > BTR1701
>> > > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > In article <181120220547459990%nope@noway.com>,
>> > > > > > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > In article <wB2dnfVyzt00mOr-nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>,
>> > > > > > > > BTR1701
>> > > > > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > On Nov 17, 2022 at 7:49:38 PM PST, "A Friend"
>> <nope@noway.com>
>> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > In article
>> <atropos-EFD348.19223917112022@news.giganews.com>,
>> > > > > > > > > > BTR1701
>> > > > > > > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >> In article <171120222204425407%nope@noway.com>,
>> > > > > > > > > >> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > >>> In article <vhfdnhhkg8f3gjf1g8atbabt3ivl4oj4jt@4ax.com>,
>> > > > > > > > > >>> The
>> > > > > > > > > >>> Horny
>> > > > > > > > > >>> Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > >>> > On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 04:30:46 -0500, Ubiquitous
>> > > > > > > > > >>> > <weberm@polaris.net>
>> > > > > > > > > >>> > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > "I think we know the core audience and what they love
>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > is exactly how Bill originally built the Hallmark
>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > Channel," Bure continued. "That was Christmas and
>> those
>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > traditional holidays, so that's what the focus is
>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > going to be. You've got to start somewhere. You can't
>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > do everything at once."
>> > > > > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > > > > >>> > Is this the same Bure who is or was married to hockey
>> > > > > > > > > >>> > star Pavel Bure (who along with Igor Larionov were the
>> > > > > > > > > >>> > first two major Russian stars in the National Hockey
>> > > > > > > > > >>> > League)?
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > >>> Yes. They're still married.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >>> Bure thinks that Christmas and morals are under threat
>> > > > > > > > > >>> because Hallmark has made a handful of movies about gay
>> > > > > > > > > >>> people in which none was burned at the stake.
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > >> You know better than that. There's no reason to lie about
>> > > > > > > > > >> it.
>> > > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > > > How clever. I'm in awe. I'm also right.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > No, you're not. Bure has never once suggested anyone should
>> be
>> > > > > > > > > burned at the stake.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > I never said she did, but you're trying to be as cute as a gay
>> > > > > > > > Macy's parade float about this. That's a sensible approach, as
>> > > > > > > > you've brought nothing to the table here.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > You said she left Hallmark because they weren't burning gays at
>> > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > stake in their movies. That's false and you know it. No reason to
>> > > > > > > lie about it.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > What I actually said is on the record here. Bure has criticized
>> > > > > > Hallmark for running gay-friendly movies. That's beyond dispute. I
>> > > > > > presume she left Hallmark because she got a better deal from GAC and
>> > > > > > not because of some gay-friendly movies, but she nevertheless
>> > > > > > delivered that shot on her way out the door.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > And where in all that is there any mention of burning people at
>> > > > > stakes,
>> > > > > either literally or in the plots of movies?
>> > >
>> > > > <yawn> Again, I didn't quote Bure as having said that. *I* said that.
>> > > > Try to get at least that much straight.
>> > >
>> > > <burp> Yes, *you* said that's what *she* thinks. A statement of fact
>> > > with no evidence to support it. It's false and you know it. No reason to
>> > > lie about it.
>> >
>> > Polly want a cracker?
>>
>> I accept your concession.
>
> Thanks for admitting you had nothing here.

Nothing except your own words condemning you.

On 11/18/2022 1:04 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <181120221257240264%nope@noway.com>,
> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <atropos-51D98D.09323218112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <181120221227188288%nope@noway.com>,
>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <atropos-A6AB0F.08420018112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
>>>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <181120220547459990%nope@noway.com>,
>>>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <wB2dnfVyzt00mOr-nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>, BTR1701
>>>>>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2022 at 7:49:38 PM PST, "A Friend" <nope@noway.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In article <atropos-EFD348.19223917112022@news.giganews.com>,
>>>>>>>> BTR1701
>>>>>>>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <171120222204425407%nope@noway.com>,
>>>>>>>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In article <vhfdnhhkg8f3gjf1g8atbabt3ivl4oj4jt@4ax.com>, The
>>>>>>>>>> Horny
>>>>>>>>>> Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 04:30:46 -0500, Ubiquitous
>>>>>>>>>>> <weberm@polaris.net>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "I think we know the core audience and what they love is
>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly how Bill originally built the Hallmark Channel,"
>>>>>>>>>>>> Bure continued. "That was Christmas and those traditional
>>>>>>>>>>>> holidays, so that's what the focus is going to be. You've
>>>>>>>>>>>> got to start somewhere. You can't do everything at once."
>>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>>>>> Is this the same Bure who is or was married to hockey star
>>>>>>>>>>> Pavel Bure (who along with Igor Larionov were the first two
>>>>>>>>>>> major Russian stars in the National Hockey League)?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes. They're still married.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Bure thinks that Christmas and morals are under threat because
>>>>>>>>>> Hallmark has made a handful of movies about gay people in which
>>>>>>>>>> none was burned at the stake.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You know better than that. There's no reason to lie about it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How clever. I'm in awe. I'm also right.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, you're not. Bure has never once suggested anyone should be
>>>>>>> burned at the stake.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I never said she did, but you're trying to be as cute as a gay Macy's
>>>>>> parade float about this. That's a sensible approach, as you've
>>>>>> brought
>>>>>> nothing to the table here.
>>>>>
>>>>> You said she left Hallmark because they weren't burning gays at the
>>>>> stake in their movies. That's false and you know it. No reason to lie
>>>>> about it.
>>>
>>>> What I actually said is on the record here. Bure has criticized
>>>> Hallmark for running gay-friendly movies. That's beyond dispute. I
>>>> presume she left Hallmark because she got a better deal from GAC and
>>>> not because of some gay-friendly movies, but she nevertheless delivered
>>>> that shot on her way out the door.
>>>
>>> And where in all that is there any mention of burning people at stakes,
>>> either literally or in the plots of movies?
>
>> <yawn> Again, I didn't quote Bure as having said that. *I* said that.
>> Try to get at least that much straight.
>
> <burp> Yes, *you* said that's what *she* thinks. A statement of fact
> with no evidence to support it. It's false and you know it. No reason to
> lie about it.

Say, how do you *know* there's "no reason to lie about it"? Whether or
not anyone's lying about it, how do you know there's no reason to?

moviePig <pwallace@moviepig.com> wrote:
> On 11/18/2022 1:04 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <181120221257240264%nope@noway.com>,
>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <atropos-51D98D.09323218112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
>>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <181120221227188288%nope@noway.com>,
>>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <atropos-A6AB0F.08420018112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
>>>>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <181120220547459990%nope@noway.com>,
>>>>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <wB2dnfVyzt00mOr-nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>, BTR1701
>>>>>>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2022 at 7:49:38 PM PST, "A Friend" <nope@noway.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <atropos-EFD348.19223917112022@news.giganews.com>,
>>>>>>>>> BTR1701
>>>>>>>>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In article <171120222204425407%nope@noway.com>,
>>>>>>>>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vhfdnhhkg8f3gjf1g8atbabt3ivl4oj4jt@4ax.com>, The
>>>>>>>>>>> Horny
>>>>>>>>>>> Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 04:30:46 -0500, Ubiquitous
>>>>>>>>>>>> <weberm@polaris.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "I think we know the core audience and what they love is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly how Bill originally built the Hallmark Channel,"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bure continued. "That was Christmas and those traditional
>>>>>>>>>>>>> holidays, so that's what the focus is going to be. You've
>>>>>>>>>>>>> got to start somewhere. You can't do everything at once."
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Is this the same Bure who is or was married to hockey star
>>>>>>>>>>>> Pavel Bure (who along with Igor Larionov were the first two
>>>>>>>>>>>> major Russian stars in the National Hockey League)?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes. They're still married.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Bure thinks that Christmas and morals are under threat because
>>>>>>>>>>> Hallmark has made a handful of movies about gay people in which
>>>>>>>>>>> none was burned at the stake.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You know better than that. There's no reason to lie about it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How clever. I'm in awe. I'm also right.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No, you're not. Bure has never once suggested anyone should be
>>>>>>>> burned at the stake.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I never said she did, but you're trying to be as cute as a gay Macy's
>>>>>>> parade float about this. That's a sensible approach, as you've
>>>>>>> brought
>>>>>>> nothing to the table here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You said she left Hallmark because they weren't burning gays at the
>>>>>> stake in their movies. That's false and you know it. No reason to lie
>>>>>> about it.
>>>>
>>>>> What I actually said is on the record here. Bure has criticized
>>>>> Hallmark for running gay-friendly movies. That's beyond dispute. I
>>>>> presume she left Hallmark because she got a better deal from GAC and
>>>>> not because of some gay-friendly movies, but she nevertheless delivered
>>>>> that shot on her way out the door.
>>>>
>>>> And where in all that is there any mention of burning people at stakes,
>>>> either literally or in the plots of movies?
>>
>>> <yawn> Again, I didn't quote Bure as having said that. *I* said that.
>>> Try to get at least that much straight.
>>
>> <burp> Yes, *you* said that's what *she* thinks. A statement of fact
>> with no evidence to support it. It's false and you know it. No reason to
>> lie about it.
>
> Say, how do you *know* there's "no reason to lie about it"? Whether or
> not anyone's lying about it, how do you know there's no reason to?

Same way A Friend apparently does.

