On Thursday, May 6, 2021 at 1:37:15 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> Michael Moroney <mor...@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote:
> > On 5/6/2021 8:15 AM, Ken Seto wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, May 5, 2021 at 10:26:43 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>>> An equation alone is not a theory. It is irrelevant what physicists call a theory.
> >
> >>> LOL.
> >>>
> >>> So what YOU say a theory is, is relevant. But not what a physicist says a
> >>> physics theory is.
> >>
> >> Idiot.....I added the cause of the interaction to the current definition for a theory.
> >
> > You can't add anything to the current definition of a theory. That is
> > for scientists (collectively) to do, not some nobody wannabe scientist.
> >
> >> That’s an improvement of the current theory.
> >
> > Not according to scientists.
> >
> >> It turns out that the cause of the interaction
> >> is the most important, it leads to a valid theory of everything. Live with it.
> >
> > Scientists don't care what you think is "most important". Live with it.
> >
> Ken’s whole bag is “I like science better if it does these things and
> doesn’t do those other things. So I’ll just say that’s what ‘new science’
> is and say it’s better because I like it better. And anybody who doesn’t
> like it, including scientists, can go suck a rock.”

Moron, it is the result that counts. Model Mechanics is a valid theory of TOE and current physics failed to do after 110 years of trying. Live with it..
>
> It’s a psychosis of a desperate and alienated old man.
>
> --
> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, May 6, 2021 at 1:37:15 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Michael Moroney <mor...@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote:
>>> On 5/6/2021 8:15 AM, Ken Seto wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, May 5, 2021 at 10:26:43 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> An equation alone is not a theory. It is irrelevant what physicists call a theory.
>>>
>>>>> LOL.
>>>>>
>>>>> So what YOU say a theory is, is relevant. But not what a physicist says a
>>>>> physics theory is.
>>>>
>>>> Idiot.....I added the cause of the interaction to the current definition for a theory.
>>>
>>> You can't add anything to the current definition of a theory. That is
>>> for scientists (collectively) to do, not some nobody wannabe scientist.
>>>
>>>> That’s an improvement of the current theory.
>>>
>>> Not according to scientists.
>>>
>>>> It turns out that the cause of the interaction
>>>> is the most important, it leads to a valid theory of everything. Live with it.
>>>
>>> Scientists don't care what you think is "most important". Live with it.
>>>
>> Ken’s whole bag is “I like science better if it does these things and
>> doesn’t do those other things. So I’ll just say that’s what ‘new science’
>> is and say it’s better because I like it better. And anybody who doesn’t
>> like it, including scientists, can go suck a rock.”
>
> Moron, it is the result that counts.

That’s right it is. The result in science that counts is adoption and usage
by other scientists. What the author thinks of it is not a result that
counts or means anything.

Think of it like a patent. A patent on an idea that nobody wants to use is
worthless, no matter how highly the inventor thought of it.

> Model Mechanics is a valid theory of TOE and current physics failed to do
> after 110 years of trying. Live with it.
>>
>> It’s a psychosis of a desperate and alienated old man.
>>
>> --
>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>

--
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

On Friday, 7 May 2021 at 00:34:26 UTC+2, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:

> That’s right it is. The result in science that counts is adoption and usage
> by other scientists.

And the idiot woodworker! Howgh!

On 5/6/2021 5:32 PM, Ken Seto wrote:
> On Thursday, May 6, 2021 at 1:37:15 PM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Michael Moroney <mor...@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote:

>>> Scientists don't care what you think is "most important". Live with it.
>>>
>> Ken’s whole bag is “I like science better if it does these things and
>> doesn’t do those other things. So I’ll just say that’s what ‘new science’
>> is and say it’s better because I like it better. And anybody who doesn’t
>> like it, including scientists, can go suck a rock.”
>
> Moron, it is the result that counts.

That's right. And your Muddle Mechanics' "results" are that it is a
complete, total, absolute failure.

> Model Mechanics is a valid theory of TOE

No, your Muddle Mechanics asserts falsely that it has a ToE. With no
evidence.

> and current physics failed to do after 110 years of trying. Live with it.

No time limit on physics, Stupid Ken.

On 5/6/2021 5:30 PM, Ken Seto wrote:
> On Thursday, May 6, 2021 at 12:53:53 PM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> On 5/6/2021 8:15 AM, Ken Seto wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, May 5, 2021 at 10:26:43 AM UTC-4, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> Ken Seto <seto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> An equation alone is not a theory. It is irrelevant what physicists call a theory.
>> k so....> >> LOL.
>>>>
>>>> So what YOU say a theory is, is relevant. But not what a physicist says a
>>>> physics theory is.
>>>
>>> Idiot.....I added the cause of the interact solve (-6)/ed canonic dauphin to the current definition for a theory.

?????

>> You can't add anything to the current definition of a theory. That is
>> for scientists (collectively) to do, not some nobody wannabe scientist.
>
> Idiot my way leads to a valid TOE. Current way failed to do so after 110 years of trying.

Assertions are not evidence of anything.
>
>>> That’s an improvement of the current theory.

>> Not according to scientists.
>
> So you represent all the scientists? I don’t think so.

It is YOU who thinks he gets to tell scientists to accept your nonsense
definition of a "theory". I am just telling you what science as a group
consider a valid theory.

> You and your moronic daughter can’t even solve (-6/-2).

You are *still* projecting your complete failure to be able to do any
math on us. I remind you yet again, that it is YOU who is a failure at
math, even trivial fourth grade math.

On Friday, 7 May 2021 at 16:13:07 UTC+2, Michael Moroney wrote:

> You are *still* projecting your complete failure to be able to do any
> math on us. I remind you yet again, that it is YOU who is a failure at
> math, even trivial fourth grade math.

Speaking of trivial fourth grade math, it's always good to
remind that your moronic cult had to assume it false,
as it didn't want to fit your madness.