On 25/04/2022 22:32, #Paul wrote:
> ARW <adamwadsworth@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>> And by paying no attention and not listening I really mean that. Myself
>> and a college discussed how we would nail his Mother in a threesome in
>> front of him (the discussion was in front of him - we were not
>> discussing actually having a threesome and him standing there and
>> watching us nail her). Never cottoned on even when we used her name and
>> what street she lives on.
>
> Or, being in the presence of some dickhead authority types
> determined to try to embarrass and/or humiliate, had the good
> sense to pretend not to hear anything. It seems to me that you
> could have use almost any sort of reasonable reaction by them to
> protest as a lever to amplify the effect of the insult. And
> if any formal process of complaint was followed, you would -
> I presume - have just denied everything and then made sure they
> were got rid of on some pretext or other.
>
> Bullying a 16 year old. What a hero.
>

Buildings sites are robust places. I get the same banter.

He also must pretend not to hear us when we ask him to take his hands
out his pockets.

On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 20:31:27 +1000, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> wrote:

> On 26/04/2022 10:51, Jock wrote:
>> On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 18:49:49 +1000, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> On 25/04/2022 20:34, Jock wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 04:51:27 +1000, williamwright
>>>> <wrightsaerials@f2s.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 25/04/2022 19:26, Jock wrote:
>>>>>>> Common sense comes with usage and experience.
>>>>>> Not really true in the dust sheet situation.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think that might be true of someone brought up with servants, but
>>>>> not otherwise.
>>>> I doubt most apprentices have ever used a dust sheet at home.
>>>> And few male apprentices would have done much cleaning at home
>>>> either.
>>
>>>> The most most of they would have done is washing their car if they
>>>> have one.
>>
>>> For once I agree with you. However you are seen to lose the argument
>>> every time you resort to abuse.
>> More of your mindless bullshit;
>
> Another lost argument.

Your sig is sposed to have a line with just -- on it in front of it, loser.

On 26 Apr 2022 at 18:26:08 BST, Jock <kdj@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 20:31:27 +1000, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 26/04/2022 10:51, Jock wrote:
>>> On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 18:49:49 +1000, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 25/04/2022 20:34, Jock wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 04:51:27 +1000, williamwright
>>>>> <wrightsaerials@f2s.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 25/04/2022 19:26, Jock wrote:
>>>>>>>> Common sense comes with usage and experience.
>>>>>>> Not really true in the dust sheet situation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think that might be true of someone brought up with servants, but
>>>>>> not otherwise.
>>>>> I doubt most apprentices have ever used a dust sheet at home.
>>>>> And few male apprentices would have done much cleaning at home
>>>>> either.
>>>
>>>>> The most most of they would have done is washing their car if they
>>>>> have one.
>>>
>>>> For once I agree with you. However you are seen to lose the argument
>>>> every time you resort to abuse.
>>> More of your mindless bullshit;
>>
>> Another lost argument.
>
> Your sig is sposed to have a line with just -- on it in front of it, loser.

Not just --. There needs to be a space after it.

--
HAL 9000: Dave. Put down those Windows disks. Dave. DAVE!

On 26/04/2022 09:49, Fredxx wrote:

> For once I agree with you. However you are seen to lose the argument
> every time you resort to abuse. I guess you will never learn, hopefully
> ARW's apprentices will.

One of the most naive ones that started last year threw a wobbly when I
made him walk to a pub car park to be picked up at 7am instead of me
picking him up at home because he was late coming out the house three
days in a row.

Some claim that "I had to let him know I was outside and it was not fair
as he cannot go into the lounge in his work boots and look through the
window to watch for me etc".

He never let his Dad know what happened. But I did.

His Dad said "Odd how he sits watching CCTV on his mobile phone when he
has a driving lesson and is out in seconds of the instructor pulling up"

On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 03:57:17 +1000, Tim Streater
<timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote:

> On 26 Apr 2022 at 18:26:08 BST, Jock <kdj@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 20:31:27 +1000, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> On 26/04/2022 10:51, Jock wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 18:49:49 +1000, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 25/04/2022 20:34, Jock wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 04:51:27 +1000, williamwright
>>>>>> <wrightsaerials@f2s.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 25/04/2022 19:26, Jock wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Common sense comes with usage and experience.
>>>>>>>> Not really true in the dust sheet situation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think that might be true of someone brought up with servants, but
>>>>>>> not otherwise.
>>>>>> I doubt most apprentices have ever used a dust sheet at home.
>>>>>> And few male apprentices would have done much cleaning at home
>>>>>> either.
>>>>
>>>>>> The most most of they would have done is washing their car if they
>>>>>> have one.
>>>>
>>>>> For once I agree with you. However you are seen to lose the argument
>>>>> every time you resort to abuse.
>>>> More of your mindless bullshit;
>>>
>>> Another lost argument.
>>
>> Your sig is sposed to have a line with just -- on it in front of it,
>> loser.
>
> Not just --. There needs to be a space after it.

I did have a space after it.

On 23/04/2022 12:24, AnthonyL wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2022 09:36:20 +0100, ARW
> <adamwadsworth@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Thick as fuck.
>>
>> A fully refurbished function room and so I dust sheeted up, did my
>> ceiling damage and found the missing cable and asked the brain dead one
>> to clean up.
>>
>> So he then emptied the dust sheet onto the new flooring and went to look
>> for a sweeping brush.
>>
>
> Sack the recruitment department or the training department, or both.
> hth
>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0c-M-esF8z0&ab_channel=Shirley%C8%98erban

On 26/04/2022 18:26, Jock wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 20:31:27 +1000, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 26/04/2022 10:51, Jock wrote:
>>> On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 18:49:49 +1000, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 25/04/2022 20:34, Jock wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 04:51:27 +1000, williamwright
>>>>> <wrightsaerials@f2s.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 25/04/2022 19:26, Jock wrote:
>>>>>>>> Common sense comes with usage and experience.
>>>>>>>  Not really true in the dust sheet situation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think that might be true of someone brought up with servants,
>>>>>> but not otherwise.
>>>>>  I doubt most apprentices have ever used a dust sheet at home.
>>>>>  And few male apprentices would have done much cleaning at home
>>>>> either.
>>>
>>>>>  The most most of they would have done is washing their car if they
>>>>> have one.
>>>
>>>> For once I agree with you. However you are seen to lose the argument
>>>> every time you resort to abuse.
>>>  More of your mindless bullshit;
>>
>> Another lost argument.
>
> Your sig is sposed to have a line with just -- on it in front of it, loser.

The only loser here is the one who dreams I have a signature to my posts.

On 25/04/2022 20:42, Jock wrote:

>
> Adam has only ever had one or two who had much of a clue or intelligence.

The hands in his pockets useless 16 year old has gone. Failed a drugs test.

On 26/04/2022 17:51, ARW wrote:
> He also must pretend not to hear us when we ask him to take his hands
> out his pockets.

I've never understood why having your hands in your pockets is a
problem. Perhaps you could explain?

Andy

On 25/04/2022 22:32, #Paul wrote:
> Bullying a 16 year old. What a hero.

He's in an adult workplace. If he acts the fool he'll get told off,
robustly.

Bill

On 28/04/2022 21:59, Vir Campestris wrote:
> On 26/04/2022 17:51, ARW wrote:
>> He also must pretend not to hear us when we ask him to take his hands
>> out his pockets.
>
> I've never understood why having your hands in your pockets is a
> problem. Perhaps you could explain?

It's slovenly.

Bill

On 26/04/2022 10:51, Jock wrote:

> More of your mindless bullshit;
>
>
> Bullshit.

You lose every argument because you resort to abuse. Anyone reading it
will dismiss what you say.

Bill

On 26/04/2022 03:41, Jock wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 12:06:27 +1000, williamwright
> <wrightsaerials@f2s.com> wrote:
>
>> On 25/04/2022 20:42, Jock wrote:
>>> The rest of the post was the argument, fuckwit.
>>
>> I win.
>
> Only in your pathetic little drug crazed drunken narcissistic fantasyland.

Ha! You're funny!

Bill

On 26/04/2022 17:45, ARW wrote:
> Cannot get reliable ones.
> 1Hr 15min in
>
> https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p0bzn992

Very interesting.

Bill

On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 12:33:05 +1000, williamwright <wrightsaerials@f2s.com>
wrote:

> On 28/04/2022 21:59, Vir Campestris wrote:
>> On 26/04/2022 17:51, ARW wrote:
>>> He also must pretend not to hear us when we ask him to take his hands
>>> out his pockets.
>> I've never understood why having your hands in your pockets is a
>> problem. Perhaps you could explain?
>
> It's slovenly.

Only fools believe that they get any say what someone else can do.

On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 12:35:10 +1000, williamwright <wrightsaerials@f2s.com>
wrote:

> On 26/04/2022 10:51, Jock wrote:
>

> You lose every argument because you resort to abuse.

Corse you never ever resort to abuse yourself, eh ?

Usenet is never about winning or losing.

> Anyone reading it will dismiss what you say.

More of your mindless bullshit.

On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 12:37:37 +1000, williamwright <wrightsaerials@f2s.com>
wrote:

> On 26/04/2022 03:41, Jock wrote:
>> On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 12:06:27 +1000, williamwright
>> <wrightsaerials@f2s.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 25/04/2022 20:42, Jock wrote:
>>>> The rest of the post was the argument, fuckwit.
>>>
>>> I win.
>> Only in your pathetic little drug crazed drunken narcissistic
>> fantasyland.
>
> Ha! You're funny!

You are just pathetic.

On 29/04/2022 04:57, Jock wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 12:35:10 +1000, williamwright
> <wrightsaerials@f2s.com> wrote:
>
>> On 26/04/2022 10:51, Jock wrote:
>>
>
>> You lose every argument because you resort to abuse.
>
> Corse you never ever resort to abuse yourself, eh ?
>
> Usenet is never about winning or losing.
>
>> Anyone reading it will dismiss what you say.
>
> More of your mindless bullshit.

Using such words demonstrates your limited vocabulary and an undesirable
aspect of your persona. Writing under various socks adds to that perception.

On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 19:04:33 +1000, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> wrote:

> On 29/04/2022 04:57, Jock wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 12:35:10 +1000, williamwright
>> <wrightsaerials@f2s.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 26/04/2022 10:51, Jock wrote:
>>>
>>
>>> You lose every argument because you resort to abuse.
>> Corse you never ever resort to abuse yourself, eh ?
>> Usenet is never about winning or losing.
>>
>>> Anyone reading it will dismiss what you say.
>> More of your mindless bullshit.
>
>
> Using such words demonstrates your limited vocabulary

More of your mindless bullshit. The use of the word bullshit
exibits a wider vocabularly than just saying "you are wrong"
or "I disagree"

> and an undesirable aspect of your persona.

Only undesirable to fools.

> Writing under various socks adds to that perception.

Only to fools too stupid to work out why that is done.

On 29/04/2022 10:26, Jock wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 19:04:33 +1000, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 29/04/2022 04:57, Jock wrote:
>>> On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 12:35:10 +1000, williamwright
>>> <wrightsaerials@f2s.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 26/04/2022 10:51, Jock wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>>> You lose every argument because you resort to abuse.
>>>  Corse you never ever resort to abuse yourself, eh ?
>>>  Usenet is never about winning or losing.
>>>
>>>> Anyone reading it will dismiss what you say.
>>>  More of your mindless bullshit.
>>
>>
>> Using such words demonstrates your limited vocabulary
>
> More of your mindless bullshit. The use of the word bullshit
> exibits a wider vocabularly than just saying "you are wrong"
> or "I disagree"

When you can't explain why anyone one is wrong is down to ignorance then
I can see why you resort to such language. Saying BS without any
justification demonstrates bot a lack of the English language and ignorance.

>> and an undesirable aspect of your persona.
>
> Only undesirable to fools.

That, in your eyes, is 99% of the readers here.

>> Writing under various socks adds to that perception.
>
> Only to fools too stupid to work out why that is done.

Yes, it's done because of your irreverent persona and it's consequence
that your posts are perceived to be of zero value.

On 29/04/2022 03:33, williamwright wrote:
> On 28/04/2022 21:59, Vir Campestris wrote:
>> On 26/04/2022 17:51, ARW wrote:
>>> He also must pretend not to hear us when we ask him to take his hands
>>> out his pockets.
>>
>> I've never understood why having your hands in your pockets is a
>> problem. Perhaps you could explain?
>
> It's slovenly.
>
> Bill

Given the lack of common-sense and 'gumption' that could be the
safest place for them.

On 25/04/2022 19:54, williamwright wrote:

> No that isn't special knowledge. Cleaning up happens in all walks of
> life and occupations.
>

But is an alien concept to most boys still living at home

On 24/04/2022 06:28, Adrian Caspersz wrote:
> On 23/04/2022 09:36, ARW wrote:
>> Thick as fuck.
>>
>> A fully refurbished function room and so I dust sheeted up, did my
>> ceiling damage and found the missing cable and asked the brain dead
>> one to clean up.
>>
>> So he then emptied the dust sheet onto the new flooring and went to
>> look for a sweeping brush.
>>
>
> How much lead is in his bones?
>
> Does he need more or less?
>
> "The Man Who Accidentally Killed The Most People In History"
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IV3dnLzthDA
>
>
>
> Me, I've handled and even eaten a bit of lead since was young, never
> mind car pollution and soldering fumes. Explains a lot :(
>

After watching last nights BBC2 program about repairing Notre Dame
in Paris, I have come to the conclusion that the French have a
relaxed attitude to working in an environment massively contaminated
with lead dust.

The cleaners removing the first and obvious layers of dust were properly
suited-up but the ladies looking at the damage to the stained glass
(where there must still have been plenty of dust) didn't seem too
bothered.

On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 19:34:11 +1000, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> wrote:

> On 29/04/2022 10:26, Jock wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 19:04:33 +1000, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> On 29/04/2022 04:57, Jock wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 12:35:10 +1000, williamwright
>>>> <wrightsaerials@f2s.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 26/04/2022 10:51, Jock wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> You lose every argument because you resort to abuse.
>>>> Corse you never ever resort to abuse yourself, eh ?
>>>> Usenet is never about winning or losing.
>>>>
>>>>> Anyone reading it will dismiss what you say.
>>>> More of your mindless bullshit.
>>>
>>>
>>> Using such words demonstrates your limited vocabulary
>> More of your mindless bullshit. The use of the word bullshit
>> exibits a wider vocabularly than just saying "you are wrong"
>> or "I disagree"

> When you can't explain why anyone one is wrong is down to ignorance

More of your mindless bullshit. I ALWAYS include the explanation
fuckwit.

> then I can see why you resort to such language. Saying BS without any
> justification

That never happens, fuckwit.

> demonstrates bot a lack of the English language

More of your mindless bullshit.

> and ignorance.

Even sillier than you usually manage and that's saying someing.

>>> and an undesirable aspect of your persona.
>> Only undesirable to fools.
>
> That, in your eyes, is 99% of the readers here.

BULLSHIT.

>>> Writing under various socks adds to that perception.

>> Only to fools too stupid to work out why that is done.
>
> Yes, it's done because of your irreverent persona and it's consequence
> that your posts are perceived to be of zero value.

Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you actually are that
stupid.

On 29/04/2022 14:28, Andrew wrote:
> On 29/04/2022 03:33, williamwright wrote:
>> On 28/04/2022 21:59, Vir Campestris wrote:
>>> On 26/04/2022 17:51, ARW wrote:
>>>> He also must pretend not to hear us when we ask him to take his
>>>> hands out his pockets.
>>>
>>> I've never understood why having your hands in your pockets is a
>>> problem. Perhaps you could explain?
>>
>> It's slovenly.
>>
>> Bill
>
> Given the lack of common-sense and 'gumption' that could be the
> safest place for them.

It is after he was asked to take an old light fitting to the skip and
smashed it on the floor next to the swimming pool.