A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> In article
> <1739775556.690485717.349073.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>,
> anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> I had forgotten or never knew that she is the sister of total psychotic
>> head case Kirk Cameron who had Julie McCullough fired from his show for
>> having been naked at one point in her life.
>
>
> There's a whole bunch of feuds like that one (including that one) here:
>
> https://www.usmagazine.com/entertainment/pictures/biggest-costar-feuds-a
> nd-fights-ever-w207187/
>

I think Kirks incredibly hot girlfriend made him do it.

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

In article <rq6cnVuAgO6tuuX-nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>, BTR1701
<atropos@mac.com> wrote:

> On Nov 18, 2022 at 1:26:45 PM PST, "A Friend" <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <atropos-45E025.10205318112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
> > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >
> >> In article <181120221306462864%nope@noway.com>,
> >> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > In article <atropos-B22814.10041418112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
> >> > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > In article <181120221257240264%nope@noway.com>,
> >> > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > In article <atropos-51D98D.09323218112022@news.giganews.com>,
> >> > > > BTR1701
> >> > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > In article <181120221227188288%nope@noway.com>,
> >> > > > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > In article <atropos-A6AB0F.08420018112022@news.giganews.com>,
> >> > > > > > BTR1701
> >> > > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > In article <181120220547459990%nope@noway.com>,
> >> > > > > > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > In article <wB2dnfVyzt00mOr-nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>,
> >> > > > > > > > BTR1701
> >> > > > > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > On Nov 17, 2022 at 7:49:38 PM PST, "A Friend"
> >> <nope@noway.com>
> >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > In article
> >> <atropos-EFD348.19223917112022@news.giganews.com>,
> >> > > > > > > > > > BTR1701
> >> > > > > > > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >> In article <171120222204425407%nope@noway.com>,
> >> > > > > > > > > >> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > > >>> In article
> <vhfdnhhkg8f3gjf1g8atbabt3ivl4oj4jt@4ax.com>,
> >> > > > > > > > > >>> The
> >> > > > > > > > > >>> Horny
> >> > > > > > > > > >>> Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 04:30:46 -0500, Ubiquitous
> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > <weberm@polaris.net>
> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > "I think we know the core audience and what they
> love
> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > is exactly how Bill originally built the Hallmark
> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > Channel," Bure continued. "That was Christmas and
> >> those
> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > traditional holidays, so that's what the focus is
> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > going to be. You've got to start somewhere. You
> can't
> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > do everything at once."
> >> > > > > > > > > >> > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > Is this the same Bure who is or was married to
> hockey
> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > star Pavel Bure (who along with Igor Larionov were
> the
> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > first two major Russian stars in the National Hockey
> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > League)?
> >> > > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > > >>> Yes. They're still married.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >>> Bure thinks that Christmas and morals are under threat
> >> > > > > > > > > >>> because Hallmark has made a handful of movies about
> gay
> >> > > > > > > > > >>> people in which none was burned at the stake.
> >> > > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > > >> You know better than that. There's no reason to lie
> about
> >> > > > > > > > > >> it.
> >> > > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > > > How clever. I'm in awe. I'm also right.
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > No, you're not. Bure has never once suggested anyone
> should
> >> be
> >> > > > > > > > > burned at the stake.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > I never said she did, but you're trying to be as cute as a
> gay
> >> > > > > > > > Macy's parade float about this. That's a sensible approach,
> as
> >> > > > > > > > you've brought nothing to the table here.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > You said she left Hallmark because they weren't burning gays
> at
> >> > > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > > stake in their movies. That's false and you know it. No
> reason to
> >> > > > > > > lie about it.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > What I actually said is on the record here. Bure has criticized
> >> > > > > > Hallmark for running gay-friendly movies. That's beyond
> dispute. I
> >> > > > > > presume she left Hallmark because she got a better deal from
> GAC and
> >> > > > > > not because of some gay-friendly movies, but she nevertheless
> >> > > > > > delivered that shot on her way out the door.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > And where in all that is there any mention of burning people at
> >> > > > > stakes,
> >> > > > > either literally or in the plots of movies?
> >> > >
> >> > > > <yawn> Again, I didn't quote Bure as having said that. *I* said
> >> > > > that.
> >> > > > Try to get at least that much straight.
> >> > >
> >> > > <burp> Yes, *you* said that's what *she* thinks. A statement of fact
> >> > > with no evidence to support it. It's false and you know it. No reason to
> >> > > lie about it.
> >> >
> >> > Polly want a cracker?
> >>
> >> I accept your concession.
> >
> > Thanks for admitting you had nothing here.
>
> Nothing except your own words condemning you.

Wow. The gay thing must really have bothered you. And "condemning" me
over this? Get over yourself. I don't care what your actual agenda is
here, but you've never come closer to revealing it as you have in this
thread. All the veterans will probably find it interesting.

On Nov 19, 2022 at 1:17:26 AM PST, "A Friend" <nope@noway.com> wrote:

> In article <rq6cnVuAgO6tuuX-nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>, BTR1701
> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> On Nov 18, 2022 at 1:26:45 PM PST, "A Friend" <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>
>> > In article <atropos-45E025.10205318112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
>> > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> In article <181120221306462864%nope@noway.com>,
>> >> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > In article <atropos-B22814.10041418112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
>> >> > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > In article <181120221257240264%nope@noway.com>,
>> >> > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > > In article <atropos-51D98D.09323218112022@news.giganews.com>,
>> >> > > > BTR1701
>> >> > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > > In article <181120221227188288%nope@noway.com>,
>> >> > > > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > > In article <atropos-A6AB0F.08420018112022@news.giganews.com>,
>> >> > > > > > BTR1701
>> >> > > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > In article <181120220547459990%nope@noway.com>,
>> >> > > > > > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > In article <wB2dnfVyzt00mOr-nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>,
>> >> > > > > > > > BTR1701
>> >> > > > > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > On Nov 17, 2022 at 7:49:38 PM PST, "A Friend"
>> >> <nope@noway.com>
>> >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > > In article
>> >> <atropos-EFD348.19223917112022@news.giganews.com>,
>> >> > > > > > > > > > BTR1701
>> >> > > > > > > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>> >> > > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> In article <171120222204425407%nope@noway.com>,
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> In article
>> <vhfdnhhkg8f3gjf1g8atbabt3ivl4oj4jt@4ax.com>,
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> The
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> Horny
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 04:30:46 -0500, Ubiquitous
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > <weberm@polaris.net>
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > wrote:
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > "I think we know the core audience and what they
>> love
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > is exactly how Bill originally built the Hallmark
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > Channel," Bure continued. "That was Christmas and
>> >> those
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > traditional holidays, so that's what the focus is
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > going to be. You've got to start somewhere. You
>> can't
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > do everything at once."
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > Is this the same Bure who is or was married to
>> hockey
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > star Pavel Bure (who along with Igor Larionov were
>> the
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > first two major Russian stars in the National Hockey
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > League)?
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> Yes. They're still married.
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> Bure thinks that Christmas and morals are under threat
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> because Hallmark has made a handful of movies about
>> gay
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> people in which none was burned at the stake.
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> You know better than that. There's no reason to lie
>> about
>> >> > > > > > > > > >> it.
>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > > > How clever. I'm in awe. I'm also right.
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > No, you're not. Bure has never once suggested anyone
>> should
>> >> be
>> >> > > > > > > > > burned at the stake.
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > I never said she did, but you're trying to be as cute as a
>> gay
>> >> > > > > > > > Macy's parade float about this. That's a sensible approach,
>> as
>> >> > > > > > > > you've brought nothing to the table here.
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > You said she left Hallmark because they weren't burning gays
>> at
>> >> > > > > > > the
>> >> > > > > > > stake in their movies. That's false and you know it. No
>> reason to
>> >> > > > > > > lie about it.
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > > What I actually said is on the record here. Bure has criticized
>> >> > > > > > Hallmark for running gay-friendly movies. That's beyond
>> dispute. I
>> >> > > > > > presume she left Hallmark because she got a better deal from
>> GAC and
>> >> > > > > > not because of some gay-friendly movies, but she nevertheless
>> >> > > > > > delivered that shot on her way out the door.
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > And where in all that is there any mention of burning people at
>> >> > > > > stakes,
>> >> > > > > either literally or in the plots of movies?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > > <yawn> Again, I didn't quote Bure as having said that. *I* said
>> >> > > > that.
>> >> > > > Try to get at least that much straight.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > <burp> Yes, *you* said that's what *she* thinks. A statement of fact
>> >> > > with no evidence to support it. It's false and you know it. No
>>>>>> reason to
>> >> > > lie about it.
>> >> >
>> >> > Polly want a cracker?
>> >>
>> >> I accept your concession.
>> >
>> > Thanks for admitting you had nothing here.
>>
>> Nothing except your own words condemning you.
>
> Wow. The gay thing must really have bothered you.

In article <zbGdnUYJFY4mKOX-nZ2dnZfqn_cAAAAA@giganews.com>, BTR1701
<atropos@mac.com> wrote:

> On Nov 19, 2022 at 1:17:26 AM PST, "A Friend" <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <rq6cnVuAgO6tuuX-nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>, BTR1701
> > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Nov 18, 2022 at 1:26:45 PM PST, "A Friend" <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > In article <atropos-45E025.10205318112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
> >> > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> In article <181120221306462864%nope@noway.com>,
> >> >> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > In article <atropos-B22814.10041418112022@news.giganews.com>,
> >> >> > BTR1701
> >> >> > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > > In article <181120221257240264%nope@noway.com>,
> >> >> > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > > In article <atropos-51D98D.09323218112022@news.giganews.com>,
> >> >> > > > BTR1701
> >> >> > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > > In article <181120221227188288%nope@noway.com>,
> >> >> > > > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > > > In article
> <atropos-A6AB0F.08420018112022@news.giganews.com>,
> >> >> > > > > > BTR1701
> >> >> > > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >> >> > > > > >
> >> >> > > > > > > In article <181120220547459990%nope@noway.com>,
> >> >> > > > > > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> >> >> > > > > > >
> >> >> > > > > > > > In article
> <wB2dnfVyzt00mOr-nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>,
> >> >> > > > > > > > BTR1701
> >> >> > > > > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >> >> > > > > > > >
> >> >> > > > > > > > > On Nov 17, 2022 at 7:49:38 PM PST, "A Friend"
> >> >> <nope@noway.com>
> >> >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> >> > > > > > > > > > In article
> >> >> <atropos-EFD348.19223917112022@news.giganews.com>,
> >> >> > > > > > > > > > BTR1701
> >> >> > > > > > > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >> In article <171120222204425407%nope@noway.com>,
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >>
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> In article
> >> <vhfdnhhkg8f3gjf1g8atbabt3ivl4oj4jt@4ax.com>,
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> The
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> Horny
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >>
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 04:30:46 -0500, Ubiquitous
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > <weberm@polaris.net>
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > wrote:
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >>
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > "I think we know the core audience and what
> they
> >> love
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > is exactly how Bill originally built the
> Hallmark
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > Channel," Bure continued. "That was Christmas
> and
> >> >> those
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > traditional holidays, so that's what the
> focus is
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > going to be. You've got to start somewhere.
> You
> >> can't
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > do everything at once."
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >> > >
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > Is this the same Bure who is or was married to
> >> hockey
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > star Pavel Bure (who along with Igor Larionov
> were
> >> the
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > first two major Russian stars in the National
> Hockey
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > League)?
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >>
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> Yes. They're still married.
> >> >> > > > > > >
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> Bure thinks that Christmas and morals are under
> threat
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> because Hallmark has made a handful of movies
> about
> >> gay
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >>> people in which none was burned at the stake.
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >>
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >> You know better than that. There's no reason to
> lie
> >> about
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >> it.
> >> >> > > > > > > > > >>
> >> >> > > > > > > > > > How clever. I'm in awe. I'm also right.
> >> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> >> > > > > > > > > No, you're not. Bure has never once suggested anyone
> >> should
> >> >> be
> >> >> > > > > > > > > burned at the stake.
> >> >> > > > > > >
> >> >> > > > > > > > I never said she did, but you're trying to be as cute
> as a
> >> gay
> >> >> > > > > > > > Macy's parade float about this. That's a sensible
> approach,
> >> as
> >> >> > > > > > > > you've brought nothing to the table here.
> >> >> > > > > > >
> >> >> > > > > > > You said she left Hallmark because they weren't burning
> gays
> >> at
> >> >> > > > > > > the
> >> >> > > > > > > stake in their movies. That's false and you know it. No
> >> reason to
> >> >> > > > > > > lie about it.
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > > > What I actually said is on the record here. Bure has
> criticized
> >> >> > > > > > Hallmark for running gay-friendly movies. That's beyond
> >> dispute. I
> >> >> > > > > > presume she left Hallmark because she got a better deal from
> >> GAC and
> >> >> > > > > > not because of some gay-friendly movies, but she
> nevertheless
> >> >> > > > > > delivered that shot on her way out the door.
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > > And where in all that is there any mention of burning people
> at
> >> >> > > > > stakes,
> >> >> > > > > either literally or in the plots of movies?
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > > <yawn> Again, I didn't quote Bure as having said that. *I* said
> >> >> > > > that.
> >> >> > > > Try to get at least that much straight.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > <burp> Yes, *you* said that's what *she* thinks. A statement of
> >> >> > > fact
> >> >> > > with no evidence to support it. It's false and you know it. No
> >>>>>> reason to
> >> >> > > lie about it.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Polly want a cracker?
> >> >>
> >> >> I accept your concession.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for admitting you had nothing here.
> >>
> >> Nothing except your own words condemning you.
> >
> > Wow. The gay thing must really have bothered you.
>
> And now you've lowered yourself to using subtle accusations of homosexuality
> as a weapon. You do know that's considered bigoted behavior, right?
>
> When you're sharing bench space with Trotsky the Hutt, you really need to stop
> and reevaluate yourself.

On 11/19/22 4:53 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2022 at 1:17:26 AM PST, "A Friend" <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <rq6cnVuAgO6tuuX-nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>, BTR1701
>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 18, 2022 at 1:26:45 PM PST, "A Friend" <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > In article <atropos-45E025.10205318112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
>>> > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> In article <181120221306462864%nope@noway.com>,
>>> >> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > In article <atropos-B22814.10041418112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
>>> >> > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > > In article <181120221257240264%nope@noway.com>,
>>> >> > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > > In article <atropos-51D98D.09323218112022@news.giganews.com>,
>>> >> > > > BTR1701
>>> >> > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > > In article <181120221227188288%nope@noway.com>,
>>> >> > > > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>> >> > > > >
>>> >> > > > > > In article <atropos-A6AB0F.08420018112022@news.giganews.com>,
>>> >> > > > > > BTR1701
>>> >> > > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>> >> > > > > >
>>> >> > > > > > > In article <181120220547459990%nope@noway.com>,
>>> >> > > > > > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>> >> > > > > > >
>>> >> > > > > > > > In article <wB2dnfVyzt00mOr-nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>,
>>> >> > > > > > > > BTR1701
>>> >> > > > > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>> >> > > > > > > >
>>> >> > > > > > > > > On Nov 17, 2022 at 7:49:38 PM PST, "A Friend"
>>> >> <nope@noway.com>
>>> >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>>> >> > > > > > > > >
>>> >> > > > > > > > > > In article
>>> >> <atropos-EFD348.19223917112022@news.giganews.com>,
>>> >> > > > > > > > > > BTR1701
>>> >> > > > > > > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >> In article <171120222204425407%nope@noway.com>,
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> In article
>>> <vhfdnhhkg8f3gjf1g8atbabt3ivl4oj4jt@4ax.com>,
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> The
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> Horny
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 04:30:46 -0500, Ubiquitous
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > <weberm@polaris.net>
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > wrote:
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > "I think we know the core audience and what they
>>> love
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > is exactly how Bill originally built the Hallmark
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > Channel," Bure continued. "That was Christmas and
>>> >> those
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > traditional holidays, so that's what the focus is
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > going to be. You've got to start somewhere. You
>>> can't
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > do everything at once."
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >> > >
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > Is this the same Bure who is or was married to
>>> hockey
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > star Pavel Bure (who along with Igor Larionov were
>>> the
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > first two major Russian stars in the National Hockey
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > League)?
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> Yes. They're still married.
>>> >> > > > > > >
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> Bure thinks that Christmas and morals are under threat
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> because Hallmark has made a handful of movies about
>>> gay
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> people in which none was burned at the stake.
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >> You know better than that. There's no reason to lie
>>> about
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >> it.
>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>>> >> > > > > > > > > > How clever. I'm in awe. I'm also right.
>>> >> > > > > > > > >
>>> >> > > > > > > > > No, you're not. Bure has never once suggested anyone
>>> should
>>> >> be
>>> >> > > > > > > > > burned at the stake.
>>> >> > > > > > >
>>> >> > > > > > > > I never said she did, but you're trying to be as cute as a
>>> gay
>>> >> > > > > > > > Macy's parade float about this. That's a sensible approach,
>>> as
>>> >> > > > > > > > you've brought nothing to the table here.
>>> >> > > > > > >
>>> >> > > > > > > You said she left Hallmark because they weren't burning gays
>>> at
>>> >> > > > > > > the
>>> >> > > > > > > stake in their movies. That's false and you know it. No
>>> reason to
>>> >> > > > > > > lie about it.
>>> >> > > > >
>>> >> > > > > > What I actually said is on the record here. Bure has criticized
>>> >> > > > > > Hallmark for running gay-friendly movies. That's beyond
>>> dispute. I
>>> >> > > > > > presume she left Hallmark because she got a better deal from
>>> GAC and
>>> >> > > > > > not because of some gay-friendly movies, but she nevertheless
>>> >> > > > > > delivered that shot on her way out the door.
>>> >> > > > >
>>> >> > > > > And where in all that is there any mention of burning people at
>>> >> > > > > stakes,
>>> >> > > > > either literally or in the plots of movies?
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > > <yawn> Again, I didn't quote Bure as having said that. *I* said
>>> >> > > > that.
>>> >> > > > Try to get at least that much straight.
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > <burp> Yes, *you* said that's what *she* thinks. A statement of fact
>>> >> > > with no evidence to support it. It's false and you know it. No
>>>>>>> reason to
>>> >> > > lie about it.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Polly want a cracker?
>>> >>
>>> >> I accept your concession.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for admitting you had nothing here.
>>>
>>> Nothing except your own words condemning you.
>>
>> Wow. The gay thing must really have bothered you.
>
> And now you've lowered yourself to using subtle accusations of homosexuality
> as a weapon. You do know that's considered bigoted behavior, right?
>
> When you're sharing bench space with Trotsky the Hutt, you really need to stop
> and reevaluate yourself.

On 11/19/22 5:14 AM, A Friend wrote:
> In article <zbGdnUYJFY4mKOX-nZ2dnZfqn_cAAAAA@giganews.com>, BTR1701
> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> On Nov 19, 2022 at 1:17:26 AM PST, "A Friend" <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <rq6cnVuAgO6tuuX-nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>, BTR1701
>>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Nov 18, 2022 at 1:26:45 PM PST, "A Friend" <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > In article <atropos-45E025.10205318112022@news.giganews.com>, BTR1701
>>>> > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> In article <181120221306462864%nope@noway.com>,
>>>> >> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > In article <atropos-B22814.10041418112022@news.giganews.com>,
>>>> >> > BTR1701
>>>> >> > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > > In article <181120221257240264%nope@noway.com>,
>>>> >> > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>> >> > >
>>>> >> > > > In article <atropos-51D98D.09323218112022@news.giganews.com>,
>>>> >> > > > BTR1701
>>>> >> > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >> > > > > In article <181120221227188288%nope@noway.com>,
>>>> >> > > > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>> >> > > > >
>>>> >> > > > > > In article
>> <atropos-A6AB0F.08420018112022@news.giganews.com>,
>>>> >> > > > > > BTR1701
>>>> >> > > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>> >> > > > > >
>>>> >> > > > > > > In article <181120220547459990%nope@noway.com>,
>>>> >> > > > > > > A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>> >> > > > > > >
>>>> >> > > > > > > > In article
>> <wB2dnfVyzt00mOr-nZ2dnZfqn_sAAAAA@giganews.com>,
>>>> >> > > > > > > > BTR1701
>>>> >> > > > > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>> >> > > > > > > >
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > On Nov 17, 2022 at 7:49:38 PM PST, "A Friend"
>>>> >> <nope@noway.com>
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>>>> >> > > > > > > > >
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > In article
>>>> >> <atropos-EFD348.19223917112022@news.giganews.com>,
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > BTR1701
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >> In article <171120222204425407%nope@noway.com>,
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> In article
>>>> <vhfdnhhkg8f3gjf1g8atbabt3ivl4oj4jt@4ax.com>,
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> The
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> Horny
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 04:30:46 -0500, Ubiquitous
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > <weberm@polaris.net>
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > wrote:
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > "I think we know the core audience and what
>> they
>>>> love
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > is exactly how Bill originally built the
>> Hallmark
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > Channel," Bure continued. "That was Christmas
>> and
>>>> >> those
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > traditional holidays, so that's what the
>> focus is
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > going to be. You've got to start somewhere.
>> You
>>>> can't
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > do everything at once."
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >> > >
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > Is this the same Bure who is or was married to
>>>> hockey
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > star Pavel Bure (who along with Igor Larionov
>> were
>>>> the
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > first two major Russian stars in the National
>> Hockey
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> > League)?
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> Yes. They're still married.
>>>> >> > > > > > >
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> Bure thinks that Christmas and morals are under
>> threat
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> because Hallmark has made a handful of movies
>> about
>>>> gay
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>> people in which none was burned at the stake.
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >> You know better than that. There's no reason to
>> lie
>>>> about
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >> it.
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >>
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > How clever. I'm in awe. I'm also right.
>>>> >> > > > > > > > >
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > No, you're not. Bure has never once suggested anyone
>>>> should
>>>> >> be
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > burned at the stake.
>>>> >> > > > > > >
>>>> >> > > > > > > > I never said she did, but you're trying to be as cute
>> as a
>>>> gay
>>>> >> > > > > > > > Macy's parade float about this. That's a sensible
>> approach,
>>>> as
>>>> >> > > > > > > > you've brought nothing to the table here.
>>>> >> > > > > > >
>>>> >> > > > > > > You said she left Hallmark because they weren't burning
>> gays
>>>> at
>>>> >> > > > > > > the
>>>> >> > > > > > > stake in their movies. That's false and you know it. No
>>>> reason to
>>>> >> > > > > > > lie about it.
>>>> >> > > > >
>>>> >> > > > > > What I actually said is on the record here. Bure has
>> criticized
>>>> >> > > > > > Hallmark for running gay-friendly movies. That's beyond
>>>> dispute. I
>>>> >> > > > > > presume she left Hallmark because she got a better deal from
>>>> GAC and
>>>> >> > > > > > not because of some gay-friendly movies, but she
>> nevertheless
>>>> >> > > > > > delivered that shot on her way out the door.
>>>> >> > > > >
>>>> >> > > > > And where in all that is there any mention of burning people
>> at
>>>> >> > > > > stakes,
>>>> >> > > > > either literally or in the plots of movies?
>>>> >> > >
>>>> >> > > > <yawn> Again, I didn't quote Bure as having said that. *I* said
>>>> >> > > > that.
>>>> >> > > > Try to get at least that much straight.
>>>> >> > >
>>>> >> > > <burp> Yes, *you* said that's what *she* thinks. A statement of
>>>> >> > > fact
>>>> >> > > with no evidence to support it. It's false and you know it. No
>>>>>>>> reason to
>>>> >> > > lie about it.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Polly want a cracker?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I accept your concession.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks for admitting you had nothing here.
>>>>
>>>> Nothing except your own words condemning you.
>>>
>>> Wow. The gay thing must really have bothered you.
>>
>> And now you've lowered yourself to using subtle accusations of homosexuality
>> as a weapon. You do know that's considered bigoted behavior, right?
>>
>> When you're sharing bench space with Trotsky the Hutt, you really need to stop
>> and reevaluate yourself.
>
>
> I have no problems with Trotsky. Sometimes we've disagreed, but we've
> discussed it calmly and respectfully because I think he knows I'm not
> out to spar with him.

In article <191120220614159028%nope@noway.com>,
A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:

> In article <zbGdnUYJFY4mKOX-nZ2dnZfqn_cAAAAA@giganews.com>, BTR1701
> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 19, 2022 at 1:17:26 AM PST, "A Friend" <nope@noway.com> wrote:

> > > Wow. The gay thing must really have bothered you.
> >
> > And now you've lowered yourself to using subtle accusations of
> > homosexuality as a weapon. You do know that's considered bigoted
> > behavior, right?
> >
> > When you're sharing bench space with Trotsky the Hutt, you really need to
> > stop and reevaluate yourself.
>
> I have no problems with Trotsky.

Of course you don't. His constant bigoted homophobic comments seem right
in line with your value system.

> I was suggesting that you are exhibiting intolerant attitudes.

How exactly does pointing out your lies about Bure being upset about the
lack of gays being burned at stakes in movies make me "intolerant"?

On 11/19/22 11:10 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <191120220614159028%nope@noway.com>,
> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <zbGdnUYJFY4mKOX-nZ2dnZfqn_cAAAAA@giganews.com>, BTR1701
>> <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 19, 2022 at 1:17:26 AM PST, "A Friend" <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>
>>>> Wow. The gay thing must really have bothered you.
>>>
>>> And now you've lowered yourself to using subtle accusations of
>>> homosexuality as a weapon. You do know that's considered bigoted
>>> behavior, right?
>>>
>>> When you're sharing bench space with Trotsky the Hutt, you really need to
>>> stop and reevaluate yourself.
>>
>> I have no problems with Trotsky.
>
> Of course you don't. His constant bigoted homophobic comments seem right
> in line with your value system.

You seem to have me confused with Eunuch "Rich." Moreover, the shit you
spew about transgenders et al is the real issue but like a true eunuch
you don't have the balls to admit this.

>> I was suggesting that you are exhibiting intolerant attitudes.
>
> How exactly does pointing out your lies about Bure being upset about the
> lack of gays being burned at stakes in movies make me "intolerant"?

Lying about Bure is as low as it gets. No, wait, I misspoke: "Lying
about Bure" is more likely to prompt "Who gives a shit?" than just about
anything else you could possibly say.

In article <191120220417261487%nope@noway.com>, nope@noway.com wrote:
> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>> On Nov 18, 2022 at 1:26:45 PM PST, "A Friend" <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>> A Friend <nope@noway.com> wrote:
>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

>>>>>> Yes, *you* said that's what *she* thinks. A statement of fact
>>>>>> with no evidence to support it. It's false and you know it.
>>>>>> No reason to lie about it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Polly want a cracker?
>>>>
>>>> I accept your concession.
>>>
>>> Thanks for admitting you had nothing here.
>>
>> Nothing except your own words condemning you.
>
> Wow. The gay thing must really have bothered you.

Homophobia noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.

--
Let's go Brandon!

In article <191120220614159028%nope@noway.com>, nope@noway.com wrote:
> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>> On Nov 19, 2022 at 1:17:26 AM PST, "A Friend" <nope@noway.com> wrote:

>> > Wow. The gay thing must really have bothered you.
>>
>> And now you've lowered yourself to using subtle accusations of homosexuality
>> as a weapon. You do know that's considered bigoted behavior, right?
>>
>> When you're sharing bench space with Trotsky the Hutt, you really need to
>> stop and reevaluate yourself.
>
> I have no problems with Trotsky. Sometimes we've disagreed, but we've
> discussed it calmly and respectfully.

OK, sockpuppet.

TROLL-O-METER
5* 6* *7
4* *8
3* *9
2* *10
1* | *stuporous
0* -*- *catatonic
* |\ *comatose
* \ *clinical death
* \ *biological death
* _\/ *demonic apparition
* * *damned for all eternity