Binky bleated:

> In article <t6n0b7$n5q$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t6lpm3$a8u$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <t6kn6i$cfr$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <t6jkec$451$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <t6iocc$b3g$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But in any case, even if the show was in decline,
>>>>>>>>>> even if that was related in any way to the Timeless
>>>>>>>>>> Child arc, that would have NO RELEVANCE to whether
>>>>>>>>>> the arc contradicted Rassilon or Omega.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What you need are quotes from the show that prove
>>>>>>>>>> the contradiction. But you don’t have any.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And you are ignoring the numbers presented to you!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Liar! You haven’t presented any numbers that show
>>>>>>>> how the Timeless Child arc contradicted Rassilon or
>>>>>>>> Omega.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The audience has the knives out for Chibnall!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Liar! Knives aren’t numbers! And even if they were, they
>>>>>> still wouldn’t show how the Timeless Child arc contradicted
>>>>>> Rassilon or Omega.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But Tectuen contradictis the Time Lords.
>>>>
>>>> She doesn’t, but so what if she does? “Tectuen” (sic) isn’t
>>>> a number.
>>>>
>>>> You claimed you could present numbers that show how
>>>> the Timeless Child arc contradicted Rassilon or Omega.
>>>>
>>>> You haven’t presented those numbers. You were lying.
>>>> Again.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The audience is turned off!
>>>
>>
>> That still doesn’t show how the Timeless Child arc contradicts
>> Rassilon or Omega. And you still haven’t presented any
>> numbers.
>>
>> You claimed you could present numbers that show how
>> the Timeless Child arc contradicted Rassilon or Omega.
>> You were lying. Again.
>>
>
> No lie when End of Time contractics Timelss Child!
>

Then quote the numbers that show how it contradicts it!

--
solar penguin

Binky brainlessly babbled:
> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>> Binky burbled bollocks:
>>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>> Binky blathered bullshit:
>>>>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> The part we should be following up on is the one you’re trying to ignore
>>>>>> because you know you’re wrong and constantly lying about it:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Timeless Child arc does not contradict Rassilon or Omega in any way.
>>>>>> What you need are quotes from the show that prove the contradiction. But
>>>>>> you can’t find them because
>>>>>>
>>>>>> a) there aren’t any, there’s no contradiction, you’re a liar
>>>> and an idiot
>>>>>>
>>>>>> or
>>>>>>
>>>>>> b) …er… alien space bats have re-edited every single episode and
>>>> transcript
>>>>>> of the modern and classic show to remove every trace of all the
>>>>>> contradictions that used to be there, and have wiped the memories of every
>>>>>> member of the human race but you so that only you now remember the
>>>>>> contradictions, and even now they are preventing you from actually telling
>>>>>> us what the contradictions used to be?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Choose. Is it a or b?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry your choices are are as valid as the legitimacy of the Timeless Child!
>>>>
>>>> So, completely legitimate then. I can understand you feeling sorry about
>>>> that.
>>>>
>>>> If there’s a third alternative, you’re more than welcome to add
>> it. As long
>>>> as, if you’re going to claim a contradiction, you provide quotes from the
>>>> show to demonstrate one. Otherwise you’re just a stupid liar.
>>>
>>> Lies MM to wriggle out of trouble.
>>
>> Where is the lie, you babbling buffoon? I gave you two choices, and offered
>> you the chance to submit a third, providing only that you furnish the
>> necessary minimum evidence to allow the third choice to be considered. What
>> can conceivably be a lie about that? What delusionally-imagined trouble are
>> you mendaciously claiming I’m trying to wriggle out of?
>>
>> It’s YOU that does all the lying and wriggling to defend baseless
>> assertions around here, you brainless blatherer.
>>
>> I did (conditionally) call you a stupid liar. However you are demonstrably
>> stupid and a proven serial liar, so that wasn’t a lie either.
>>
>
> Still defending Chibnall I see, MikeMCK.

Ah, so by deflecting you are hoping people won’t notice that you failed to
point out any lies on my part, because you’re the liar round here.

I haven’t defended Chibnall anywhere. His tenure as showrunner did not
deliver a great show, though it got better over time. So that’s just you
being a liar again.

And you still haven’t even TRIED to show one of these “contradictions” you
keep lying about. Just as a hint: lying that they exist doesn’t make it
true. You need QUOTES that point to a contradiction.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

Binky bleated:

> In article <t6ohc7$6lf$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t6n0b7$n5q$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You claimed you could present numbers that show how
>>>> the Timeless Child arc contradicted Rassilon or Omega.
>>>> You were lying. Again.
>>>>
>>>
>>> No lie when End of Time contractics Timelss Child!
>>>
>>
>> Then quote the numbers that show how it contradicts it!
>>
>
> Especially when the Timeless Child is turning off Doctor Who.

No, that’s still not a number.

You don’t have any numbers, do you?

--
solar penguin

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <t6oh9d$64k$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t6n6ve$or3$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Tim typed:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 9:40:10 PM UTC-7, solar penguin wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You claimed you could present numbers that show
>>>>>> how the Timeless Child arc contradicted Rassilon or
>>>>>> Omega. You were lying. Again.
>>>>>
>>>>> What kind of numbers would show how the Timeless
>>>>> Child contradicts Rassilon or Omega?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don’t know. That’s why I want to see them and find out.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Check out why fans are turned off of Doctor Who!
>>>
>>
>> Because they’re closed-minded misogynists and racists.
>> That’s why.
>>
>> There, now I’ve answered your question, you answer mine.
>> Quote those numbers to prove that contradiction!
>>
>
> IYIO , birdie!
>

No, that’s still not a number.

Quote the numbers if you have them. (But you don’t, do you?)

--
solar penguin

Binky blathered bullshit:
> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>> Binky brainlessly babbled:
>>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>> Binky burbled bollocks:
>>>>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:

>>>>>> If there’s a third alternative, you’re more than welcome to add it.
>>>>>> As long as, if you’re going to claim a contradiction, you provide
>>>>>> quotes from the show to demonstrate one. Otherwise you’re just a stupid liar.

>>>>> Lies MM to wriggle out of trouble.

>>>> Where is the lie, you babbling buffoon? I gave you two choices, and
>>>> offered you the chance to submit a third, providing only that you
>>>> furnish the necessary minimum evidence to allow the third choice to be
>>>> considered. What can conceivably be a lie about that? What
>>>> delusionally-imagined trouble are you mendaciously claiming I’m trying
>>>> to wriggle out of?
>>>> It’s YOU that does all the lying and wriggling to defend baseless
>>>> assertions around here, you brainless blatherer.
>>>> I did (conditionally) call you a stupid liar. However you are
>>>> demonstrably stupid and a proven serial liar, so that wasn’t a lie either.

>>> Still defending Chibnall I see, MikeMCK.

>> Ah, so by deflecting you are hoping people won’t notice that you failed
>> to point out any lies on my part, because you’re the liar round here.

>> I haven’t defended Chibnall anywhere. His tenure as showrunner did not
>> deliver a great show, though it got better over time. So that’s just you
>> being a liar again.
>> And you still haven’t even TRIED to show one of these “contradictions”
>> you keep lying about. Just as a hint: lying that they exist doesn’t make
>> it true. You need QUOTES that point to a contradiction.

> Enough to write a War and P[e]ace Novel!

Wow. There are that many? Really? *

{* No, not really. War and Peace is almost 600,000 words long. A TV show
will run to less than 6,000 words of dialogue per hour. So for that
statement to be true we’d have to have had about 110 episodes containing
nothing BUT contradictions. So once again, you’re a liar, you bumbleheaded
bimbo.}

But if any of these supposed reams of contradictions are real, how come, in
two years of making these ridiculous claims, you haven’t managed to supply
even ONE such quote?

Where are the quotes, you blithering bonehead? Don’t just lie that they
exist - QUOTE them!

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <t6on3b$gem$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t6ohc7$6lf$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <t6n0b7$n5q$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You claimed you could present numbers that show how
>>>>>> the Timeless Child arc contradicted Rassilon or Omega.
>>>>>> You were lying. Again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No lie when End of Time contractics Timelss Child!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Then quote the numbers that show how it contradicts it!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Especially when the Timeless Child is turning off Doctor Who.
>>
>> No, that’s still not a number.
>>
>> You don’t have any numbers, do you?
>>
>
> Check AGA.

It’s your claim, not the claim of a range cooker manufacturer. YOU need to
supply the numbers that prove a contradiction. (Remember - numbers that
prove a contradiction. Those wouldn’t be related to audience numbers IN ANY
WAY.)

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <t6on3c$gem$2@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> In article <t6oh9d$64k$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <t6n6ve$or3$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tim typed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 9:40:10 PM UTC-7, solar penguin wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You claimed you could present numbers that show
>>>>>>>> how the Timeless Child arc contradicted Rassilon or
>>>>>>>> Omega. You were lying. Again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What kind of numbers would show how the Timeless
>>>>>>> Child contradicts Rassilon or Omega?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don’t know. That’s why I want to see them and find out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Check out why fans are turned off of Doctor Who!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Because they’re closed-minded misogynists and racists.
>>>> That’s why.
>>>>
>>>> There, now I’ve answered your question, you answer mine.
>>>> Quote those numbers to prove that contradiction!
>>>>
>>>
>>> IYIO , birdie!
>>>
>>
>> No, that’s still not a number.
>>
>> Quote the numbers if you have them. (But you don’t, do you?)
>>
>
> As presented by AGA.

If you don’t mean the range cookers, presumably you mean Aggie. But Aggie
wouldn’t be presenting numbers showing contradictions between the Timeless
Child arc and the classic series because for him, the show ended years ago
and he just comes to this newsgroup from time to time to remind the rest of
us what the words “deranged bigot” really mean.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

Binky bleated:

> In article <t6on3b$gem$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t6ohc7$6lf$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <t6n0b7$n5q$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You claimed you could present numbers that show how
>>>>>> the Timeless Child arc contradicted Rassilon or Omega.
>>>>>> You were lying. Again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No lie when End of Time contractics Timelss Child!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Then quote the numbers that show how it contradicts it!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Especially when the Timeless Child is turning off Doctor Who.
>>
>> No, that’s still not a number.
>>
>> You don’t have any numbers, do you?
>>
>
> Check AGA.
>

Liar! The Angry Greek Atavist (AGA) hasn’t provided numbers
that show specific plot contradictions.

If he has, then prove me wrong and quote the posts where
he did.

--
solar penguin

The Doctor wrote on 26/5/22 9:13 pm:
> In article <t6n0b7$n5q$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Binky bleated:
>>> In article <t6lpm3$a8u$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>> In article <t6kn6i$cfr$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>>> In article <t6jkec$451$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <t6iocc$b3g$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But in any case, even if the show was in decline,
>>>>>>>>>> even if that was related in any way to the Timeless
>>>>>>>>>> Child arc, that would have NO RELEVANCE to whether
>>>>>>>>>> the arc contradicted Rassilon or Omega.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What you need are quotes from the show that prove
>>>>>>>>>> the contradiction. But you don’t have any.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And you are ignoring the numbers presented to you!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Liar! You haven’t presented any numbers that show
>>>>>>>> how the Timeless Child arc contradicted Rassilon or
>>>>>>>> Omega.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The audience has the knives out for Chibnall!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Liar! Knives aren’t numbers! And even if they were, they
>>>>>> still wouldn’t show how the Timeless Child arc contradicted
>>>>>> Rassilon or Omega.
>>>>>
>>>>> But Tectuen contradictis the Time Lords.
>>>>
>>>> She doesn’t, but so what if she does? “Tectuen” (sic) isn’t
>>>> a number.
>>>>
>>>> You claimed you could present numbers that show how
>>>> the Timeless Child arc contradicted Rassilon or Omega.
>>>>
>>>> You haven’t presented those numbers. You were lying.
>>>> Again.
>>>
>>> The audience is turned off!
>>
>> That still doesn’t show how the Timeless Child arc contradicts
>> Rassilon or Omega. And you still haven’t presented any
>> numbers.
>>
>> You claimed you could present numbers that show how
>> the Timeless Child arc contradicted Rassilon or Omega.
>> You were lying. Again.
>
> No lie when End of Time contractics Timelss Child!

No lie when 'The 5 Doctors' contradicts 'End of Time', clown!!

See!! I can make a statement just like YOU, clown!!

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

Binky bleated:

> In article <t6q8tb$nch$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>
>>> In article <t6on3b$gem$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <t6ohc7$6lf$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <t6n0b7$n5q$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You claimed you could present numbers that
>>>>>>>> show how the Timeless Child arc contradicted
>>>>>>>> Rassilon or Omega. You were lying. Again.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No lie when End of Time contractics Timelss
>>>>>>> Child!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then quote the numbers that show how it contradicts
>>>>>> it!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Especially when the Timeless Child is turning off
>>>>> Doctor Who.
>>>>
>>>> No, that’s still not a number.
>>>>
>>>> You don’t have any numbers, do you?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Check AGA.
>>>
>>
>> Liar! The Angry Greek Atavist (AGA) hasn’t provided
>> numbers that show specific plot contradictions.
>>
>> If he has, then prove me wrong and quote the posts
>> where he did.
>>
>
> Atavist?
>

Someone or something that’s very, very old-fashioned.

Now, stop trying to change the subject. Quote those magic
numbers.

--
solar penguin

Binky bleated:

> In article <t6pnti$faf$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>> Binky blathered bullshit:
>>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I haven’t defended Chibnall anywhere. His tenure as showrunner did not
>>>> deliver a great show, though it got better over time. So that’s just you
>>>> being a liar again.
>>>> And you still haven’t even TRIED to show one of these “contradictions”
>>>> you keep lying about. Just as a hint: lying that they exist doesn’t make
>>>> it true. You need QUOTES that point to a contradiction.
>>>
>>> Enough to write a War and P[e]ace Novel!
>>
>> Wow. There are that many? Really? *
>>
>> {* No, not really. War and Peace is almost 600,000 words long. A TV show
>> will run to less than 6,000 words of dialogue per hour. So for that
>> statement to be true we’d have to have had about 110 episodes containing
>> nothing BUT contradictions. So once again, you’re a liar, you bumbleheaded
>> bimbo.}
>>
>> But if any of these supposed reams of contradictions are real, how come, in
>> two years of making these ridiculous claims, you haven’t managed to supply
>> even ONE such quote?
>>
>> Where are the quotes, you blithering bonehead? Don’t just lie that they
>> exist - QUOTE them!
>>
>
> Ware and PAce?
>

Gibberish!

--
solar penguin

Binky bleated:

> In article <t6q5uk$43e$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> In article <t6on3b$gem$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You don’t have any numbers, do you?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Check AGA.
>>
>> It’s your claim, not the claim of a range cooker manufacturer.
>> YOU need to supply the numbers that prove a contradiction.
>> (Remember - numbers that prove a contradiction. Those
>> wouldn’t be related to audience numbers IN ANY WAY.)
>>
>
> Yes!!!
>

Yes to what???

--
solar penguin

Binky bleated:

>
> Said a deraned Chibnallite, MikeMcK.
>

Someone took his rane away? (What is a rane anyway?)

--
solar penguin

Binky bleated:

> In article <t6qlo1$id6$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>>
>>> Ware and PAce?
>>>
>>
>> Gibberish!
>>
>
> Did you deface my War and Peace?
>

Look back up the thread and see for yourself.

--
solar penguin

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <t6qlgk$gi5$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t6q8tb$nch$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> In article <t6on3b$gem$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You don’t have any numbers, do you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Check AGA.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Liar! The Angry Greek Atavist (AGA) hasn’t provided
>>>> numbers that show specific plot contradictions.
>>>>
>>>> If he has, then prove me wrong and quote the posts
>>>> where he did.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Atavist?
>>>
>>
>> Someone or something that’s very, very old-fashioned.
>>
>> Now, stop trying to change the subject. Quote those
>> magic numbers.
>>
>
> I thoght you misspelled activist for a moment.
>

And that prevented you from quoting the numbers, did it?

--
solar penguin

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <t6q5ul$43e$2@dont-email.me>,
> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> In article <t6on3c$gem$2@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Quote the numbers if you have them. (But you don’t, do you?)
>>>>
>>>
>>> As presented by AGA.
>>
>> If you don’t mean the range cookers, presumably you mean Aggie. But Aggie
>> wouldn’t be presenting numbers showing contradictions between the Timeless
>> Child arc and the classic series because for him, the show ended years ago
>> and he just comes to this newsgroup from time to time to remind the rest of
>> us what the words “deranged bigot” really mean.
>>
>
> Said a deran ed Chibnallite, MikeMcK.

I’ve proven to you I’m not a Chibnallite, and I have no clue what “deran
ed” means. But none of that is numbers that prove a contradiction, is it?
Why don’t you just admit you were lying again so we can move on?

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <t6q5uk$43e$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> In article <t6on3b$gem$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <t6ohc7$6lf$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <t6n0b7$n5q$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You claimed you could present numbers that show how
>>>>>>>> the Timeless Child arc contradicted Rassilon or Omega.
>>>>>>>> You were lying. Again.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No lie when End of Time contractics Timelss Child!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then quote the numbers that show how it contradicts it!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Especially when the Timeless Child is turning off Doctor Who.
>>>>
>>>> No, that’s still not a number.
>>>>
>>>> You don’t have any numbers, do you?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Check AGA.
>>
>> It’s your claim, not the claim of a range cooker manufacturer. YOU need to
>> supply the numbers that prove a contradiction. (Remember - numbers that
>> prove a contradiction. Those wouldn’t be related to audience numbers IN ANY
>> WAY.)
>>
>
> Yes!!!
>
So you agree that you need to supply the numbers? Why won’t you do it then?
Let me guess - is it that you can’t provide numbers that don’t exist,
because you are of course lying?

It’s the same old truism isn’t it?

“Yads is lying again.”

“How can you be sure he’s lying?”

“His fingers have been typing.”

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

Binky blabbered boneheadedly:
> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>> Binky blathered bullshit:
>>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>> Binky brainlessly babbled:
>>>>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Binky burbled bollocks:
>>>>>>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>> If there’s a third alternative, you’re more than welcome to add it.
>>>>>>>> As long as, if you’re going to claim a contradiction, you provide
>>>>>>>> quotes from the show to demonstrate one. Otherwise you’re just
>> a stupid liar.
>>
>>>>>>> Lies MM to wriggle out of trouble.
>>
>>>>>> Where is the lie, you babbling buffoon? I gave you two choices, and
>>>>>> offered you the chance to submit a third, providing only that you
>>>>>> furnish the necessary minimum evidence to allow the third choice to be
>>>>>> considered. What can conceivably be a lie about that? What
>>>>>> delusionally-imagined trouble are you mendaciously claiming I’m trying
>>>>>> to wriggle out of?
>>>>>> It’s YOU that does all the lying and wriggling to defend baseless
>>>>>> assertions around here, you brainless blatherer.
>>>>>> I did (conditionally) call you a stupid liar. However you are
>>>>>> demonstrably stupid and a proven serial liar, so that wasn’t a
>> lie either.
>>
>>>>> Still defending Chibnall I see, MikeMCK.
>>
>>>> Ah, so by deflecting you are hoping people won’t notice that you failed
>>>> to point out any lies on my part, because you’re the liar round here.
>>
>>>> I haven’t defended Chibnall anywhere. His tenure as showrunner did not
>>>> deliver a great show, though it got better over time. So that’s just you
>>>> being a liar again.
>>>> And you still haven’t even TRIED to show one of these “contradictions”
>>>> you keep lying about. Just as a hint: lying that they exist doesn’t make
>>>> it true. You need QUOTES that point to a contradiction.
>>
>>> Enough to write a War and P[e]ace Novel!
>>
>> Wow. There are that many? Really? *
>>
>> {* No, not really. War and Peace is almost 600,000 words long. A TV show
>> will run to less than 6,000 words of dialogue per hour. So for that
>> statement to be true we’d have to have had about 110 episodes containing
>> nothing BUT contradictions. So once again, you’re a liar, you bumbleheaded
>> bimbo.}
>>
>> But if any of these supposed reams of contradictions are real, how come, in
>> two years of making these ridiculous claims, you haven’t managed to supply
>> even ONE such quote?
>>
>> Where are the quotes, you blithering bonehead? Don’t just lie that they
>> exist - QUOTE them!
>>
>
> Ware and PAce?

No, “War and Peace”. Not “War and Pace” and not “Ware and PAce”, the two
mangled attempts you made to get an eleven-letter, three word, famous title
correct which I’d already provided the right spelling for (as well as
gently correcting your first error without making a song and dance about
it).

But you’re just trying to deflect from your lies about these imaginary
contradictions again, aren’t you? After all, if they were real and you
weren’t lying, you could prove it easily with a single quote. Something you
have been failing to do for over TWO YEARS. Liar!

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <t6qm0u$ki5$2@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>>
>>> Said a deranged Chibnallite, MikeMcK.
>>>
>>
>> Someone took his rane away? (What is a rane anyway?)
>>
>
> rane?
>
You liar. You inserted a “g” that was not in your previous post. Liar.
Liar. Liar.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <t6qm93$mgc$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t6qlo1$id6$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ware and PAce?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Gibberish!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Did you deface my War and Peace?
>>>
>>
>> Look back up the thread and see for yourself.
>>
>
> cut and lie.

YOU are the liar. You wrote “War and Pace”. Then you wrote “Ware and PAce”.
Now you want to lie about it. Liar. Liar. Liar.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <t6r249$fvc$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> In article <t6q5ul$43e$2@dont-email.me>,
>>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>> In article <t6on3c$gem$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Quote the numbers if you have them. (But you don’t, do you?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As presented by AGA.
>>>>
>>>> If you don’t mean the range cookers, presumably you mean Aggie. But Aggie
>>>> wouldn’t be presenting numbers showing contradictions between the Timeless
>>>> Child arc and the classic series because for him, the show ended years ago
>>>> and he just comes to this newsgroup from time to time to remind the rest of
>>>> us what the words “deranged bigot” really mean.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Said a deran ed Chibnallite, MikeMcK.
>>
>> I’ve proven to you I’m not a Chibnallite, and I have no clue what “deran
>> ed” means. But none of that is numbers that prove a contradiction, is it?
>> Why don’t you just admit you were lying again so we can move on?
>>
>
> Prove that you are a Doctor Who Fan and totally renounce everything the
> Timeless Child stands for!

You’re no Doctor Who fan if you don’t allow other fans to like or dislike
any part of the show they choose. You’re just trying to dictate that people
agree with your ignorant opinions.

You’re no Doctor Who fan if you can’t be honest about the show. So: tell
the truth.

When you stop lying, we can talk about something else. Stop evading, and
admit that there are no contradictions between the Timeless Child and
Rassilon or Omega.

Or - as I’m always inviting you to do - prove ME wrong. Demonstrate the
contradictions you keep on about with quotes from the show. But you can’t.
Because you’re such a big liar you have third degree burns on your arse.
Liar. Liar. Liar.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

Binky’s bonkers babbling was:
> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>
>> But you’re just trying to deflect from your lies about these imaginary
>> contradictions again, aren’t you? After all, if they were real and you
>> weren’t lying, you could prove it easily with a single quote. Something
>> you have been failing to do for over TWO YEARS. Liar!
>
> Yet you still insist the Timelss Child is Doctor Who, MikeMcK.

I don’t insist on anything. The Timeless Children is an official episode of
Doctor Who. That makes it Doctor Who. It doesn’t make it GOOD Doctor Who.
But it makes it Doctor Who.

Only a complete moron would insist that it isn’t. A complete idiot would
continue to lie about it.

But oh look - you’re deflecting again and ignoring the point about the
contradictions you keep lying about. Liar. Liar. Liar.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

Binky went bananas and blathered:
> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>> Binky’s bonkers babbling was:
>>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> But you’re just trying to deflect from your lies about these imaginary
>>>> contradictions again, aren’t you? After all, if they were real and you
>>>> weren’t lying, you could prove it easily with a single quote. Something
>>>> you have been failing to do for over TWO YEARS. Liar!
>>>
>>> Yet you still insist the Timelss Child is Doctor Who, MikeMcK.
>>
>> I don’t insist on anything. The Timeless Children is an official episode of
>> Doctor Who. That makes it Doctor Who. It doesn’t make it GOOD Doctor Who.
>> But it makes it Doctor Who.
>>
>> Only a complete moron would insist that it isn’t. A complete idiot would
>> continue to lie about it.
>>
>> But oh look - you’re deflecting again and ignoring the point about the
>> contradictions you keep lying about. Liar. Liar. Liar.
>>
>
> Save Doctor Who! Retcon the Timelss Child!

Deflection by mindless slogan noted. You’re not just a liar, a troll, a
spammer and and idiot: you’re a BORING liar, troll, spammer and idiot.

Doctor Who doesn’t need to be saved.
The Timeless Child doesn’t need to be retconned. Simply ignoring it is
sufficient.

But just to be clear: it could only be retconned out of Doctor Who if it is
a part of Doctor Who in the first place. Therefore YOU insist that the
Timeless Child is Doctor Who.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

Dave Yadallee, the Lying Liar, lied:
> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>> You’re no Doctor Who fan if you don’t allow other fans to like or dislike
>> any part of the show they choose. You’re just trying to dictate that people
>> agree with your ignorant opinions.
>>
>> You’re no Doctor Who fan if you can’t be honest about the show. So: tell
>> the truth.
>>
>> When you stop lying, we can talk about something else. Stop evading, and
>> admit that there are no contradictions between the Timeless Child and
>> Rassilon or Omega.
>>
>> Or - as I’m always inviting you to do - prove ME wrong. Demonstrate the
>> contradictions you keep on about with quotes from the show. But you can’t.
>> Because you’re such a big liar you have third degree burns on your arse.
>> Liar. Liar. Liar.
>
> Says Chibnallite MikeMcK!
>
By every semi-demi coherent definition of “Chibnallite” you’ve come up
with, I’m not one. So you’re just doubling down on your lies. Do you own
ANY pants without burn holes? Liar. Liar. Liar. Liar.

Instead of lying, why not make a liar out of me? Offer up these quotes that
prove contradictions.

Or since you can’t do that (because you’re lying), just admit you were
lying and move on.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

The Doctor wrote on 27/5/22 11:27 pm:
> In article <t6q5ul$43e$2@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
> <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> In article <t6on3c$gem$2@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>>> <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>> In article <t6oh9d$64k$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>>>>> <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>>> In article <t6n6ve$or3$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>>>>>>> <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Tim typed:
>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 9:40:10 PM UTC-7, solar
>>>>>>>>> penguin wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You claimed you could present numbers that show how
>>>>>>>>>> the Timeless Child arc contradicted Rassilon or
>>>>>>>>>> Omega. You were lying. Again.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What kind of numbers would show how the Timeless
>>>>>>>>> Child contradicts Rassilon or Omega?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don’t know. That’s why I want to see them and
>>>>>>>> find out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Check out why fans are turned off of Doctor Who!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because they’re closed-minded misogynists and racists.
>>>>>> That’s why.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There, now I’ve answered your question, you answer mine.
>>>>>> Quote those numbers to prove that contradiction!
>>>>>
>>>>> IYIO , birdie!
>>>>
>>>> No, that’s still not a number.
>>>>
>>>> Quote the numbers if you have them. (But you don’t, do you?)
>>>
>>> As presented by AGA.
>>
>> If you don’t mean the range cookers, presumably you mean Aggie.
>> But Aggie wouldn’t be presenting numbers showing contradictions
>> between the Timeless Child arc and the classic series because for
>> him, the show ended years ago and he just comes to this newsgroup
>> from time to time to remind the rest of us what the words
>> “deranged bigot” really mean.
>
> Said a deraned Chibnallite, MikeMcK.

"Said"?? "deraned"??

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel