On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 2:45:58 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> On 2022-10-26 10:45 p.m., Michael Pendragon wrote:
> > On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 10:34:05 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >> On 2022-10-25 1:31 p.m., W.Dockery wrote:
> >>> George J. Dance wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 2022-10-23 11:48 p.m., ME wrote:
> >>>>> On Tuesday, 18 October 2022 at 20:26:03 UTC-4, David Dalton wrote:
> >>>>>> Here is Sarah McLachlan performing Leonard Cohen’s
> >>>>>> Hallelujah. Even though many people have covered it,
> >>>>>> it is wonderful to hear her doing it---she does a beautiful
> >>>>>> version.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l41Ywxgz1mI
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> (And I hope I am playing the right chord tonight, ha.)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Also the song is only partly religious.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> David Dalton dal...@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home
> >> page)
> >>>>>> https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns
> >>>> (mystic page)
> >>>>>> "And I know the young man with a century's face/A philosopher king
> >>>> - he
> >>>>>> will try to amaze/With examples of love and examples of hate" (T.
> >>>> Tikaram)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This has not worked out well for you, has it?
> >>>
> >>>> *What* do you think hasn't worked out well for Mr. Dalton, troll? The
> >>>> song?
> >>>
> >>> ME responded to David Dalton twice, which seems to indicate that she was
> >>> posting to him, just as she called Mack a "mother fucker" last week.
> >>>
> >> I didn't know about that; I stopped reading the "NIMBY" thread earlier..
> >> But I went back and read it today; I see that ME took up the trolling
> >> there, just like here. But it does explain their comment; they thought
> >> that "David Dalton" was just "Mack" posting under another name, and were
> >> was telling him that posting under different fake names to escape
> >> trolling is what "has not worked out well" for him.
> >
> > Interesting theory, Kowalski, but ME has confirmed that she was responding to George "General Stink" Sulzbach.
> Really? Your MEatpuppet has "confirmed" that you were correct all along.
> I guess you think that clinches it.
> >
> >>> Apparently Pendragon will continue to try to explain it, but the fact is
> >>> obvious.
>
> >> It's undeniable that ME was trolling David Dalton. MMP just came up
> >> with the first excuse he could think of -- that she was trolling you --
> >> and he's had to come up with this ridiculous idea of this "glitch" in
> >> the headers to try to defend it.
> >
> > Sorry, George. ME has confirmed that she was responding to George "General Stink" Sulzbach.
> Sorry, Michael, but having a meatpuppet say you're correct is little
> different from you saying you're correct. That's what meatpuppets do;
> that's what they're for.
>
> That's how your MEatpuppet got her name in the first place.

I've explained this to you, George.

One can only be said to have earned a nickname when said nickname sticks.

You're the only one who calls ME by that name... unlike the appellation "Dunce" which has been attributed to you by several generations of AAPC members.

*Not that I'm calling you "Dunce" (even if you have been acting like one of late).

On 2022-10-27 12:35 a.m., Michael Pendragon wrote:
> On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 12:15:32 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>> On 2022-10-25 9:28 p.m., Will Dockery wrote:
>>> No, ME fucked up and responded to David Dalton twice and now you're trying to somehow explain it all away, Pendragon.
>>>
>>
>> As I said, I don't think the MEatpuppet fucked up; it looks like she was
>> trolling Dr. Dalton deliberately, under the impression he was "Mack"
>> using a different name.
>>
>> But yes, MMP's just trying to make excuses for her again, just as he did
>> when she was trolling "Mack" in the NIMBY thread.
>
> ME has said that she was addressing General Stink, George.
>
> Why do you insist on lying about it?

I've asked you several times, not be so dishonest, Michael. Whether you
made up the "email" story or not, no one will deny that your MEatpuppet
agrees with you.

What I told you is that that's what meatpuppets do; having your own
meatpuppet agree with you doesn't mean anything more than you agreeing
with yourself.

On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 2:58:01 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> On 2022-10-27 12:21 a.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 12:15:32 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >> On 2022-10-25 9:28 p.m., Will Dockery wrote:
> >>> No, ME fucked up and responded to David Dalton twice and now you're trying to somehow explain it all away, Pendragon.
> >>>
> >>
> >> As I said, I don't think the MEatpuppet fucked up; it looks like she was
> >> trolling Dr. Dalton deliberately, under the impression he was "Mack"
> >> using a different name.
> >>
> >> But yes, MMP's just trying to make excuses for her again, just as he did
> >> when she was trolling "Mack" in the NIMBY thread.
> >
> >
> > Now wait a moment...didn't you put it on me, e-mailing ME about the 'plants' to include David Dalton?
> No. I said you'd told the MEatpuppet about the "plants", but I didn't
> say you'd told her any names. It's pretty obvious that "plants" would
> keep changing their names -- and pretty damn sad that the MEatpuppet
> could figure that out, even if you couldn't.

How would you know what (if anything) Jim said to ME?

Your conspiracy theories have gotten the better of you, George.

On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 3:08:55 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> On 2022-10-27 12:35 a.m., Michael Pendragon wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 12:15:32 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >> On 2022-10-25 9:28 p.m., Will Dockery wrote:
> >>> No, ME fucked up and responded to David Dalton twice and now you're trying to somehow explain it all away, Pendragon.
> >>>
> >>
> >> As I said, I don't think the MEatpuppet fucked up; it looks like she was
> >> trolling Dr. Dalton deliberately, under the impression he was "Mack"
> >> using a different name.
> >>
> >> But yes, MMP's just trying to make excuses for her again, just as he did
> >> when she was trolling "Mack" in the NIMBY thread.
> >
> > ME has said that she was addressing General Stink, George.
> >
> > Why do you insist on lying about it?
> I've asked you several times, not be so dishonest, Michael. Whether you
> made up the "email" story or not, no one will deny that your MEatpuppet
> agrees with you.
>
> What I told you is that that's what meatpuppets do; having your own
> meatpuppet agree with you doesn't mean anything more than you agreeing
> with yourself.

I'll advise you not to call me a liar, George.

ME sent me an email confirming that she was responding to Stink.

If your IQ was half of what you pretend, you would see that here post directly replies to Stinks.

And let us not forget that you'd previously questioned how her post applied to Mr. Dalton's:

"*What* do you think hasn't worked out well for Mr. Dalton, troll? The song?"

How do you explain that, George?

On 2022-10-27 3:07 a.m., Michael Pendragon wrote:
> On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 2:45:58 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>> On 2022-10-26 10:45 p.m., Michael Pendragon wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 10:34:05 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>>>> On 2022-10-25 1:31 p.m., W.Dockery wrote:
>>>>> George J. Dance wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2022-10-23 11:48 p.m., ME wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 18 October 2022 at 20:26:03 UTC-4, David Dalton wrote:
>>>>>>>> Here is Sarah McLachlan performing Leonard Cohen’s
>>>>>>>> Hallelujah. Even though many people have covered it,
>>>>>>>> it is wonderful to hear her doing it---she does a beautiful
>>>>>>>> version.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l41Ywxgz1mI
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (And I hope I am playing the right chord tonight, ha.)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also the song is only partly religious.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> David Dalton dal...@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home
>>>> page)
>>>>>>>> https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns
>>>>>> (mystic page)
>>>>>>>> "And I know the young man with a century's face/A philosopher king
>>>>>> - he
>>>>>>>> will try to amaze/With examples of love and examples of hate" (T.
>>>>>> Tikaram)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This has not worked out well for you, has it?
>>>>>
>>>>>> *What* do you think hasn't worked out well for Mr. Dalton, troll? The
>>>>>> song?
>>>>>
>>>>> ME responded to David Dalton twice, which seems to indicate that she was
>>>>> posting to him, just as she called Mack a "mother fucker" last week.
>>>>>
>>>> I didn't know about that; I stopped reading the "NIMBY" thread earlier.
>>>> But I went back and read it today; I see that ME took up the trolling
>>>> there, just like here. But it does explain their comment; they thought
>>>> that "David Dalton" was just "Mack" posting under another name, and were
>>>> was telling him that posting under different fake names to escape
>>>> trolling is what "has not worked out well" for him.
>>>
>>> Interesting theory, Kowalski, but ME has confirmed that she was responding to George "General Stink" Sulzbach.
>> Really? Your MEatpuppet has "confirmed" that you were correct all along.
>> I guess you think that clinches it.
>>>
>>>>> Apparently Pendragon will continue to try to explain it, but the fact is
>>>>> obvious.
>>
>>>> It's undeniable that ME was trolling David Dalton. MMP just came up
>>>> with the first excuse he could think of -- that she was trolling you --
>>>> and he's had to come up with this ridiculous idea of this "glitch" in
>>>> the headers to try to defend it.
>>>
>>> Sorry, George. ME has confirmed that she was responding to George "General Stink" Sulzbach.
>> Sorry, Michael, but having a meatpuppet say you're correct is little
>> different from you saying you're correct. That's what meatpuppets do;
>> that's what they're for.
>>
>> That's how your MEatpuppet got her name in the first place.
>
> I've explained this to you, George.
>
> One can only be said to have earned a nickname when said nickname sticks.
>
> You're the only one who calls ME by that name...

