On 11/03/2022 9:05 pm, lindsay wrote:
> On 11/03/2022 8:50 pm, Xeno wrote:
>
>> own claims. Oh what a quandary you find yourself in, eh?
>
> Hows the search for the walled up cars going, shit fer brains? Deleted
> posts? DNA?
>>
>> Hey, keep it up, I'm lovin' just watching this shit play out.
>
> You and me both. :-D watching you spout your "knowledge" about kids glue
> is hilarious.  How easily was it for Clocky to prove you wrong.

Lol :) Like everything else he blurts about, he has absolutely no
fucking idea.

Hey Kryppy? Did you ever come up with an explanation as to how Allan
Moffat managed to top qualify at Bathurst in 1972 using a Dominator carb
on his 351 Cleveland engine despite you claiming that a carb of that
size wouldn't work on an engine of that capacity as it was a "practical
impossibility"?

> Like everyone else. ROFLBOCLOG :-D
>
> Added to the Tomas Clasener Tome of Lies.

If the cunt of a thing had *any* shame at all he would simply disappear
and never be heard from again.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 11/3/22 21:31, Noddy wrote:
> On 11/03/2022 8:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 11/03/2022 7:07 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 11/03/2022 5:25 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 11/03/2022 12:37 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>
>>>>> There is nothing to crawl out of since I've made no specific claims
>>>>> to *my* programming ability. You claim to be a "programmer" but I
>>>>> haven't seen any examples of your code or proof that you are. Since
>>>>> therefore it is unproven... well, see below.
>>>>
>>>> "What, you copy and paste code into a Sketch in Arduino, select
>>>> the libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program.
>>>> Literally anyone can do that."
>>>>
>>>> That was your statement, you're just being asked to prove it. If
>>>> anybody can then it follows that you should be able to. If you want
>>>> to withdraw that statement, then you don't have to prove anything.
>>>
>>> What's the actual motivation behind this nonsensical hypocrisy of
>>> yours here, Keith? Are you suffering from a bit of butt-hurt at the
>>> idea of you not being the only person in this group who can write
>>> code and get it to work?
>>
>> Something seems to have spooked you nodz, what are you afraid of?
>
> ROTFL :)
>
> The only thing "spooky" going on here is you suddenly doing what you've
> spent the last few months criticising others for, but for some reason
> known only to you it's perfectly rational behaviour when *you* do it.
>
> Which, of course, is complete and utter bullshit.
>
But Darren, up until *very recently*, you asked, nay, demanded that
everyone and anyone who made a *claim* proved it. Now, all of a sudden,
you've come to the horrific realisation that you too have *unproven* and
in the case of your qualifications and business ownership, eminently
*unprovable* claims. Long term claims at that, 20+ years and climbing.

Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive!"
(Sir Walter Scott, 1808)

Old Walt, he had you or your ilk in mind when he coined that saying!

--
Xeno

On 11/03/2022 8:42 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 10/03/2022 9:05 pm, Noddy wrote:

>> I didn't see all the comment, but I believe Arduino was being
>> discussed and if that's the case then anyone *can* do it. I programmed
>> a little Arduino logic board to control my vapour blasting cabinet so
>> regular momentary contact foot switches where turned into "push
>> on/push off" latching switches to control the fan, pump, air solenoid
>> and windscreen wiper. The code itself was a pre-written demo but it's
>> not difficult, and I modified the basic sample to suit my own
>> particular needs with regards to the number of pedals, timing delays
>> and so on.
>
> The difference is the same as going to the shop, buying a set of
> headers, and following a monkey see monkey do set of instructions,
> against designing your own and fabricating them.

What "difference". What the hell are you talking about?

Listen to yourself. Apart from being delusional enough to actually think
you're in some mythical position of authority to be "setting tasks" for
which to evaluate people, you've concocted some ridiculous schoolboy
activity where even if someone had zero experience they could spend the
next month trawling the net to find enough information to come up with
something that met your criteria and pass your insane "test".

And if they did, what exactly would *that* prove?

Do you understand the ridiculousness of what you're asking? I dare say
Jerky couldn't give the slightest toss about what you think, which makes
your efforts to "test" him all the more nonsensical.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 11/03/2022 8:58 pm, lindsay wrote:
> On 11/03/2022 2:01 pm, Clocky wrote:

>> Same as it always was and still used in schools around Australia. Why
>> do you think you can buy it in bulk by the bucket load?
>
> Used in ladyboy porno's as baby batter? :-D

ROTFL :)

Cunt. That genuinely made me blow a snot bubble :)

>> tinyurl.com/537ktwaf
>>
>> Jesus wept...
>
> Owned.
>
> C'mon Clocky... after all this time, you must have realised that Tommy
> is an expert on *EVERYTHING*, from the sordid shit in Thailand, to
> fucking kids glue, and when shown to be wrong, will move the goalposts,
> (college?) and bullshit himself stupid, because an ex-teacher cannot be
> shown to be wrong.

Surprised he hasn't introduced a "friend" who worked in the Clag factory.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 11/03/2022 8:35 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 11/03/2022 5:09 pm, Clocky wrote:

>> Nailed it actually plus I proved you have no integrity and proved
>> you're nearly as smart as you would have people believe - which is why
>> you're so bitter now :-)
>
> If you were any further up yourself you'd need your name on the soles of
> your shoes for identification.

Lol :)

And just to top off a day of complete insanity on your part, you throw a
wheelbarrow load of irony into the mix. Hate to burst your bubble Keith,
but if anyone's "up themselves" around here it's the idiot who thinks
it's his place to be setting "tests" for people :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 11/03/2022 5:58 pm, lindsay wrote:
> On 11/03/2022 2:01 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 11/03/2022 10:47 am, Xeno wrote:
>>> On 11/3/22 12:16, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 11/03/2022 7:21 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 10/03/2022 4:43 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/03/2022 1:28 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>> On 10/03/2022 4:25 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 10/03/2022 12:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 10/03/2022 2:22 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 18/2/22 (and unlike clocky the date is correct) clocky posted
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "What, you copy and paste code into a Sketch in Arduino,
>>>>>>>>>> select the libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit
>>>>>>>>>> program. Literally anyone can do that."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So now it is time for him to put his talents such as they are
>>>>>>>>>> where his mouth is. Its a simple task, make a speedometer that
>>>>>>>>>> runs from GPS. It must display current speed of course, but
>>>>>>>>>> that is so simple that felix could do it in BASIC on his Mac,
>>>>>>>>>> so, in addition, it has to display average speed. The current
>>>>>>>>>> average speed needs to be continuously displayed starting when
>>>>>>>>>> a button is pressed (the button press also resets any average
>>>>>>>>>> speed displayed up to that point). Extra points for displaying
>>>>>>>>>> current time, time and distance that the average speed is
>>>>>>>>>> calculated over, but don't make the display crowded and
>>>>>>>>>> unreadable.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The whole thing has to be small enough to the fitted in or on
>>>>>>>>>> top of the dashboard, and be a single unit, the display has to
>>>>>>>>>> be clear enough to be read while concentrating on driving.
>>>>>>>>>> Probably a 3.5" 380x320 display is the sweet spot.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The code has to be readable and compilable, and provided in
>>>>>>>>>> source form so that it can be inspected and tested.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Since anybody can do that, I would expect that as a licenced
>>>>>>>>>> and qualified mechanic, holder of a certificate in
>>>>>>>>>> electronics, well renowned vintage computer dealer you will
>>>>>>>>>> have no trouble doing it in say a month. In fact, since
>>>>>>>>>> anybody can do it anybody who wants to have a go is welcome,
>>>>>>>>>> felix included.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> so you want Clocky to work for a month just to prove something
>>>>>>>>> to you? Clocky should charge you $75 an hour then, the price
>>>>>>>>> you quoted me for computer problem diagnostics.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> keith is acting *very* weird and it's getting worse.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> maybe he's been sniffing too much of the glue they use at the
>>>>>>> Aviation museum?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can imagine keith sitting in the corner of the museum with a
>>>>>> Reflex 500 sheet pack of A4 and a pot of Clag to keep him busy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> do they still use Clag in schools these days?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yep, though not necessarily in the pots with the brush as there are
>>>> more options.
>>>
>>> Well, yes, as I said, the Yuhu Stick. Clag, the company, make a
>>> similar product but it is nothing like the clag paste in the pot.
>>
>> The clag in the pot is right there on that fucking page.
>>
>> tinyurl.com/537ktwaf
>>
>> Same as it always was and still used in schools around Australia. Why
>> do you think you can buy it in bulk by the bucket load?
>
> Used in ladyboy

<snip>

You're on your own as soon as you start with that shit.

On 11/03/2022 5:30 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 11/03/2022 4:51 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 11/03/2022 2:42 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 11/03/2022 9:27 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 11/03/2022 1:04 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 10/03/2022 4:02 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/03/2022 3:17 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>> On 10/03/2022 4:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 10/03/2022 11:22 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 18/2/22 (and unlike clocky the date is correct) clocky posted
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "What, you copy and paste code into a Sketch in Arduino, select
>>>>>>>>> the libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program.
>>>>>>>>> Literally anyone can do that."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So now it is time for him to put his talents such as they are
>>>>>>>>> where his mouth is. Its a simple task, make a speedometer that
>>>>>>>>> runs from GPS. It must display current speed of course, but
>>>>>>>>> that is so simple that felix could do it in BASIC on his Mac,
>>>>>>>>> so, in addition, it has to display average speed. The current
>>>>>>>>> average speed needs to be continuously displayed starting when
>>>>>>>>> a button is pressed (the button press also resets any average
>>>>>>>>> speed displayed up to that point). Extra points for displaying
>>>>>>>>> current time, time and distance that the average speed is
>>>>>>>>> calculated over, but don't make the display crowded and
>>>>>>>>> unreadable.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The whole thing has to be small enough to the fitted in or on
>>>>>>>>> top of the dashboard, and be a single unit, the display has to
>>>>>>>>> be clear enough to be read while concentrating on driving.
>>>>>>>>> Probably a 3.5" 380x320 display is the sweet spot.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The code has to be readable and compilable, and provided in
>>>>>>>>> source form so that it can be inspected and tested.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Since anybody can do that, I would expect that as a licenced
>>>>>>>>> and qualified mechanic, holder of a certificate in electronics,
>>>>>>>>> well renowned vintage computer dealer you will have no trouble
>>>>>>>>> doing it in say a month. In fact, since anybody can do it
>>>>>>>>> anybody who wants to have a go is welcome, felix included.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are you asking for a quote?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> hahahaha!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Clocky is a fake" there's a quote for you.
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL, keith, mate... you seem to have a very high opinion of
>>>>> yourself as a programmer - so successful and highly paid that you
>>>>> could afford such prestige vehicles as a Cordia Turbo and Miata.
>>>>> You must have been ace to be able to afford those two  examples of
>>>>> motoring excellence...  :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> he claims he worked at NASA as a programmer but has no formal
>>>> qualifications, and was in a senior position there, iirc. can you
>>>> imagine what the competition to be employed at NASA would be like?
>>>> they would only be interested in the very best and brightest; the
>>>> most qualified and capable. me thinketh that maybe, just maybe,
>>>> something is rotten in Denmark! :)
>>>
>>> Wrong as usual felix. I worked for NASA and I worked as a programmer
>>> but I didn't work as a programmer for NASA.
>>
>> Ah, so you scrubbed dunnies?
>
> Is that the best best you can do? If wit was shit you'd have a severe
> attack of constipation.

<yawn>

--
keith on the 7 Oct 2021 wrote;
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if
it is unproven, he is lying."

On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 06:17:32 +1000, alvey wrote:

> On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 17:51:45 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>
>> 2) I didn't use an Arduino or the Arduino workspace, real programmers
>> don't need to.
>
> What's the difference between a 'software engineer' and a programmer?

Thanks keith.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 19:36:57 +1000, keithr0 wrote:

> On 11/03/2022 7:07 pm, Noddy wrote:
>> On 11/03/2022 5:25 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 11/03/2022 12:37 am, Clocky wrote:
>>
>>>> There is nothing to crawl out of since I've made no specific claims
>>>> to *my* programming ability. You claim to be a "programmer" but I
>>>> haven't seen any examples of your code or proof that you are. Since
>>>> therefore it is unproven... well, see below.
>>>
>>> "What, you copy and paste code into a Sketch in Arduino, select
>>> the libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program.
>>> Literally anyone can do that."
>>>
>>> That was your statement, you're just being asked to prove it. If
>>> anybody can then it follows that you should be able to. If you want to
>>> withdraw that statement, then you don't have to prove anything.
>>
>> What's the actual motivation behind this nonsensical hypocrisy of yours
>> here, Keith? Are you suffering from a bit of butt-hurt at the idea of
>> you not being the only person in this group who can write code and get
>> it to work?
>
> Something seems to have spooked you nodz, what are you afraid of?

That'd be 'reality' keith. The Fraudster's moral (sic) enemy.

The Fraudster can't support your crusade because he would get laughed at
even harder. He'd be adding another 20 floors to his already massive
Hypocrisy Tower. Of course he could have just shut up and waited out the
storm, but that's not what narcissistic sociopaths do when they're being
left out of anything. Nope, Fraudster just *had* to poke his head in and
give his laughable reason for not substantiating any of that large pile of
challenged claims another airing. You know, because in the Fraudster's mad
mind the Repetition of Lies and Bullshit Makes Them Truer.

Anyhoo, it looks like you're heading to where you wanted to be, an
independent. As in, unwanted by all.

cheerio

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 21:31:37 +1100, Noddy wrote:

> On 11/03/2022 8:36 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 11/03/2022 7:07 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 11/03/2022 5:25 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 11/03/2022 12:37 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>
>>>>> There is nothing to crawl out of since I've made no specific claims
>>>>> to *my* programming ability. You claim to be a "programmer" but I
>>>>> haven't seen any examples of your code or proof that you are. Since
>>>>> therefore it is unproven... well, see below.
>>>>
>>>> "What, you copy and paste code into a Sketch in Arduino, select
>>>> the libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program.
>>>> Literally anyone can do that."
>>>>
>>>> That was your statement, you're just being asked to prove it. If
>>>> anybody can then it follows that you should be able to. If you want
>>>> to withdraw that statement, then you don't have to prove anything.
>>>
>>> What's the actual motivation behind this nonsensical hypocrisy of
>>> yours here, Keith? Are you suffering from a bit of butt-hurt at the
>>> idea of you not being the only person in this group who can write code
>>> and get it to work?
>>
>> Something seems to have spooked you nodz, what are you afraid of?
>
> ROTFL :)
>
> The only thing "spooky" going on here is you suddenly doing what you've
> spent the last few months criticising others for, but for some reason
> known only to you it's perfectly rational behaviour when *you* do it.
>
> Which, of course, is complete and utter bullshit.

[Insert page of Fraudster quotes demanding that others prove their claim]

Now, what was that about "bullshit" Fraudster?

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 21:32:59 +1100, Noddy wrote:

> On 11/03/2022 8:28 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 11/03/2022 7:13 pm, Noddy wrote:
>
>>> Seriously pal, you are making an absolute *flog* out of yourself with
>>> this ridiculous bullshit, and your sense of entitlement is making
>>> Alvey look positively sane.
>>>
>>> As I said in another post, you need to get over yourself.
>>>
>>>
>> Methinks you protest too much.
>
> Methinks you need to up your meds, as you have become the very fuckwit
> you've spend weeks running around here chasing.
>
> Congratulations are in order. Very few people are capable of making such
> a remarkable turn around in such a ridiculously short time.

Game of Thrones had the spectacular 'Battle of the Bastards'. This 'Clash
of the Cliches' is errr... as dull as dishwater.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 21:37:48 +1100, Noddy wrote:

> On 11/03/2022 9:05 pm, lindsay wrote:
>> On 11/03/2022 8:50 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>
>>> own claims. Oh what a quandary you find yourself in, eh?
>>
>> Hows the search for the walled up cars going, shit fer brains? Deleted
>> posts? DNA?
>>>
>>> Hey, keep it up, I'm lovin' just watching this shit play out.
>>
>> You and me both. :-D watching you spout your "knowledge" about kids glue
>> is hilarious.  How easily was it for Clocky to prove you wrong.
>
> Lol :) Like everything else he blurts about, he has absolutely no
> fucking idea.
>
> Hey Kryppy? Did you ever come up with an explanation as to how Allan
> Moffat managed to top qualify at Bathurst in 1972 using a Dominator carb
> on his 351 Cleveland engine despite you claiming that a carb of that
> size wouldn't work on an engine of that capacity as it was a "practical
> impossibility"?
>
>> Like everyone else. ROFLBOCLOG :-D
>>
>> Added to the Tomas Clasener Tome of Lies.
>
> If the cunt of a thing had *any* shame at all he would simply disappear
> and never be heard from again.

Hmmmm.
So if he 'has to go' for his errors, what should be the Fraudster's fate
for all his errors and lies?

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 19:31:49 +1000, keithr0 wrote:

> On 11/03/2022 6:32 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 11/03/2022 5:42 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 11/03/2022 9:27 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 11/03/2022 1:04 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 10/03/2022 4:02 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/03/2022 3:17 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>> On 10/03/2022 4:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 10/03/2022 11:22 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 18/2/22 (and unlike clocky the date is correct) clocky posted
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "What, you copy and paste code into a Sketch in Arduino, select
>>>>>>>>> the libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program.
>>>>>>>>> Literally anyone can do that."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So now it is time for him to put his talents such as they are
>>>>>>>>> where his mouth is. Its a simple task, make a speedometer that
>>>>>>>>> runs from GPS. It must display current speed of course, but that
>>>>>>>>> is so simple that felix could do it in BASIC on his Mac, so, in
>>>>>>>>> addition, it has to display average speed. The current average
>>>>>>>>> speed needs to be continuously displayed starting when a button
>>>>>>>>> is pressed (the button press also resets any average speed
>>>>>>>>> displayed up to that point). Extra points for displaying current
>>>>>>>>> time, time and distance that the average speed is calculated
>>>>>>>>> over, but don't make the display crowded and unreadable.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The whole thing has to be small enough to the fitted in or on
>>>>>>>>> top of the dashboard, and be a single unit, the display has to
>>>>>>>>> be clear enough to be read while concentrating on driving.
>>>>>>>>> Probably a 3.5" 380x320 display is the sweet spot.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The code has to be readable and compilable, and provided in
>>>>>>>>> source form so that it can be inspected and tested.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Since anybody can do that, I would expect that as a licenced and
>>>>>>>>> qualified mechanic, holder of a certificate in electronics, well
>>>>>>>>> renowned vintage computer dealer you will have no trouble doing
>>>>>>>>> it in say a month. In fact, since anybody can do it anybody who
>>>>>>>>> wants to have a go is welcome, felix included.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are you asking for a quote?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> hahahaha!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Clocky is a fake" there's a quote for you.
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL, keith, mate... you seem to have a very high opinion of yourself
>>>>> as a programmer - so successful and highly paid that you could
>>>>> afford such prestige vehicles as a Cordia Turbo and Miata. You must
>>>>> have been ace to be able to afford those two examples of motoring
>>>>> excellence...  :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> he claims he worked at NASA as a programmer but has no formal
>>>> qualifications, and was in a senior position there, iirc. can you
>>>> imagine what the competition to be employed at NASA would be like?
>>>> they would only be interested in the very best and brightest; the
>>>> most qualified and capable. me thinketh that maybe, just maybe,
>>>> something is rotten in Denmark! :)
>>>
>>> Wrong as usual felix. I worked for NASA and I worked as a programmer
>>> but I didn't work as a programmer for NASA.
>>
>> oh, I'm expected to take such interest in you that I'm expected to know
>> such details am I, fukwit. but of course you didn't, you're no where
>> good enough
>
> If you can't be bothered to get it s\right, you should STFU otherwise
> you just look stupid.

So what *did* you do at NASA keith?

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 11/03/2022 8:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 11/03/2022 6:32 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 11/03/2022 5:42 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 11/03/2022 9:27 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 11/03/2022 1:04 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL, keith, mate... you seem to have a very high opinion of
>>>>> yourself as a programmer - so successful and highly paid that you
>>>>> could afford such prestige vehicles as a Cordia Turbo and Miata.
>>>>> You must have been ace to be able to afford those two examples of
>>>>> motoring excellence... :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> he claims he worked at NASA as a programmer but has no formal
>>>> qualifications, and was in a senior position there, iirc. can you
>>>> imagine what the competition to be employed at NASA would be like?
>>>> they would only be interested in the very best and brightest; the
>>>> most qualified and capable. me thinketh that maybe, just maybe,
>>>> something is rotten in Denmark! :)
>>>
>>> Wrong as usual felix. I worked for NASA and I worked as a programmer
>>> but I didn't work as a programmer for NASA.
>>
>>
>> oh, I'm expected to take such interest in you that I'm expected to
>> know such details am I, fukwit. but of course you didn't, you're no
>> where good enough
>
> If you can't be bothered to get it s\right, you should STFU otherwise
> you just look stupid.

by telling us about your incredible programming talent and skills, and
THEN saying you worked for NASA, you created the impression that you
were employed by them as a programmer. but we now know you just emptied
rubbish bins at NASA and probably just programmed a Commodore 64 for the
kids. :)

>
>>> Can you understand that, I'm not sure that it can be put in any
>>> simpler terms than that. You're not really the brightest are you?
>>>
>>
>> fuck off troll
>
> Ahh diddums
>

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam

FUCK PUTIN!!

"His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
"He came, he saw, he got pummelled" - Alvey on Keefy
"What a pair! Not a single word of rebuttal or reason,
just cretinous abuse" - Alvey on jonz and noddy
"His self serving ego pumping comments just read
like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy
"your opinion isn't worth 2 knobs of goat shit"- Xeno on Grubby Tech
"You cannot turn Darren's lies into the truth by attempting to *discredit*
what *I* say. You just make yourself look more of a dick"- Xeno to Grubby Tech

On 12/03/2022 6:49 am, alvey wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 19:36:57 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>
>> On 11/03/2022 7:07 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 11/03/2022 5:25 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 11/03/2022 12:37 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> There is nothing to crawl out of since I've made no specific claims
>>>>> to *my* programming ability. You claim to be a "programmer" but I
>>>>> haven't seen any examples of your code or proof that you are. Since
>>>>> therefore it is unproven... well, see below.
>>>> "What, you copy and paste code into a Sketch in Arduino, select
>>>> the libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program.
>>>> Literally anyone can do that."
>>>>
>>>> That was your statement, you're just being asked to prove it. If
>>>> anybody can then it follows that you should be able to. If you want to
>>>> withdraw that statement, then you don't have to prove anything.
>>> What's the actual motivation behind this nonsensical hypocrisy of yours
>>> here, Keith? Are you suffering from a bit of butt-hurt at the idea of
>>> you not being the only person in this group who can write code and get
>>> it to work?
>> Something seems to have spooked you nodz, what are you afraid of?
> That'd be 'reality' keith. The Fraudster's moral (sic) enemy.
>
> The Fraudster can't support your crusade because he would get laughed at
> even harder. He'd be adding another 20 floors to his already massive
> Hypocrisy Tower. Of course he could have just shut up and waited out the
> storm, but that's not what narcissistic sociopaths do when they're being
> left out of anything. Nope, Fraudster just *had* to poke his head in and
> give his laughable reason for not substantiating any of that large pile of
> challenged claims another airing. You know, because in the Fraudster's mad
> mind the Repetition of Lies and Bullshit Makes Them Truer.
>
> Anyhoo, it looks like you're heading to where you wanted to be, an
> independent. As in, unwanted by all.
>
> cheerio
>

nailed it!

>
> alvey
>

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam

FUCK PUTIN!!

"His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
"He came, he saw, he got pummelled" - Alvey on Keefy
"What a pair! Not a single word of rebuttal or reason,
just cretinous abuse" - Alvey on jonz and noddy
"His self serving ego pumping comments just read
like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy
"your opinion isn't worth 2 knobs of goat shit"- Xeno on Grubby Tech
"You cannot turn Darren's lies into the truth by attempting to *discredit*
what *I* say. You just make yourself look more of a dick"- Xeno to Grubby Tech
"in the Fraudster's mad mind the Repetition of Lies and Bullshit Makes Them Truer"
- Alvey on noddy

On 12/03/2022 7:04 am, alvey wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 21:37:48 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>
>> On 11/03/2022 9:05 pm, lindsay wrote:
>>> On 11/03/2022 8:50 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>
>>>> own claims. Oh what a quandary you find yourself in, eh?
>>> Hows the search for the walled up cars going, shit fer brains? Deleted
>>> posts? DNA?
>>>> Hey, keep it up, I'm lovin' just watching this shit play out.
>>> You and me both. :-D watching you spout your "knowledge" about kids glue
>>> is hilarious.  How easily was it for Clocky to prove you wrong.
>> Lol :) Like everything else he blurts about, he has absolutely no
>> fucking idea.
>>
>> Hey Kryppy? Did you ever come up with an explanation as to how Allan
>> Moffat managed to top qualify at Bathurst in 1972 using a Dominator carb
>> on his 351 Cleveland engine despite you claiming that a carb of that
>> size wouldn't work on an engine of that capacity as it was a "practical
>> impossibility"?
>>
>>> Like everyone else. ROFLBOCLOG :-D
>>>
>>> Added to the Tomas Clasener Tome of Lies.
>> If the cunt of a thing had *any* shame at all he would simply disappear
>> and never be heard from again.
> Hmmmm.
> So if he 'has to go' for his errors, what should be the Fraudster's fate
> for all his errors and lies?
>

flayed alive, boiled in oil, shot, burnt, buried, dug up, and burnt again..

>
> alvey
>

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam

FUCK PUTIN!!

"His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
"He came, he saw, he got pummelled" - Alvey on Keefy
"What a pair! Not a single word of rebuttal or reason,
just cretinous abuse" - Alvey on jonz and noddy
"His self serving ego pumping comments just read
like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy
"your opinion isn't worth 2 knobs of goat shit"- Xeno on Grubby Tech
"You cannot turn Darren's lies into the truth by attempting to *discredit*
what *I* say. You just make yourself look more of a dick"- Xeno to Grubby Tech

On 12/03/2022 7:07 am, alvey wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 19:31:49 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>
>> On 11/03/2022 6:32 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 11/03/2022 5:42 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 11/03/2022 9:27 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 11/03/2022 1:04 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/03/2022 4:02 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 10/03/2022 3:17 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 10/03/2022 4:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 10/03/2022 11:22 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 18/2/22 (and unlike clocky the date is correct) clocky posted
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "What, you copy and paste code into a Sketch in Arduino, select
>>>>>>>>>> the libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program.
>>>>>>>>>> Literally anyone can do that."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So now it is time for him to put his talents such as they are
>>>>>>>>>> where his mouth is. Its a simple task, make a speedometer that
>>>>>>>>>> runs from GPS. It must display current speed of course, but that
>>>>>>>>>> is so simple that felix could do it in BASIC on his Mac, so, in
>>>>>>>>>> addition, it has to display average speed. The current average
>>>>>>>>>> speed needs to be continuously displayed starting when a button
>>>>>>>>>> is pressed (the button press also resets any average speed
>>>>>>>>>> displayed up to that point). Extra points for displaying current
>>>>>>>>>> time, time and distance that the average speed is calculated
>>>>>>>>>> over, but don't make the display crowded and unreadable.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The whole thing has to be small enough to the fitted in or on
>>>>>>>>>> top of the dashboard, and be a single unit, the display has to
>>>>>>>>>> be clear enough to be read while concentrating on driving.
>>>>>>>>>> Probably a 3.5" 380x320 display is the sweet spot.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The code has to be readable and compilable, and provided in
>>>>>>>>>> source form so that it can be inspected and tested.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Since anybody can do that, I would expect that as a licenced and
>>>>>>>>>> qualified mechanic, holder of a certificate in electronics, well
>>>>>>>>>> renowned vintage computer dealer you will have no trouble doing
>>>>>>>>>> it in say a month. In fact, since anybody can do it anybody who
>>>>>>>>>> wants to have a go is welcome, felix included.
>>>>>>>>> Are you asking for a quote?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> hahahaha!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Clocky is a fake" there's a quote for you.
>>>>>> LOL, keith, mate... you seem to have a very high opinion of yourself
>>>>>> as a programmer - so successful and highly paid that you could
>>>>>> afford such prestige vehicles as a Cordia Turbo and Miata. You must
>>>>>> have been ace to be able to afford those two examples of motoring
>>>>>> excellence...  :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> he claims he worked at NASA as a programmer but has no formal
>>>>> qualifications, and was in a senior position there, iirc. can you
>>>>> imagine what the competition to be employed at NASA would be like?
>>>>> they would only be interested in the very best and brightest; the
>>>>> most qualified and capable. me thinketh that maybe, just maybe,
>>>>> something is rotten in Denmark! :)
>>>> Wrong as usual felix. I worked for NASA and I worked as a programmer
>>>> but I didn't work as a programmer for NASA.
>>> oh, I'm expected to take such interest in you that I'm expected to know
>>> such details am I, fukwit. but of course you didn't, you're no where
>>> good enough
>> If you can't be bothered to get it s\right, you should STFU otherwise
>> you just look stupid.
> So what *did* you do at NASA keith?
>

and.. where was he employed utilizing his amazing programming skills?

>
> alvey
>

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam

FUCK PUTIN!!

"His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
"He came, he saw, he got pummelled" - Alvey on Keefy
"What a pair! Not a single word of rebuttal or reason,
just cretinous abuse" - Alvey on jonz and noddy
"His self serving ego pumping comments just read
like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy
"your opinion isn't worth 2 knobs of goat shit"- Xeno on Grubby Tech
"You cannot turn Darren's lies into the truth by attempting to *discredit*
what *I* say. You just make yourself look more of a dick"- Xeno to Grubby Tech

On 12/03/2022 4:04 am, alvey wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 21:37:48 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>
>> On 11/03/2022 9:05 pm, lindsay wrote:
>>> On 11/03/2022 8:50 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>
>>>> own claims. Oh what a quandary you find yourself in, eh?
>>>
>>> Hows the search for the walled up cars going, shit fer brains? Deleted
>>> posts? DNA?
>>>>
>>>> Hey, keep it up, I'm lovin' just watching this shit play out.
>>>
>>> You and me both. :-D watching you spout your "knowledge" about kids glue
>>> is hilarious.  How easily was it for Clocky to prove you wrong.
>>
>> Lol :) Like everything else he blurts about, he has absolutely no
>> fucking idea.
>>
>> Hey Kryppy? Did you ever come up with an explanation as to how Allan
>> Moffat managed to top qualify at Bathurst in 1972 using a Dominator carb
>> on his 351 Cleveland engine despite you claiming that a carb of that
>> size wouldn't work on an engine of that capacity as it was a "practical
>> impossibility"?
>>
>>> Like everyone else. ROFLBOCLOG :-D
>>>
>>> Added to the Tomas Clasener Tome of Lies.
>>
>> If the cunt of a thing had *any* shame at all he would simply disappear
>> and never be heard from again.
>
> Hmmmm.
> So if he 'has to go' for his errors, what should be the Fraudster's fate
> for all his errors and lies?
>
>

He potentially could be in quite a bit of strife actually.

--
keith on the 7 Oct 2021 wrote;
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if
it is unproven, he is lying."

On 12/03/2022 7:18 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 11/03/2022 8:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 11/03/2022 6:32 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 11/03/2022 5:42 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 11/03/2022 9:27 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 11/03/2022 1:04 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL, keith, mate... you seem to have a very high opinion of
>>>>>> yourself as a programmer - so successful and highly paid that you
>>>>>> could afford such prestige vehicles as a Cordia Turbo and Miata.
>>>>>> You must have been ace to be able to afford those two examples of
>>>>>> motoring excellence... :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> he claims he worked at NASA as a programmer but has no formal
>>>>> qualifications, and was in a senior position there, iirc. can you
>>>>> imagine what the competition to be employed at NASA would be like?
>>>>> they would only be interested in the very best and brightest; the
>>>>> most qualified and capable. me thinketh that maybe, just maybe,
>>>>> something is rotten in Denmark! :)
>>>>
>>>> Wrong as usual felix. I worked for NASA and I worked as a programmer
>>>> but I didn't work as a programmer for NASA.
>>>
>>>
>>> oh, I'm expected to take such interest in you that I'm expected to
>>> know such details am I, fukwit. but of course you didn't, you're no
>>> where good enough
>>
>> If you can't be bothered to get it s\right, you should STFU otherwise
>> you just look stupid.
>
>
> by telling us about your incredible programming talent and skills, and
> THEN saying you worked for NASA, you created the impression that you
> were employed by them as a programmer. but we now know you just emptied
> rubbish bins at NASA and probably just programmed a Commodore 64 for the
> kids. :)
>
>

keith preferred this
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8a/Sinclair-ZX81.png to
a real computer.

The Z80 uses twice as many cycles (4 on average) to execute an opcode
compared to 2 cycles on average for the a 6502 (6510/8500 in the C64,
same core). The Z80 is inefficient and slow, like keith.

>>
>>>> Can you understand that, I'm not sure that it can be put in any
>>>> simpler terms than that. You're not really the brightest are you?
>>>>
>>>
>>> fuck off troll
>>
>> Ahh diddums
>>
>
>

--
keith on the 7 Oct 2021 wrote;
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if
it is unproven, he is lying."

On 11/03/2022 5:42 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 10/03/2022 9:05 pm, Noddy wrote:
>> On 10/03/2022 9:31 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>> On Thursday, 10 March 2022 at 20:53:25 UTC+11, Noddy wrote:
>>
>>>>>> I'm no friend of Jerky's, and to my mind he *already* proved the
>>>>>> limited range of his "electronics knowledge" when I posted the
>>>>>> pictures of my distributor's failed logic board and he decided to
>>>>>> comment about it, but what you're doing here just makes you look like
>>>>>> an *idiot* who needs to get the fuck over himself. For fuck's sake.
>>>>>> Demanding people "prove themselves" to you makes you no different to
>>>>>> the morons you criticise daily for doing the *exact* same thing.
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>>>   Ticky said *Anyone can do it*.. Therefore, "The proof of the
>>> pudding is in the eating"
>>
>> I didn't see all the comment, but I believe Arduino was being
>> discussed and if that's the case then anyone *can* do it. I programmed
>> a little Arduino logic board to control my vapour blasting cabinet so
>> regular momentary contact foot switches where turned into "push
>> on/push off" latching switches to control the fan, pump, air solenoid
>> and windscreen wiper. The code itself was a pre-written demo but it's
>> not difficult, and I modified the basic sample to suit my own
>> particular needs with regards to the number of pedals, timing delays
>> and so on.
>
> The difference is the same as going to the shop, buying a set of
> headers, and following a monkey see monkey do set of instructions,
> against designing your own and fabricating them.

No it isn't the same. The correct analogy would be "buy a kit, modify it
a bit to suit your needs, and assemble" because that's the process I
described. Anyone *can* do that.

There was no mention of "designing and fabricating" process aka writing
your own program from scratch.

If you can't comprehend the difference that's your issue.

On 12/03/2022 12:17 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 12/03/2022 7:18 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 11/03/2022 8:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 11/03/2022 6:32 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 11/03/2022 5:42 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 11/03/2022 9:27 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/03/2022 1:04 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL, keith, mate... you seem to have a very high opinion of
>>>>>>> yourself as a programmer - so successful and highly paid that
>>>>>>> you could afford such prestige vehicles as a Cordia Turbo and
>>>>>>> Miata. You must have been ace to be able to afford those two
>>>>>>> examples of motoring excellence... :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> he claims he worked at NASA as a programmer but has no formal
>>>>>> qualifications, and was in a senior position there, iirc. can you
>>>>>> imagine what the competition to be employed at NASA would be
>>>>>> like? they would only be interested in the very best and
>>>>>> brightest; the most qualified and capable. me thinketh that
>>>>>> maybe, just maybe, something is rotten in Denmark! :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Wrong as usual felix. I worked for NASA and I worked as a
>>>>> programmer but I didn't work as a programmer for NASA.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> oh, I'm expected to take such interest in you that I'm expected to
>>>> know such details am I, fukwit. but of course you didn't, you're no
>>>> where good enough
>>>
>>> If you can't be bothered to get it s\right, you should STFU
>>> otherwise you just look stupid.
>>
>>
>> by telling us about your incredible programming talent and skills,
>> and THEN saying you worked for NASA, you created the impression that
>> you were employed by them as a programmer. but we now know you just
>> emptied rubbish bins at NASA and probably just programmed a Commodore
>> 64 for the kids. :)
>>
>>
>
> keith preferred this
> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8a/Sinclair-ZX81.png
> to a real computer.
>
> The Z80 uses twice as many cycles (4 on average) to execute an opcode
> compared to 2 cycles on average for the a 6502 (6510/8500 in the C64,
> same core). The Z80 is inefficient and slow, like keith.
>
>

LOL

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam

FUCK PUTIN!!

"His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
"He came, he saw, he got pummelled" - Alvey on Keefy
"What a pair! Not a single word of rebuttal or reason,
just cretinous abuse" - Alvey on jonz and noddy
"His self serving ego pumping comments just read
like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy
"your opinion isn't worth 2 knobs of goat shit"- Xeno on Grubby Tech
"You cannot turn Darren's lies into the truth by attempting to *discredit*
what *I* say. You just make yourself look more of a dick"- Xeno to Grubby Tech

On 11/03/2022 6:49 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 11/03/2022 8:42 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 10/03/2022 9:05 pm, Noddy wrote:
>
>>> I didn't see all the comment, but I believe Arduino was being
>>> discussed and if that's the case then anyone *can* do it. I
>>> programmed a little Arduino logic board to control my vapour blasting
>>> cabinet so regular momentary contact foot switches where turned into
>>> "push on/push off" latching switches to control the fan, pump, air
>>> solenoid and windscreen wiper. The code itself was a pre-written demo
>>> but it's not difficult, and I modified the basic sample to suit my
>>> own particular needs with regards to the number of pedals, timing
>>> delays and so on.
>>
>> The difference is the same as going to the shop, buying a set of
>> headers, and following a monkey see monkey do set of instructions,
>> against designing your own and fabricating them.
>
> What "difference". What the hell are you talking about?
>
> Listen to yourself. Apart from being delusional enough to actually think
> you're in some mythical position of authority to be "setting tasks" for
> which to evaluate people, you've concocted some ridiculous schoolboy
> activity where even if someone had zero experience they could spend the
> next month trawling the net to find enough information to come up with
> something that met your criteria and pass your insane "test".
>

Which he would then reject claiming I didn't actually write the code and
just copied and pasted it - which was the process I described.

There is no possible scenario where I could win this idiotic "challenge".

> And if they did, what exactly would *that* prove?
>
> Do you understand the ridiculousness of what you're asking? I dare say
> Jerky couldn't give the slightest toss about what you think, which makes
> your efforts to "test" him all the more nonsensical.
>
>
>

--
keith on the 7 Oct 2021 wrote;
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if
it is unproven, he is lying."

On Friday, 11 March 2022 at 18:09:29 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:
> On 11/03/2022 2:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> > On 11/03/2022 12:04 am, Clocky wrote:
> >> On 10/03/2022 4:02 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>> On 10/03/2022 3:17 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>>> On 10/03/2022 4:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
> >>>>> On 10/03/2022 11:22 am, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>> On 18/2/22 (and unlike clocky the date is correct) clocky posted
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> "What, you copy and paste code into a Sketch in Arduino, select
> >>>>>> the libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program.
> >>>>>> Literally anyone can do that."
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So now it is time for him to put his talents such as they are
> >>>>>> where his mouth is. Its a simple task, make a speedometer that
> >>>>>> runs from GPS. It must display current speed of course, but that
> >>>>>> is so simple that felix could do it in BASIC on his Mac, so, in
> >>>>>> addition, it has to display average speed. The current average
> >>>>>> speed needs to be continuously displayed starting when a button is
> >>>>>> pressed (the button press also resets any average speed displayed
> >>>>>> up to that point). Extra points for displaying current time, time
> >>>>>> and distance that the average speed is calculated over, but don't
> >>>>>> make the display crowded and unreadable.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The whole thing has to be small enough to the fitted in or on top
> >>>>>> of the dashboard, and be a single unit, the display has to be
> >>>>>> clear enough to be read while concentrating on driving. Probably a
> >>>>>> 3.5" 380x320 display is the sweet spot.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The code has to be readable and compilable, and provided in source
> >>>>>> form so that it can be inspected and tested.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Since anybody can do that, I would expect that as a licenced and
> >>>>>> qualified mechanic, holder of a certificate in electronics, well
> >>>>>> renowned vintage computer dealer you will have no trouble doing it
> >>>>>> in say a month. In fact, since anybody can do it anybody who wants
> >>>>>> to have a go is welcome, felix included.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Are you asking for a quote?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> hahahaha!
> >>>>
> >>> "Clocky is a fake" there's a quote for you.
> >>
> >> LOL, keith, mate... you seem to have a very high opinion of yourself
> >> as a programmer - so successful and highly paid that you could afford
> >> such prestige vehicles as a Cordia Turbo and Miata. You must have been
> >> ace to be able to afford those two examples of motoring
> >> excellence... :-)
> >
> > Maybe you don't or can't understand, not all of us want to spend money
> > on expensive cars, the Cordia was fun back in the 80s, the MX-5 is fun
> > now ( and it's probably worth about double what I paid for it). I choose
> > to spend my money on things that I like not status symbols.
> >
> Or you couldn't afford them and that is just your excuse. There were
> nicer cars that were more fun than a shitbox Cordia in the 80's, so your
> reasoning doesn't hold up.
>
> Maybe you were just a bit shit and paid accordingly - and bought what
> you could afford - in our case a three door Colt with a Turbo.
> >> So, here's a proposal. Fucking program it yourself. Happy to compile
> >> the sketch to make sure it actually works once your done. Off you go
> >> you fucking deluded dickhead.
> >
> > So after being a failure as a gaslighter,
> Nailed it
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ya think so?. Really Just another nail in yer coffin of credibility!.

actually plus I proved you have no integrity
~~~
Haha, you are the last person to be belittling the credibility of *others* Tho its a favourite accusation of yours. I guess when you *hear* it levelled at yerself on a (nearly) daily basis..........

and proved you're
> nearly as smart as you would have people believe - which is why you're
> so bitter now :-)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*Bitter* eh?, by the last few poasts of yours, you have stuck that moniker on *yerself*.
What happened?, did the cook run away with the milkman? <FBG>

> you are admitting that your
> > contention that anybody can write software

> False premise. That's *not* what I said.
> I was very clear in what I said and your comprehension issues are not
> *my* problem.
~~~
*you* said (in this context) :*"Anyone can do it"*,, Hmmmm???.
>
> They are very much *your* problem.
>
> <snip>
> --
> keith on the 7 Oct 2021 wrote;
> "He asserts that the claim is true, so, if
> it is unproven, he is lying."

On Sat, 12 Mar 2022 09:03:28 +0800, Clocky wrote:

> On 12/03/2022 4:04 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 21:37:48 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/03/2022 9:05 pm, lindsay wrote:
>>>> On 11/03/2022 8:50 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> own claims. Oh what a quandary you find yourself in, eh?
>>>>
>>>> Hows the search for the walled up cars going, shit fer brains? Deleted
>>>> posts? DNA?
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey, keep it up, I'm lovin' just watching this shit play out.
>>>>
>>>> You and me both. :-D watching you spout your "knowledge" about kids glue
>>>> is hilarious.  How easily was it for Clocky to prove you wrong.
>>>
>>> Lol :) Like everything else he blurts about, he has absolutely no
>>> fucking idea.
>>>
>>> Hey Kryppy? Did you ever come up with an explanation as to how Allan
>>> Moffat managed to top qualify at Bathurst in 1972 using a Dominator carb
>>> on his 351 Cleveland engine despite you claiming that a carb of that
>>> size wouldn't work on an engine of that capacity as it was a "practical
>>> impossibility"?
>>>
>>>> Like everyone else. ROFLBOCLOG :-D
>>>>
>>>> Added to the Tomas Clasener Tome of Lies.
>>>
>>> If the cunt of a thing had *any* shame at all he would simply disappear
>>> and never be heard from again.
>>
>> Hmmmm.
>> So if he 'has to go' for his errors, what should be the Fraudster's fate
>> for all his errors and lies?
>>
>
> He potentially could be in quite a bit of strife actually.

Yep, under the new Online Safety Act (2021) he's a goner.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Friday, 11 March 2022 at 19:32:46 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 11/03/2022 5:42 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> > On 11/03/2022 9:27 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >> On 11/03/2022 1:04 am, Clocky wrote:
> >>> On 10/03/2022 4:02 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>> On 10/03/2022 3:17 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>>>> On 10/03/2022 4:07 pm, Clocky wrote:
> >>>>>> On 10/03/2022 11:22 am, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 18/2/22 (and unlike clocky the date is correct) clocky posted
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> "What, you copy and paste code into a Sketch in Arduino, select
> >>>>>>> the libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program.
> >>>>>>> Literally anyone can do that."
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> So now it is time for him to put his talents such as they are
> >>>>>>> where his mouth is. Its a simple task, make a speedometer that
> >>>>>>> runs from GPS. It must display current speed of course, but that
> >>>>>>> is so simple that felix could do it in BASIC on his Mac, so, in
> >>>>>>> addition, it has to display average speed. The current average
> >>>>>>> speed needs to be continuously displayed starting when a button
> >>>>>>> is pressed (the button press also resets any average speed
> >>>>>>> displayed up to that point). Extra points for displaying current
> >>>>>>> time, time and distance that the average speed is calculated
> >>>>>>> over, but don't make the display crowded and unreadable.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The whole thing has to be small enough to the fitted in or on
> >>>>>>> top of the dashboard, and be a single unit, the display has to
> >>>>>>> be clear enough to be read while concentrating on driving.
> >>>>>>> Probably a 3.5" 380x320 display is the sweet spot.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The code has to be readable and compilable, and provided in
> >>>>>>> source form so that it can be inspected and tested.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Since anybody can do that, I would expect that as a licenced and
> >>>>>>> qualified mechanic, holder of a certificate in electronics, well
> >>>>>>> renowned vintage computer dealer you will have no trouble doing
> >>>>>>> it in say a month. In fact, since anybody can do it anybody who
> >>>>>>> wants to have a go is welcome, felix included.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Are you asking for a quote?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> hahahaha!
> >>>>>
> >>>> "Clocky is a fake" there's a quote for you.
> >>>
> >>> LOL, keith, mate... you seem to have a very high opinion of yourself
> >>> as a programmer - so successful and highly paid that you could
> >>> afford such prestige vehicles as a Cordia Turbo and Miata. You must
> >>> have been ace to be able to afford those two examples of motoring
> >>> excellence... :-)
> >>
> >>
> >> he claims he worked at NASA as a programmer but has no formal
> >> qualifications, and was in a senior position there, iirc. can you
> >> imagine what the competition to be employed at NASA would be like?
> >> they would only be interested in the very best and brightest; the
> >> most qualified and capable. me thinketh that maybe, just maybe,
> >> something is rotten in Denmark! :)
> >
> > Wrong as usual felix. I worked for NASA and I worked as a programmer

> > but I didn't work as a programmer for NASA.
===//===
>*** oh, I'm expected to take such interest in you that I'm expected to know

> such details am I, fukwit. but of course you didn't, you're no where

> good enough***
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*YOU* wrote the above^^^^^^^ *All incorrect* you fuckin' simpleton. :(

> > Can you understand that, I'm not sure that it can be put in any
> > simpler terms than that. You're not really the brightest are you?
> >
> >
> fuck off troll
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Please do!.
> --
> https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
>
> FUCK PUTIN!!
>
> "His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
> the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
> "He came, he saw, he got pummelled" - Alvey on Keefy
> "What a pair! Not a single word of rebuttal or reason,
> just cretinous abuse" - Alvey on jonz and noddy
> "His self serving ego pumping comments just read
> like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy
> "your opinion isn't worth 2 knobs of goat shit"- Xeno on Grubby Tech
> "You cannot turn Darren's lies into the truth by attempting to *discredit*
> what *I* say. You just make yourself look more of a dick"- Xeno to Grubby Tech