On 22/12/2021 12:16 pm, Xeno wrote:
> On 22/12/21 11:00 am, Noddy wrote:
>> On 22/12/2021 10:24 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>
>>>>> maths was never noddy's forte. 400k klms a year is 11,111 klms a
>>>>> month,
>>>>> or 2,564 klms a week, or 365.30 klms a day. so traveling 365.30
>>>>> klms @
>>>>> an average (say) 60 klms an hour would take 6 hours out of his
>>>>> working
>>>>> day. so where/when did he work? he would have spent most of his day
>>>>> driving to jobs, which would be very unusual for someone who only
>>>>> advertises locally and would therefore be working locally. the
>>>>> pile just
>>>>> keeps getting bigger..
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>>>   Just in passing, how does 400k k`s over a three year period become
>>> 400k k`s a *year*??.
>>
>> A willingness to deliberately misquote in order to create a bullshit
>> argument would do it, but then that's Tom & Jerky's usual operating
>> procedure. This comment above seems to come from Felix, and it's most
>> likely a case of him being too fucking stupid to comprehend what's on
>> the screen right in front of him.
>>
> Hey Darren, as I pointed out, 400k kilometres in *3 years* is a huge
> stretch anyway. Still wondering (a) how your father needed to do so
> many kilometres whilst working local and (b) managed to get out of the
> driver's seat and find time to do some actual work on job sites. Most
> tradies I know do a max of 30-40k per year working *local*. As I said,
> your lies start the moment you start typing. Where do they end Darren?
> Do the lies ever end Darren?
>
>

the figures are for 400k in three years. I just wrote a year instead of
three years

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 22/12/2021 12:20 pm, alvey wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 11:00:22 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>
>> On 22/12/2021 10:24 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>
>>>>> maths was never noddy's forte. 400k klms a year is 11,111 klms a month,
>>>>> or 2,564 klms a week, or 365.30 klms a day. so traveling 365.30 klms @
>>>>> an average (say) 60 klms an hour would take 6 hours out of his working
>>>>> day. so where/when did he work? he would have spent most of his day
>>>>> driving to jobs, which would be very unusual for someone who only
>>>>> advertises locally and would therefore be working locally. the pile just
>>>>> keeps getting bigger..
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>>> Just in passing, how does 400k k`s over a three year period become 400k k`s a *year*??.
>> A willingness to deliberately misquote in order to create a bullshit
>> argument would do it, but then that's Tom & Jerky's usual operating
>> procedure. This comment above seems to come from Felix, and it's most
>> likely a case of him being too fucking stupid to comprehend what's on
>> the screen right in front of him.
> Nope. That'd be you and jonz who can't comprehend what's on the screen
> Fraudster. It's especially tragic for you two as one the internets Golden
> Rules is, 'If you are going to correct someone, make certain that your post
> is accurate'. The most important piece of felix's post is the bottom line,
> the figure which shows that your story is, apu, a lie. 365km a day, 365
> days a year is correct. You and your mate look like fools. Again.

or still..  :)

but important point you've highlighted. as you noted, the figures are
for 365 days a year. no one works every day. so allowing for weekends,
public holidays, holidays, time off sick, unforeseen circumstances,
attending funerals or weddings, etc., etc., the bottom line becomes even
worse for the king of coward castle.

> Fail.
>

indeed

>
> alvey
>

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 22/12/21 12:39 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 22/12/2021 12:16 pm, Xeno wrote:
>> On 22/12/21 11:00 am, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 22/12/2021 10:24 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> maths was never noddy's forte. 400k klms a year is 11,111 klms a
>>>>>> month,
>>>>>> or 2,564 klms a week, or 365.30 klms a day. so traveling 365.30
>>>>>> klms @
>>>>>> an average (say) 60 klms an hour would take 6 hours out of his
>>>>>> working
>>>>>> day. so where/when did he work? he would have spent most of his day
>>>>>> driving to jobs, which would be very unusual for someone who only
>>>>>> advertises locally and would therefore be working locally. the
>>>>>> pile just
>>>>>> keeps getting bigger..
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>
>>>>   Just in passing, how does 400k k`s over a three year period become
>>>> 400k k`s a *year*??.
>>>
>>> A willingness to deliberately misquote in order to create a bullshit
>>> argument would do it, but then that's Tom & Jerky's usual operating
>>> procedure. This comment above seems to come from Felix, and it's most
>>> likely a case of him being too fucking stupid to comprehend what's on
>>> the screen right in front of him.
>>>
>> Hey Darren, as I pointed out, 400k kilometres in *3 years* is a huge
>> stretch anyway. Still wondering (a) how your father needed to do so
>> many kilometres whilst working local and (b) managed to get out of the
>> driver's seat and find time to do some actual work on job sites. Most
>> tradies I know do a max of 30-40k per year working *local*. As I said,
>> your lies start the moment you start typing. Where do they end Darren?
>> Do the lies ever end Darren?
>>
>>
>
> the figures are for 400k in three years. I just wrote a year instead of
> three years
>
Yeah, I noticed that so didn't make an issue of it. As you say, your
*calcs* were correct based on 3 years. Typos are easy to make, do it
myself now and then too. But did you see the weird conclusion Daryl came
to when he stated *I* just proved Darren was qualified? HTF does he work
that out from what *I* wrote? Darren *isn't qualified*, of that I am
100% positive because there is no record of him either being in an
apprenticeship, any apprenticeship, ever, nor any trade qualification
records or numbers either at PROV or on the trade registration database.
Daryl can go verify the PROV records himself any time he likes. He will
find there exactly what I found, no record for Darren whatsoever. For
the record, Darren can not work on *any vehicle* that is under factory
warranty nor can he work on *any vehicle* that is under any sort of
lease arrangement. It's why he can't work on the Santa Fe his wife owns.
Sadly for Darren, I can legally work on his wife's Santa Fe with no
recriminations because I am *qualified* to do so, as is Clocky. Hmm,
Daryl could even service or repair the Santa Fe - but Darren, no way.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 22/12/2021 11:52 am, Daryl wrote:
> On 22/12/21 10:24 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Monday, 20 December 2021 at 15:17:38 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>>> On 20/12/21 11:00 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 20/12/2021 6:41 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 12:39:31 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> snip bullshit
>>>>>
>>>>>>    I can remember when I used to service my old man's work vans.
>>>>> snip more bullshit
>>>>>
>>>>>> This was on vans that would hit 400k km's over the course of a
>>>>>> 3 year lease before he would off-load it and move onto the next one.
>>>>> Couple of things here Fraudster.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. As an unqualified wannabee, you would have voided the warranty by
>>>>> servicing anything on a lease.
>>>>> 2. 400km over a three year lease for an owner operator who,
>>>>> according to
>>>>> you, only ever advertised in the local paper?(a)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> maths was never noddy's forte. 400k klms a year is 11,111 klms a
>>>> month,
>>>> or 2,564 klms a week, or 365.30 klms a day. so traveling 365.30 klms @
>>>> an average (say) 60 klms an hour would take 6 hours out of his working
>>>> day. so where/when did he work? he would have spent most of his day
>>>> driving to jobs, which would be very unusual for someone who only
>>>> advertises locally and would therefore be working locally. the pile
>>>> just
>>>> keeps getting bigger..
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>>   Just in passing, how does 400k k`s over a three year period become
>> 400k k`s a *year*??.
>
> LOL, maths is not Xeno's forte apparently:-)

err.. maybe a visit to your optometrist is warranted. I wrote it not
xeno. and maths is not your forte obviously, as the figures are correct.

> I think Xeno just proved that Noddy is qualified,

no

> he did service leased vehicles without causing warranty problems

he could still have serviced them knowing he would void the warranty
just to save costs. but how do you know he serviced them? we only have
his word on that. and we know what that's worth! and the amount of
traveling in the story is BS so probably the whole story is.

> therefore he must be qualified,

Oh, thank you so much for admitting that you, his best mate, don't even
know if he's qualified. ever thought of asking him, and seeing some
proof?  :)

> thanks Xeno for finally clearing that matter up and hopefully putting
> it to rest:-)

Xeno has done nothing of the sort, but thanks again for confirming that
you have seen no evidence noddy is a qualified mechanic. :)

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 22/12/21 1:01 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 22/12/2021 11:52 am, Daryl wrote:
>> On 22/12/21 10:24 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>> On Monday, 20 December 2021 at 15:17:38 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>>>> On 20/12/21 11:00 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 20/12/2021 6:41 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 12:39:31 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> snip bullshit
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    I can remember when I used to service my old man's work vans.
>>>>>> snip more bullshit
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This was on vans that would hit 400k km's over the course of a
>>>>>>> 3 year lease before he would off-load it and move onto the next one.
>>>>>> Couple of things here Fraudster.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. As an unqualified wannabee, you would have voided the warranty by
>>>>>> servicing anything on a lease.
>>>>>> 2. 400km over a three year lease for an owner operator who,
>>>>>> according to
>>>>>> you, only ever advertised in the local paper?(a)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> maths was never noddy's forte. 400k klms a year is 11,111 klms a
>>>>> month,
>>>>> or 2,564 klms a week, or 365.30 klms a day. so traveling 365.30 klms @
>>>>> an average (say) 60 klms an hour would take 6 hours out of his working
>>>>> day. so where/when did he work? he would have spent most of his day
>>>>> driving to jobs, which would be very unusual for someone who only
>>>>> advertises locally and would therefore be working locally. the pile
>>>>> just
>>>>> keeps getting bigger..
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>>>   Just in passing, how does 400k k`s over a three year period become
>>> 400k k`s a *year*??.
>>
>> LOL, maths is not Xeno's forte apparently:-)
>
>
> err.. maybe a visit to your optometrist is warranted. I wrote it not
> xeno. and maths is not your forte obviously, as the figures are correct.
>
>
>> I think Xeno just proved that Noddy is qualified,
>
>
> no
>
>
>> he did service leased vehicles without causing warranty problems
>
>
> he could still have serviced them knowing he would void the warranty
> just to save costs. but how do you know he serviced them? we only have
> his word on that. and we know what that's worth! and the amount of
> traveling in the story is BS so probably the whole story is.
>
>
>> therefore he must be qualified,
>
>
> Oh, thank you so much for admitting that you, his best mate, don't even
> know if he's qualified. ever thought of asking him, and seeing some
> proof?  :)
>
>
>> thanks Xeno for finally clearing that matter up and hopefully putting
>> it to rest:-)
>
>
> Xeno has done nothing of the sort, but thanks again for confirming that
> you have seen no evidence noddy is a qualified mechanic. :)
>
Yeah, dopey Daryl did indeed confirm that he had never seen hide nor
hair of anything resembling *qualifications* that Darren claims to
possess. It seems lost on these numbnuts that Daryl would have seen such
qualifications papers on Darren's desk - had they actually existed.
Remember, Darren said they were on the desk in his office. Well, at
least until I noted that *Daryl* had been in his office and not seen
them. Suddenly they were somewhere else. I know they don't exist and so
too, it would seem, does Daryl.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 11:23:39 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:
> On 22/12/2021 8:11 am, Noddy wrote:
> > On 22/12/2021 10:50 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 09:46:15 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:
> >
> >>>> I'll bet he *still* insists that Krypsis is a real person. I wonder
> >>>> what
> >>>> Jerky Birko thinks about that :)
> >>>>
> >>> A person so confident in his position would have the integrity to ask
> >>> such questions directly from whoever it is they are addressing them to
> >>> instead of using some gullible dimwit to ask questions by proxy and
> >>> snipe from behind a killfail.
> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> So speaketh ticcy. (Aka *runaway*)
> >> BTW, all my own work shitfer. (Btw #11) krypsis is in my K/F
> >> also. (along with alvira the mouth) any comment? <FBG>
> >
> > Interesting to note that
> Thanks for proving my point.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*POINT*? you?? proof req. or it never happened.
> I rest my case.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yep, you might as well, no point <grin> in carrying around all that nothingness...

On 22/12/2021 8:00 am, Noddy wrote:
> On 22/12/2021 10:24 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>
>>>> maths was never noddy's forte. 400k klms a year is 11,111 klms a month,
>>>> or 2,564 klms a week, or 365.30 klms a day. so traveling 365.30 klms @
>>>> an average (say) 60 klms an hour would take 6 hours out of his working
>>>> day. so where/when did he work? he would have spent most of his day
>>>> driving to jobs, which would be very unusual for someone who only
>>>> advertises locally and would therefore be working locally. the pile
>>>> just
>>>> keeps getting bigger..
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>>   Just in passing, how does 400k k`s over a three year period become
>> 400k k`s a *year*??.
>
> A willingness to deliberately misquote in order to create a bullshit
> argument would do it, but then that's Tom & Jerky's usual operating
> procedure.

Is that right Mr. "Appliance Salesman"?

This comment above seems to come from Felix, and it's most
> likely a case of him being too fucking stupid to comprehend what's on
> the screen right in front of him.
>

LOL, you pair of dumbarses :-)

On 22/12/2021 8:52 am, Daryl wrote:
> On 22/12/21 10:24 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Monday, 20 December 2021 at 15:17:38 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>>> On 20/12/21 11:00 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 20/12/2021 6:41 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 12:39:31 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> snip bullshit
>>>>>
>>>>>>    I can remember when I used to service my old man's work vans.
>>>>> snip more bullshit
>>>>>
>>>>>> This was on vans that would hit 400k km's over the course of a
>>>>>> 3 year lease before he would off-load it and move onto the next one.
>>>>> Couple of things here Fraudster.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. As an unqualified wannabee, you would have voided the warranty by
>>>>> servicing anything on a lease.
>>>>> 2. 400km over a three year lease for an owner operator who,
>>>>> according to
>>>>> you, only ever advertised in the local paper?(a)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> maths was never noddy's forte. 400k klms a year is 11,111 klms a month,
>>>> or 2,564 klms a week, or 365.30 klms a day. so traveling 365.30 klms @
>>>> an average (say) 60 klms an hour would take 6 hours out of his working
>>>> day. so where/when did he work? he would have spent most of his day
>>>> driving to jobs, which would be very unusual for someone who only
>>>> advertises locally and would therefore be working locally. the pile
>>>> just
>>>> keeps getting bigger..
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>>   Just in passing, how does 400k k`s over a three year period become
>> 400k k`s a *year*??.
>
> LOL, maths is not Xeno's forte apparently:-)

400,000km's over three years you simpleton. Work it out.
Oh wait, you're the guy who bet his retirement on a single contract
aren't you... LOL :-)

> I think Xeno just proved that Noddy is qualified, he did service leased
> vehicles without causing warranty problems

The only proof available shows he can't be qualified, something real
mechanics have always suspected over the years btw. Not you obviously,
but then you're a failed dunny cleaner.

therefore he must be
> qualified, thanks Xeno for finally clearing that matter up and hopefully
> putting it to rest:-)

The real world is not as easily convinced as a gullible fool like you
evidently is.

On 22/12/2021 12:34 pm, Xeno wrote:
> On 22/12/21 1:01 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 22/12/2021 11:52 am, Daryl wrote:
>>> On 22/12/21 10:24 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>> On Monday, 20 December 2021 at 15:17:38 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>>>>> On 20/12/21 11:00 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>> On 20/12/2021 6:41 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 12:39:31 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> snip bullshit
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    I can remember when I used to service my old man's work vans.
>>>>>>> snip more bullshit
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This was on vans that would hit 400k km's over the course of a
>>>>>>>> 3 year lease before he would off-load it and move onto the next
>>>>>>>> one.
>>>>>>> Couple of things here Fraudster.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. As an unqualified wannabee, you would have voided the warranty by
>>>>>>> servicing anything on a lease.
>>>>>>> 2. 400km over a three year lease for an owner operator who,
>>>>>>> according to
>>>>>>> you, only ever advertised in the local paper?(a)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> maths was never noddy's forte. 400k klms a year is 11,111 klms a
>>>>>> month,
>>>>>> or 2,564 klms a week, or 365.30 klms a day. so traveling 365.30
>>>>>> klms @
>>>>>> an average (say) 60 klms an hour would take 6 hours out of his
>>>>>> working
>>>>>> day. so where/when did he work? he would have spent most of his day
>>>>>> driving to jobs, which would be very unusual for someone who only
>>>>>> advertises locally and would therefore be working locally. the
>>>>>> pile just
>>>>>> keeps getting bigger..
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>
>>>>   Just in passing, how does 400k k`s over a three year period become
>>>> 400k k`s a *year*??.
>>>
>>> LOL, maths is not Xeno's forte apparently:-)
>>
>>
>> err.. maybe a visit to your optometrist is warranted. I wrote it not
>> xeno. and maths is not your forte obviously, as the figures are correct.
>>
>>
>>> I think Xeno just proved that Noddy is qualified,
>>
>>
>> no
>>
>>
>>> he did service leased vehicles without causing warranty problems
>>
>>
>> he could still have serviced them knowing he would void the warranty
>> just to save costs. but how do you know he serviced them? we only have
>> his word on that. and we know what that's worth! and the amount of
>> traveling in the story is BS so probably the whole story is.
>>
>>
>>> therefore he must be qualified,
>>
>>
>> Oh, thank you so much for admitting that you, his best mate, don't
>> even know if he's qualified. ever thought of asking him, and seeing
>> some proof?  :)
>>
>>
>>> thanks Xeno for finally clearing that matter up and hopefully putting
>>> it to rest:-)
>>
>>
>> Xeno has done nothing of the sort, but thanks again for confirming
>> that you have seen no evidence noddy is a qualified mechanic. :)
>>
> Yeah, dopey Daryl did indeed confirm that he had never seen hide nor
> hair of anything resembling *qualifications* that Darren claims to
> possess. It seems lost on these numbnuts that Daryl would have seen such
> qualifications papers on Darren's desk - had they actually existed.
> Remember, Darren said they were on the desk in his office. Well, at
> least until I noted that *Daryl* had been in his office and not seen
> them. Suddenly they were somewhere else. I know they don't exist and so
> too, it would seem, does Daryl.
>
>

Of course they don't exist. Derro's whole life is a lie... one
fabrication after the other. No proof of any of his claims exist
anywhere... yet the FLCJC still believe him.

They're like anti-vaxxers and flat earth supporters... not a braincell
between them.

