On 10/03/2022 3:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 10/03/2022 11:22 am, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 18/2/22 (and unlike clocky the date is correct) clocky posted
>>
>> "What, you copy and paste code into a Sketch in Arduino, select the
>> libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program. Literally
>> anyone can do that."
>>
>> So now it is time for him to put his talents such as they are where
>> his mouth is. Its a simple task, make a speedometer that runs from
>> GPS. It must display current speed of course, but that is so simple
>> that felix could do it in BASIC on his Mac, so, in addition, it has to
>> display average speed. The current average speed needs to be
>> continuously displayed starting when a button is pressed (the button
>> press also resets any average speed displayed up to that point). Extra
>> points for displaying current time, time and distance that the average
>> speed is calculated over, but don't make the display crowded and
>> unreadable.
>>
>> The whole thing has to be small enough to the fitted in or on top of
>> the dashboard, and be a single unit, the display has to be clear
>> enough to be read while concentrating on driving. Probably a 3.5"
>> 380x320 display is the sweet spot.
>>
>> The code has to be readable and compilable, and provided in source
>> form so that it can be inspected and tested.
>>
>> Since anybody can do that, I would expect that as a licenced and
>> qualified mechanic, holder of a certificate in electronics, well
>> renowned vintage computer dealer you will have no trouble doing it in
>> say a month. In fact, since anybody can do it anybody who wants to
>> have a go is welcome, felix included.
>
> Are you asking for a quote?
>
Nope, trying to see if your brain can do what your mouth promised.

On 10/03/2022 3:17 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 10/03/2022 4:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 10/03/2022 11:22 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 18/2/22 (and unlike clocky the date is correct) clocky posted
>>>
>>> "What, you copy and paste code into a Sketch in Arduino, select the
>>> libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program. Literally
>>> anyone can do that."
>>>
>>> So now it is time for him to put his talents such as they are where
>>> his mouth is. Its a simple task, make a speedometer that runs from
>>> GPS. It must display current speed of course, but that is so simple
>>> that felix could do it in BASIC on his Mac, so, in addition, it has
>>> to display average speed. The current average speed needs to be
>>> continuously displayed starting when a button is pressed (the button
>>> press also resets any average speed displayed up to that point).
>>> Extra points for displaying current time, time and distance that the
>>> average speed is calculated over, but don't make the display crowded
>>> and unreadable.
>>>
>>> The whole thing has to be small enough to the fitted in or on top of
>>> the dashboard, and be a single unit, the display has to be clear
>>> enough to be read while concentrating on driving. Probably a 3.5"
>>> 380x320 display is the sweet spot.
>>>
>>> The code has to be readable and compilable, and provided in source
>>> form so that it can be inspected and tested.
>>>
>>> Since anybody can do that, I would expect that as a licenced and
>>> qualified mechanic, holder of a certificate in electronics, well
>>> renowned vintage computer dealer you will have no trouble doing it in
>>> say a month. In fact, since anybody can do it anybody who wants to
>>> have a go is welcome, felix included.
>>
>> Are you asking for a quote?
>>
>
> hahahaha!
>
"Clocky is a fake" there's a quote for you.

On 10/03/2022 5:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 10/03/2022 3:17 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 10/03/2022 3:38 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 10/03/2022 3:13 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 10/03/2022 2:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>
>>>>> so you want Clocky to work for a month just to prove something to
>>>>> you? Clocky should charge you $75 an hour then, the price you
>>>>> quoted me for computer problem diagnostics.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> He is free to decline, but it will prove what a fraud he is.
>>>
>>> It does no such thing.
>>>
>>> I don't know what you were hoping to achieve here but it has
>>> completely backfired on you. Someone who is unwilling to do
>>> something doesn't mean they *cannot* do something. It just means
>>> they don't want to do it. Especially if it's some kind of dick
>>> "test" that would prove nothing to someone who's opinions you don't
>>> give a toss about anyway.
>>>
>>> Felix is 100% right on this.
>>
>>
>> wow! I actually got something right! :)
>>
>>
>
> No, he agreed with you

it's the same thing!

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam

FUCK PUTIN!!

"His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
"He came, he saw, he got pummelled" - Alvey on Keefy
"What a pair! Not a single word of rebuttal or reason,
just cretinous abuse" - Alvey on jonz and noddy
"His self serving ego pumping comments just read
like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy
"your opinion isn't worth 2 knobs of goat shit"- Xeno on Grubby Tech
"You cannot turn Darren's lies into the truth by attempting to *discredit*
what *I* say. You just make yourself look more of a dick"- Xeno to Grubby Tech

On 10/03/2022 6:54 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 10/03/2022 3:28 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 10/03/2022 4:25 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 10/03/2022 12:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 10/03/2022 2:22 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 18/2/22 (and unlike clocky the date is correct) clocky posted
>>>>>
>>>>> "What, you copy and paste code into a Sketch in Arduino, select
>>>>> the libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program.
>>>>> Literally anyone can do that."
>>>>>
>>>>> So now it is time for him to put his talents such as they are
>>>>> where his mouth is. Its a simple task, make a speedometer that
>>>>> runs from GPS. It must display current speed of course, but that
>>>>> is so simple that felix could do it in BASIC on his Mac, so, in
>>>>> addition, it has to display average speed. The current average
>>>>> speed needs to be continuously displayed starting when a button is
>>>>> pressed (the button press also resets any average speed displayed
>>>>> up to that point). Extra points for displaying current time, time
>>>>> and distance that the average speed is calculated over, but don't
>>>>> make the display crowded and unreadable.
>>>>>
>>>>> The whole thing has to be small enough to the fitted in or on top
>>>>> of the dashboard, and be a single unit, the display has to be
>>>>> clear enough to be read while concentrating on driving. Probably a
>>>>> 3.5" 380x320 display is the sweet spot.
>>>>>
>>>>> The code has to be readable and compilable, and provided in source
>>>>> form so that it can be inspected and tested.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since anybody can do that, I would expect that as a licenced and
>>>>> qualified mechanic, holder of a certificate in electronics, well
>>>>> renowned vintage computer dealer you will have no trouble doing it
>>>>> in say a month. In fact, since anybody can do it anybody who wants
>>>>> to have a go is welcome, felix included.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> so you want Clocky to work for a month just to prove something to
>>>> you? Clocky should charge you $75 an hour then, the price you
>>>> quoted me for computer problem diagnostics.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> keith is acting *very* weird and it's getting worse.
>>>
>>
>> maybe he's been sniffing too much of the glue they use at the
>> Aviation museum?
>
> Glue? You think that real aircraft are made like models? Modern
> airlines do use bonded panels, but the old one we have are done
> properly with bolts and rivets.
>

don't you have any WW1 bi-planes? :)

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam

FUCK PUTIN!!

"His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
"He came, he saw, he got pummelled" - Alvey on Keefy
"What a pair! Not a single word of rebuttal or reason,
just cretinous abuse" - Alvey on jonz and noddy
"His self serving ego pumping comments just read
like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy
"your opinion isn't worth 2 knobs of goat shit"- Xeno on Grubby Tech
"You cannot turn Darren's lies into the truth by attempting to *discredit*
what *I* say. You just make yourself look more of a dick"- Xeno to Grubby Tech

On 10/03/2022 6:58 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 10/03/2022 2:34 pm, Noddy wrote:
>> On 10/03/2022 2:22 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 18/2/22 (and unlike clocky the date is correct) clocky posted
>>>
>>> "What, you copy and paste code into a Sketch in Arduino, select the
>>> libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program. Literally
>>> anyone can do that."
>>>
>>> So now it is time for him to put his talents such as they are where
>>> his mouth is. Its a simple task, make a speedometer that runs from
>>> GPS. It must display current speed of course, but that is so simple
>>> that felix could do it in BASIC on his Mac, so, in addition, it has
>>> to display average speed. The current average speed needs to be
>>> continuously displayed starting when a button is pressed (the button
>>> press also resets any average speed displayed up to that point).
>>> Extra points for displaying current time, time and distance that the
>>> average speed is calculated over, but don't make the display crowded
>>> and unreadable.
>>>
>>> The whole thing has to be small enough to the fitted in or on top of
>>> the dashboard, and be a single unit, the display has to be clear
>>> enough to be read while concentrating on driving. Probably a 3.5"
>>> 380x320 display is the sweet spot.
>>>
>>> The code has to be readable and compilable, and provided in source
>>> form so that it can be inspected and tested.
>>>
>>> Since anybody can do that, I would expect that as a licenced and
>>> qualified mechanic, holder of a certificate in electronics, well
>>> renowned vintage computer dealer you will have no trouble doing it
>>> in say a month. In fact, since anybody can do it anybody who wants
>>> to have a go is welcome, felix included.
>>
>> What is the point of this? You expect someone to go to the trouble of
>> building something and presenting it to you just so you can be
>> satisfied that they know what they're talking about, and as the
>> "task" you set for them is "so simple that Felix could do it" it
>> would prove absolutely nothing even if they *did* feel compelled to
>> respond to you?
>
> Yes, he just has to show that his talents are as big as his mouth.
>
>> I'm no friend of Jerky's, and to my mind he *already* proved the
>> limited range of his "electronics knowledge" when I posted the
>> pictures of my distributor's failed logic board and he decided to
>> comment about it, but what you're doing here just makes you look like
>> an *idiot* who needs to get the fuck over himself. For fuck's sake.
>> Demanding people "prove themselves" to you makes you no different to
>> the morons you criticise daily for doing the *exact* same thing.
>
> It's up to him, he's been big noting himself in this regard, I'm
> calling him out on it.
>
>> Jesus.
>
> You rang?
>

OMG!

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam

FUCK PUTIN!!

"His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
"He came, he saw, he got pummelled" - Alvey on Keefy
"What a pair! Not a single word of rebuttal or reason,
just cretinous abuse" - Alvey on jonz and noddy
"His self serving ego pumping comments just read
like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy
"your opinion isn't worth 2 knobs of goat shit"- Xeno on Grubby Tech
"You cannot turn Darren's lies into the truth by attempting to *discredit*
what *I* say. You just make yourself look more of a dick"- Xeno to Grubby Tech

On 10/03/2022 7:00 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 10/03/2022 3:22 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 10/03/2022 12:34 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 10/03/2022 2:22 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 18/2/22 (and unlike clocky the date is correct) clocky posted
>>>>
>>>> "What, you copy and paste code into a Sketch in Arduino, select the
>>>> libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program. Literally
>>>> anyone can do that."
>>>>
>>>> So now it is time for him to put his talents such as they are where
>>>> his mouth is. Its a simple task, make a speedometer that runs from
>>>> GPS. It must display current speed of course, but that is so simple
>>>> that felix could do it in BASIC on his Mac, so, in addition, it has
>>>> to display average speed. The current average speed needs to be
>>>> continuously displayed starting when a button is pressed (the
>>>> button press also resets any average speed displayed up to that
>>>> point). Extra points for displaying current time, time and distance
>>>> that the average speed is calculated over, but don't make the
>>>> display crowded and unreadable.
>>>>
>>>> The whole thing has to be small enough to the fitted in or on top
>>>> of the dashboard, and be a single unit, the display has to be clear
>>>> enough to be read while concentrating on driving. Probably a 3.5"
>>>> 380x320 display is the sweet spot.
>>>>
>>>> The code has to be readable and compilable, and provided in source
>>>> form so that it can be inspected and tested.
>>>>
>>>> Since anybody can do that, I would expect that as a licenced and
>>>> qualified mechanic, holder of a certificate in electronics, well
>>>> renowned vintage computer dealer you will have no trouble doing it
>>>> in say a month. In fact, since anybody can do it anybody who wants
>>>> to have a go is welcome, felix included.
>>>
>>> What is the point of this? You expect someone to go to the trouble
>>> of building something and presenting it to you just so you can be
>>> satisfied that they know what they're talking about, and as the
>>> "task" you set for them is "so simple that Felix could do it" it
>>> would prove absolutely nothing even if they *did* feel compelled to
>>> respond to you?
>>>
>>> I'm no friend of Jerky's, and to my mind he *already* proved the
>>> limited range of his "electronics knowledge" when I posted the
>>> pictures of my distributor's failed logic board and he decided to
>>> comment about it, but what you're doing here just makes you look
>>> like an *idiot* who needs to get the fuck over himself. For fuck's
>>> sake. Demanding people "prove themselves" to you makes you no
>>> different to the morons you criticise daily for doing the *exact*
>>> same thing.
>>>
>>> Jesus.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> keith is a bit butthurt that I nailed the extent of his cut and paste
>> "programming" expertise these days.
>
> You "Nailed it"? It's pretty sad when you have to give yourself a pat
> on the back

you've been giving yourself pats on the back ever since you popped up on
usenet

> for something that was a total failure. You're living in a fantasy
> world, and trying to duck for cover when called out on it.
>

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam

FUCK PUTIN!!

"His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
"He came, he saw, he got pummelled" - Alvey on Keefy
"What a pair! Not a single word of rebuttal or reason,
just cretinous abuse" - Alvey on jonz and noddy
"His self serving ego pumping comments just read
like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy
"your opinion isn't worth 2 knobs of goat shit"- Xeno on Grubby Tech
"You cannot turn Darren's lies into the truth by attempting to *discredit*
what *I* say. You just make yourself look more of a dick"- Xeno to Grubby Tech

On Thursday, 10 March 2022 at 14:22:29 UTC+11, keithr0 wrote:
> On 18/2/22 (and unlike clocky the date is correct) clocky posted
>
> "What, you copy and paste code into a Sketch in Arduino, select the
> libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program. Literally anyone
> can do that."
>
> So now it is time for him to put his talents such as they are where his
> mouth is. Its a simple task, make a speedometer that runs from GPS. It
> must display current speed of course, but that is so simple that felix
> could do it in BASIC on his Mac, so, in addition, it has to display
> average speed. The current average speed needs to be continuously
> displayed starting when a button is pressed (the button press also
> resets any average speed displayed up to that point). Extra points for
> displaying current time, time and distance that the average speed is
> calculated over, but don't make the display crowded and unreadable.
>
> The whole thing has to be small enough to the fitted in or on top of the
> dashboard, and be a single unit, the display has to be clear enough to
> be read while concentrating on driving. Probably a 3.5" 380x320 display
> is the sweet spot.
>
> The code has to be readable and compilable, and provided in source form
> so that it can be inspected and tested.
>
> Since anybody can do that, I would expect that as a licenced and
> qualified mechanic, holder of a certificate in electronics, well
> renowned vintage computer dealer you will have no trouble doing it in
> say a month. In fact, since anybody can do it anybody who wants to have
> a go is welcome, felix included.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
Good stuff, I`ll bring the popcorn. :)))

On Thursday, 10 March 2022 at 15:13:21 UTC+11, keithr0 wrote:
> On 10/03/2022 2:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> > On 10/03/2022 2:22 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >> On 18/2/22 (and unlike clocky the date is correct) clocky posted
> >>
> >> "What, you copy and paste code into a Sketch in Arduino, select the
> >> libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program. Literally
> >> anyone can do that."
> >>
> >> So now it is time for him to put his talents such as they are where
> >> his mouth is. Its a simple task, make a speedometer that runs from
> >> GPS. It must display current speed of course, but that is so simple
> >> that felix could do it in BASIC on his Mac, so, in addition, it has to
> >> display average speed. The current average speed needs to be
> >> continuously displayed starting when a button is pressed (the button
> >> press also resets any average speed displayed up to that point). Extra
> >> points for displaying current time, time and distance that the average
> >> speed is calculated over, but don't make the display crowded and
> >> unreadable.
> >>
> >> The whole thing has to be small enough to the fitted in or on top of
> >> the dashboard, and be a single unit, the display has to be clear
> >> enough to be read while concentrating on driving. Probably a 3.5"
> >> 380x320 display is the sweet spot.
> >>
> >> The code has to be readable and compilable, and provided in source
> >> form so that it can be inspected and tested.
> >>
> >> Since anybody can do that, I would expect that as a licenced and
> >> qualified mechanic, holder of a certificate in electronics, well
> >> renowned vintage computer dealer you will have no trouble doing it in
> >> say a month. In fact, since anybody can do it anybody who wants to
> >> have a go is welcome, felix included.
> >
> >
> > so you want Clocky to work for a month just to prove something to you?
> > Clocky should charge you $75 an hour then, the price you quoted me for
> > computer problem diagnostics.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Get away from the goalposts willy wonka.
> >
> >
> He is free to decline, but it will prove what a fraud he is.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Might er, *run away* even. <FBG>

On 10/03/2022 5:59 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 10/03/2022 3:17 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:

>>> Felix is 100% right on this.
>>
>>
>> wow! I actually got something right! :)
>>
>>
>
> No, he agreed with you, since you reckon that he is always wrong, and a
> liar, what does that make you?

Don't waste your time here Keith. You've made an idiot out of yourself
here, and that ain't my fault.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 10/03/2022 6:58 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 10/03/2022 2:34 pm, Noddy wrote:

>> What is the point of this? You expect someone to go to the trouble of
>> building something and presenting it to you just so you can be
>> satisfied that they know what they're talking about, and as the "task"
>> you set for them is "so simple that Felix could do it" it would prove
>> absolutely nothing even if they *did* feel compelled to respond to you?
>
> Yes, he just has to show that his talents are as big as his mouth.

He doesn't have to show you or anyone else a bloody *thing*. The fuck do
you get off demanding that people prove themselves to you, Alvey?

>> I'm no friend of Jerky's, and to my mind he *already* proved the
>> limited range of his "electronics knowledge" when I posted the
>> pictures of my distributor's failed logic board and he decided to
>> comment about it, but what you're doing here just makes you look like
>> an *idiot* who needs to get the fuck over himself. For fuck's sake.
>> Demanding people "prove themselves" to you makes you no different to
>> the morons you criticise daily for doing the *exact* same thing.
>
> It's up to him, he's been big noting himself in this regard, I'm calling
> him out on it.

Good. Call him out as much as you like, but if you think he has any
obligation to dance to whatever tune you feel like playing on your pipe
then you're off your fucking rocker.

As I said, you need to get over yourself.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On Thursday, 10 March 2022 at 16:09:27 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:
> On 10/03/2022 12:13 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> > On 10/03/2022 2:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >> On 10/03/2022 2:22 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>> On 18/2/22 (and unlike clocky the date is correct) clocky posted
> >>>
> >>> "What, you copy and paste code into a Sketch in Arduino, select the
> >>> libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program. Literally
> >>> anyone can do that."
> >>>
> >>> So now it is time for him to put his talents such as they are where
> >>> his mouth is. Its a simple task, make a speedometer that runs from
> >>> GPS. It must display current speed of course, but that is so simple
> >>> that felix could do it in BASIC on his Mac, so, in addition, it has
> >>> to display average speed. The current average speed needs to be
> >>> continuously displayed starting when a button is pressed (the button
> >>> press also resets any average speed displayed up to that point).
> >>> Extra points for displaying current time, time and distance that the
> >>> average speed is calculated over, but don't make the display crowded
> >>> and unreadable.
> >>>
> >>> The whole thing has to be small enough to the fitted in or on top of
> >>> the dashboard, and be a single unit, the display has to be clear
> >>> enough to be read while concentrating on driving. Probably a 3.5"
> >>> 380x320 display is the sweet spot.
> >>>
> >>> The code has to be readable and compilable, and provided in source
> >>> form so that it can be inspected and tested.
> >>>
> >>> Since anybody can do that, I would expect that as a licenced and
> >>> qualified mechanic, holder of a certificate in electronics, well
> >>> renowned vintage computer dealer you will have no trouble doing it in
> >>> say a month. In fact, since anybody can do it anybody who wants to
> >>> have a go is welcome, felix included.
> >>
> >>
> >> so you want Clocky to work for a month just to prove something to you?
> >> Clocky should charge you $75 an hour then, the price you quoted me for
> >> computer problem diagnostics.
> >>
> >>
> > He is free to decline, but it will prove what a fraud he is.
> How so? All it proves is that you need someone to program an Arduino for
> you presumably because you can't do it yourself
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yep, you are a presumptive cunt.. *you* ran yer mouth and said *anyone* can do it.
Therefore *you* should put your *money* where your mouth is. I mean *you* and the other circle jerkers squark nearly every day that a certain other person should do such *Forthwith*..
SO, C'mon show me (I don`t need the royal *we* didya copy that pepe??) how its done.
I for one am quite sure that Keith can handle it, But *YOU*?. Well, lets see.
Remember! *anyone can do it* (you said) However I`m *not* one of the anyones, (proper dum i is) and would like to know.
So on with the motley.
Or are you gunna duck and weave annnd *run away*......:))))
> --
> keith on the 7 Oct 2021 wrote;
> "He asserts that the claim is true, so, if
> it is unproven, he is lying."

On Thursday, 10 March 2022 at 16:17:14 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 10/03/2022 3:38 pm, Noddy wrote:
> > On 10/03/2022 3:13 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >> On 10/03/2022 2:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >
> >>> so you want Clocky to work for a month just to prove something to
> >>> you? Clocky should charge you $75 an hour then, the price you quoted
> >>> me for computer problem diagnostics.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> He is free to decline, but it will prove what a fraud he is.
> >
> > It does no such thing.
> >
> > I don't know what you were hoping to achieve here but it has
> > completely backfired on you. Someone who is unwilling to do something
> > doesn't mean they *cannot* do something. It just means they don't want
> > to do it. Especially if it's some kind of dick "test" that would prove
> > nothing to someone who's opinions you don't give a toss about anyway.
> >
> > Felix is 100% right on this.
> wow! I actually got something right! :)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Not a chance!.
> > Your idea, whatever it was, is completely nonsensical.
> >
>
> --
> https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
>
> FUCK PUTIN!!
>
> "His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
> the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
> "He came, he saw, he got pummelled" - Alvey on Keefy
> "What a pair! Not a single word of rebuttal or reason,
> just cretinous abuse" - Alvey on jonz and noddy
> "His self serving ego pumping comments just read
> like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy
> "your opinion isn't worth 2 knobs of goat shit"- Xeno on Grubby Tech
> "You cannot turn Darren's lies into the truth by attempting to *discredit*
> what *I* say. You just make yourself look more of a dick"- Xeno to Grubby Tech

On Thursday, 10 March 2022 at 16:37:29 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:
> On 10/03/2022 1:17 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> > On 10/03/2022 3:38 pm, Noddy wrote:
> >> On 10/03/2022 3:13 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>> On 10/03/2022 2:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>
> >>>> so you want Clocky to work for a month just to prove something to
> >>>> you? Clocky should charge you $75 an hour then, the price you quoted
> >>>> me for computer problem diagnostics.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> He is free to decline, but it will prove what a fraud he is.
> >>
> >> It does no such thing.
> >>
> >> I don't know what you were hoping to achieve here but it has
> >> completely backfired on you. Someone who is unwilling to do something
> >> doesn't mean they *cannot* do something. It just means they don't want
> >> to do it. Especially if it's some kind of dick "test" that would prove
> >> nothing to someone who's opinions you don't give a toss about anyway.
> >>
> >> Felix is 100% right on this.
> >
> >
> > wow! I actually got something right! :)
> >
> >
> No, he *admits* you got something right rather than attack you for it.
>
> Maybe NoddyLiar will stop chasing keith with his rubber stamp of
> approval for every illogical and absurd comment keith makes..
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nope, He keeps handing *YOU* yer arse, he usually makes plenty of sense.
You and the other *mouth runners* just can`t handle such..
*COMPREHENSION* with a cap. C is completely *absent*

> >> Your idea, whatever it was, is completely nonsensical.
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> keith on the 7 Oct 2021 wrote;
> "He asserts that the claim is true, so, if
> it is unproven, he is lying."

On Thursday, 10 March 2022 at 18:51:48 UTC+11, keithr0 wrote:
> On 10/03/2022 3:09 pm, Clocky wrote:
> > On 10/03/2022 12:13 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >> On 10/03/2022 2:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>> On 10/03/2022 2:22 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>> On 18/2/22 (and unlike clocky the date is correct) clocky posted
> >>>>
> >>>> "What, you copy and paste code into a Sketch in Arduino, select the
> >>>> libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program. Literally
> >>>> anyone can do that."
> >>>>
> >>>> So now it is time for him to put his talents such as they are where
> >>>> his mouth is. Its a simple task, make a speedometer that runs from
> >>>> GPS. It must display current speed of course, but that is so simple
> >>>> that felix could do it in BASIC on his Mac, so, in addition, it has
> >>>> to display average speed. The current average speed needs to be
> >>>> continuously displayed starting when a button is pressed (the button
> >>>> press also resets any average speed displayed up to that point).
> >>>> Extra points for displaying current time, time and distance that the
> >>>> average speed is calculated over, but don't make the display crowded
> >>>> and unreadable.
> >>>>
> >>>> The whole thing has to be small enough to the fitted in or on top of
> >>>> the dashboard, and be a single unit, the display has to be clear
> >>>> enough to be read while concentrating on driving. Probably a 3.5"
> >>>> 380x320 display is the sweet spot.
> >>>>
> >>>> The code has to be readable and compilable, and provided in source
> >>>> form so that it can be inspected and tested.
> >>>>
> >>>> Since anybody can do that, I would expect that as a licenced and
> >>>> qualified mechanic, holder of a certificate in electronics, well
> >>>> renowned vintage computer dealer you will have no trouble doing it
> >>>> in say a month. In fact, since anybody can do it anybody who wants
> >>>> to have a go is welcome, felix included.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> so you want Clocky to work for a month just to prove something to
> >>> you? Clocky should charge you $75 an hour then, the price you quoted
> >>> me for computer problem diagnostics.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> He is free to decline, but it will prove what a fraud he is.
> >
> > How so? All it proves is that you need someone to program an Arduino for
> > you presumably because you can't do it yourself.
> Wrong and wrong.
>
> !) I've already done it, I just want to see if your abilities are as big
> as your mouth
> 2) I didn't use an Arduino or the Arduino workspace, real programmers
> don't need to.
>
> You're just looking for a way to crawl out.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Prezackerly. :)))

On 10/3/2022 8:53 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 10/03/2022 6:58 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 10/03/2022 2:34 pm, Noddy wrote:
>
>>> What is the point of this? You expect someone to go to the trouble of
>>> building something and presenting it to you just so you can be
>>> satisfied that they know what they're talking about, and as the
>>> "task" you set for them is "so simple that Felix could do it" it
>>> would prove absolutely nothing even if they *did* feel compelled to
>>> respond to you?
>>
>> Yes, he just has to show that his talents are as big as his mouth.
>
> He doesn't have to show you or anyone else a bloody *thing*. The fuck do
> you get off demanding that people prove themselves to you, Alvey?
>
>>> I'm no friend of Jerky's, and to my mind he *already* proved the
>>> limited range of his "electronics knowledge" when I posted the
>>> pictures of my distributor's failed logic board and he decided to
>>> comment about it, but what you're doing here just makes you look like
>>> an *idiot* who needs to get the fuck over himself. For fuck's sake.
>>> Demanding people "prove themselves" to you makes you no different to
>>> the morons you criticise daily for doing the *exact* same thing.
>>
>> It's up to him, he's been big noting himself in this regard, I'm
>> calling him out on it.
>
> Good. Call him out as much as you like, but if you think he has any
> obligation to dance to whatever tune you feel like playing on your pipe
> then you're off your fucking rocker.
>
> As I said, you need to get over yourself.
>
How odd, a complete 180 degree reversal in your opinion, and viewpoint,
no doubt fostered by the realisation that *you* have been bignoting
yourself *bigtime* over *decades* and now all that fraudulent shit you
came out with has blown up in your own face. It's left you in a bit of a
quandary, eh? It's Ok Darren, I'm sure most here with a clue know full
well you have no proof to show. Certainly the Government business,
apprenticeship and trade qualifications records are indicative of that.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On Thursday, 10 March 2022 at 20:53:25 UTC+11, Noddy wrote:
> On 10/03/2022 6:58 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> > On 10/03/2022 2:34 pm, Noddy wrote:
>
> >> What is the point of this? You expect someone to go to the trouble of
> >> building something and presenting it to you just so you can be
> >> satisfied that they know what they're talking about, and as the "task"
> >> you set for them is "so simple that Felix could do it" it would prove
> >> absolutely nothing even if they *did* feel compelled to respond to you?
> >
> > Yes, he just has to show that his talents are as big as his mouth.
> He doesn't have to show you or anyone else a bloody *thing*. The fuck do
> you get off demanding that people prove themselves to you, Alvey?
> >> I'm no friend of Jerky's, and to my mind he *already* proved the
> >> limited range of his "electronics knowledge" when I posted the
> >> pictures of my distributor's failed logic board and he decided to
> >> comment about it, but what you're doing here just makes you look like
> >> an *idiot* who needs to get the fuck over himself. For fuck's sake.
> >> Demanding people "prove themselves" to you makes you no different to
> >> the morons you criticise daily for doing the *exact* same thing.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ticky said *Anyone can do it*.. Therefore, "The proof of the pudding is in the eating"
Keith is simply *calling his bluff*. Comprende ?
> >
> > It's up to him, he's been big noting himself in this regard, I'm calling
> > him out on it.
> Good. Call him out as much as you like, but if you think he has any
> obligation to dance to whatever tune you feel like playing on your pipe
> then you're off your fucking rocker.
>
> As I said, you need to get over yourself.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Really? how do you come to *that* conclusion?.
Anyway, Keith set the task, lets see if W. O'T follows thru, or fucks off. (To his rock.)
> --
> --
> --
> Regards,
> Noddy.

On Thursday, 10 March 2022 at 21:30:21 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
> On 10/3/2022 8:53 pm, Noddy wrote:
> > On 10/03/2022 6:58 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >> On 10/03/2022 2:34 pm, Noddy wrote:
> >
> >>> What is the point of this? You expect someone to go to the trouble of
> >>> building something and presenting it to you just so you can be
> >>> satisfied that they know what they're talking about, and as the
> >>> "task" you set for them is "so simple that Felix could do it" it
> >>> would prove absolutely nothing even if they *did* feel compelled to
> >>> respond to you?
> >>
> >> Yes, he just has to show that his talents are as big as his mouth.
> >
> > He doesn't have to show you or anyone else a bloody *thing*. The fuck do
> > you get off demanding that people prove themselves to you, Alvey?
> >
> >>> I'm no friend of Jerky's, and to my mind he *already* proved the
> >>> limited range of his "electronics knowledge" when I posted the
> >>> pictures of my distributor's failed logic board and he decided to
> >>> comment about it, but what you're doing here just makes you look like
> >>> an *idiot* who needs to get the fuck over himself. For fuck's sake.
> >>> Demanding people "prove themselves" to you makes you no different to
> >>> the morons you criticise daily for doing the *exact* same thing.
> >>
> >> It's up to him, he's been big noting himself in this regard, I'm
> >> calling him out on it.
> >
> > Good. Call him out as much as you like, but if you think he has any
> > obligation to dance to whatever tune you feel like playing on your pipe
> > then you're off your fucking rocker.
> >
> > As I said, you need to get over yourself.
> >
> How odd, a complete 180 degree reversal in your opinion, and viewpoint,
> no doubt fostered by the realisation that *you* have been bignoting
> yourself *bigtime* over *decades* and now all that fraudulent shit you
> came out with has blown up in your own face. It's left you in a bit of a
> quandary, eh? It's Ok Darren, I'm sure most here with a clue know full
> well you have no proof to show. Certainly the Government business,
> apprenticeship and trade qualifications records are indicative of that.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Fuck off krypsis!.
>
>
> --
> Xeno
>
>
> Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
> (with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 10/03/2022 9:31 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> On Thursday, 10 March 2022 at 20:53:25 UTC+11, Noddy wrote:

>>>> I'm no friend of Jerky's, and to my mind he *already* proved the
>>>> limited range of his "electronics knowledge" when I posted the
>>>> pictures of my distributor's failed logic board and he decided to
>>>> comment about it, but what you're doing here just makes you look like
>>>> an *idiot* who needs to get the fuck over himself. For fuck's sake.
>>>> Demanding people "prove themselves" to you makes you no different to
>>>> the morons you criticise daily for doing the *exact* same thing.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

> Ticky said *Anyone can do it*.. Therefore, "The proof of the pudding is in the eating"

I didn't see all the comment, but I believe Arduino was being discussed
and if that's the case then anyone *can* do it. I programmed a little
Arduino logic board to control my vapour blasting cabinet so regular
momentary contact foot switches where turned into "push on/push off"
latching switches to control the fan, pump, air solenoid and windscreen
wiper. The code itself was a pre-written demo but it's not difficult,
and I modified the basic sample to suit my own particular needs with
regards to the number of pedals, timing delays and so on.

I was able to get what I wanted out of it and I'm *far* from a
programmer :) It is not at all difficult. Even if you knew nothing about
it you could find enough information on the Net to complete Keith's task
fairly easily which makes the whole exercise completely futile.

> Keith is simply *calling his bluff*. Comprende ?

I know exactly what he's doing. He's being a complete flog in thinking
that he has any right to demand anyone prove themselves to him, and a
massive hypocrite for doing the very thing he criticises the FLC of doing.

>> Good. Call him out as much as you like, but if you think he has any
>> obligation to dance to whatever tune you feel like playing on your pipe
>> then you're off your fucking rocker.
>>
>> As I said, you need to get over yourself.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Really? how do you come to *that* conclusion?.

Read what I just wrote above. All Keith is managing to show here is that
he can do a really good impersonation of Alvey.

> Anyway, Keith set the task, lets see if W. O'T follows thru, or fucks off. (To his rock.)

Keith doesn't get to "set tasks". No one fucked off and left him in charge.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 10/03/2022 9:33 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> On Thursday, 10 March 2022 at 21:30:21 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:

>> How odd, a complete 180 degree reversal in your opinion, and viewpoint,
>> no doubt fostered by the realisation that *you* have been bignoting
>> yourself *bigtime* over *decades* and now all that fraudulent shit you
>> came out with has blown up in your own face. It's left you in a bit of a
>> quandary, eh? It's Ok Darren, I'm sure most here with a clue know full
>> well you have no proof to show. Certainly the Government business,
>> apprenticeship and trade qualifications records are indicative of that.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Fuck off krypsis!.

Yeah, fuck off Krypsis.

Before you do though, want to name the cars you have walled up in your shed?
--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 10/3/22 22:06, Noddy wrote:
> On 10/03/2022 9:33 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Thursday, 10 March 2022 at 21:30:21 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>
>>> How odd, a complete 180 degree reversal in your opinion, and viewpoint,
>>> no doubt fostered by the realisation that *you* have been bignoting
>>> yourself *bigtime* over *decades* and now all that fraudulent shit you
>>> came out with has blown up in your own face. It's left you in a bit of a
>>> quandary, eh? It's Ok Darren, I'm sure most here with a clue know full
>>> well you have no proof to show. Certainly the Government business,
>>> apprenticeship and trade qualifications records are indicative of that.
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>   Fuck off krypsis!.
>
> Yeah, fuck off Krypsis.
>
> Before you do though, want to name the cars you have walled up in your
> shed?

Suzuki and Toyota. But they are in the garage and the garage door opens
and shuts. The *shed* is a tad small and holds garden equipment which, I
must say, got a hell of a workout today.

Oh, and thanks for showing you *still* read everything I write. ;-)

--
Xeno

On 10/03/2022 3:58 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 10/03/2022 2:34 pm, Noddy wrote:
>> On 10/03/2022 2:22 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 18/2/22 (and unlike clocky the date is correct) clocky posted
>>>
>>> "What, you copy and paste code into a Sketch in Arduino, select the
>>> libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program. Literally
>>> anyone can do that."
>>>
>>> So now it is time for him to put his talents such as they are where
>>> his mouth is. Its a simple task, make a speedometer that runs from
>>> GPS. It must display current speed of course, but that is so simple
>>> that felix could do it in BASIC on his Mac, so, in addition, it has
>>> to display average speed. The current average speed needs to be
>>> continuously displayed starting when a button is pressed (the button
>>> press also resets any average speed displayed up to that point).
>>> Extra points for displaying current time, time and distance that the
>>> average speed is calculated over, but don't make the display crowded
>>> and unreadable.
>>>
>>> The whole thing has to be small enough to the fitted in or on top of
>>> the dashboard, and be a single unit, the display has to be clear
>>> enough to be read while concentrating on driving. Probably a 3.5"
>>> 380x320 display is the sweet spot.
>>>
>>> The code has to be readable and compilable, and provided in source
>>> form so that it can be inspected and tested.
>>>
>>> Since anybody can do that, I would expect that as a licenced and
>>> qualified mechanic, holder of a certificate in electronics, well
>>> renowned vintage computer dealer you will have no trouble doing it in
>>> say a month. In fact, since anybody can do it anybody who wants to
>>> have a go is welcome, felix included.
>>
>> What is the point of this? You expect someone to go to the trouble of
>> building something and presenting it to you just so you can be
>> satisfied that they know what they're talking about, and as the "task"
>> you set for them is "so simple that Felix could do it" it would prove
>> absolutely nothing even if they *did* feel compelled to respond to you?
>
> Yes, he just has to show that his talents are as big as his mouth.
>
>> I'm no friend of Jerky's, and to my mind he *already* proved the
>> limited range of his "electronics knowledge" when I posted the
>> pictures of my distributor's failed logic board and he decided to
>> comment about it, but what you're doing here just makes you look like
>> an *idiot* who needs to get the fuck over himself. For fuck's sake.
>> Demanding people "prove themselves" to you makes you no different to
>> the morons you criticise daily for doing the *exact* same thing.
>
> It's up to him, he's been big noting himself in this regard, I'm calling
> him out on it.
>

Big noting myself how?

You are delusional.

--
keith on the 7 Oct 2021 wrote;
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if
it is unproven, he is lying."

On 10/03/2022 4:02 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 10/03/2022 3:17 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 10/03/2022 4:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 10/03/2022 11:22 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 18/2/22 (and unlike clocky the date is correct) clocky posted
>>>>
>>>> "What, you copy and paste code into a Sketch in Arduino, select the
>>>> libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program. Literally
>>>> anyone can do that."
>>>>
>>>> So now it is time for him to put his talents such as they are where
>>>> his mouth is. Its a simple task, make a speedometer that runs from
>>>> GPS. It must display current speed of course, but that is so simple
>>>> that felix could do it in BASIC on his Mac, so, in addition, it has
>>>> to display average speed. The current average speed needs to be
>>>> continuously displayed starting when a button is pressed (the button
>>>> press also resets any average speed displayed up to that point).
>>>> Extra points for displaying current time, time and distance that the
>>>> average speed is calculated over, but don't make the display crowded
>>>> and unreadable.
>>>>
>>>> The whole thing has to be small enough to the fitted in or on top of
>>>> the dashboard, and be a single unit, the display has to be clear
>>>> enough to be read while concentrating on driving. Probably a 3.5"
>>>> 380x320 display is the sweet spot.
>>>>
>>>> The code has to be readable and compilable, and provided in source
>>>> form so that it can be inspected and tested.
>>>>
>>>> Since anybody can do that, I would expect that as a licenced and
>>>> qualified mechanic, holder of a certificate in electronics, well
>>>> renowned vintage computer dealer you will have no trouble doing it
>>>> in say a month. In fact, since anybody can do it anybody who wants
>>>> to have a go is welcome, felix included.
>>>
>>> Are you asking for a quote?
>>>
>>
>> hahahaha!
>>
> "Clocky is a fake" there's a quote for you.

LOL, keith, mate... you seem to have a very high opinion of yourself as
a programmer - so successful and highly paid that you could afford such
prestige vehicles as a Cordia Turbo and Miata. You must have been ace to
be able to afford those two examples of motoring excellence... :-)

So, here's a proposal. Fucking program it yourself. Happy to compile the
sketch to make sure it actually works once your done. Off you go you
fucking deluded dickhead.

Jesus...

--
keith on the 7 Oct 2021 wrote;
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if
it is unproven, he is lying."

On 10/03/2022 3:51 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 10/03/2022 3:09 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 10/03/2022 12:13 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 10/03/2022 2:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 10/03/2022 2:22 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 18/2/22 (and unlike clocky the date is correct) clocky posted
>>>>>
>>>>> "What, you copy and paste code into a Sketch in Arduino, select the
>>>>> libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program. Literally
>>>>> anyone can do that."
>>>>>
>>>>> So now it is time for him to put his talents such as they are where
>>>>> his mouth is. Its a simple task, make a speedometer that runs from
>>>>> GPS. It must display current speed of course, but that is so simple
>>>>> that felix could do it in BASIC on his Mac, so, in addition, it has
>>>>> to display average speed. The current average speed needs to be
>>>>> continuously displayed starting when a button is pressed (the
>>>>> button press also resets any average speed displayed up to that
>>>>> point). Extra points for displaying current time, time and distance
>>>>> that the average speed is calculated over, but don't make the
>>>>> display crowded and unreadable.
>>>>>
>>>>> The whole thing has to be small enough to the fitted in or on top
>>>>> of the dashboard, and be a single unit, the display has to be clear
>>>>> enough to be read while concentrating on driving. Probably a 3.5"
>>>>> 380x320 display is the sweet spot.
>>>>>
>>>>> The code has to be readable and compilable, and provided in source
>>>>> form so that it can be inspected and tested.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since anybody can do that, I would expect that as a licenced and
>>>>> qualified mechanic, holder of a certificate in electronics, well
>>>>> renowned vintage computer dealer you will have no trouble doing it
>>>>> in say a month. In fact, since anybody can do it anybody who wants
>>>>> to have a go is welcome, felix included.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> so you want Clocky to work for a month just to prove something to
>>>> you? Clocky should charge you $75 an hour then, the price you quoted
>>>> me for computer problem diagnostics.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> He is free to decline, but it will prove what a fraud he is.
>>
>> How so? All it proves is that you need someone to program an Arduino
>> for you presumably because you can't do it yourself.
>
> Wrong and wrong.
>
> !) I've already done it,

Easy to claim, why don't you prove it?

I just want to see if your abilities are as big
> as your mouth

I've made no specific claims to my abilities. I described a process that
works for countless people programming an Arduino. Many of them novices,
like me.

> 2) I didn't use an Arduino or the Arduino workspace, real programmers
> don't need to.
>

Easy to claim.

> You're just looking for a way to crawl out.
>

There is nothing to crawl out of since I've made no specific claims to
*my* programming ability. You claim to be a "programmer" but I haven't
seen any examples of your code or proof that you are. Since therefore it
is unproven... well, see below.

--
keith on the 7 Oct 2021 wrote;
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if
it is unproven, he is lying."

On 10/03/2022 3:55 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 10/03/2022 3:43 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 10/03/2022 1:28 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 10/03/2022 4:25 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 10/03/2022 12:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 10/03/2022 2:22 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 18/2/22 (and unlike clocky the date is correct) clocky posted
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "What, you copy and paste code into a Sketch in Arduino, select
>>>>>> the libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program.
>>>>>> Literally anyone can do that."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So now it is time for him to put his talents such as they are
>>>>>> where his mouth is. Its a simple task, make a speedometer that
>>>>>> runs from GPS. It must display current speed of course, but that
>>>>>> is so simple that felix could do it in BASIC on his Mac, so, in
>>>>>> addition, it has to display average speed. The current average
>>>>>> speed needs to be continuously displayed starting when a button is
>>>>>> pressed (the button press also resets any average speed displayed
>>>>>> up to that point). Extra points for displaying current time, time
>>>>>> and distance that the average speed is calculated over, but don't
>>>>>> make the display crowded and unreadable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The whole thing has to be small enough to the fitted in or on top
>>>>>> of the dashboard, and be a single unit, the display has to be
>>>>>> clear enough to be read while concentrating on driving. Probably a
>>>>>> 3.5" 380x320 display is the sweet spot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The code has to be readable and compilable, and provided in source
>>>>>> form so that it can be inspected and tested.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since anybody can do that, I would expect that as a licenced and
>>>>>> qualified mechanic, holder of a certificate in electronics, well
>>>>>> renowned vintage computer dealer you will have no trouble doing it
>>>>>> in say a month. In fact, since anybody can do it anybody who wants
>>>>>> to have a go is welcome, felix included.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> so you want Clocky to work for a month just to prove something to
>>>>> you? Clocky should charge you $75 an hour then, the price you
>>>>> quoted me for computer problem diagnostics.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> keith is acting *very* weird and it's getting worse.
>>>>
>>>
>>> maybe he's been sniffing too much of the glue they use at the
>>> Aviation museum?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I can imagine keith sitting in the corner of the museum with a Reflex
>> 500 sheet pack of A4 and a pot of Clag to keep him busy.
>>
> And you're calling me weird? It looks like you've got a totally warped
> mind.

I'm not the one setting absurd challenges you humourless dimwit.

--
keith on the 7 Oct 2021 wrote;
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if
it is unproven, he is lying."

On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 17:51:45 +1000, keithr0 wrote:

> 2) I didn't use an Arduino or the Arduino workspace, real programmers
> don't need to.

What's the difference between a 'software engineer' and a programmer?

> You're just looking for a way to crawl out.

PKB there keith. You've dodged more than enough questions to easily pass
The Enablers entrance test.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus