On 4/18/24 11:37 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <uvrgkh$2bcsg$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 4/17/24 3:02 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <uvog6v$1jt55$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/16/24 3:11 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <uvlpfs$u7hv$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> On Apr 15, 2024 at 1:34:00 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/14/24 2:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <uvgtgb$3n4e9$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2024 at 6:15:20 PM PDT, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/9/24 12:46 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2024 at 6:53:43 AM PDT, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/6/24 2:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> . . .
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you still haven't explained why Biden hasn't denounced any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of them, since he's decreed that denouncing political violence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is the duty of every president.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [Fred Phelps citing headline]
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fact check: Joe Biden has condemned Antifa, violent protests
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wait, I thought Antifa didn't exist? Now you're claiming it does
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and that Biden has condemned them?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wow. Baby steps, I guess.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or do they only exist to the extent you can win on Usenet today?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It exists as a concept, but not as an organization.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> LOL! So it was a concept that was trying to burn down the federal
>>>>>>>>>>> courthouse every night in Portland during the 2020 Summer of Love,
>>>>>>>>>>> was it?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm so confused about Fred Phelps' position here. These large-scale
>>>>>>>>>> protests that included violence, arson, and vandalism were organized
>>>>>>>>>> through Twitter by people forwarding tweets. An "organization" is a
>>>>>>>>>> body that organizes something. A protest was organized by those
>>>>>>>>>> tweeting.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Of course Effa is full of it here. Even his fellow leftists recognize
>>>>>>>>> Antifa as a thing, not just some ephemeral 'concept'.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He acts like since they don't issue membership cards they're not a
>>>>>>>>> group.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> fact that they worked in concert is what made them an organization,
>>>>>>>>>> even without being organized as a corporation, partnership, or
>>>>>>>>>> unincorporated society with charters and bylaws and other organic
>>>>>>>>>> documents. Working together by passing the word along is what made
>>>>>>>>>> them an organization.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It exists as a means of organizing among those doing the organizing.
>>>>>>>>>> This is actual, not conceptual. Working together toward a common
>>>>>>>>>> purpose is all that's necessary to be an organization.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Two dumbfucks don't make a right.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two
>>>>>>>> ignorant fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1787. You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and
>>>>>> defend.
>>>>>
>>>>> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking
>>>>> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an oath to
>>>>> defend Congress, jackass.
>>>>>
>>>> Constitution written in 1787. Ratified 1788. Met 1789.
>>>
>>> Which mean there was no Congress until at least 1789, not 1787 as you
>>> claimed above.
>>>
>>> Any questions?
>>
>> All I mentioned was a date. I made no claim.
>
> I asked since when has Congress had any credibility and you gave me a
> date in which Congress didn't even exist.
>
> Reading trouble? Again?

Sounds more like not giving a shit about what you're blathering about.
Hope this helps.

On 4/20/24 7:30 AM, trotsky wrote:
> On 4/18/24 11:37 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <uvrgkh$2bcsg$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/17/24 3:02 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> In article <uvog6v$1jt55$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 4/16/24 3:11 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> In article <uvlpfs$u7hv$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Apr 15, 2024 at 1:34:00 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 4/14/24 2:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <uvgtgb$3n4e9$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2024 at 6:15:20 PM PDT, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/9/24 12:46 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2024 at 6:53:43 AM PDT, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/6/24 2:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      . . .
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you still haven't explained why Biden hasn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> denounced any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of them, since he's decreed that denouncing political
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is the duty of every president.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [Fred Phelps citing headline]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fact check: Joe Biden has condemned Antifa, violent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protests
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wait, I thought Antifa didn't exist? Now you're claiming
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it does
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and that Biden has condemned them?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wow. Baby steps, I guess.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or do they only exist to the extent you can win on Usenet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> today?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It exists as a concept, but not as an organization.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL! So it was a concept that was trying to burn down the
>>>>>>>>>>>> federal
>>>>>>>>>>>> courthouse every night in Portland during the 2020 Summer of
>>>>>>>>>>>> Love,
>>>>>>>>>>>> was it?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm so confused about Fred Phelps' position here. These
>>>>>>>>>>> large-scale
>>>>>>>>>>> protests that included violence, arson, and vandalism were
>>>>>>>>>>> organized
>>>>>>>>>>> through Twitter by people forwarding tweets. An
>>>>>>>>>>> "organization" is a
>>>>>>>>>>> body that organizes something. A protest was organized by those
>>>>>>>>>>> tweeting.
>>>>>>>>>> Of course Effa is full of it here. Even his fellow leftists
>>>>>>>>>> recognize
>>>>>>>>>> Antifa as a thing, not just some ephemeral 'concept'.
>>>>>>>>>> He acts like since they don't issue membership cards they're
>>>>>>>>>> not a
>>>>>>>>>> group.
>>>>>>>>>>> fact that they worked in concert is what made them an
>>>>>>>>>>> organization,
>>>>>>>>>>> even without being organized as a corporation, partnership, or
>>>>>>>>>>> unincorporated society with charters and bylaws and other
>>>>>>>>>>> organic
>>>>>>>>>>> documents. Working together by passing the word along is what
>>>>>>>>>>> made
>>>>>>>>>>> them an organization.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It exists as a means of organizing among those doing the
>>>>>>>>>>> organizing.
>>>>>>>>>>> This is actual, not conceptual. Working together toward a common
>>>>>>>>>>> purpose is all that's necessary to be an organization.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Two dumbfucks don't make a right.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two
>>>>>>>>> ignorant fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1787. You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and
>>>>>>> defend.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking
>>>>>> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an
>>>>>> oath to
>>>>>> defend Congress, jackass.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Constitution written in 1787. Ratified 1788. Met 1789.
>>>>
>>>> Which mean there was no Congress until at least 1789, not 1787 as you
>>>> claimed above.
>>>>
>>>> Any questions?
>>>
>>> All I mentioned was a date. I made no claim.
>>
>> I asked since when has Congress had any credibility and you gave me a
>> date in which Congress didn't even exist.
>>
>> Reading trouble? Again?
>
>
> Sounds more like not giving a shit about what you're blathering about.
> Hope this helps.

He's bitching about when Congress was Congress. I don't get what any of
that has to do with anything. We were debating the credibility of Congress:

> From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two ignorant fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.

Somehow that devolved into an excursion into the validity of dates.

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

On 4/20/24 8:38 AM, FPP wrote:
> On 4/20/24 7:30 AM, trotsky wrote:
>> On 4/18/24 11:37 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <uvrgkh$2bcsg$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/17/24 3:02 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <uvog6v$1jt55$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/16/24 3:11 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <uvlpfs$u7hv$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Apr 15, 2024 at 1:34:00 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 4/14/24 2:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <uvgtgb$3n4e9$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2024 at 6:15:20 PM PDT, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/9/24 12:46 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2024 at 6:53:43 AM PDT, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/6/24 2:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      . . .
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you still haven't explained why Biden hasn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> denounced any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of them, since he's decreed that denouncing political
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is the duty of every president.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [Fred Phelps citing headline]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fact check: Joe Biden has condemned Antifa, violent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protests
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wait, I thought Antifa didn't exist? Now you're claiming
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it does
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and that Biden has condemned them?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wow. Baby steps, I guess.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or do they only exist to the extent you can win on Usenet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> today?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It exists as a concept, but not as an organization.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL! So it was a concept that was trying to burn down the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> federal
>>>>>>>>>>>>> courthouse every night in Portland during the 2020 Summer
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Love,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> was it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm so confused about Fred Phelps' position here. These
>>>>>>>>>>>> large-scale
>>>>>>>>>>>> protests that included violence, arson, and vandalism were
>>>>>>>>>>>> organized
>>>>>>>>>>>> through Twitter by people forwarding tweets. An
>>>>>>>>>>>> "organization" is a
>>>>>>>>>>>> body that organizes something. A protest was organized by those
>>>>>>>>>>>> tweeting.
>>>>>>>>>>> Of course Effa is full of it here. Even his fellow leftists
>>>>>>>>>>> recognize
>>>>>>>>>>> Antifa as a thing, not just some ephemeral 'concept'.
>>>>>>>>>>> He acts like since they don't issue membership cards they're
>>>>>>>>>>> not a
>>>>>>>>>>> group.
>>>>>>>>>>>> fact that they worked in concert is what made them an
>>>>>>>>>>>> organization,
>>>>>>>>>>>> even without being organized as a corporation, partnership, or
>>>>>>>>>>>> unincorporated society with charters and bylaws and other
>>>>>>>>>>>> organic
>>>>>>>>>>>> documents. Working together by passing the word along is
>>>>>>>>>>>> what made
>>>>>>>>>>>> them an organization.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It exists as a means of organizing among those doing the
>>>>>>>>>>>> organizing.
>>>>>>>>>>>> This is actual, not conceptual. Working together toward a
>>>>>>>>>>>> common
>>>>>>>>>>>> purpose is all that's necessary to be an organization.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Two dumbfucks don't make a right.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two
>>>>>>>>>> ignorant fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1787. You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and
>>>>>>>> defend.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking
>>>>>>> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an
>>>>>>> oath to
>>>>>>> defend Congress, jackass.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Constitution written in 1787. Ratified 1788. Met 1789.
>>>>>
>>>>> Which mean there was no Congress until at least 1789, not 1787 as you
>>>>> claimed above.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any questions?
>>>>
>>>> All I mentioned was a date. I made no claim.
>>>
>>> I asked since when has Congress had any credibility and you gave me a
>>> date in which Congress didn't even exist.
>>>
>>> Reading trouble? Again?
>>
>>
>> Sounds more like not giving a shit about what you're blathering about.
>> Hope this helps.
>
>
> He's bitching about when Congress was Congress.  I don't get what any of
> that has to do with anything.  We were debating the credibility of
> Congress:
>
>
>> From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two ignorant
>> fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
>
> Somehow that devolved into an excursion into the validity of dates.

I've been on some dates like that. I'm sure Twat has too, with his Oath
Keeper buddies. What Oath do they claim to be keeping I wonder.

In article <uvrgqf$2bg49$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 4/17/24 3:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <uvog9d$1jt55$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 4/16/24 3:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> In article <uvmj6j$13qg7$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >>>>> In article <uvlpfs$u7hv$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Apr 15, 2024 at 1:34:00 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>>>>>>> From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two
> >>>>>>>> ignorant fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 1787. You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and
> >>>>>> defend.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking
> >>>>> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an oath to
> >>>>> defend Congress, jackass.
> >>>>
> >>>> Fred Phelps stole my gag!
> >>>
> >>> And as is typical for him, he somehow managed to drain it of all of its
> >>> humor.
> >>>
> >> Oh, no... your posts are fucking hilarious!
> >> Specially the ones where you denigrate and stigmatize your fellow man.
> >
> > Because you never do that, so you're not a massive hypocrite or anything.

> There's quite a difference denigrating and belittling assholes like
> you. You like to pick on marginalized groups.

There's nothing 'marginalized' about troons in today's society. They're
embraced and protected at every level of government. Major corporations
across the spectrum are catering to them. Joe Biden is having Troon Day
at the White House on Easter. Laws are being passed that favor troons
over the privacy rights of real women, and which force everyone from
high schools and colleges to professional sports teams to allow them to
compete against real women. Laws are being passed to criminalize refusal
to actively participate in their delusions. Laws are being passed to
take kids away from their parents if the parents aren't on board with
trooning their kid. Hollywood is pushing troons in movies and TV shows.

There's nothing 'marginalized' whatsoever about any of that. If anyone's
marginalized vis a vis troons, it's the real women whose private spaces,
accolades, championships, records, and endorsements the dudes in dresses
are usurping.

On 4/20/2024 3:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <uvrgqf$2bg49$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 4/17/24 3:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <uvog9d$1jt55$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/16/24 3:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <uvmj6j$13qg7$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <uvlpfs$u7hv$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Apr 15, 2024 at 1:34:00 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two
>>>>>>>>>> ignorant fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1787. You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and
>>>>>>>> defend.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking
>>>>>>> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an oath to
>>>>>>> defend Congress, jackass.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fred Phelps stole my gag!
>>>>>
>>>>> And as is typical for him, he somehow managed to drain it of all of its
>>>>> humor.
>>>>>
>>>> Oh, no... your posts are fucking hilarious!
>>>> Specially the ones where you denigrate and stigmatize your fellow man.
>>>
>>> Because you never do that, so you're not a massive hypocrite or anything.
>
>> There's quite a difference denigrating and belittling assholes like
>> you. You like to pick on marginalized groups.
>
> There's nothing 'marginalized' about troons in today's society. They're
> embraced and protected at every level of government. Major corporations
> across the spectrum are catering to them. Joe Biden is having Troon Day
> at the White House on Easter. Laws are being passed that favor troons
> over the privacy rights of real women, and which force everyone from
> high schools and colleges to professional sports teams to allow them to
> compete against real women. Laws are being passed to criminalize refusal
> to actively participate in their delusions. Laws are being passed to
> take kids away from their parents if the parents aren't on board with
> trooning their kid. Hollywood is pushing troons in movies and TV shows.
>
> There's nothing 'marginalized' whatsoever about any of that. If anyone's
> marginalized vis a vis troons, it's the real women whose private spaces,
> accolades, championships, records, and endorsements the dudes in dresses
> are usurping.

Please cite any "usurped endorsement" that's within shouting distance of
mainstream. If you can't, maybe it's because trans people are indeed
'marginalized' by the public as too unsavory for commercialization...

On 4/20/24 2:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <uvrgqf$2bg49$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 4/17/24 3:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <uvog9d$1jt55$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/16/24 3:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <uvmj6j$13qg7$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <uvlpfs$u7hv$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Apr 15, 2024 at 1:34:00 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two
>>>>>>>>>> ignorant fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1787. You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and
>>>>>>>> defend.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking
>>>>>>> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an oath to
>>>>>>> defend Congress, jackass.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fred Phelps stole my gag!
>>>>>
>>>>> And as is typical for him, he somehow managed to drain it of all of its
>>>>> humor.
>>>>>
>>>> Oh, no... your posts are fucking hilarious!
>>>> Specially the ones where you denigrate and stigmatize your fellow man.
>>>
>>> Because you never do that, so you're not a massive hypocrite or anything.
>
>> There's quite a difference denigrating and belittling assholes like
>> you. You like to pick on marginalized groups.
>
> There's nothing 'marginalized' about troons in today's society.

Wow, that sounds definitive: who was the last person beaten to death for
being openly heterosexual?

They're
> embraced and protected at every level of government. Major corporations
> across the spectrum are catering to them. Joe Biden is having Troon Day
> at the White House on Easter. Laws are being passed that favor troons
> over the privacy rights of real women, and which force everyone from
> high schools and colleges to professional sports teams to allow them to
> compete against real women. Laws are being passed to criminalize refusal
> to actively participate in their delusions. Laws are being passed to
> take kids away from their parents if the parents aren't on board with
> trooning their kid. Hollywood is pushing troons in movies and TV shows.
>
> There's nothing 'marginalized' whatsoever about any of that. If anyone's
> marginalized vis a vis troons, it's the real women whose private spaces,
> accolades, championships, records, and endorsements the dudes in dresses
> are usurping.

On 4/21/2024 5:00 AM, trotsky wrote:
> On 4/20/24 2:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <uvrgqf$2bg49$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/17/24 3:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> In article <uvog9d$1jt55$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 4/16/24 3:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> In article <uvmj6j$13qg7$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>     "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BTR1701  <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <uvlpfs$u7hv$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 15, 2024 at 1:34:00 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>   From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two
>>>>>>>>>>> ignorant fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1787.  You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and
>>>>>>>>> defend.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking
>>>>>>>> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an
>>>>>>>> oath to
>>>>>>>> defend Congress, jackass.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fred Phelps stole my gag!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And as is typical for him, he somehow managed to drain it of all
>>>>>> of its
>>>>>> humor.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, no... your posts are fucking hilarious!
>>>>> Specially the ones where you denigrate and stigmatize your fellow man.
>>>>
>>>> Because you never do that, so you're not a massive hypocrite or
>>>> anything.
>>
>>> There's quite a difference denigrating and belittling assholes like
>>> you. You like to pick on marginalized groups.
>>
>> There's nothing 'marginalized' about troons in today's society.
>
>
> Wow, that sounds definitive: who was the last person beaten to death for
> being openly heterosexual?

Peeping Tom.

atropos@mac.com wrote:
> FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 4/17/24 3:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> > FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On 4/16/24 3:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> >>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>> >>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>> >>>>> FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> >>>>>>> "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:

>> >>>>>>>> From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two
>> >>>>>>>> ignorant fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> 1787. You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and
>> >>>>>> defend.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking
>> >>>>> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an oath
>> >>>>> to defend Congress, jackass.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Fred Phelps stole my gag!
>> >>>
>> >>> And as is typical for him, he somehow managed to drain it of all of
>> >>> its humor.
>> >>
>> >> Oh, no... your posts are fucking hilarious!
>> >> Specially the ones where you denigrate and stigmatize your fellow man.
>> >
>> > Because you never do that, so you're not a massive hypocrite or anything.
>
>> There's quite a difference denigrating and belittling assholes like
>> you. You like to pick on marginalized groups.
>
>There's nothing 'marginalized' about troons in today's society. They're
>embraced and protected at every level of government. Major corporations
>across the spectrum are catering to them.

You misspelled "pandering".

--
Let's go Brandon!

On 4/20/24 3:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <uvrgqf$2bg49$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 4/17/24 3:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <uvog9d$1jt55$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/16/24 3:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <uvmj6j$13qg7$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <uvlpfs$u7hv$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Apr 15, 2024 at 1:34:00 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two
>>>>>>>>>> ignorant fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1787. You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and
>>>>>>>> defend.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking
>>>>>>> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an oath to
>>>>>>> defend Congress, jackass.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fred Phelps stole my gag!
>>>>>
>>>>> And as is typical for him, he somehow managed to drain it of all of its
>>>>> humor.
>>>>>
>>>> Oh, no... your posts are fucking hilarious!
>>>> Specially the ones where you denigrate and stigmatize your fellow man.
>>>
>>> Because you never do that, so you're not a massive hypocrite or anything.
>
>> There's quite a difference denigrating and belittling assholes like
>> you. You like to pick on marginalized groups.
>
> There's nothing 'marginalized' about troons in today's society. They're
> embraced and protected at every level of government. Major corporations
> across the spectrum are catering to them. Joe Biden is having Troon Day
> at the White House on Easter. Laws are being passed that favor troons
> over the privacy rights of real women, and which force everyone from
> high schools and colleges to professional sports teams to allow them to
> compete against real women. Laws are being passed to criminalize refusal
> to actively participate in their delusions. Laws are being passed to
> take kids away from their parents if the parents aren't on board with
> trooning their kid. Hollywood is pushing troons in movies and TV shows.
>
> There's nothing 'marginalized' whatsoever about any of that. If anyone's
> marginalized vis a vis troons, it's the real women whose private spaces,
> accolades, championships, records, and endorsements the dudes in dresses
> are usurping.
>

Clown still doesn't understand what words mean.

"Marginalize refers to the act of treating a person or group as though
they are insignificant by isolating and/or disempowering them. The term
marginalized describes the person or group that is being treated
insignificantly, pushed to the margins of society and rendered powerless."

You do it every day, just like your party does it as a whole.

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

On 4/20/24 3:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <uvrgqf$2bg49$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 4/17/24 3:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <uvog9d$1jt55$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/16/24 3:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <uvmj6j$13qg7$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <uvlpfs$u7hv$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Apr 15, 2024 at 1:34:00 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two
>>>>>>>>>> ignorant fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1787. You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and
>>>>>>>> defend.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking
>>>>>>> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an oath to
>>>>>>> defend Congress, jackass.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fred Phelps stole my gag!
>>>>>
>>>>> And as is typical for him, he somehow managed to drain it of all of its
>>>>> humor.
>>>>>
>>>> Oh, no... your posts are fucking hilarious!
>>>> Specially the ones where you denigrate and stigmatize your fellow man.
>>>
>>> Because you never do that, so you're not a massive hypocrite or anything.
>
>> There's quite a difference denigrating and belittling assholes like
>> you. You like to pick on marginalized groups.
>
> There's nothing 'marginalized' about troons in today's society. They're
> embraced and protected at every level of government. Major corporations
> across the spectrum are catering to them. Joe Biden is having Troon Day
> at the White House on Easter. Laws are being passed that favor troons
> over the privacy rights of real women, and which force everyone from
> high schools and colleges to professional sports teams to allow them to
> compete against real women. Laws are being passed to criminalize refusal
> to actively participate in their delusions. Laws are being passed to
> take kids away from their parents if the parents aren't on board with
> trooning their kid. Hollywood is pushing troons in movies and TV shows.
>
> There's nothing 'marginalized' whatsoever about any of that. If anyone's
> marginalized vis a vis troons, it's the real women whose private spaces,
> accolades, championships, records, and endorsements the dudes in dresses
> are usurping.
>

Hollywood ain't passing laws telling them what they can and can't do.
Your buddies in government are.

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

In article <v05skq$10dpk$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 4/20/24 3:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <uvrgqf$2bg49$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 4/17/24 3:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> In article <uvog9d$1jt55$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 4/16/24 3:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>> In article <uvmj6j$13qg7$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <uvlpfs$u7hv$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Apr 15, 2024 at 1:34:00 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>>> From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two
> >>>>>>>>>> ignorant fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 1787. You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and
> >>>>>>>> defend.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking
> >>>>>>> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an oath
> >>>>>>> to defend Congress, jackass.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Fred Phelps stole my gag!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> And as is typical for him, he somehow managed to drain it of all of its
> >>>>> humor.
> >>>>>
> >>>> Oh, no... your posts are fucking hilarious!
> >>>> Specially the ones where you denigrate and stigmatize your fellow man.
> >>>
> >>> Because you never do that, so you're not a massive hypocrite or anything.
> >
> >> There's quite a difference denigrating and belittling assholes like
> >> you. You like to pick on marginalized groups.
> >
> > There's nothing 'marginalized' about troons in today's society. They're
> > embraced and protected at every level of government. Major corporations
> > across the spectrum are catering to them. Joe Biden is having Troon Day
> > at the White House on Easter. Laws are being passed that favor troons
> > over the privacy rights of real women, and which force everyone from
> > high schools and colleges to professional sports teams to allow them to
> > compete against real women. Laws are being passed to criminalize refusal
> > to actively participate in their delusions. Laws are being passed to
> > take kids away from their parents if the parents aren't on board with
> > trooning their kid. Hollywood is pushing troons in movies and TV shows.
> >
> > There's nothing 'marginalized' whatsoever about any of that. If anyone's
> > marginalized vis a vis troons, it's the real women whose private spaces,
> > accolades, championships, records, and endorsements the dudes in dresses
> > are usurping.
> >
>
> Hollywood ain't passing laws telling them what they can and can't do.
> Your buddies in government are.

The government passes laws telling ALL OF US what we can and can't do.

In article <v05sj6$10dpk$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 4/20/24 3:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <uvrgqf$2bg49$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 4/17/24 3:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> In article <uvog9d$1jt55$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 4/16/24 3:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>> In article <uvmj6j$13qg7$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <uvlpfs$u7hv$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Apr 15, 2024 at 1:34:00 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>>> From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two
> >>>>>>>>>> ignorant fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 1787. You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and
> >>>>>>>> defend.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking
> >>>>>>> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an oath
> >>>>>>> to defend Congress, jackass.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Fred Phelps stole my gag!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> And as is typical for him, he somehow managed to drain it of all of its
> >>>>> humor.
> >>>>>
> >>>> Oh, no... your posts are fucking hilarious!
> >>>> Specially the ones where you denigrate and stigmatize your fellow man.
> >>>
> >>> Because you never do that, so you're not a massive hypocrite or anything.
> >
> >> There's quite a difference denigrating and belittling assholes like
> >> you. You like to pick on marginalized groups.
> >
> > There's nothing 'marginalized' about troons in today's society. They're
> > embraced and protected at every level of government. Major corporations
> > across the spectrum are catering to them. Joe Biden is having Troon Day
> > at the White House on Easter. Laws are being passed that favor troons
> > over the privacy rights of real women, and which force everyone from
> > high schools and colleges to professional sports teams to allow them to
> > compete against real women. Laws are being passed to criminalize refusal
> > to actively participate in their delusions. Laws are being passed to
> > take kids away from their parents if the parents aren't on board with
> > trooning their kid. Hollywood is pushing troons in movies and TV shows.
> >
> > There's nothing 'marginalized' whatsoever about any of that. If anyone's
> > marginalized vis a vis troons, it's the real women whose private spaces,
> > accolades, championships, records, and endorsements the dudes in dresses
> > are usurping.

> "Marginalize refers to the act of treating a person or group as though
> they are insignificant by isolating and/or disempowering them. The term
> marginalized describes the person or group that is being treated
> insignificantly, pushed to the margins of society and rendered powerless."

Rendered powerless?

They can get you fired for not playing along with their delusions.

They're taking sports records right and left from real women and walking
around women's locker rooms with their dicks hanging out and just
telling them to deal with it-- and the schools and businesses back them
up and threaten the real women with reprisal if they complain.

Doesn't sound powerless to me.

When you have every Fortune 500 company waving the gay/troon flag and
changing their logos to rainbows, that ain't powerless.

In article <v05sj6$10dpk$1@dont-email.me>, fredp1571@gmail.com wrote:
> On 4/20/24 3:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 4/17/24 3:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 4/16/24 3:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two
>>>>>>>>>>> ignorant fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1787. You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and
>>>>>>>>> defend.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking
>>>>>>>> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an oath
>>>>>>>> to defend Congress, jackass.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fred Phelps stole my gag!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And as is typical for him, he somehow managed to drain it of all of
>>>>>> its humor.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, no... your posts are fucking hilarious!
>>>>> Specially the ones where you denigrate and stigmatize your fellow man.
>>>>
>>>> Because you never do that, so you're not a massive hypocrite or anything.
>>
>>> There's quite a difference denigrating and belittling assholes like
>>> you. You like to pick on marginalized groups.
>>
>> There's nothing 'marginalized' about troons in today's society. They're
>> embraced and protected at every level of government. Major corporations
>> across the spectrum are catering to them. Joe Biden is having Troon Day
>> at the White House on Easter. Laws are being passed that favor troons
>> over the privacy rights of real women, and which force everyone from
>> high schools and colleges to professional sports teams to allow them to
>> compete against real women. Laws are being passed to criminalize refusal
>> to actively participate in their delusions. Laws are being passed to
>> take kids away from their parents if the parents aren't on board with
>> trooning their kid. Hollywood is pushing troons in movies and TV shows.
>>
>> There's nothing 'marginalized' whatsoever about any of that. If anyone's
>> marginalized vis a vis troons, it's the real women whose private spaces,
>> accolades, championships, records, and endorsements the dudes in dresses
>> are usurping.
>>
>
>Clown still doesn't understand what words mean.

Irony noted.

>You do it every day, just like your party does it as a whole.

Projection noted.

Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.

--
Let's go Brandon!

atropos@mac.com wrote:
> FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 4/20/24 3:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 4/17/24 3:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 4/16/24 3:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1787. You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and
>>>>>>>>>> defend.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking
>>>>>>>>> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an oath
>>>>>>>>> to defend Congress, jackass.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fred Phelps stole my gag!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And as is typical for him, he somehow managed to drain it of all of its
>>>>>>> humor.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, no... your posts are fucking hilarious!
>>>>>> Specially the ones where you denigrate and stigmatize your fellow man.
>>>>>
>>>>> Because you never do that, so you're not a massive hypocrite or anything.
>>>
>>>> There's quite a difference denigrating and belittling assholes like
>>>> you. You like to pick on marginalized groups.
>>>
>>> There's nothing 'marginalized' about troons in today's society. They're
>>> embraced and protected at every level of government. Major corporations
>>> across the spectrum are catering to them. Joe Biden is having Troon Day
>>> at the White House on Easter. Laws are being passed that favor troons
>>> over the privacy rights of real women, and which force everyone from
>>> high schools and colleges to professional sports teams to allow them to
>>> compete against real women. Laws are being passed to criminalize refusal
>>> to actively participate in their delusions. Laws are being passed to
>>> take kids away from their parents if the parents aren't on board with
>>> trooning their kid. Hollywood is pushing troons in movies and TV shows.
>>>
>>> There's nothing 'marginalized' whatsoever about any of that. If anyone's
>>> marginalized vis a vis troons, it's the real women whose private spaces,
>>> accolades, championships, records, and endorsements the dudes in dresses
>>> are usurping.
>>
>> Hollywood ain't passing laws telling them what they can and can't do.
>> Your buddies in government are.
>
>The government passes laws telling ALL OF US what we can and can't do.

And regulatory agencies and "private-public" partnerships.

--
Let's go Brandon!

On 4/22/24 2:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <v05skq$10dpk$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 4/20/24 3:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <uvrgqf$2bg49$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/17/24 3:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <uvog9d$1jt55$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/16/24 3:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <uvmj6j$13qg7$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <uvlpfs$u7hv$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 15, 2024 at 1:34:00 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two
>>>>>>>>>>>> ignorant fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1787. You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and
>>>>>>>>>> defend.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking
>>>>>>>>> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an oath
>>>>>>>>> to defend Congress, jackass.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fred Phelps stole my gag!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And as is typical for him, he somehow managed to drain it of all of its
>>>>>>> humor.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, no... your posts are fucking hilarious!
>>>>>> Specially the ones where you denigrate and stigmatize your fellow man.
>>>>>
>>>>> Because you never do that, so you're not a massive hypocrite or anything.
>>>
>>>> There's quite a difference denigrating and belittling assholes like
>>>> you. You like to pick on marginalized groups.
>>>
>>> There's nothing 'marginalized' about troons in today's society. They're
>>> embraced and protected at every level of government. Major corporations
>>> across the spectrum are catering to them. Joe Biden is having Troon Day
>>> at the White House on Easter. Laws are being passed that favor troons
>>> over the privacy rights of real women, and which force everyone from
>>> high schools and colleges to professional sports teams to allow them to
>>> compete against real women. Laws are being passed to criminalize refusal
>>> to actively participate in their delusions. Laws are being passed to
>>> take kids away from their parents if the parents aren't on board with
>>> trooning their kid. Hollywood is pushing troons in movies and TV shows.
>>>
>>> There's nothing 'marginalized' whatsoever about any of that. If anyone's
>>> marginalized vis a vis troons, it's the real women whose private spaces,
>>> accolades, championships, records, and endorsements the dudes in dresses
>>> are usurping.
>>>
>>
>> Hollywood ain't passing laws telling them what they can and can't do.
>> Your buddies in government are.
>
> The government passes laws telling ALL OF US what we can and can't do.
>

Well, not all of us. And it's your buddies who are actively taking
rights AWAY from people.

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

On 4/22/24 2:53 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <v05sj6$10dpk$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 4/20/24 3:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <uvrgqf$2bg49$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/17/24 3:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <uvog9d$1jt55$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/16/24 3:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <uvmj6j$13qg7$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <uvlpfs$u7hv$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 15, 2024 at 1:34:00 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two
>>>>>>>>>>>> ignorant fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1787. You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and
>>>>>>>>>> defend.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking
>>>>>>>>> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an oath
>>>>>>>>> to defend Congress, jackass.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fred Phelps stole my gag!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And as is typical for him, he somehow managed to drain it of all of its
>>>>>>> humor.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, no... your posts are fucking hilarious!
>>>>>> Specially the ones where you denigrate and stigmatize your fellow man.
>>>>>
>>>>> Because you never do that, so you're not a massive hypocrite or anything.
>>>
>>>> There's quite a difference denigrating and belittling assholes like
>>>> you. You like to pick on marginalized groups.
>>>
>>> There's nothing 'marginalized' about troons in today's society. They're
>>> embraced and protected at every level of government. Major corporations
>>> across the spectrum are catering to them. Joe Biden is having Troon Day
>>> at the White House on Easter. Laws are being passed that favor troons
>>> over the privacy rights of real women, and which force everyone from
>>> high schools and colleges to professional sports teams to allow them to
>>> compete against real women. Laws are being passed to criminalize refusal
>>> to actively participate in their delusions. Laws are being passed to
>>> take kids away from their parents if the parents aren't on board with
>>> trooning their kid. Hollywood is pushing troons in movies and TV shows.
>>>
>>> There's nothing 'marginalized' whatsoever about any of that. If anyone's
>>> marginalized vis a vis troons, it's the real women whose private spaces,
>>> accolades, championships, records, and endorsements the dudes in dresses
>>> are usurping.
>
>> "Marginalize refers to the act of treating a person or group as though
>> they are insignificant by isolating and/or disempowering them. The term
>> marginalized describes the person or group that is being treated
>> insignificantly, pushed to the margins of society and rendered powerless."
>
> Rendered powerless?
>
> They can get you fired for not playing along with their delusions.
>
> They're taking sports records right and left from real women and walking
> around women's locker rooms with their dicks hanging out and just
> telling them to deal with it-- and the schools and businesses back them
> up and threaten the real women with reprisal if they complain.
>
> Doesn't sound powerless to me.
>
> When you have every Fortune 500 company waving the gay/troon flag and
> changing their logos to rainbows, that ain't powerless.
>

Can you go into a bathroom without worrying about whether someone will
harass you?

Because government isn't bothering to tell you you can't take a piss.

--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

On Apr 20, 2024 at 1:49:53 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:

> On 4/20/2024 3:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <uvrgqf$2bg49$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/17/24 3:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> In article <uvog9d$1jt55$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 4/16/24 3:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> In article <uvmj6j$13qg7$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <uvlpfs$u7hv$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 15, 2024 at 1:34:00 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two
>>>>>>>>>>> ignorant fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1787. You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and
>>>>>>>>> defend.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking
>>>>>>>> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an oath to
>>>>>>>> defend Congress, jackass.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fred Phelps stole my gag!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And as is typical for him, he somehow managed to drain it of all of its
>>>>>> humor.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, no... your posts are fucking hilarious!
>>>>> Specially the ones where you denigrate and stigmatize your fellow man.
>>>>
>>>> Because you never do that, so you're not a massive hypocrite or anything.
>>
>>> There's quite a difference denigrating and belittling assholes like
>>> you. You like to pick on marginalized groups.
>>
>> There's nothing 'marginalized' about troons in today's society. They're
>> embraced and protected at every level of government. Major corporations
>> across the spectrum are catering to them. Joe Biden is having Troon Day
>> at the White House on Easter. Laws are being passed that favor troons
>> over the privacy rights of real women, and which force everyone from
>> high schools and colleges to professional sports teams to allow them to
>> compete against real women. Laws are being passed to criminalize refusal
>> to actively participate in their delusions. Laws are being passed to
>> take kids away from their parents if the parents aren't on board with
>> trooning their kid. Hollywood is pushing troons in movies and TV shows.
>>
>> There's nothing 'marginalized' whatsoever about any of that. If anyone's
>> marginalized vis a vis troons, it's the real women whose private spaces,
>> accolades, championships, records, and endorsements the dudes in dresses
>> are usurping.
>
> Please cite any "usurped endorsement" that's within shouting distance of
> mainstream. If you can't, maybe it's because trans people are indeed
> 'marginalized' by the public as too unsavory for commercialization...

https://comicvine.gamespot.com/forums/off-topic-5/trans-tiktoker-dylan-mulvaney-becomes-nike-women-b-2299910/

https://wwd.com/fashion-news/intimates/victorias-secret-hires-black-trans-model-1235060514/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VxDNXXyHKs

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/is-adidas-woke-ad-featuring-a-trans-woman-is-playing-on-repeat-during-march-madness-its-making-people-angry-222654486.html

https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/dad-shows-transgender-son-how-shave-viral-gillette-ad-n1010891

https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/08/entertainment/pantene-trangender-holiday-video-series-trnd/index.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HigxpMGxkZg

On Apr 22, 2024 at 8:00:00 PM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 4/22/24 2:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <v05skq$10dpk$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/20/24 3:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> In article <uvrgqf$2bg49$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 4/17/24 3:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> In article <uvog9d$1jt55$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/16/24 3:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <uvmj6j$13qg7$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <uvlpfs$u7hv$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 15, 2024 at 1:34:00 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignorant fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1787. You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and
>>>>>>>>>>> defend.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking
>>>>>>>>>> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an oath
>>>>>>>>>> to defend Congress, jackass.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Fred Phelps stole my gag!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And as is typical for him, he somehow managed to drain it of all of its
>>>>>>>> humor.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh, no... your posts are fucking hilarious!
>>>>>>> Specially the ones where you denigrate and stigmatize your fellow man.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because you never do that, so you're not a massive hypocrite or anything.
>>>>
>>>>> There's quite a difference denigrating and belittling assholes like
>>>>> you. You like to pick on marginalized groups.
>>>>
>>>> There's nothing 'marginalized' about troons in today's society. They're
>>>> embraced and protected at every level of government. Major corporations
>>>> across the spectrum are catering to them. Joe Biden is having Troon Day
>>>> at the White House on Easter. Laws are being passed that favor troons
>>>> over the privacy rights of real women, and which force everyone from
>>>> high schools and colleges to professional sports teams to allow them to
>>>> compete against real women. Laws are being passed to criminalize refusal
>>>> to actively participate in their delusions. Laws are being passed to
>>>> take kids away from their parents if the parents aren't on board with
>>>> trooning their kid. Hollywood is pushing troons in movies and TV shows.
>>>>
>>>> There's nothing 'marginalized' whatsoever about any of that. If anyone's
>>>> marginalized vis a vis troons, it's the real women whose private spaces,
>>>> accolades, championships, records, and endorsements the dudes in dresses
>>>> are usurping.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hollywood ain't passing laws telling them what they can and can't do.
>>> Your buddies in government are.
>>
>> The government passes laws telling ALL OF US what we can and can't do.
>>
> Well, not all of us. And it's your buddies who are actively taking
> rights AWAY from people.

Yeah, the right to show their dicks to little girls in public bathrooms. Boo
hoo.

On 4/22/24 10:02 PM, FPP wrote:
> On 4/22/24 2:53 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <v05sj6$10dpk$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/20/24 3:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> In article <uvrgqf$2bg49$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 4/17/24 3:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> In article <uvog9d$1jt55$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/16/24 3:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <uvmj6j$13qg7$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>      "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> BTR1701  <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <uvlpfs$u7hv$5@dont-email.me>, FPP
>>>>>>>>>> <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 15, 2024 at 1:34:00 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignorant fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1787.  You know... that thing that you took an oath to
>>>>>>>>>>> protect and
>>>>>>>>>>> defend.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're
>>>>>>>>>> talking
>>>>>>>>>> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an
>>>>>>>>>> oath
>>>>>>>>>> to defend Congress, jackass.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Fred Phelps stole my gag!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And as is typical for him, he somehow managed to drain it of all
>>>>>>>> of its
>>>>>>>> humor.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh, no... your posts are fucking hilarious!
>>>>>>> Specially the ones where you denigrate and stigmatize your fellow
>>>>>>> man.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because you never do that, so you're not a massive hypocrite or
>>>>>> anything.
>>>>
>>>>> There's quite a difference denigrating and belittling assholes like
>>>>> you. You like to pick on marginalized groups.
>>>>
>>>> There's nothing 'marginalized' about troons in today's society. They're
>>>> embraced and protected at every level of government. Major corporations
>>>> across the spectrum are catering to them. Joe Biden is having Troon Day
>>>> at the White House on Easter. Laws are being passed that favor troons
>>>> over the privacy rights of real women, and which force everyone from
>>>> high schools and colleges to professional sports teams to allow them to
>>>> compete against real women. Laws are being passed to criminalize
>>>> refusal
>>>> to actively participate in their delusions. Laws are being passed to
>>>> take kids away from their parents if the parents aren't on board with
>>>> trooning their kid. Hollywood is pushing troons in movies and TV shows.
>>>>
>>>> There's nothing 'marginalized' whatsoever about any of that. If
>>>> anyone's
>>>> marginalized vis a vis troons, it's the real women whose private
>>>> spaces,
>>>> accolades, championships, records, and endorsements the dudes in
>>>> dresses
>>>> are usurping.
>>
>>> "Marginalize refers to the act of treating a person or group as though
>>> they are insignificant by isolating and/or disempowering them. The term
>>> marginalized describes the person or group that is being treated
>>> insignificantly, pushed to the margins of society and rendered
>>> powerless."
>>
>> Rendered powerless?
>>
>> They can get you fired for not playing along with their delusions.
>>
>> They're taking sports records right and left from real women and walking
>> around women's locker rooms with their dicks hanging out and just
>> telling them to deal with it-- and the schools and businesses back them
>> up and threaten the real women with reprisal if they complain.
>>
>> Doesn't sound powerless to me.
>>
>> When you have every Fortune 500 company waving the gay/troon flag and
>> changing their logos to rainbows, that ain't powerless.
>>
>
> Can you go into a bathroom without worrying about whether someone will
> harass you?
>
> Because government isn't bothering to tell you you can't take a piss.
>

Holy fuck he's afraid of rainbows now.

On 4/22/24 10:14 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Apr 22, 2024 at 8:00:00 PM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 4/22/24 2:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <v05skq$10dpk$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/20/24 3:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <uvrgqf$2bg49$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/17/24 3:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <uvog9d$1jt55$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/16/24 3:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <uvmj6j$13qg7$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <uvlpfs$u7hv$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 15, 2024 at 1:34:00 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignorant fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1787. You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and
>>>>>>>>>>>> defend.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking
>>>>>>>>>>> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an oath
>>>>>>>>>>> to defend Congress, jackass.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Fred Phelps stole my gag!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And as is typical for him, he somehow managed to drain it of all of its
>>>>>>>>> humor.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh, no... your posts are fucking hilarious!
>>>>>>>> Specially the ones where you denigrate and stigmatize your fellow man.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Because you never do that, so you're not a massive hypocrite or anything.
>>>>>
>>>>>> There's quite a difference denigrating and belittling assholes like
>>>>>> you. You like to pick on marginalized groups.
>>>>>
>>>>> There's nothing 'marginalized' about troons in today's society. They're
>>>>> embraced and protected at every level of government. Major corporations
>>>>> across the spectrum are catering to them. Joe Biden is having Troon Day
>>>>> at the White House on Easter. Laws are being passed that favor troons
>>>>> over the privacy rights of real women, and which force everyone from
>>>>> high schools and colleges to professional sports teams to allow them to
>>>>> compete against real women. Laws are being passed to criminalize refusal
>>>>> to actively participate in their delusions. Laws are being passed to
>>>>> take kids away from their parents if the parents aren't on board with
>>>>> trooning their kid. Hollywood is pushing troons in movies and TV shows.
>>>>>
>>>>> There's nothing 'marginalized' whatsoever about any of that. If anyone's
>>>>> marginalized vis a vis troons, it's the real women whose private spaces,
>>>>> accolades, championships, records, and endorsements the dudes in dresses
>>>>> are usurping.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hollywood ain't passing laws telling them what they can and can't do.
>>>> Your buddies in government are.
>>>
>>> The government passes laws telling ALL OF US what we can and can't do.
>>>
>> Well, not all of us. And it's your buddies who are actively taking
>> rights AWAY from people.
>
> Yeah, the right to show their dicks to little girls in public bathrooms. Boo
> hoo.

I think he was thinking more along the lines of a woman not having to
carry a rapist's baby to term you sick fuck.

On 4/22/24 10:14 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Apr 22, 2024 at 8:00:00 PM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 4/22/24 2:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <v05skq$10dpk$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/20/24 3:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <uvrgqf$2bg49$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/17/24 3:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <uvog9d$1jt55$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/16/24 3:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <uvmj6j$13qg7$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <uvlpfs$u7hv$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 15, 2024 at 1:34:00 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignorant fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1787. You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and
>>>>>>>>>>>> defend.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking
>>>>>>>>>>> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an oath
>>>>>>>>>>> to defend Congress, jackass.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Fred Phelps stole my gag!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And as is typical for him, he somehow managed to drain it of all of its
>>>>>>>>> humor.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh, no... your posts are fucking hilarious!
>>>>>>>> Specially the ones where you denigrate and stigmatize your fellow man.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Because you never do that, so you're not a massive hypocrite or anything.
>>>>>
>>>>>> There's quite a difference denigrating and belittling assholes like
>>>>>> you. You like to pick on marginalized groups.
>>>>>
>>>>> There's nothing 'marginalized' about troons in today's society. They're
>>>>> embraced and protected at every level of government. Major corporations
>>>>> across the spectrum are catering to them. Joe Biden is having Troon Day
>>>>> at the White House on Easter. Laws are being passed that favor troons
>>>>> over the privacy rights of real women, and which force everyone from
>>>>> high schools and colleges to professional sports teams to allow them to
>>>>> compete against real women. Laws are being passed to criminalize refusal
>>>>> to actively participate in their delusions. Laws are being passed to
>>>>> take kids away from their parents if the parents aren't on board with
>>>>> trooning their kid. Hollywood is pushing troons in movies and TV shows.
>>>>>
>>>>> There's nothing 'marginalized' whatsoever about any of that. If anyone's
>>>>> marginalized vis a vis troons, it's the real women whose private spaces,
>>>>> accolades, championships, records, and endorsements the dudes in dresses
>>>>> are usurping.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hollywood ain't passing laws telling them what they can and can't do.
>>>> Your buddies in government are.
>>>
>>> The government passes laws telling ALL OF US what we can and can't do.
>>>
>> Well, not all of us. And it's your buddies who are actively taking
>> rights AWAY from people.
>
> Yeah, the right to show their dicks to little girls in public bathrooms. Boo
> hoo.

I believe pedophiles have been doing that for centuries. Good guess though.

On 4/22/2024 11:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Apr 20, 2024 at 1:49:53 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>
>> On 4/20/2024 3:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <uvrgqf$2bg49$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/17/24 3:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <uvog9d$1jt55$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/16/24 3:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <uvmj6j$13qg7$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <uvlpfs$u7hv$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 15, 2024 at 1:34:00 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two
>>>>>>>>>>>> ignorant fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1787. You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and
>>>>>>>>>> defend.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking
>>>>>>>>> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an oath to
>>>>>>>>> defend Congress, jackass.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fred Phelps stole my gag!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And as is typical for him, he somehow managed to drain it of all of its
>>>>>>> humor.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, no... your posts are fucking hilarious!
>>>>>> Specially the ones where you denigrate and stigmatize your fellow man.
>>>>>
>>>>> Because you never do that, so you're not a massive hypocrite or anything.
>>>
>>>> There's quite a difference denigrating and belittling assholes like
>>>> you. You like to pick on marginalized groups.
>>>
>>> There's nothing 'marginalized' about troons in today's society. They're
>>> embraced and protected at every level of government. Major corporations
>>> across the spectrum are catering to them. Joe Biden is having Troon Day
>>> at the White House on Easter. Laws are being passed that favor troons
>>> over the privacy rights of real women, and which force everyone from
>>> high schools and colleges to professional sports teams to allow them to
>>> compete against real women. Laws are being passed to criminalize refusal
>>> to actively participate in their delusions. Laws are being passed to
>>> take kids away from their parents if the parents aren't on board with
>>> trooning their kid. Hollywood is pushing troons in movies and TV shows.
>>>
>>> There's nothing 'marginalized' whatsoever about any of that. If anyone's
>>> marginalized vis a vis troons, it's the real women whose private spaces,
>>> accolades, championships, records, and endorsements the dudes in dresses
>>> are usurping.
>>
>> Please cite any "usurped endorsement" that's within shouting distance of
>> mainstream. If you can't, maybe it's because trans people are indeed
>> 'marginalized' by the public as too unsavory for commercialization...
>
>
> https://comicvine.gamespot.com/forums/off-topic-5/trans-tiktoker-dylan-mulvaney-becomes-nike-women-b-2299910/
>
>
> https://wwd.com/fashion-news/intimates/victorias-secret-hires-black-trans-model-1235060514/
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VxDNXXyHKs
>
>
> https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/is-adidas-woke-ad-featuring-a-trans-woman-is-playing-on-repeat-during-march-madness-its-making-people-angry-222654486.html
>
>
> https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/dad-shows-transgender-son-how-shave-viral-gillette-ad-n1010891
>
>
> https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/08/entertainment/pantene-trangender-holiday-video-series-trnd/index.html
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HigxpMGxkZg

People hired *because* they're trans aren't "replacing women"...

On Apr 23, 2024 at 9:55:17 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

> On 4/22/2024 11:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> On Apr 20, 2024 at 1:49:53 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/20/2024 3:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> In article <uvrgqf$2bg49$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 4/17/24 3:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> In article <uvog9d$1jt55$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/16/24 3:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <uvmj6j$13qg7$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <uvlpfs$u7hv$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 15, 2024 at 1:34:00 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignorant fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1787. You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and
>>>>>>>>>>> defend.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking
>>>>>>>>>> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an oath to
>>>>>>>>>> defend Congress, jackass.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Fred Phelps stole my gag!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And as is typical for him, he somehow managed to drain it of all of its
>>>>>>>> humor.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh, no... your posts are fucking hilarious!
>>>>>>> Specially the ones where you denigrate and stigmatize your fellow man.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because you never do that, so you're not a massive hypocrite or anything.
>>>>
>>>>> There's quite a difference denigrating and belittling assholes like
>>>>> you. You like to pick on marginalized groups.
>>>>
>>>> There's nothing 'marginalized' about troons in today's society. They're
>>>> embraced and protected at every level of government. Major corporations
>>>> across the spectrum are catering to them. Joe Biden is having Troon Day
>>>> at the White House on Easter. Laws are being passed that favor troons
>>>> over the privacy rights of real women, and which force everyone from
>>>> high schools and colleges to professional sports teams to allow them to
>>>> compete against real women. Laws are being passed to criminalize refusal
>>>> to actively participate in their delusions. Laws are being passed to
>>>> take kids away from their parents if the parents aren't on board with
>>>> trooning their kid. Hollywood is pushing troons in movies and TV shows.
>>>>
>>>> There's nothing 'marginalized' whatsoever about any of that. If anyone's
>>>> marginalized vis a vis troons, it's the real women whose private spaces,
>>>> accolades, championships, records, and endorsements the dudes in dresses
>>>> are usurping.
>>>
>>> Please cite any "usurped endorsement" that's within shouting distance of
>>> mainstream. If you can't, maybe it's because trans people are indeed
>>> 'marginalized' by the public as too unsavory for commercialization...
>>
>>
>> https://comicvine.gamespot.com/forums/off-topic-5/trans-tiktoker-dylan-mulvaney-becomes-nike-women-b-2299910/
>>
>>
>> https://wwd.com/fashion-news/intimates/victorias-secret-hires-black-trans-model-1235060514/
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VxDNXXyHKs
>>
>>
>> https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/is-adidas-woke-ad-featuring-a-trans-woman-is-playing-on-repeat-during-march-madness-its-making-people-angry-222654486.html
>>
>>
>> https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/dad-shows-transgender-son-how-shave-viral-gillette-ad-n1010891
>>
>>
>> https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/08/entertainment/pantene-trangender-holiday-video-series-trnd/index.html
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HigxpMGxkZg
>
> People hired *because* they're trans aren't "replacing women"...

When a troon is the 'brand ambassador' for Nike's women's sportswear line, yes
he has taken a job that would normally go to a woman.

Then there's all the beauty pageants who have recently been selecting troons
as the winners. Again, an accolade (and subsequent endorsement opportunity)
that rightly belongs to a woman if the title is "Miss" Anything.

On 4/23/2024 1:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Apr 23, 2024 at 9:55:17 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>> On 4/22/2024 11:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> On Apr 20, 2024 at 1:49:53 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/20/2024 3:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <uvrgqf$2bg49$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/17/24 3:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <uvog9d$1jt55$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/16/24 3:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <uvmj6j$13qg7$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <uvlpfs$u7hv$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 15, 2024 at 1:34:00 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignorant fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1787. You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and
>>>>>>>>>>>> defend.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking
>>>>>>>>>>> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an oath to
>>>>>>>>>>> defend Congress, jackass.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Fred Phelps stole my gag!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And as is typical for him, he somehow managed to drain it of all of its
>>>>>>>>> humor.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh, no... your posts are fucking hilarious!
>>>>>>>> Specially the ones where you denigrate and stigmatize your fellow man.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Because you never do that, so you're not a massive hypocrite or anything.
>>>>>
>>>>>> There's quite a difference denigrating and belittling assholes like
>>>>>> you. You like to pick on marginalized groups.
>>>>>
>>>>> There's nothing 'marginalized' about troons in today's society. They're
>>>>> embraced and protected at every level of government. Major corporations
>>>>> across the spectrum are catering to them. Joe Biden is having Troon Day
>>>>> at the White House on Easter. Laws are being passed that favor troons
>>>>> over the privacy rights of real women, and which force everyone from
>>>>> high schools and colleges to professional sports teams to allow them to
>>>>> compete against real women. Laws are being passed to criminalize refusal
>>>>> to actively participate in their delusions. Laws are being passed to
>>>>> take kids away from their parents if the parents aren't on board with
>>>>> trooning their kid. Hollywood is pushing troons in movies and TV shows.
>>>>>
>>>>> There's nothing 'marginalized' whatsoever about any of that. If anyone's
>>>>> marginalized vis a vis troons, it's the real women whose private spaces,
>>>>> accolades, championships, records, and endorsements the dudes in dresses
>>>>> are usurping.
>>>>
>>>> Please cite any "usurped endorsement" that's within shouting distance of
>>>> mainstream. If you can't, maybe it's because trans people are indeed
>>>> 'marginalized' by the public as too unsavory for commercialization...
>>>
>>>
>>> https://comicvine.gamespot.com/forums/off-topic-5/trans-tiktoker-dylan-mulvaney-becomes-nike-women-b-2299910/
>>>
>>>
>>> https://wwd.com/fashion-news/intimates/victorias-secret-hires-black-trans-model-1235060514/
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VxDNXXyHKs
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/is-adidas-woke-ad-featuring-a-trans-woman-is-playing-on-repeat-during-march-madness-its-making-people-angry-222654486.html
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/dad-shows-transgender-son-how-shave-viral-gillette-ad-n1010891
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/08/entertainment/pantene-trangender-holiday-video-series-trnd/index.html
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HigxpMGxkZg
>>
>> People hired *because* they're trans aren't "replacing women"...
>
> When a troon is the 'brand ambassador' for Nike's women's sportswear line, yes
> he has taken a job that would normally go to a woman.
>
> Then there's all the beauty pageants who have recently been selecting troons
> as the winners. Again, an accolade (and subsequent endorsement opportunity)
> that rightly belongs to a woman if the title is "Miss" Anything.

The appeal of novelty is always marketable, and always brief.

On Apr 23, 2024 at 12:14:14 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

> On 4/23/2024 1:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> On Apr 23, 2024 at 9:55:17 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/22/2024 11:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> On Apr 20, 2024 at 1:49:53 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 4/20/2024 3:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> In article <uvrgqf$2bg49$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/17/24 3:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <uvog9d$1jt55$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 4/16/24 3:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <uvmj6j$13qg7$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <uvlpfs$u7hv$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 15, 2024 at 1:34:00 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignorant fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1787. You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> defend.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking
>>>>>>>>>>>> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an oath to
>>>>>>>>>>>> defend Congress, jackass.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Fred Phelps stole my gag!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And as is typical for him, he somehow managed to drain it of all of its
>>>>>>>>>> humor.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Oh, no... your posts are fucking hilarious!
>>>>>>>>> Specially the ones where you denigrate and stigmatize your fellow man.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Because you never do that, so you're not a massive hypocrite or
>>>>>>>> anything.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There's quite a difference denigrating and belittling assholes like
>>>>>>> you. You like to pick on marginalized groups.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's nothing 'marginalized' about troons in today's society. They're
>>>>>> embraced and protected at every level of government. Major corporations
>>>>>> across the spectrum are catering to them. Joe Biden is having Troon Day
>>>>>> at the White House on Easter. Laws are being passed that favor troons
>>>>>> over the privacy rights of real women, and which force everyone from
>>>>>> high schools and colleges to professional sports teams to allow them to
>>>>>> compete against real women. Laws are being passed to criminalize refusal
>>>>>> to actively participate in their delusions. Laws are being passed to
>>>>>> take kids away from their parents if the parents aren't on board with
>>>>>> trooning their kid. Hollywood is pushing troons in movies and TV shows.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's nothing 'marginalized' whatsoever about any of that. If anyone's
>>>>>> marginalized vis a vis troons, it's the real women whose private spaces,
>>>>>> accolades, championships, records, and endorsements the dudes in dresses
>>>>>> are usurping.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please cite any "usurped endorsement" that's within shouting distance of
>>>>> mainstream. If you can't, maybe it's because trans people are indeed
>>>>> 'marginalized' by the public as too unsavory for commercialization...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://comicvine.gamespot.com/forums/off-topic-5/trans-tiktoker-dylan-mulvaney-becomes-nike-women-b-2299910/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://wwd.com/fashion-news/intimates/victorias-secret-hires-black-trans-model-1235060514/
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VxDNXXyHKs
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/is-adidas-woke-ad-featuring-a-trans-woman-is-playing-on-repeat-during-march-madness-its-making-people-angry-222654486.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/dad-shows-transgender-son-how-shave-viral-gillette-ad-n1010891
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/08/entertainment/pantene-trangender-holiday-video-series-trnd/index.html
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HigxpMGxkZg
>>>
>>> People hired *because* they're trans aren't "replacing women"...
>>
>> When a troon is the 'brand ambassador' for Nike's women's sportswear line,
>> yes
>> he has taken a job that would normally go to a woman.
>>
>> Then there's all the beauty pageants who have recently been selecting troons
>> as the winners. Again, an accolade (and subsequent endorsement opportunity)
>> that rightly belongs to a woman if the title is "Miss" Anything.
>
> The appeal of novelty is always marketable, and always brief.

Says the guy who just two levels up was claiming that "trans people are indeed
'marginalized' by the public as too unsavory for commercialization" and aren't
"within shouting distance of the mainstream".

What's more mainstream than Nike, Victoria's Secret, Sports Illustrated, and
Miss America?