On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 11:52:52 +1100, Daryl wrote:

> On 22/12/21 10:24 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Monday, 20 December 2021 at 15:17:38 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>>> On 20/12/21 11:00 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 20/12/2021 6:41 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 12:39:31 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> snip bullshit
>>>>>
>>>>>> I can remember when I used to service my old man's work vans.
>>>>> snip more bullshit
>>>>>
>>>>>> This was on vans that would hit 400k km's over the course of a
>>>>>> 3 year lease before he would off-load it and move onto the next one.
>>>>> Couple of things here Fraudster.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. As an unqualified wannabee, you would have voided the warranty by
>>>>> servicing anything on a lease.
>>>>> 2. 400km over a three year lease for an owner operator who, according to
>>>>> you, only ever advertised in the local paper?(a)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> maths was never noddy's forte. 400k klms a year is 11,111 klms a month,
>>>> or 2,564 klms a week, or 365.30 klms a day. so traveling 365.30 klms @
>>>> an average (say) 60 klms an hour would take 6 hours out of his working
>>>> day. so where/when did he work? he would have spent most of his day
>>>> driving to jobs, which would be very unusual for someone who only
>>>> advertises locally and would therefore be working locally. the pile just
>>>> keeps getting bigger..
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> Just in passing, how does 400k k`s over a three year period become 400k k`s a *year*??.
>
> LOL, maths is not Xeno's forte apparently:-)
> I think Xeno just proved that Noddy is qualified, he did service leased
> vehicles without causing warranty problems therefore he must be
> qualified, thanks Xeno for finally clearing that matter up and hopefully
> putting it to rest:-)

Gawd. I don't like calling people 'stupid' etc, but when you see what Deryl
thinks then it's impossible to *not* call him an idiot of the highest
quality.

Deryl, you are assuming that the Fraudster is telling the truth.
Unfortunately for you, there is such a vast catalogue of instances where he
unarguably *hasn't* that it is impossible to argue against the opinion that
he is a compulsive, and repulsive, liar.

alvey
ps. Have you seen his fabled Grange collection *yet*?

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 22/12/2021 5:12 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 11:23:39 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:

>>> Interesting to note that
>> Thanks for proving my point.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> *POINT*? you?? proof req. or it never happened.
>> I rest my case.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Yep, you might as well, no point <grin> in carrying around all that nothingness...

And despite all the noise he made, he *still* avoided answering any
questions.

Which tells anyone all they need to know, really :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 12:04:35 UTC+11, alvey wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 11:11:03 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>
> > On 22/12/2021 10:50 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 09:46:15 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:
> >
> >>>> I'll bet he *still* insists that Krypsis is a real person. I wonder what
> >>>> Jerky Birko thinks about that :)
> >>>>
> >>> A person so confident in his position would have the integrity to ask
> >>> such questions directly from whoever it is they are addressing them to
> >>> instead of using some gullible dimwit to ask questions by proxy and
> >>> snipe from behind a killfail.
> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> So speaketh ticcy. (Aka *runaway*)
> >> BTW, all my own work shitfer. (Btw #11) krypsis is in my K/F also. (along with alvira the mouth) any comment? <FBG>
> >
> > Interesting to note that while I wasn't actually asking him a question
> > in this particular case,
> ***EVERYONE*** knows that your English is comprehensively sub-par Fraudster
> but when you write, "I wonder what Jerky Birko thinks about that", and then
> subsequently blurt, "... while I wasn't actually asking him a question in
> this particular case...", well, you look even more buffoonish than usual.
> No mean feat that.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It`s known as 'musing' you cretinous clown..

> > Jerky Birko decided to give an answer anyway
> > and in doing so completely avoided answering the question that he
> > *thought* he was being asked.
> LOL! And now the Buffo level goes off the scale!
> Jaysus Fraudster! You've got a 100% Fail rate for answering tricky
> questions.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`~~
Easy when one has not been asked any.

No-one in their right mind, or even having a minute grasp on
> reality, would answer any serious question from you until you stump up with
> the Biggies that you've failed for years to answer.
>
> Some facts: You are a liar, fraud, hypocrite and coward Gibbens.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yap, yap, yap, yap, yap. Forever yapping the yap.
someone feed this yappy mutt a bait. ASAP.

>
>
> alvey
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 22/12/2021 12:37 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 22/12/2021 11:00 am, Noddy wrote:
>> On 22/12/2021 10:24 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>
>>>>> maths was never noddy's forte. 400k klms a year is 11,111 klms a
>>>>> month,
>>>>> or 2,564 klms a week, or 365.30 klms a day. so traveling 365.30 klms @
>>>>> an average (say) 60 klms an hour would take 6 hours out of his working
>>>>> day. so where/when did he work? he would have spent most of his day
>>>>> driving to jobs, which would be very unusual for someone who only
>>>>> advertises locally and would therefore be working locally. the pile
>>>>> just
>>>>> keeps getting bigger..
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>>>   Just in passing, how does 400k k`s over a three year period become
>>> 400k k`s a *year*??.
>>
>> A willingness to deliberately misquote in order to create a bullshit
>> argument
>
>
> err.. that would be you who does that numbnuts. for me it was just a
> typo.

"just a typo" Bwahahahahahahahahahha Do you really expect people to
believe this as a "typo", Spazpecker? Even your fellow members of the FLC?

Try again, FLC banner carrier. A "typo" is a misspelt word.
However, a felix fuck-up, is you not reading what's put in front of you,
" 3 year lease" , and putting your own wishful thinking on it. Hoping
you'd get support for trying to look intelligent. Except, you've fucked
up, and failed, yet again, one wing man.

****************************************************************

Noddy: "on vans that would hit 400k km's over the course of a 3 year
lease..." 19/12/21

Felix, aka Spazpecker the Dull: "maths was never noddy's forte. 400k
klms a year is 11,111 klms a month,...." But it's a "typo",
apparently..... :-)

*****************************************************************

You silly old dumb spineless cunt, one wing man... and you even need to
*lie* about it. Gee, what quality membership the FLC has. What, with
you, and Tommy's recent attempt to explain how usenet works, and in
particular, access to newsgroups, which was so funny, as he's fucked up
previously on the subject. Multiple times.

> no comment from you tho about the absurdity of your claim I see.
> (as proved by the maths)

Which maths would they be? The ones you supplied that shows " the
absurdity of your claim"? :-D

>> would do it, but then that's Tom & Jerky's usual operating procedure.
>> This comment above seems to come from Felix,
>
>
> so you're not smart enough to read the thread and see who wrote it?

You're *obviously* not smart enough to read *who said what*, and absorb
the big words like *3 year lease*, and make a fool of yourself, yet
again, coattailer.
>
>
>> and it's most likely a case of him being too fucking stupid to
>> comprehend what's on the screen right in front of him.
>>
>
> you mean like you not being able to see who wrote something?

No, like you being unable to comprehend what's put in front of you,
spazpecker. You just proved it, yet *again* . And tried to call your
fuck up a 'typo".... Bwahahahahahahahahahaha

On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 12:37:21 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 22/12/2021 11:00 am, Noddy wrote:
> > On 22/12/2021 10:24 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> >
> >>>> maths was never noddy's forte. 400k klms a year is 11,111 klms a
> >>>> month,
> >>>> or 2,564 klms a week, or 365.30 klms a day. so traveling 365.30 klms @
> >>>> an average (say) 60 klms an hour would take 6 hours out of his working
> >>>> day. so where/when did he work? he would have spent most of his day
> >>>> driving to jobs, which would be very unusual for someone who only
> >>>> advertises locally and would therefore be working locally. the pile
> >>>> just
> >>>> keeps getting bigger..
> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>
> >> Just in passing, how does 400k k`s over a three year period become
> >> 400k k`s a *year*??.
> >
> > A willingness to deliberately misquote in order to create a bullshit
> > argument
> err.. that would be you who does that numbnuts. for me it was just a
> typo. no comment from you tho about the absurdity of your claim I see.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*Just in passing* you fuckin' flop......Jeez, unplug the fuckin' ventilator.
> (as proved by the maths)
> > would do it, but then that's Tom & Jerky's usual operating procedure.
> > This comment above seems to come from Felix,
> so you're not smart enough to read the thread and see who wrote it?
> > and it's most likely a case of him being too fucking stupid to
> > comprehend what's on the screen right in front of him.
> >
> you mean like you not being able to see who wrote something?
> --
> "his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
> the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 22/12/2021 6:23 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 12:04:35 UTC+11, alvey wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 11:11:03 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>
>>> On 22/12/2021 10:50 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 09:46:15 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>> I'll bet he *still* insists that Krypsis is a real person. I wonder what
>>>>>> Jerky Birko thinks about that :)
>>>>>>
>>>>> A person so confident in his position would have the integrity to ask
>>>>> such questions directly from whoever it is they are addressing them to
>>>>> instead of using some gullible dimwit to ask questions by proxy and
>>>>> snipe from behind a killfail.
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>> So speaketh ticcy. (Aka *runaway*)
>>>> BTW, all my own work shitfer. (Btw #11) krypsis is in my K/F also. (along with alvira the mouth) any comment? <FBG>
>>> Interesting to note that while I wasn't actually asking him a question
>>> in this particular case,
>> ***EVERYONE*** knows that your English is comprehensively sub-par Fraudster
>> but when you write, "I wonder what Jerky Birko thinks about that", and then
>> subsequently blurt, "... while I wasn't actually asking him a question in
>> this particular case...", well, you look even more buffoonish than usual.
>> No mean feat that.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> It`s known as 'musing' you cretinous clown..
>
>>> Jerky Birko decided to give an answer anyway
>>> and in doing so completely avoided answering the question that he
>>> *thought* he was being asked.
>> LOL! And now the Buffo level goes off the scale!
>> Jaysus Fraudster! You've got a 100% Fail rate for answering tricky
>> questions.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`~~
> Easy when one has not been asked any.
>
> No-one in their right mind, or even having a minute grasp on
>> reality, would answer any serious question from you until you stump up with
>> the Biggies that you've failed for years to answer.
>>
>> Some facts: You are a liar, fraud, hypocrite and coward Gibbens.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Yap, yap, yap, yap, yap. Forever yapping the yap.
> someone feed this yappy mutt a bait. ASAP.

just facts ol'boy. but noted you're happy to support a 'liar, fraud,
hypocrite and coward'. what does that make you then?

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 22/12/2021 6:30 pm, lindsay wrote:
> On 22/12/2021 12:37 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 22/12/2021 11:00 am, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 22/12/2021 10:24 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> maths was never noddy's forte. 400k klms a year is 11,111 klms a
>>>>>> month,
>>>>>> or 2,564 klms a week, or 365.30 klms a day. so traveling 365.30
>>>>>> klms @
>>>>>> an average (say) 60 klms an hour would take 6 hours out of his
>>>>>> working
>>>>>> day. so where/when did he work? he would have spent most of his day
>>>>>> driving to jobs, which would be very unusual for someone who only
>>>>>> advertises locally and would therefore be working locally. the
>>>>>> pile just
>>>>>> keeps getting bigger..
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>
>>>>   Just in passing, how does 400k k`s over a three year period
>>>> become 400k k`s a *year*??.
>>>
>>> A willingness to deliberately misquote in order to create a bullshit
>>> argument
>>
>>
>> err.. that would be you who does that numbnuts. for me it was just a
>> typo.
>
> "just a typo" Bwahahahahahahahahahha Do you really expect people to
> believe this as a "typo", Spazpecker? Even your fellow members of the
> FLC?
>
> Try again, FLC banner carrier. A "typo" is a misspelt word.
> However, a felix fuck-up, is you not reading what's put in front of
> you, " 3 year lease" , and putting your own wishful thinking on it.
> Hoping you'd get support for trying to look intelligent. Except,
> you've fucked up, and failed, yet again, one wing man.
>
> ****************************************************************
>
> Noddy: "on vans that would hit 400k km's over the course of a 3 year
> lease..." 19/12/21
>
> Felix, aka Spazpecker the Dull: "maths was never noddy's forte. 400k
> klms a year is 11,111 klms a month,...." But it's a "typo",
> apparently..... :-)
>
> *****************************************************************
>
> You silly old dumb spineless cunt, one wing man... and you even need
> to *lie* about it. Gee, what quality membership the FLC has. What,
> with you, and Tommy's recent attempt to explain how usenet works, and
> in particular, access to newsgroups, which was so funny, as he's
> fucked up previously on the subject. Multiple times.
>
>> no comment from you tho about the absurdity of your claim I see. (as
>> proved by the maths)
>
> Which maths would they be? The ones you supplied that shows " the
> absurdity of your claim"? :-D
>
>>> would do it, but then that's Tom & Jerky's usual operating
>>> procedure. This comment above seems to come from Felix,
>>
>>
>> so you're not smart enough to read the thread and see who wrote it?
>
> You're *obviously* not smart enough to read *who said what*, and
> absorb the big words like *3 year lease*, and make a fool of yourself,
> yet again, coattailer.
>>
>>
>>> and it's most likely a case of him being too fucking stupid to
>>> comprehend what's on the screen right in front of him.
>>>
>>
>> you mean like you not being able to see who wrote something?
>
> No, like you being unable to comprehend what's put in front of you,
> spazpecker. You just proved it, yet *again* . And tried to call your
> fuck up a 'typo".... Bwahahahahahahahahahaha
>
>

seek help sicko. a worthless post from a low life weirdo. the figures
apply to a three year lease dumbass. the fact that I typed 'a year'
instead of 'a three year lease' is irrelevant to the outcome, as any
sane person could see. and nothing to say about your mate lying I see,
as the figures prove. crawl back under yer rock with all the other slimy
creatures.

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 22/12/2021 6:49 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 12:37:21 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 22/12/2021 11:00 am, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 22/12/2021 10:24 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> maths was never noddy's forte. 400k klms a year is 11,111 klms a
>>>>>> month,
>>>>>> or 2,564 klms a week, or 365.30 klms a day. so traveling 365.30 klms @
>>>>>> an average (say) 60 klms an hour would take 6 hours out of his working
>>>>>> day. so where/when did he work? he would have spent most of his day
>>>>>> driving to jobs, which would be very unusual for someone who only
>>>>>> advertises locally and would therefore be working locally. the pile
>>>>>> just
>>>>>> keeps getting bigger..
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>
>>>> Just in passing, how does 400k k`s over a three year period become
>>>> 400k k`s a *year*??.
>>> A willingness to deliberately misquote in order to create a bullshit
>>> argument
>> err.. that would be you who does that numbnuts. for me it was just a
>> typo. no comment from you tho about the absurdity of your claim I see.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> *Just in passing* you fuckin' flop......Jeez, unplug the fuckin' ventilator.

oh, did you have something to say barrel guts? I missed it while
sensible ppl were talking..

>> (as proved by the maths)
>>> would do it, but then that's Tom & Jerky's usual operating procedure.
>>> This comment above seems to come from Felix,
>> so you're not smart enough to read the thread and see who wrote it?
>>> and it's most likely a case of him being too fucking stupid to
>>> comprehend what's on the screen right in front of him.
>>>
>> you mean like you not being able to see who wrote something?
>> --
>>

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 22/12/2021 8:59 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 22/12/2021 6:30 pm, lindsay wrote:
>> On 22/12/2021 12:37 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 22/12/2021 11:00 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>> On 22/12/2021 10:24 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> maths was never noddy's forte. 400k klms a year is 11,111 klms a
>>>>>>> month,
>>>>>>> or 2,564 klms a week, or 365.30 klms a day. so traveling 365.30
>>>>>>> klms @
>>>>>>> an average (say) 60 klms an hour would take 6 hours out of his
>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>> day. so where/when did he work? he would have spent most of his day
>>>>>>> driving to jobs, which would be very unusual for someone who only
>>>>>>> advertises locally and would therefore be working locally. the
>>>>>>> pile just
>>>>>>> keeps getting bigger..
>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>
>>>>>   Just in passing, how does 400k k`s over a three year period
>>>>> become 400k k`s a *year*??.
>>>>
>>>> A willingness to deliberately misquote in order to create a bullshit
>>>> argument
>>>
>>>
>>> err.. that would be you who does that numbnuts. for me it was just a
>>> typo.
>>
>> "just a typo" Bwahahahahahahahahahha Do you really expect people to
>> believe this as a "typo", Spazpecker? Even your fellow members of the
>> FLC?
>>
>> Try again, FLC banner carrier. A "typo" is a misspelt word.
>> However, a felix fuck-up, is you not reading what's put in front of
>> you, " 3 year lease" , and putting your own wishful thinking on it.
>> Hoping you'd get support for trying to look intelligent. Except,
>> you've fucked up, and failed, yet again, one wing man.
>>
>> ****************************************************************
>>
>> Noddy: "on vans that would hit 400k km's over the course of a 3 year
>> lease..." 19/12/21
>>
>> Felix, aka Spazpecker the Dull: "maths was never noddy's forte. 400k
>> klms a year is 11,111 klms a month,...." But it's a "typo",
>> apparently..... :-)
>>
>> *****************************************************************
>>
>> You silly old dumb spineless cunt, one wing man... and you even need
>> to *lie* about it. Gee, what quality membership the FLC has. What,
>> with you, and Tommy's recent attempt to explain how usenet works, and
>> in particular, access to newsgroups, which was so funny, as he's
>> fucked up previously on the subject. Multiple times.
>>
>>> no comment from you tho about the absurdity of your claim I see. (as
>>> proved by the maths)
>>
>> Which maths would they be? The ones you supplied that shows " the
>> absurdity of your claim"? :-D
>>
>>>> would do it, but then that's Tom & Jerky's usual operating
>>>> procedure. This comment above seems to come from Felix,
>>>
>>>
>>> so you're not smart enough to read the thread and see who wrote it?
>>
>> You're *obviously* not smart enough to read *who said what*, and
>> absorb the big words like *3 year lease*, and make a fool of yourself,
>> yet again, coattailer.
>>>
>>>
>>>> and it's most likely a case of him being too fucking stupid to
>>>> comprehend what's on the screen right in front of him.
>>>>
>>>
>>> you mean like you not being able to see who wrote something?
>>
>> No, like you being unable to comprehend what's put in front of you,
>> spazpecker. You just proved it, yet *again* . And tried to call your
>> fuck up a 'typo".... Bwahahahahahahahahahaha
>>
>>
>
> seek help sicko. a worthless post from a low life weirdo. the figures
> apply to a three year lease dumbass.

The figures aren't in question, the time frame you posted was, dumb cunt.

the fact that I typed 'a year'
> instead of 'a three year lease' is irrelevant to the outcome,

yeah, because "it's a "typo"... Excuses, excuses Fetid. As usual.
Hahahahahaha Cant admit you fucked up, just like your one wing plane,
your evap air cooling, your CD-R expose, your 95 mph in 2nd gear....

as any
> sane person could see. and nothing to say about your mate lying I see,
> as the figures prove. crawl back under yer rock with all the other slimy
> creatures.

At least I've ascertained i'm not in your flakey (just like you) seine
net killfile, Biggles. This week. Yet.

>
>

On 22/12/2021 5:59 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 22/12/2021 6:30 pm, lindsay wrote:
>> On 22/12/2021 12:37 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 22/12/2021 11:00 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>> On 22/12/2021 10:24 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> maths was never noddy's forte. 400k klms a year is 11,111 klms a
>>>>>>> month,
>>>>>>> or 2,564 klms a week, or 365.30 klms a day. so traveling 365.30
>>>>>>> klms @
>>>>>>> an average (say) 60 klms an hour would take 6 hours out of his
>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>> day. so where/when did he work? he would have spent most of his day
>>>>>>> driving to jobs, which would be very unusual for someone who only
>>>>>>> advertises locally and would therefore be working locally. the
>>>>>>> pile just
>>>>>>> keeps getting bigger..
>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>
>>>>>   Just in passing, how does 400k k`s over a three year period
>>>>> become 400k k`s a *year*??.
>>>>
>>>> A willingness to deliberately misquote in order to create a bullshit
>>>> argument
>>>
>>>
>>> err.. that would be you who does that numbnuts. for me it was just a
>>> typo.
>>
>> "just a typo" Bwahahahahahahahahahha Do you really expect people to
>> believe this as a "typo", Spazpecker? Even your fellow members of the
>> FLC?
>>
>> Try again, FLC banner carrier. A "typo" is a misspelt word.
>> However, a felix fuck-up, is you not reading what's put in front of
>> you, " 3 year lease" , and putting your own wishful thinking on it.
>> Hoping you'd get support for trying to look intelligent. Except,
>> you've fucked up, and failed, yet again, one wing man.
>>
>> ****************************************************************
>>
>> Noddy: "on vans that would hit 400k km's over the course of a 3 year
>> lease..." 19/12/21
>>
>> Felix, aka Spazpecker the Dull: "maths was never noddy's forte. 400k
>> klms a year is 11,111 klms a month,...." But it's a "typo",
>> apparently..... :-)
>>
>> *****************************************************************
>>
>> You silly old dumb spineless cunt, one wing man... and you even need
>> to *lie* about it. Gee, what quality membership the FLC has. What,
>> with you, and Tommy's recent attempt to explain how usenet works, and
>> in particular, access to newsgroups, which was so funny, as he's
>> fucked up previously on the subject. Multiple times.
>>
>>> no comment from you tho about the absurdity of your claim I see. (as
>>> proved by the maths)
>>
>> Which maths would they be? The ones you supplied that shows " the
>> absurdity of your claim"? :-D
>>
>>>> would do it, but then that's Tom & Jerky's usual operating
>>>> procedure. This comment above seems to come from Felix,
>>>
>>>
>>> so you're not smart enough to read the thread and see who wrote it?
>>
>> You're *obviously* not smart enough to read *who said what*, and
>> absorb the big words like *3 year lease*, and make a fool of yourself,
>> yet again, coattailer.
>>>
>>>
>>>> and it's most likely a case of him being too fucking stupid to
>>>> comprehend what's on the screen right in front of him.
>>>>
>>>
>>> you mean like you not being able to see who wrote something?
>>
>> No, like you being unable to comprehend what's put in front of you,
>> spazpecker. You just proved it, yet *again* . And tried to call your
>> fuck up a 'typo".... Bwahahahahahahahahahaha
>>
>>
>
> seek help sicko. a worthless post from a low life weirdo. the figures
> apply to a three year lease dumbass. the fact that I typed 'a year'
> instead of 'a three year lease' is irrelevant to the outcome, as any
> sane person could see.

LOL, indeed. What a bunch of fucking desperate numpties the FLCJC are.

and nothing to say about your mate lying I see,
> as the figures prove. crawl back under yer rock with all the other slimy
> creatures.
>
>

On 22/12/2021 11:32 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 22/12/2021 5:59 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 22/12/2021 6:30 pm, lindsay wrote:
>>> On 22/12/2021 12:37 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 22/12/2021 11:00 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>> On 22/12/2021 10:24 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> maths was never noddy's forte. 400k klms a year is 11,111 klms a
>>>>>>>> month,
>>>>>>>> or 2,564 klms a week, or 365.30 klms a day. so traveling 365.30
>>>>>>>> klms @
>>>>>>>> an average (say) 60 klms an hour would take 6 hours out of his
>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>> day. so where/when did he work? he would have spent most of his day
>>>>>>>> driving to jobs, which would be very unusual for someone who only
>>>>>>>> advertises locally and would therefore be working locally. the
>>>>>>>> pile just
>>>>>>>> keeps getting bigger..
>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Just in passing, how does 400k k`s over a three year period
>>>>>> become 400k k`s a *year*??.
>>>>>
>>>>> A willingness to deliberately misquote in order to create a
>>>>> bullshit argument
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> err.. that would be you who does that numbnuts. for me it was just a
>>>> typo.
>>>
>>> "just a typo" Bwahahahahahahahahahha Do you really expect people to
>>> believe this as a "typo", Spazpecker? Even your fellow members of the
>>> FLC?
>>>
>>> Try again, FLC banner carrier. A "typo" is a misspelt word.
>>> However, a felix fuck-up, is you not reading what's put in front of
>>> you, " 3 year lease" , and putting your own wishful thinking on it.
>>> Hoping you'd get support for trying to look intelligent. Except,
>>> you've fucked up, and failed, yet again, one wing man.
>>>
>>> ****************************************************************
>>>
>>> Noddy: "on vans that would hit 400k km's over the course of a 3 year
>>> lease..." 19/12/21
>>>
>>> Felix, aka Spazpecker the Dull: "maths was never noddy's forte. 400k
>>> klms a year is 11,111 klms a month,...." But it's a "typo",
>>> apparently..... :-)
>>>
>>> *****************************************************************
>>>
>>> You silly old dumb spineless cunt, one wing man... and you even need
>>> to *lie* about it. Gee, what quality membership the FLC has. What,
>>> with you, and Tommy's recent attempt to explain how usenet works, and
>>> in particular, access to newsgroups, which was so funny, as he's
>>> fucked up previously on the subject. Multiple times.
>>>
>>>> no comment from you tho about the absurdity of your claim I see. (as
>>>> proved by the maths)
>>>
>>> Which maths would they be? The ones you supplied that shows " the
>>> absurdity of your claim"? :-D
>>>
>>>>> would do it, but then that's Tom & Jerky's usual operating
>>>>> procedure. This comment above seems to come from Felix,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> so you're not smart enough to read the thread and see who wrote it?
>>>
>>> You're *obviously* not smart enough to read *who said what*, and
>>> absorb the big words like *3 year lease*, and make a fool of
>>> yourself, yet again, coattailer.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> and it's most likely a case of him being too fucking stupid to
>>>>> comprehend what's on the screen right in front of him.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> you mean like you not being able to see who wrote something?
>>>
>>> No, like you being unable to comprehend what's put in front of you,
>>> spazpecker. You just proved it, yet *again* . And tried to call your
>>> fuck up a 'typo".... Bwahahahahahahahahahaha
>>>
>>>
>>
>> seek help sicko. a worthless post from a low life weirdo. the figures
>> apply to a three year lease dumbass. the fact that I typed 'a year'
>> instead of 'a three year lease' is irrelevant to the outcome, as any
>> sane person could see.
>
> LOL, indeed. What a bunch of fucking desperate numpties the FLCJC are.

Gee, imagine aligning yourself with Felix and Tomas! Still, when the FLC
have nothing else...

> and nothing to say about your mate lying I see,
>> as the figures prove. crawl back under yer rock with all the other
>> slimy creatures.
>>
>>
>
>

On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 18:30:14 +1100, lindsay wrote:

> On 22/12/2021 12:37 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 22/12/2021 11:00 am, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 22/12/2021 10:24 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> maths was never noddy's forte. 400k klms a year is 11,111 klms a
>>>>>> month,
>>>>>> or 2,564 klms a week, or 365.30 klms a day. so traveling 365.30 klms @
>>>>>> an average (say) 60 klms an hour would take 6 hours out of his working
>>>>>> day. so where/when did he work? he would have spent most of his day
>>>>>> driving to jobs, which would be very unusual for someone who only
>>>>>> advertises locally and would therefore be working locally. the pile
>>>>>> just
>>>>>> keeps getting bigger..
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>
>>>>   Just in passing, how does 400k k`s over a three year period become
>>>> 400k k`s a *year*??.
>>>
>>> A willingness to deliberately misquote in order to create a bullshit
>>> argument
>>
>> err.. that would be you who does that numbnuts. for me it was just a
>> typo.
>
> "just a typo" Bwahahahahahahahahahha Do you really expect people to
> believe this as a "typo", Spazpecker? Even your fellow members of the FLC?
>
> Try again, FLC banner carrier. A "typo" is a misspelt word.
> However, a felix fuck-up, is you not reading what's put in front of you,
> " 3 year lease" , and putting your own wishful thinking on it. Hoping
> you'd get support for trying to look intelligent. Except, you've fucked
> up, and failed, yet again, one wing man.
>
> ****************************************************************
>
> Noddy: "on vans that would hit 400k km's over the course of a 3 year
> lease..." 19/12/21
>
> Felix, aka Spazpecker the Dull: "maths was never noddy's forte. 400k
> klms a year is 11,111 klms a month,...." But it's a "typo",
> apparently..... :-)
>
> *****************************************************************
>
> You silly old dumb spineless cunt, one wing man... and you even need to
> *lie* about it. Gee, what quality membership the FLC has. What, with
> you, and Tommy's recent attempt to explain how usenet works, and in
> particular, access to newsgroups, which was so funny, as he's fucked up
> previously on the subject. Multiple times.
>
>> no comment from you tho about the absurdity of your claim I see.
>> (as proved by the maths)
>
> Which maths would they be? The ones you supplied that shows " the
> absurdity of your claim"? :-D
>
>>> would do it, but then that's Tom & Jerky's usual operating procedure.
>>> This comment above seems to come from Felix,
>>
>> so you're not smart enough to read the thread and see who wrote it?
>
> You're *obviously* not smart enough to read *who said what*, and absorb
> the big words like *3 year lease*, and make a fool of yourself, yet
> again, coattailer.
>>
>>> and it's most likely a case of him being too fucking stupid to
>>> comprehend what's on the screen right in front of him.
>>>
>>
>> you mean like you not being able to see who wrote something?
>
> No, like you being unable to comprehend what's put in front of you,
> spazpecker. You just proved it, yet *again* . And tried to call your
> fuck up a 'typo".... Bwahahahahahahahahahaha

lol!

Loons works himself into a throbbing vein genre lather over a typo, but not
a single word on the *fact* that his wretched little crony was caught out
in a(nother) lie.

These people are a serial dills.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 23:29:39 +1100, lindsay wrote:

> On 22/12/2021 8:59 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:

>>
>> seek help sicko. a worthless post from a low life weirdo. the figures
>> apply to a three year lease dumbass.
>
> The figures aren't in question,

So the Fraudster is a liar?

a. Yes
b. No
c. I refuse to answer on the grounds that responding with either a *or* b
will continue to make me look like a loon.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 23:47:10 +1100, lindsay wrote:

> On 22/12/2021 11:32 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>
>> LOL, indeed. What a bunch of fucking desperate numpties the FLCJC are.
>
> Gee, imagine aligning yourself with Felix and Tomas! Still, when the FLC
> have nothing else...

Ummm. You've just conceded that Der Der is a liar, and you're also
"aligned" with jonz (currently) and Gumps. Time to put down the stones and
call the glazier champ.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 23:23:04 -0800 (PST), jonz@ nothere.com wrote:

> On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 12:04:35 UTC+11, alvey wrote:

Shades of Darren!
At 09:50 on 22Dec Mr jonz slowly pecked out, "BTW, all my own work shitfer.
(Btw #11) krypsis is in my K/F also. (along with alvira the mouth) any
comment? <FBG>"
Yet at 17:23 on the same day Mr jonz replied *directly* to a post of mine.

Maybe it's a cry for help?

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 22/12/2021 11:29 pm, lindsay wrote:
> On 22/12/2021 8:59 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:

>> sane person could see. and nothing to say about your mate lying I see,
>> as the figures prove. crawl back under yer rock with all the other
>> slimy creatures.
>
> At least I've ascertained i'm not in your flakey (just like you) seine
> net killfile, Biggles. This week. Yet.

Wait until you *really* piss him off. Then he'll call you a pedophile,
run away and block you, and then bitch to everyone that you're too
gutless to talk to him.

Not a smart man, but then you can't expect much from a moron who reckons
he can pick a difference in picture quality when using different AV
cables but *can't* pick the difference between a gane generated truck
and a real one, or pick a fake video of a plane flying with one wing
completely missing :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.