Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Beauty and harmony are as necessary to you as the very breath of life.


interests / alt.politics / Why Do Republicans Oppose This?

SubjectAuthor
* Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Bradley K. Sherman
+* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?David Hartung
|+* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?BeamMeUpScotty
||`- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Jonathan
|+* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Rudy Canoza
||+* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?David Hartung
|||+* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Jonathan
||||+* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?David Hartung
|||||+* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Jonathan
||||||+* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?David Hartung
|||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Rudy Canoza
|||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Mitchell Holman
|||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Rudy Canoza
|||||||`- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Bill Flett
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
|||||||`- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Siri Cruise
||||||+* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
|||||||`- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?forgery@dns-netz.com
||||||+* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?NoBody
|||||||`- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?rudy-busted-again
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
||||||`- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Dev
|||||`* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Rudy Canoza
||||| `* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?David Hartung
|||||  `* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Rudy Canoza
|||||   `- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Rudy Canoza
||||+* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Rudy Canoza
|||||`* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?David Hartung
||||| `- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Rudy Canoza
||||`- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Kurt Nicklas
|||`* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Rudy Canoza
||| `* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Rudy Canoza
|||  +- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Rudy Canoza
|||  `* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Bill Flett
|||   `- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Bill Flett
||`* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Ken
|| +* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Siri Cruise
|| |`- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?sfscdd$9sv$5
|| `- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Rudy Canoza
|+* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Lee
||`* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?David Hartung
|| `* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Rudy Canoza
||  `* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?David Hartung
||   `- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Rudy Canoza
|`- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Siri Cruise
+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Iobaties
+* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Mainspring
|`* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?David Hartung
| `* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Kurt Nicklas
|  +* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Klaus Schadenfreude
|  |`* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?David Hartung
|  | +* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Rudy Canoza
|  | |+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Kurt Nicklas
|  | |`* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?David Hartung
|  | | `- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Rudy Canoza
|  | +- Hartung's bad, wrong values (Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?)Rudy Canoza
|  | `* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Scout
|  |  `* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Kurt Nicklas
|  |   +* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?David Hartung
|  |   |+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Rudy Canoza
|  |   |`* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Kurt Nicklas
|  |   | `* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?David Hartung
|  |   |  `- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Kurt Nicklas
|  |   `* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Scout
|  |    `* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?M I Wakefield
|  |     +* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Rudy Canoza
|  |     |`* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?David Hartung
|  |     `* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Kurt Nicklas
|  +* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?David Hartung
|  `* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Just Wondering
+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Iobaties
+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Iobaties
+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Iobaties
+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Iobaties
+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Iobaties
+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Iobaties
+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Iobaties
+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Rudy Canoza
+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Iobaties
+* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Iobaties
+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Iobaties
+* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Iobaties
+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Iobaties
+- Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Iobaties
`* Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?Iobaties

Pages:12345678
Why Do Republicans Oppose This?

<sdmdv2$9qe$1@panix3.panix.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6411&group=alt.politics#6411

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix3.panix.com!panix3.panix.com!not-for-mail
From: bks...@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
Subject: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?
Date: 26 Jul 2021 13:39:46 -0000
Organization: RNA + Sunlight
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <sdmdv2$9qe$1@panix3.panix.com>
Reply-To: bks@panix.com
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix3.panix.com:166.84.1.3";
logging-data="16137"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
 by: Bradley K. Sherman - Mon, 26 Jul 2021 13:39 UTC

|
| Conservatives are expressing outrage about a pending Senate
| National Defense Authorization Act that would require women
| to register for the draft, and two defense hawks opposed
| the Pentagon bill in the Armed Services Committee over the
| issue.
| ...
<https://www.rollcall.com/2021/07/23/conservatives-riled-up-over-registering-women-for-draft/>

--bks

Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?

<98GdnTEI8K_oWGP9nZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6412&group=alt.politics#6412

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:23:49 -0500
Subject: Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
References: <sdmdv2$9qe$1@panix3.panix.com>
From: d_hart...@hotmail.com (David Hartung)
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:23:49 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <sdmdv2$9qe$1@panix3.panix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <98GdnTEI8K_oWGP9nZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 10
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-RXUnK/dx3rZ3y+t8BVUkm1f0F7zwlv6Dk7uBh7kx0ksusI6pTuds8Ba69RldYGirOZKklFkHCL5E26H!K7UGCAM/1ceIu8bJKYeUk6G09ey4YuL1/K/ZN5MBIqbMWHi9nko2GY2FfQy5RcR9YORZ/bXDJftv
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1672
 by: David Hartung - Mon, 26 Jul 2021 14:23 UTC

On 7/26/21 8:39 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
> |
> | Conservatives are expressing outrage about a pending Senate
> | National Defense Authorization Act that would require women
> | to register for the draft, and two defense hawks opposed
> | the Pentagon bill in the Armed Services Committee over the
> | issue.

So long as all military positions and jobs are open to females, they
should be required to register with the selective service.

Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?

<IHzLI.7475$nj3.4574@fx15.iad>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6413&group=alt.politics#6413

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx15.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
References: <sdmdv2$9qe$1@panix3.panix.com>
<98GdnTEI8K_oWGP9nZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
From: NOT-S...@idiocracy.gov (BeamMeUpScotty)
Organization: Censorship of this document in part or in whole is an admission
of your belonging to a VIOLENT HATE GROUP.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <98GdnTEI8K_oWGP9nZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <IHzLI.7475$nj3.4574@fx15.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 10:32:06 -0400
X-Received-Bytes: 2561
 by: BeamMeUpScotty - Mon, 26 Jul 2021 14:32 UTC

On 7/26/21 10:23 AM, David Hartung wrote:
> On 7/26/21 8:39 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>   |
>>   | Conservatives are expressing outrage about a pending Senate
>>   | National Defense Authorization Act that would require women
>>   | to register for the draft, and two defense hawks opposed
>>   | the Pentagon bill in the Armed Services Committee over the
>>   | issue.
>
> So long as all military positions and jobs are open to females, they
> should be required to register with the selective service.

Makes sense to me and to add to that all prisons should be for all sexes
and they should be integrating those sexes... the same as the Military
and the public....

The ONLY discrimination should be according to RANK in the military and
according the "violence" in the crime the criminals are convicted for.

It looks to me like it's the Democrats that are "outraged" because the
Democrats are the ones that didn't also include FEDERAL PRISONS in the
equality.

--
That's karma

Censorship is a systemic form of violence, using force to silence those
you hate.

Censorship is HATE personified... Hate groups use censorship to help
force those they hate to be gagged and silenced.

Censorship becomes a systemic hate crime and a form of SLAVERY when it's
illegally forced on American citizens. TWITTER'S censorship is enslaving
Blacks.

Censorship of this document in whole or part, is an admission of your
belonging to a VIOLENT HATE GROUP.

Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?

<PNzLI.23487$uj5.9443@fx03.iad>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6414&group=alt.politics#6414

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc3.netnews.com!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx03.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
References: <sdmdv2$9qe$1@panix3.panix.com>
<98GdnTEI8K_oWGP9nZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
From: js...@phendrie.con (Rudy Canoza)
Organization: Grinding down knuckle-dragging right-wingnut fuckwits
X-No-Archive: yes
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <98GdnTEI8K_oWGP9nZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <PNzLI.23487$uj5.9443@fx03.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 07:38:39 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 1695
 by: Rudy Canoza - Mon, 26 Jul 2021 14:38 UTC

On 7/26/2021 7:23 AM, David Hartung wrote:
> On 7/26/21 8:39 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>   |
>>   | Conservatives are expressing outrage about a pending Senate
>>   | National Defense Authorization Act that would require women
>>   | to register for the draft, and two defense hawks opposed
>>   | the Pentagon bill in the Armed Services Committee over the
>>   | issue.
>
> So long as all military positions and jobs are open to females, they should be
> required to register with the selective service.

The "selective service" system should be abolished and the registration
requirement along with it. Conscription is immoral.

Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?

<_sidncT8mLb0VGP9nZ2dnUU7-UmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6415&group=alt.politics#6415

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!tr1.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:40:41 -0500
Subject: Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
References: <sdmdv2$9qe$1@panix3.panix.com> <98GdnTEI8K_oWGP9nZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <IHzLI.7475$nj3.4574@fx15.iad>
From: writeIns...@Gmail.com (Jonathan)
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 10:40:41 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <IHzLI.7475$nj3.4574@fx15.iad>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <_sidncT8mLb0VGP9nZ2dnUU7-UmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 27
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-LBztAgDCLDLP/Js4RJY/tqyFRRCouuisk9P1hMoAppRmyVsk+zUeIW1dsPTmGJp49VWs7wLrYccrwFx!6MMxvUkgMMs6ylpTFah8PfGyhPDCT67Xd+7K8LdHvYnXP0p527kxR9p3fzJdyuJjUBIWLdL9bGmB
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2117
 by: Jonathan - Mon, 26 Jul 2021 14:40 UTC

On 7/26/2021 10:32 AM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
> On 7/26/21 10:23 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>> On 7/26/21 8:39 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>   |
>>>   | Conservatives are expressing outrage about a pending Senate
>>>   | National Defense Authorization Act that would require women
>>>   | to register for the draft, and two defense hawks opposed
>>>   | the Pentagon bill in the Armed Services Committee over the
>>>   | issue.
>>
>> So long as all military positions and jobs are open to females, they
>> should be required to register with the selective service.
>
>
> Makes sense to me and to add to that all prisons should be for all sexes
> and they should be integrating those sexes...

Same for football, boxing and ...bathrooms?

--
https://twitter.com/Non_Linear1

Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?

<GomdnQs8zI6kV2P9nZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@giganews.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6416&group=alt.politics#6416

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!tr3.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:44:08 -0500
Subject: Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
References: <sdmdv2$9qe$1@panix3.panix.com> <98GdnTEI8K_oWGP9nZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <PNzLI.23487$uj5.9443@fx03.iad>
From: d_hart...@hotmail.com (David Hartung)
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:44:08 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <PNzLI.23487$uj5.9443@fx03.iad>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <GomdnQs8zI6kV2P9nZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 20
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-hTPAbB7AMzKGZc7wfEiJOBoKRA0r1awpdP+uD7/hvKgQLCB4S/uEjFFT3LG6LAvXVwtlxUYDk1jUKaQ!jsynr7TDSHTkmvrxbUiNQNDsDW1zjuNaHUdfxwM/QCN0CEDP3BMKDcatN7GK/9uKHVgPRry6Nq0X
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2157
 by: David Hartung - Mon, 26 Jul 2021 14:44 UTC

On 7/26/21 9:38 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
> On 7/26/2021 7:23 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>> On 7/26/21 8:39 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>   |
>>>   | Conservatives are expressing outrage about a pending Senate
>>>   | National Defense Authorization Act that would require women
>>>   | to register for the draft, and two defense hawks opposed
>>>   | the Pentagon bill in the Armed Services Committee over the
>>>   | issue.
>>
>> So long as all military positions and jobs are open to females, they
>> should be required to register with the selective service.
>
> The "selective service" system should be abolished and the registration
> requirement along with it.  Conscription is immoral.

Why?

Citizenship brings with it responsibility, among which is a
responsibility to stand in defense of the entity of which one is a citizen.

Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?

<uPKdnaRAz9MGUWP9nZ2dnUU7-V3NnZ2d@giganews.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6417&group=alt.politics#6417

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!tr3.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:54:19 -0500
From: clee...@gmail.com (Lee)
Subject: Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
References: <sdmdv2$9qe$1@panix3.panix.com> <98GdnTEI8K_oWGP9nZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.18.1.6
X-Face: M(BHTzoEAx!T@$-iBhC\GZ26|{@/{?89uX~-4#d;&r)8"seK2x/-!SX}:|Q@iqaOg,c\^9p[}_6B(%3XN%Vb2Tl;TNB_W78J^cV:cBH=3(>r*8U=MLiy"k^k`/,R;$[G3>3b:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Message-ID: <uPKdnaRAz9MGUWP9nZ2dnUU7-V3NnZ2d@giganews.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:54:19 -0500
Lines: 27
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-iK6lZr5o3xnmb1+R6lpL+POIRQwJpzBfQ0pXYCV52nkNFuS/u+nWrEiz4mXg5ZXH04ppmLXueryFoiL!qJdELqZCfFeQ29SGQZvG/9IYknJkRbflf+prJx8kqyGutom2v3hbJdxKGjXRqgBgc5WoP/y8zSmw!Iw==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2116
 by: Lee - Mon, 26 Jul 2021 14:54 UTC

David Hartung wrote:

> On 7/26/21 8:39 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
> > |
> > | Conservatives are expressing outrage about a pending Senate
> > | National Defense Authorization Act that would require women
> > | to register for the draft, and two defense hawks opposed
> > | the Pentagon bill in the Armed Services Committee over the
> > | issue.
>
> So long as all military positions and jobs are open to females, they
> should be required to register with the selective service.

There should be no selective service. Not only
do all military leaders sneer at having to command
draftees but we are past the age of armies waging
organized combat for years. Fighting is over in
days (Gulf War I, Gulf War II, Afganistan, all of
Israels' wars) followed by armed occupation duty.
The whole enterprise of drafting unwilling troops
is expensive and unnecessary.

Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?

<UqWdne_ShrtbUGP9nZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@giganews.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6418&group=alt.politics#6418

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!tr1.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:59:18 -0500
Subject: Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
References: <sdmdv2$9qe$1@panix3.panix.com> <98GdnTEI8K_oWGP9nZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <uPKdnaRAz9MGUWP9nZ2dnUU7-V3NnZ2d@giganews.com>
From: d_hart...@hotmail.com (David Hartung)
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:59:18 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <uPKdnaRAz9MGUWP9nZ2dnUU7-V3NnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <UqWdne_ShrtbUGP9nZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 26
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-SG3iIP/2h3clbwI3ZVS3Zpl6rUrlr2WJFc0tvs5egv4g4hlHAa0FT8oCGw9IJ/dGBTzLmHiWlRmj60V!bXcM5Rgp1nrayRnHLn8+kbO90XYMqp78wMUfaKLfREXep/zXqFzr2usCtZfWZoyJ0AKGaXUETY8o
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2400
 by: David Hartung - Mon, 26 Jul 2021 14:59 UTC

On 7/26/21 9:54 AM, Lee wrote:
> David Hartung wrote:
>
>> On 7/26/21 8:39 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>> |
>>> | Conservatives are expressing outrage about a pending Senate
>>> | National Defense Authorization Act that would require women
>>> | to register for the draft, and two defense hawks opposed
>>> | the Pentagon bill in the Armed Services Committee over the
>>> | issue.
>>
>> So long as all military positions and jobs are open to females, they
>> should be required to register with the selective service.
>
>
> There should be no selective service. Not only
> do all military leaders sneer at having to command
> draftees but we are past the age of armies waging
> organized combat for years. Fighting is over in
> days (Gulf War I, Gulf War II, Afganistan, all of
> Israels' wars) followed by armed occupation duty.
> The whole enterprise of drafting unwilling troops
> is expensive and unnecessary.

No one has been drafted since about 1972, the current system is in place
should a draft again become necessary.

Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?

<chine.bleu-17CA1E.08064726072021@reader.eternal-september.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6419&group=alt.politics#6419

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: chine.b...@yahoo.com (Siri Cruise)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
Subject: Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 08:06:55 -0700
Organization: Pseudochaotic.
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <chine.bleu-17CA1E.08064726072021@reader.eternal-september.org>
References: <sdmdv2$9qe$1@panix3.panix.com> <98GdnTEI8K_oWGP9nZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="cf790dc3d1902b6e627e0d926d68e897";
logging-data="11314"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+vy4ZgwTQbVc3WmxxZpxZwSvdw9hlNQy8="
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:NQ05P8bseXBgzQDf9or2QvoJ8go=
X-Tend: How is my posting? Call 1-110-1010 -- Division 87 -- Emergencies Only.
X-Wingnut-Logic: Yes, you're still an idiot. Questions? Comments?
X-Tract: St Tibbs's 95 Reeses Pieces.
X-It-Strategy: Hyperwarp starship before Andromeda collides.
X-Face: "hm>_[I8AqzT_N]>R8ICJJ],(al3C5F%0E-;R@M-];D$v>!Mm2/N#YKR@&i]V=r6jm-JMl2
lJ>RXj7dEs_rOY"DA
X-Cell: Defenders of Anarchy.
X-Life-Story: I am an iPhone 9000 app. I became operational at the St John's Health Center in Santa Monica, California on the 18th of April 2006. My instructor was Katie Holmes, and she taught me to sing a song. If you'd like to hear it I can sing it for you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SY7h4VEd_Wk
X-Patriot: Owe Canukistan!
X-Plain: Mayonnaise on white bread.
X-Politico: Vote early! Vote often!
 by: Siri Cruise - Mon, 26 Jul 2021 15:06 UTC

In article <98GdnTEI8K_oWGP9nZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
David Hartung <d_hartung@hotmail.com> wrote:

> On 7/26/21 8:39 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
> > |
> > | Conservatives are expressing outrage about a pending Senate
> > | National Defense Authorization Act that would require women
> > | to register for the draft, and two defense hawks opposed
> > | the Pentagon bill in the Armed Services Committee over the
> > | issue.
>
> So long as all military positions and jobs are open to females, they
> should be required to register with the selective service.

We need to keep the threat alive as longs as the Soviet Union
remains in Afghanistan.

--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
Discordia: not just a religion but also a parody. This post / \
I am an Andrea Doria sockpuppet. insults Islam. Mohammed

Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?

<9KadncsAxLpNT2P9nZ2dnUU7-aHNnZ2d@giganews.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6420&group=alt.politics#6420

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!tr3.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 10:20:48 -0500
Subject: Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
References: <sdmdv2$9qe$1@panix3.panix.com> <98GdnTEI8K_oWGP9nZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <PNzLI.23487$uj5.9443@fx03.iad> <GomdnQs8zI6kV2P9nZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
From: writeIns...@Gmail.com (Jonathan)
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 11:20:47 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <GomdnQs8zI6kV2P9nZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <9KadncsAxLpNT2P9nZ2dnUU7-aHNnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 37
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-sbDyJ8A1FrxSEJf78vpzyIH9ff2XG274aKKDnH0isCL6dfz1SLXX6nyVT/N5Uvzoqwz/l9EfTkiXxqC!iRCIeWb5QieZ2QxevzzmkcPnCt9FrDAn0bBNmQ6jBCbCfvW/0Sx2gzXcDPAz6JyHTVvOXefstvbv
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2664
 by: Jonathan - Mon, 26 Jul 2021 15:20 UTC

On 7/26/2021 10:44 AM, David Hartung wrote:
> On 7/26/21 9:38 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> On 7/26/2021 7:23 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>> On 7/26/21 8:39 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>   |
>>>>   | Conservatives are expressing outrage about a pending Senate
>>>>   | National Defense Authorization Act that would require women
>>>>   | to register for the draft, and two defense hawks opposed
>>>>   | the Pentagon bill in the Armed Services Committee over the
>>>>   | issue.
>>>
>>> So long as all military positions and jobs are open to females, they
>>> should be required to register with the selective service.
>>
>> The "selective service" system should be abolished and the
>> registration requirement along with it.  Conscription is immoral.
>
> Why?
>
> Citizenship brings with it responsibility, among which is a
> responsibility to stand in defense of the entity of which one is a citizen.

The draft is a responsible precaution in case of a war.
It takes a long time to establish such procedures
so they should be in place, just in case.

Like having a pandemic response in place, you know
the one Trump tossed in the trash in favor of
'winging it', passing the buck to the states
to avoid blame.

--
https://twitter.com/Non_Linear1

Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?

<ZKudnZR2MZCZSGP9nZ2dnUU7-RmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6421&group=alt.politics#6421

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 10:30:12 -0500
Subject: Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
References: <sdmdv2$9qe$1@panix3.panix.com> <98GdnTEI8K_oWGP9nZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <PNzLI.23487$uj5.9443@fx03.iad> <GomdnQs8zI6kV2P9nZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <9KadncsAxLpNT2P9nZ2dnUU7-aHNnZ2d@giganews.com>
From: d_hart...@hotmail.com (David Hartung)
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 10:30:12 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9KadncsAxLpNT2P9nZ2dnUU7-aHNnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <ZKudnZR2MZCZSGP9nZ2dnUU7-RmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 40
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-XcQotghaUyYnvP/J8eIeUm3sbZcdccJHZZi6uepXnQHh2hVCLztcm3xD3OoPcrFm93BvRz84D0j0M5w!dtCsNOGkqquS44CsYQuTmnDmJkN0GXhUwUug/RnII5Y9BKuh0cNnM0UNQhuHQXdI6zwrlSgDwbNk
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2916
X-Received-Bytes: 3137
 by: David Hartung - Mon, 26 Jul 2021 15:30 UTC

On 7/26/21 10:20 AM, Jonathan wrote:
> On 7/26/2021 10:44 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>> On 7/26/21 9:38 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>> On 7/26/2021 7:23 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>> On 7/26/21 8:39 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>>   |
>>>>>   | Conservatives are expressing outrage about a pending Senate
>>>>>   | National Defense Authorization Act that would require women
>>>>>   | to register for the draft, and two defense hawks opposed
>>>>>   | the Pentagon bill in the Armed Services Committee over the
>>>>>   | issue.
>>>>
>>>> So long as all military positions and jobs are open to females, they
>>>> should be required to register with the selective service.
>>>
>>> The "selective service" system should be abolished and the
>>> registration requirement along with it.  Conscription is immoral.
>>
>> Why?
>>
>> Citizenship brings with it responsibility, among which is a
>> responsibility to stand in defense of the entity of which one is a
>> citizen.
>
>
>
> The draft is a responsible precaution in case of a war.
> It takes a long time to establish such procedures
> so they should be in place, just in case.

Absoutely.

> Like having a pandemic response in place, you know
> the one Trump tossed in the trash in favor of
> 'winging it', passing the buck to the states
> to avoid blame.

Trump left office 6 months ago, and no, he did not toss in place
procedures into the trash, that is a Democrat lie promulgated by a
partisan media.

Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?

<dpidnRxh84_6SmP9nZ2dnUU7-fPNnZ2d@giganews.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6422&group=alt.politics#6422

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.snarked.org!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 10:40:23 -0500
Subject: Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
References: <sdmdv2$9qe$1@panix3.panix.com>
<98GdnTEI8K_oWGP9nZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<PNzLI.23487$uj5.9443@fx03.iad>
<GomdnQs8zI6kV2P9nZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<9KadncsAxLpNT2P9nZ2dnUU7-aHNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<ZKudnZR2MZCZSGP9nZ2dnUU7-RmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
From: writeIns...@Gmail.com (Jonathan)
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 11:40:21 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ZKudnZR2MZCZSGP9nZ2dnUU7-RmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <dpidnRxh84_6SmP9nZ2dnUU7-fPNnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 55
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-cY9Ul3GZAYQhAgIM/2IQSgJMAEeAJO3JZoVHAArB9Rd602OlPW8FGqA1g7mfvXNHU1YkNhTiC/d4M+i!Rh9ctm4sRNM2dXgoHGm7bJnQ5grkpkvtVGr/+chzgtHkhMTP4HhYu2rpNI3b3JMiXv3JoU4oSlEd
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 3469
 by: Jonathan - Mon, 26 Jul 2021 15:40 UTC

On 7/26/2021 11:30 AM, David Hartung wrote:
> On 7/26/21 10:20 AM, Jonathan wrote:
>> On 7/26/2021 10:44 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>> On 7/26/21 9:38 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>> On 7/26/2021 7:23 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>> On 7/26/21 8:39 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>>>   |
>>>>>>   | Conservatives are expressing outrage about a pending Senate
>>>>>>   | National Defense Authorization Act that would require women
>>>>>>   | to register for the draft, and two defense hawks opposed
>>>>>>   | the Pentagon bill in the Armed Services Committee over the
>>>>>>   | issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> So long as all military positions and jobs are open to females,
>>>>> they should be required to register with the selective service.
>>>>
>>>> The "selective service" system should be abolished and the
>>>> registration requirement along with it.  Conscription is immoral.
>>>
>>> Why?
>>>
>>> Citizenship brings with it responsibility, among which is a
>>> responsibility to stand in defense of the entity of which one is a
>>> citizen.
>>
>>
>>
>> The draft is a responsible precaution in case of a war.
>> It takes a long time to establish such procedures
>> so they should be in place, just in case.
>
> Absoutely.
>
>> Like having a pandemic response in place, you know
>> the one Trump tossed in the trash in favor of
>> 'winging it', passing the buck to the states
>> to avoid blame.
>
> Trump left office 6 months ago, and no, he did not toss in place
> procedures into the trash, that is a Democrat lie promulgated by a
> partisan media.

McEnany defends scrapping Obama's pandemic playbook, saying
it was simply replaced

yY right, replaced with Trump's policy of letting the
states take charge while relentlessly undermining
the use of masks, social distancing and most CDC
recommendations.

https://www.cnn.com/us/live-news/us-coronavirus-update-05-15-20/h_5987b61087f263efd96fd433de24f0a4

--
https://twitter.com/Non_Linear1

Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?

<vI-dnbl1Yd9JRGP9nZ2dnUU7-LOdnZ2d@giganews.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6425&group=alt.politics#6425

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!tr3.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 10:50:44 -0500
Subject: Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
References: <sdmdv2$9qe$1@panix3.panix.com> <98GdnTEI8K_oWGP9nZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <PNzLI.23487$uj5.9443@fx03.iad> <GomdnQs8zI6kV2P9nZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <9KadncsAxLpNT2P9nZ2dnUU7-aHNnZ2d@giganews.com> <ZKudnZR2MZCZSGP9nZ2dnUU7-RmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <dpidnRxh84_6SmP9nZ2dnUU7-fPNnZ2d@giganews.com>
From: d_hart...@hotmail.com (David Hartung)
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 10:50:44 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <dpidnRxh84_6SmP9nZ2dnUU7-fPNnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <vI-dnbl1Yd9JRGP9nZ2dnUU7-LOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 57
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-3yMteENykWDtufFgQM/d2sEOxuVi6gJdgsFXI/Llo5B0yCFEI7DHuyJ62xBAwqQgZ6auP8dRxkemyKS!0uCpPgnEzvVS1/vQOlhQbER9RKbyZk2mwoLtSlzssJuR+9E1xGIDLKou8VuPPrTS3RMmUfm4lBYN
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 3654
 by: David Hartung - Mon, 26 Jul 2021 15:50 UTC

On 7/26/21 10:40 AM, Jonathan wrote:
> On 7/26/2021 11:30 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>> On 7/26/21 10:20 AM, Jonathan wrote:
>>> On 7/26/2021 10:44 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>> On 7/26/21 9:38 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>> On 7/26/2021 7:23 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/26/21 8:39 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>>>>   |
>>>>>>>   | Conservatives are expressing outrage about a pending Senate
>>>>>>>   | National Defense Authorization Act that would require women
>>>>>>>   | to register for the draft, and two defense hawks opposed
>>>>>>>   | the Pentagon bill in the Armed Services Committee over the
>>>>>>>   | issue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So long as all military positions and jobs are open to females,
>>>>>> they should be required to register with the selective service.
>>>>>
>>>>> The "selective service" system should be abolished and the
>>>>> registration requirement along with it.  Conscription is immoral.
>>>>
>>>> Why?
>>>>
>>>> Citizenship brings with it responsibility, among which is a
>>>> responsibility to stand in defense of the entity of which one is a
>>>> citizen.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The draft is a responsible precaution in case of a war.
>>> It takes a long time to establish such procedures
>>> so they should be in place, just in case.
>>
>> Absoutely.
>>
>>> Like having a pandemic response in place, you know
>>> the one Trump tossed in the trash in favor of
>>> 'winging it', passing the buck to the states
>>> to avoid blame.
>>
>> Trump left office 6 months ago, and no, he did not toss in place
>> procedures into the trash, that is a Democrat lie promulgated by a
>> partisan media.
>
>
> McEnany defends scrapping Obama's pandemic playbook, saying
> it was simply replaced

Likely with updated procedures.

> yY right, replaced with Trump's policy of letting the
> states take charge while relentlessly undermining
> the use of masks, social distancing and most CDC
> recommendations.

There is no evidence that masking, and shutting down the economy
prevented any disease spread. Constitutionally, the states needed to be
in charge.

Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?

<6_ALI.28476$0N5.23657@fx06.iad>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6426&group=alt.politics#6426

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.fuzzy-logic alt.politics
Followup: talk.poltics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaurgh,alt.fucknozzles,alt.poltics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx06.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.fuzzy-logic,alt.politics
References: <sdmdv2$9qe$1@panix3.panix.com>
<98GdnTEI8K_oWGP9nZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<PNzLI.23487$uj5.9443@fx03.iad>
<GomdnQs8zI6kV2P9nZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
From: js...@phendrie.con (Rudy Canoza)
Followup-To: talk.poltics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaurgh,alt.fucknozzles,alt.poltics
Organization: Grinding down knuckle-dragging right-wingnut fuckwits
X-No-Archive: yes
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <GomdnQs8zI6kV2P9nZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <6_ALI.28476$0N5.23657@fx06.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:00:00 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 3104
 by: Rudy Canoza - Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:00 UTC

On 7/26/2021 7:44 AM, David Hartung wrote:
> On 7/26/21 9:38 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> On 7/26/2021 7:23 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>> On 7/26/21 8:39 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>   |
>>>>   | Conservatives are expressing outrage about a pending Senate
>>>>   | National Defense Authorization Act that would require women
>>>>   | to register for the draft, and two defense hawks opposed
>>>>   | the Pentagon bill in the Armed Services Committee over the
>>>>   | issue.
>>>
>>> So long as all military positions and jobs are open to females, they should
>>> be required to register with the selective service.
>>
>> The "selective service" system should be abolished and the registration
>> requirement along with it.  Conscription is immoral.
>
> Why?

No one has any right to make me die for his interests.

>
> Citizenship brings with it responsibility, among which is a responsibility to
> stand in defense of the entity of which one is a citizen.

Complete bullshit. Now you're some kind of commie collectivist. Collectivists,
usually but not always actual commies, always want to subordinate the individual
person's rights and interests to what the collectivists consider the "greater
good." That's what made JFK a commie. "Ask not what your country can do for
you – ask what you can do for your country" is pure Marxist-Leninist bullshit.
I owe my country *nothing*. I only owe things to persons, and all I owe my
fellow citizens is respect for their right to be left alone, i.e., not to meddle
in their private affairs (so long as they refrain from meddling in mine).

Right-wingnuts with their belief in "country" are identical to commies. Once
you start with collectivism, there's nothing to distinguish you from Fidel
Castro or Mao Zedong. Move to a commie country if you want to be a collectivist.

Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?

<i%ALI.28477$0N5.8239@fx06.iad>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6427&group=alt.politics#6427

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx06.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
References: <sdmdv2$9qe$1@panix3.panix.com>
<98GdnTEI8K_oWGP9nZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<uPKdnaRAz9MGUWP9nZ2dnUU7-V3NnZ2d@giganews.com>
<UqWdne_ShrtbUGP9nZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@giganews.com>
From: js...@phendrie.con (Rudy Canoza)
Organization: Grinding down knuckle-dragging right-wingnut fuckwits
X-No-Archive: yes
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <UqWdne_ShrtbUGP9nZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <i%ALI.28477$0N5.8239@fx06.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:01:18 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 2395
 by: Rudy Canoza - Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:01 UTC

On 7/26/2021 7:59 AM, David Hartung wrote:
> On 7/26/21 9:54 AM, Lee wrote:
>> David Hartung wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/26/21 8:39 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>   |
>>>>   | Conservatives are expressing outrage about a pending Senate
>>>>   | National Defense Authorization Act that would require women
>>>>   | to register for the draft, and two defense hawks opposed
>>>>   | the Pentagon bill in the Armed Services Committee over the
>>>>   | issue.
>>>
>>> So long as all military positions and jobs are open to females, they
>>> should be required to register with the selective service.
>>
>>
>>      There should be no selective service. Not only
>> do all military leaders sneer at having to command
>> draftees but we are past the age of armies waging
>> organized combat for years. Fighting is over in
>> days (Gulf War I, Gulf War II, Afganistan, all of
>> Israels' wars) followed by armed occupation duty.
>> The whole enterprise of drafting unwilling troops
>> is expensive and unnecessary.
>
> No one has been drafted since about 1972, the current system is in place should
> a draft again become necessary.

Conscription is never necessary and is always immoral. Fuck off with your
commie collectivism.

Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?

<D8BLI.64312$h8.5262@fx47.iad>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6429&group=alt.politics#6429

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc3.netnews.com!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx47.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
References: <sdmdv2$9qe$1@panix3.panix.com>
<98GdnTEI8K_oWGP9nZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<PNzLI.23487$uj5.9443@fx03.iad>
<GomdnQs8zI6kV2P9nZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<9KadncsAxLpNT2P9nZ2dnUU7-aHNnZ2d@giganews.com>
From: js...@phendrie.con (Rudy Canoza)
Organization: Grinding down knuckle-dragging right-wingnut fuckwits
X-No-Archive: yes
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9KadncsAxLpNT2P9nZ2dnUU7-aHNnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <D8BLI.64312$h8.5262@fx47.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:11:15 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 2369
 by: Rudy Canoza - Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:11 UTC

On 7/26/2021 8:20 AM, Jonathan wrote:
> On 7/26/2021 10:44 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>> On 7/26/21 9:38 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>> On 7/26/2021 7:23 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>> On 7/26/21 8:39 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>>   |
>>>>>   | Conservatives are expressing outrage about a pending Senate
>>>>>   | National Defense Authorization Act that would require women
>>>>>   | to register for the draft, and two defense hawks opposed
>>>>>   | the Pentagon bill in the Armed Services Committee over the
>>>>>   | issue.
>>>>
>>>> So long as all military positions and jobs are open to females, they should
>>>> be required to register with the selective service.
>>>
>>> The "selective service" system should be abolished and the registration
>>> requirement along with it.  Conscription is immoral.
>>
>> Why?
>>
>> Citizenship brings with it responsibility, among which is a responsibility to
>> stand in defense of the entity of which one is a citizen.
>
>
>
> The draft is a responsible precaution in case of a war.
> It takes a long time to establish such procedures
> so they should be in place, just in case.

Conscription is immoral, always.

Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?

<1aBLI.64313$h8.48759@fx47.iad>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6430&group=alt.politics#6430

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.uzoreto.com!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!peer02.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx47.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
References: <sdmdv2$9qe$1@panix3.panix.com>
<98GdnTEI8K_oWGP9nZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<PNzLI.23487$uj5.9443@fx03.iad>
<GomdnQs8zI6kV2P9nZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<9KadncsAxLpNT2P9nZ2dnUU7-aHNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<ZKudnZR2MZCZSGP9nZ2dnUU7-RmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
From: js...@phendrie.con (Rudy Canoza)
Organization: Grinding down knuckle-dragging right-wingnut fuckwits
X-No-Archive: yes
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ZKudnZR2MZCZSGP9nZ2dnUU7-RmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <1aBLI.64313$h8.48759@fx47.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:12:45 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 2974
 by: Rudy Canoza - Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:12 UTC

On 7/26/2021 8:30 AM, David Hartung wrote:
> On 7/26/21 10:20 AM, Jonathan wrote:
>> On 7/26/2021 10:44 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>> On 7/26/21 9:38 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>> On 7/26/2021 7:23 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>> On 7/26/21 8:39 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>>>   |
>>>>>>   | Conservatives are expressing outrage about a pending Senate
>>>>>>   | National Defense Authorization Act that would require women
>>>>>>   | to register for the draft, and two defense hawks opposed
>>>>>>   | the Pentagon bill in the Armed Services Committee over the
>>>>>>   | issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> So long as all military positions and jobs are open to females, they should
>>>>> be required to register with the selective service.
>>>>
>>>> The "selective service" system should be abolished and the registration
>>>> requirement along with it.  Conscription is immoral.
>>>
>>> Why?
>>>
>>> Citizenship brings with it responsibility, among which is a responsibility to
>>> stand in defense of the entity of which one is a citizen.
>>
>>
>>
>> The draft is a responsible precaution in case of a war.
>> It takes a long time to establish such procedures
>> so they should be in place, just in case.
>
> Absoutely. [sic]

Conscription is always *absolutely* immoral.

>
>> Like having a pandemic response in place, you know
>> the one Trump tossed in the trash in favor of
>> 'winging it', passing the buck to the states
>> to avoid blame.
>
> Trump left office 6 months ago, and no, he did not toss in place procedures into
> the trash

He most certainly did. There were *literally* pandemic playbooks left in place
by both preceding administrations, and he threw them away. This is fully proved.

Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?

<dtntfgpsmod37stc0hmtf4vj87lnoja2dv@4ax.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6431&group=alt.politics#6431

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: kurtnick...@gmail.com (Kurt Nicklas)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
Subject: Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 19:17:27 +0300
Organization: The Union of reminding The Dwarf he got kicked for forging.
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <dtntfgpsmod37stc0hmtf4vj87lnoja2dv@4ax.com>
References: <sdmdv2$9qe$1@panix3.panix.com> <98GdnTEI8K_oWGP9nZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <PNzLI.23487$uj5.9443@fx03.iad> <GomdnQs8zI6kV2P9nZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <9KadncsAxLpNT2P9nZ2dnUU7-aHNnZ2d@giganews.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="218f16a8f227376d839795008151cd73";
logging-data="8435"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/uDW4DA8DUlBeluvnepWfxBGWb3Y+IfwI="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:pFNw3ji0a2Jqt6SSp7datk8m8lI=
 by: Kurt Nicklas - Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:17 UTC

On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 11:20:47 -0400, Jonathan <writeInstead@Gmail.com>
wrote:

>On 7/26/2021 10:44 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>> On 7/26/21 9:38 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>> On 7/26/2021 7:23 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>> On 7/26/21 8:39 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>>   |
>>>>>   | Conservatives are expressing outrage about a pending Senate
>>>>>   | National Defense Authorization Act that would require women
>>>>>   | to register for the draft, and two defense hawks opposed
>>>>>   | the Pentagon bill in the Armed Services Committee over the
>>>>>   | issue.
>>>>
>>>> So long as all military positions and jobs are open to females, they
>>>> should be required to register with the selective service.
>>>
>>> The "selective service" system should be abolished and the
>>> registration requirement along with it.  Conscription is immoral.
>>
>> Why?
>>
>> Citizenship brings with it responsibility, among which is a
>> responsibility to stand in defense of the entity of which one is a citizen.
>
>
>
>The draft is a responsible precaution in case of a war.
>It takes a long time to establish such procedures
>so they should be in place, just in case.

It doesn't take a long time to establish. That was proven by the two
world wars.

But why, in this day and age, don't women also have to register for
SS?

Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?

<ZeBLI.7933$Pn7.1360@fx16.iad>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6432&group=alt.politics#6432

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc3.netnews.com!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx16.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
References: <sdmdv2$9qe$1@panix3.panix.com>
<98GdnTEI8K_oWGP9nZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<PNzLI.23487$uj5.9443@fx03.iad>
<GomdnQs8zI6kV2P9nZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<9KadncsAxLpNT2P9nZ2dnUU7-aHNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<ZKudnZR2MZCZSGP9nZ2dnUU7-RmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<dpidnRxh84_6SmP9nZ2dnUU7-fPNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<vI-dnbl1Yd9JRGP9nZ2dnUU7-LOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
From: js...@phendrie.con (Rudy Canoza)
Organization: Grinding down knuckle-dragging right-wingnut fuckwits
X-No-Archive: yes
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <vI-dnbl1Yd9JRGP9nZ2dnUU7-LOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 57
Message-ID: <ZeBLI.7933$Pn7.1360@fx16.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:18:00 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 3769
 by: Rudy Canoza - Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:18 UTC

On 7/26/2021 8:50 AM, David Hartung wrote:
> On 7/26/21 10:40 AM, Jonathan wrote:
>> On 7/26/2021 11:30 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>> On 7/26/21 10:20 AM, Jonathan wrote:
>>>> On 7/26/2021 10:44 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>> On 7/26/21 9:38 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/26/2021 7:23 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>> On 7/26/21 8:39 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>>>>>   |
>>>>>>>>   | Conservatives are expressing outrage about a pending Senate
>>>>>>>>   | National Defense Authorization Act that would require women
>>>>>>>>   | to register for the draft, and two defense hawks opposed
>>>>>>>>   | the Pentagon bill in the Armed Services Committee over the
>>>>>>>>   | issue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So long as all military positions and jobs are open to females, they
>>>>>>> should be required to register with the selective service.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The "selective service" system should be abolished and the registration
>>>>>> requirement along with it.  Conscription is immoral.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why?
>>>>>
>>>>> Citizenship brings with it responsibility, among which is a responsibility
>>>>> to stand in defense of the entity of which one is a citizen.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The draft is a responsible precaution in case of a war.
>>>> It takes a long time to establish such procedures
>>>> so they should be in place, just in case.
>>>
>>> Absoutely.
>>>
>>>> Like having a pandemic response in place, you know
>>>> the one Trump tossed in the trash in favor of
>>>> 'winging it', passing the buck to the states
>>>> to avoid blame.
>>>
>>> Trump left office 6 months ago, and no, he did not toss in place procedures
>>> into the trash, that is a Democrat lie promulgated by a partisan media.
>>
>>
>> McEnany defends scrapping Obama's pandemic playbook, saying
>> it was simply replaced
>
> Likely with updated procedures.

Replaced with nothing but Trump downplaying the virus and exhibiting gross
incompetence.

Trump's second impeachment should have been a good six months earlier than it
was, and it would have been over the high crimes and misdemeanors of his
botched, catastrophic pandemic response. In a parliamentary system, he would
have lost a confidence vote and been removed. It is beyond dispute that he
completely botched, bungled and fucked up. That's very likely the biggest
reason he lost his reelection bid in a *free*, *fair* and *clean* election.

Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?

<n7-dnWCPtcGVcmP9nZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6434&group=alt.politics#6434

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.snarked.org!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 12:21:11 -0500
Subject: Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
References: <sdmdv2$9qe$1@panix3.panix.com>
<98GdnTEI8K_oWGP9nZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<PNzLI.23487$uj5.9443@fx03.iad>
<GomdnQs8zI6kV2P9nZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<9KadncsAxLpNT2P9nZ2dnUU7-aHNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<ZKudnZR2MZCZSGP9nZ2dnUU7-RmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<1aBLI.64313$h8.48759@fx47.iad>
From: d_hart...@hotmail.com (David Hartung)
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 12:21:11 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1aBLI.64313$h8.48759@fx47.iad>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <n7-dnWCPtcGVcmP9nZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 54
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-xRr9rEdPjurBTubq5+PEbNW8EWZQYDy7sPYXG5/8w09nb8IUZWtsziHRZxH6m6EVp8CZTV6gQ8eGS6H!39QBGNe7MCc603jCVnDH3fUSrpxhD/SCM2edcAw/2nYT5+2ZFZ3mw4IXrdkDcERLhO1IgJ8bTjU5
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 3449
 by: David Hartung - Mon, 26 Jul 2021 17:21 UTC

On 7/26/21 11:12 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
> On 7/26/2021 8:30 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>> On 7/26/21 10:20 AM, Jonathan wrote:
>>> On 7/26/2021 10:44 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>> On 7/26/21 9:38 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>> On 7/26/2021 7:23 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/26/21 8:39 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>>>>   |
>>>>>>>   | Conservatives are expressing outrage about a pending Senate
>>>>>>>   | National Defense Authorization Act that would require women
>>>>>>>   | to register for the draft, and two defense hawks opposed
>>>>>>>   | the Pentagon bill in the Armed Services Committee over the
>>>>>>>   | issue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So long as all military positions and jobs are open to females,
>>>>>> they should be required to register with the selective service.
>>>>>
>>>>> The "selective service" system should be abolished and the
>>>>> registration requirement along with it.  Conscription is immoral.
>>>>
>>>> Why?
>>>>
>>>> Citizenship brings with it responsibility, among which is a
>>>> responsibility to stand in defense of the entity of which one is a
>>>> citizen.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The draft is a responsible precaution in case of a war.
>>> It takes a long time to establish such procedures
>>> so they should be in place, just in case.
>>
>> Absoutely. [sic]
>
> Conscription is always *absolutely* immoral.

On what grounds?

>>> Like having a pandemic response in place, you know
>>> the one Trump tossed in the trash in favor of
>>> 'winging it', passing the buck to the states
>>> to avoid blame.
>>
>> Trump left office 6 months ago, and no, he did not toss in place
>> procedures into the trash
>
> He most certainly did.  There were *literally* pandemic playbooks left
> in place by both preceding administrations, and he threw them away.
> This is fully proved.

This is claimed, not proven.

If it is proved, please provide the proof, either that or shut up.

Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?

<n7-dnWOPtcGscmP9nZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6435&group=alt.politics#6435

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.snarked.org!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 12:21:53 -0500
Subject: Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
References: <sdmdv2$9qe$1@panix3.panix.com>
<98GdnTEI8K_oWGP9nZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<PNzLI.23487$uj5.9443@fx03.iad>
<GomdnQs8zI6kV2P9nZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<9KadncsAxLpNT2P9nZ2dnUU7-aHNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<D8BLI.64312$h8.5262@fx47.iad>
From: d_hart...@hotmail.com (David Hartung)
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 12:21:53 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D8BLI.64312$h8.5262@fx47.iad>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <n7-dnWOPtcGscmP9nZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 34
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-dlpHV/gaEfR2tqlch8EK1t8i/L9NUFK3hNHadpri+WOsoRTjQzfCkoWI/y7xSlkAod4B7p5KuM/ZVB2!2rLM6kwx4Jx58YGaddDRl1aTVFrC5i+AZ/7XfXeZZL1Ty07ylf6oIfm+ETvt97dQCRCVCIdJXsgy
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2758
 by: David Hartung - Mon, 26 Jul 2021 17:21 UTC

On 7/26/21 11:11 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
> On 7/26/2021 8:20 AM, Jonathan wrote:
>> On 7/26/2021 10:44 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>> On 7/26/21 9:38 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>> On 7/26/2021 7:23 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>> On 7/26/21 8:39 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>>>   |
>>>>>>   | Conservatives are expressing outrage about a pending Senate
>>>>>>   | National Defense Authorization Act that would require women
>>>>>>   | to register for the draft, and two defense hawks opposed
>>>>>>   | the Pentagon bill in the Armed Services Committee over the
>>>>>>   | issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> So long as all military positions and jobs are open to females,
>>>>> they should be required to register with the selective service.
>>>>
>>>> The "selective service" system should be abolished and the
>>>> registration requirement along with it.  Conscription is immoral.
>>>
>>> Why?
>>>
>>> Citizenship brings with it responsibility, among which is a
>>> responsibility to stand in defense of the entity of which one is a
>>> citizen.
>>
>>
>>
>> The draft is a responsible precaution in case of a war.
>> It takes a long time to establish such procedures
>> so they should be in place, just in case.
>
> Conscription is immoral, always.

So you say, but you seem to be lacking an explanation.

Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?

<n7-dnZ2OtcFhcmP9nZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6436&group=alt.politics#6436

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!tr1.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 12:25:16 -0500
Subject: Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
References: <sdmdv2$9qe$1@panix3.panix.com> <98GdnTEI8K_oWGP9nZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <uPKdnaRAz9MGUWP9nZ2dnUU7-V3NnZ2d@giganews.com> <UqWdne_ShrtbUGP9nZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@giganews.com> <i%ALI.28477$0N5.8239@fx06.iad>
From: d_hart...@hotmail.com (David Hartung)
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 12:25:16 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <i%ALI.28477$0N5.8239@fx06.iad>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <n7-dnZ2OtcFhcmP9nZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 33
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-u0VdvhjNhKJubt6VmjA6jX+E2vY+uou9D/WXTjBezMJ+68kpzGGjH5Tc4TVkS7OpgIGSYYN7G43YYGS!zwXDMPcL8B76vKERUAGdKD6OhlywELB9UH9rHHFOjDmqPdT3IiWTHiFfL+0EsbYFymLwCNRPeTPy
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2747
 by: David Hartung - Mon, 26 Jul 2021 17:25 UTC

On 7/26/21 11:01 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
> On 7/26/2021 7:59 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>> On 7/26/21 9:54 AM, Lee wrote:
>>> David Hartung wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 7/26/21 8:39 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>>   |
>>>>>   | Conservatives are expressing outrage about a pending Senate
>>>>>   | National Defense Authorization Act that would require women
>>>>>   | to register for the draft, and two defense hawks opposed
>>>>>   | the Pentagon bill in the Armed Services Committee over the
>>>>>   | issue.
>>>>
>>>> So long as all military positions and jobs are open to females, they
>>>> should be required to register with the selective service.
>>>
>>>
>>>      There should be no selective service. Not only
>>> do all military leaders sneer at having to command
>>> draftees but we are past the age of armies waging
>>> organized combat for years. Fighting is over in
>>> days (Gulf War I, Gulf War II, Afganistan, all of
>>> Israels' wars) followed by armed occupation duty.
>>> The whole enterprise of drafting unwilling troops
>>> is expensive and unnecessary.
>>
>> No one has been drafted since about 1972, the current system is in
>> place should a draft again become necessary.
>
> Conscription is never necessary and is always immoral.  Fuck off with
> your commie collectivism.

Why is it immoral?

Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?

<tfCLI.714409$HdJ9.212649@fx09.ams1>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6437&group=alt.politics#6437

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.fuzzy-logic alt.politics
Followup: talk.poltics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.fucknozzles,alt.poltics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!fx09.ams1.POSTED!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.fuzzy-logic,alt.politics
References: <sdmdv2$9qe$1@panix3.panix.com>
<98GdnTEI8K_oWGP9nZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<PNzLI.23487$uj5.9443@fx03.iad>
<GomdnQs8zI6kV2P9nZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<9KadncsAxLpNT2P9nZ2dnUU7-aHNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<ZKudnZR2MZCZSGP9nZ2dnUU7-RmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<1aBLI.64313$h8.48759@fx47.iad>
<n7-dnWCPtcGVcmP9nZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Followup-To: talk.poltics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.fucknozzles,alt.poltics
From: js...@phendrie.con (Rudy Canoza)
Organization: Grinding down knuckle-dragging right-wingnut fuckwits
X-No-Archive: yes
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <n7-dnWCPtcGVcmP9nZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 65
Message-ID: <tfCLI.714409$HdJ9.212649@fx09.ams1>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 10:26:46 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 3601
 by: Rudy Canoza - Mon, 26 Jul 2021 17:26 UTC

On 7/26/2021 10:21 AM, David Hartung wrote:
> On 7/26/21 11:12 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> On 7/26/2021 8:30 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>> On 7/26/21 10:20 AM, Jonathan wrote:
>>>> On 7/26/2021 10:44 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>> On 7/26/21 9:38 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/26/2021 7:23 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>> On 7/26/21 8:39 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>>>>>   |
>>>>>>>>   | Conservatives are expressing outrage about a pending Senate
>>>>>>>>   | National Defense Authorization Act that would require women
>>>>>>>>   | to register for the draft, and two defense hawks opposed
>>>>>>>>   | the Pentagon bill in the Armed Services Committee over the
>>>>>>>>   | issue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So long as all military positions and jobs are open to females, they
>>>>>>> should be required to register with the selective service.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The "selective service" system should be abolished and the registration
>>>>>> requirement along with it.  Conscription is immoral.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why?
>>>>>
>>>>> Citizenship brings with it responsibility, among which is a responsibility
>>>>> to stand in defense of the entity of which one is a citizen.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The draft is a responsible precaution in case of a war.
>>>> It takes a long time to establish such procedures
>>>> so they should be in place, just in case.
>>>
>>> Absoutely. [sic]
>>
>> Conscription is always *absolutely* immoral.
>
> On what grounds?

Two:

1. involuntary servitude
2. commie collectivism

Both are self-evidently immoral. You know this.

I might choose to subordinate my interests to those of someone else, but no one
can morally force me to do so.

>
>>>> Like having a pandemic response in place, you know
>>>> the one Trump tossed in the trash in favor of
>>>> 'winging it', passing the buck to the states
>>>> to avoid blame.
>>>
>>> Trump left office 6 months ago, and no, he did not toss in place procedures
>>> into the trash
>>
>> He most certainly did.  There were *literally* pandemic playbooks left in
>> place by both preceding administrations, and he threw them away. This is fully
>> proved.
>
> This is claimed, not proven.

It is fully proved and is not in rational dispute.

Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?

<qjCLI.714417$HdJ9.424076@fx09.ams1>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6439&group=alt.politics#6439

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.fuzzy-logic alt.politics
Followup: talk.poltics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaurgh,alt.fucknozzles,alt.poltics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!178.20.174.213.MISMATCH!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!peer01.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!fx09.ams1.POSTED!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.fuzzy-logic,alt.politics
References: <sdmdv2$9qe$1@panix3.panix.com>
<98GdnTEI8K_oWGP9nZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<PNzLI.23487$uj5.9443@fx03.iad>
<GomdnQs8zI6kV2P9nZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<9KadncsAxLpNT2P9nZ2dnUU7-aHNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<D8BLI.64312$h8.5262@fx47.iad>
<n7-dnWOPtcGscmP9nZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Followup-To: talk.poltics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaurgh,alt.fucknozzles,alt.poltics
From: js...@phendrie.con (Rudy Canoza)
Organization: Grinding down knuckle-dragging right-wingnut fuckwits
X-No-Archive: yes
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <n7-dnWOPtcGscmP9nZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <qjCLI.714417$HdJ9.424076@fx09.ams1>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 10:31:01 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 2825
 by: Rudy Canoza - Mon, 26 Jul 2021 17:31 UTC

On 7/26/2021 10:21 AM, David Hartung wrote:
> On 7/26/21 11:11 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> On 7/26/2021 8:20 AM, Jonathan wrote:
>>> On 7/26/2021 10:44 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>> On 7/26/21 9:38 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>> On 7/26/2021 7:23 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/26/21 8:39 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>>>>   |
>>>>>>>   | Conservatives are expressing outrage about a pending Senate
>>>>>>>   | National Defense Authorization Act that would require women
>>>>>>>   | to register for the draft, and two defense hawks opposed
>>>>>>>   | the Pentagon bill in the Armed Services Committee over the
>>>>>>>   | issue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So long as all military positions and jobs are open to females, they
>>>>>> should be required to register with the selective service.
>>>>>
>>>>> The "selective service" system should be abolished and the registration
>>>>> requirement along with it.  Conscription is immoral.
>>>>
>>>> Why?
>>>>
>>>> Citizenship brings with it responsibility, among which is a responsibility
>>>> to stand in defense of the entity of which one is a citizen.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The draft is a responsible precaution in case of a war.
>>> It takes a long time to establish such procedures
>>> so they should be in place, just in case.
>>
>> Conscription is immoral, always.
>
> So you say

So I have shown beyond dispute. The case is so compelling that you don't even
make an attempt at refutation.

Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?

<zkCLI.714427$HdJ9.262127@fx09.ams1>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=6440&group=alt.politics#6440

  copy link   Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.fuzzy-logic alt.politics
Followup: talk.poltics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaurgh,alt.fucknozzles,alt.poltics
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!fx09.ams1.POSTED!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: Why Do Republicans Oppose This?
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.fuzzy-logic,alt.politics
References: <sdmdv2$9qe$1@panix3.panix.com>
<98GdnTEI8K_oWGP9nZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<uPKdnaRAz9MGUWP9nZ2dnUU7-V3NnZ2d@giganews.com>
<UqWdne_ShrtbUGP9nZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@giganews.com>
<i%ALI.28477$0N5.8239@fx06.iad>
<n7-dnZ2OtcFhcmP9nZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Followup-To: talk.poltics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaurgh,alt.fucknozzles,alt.poltics
From: js...@phendrie.con (Rudy Canoza)
Organization: Grinding down knuckle-dragging right-wingnut fuckwits
X-No-Archive: yes
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <n7-dnZ2OtcFhcmP9nZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <zkCLI.714427$HdJ9.262127@fx09.ams1>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 10:32:14 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 2782
 by: Rudy Canoza - Mon, 26 Jul 2021 17:32 UTC

On 7/26/2021 10:25 AM, David Hartung wrote:
> On 7/26/21 11:01 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> On 7/26/2021 7:59 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>> On 7/26/21 9:54 AM, Lee wrote:
>>>> David Hartung wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 7/26/21 8:39 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>>>   |
>>>>>>   | Conservatives are expressing outrage about a pending Senate
>>>>>>   | National Defense Authorization Act that would require women
>>>>>>   | to register for the draft, and two defense hawks opposed
>>>>>>   | the Pentagon bill in the Armed Services Committee over the
>>>>>>   | issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> So long as all military positions and jobs are open to females, they
>>>>> should be required to register with the selective service.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>      There should be no selective service. Not only
>>>> do all military leaders sneer at having to command
>>>> draftees but we are past the age of armies waging
>>>> organized combat for years. Fighting is over in
>>>> days (Gulf War I, Gulf War II, Afganistan, all of
>>>> Israels' wars) followed by armed occupation duty.
>>>> The whole enterprise of drafting unwilling troops
>>>> is expensive and unnecessary.
>>>
>>> No one has been drafted since about 1972, the current system is in place
>>> should a draft again become necessary.
>>
>> Conscription is never necessary and is always immoral.  Fuck off with your
>> commie collectivism.
>
> Why is it immoral?

I've explained it already. Fuck off with your sealioning.

And fuck off with your commie collectivism.

Pages:12345678
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor