George Hammond wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 1:51:29 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > There is no God.
> >
> [George Hammond MS physics]
> You can wager with total confidence
> That Scientific Proof has been found
> that PROVES SCIENTIFICALLY THERE IS A REAL GOD !
> – And that it is an
> Einsteinian curvature of subjective space-time (reality)
> measurable to 2 decimal point accuracy!
> George

You're using algebra on your mac computer to find God?

You've been working on this 'God problem' for over TWENTY YEARS!!!!

Throw you Mac out the window!

(and windows too!)

As Einstein once said.. "Your calculations are correct, but your grasp of physics is abominable."

"As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality." -Einstein

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> George Hammond wrote:
> >
> > On Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 1:51:29 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > There is no God.
> > >
> > [George Hammond MS physics]
> > You can wager with total confidence
> > That Scientific Proof has been found
> > that PROVES SCIENTIFICALLY THERE IS A REAL GOD !
> > – And that it is an
> > Einsteinian curvature of subjective space-time (reality)
> > measurable to 2 decimal point accuracy!
> > George
>
> You're using algebra on your mac computer to find God?
>
> You've been working on this 'God problem' for over TWENTY YEARS!!!!
>
> Throw you Mac out the window!
>
> (and windows too!)
>
> As Einstein once said.. "Your calculations are correct, but your grasp of physics is abominable."
>
> "As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality." -Einstein
>

....and you don't have SCIENTIFIC PROOF because Math is not Science.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 1:06:53 AM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > George Hammond wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 1:51:29 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > There is no God.
> > > >
> > > [George Hammond MS physics]
> > > You can wager with total confidence
> > > That Scientific Proof has been found
> > > that PROVES SCIENTIFICALLY THERE IS A REAL GOD !
> > > – And that it is an
> > > Einsteinian curvature of subjective space-time (reality)
> > > measurable to 2 decimal point accuracy!
> > > George
> >
> > You're using algebra on your mac computer to find God?
> >
> > You've been working on this 'God problem' for over TWENTY YEARS!!!!
> >
> > Throw you Mac out the window!
> >
> > (and windows too!)
> >
> > As Einstein once said.. "Your calculations are correct, but your grasp of physics is abominable."
> >
> > "As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality." -Einstein
> >
> ...and you don't have SCIENTIFIC PROOF because Math is not Science.
> --
..
[George E Hammond MS physics USA]
Hey "Starmaker" I'm familiar with Olaf Stapledon's 1937
Science Fiction Bible entitled "Star Maker". I'm NOT a
Science Fiction enthusiast – I'm a REAL scientist !
..... I understand that you are spamming half a dozen
USENET groups at once with your pseudo-anti-Semitic
slobbery.
..... What are you doing on sci.physics.relativity?.
Just here to harass people – or do you actually know any
Relativity Physics?
George

George Hammond wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 1:06:53 AM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > George Hammond wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 1:51:29 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > There is no God.
> > > > >
> > > > [George Hammond MS physics]
> > > > You can wager with total confidence
> > > > That Scientific Proof has been found
> > > > that PROVES SCIENTIFICALLY THERE IS A REAL GOD !
> > > > – And that it is an
> > > > Einsteinian curvature of subjective space-time (reality)
> > > > measurable to 2 decimal point accuracy!
> > > > George
> > >
> > > You're using algebra on your mac computer to find God?
> > >
> > > You've been working on this 'God problem' for over TWENTY YEARS!!!!
> > >
> > > Throw you Mac out the window!
> > >
> > > (and windows too!)
> > >
> > > As Einstein once said.. "Your calculations are correct, but your grasp of physics is abominable."
> > >
> > > "As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality." -Einstein
> > >
> > ...and you don't have SCIENTIFIC PROOF because Math is not Science.
> > --
> .
> [George E Hammond MS physics USA]
> Hey "Starmaker" I'm familiar with Olaf Stapledon's 1937
> Science Fiction Bible entitled "Star Maker". I'm NOT a
> Science Fiction enthusiast – I'm a REAL scientist !
> .... I understand that you are spamming half a dozen
> USENET groups at once with your pseudo-anti-Semitic
> slobbery.
> .... What are you doing on sci.physics.relativity?.
> Just here to harass people – or do you actually know any
> Relativity Physics?
> George

What exactly does this mean? What is a "3-year afterlife dream"???? where's it downloading from, Heaven?

"just before you die and downloads a 3-year afterlife dream"

I mean, did is insane...

You use a mac and a algebra software to prove God exist...and when your numbers don't add up, you complain to the algebra programmer that there must be a BUG in the program??!!!???

THAT'S INSANE!!!!

insanely funny.

