Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:

- flush -

It was always obvious you are just a stinking dunny full of stinking shit.

- flush -

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:

- flush -

It was always obvious you are just a stinking dunny full of stinking shit.

- flush -

On Wednesday, 16 March 2022 at 16:30:09 UTC+11, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rw5OcSXkN_4
>
> No defence for it, what. So they say.
>
> My new design rail gun could sort that out.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
> Upgraded versions of this design could fire a missile at Mach2 and above and then that missile goes up to Mach 10 or so. Very efficient!
>
> Only for Australia, of course.

In videos we see missiles taking off. A lot of their fuel is wasted just at that stage.
In rail gun launchers following my design, no one can see them taking off that way.
For they will exit at more than twice the speed of sound.
After that, the rockets will fire, the missile righted by 90deg, and the guidance on.
A huge guided bullet, impacting precisely anywhere with Mach 8 upwards.
Excellent for protection against ballistic nukes from hostiles, and land invasion forces, for it will wipe out anything at sea.
Great for defending Australia against invasion, cheaply and effectively.
>
> Cheers,
> Arindam Banerjee
> Director
> HTN Research Pty Ltd.

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:

- flush -

It was always obvious you are just a stinking dunny full of stinking shit.

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote
> Arindam Banerjee wrote

>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rw5OcSXkN_4
>>
>> No defence for it, what. So they say.
>>
>> My new design rail gun could sort that out.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
>> Upgraded versions of this design could fire a missile at Mach2 and
>> above and then that missile goes up to Mach 10 or so. Very efficient!
>>
>> Only for Australia, of course.

Not even possible for it to be only for Ausralia, stupid.

> In videos we see missiles taking off. A lot of their fuel is wasted
> just at that stage.
> In rail gun launchers following my design, no one can see them taking
> off that way.
> For they will exit at more than twice the speed of sound.
> After that, the rockets will fire, the missile righted by 90deg, and the
> guidance on.
> A huge guided bullet, impacting precisely anywhere with Mach 8 upwards.
> Excellent for protection against ballistic nukes from hostiles, and land
> invasion forces, for it will wipe out anything at sea.

> Great for defending Australia against invasion, cheaply and effectively.

No one will be invading Australia. Even the Japs were'nt actually stupid
enough to try that.

- flush -
Cleanliness is godliness.

- flush -

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:

- flush -

It was always obvious you are just a stinking dunny full of stinking shit.

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:

- flush -

It was always obvious you are just a stinking dunny full of stinking shit.

- flush -

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:

- flush -

It was always obvious you are just a stinking dunny full of stinking shit.

- flush -

On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 22:30:07 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
<banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rw5OcSXkN_4
>
>No defence for it, what. So they say.
>
>My new design rail gun could sort that out.
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
>Upgraded versions of this design could fire a missile at Mach2 and above and then that missile goes up to Mach 10 or so. Very efficient!
>
>Only for Australia, of course.

It is China that has it's eyes on Australia.
>
>Cheers,
>Arindam Banerjee
>Director
>HTN Research Pty Ltd.

Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote
> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote

>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rw5OcSXkN_4
>>
>> No defence for it, what. So they say.
>>
>> My new design rail gun could sort that out.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
>> Upgraded versions of this design could fire a missile at Mach2 and
>> above and then that missile goes up to Mach 10 or so. Very efficient!
>>
>> Only for Australia, of course.

> It is China that has it's eyes on Australia.

They aren't that stupid given that Mongolia etc are far more convenient
for them.

On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 15:50:40 -0700, Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 22:30:07 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
><banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rw5OcSXkN_4
>>
>>No defence for it, what. So they say.
>>
>>My new design rail gun could sort that out.
>>
>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
>>Upgraded versions of this design could fire a missile at Mach2 and above and then that missile goes up to Mach 10 or so. Very efficient!
>>
>>Only for Australia, of course.
>
Used to use "rail Guns" now out dated.
>
> It is China that has it's eyes on Australia.
>
China already owns China through corrpt polititions on the take.
Both major parties Labor and Coalition.
--
Petzl
IN A WORLD OF PROPAGANDA, THE TRUTH IS ALWAYS A CONSPIRACY.

On Sunday, 20 March 2022 at 09:50:42 UTC+11, Mattb wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 22:30:07 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
> <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rw5OcSXkN_4
> >
> >No defence for it, what. So they say.
> >
> >My new design rail gun could sort that out.
> >
> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
> >Upgraded versions of this design could fire a missile at Mach2 and above and then that missile goes up to Mach 10 or so. Very efficient!
> >
> >Only for Australia, of course.

But that won't happen, if the decision makers are like the imbecile Rod Speed here, who has just enough wits to tell lies.
There should be other markets for the new design rail gun to launch Mach8+ missiles, like Taiwan.

> It is China that has it's eyes on Australia.

If Australia tries to be smart and independent, then it is US/UK that could invade, like Russia invaded Ukraine.
Cultivated stupidity and dependence are assets for good living when you are a very lucky country.
How long can that present strategy continue, is the question.

Anyway, the new design rail gun, an awesome invention, is there, and easy to duplicate. Every science teacher in high school must perform this experiment, to demonstrate lack of recoil from the accelerating force upon the projectile. (There is recoil, but that is from rolling friction, which can be minimized for greater efficiency).

Lots of fun! And quite shattering, in more ways than one.

My purpose was to upset the laws of physics, thereby making it possible to go to the stars with new reactionless motors using the effect I have shown, and will elaborate in a coming video film.

Hypersonic missiles will be useful to smash asteroids, for mining primarily, in outer space.
Or save the planet.

> >
> >Cheers,
> >Arindam Banerjee
> >Director
> >HTN Research Pty Ltd.

On Sunday, 20 March 2022 at 10:44:52 UTC+11, petzl wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 15:50:40 -0700, Mattb <trdel...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 22:30:07 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
> ><banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rw5OcSXkN_4
> >>
> >>No defence for it, what. So they say.
> >>
> >>My new design rail gun could sort that out.
> >>
> >>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
> >>Upgraded versions of this design could fire a missile at Mach2 and above and then that missile goes up to Mach 10 or so. Very efficient!
> >>
> >>Only for Australia, of course.
> >
> Used to use "rail Guns" now out dated.

Wrong.
US went for rail guns, but their high voltage low mass narrow bore rail gun had enormous problems.
My design is very different.
> >
> > It is China that has it's eyes on Australia.
> >
> China already owns China through corrpt polititions on the take.
> Both major parties Labor and Coalition.

Wrong. Australia is a distant appendage in the Anglosphere.
> --
> Petzl
> IN A WORLD OF PROPAGANDA, THE TRUTH IS ALWAYS A CONSPIRACY.

On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 17:06:53 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
<banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sunday, 20 March 2022 at 10:44:52 UTC+11, petzl wrote:
>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 15:50:40 -0700, Mattb <trdel...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 22:30:07 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
>> ><banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rw5OcSXkN_4
>> >>
>> >>No defence for it, what. So they say.
>> >>
>> >>My new design rail gun could sort that out.
>> >>
>> >>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
>> >>Upgraded versions of this design could fire a missile at Mach2 and above and then that missile goes up to Mach 10 or so. Very efficient!
>> >>
>> >>Only for Australia, of course.
>> >
>> Used to use "rail Guns" now out dated.
>
>Wrong.
>US went for rail guns, but their high voltage low mass narrow bore rail gun had enormous problems.
>My design is very different.
>
Also their length, as a weapon limited means of aiming and firing them
They were thought to be maybe able to shoot small objects into space
but other ways were more practice.
Don't reckon anyone is interested in your claimed better mousetrap!

New Zealand's answer they launch 100 satellites into space every year.
Become a big tourist attraction with worlds best fishing and shell
fish.
https://youtu.be/DqOW1P6hUss
They now have two launch pads privately owned
All rockets and engines are "printed" super fastly
Australia better worry about them, ring Dutton!
>> >
>> > It is China that has it's eyes on Australia.
>> >
>> China already owns China through corrpt polititions on the take.
>> Both major parties Labor and Coalition.
>
>Wrong. Australia is a distant appendage in the Anglosphere.
>
What you find wrong with that!
That's you are a racist with an inferiority complex!
Bordering on Schizophrenia.
Trouble is I find you reasonably intelligent
--
Petzl
'we are a Christian nation' with 'Christian values' to which newcomers
should conform, while enjoying freedom for their own beliefs.
Pauline Hanson.

If you look at Australia it is largely a Christian country with
Christian norms. The things we do, the way our political parties
behave, have, if not an activist Christianity about it, Christian
ideals.
Paul Keating

On Sunday, 20 March 2022 at 11:34:49 UTC+11, petzl wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 17:06:53 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
> <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Sunday, 20 March 2022 at 10:44:52 UTC+11, petzl wrote:
> >> On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 15:50:40 -0700, Mattb <trdel...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 22:30:07 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
> >> ><banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rw5OcSXkN_4
> >> >>
> >> >>No defence for it, what. So they say.
> >> >>
> >> >>My new design rail gun could sort that out.
> >> >>
> >> >>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
> >> >>Upgraded versions of this design could fire a missile at Mach2 and above and then that missile goes up to Mach 10 or so. Very efficient!
> >> >>
> >> >>Only for Australia, of course.
> >> >
> >> Used to use "rail Guns" now out dated.
> >
> >Wrong.
> >US went for rail guns, but their high voltage low mass narrow bore rail gun had enormous problems.
> >My design is very different.
> >
> Also their length, as a weapon limited means of aiming and firing them
> They were thought to be maybe able to shoot small objects into space
> but other ways were more practice.

They simply did not work. Ronald Reagan boosted them as star wars tech but their basic design was wrong.
They tried to put in on naval vessels, and indeed it is still there on their latest ships.
However there are lots of problems.

> Don't reckon anyone is interested in your claimed better mousetrap!

Not yet, true.
I have just made the one introductory video lasting for 4 seconds, out of which 0.5 seconds is the most meaningful.
At least one person in the whole world (in sci.math) showed positive interest.
> New Zealand's answer they launch 100 satellites into space every year.
> Become a big tourist attraction with worlds best fishing and shell
> fish.
> https://youtu.be/DqOW1P6hUss
> They now have two launch pads privately owned
> All rockets and engines are "printed" super fastly
> Australia better worry about them, ring Dutton!

Rockets will be fired after the missiles are launched by special rail launchers.
It will mean an increase in speed.
Yes, small satellites can be launched into space, with this launcher. Far more efficiently, as the rockets and fuel will be smaller.

> >> >
> >> > It is China that has it's eyes on Australia.
> >> >
> >> China already owns China through corrpt polititions on the take.
> >> Both major parties Labor and Coalition.
> >
> >Wrong. Australia is a distant appendage in the Anglosphere.
> >
> What you find wrong with that!

Nothing. I just mentioned that China does not own Australia, which is probably what you meant, otherwise your statement "China already owns China" above make no sense.
You probably meant to write "China already owns Australia".
China does not own Australia.
To claim that is stupid.
Australia is owned by the Anglospheric elites; some of them may be in Australia.
They are doing a pretty good job, so far as my well-being is concerned.
So I find nothing wrong about Australia being a distant appendage in the Anglosphere.
On the other hand, Australia could develop its own identity. Be a republic, strong, free and independent, with its own excellent values, not looking backwards but forwards.
A matter of choice, that, for future generations.

> That's you are a racist with an inferiority complex!

Racists call me racist, when they try to be insulting.
Makes them look even more foolish.

> Bordering on Schizophrenia.

I doubt you know what that means.
> Trouble is I find you reasonably intelligent

I find you ignorant, biased and paranoid.
Have you any good qualities?
Dismissal with faint praise is so slimy.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

On Sunday, 20 March 2022 at 11:34:49 UTC+11, petzl wrote:

> Don't reckon anyone is interested in your claimed better mousetrap!
Not "claimed", demonstrated.

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote
> Mattb wrote
>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote

>> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rw5OcSXkN_4
>> >
>> >No defence for it, what. So they say.
>> >
>> >My new design rail gun could sort that out.
>> >
>> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
>> >Upgraded versions of this design could fire a missile at Mach2 and
>> above and then that missile goes up to Mach 10 or so. Very efficient!
>> >
>> >Only for Australia, of course.

> But that won't happen,

Yep, no one will be firing nukes at anywhere that matters here.

<reams of curry muncher shit flushed where it belongs>

> There should be other markets for the new design rail gun to launch
> Mach8+ missiles, like Taiwan.

They dont need that, they have all they need to stop
China doing an amphibious or psratrooper landing.

>> It is China that has it's eyes on Australia.

> If Australia tries to be smart and independent,then it is US/UK that
> could invade,

UK doesnt have anything even remotely like the capacity to do that.

The USA has no capacity to hold it so won't be that stupid.

They couldn't even manage to hold Afghanistan.

> like Russia invaded Ukraine.

Nothing even remotely like, fuckwit.

> Cultivated stupidity and dependence are assets for good living when you
> are a very lucky country.

Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always.

> How long can that present strategy continue, is the question.

Forever, you watch.

> Anyway, the new design rail gun, an awesome invention, is there, and
> easy to duplicate.

So not possible for it to only be for Australia, fuckwit.

> Every science teacher in high school must perform this experiment, to
> demonstrate lack of recoil from the accelerating force upon the
> projectile. (There is recoil, but that is from rolling friction, which
> can be minimized for greater efficiency).

> Lots of fun! And quite shattering, in more ways than one.

> My purpose was to upset the laws of physics,

Even sillier than you usually manage and that's saying something.

> thereby making it possible to go to the stars with new reactionless
> motors

No point, takes too long, fuckwit.

> using the effect I have shown, and will elaborate in a coming video film.

> Hypersonic missiles will be useful to smash asteroids, for mining
> primarily, in outer space.

Taint gunna happen.

> Or save the planet.

They can't do that.

- flush -
Some pair, this petzl and Rod!

On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 18:01:38 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
<banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sunday, 20 March 2022 at 11:34:49 UTC+11, petzl wrote:
>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 17:06:53 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
>> <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Sunday, 20 March 2022 at 10:44:52 UTC+11, petzl wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 15:50:40 -0700, Mattb <trdel...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 22:30:07 -0700 (PDT), Arindam Banerjee
>> >> ><banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rw5OcSXkN_4
>> >> >>
>> >> >>No defence for it, what. So they say.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>My new design rail gun could sort that out.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
>> >> >>Upgraded versions of this design could fire a missile at Mach2 and above and then that missile goes up to Mach 10 or so. Very efficient!
>> >> >>
>> >> >>Only for Australia, of course.
>> >> >
>> >> Used to use "rail Guns" now out dated.
>> >
>> >Wrong.
>> >US went for rail guns, but their high voltage low mass narrow bore rail gun had enormous problems.
>> >My design is very different.
>> >
>> Also their length, as a weapon limited means of aiming and firing them
>> They were thought to be maybe able to shoot small objects into space
>> but other ways were more practice.
>
>They simply did not work. Ronald Reagan boosted them as star wars tech but their basic design was wrong.
>They tried to put in on naval vessels, and indeed it is still there on their latest ships.
>However there are lots of problems.
>
>> Don't reckon anyone is interested in your claimed better mousetrap!
>
>Not yet, true.
>I have just made the one introductory video lasting for 4 seconds, out of which 0.5 seconds is the most meaningful.
>At least one person in the whole world (in sci.math) showed positive interest.
>
Well I looked at it but not impressed. You made a water wheel
(I think) that I were impressed with
https://youtu.be/50Aag0J0Qe4

>> New Zealand's answer they launch 100 satellites into space every year.
>> Become a big tourist attraction with worlds best fishing and shell
>> fish.
>> https://youtu.be/DqOW1P6hUss
>> They now have two launch pads privately owned
>> All rockets and engines are "printed" super fastly
>> Australia better worry about them, ring Dutton!
>
>Rockets will be fired after the missiles are launched by special rail launchers.
>It will mean an increase in speed.
>Yes, small satellites can be launched into space, with this launcher. Far more efficiently, as the rockets and fuel will be smaller.
>
>> >> >
>> >> > It is China that has it's eyes on Australia.
>> >> >
>> >> China already owns China through corrpt polititions on the take.
>> >> Both major parties Labor and Coalition.
>> >
>> >Wrong. Australia is a distant appendage in the Anglosphere.
>> >
>> What you find wrong with that!
>
>Nothing. I just mentioned that China does not own Australia, which is probably what you meant, otherwise your statement "China already owns China" above make no sense.
>You probably meant to write "China already owns Australia".
>China does not own Australia.
>To claim that is stupid.
>Australia is owned by the Anglospheric elites; some of them may be in Australia.
>They are doing a pretty good job, so far as my well-being is concerned.
>So I find nothing wrong about Australia being a distant appendage in the Anglosphere.
>On the other hand, Australia could develop its own identity. Be a republic, strong, free and independent, with its own excellent values, not looking backwards but forwards.
>A matter of choice, that, for future generations.
>
Walt you believe Australia's values are Rod Speed is typical of
modern, the world ends at his nose.
But he also is cluey with ideas, types real fast so stop feeding the
flame!

>
>> That's you are a racist with an inferiority complex!
>
>Racists call me racist, when they try to be insulting.
>Makes them look even more foolish.
>
You finding others calling you racist also?
>
>> Bordering on Schizophrenia.
>
>I doubt you know what that means.
>
many symptoms. One being an inferiority complex!
>
>> Trouble is I find you reasonably intelligent
>
>I find you ignorant, biased and paranoid.
>Have you any good qualities?
>
Don't toot my own horn!
>
>Dismissal with faint praise is so slimy.
>
Glad you have an biased opinion
>
--
Petzl
'we are a Christian nation' with 'Christian values' to which newcomers
should conform, while enjoying freedom for their own beliefs.
Pauline Hanson.

If you look at Australia it is largely a Christian country with
Christian norms. The things we do, the way our political parties
behave, have, if not an activist Christianity about it, Christian
ideals.
Paul Keating