> unlike the appellation "Dunce" which has been attributed to you by several generations of AAPC members.
>

Yes, we both know that you 'second-handed' that name. I'm glad you admit
you weren't creative enough to come up with anything original.

Now that we've dealt with that deflection on your part, please try to
focus on the point.

I call that ally of yours "MEatpuppet" because:
(1) it's a pun on her nym; and
(2) she is your team's meatpuppet.

And having your own meatpuppet agree with you means no more than you
agreeing with yourself.

> *Not that I'm calling you "Dunce" (even if you have been acting like one of late).

Fair enough; just like I haven't been calling you "Michael Monkey" in
this thread (even if have started throwing your poo around again). I'm
glad we're keeping things so civil.

On 2022-10-27 3:12 a.m., Michael Pendragon wrote:
> On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 2:58:01 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>> On 2022-10-27 12:21 a.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
>>> On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 12:15:32 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>>>> On 2022-10-25 9:28 p.m., Will Dockery wrote:
>>>>> No, ME fucked up and responded to David Dalton twice and now you're trying to somehow explain it all away, Pendragon.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As I said, I don't think the MEatpuppet fucked up; it looks like she was
>>>> trolling Dr. Dalton deliberately, under the impression he was "Mack"
>>>> using a different name.
>>>>
>>>> But yes, MMP's just trying to make excuses for her again, just as he did
>>>> when she was trolling "Mack" in the NIMBY thread.
>>>
>>>
>>> Now wait a moment...didn't you put it on me, e-mailing ME about the 'plants' to include David Dalton?
>> No. I said you'd told the MEatpuppet about the "plants", but I didn't
>> say you'd told her any names. It's pretty obvious that "plants" would
>> keep changing their names -- and pretty damn sad that the MEatpuppet
>> could figure that out, even if you couldn't.
>
> How would you know what (if anything) Jim said to ME?

The Chimp's been posting his conspiracy theories about the Team Donkey
"plants" on aapc for at least a week. Of course you may have missed them.

> Your conspiracy theories have gotten the better of you, George.
>

The conspiracy theory about the "plants" isn't mine, you know. Why would
you pretend it is?

On 2022-10-27 3:22 a.m., Michael Pendragon wrote:
> On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 3:08:55 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>> On 2022-10-27 12:35 a.m., Michael Pendragon wrote:
>>> On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 12:15:32 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>>>> On 2022-10-25 9:28 p.m., Will Dockery wrote:
>>>>> No, ME fucked up and responded to David Dalton twice and now you're trying to somehow explain it all away, Pendragon.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As I said, I don't think the MEatpuppet fucked up; it looks like she was
>>>> trolling Dr. Dalton deliberately, under the impression he was "Mack"
>>>> using a different name.
>>>>
>>>> But yes, MMP's just trying to make excuses for her again, just as he did
>>>> when she was trolling "Mack" in the NIMBY thread.
>>>
>>> ME has said that she was addressing General Stink, George.
>>>
>>> Why do you insist on lying about it?
>> I've asked you several times, not be so dishonest, Michael. Whether you
>> made up the "email" story or not, no one will deny that your MEatpuppet
>> agrees with you.
>>
>> What I told you is that that's what meatpuppets do; having your own
>> meatpuppet agree with you doesn't mean anything more than you agreeing
>> with yourself.
>
> I'll advise you not to call me a liar, George.
>
I'll be more than happy to not have reason to.

> ME sent me an email confirming that she was responding to Stink.

And you falsely accused me of "lying about that". When what I've told
you is that claiming that your're right because your meatpuppet agrees
with you counts is no better than claiming you're right because you say
you are.

>
> If your IQ was half of what you pretend, you would see that here post directly replies to Stinks.
>

Fortunately, my IQ is double that; so it's not all that hard to read the
thread to and see that both her posts in this thread were trolls of
David Dalton['s OP. Hell, Will and Zod both did the same; and you
"pretend" to have a higher IQ than either of them.

> And let us not forget that you'd previously questioned how her post applied to Mr. Dalton's:
>
> "*What* do you think hasn't worked out well for Mr. Dalton, troll? The song?"
>
> How do you explain that, George?
>

Rather than assume what she meant by "this", I asked her to explain it.

Instead of answering, of course, she ran away and you took up the troll
baton.

On 2022-10-26 11:15 p.m., W.Dockery wrote:
> Michael Pendragon wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 10:52:13 PM UTC-4,
>> george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>>> On 2022-10-26 4:32 p.m., W-Dockery wrote: > George J. Dance wrote: >
>>> >> On 2022-10-23 11:48 p.m., ME wrote: >> > On Tuesday, 18 October
>>> 2022 at 20:26:03 UTC-4, David Dalton wrote: >> >> >> Here is Sarah
>>> McLachlan performing Leonard Cohen’s >> >> Hallelujah. Even though
>>> many people have covered it, >> >> it is wonderful to hear her doing
>>> it---she does a beautiful >> >> version. >> >> >> >>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l41Ywxgz1mI >> >> >> >> (And I hope
>>> I am playing the right chord tonight, ha.) >> >> >> >> Also the
>>> song is only partly religious. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> David Dalton
>>> dal...@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page) >> >>
>>> https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns >>
>>> (mystic page) >> >> "And I know the young man with a century's
>>> face/A philosopher king >> - he >> >> will try to amaze/With
>>> examples of love and examples of hate" (T. >> Tikaram) >> > >> >
>>> >> > This has not worked out well for you, has it? > >> *What* do
>>> you think hasn't worked out well for Mr. Dalton, troll? The >> song?
>>> > > ME made a mistake (twice) and replied to David Dalton by accident.
>>> It's possible that the MEatpuppet replied to the wrong person's post
>>> by accident; but not very likely that she'd have made the same
>>> mistake twice in a row. Still, if the Monkeys had claimed that's what
>>> happened, either in a post from her or an alleged "email" from her to
>>> MMP, then we could accept it, drop it, and move on.
>>> Instead, they're stuck defending this cockamamie story that somehow
>>> all the backthread got scrambled by this glitch in the internet.
>>> > Just goes to show that we all make mistakes from time-to-time.
>
>> Pay attention, George.
>
>> Here is what I said:
>
>> 1) NovaBS might have posted the wrong headers (as per usual),
>
> Definitely not the correct answer.

Agreed. Neither Dalton's post nor the MEatpuppet's were made on NovaBBS,
nor am I reading them there. I have looked on narkive and of course
Thunderbird, as well as Google, and they all show the MEatpuppet
replying to Dr. Dalton. So, while it's possible (at least one chance in
a million) that usenet could have mixed up the headers, there's no
reason to think NovaBBS had anything to do with it.

>
>> 2) ME may have responded to Stink's statement within the body of
>> Dalton's post
>
> Possibly >

No, that is impossible. The MEatpuppet couldn't have been responding to
Zod's statement in the backthread of Dr. Dalton's post, because Zod's
statement wasn't in the backthread of Dr. Dalton's post.

Just saying Zod's post is not in the backthread isn't conclusive. What
is conclusive is thhe fact that Zod's post couldn't have been in the
backthread. That's Dr. Dalton's post, the one to which the MEatpuppet
replied (twice), didn't have any backthread: he made the original post
in the thread.

So that scenario is patently false; we don't even have to consider it.

> = ME fucked up.
>
Knowing the MEatpuppet, that is possible, but I don't see how even she
could have fucked up in that way. Google is virtually idiot-proof in
that respect: You read a post, click a "reply" option right on that
post, and your reply is linked to it automatically. So I don't think
it's likely.

I think it's more likely, given the Chimp's Invasion of the Body
Snatchers paranoia about the "plant" people, and ME's subsequent
trolling of Mack, that she just assumed Dr. Dalton was Mack or another
"plant" person.

> HTH and HAND.

George J. Dance wrote:

> On 2022-10-26 11:15 p.m., W.Dockery wrote:
> > Michael Pendragon wrote:
> >
> >> On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 10:52:13 PM UTC-4,
> >> george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >>> On 2022-10-26 4:32 p.m., W-Dockery wrote: > George J. Dance wrote: >
> >>> >> On 2022-10-23 11:48 p.m., ME wrote: >> > On Tuesday, 18 October
> >>> 2022 at 20:26:03 UTC-4, David Dalton wrote: >> >> >> Here is Sarah
> >>> McLachlan performing Leonard Cohen’s >> >> Hallelujah. Even though
> >>> many people have covered it, >> >> it is wonderful to hear her doing
> >>> it---she does a beautiful >> >> version. >> >> >> >>
> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l41Ywxgz1mI >> >> >> >> (And I hope
> >>> I am playing the right chord tonight, ha.) >> >> >> >> Also the
> >>> song is only partly religious. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> David Dalton
> >>> dal...@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page) >> >>
> >>> https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns >>
> >>> (mystic page) >> >> "And I know the young man with a century's
> >>> face/A philosopher king >> - he >> >> will try to amaze/With
> >>> examples of love and examples of hate" (T. >> Tikaram) >> > >> >
> >>> >> > This has not worked out well for you, has it? > >> *What* do
> >>> you think hasn't worked out well for Mr. Dalton, troll? The >> song?
> >>> > > ME made a mistake (twice) and replied to David Dalton by accident.
> >>> It's possible that the MEatpuppet replied to the wrong person's post
> >>> by accident; but not very likely that she'd have made the same
> >>> mistake twice in a row. Still, if the Monkeys had claimed that's what
> >>> happened, either in a post from her or an alleged "email" from her to
> >>> MMP, then we could accept it, drop it, and move on.
> >>> Instead, they're stuck defending this cockamamie story that somehow
> >>> all the backthread got scrambled by this glitch in the internet.
> >>> > Just goes to show that we all make mistakes from time-to-time.
> >
> >> Pay attention, George.
> >
> >> Here is what I said:
> >
> >> 1) NovaBS might have posted the wrong headers (as per usual),
> >
> > Definitely not the correct answer.

> Agreed. Neither Dalton's post nor the MEatpuppet's were made on NovaBBS,
> nor am I reading them there. I have looked on narkive and of course
> Thunderbird, as well as Google, and they all show the MEatpuppet
> replying to Dr. Dalton. So, while it's possible (at least one chance in
> a million) that usenet could have mixed up the headers, there's no
> reason to think NovaBBS had anything to do with it.

> >
> >> 2) ME may have responded to Stink's statement within the body of
> >> Dalton's post
> >
> > Possibly >

> No, that is impossible. The MEatpuppet couldn't have been responding to
> Zod's statement in the backthread of Dr. Dalton's post, because Zod's
> statement wasn't in the backthread of Dr. Dalton's post.

> Just saying Zod's post is not in the backthread isn't conclusive. What
> is conclusive is thhe fact that Zod's post couldn't have been in the
> backthread. That's Dr. Dalton's post, the one to which the MEatpuppet
> replied (twice), didn't have any backthread: he made the original post
> in the thread.

> So that scenario is patently false; we don't even have to consider it.

> > = ME fucked up.
> >
> Knowing the MEatpuppet, that is possible, but I don't see how even she
> could have fucked up in that way. Google is virtually idiot-proof in
> that respect: You read a post, click a "reply" option right on that
> post, and your reply is linked to it automatically. So I don't think
> it's likely.

> I think it's more likely, given the Chimp's Invasion of the Body
> Snatchers paranoia about the "plant" people, and ME's subsequent
> trolling of Mack, that she just assumed Dr. Dalton was Mack or another
> "plant" person.

Yes, it looked obvious that was the agenda at that time.

On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 3:28:23 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> On 2022-10-27 3:07 a.m., Michael Pendragon wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 2:45:58 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >> On 2022-10-26 10:45 p.m., Michael Pendragon wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 10:34:05 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >>>> On 2022-10-25 1:31 p.m., W.Dockery wrote:
> >>>>> George J. Dance wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2022-10-23 11:48 p.m., ME wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Tuesday, 18 October 2022 at 20:26:03 UTC-4, David Dalton wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Here is Sarah McLachlan performing Leonard Cohen’s
> >>>>>>>> Hallelujah. Even though many people have covered it,
> >>>>>>>> it is wonderful to hear her doing it---she does a beautiful
> >>>>>>>> version.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l41Ywxgz1mI
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> (And I hope I am playing the right chord tonight, ha.)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Also the song is only partly religious.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> David Dalton dal...@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home
> >>>> page)
> >>>>>>>> https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns
> >>>>>> (mystic page)
> >>>>>>>> "And I know the young man with a century's face/A philosopher king
> >>>>>> - he
> >>>>>>>> will try to amaze/With examples of love and examples of hate" (T..
> >>>>>> Tikaram)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This has not worked out well for you, has it?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> *What* do you think hasn't worked out well for Mr. Dalton, troll? The
> >>>>>> song?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ME responded to David Dalton twice, which seems to indicate that she was
> >>>>> posting to him, just as she called Mack a "mother fucker" last week..
> >>>>>
> >>>> I didn't know about that; I stopped reading the "NIMBY" thread earlier.
> >>>> But I went back and read it today; I see that ME took up the trolling
> >>>> there, just like here. But it does explain their comment; they thought
> >>>> that "David Dalton" was just "Mack" posting under another name, and were
> >>>> was telling him that posting under different fake names to escape
> >>>> trolling is what "has not worked out well" for him.
> >>>
> >>> Interesting theory, Kowalski, but ME has confirmed that she was responding to George "General Stink" Sulzbach.
> >> Really? Your MEatpuppet has "confirmed" that you were correct all along.
> >> I guess you think that clinches it.
> >>>
> >>>>> Apparently Pendragon will continue to try to explain it, but the fact is
> >>>>> obvious.
> >>
> >>>> It's undeniable that ME was trolling David Dalton. MMP just came up
> >>>> with the first excuse he could think of -- that she was trolling you --
> >>>> and he's had to come up with this ridiculous idea of this "glitch" in
> >>>> the headers to try to defend it.
> >>>
> >>> Sorry, George. ME has confirmed that she was responding to George "General Stink" Sulzbach.
> >> Sorry, Michael, but having a meatpuppet say you're correct is little
> >> different from you saying you're correct. That's what meatpuppets do;
> >> that's what they're for.
> >>
> >> That's how your MEatpuppet got her name in the first place.
> >
> > I've explained this to you, George.
> >
> > One can only be said to have earned a nickname when said nickname sticks.
> >
> > You're the only one who calls ME by that name...
>
>
> > unlike the appellation "Dunce" which has been attributed to you by several generations of AAPC members.
> >
> Yes, we both know that you 'second-handed' that name. I'm glad you admit
> you weren't creative enough to come up with anything original.

I wasn't calling you "Dunce," George. I was reminding you that others have done so -- and that said nickname has stuck.

> Now that we've dealt with that deflection on your part, please try to
> focus on the point.
>
> I call that ally of yours "MEatpuppet" because:
> (1) it's a pun on her nym; and
> (2) she is your team's meatpuppet.

I don't care why you call anyone by childish names, George, or what those names supposedly mean. I realize that you think they're witty... but they're only witty to a 6-year old (or to one whose mindset has never advanced beyond that point).

I don't even care that you insist on pretending that I'm part of a team. As previously noted, it's every bit as ridiculous as when PJR assigned me to "The Dunce Gang."

> And having your own meatpuppet agree with you means no more than you
> agreeing with yourself.

ME and I have had several disagreements over the years, for which she has berated me both here and in private emails. ME is obviously her own person who does not blindly follow anyone. I have also publicly disagreed with ME numerous times; her recent Mack attack being but one example.

> > *Not that I'm calling you "Dunce" (even if you have been acting like one of late).
> Fair enough; just like I haven't been calling you "Michael Monkey" in
> this thread (even if have started throwing your poo around again). I'm
> glad we're keeping things so civil.

Why should you call me "Michael Monkey" when I come with my own monkey nym: "Cocodesockmonkey"?

On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 3:43:37 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> On 2022-10-27 3:12 a.m., Michael Pendragon wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 2:58:01 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >> On 2022-10-27 12:21 a.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 12:15:32 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >>>> On 2022-10-25 9:28 p.m., Will Dockery wrote:
> >>>>> No, ME fucked up and responded to David Dalton twice and now you're trying to somehow explain it all away, Pendragon.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> As I said, I don't think the MEatpuppet fucked up; it looks like she was
> >>>> trolling Dr. Dalton deliberately, under the impression he was "Mack"
> >>>> using a different name.
> >>>>
> >>>> But yes, MMP's just trying to make excuses for her again, just as he did
> >>>> when she was trolling "Mack" in the NIMBY thread.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Now wait a moment...didn't you put it on me, e-mailing ME about the 'plants' to include David Dalton?
> >> No. I said you'd told the MEatpuppet about the "plants", but I didn't
> >> say you'd told her any names. It's pretty obvious that "plants" would
> >> keep changing their names -- and pretty damn sad that the MEatpuppet
> >> could figure that out, even if you couldn't.
> >
> > How would you know what (if anything) Jim said to ME?
> The Chimp's been posting his conspiracy theories about the Team Donkey
> "plants" on aapc for at least a week. Of course you may have missed them.

Since when has Jim become "The Chimp"?

Damn, George! You change your childish nicknames for people so often that it's almost impossible to know who you're talking about.

On first read, I thought you were referring to my "Coco" persona, but couldn't think of what conspiracy theories your were whining about.

> > Your conspiracy theories have gotten the better of you, George.
> >
> The conspiracy theory about the "plants" isn't mine, you know. Why would
> you pretend it is?

I haven't any theories about "plants," George. You seem to thing that the alleged "Team Monkey" (a conspiracy theory in itself) has been posting its own conspiracy theories about you and your Donkey.

On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 4:35:06 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> On 2022-10-27 3:22 a.m., Michael Pendragon wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 3:08:55 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >> On 2022-10-27 12:35 a.m., Michael Pendragon wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 12:15:32 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >>>> On 2022-10-25 9:28 p.m., Will Dockery wrote:
> >>>>> No, ME fucked up and responded to David Dalton twice and now you're trying to somehow explain it all away, Pendragon.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> As I said, I don't think the MEatpuppet fucked up; it looks like she was
> >>>> trolling Dr. Dalton deliberately, under the impression he was "Mack"
> >>>> using a different name.
> >>>>
> >>>> But yes, MMP's just trying to make excuses for her again, just as he did
> >>>> when she was trolling "Mack" in the NIMBY thread.
> >>>
> >>> ME has said that she was addressing General Stink, George.
> >>>
> >>> Why do you insist on lying about it?
> >> I've asked you several times, not be so dishonest, Michael. Whether you
> >> made up the "email" story or not, no one will deny that your MEatpuppet
> >> agrees with you.
> >>
> >> What I told you is that that's what meatpuppets do; having your own
> >> meatpuppet agree with you doesn't mean anything more than you agreeing
> >> with yourself.
> >
> > I'll advise you not to call me a liar, George.
> >
> I'll be more than happy to not have reason to.

You haven't been given any -- but it hasn't stopped you from shooting off your mouth.

> > ME sent me an email confirming that she was responding to Stink.
> And you falsely accused me of "lying about that". When what I've told
> you is that claiming that your're right because your meatpuppet agrees
> with you counts is no better than claiming you're right because you say

And that *is* a lie.

You may have deluded yourself into believing it, but that doesn't make it any less of a lie.

> > If your IQ was half of what you pretend, you would see that here post directly replies to Stinks.
> >
> Fortunately, my IQ is double that; so it's not all that hard to read the
> thread to and see that both her posts in this thread were trolls of
> David Dalton['s OP. Hell, Will and Zod both did the same; and you
> "pretend" to have a higher IQ than either of them.
> > And let us not forget that you'd previously questioned how her post applied to Mr. Dalton's:
> >
> > "*What* do you think hasn't worked out well for Mr. Dalton, troll? The song?"
> >
> > How do you explain that, George?
> >
> Rather than assume what she meant by "this", I asked her to explain it.

The fact that you were unable to apply it to Dalton's post should have alerted you to the fact that her message wasn't directed at Dalton.

> Instead of answering, of course, she ran away and you took up the troll
> baton.

Why should ME bother with your nonsense?

There's no point in arguing with bratty children. You're going to stick out your tongues and chant "Nyah! Nyah! Nyah!" regardless of what anyone says.

On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 6:26:25 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> On 2022-10-26 11:15 p.m., W.Dockery wrote:
> > Michael Pendragon wrote:
> >
> >> On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 10:52:13 PM UTC-4,
> >> george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >>> On 2022-10-26 4:32 p.m., W-Dockery wrote: > George J. Dance wrote: >
> >>> >> On 2022-10-23 11:48 p.m., ME wrote: >> > On Tuesday, 18 October
> >>> 2022 at 20:26:03 UTC-4, David Dalton wrote: >> >> >> Here is Sarah
> >>> McLachlan performing Leonard Cohen’s >> >> Hallelujah. Even though
> >>> many people have covered it, >> >> it is wonderful to hear her doing
> >>> it---she does a beautiful >> >> version. >> >> >> >>
> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l41Ywxgz1mI >> >> >> >> (And I hope
> >>> I am playing the right chord tonight, ha.) >> >> >> >> Also the
> >>> song is only partly religious. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> David Dalton
> >>> dal...@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page) >> >>
> >>> https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns >>
> >>> (mystic page) >> >> "And I know the young man with a century's
> >>> face/A philosopher king >> - he >> >> will try to amaze/With
> >>> examples of love and examples of hate" (T. >> Tikaram) >> > >> >
> >>> >> > This has not worked out well for you, has it? > >> *What* do
> >>> you think hasn't worked out well for Mr. Dalton, troll? The >> song?
> >>> > > ME made a mistake (twice) and replied to David Dalton by accident..
> >>> It's possible that the MEatpuppet replied to the wrong person's post
> >>> by accident; but not very likely that she'd have made the same
> >>> mistake twice in a row. Still, if the Monkeys had claimed that's what
> >>> happened, either in a post from her or an alleged "email" from her to
> >>> MMP, then we could accept it, drop it, and move on.
> >>> Instead, they're stuck defending this cockamamie story that somehow
> >>> all the backthread got scrambled by this glitch in the internet.
> >>> > Just goes to show that we all make mistakes from time-to-time.
> >
> >> Pay attention, George.
> >
> >> Here is what I said:
> >
> >> 1) NovaBS might have posted the wrong headers (as per usual),
> >
> > Definitely not the correct answer.
> Agreed. Neither Dalton's post nor the MEatpuppet's were made on NovaBBS,
> nor am I reading them there.

But Stink's probably was.

And ME was responding to Stink.

> I have looked on narkive and of course
> Thunderbird, as well as Google, and they all show the MEatpuppet
> replying to Dr. Dalton. So, while it's possible (at least one chance in
> a million) that usenet could have mixed up the headers, there's no

My reason for thinking it is because Nova BS often does that to me.

> >> 2) ME may have responded to Stink's statement within the body of
> >> Dalton's post
> >
> > Possibly >
> No, that is impossible. The MEatpuppet couldn't have been responding to
> Zod's statement in the backthread of Dr. Dalton's post, because Zod's
> statement wasn't in the backthread of Dr. Dalton's post.

It's in the thread.

> Just saying Zod's post is not in the backthread isn't conclusive. What
> is conclusive is thhe fact that Zod's post couldn't have been in the
> backthread. That's Dr. Dalton's post, the one to which the MEatpuppet
> replied (twice), didn't have any backthread: he made the original post
> in the thread.
>
> So that scenario is patently false; we don't even have to consider it.

Stink's post preceded ME's in the thread. That is all that is required for her to have responded to it.

If it doesn't appear in the backthread, but nevertheless appears prior to hers in the thread, this lends further credence to my first theory regarding NovaBS.

> > = ME fucked up.
> >
> Knowing the MEatpuppet, that is possible, but I don't see how even she
> could have fucked up in that way. Google is virtually idiot-proof in
> that respect: You read a post, click a "reply" option right on that
> post, and your reply is linked to it automatically. So I don't think
> it's likely.

There are plenty of ways for such things to happen, George. Use that MENSA level IQ for a change.

For instance, she could have read all of the posts in the thread (leaving them open) before responding. When responding, she did so in a post made by Dalton.

Or she may have thought of her reply after having left the thread. In her hurry to post her reply, she clicked on a random post in the thread, skimmed it, thought it looked like the one she wanted to reply to, and left her post there.

Not everyone places as much weight on AAPC as you and your fellow Splooges.

> I think it's more likely, given the Chimp's Invasion of the Body
> Snatchers paranoia about the "plant" people, and ME's subsequent
> trolling of Mack, that she just assumed Dr. Dalton was Mack or another
> "plant" person.

For all I know, he may be.

But, again, you had to ask ME how her post related to Dalton's song in any way... whereas anyone can see that it relates directly to Stink's.

On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 12:13:05 AM UTC-4, ME wrote:
> On Sunday, 23 October 2022 at 23:48:50 UTC-4, ME wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 18 October 2022 at 20:26:03 UTC-4, David Dalton wrote:
>
> > > Here is Sarah McLachlan performing Leonard Cohen’s
> > > Hallelujah. Even though many people have covered it,
> > > it is wonderful to hear her doing it---she does a beautiful
> > > version.
> > >
> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l41Ywxgz1mI
> > >
> > > (And I hope I am playing the right chord tonight, ha.)
> > >
> > > Also the song is only partly religious.
> > >
> > > --
> > > David Dalton dal...@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page)
> > > https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page)
> > > "And I know the young man with a century's face/A philosopher king - he
> > > will try to amaze/With examples of love and examples of hate" (T. Tikaram)
> > This has not worked out well for you, has it?
> Duuuhhh…..

Returning to the original two posts from ME, both are responses to David Dalton, no mention of Zod anywhere in her reply or attributions.

On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 1:10:03 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 12:13:05 AM UTC-4, ME wrote:
> > On Sunday, 23 October 2022 at 23:48:50 UTC-4, ME wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 18 October 2022 at 20:26:03 UTC-4, David Dalton wrote:
> >
> > > > Here is Sarah McLachlan performing Leonard Cohen’s
> > > > Hallelujah. Even though many people have covered it,
> > > > it is wonderful to hear her doing it---she does a beautiful
> > > > version.
> > > >
> > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l41Ywxgz1mI
> > > >
> > > > (And I hope I am playing the right chord tonight, ha.)
> > > >
> > > > Also the song is only partly religious.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > David Dalton dal...@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page)
> > > > https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page)
> > > > "And I know the young man with a century's face/A philosopher king - he
> > > > will try to amaze/With examples of love and examples of hate" (T. Tikaram)
> > > This has not worked out well for you, has it?
> > Duuuhhh…..
>
> Returning to the original two posts from ME, both are responses to David Dalton, no mention of Zod anywhere in her reply or attributions.

Your stupidity is impenetrable.

*PLONK*

George J. Dance wrote:

> On 2022-10-27 3:22 a.m., Michael Pendragon wrote:
>> On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 3:08:55 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>>> On 2022-10-27 12:35 a.m., Michael Pendragon wrote:
>>>> On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 12:15:32 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>>>>> On 2022-10-25 9:28 p.m., Will Dockery wrote:
>>>>>> No, ME fucked up and responded to David Dalton twice and now you're trying to somehow explain it all away, Pendragon.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As I said, I don't think the MEatpuppet fucked up; it looks like she was
>>>>> trolling Dr. Dalton deliberately, under the impression he was "Mack"
>>>>> using a different name.
>>>>>
>>>>> But yes, MMP's just trying to make excuses for her again, just as he did
>>>>> when she was trolling "Mack" in the NIMBY thread.
>>>>
>>>> ME has said that she was addressing General Stink, George.
>>>>
>>>> Why do you insist on lying about it?
>>> I've asked you several times, not be so dishonest, Michael. Whether you
>>> made up the "email" story or not, no one will deny that your MEatpuppet
>>> agrees with you.
>>>
>>> What I told you is that that's what meatpuppets do; having your own
>>> meatpuppet agree with you doesn't mean anything more than you agreeing
>>> with yourself.
>>
>> I'll advise you not to call me a liar, George.
>>
> I'll be more than happy to not have reason to.

>> ME sent me an email confirming that she was responding to Stink.

> And you falsely accused me of "lying about that". When what I've told
> you is that claiming that your're right because your meatpuppet agrees
> with you counts is no better than claiming you're right because you say
> you are.

>>
>> If your IQ was half of what you pretend, you would see that here post directly replies to Stinks.
>>

> Fortunately, my IQ is double that; so it's not all that hard to read the
> thread to and see that both her posts in this thread were trolls of
> David Dalton['s OP. Hell, Will and Zod both did the same; and you
> "pretend" to have a higher IQ than either of them.

>> And let us not forget that you'd previously questioned how her post applied to Mr. Dalton's:
>>
>> "*What* do you think hasn't worked out well for Mr. Dalton, troll? The song?"
>>
>> How do you explain that, George?
>>

> Rather than assume what she meant by "this", I asked her to explain it.

> Instead of answering, of course, she ran away and you took up the troll
> baton.

Exactly, all we've heard nothing from ME about this, only Pendragon and his odd attempt t explain it all away

And so it goes.

On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 3:28:23 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> On 2022-10-27 3:07 a.m., Michael Pendragon wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 2:45:58 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >> On 2022-10-26 10:45 p.m., Michael Pendragon wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 10:34:05 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >>>> On 2022-10-25 1:31 p.m., W.Dockery wrote:
> >>>>> George J. Dance wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2022-10-23 11:48 p.m., ME wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Tuesday, 18 October 2022 at 20:26:03 UTC-4, David Dalton wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Here is Sarah McLachlan performing Leonard Cohen’s
> >>>>>>>> Hallelujah. Even though many people have covered it,
> >>>>>>>> it is wonderful to hear her doing it---she does a beautiful
> >>>>>>>> version.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l41Ywxgz1mI
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> (And I hope I am playing the right chord tonight, ha.)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Also the song is only partly religious.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> David Dalton dal...@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home
> >>>> page)
> >>>>>>>> https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns
> >>>>>> (mystic page)
> >>>>>>>> "And I know the young man with a century's face/A philosopher king
> >>>>>> - he
> >>>>>>>> will try to amaze/With examples of love and examples of hate" (T..
> >>>>>> Tikaram)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This has not worked out well for you, has it?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> *What* do you think hasn't worked out well for Mr. Dalton, troll? The
> >>>>>> song?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ME responded to David Dalton twice, which seems to indicate that she was
> >>>>> posting to him, just as she called Mack a "mother fucker" last week..
> >>>>>
> >>>> I didn't know about that; I stopped reading the "NIMBY" thread earlier.
> >>>> But I went back and read it today; I see that ME took up the trolling
> >>>> there, just like here. But it does explain their comment; they thought
> >>>> that "David Dalton" was just "Mack" posting under another name, and were
> >>>> was telling him that posting under different fake names to escape
> >>>> trolling is what "has not worked out well" for him.
> >>>
> >>> Interesting theory, Kowalski, but ME has confirmed that she was responding to George "General Stink" Sulzbach.
> >> Really? Your MEatpuppet has "confirmed" that you were correct all along.
> >> I guess you think that clinches it.
> >>>
> >>>>> Apparently Pendragon will continue to try to explain it, but the fact is
> >>>>> obvious.
> >>
> >>>> It's undeniable that ME was trolling David Dalton. MMP just came up
> >>>> with the first excuse he could think of -- that she was trolling you --
> >>>> and he's had to come up with this ridiculous idea of this "glitch" in
> >>>> the headers to try to defend it.
> >>>
> >>> Sorry, George. ME has confirmed that she was responding to George "General Stink" Sulzbach.
> >> Sorry, Michael, but having a meatpuppet say you're correct is little
> >> different from you saying you're correct. That's what meatpuppets do;
> >> that's what they're for.
> >>
> >> That's how your MEatpuppet got her name in the first place.
> >
> > I've explained this to you, George.
> >
> > One can only be said to have earned a nickname when said nickname sticks.
> >
> > You're the only one who calls ME by that name...
>
>
> > unlike the appellation "Dunce" which has been attributed to you by several generations of AAPC members.
> >
> Yes, we both know that you 'second-handed' that name. I'm glad you admit
> you weren't creative enough to come up with anything original.
>
> Now that we've dealt with that deflection on your part, please try to
> focus on the point.
>
> I call that ally of yours "MEatpuppet" because:
> (1) it's a pun on her nym; and
> (2) she is your team's meatpuppet.
>
>
> And having your own meatpuppet agree with you means no more than you
> agreeing with yourself.
> > *Not that I'm calling you "Dunce" (even if you have been acting like one of late).
> Fair enough; just like I haven't been calling you "Michael Monkey" in
> this thread (even if have started throwing your poo around again). I'm
> glad we're keeping things so civil.

Yes, Pendragon is showing a good bit of restaurant, given he's losing the argument.

🙂

Michael Pendragon wrote:

> On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 8:33:42 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
>> George J. Dance wrote:
>>
>> > On 2022-10-23 11:48 p.m., ME wrote:
>> > > On Tuesday, 18 October 2022 at 20:26:03 UTC-4, David Dalton wrote:
>> >
>> > >> Here is Sarah McLachlan performing Leonard Cohen’s
>> > >> Hallelujah. Even though many people have covered it,
>> > >> it is wonderful to hear her doing it---she does a beautiful
>> > >> version.
>> > >>
>> > >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l41Ywxgz1mI
>> > >>
>> > >> (And I hope I am playing the right chord tonight, ha.)
>> > >>
>> > >> Also the song is only partly religious.
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> David Dalton dal...@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page)
>> > >> https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns
>> > (mystic page)
>> > >> "And I know the young man with a century's face/A philosopher king - he
>> > >> will try to amaze/With examples of love and examples of hate" (T.
>> > Tikaram)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > This has not worked out well for you, has it?
>>
>> > *What* do you think hasn't worked out well for Mr. Dalton, troll? The song?
>> Plain as day, ME was clearly responding to David Dalton, NOT me...!

> George Dance is facetiously asking the above question because ME's response is obviously *not* to Mr. Dalton's post

Absurd, pen... ME responded to David Dalton TWICE, never to me...!

On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 6:26:25 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> On 2022-10-26 11:15 p.m., W.Dockery wrote:
> > Michael Pendragon wrote:
> >
> >> On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 10:52:13 PM UTC-4,
> >> george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >>> On 2022-10-26 4:32 p.m., W-Dockery wrote: > George J. Dance wrote: >
> >>> >> On 2022-10-23 11:48 p.m., ME wrote: >> > On Tuesday, 18 October
> >>> 2022 at 20:26:03 UTC-4, David Dalton wrote:
>
> >> >> Here is Sarah
> >>> McLachlan performing Leonard Cohen’s >> >> Hallelujah. Even though
> >>> many people have covered it, >> >> it is wonderful to hear her doing
> >>> it---she does a beautiful >> >> version. >> >> >> >>
> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l41Ywxgz1mI >> >> >> >> (And I hope
> >>> I am playing the right chord tonight, ha.) >> >> >> >> Also the
> >>> song is only partly religious. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> David Dalton
> >>> dal...@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page) >> >>
> >>> https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns >>
> >>> (mystic page) >> >> "And I know the young man with a century's
> >>> face/A philosopher king >> - he >> >> will try to amaze/With
> >>> examples of love and examples of hate" (T. >> Tikaram) >> > >> >
> >>> >> > This has not worked out well for you, has it? > >> *What* do
> >>> you think hasn't worked out well for Mr. Dalton, troll? The >> song?
> >>> > > ME made a mistake (twice) and replied to David Dalton by accident..
> >>> It's possible that the MEatpuppet replied to the wrong person's post
> >>> by accident; but not very likely that she'd have made the same
> >>> mistake twice in a row. Still, if the Monkeys had claimed that's what
> >>> happened, either in a post from her or an alleged "email" from her to
> >>> MMP, then we could accept it, drop it, and move on.
> >>> Instead, they're stuck defending this cockamamie story that somehow
> >>> all the backthread got scrambled by this glitch in the internet.
> >>> > Just goes to show that we all make mistakes from time-to-time.
> >
> >> Pay attention, George.
> >
> >> Here is what I said:
> >
> >> 1) NovaBS might have posted the wrong headers (as per usual),
> >
> > Definitely not the correct answer.
> Agreed. Neither Dalton's post nor the MEatpuppet's were made on NovaBBS,
> nor am I reading them there. I have looked on narkive and of course
> Thunderbird, as well as Google, and they all show the MEatpuppet
> replying to Dr. Dalton. So, while it's possible (at least one chance in
> a million) that usenet could have mixed up the headers, there's no
> reason to think NovaBBS had anything to do with it.
> >
> >> 2) ME may have responded to Stink's statement within the body of
> >> Dalton's post
> >
> > Possibly >
> No, that is impossible. The MEatpuppet couldn't have been responding to
> Zod's statement in the backthread of Dr. Dalton's post, because Zod's
> statement wasn't in the backthread of Dr. Dalton's post.
>
> Just saying Zod's post is not in the backthread isn't conclusive. What
> is conclusive is thhe fact that Zod's post couldn't have been in the
> backthread. That's Dr. Dalton's post, the one to which the MEatpuppet
> replied (twice), didn't have any backthread: he made the original post
> in the thread.
>
> So that scenario is patently false; we don't even have to consider it.
>
>
> > = ME fucked up.
> >
> Knowing the MEatpuppet, that is possible, but I don't see how even she
> could have fucked up in that way. Google is virtually idiot-proof in
> that respect: You read a post, click a "reply" option right on that
> post, and your reply is linked to it automatically. So I don't think
> it's likely.
>
> I think it's more likely, given the Chimp's Invasion of the Body
> Snatchers paranoia about the "plant" people, and ME's subsequent
> trolling of Mack, that she just assumed Dr. Dalton was Mack or another
> "plant" person.
>
> > HTH and HAND.

Well put and quite likely, G.D.

On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 4:24:08 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
> On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 6:26:25 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > On 2022-10-26 11:15 p.m., W.Dockery wrote:
> > > Michael Pendragon wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 10:52:13 PM UTC-4,
> > >> george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > >>> On 2022-10-26 4:32 p.m., W-Dockery wrote: > George J. Dance wrote: >
> > >>> >> On 2022-10-23 11:48 p.m., ME wrote: >> > On Tuesday, 18 October
> > >>> 2022 at 20:26:03 UTC-4, David Dalton wrote:
> >
> > >> >> Here is Sarah
> > >>> McLachlan performing Leonard Cohen’s >> >> Hallelujah. Even though
> > >>> many people have covered it, >> >> it is wonderful to hear her doing
> > >>> it---she does a beautiful >> >> version. >> >> >> >>
> > >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l41Ywxgz1mI >> >> >> >> (And I hope
> > >>> I am playing the right chord tonight, ha.) >> >> >> >> Also the
> > >>> song is only partly religious. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> David Dalton
> > >>> dal...@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page) >> >>
> > >>> https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns >>
> > >>> (mystic page) >> >> "And I know the young man with a century's
> > >>> face/A philosopher king >> - he >> >> will try to amaze/With
> > >>> examples of love and examples of hate" (T. >> Tikaram) >> > >> >
> > >>> >> > This has not worked out well for you, has it? > >> *What* do
> > >>> you think hasn't worked out well for Mr. Dalton, troll? The >> song?
> > >>> > > ME made a mistake (twice) and replied to David Dalton by accident.
> > >>> It's possible that the MEatpuppet replied to the wrong person's post
> > >>> by accident; but not very likely that she'd have made the same
> > >>> mistake twice in a row. Still, if the Monkeys had claimed that's what
> > >>> happened, either in a post from her or an alleged "email" from her to
> > >>> MMP, then we could accept it, drop it, and move on.
> > >>> Instead, they're stuck defending this cockamamie story that somehow
> > >>> all the backthread got scrambled by this glitch in the internet.
> > >>> > Just goes to show that we all make mistakes from time-to-time.
> > >
> > >> Pay attention, George.
> > >
> > >> Here is what I said:
> > >
> > >> 1) NovaBS might have posted the wrong headers (as per usual),
> > >
> > > Definitely not the correct answer.
> > Agreed. Neither Dalton's post nor the MEatpuppet's were made on NovaBBS,
> > nor am I reading them there. I have looked on narkive and of course
> > Thunderbird, as well as Google, and they all show the MEatpuppet
> > replying to Dr. Dalton. So, while it's possible (at least one chance in
> > a million) that usenet could have mixed up the headers, there's no
> > reason to think NovaBBS had anything to do with it.
> > >
> > >> 2) ME may have responded to Stink's statement within the body of
> > >> Dalton's post
> > >
> > > Possibly >
> > No, that is impossible. The MEatpuppet couldn't have been responding to
> > Zod's statement in the backthread of Dr. Dalton's post, because Zod's
> > statement wasn't in the backthread of Dr. Dalton's post.
> >
> > Just saying Zod's post is not in the backthread isn't conclusive. What
> > is conclusive is thhe fact that Zod's post couldn't have been in the
> > backthread. That's Dr. Dalton's post, the one to which the MEatpuppet
> > replied (twice), didn't have any backthread: he made the original post
> > in the thread.
> >
> > So that scenario is patently false; we don't even have to consider it.
> >
> >
> > > = ME fucked up.
> > >
> > Knowing the MEatpuppet, that is possible, but I don't see how even she
> > could have fucked up in that way. Google is virtually idiot-proof in
> > that respect: You read a post, click a "reply" option right on that
> > post, and your reply is linked to it automatically. So I don't think
> > it's likely.
> >
> > I think it's more likely, given the Chimp's Invasion of the Body
> > Snatchers paranoia about the "plant" people, and ME's subsequent
> > trolling of Mack, that she just assumed Dr. Dalton was Mack or another
> > "plant" person.
> >
> > > HTH and HAND.
> Well put and quite likely, G.D.

Agreed and seconded.

🙂

On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 4:35:06 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> On 2022-10-27 3:22 a.m., Michael Pendragon wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 3:08:55 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >> On 2022-10-27 12:35 a.m., Michael Pendragon wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 12:15:32 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >>>> On 2022-10-25 9:28 p.m., Will Dockery wrote:
>
> >>>>> No, ME fucked up and responded to David Dalton twice and now you're trying to somehow explain it all away, Pendragon.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> As I said, I don't think the MEatpuppet fucked up; it looks like she was
> >>>> trolling Dr. Dalton deliberately, under the impression he was "Mack"
> >>>> using a different name.
> >>>>
> >>>> But yes, MMP's just trying to make excuses for her again, just as he did
> >>>> when she was trolling "Mack" in the NIMBY thread.
> >>>
> >>> ME has said that she was addressing General Stink, George.
> >>>
> >>> Why do you insist on lying about it?
> >> I've asked you several times, not be so dishonest, Michael. Whether you
> >> made up the "email" story or not, no one will deny that your MEatpuppet
> >> agrees with you.
> >>
> >> What I told you is that that's what meatpuppets do; having your own
> >> meatpuppet agree with you doesn't mean anything more than you agreeing
> >> with yourself.
> >
> > I'll advise you not to call me a liar, George.
> >
> I'll be more than happy to not have reason to.
> > ME sent me an email confirming that she was responding to Stink.
> And you falsely accused me of "lying about that". When what I've told
> you is that claiming that your're right because your meatpuppet agrees
> with you counts is no better than claiming you're right because you say
> you are.
> >
> > If your IQ was half of what you pretend, you would see that here post directly replies to Stinks.
> >
> Fortunately, my IQ is double that; so it's not all that hard to read the
> thread to and see that both her posts in this thread were trolls of
> David Dalton['s OP. Hell, Will and Zod both did the same; and you
> "pretend" to have a higher IQ than either of them.
> > And let us not forget that you'd previously questioned how her post applied to Mr. Dalton's:
> >
> > "*What* do you think hasn't worked out well for Mr. Dalton, troll? The song?"
> >
> > How do you explain that, George?
> >
> Rather than assume what she meant by "this", I asked her to explain it.
>
>
> Instead of answering, of course, she ran away and you took up the troll
> baton.

You nailed it, G.D.... odd how Pen wants to endlessly fail to defend and explain what was an OBVIOUS fuck up...?

Pen is a strange bird... ha ha.

On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 3:28:23 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>> On 2022-10-27 3:07 a.m., Michael Pendragon wrote:
>> > On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 2:45:58 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>> >> On 2022-10-26 10:45 p.m., Michael Pendragon wrote:
>> >>>>> George J. Dance wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> On 2022-10-23 11:48 p.m., ME wrote:
>> >>>>>>> On Tuesday, 18 October 2022 at 20:26:03 UTC-4, David Dalton wrote:
>
>> >>>>>>>> Here is Sarah McLachlan performing Leonard Cohen’s
>> >>>>>>>> Hallelujah. Even though many people have covered it,
>> >>>>>>>> it is wonderful to hear her doing it---she does a beautiful
>> >>>>>>>> version.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l41Ywxgz1mI
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> (And I hope I am playing the right chord tonight, ha.)
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Also the song is only partly religious.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>> David Dalton dal...@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home
>> >>>> page)
>> >>>>>>>> https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns
>> >>>>>> (mystic page)
>> >>>>>>>> "And I know the young man with a century's face/A philosopher king
>> >>>>>> - he
>> >>>>>>>> will try to amaze/With examples of love and examples of hate" (T..
>> >>>>>> Tikaram)
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> This has not worked out well for you, has it?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> *What* do you think hasn't worked out well for Mr. Dalton, troll? The
>> >>>>>> song?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> ME responded to David Dalton twice, which seems to indicate that she was
>> >>>>> posting to him, just as she called Mack a "mother fucker" last week..
>> >>>>>
>> >>>> I didn't know about that; I stopped reading the "NIMBY" thread earlier.
>> >>>> But I went back and read it today; I see that ME took up the trolling
>> >>>> there, just like here. But it does explain their comment; they thought
>> >>>> that "David Dalton" was just "Mack" posting under another name, and were
>> >>>> was telling him that posting under different fake names to escape
>> >>>> trolling is what "has not worked out well" for him.
>> >>>
>> >>> Interesting theory, Kowalski, but ME has confirmed that she was responding to George "General Stink" Sulzbach.
>> >> Really? Your MEatpuppet has "confirmed" that you were correct all along.
>> >> I guess you think that clinches it.
>> >>>
>> >>>>> Apparently Pendragon will continue to try to explain it, but the fact is
>> >>>>> obvious.
>> >>
>> >>>> It's undeniable that ME was trolling David Dalton. MMP just came up
>> >>>> with the first excuse he could think of -- that she was trolling you --
>> >>>> and he's had to come up with this ridiculous idea of this "glitch" in
>> >>>> the headers to try to defend it.
>> >>>
>> >>> Sorry, George. ME has confirmed that she was responding to George "General Stink" Sulzbach.
>> >> Sorry, Michael, but having a meatpuppet say you're correct is little
>> >> different from you saying you're correct. That's what meatpuppets do;
>> >> that's what they're for.
>> >>
>> >> That's how your MEatpuppet got her name in the first place.
>> >
>> > I've explained this to you, George.
>> >
>> > One can only be said to have earned a nickname when said nickname sticks.
>> >
>> > You're the only one who calls ME by that name...
>>
>>
>> > unlike the appellation "Dunce" which has been attributed to you by several generations of AAPC members.
>> >
>> Yes, we both know that you 'second-handed' that name. I'm glad you admit
>> you weren't creative enough to come up with anything original.
>>
>> Now that we've dealt with that deflection on your part, please try to
>> focus on the point.
>>
>> I call that ally of yours "MEatpuppet" because:
>> (1) it's a pun on her nym; and
>> (2) she is your team's meatpuppet.
>>
>>
>> And having your own meatpuppet agree with you means no more than you
>> agreeing with yourself.
>> > *Not that I'm calling you "Dunce" (even if you have been acting like one of late).
>> Fair enough; just like I haven't been calling you "Michael Monkey" in
>> this thread (even if have started throwing your poo around again). I'm
>> glad we're keeping things so civil.

Yes, Pendragon is showing a good bit of restraint, given he's losing the argument.

Typo corrected, good to see you're following the discussion, NancyGene.

:)

On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 9:01:45 PM UTC-4, michaelmalef...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 8:33:42 PM UTC-4, Zod wrote:
> > George J. Dance wrote:
> >
> > > On 2022-10-23 11:48 p.m., ME wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, 18 October 2022 at 20:26:03 UTC-4, David Dalton wrote:
> > >
> > > >> Here is Sarah McLachlan performing Leonard Cohen’s
> > > >> Hallelujah. Even though many people have covered it,
> > > >> it is wonderful to hear her doing it---she does a beautiful
> > > >> version.
> > > >>
> > > >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l41Ywxgz1mI
> > > >>
> > > >> (And I hope I am playing the right chord tonight, ha.)
> > > >>
> > > >> Also the song is only partly religious.
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> David Dalton dal...@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page)
> > > >> https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns
> > > (mystic page)
> > > >> "And I know the young man with a century's face/A philosopher king - he
> > > >> will try to amaze/With examples of love and examples of hate" (T.
> > > Tikaram)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This has not worked out well for you, has it?
> >
> > > *What* do you think hasn't worked out well for Mr. Dalton, troll? The song?
> > Plain as day, ME was clearly responding to David Dalton, NOT me...!
> George Dance is facetiously asking the above question because ME's response is obviously *not* to Mr. Dalton's post.

Pendragon, the posts by ME are obviously responding to David Dalton.

HTH and HAND.

On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 11:11:15 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> On 2022-10-26 7:59 p.m., Michael Pendragon wrote:
> > On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 7:51:05 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> >> George J. Dance wrote:
> >>> On 2022-10-23 11:48 p.m., ME wrote:
> >>>> On Tuesday, 18 October 2022 at 20:26:03 UTC-4, David Dalton wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> Here is Sarah McLachlan performing Leonard Cohen’s
> >>>>> Hallelujah. Even though many people have covered it,
> >>>>> it is wonderful to hear her doing it---she does a beautiful
> >>>>> version.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l41Ywxgz1mI
> >>>>>
> >>>>> (And I hope I am playing the right chord tonight, ha.)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Also the song is only partly religious.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> David Dalton dal...@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page)
> >>>>> https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns
> >>> (mystic page)
> >>>>> "And I know the young man with a century's face/A philosopher king - he
> >>>>> will try to amaze/With examples of love and examples of hate" (T.
> >>> Tikaram)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> This has not worked out well for you, has it?
> >>> *What* do you think hasn't worked out well for Mr. Dalton, troll? The song?
> >> ME made a mistake (twice) and replied to David Dalton by accident.
> >>
> >> Just goes to show that we all make mistakes from time-to-time.
> >
> > 1) NovaBS might have posted the wrong headers (as per usual)
> The problem with that "scenario" of yours is that the same "wrong
> headers" also appear on Google Groups, and Thunderbird, and Narkive.
> you'd have to claim that usenet "posted the wrong headers" everywhere.
> > , or
> > 2) ME may have responded to Stink's statement within the body of Dalton's post.
> >
> And the problem with that "scenario" of yours, is that "Stink's"
> statement didn't appear "within the body of [Dr.] Dalton's post". So,
> according to you, usenet didn't just screw up the headers but screwed up
> all the backthread, too.
>
> The fact is that the MEatpuppet was trolling David Dalton -- twice --
> before I stepped in.
>
>
> > Like I said, whichever scenario one chooses to believe, George Dance was still playing the disingenuous troll.
>
>
> The only trolls evident here are (1) your MEatpuppet, trolling Dr.
> Dalton; and (2) you, trying to defend your MEatpuppet's trolling of Dr.
> Dalton.

Exactly, who does Pendragon think he's fooling?

George J. Dance wrote:

> On 2022-10-23 11:48 p.m., ME wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 18 October 2022 at 20:26:03 UTC-4, David Dalton wrote:
>
>> Here is Sarah McLachlan performing Leonard Cohen’s
> >> Hallelujah. Even though many people have covered it,
> >> it is wonderful to hear her doing it---she does a beautiful
> >> version.
> >>
> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l41Ywxgz1mI
> >>
> >> (And I hope I am playing the right chord tonight, ha.)
> >>
> >> Also the song is only partly religious.
> >>
> >> --
> >> David Dalton dal...@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page)
> >> https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns
> (mystic page)
> >> "And I know the young man with a century's face/A philosopher king - he
> >> will try to amaze/With examples of love and examples of hate" (T.
> Tikaram)
> >
> >
> > This has not worked out well for you, has it?

> *What* do you think hasn't worked out well for Mr. Dalton, troll? The song?

Lest we forget.

🙂