On 21/12/21 10:32 am, Clocky wrote:
> On 20/12/2021 10:25 am, Noddy wrote:
>> On 20/12/2021 12:53 pm, Daryl wrote:
>>> On 20/12/21 11:17 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>
>>>>   *Insider?* cunt has *never* been one.!
>>>
>>> Never seen any evidence that showed Xeno has any qualifications.
>>
>> Me either, but apparently it's "proved" though. Just like all his
>> claims about me being "proved" yet no one has ever seen any of that
>> proof :)
>>
>>> Just another theory laden chalky.
>>>
>>> Very little hands experience that's for sure.
>>
>> Combined with zero ability.
>>
>> This is a bloke who reckons he had 8 jobs in 6 years as his
>> "journeyman" period, which is a really cool way of saying that he was
>> *so* incompetent that he couldn't hold a job down long enough to know
>> where the toilets and lunchroom were.
>>
>> A *perfect* teacher in fact. Big on theory, but utterly fucking
>> hopeless when it came to practical effort.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> Really, so how is it that you're never been employed in the trade by
> anyone for any length of time? Fucking around in your home sheltered
> garage doesn't count and that's all you have ever done.
>
>
I managed to complete a 5 year apprenticeship. That, in and of itself,
says a lot. Darren didn't even get signed up to one.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 21/12/21 10:33 am, Clocky wrote:
> On 20/12/2021 8:06 pm, Xeno wrote:
>> On 20/12/21 1:25 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 20/12/2021 12:53 pm, Daryl wrote:
>>>> On 20/12/21 11:17 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>
>>>>>   *Insider?* cunt has *never* been one.!
>>>>
>>>> Never seen any evidence that showed Xeno has any qualifications.
>>>
>>> Me either, but apparently it's "proved" though. Just like all his
>>> claims about me being "proved" yet no one has ever seen any of that
>>> proof :)
>>
>> Certainly has and you *proved* why it was never put into your hot
>> little hands.
>>>
>>>> Just another theory laden chalky.
>>>>
>>>> Very little hands experience that's for sure.
>>>
>>> Combined with zero ability.
>>>
>>> This is a bloke who reckons he had 8 jobs in 6 years as his
>>> "journeyman" period, which is a really cool way of saying that he was
>>> *so* incompetent that he couldn't hold a job down long enough to know
>>> where the toilets and lunchroom were.
>>>
>>> A *perfect* teacher in fact. Big on theory, but utterly fucking
>>> hopeless when it came to practical effort.
>>
>> You just keep showing that you never ever saw the inside of an
>> apprentice trade classroom Darren. Especially one for motor mechanics
>> in the 80s. No theory classrooms Darren, all prac work.
>>
>>
>
>
> He just doesn't understand how obvious he makes it that he's never
> completed an apprenticeship to those who have.

Yep, always trying to bluff his way through. Doesn't work on those of us
who've been there, done that! ;-)

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On Monday, 20 December 2021 at 23:03:37 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
> On 20/12/21 1:20 pm, Noddy wrote:
>
> >
> > Lol :) Is he ever? This is a bloke who carries on about being "extremely
> > trade relevant" yet his last faint connection to the trade was over 25
> > years ago according to him which in any normal situation would make any
> > right minded person wonder how he considers a disconnection of a quarter
> > of a century would enable "relevance" of any kind :)
> You banging on about trade relevance, especially that of others, doesn't
> make you trade relevant Darren. FFS, you couldn't even get to first
> base, an apprenticeship. Worse, you had to *invent* your own trade
> qualifications and create what *you perceived* as your trade relevance
> by inventing a career in the automotive trade. Hey, that year you
> *claim* to have spent as a dealer service manager, that was a real
> pisser. What about your *invented* 15 years in your own business. Funny
> how no records of it exist, eh? Just like your claimed trade
> qualifications, they don't exist either - except in your own mind.
> >
> >> All he`s good?? for is showing just how mind numbingly fixated one can
> >> get.
> >
> > It's his inferiority complex hard at work. He simply *can't* be seen as
> > being inferior in any way, so he has to ridicule anything anyone else
> Inferiority complexes cause people to create a fake persona for
> themselves - like you did when you invented your trade qualifications
~~~~~~~~~~~

*Fake persona*???, holy fuck, talk about leading with your chin!.
Eh Krypsis.. you of the *walled up cars*, and aeroplanes?.
> > says in order to feel superior and usually does nothing other than show
> > how clueless he actually is in the process.
``
*Exactly* dumb cunt, and *YOU* suck at it..
> >
> > Like his waffle about carburetors for example. A 1050cfm carburetor on
> > an engine of 360 cubic inches was a practical impossibility according to
> > him, yet Allan Moffat set pole position at Bathurst in 1972 with
> > *exactly* that combination. Then there's his *complete* failure to
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

> Just keep harping on about how the simple automotive maths is beyond
> your ken Darren.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Comment on this:

'Allan Moffat set pole position at Bathurst in 1972 with
> > *exactly* that combination."

Nah, of course not! No fuckin' chance..You fuckin' lying, full of shit runaway cunt `
> > comprehend the differences between boosted and unboosted brake systems :)

> Big differences Darren -

but I was talking about discs needing boosters
> whilst drums, if given enough shoe factor, worked quite capably without.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

**NOTHING** to do with *anything* involved in this, er, dare i say, debate!!.
> >
> > Not surprisingly he sticks his fingers in his ears and "La-La-La's"
> > anything that proves him wrong. And this is an imbecile who claims he
> Well, this proves me right;
>
> https://what-when-how.com/automobile/brake-shoe-and-pad-fundamentals-automobile/
>
> It's you with the fingers in the ear Darren. BTW, have fun with the
> maths involved with shoe factor and friction - way beyond your ken.
> > was passing on knowledge to students? The imbecile who claims
> > "transferred experience" is a real thing? :)
> You have no clue of the concept Darren. But then, you're not smart
> enough so no surprise there.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
As per:
'If you can`t dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit'. Lots of equations to make it all look kosher.
However, they use words such as *ASSUME* and *ASSUMPTION* in a supposedly scientific tretise*... Yeah sure!. Ho,ho ho..
*NONE* of that blurb goes even close to answering the original question/statement. (Depending on ones stance.)
You`re a goose xenokryp. Give it up afore ye go blind!
> --
> Xeno
>
>
> Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
> (with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 11:40:12 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:
> On 20/12/2021 10:20 am, Noddy wrote:
> > On 20/12/2021 11:17 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> >> On Sunday, 19 December 2021 at 20:59:47 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >
> >>> yes, which is why his claims seem credible to those (like me) outside
> >>> the industry , but not insiders like yourself. :)
> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>
> >> *Insider?* cunt has *never* been one.! Just another theory laden
> >> chalky.
> >
> > Lol :) Is he ever? This is a bloke who carries on about being "extremely
> > trade relevant"
> No he doesn't. You have claimed you are qualified and all evidence
> suggests you are not.
>
> So prove it or be considered a fraud for ever more.
>
> As for Jonz, he was too fucking stupid to complete an apprenticeship and
> his only life achievement is a permanent rash from a steering wheel
> rubbing on his fat guts.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oh, so very hurtful .. :(
But, I *do* know about windscreen construction *and* fitting.
Perhaps you *could* learn...(Nah scrap that.)

On 21/12/2021 1:38 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> On Monday, 20 December 2021 at 23:03:37 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:

>> Inferiority complexes cause people to create a fake persona for
>> themselves - like you did when you invented your trade qualifications
> ~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> *Fake persona*???, holy fuck, talk about leading with your chin!.
> Eh Krypsis.. you of the *walled up cars*, and aeroplanes?.

ROTFL :)

I'll bet he *still* insists that Krypsis is a real person. I wonder what
Jerky Birko thinks about that :)

>>> says in order to feel superior and usually does nothing other than show
>>> how clueless he actually is in the process.
> ``
> *Exactly* dumb cunt, and *YOU* suck at it..
>>>
>>> Like his waffle about carburetors for example. A 1050cfm carburetor on
>>> an engine of 360 cubic inches was a practical impossibility according to
>>> him, yet Allan Moffat set pole position at Bathurst in 1972 with
>>> *exactly* that combination. Then there's his *complete* failure to
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>> Just keep harping on about how the simple automotive maths is beyond
>> your ken Darren.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Comment on this:
>
> 'Allan Moffat set pole position at Bathurst in 1972 with
>>> *exactly* that combination."
>
> Nah, of course not! No fuckin' chance..You fuckin' lying, full of shit runaway cunt `

Incapable of (a) dealing with reality, and (b) admitting he is
completely wrong which is why he ignores proof like this.

Deleted posts anyone? :)

> but I was talking about discs needing boosters
>> whilst drums, if given enough shoe factor, worked quite capably without.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> **NOTHING** to do with *anything* involved in this, er, dare i say, debate!!.

Absolutely nothing whatsoever, but then we all know that such ridiculous
waffle is his standard arse cover attempt whenever he's made a total
cunt out of himself which is generally any time he comments about
anything in particular. His long winded rant about drum brakes was
*totally* irrelevant to his claim that disconnecting the vacuum supply
on a boosted brake system was an accurate way to simulate the feel of an
unboosted brake system.

That statement was totally and unequivocally *wrong*, and in making it
not *only* did he show how little he actually knows, but in spewing out
reams of irrelevant bullshit to try to justify it he showed how much of
a total fucking *idiot* he's prepared to make of himself rather than
acknowledge that he was wrong.

Again, I'd like to see Jerky's stance on this? What say you Jerky? Do
you agree with Clasener's comment about disconnecting the vacuum supply
on a boosted brake system being an accurate way to simulate the feel of
an unboosted system or not?

You don't need to make a qualifying statement. A simple "Yes" or "No"
answer is all that is required :)

I'll leave space for you here --> _________________________

>> was passing on knowledge to students? The imbecile who claims
>>> "transferred experience" is a real thing? :)

>> You have no clue of the concept Darren. But then, you're not smart
>> enough so no surprise there.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
> As per:
> 'If you can`t dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit'. Lots of equations to make it all look kosher.
> However, they use words such as *ASSUME* and *ASSUMPTION* in a supposedly scientific tretise*... Yeah sure!. Ho,ho ho..
> *NONE* of that blurb goes even close to answering the original question/statement. (Depending on ones stance.)
> You`re a goose xenokryp. Give it up afore ye go blind!

There is no "concept" here to get. There is no such thing as
"transferred experience" :)

Felix even picked him on this one when he said "You can share an
experience, but you cannot transfer one", and he was absolutely spot on
in making that statement. You *cannot* transfer experience. It is a
bullshit concept that Clasener has invented to grant himself
"experience" with things that he's never laid his hands on and in doing
so is about as smart as someone who has driven a Morris Minor claiming
that they have "experience" driving a Ferrari because the two have the
same controls and are operated in the same way.

Screams for relevance make egocentric fucktards do *amazingly* stupid
things, and Clasener is the biggest egocentric fucktard this group has
*ever* known.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 21:18:09 +1100, Noddy wrote:

> On 21/12/2021 1:38 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Monday, 20 December 2021 at 23:03:37 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>
>>> Inferiority complexes cause people to create a fake persona for
>>> themselves - like you did when you invented your trade qualifications
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> *Fake persona*???, holy fuck, talk about leading with your chin!.
>> Eh Krypsis.. you of the *walled up cars*, and aeroplanes?.
>
> ROTFL :)
>
> I'll bet he *still* insists that Krypsis is a real person. I wonder what
> Jerky Birko thinks about that :)

Errrr Der Der. Remember, you "couldn't care less" what your killfailees
think.

snip buffoonery.

alvey
Recalling the Fraudsters 100+ fake members of his Facie 'group'.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 21/12/2021 6:18 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 21/12/2021 1:38 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Monday, 20 December 2021 at 23:03:37 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>
>>> Inferiority complexes cause people to create a fake persona for
>>> themselves - like you did when you invented your trade qualifications
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>>   *Fake persona*???, holy fuck, talk about leading with your chin!.
>>            Eh Krypsis.. you of the *walled up cars*, and aeroplanes?.
>
> ROTFL :)
>
> I'll bet he *still* insists that Krypsis is a real person. I wonder what
> Jerky Birko thinks about that :)
>

A person so confident in his position would have the integrity to ask
such questions directly from whoever it is they are addressing them to
instead of using some gullible dimwit to ask questions by proxy and
snipe from behind a killfail.

Besides, for a person who couldn't care less about what some people
think you sure waste a lot of words on them.

On Monday, 20 December 2021 at 15:17:38 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
> On 20/12/21 11:00 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> > On 20/12/2021 6:41 am, alvey wrote:
> >> On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 12:39:31 +1100, Noddy wrote:
> >>
> >> snip bullshit
> >>
> >>> I can remember when I used to service my old man's work vans.
> >> snip more bullshit
> >>
> >>> This was on vans that would hit 400k km's over the course of a
> >>> 3 year lease before he would off-load it and move onto the next one.
> >> Couple of things here Fraudster.
> >>
> >> 1. As an unqualified wannabee, you would have voided the warranty by
> >> servicing anything on a lease.
> >> 2. 400km over a three year lease for an owner operator who, according to
> >> you, only ever advertised in the local paper?(a)
> >
> >
> > maths was never noddy's forte. 400k klms a year is 11,111 klms a month,
> > or 2,564 klms a week, or 365.30 klms a day. so traveling 365.30 klms @
> > an average (say) 60 klms an hour would take 6 hours out of his working
> > day. so where/when did he work? he would have spent most of his day
> > driving to jobs, which would be very unusual for someone who only
> > advertises locally and would therefore be working locally. the pile just
> > keeps getting bigger..
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Just in passing, how does 400k k`s over a three year period become 400k k`s a *year*??.
> >
> Noddy didn't reach the level of *Maths*. He stumbled and fell over basic
> arithmetic, as he well and truly proved in the above bullshit story.
> >
> >> 3. As NA of A in the Slough Estate never existed, where did you do these
> >> services? Or when you say "serviced", do you mean "washed"?
> >>
> >> (a) "I learnt that lesson from my father who worked for himself for 50
> >> years and made a good living doing nothing more than having an ad in the
> >> "tradies" section of the local paper". Fraudster 09Jul19
> >>
> >> Der Der really should begin these anecdotes, 'Once upon a time...'.
> >>
> >>
> >> alvey
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Xeno
>
>
> Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
> (with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 21/12/2021 9:12 am, Xeno wrote:
> On 21/12/21 2:42 am, Clocky wrote:
>> On 20/12/2021 9:51 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 20/12/2021 12:18 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 11:00:41 +1100, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 20/12/2021 6:41 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 12:39:31 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> snip bullshit
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    I can remember when I used to service my old man's work vans.
>>>>>> snip more bullshit
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This was on vans that would hit 400k km's over the course of a
>>>>>>> 3 year lease before he would off-load it and move onto the next one.
>>>>>> Couple of things here Fraudster.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. As an unqualified wannabee, you would have voided the warranty by
>>>>>> servicing anything on a lease.
>>>>>> 2. 400km over a three year lease for an owner operator who,
>>>>>> according to
>>>>>> you, only ever advertised in the local paper?(a)
>>>>> maths was never noddy's forte. 400k klms a year is 11,111 klms a
>>>>> month,
>>>>> or 2,564 klms a week, or 365.30 klms a day. so traveling 365.30 klms @
>>>>> an average (say) 60 klms an hour would take 6 hours out of his working
>>>>> day. so where/when did he work? he would have spent most of his day
>>>>> driving to jobs, which would be very unusual for someone who only
>>>>> advertises locally and would therefore be working locally. the pile
>>>>> just
>>>>> keeps getting bigger..
>>>> Would you like to revise your opinion on the Fraudster's 'credible
>>>> claims'
>>>> now?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I didn't say all or any of his claims were credible, only that his
>>> stories (often) appear credible. and by 'credible' I meant they
>>> sounded like they were true or really happened. but of course some do
>>> smell like rotting fish.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The problem is that now you can never know if his story is true,
>> partially true, someone else' true story, something he read and
>> modified or something he made up entirely. He tells so many lies that
>> it's simply impossible to take anything he says on face value.
>>
>>
> It's quite easy, really it is. You assume anything and everything he
> posts is bullshit and lies *until* and *unless* he comes up with
> irrefutable *hard evidence* to the contrary. In the case of him doing
> something in his workshop, then nothing less than a *video* of the
> entire process will suffice. Photos tell you nothing conclusive and can
> be dummied up quite easily.
>

In the case of his trailer "fabricating", how would he get away with
certifying the trailers? They need approval to be registered in Victoria no?

https://www.vicroads.vic.gov.au/registration/modify-or-build-a-vehicle/modify-or-build-a-light-vehicle-or-trailer/build-or-modify-a-light-trailer/construction-requirements-for-light-trailers-or-caravans

On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 09:46:15 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:
> On 21/12/2021 6:18 pm, Noddy wrote:
> > On 21/12/2021 1:38 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> >> On Monday, 20 December 2021 at 23:03:37 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
> >
> >>> Inferiority complexes cause people to create a fake persona for
> >>> themselves - like you did when you invented your trade qualifications
> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>
> >> *Fake persona*???, holy fuck, talk about leading with your chin!.
> >> Eh Krypsis.. you of the *walled up cars*, and aeroplanes?.
> >
> > ROTFL :)
> >
> > I'll bet he *still* insists that Krypsis is a real person. I wonder what
> > Jerky Birko thinks about that :)
> >
> A person so confident in his position would have the integrity to ask
> such questions directly from whoever it is they are addressing them to
> instead of using some gullible dimwit to ask questions by proxy and
> snipe from behind a killfail.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So speaketh ticcy. (Aka *runaway*)
BTW, all my own work shitfer. (Btw #11) krypsis is in my K/F also. (along with alvira the mouth) any comment? <FBG>

>
> Besides, for a person who couldn't care less about what some people
> think you sure waste a lot of words on them.

On 22/12/2021 10:24 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:

>>> maths was never noddy's forte. 400k klms a year is 11,111 klms a month,
>>> or 2,564 klms a week, or 365.30 klms a day. so traveling 365.30 klms @
>>> an average (say) 60 klms an hour would take 6 hours out of his working
>>> day. so where/when did he work? he would have spent most of his day
>>> driving to jobs, which would be very unusual for someone who only
>>> advertises locally and would therefore be working locally. the pile just
>>> keeps getting bigger..
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Just in passing, how does 400k k`s over a three year period become 400k k`s a *year*??.

A willingness to deliberately misquote in order to create a bullshit
argument would do it, but then that's Tom & Jerky's usual operating
procedure. This comment above seems to come from Felix, and it's most
likely a case of him being too fucking stupid to comprehend what's on
the screen right in front of him.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 22/12/2021 10:50 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 09:46:15 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:

>>> I'll bet he *still* insists that Krypsis is a real person. I wonder what
>>> Jerky Birko thinks about that :)
>>>
>> A person so confident in his position would have the integrity to ask
>> such questions directly from whoever it is they are addressing them to
>> instead of using some gullible dimwit to ask questions by proxy and
>> snipe from behind a killfail.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> So speaketh ticcy. (Aka *runaway*)
> BTW, all my own work shitfer. (Btw #11) krypsis is in my K/F also. (along with alvira the mouth) any comment? <FBG>

Interesting to note that while I wasn't actually asking him a question
in this particular case, Jerky Birko decided to give an answer anyway
and in doing so completely avoided answering the question that he
*thought* he was being asked.

Which is hardly a surprise :)

It's *also* interesting to note that the question he *was* specifically
asked, which was whether or not he supported Clasener's statement of
accurately simulating the feel of a non boosted brake system by
disconnecting the vacuum supply hose on a boosted brake system was one
that he chose to avoid completely by snipping it out of his post and
pretending it never existed.

Which is *also* unsurprising. The gutless cunt has painted himself up to
be a fucking lunatic in this group and he'll do whatever he can to hang
onto the only tenable grip he has left here which is to align himself
with his clueless bestie Clasener.

It's pathetic, but I really must stop relating them to 10 year olds in a
treehouse as there are 10 year olds who would have more self respect
than to carry on in such a juvenile way as these morons do.

10 year olds would also have a better comprehension of the law regarding
venomous snakes, too :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 22/12/2021 8:11 am, Noddy wrote:
> On 22/12/2021 10:50 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 09:46:15 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:
>
>>>> I'll bet he *still* insists that Krypsis is a real person. I wonder
>>>> what
>>>> Jerky Birko thinks about that :)
>>>>
>>> A person so confident in his position would have the integrity to ask
>>> such questions directly from whoever it is they are addressing them to
>>> instead of using some gullible dimwit to ask questions by proxy and
>>> snipe from behind a killfail.
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>   So speaketh ticcy. (Aka *runaway*)
>>          BTW, all my own work shitfer. (Btw #11) krypsis is in my K/F
>> also. (along with alvira the mouth) any comment? <FBG>
>
> Interesting to note that

Thanks for proving my point.
I rest my case.

On 22/12/21 10:24 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> On Monday, 20 December 2021 at 15:17:38 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>> On 20/12/21 11:00 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 20/12/2021 6:41 am, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 12:39:31 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>>>
>>>> snip bullshit
>>>>
>>>>> I can remember when I used to service my old man's work vans.
>>>> snip more bullshit
>>>>
>>>>> This was on vans that would hit 400k km's over the course of a
>>>>> 3 year lease before he would off-load it and move onto the next one.
>>>> Couple of things here Fraudster.
>>>>
>>>> 1. As an unqualified wannabee, you would have voided the warranty by
>>>> servicing anything on a lease.
>>>> 2. 400km over a three year lease for an owner operator who, according to
>>>> you, only ever advertised in the local paper?(a)
>>>
>>>
>>> maths was never noddy's forte. 400k klms a year is 11,111 klms a month,
>>> or 2,564 klms a week, or 365.30 klms a day. so traveling 365.30 klms @
>>> an average (say) 60 klms an hour would take 6 hours out of his working
>>> day. so where/when did he work? he would have spent most of his day
>>> driving to jobs, which would be very unusual for someone who only
>>> advertises locally and would therefore be working locally. the pile just
>>> keeps getting bigger..
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Just in passing, how does 400k k`s over a three year period become 400k k`s a *year*??.

LOL, maths is not Xeno's forte apparently:-)
I think Xeno just proved that Noddy is qualified, he did service leased
vehicles without causing warranty problems therefore he must be
qualified, thanks Xeno for finally clearing that matter up and hopefully
putting it to rest:-)
--
Daryl

On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 11:11:03 +1100, Noddy wrote:

> On 22/12/2021 10:50 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 09:46:15 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:
>
>>>> I'll bet he *still* insists that Krypsis is a real person. I wonder what
>>>> Jerky Birko thinks about that :)
>>>>
>>> A person so confident in his position would have the integrity to ask
>>> such questions directly from whoever it is they are addressing them to
>>> instead of using some gullible dimwit to ask questions by proxy and
>>> snipe from behind a killfail.
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> So speaketh ticcy. (Aka *runaway*)
>> BTW, all my own work shitfer. (Btw #11) krypsis is in my K/F also. (along with alvira the mouth) any comment? <FBG>
>
> Interesting to note that while I wasn't actually asking him a question
> in this particular case,

***EVERYONE*** knows that your English is comprehensively sub-par Fraudster
but when you write, "I wonder what Jerky Birko thinks about that", and then
subsequently blurt, "... while I wasn't actually asking him a question in
this particular case...", well, you look even more buffoonish than usual.
No mean feat that.

> Jerky Birko decided to give an answer anyway
> and in doing so completely avoided answering the question that he
> *thought* he was being asked.

LOL! And now the Buffo level goes off the scale!
Jaysus Fraudster! You've got a 100% Fail rate for answering tricky
questions. No-one in their right mind, or even having a minute grasp on
reality, would answer any serious question from you until you stump up with
the Biggies that you've failed for years to answer.

Some facts: You are a liar, fraud, hypocrite and coward Gibbens.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 08:23:36 +0800, Clocky wrote:

> On 22/12/2021 8:11 am, Noddy wrote:
>> On 22/12/2021 10:50 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 09:46:15 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:
>>
>>>>> I'll bet he *still* insists that Krypsis is a real person. I wonder
>>>>> what
>>>>> Jerky Birko thinks about that :)
>>>>>
>>>> A person so confident in his position would have the integrity to ask
>>>> such questions directly from whoever it is they are addressing them to
>>>> instead of using some gullible dimwit to ask questions by proxy and
>>>> snipe from behind a killfail.
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>   So speaketh ticcy. (Aka *runaway*)
>>>          BTW, all my own work shitfer. (Btw #11) krypsis is in my K/F
>>> also. (along with alvira the mouth) any comment? <FBG>
>>
>> Interesting to note that
>
> Thanks for proving my point.
> I rest my case.

Bit late Clock. The jury said "Guilty" and went home years ago.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 22/12/21 10:44 am, Clocky wrote:
> On 21/12/2021 9:12 am, Xeno wrote:
>> On 21/12/21 2:42 am, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 20/12/2021 9:51 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 20/12/2021 12:18 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 11:00:41 +1100, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 20/12/2021 6:41 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 12:39:31 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> snip bullshit
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    I can remember when I used to service my old man's work vans.
>>>>>>> snip more bullshit
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This was on vans that would hit 400k km's over the course of a
>>>>>>>> 3 year lease before he would off-load it and move onto the next
>>>>>>>> one.
>>>>>>> Couple of things here Fraudster.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. As an unqualified wannabee, you would have voided the warranty by
>>>>>>> servicing anything on a lease.
>>>>>>> 2. 400km over a three year lease for an owner operator who,
>>>>>>> according to
>>>>>>> you, only ever advertised in the local paper?(a)
>>>>>> maths was never noddy's forte. 400k klms a year is 11,111 klms a
>>>>>> month,
>>>>>> or 2,564 klms a week, or 365.30 klms a day. so traveling 365.30
>>>>>> klms @
>>>>>> an average (say) 60 klms an hour would take 6 hours out of his
>>>>>> working
>>>>>> day. so where/when did he work? he would have spent most of his day
>>>>>> driving to jobs, which would be very unusual for someone who only
>>>>>> advertises locally and would therefore be working locally. the
>>>>>> pile just
>>>>>> keeps getting bigger..
>>>>> Would you like to revise your opinion on the Fraudster's 'credible
>>>>> claims'
>>>>> now?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I didn't say all or any of his claims were credible, only that his
>>>> stories (often) appear credible. and by 'credible' I meant they
>>>> sounded like they were true or really happened. but of course some
>>>> do smell like rotting fish.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> The problem is that now you can never know if his story is true,
>>> partially true, someone else' true story, something he read and
>>> modified or something he made up entirely. He tells so many lies that
>>> it's simply impossible to take anything he says on face value.
>>>
>>>
>> It's quite easy, really it is. You assume anything and everything he
>> posts is bullshit and lies *until* and *unless* he comes up with
>> irrefutable *hard evidence* to the contrary. In the case of him doing
>> something in his workshop, then nothing less than a *video* of the
>> entire process will suffice. Photos tell you nothing conclusive and
>> can be dummied up quite easily.
>>
>
>
> In the case of his trailer "fabricating", how would he get away with
> certifying the trailers? They need approval to be registered in Victoria
> no?
>
> https://www.vicroads.vic.gov.au/registration/modify-or-build-a-vehicle/modify-or-build-a-light-vehicle-or-trailer/build-or-modify-a-light-trailer/construction-requirements-for-light-trailers-or-caravans
>
It would seem so. But then, we don't know where his lies end. We know
where they begin - the moment he starts typing.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 22/12/2021 10:24 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> On Monday, 20 December 2021 at 15:17:38 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>> On 20/12/21 11:00 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 20/12/2021 6:41 am, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 12:39:31 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>>>
>>>> snip bullshit
>>>>
>>>>> I can remember when I used to service my old man's work vans.
>>>> snip more bullshit
>>>>
>>>>> This was on vans that would hit 400k km's over the course of a
>>>>> 3 year lease before he would off-load it and move onto the next one.
>>>> Couple of things here Fraudster.
>>>>
>>>> 1. As an unqualified wannabee, you would have voided the warranty by
>>>> servicing anything on a lease.
>>>> 2. 400km over a three year lease for an owner operator who, according to
>>>> you, only ever advertised in the local paper?(a)
>>>
>>> maths was never noddy's forte. 400k klms a year is 11,111 klms a month,
>>> or 2,564 klms a week, or 365.30 klms a day. so traveling 365.30 klms @
>>> an average (say) 60 klms an hour would take 6 hours out of his working
>>> day. so where/when did he work? he would have spent most of his day
>>> driving to jobs, which would be very unusual for someone who only
>>> advertises locally and would therefore be working locally. the pile just
>>> keeps getting bigger..
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Just in passing, how does 400k k`s over a three year period become 400k k`s a *year*??.

just a typo. the maths are good.

>> Noddy didn't reach the level of *Maths*. He stumbled and fell over basic
>> arithmetic, as he well and truly proved in the above bullshit story.
>>>> 3. As NA of A in the Slough Estate never existed, where did you do these
>>>> services? Or when you say "serviced", do you mean "washed"?
>>>>
>>>> (a) "I learnt that lesson from my father who worked for himself for 50
>>>> years and made a good living doing nothing more than having an ad in the
>>>> "tradies" section of the local paper". Fraudster 09Jul19
>>>>
>>>> Der Der really should begin these anecdotes, 'Once upon a time...'.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> alvey
>>>>

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 22/12/21 11:00 am, Noddy wrote:
> On 22/12/2021 10:24 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>
>>>> maths was never noddy's forte. 400k klms a year is 11,111 klms a month,
>>>> or 2,564 klms a week, or 365.30 klms a day. so traveling 365.30 klms @
>>>> an average (say) 60 klms an hour would take 6 hours out of his working
>>>> day. so where/when did he work? he would have spent most of his day
>>>> driving to jobs, which would be very unusual for someone who only
>>>> advertises locally and would therefore be working locally. the pile
>>>> just
>>>> keeps getting bigger..
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>>   Just in passing, how does 400k k`s over a three year period become
>> 400k k`s a *year*??.
>
> A willingness to deliberately misquote in order to create a bullshit
> argument would do it, but then that's Tom & Jerky's usual operating
> procedure. This comment above seems to come from Felix, and it's most
> likely a case of him being too fucking stupid to comprehend what's on
> the screen right in front of him.
>
Hey Darren, as I pointed out, 400k kilometres in *3 years* is a huge
stretch anyway. Still wondering (a) how your father needed to do so many
kilometres whilst working local and (b) managed to get out of the
driver's seat and find time to do some actual work on job sites. Most
tradies I know do a max of 30-40k per year working *local*. As I said,
your lies start the moment you start typing. Where do they end Darren?
Do the lies ever end Darren?

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 22/12/2021 9:46 am, Clocky wrote:
> On 21/12/2021 6:18 pm, Noddy wrote:
>> On 21/12/2021 1:38 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>> On Monday, 20 December 2021 at 23:03:37 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>>
>>>> Inferiority complexes cause people to create a fake persona for
>>>> themselves - like you did when you invented your trade qualifications
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>>>   *Fake persona*???, holy fuck, talk about leading with your chin!.
>>>            Eh Krypsis.. you of the *walled up cars*, and aeroplanes?.
>>
>> ROTFL :)
>>
>> I'll bet he *still* insists that Krypsis is a real person. I wonder
>> what Jerky Birko thinks about that :)
>>
>
> A person so confident in his position would have the integrity to ask
> such questions directly from whoever it is they are addressing them to
> instead of using some gullible dimwit to ask questions by proxy and
> snipe from behind a killfail.

exactly

>
> Besides, for a person who couldn't care less about what some people
> think you sure waste a lot of words on them.
>
>

:)

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 11:00:22 +1100, Noddy wrote:

> On 22/12/2021 10:24 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>
>>>> maths was never noddy's forte. 400k klms a year is 11,111 klms a month,
>>>> or 2,564 klms a week, or 365.30 klms a day. so traveling 365.30 klms @
>>>> an average (say) 60 klms an hour would take 6 hours out of his working
>>>> day. so where/when did he work? he would have spent most of his day
>>>> driving to jobs, which would be very unusual for someone who only
>>>> advertises locally and would therefore be working locally. the pile just
>>>> keeps getting bigger..
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> Just in passing, how does 400k k`s over a three year period become 400k k`s a *year*??.
>
> A willingness to deliberately misquote in order to create a bullshit
> argument would do it, but then that's Tom & Jerky's usual operating
> procedure. This comment above seems to come from Felix, and it's most
> likely a case of him being too fucking stupid to comprehend what's on
> the screen right in front of him.

Nope. That'd be you and jonz who can't comprehend what's on the screen
Fraudster. It's especially tragic for you two as one the internets Golden
Rules is, 'If you are going to correct someone, make certain that your post
is accurate'. The most important piece of felix's post is the bottom line,
the figure which shows that your story is, apu, a lie. 365km a day, 365
days a year is correct. You and your mate look like fools. Again. Fail.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 22/12/21 11:52 am, Daryl wrote:
> On 22/12/21 10:24 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Monday, 20 December 2021 at 15:17:38 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>>> On 20/12/21 11:00 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 20/12/2021 6:41 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 12:39:31 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> snip bullshit
>>>>>
>>>>>>    I can remember when I used to service my old man's work vans.
>>>>> snip more bullshit
>>>>>
>>>>>> This was on vans that would hit 400k km's over the course of a
>>>>>> 3 year lease before he would off-load it and move onto the next one.
>>>>> Couple of things here Fraudster.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. As an unqualified wannabee, you would have voided the warranty by
>>>>> servicing anything on a lease.
>>>>> 2. 400km over a three year lease for an owner operator who,
>>>>> according to
>>>>> you, only ever advertised in the local paper?(a)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> maths was never noddy's forte. 400k klms a year is 11,111 klms a month,
>>>> or 2,564 klms a week, or 365.30 klms a day. so traveling 365.30 klms @
>>>> an average (say) 60 klms an hour would take 6 hours out of his working
>>>> day. so where/when did he work? he would have spent most of his day
>>>> driving to jobs, which would be very unusual for someone who only
>>>> advertises locally and would therefore be working locally. the pile
>>>> just
>>>> keeps getting bigger..
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>>   Just in passing, how does 400k k`s over a three year period become
>> 400k k`s a *year*??.
>
> LOL, maths is not Xeno's forte apparently:-)
> I think Xeno just proved that Noddy is qualified, he did service leased
> vehicles without causing warranty problems therefore he must be
> qualified, thanks Xeno for finally clearing that matter up and hopefully
> putting it to rest:-)

I made no comment on anyone's maths other than what *Darren* posted.
400k klm over 3 years is, in anyone's terms, bullshit of the highest
order but especially so for a tradie who works local. I have a lot of
friends here who *work local* and none of them clock up anywhere even
close to 130k+ per year. The plumber in Bellingen, for example, took 20
years to cover 500k klm in his 4WD and he had a working range of 100+
kilometre radius - IOW he covered the whole district.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 22/12/2021 11:11 am, Noddy wrote:
> On 22/12/2021 10:50 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 09:46:15 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:
>
>>>> I'll bet he *still* insists that Krypsis is a real person. I wonder
>>>> what
>>>> Jerky Birko thinks about that :)
>>>>
>>> A person so confident in his position would have the integrity to ask
>>> such questions directly from whoever it is they are addressing them to
>>> instead of using some gullible dimwit to ask questions by proxy and
>>> snipe from behind a killfail.
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>   So speaketh ticcy. (Aka *runaway*)
>>          BTW, all my own work shitfer. (Btw #11) krypsis is in my K/F
>> also. (along with alvira the mouth) any comment? <FBG>
>
> Interesting to note that while I wasn't actually asking him a question
> in this particular case, Jerky Birko decided to give an answer anyway
> and in doing so completely avoided answering the question that he
> *thought* he was being asked.
>
> Which is hardly a surprise :)
>
> It's *also* interesting to note that the question he *was*
> specifically asked,

why would he answer a question you're too gutless to put directly to him?

<BS deleted>

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster

On 22/12/21 12:20 pm, alvey wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 11:00:22 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>
>> On 22/12/2021 10:24 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>
>>>>> maths was never noddy's forte. 400k klms a year is 11,111 klms a month,
>>>>> or 2,564 klms a week, or 365.30 klms a day. so traveling 365.30 klms @
>>>>> an average (say) 60 klms an hour would take 6 hours out of his working
>>>>> day. so where/when did he work? he would have spent most of his day
>>>>> driving to jobs, which would be very unusual for someone who only
>>>>> advertises locally and would therefore be working locally. the pile just
>>>>> keeps getting bigger..
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>>> Just in passing, how does 400k k`s over a three year period become 400k k`s a *year*??.
>>
>> A willingness to deliberately misquote in order to create a bullshit
>> argument would do it, but then that's Tom & Jerky's usual operating
>> procedure. This comment above seems to come from Felix, and it's most
>> likely a case of him being too fucking stupid to comprehend what's on
>> the screen right in front of him.
>
> Nope. That'd be you and jonz who can't comprehend what's on the screen
> Fraudster. It's especially tragic for you two as one the internets Golden
> Rules is, 'If you are going to correct someone, make certain that your post
> is accurate'. The most important piece of felix's post is the bottom line,
> the figure which shows that your story is, apu, a lie. 365km a day, 365
> days a year is correct. You and your mate look like fools. Again. Fail.
>
Not *again* but *still*. There is no time ever where Darren and the
FLCJC don not look like fools.
>
>
> alvey
>

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 22/12/2021 11:00 am, Noddy wrote:
> On 22/12/2021 10:24 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>
>>>> maths was never noddy's forte. 400k klms a year is 11,111 klms a
>>>> month,
>>>> or 2,564 klms a week, or 365.30 klms a day. so traveling 365.30 klms @
>>>> an average (say) 60 klms an hour would take 6 hours out of his working
>>>> day. so where/when did he work? he would have spent most of his day
>>>> driving to jobs, which would be very unusual for someone who only
>>>> advertises locally and would therefore be working locally. the pile
>>>> just
>>>> keeps getting bigger..
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>>   Just in passing, how does 400k k`s over a three year period become
>> 400k k`s a *year*??.
>
> A willingness to deliberately misquote in order to create a bullshit
> argument

err.. that would be you who does that numbnuts. for me it was just a
typo. no comment from you tho about the absurdity of your claim I see.
(as proved by the maths)

> would do it, but then that's Tom & Jerky's usual operating procedure.
> This comment above seems to come from Felix,

so you're not smart enough to read the thread and see who wrote it?

> and it's most likely a case of him being too fucking stupid to
> comprehend what's on the screen right in front of him.
>

you mean like you not being able to see who wrote something?

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster