Herpes boy evacuated from his brain:
> I expect everybody gets infected.

Thats not advisable, see this case:

Eram semper recta schrieb am Sonntag, 8. August 2021 um 23:56:13 UTC+2:
> Another rightwing scumbag bites the dust! Woohoo!
>
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/aug/08/rightwing-radio-host-dick-farrel-anti-vaxxer-dies-covid

What plays into such a death is possibly the age 60-70.
Some statistics ascribed higher probability of severe
Covid-19 to the elderly.

So **everbody** gets infected, is not possible I guess.
The probability is much lower for 50-60 or again much
lower for 40-50.

See also:
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm#SexAndAge

As a result vaccine is not the only measure. There
is stil the advise to wear masks and of social
distancing.

Hope this helps!

But the percentage of deaths due to covid,
around the usual deaths, which is 12%, is not
so interesting.

You should look at the probability of infected
dying, i.e. Infection Fatality Rate (IFR). This is
not that even distributed like the 12%.

Some Germany Data:
Estimating effective infection fatality rates
during the course of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany
https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-021-11127-7

Mostowski Collapse schrieb:
> Herpes boy evacuated from his brain:
> > I expect everybody gets infected.
>
> Thats not advisable, see this case:
>
> Eram semper recta schrieb am Sonntag, 8. August 2021 um 23:56:13 UTC+2:
> > Another rightwing scumbag bites the dust! Woohoo!
> >
> https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/aug/08/rightwing-radio-host-dick-farrel-anti-vaxxer-dies-covid
>
>
> What plays into such a death is possibly the age 60-70.
> Some statistics ascribed higher probability of severe
> Covid-19 to the elderly.
>
> So **everbody** gets infected, is not possible I guess.
> The probability is much lower for 50-60 or again much
> lower for 40-50.
>
> See also:
> https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm#SexAndAge
>
> As a result vaccine is not the only measure. There
> is stil the advise to wear masks and of social
> distancing.
>
> Hope this helps!

That IFR isn't 100% accounts also for something
herpes boy, possibly didn't understand. The
complement of IFR are those

that do not need vaccination, because they
were infected, built antibodies and survived.
Somehow they are not judged

Typhoid Mary
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Mallon

Mostowski Collapse schrieb:
>
> But the percentage of deaths due to covid,
> around the usual deaths, which is 12%, is not
> so interesting.
>
> You should look at the probability of infected
> dying, i.e. Infection Fatality Rate (IFR). This is
> not that even distributed like the 12%.
>
> Some Germany Data:
> Estimating effective infection fatality rates
> during the course of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany
> https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-021-11127-7
>
>
> Mostowski Collapse schrieb:
>> Herpes boy evacuated from his brain:
>>  > I expect everybody gets infected.
>>
>> Thats not advisable, see this case:
>>
>> Eram semper recta schrieb am Sonntag, 8. August 2021 um 23:56:13 UTC+2:
>>  > Another rightwing scumbag bites the dust! Woohoo!
>>  >
>> https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/aug/08/rightwing-radio-host-dick-farrel-anti-vaxxer-dies-covid
>>
>>
>> What plays into such a death is possibly the age 60-70.
>> Some statistics ascribed higher probability of severe
>> Covid-19 to the elderly.
>>
>> So **everbody** gets infected, is not possible I guess.
>> The probability is much lower for 50-60 or again much
>> lower for 40-50.
>>
>> See also:
>> https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm#SexAndAge
>>
>> As a result vaccine is not the only measure. There
>> is stil the advise to wear masks and of social
>> distancing.
>>
>> Hope this helps!
>

On Saturday, August 7, 2021 at 12:21:58 AM UTC+2, Eram semper recta wrote:
> >
> > Consider the following statements:
> >
> > i. "3 is less than 4"
> > ii. "3 is equal to 4"

i. In C and Python: "3 < 4"
ii. in C and Python: "3 == 4"

> > Now ask yourself, "Can I put an OR between them?" In other words, can you say:
> >
> > "3 is less than 4" OR "3 is equal to 4" ?

Yes, we can:

in C: "3 < 4 || 3 == 4"
im Python: "3 < 4 or 3 == 4"

On Sunday, August 8, 2021 at 4:51:18 PM UTC-7, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> That IFR isn't 100% accounts also for something
> herpes boy, possibly didn't understand. The
> complement of IFR are those
>
> that do not need vaccination, because they
> were infected, built antibodies and survived.
> Somehow they are not judged
>
> Typhoid Mary
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Mallon
>
> Mostowski Collapse schrieb:
> >
> > But the percentage of deaths due to covid,
> > around the usual deaths, which is 12%, is not
> > so interesting.
> >
> > You should look at the probability of infected
> > dying, i.e. Infection Fatality Rate (IFR). This is
> > not that even distributed like the 12%.
> >
> > Some Germany Data:
> > Estimating effective infection fatality rates
> > during the course of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany
> > https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-021-11127-7
> >
> >
> > Mostowski Collapse schrieb:
> >> Herpes boy evacuated from his brain:
> >> > I expect everybody gets infected.
> >>
> >> Thats not advisable, see this case:
> >>
> >> Eram semper recta schrieb am Sonntag, 8. August 2021 um 23:56:13 UTC+2:
> >> > Another rightwing scumbag bites the dust! Woohoo!
> >> >
> >> https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/aug/08/rightwing-radio-host-dick-farrel-anti-vaxxer-dies-covid
> >>
> >>
> >> What plays into such a death is possibly the age 60-70.
> >> Some statistics ascribed higher probability of severe
> >> Covid-19 to the elderly.
> >>
> >> So **everbody** gets infected, is not possible I guess.
> >> The probability is much lower for 50-60 or again much
> >> lower for 40-50.
> >>
> >> See also:
> >> https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm#SexAndAge
> >>
> >> As a result vaccine is not the only measure. There
> >> is stil the advise to wear masks and of social
> >> distancing.
> >>
> >> Hope this helps!
> >

That's ARDS not SARS.

I.e., 'mild SARS at least is not ARDS'.

(And it is not mild.)

On Sunday, August 8, 2021 at 5:30:48 PM UTC-7, Greg Cunt wrote:
> On Saturday, August 7, 2021 at 12:21:58 AM UTC+2, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > >
> > > Consider the following statements:
> > >
> > > i. "3 is less than 4"
> > > ii. "3 is equal to 4"
>
> i. In C and Python: "3 < 4"
> ii. in C and Python: "3 == 4"
>
> > > Now ask yourself, "Can I put an OR between them?" In other words, can you say:
> > >
> > > "3 is less than 4" OR "3 is equal to 4" ?
>
> Yes, we can:
>
> in C: "3 < 4 || 3 == 4"
> im Python: "3 < 4 or 3 == 4"

Hah but in SQL there's no assignment,
and the expression over constants is
written the same '='.

The expression a < b is a constraint,
on a and b, not just erased as constants,
which have their value and existence
regardless constraints.

In proofs it's mostly written "let a < b" (thus...)
not so much "if a < b", except for of
course matters of cases and the conditional.

I.e., that given a<b, that a<b has a truth value.

From the realm of numbers and logic....

On Sunday, August 8, 2021 at 4:24:55 PM UTC-7, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> Herpes boy evacuated from his brain:
> > I expect everybody gets infected.
> Thats not advisable, see this case:
> Eram semper recta schrieb am Sonntag, 8. August 2021 um 23:56:13 UTC+2:
> > Another rightwing scumbag bites the dust! Woohoo!
> >
> https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/aug/08/rightwing-radio-host-dick-farrel-anti-vaxxer-dies-covid
> What plays into such a death is possibly the age 60-70.
> Some statistics ascribed higher probability of severe
> Covid-19 to the elderly.
>
> So **everbody** gets infected, is not possible I guess.
> The probability is much lower for 50-60 or again much
> lower for 40-50.
>
> See also:
> https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm#SexAndAge
>
> As a result vaccine is not the only measure. There
> is stil the advise to wear masks and of social
> distancing.
>
> Hope this helps!

Also, ..., Burse, when I say "I expect" I mean "I'd gather"
not "I wish", Burse.

söndag 8 augusti 2021 kl. 13:56:38 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Sunday, 8 August 2021 at 07:55:58 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > On Sunday, 8 August 2021 at 07:45:31 UTC-4, Swiss Idiot Jan Burse aka Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> > > Nope, they are not self destroying messages, that
> > > destroy themselves while reading.
> > >
> > Nobody cares about wikipedia moronica. Most of the crap written there is unreliable - especially in the math articles.
> No source that claims 0.999... and 1 are the same thing has any credibility whatsoever.

They do because it is a basic mathematical fact

Herpes boy got into a lot of trouble explaing:
> Also, ..., when I say "I expect" I mean "I'd gather" not "I wish".

Doesn't make any sense. A vaccine exactly does simulate
an infection. So that antigen is expressed and then over
time an antibody memory can be formed.

When you say "I expect everybody gets infected.", then
you gather that everybody gets infected by the virus,
and not by some mRNA vaccine.

Which doesn't make any sense, since statistically
a percentage of those vaccinated, do not get infected
by the virus anymore.

Because they already have antibodies. Infected
means viruses can enter the cell and replicated
in created numner. If you have

an antibody defense outside of the cell, the idea
is that this antibody defense preemptively catches
the virus and bars it from entering cells.

The antibodies are homoral.

Ross A. Finlayson schrieb am Montag, 9. August 2021 um 03:03:03 UTC+2:
> On Sunday, August 8, 2021 at 4:24:55 PM UTC-7, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> > Herpes boy evacuated from his brain:
> > > I expect everybody gets infected.
> > Thats not advisable, see this case:
> > Eram semper recta schrieb am Sonntag, 8. August 2021 um 23:56:13 UTC+2:
> > > Another rightwing scumbag bites the dust! Woohoo!
> > >
> > https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/aug/08/rightwing-radio-host-dick-farrel-anti-vaxxer-dies-covid
> > What plays into such a death is possibly the age 60-70.
> > Some statistics ascribed higher probability of severe
> > Covid-19 to the elderly.
> >
> > So **everbody** gets infected, is not possible I guess.
> > The probability is much lower for 50-60 or again much
> > lower for 40-50.
> >
> > See also:
> > https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm#SexAndAge
> >
> > As a result vaccine is not the only measure. There
> > is stil the advise to wear masks and of social
> > distancing.
> >
> > Hope this helps!
> Also, ..., Burse, when I say "I expect" I mean "I'd gather"
> not "I wish", Burse.

Your gathering is therefore a wish, since it is counterfactual.
It would be only not counterfactual if such reports were
fake news or misrepresentations of the vaccine:

"Separately, this week the company Moderna announced early
results from a trial of its coronavirus vaccine candidate: eight
individuals who have received the vaccine produced antibodies
to the virus at levels similar to those of people who had the disease."
https://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/63104-early-coronavirus-immunity-data-fuel-promise-for-a-vaccine

What is your evidence that Scientific American was lying?
Or do you have a new theory of infection by SQL statements,
where = is equality and not assignment?

Because of your Sweep theory of real numbers?

LMAO!

Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Montag, 9. August 2021 um 13:18:42 UTC+2:
> Herpes boy got into a lot of trouble explaing:
> > Also, ..., when I say "I expect" I mean "I'd gather" not "I wish".
>
> Doesn't make any sense. A vaccine exactly does simulate
> an infection. So that antigen is expressed and then over
> time an antibody memory can be formed.
>
> When you say "I expect everybody gets infected.", then
> you gather that everybody gets infected by the virus,
> and not by some mRNA vaccine.
>
> Which doesn't make any sense, since statistically
> a percentage of those vaccinated, do not get infected
> by the virus anymore.
>
> Because they already have antibodies. Infected
> means viruses can enter the cell and replicated
> in created numner. If you have
>
> an antibody defense outside of the cell, the idea
> is that this antibody defense preemptively catches
> the virus and bars it from entering cells.
>
> The antibodies are homoral.
> Ross A. Finlayson schrieb am Montag, 9. August 2021 um 03:03:03 UTC+2:
> > On Sunday, August 8, 2021 at 4:24:55 PM UTC-7, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> > > Herpes boy evacuated from his brain:
> > > > I expect everybody gets infected.
> > > Thats not advisable, see this case:
> > > Eram semper recta schrieb am Sonntag, 8. August 2021 um 23:56:13 UTC+2:
> > > > Another rightwing scumbag bites the dust! Woohoo!
> > > >
> > > https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/aug/08/rightwing-radio-host-dick-farrel-anti-vaxxer-dies-covid
> > > What plays into such a death is possibly the age 60-70.
> > > Some statistics ascribed higher probability of severe
> > > Covid-19 to the elderly.
> > >
> > > So **everbody** gets infected, is not possible I guess.
> > > The probability is much lower for 50-60 or again much
> > > lower for 40-50.
> > >
> > > See also:
> > > https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm#SexAndAge
> > >
> > > As a result vaccine is not the only measure. There
> > > is stil the advise to wear masks and of social
> > > distancing.
> > >
> > > Hope this helps!
> > Also, ..., Burse, when I say "I expect" I mean "I'd gather"
> > not "I wish", Burse.

The only uncertainty is how long these antibodies
last, and how a refresh is done. And whether heard
immunity can be archived sooner or later.

Heard immunity is difficult. Even if a country gets
heard immunity, yet another country can import
the virus again. So there might be an infinite

circulation of the virus in the future.

But this infinite circulation again doesn't mean that
everybody gets infected. Because people die, and
babies are born. There are such models, like here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compartmental_models_in_epidemiology#The_MSIR_model

Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Montag, 9. August 2021 um 13:22:33 UTC+2:
> Your gathering is therefore a wish, since it is counterfactual.
> It would be only not counterfactual if such reports were
> fake news or misrepresentations of the vaccine:
> "Separately, this week the company Moderna announced early
> results from a trial of its coronavirus vaccine candidate: eight
> individuals who have received the vaccine produced antibodies
> to the virus at levels similar to those of people who had the disease."
> https://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/63104-early-coronavirus-immunity-data-fuel-promise-for-a-vaccine
>
> What is your evidence that Scientific American was lying?
> Or do you have a new theory of infection by SQL statements,
> where = is equality and not assignment?
>
> Because of your Sweep theory of real numbers?
>
> LMAO!
> Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Montag, 9. August 2021 um 13:18:42 UTC+2:
> > Herpes boy got into a lot of trouble explaing:
> > > Also, ..., when I say "I expect" I mean "I'd gather" not "I wish".
> >
> > Doesn't make any sense. A vaccine exactly does simulate
> > an infection. So that antigen is expressed and then over
> > time an antibody memory can be formed.
> >
> > When you say "I expect everybody gets infected.", then
> > you gather that everybody gets infected by the virus,
> > and not by some mRNA vaccine.
> >
> > Which doesn't make any sense, since statistically
> > a percentage of those vaccinated, do not get infected
> > by the virus anymore.
> >
> > Because they already have antibodies. Infected
> > means viruses can enter the cell and replicated
> > in created numner. If you have
> >
> > an antibody defense outside of the cell, the idea
> > is that this antibody defense preemptively catches
> > the virus and bars it from entering cells.
> >
> > The antibodies are homoral.
> > Ross A. Finlayson schrieb am Montag, 9. August 2021 um 03:03:03 UTC+2:
> > > On Sunday, August 8, 2021 at 4:24:55 PM UTC-7, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> > > > Herpes boy evacuated from his brain:
> > > > > I expect everybody gets infected.
> > > > Thats not advisable, see this case:
> > > > Eram semper recta schrieb am Sonntag, 8. August 2021 um 23:56:13 UTC+2:
> > > > > Another rightwing scumbag bites the dust! Woohoo!
> > > > >
> > > > https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/aug/08/rightwing-radio-host-dick-farrel-anti-vaxxer-dies-covid
> > > > What plays into such a death is possibly the age 60-70.
> > > > Some statistics ascribed higher probability of severe
> > > > Covid-19 to the elderly.
> > > >
> > > > So **everbody** gets infected, is not possible I guess.
> > > > The probability is much lower for 50-60 or again much
> > > > lower for 40-50.
> > > >
> > > > See also:
> > > > https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm#SexAndAge
> > > >
> > > > As a result vaccine is not the only measure. There
> > > > is stil the advise to wear masks and of social
> > > > distancing.
> > > >
> > > > Hope this helps!
> > > Also, ..., Burse, when I say "I expect" I mean "I'd gather"
> > > not "I wish", Burse.

To say gather or expect in science is often wrong,
because of the many uncertainties attached. Even
if you have a model, the outcome can be

non-deterministic, small butterfly effects changing
the output dramatically. So what one can usually say
this and that might be possible,

but gather and expect. Ha Ha, good one. If gather
and expect were possible, you could overtake
Berkshire Hathaway I guess. LoL

Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Montag, 9. August 2021 um 13:32:53 UTC+2:
> The only uncertainty is how long these antibodies
> last, and how a refresh is done. And whether heard
> immunity can be archived sooner or later.
>
> Heard immunity is difficult. Even if a country gets
> heard immunity, yet another country can import
> the virus again. So there might be an infinite
>
> circulation of the virus in the future.
>
> But this infinite circulation again doesn't mean that
> everybody gets infected. Because people die, and
> babies are born. There are such models, like here:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compartmental_models_in_epidemiology#The_MSIR_model
> Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Montag, 9. August 2021 um 13:22:33 UTC+2:
> > Your gathering is therefore a wish, since it is counterfactual.
> > It would be only not counterfactual if such reports were
> > fake news or misrepresentations of the vaccine:
> > "Separately, this week the company Moderna announced early
> > results from a trial of its coronavirus vaccine candidate: eight
> > individuals who have received the vaccine produced antibodies
> > to the virus at levels similar to those of people who had the disease."
> > https://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/63104-early-coronavirus-immunity-data-fuel-promise-for-a-vaccine
> >
> > What is your evidence that Scientific American was lying?
> > Or do you have a new theory of infection by SQL statements,
> > where = is equality and not assignment?
> >
> > Because of your Sweep theory of real numbers?
> >
> > LMAO!
> > Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Montag, 9. August 2021 um 13:18:42 UTC+2:
> > > Herpes boy got into a lot of trouble explaing:
> > > > Also, ..., when I say "I expect" I mean "I'd gather" not "I wish".
> > >
> > > Doesn't make any sense. A vaccine exactly does simulate
> > > an infection. So that antigen is expressed and then over
> > > time an antibody memory can be formed.
> > >
> > > When you say "I expect everybody gets infected.", then
> > > you gather that everybody gets infected by the virus,
> > > and not by some mRNA vaccine.
> > >
> > > Which doesn't make any sense, since statistically
> > > a percentage of those vaccinated, do not get infected
> > > by the virus anymore.
> > >
> > > Because they already have antibodies. Infected
> > > means viruses can enter the cell and replicated
> > > in created numner. If you have
> > >
> > > an antibody defense outside of the cell, the idea
> > > is that this antibody defense preemptively catches
> > > the virus and bars it from entering cells.
> > >
> > > The antibodies are homoral.
> > > Ross A. Finlayson schrieb am Montag, 9. August 2021 um 03:03:03 UTC+2:
> > > > On Sunday, August 8, 2021 at 4:24:55 PM UTC-7, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> > > > > Herpes boy evacuated from his brain:
> > > > > > I expect everybody gets infected.
> > > > > Thats not advisable, see this case:
> > > > > Eram semper recta schrieb am Sonntag, 8. August 2021 um 23:56:13 UTC+2:
> > > > > > Another rightwing scumbag bites the dust! Woohoo!
> > > > > >
> > > > > https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/aug/08/rightwing-radio-host-dick-farrel-anti-vaxxer-dies-covid
> > > > > What plays into such a death is possibly the age 60-70.
> > > > > Some statistics ascribed higher probability of severe
> > > > > Covid-19 to the elderly.
> > > > >
> > > > > So **everbody** gets infected, is not possible I guess.
> > > > > The probability is much lower for 50-60 or again much
> > > > > lower for 40-50.
> > > > >
> > > > > See also:
> > > > > https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm#SexAndAge
> > > > >
> > > > > As a result vaccine is not the only measure. There
> > > > > is stil the advise to wear masks and of social
> > > > > distancing.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hope this helps!
> > > > Also, ..., Burse, when I say "I expect" I mean "I'd gather"
> > > > not "I wish", Burse.

Corr.:
Heard immunity is difficult. Even if a country gets
heard immunity, and can dim out the virus, months
later another country can export the virus again.

It does not have to be a mutation. If antibody immunity
lasts only a few months, even a 100% vaccinated
community will have a herd immunity expiration date.

As a result long term herd immunity is quite a challenge
in the modern connected world, where everybody
can travel around the globe. This makes the comming

winter interesting, since people got vaccinated in spring.

LoL

Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Montag, 9. August 2021 um 13:32:53 UTC+2:
> The only uncertainty is how long these antibodies
> last, and how a refresh is done. And whether heard
> immunity can be archived sooner or later.
>
> Heard immunity is difficult. Even if a country gets
> heard immunity, yet another country can import
> the virus again. So there might be an infinite
>
> circulation of the virus in the future.
>
> But this infinite circulation again doesn't mean that
> everybody gets infected. Because people die, and
> babies are born. There are such models, like here:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compartmental_models_in_epidemiology#The_MSIR_model
> Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Montag, 9. August 2021 um 13:22:33 UTC+2:
> > Your gathering is therefore a wish, since it is counterfactual.
> > It would be only not counterfactual if such reports were
> > fake news or misrepresentations of the vaccine:
> > "Separately, this week the company Moderna announced early
> > results from a trial of its coronavirus vaccine candidate: eight
> > individuals who have received the vaccine produced antibodies
> > to the virus at levels similar to those of people who had the disease."
> > https://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/63104-early-coronavirus-immunity-data-fuel-promise-for-a-vaccine
> >
> > What is your evidence that Scientific American was lying?
> > Or do you have a new theory of infection by SQL statements,
> > where = is equality and not assignment?
> >
> > Because of your Sweep theory of real numbers?
> >
> > LMAO!
> > Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Montag, 9. August 2021 um 13:18:42 UTC+2:
> > > Herpes boy got into a lot of trouble explaing:
> > > > Also, ..., when I say "I expect" I mean "I'd gather" not "I wish".
> > >
> > > Doesn't make any sense. A vaccine exactly does simulate
> > > an infection. So that antigen is expressed and then over
> > > time an antibody memory can be formed.
> > >
> > > When you say "I expect everybody gets infected.", then
> > > you gather that everybody gets infected by the virus,
> > > and not by some mRNA vaccine.
> > >
> > > Which doesn't make any sense, since statistically
> > > a percentage of those vaccinated, do not get infected
> > > by the virus anymore.
> > >
> > > Because they already have antibodies. Infected
> > > means viruses can enter the cell and replicated
> > > in created numner. If you have
> > >
> > > an antibody defense outside of the cell, the idea
> > > is that this antibody defense preemptively catches
> > > the virus and bars it from entering cells.
> > >
> > > The antibodies are homoral.
> > > Ross A. Finlayson schrieb am Montag, 9. August 2021 um 03:03:03 UTC+2:
> > > > On Sunday, August 8, 2021 at 4:24:55 PM UTC-7, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> > > > > Herpes boy evacuated from his brain:
> > > > > > I expect everybody gets infected.
> > > > > Thats not advisable, see this case:
> > > > > Eram semper recta schrieb am Sonntag, 8. August 2021 um 23:56:13 UTC+2:
> > > > > > Another rightwing scumbag bites the dust! Woohoo!
> > > > > >
> > > > > https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/aug/08/rightwing-radio-host-dick-farrel-anti-vaxxer-dies-covid
> > > > > What plays into such a death is possibly the age 60-70.
> > > > > Some statistics ascribed higher probability of severe
> > > > > Covid-19 to the elderly.
> > > > >
> > > > > So **everbody** gets infected, is not possible I guess.
> > > > > The probability is much lower for 50-60 or again much
> > > > > lower for 40-50.
> > > > >
> > > > > See also:
> > > > > https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm#SexAndAge
> > > > >
> > > > > As a result vaccine is not the only measure. There
> > > > > is stil the advise to wear masks and of social
> > > > > distancing.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hope this helps!
> > > > Also, ..., Burse, when I say "I expect" I mean "I'd gather"
> > > > not "I wish", Burse.

On Monday, 9 August 2021 at 06:27:55 UTC-4, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> söndag 8 augusti 2021 kl. 13:56:38 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Sunday, 8 August 2021 at 07:55:58 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > On Sunday, 8 August 2021 at 07:45:31 UTC-4, Swiss Idiot Jan Burse aka Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> > > > Nope, they are not self destroying messages, that
> > > > destroy themselves while reading.
> > > >
> > > Nobody cares about wikipedia moronica. Most of the crap written there is unreliable - especially in the math articles.
> > No source that claims 0.999... and 1 are the same thing has any credibility whatsoever.
>
> They do because it is a basic mathematical fact

It has nothing in common with FACT, but it reveals a lot about incorrigible mainstream math academic ignorance and stupidity:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/12oUJAfIMFMcXFb8DvgsYxuPfdaB99XYH