On 15/02/2023 5:38 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
> On 14/02/2023 8:30 pm, Noddy wrote:

> Keith has made a noise about me copying and pasting code into an
>> assembly program doesn't make me a "programmer", and I never said that
>> it did. All I did was used some sample code that was written by
>> someone else, and modified it to suit my own particular use. No, I
>> didn't write it from scratch, and no, I don't consider myself to be a
>> programmer. But I created a program that does what I want it to do,
>> and it was pretty easy.
>>
>> That's the fucking point. It doesn't have to be difficult, and Keith
>> doesn't get this.
>
> Sorry nodz, nothing has to be that difficult (except perhaps brain
> surgery) I've changed spark plugs, fan belts, brake pads and linings,
> even replaced distributors, starter motors, and alternators, so that all
> that it take to be a mechanic?

No, but why you keep on with nonsense like this makes sense to nobody
but you. No one here, least of all me, claimed to be a programmer, so
your analogies make no sense whatsoever.

> You had a step by step video and instructions, I've seen them, that
> ain't programming, it's paint by numbers. Sorry if that deflates your
> ego in that regard but that's life.

Lol :) You're trying hard, but you're not getting anywhere :)

It doesn't deflate my ego at all. I was the one who posted the link to
the bloke who put the video up. As I said, all I did was used his sample
code and modified it slightly to suit my own application. Again, I never
said that made me a programmer or pretended to be one, yet you keep on
with this bullshit as if it means something....

>> Instead, he carries on like a first class entitled twat thinking it's
>> *his* job to set tasks for people to assess their capabilities, and
>> believes that if they don't jump when he tells them to it's because
>> they're incapable and therefore a complete liar.
>
> God sakes, how often do we have to go over this, clocky was being a
> gaslighting arsehole, telling me that I was losing it,

From what I've seen of your behaviour around here, you're not exactly
carrying on as if you're composed and level headed.

> I said how come then that I still write software. His reply was that
it's easy, anybody
> can do it. So I put him to the test, if anybody can do it the, obviously
> he should be able to, so I asked him to write something, I knew it could
> be done because I had already done it, I also knew that he couldn't crib
> something off the Internet because I had looked. Instead of manning up
> and admitting he was wrong, he started screaming all over the place
> about it. Of cause, his mates joined to help him save face, and so for
> whatever reason did you.

Sometimes I think you like repeating yourself because you like the sound
of your own voice in your head when you read it back to yourself.

I've told you, and a number of times now, I couldn't care less about you
and him trading blows about who knows more than who and who can do what.
What I object to is your entitled belief that you have the *right* to
demand that someone else prove themselves to your satisfaction. This is
*exactly* the same bullshit that Clasener and his band of merry
cocksuckers go on with around here day after day, and it is *exactly*
the very thing that you have criticised them for doing so.

It also defies belief that a man who makes himself out to be as
intelligent as you do could subscribe to the idea that if someone
chooses not to do something that it automatically means they are
*incapable* of doing so.

That's the nonsensical logic of a primary school kid.

> The discussion on the subject is now closed, no further correspondence
> will be entered into.

Yeah, right.

> BTW This is what the actual thing looks like
> https://imgur.com/a/WfMhdfd

I don't care, Keith. At all.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

Keithr0 wrote:
> On 14/02/2023 8:30 pm, Noddy wrote:
>> On 14/02/2023 5:43 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>> On Friday, 10 February 2023 at 23:02:44 UTC+11, Noddy wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>>> But, it Sounds like you and the ol' runaway have been seeing a
>>>>> counselor......Swings and roundabouts...Who-Hoo....<FBG>
>>>> Sorry, but I have no idea what you're on about here. If you think what
>>>> Keith says makes sense then good on you. I think it's utterly
>>>> nonsensical.
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>   Making sense?, of course he is!. ticcky  is simply *running away*
>>> as he always does!. Keith *obviously* knows what he`s talking
>>> about!. As I said the other day, he'll (The windscreen boi) light
>>> the fuse and pass the stick of gelly to his minions and let them er,
>>> handle things....Simply a big girls blouse. I`ve taken him to task
>>> on numerous occasions re. his shots at me, answers?, not a
>>> snowballs!. He`s now admitted  i`m in his killfile (fail) from
>>> whence he`s *still* squawking. Useless as tits on a bull...And you
>>> *believe* him?.
>>
>> We both know that the clog wearing jerkoff is a gaslighting fuckwit
>> with massive delusions of grandeur, but that doesn't make his
>> comments about Arduino wrong. It *is* easy to use, and as someone who
>> has zero practical programming experience who has used it myself I
>> can tell you that anyone can do what I did.
>>
>> Keith has made a noise about me copying and pasting code into an
>> assembly program doesn't make me a "programmer", and I never said
>> that it did. All I did was used some sample code that was written by
>> someone else, and modified it to suit my own particular use. No, I
>> didn't write it from scratch, and no, I don't consider myself to be a
>> programmer. But I created a program that does what I want it to do,
>> and it was pretty easy.
>>
>> That's the fucking point. It doesn't have to be difficult, and Keith
>> doesn't get this.
>
> Sorry nodz, nothing has to be that difficult (except perhaps brain
> surgery) I've changed spark plugs, fan belts, brake pads and linings,
> even replaced distributors, starter motors, and alternators, so that
> all that it take to be a mechanic?
>
> You had a step by step video and instructions, I've seen them, that
> ain't programming, it's paint by numbers. Sorry if that deflates your
> ego in that regard but that's life.

why would it deflate his ego when he's not claiming to be a programmer.
more flawed logic from you there, Mr. Programmer.

>
>> Instead, he carries on like a first class entitled twat thinking it's
>> *his* job to set tasks for people to assess their capabilities, and
>> believes that if they don't jump when he tells them to it's because
>> they're incapable and therefore a complete liar.
>
> God sakes, how often do we have to go over this, clocky was being a
> gaslighting arsehole, telling me that I was losing it, I said how come
> then that I still write software. His reply was that it's easy,
> anybody can do it. So I put him to the test, if anybody can do it the,
> obviously he should be able to, so I asked him to write something, I
> knew it could be done because I had already done it, I also knew that
> he couldn't crib something off the Internet because I had looked.
> Instead of manning up and admitting he was wrong, he started screaming
> all over the place about it. Of cause,

err.. you mean 'course', I strongly suggest

> his mates joined to help him save face, and so for whatever reason did
> you.

no, we chimed in to point out the error in your logic in claiming that
something not done means it can't be done. the efficacy of your logic
and reasoning is on par with the success marshmellows would have
knocking down a brick wall by being thrown at it.

>
> The discussion on the subject is now closed, no further correspondence
> will be entered into.
>
> BTW This is what the actual thing looks like
> https://imgur.com/a/WfMhdfd
>
>> Whether the Jerkoff is capable or not I cannot tell you and nor do I
>> care. I'm not defending him. I'm criticising Keith's entitled
>> bullshit and his imbecilic logic.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

--
"He's gone from being King of the Dung Heap to having to follow around
someone he derided for years as being sub-human to post his worthless
& cowardly snipes. If only he hadn't told all those lies and abused so many
people... " - Alvey on Noddy 14/2/23

On 6/02/2023 2:41 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
> On 5/02/2023 11:54 am, Xeno wrote:
>> On 5/2/2023 12:38 am, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 4/02/2023 8:53 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>> On 4/02/2023 5:27 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>> On 4/2/2023 2:42 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>> On 4/02/2023 9:32 am, Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/02/2023 10:00 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On another subject, perhaps you could enlighten me about
>>>>>>>> something. What's this about?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "What, you copy and paste code into a sketch in Arduino, select
>>>>>>>>> the libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You cite this as a quote from Jerky Birko in your sig and I'm
>>>>>>>> not sure why, for as far as Arduino goes that's exactly what you
>>>>>>>> do.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Taking some code that somebody else wrote and plugging it into an
>>>>>>> Arduino is to programming what changing a plug is to being a
>>>>>>> mechanic, or doing a paint by numbers is to being an artist. It's
>>>>>>> just monkey see monkey do.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, by your logic anyone who can play a guitar but never writes a
>>>>>> song themselves is just a copycat?
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm, unless they add some *originality* in their *style* of
>>>>> playing, yeah, pretty much.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's not writing code from scratch to control the auto pilot on
>>>>>> the space shuttle certainly, but it *is* programming nonetheless.
>>>>>> It is formulating a series of instructions and compiling them in
>>>>>> such a way to make the events occur that you want to occur, and
>>>>>> while it may not be much more complicated than writing an
>>>>>> elaborate batch file it's *still* programming in the most basic
>>>>>> sense.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the most basic sense, yes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The simplicity of Arduino is what makes it popular, which is a
>>>>>> concept you seem incapable of grasping. It allows people like me
>>>>>> for example, who have little to no real programming experience, to
>>>>>> put together
>>>>>
>>>>> No real automotive experience either but that's never held you back
>>>>> from *lying* about the level of expertise you *claim* to possess.
>>>>>
>>>>>> packages that work, and for some reason you seem threatened by
>>>>>> that or think it's "not real" because I didn't spend 17 years in a
>>>>>> dark room wearing a beige cardigan eating digestive biscuits
>>>>>> learning how to program in Fortran, Cobol or C before I could do
>>>>>> that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Back in 1983 or 1984, a friend could write routines in *direct Hex
>>>>> code* for the Z80 processor and pop them into the requisite memory
>>>>> locations using the monitor program the computer came with.
>>>>> Impressive to watch and that's what convinced me I wasn't ever
>>>>> going to be much of a programmer. You see, I wasn't prepared, nor
>>>>> could I afford, to spare the amount of time required to get to that
>>>>> level of expertise. My friend was single (still is) and devoted all
>>>>> his time to his *hobby*. At the time I was full time teaching and
>>>>> part time Uni, and had a wife to consider - no way was I ever going
>>>>> to be able to devote the requisite time. Anyway, it was easier to
>>>>> say to him, "Could you whip up this little program for me" and it'd
>>>>> be done in *minutes*. Priorities, that's what you need to consider.
>>>>
>>>> Does your level of bullshitting need to get any deeper. FFS Nobody
>>>> can write a little program in hex on the z80 in minutes....
>>>>
>>>
>>> You obviously don't know any real proficient programmers.
>>> Shit - even dumbarse keith probably could have written a program in
>>> Z80 assembler at one time - in minutes.
>>>
>>>> This is the code just to write 'Hello World' to the screen....
>>>>
>>>> 5200: 210652C31B0248656C6C6F20576F726F
>>>> 5210: 64210D00000000000000000000000000
>>>>
>>>
>>> Screen of what system?
>>
>> It doesn't matter since, at the end of the day, he's only trying to
>> obfuscate matters. He appears to have never done any machine code
>> programming nor does he appear to know anyone else who does.
>>
> Yes he does.

Well he knows me so I guess technically that's true.

--
In thread "May need to buy petrol soon" Sept 23 2021 11:15:59am
Keithr0 wrote: "He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a
proven liar."

On Sept 23 2021 3:16:29pm Keithr0 wrote:
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying."

Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> wrote in
news:k53cugFd0pbU5@mid.individual.net:

snippo

> The discussion on the subject is now closed, no further correspondence
> will be entered into.

lol!
That's a classic losers runaway statement.

On Wednesday, 15 February 2023 at 19:21:52 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> Keithr0 wrote:
> > On 14/02/2023 8:30 pm, Noddy wrote:
> >> On 14/02/2023 5:43 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> >>> On Friday, 10 February 2023 at 23:02:44 UTC+11, Noddy wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>> But, it Sounds like you and the ol' runaway have been seeing a
> >>>>> counselor......Swings and roundabouts...Who-Hoo....<FBG>
> >>>> Sorry, but I have no idea what you're on about here. If you think what
> >>>> Keith says makes sense then good on you. I think it's utterly
> >>>> nonsensical.
> >>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>> Making sense?, of course he is!. ticcky is simply *running away*
> >>> as he always does!. Keith *obviously* knows what he`s talking
> >>> about!. As I said the other day, he'll (The windscreen boi) light
> >>> the fuse and pass the stick of gelly to his minions and let them er,
> >>> handle things....Simply a big girls blouse. I`ve taken him to task
> >>> on numerous occasions re. his shots at me, answers?, not a
> >>> snowballs!. He`s now admitted i`m in his killfile (fail) from
> >>> whence he`s *still* squawking. Useless as tits on a bull...And you
> >>> *believe* him?.
> >>
> >> We both know that the clog wearing jerkoff is a gaslighting fuckwit
> >> with massive delusions of grandeur, but that doesn't make his
> >> comments about Arduino wrong. It *is* easy to use, and as someone who
> >> has zero practical programming experience who has used it myself I
> >> can tell you that anyone can do what I did.
> >>
> >> Keith has made a noise about me copying and pasting code into an
> >> assembly program doesn't make me a "programmer", and I never said
> >> that it did. All I did was used some sample code that was written by
> >> someone else, and modified it to suit my own particular use. No, I
> >> didn't write it from scratch, and no, I don't consider myself to be a
> >> programmer. But I created a program that does what I want it to do,
> >> and it was pretty easy.
> >>
> >> That's the fucking point. It doesn't have to be difficult, and Keith
> >> doesn't get this.
> >
> > Sorry nodz, nothing has to be that difficult (except perhaps brain
> > surgery) I've changed spark plugs, fan belts, brake pads and linings,
> > even replaced distributors, starter motors, and alternators, so that
> > all that it take to be a mechanic?
> >
> > You had a step by step video and instructions, I've seen them, that
> > ain't programming, it's paint by numbers. Sorry if that deflates your
> > ego in that regard but that's life.
> why would it deflate his ego when he's not claiming to be a programmer.
> more flawed logic from you there, Mr. Programmer.
> >
> >> Instead, he carries on like a first class entitled twat thinking it's
> >> *his* job to set tasks for people to assess their capabilities, and
> >> believes that if they don't jump when he tells them to it's because
> >> they're incapable and therefore a complete liar.
> >
> > God sakes, how often do we have to go over this, clocky was being a
> > gaslighting arsehole, telling me that I was losing it, I said how come
> > then that I still write software. His reply was that it's easy,
> > anybody can do it. So I put him to the test, if anybody can do it the,
> > obviously he should be able to, so I asked him to write something, I
> > knew it could be done because I had already done it, I also knew that
> > he couldn't crib something off the Internet because I had looked.
> > Instead of manning up and admitting he was wrong, he started screaming
> > all over the place about it. Of cause,
> err.. you mean 'course', I strongly suggest
> > his mates joined to help him save face, and so for whatever reason did
> > you.
> no, we chimed in to point out the error in your logic in claiming that
> something not done means it can't be done. the efficacy of your logic
> and reasoning is on par with the success marshmellows would have
> knocking down a brick wall by being thrown at it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*WE* again?, <shrug> why not i 'spose since you lot are *incapable* of independent thought!
To top it off, *none* of that spiel(s) made an iota of sense!.

Why do you whacko`s even try... Hahahaha......

> >
> > The discussion on the subject is now closed, no further correspondence
> > will be entered into.
> >
> > BTW This is what the actual thing looks like
> > https://imgur.com/a/WfMhdfd
> >
> >> Whether the Jerkoff is capable or not I cannot tell you and nor do I
> >> care. I'm not defending him. I'm criticising Keith's entitled
> >> bullshit and his imbecilic logic.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~``
However, *I* am!. No and No to yer last.......

> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> "He's gone from being King of the Dung Heap to having to follow around
> someone he derided for years as being sub-human to post his worthless
> & cowardly snipes. If only he hadn't told all those lies and abused so many
> people... " - Alvey on Noddy 14/2/23

On 16/02/2023 10:18 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, 15 February 2023 at 19:21:52 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:

>>>> Whether the Jerkoff is capable or not I cannot tell you and nor do I
>>>> care. I'm not defending him. I'm criticising Keith's entitled
>>>> bullshit and his imbecilic logic.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~``
> However, *I* am!. No and No to yer last.......

Disagree all you like, but I wasn't asking for your approval.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

Noddy <me@home.com> wrote in news:tsjpmi$31378$1@dont-email.me:

> On 16/02/2023 10:18 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 15 February 2023 at 19:21:52 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>
>>>>> Whether the Jerkoff is capable or not I cannot tell you and nor do I
>>>>> care. I'm not defending him. I'm criticising Keith's entitled
>>>>> bullshit and his imbecilic logic.
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~``
>> However, *I* am!. No and No to yer last.......
>
> Disagree all you like, but I wasn't asking for your approval.

I'm guessing that the Mad Snipper of Merrimu is unaware that he's replying
to to John.

And still on the topic of unintelligible gibberish... Gerald Cooper is
back! And as incomprensible as ever, in the latest excellent series of
"Clarkson's Farm".

alvey

On 15/02/2023 10:15 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 6/02/2023 2:41 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>> On 5/02/2023 11:54 am, Xeno wrote:
>>> On 5/2/2023 12:38 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 4/02/2023 8:53 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>> On 4/02/2023 5:27 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>> On 4/2/2023 2:42 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>> On 4/02/2023 9:32 am, Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 3/02/2023 10:00 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On another subject, perhaps you could enlighten me about
>>>>>>>>> something. What's this about?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "What, you copy and paste code into a sketch in Arduino,
>>>>>>>>>> select the libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You cite this as a quote from Jerky Birko in your sig and I'm
>>>>>>>>> not sure why, for as far as Arduino goes that's exactly what
>>>>>>>>> you do.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Taking some code that somebody else wrote and plugging it into
>>>>>>>> an Arduino is to programming what changing a plug is to being a
>>>>>>>> mechanic, or doing a paint by numbers is to being an artist.
>>>>>>>> It's just monkey see monkey do.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, by your logic anyone who can play a guitar but never writes a
>>>>>>> song themselves is just a copycat?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmm, unless they add some *originality* in their *style* of
>>>>>> playing, yeah, pretty much.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's not writing code from scratch to control the auto pilot on
>>>>>>> the space shuttle certainly, but it *is* programming nonetheless.
>>>>>>> It is formulating a series of instructions and compiling them in
>>>>>>> such a way to make the events occur that you want to occur, and
>>>>>>> while it may not be much more complicated than writing an
>>>>>>> elaborate batch file it's *still* programming in the most basic
>>>>>>> sense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the most basic sense, yes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The simplicity of Arduino is what makes it popular, which is a
>>>>>>> concept you seem incapable of grasping. It allows people like me
>>>>>>> for example, who have little to no real programming experience,
>>>>>>> to put together
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No real automotive experience either but that's never held you
>>>>>> back from *lying* about the level of expertise you *claim* to
>>>>>> possess.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> packages that work, and for some reason you seem threatened by
>>>>>>> that or think it's "not real" because I didn't spend 17 years in
>>>>>>> a dark room wearing a beige cardigan eating digestive biscuits
>>>>>>> learning how to program in Fortran, Cobol or C before I could do
>>>>>>> that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Back in 1983 or 1984, a friend could write routines in *direct Hex
>>>>>> code* for the Z80 processor and pop them into the requisite memory
>>>>>> locations using the monitor program the computer came with.
>>>>>> Impressive to watch and that's what convinced me I wasn't ever
>>>>>> going to be much of a programmer. You see, I wasn't prepared, nor
>>>>>> could I afford, to spare the amount of time required to get to
>>>>>> that level of expertise. My friend was single (still is) and
>>>>>> devoted all his time to his *hobby*. At the time I was full time
>>>>>> teaching and part time Uni, and had a wife to consider - no way
>>>>>> was I ever going to be able to devote the requisite time. Anyway,
>>>>>> it was easier to say to him, "Could you whip up this little
>>>>>> program for me" and it'd be done in *minutes*. Priorities, that's
>>>>>> what you need to consider.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does your level of bullshitting need to get any deeper. FFS Nobody
>>>>> can write a little program in hex on the z80 in minutes....
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You obviously don't know any real proficient programmers.
>>>> Shit - even dumbarse keith probably could have written a program in
>>>> Z80 assembler at one time - in minutes.
>>>>
>>>>> This is the code just to write 'Hello World' to the screen....
>>>>>
>>>>> 5200: 210652C31B0248656C6C6F20576F726F
>>>>> 5210: 64210D00000000000000000000000000
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Screen of what system?
>>>
>>> It doesn't matter since, at the end of the day, he's only trying to
>>> obfuscate matters. He appears to have never done any machine code
>>> programming nor does he appear to know anyone else who does.
>>>
>> Yes he does.
>
>
> Well he knows me so I guess technically that's true.

That's good to know, of course when fixing mainframe computers back in
the 70s, we had to know how to program in machine language in order to
do the job, but then you wouldn't know anything about that.

There isn't much, if any need for it today, modern compiler output is
just as efficient as hand written assembler (machine) code in 99.9% of
cases probably more so in most cases. That is, I suppose, unless you're
playing with really obsolete stuff.

--
Clocky on programming 18 Feb 2022
"What, you copy and paste code into a sketch in Arduino, select the
libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program"

Clocky on NASA 18 Mar 2022
"Oh, and btw... if you worked for NASA how is it thay you are seemingly
oblivious to Commodore Amigas used at NASA"

jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, 15 February 2023 at 19:21:52 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> Keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 14/02/2023 8:30 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>> On 14/02/2023 5:43 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>>> On Friday, 10 February 2023 at 23:02:44 UTC+11, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>> But, it Sounds like you and the ol' runaway have been seeing a
>>>>>>> counselor......Swings and roundabouts...Who-Hoo....<FBG>
>>>>>> Sorry, but I have no idea what you're on about here. If you think what
>>>>>> Keith says makes sense then good on you. I think it's utterly
>>>>>> nonsensical.
>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>> Making sense?, of course he is!. ticcky is simply *running away*
>>>>> as he always does!. Keith *obviously* knows what he`s talking
>>>>> about!. As I said the other day, he'll (The windscreen boi) light
>>>>> the fuse and pass the stick of gelly to his minions and let them er,
>>>>> handle things....Simply a big girls blouse. I`ve taken him to task
>>>>> on numerous occasions re. his shots at me, answers?, not a
>>>>> snowballs!. He`s now admitted i`m in his killfile (fail) from
>>>>> whence he`s *still* squawking. Useless as tits on a bull...And you
>>>>> *believe* him?.
>>>> We both know that the clog wearing jerkoff is a gaslighting fuckwit
>>>> with massive delusions of grandeur, but that doesn't make his
>>>> comments about Arduino wrong. It *is* easy to use, and as someone who
>>>> has zero practical programming experience who has used it myself I
>>>> can tell you that anyone can do what I did.
>>>>
>>>> Keith has made a noise about me copying and pasting code into an
>>>> assembly program doesn't make me a "programmer", and I never said
>>>> that it did. All I did was used some sample code that was written by
>>>> someone else, and modified it to suit my own particular use. No, I
>>>> didn't write it from scratch, and no, I don't consider myself to be a
>>>> programmer. But I created a program that does what I want it to do,
>>>> and it was pretty easy.
>>>>
>>>> That's the fucking point. It doesn't have to be difficult, and Keith
>>>> doesn't get this.
>>> Sorry nodz, nothing has to be that difficult (except perhaps brain
>>> surgery) I've changed spark plugs, fan belts, brake pads and linings,
>>> even replaced distributors, starter motors, and alternators, so that
>>> all that it take to be a mechanic?
>>>
>>> You had a step by step video and instructions, I've seen them, that
>>> ain't programming, it's paint by numbers. Sorry if that deflates your
>>> ego in that regard but that's life.
>> why would it deflate his ego when he's not claiming to be a programmer.
>> more flawed logic from you there, Mr. Programmer.
>>>> Instead, he carries on like a first class entitled twat thinking it's
>>>> *his* job to set tasks for people to assess their capabilities, and
>>>> believes that if they don't jump when he tells them to it's because
>>>> they're incapable and therefore a complete liar.
>>> God sakes, how often do we have to go over this, clocky was being a
>>> gaslighting arsehole, telling me that I was losing it, I said how come
>>> then that I still write software. His reply was that it's easy,
>>> anybody can do it. So I put him to the test, if anybody can do it the,
>>> obviously he should be able to, so I asked him to write something, I
>>> knew it could be done because I had already done it, I also knew that
>>> he couldn't crib something off the Internet because I had looked.
>>> Instead of manning up and admitting he was wrong, he started screaming
>>> all over the place about it. Of cause,
>> err.. you mean 'course', I strongly suggest
>>> his mates joined to help him save face, and so for whatever reason did
>>> you.
>> no, we chimed in to point out the error in your logic in claiming that
>> something not done means it can't be done. the efficacy of your logic
>> and reasoning is on par with the success marshmellows would have
>> knocking down a brick wall by being thrown at it.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> *WE* again?, <shrug> why not i 'spose since you lot are *incapable* of independent thought!
> To top it off, *none* of that spiel(s) made an iota of sense!.

it makes perfect sense to anyone with more than half a brain, so totally
unsurprising it makes no sense to you

--
"He's gone from being King of the Dung Heap to having to follow around
someone he derided for years as being sub-human to post his worthless
& cowardly snipes. If only he hadn't told all those lies and abused so many
people... " - Alvey on Noddy 14/2/23

On 16/02/2023 11:27 am, Keithr0 wrote:
> On 15/02/2023 10:15 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 6/02/2023 2:41 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 5/02/2023 11:54 am, Xeno wrote:
>>>> On 5/2/2023 12:38 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 4/02/2023 8:53 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>> On 4/02/2023 5:27 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>> On 4/2/2023 2:42 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 4/02/2023 9:32 am, Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 3/02/2023 10:00 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On another subject, perhaps you could enlighten me about
>>>>>>>>>> something. What's this about?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "What, you copy and paste code into a sketch in Arduino,
>>>>>>>>>>> select the libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit
>>>>>>>>>>> program"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You cite this as a quote from Jerky Birko in your sig and I'm
>>>>>>>>>> not sure why, for as far as Arduino goes that's exactly what
>>>>>>>>>> you do.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Taking some code that somebody else wrote and plugging it into
>>>>>>>>> an Arduino is to programming what changing a plug is to being a
>>>>>>>>> mechanic, or doing a paint by numbers is to being an artist.
>>>>>>>>> It's just monkey see monkey do.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, by your logic anyone who can play a guitar but never writes
>>>>>>>> a song themselves is just a copycat?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hmm, unless they add some *originality* in their *style* of
>>>>>>> playing, yeah, pretty much.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's not writing code from scratch to control the auto pilot on
>>>>>>>> the space shuttle certainly, but it *is* programming
>>>>>>>> nonetheless. It is formulating a series of instructions and
>>>>>>>> compiling them in such a way to make the events occur that you
>>>>>>>> want to occur, and while it may not be much more complicated
>>>>>>>> than writing an elaborate batch file it's *still* programming in
>>>>>>>> the most basic sense.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In the most basic sense, yes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The simplicity of Arduino is what makes it popular, which is a
>>>>>>>> concept you seem incapable of grasping. It allows people like me
>>>>>>>> for example, who have little to no real programming experience,
>>>>>>>> to put together
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No real automotive experience either but that's never held you
>>>>>>> back from *lying* about the level of expertise you *claim* to
>>>>>>> possess.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> packages that work, and for some reason you seem threatened by
>>>>>>>> that or think it's "not real" because I didn't spend 17 years in
>>>>>>>> a dark room wearing a beige cardigan eating digestive biscuits
>>>>>>>> learning how to program in Fortran, Cobol or C before I could do
>>>>>>>> that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Back in 1983 or 1984, a friend could write routines in *direct
>>>>>>> Hex code* for the Z80 processor and pop them into the requisite
>>>>>>> memory locations using the monitor program the computer came
>>>>>>> with. Impressive to watch and that's what convinced me I wasn't
>>>>>>> ever going to be much of a programmer. You see, I wasn't
>>>>>>> prepared, nor could I afford, to spare the amount of time
>>>>>>> required to get to that level of expertise. My friend was single
>>>>>>> (still is) and devoted all his time to his *hobby*. At the time I
>>>>>>> was full time teaching and part time Uni, and had a wife to
>>>>>>> consider - no way was I ever going to be able to devote the
>>>>>>> requisite time. Anyway, it was easier to say to him, "Could you
>>>>>>> whip up this little program for me" and it'd be done in
>>>>>>> *minutes*. Priorities, that's what you need to consider.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does your level of bullshitting need to get any deeper. FFS Nobody
>>>>>> can write a little program in hex on the z80 in minutes....
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You obviously don't know any real proficient programmers.
>>>>> Shit - even dumbarse keith probably could have written a program in
>>>>> Z80 assembler at one time - in minutes.
>>>>>
>>>>>> This is the code just to write 'Hello World' to the screen....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 5200: 210652C31B0248656C6C6F20576F726F
>>>>>> 5210: 64210D00000000000000000000000000
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Screen of what system?
>>>>
>>>> It doesn't matter since, at the end of the day, he's only trying to
>>>> obfuscate matters. He appears to have never done any machine code
>>>> programming nor does he appear to know anyone else who does.
>>>>
>>> Yes he does.
>>
>>
>> Well he knows me so I guess technically that's true.
>
> That's good to know, of course when fixing mainfr...

Nobody cares keith.

--
In thread "May need to buy petrol soon" Sept 23 2021 11:15:59am
Keithr0 wrote: "He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a
proven liar."

On Sept 23 2021 3:16:29pm Keithr0 wrote:
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying."

On Thursday, 16 February 2023 at 10:26:19 UTC+11, Noddy wrote:
> On 16/02/2023 10:18 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 15 February 2023 at 19:21:52 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>
> >>>> Whether the Jerkoff is capable or not I cannot tell you and nor do I
> >>>> care. I'm not defending him. I'm criticising Keith's entitled
> >>>> bullshit and his imbecilic logic.
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~``
> > However, *I* am!. No and No to yer last.......
> Disagree all you like, but I wasn't asking for your approval.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And????.
> --
> --
> --
> Regards,
> Noddy.

On 16/02/2023 4:14 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 16/02/2023 11:27 am, Keithr0 wrote:
>> On 15/02/2023 10:15 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 6/02/2023 2:41 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 5/02/2023 11:54 am, Xeno wrote:
>>>>> On 5/2/2023 12:38 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>> On 4/02/2023 8:53 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>> On 4/02/2023 5:27 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 4/2/2023 2:42 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 4/02/2023 9:32 am, Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 3/02/2023 10:00 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On another subject, perhaps you could enlighten me about
>>>>>>>>>>> something. What's this about?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "What, you copy and paste code into a sketch in Arduino,
>>>>>>>>>>>> select the libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit
>>>>>>>>>>>> program"
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You cite this as a quote from Jerky Birko in your sig and I'm
>>>>>>>>>>> not sure why, for as far as Arduino goes that's exactly what
>>>>>>>>>>> you do.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Taking some code that somebody else wrote and plugging it into
>>>>>>>>>> an Arduino is to programming what changing a plug is to being
>>>>>>>>>> a mechanic, or doing a paint by numbers is to being an artist.
>>>>>>>>>> It's just monkey see monkey do.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So, by your logic anyone who can play a guitar but never writes
>>>>>>>>> a song themselves is just a copycat?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hmm, unless they add some *originality* in their *style* of
>>>>>>>> playing, yeah, pretty much.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's not writing code from scratch to control the auto pilot on
>>>>>>>>> the space shuttle certainly, but it *is* programming
>>>>>>>>> nonetheless. It is formulating a series of instructions and
>>>>>>>>> compiling them in such a way to make the events occur that you
>>>>>>>>> want to occur, and while it may not be much more complicated
>>>>>>>>> than writing an elaborate batch file it's *still* programming
>>>>>>>>> in the most basic sense.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In the most basic sense, yes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The simplicity of Arduino is what makes it popular, which is a
>>>>>>>>> concept you seem incapable of grasping. It allows people like
>>>>>>>>> me for example, who have little to no real programming
>>>>>>>>> experience, to put together
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No real automotive experience either but that's never held you
>>>>>>>> back from *lying* about the level of expertise you *claim* to
>>>>>>>> possess.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> packages that work, and for some reason you seem threatened by
>>>>>>>>> that or think it's "not real" because I didn't spend 17 years
>>>>>>>>> in a dark room wearing a beige cardigan eating digestive
>>>>>>>>> biscuits learning how to program in Fortran, Cobol or C before
>>>>>>>>> I could do that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Back in 1983 or 1984, a friend could write routines in *direct
>>>>>>>> Hex code* for the Z80 processor and pop them into the requisite
>>>>>>>> memory locations using the monitor program the computer came
>>>>>>>> with. Impressive to watch and that's what convinced me I wasn't
>>>>>>>> ever going to be much of a programmer. You see, I wasn't
>>>>>>>> prepared, nor could I afford, to spare the amount of time
>>>>>>>> required to get to that level of expertise. My friend was single
>>>>>>>> (still is) and devoted all his time to his *hobby*. At the time
>>>>>>>> I was full time teaching and part time Uni, and had a wife to
>>>>>>>> consider - no way was I ever going to be able to devote the
>>>>>>>> requisite time. Anyway, it was easier to say to him, "Could you
>>>>>>>> whip up this little program for me" and it'd be done in
>>>>>>>> *minutes*. Priorities, that's what you need to consider.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does your level of bullshitting need to get any deeper. FFS
>>>>>>> Nobody can write a little program in hex on the z80 in minutes....
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You obviously don't know any real proficient programmers.
>>>>>> Shit - even dumbarse keith probably could have written a program
>>>>>> in Z80 assembler at one time - in minutes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is the code just to write 'Hello World' to the screen....
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 5200: 210652C31B0248656C6C6F20576F726F
>>>>>>> 5210: 64210D00000000000000000000000000
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Screen of what system?
>>>>>
>>>>> It doesn't matter since, at the end of the day, he's only trying to
>>>>> obfuscate matters. He appears to have never done any machine code
>>>>> programming nor does he appear to know anyone else who does.
>>>>>
>>>> Yes he does.
>>>
>>>
>>> Well he knows me so I guess technically that's true.
>>
>> That's good to know, of course when fixing mainfr...
>
>
> Nobody cares keith.

Somebody obviously does, he took the time to reply.

--
Clocky on programming 18 Feb 2022
"What, you copy and paste code into a sketch in Arduino, select the
libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program"

Clocky on NASA 18 Mar 2022
"Oh, and btw... if you worked for NASA how is it thay you are seemingly
oblivious to Commodore Amigas used at NASA"

On Friday, 10 February 2023 at 20:12:01 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:
> On 9/02/2023 9:21 pm, Noddy wrote:
> > On 9/02/2023 8:49 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> >> On Thursday, 9 February 2023 at 16:33:20 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:
> >
> >>>>
> >>> What a load of pig ignorant bullshit that is.
> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>
> >> Is it?, why then, are vehicles being written off after even a
> >> *minor* bingle?. (Quite often as an *unrepairable* (Stat. write off)
> >> See it here all the time. The assessor comes in (NRMA holding
> >> yard) and over 50% become a write off ..
> >
> Since I can't see your posts I'll address it here.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
HaHa, yeah sure!... Ms Gutless.......

Nice snipping
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
What and where?.

>. I said "Reliability, safety and longevity has improved
> exponentially over time, even with cars being far more complex today."
> and that is 100% true. Accident damage has nothing to do with what I
> said... you really are the definition of rank stupidity.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Try reading for comprehension you retard!.
(Memo to self..) Guess I have to double space and TY P E S L O W L Y for this goose.

> > You can only laugh at the snorkel fitter. His only connection with "new
> > cars" is fitting mudflaps and side steps on mine vehicles, but he
> > reckons he knows everything there is to the entire automotive world.
> > Like extracting fuel trim data that's over 2 weeks old at ramdom from a
> > car with no fault codes present.
> >
> Sigh... there is no hope for an incompetent like you.
>
> You are so lost and clueless.
> > You'd have to wonder how he actually manages to do that given that none
> > of it is recorded :)
> >
> Of course LTFT is recorded
Your retarded mate only needs to search
> youtube and see a bunch of mechanics use it to diagnose faults.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*Bunch* eh??, as in bananas?....Fitting for your skill level I guess. <SHRUG>
>
> You're so fucking stupid!
> --
> In thread "May need to buy petrol soon" Sept 23 2021 11:15:59am
> Keithr0 wrote: "He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a
> proven liar."
>
> On Sept 23 2021 3:16:29pm Keithr0 wrote:
> "He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying."

On 14/02/2023 1:37 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
> On 14/02/2023 1:51 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 10/02/2023 5:23 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 10/02/2023 7:16 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 10/02/2023 1:23 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/02/2023 1:28 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>> Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 7/02/2023 9:19 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 7/02/2023 9:34 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/02/2023 8:45 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I've programmed Arduino's, so have millions of others using
>>>>>>>>>>> the process I described. So has Noddy.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You still couldn't do a simple task when asked.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You really can't be this thick by accident :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That he chose *not* to do it is no indication that he
>>>>>>>>> *couldn't* do it, and you have some fucking nerve expecting
>>>>>>>>> people to jump whenever you tell them to. Especially in light
>>>>>>>>> of the fact that you've been quite vocal in your criticisms of
>>>>>>>>> people doing precisely that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Quite remarkably, that criticism doesn't extend to you when
>>>>>>>>> *you* do it....
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>   > You obviously have forgotten how all this started, you were
>>>>>>>>> doing your stupid gaslighting
>>>>>>>>>> effort, trying to claim that I was losing it. When I said that
>>>>>>>>>> I still write software, you claimed "What, you copy and paste
>>>>>>>>>> code into a sketch in Arduino, select the libraries to
>>>>>>>>>> include, modify it a bit and hit program", so I asked you to
>>>>>>>>>> do something that I'd already done and which you couldn't crib
>>>>>>>>>> of the internet. Obviously you couldn't, so you panicked and
>>>>>>>>>> ran round like chicken little. You weren't man enough to admit
>>>>>>>>>> that you were wrong. Some integrity.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Man, you *seriously* need to get the fuck over yourself :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Noddy BTW just loaded some code into an Arduino given full
>>>>>>>>>> instructions. Programming that ain't.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I never said I did otherwise, but just to be clear the code I
>>>>>>>>> used was a sample provided by a guy who gave a demonstration on
>>>>>>>>> how he built a particular machine, and I modified that code to
>>>>>>>>> suit my own particular circumstances. Those modifications were
>>>>>>>>> not extensive, and were basically limited to things like switch
>>>>>>>>> functions and timings, but the code itself was easy enough for
>>>>>>>>> me to follow and tailor to suit my needs bearing in mind that
>>>>>>>>> my programming experience is next to zip.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But then that was precisely the point. Arduino is easy enough
>>>>>>>>> that anyone can use it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> All this because I wouldn't call noddy a liar when ordered to
>>>>>>>>>> do so by you. What a load of shit over nothing, but then,
>>>>>>>>>> that's the way you operate.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You're away with the fairies :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This has nothing whatsoever to do with what you think you were
>>>>>>>>> "told to do", and everything to do with you being ridiculously
>>>>>>>>> self absorbed and needing to rain shit over anyone else where
>>>>>>>>> you think you know more than they do. It's all about Keith,
>>>>>>>>> Keith, Keith, and your incessant need to paint yourself up as
>>>>>>>>> an "expert". You're as bad as Clasener.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Oh, by the way. Have you ever used Arduino? :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Since he expected me to program something very specific for him
>>>>>>>> I presume he's not very proficient.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> considering the lack of logical thought processes displayed in
>>>>>>> his posts, I'd say that's a given
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The master speaks, the dog barks.
>>>>>
>>>>> little keefy squeaks from behind the curtain..  :)
>>>>>
>>>>> but we don't have masters and servants. that's a FLCJC thing. if
>>>>> you servants upset the master you cop ridicule and abuse. we
>>>>> respect each other and communicate harmoniously.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If keith had any credibility he would question his master NoddyLiar.
>>>>
>>>> But the troll has no credibility or balls.
>>>>
>>> My God you're a boring old fart, can't you ever think of anything new
>>> to say?
>>
>> Sure, but until you gain some credibility and question NoddyLiar the
>> *truth* is you're a troll with no credibility and no balls.
>>
>> You want something fresh, stop being a troll with no credibility and
>> no balls. Until such time the truth will suffice.
>
> My God you're a boring old fart, can't you ever think of anything new
> to say?
>
>

Sure, but until you gain some credibility and question NoddyLiar the
*truth* is you're a troll with no credibility and no balls.

You want something fresh, stop being a troll with no credibility and no
balls. Until such time the truth will suffice.

--
In thread "May need to buy petrol soon" Sept 23 2021 11:15:59am
Keithr0 wrote: "He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a
proven liar."

On Sept 23 2021 3:16:29pm Keithr0 wrote:
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying."

On 19/02/2023 1:56 am, Clocky wrote:
> On 14/02/2023 1:37 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>> On 14/02/2023 1:51 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 10/02/2023 5:23 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 10/02/2023 7:16 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 10/02/2023 1:23 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>> Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/02/2023 1:28 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>> Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 7/02/2023 9:19 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 7/02/2023 9:34 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/02/2023 8:45 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I've programmed Arduino's, so have millions of others using
>>>>>>>>>>>> the process I described. So has Noddy.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You still couldn't do a simple task when asked.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You really can't be this thick by accident :)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That he chose *not* to do it is no indication that he
>>>>>>>>>> *couldn't* do it, and you have some fucking nerve expecting
>>>>>>>>>> people to jump whenever you tell them to. Especially in light
>>>>>>>>>> of the fact that you've been quite vocal in your criticisms of
>>>>>>>>>> people doing precisely that.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Quite remarkably, that criticism doesn't extend to you when
>>>>>>>>>> *you* do it....
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>   > You obviously have forgotten how all this started, you
>>>>>>>>>> were doing your stupid gaslighting
>>>>>>>>>>> effort, trying to claim that I was losing it. When I said
>>>>>>>>>>> that I still write software, you claimed "What, you copy and
>>>>>>>>>>> paste code into a sketch in Arduino, select the libraries to
>>>>>>>>>>> include, modify it a bit and hit program", so I asked you to
>>>>>>>>>>> do something that I'd already done and which you couldn't
>>>>>>>>>>> crib of the internet. Obviously you couldn't, so you panicked
>>>>>>>>>>> and ran round like chicken little. You weren't man enough to
>>>>>>>>>>> admit that you were wrong. Some integrity.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Man, you *seriously* need to get the fuck over yourself :)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Noddy BTW just loaded some code into an Arduino given full
>>>>>>>>>>> instructions. Programming that ain't.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I never said I did otherwise, but just to be clear the code I
>>>>>>>>>> used was a sample provided by a guy who gave a demonstration
>>>>>>>>>> on how he built a particular machine, and I modified that code
>>>>>>>>>> to suit my own particular circumstances. Those modifications
>>>>>>>>>> were not extensive, and were basically limited to things like
>>>>>>>>>> switch functions and timings, but the code itself was easy
>>>>>>>>>> enough for me to follow and tailor to suit my needs bearing in
>>>>>>>>>> mind that my programming experience is next to zip.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But then that was precisely the point. Arduino is easy enough
>>>>>>>>>> that anyone can use it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> All this because I wouldn't call noddy a liar when ordered to
>>>>>>>>>>> do so by you. What a load of shit over nothing, but then,
>>>>>>>>>>> that's the way you operate.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You're away with the fairies :)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This has nothing whatsoever to do with what you think you were
>>>>>>>>>> "told to do", and everything to do with you being ridiculously
>>>>>>>>>> self absorbed and needing to rain shit over anyone else where
>>>>>>>>>> you think you know more than they do. It's all about Keith,
>>>>>>>>>> Keith, Keith, and your incessant need to paint yourself up as
>>>>>>>>>> an "expert". You're as bad as Clasener.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Oh, by the way. Have you ever used Arduino? :)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Since he expected me to program something very specific for him
>>>>>>>>> I presume he's not very proficient.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> considering the lack of logical thought processes displayed in
>>>>>>>> his posts, I'd say that's a given
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The master speaks, the dog barks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> little keefy squeaks from behind the curtain..  :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> but we don't have masters and servants. that's a FLCJC thing. if
>>>>>> you servants upset the master you cop ridicule and abuse. we
>>>>>> respect each other and communicate harmoniously.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If keith had any credibility he would question his master NoddyLiar.
>>>>>
>>>>> But the troll has no credibility or balls.
>>>>>
>>>> My God you're a boring old fart, can't you ever think of anything
>>>> new to say?
>>>
>>> Sure, but until you gain some credibility and question NoddyLiar the
>>> *truth* is you're a troll with no credibility and no balls.
>>>
>>> You want something fresh, stop being a troll with no credibility and
>>> no balls. Until such time the truth will suffice.
>>
>> My God you're a boring old fart, can't you ever think of anything new
>> to say?
>>
>>
>
> Sure, but until you gain some credibility and question NoddyLiar the
> *truth* is you're a troll with no credibility and no balls.
>
> You want something fresh, stop being a troll with no credibility and no
> balls. Until such time the truth will suffice.
>
>
Same shit different day, you are a boring old fart.
--
Clocky on programming 18 Feb 2022
"What, you copy and paste code into a sketch in Arduino, select the
libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program"

Clocky on NASA 18 Mar 2022
"Oh, and btw... if you worked for NASA how is it thay you are seemingly
oblivious to Commodore Amigas used at NASA"