The Doctor wrote:
> In article <t7e1dg$3fs$1@dont-email.me>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> > The Last Doctor wrote:
> >
> >> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Depends if you beleive anything verifiable.
> >>
> >> Amazingly enough Dave, I believe in things that are verifiable and
> >> verified.
> >
> > It's strange that Dave would use the word "verifiable" in a post
> > here... his opinions are often based on non-verifiable beliefs!
>
> You contradict yourself.

Read it again... slowly...

Most of what YOU believe in is non-verifiable, so for you to question
if somebody else believes anything verifiable is odd. It's a standard
you don't apply to yourself!

Believing something to be true doesn't mean it is a verified fact! Like
you weird religious beliefs that are backed up by nothing other than
wishful thinking.

If The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <t7e8ai$mul$2@dont-email.me>,
> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> In article <t7e0go$tc1$3@dont-email.me>,
>>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Depends if you beleive anything verifiable.
>>>>
>>>> Amazingly enough Dave, I believe in things that are verifiable and
>>>> verified. But whether or not you were lying doesn’t /depend/ on
>>>> belief, since you were self-evidently lying. As per usual.
>>>
>>> Evolution is not verifiable.
>>
>> Bit of a curve ball there Dave, since you were “accusing” me of
>> believing in things that ARE verifiable.
>>
>> It is not only verifiable, it is incontrovertibly proven to be true and
>> can directly be observed happening over generations in many organisms.
>>
>> You won’t bother to read this link, but here is a CHRISTIAN take on the
>> proof of evolution:
>>
>> https://biologos.org/common-questions/what-is-the-evidence-for-evolution
>
> The lies beleived by the gullible MM!

I knew you wouldn’t follow the link. As the old adage goes, “you can lead a
fool to knowledge, but you can’t make him think.”

Exercise for you Dave: show that evolution is a lie. With verifiable
scientific evidence to support your claim.

Meanwhile, of course, your own credibility is revealed precisely by the
following:

I wrote: “I won this argument ages ago but you’re just too stupid to stop
lying. A fact you will now prove by lying in response to this comment.”

You then proved me right by lying: “You lost out to TTD months ago.” I have
lost many arguments and debates in my life. I’ve NEVER lost one to the
insane Greek you refer to as “TTD”, just as I’ve never lost one to you.

I wrote: “QED. Once again, you have made a statement that describes your
belief system and falsely ascribed it to me. You will now deny facts by
responding to this post.

In spite of me advising you that you would be denying facts by responding,
you responded with “You do not beleive in fcts MM!”

I wrote: “you are continuing to deflect by wanting only to elaborate on
your lies. You’ll now prove you have a negative IQ by responding to this
post.

Despite you being told what responding meant, you responded “All you do is
live in lies MM!”

So this is your credibility. By your own responses you have declared that
you have a negative IQ, deny facts, and are too stupid to stop lying.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

Binky bleated:

> In article <t7f7ja$hpo$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>>
>>> Still retconn the Timeless Child!
>>
>> "Retconn"??
>>
>
> One to many n's for you SP?
>

"To"??

--
solar penguin

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <t7g1ct$g6v$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:

>> Meanwhile, of course, your own credibility is revealed precisely by the
>> following:
>>
>> I wrote: “You’re just too stupid to stop lying, [which] you will prove
>> by lying in response to this comment.” You responded with a lie.
>>
>> I wrote: “You will now deny facts by responding to this post.” You responded to the post.
>>
>> I wrote: “You’ll now prove you have a negative IQ by responding to this
>> post.” You responded to the post.
>>
>> By your own responses you have declared that you have a negative IQ,
>> deny facts, and are too stupid to stop lying.
>
> And you just go with the deceived crowd MM!

No, I’m simply reiterating what you agreed about yourself by responding to
my challenges for you not to respond. You could easily have chosen not to
reply, but you just can’t do it, can you?

> What was that the Doctor said about Mankind and sausages, twice?

I hardly think that me proving that you’re incapable of not responding
because you’re too stupid to walk away is the same as the mind control
proposed by the Master of the Land of Fiction.

That was much more akin to fundamentalist religious indoctrination, the
need for unquestioning belief in a rigid, elaborate and flawed
interpretation of a supposedly “infallible” book. The evangelistic denial
of facts by everyone would indeed result in a situation where “Man will
just become like a string of sausages, all the same.”

I don’t recall the Doctor using that analogy a second time.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

The Doctor wrote on 5/6/22 12:09 am:
> In article <t7f928$ddf$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 4/6/22 9:40 am:
>>> In article <t7e0go$tc1$3@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
>>> <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>> In article <t7d898$nav$2@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
>>>>> <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <t7cm1r$4fs$2@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
>>>>>>> <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Mike McKeown - "I deny therefore I am"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In addition to not addressing comments to others that would
>>>>>>>> be better addressed to you, you should stop lying by
>>>>>>>> preventing to quote others. Particularly quotes that would
>>>>>>>> only be accurate if you were the one speaking them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lies MM as usual.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Um, where was the lie? You deny reality the whole time. I
>>>>>> accept reality. As you can clearly see, even your response just
>>>>>> now was something that applies to you, not me. In falsely
>>>>>> claiming “Lies MM as usual”, you were lying. As usual.
>>>>>
>>>>> Depends if you beleive anything verifiable.
>>>>
>>>> Amazingly enough Dave, I believe in things that are verifiable and
>>>> verified. But whether or not you were lying doesn’t /depend/ on
>>>> belief, since you were self-evidently lying. As per usual.
>>>
>>> Evolution is not verifiable.
>>
>> Lie, clown, lie ...... unless YOU, clown, look EXACTLY like YOUR Mother
>> or YOUR Father, clown!!
>>
>> Evolution is change!!

> That's genetics, Dannyboy!

Yes, clown, it *IS* genetics, clown, which causes *CHANGE* , clown, and
that *CHANGE* is also called *EVOLUTION* , clown!!

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 5/6/22 12:06 am:
> In article <t7f7ja$hpo$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Binky bleated:
>>> In article <t7a5dc$6la$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Daniel declared:
>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 2/6/22 12:03 am:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Tectuen was put it to detroy Rassilon and Omega, Dannyboy.
>>>>>
>>>>> "it"?? "detroy"??
>>>>
>>>> And also "Tectuen”??
>>>>>
>>>>> How could Tectuem 'detroy' Rassilon and/or Omega if they weren't even
>>>>> mentioned in 'The Timeless Child' arc, clown??
>>>>
>>>> "Tectuem"?? That’s an even worse typo than "Tectuen".
>>>
>>> Still retconn the Timeless Child!
>>
>> "Retconn"??
>
> One to many n's for you SP?

If I were Solar Penguin, I would think there is a lot more that could
have been done without .... like doing without "Still retconn the
Timeless Child!", clown!!

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 5/6/22 12:10 am:
> In article <t7f98u$ddf$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 4/6/22 12:04 am:
>>> In article <t7bqvo$r04$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 2/6/22 9:29 pm:
>>>>> In article <t7a2o2$d4g$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 2/6/22 12:03 am:
>>>>>>> In article <t770p1$7jm$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 1/06/2022 8:02 am:
>>>>
>>>> <Snip>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How about the bogus Tectuen.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What was 'revised' about Tectuen, clown?? As I recall
>>>>>>>> she had not been mentioned previously, so how could
>>>>>>>> anything about her be 'revised', clown??
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh, and YOUR newsreader is corrupting the quoted text,
>>>>>>>> clown!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tectuen was put it to detroy Rassilon and Omega,
>>>>>>> Dannyboy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "it"?? "detroy"??
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How could Tectuem 'detroy' Rassilon and/or Omega if they
>>>>>> weren't even mentioned in 'The Timeless Child' arc,
>>>>>> clown??
>>>>
>>>>> CC's method of revisionism, Dannyboy!
>>>>
>>>> So .... by not mentioning something, you can retcon
>>>> something!!
>>>>
>>>> Really??
>>
>>> Well Dw is on a downwards trend with CC in charge, Dannyboy!
>>
>> Oh!! Is that so, clown?? If so, best YOU, clown, change YOUR NYM,
>> clown!!

> Sice when, Dannyboy?

"Sice"??

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 5/6/22 12:12 am:
> In article <t7f9h4$m6h$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 4/6/22 12:47 am:
>>> In article <t7cr1c$b2v$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:

<Snip>

>>>> And for the benefit of the clown, perhaps one should emphasis
>>>> that Mike typed "I wish it hadn’t been done, but it
>>>> has."!!
>>>>
>>>> Maybe he'll notice this time!!
>>
>>> Looks like Mike is confused.
>>
>> 'confused' about WHAT, clown??

> Confused about Life and the universe, Dannyboy.

Ah!! Well, in that case the answer to Mike's problems is not '42', clown!!

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

Binky bleated:

> In article <t7g873$mi6$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t7f7ja$hpo$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Still retconn the Timeless Child!
>>>>
>>>> "Retconn"??
>>>>
>>>
>>> One to many n's for you SP?
>>>
>>
>> "To"??
>>
>
> Yes, SP?

No, binky!

It’s "too", not "to".

>
> Still Save Doctor Who! Retcon the Timeless Child!

Not gonna happen.

--
solar penguin

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <t7hl88$4q9$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> What was that the Doctor said about Mankind and sausages, twice?
>>
>> I hardly think that me proving that you’re incapable of not responding
>> there because you’re too stupid to walk away is the same as the mind
>> control proposed by the Master of the Land of Fiction.
>>
>> That was much more akin to fundamentalist religious indoctrination, the
>> need for unquestioning belief in a rigid, elaborate and flawed
>> interpretation of a supposedly “infallible” book. The evangelistic
>> denial of facts by everyone would indeed result in a situation where
>> “Man will just become like a string of sausages, all the same.”
>>
>> I don’t recall the Doctor using that analogy a second time.
>
> MM forgot the Masque of Mandragona in the process while acknowledging Mind Robber.

Since sausages aren’t mentioned in “Masque”, I can’t help feeling that
you’re just lying again, Dave. There is a brief cameo by a salami, but all
that is said about it is that it’s delicious.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <t7icsr$vj$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> In article <t7hl88$4q9$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>> What was that the Doctor said about Mankind and sausages, twice?
>>>>
>>>> I hardly think that me proving that you’re incapable of not responding
>>>> there because you’re too stupid to walk away is the same as the mind
>>>> control proposed by the Master of the Land of Fiction.
>>>>
>>>> That was much more akin to fundamentalist religious indoctrination, the
>>>> need for unquestioning belief in a rigid, elaborate and flawed
>>>> interpretation of a supposedly “infallible” book. The evangelistic
>>>> denial of facts by everyone would indeed result in a situation where
>>>> “Man will just become like a string of sausages, all the same.”
>>>>
>>>> I don’t recall the Doctor using that analogy a second time.
>>>
>>> MM forgot the Masque of Mandragona in the process while acknowledging
>> Mind Robber.
>>
>> Since sausages aren’t mentioned in “Masque”, I can’t help feeling that
>> you’re just lying again, Dave. There is a brief cameo by a salami, but all
>> that is said about it is that it’s delicious.
>>
>
> https://tardis.fandom.com/wiki/Sausage

That is one of those rather pointless wiki entries that cover every time a
sausage is mentioned in the show. Most of which are trivial and to do with
… eating sausages.

The only metaphorical reference is to “The Mind Robber”, as I said. Do you
know what story isn’t mentioned in that article, specifically? “The Masque
of Mandragora”.

Your original error was that the Doctor mentioned “sausages and mankind”
twice.

You then lied by claiming the second instance was in “Masque”.

And now you have posted a link that shows that I was correct and that you
were lying, but didn’t add any text of your own.

How about, just for once, you actually admit that you were wrong and that
you then doubled down by lying? After all, it’s you that just proved it.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

The Doctor wrote on 5/6/22 9:09 pm:
> In article <t7i0lr$6vl$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 5/6/22 12:09 am:
>>> In article <t7f928$ddf$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 4/6/22 9:40 am:
>>>>> In article <t7e0go$tc1$3@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
>>>>> <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <t7d898$nav$2@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
>>>>>>> <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <t7cm1r$4fs$2@dont-email.me>, The Last
>>>>>>>>> Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Mike McKeown - "I deny therefore I am"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In addition to not addressing comments to others
>>>>>>>>>> that would be better addressed to you, you should
>>>>>>>>>> stop lying by preventing to quote others.
>>>>>>>>>> Particularly quotes that would only be accurate if
>>>>>>>>>> you were the one speaking them.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Lies MM as usual.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Um, where was the lie? You deny reality the whole time.
>>>>>>>> I accept reality. As you can clearly see, even your
>>>>>>>> response just now was something that applies to you,
>>>>>>>> not me. In falsely claiming “Lies MM as
>>>>>>>> usual”, you were lying. As usual.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Depends if you beleive anything verifiable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Amazingly enough Dave, I believe in things that are
>>>>>> verifiable and verified. But whether or not you were lying
>>>>>> doesn’t /depend/ on belief, since you were
>>>>>> self-evidently lying. As per usual.
>>>>>
>>>>> Evolution is not verifiable.
>>>>
>>>> Lie, clown, lie ...... unless YOU, clown, look EXACTLY like
>>>> YOUR Mother or YOUR Father, clown!!
>>>>
>>>> Evolution is change!!
>>
>>> That's genetics, Dannyboy!
>>
>> Yes, clown, it *IS* genetics, clown, which causes *CHANGE* , clown,
>> and that *CHANGE* is also called *EVOLUTION* , clown!!

> So how easy is it for a gene to mutate , Dannyboy?!

CoViD-19 .... Strains/Mutations Alpha, Beta, Kappa, Delta, Mu, Omicron,
Omicron A, Omicron B, Omicron BA, Omicron BA-2!!

Influenza .... different strains just about every year!!

Pretty easy, I think, clown!!

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <t7k5p5$k5$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> In article <t7icsr$vj$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>> In article <t7hl88$4q9$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>> What was that the Doctor said about Mankind and sausages, twice?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I hardly think that me proving that you’re incapable of not responding
>>>>>> there because you’re too stupid to walk away is the same as the mind
>>>>>> control proposed by the Master of the Land of Fiction.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That was much more akin to fundamentalist religious indoctrination, the
>>>>>> need for unquestioning belief in a rigid, elaborate and flawed
>>>>>> interpretation of a supposedly “infallible” book. The evangelistic
>>>>>> denial of facts by everyone would indeed result in a situation where
>>>>>> “Man will just become like a string of sausages, all the same.”
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don’t recall the Doctor using that analogy a second time.
>>>>>
>>>>> MM forgot the Masque of Mandragona in the process while acknowledging
>>>> Mind Robber.
>>>>
>>>> Since sausages aren’t mentioned in “Masque”, I can’t help
>> feeling that
>>>> you’re just lying again, Dave. There is a brief cameo by a salami, but all
>>>> that is said about it is that it’s delicious.
>>>>
>>>
>>> https://tardis.fandom.com/wiki/Sausage
>>
>> That is one of those rather pointless wiki entries that cover every time a
>> sausage is mentioned in the show. Most of which are trivial and to do with
>> … eating sausages.
>>
>> The only metaphorical reference is to “The Mind Robber”, as I said. Do you
>> know what story isn’t mentioned in that article, specifically? “The Masque
>> of Mandragora”.
>>
>> Your original error was that the Doctor mentioned “sausages and mankind”
>> twice.
>>
>> You then lied by claiming the second instance was in “Masque”.
>>
>> And now you have posted a link that shows that I was correct and that you
>> were lying, but didn’t add any text of your own.
>>
>> How about, just for once, you actually admit that you were wrong and that
>> you then doubled down by lying? After all, it’s you that just proved it.
>
>
> Lies MM as usual.

You lying moron. Quote the exact place where “Masque of Mandragora” and
“Man would be a string of sausages” (or anything similar) are in that Wiki
page. Better still, quote from the transcript from “Masque”.

You can’t, of course, which is because you’re a lying idiot. Too stupid to
stop lying, and too ignorant to apologise.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <t7l05n$h41$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> In article <t7k5p5$k5$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>> In article <t7icsr$vj$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <t7hl88$4q9$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> What was that the Doctor said about Mankind and sausages, twice?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I hardly think that me proving that you’re incapable of not responding
>>>>>>>> there because you’re too stupid to walk away is the same as the mind
>>>>>>>> control proposed by the Master of the Land of Fiction.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That was much more akin to fundamentalist religious indoctrination, the
>>>>>>>> need for unquestioning belief in a rigid, elaborate and flawed
>>>>>>>> interpretation of a supposedly “infallible” book. The evangelistic
>>>>>>>> denial of facts by everyone would indeed result in a situation where
>>>>>>>> “Man will just become like a string of sausages, all the same.”
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don’t recall the Doctor using that analogy a second time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> MM forgot the Masque of Mandragona in the process while acknowledging
>>>>>> Mind Robber.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since sausages aren’t mentioned in “Masque”, I can’t help
>>>> feeling that
>>>>>> you’re just lying again, Dave. There is a brief cameo by a
>> salami, but all
>>>>>> that is said about it is that it’s delicious.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://tardis.fandom.com/wiki/Sausage
>>>>
>>>> That is one of those rather pointless wiki entries that cover every time a
>>>> sausage is mentioned in the show. Most of which are trivial and to do with
>>>> … eating sausages.
>>>>
>>>> The only metaphorical reference is to “The Mind Robber”, as I
>> said. Do you
>>>> know what story isn’t mentioned in that article, specifically?
>> “The Masque
>>>> of Mandragora”.
>>>>
>>>> Your original error was that the Doctor mentioned “sausages and mankind”
>>>> twice.
>>>>
>>>> You then lied by claiming the second instance was in “Masque”.
>>>>
>>>> And now you have posted a link that shows that I was correct and that you
>>>> were lying, but didn’t add any text of your own.
>>>>
>>>> How about, just for once, you actually admit that you were wrong and that
>>>> you then doubled down by lying? After all, it’s you that just proved it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Lies MM as usual.
>>
>> You lying moron. Quote the exact place where “Masque of Mandragora” and
>> “Man would be a string of sausages” (or anything similar) are in that Wiki
>> page. Better still, quote from the transcript from “Masque”.
>>
>> You can’t, of course, which is because you’re a lying idiot. Too stupid to
>> stop lying, and too ignorant to apologise.
>>
>
> Still continually lying MM!

Yes, you are, you stupid, imbecilic little troll. Your OWN LINK (not mine)
proves you’re lying. I haven’t told one lie. Not one. Did you try READING
the page you linked to? No. How about searching for “Masque” or
“Mandragora” in it? No. How about reading the story’s transcript? No. How
about searching for “sausage” in it? No. Facts. You hate them.

Instead you decide to just lie and lie and lie in the face of honesty and
an offer for you to apologise with a little dignity.

I feel sorry for you, and your sad little life of lies. I really do.

Go on, ignore the truth and tell yet another lie in response. Don’t check
out the evidence - the evidence would prove you wrong and that I, as ever,
am telling only the truth! It’s the same bullet headed ignorance you show
about everything. You get some dumb idea in your head and will NOT let
facts sway you from insulting, trolling and spamming lies.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

Binky bleated:

> In article <t7l1uc$lc2$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Still continually lying MM!
>>
>> Yes, you are, you stupid, imbecilic little troll. Your OWN LINK (not mine)
>> proves you’re lying. I haven’t told one lie. Not one. Did you try READING
>> the page you linked to? No. How about searching for “Masque” or
>> “Mandragora” in it? No. How about reading the story’s transcript? No. How
>> about searching for “sausage” in it? No. Facts. You hate them.
>>
>> Instead you decide to just lie and lie and lie in the face of honesty and
>> an offer for you to apologise with a little dignity.
>>
>> I feel sorry for you, and your sad little life of lies. I really do.
>>
>> Go on, ignore the truth and tell yet another lie in response. Don’t check
>> out the evidence - the evidence would prove you wrong and that I, as ever,
>> am telling only the truth! It’s the same bullet headed ignorance you show
>> about everything. You get some dumb idea in your head and will NOT let
>> facts sway you from insulting, trolling and spamming lies.
>>
>
> Said the fact hating lying MikeMcK!
>

Which facts was he hating in that post? How was he lying
in that post?

His post looks factual and truthful to me.

--
solar penguin

solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Binky bleated:
>
>> In article <t7l1uc$lc2$1@dont-email.me>,
>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Still continually lying MM!
>>>
>>> Yes, you are, you stupid, imbecilic little troll. Your OWN LINK (not mine)
>>> proves you’re lying. I haven’t told one lie. Not one. Did you try READING
>>> the page you linked to? No. How about searching for “Masque” or
>>> “Mandragora” in it? No. How about reading the story’s transcript? No. How
>>> about searching for “sausage” in it? No. Facts. You hate them.
>>>
>>> Instead you decide to just lie and lie and lie in the face of honesty and
>>> an offer for you to apologise with a little dignity.
>>>
>>> I feel sorry for you, and your sad little life of lies. I really do.
>>>
>>> Go on, ignore the truth and tell yet another lie in response. Don’t check
>>> out the evidence - the evidence would prove you wrong and that I, as ever,
>>> am telling only the truth! It’s the same bullet headed ignorance you show
>>> about everything. You get some dumb idea in your head and will NOT let
>>> facts sway you from insulting, trolling and spamming lies.
>>>
>>
>> Said the fact hating lying MikeMcK!
>>
>
> Which facts was he hating in that post? How was he lying
> in that post?
>
> His post looks factual and truthful to me.
>

What I can’t believe is that he isn’t lying about some meaningful deep
seated hate of his, like evolution or the Timeless Child. This time he’s
hell bent on lying about “The Masque of Mandragora” containing a reference
to sausages. Baffled.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

The Doctor wrote on 7/6/22 3:06 pm:
> In article <t7mi81$jmr$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
> <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t7l1uc$lc2$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
>>> <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Still continually lying MM!
>>>>
>>>> Yes, you are, you stupid, imbecilic little troll. Your OWN LINK
>>>> (not mine) proves you’re lying. I haven’t told one lie. Not
>>>> one. Did you try READING the page you linked to? No. How about
>>>> searching for “Masque” or “Mandragora” in it? No. How
>>>> about reading the story’s
>> transcript? No. How
>>>> about searching for “sausage” in it? No. Facts. You hate
>>>> them.
>>>>
>>>> Instead you decide to just lie and lie and lie in the face of
>>>> honesty and an offer for you to apologise with a little
>>>> dignity.
>>>>
>>>> I feel sorry for you, and your sad little life of lies. I
>>>> really do.
>>>>
>>>> Go on, ignore the truth and tell yet another lie in response.
>>>> Don’t check out the evidence - the evidence would prove you
>>>> wrong and that I, as ever, am telling only the truth! It’s
>>>> the same bullet headed ignorance you show about everything. You
>>>> get some dumb idea in your head and will NOT let facts sway you
>>>> from insulting, trolling and spamming lies.
>>>
>>> Said the fact hating lying MikeMcK!
>>
>> Which facts was he hating in that post? How was he lying in that
>> post?
>>
>> His post looks factual and truthful to me.
>
> Birdie, are you on drugs?

Typical, clown .... rather than actually PROVING YOUR point, clown, YOU,
clown, just ABUSE, ABUSE, ABUSE anyone that dares to disagree with YOU,
clown!!

Still, it gives YOU, clown, a much greater ability to increase YOUR
Precious Post Count, doesn't it, clown??

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 6/6/22 11:23 pm:
> In article <t7kave$uha$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 5/6/22 9:09 pm:
>>> In article <t7i0lr$6vl$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 5/6/22 12:09 am:
>>>>> In article <t7f928$ddf$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 4/6/22 9:40 am:
>>>>>>> In article <t7e0go$tc1$3@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
>>>>>>> <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:

<Snip>

>>>>>>>>> Depends if you beleive anything verifiable.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Amazingly enough Dave, I believe in things that are
>>>>>>>> verifiable and verified. But whether or not you were
>>>>>>>> lying doesn’t
>>>>>>>> /depend/ on belief, since you were self-evidently
>>>>>>>> lying. As per usual.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Evolution is not verifiable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lie, clown, lie ...... unless YOU, clown, look EXACTLY
>>>>>> like YOUR Mother or YOUR Father, clown!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Evolution is change!!
>>>>
>>>>> That's genetics, Dannyboy!
>>>>
>>>> Yes, clown, it *IS* genetics, clown, which causes *CHANGE* ,
>>>> clown, and that *CHANGE* is also called *EVOLUTION* , clown!!
>>
>>> So how easy is it for a gene to mutate , Dannyboy?!
>>
>> CoViD-19 .... Strains/Mutations Alpha, Beta, Kappa, Delta, Mu,
>> Omicron, Omicron A, Omicron B, Omicron BA, Omicron BA-2!!
>>
>> Influenza .... different strains just about every year!!
>>
>> Pretty easy, I think, clown!!

> So where is the Flu now, Dannyboy?

Everywhere down here in the South, clown!!

Oh!! And deflection noted ..... rather than YOU, clown, actually
addressing the point of my post, clown!!

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:

> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t7l1uc$lc2$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I flirted with you when I had amnesia.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, you are, you stupid, imbecilic little troll. Your OWN LINK (not mine)
>>>> proves you’re lying. I haven’t told one lie. Not one. Did you try READING
>>>> the page you linked to? No. How about searching for “Masque” or
>>>> “Mandragora” in it? No. How about reading the story’s transcript? No. How
>>>> about searching for “sausage” in it? No. Facts. You hate them.
>>>>
>>>> Instead you decide to just lie and lie and lie in the face of honesty and
>>>> an offer for you to apologise with a little dignity.
>>>>
>>>> I feel sorry for you, and your sad little life of lies. I really do.
>>>>
>>>> Go on, ignore the truth and tell yet another lie in response. Don’t check
>>>> out the evidence - the evidence would prove you wrong and that I, as ever,
>>>> am telling only the truth! It’s the same bullet headed ignorance you show
>>>> about everything. You get some dumb idea in your head and will NOT let
>>>> facts sway you from insulting, trolling and spamming lies.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Said the fact hating lying MikeMcK!
>>>
>>
>> Which facts was he hating in that post? How was he lying
>> in that post?
>>
>> His post looks factual and truthful to me.
>>
>
> What I can’t believe is that he isn’t lying about some meaningful deep
> seated hate of his, like evolution or the Timeless Child. This time he’s
> hell bent on lying about “The Masque of Mandragora” containing a reference
> to sausages. Baffled.
>

Yeah. It’s odd. Normally when he lies about some random
bit of dialogue, it’s in The Sensorites. I don’t know why
he’s switched it to ‘Masque’ this time.

--
solar penguin

Binky bleated:

> In article <t7mi81$jmr$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t7l1uc$lc2$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Should I love you this much?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, you are, you stupid, imbecilic little troll. Your OWN LINK (not mine)
>>>> proves you’re lying. I haven’t told one lie. Not one. Did you try READING
>>>> the page you linked to? No. How about searching for “Masque” or
>>>> “Mandragora” in it? No. How about reading the story’s
>> transcript? No. How
>>>> about searching for “sausage” in it? No. Facts. You hate them.
>>>>
>>>> Instead you decide to just lie and lie and lie in the face of honesty and
>>>> an offer for you to apologise with a little dignity.
>>>>
>>>> I feel sorry for you, and your sad little life of lies. I really do.
>>>>
>>>> Go on, ignore the truth and tell yet another lie in response. Don’t check
>>>> out the evidence - the evidence would prove you wrong and that I, as ever,
>>>> am telling only the truth! It’s the same bullet headed ignorance you show
>>>> about everything. You get some dumb idea in your head and will NOT let
>>>> facts sway you from insulting, trolling and spamming lies.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Said the fact hating lying MikeMcK!
>>>
>>
>> Which facts was he hating in that post? How was he lying
>> in that post?
>>
>> His post looks factual and truthful to me.
>>
>
> Birdie, are you on drugs?
>

Answer my questions, and then I’ll answer yours.

--
solar penguin

On 2022-06-07 7:13 a.m., The Doctor wrote:
> In article <t7n8q1$mkl$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 7/6/22 3:06 pm:
>>> In article <t7mi81$jmr$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>>> <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <t7l1uc$lc2$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
>>>>> <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Still continually lying MM!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, you are, you stupid, imbecilic little troll. Your OWN LINK
>>>>>> (not mine) proves you’re lying. I haven’t told one lie. Not
>>>>>> one. Did you try READING the page you linked to? No. How about
>>>>>> searching for “Masque” or “Mandragora” in
>> it? No. How
>>>>>> about reading the story’s
>>>> transcript? No. How
>>>>>> about searching for “sausage” in it? No. Facts. You hate
>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Instead you decide to just lie and lie and lie in the face of
>>>>>> honesty and an offer for you to apologise with a little
>>>>>> dignity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I feel sorry for you, and your sad little life of lies. I
>>>>>> really do.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Go on, ignore the truth and tell yet another lie in response.
>>>>>> Don’t check out the evidence - the evidence would prove you
>>>>>> wrong and that I, as ever, am telling only the truth! It’s
>>>>>> the same bullet headed ignorance you show about everything. You
>>>>>> get some dumb idea in your head and will NOT let facts sway you
>>>>>> from insulting, trolling and spamming lies.
>>>>>
>>>>> Said the fact hating lying MikeMcK!
>>>>
>>>> Which facts was he hating in that post? How was he lying in that
>>>> post?
>>>>
>>>> His post looks factual and truthful to me.
>>>
>>> Birdie, are you on drugs?
>>
>> Typical, clown .... rather than actually PROVING YOUR point, clown, YOU,
>> clown, just ABUSE, ABUSE, ABUSE anyone that dares to disagree with YOU,
>> clown!!
>>
>> Still, it gives YOU, clown, a much greater ability to increase YOUR
>> Precious Post Count, doesn't it, clown??
>
> Dan's definition of clown comes from
> http://www.chakoteya.net/DoctorWho/10-1.htm
>
> JO: Look.
> (The scanner shows William inside a pyramid shape. He was too ill to act, bless
> him.)
> DOCTOR 1: [on scanner] Ah, there you are. I seem to be stuck up here. Hmm? Hmm?
> Oh, so you're my replacements. Huh. A dandy and a clown. Have you done anything?
> DOCTOR 2: Well, we've, er, assessed the situation.
> DOCTOR 1 [on scanner]: Just as I thought. Nothing.
> DOCTOR: Well it's not easy, you know.
>
> Get out of chronic hysteresis mode Dannyboy!
>
> SP looked as if he was high on something, Dannyboy!
>
> Dannyboy just wants his post count to increase.
> Are you complaining that your post count is too low Dannyboy?
>
>>
>> Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
>> say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
>> eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
>> Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
>> shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
>
> So who do you worship? Jesus Christ or the Pope?
> And that is a mutually exclusive or.
>
>> --
>> Daniel
>
>
for the fellowship

Binky bleated:

> In article <t7n8q1$mkl$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 7/6/22 3:06 pm:
>>> In article <t7mi81$jmr$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>>> <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Said the fact hating lying MikeMcK!
>>>>
>>>> Which facts was he hating in that post? How was he lying in that
>>>> post?
>>>>
>>>> His post looks factual and truthful to me.
>>>
>>> Birdie, are you on drugs?
>>
>> Typical, clown .... rather than actually PROVING YOUR point, clown, YOU,
>> clown, just ABUSE, ABUSE, ABUSE anyone that dares to disagree with YOU,
>> clown!!
>>
>> Still, it gives YOU, clown, a much greater ability to increase YOUR
>> Precious Post Count, doesn't it, clown??
>

>
> SP looked as if he was high on something, Dannyboy!
>

Liar! You couldn’t even see me!

--
solar penguin

On 2022-06-07 7:16 a.m., solar penguin wrote:
>
> Binky bleated:
>
>> In article <t7n8q1$mkl$1@dont-email.me>,
>> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote on 7/6/22 3:06 pm:
>>>> In article <t7mi81$jmr$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>>>> <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Said the fact hating lying MikeMcK!
>>>>>
>>>>> Which facts was he hating in that post? How was he lying in that
>>>>> post?
>>>>>
>>>>> His post looks factual and truthful to me.
>>>>
>>>> Birdie, are you on drugs?
>>>
>>> Typical, clown .... rather than actually PROVING YOUR point, clown, YOU,
>>> clown, just ABUSE, ABUSE, ABUSE anyone that dares to disagree with YOU,
>>> clown!!
>>>
>>> Still, it gives YOU, clown, a much greater ability to increase YOUR
>>> Precious Post Count, doesn't it, clown??
>>
>
>>
>> SP looked as if he was high on something, Dannyboy!
>>
>
> Liar! You couldn’t even see me!
>
oh admit it you were wired right out of your head

Binky bleated:

> In article <t7nadf$lug$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> What I can’t believe is that he isn’t lying about some meaningful deep
>>> seated hate of his, like evolution or the Timeless Child. This time he’s
>>> hell bent on lying about “The Masque of Mandragora” containing a reference
>>> to sausages. Baffled.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah. It’s odd. Normally when he lies about some random
>> bit of dialogue, it’s in The Sensorites. I don’t know why
>> he’s switched it to ‘Masque’ this time.
>>
>
> What was in the Sensorites?
>

I’ll tell you what _wasn’t_ in The Sensorites. That’s the
important part. And everything you claimed was there,
wasn’t. None of it was. That’s because you were lying,
just like you’re lying about the sausages of Mandragora.

--
solar penguin

Binky bleated:

> In article <t7nngn$u30$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t7nadf$lug$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What I can’t believe is that he isn’t lying about some meaningful deep
>>>>> seated hate of his, like evolution or the Timeless Child. This time he’s
>>>>> hell bent on lying about “The Masque of Mandragora” containing a
>> reference
>>>>> to sausages. Baffled.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah. It’s odd. Normally when he lies about some random
>>>> bit of dialogue, it’s in The Sensorites. I don’t know why
>>>> he’s switched it to ‘Masque’ this time.
>>>>
>>>
>>> What was in the Sensorites?
>>>
>>
>> I’ll tell you what _wasn’t_ in The Sensorites. That’s the
>> important part. And everything you claimed was there,
>> wasn’t. None of it was. That’s because you were lying,
>> just like you’re lying about the sausages of Mandragora.
>>
>
> So when did the 4th Doctor say that?
>

When did he say what!?! You still haven’t told us what
he said!

--
solar penguin