"Einsteinian curvature of subjective space-time (reality)"?? (i have difficulty reading that statement)

What is "Einsteinian"? Is dat a chemical, mineral, a rock??? (don't tell me it's in your algebra God formula) (throw in friedman while you're at it)

"curvature of subjective space-time (reality)"

subjective reality means DREAM?

I think there is a BUG in your programming...you need to be, reprogrammed.

The only God that exist is a 'personal God' in all people (including atheists). A personal god and a personal devil only exist in the mind.

There is no Evil in the world.

There is no God.

Your numbers don't add up.

It doesn't agree with Nature.

You're having a subjective (reality), you're dreaming....wake up.

You're having the same dream for over twenty years...stop downloading.

I don't really exist...I'm just in your dream. TECH SUPPORT, TECH SUPPORT!

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 2:20:04 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:
> God is an"Einsteinian curvature of subjective space-time (reality)
> "?? (i have difficulty reading that statement)
>
[George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
..... Look Starmaker – I've shown that the metric of human
subjective reality is: –
..
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = The Metric of God.
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
..
Where a=a(t) is the "scale factor" (magnification factor)
for people who are less than fully grown – which includes
ALL of us !
..
If you are a competent scientist qualified to be posting on SPR
you can plug this metric into MAXIMA or MATHEMATICA
and tell me what the "Riemann Curvature" is – and show that it is
NONZERO – which proves that: –
..
GOD IS AN EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME !
..
.... Now if you're not able to do that – I'm not interested in
talking to you – because apparently you're simply a "SON OF SAM"
mental case who gets his thrills by posting pseudo anti-Semitic
SLOBBERY to USENET discussion groups.
..
Prove to me you're a scientist – or get outta here !
George

George Hammond wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 2:20:04 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > George Hammond wrote:
> > God is an"Einsteinian curvature of subjective space-time (reality)
> > "?? (i have difficulty reading that statement)
> >
> [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
> .... Look Starmaker – I've shown that the metric of human
> subjective reality is: –
> .
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | = The Metric of God.
> |o o a² o. |
> |ooo-1/a²|
> .
> Where a=a(t) is the "scale factor" (magnification factor)
> for people who are less than fully grown – which includes
> ALL of us !
> .
> If you are a competent scientist qualified to be posting on SPR
> you can plug this metric into MAXIMA or MATHEMATICA
> and tell me what the "Riemann Curvature" is – and show that it is
> NONZERO – which proves that: –
> .
> GOD IS AN EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME !
> .
> ... Now if you're not able to do that – I'm not interested in
> talking to you – because apparently you're simply a "SON OF SAM"
> mental case who gets his thrills by posting pseudo anti-Semitic
> SLOBBERY to USENET discussion groups.
> .
> Prove to me you're a scientist – or get outta here !
> George

(%t4)
riemann (true);

(%t4)
riem
1,2,1,2
=-a
2 ()a
t2
(%t5)
riem
1,3,1,3
=-a
2 ()a
t2
(%t6)
riem
1,4,1,4
=-a
3 ()a
tt
-a
2 ()a
t2
(%t7)
riem
2,2,1,1
=a
2 ()a
t2
(%t8)
riem
2,3,2,3
=-a
2 ()a
t2
(%t9)
riem
2,4,2,4
=-a
3 ()a
tt
-a
2 ()a
t2
(%t10)
riem
3,3,1,1
=a
2 ()a
t2
(%t11)
riem
3,3,2,2
=a
2 ()a
t2
(%t12)
riem
3,4,3,4
=-a
3 ()a
tt
-a
2 ()a
t2
(%t13)
riem
4,4,1,1
=-
a()a
tt
+()a
t2
a 2
(%t14)
riem
4,4,2,2
=-
a()a
tt
+()a
t2
a 2
(%t15)
riem
4,4,3,3
=-
a()a
tt
+()a
t2
a 2
(%o15)
done
riemann (true);
(%i4)
(%t16)
ein
1,1
=-2a()a
tt
-3()a
t2
(%t17)
ein
2,2
=-2a()a
tt
-3()a
t2
(%t18)
ein
3,3
=-2a()a
tt
-3()a
t2
(%t19)
ein
4,4
=-3()a
t2
(%o19)
done

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 2:46:34 AM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> riemann (true);
>
> (%t4)
> riem
> 1,2,1,2
> =-a
> 2
> ()a
> t2
> (%t5)
..
[George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
..
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = The Metric of God.
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
..
..... Okay, you're smart enough to have located my MAXIMA computer
printout of the Riemann Curvature Calculation located on my
Academia.edu website located at: –
..
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/snHF7Wmlbhw
..
Unfortunately it's in ".pdf" so you couldn't cut and paste it
into USENET ASCII without screwing it up !.
..
Okay, that qualifies you as an FBI DETECTIVE – that's pretty smart,
but it doesn't qualify you as a PHYSICIST !
..
INTERESTINGLY HOWEVER – a penultimate psycho like you
is apparently the ONLY person on the Internet who is
psycho-genius enough to realize that a HISTORIC and
DRAMATIC scientific discovery has occurred !
..
The heroic Russian Alexander Friedmann would be proud of you !!
..
Congratulations on that psycho genius –
George

> .
> .... Okay, you're smart enough to have located my MAXIMA computer
> printout of the Riemann Curvature Calculation located on my
> Academia.edu website located at: –
> .
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/snHF7Wmlbhw
> .
[George E Hammond MS physics]
Oops – the above URL is incorrect – the correct URL is: –
..
https://www.academia.edu/82105046/MAXIMA_Curvature_of_the_Metric_of_God
..
George

George Hammond wrote:
>
> On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 2:46:34 AM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > riemann (true);
> >
> > (%t4)
> > riem
> > 1,2,1,2
> > =-a
> > 2
> > ()a
> > t2
> > (%t5)
> .
> [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
> .
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | = The Metric of God.
> |o o a² o. |
> |ooo-1/a²|
> .
> .... Okay, you're smart enough to have located my MAXIMA computer
> printout of the Riemann Curvature Calculation located on my
> Academia.edu website located at: –
> .
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/snHF7Wmlbhw
> .
> Unfortunately it's in ".pdf" so you couldn't cut and paste it
> into USENET ASCII without screwing it up !.
> .
> Okay, that qualifies you as an FBI DETECTIVE – that's pretty smart,
> but it doesn't qualify you as a PHYSICIST !
> .
> INTERESTINGLY HOWEVER – a penultimate psycho like you
> is apparently the ONLY person on the Internet who is
> psycho-genius enough to realize that a HISTORIC and
> DRAMATIC scientific discovery has occurred !
> .
> The heroic Russian Alexander Friedmann would be proud of you !!
> .
> Congratulations on that psycho genius –
> George

Can you explain what you wrote: "just before you die and downloads a
3-year afterlife dream"

i'm not dat smart...

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

On Thursday, October 27, 2022 at 3:30:52 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:

> Can you explain what you wrote: "just before you die and downloads a
> 3-year afterlife dream"
>

> i'm not dat smart...
> --
[George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
..
..... Okay Starmaker, you have asked: –
..
[STARMAKER]: – "what do you mean when you say: –
"just before you die it (the brain)
downloads a 3-year afterlife dream"
..
[HAMMOND]: –
..... On my academia.edu website located at: –
https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond
..
You will find one of my papers entitled: –
..
A simple "airbag" theory of Life After Death: –
https://www.academia.edu/44527322/A_simple_airbag_theory_of_Life_After_Death
..
It is LARGE PRINT – ILLUSTRATED – only 2 pages long
and this paper will explain to you how LIFE AFTER DEATH
actually works (if it exists) – and as I explained – – In my
scientific opinion the ODDS are above 1 in 3 that it actually
does exist !
..
To clarify that – I maintain that the EXISTENCE of God has
been scientifically proven to a 100% certainty – but the
scientific chances of the existence of "Life after Death"
SCIENTIFICALLY appears to be about "1 chance in 3",
at the present time; in my professional opinion !
..
But figure it out – if someone told you the chances of your
next automobile trip ending in a head-on collision was
1 chance in 3 – you certainly would drive goddamed
carefully !
George

George Hammond wrote:

>> i'm not dat smart...
>> --
> [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
> .... Okay Starmaker, you have asked: –
> [STARMAKER]: – "what do you mean when you say: –
> "just before you die it (the brain) downloads a 3-year afterlife dream"

amazing, none of the brainwashed capitalists from america are protesting
against the bidans private war in nazi "uKraine", using the military
apparatus industrial complex of the big america. The bidans owned nazi
"uKraine" before the war, my friend. His son was about to go in prison in
"uKraine", saved by his father, illegally dismissing the judges from the
process. So you are committing a crime then you dismiss the judges, what
the fuck is that?? Where are all those good americans, from the movies,
western, avatar, scifi and crap, not out being protesting, having a guy
using their military for a 100% private case of owning a wannabe country in
europe. With, an immediate danger of atomic war. Where are you guys, not
out, protesting??

Ben Shapiro FINALLY Realizes mRNA Jabs are Bad
https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/video/pt9Bjtu6ROPk/

[George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
...... STARMAKER: – I hope you've read my paper:
..
https://www.academia.edu/44527322/A_simple_airbag_theory_of_Life_After_Death
..
..... I sent this paper to STUART HAMEROFF HIMSELF who is
the world's leading authority on MICROTUBULES – and he
sent me back this EMAIL –
..
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 09:43:23 -0700
From: Stuart Hameroff, U. Arizona
... Subject: Re: (fwd) A Scientifically Competent
............Religious Question for Stuart Hameroff
To: George Hammond
Cc: Frank Tipler, Tulane U.
Dear George Hammond:
I believe downloading and Afterlife are possible.
Stuart Hameroff
...
So as you can see – the world's leading authority on microtubules
believes that my theory of Life after Death is "POSSIBLE" !!!
George

On 2022-10-28 14:02:35 +0000, George Hammond said:

> [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
> ..... STARMAKER: – I hope you've read my paper:
> .
> https://www.academia.edu/44527322/A_simple_airbag_theory_of_Life_After_Death
> .
> .... I sent this paper to STUART HAMEROFF HIMSELF who is
> the world's leading authority on MICROTUBULES – and hesent me back this EMAIL –
> .
> Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 09:43:23 -0700
> From: Stuart Hameroff, U. Arizona
> .. Subject: Re: (fwd) A Scientifically Competent...........Religious
> Question for Stuart Hameroff
> To: George Hammond
> Cc: Frank Tipler, Tulane U.
> Dear George Hammond:
> I believe downloading and Afterlife are possible.
> Stuart Hameroff
> ..
> So as you can see – the world's leading authority on microtubules
> believes that my theory of Life after Death is "POSSIBLE" !!!
> George

On what basis do you describe Stuart Hameroff as "the world's leading
authority on microtubules"? He's far from being the most highly cited,
and people like Charles Cantor and Marc Kirschner are far better known.
Copying the message to Frank Tipler should ring loud bells.

--
Athel -- French and British, living mainly in England until 1987.

George Hammond wrote:
>
> [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
> ..... STARMAKER: – I hope you've read my paper:
> .
> https://www.academia.edu/44527322/A_simple_airbag_theory_of_Life_After_Death
> .
> .... I sent this paper to STUART HAMEROFF HIMSELF who is
> the world's leading authority on MICROTUBULES – and he
> sent me back this EMAIL –
> .
> Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 09:43:23 -0700
> From: Stuart Hameroff, U. Arizona
> .. Subject: Re: (fwd) A Scientifically Competent
> ...........Religious Question for Stuart Hameroff
> To: George Hammond
> Cc: Frank Tipler, Tulane U.
> Dear George Hammond:
> I believe downloading and Afterlife are possible.
> Stuart Hameroff
> ..
> So as you can see – the world's leading authority on microtubules
> believes that my theory of Life after Death is "POSSIBLE" !!!
> George

well the airbag theory certaintly threw me off...

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

On 2022-10-28 14:49:39 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden said:

> On 2022-10-28 14:02:35 +0000, George Hammond said:
>
>> [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
>> ..... STARMAKER: – I hope you've read my paper:
>> .
>> https://www.academia.edu/44527322/A_simple_airbag_theory_of_Life_After_Death
>> .
>> .... I sent this paper to STUART HAMEROFF HIMSELF who is
>> the world's leading authority on MICROTUBULES – and hesent me back this EMAIL –
>> .
>> Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 09:43:23 -0700
>> From: Stuart Hameroff, U. Arizona
>> .. Subject: Re: (fwd) A Scientifically Competent...........Religious
>> Question for Stuart Hameroff
>> To: George Hammond
>> Cc: Frank Tipler, Tulane U.
>> Dear George Hammond:
>> I believe downloading and Afterlife are possible.
>> Stuart Hameroff
>> ..
>> So as you can see – the world's leading authority on microtubules
>> believes that my theory of Life after Death is "POSSIBLE" !!!
>> George
>
> On what basis do you describe Stuart Hameroff as "the world's leading
> authority on microtubules"? He's far from being the most highly cited,
> and people like Charles Cantor and Marc Kirschner are far better known.
> Copying the message to Frank Tipler should ring loud bells.

I have just checked. Only 831 papers on microtubules have been cited
more than Hameroff's paper of 2014, his best-known work on this topic.
Not especially impressive.

--
Athel -- French and British, living mainly in England until 1987.

On Friday, October 28, 2022 at 1:16:49 PM UTC-4, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
> On 2022-10-28 14:49:39 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden said:
>
> >
> > On what basis do you describe Stuart Hameroff as "the world's leading
> > authority on microtubules"? He's far from being the most highly cited,
> > and people like Charles Cantor and Marc Kirschner are far better known.
> > Copying the message to Frank Tipler should ring loud bells.
>>
> I have just checked. Only 831 papers on microtubules have been cited
> more than Hameroff's paper of 2014, his best-known work on this topic.
> Not especially impressive.
>
> --
[George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
..
Dear Prof. Athel Bowden,
..
You've published 200 papers and 9 textbooks and and are
at home in the academic fortresses of formality.
..
Sci.physics.relativity (SPR) is unmoderated and wide open to
rude, lowbrow hecklers and diverse mental cases.
..
I absolutely STAND CORRECTED that Dr. Stuart Hameroff M.D.
is not the "world's leading authority on microtubules" he is in
fact the world's leading authority on:
.................. "MICROTUBULE CONSCIOUSNESS"
but in this checkered Internet milieu I simply thought it was
unnecessary to add the word "Consciousness". I had no idea
that a professionally educated academic authority such as yourself
would be anywhere near this discussion thread.
..
Stuart Hameroff is cofounder and DIRECTOR of the
Center for Consciousness at the University of Arizona where he
holds the rank of Professor Of Anesthesiology.
..... He is widely known for his collaboration with Sir Roger Penrose
on the creation of the "Orch-Or" model of Consciousness. And he
first obtained notoriety in 1998 with his publication of this paper
in 1998 –
..
Quantum computation in brain microtubules?
The Penrose–Hameroff ‘Orch OR’ model
of consciousness
..
In the philosophical transactions Of the Royal Society of London
which put him, Roger Penrose, and microtubules on the front pages
of worldwide "Consciousness" studies !
...... Meanwhile, he's been on global television numerous times, has
given thousands of lectures at major world universities and has been
cited many times by Roger Penrose in his best-selling books.
In fact, at one time Penrose and Hameroff were being referred to
as the "Odd Couple" in scientific circles !
George

George Hammond wrote:
>
> On Friday, October 28, 2022 at 1:16:49 PM UTC-4, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
> > On 2022-10-28 14:49:39 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden said:
> >
> > >
> > > On what basis do you describe Stuart Hameroff as "the world's leading
> > > authority on microtubules"? He's far from being the most highly cited,
> > > and people like Charles Cantor and Marc Kirschner are far better known.
> > > Copying the message to Frank Tipler should ring loud bells.
> >>
> > I have just checked. Only 831 papers on microtubules have been cited
> > more than Hameroff's paper of 2014, his best-known work on this topic.
> > Not especially impressive.
> >
> > --
> [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
> .
> Dear Prof. Athel Bowden,
> .
> You've published 200 papers and 9 textbooks and and are
> at home in the academic fortresses of formality.
> .
> Sci.physics.relativity (SPR) is unmoderated and wide open to
> rude, lowbrow hecklers and diverse mental cases.
> .
> I absolutely STAND CORRECTED that Dr. Stuart Hameroff M.D.
> is not the "world's leading authority on microtubules" he is in
> fact the world's leading authority on:
> ................. "MICROTUBULE CONSCIOUSNESS"
> but in this checkered Internet milieu I simply thought it was
> unnecessary to add the word "Consciousness". I had no idea
> that a professionally educated academic authority such as yourself
> would be anywhere near this discussion thread.
> .
> Stuart Hameroff is cofounder and DIRECTOR of the
> Center for Consciousness at the University of Arizona where he
> holds the rank of Professor Of Anesthesiology.
> .... He is widely known for his collaboration with Sir Roger Penrose
> on the creation of the "Orch-Or" model of Consciousness. And he
> first obtained notoriety in 1998 with his publication of this paper
> in 1998 –
> .
> Quantum computation in brain microtubules?
> The Penrose–Hameroff ‘Orch OR’ model
> of consciousness
> .
> In the philosophical transactions Of the Royal Society of London
> which put him, Roger Penrose, and microtubules on the front pages
> of worldwide "Consciousness" studies !
> ..... Meanwhile, he's been on global television numerous times, has
> given thousands of lectures at major world universities and has been
> cited many times by Roger Penrose in his best-selling books.
> In fact, at one time Penrose and Hameroff were being referred to
> as the "Odd Couple" in scientific circles !
> George

Tell Prof. Athel Bowden that I said he can go fuck his mother!

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

On Saturday, October 29, 2022 at 12:02:37 AM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:
> >
> > On Friday, October 28, 2022 at 1:16:49 PM UTC-4, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
> > > On 2022-10-28 14:49:39 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden said:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On what basis do you describe Stuart Hameroff as "the world's leading
> > > > authority on microtubules"? He's far from being the most highly cited,
> > > > and people like Charles Cantor and Marc Kirschner are far better known.
> > > > Copying the message to Frank Tipler should ring loud bells.
> > >>
> > > I have just checked. Only 831 papers on microtubules have been cited
> > > more than Hameroff's paper of 2014, his best-known work on this topic..
> > > Not especially impressive.
> > >
> > > --
> > [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
> > .
> > Dear Prof. Athel Bowden,
> > .
> > You've published 200 papers and 9 textbooks and and are
> > at home in the academic fortresses of formality.
> > .
> > Sci.physics.relativity (SPR) is unmoderated and wide open to
> > rude, lowbrow hecklers and diverse mental cases.
> > .
> > I absolutely STAND CORRECTED that Dr. Stuart Hameroff M.D.
> > is not the "world's leading authority on microtubules" he is in
> > fact the world's leading authority on:
> > ................. "MICROTUBULE CONSCIOUSNESS"
> > but in this checkered Internet milieu I simply thought it was
> > unnecessary to add the word "Consciousness". I had no idea
> > that a professionally educated academic authority such as yourself
> > would be anywhere near this discussion thread.
> > .
> > Stuart Hameroff is cofounder and DIRECTOR of the
> > Center for Consciousness at the University of Arizona where he
> > holds the rank of Professor Of Anesthesiology.
> > .... He is widely known for his collaboration with Sir Roger Penrose
> > on the creation of the "Orch-Or" model of Consciousness. And he
> > first obtained notoriety in 1998 with his publication of this paper
> > in 1998 –
> > .
> > Quantum computation in brain microtubules?
> > The Penrose–Hameroff ‘Orch OR’ model
> > of consciousness
> > .
> > In the philosophical transactions Of the Royal Society of London
> > which put him, Roger Penrose, and microtubules on the front pages
> > of worldwide "Consciousness" studies !
> > ..... Meanwhile, he's been on global television numerous times, has
> > given thousands of lectures at major world universities and has been
> > cited many times by Roger Penrose in his best-selling books.
> > In fact, at one time Penrose and Hameroff were being referred to
> > as the "Odd Couple" in scientific circles !
..> > George
>
>[Starmaker]
> Tell Prof. Athel Bowden that I said he can go fuck his mother!
> --
[Hammond]
Easy for you to say !

George Hammond wrote:

>>[Starmaker]
>> Tell Prof. Athel Bowden that I said he can go fuck his mother!
>> --
> [Hammond]
> Easy for you to say

On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 11:50:42 AM UTC-4, Buddie Fiore wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:
> > Easy for you to say
..
..
[George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
..
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | ...= ..THE METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
..
(Derivation is given at: –
DUTCH WINDMILL POST (sci.physics.relativity)
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/lkvb-IXoFyA/m/VnhEVHBAAQAJ
..
plugging this metric into
a MAXIMA relativity computer program and
you get the following results: –
..
THE RIEMANN TENSOR is NONZERO
THE EINSTEIN TENSOR is NONZERO
THE SCALAR CURVATURE is NONZERO
..
and in fact all 3 of these quantities are
proportional to (da/dt)^2 which is about
5%/year for a growing child.
Hammond realized that this is an –
ENORMOUS SPACETIME CURVATURE
by ordinary Relativity standards !
A near BLACK HOLE size curvature!
..
The MAXIMA computer printout can be seen here:
https://www.academia.edu/82105046/MAXIMA_curvature_calculation
..
Hence it turns out I have discovered the world's first
Scientific Proof of God (SPOG) and that: –
..
GOD IS A (large) EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE
OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME
..
..... Meanwhile, I had long since published the foundation of my theory
in the peer reviewed literature: –
..
Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory
New Ideas In Psychology, Vol 12(2) 153-167
Elsevier Scientific Ltd. 1994
..
https://tinyurl.com/2wnrjht3
..
..
Maybe you-all (on alt.philosophy.debate) should try suing Elsevier Scientific Ltd.
who published my work – and
who is the world's largest scientific publisher !!
YOU'D LOOK PRETTY FUNNY TRYING !!
..
You (Jeffrey Rubard) have posted the same heckling comments to Matt Faunce
whose IQ is twice yours

Matt Faunce pointed out that my "Scientific Proof of God" is entirely
supported by WILLIAM JAMES in his historic statement: –
..
[Matt Faunce posted to George Hammond on alt.philosophy.debate:]
....I think this quote by William James fits your theory.

[William James wrote:]
“[T]he theologian’s contention that the religious man is moved by an
external power is vindicated, for it is one of the peculiarities of
invasions from the subconscious region to take on objective appearances,
and to suggest to the Subject an external control. In the religious life
the control is felt as ‘higher’; but since on our hypothesis it is
primarily the higher faculties of our own hidden mind which are
controlling, the sense of union with the power beyond us is a sense of
something, not merely apparently, but literally true.”

–William James, in The Varieties of Religious Experience, Lecture XX,
(paragraph 512).
..
..
So you may not believe my theory – but WILLIAM JAMES certainly
believed it – even though he couldn't prove it 120 years ago –
but now HAMMOND has actually scientifically PROVED IT !!
..
GO FLY A KITE "JEFFREY RHUBARB"
..
George

On Monday, November 7, 2022 at 11:19:46 PM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
> On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 11:50:42 AM UTC-4, Buddie Fiore wrote:
> > George Hammond wrote:
> > > Easy for you to say
> .
> .
> [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
> .
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | ...= ..THE METRIC OF GOD
> |o o a² o. |
> |ooo-1/a²|
> .
> (Derivation is given at: –
> DUTCH WINDMILL POST (sci.physics.relativity)
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/lkvb-IXoFyA/m/VnhEVHBAAQAJ
> .
> plugging this metric into
> a MAXIMA relativity computer program and
> you get the following results: –
> .
> THE RIEMANN TENSOR is NONZERO
> THE EINSTEIN TENSOR is NONZERO
> THE SCALAR CURVATURE is NONZERO
> .
> and in fact all 3 of these quantities are
> proportional to (da/dt)^2 which is about
> 5%/year for a growing child.
> Hammond realized that this is an –
> ENORMOUS SPACETIME CURVATURE
> by ordinary Relativity standards !
> A near BLACK HOLE size curvature!
> .
> The MAXIMA computer printout can be seen here:
> https://www.academia.edu/82105046/MAXIMA_curvature_calculation
> .
> Hence it turns out I have discovered the world's first
> Scientific Proof of God (SPOG) and that: –
> .
> GOD IS A (large) EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE
> OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME
> .
> .... Meanwhile, I had long since published the foundation of my theory
> in the peer reviewed literature: –
> .
> Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory
> New Ideas In Psychology, Vol 12(2) 153-167
> Elsevier Scientific Ltd. 1994
> .
> https://tinyurl.com/2wnrjht3
> .
> .
> Maybe you-all (on alt.philosophy.debate) should try suing Elsevier Scientific Ltd.
> who published my work – and
> who is the world's largest scientific publisher !!
> YOU'D LOOK PRETTY FUNNY TRYING !!
> .
> You (Jeffrey Rubard) have posted the same heckling comments to Matt Faunce
> whose IQ is twice yours
>
> Matt Faunce pointed out that my "Scientific Proof of God" is entirely
> supported by WILLIAM JAMES in his historic statement: –
> .
> [Matt Faunce posted to George Hammond on alt.philosophy.debate:]
> ...I think this quote by William James fits your theory.
>
> [William James wrote:]
> “[T]he theologian’s contention that the religious man is moved by an
> external power is vindicated, for it is one of the peculiarities of
> invasions from the subconscious region to take on objective appearances,
> and to suggest to the Subject an external control. In the religious life
> the control is felt as ‘higher’; but since on our hypothesis it is
> primarily the higher faculties of our own hidden mind which are
> controlling, the sense of union with the power beyond us is a sense of
> something, not merely apparently, but literally true.”
>
> –William James, in The Varieties of Religious Experience, Lecture XX,
> (paragraph 512).
> .
> .
> So you may not believe my theory – but WILLIAM JAMES certainly
> believed it – even though he couldn't prove it 120 years ago –
> but now HAMMOND has actually scientifically PROVED IT !!
> .
> GO FLY A KITE "JEFFREY RHUBARB"
> .
> George
..
..
[George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
..
..... Above I have written down my discovery of the GOD METRIC: –
..
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
..
And have cited its SIMPLE DERIVATION.
..
.... But as any Wag will tell you – it would take far more than
that to convince anyone that it was actually "God".
..
..... Well for those Skeptics let me inform you that
THERE IS A LOT MORE – and it comes from the 50 year
Global research in 20 languages of a 1,000 man Academic
Psychology Army, using desktop computers resulting in a
peer – published literature large enough to fill a major
library – and costing an estimated $50,000,000 !
........... AND THE RESULT OF THAT –
is superbly summarized, and entertainingly pedagogically
presented by ME in this now famous 10 minute YouTube
video: –
..

WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
........https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk
.................(YouTube 12-min)
..
..... SO YES – it turns out an intrepid physicist George Hammond
heading up an army of 1,000 PhD Psychologists has actually
DISCOVERED THE WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
..
And it turns out that: –
..
GOD IS AN EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME
..
And is currently measurable to a 2 decimal point accuracy in SI units!
..
Richard Dawkins: – you owe me a bottle of champagne !
..
George

George Hammond wrote:

> [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
> .... Above I have written down my discovery of the GOD METRIC: –
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | = THE METRIC OF GOD |o o a² o. |
> |ooo-1/a²|
> And have cited its SIMPLE DERIVATION.

what kind of tensor is that? That's not even a matrix, let alone a tensor.
You don't undrestand your tensors, my friend. Nor did Einstine, so you are
equal.

On Tuesday, November 8, 2022 at 12:50:20 PM UTC-5, Everly Segreti wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:
>
> > [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
> > .... Above I have written down my discovery of the GOD METRIC: –
> > |a² o o o. |
> > |o a² o o. | = THE METRIC OF GOD
> > |o o a² o. |
> > |ooo-1/a²|
> > And have cited its SIMPLE DERIVATION.
> >
> [Everly Segreti]
> what kind of tensor is that? That's not even a matrix, let alone a tensor..
> You don't undrestand your tensors, my friend. Nor did Einstine, so you are
> equal.
..
[George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
..... On a scale of (0–100) you get 80 POINTS for simply being responsible
enough to respond !! Most readers get a big fat goose egg = 0 !!
...
.... As all qualified physicists know, a 2nd rank tensor is commonly represented
as a matrix therefore g^uv the "metric tensor" of flat Cartesian space-time is commonly
represented as a 4 x 4 matrix: –
..
|1000..|
|0100. | = g^uv
|0010. |
|000-1 |
..
.... Likewise therefore it is correct for me to write the METRIC OF GOD as: –
..
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
..
George

George Hammond wrote:

> Hence it turns out I have discovered the world's first Scientific Proof
> of God (SPOG) and that: –
> GOD IS A (large) EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME

I would not be that sure. What on earth is a *subjective_spacetime*, as
different from *objective*?? ?

Western media praise Ukrainian Azov soldier known for promoting Nazism
http://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/EjWlgrHw0NUe/

Pentagon terrorists admit direct involvement in war in Ukraine
http://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/J8jktlZzc3YS/

American Instructors Train AFU To ＂Nato Standards＂ (How To Die Like
Cowards)
http://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/21OlRL7tvRA2/

AFU Racist Ukrainian Nazi's Beat Black American Mercenary On Their Own Side
http://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/sPw7rZKVyJ2x/

American tiktok brigade
http://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/yyYFis82zvjo/

The United States is giving Ukraine almost $2.5 million an hour,
http://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/L8vugAnuB30H/

Footage emerges of Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB) DETAINING 9
Ukrainian saboteurs
http://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/jeFPGiyEiLVG/

On Tuesday, November 8, 2022 at 3:19:57 PM UTC-5, Everly Segreti wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:
>
> > Hence it turns out I have discovered the world's first Scientific Proof
> > of God (SPOG) and that: –
> >
> > GOD IS A (large) EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME
>
>[Everly Segreti]
> I would not be that sure. What on earth is a *subjective_spacetime*, as
> different from *objective*?? ?
>
>
[George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
..
..... I am giving you another 20 points for simply being the
first person to actually ask: – "what is subjective spacetime"
I've talked to 10,000 people – and you're the first one to ask
THE MOST OBVIOUS QUESTION !!!! Maybe you're a genius !
Either that or a high-ranking authority !
..
OBJECTIVE of space-time is measured by CLOCKS and RULERS
and is the same for everyone irregardless of age.
..
SUBJECTIVE space-time varies drastically with age
for instance: – a 6 month old baby looks up at the
bottom of the kitchen table while an 18-year-old
standing nearby looks down at the top of the table!
..
The table looks (subjectively) at least 3 or 4 times larger
to the 6-month-old than it does to the 18-year-old !
..
Likewise, the speed of motion (any motion) looks
3 or 4 times faster to the 6-month-old than it does to
the 18-year-old because his perceptual speed is
likewise 3 or 4 times SLOWER than an adult.
This of course is again simply because GROWTH
and in this case, of brain growth..
..
This magnification factor (scale factor) is called a (t)
similar to FRIEDMANS famous 1922 "scale factor" for the
expansion of the universe.
..
In the "phenomenon of God" the scale factor a (t)
begins at 3.5 at birth and CONTRACTS down to 1.8
at age 18 to 20 years old.
..
So while the FRIEDMAN METRIC of astrophysics is: –
..
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE FRIEDMANN METRIC OF ASTROPHYSICS
|o o a² o. |
|o o o..-1.|
..
And the OBJECTIVE universe EXPANDS;
..
The metric of God is given by: –
..
a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
..
And the SUBJECTIVE universe CONTRACTS as we grow up !
..
..... This is all because "length" in SUBJECTIVE space-time
is measured by the size of your foot: – which varies with age.
..... And time is measured by your own "perceptual speed"
which likewise similarly varies with age under the age of 20 !
..
..... "God" comes into the picture because no one ever reaches
"full 100% growth": – the world population average for adults
is only around 85%: – which causes every adult to see a world
that is 15% LARGER and 15% FASTER than it actually (objectively)
is ! SOME MORE – SOME LESS (some people are closer to God
than others (elected officials, movie stars, CEOs, 5 star generals,
etc. etc.: –And this phenomenon is called "GOD"!
..
I hope this answers your question –
..
George