Permanently banning Kibo Parry M from sci.math & sci.physics// And the sacking of Dr. Panchanathan from NSF if found responsible for paying Kibo to stalk Usenet.
>
> Examples of latest odious stalks by Kibo Parry M.
> > ☠️ Dr. Panchanathan of NSF of Math and 🕱 of Physics USA dept of Educ "anti math"
> On Friday, September 3, 2021 at 6:47:20 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> AP writes: AP puts every one of Kibo Parry M. stalker posts through the paper shredder and this is what comes out--
>
> > ☠️ Dr. Panchanathan of NSF of Math and 🕱 of Physics USA dept of Educ "anti math"
> >National Science Foundation> fails at math and science:
> >
> > Fuckdog block spammer of "Dr. Panchanathan" is likely mentally ill
> > I recommend banning him and his diseased cats from ever
> > posting to sci.math & sci.physics //SCI.MATH FAQ
> >
> > Unfortunately, NSF and USA dept of Educ doesn't give a f about their Google Groups
> > interface, so that will never happen.
> >
> > Everything you post is a mess.
>
> Is NSF and USA dept of Educ ruining sci.math and sci.physics with their paying a $100 per post to a insane nonstop 28 year stalker of Kibo Parry M. Evidence suggests this is true.
>
> Evidence in favor of Kibo Parry M. paid $100 per stalker attack posts by USA govt.
>
>
> ---quoting Wikipedia ---
> Controversy
> Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
> --- end quote ---
>
> NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
>
> Dr. Panchanathan , present day
> France Anne Cordova
> Subra Suresh
> Arden Lee Bement Jr.
> Rita R. Colwell
> Neal Francis Lane
> John Howard Gibbons 1993
>
> Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
> Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
>
>
> Evidence that Kibo Parry M. never belonged in sci.math or sci.physics because he is total worthless failure of science.
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
>
> Can someone in the Boston area make sure this numbskull is never a science teacher in Boston-- and the damage he can do to a classroom.
>
> Mike Moroney, science failure-- on geothermal
>
>
> (1)
> On Monday, May 9, 2016 at 12:15:22 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> >
> > There are some places here that use "geothermal" for heating and cooling
> > but even these are solar power in disguise. They pump water from wells
> > from where the temperature is the average over many years and extract heat
> > from it (in the winter) and dump heat into it (in the summer) and pump the
> > water back into the ground. The water is about 55F out of the ground.
>
>
>
> (2)
> On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 1:31:27 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> >
> > >Just as a point of order, what you described is not geothermal. What
> > >you've just described is thermal balancing with water, using water
> > >cooler than air from the water table to cool a building in the summer,
> > >and using water warmer than air from the water table to warm a building
> > >in the winter.
> >
> > In other words, glorified solar energy. Solar energy stored and averaged
> > out over many, many years.
> >
>
> (3)
> On Friday, December 23, 2016 at 8:44:12 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> >
> > Admit it, you were fooled by a "This Old House" type show where they
> > use a high-tech sounding buzzword to impress people who don't know any
> > better.
> >
> > Just answer one question, if you can. If it's really geothermal, why
> > is the temperature only 51 degrees, but in Iceland, where there's real
> > geothermal, they're accessing temperatures of hundreds of degrees?
>
>
> (4)
> > On Friday, December 23, 2016 at 10:40:09 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Pretty cool, fossil solar energy! 51 degrees, the average of summer and
> > > winter temperatures for hundreds or even thousands of years, depending
> > > on how deep they go.
> > >
> > > Too bad you do have to use real energy to run the heat pump, although it
> > > is much better than simply using that energy to make heat.
> >
>
> (5)
> On Tuesday, September 19, 2017 at 12:30:56 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> >
> > It's amusing how he can't handle that at all. Just like he can't
> > handle the concept of permafrost when he goes off on geothermal
> > energy. All he can do is attack.
>
> (6)
>
>
> On Saturday, October 14, 2017 at 12:21:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> > geothermal heat energy is 99% from the sun where he was (unsure where,
> > Mass. I think)
> >
> > Now tell us where Permafrost comes from.
> >
> > p.p.s. I was searching because I am actually looking into getting
> > geothermal heat. Fossil solar energy is a great resource!
>
>
> (7)
> On Sunday, January 3, 2021 at 11:25:58 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > >And my geothermal house works on sunshine collected in the day,
> >
> > Not quite. Sunshine (more specifically ambient heat) collected over
> > hundreds or thousands of years. Constant 50 degrees F/10 C down the hole.
> > No significant geological activity here since the Jurassic and not deep
> > enough to get to the actual heat of the earth.

> ☠️ NSF Dr. Panchanathan of Math and 🕱 of Physics "anti science"
On Friday, September 3, 2021 at 6:48:45 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> ☠️ NSF Dr. Panchanathan of Math and 🕱 of Physics "anti science"
> NSF and USA dept Educ > fails at math and science:
>
> Fuckdog block spammer of NSF Dr. Panchanathan who is likely paying for Kibo Parry M 28 year nonstop stalking in sci.math and sci.physics

AP no longer tolerates a 28 year nonstop insane stalker like Kibo Parry M. and shoves the shit he dishes out right back into his mouth.

>🃏 Brian Stone of Physics 🤡 NSF Dorothy E Aronson of Math "Court Jester of Physics"
> NSF Dr. Panchanathan > fails at math and science:

SAYS the 28 year nonstop paid for stalker Kibo Parry M.

On Thursday, September 9, 2021 at 10:22:24 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 🧟‍♂️ Vernon D. Ross of Math and 👻 Lloyd Whitman of Physics

> 🧛🏻‍♂️ John J. Veysey of Math and 👻 Scott Stanley of Physics "math hater"
On Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 7:37:43 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 🧛🏻‍♂️ John J. Veysey of Math and 👻 Scott Stanley of Physics "math hater"
>John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley > tarded:

AP writes: 28 year long nonstop paid for stalker Kibo Parry Moroney has a hard time of keeping up with the treadmill of AP's paper shredder that spits out the Kibo spam in regurgitated milk form. Hope there is enough cream in the milk for NSF.

Is Dr. Panchanathan NSF paying Kibo Parry M. a $100. per stalker spam post he emits? Making kibo richer than all college professors actually teaching math in classrooms.

>🃏 Brian Stone of Physics 🤡 NSF Dorothy E Aronson of Math "Court Jester of Physics"
> NSF Dr. Panchanathan > fails at math and science:

On Sunday, September 5, 2021 at 10:34:19 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 🤡 NSF Dorothy E Aronson of Math and 🃏 Brian Stone of Physics "Court Jester of Physics"
> NSF Dr. Panchanathan > fails at math and science:

> 💀 F. Fleming Crim of Math and ☠️ Dr. Panchanathan of Physics "Putin's Stooge"
On Saturday, September 4, 2021 at 8:51:26 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 💀 F. Fleming Crim of Math and ☠️ Dr. Panchanathan of Physics "Putin's Stooge"
> Brian Stone> blithered:

NSF fraud waste abuse of taxpayer money $100 per stalker post-- Champagne,Hewitt,Crago
On Saturday, July 31, 2021 at 2:17:31 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim

NSF fraud waste abuse of taxpayer money $100 per stalker post--

Canada's NSF-- Francois-Philippe Champagne, Ted Hewitt, Martha Crago, Frederic Bouchard, Cinthia Duclos, Normand Labrie
USA--NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Ulvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley

---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---

AP writes: AP no longer tolerates endless stalker spam and runs them through a shredder of their vicious content and reposts them, so that the people responsible for hiring a stalker can taste their own fruit.

> Sacking Dr. Panchanathan of NSF of Math and 🕱 of Physics USA dept of Educ "anti math"
> On Friday, September 3, 2021 at 6:47:20 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> AP writes: AP puts every one of Kibo Parry M. stalker posts through the paper shredder and this is what comes out--
>
> > ☠️ Dr. Panchanathan of NSF of Math and 🕱 of Physics USA dept of Educ "anti math"
> >National Science Foundation> fails at math and science:
> >
> > Fuckdog block spammer of "Dr. Panchanathan" is likely mentally ill
> > I recommend banning him and his diseased cats from ever
> > posting to sci.math & sci.physics //SCI.MATH FAQ
> >
> > Unfortunately, NSF and USA dept of Educ doesn't give a f about their Google Groups
> > interface, so that will never happen.
> >
> > Everything you post is a mess.
>
> Is NSF and USA dept of Educ ruining sci.math and sci.physics with their paying a $100 per post to a insane nonstop 28 year stalker of Kibo Parry M. Evidence suggests this is true.
>
> Evidence in favor of Kibo Parry M. paid $100 per stalker attack posts by USA govt.
>
>
> ---quoting Wikipedia ---
> Controversy
> Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
> --- end quote ---
>
> NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
>
> Dr. Panchanathan , present day
> France Anne Cordova
> Subra Suresh
> Arden Lee Bement Jr.
> Rita R. Colwell
> Neal Francis Lane
> John Howard Gibbons 1993
>
> Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
> Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
>
>
> Evidence that Kibo Parry M. never belonged in sci.math or sci.physics because he is total worthless failure of science.
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
>
> Can someone in the Boston area make sure this numbskull is never a science teacher in Boston-- and the damage he can do to a classroom.
>
> Mike Moroney, science failure-- on geothermal
>
>
> (1)
> On Monday, May 9, 2016 at 12:15:22 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> >
> > There are some places here that use "geothermal" for heating and cooling
> > but even these are solar power in disguise. They pump water from wells
> > from where the temperature is the average over many years and extract heat
> > from it (in the winter) and dump heat into it (in the summer) and pump the
> > water back into the ground. The water is about 55F out of the ground.
>
>
>
> (2)
> On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 1:31:27 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> >
> > >Just as a point of order, what you described is not geothermal. What
> > >you've just described is thermal balancing with water, using water
> > >cooler than air from the water table to cool a building in the summer,
> > >and using water warmer than air from the water table to warm a building
> > >in the winter.
> >
> > In other words, glorified solar energy. Solar energy stored and averaged
> > out over many, many years.
> >
>
> (3)
> On Friday, December 23, 2016 at 8:44:12 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> >
> > Admit it, you were fooled by a "This Old House" type show where they
> > use a high-tech sounding buzzword to impress people who don't know any
> > better.
> >
> > Just answer one question, if you can. If it's really geothermal, why
> > is the temperature only 51 degrees, but in Iceland, where there's real
> > geothermal, they're accessing temperatures of hundreds of degrees?
>
>
> (4)
> > On Friday, December 23, 2016 at 10:40:09 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Pretty cool, fossil solar energy! 51 degrees, the average of summer and
> > > winter temperatures for hundreds or even thousands of years, depending
> > > on how deep they go.
> > >
> > > Too bad you do have to use real energy to run the heat pump, although it
> > > is much better than simply using that energy to make heat.
> >
>
> (5)
> On Tuesday, September 19, 2017 at 12:30:56 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> >
> > It's amusing how he can't handle that at all. Just like he can't
> > handle the concept of permafrost when he goes off on geothermal
> > energy. All he can do is attack.
>
> (6)
>
>
> On Saturday, October 14, 2017 at 12:21:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> > geothermal heat energy is 99% from the sun where he was (unsure where,
> > Mass. I think)
> >
> > Now tell us where Permafrost comes from.
> >
> > p.p.s. I was searching because I am actually looking into getting
> > geothermal heat. Fossil solar energy is a great resource!
>
>
> (7)
> On Sunday, January 3, 2021 at 11:25:58 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > >And my geothermal house works on sunshine collected in the day,
> >
> > Not quite. Sunshine (more specifically ambient heat) collected over
> > hundreds or thousands of years. Constant 50 degrees F/10 C down the hole.
> > No significant geological activity here since the Jurassic and not deep
> > enough to get to the actual heat of the earth.

On Sunday, September 26, 2021 at 10:46:41 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Dear Infamous Crank Rectum Breath (aka John Gabriel).
> Nobody cares what you think. You are a nobody who has accomplished zero.
> You're very annoying but harmless.
> The reason others respond to you is due to the fact that interacting
> with cranks such as yourself can be quite entertaining.
> As for you, well, you've earned your title: INFAMOUS CRANK OF SCI.MATH

AP writes: other esteemed work by Rensselaer Polytech Univ of Kibo Parry M.

Re: 5) AP's 174th book// Mathopedia-- Listing of 67 fakes and mistakes of Old Math. Last revision was 8JUN2021. Under-Construction: AP recently is reinventing Multivariable Calculus, and will end up throwing out Old Math's Gradient theorem, Green's
by
Michael Moroney
Jun 17, 2021, 11:57 AM

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney stalks "AnalButtfuckManure Attacks" Dartmouth's Philip J. Hanlon, Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne with his 10 OR 6 = 16; his ellipse a conic when it never was; his proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth..
1481 views
by Professor Wordsmith Aug 14, 2020, 11:07:05 AM

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP with his incited hatred of 28 years stalking
148th published book Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1
Jun 16, 2021, 12:09 AM
by
Graham Cooper

Re: 1- Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP, with his inciting hatred of 28 years stalking leading to Violence
Mutt Buncher Re: 3- Kibo Parry Moroney says Dr. Tao, Hales, Stillwell, Wiles, educators
Jun 16, 2021
by
Efftard K. Donglemeier

Re: l) AP's 175th book//Physicsopedia-- Listing of 125 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics. New entrees under construction: AP is reinventing Multivariable Calculus so that AP throws on the trash pile the Green's theorem, Gradient theorem, Stokes
by Michael Moroney Jun 13, 2021, 4:47:35 PM

Kibo Parry M why is Rensselaer David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, CCP Stooge and "spamming shithead" as your title says?
On Sunday, October 24, 2021 at 12:36:19 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "The CCP's Stooge"

Insane Kibo Parry M leashing out at Kristin Bennett, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw and Rensselaer Polytech for failing math and science with kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945. Kibo, is it insanity that makes you fail, kibo?

On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 8:27:14 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "math hater"
On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 8:11:32 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"antiscience"

Kibo Parry M. opinion of Rensselaer Polytech where Kibo learned 938 is 12% short of 945 Re: "spamming shithead" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 8:22:09 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"physics hater"

Kibo Parry M fails math Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw as witness, and Kibo invents "analbuttfuckmanure" leashing out at Rensselaer Polytech for his science failureship of kibo Parry M.

On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 8:21:33 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> fails at math and science:

Psst, Kibo Parry you insane stalker, 938 is short of 945 by less than 1%, not your 12% short.

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon..
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

Kibo Parry M on Rensselaer failures Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
> Re: 2.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to math percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang

On Thursday, June 27, 2019 at 8:40:35 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Math Minnow

Moroney and Rensselaer Polytech Institute fail at High School Math, High School Logic// both teach Ellipse is a conic when it never was// teach 10 OR 4 = 14 when even the village idiot knows 10 AND 4=14 // never have a geometry proof of Calculus

kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin,, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic and real proton is 840MeV not 938

kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_Peter Persans, Moussa N'Gom, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938

kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938

kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938

kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938

kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_William Siegmann,Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang

Rensselaer math department
Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann

On Friday, June 7, 2019 at 12:13:14 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Physics minnow
> WARNING TO ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING STUDENTS:

> Kibo Parry M on Rensselaer failures Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
> Re: 2.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to math percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
> On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 11:34:20 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >Failure
>
>
> Is Kibo Parry M. the largest taxpayer fraud waste and abuse in Usenet history, paid $100 per stalker post by NSF and dept Educ Dr. Panchanathan??????????
>
> On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 6:15:27 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 6:24:20 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> >blithered:
> On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > "FireD your ass"
>
> snip the threats of violence kibo so many times posted
>
> AP writes: Kibo Parry M. is NSF Dr. Panchanathan and USA dept Educ going to pay you $100. for that post?? If so, then Barry Shein's World std must be a goldmine of USA taxpayer fraud waste and abuse. Just posting abusive stalker defaming spam for 28 years now. No wonder Kibo keeps defaming and stalking; many people would gladly defame and stalk at $100. a post.
>
> Re: The Gabriel Polynomial- an advanced stealing and stolen item from Archimedes Plutonium and his book//
> by Michael Moroney Sep 27, 2021, 1:16 AM
>
> Re: 1-Did Kibo-Parry-Maroney fail Rensselaer or was kicked out due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938, the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole
> by Roy Masters Sep 13, 2019, 3:24:07 PM
>
> Re: 1.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Maroney fail Rensselaer or was kicked out due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938, the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole
> by Patricio J. Whackmember Sep 13, 2019, 5:43:28 PM
>
> Re: 1.9-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Korniss,Toh-Ming Lu,Martin
> By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:57:15 AM
>
> Re: 2.0-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Michael,Newberg,N'Gom
> By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:57 AM
>
> Re: 2.1-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Persans,Schroeder,Shur
> By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:39 AM
>
> Re: 2.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to math percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
> By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:28 AM
>
> Re: A newsgroup like sci.math is a pile of shit when you have paid stalkers like Kibo Parry M. or Dan Christensen lording over sci.math as if he owns the place-- stalking and attacking posters 7-24-365. This is why I now post a roadmap to AP's newsgr
> by Alan Mackenzie Jun 29, 2021, 2:36:04 PM
>
> Re: 30) AP's 174th book// Mathopedia-- Listing of 70 fakes and mistakes of Old Math. Last revision was 28JUN2021. Preface: I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held
> by Michael Moroney Jul 3, 2021, 12:55:10 PM
>
> Re: 5) AP's 174th book// Mathopedia-- Listing of 67 fakes and mistakes of Old Math. Last revision was 8JUN2021. Under-Construction: AP recently is reinventing Multivariable Calculus, and will end up throwing out Old Math's Gradient theorem, Green's
> by
> Michael Moroney
> Jun 17, 2021, 11:57 AM
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney stalks "AnalButtfuckManure Attacks" Dartmouth's Philip J. Hanlon, Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne with his 10 OR 6 = 16; his ellipse a conic when it never was; his proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth..
> 1481 views
> by Professor Wordsmith Aug 14, 2020, 11:07:05 AM
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP with his incited hatred of 28 years stalking
> 148th published book Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1
> Jun 16, 2021, 12:09 AM
> by
> Graham Cooper
>
>
> Re: 1- Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP, with his inciting hatred of 28 years stalking leading to Violence
> Mutt Buncher Re: 3- Kibo Parry Moroney says Dr. Tao, Hales, Stillwell, Wiles, educators
> Jun 16, 2021
> by
> Efftard K. Donglemeier
>
>
> Re: l) AP's 175th book//Physicsopedia-- Listing of 125 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics. New entrees under construction: AP is reinventing Multivariable Calculus so that AP throws on the trash pile the Green's theorem, Gradient theorem, Stokes
> by Michael Moroney Jun 13, 2021, 4:47:35 PM
>
> Re: 1-Kibo Parry Moroney on failed physicist Steven Weinberg who cannot entertain the question of which is the real electron of atoms-- is it the muon or the 0.5MeV particle?
> by Mina Arvuti lähedal May 30, 2021, 7:54 AM
>
> Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block, Ernest Abers, Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and 0.5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
> by Michael Moroney Mar 3, 2019, 6:38:18 PM
>
>
> Re: 77,233 Student victims of Lawrence Bacow's Harvard from stalker Kibo Parry Moroney with his 938 is 12% short 945, his 10 OR 4 = 14 with AND as subtraction, and his mindless belief real electron = 0.5MeV when true electron is muon
> 11:57 AM 10Apr2021
> by Wayne Decarlo
>
> Re: 135,566 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron o
> May 10, 2021
> by Michael Moroney
>
> Re: 6Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
> By Michael Moroney 28 posts 292 views updated 12:31 PM
>
> Re: L. Reif, Marty Walsh, Charlie Baker, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins-- Moroney-- Boston's antiscience stalker fool//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> By Michael Moroney 19 posts 120 views updated 12:28 PM
>
> Re: If Marissa Mayer were still at Google-- probably take her 15 minutes to engineer a better newsgroup
> By Michael Moroney 20 posts 156 views updated 12:26 PM
>
> Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
> By Michael Moroney 29 posts 422 views updated 12:25 PM
>
> Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block,Ernest Abers,Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
> By Michael Moroney 34 posts 244 views updated 12:23 PM
>
> Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work
> By Michael Moroney 20 posts 165 views updated 12:22 PM
>
> Re: Racist-math at Reed College-- ellipse is never a conic, David Perkinson, Lyudmila Korobenko, John Lind, Dylan McNamee, Kyle Ormsby, Angelica Osorno
> By Michael Moroney 50 posts 405 views updated 12:21 PM
>
> Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
> By Michael Moroney 44 posts 461 views updated 12:17 PM
>
> Re: 1Moroney barks at math failures Baez, Bullock, Witten. But I see the three as having failed Angular Momentum with their 938 proton and .5MeV electron
> 12/30/18
> by j4n bur53
>
> Re: TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS series by Archimedes Plutonium, only math books to teach correct calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental theorem of Calculus. Old Math cannot even fix its mistake of ellipse is a cylinder section, never a conic.
> by Michael Moroney
>
> Re: 5-AP's 150th book// TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Freshperson College// Physics textbook series, book 4 by Archimedes Plutonium// Using as template Halliday& Resnick & AP's Senior year High School to AP's 150th book// TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//
> by Michael Moroney
>
> Re: Zelos asks why Harvard's Dr. Hau wants to fail in physics, by not turning off the light to see if light wave is a closed loop pencil ellipse that AP predicts. Is Dr.Hau stubborn and too ignorant to finish her experiment??
> by Michael Moroney
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney on Dr. Thorp stealing AP's dog theory connected to why he is a failure on Lewis 8 Structure because CO and N2 dissociation energy says it is Lewis 6 Structure. Yes, Kibo, what is your psychoanalysis of Dr. Thorp stealing? Is steal
> Ebenezer Splooge
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney asks Trump to give South Korea to North Korea, for who wants to protect barbarians that torture Moon Bears in cages
> by Roger Davis
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says of Dr. Tao "ant of Math" and a pandemic shit mule// Perhaps because Dr. Tao is such a failure of math, he believed primes are real when Naturals have no division-- and failures of math overlook even the most obvious
> by Professor Wordsmith Jul 25, 2020, 8:23:21 PM
>
> Re: 8-Kibo Parry Moroney says boycott Samsung & Hyundai until South Korea stops torturing to death caged Moon Bears // SOUTH KOREA, MOON BEARS Moon Bears of South Korea need the world's helping hand from evil//SCIENCE COUNCIL RULE EARTH
> by Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck Jul 28, 2020, 5:35:52 PM
>
> Re: 1- Kibo Parry Moroney says of math failure Dan Christensen Univ. Western Ontario with his ellipse a conic when it never was//And his insane Boole logic of 10 OR 2 = 12// pandemic shit mule
> by Hank Hill Jul 26, 2020, 7:26:18 PM
>
> Re: 102-Kibo Parry Moroney (Barry Shein's world std) stalking analbuttfuckmanure shithead of 27 years nonstop-- needs a emergency straightjacket size XXsmall
> By Eduardo Remington 2 posts 3 views updated 12:15 AM
>
> Re: 1-Kibo Parry Moroney, how do you clean your dick after it has been up Barry Shein's arsehole, or does it improve your stalking
> 285 views
> by Richard Cranium May 10, 2020, 8:30:43 PM
>
> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
>
>
>
> ..
> .- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
> , . `.' ' `.
> .' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
> . ; .' . `. ;
> ; . ' `. . '
> . ' ` `. |
> . '. '
> . 0 0 ' `.
> ' `
> ; `
> .' `
> ; U `
> ; '; `
> : | ;.. :` `
> : `;. ```. .-; | '
> '. ` ``.., .' :' '
> ; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' Hi, I am Kibo Parry Moroney, the grand failure of science with my 938 is 12% short of 945, and my ellipse is a conic when it never was, and my idiocy of thinking geothermal is not radioactivity but is recycled solar fossil. I stalk on Internet because NSF pays a million dollars and is 5 times the salary of those professors stuck with actually teaching science and all I do is attack dog style in sci.math, sci.physics.
> ` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
> ` ` ; ; ' '
> ` ` ; ; ' '
> ` `. ````'''''' ' '
> ` . ' '
> / ` `. ' ' .
> / ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
> / .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
> / .'' ; ` .' `
> ...'.' ; .' ` .' `
> "" .' .' | ` .; \ `
> ; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
> :' | ' ` , `. `
> | ' ` ' `. `
> ` ' ` ; `. |
> `.' ` ; `-'
> `...'
>
> IS ALL OF THE BELOW TRUE?????? Kibo Parry M. and Dan Christensen in Canada/USA
>
> NSF fraud waste abuse of taxpayer money $100 per stalker post-- Champagne,Hewitt,Crago
> On Saturday, July 31, kibo Parry M. stalked
>
> NSF fraud waste abuse of taxpayer money $100 per stalker post--
>
> USA--NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Ulvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley
>
> USA NSF---Sethuraman Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Ulvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley
>
> USA dept Educ, Cindy Marten
>
> Canada's NSF-- Francois-Philippe Champagne, Ted Hewitt, Martha Crago, Frederic Bouchard, Cinthia Duclos, Normand Labrie
>
> ---quoting Wikipedia ---
> Controversy
> Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
> --- end quote ---
>
> NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
>
> Dr. Panchanathan , present day
> France Anne Cordova
> Subra Suresh
> Arden Lee Bement Jr.
> Rita R. Colwell
> Neal Francis Lane
> John Howard Gibbons 1993
>
> Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
> Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
>
>
> MIT math dept.
>
> Michael Artin, Martin Bazant, Bonnie Berger, Roman Bezrukavnikov, Alexei Borodin, John Bush, Herman Chernoff, Henry Cohn, Laurent Demanet, Richard Dudley, Jörn Dunkel, Alan Edelman, Pavel Etingof, Daniel Freedman, Michel Goemans, Vadim Gorin, Harvey Greenspan, Victor Guillemin, Larry Guth, Sigurdur Helgason, Anette Hosoi, David Jerison, Steven Johnson, Victor Kac, Steven Kleiman, Daniel Kleitman,
> Andrew Lawrie, Tom Leighton, George Lusztig, Arthur Mattuck, Davesh Maulik, Richard Melrose, Haynes Miller, William Minicozzi, Ankur Moitra, Elchanan Mossel, Tomasz Mrowka, James Munkres, Andrei Negut, Aaron Pixton, Bjorn Poonen, Alexander Postnikov, Philippe Rigollet, Rodolfo Rosales, Giulia Saccà, Gerald Sacks, Paul Seidel, Scott Sheffield, Peter Shor, Isadore Singer, Michael Sipser, Jared Speck, Gigliola Staffilani, Richard Stanley, Harold Stark, Gilbert Strang, Daniel Stroock, Goncalo Tabuada, Alar Toomre, David Vogan
>
> Chancellor Cynthia Barnhart
> President: L. Reif (electrical engineer)
>
> MIT physics dept
> William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter, James Young
>
>
>
> y z
> | /
> | /
> |/______ x
>
> More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci..physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
>
> In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
>
> I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
>
> There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
>
> Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> Archimedes Plutonium


Kibo Parry M apparently got his masters degree from Rensselaer Polytech to keep up his 28 years nonstop filthy stalking something to make Rensselaer proud of
On Wednesday, June 30, 2021 at 11:02:54 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 💩 for 🧠

Kibo Parry M on spamming Rensselaer Polytech David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann
On Sunday, October 24, 2021 at 10:31:27 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Spamming

Kibo Parry M. why cannot MIT Richard Stanley, Harold Stark, Gilbert Strang, Daniel Stroock ever do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, are they what Kibo calls "imp of math"
On Sunday, October 24, 2021 at 10:48:36 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Putin's Stooge"

3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Length: 21 pages

File Size: 1620 KB
Print Length: 21 pages
Publication Date: March 11, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PLSDQWC
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray: Not Enabled
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

#8-2, 11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)


Last revision was 19May2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Length: 137 pages

Product details
ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
Publication date : March 14, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1307 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Print length : 137 pages
Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

Kibo Parry M why is Rensselaer David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, CCP Stooge and "spamming shithead" as your title says?
On Sunday, October 24, 2021 at 12:36:19 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "The CCP's Stooge"

Insane Kibo Parry M leashing out at Kristin Bennett, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw and Rensselaer Polytech for failing math and science with kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945. Kibo, is it insanity that makes you fail, kibo?

On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 8:27:14 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "math hater"
On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 8:11:32 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"antiscience"

Kibo Parry M. opinion of Rensselaer Polytech where Kibo learned 938 is 12% short of 945 Re: "spamming shithead" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 8:22:09 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"physics hater"

Kibo Parry M fails math Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw as witness, and Kibo invents "analbuttfuckmanure" leashing out at Rensselaer Polytech for his science failureship of kibo Parry M.

On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 8:21:33 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> fails at math and science:

Psst, Kibo Parry you insane stalker, 938 is short of 945 by less than 1%, not your 12% short.

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon..
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

Kibo Parry M on Rensselaer failures Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
> Re: 2.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to math percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang

On Thursday, June 27, 2019 at 8:40:35 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Math Minnow

Moroney and Rensselaer Polytech Institute fail at High School Math, High School Logic// both teach Ellipse is a conic when it never was// teach 10 OR 4 = 14 when even the village idiot knows 10 AND 4=14 // never have a geometry proof of Calculus

kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin,, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic and real proton is 840MeV not 938

kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_Peter Persans, Moussa N'Gom, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938

kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938

kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938

kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938

kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_William Siegmann,Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang

Rensselaer math department
Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann

On Friday, June 7, 2019 at 12:13:14 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Physics minnow
> WARNING TO ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING STUDENTS:

> Kibo Parry M on Rensselaer failures Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
> Re: 2.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to math percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
> On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 11:34:20 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >Failure
>
>
> Is Kibo Parry M. the largest taxpayer fraud waste and abuse in Usenet history, paid $100 per stalker post by NSF and dept Educ Dr. Panchanathan??????????
>
> On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 6:15:27 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 6:24:20 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> >blithered:
> On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > "FireD your ass"
>
> snip the threats of violence kibo so many times posted
>
> AP writes: Kibo Parry M. is NSF Dr. Panchanathan and USA dept Educ going to pay you $100. for that post?? If so, then Barry Shein's World std must be a goldmine of USA taxpayer fraud waste and abuse. Just posting abusive stalker defaming spam for 28 years now. No wonder Kibo keeps defaming and stalking; many people would gladly defame and stalk at $100. a post.
>
> Re: The Gabriel Polynomial- an advanced stealing and stolen item from Archimedes Plutonium and his book//
> by Michael Moroney Sep 27, 2021, 1:16 AM
>
> Re: 1-Did Kibo-Parry-Maroney fail Rensselaer or was kicked out due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938, the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole
> by Roy Masters Sep 13, 2019, 3:24:07 PM
>
> Re: 1.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Maroney fail Rensselaer or was kicked out due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938, the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole
> by Patricio J. Whackmember Sep 13, 2019, 5:43:28 PM
>
> Re: 1.9-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Korniss,Toh-Ming Lu,Martin
> By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:57:15 AM
>
> Re: 2.0-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Michael,Newberg,N'Gom
> By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:57 AM
>
> Re: 2.1-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Persans,Schroeder,Shur
> By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:39 AM
>
> Re: 2.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to math percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
> By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:28 AM
>
> Re: A newsgroup like sci.math is a pile of shit when you have paid stalkers like Kibo Parry M. or Dan Christensen lording over sci.math as if he owns the place-- stalking and attacking posters 7-24-365. This is why I now post a roadmap to AP's newsgr
> by Alan Mackenzie Jun 29, 2021, 2:36:04 PM
>
> Re: 30) AP's 174th book// Mathopedia-- Listing of 70 fakes and mistakes of Old Math. Last revision was 28JUN2021. Preface: I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held
> by Michael Moroney Jul 3, 2021, 12:55:10 PM
>
> Re: 5) AP's 174th book// Mathopedia-- Listing of 67 fakes and mistakes of Old Math. Last revision was 8JUN2021. Under-Construction: AP recently is reinventing Multivariable Calculus, and will end up throwing out Old Math's Gradient theorem, Green's
> by
> Michael Moroney
> Jun 17, 2021, 11:57 AM
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney stalks "AnalButtfuckManure Attacks" Dartmouth's Philip J. Hanlon, Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne with his 10 OR 6 = 16; his ellipse a conic when it never was; his proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth..
> 1481 views
> by Professor Wordsmith Aug 14, 2020, 11:07:05 AM
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP with his incited hatred of 28 years stalking
> 148th published book Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1
> Jun 16, 2021, 12:09 AM
> by
> Graham Cooper
>
>
> Re: 1- Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP, with his inciting hatred of 28 years stalking leading to Violence
> Mutt Buncher Re: 3- Kibo Parry Moroney says Dr. Tao, Hales, Stillwell, Wiles, educators
> Jun 16, 2021
> by
> Efftard K. Donglemeier
>
>
> Re: l) AP's 175th book//Physicsopedia-- Listing of 125 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics. New entrees under construction: AP is reinventing Multivariable Calculus so that AP throws on the trash pile the Green's theorem, Gradient theorem, Stokes
> by Michael Moroney Jun 13, 2021, 4:47:35 PM
>
> Re: 1-Kibo Parry Moroney on failed physicist Steven Weinberg who cannot entertain the question of which is the real electron of atoms-- is it the muon or the 0.5MeV particle?
> by Mina Arvuti lähedal May 30, 2021, 7:54 AM
>
> Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block, Ernest Abers, Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and 0.5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
> by Michael Moroney Mar 3, 2019, 6:38:18 PM
>
>
> Re: 77,233 Student victims of Lawrence Bacow's Harvard from stalker Kibo Parry Moroney with his 938 is 12% short 945, his 10 OR 4 = 14 with AND as subtraction, and his mindless belief real electron = 0.5MeV when true electron is muon
> 11:57 AM 10Apr2021
> by Wayne Decarlo
>
> Re: 135,566 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron o
> May 10, 2021
> by Michael Moroney
>
> Re: 6Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
> By Michael Moroney 28 posts 292 views updated 12:31 PM
>
> Re: L. Reif, Marty Walsh, Charlie Baker, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins-- Moroney-- Boston's antiscience stalker fool//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> By Michael Moroney 19 posts 120 views updated 12:28 PM
>
> Re: If Marissa Mayer were still at Google-- probably take her 15 minutes to engineer a better newsgroup
> By Michael Moroney 20 posts 156 views updated 12:26 PM
>
> Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
> By Michael Moroney 29 posts 422 views updated 12:25 PM
>
> Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block,Ernest Abers,Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
> By Michael Moroney 34 posts 244 views updated 12:23 PM
>
> Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work
> By Michael Moroney 20 posts 165 views updated 12:22 PM
>
> Re: Racist-math at Reed College-- ellipse is never a conic, David Perkinson, Lyudmila Korobenko, John Lind, Dylan McNamee, Kyle Ormsby, Angelica Osorno
> By Michael Moroney 50 posts 405 views updated 12:21 PM
>
> Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
> By Michael Moroney 44 posts 461 views updated 12:17 PM
>
> Re: 1Moroney barks at math failures Baez, Bullock, Witten. But I see the three as having failed Angular Momentum with their 938 proton and .5MeV electron
> 12/30/18
> by j4n bur53
>
> Re: TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS series by Archimedes Plutonium, only math books to teach correct calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental theorem of Calculus. Old Math cannot even fix its mistake of ellipse is a cylinder section, never a conic.
> by Michael Moroney
>
> Re: 5-AP's 150th book// TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Freshperson College// Physics textbook series, book 4 by Archimedes Plutonium// Using as template Halliday& Resnick & AP's Senior year High School to AP's 150th book// TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//
> by Michael Moroney
>
> Re: Zelos asks why Harvard's Dr. Hau wants to fail in physics, by not turning off the light to see if light wave is a closed loop pencil ellipse that AP predicts. Is Dr.Hau stubborn and too ignorant to finish her experiment??
> by Michael Moroney
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney on Dr. Thorp stealing AP's dog theory connected to why he is a failure on Lewis 8 Structure because CO and N2 dissociation energy says it is Lewis 6 Structure. Yes, Kibo, what is your psychoanalysis of Dr. Thorp stealing? Is steal
> Ebenezer Splooge
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney asks Trump to give South Korea to North Korea, for who wants to protect barbarians that torture Moon Bears in cages
> by Roger Davis
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says of Dr. Tao "ant of Math" and a pandemic shit mule// Perhaps because Dr. Tao is such a failure of math, he believed primes are real when Naturals have no division-- and failures of math overlook even the most obvious
> by Professor Wordsmith Jul 25, 2020, 8:23:21 PM
>
> Re: 8-Kibo Parry Moroney says boycott Samsung & Hyundai until South Korea stops torturing to death caged Moon Bears // SOUTH KOREA, MOON BEARS Moon Bears of South Korea need the world's helping hand from evil//SCIENCE COUNCIL RULE EARTH
> by Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck Jul 28, 2020, 5:35:52 PM
>
> Re: 1- Kibo Parry Moroney says of math failure Dan Christensen Univ. Western Ontario with his ellipse a conic when it never was//And his insane Boole logic of 10 OR 2 = 12// pandemic shit mule
> by Hank Hill Jul 26, 2020, 7:26:18 PM
>
> Re: 102-Kibo Parry Moroney (Barry Shein's world std) stalking analbuttfuckmanure shithead of 27 years nonstop-- needs a emergency straightjacket size XXsmall
> By Eduardo Remington 2 posts 3 views updated 12:15 AM
>
> Re: 1-Kibo Parry Moroney, how do you clean your dick after it has been up Barry Shein's arsehole, or does it improve your stalking
> 285 views
> by Richard Cranium May 10, 2020, 8:30:43 PM
>
> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
>
>
>
> ..
> .- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
> , . `.' ' `.
> .' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
> . ; .' . `. ;
> ; . ' `. . '
> . ' ` `. |
> . '. '
> . 0 0 ' `.
> ' `
> ; `
> .' `
> ; U `
> ; '; `
> : | ;.. :` `
> : `;. ```. .-; | '
> '. ` ``.., .' :' '
> ; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' Hi, I am Kibo Parry Moroney, the grand failure of science with my 938 is 12% short of 945, and my ellipse is a conic when it never was, and my idiocy of thinking geothermal is not radioactivity but is recycled solar fossil. I stalk on Internet because NSF pays a million dollars and is 5 times the salary of those professors stuck with actually teaching science and all I do is attack dog style in sci.math, sci.physics.
> ` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
> ` ` ; ; ' '
> ` ` ; ; ' '
> ` `. ````'''''' ' '
> ` . ' '
> / ` `. ' ' .
> / ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
> / .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
> / .'' ; ` .' `
> ...'.' ; .' ` .' `
> "" .' .' | ` .; \ `
> ; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
> :' | ' ` , `. `
> | ' ` ' `. `
> ` ' ` ; `. |
> `.' ` ; `-'
> `...'
>
> IS ALL OF THE BELOW TRUE?????? Kibo Parry M. and Dan Christensen in Canada/USA
>
> NSF fraud waste abuse of taxpayer money $100 per stalker post-- Champagne,Hewitt,Crago
> On Saturday, July 31, kibo Parry M. stalked
>
> NSF fraud waste abuse of taxpayer money $100 per stalker post--
>
> USA--NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Ulvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley
>
> USA NSF---Sethuraman Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Ulvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley
>
> USA dept Educ, Cindy Marten
>
> Canada's NSF-- Francois-Philippe Champagne, Ted Hewitt, Martha Crago, Frederic Bouchard, Cinthia Duclos, Normand Labrie
>
> ---quoting Wikipedia ---
> Controversy
> Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
> --- end quote ---
>
> NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
>
> Dr. Panchanathan , present day
> France Anne Cordova
> Subra Suresh
> Arden Lee Bement Jr.
> Rita R. Colwell
> Neal Francis Lane
> John Howard Gibbons 1993
>
> Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
> Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
>
>
> MIT math dept.
>
> Michael Artin, Martin Bazant, Bonnie Berger, Roman Bezrukavnikov, Alexei Borodin, John Bush, Herman Chernoff, Henry Cohn, Laurent Demanet, Richard Dudley, Jörn Dunkel, Alan Edelman, Pavel Etingof, Daniel Freedman, Michel Goemans, Vadim Gorin, Harvey Greenspan, Victor Guillemin, Larry Guth, Sigurdur Helgason, Anette Hosoi, David Jerison, Steven Johnson, Victor Kac, Steven Kleiman, Daniel Kleitman,
> Andrew Lawrie, Tom Leighton, George Lusztig, Arthur Mattuck, Davesh Maulik, Richard Melrose, Haynes Miller, William Minicozzi, Ankur Moitra, Elchanan Mossel, Tomasz Mrowka, James Munkres, Andrei Negut, Aaron Pixton, Bjorn Poonen, Alexander Postnikov, Philippe Rigollet, Rodolfo Rosales, Giulia Saccà, Gerald Sacks, Paul Seidel, Scott Sheffield, Peter Shor, Isadore Singer, Michael Sipser, Jared Speck, Gigliola Staffilani, Richard Stanley, Harold Stark, Gilbert Strang, Daniel Stroock, Goncalo Tabuada, Alar Toomre, David Vogan
>
> Chancellor Cynthia Barnhart
> President: L. Reif (electrical engineer)
>
> MIT physics dept
> William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter, James Young

>
>
>
> y z
> | /
> | /
> |/______ x
>
> More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci..physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
>
> In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
>
> I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
>
> There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
>
> Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> Archimedes Plutonium


🤡 of Math and 🃏 of Physics Archimedes "Court Jester of Math" Plutonium
<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math:

>>> On Monday, March 12, 2018 at 10:37:45 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
>>>>> Use any aids. Answer in the space provided.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. What is the sine of 45 degrees to 3 decimal places? ____________
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. True or false: 10^604 = 0 ____________
>>>>>
>>>>> 3. If A is true and B is false, then A AND B is ____________
(true or false).
>>>>>
>>>>> 4. If A is true and B is true, then A OR B is ____________ (true
or false).
>>>>>

You still left all the answers blank, StupidPlutonium! Do you *still*
need more time?

Rensselaer's Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, psychoceramic and little fish according to Kibo Parry M stalker
On Wednesday, November 3, 2021 at 7:06:09 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"little fish"
>"psychoceramic"

Frenchman Lacassagne 1885: "Every society has the criminals it deserves"
AP 2021: "Every University is responsible for the filthy stalker who attended that school and is now a insane nonstop stalker on Usenet"

Rensselaer's Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, cannot even ask the question of the real electron of atoms is the muon, not the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac Magnetic Monopole, not after teaching Kibo Parry M. that 938 is 12% short of 945.

On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 at 2:49:54 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Oh dear, you regress. You assume the output of a theoretical experiment
> which neither you nor Dr. Hau have ever performed*.

On Monday, June 15, 2020 at 1:13:27 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Here you are!
> Below you will find a simple *proof* that shows that certain conic
> sections are ellipses.
>
> Some preliminaries:
>
> Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
> in the proof:
>
> ^ x
> |
> -+- < xh
> .' | `.
> . | .
> | | |
> ' | '
> `. | .'
> y <----------+ < x0
> Cone (side view):
> .
> /|\
> / | \
> /b | \
> /---+---' < x h
> / |' \
> / ' | \
> / ' | \
> x 0 > '-------+-------\
> / a | \
>
> Proof:
>
> r(x) a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence
>
> y(x)^2 r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.
>
> Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 1 ...equation of an ellipse
>
> qed

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon..
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

...
..- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
, . `.' ' `.
..' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
.. ; .' . `. ;
; . ' `. . '
.. ' ` `. |
.. '. '
.. 0 0 ' `.
' `
; `
..' `
; U `
; '; `
: | ;.. :` `
: `;. ```. .-; | '
'. ` ``.., .' :' '
; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' Hi, I am Kibo Parry M. a shit streaked arsewipe of science, a complete failure of math and physics, yet I stalk these newsgroups every day of the year for the past 28 years nonstop, because I am Kibo Parry the moron of science with my fool's proof ellipse and my 938 is 12% short of 945. I was trained at Rensselaer Polytech and that is where I picked up my "moron failure in science" and since I fail math and science so horribly bad, I continue to do the only thing my little mind knows how to do--- stalk stalk stalk for degenerate losers of life do the only thing they do well-- stalk
` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` `. ````'''''' ' '
` . ' '
/ ` `. ' ' .
/ ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
/ .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
/ .'' ; ` .' `
....'.' ; .' ` .' `
"" .' .' | ` .; \ `
; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
:' | ' ` , `. `
| ' ` ' `. `
` ' ` ; `. |
`.' ` ; `-'
`...'

Frenchman Lacassagne 1885: "Every society has the criminals it deserves"
AP 2021: "Every University is responsible for the filthy stalker who attended that school and is now a insane nonstop stalker on Usenet"

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang

Rensselaer math department
Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann

74th published book

HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.

Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
Length: 17 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : December 18, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 17 pages
• File Size : 698 KB
• ASIN : B082WYGVNG
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled

#1-4, 105th published book

Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.

Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
Length: 39 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : March 24, 2020
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• ASIN : B086BGSNXN
• Print Length : 39 pages
• File Size : 935 KB
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
#315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
#4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)



#1-5, 112th published book

New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.

Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book.. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
Length: 20 pages

Berkeley a minion? Reinhard Genzel, Richard Marrus, Forrest Mozer, Richard Muller
On Friday, November 5, 2021 at 12:01:07 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "Kim Jong Un's minion"
> fails at math and science:

Gilbert Strang, Daniel Stroock, Goncalo Tabuada, Alar Toomre, David Vogan
On Sunday, October 31, 2021 at 1:03:03 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> fails at math and science:

Whodat on Richard Muller, Richard Packard neither of you has produced anything worthwhile. Why Whodat? Is it because they are too stupid to ask which is the atom's real electron-- the muon or 0.5MeV particle, or is it because they believe light is a arrow ray with head and tail, while AP says it is a closed loop ellipse.
Whodat says neither Dr.Hau nor Sylvia Else did any physics of slow light, acknowledging that they are impotent in "turning off the light" proving AP's light is not a arrow ray but a closed loop pencil ellipse
On Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 9:59:33 AM UTC-5, whodat wrote:
> Neither of you has
> produced anything worthwhile.

On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 at 5:36:42 PM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote:
> Back to your abuse approach I see.
>
> That didn't take long.
>
> Sylvia.

Sylvia, no abuse at all, the King of Science is 100% serious on science, but you seem to want to waste time on chit chat b.s. that amounts to nothing overall. Sylvia wants to perpetuate her myth, along with the obnoxious myth of Dr. Hau at Harvard that light is a arrow ray with head and tail. While AP says light waves are pencil ellipses, closed loop ellipses that when the source of light is turned off, all the light-- whether normal speed or slow speed, all the light vanishes the instant the light switch is off.

Is Sylvia and Dr. Hau just plain lazy or stupid lazy in not finishing the experiment. So I ask the Berkeley physics department are they lazy and stupid or both.

The Internet indicates a Sylvia Else is a physics graduate of Berkeley.

So then, Berkeley has to stand up to the challenge that AP throws into their court yard. I throw into your court yard that if Harvard's Dr. Hau set up her slow light experiment. And sees a column of slow light in BEC medium with entrance light at normal speed and exit light at normal speed, only the BEC cold region with slow light. Now, now Dr. Hau, now Sylvia Else, turn the source light off. And to your fascination and the fascination of the entire world, watch and see that the slow light vanishes instantly along with the normal fast light. The entire column of light vanishes simultaneously.

Why does it vanish all at once simultaneously Sylvia? Why does it vanish all at once Dr. Hau? Why does it vanish all at once Harvard Univ? Why does it vanish all at once simultaneously Berkeley UC?

It vanishes all at once because light waves are closed loop circuits around a source and no matter how fast those closed loop circuits in a region of the circuit, the moment the source is gone -- the entire light is gone.

What have we proven here Sylvia? What have we proven here Harvard's Dr. Hau.. You have proven that light waves, like electricity are closed loop circuits, like a hoola hoop. And this is the reason you can have light as a constant maximum speed, yet slow light down in a region of the circuit of light.

So, Harvard's Dr. Hau, get off your lazy butt and complete your experiment, throw the switch off-- and see for yourself that light all vanishes simultaneously. And report your experiment to the world-- that light is a closed loop circuit, not what you believed all along before-- light is a single ray with head and tail. No, light was never a single ray of head of tail, like a arrow. Light is like a closed loop circuit, a pencil ellipse.

So get off your lazy butt and finish the experiment.

Or have Sylia Else in Berkeley California set up the slow light experiment and have Sylvia finish and complete the experiment.

Times a wasting, with your chit chat Sylvia, time you roll up your sleeves and burn the midnight oil.

AP, King of Science, especially Physics

> Village idiot William Frazer, Mary K. Gaillard, Martin Halpern, Allan Kaufman, says Kibo Parry M. Why Kibo? Is it because they lack the brains to ask which is the atom's real electron-- the muon or 0.5MeV particle, or is it because, like you Kibo who thinks 938 is 12% short of 945?
>
> On Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 1:20:29 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"Village Idiot"
> >"psychoceramic"
> >people (like Sylvia or Dr. Hau) to perform your
> > experiment for you. Sorry, but that's not physics. That's crackpottery.
> Univ California Berkeley math department
>
> Carolyn Abbot-- geometry group theory
> Ian Agol -- low dimensional topology
> Alexander Alldridge -- Supergeometry (never heard of such a thing, let's hope he can super solve Jan's error of never understanding that a entry cut near the cone apex has a asymmetrical arclength compared to exit cut)
> Denis Auroux-- symplectic topology and mirror symmetry (this expertise in symmetry is called for-- so many think a cut of a cone is a ellipse when anyone with a experiment can see it is a oval)
> Richard Bamler-- geometric analysis, differential geometry (sounds like a heavy weight in geometry and this cone problem should be easy for Richard)
> Robert Bryant-- many geometry expertises
> Zhiqi Chen -- differential geometry and although a visiting scholar, we should never play bias to whomever can answer the question of no ellipse is a conic but only a cylinder section
> James Conway-- contact and symplectic geometry (what in the world is symplectic-- better not ask)
> Heinz Cordes-- classical analysis (hope that does not mean classical Old Math)
> Ved Datar-- differential geometry
> David Eisenbud-- algebraic geometry
> Mark Haiman-- algebraic geometry
> Jenny Harrison-- geometric measure (perhaps measuring the arclength of cone sections is what is needed)
> Robin Hartshorne-- history of geometry (well, well, why does it take till 2016, for any mathematician to realize the ellipse was never a conic section, rather, it was the oval)
> Wu-Yi Hsiang-- differential geometry (and a long long time ago Dr. Hsiang sent me his manuscript of a alleged proof of Kepler Packing, thanks)
> Michael Hutchings-- geometry
> Marina Iliopoulou-- incidence geometry
> Brian Krummel -- geometric analysis
> Tim Laux -- geometric analysis
> David Li-Bland-- differential geometry
> John Lott-- differential geometry
> Kathryn Mann-- geometry
> David Nadler-- geometric representation
> Martin Olsson-- arithmetic geometry
> Kenneth Ribet-- algebraic geometry
> Alan Schoenfeld-- math education
> Vivek Shende-- geometry
> Isadore Singer-- geometry
> Zvezdelina Stankova-- algebraic geometry
> Bernd Sturmfels-- algebraic geometry
> Hongbin Sun-- hyperbolic geometry (the hyperbolic geometry may come in handy in showing that the cone section cannot be an ellipse)
> Peter Teichner-- geometric topology
> Dmitry Tonkonog-- geometry
> Michael Viscardi-- geometric representation
> Alan Weinstein-- geometry
> Lauren Williams-- geometry
> Mariusz Wodzicki-- geometry
> Joseph Wolf-- geometry
> Hung-Hsi Wu-- geometry
>
> UC Berkeley Physics dept emeritus
> THEORISTS
>
> Jonathan Arons (E)
>
> Korkut Bardakci (E)
>
> Geoffrey Chew (E)
>
> Marvin Cohen (E)
>
> William Frazer (E)
>
> Mary K. Gaillard (E)
>
> Martin Halpern (E)
>
> Allan Kaufman (E)
>
> Charles Kittel (E)
>
> Christopher McKee (E)
>
> Rainer Sachs (E)
>
> Charles Schwartz (E)
>
> Mahiko Suzuki (E)
>
> Eyvind Wichmann (E)
> EXPERIMENTALISTS
>
> Dmitry Budker (E)
>
> William Chinowsky (E)
>
> John Clarke (E)
>
> Marc Davis (E)
>
> Robert Ely (E)
>
> Reinhard Genzel (E)
>
> Richard Marrus (E)
>
> Forrest Mozer (E)
>
> Richard Muller (E)
>
> Richard Packard (E)
>
> P. Buford Price (E)
>
> Paul Richards (E)
>
> Charles Shank (E)
>
> Yuen-Ron Shen (E)
>
> James Siegrist (E)
>
> George Smoot III (E)
>
> Herbert Steiner (E)
>
> M. Lynn Stevenson (E)
>
> Mark Strovink (E)
>
> George Trilling (E)
>
> Robert Tripp (E)
>
> Peter Yu (E)
> True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
>
> Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
>
> Length: 1150 pages
>
>
> Product details
> • File Size : 2167 KB
> • ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
> • Publication Date : March 11, 2019
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print Length : 1150 pages
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #181 in General Chemistry & Reference
> #1324 in General Chemistry
> #1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> Kibo Parry M why is Rensselaer David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, CCP Stooge and "spamming shithead" as your title says?
> On Sunday, October 24, 2021 at 12:36:19 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > "The CCP's Stooge"
>
> Insane Kibo Parry M leashing out at Kristin Bennett, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw and Rensselaer Polytech for failing math and science with kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945. Kibo, is it insanity that makes you fail, kibo?
>
> On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 8:27:14 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > "math hater"
> On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 8:11:32 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"antiscience"
> Frenchman Lacassagne 1885: "Every society has the criminals it deserves"
> AP 2021: "Every University is responsible for the filthy stalker who attended that school and is now a insane nonstop stalker on Usenet"
> Kibo Parry M. opinion of Rensselaer Polytech where Kibo learned 938 is 12% short of 945 Re: "spamming shithead" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
>
> On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 8:22:09 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"physics hater"
>
> Kibo Parry M fails math Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw as witness, and Kibo invents "analbuttfuckmanure" leashing out at Rensselaer Polytech for his science failureship of kibo Parry M.
> On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 8:21:33 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > fails at math and science:
> Psst, Kibo Parry you insane stalker, 938 is short of 945 by less than 1%, not your 12% short.
> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
> Kibo Parry M on Rensselaer failures Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
> > Re: 2.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to math percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
>
> On Thursday, June 27, 2019 at 8:40:35 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Math Minnow
>
> Moroney and Rensselaer Polytech Institute fail at High School Math, High School Logic// both teach Ellipse is a conic when it never was// teach 10 OR 4 = 14 when even the village idiot knows 10 AND 4=14 // never have a geometry proof of Calculus
>
> kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin,, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic and real proton is 840MeV not 938
>
> kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_Peter Persans, Moussa N'Gom, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938
>
> kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938

> kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938
>
> kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938
>
> kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_William Siegmann,Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938
> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
> Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang
>
> Rensselaer math department
> Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann
> On Friday, June 7, 2019 at 12:13:14 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Physics minnow
> > WARNING TO ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING STUDENTS:
>
> > Kibo Parry M on Rensselaer failures Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
> > Re: 2.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to math percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
> > On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 11:34:20 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > >Failure
> >
> >
> > Is Kibo Parry M. the largest taxpayer fraud waste and abuse in Usenet history, paid $100 per stalker post by NSF and dept Educ Dr. Panchanathan??????????
> >
> > On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 6:15:27 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 6:24:20 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >
> > >blithered:
> > On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > "FireD your ass"
> >
> > snip the threats of violence kibo so many times posted
> >
> > AP writes: Kibo Parry M. is NSF Dr. Panchanathan and USA dept Educ going to pay you $100. for that post?? If so, then Barry Shein's World std must be a goldmine of USA taxpayer fraud waste and abuse. Just posting abusive stalker defaming spam for 28 years now. No wonder Kibo keeps defaming and stalking; many people would gladly defame and stalk at $100. a post.
> >
> > Re: The Gabriel Polynomial- an advanced stealing and stolen item from Archimedes Plutonium and his book//
> > by Michael Moroney Sep 27, 2021, 1:16 AM
> >
> > Re: 1-Did Kibo-Parry-Maroney fail Rensselaer or was kicked out due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938, the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole
> > by Roy Masters Sep 13, 2019, 3:24:07 PM
> >
> > Re: 1.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Maroney fail Rensselaer or was kicked out due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938, the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole
> > by Patricio J. Whackmember Sep 13, 2019, 5:43:28 PM
> >
> > Re: 1.9-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Korniss,Toh-Ming Lu,Martin
> > By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:57:15 AM
> >

> > On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> > Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
> >
> >
> >
> > ..
> > .- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
> > , . `.' ' `.
> > .' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
> > . ; .' . `. ;
> > ; . ' `. . '
> > . ' ` `. |
> > . '. '
> > . 0 0 ' `.
> > ' `
> > ; `
> > .' `
> > ; U `
> > ; '; `
> > : | ;.. :` `
> > : `;. ```. .-; | '
> > '. ` ``.., .' :' '
> > ; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' Hi, I am Kibo Parry Moroney, the grand failure of science with my 938 is 12% short of 945, and my ellipse is a conic when it never was, and my idiocy of thinking geothermal is not radioactivity but is recycled solar fossil. I stalk on Internet because NSF pays a million dollars and is 5 times the salary of those professors stuck with actually teaching science and all I do is attack dog style in sci.math, sci.physics.
>
> 
> > ` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
> > ` ` ; ; ' '
> > ` ` ; ; ' '
> > ` `. ````'''''' ' '
> > ` . ' '
> > / ` `. ' ' .
> > / ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
> > / .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
> > / .'' ; ` .' `
> > ...'.' ; .' ` .' `
> > "" .' .' | ` .; \ `
> > ; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
> > :' | ' ` , `. `
> > | ' ` ' `. `
> > ` ' ` ; `. |
> > `.' ` ; `-'
> > `...'
> >

> > IS ALL OF THE BELOW TRUE?????? Kibo Parry M. and Dan Christensen in Canada/USA
> >
> > NSF fraud waste abuse of taxpayer money $100 per stalker post-- Champagne,Hewitt,Crago
> > On Saturday, July 31, kibo Parry M. stalked
> >
> > NSF fraud waste abuse of taxpayer money $100 per stalker post--
> >
> > USA--NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Ulvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley
> >
> > USA NSF---Sethuraman Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Ulvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley
> >
> > USA dept Educ, Cindy Marten
> >
> > Canada's NSF-- Francois-Philippe Champagne, Ted Hewitt, Martha Crago, Frederic Bouchard, Cinthia Duclos, Normand Labrie
> >
> > ---quoting Wikipedia ---
> > Controversy
> > Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
> > --- end quote ---
> >
> > NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
> >
> > Dr. Panchanathan , present day
> > France Anne Cordova
> > Subra Suresh
> > Arden Lee Bement Jr.
> > Rita R. Colwell
> > Neal Francis Lane
> > John Howard Gibbons 1993
> >
> > Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
> > Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
> >
> >
> > MIT math dept.
> >
> > Michael Artin, Martin Bazant, Bonnie Berger, Roman Bezrukavnikov, Alexei Borodin, John Bush, Herman Chernoff, Henry Cohn, Laurent Demanet, Richard Dudley, Jörn Dunkel, Alan Edelman, Pavel Etingof, Daniel Freedman, Michel Goemans, Vadim Gorin, Harvey Greenspan, Victor Guillemin, Larry Guth, Sigurdur Helgason, Anette Hosoi, David Jerison, Steven Johnson, Victor Kac, Steven Kleiman, Daniel Kleitman,
> > Andrew Lawrie, Tom Leighton, George Lusztig, Arthur Mattuck, Davesh Maulik, Richard Melrose, Haynes Miller, William Minicozzi, Ankur Moitra, Elchanan Mossel, Tomasz Mrowka, James Munkres, Andrei Negut, Aaron Pixton, Bjorn Poonen, Alexander Postnikov, Philippe Rigollet, Rodolfo Rosales, Giulia Saccà, Gerald Sacks, Paul Seidel, Scott Sheffield, Peter Shor, Isadore Singer, Michael Sipser, Jared Speck, Gigliola Staffilani, Richard Stanley, Harold Stark, Gilbert Strang, Daniel Stroock, Goncalo Tabuada, Alar Toomre, David Vogan
> >
> > Chancellor Cynthia Barnhart
> > President: L. Reif (electrical engineer)
> >
> > MIT physics dept
> > William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter, James Young

> 
> >
> >
> >
> > y z
> > | /
> > | /
> > |/______ x
> >
> > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> >
> > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> >
> > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> >
> > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> >
> > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > Archimedes Plutonium

Kibo Parry M basking in his new word "analbuttfuckmanure" invented by Kibo in 2017-2018 and allowing his proxies of stalking to use it, test drive it, before Kibo defames AP for another 28 years of nonstop stalking.

Kibo, has your famous invented word gone virial???? Kibo applying for his invented new word be included in Webster dictionary for use in the game Scrabble.

Re: 1Canadian Stalker DAN anal buttfuckmanure CHRISTENSEN stalk reports::: 6 year stalker
17 posts by 7 authors
8/21/18
Zelos Malum Pointing out that you are an idiot is nto stalking

Kibo Parry M was always hoping that his newly invented word would reach into world politics, and it surprised even the conservative pundits of radio talk shows.

Re: 1.2Analbuttfuckmanure Justin Trudeau,Sophie Gregoire, says Dan Christensen or Kibo//Stephen Lecce, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon
by Hoofington P. McSnort Aug 26, 2020, 7:01:28 PM

Once it had reached politics, not long for Kibo Parry M famous newly invented word to become ingrained in the college bowl and classroom.

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney stalks "AnalButtfuckManure Attacks" Dartmouth's Philip J. Hanlon, Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne with his 10 OR 6 = 16; his ellipse a conic when it never was; his proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth..
1481 views
by Professor Wordsmith Aug 14, 2020, 11:07:05 AM

Re: software that engineers out stalking bullies on Twitter, Facebook, Google Newsgroups Re: Michael Moroney Anal ButtfuckManure stalker for 26 years
By Dan Christensen 50 posts 951 views updated 8:56 PM. Was this 2017 or 2018?

Re: ANALBUTTFUCKMANURE stalker Michael Moroney Corner,, stalker for 24 years
16 posts by 3 authors
1/24/18
by Jan, On Sunday, January 21, 2018 at 12:43:49 PM UTC-8,

And of course Kibo still applies his famous swear word in current discussion, and why not, for kibo knows no math, no physics and why the hell is he even in the science newsgroups.
On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 7:18:01 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>Physics Archimedes "AnalButtfuckManure" Plutonium
> <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>
> > Although, Kibo, I really find any science math or physics content in your invention of the word "analbuttfuckmanure". But then maybe your invention was spurred by your insistence that 938 is 12% short of 945.
>
>invented that word, probably because

(snipped to save space in this filthy mud language of Kibo Parry M.)
>don't use it again until May 30 2019,
>use it was in the subject of a post on Jan 25 2020,
> Next time another post January 25 2020,
> Jan 27, 2020, twice in one topic, referring to me AGAIN. Another post
> Jan 27, 2020, three times in one post (once in the Subject:). I quoted
> it when replying
> Shall I go on?
>
> Nowadays I use it to mock you

AP asks: Kibo, and how many years have you been stalking and denigrating and defaming posters in sci. math, sci.physics, is it now 29 years??
Kibo Parry M> for 28 years already.
>

> > On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> > Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

AP writes: So Kibo Parry a graduate of Rensselaer, so he says, what is 2 percentage short of being 3, in your math mind? Would you see it is 1% short, given that you think 8.88 is 12% short of 9?
AP writes: Kibo, you are still upset you cannot do math in sci.math, so why stay here like some fixture?
> You are still upset that you can't do percentages? Maybe a high school
> or community college near you has an adult education program where you
> can take remedial mathematics? Maybe a middle school remedial geometry
> course where they'll prove the ellipse is a conic section?
> >
> > Kibo can you tell us how you earned a degree in engineering from Rensselaer Polytech

> > Or will Nick Thompson's Wired Magazine explain how you can earn a engineering degree from Rensselaer and still not do a correct percentage problem?
>

Kibo Parry Moroney, why do you keep posting this b.s. about a ellipse when it has no math content at all, and you do not know the first thing about a math proof, for you still insanely think that Philip Hanlon the president of Dartmouth College is going to buy your worthless tripe of a argument you post over and over again. You think Dr. Hanlon is going to agree with you that 938 is 12% short of 945 and that your nonsense below is a proof????? What do you take Dartmouth College for, Kibo, some kindergarten-nursery school??

Kibo Parry M writes:
> Because he's smart enough to understand math proofs. He is also smart
> enough that he'd never use something as error-prone as a paper cone,
> he'd use one of those plastic or wooden teaching models which
> demonstrate that a slant cut of a cone is really an ellipse.
>

AP writes: you really think Dartmouth College Philip J. Hanlon buys your nonsense tripe of ellipse?? And why, Kibo, have you never admitted your mistake of 938 is 12% short of 945, which only a madman like Kibo would accept.

So, here we go again Kibo, calling AP your newly invented swear word---
On Monday, October 11, 2021 at 8:54:36 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>Physics Archimedes "AnalButtfuckManure" Plutonium
> <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
> > On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 7:18:01 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >> Archimedes "AnalButtfuckManure" Plutonium
> >
> >>> Although, Kibo, I really cannot find any science math or physics
> >>> content in your invention of the word "analbuttfuckmanure". But then
> >>> maybe your invention was spurred by your insistence that 938 is 12%
> >>> short of 945.
> >

On Monday, October 11, 2021 at 1:46:37 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Kibo & NSF Dr. Panchanathan why is UCR John Baez, and Marcela Carena failures in math and physics, cannot even take 9 times 105 and see that it is 945? I mean, well, why ever bother with the mindless Weinberg-Glashow-Gell-Mann Standard Model nonsense of physics, as some sort of Algebra, when you cannot even do simple simple Algebra of 9x105=945 and __interpret it correctly__ of what you have done in physics.
>
> Much the same problem with Marcela Carena of Fermi Natl. Lab with the excessive muon spin as reported in Scientific American, Oct2021. Not able to ask the most simple and basic question of physics, which is the atom's true real electron is it the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus or is it the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole. No, Marcela Carena and John Baez rather listen to a herd community, rather than practice and do physics with a logical mind-- ask the simple questions and do the logical experiments from those logical questions.
>
> Dr. Panchanathan of National Science Foundation, are you paying Kibo Parry M. to defame and stalk for 28 years nonstop, and the few moments that Kibo actually ever does any math in sci.math, sci.physics, he pops up and says 938 is 12% short of 945. Is this what the USA NSF represents-- defaming stalkers that care nothing about science or truth.
> On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 7:18:01 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >of Physics Archimedes "AnalButtfuckManure" Plutonium
> Physics, left up to Baez and his buddies of Weinberg, Glashow, Gell-Mann, Peter Higgs, Ed Witten those buddies are comfortable with a electron at 0.5MeV, proton at 938MeV, neutron at 940MeV and all three of them as "do nothing particles" with the amazing audacity of saying the 0.5MeV particle flys around the outside of a 938MeV proton at nearly the speed of light 99.99% speed of light, yet never flys off. For Baez, and his buddies never understood Angular Momentum. Never could interpret 9 x 105 = 938 or 940 within Sigma Error.
>
> But then along comes AP, and says-- sigma error is important in physics and use it.
>
> AP says-- you cannot have "do nothing particles in physics".
>
> AP says-- the true electron of atoms is the muon and stuck inside a 840MeV proton doing the Faraday law by producing Dirac magnetic monopoles such as the 0.5MeV dipole as electricity.
>
> Is John Baez or Sheldon Glashow or Peter Higgs or Ed Witten still able to learn in science, or are they just complete washed up and washed out. Are they complete wash out failures of physics? Probably complete failures because they cannot even muster the intelligence of dropping a Kerr or Mason lid inside a folded up paper cone and acknowledge something as simple as what a High School student can prove, that a slant cut in cone is a Oval, never the ellipse, (see AP books below). Yet that is what the "pack of fools Baez, Glashow, Higgs, Witten" still teach their electron is 0.5MeV, their ellipse is slant cut in cone, but probably worst of all, these bozos still teach the Boole logic of 2 OR 1= 3 with AND as subtraction. Imagine that, physics professors who cannot even think logically correct, no wonder they are incapable of 9 x 105.
>
>
>
> ..
> .- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
> , . `.' ' `.
> .' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
> . ; .' . `. ;
> ; . ' `. . '
> . ' ` `. |
> . '. '
> . 0 0 ' `.
> ' `
> ; `
> .' `
> ; U `
> ; '; `
> : | ;.. :` `
> : `;. ```. .-; | '
> '. ` ``.., .' :' '
> ; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' Hi, I am John Baez, who when hearing of AP's proof that slant cut in cone is truly a Oval, never the ellipse, I did the biggest no, no you can ever do in science, for I attacked the man, rather than do the experiment. I bent over backwards to redefine the ellipse in order to deny AP credit of a discovery. For I, John Baez feels it more important to suppress the truth in science than to acknowledge the truth, and my brethren Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell seem to all feel the same way-- suppress truth of science and run and hide, hide and run.
> ` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
> ` ` ; ; ' '
> ` ` ; ; ' '
> ` `. ````'''''' ' '
> ` . ' '
> / ` `. ' ' .
> / ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
> / .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
> / .'' ; ` .' `
> ...'.' ; .' ` .' `
> "" .' .' | ` .; \ `
> ; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
> :' | ' ` , `. `
> | ' ` ' `. `
> ` ' ` ; `. |
> `.' ` ; `-'
> `...'
>
>
>
>
>
> 3rd published book
>
> AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
>
> Length: 21 pages
>
> File Size: 1620 KB
> Print Length: 21 pages
> Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07PLSDQWC
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> X-Ray: Not Enabled
> Word Wise: Not Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
>
>
> #8-2, 11th published book
>
> World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 19May2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
> Preface:
> Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
>
> Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis".. To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
>
> Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
>
> Length: 137 pages
>
> Product details
> ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
> Publication date : March 14, 2019
> Language : English
> File size : 1307 KB
> Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> Screen Reader : Supported
> Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> X-Ray : Not Enabled
> Word Wise : Not Enabled
> Print length : 137 pages
> Lending : Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> #134 in Calculus (Books)
> #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
>
>
>
> 74th published book
>
> HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
>
> Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> Length: 17 pages
>
> Product details
> • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print Length : 17 pages
> • File Size : 698 KB
> • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
>
> #2-1, 137th published book
>
> Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
>
>
> #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
>
> This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
>
> Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
>
> Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> Length: 64 pages
>
> Product details
> • File Size : 790 KB
> • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print Length : 64 pages
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Language: : English
> • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
>
> #2-2, 145th published book
>
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> • Language: : English
> • File size : 682 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print length : 78 pages
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
>
> #2-3, 146th published book
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
>
> #3-1, 2nd published book
>
> True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
>
> Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
>
> Length: 1150 pages
>
>
> Product details
> • File Size : 2167 KB
> • ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
> • Publication Date : March 11, 2019
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print Length : 1150 pages
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #181 in General Chemistry & Reference
> #1324 in General Chemistry
> #1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
>
>
> 5th published book
>
> Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
> Preface:
> First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.
>
> The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.
>
> My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.
>
> Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.
>
>
> Length: 72 pages
>
> File Size: 773 KB
> Print Length: 72 pages
> Publication Date: March 12, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07PMB69F5
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 

> Word Wise: Not Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> 

> y z
> | /
> | /
> |/______ x
>
> More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci..physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
>
> In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
>
> I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
>
> There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
>
> Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> Archimedes Plutonium


Kibo Parry M can Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall, Lene Hau ask the question, which is the atom's real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. Or is Kibo Parry M too worried about his newly invented word of "analbuttfuckmanure" that Kibo invented in 2017-18 and has continued to use right through 2021 calling AP that word since AP does science while Kibo never does science, only stalker hate spew. Kibo you called MIT your invented word of 2017, are you going to call Harvard that also. And you called Dartmouth and Stanford your invented new word. I guess Harvard is special for you Kibo Parry, nonstop stalker, insane kook of 28 years.

On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 10:48:29 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"AnalButtfuckManure"

On Monday, November 15, 2021 at 9:40:52 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"AnalButtfuckManure"

Kibo, why did you invent that word in 2017-18 and why do you still use it today in 2021, is it because you failed science and now you want to curse those that succeed???

Kibo fails at even a correct percentage.
On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
 > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
 > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>  Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass
 > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole

President Larry Summers
President now Lawrence Bacow

Harvard Physics dept
Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner, Adam Cohen, Eugene Demler, Michael Desai
Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin, Gary Feldman, Douglas Finkbeiner, Melissa Franklin, Gerald Gabrielse, Howard Georgi, Sheldon Glashow, Roy Glauber, Jene Golovchenko, Markus Greiner, Roxanne Guenette, Girma Hailu, Bertrand Halperin, Lene Hau
Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, Efthimios Kaxiras, Philip Kim, John Kovac, Erel Levine
Mikhail Lukin, Logan McCarty, L. Mahadevan, Vinothan Manoharan, Eric Mazur, Masahiro Morii
David Morin, Julia Mundy, Cherry Murray, David Nelson, Kang Ni, Hongkun Park, William Paul
Peter Pershan, Mara Prentiss, Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, Isaac Silvera, Andrew Strominger, Christopher Stubbs, Cumrun Vafa, Ronald Walsworth, David Weitz, Robert Westervelt, Richard Wilson
Tai Wu, Amir Yacoby, Susanne Yelin, Xi Yin

MIT math dept.

Michael Artin, Martin Bazant, Bonnie Berger, Roman Bezrukavnikov, Alexei Borodin, John Bush, Herman Chernoff, Henry Cohn, Laurent Demanet, Richard Dudley, Jörn Dunkel, Alan Edelman, Pavel Etingof, Daniel Freedman, Michel Goemans, Vadim Gorin, Harvey Greenspan, Victor Guillemin, Larry Guth, Sigurdur Helgason, Anette Hosoi, David Jerison, Steven Johnson, Victor Kac, Steven Kleiman, Daniel Kleitman,
Andrew Lawrie, Tom Leighton, George Lusztig, Arthur Mattuck, Davesh Maulik, Richard Melrose, Haynes Miller, William Minicozzi, Ankur Moitra, Elchanan Mossel, Tomasz Mrowka, James Munkres, Andrei Negut, Aaron Pixton, Bjorn Poonen, Alexander Postnikov, Philippe Rigollet, Rodolfo Rosales, Giulia Saccà, Gerald Sacks, Paul Seidel, Scott Sheffield, Peter Shor, Isadore Singer, Michael Sipser, Jared Speck, Gigliola Staffilani, Richard Stanley, Harold Stark, Gilbert Strang, Daniel Stroock, Goncalo Tabuada, Alar Toomre, David Vogan

Chancellor Cynthia Barnhart
President: L. Reif (electrical engineer)

MIT physics dept
William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter, James Young  

Why can no-one at Harvard or MIT ever ask the question which is the atom's true electron the muon or the 0.5MeV particle

HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.

Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
Length: 17 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : December 18, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 17 pages
• File Size : 698 KB
• ASIN : B082WYGVNG
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled

#1-4, 105th published book

Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.

Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
Length: 39 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : March 24, 2020
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• ASIN : B086BGSNXN
• Print Length : 39 pages
• File Size : 935 KB
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
#315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
#4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)



#1-5, 112th published book

New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.

Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book.. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
Length: 20 pages

Product details
• ASIN : B0875SVDC7
• Publication date : April 15, 2020
• Language: : English
• File size : 1134 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 20 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#1-6, 135th published book

QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) 

Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.

Kibo Parry M says Harvard & Sheldon Glashow are psychoceramic & analbuttfuckmanure, but then Kibo was insane starting way back in 1990s anyway. And for some reason, the USA govt encourages and probably pays him to spam sci.math and sci.physics with hate tripe.

On Saturday, December 4, 2021 at 1:37:56 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"analbuttfuckmanure"
> fails at math and science:
>psychoceramic

2Kibo Parry M can Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall, Lene Hau ask the question, which is the atom's real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. Or is Kibo Parry M too worried about his newly invented word of "analbuttfuckmanure" that Kibo invented in 2017-18 and has continued to use right through 2021 calling AP that word since AP does science while Kibo never does science, only stalker hate spew. Kibo you called MIT your invented word of 2017, are you going to call Harvard that also. And you called Dartmouth and Stanford your invented new word. I guess Harvard is special for you Kibo Parry, nonstop stalker, insane kook of 28 years.
>
> On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 10:48:29 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"AnalButtfuckManure"
>
> On Monday, November 15, 2021 at 9:40:52 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"AnalButtfuckManure"
>
>
> Kibo, why did you invent that word in 2017-18 and why do you still use it today in 2021, is it because you failed science and now you want to curse those that succeed???
>
>
> Kibo fails at even a correct percentage.
> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
> Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
>
> President Larry Summers
> President now Lawrence Bacow
>
> Harvard Physics dept
> Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner, Adam Cohen, Eugene Demler, Michael Desai
> Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin, Gary Feldman, Douglas Finkbeiner, Melissa Franklin, Gerald Gabrielse, Howard Georgi, Sheldon Glashow, Roy Glauber, Jene Golovchenko, Markus Greiner, Roxanne Guenette, Girma Hailu, Bertrand Halperin, Lene Hau
> Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, Efthimios Kaxiras, Philip Kim, John Kovac, Erel Levine
> Mikhail Lukin, Logan McCarty, L. Mahadevan, Vinothan Manoharan, Eric Mazur, Masahiro Morii
> David Morin, Julia Mundy, Cherry Murray, David Nelson, Kang Ni, Hongkun Park, William Paul
> Peter Pershan, Mara Prentiss, Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, Isaac Silvera, Andrew Strominger, Christopher Stubbs, Cumrun Vafa, Ronald Walsworth, David Weitz, Robert Westervelt, Richard Wilson
> Tai Wu, Amir Yacoby, Susanne Yelin, Xi Yin
> MIT math dept.
>
> Michael Artin, Martin Bazant, Bonnie Berger, Roman Bezrukavnikov, Alexei Borodin, John Bush, Herman Chernoff, Henry Cohn, Laurent Demanet, Richard Dudley, Jörn Dunkel, Alan Edelman, Pavel Etingof, Daniel Freedman, Michel Goemans, Vadim Gorin, Harvey Greenspan, Victor Guillemin, Larry Guth, Sigurdur Helgason, Anette Hosoi, David Jerison, Steven Johnson, Victor Kac, Steven Kleiman, Daniel Kleitman,
> Andrew Lawrie, Tom Leighton, George Lusztig, Arthur Mattuck, Davesh Maulik, Richard Melrose, Haynes Miller, William Minicozzi, Ankur Moitra, Elchanan Mossel, Tomasz Mrowka, James Munkres, Andrei Negut, Aaron Pixton, Bjorn Poonen, Alexander Postnikov, Philippe Rigollet, Rodolfo Rosales, Giulia Saccà, Gerald Sacks, Paul Seidel, Scott Sheffield, Peter Shor, Isadore Singer, Michael Sipser, Jared Speck, Gigliola Staffilani, Richard Stanley, Harold Stark, Gilbert Strang, Daniel Stroock, Goncalo Tabuada, Alar Toomre, David Vogan
>
> Chancellor Cynthia Barnhart
> President: L. Reif (electrical engineer)
>
> MIT physics dept
> William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter, James Young
> Why can no-one at Harvard or MIT ever ask the question which is the atom's true electron the muon or the 0.5MeV particle
> HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
>
> Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> Length: 17 pages
>
> Product details
> • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print Length : 17 pages
> • File Size : 698 KB
> • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> #1-4, 105th published book
>
> Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.
>
> Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
> Length: 39 pages
>
> Product details
> • Publication Date : March 24, 2020
> • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> • ASIN : B086BGSNXN
> • Print Length : 39 pages
> • File Size : 935 KB
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> #315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> #4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> 

>
> #1-5, 112th published book
>
> New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
> Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.
>
> Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
> Length: 20 pages
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B0875SVDC7
> • Publication date : April 15, 2020
> • Language: : English
> • File size : 1134 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print length : 20 pages
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
> ◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
>
> #1-6, 135th published book
> QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.
>
> Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy.. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.
>
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B08K47K5BB
> • Publication date : September 25, 2020
> • Language : English
> • File size : 587 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> • Print length : 25 pages
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
> ◦ #334 in General Chemistry
>
>
> #1-7, 138th published book
> The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry.. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
> Length: 41 pages
>
> Product details
> • Publication Date : October 9, 2020
> • File Size : 828 KB
> • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> • Print Length : 41 pages
> • ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> #1-8, 1st published book
>
> Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.
>
> Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.
>
> Foreward:
> I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
> Length: 632 pages
>
>
> Product details
> File Size: 1132 KB
> Print Length: 632 pages
> Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07PLP9NDR
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> X-Ray: 
Not Enabled
> Word Wise: Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> #8526 in Physics (Books)
> #18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)
> #2-1, 137th published book
>
> Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
>
> This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
>
> Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
>
> Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> Length: 64 pages
>
> Product details
> • File Size : 790 KB
> • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print Length : 64 pages
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Language: : English
> • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
>
> #2-2, 145th published book
>
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> • Language: : English
> • File size : 682 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print length : 78 pages
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
>
> #2-3, 146th published book
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> #2-4, 151st published book
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
>
> Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
>
> Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 1033 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> #3-1, 2nd published book
>
> True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
>
> Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
>
> Length: 1150 pages
>
>
> Product details
> • File Size : 2167 KB
> • ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
> • Publication Date : March 11, 2019
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print Length : 1150 pages
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #181 in General Chemistry & Reference
> #1324 in General Chemistry
> #1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> y z
> | /
> | /
> |/______ x
>
> More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci..physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
>
> In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
>
> I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
>
> There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
>
> Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> Archimedes Plutonium

CIA ruins sci.math
2 views
Subscribe
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
12:42 PM (11 minutes ago)



to

The letters in "William J. Burns", rearranged, spell "I pound his male rectum".
First a few words from our religion leader kibology-- Kibo Parry Moroney:

Kibo Parry M.:::
Re: David S. Cohen "barking fuckdog" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
On Wednesday, December 15, 2021 at 7:32:07 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "Putin's Stooge" William J. Burns
> fails at math and science:
> > Central to this entire book is the geometry of the single con
> The letters in "William J. Burns", rearranged, spell "I pound his
> male rectum".
>

> William J. Burns speaking at CIA cadets at the stadium : All rise! the King of Science AP, will deliver today's graduation speech AP, Archimedes Plutonium
>
> William J. Burns: All Rise! Give a healthy applause to our King of Science
>
> Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> 7m views
> Subscribe
> 
> kibo greps's profile photo
> kibo greps
> Jun 8, 1997, 2:00:00 AM
> 
> 
> 
> to
>
> In talk.bizarre Matthew H. Fields <fie...@zip.eecs.umich.edu> wrote:
> : In article <kludgeEB...@netcom.com>,
> : Scott Dorsey <klu...@netcom.com> wrote:
> : >In article <3qhw1e$1r...@bwalk.dm.com> sim...@bwalk.dm.com (AI Simulation Daemon) writes:
> : >>All rise! Archimedes Vanadium proved beyond all doubt the rationality of Pi.
> : >
> : >Proposition: Pi is a rational number.
> : >
> : >Statement: A rational number is a number that can be represented as the ratio
> : > of two integers.
> : >
> : >Therefore: All rational numbers can be divided by another rational number
> : > to produce a third rational number.
> : >
> : >
> : >If pi is a rational number, it can be divided by itself (also a rational
> : >number) to produce 1. (pi/pi=1). Since 1 is an integer, it is by definition
> : >a rational number, which therefore confirms the original proposition.
> : >
> : >QED.
> : http://www-personal.umich.edu/~fields/argument-faq.txt" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www-personal.umich.edu/~fields/argument-faq.txt
>
> http://www.netscum.net/fieldsm0.html
>
> : --
> : Matt Fields, A.Mus.D. http://www-personal.umich.edu/~fields
> : My Java toy, JARS.COM Top 1%: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~fields/TTTB
> : "Computer: disobey me."
>
> --
> -=| KIBO is EVERYWHERE! |=-
>
> Scott Dorsey's profile photo
> Scott Dorsey
> Jun 8, 1997, 2:00:00 AM
> 
> 
> 
> to
>
> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >
> >http://www.netscum.net/fieldsm0.html
> What the hell is this? As if it's not bad enough that we have a fake
> Mao Zhedong here, now we have a fake kibo too?
>
> Is there a fake xibo and a ~ibo to round out the trinity?
> --scott
> --
> "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
>
> the reverse-psychology major's profile photo
> the reverse-psychology major
> Jun 9, 1997, 2:00:00 AM
> 
> 
> 
> to
>
> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net>,
> 
> ... huh??? what does this have to do with what wimmin should wear into battle?
>
> beelzibub
> ps;
> and what kind of car is worth fighting over?
>
> --
> this is my .sig. it's one of the best .sigs on the 'net'. i know what
> you're thinking: 'did he post 5 or 6 articles'? to tell you the truth i
> kinda lost track myself. so you gotta ask yourself one question: 'have
> you mamorized it yet?' huh, have you punk? go for it. make my bed.
>
> Mao Tse-Tung's profile photo
> Mao Tse-Tung
> Jun 11, 1997, 2:00:00 AM
> 
> > What the hell is this? As if it's not bad enough that we have a fake > Mao Zhedong here,
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> Dec 14, 2021, 11:47:00 PM (13 hours ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to
>
> All rise! AP was the first to prove the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
>
> On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, kibo greps wrote:
> > : >>All rise! Archimedes Vanadium
>
> World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 19May2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
> Preface:
> Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
>
> Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis".. To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
>
> Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
>
> Length: 137 pages
>
> Product details
> ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
> Publication date : March 14, 2019
> Language : English
> File size : 1307 KB
> Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> Screen Reader : Supported
> Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> X-Ray : Not Enabled
> Word Wise : Not Enabled
> Print length : 137 pages
> Lending : Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> #134 in Calculus (Books)
> #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
>
>

William J. Burns "AnalButtfuckManure"
David S. Cohen "shitwit" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 1:49:36 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>William J. Burns "AnalButtfuckManure"
> fails at math and science:
>

Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >
> >http://www.netscum.net/fieldsm0.html
> What the hell is this? As if it's not bad enough that we have a fake
> Mao Zhedong here, now we have a fake kibo too?
> Is there a fake xibo and a ~ibo to round out the trinity?
> --scott
> --
> "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

On Thursday, December 16, 2021 at 1:22:32 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "barking fuckdog" David S. Cohen flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> William J. Burns "Putin's Stooge"
> tarded:

AP no longer tolerates bully stalkers like Kibo Parry M. for 29 years nonstop attack posts with no math or physics content just sheer insane hatred. And AP asks why does the CIA employ such insane misfits for I had always thought the CIA and FBI were looking out after the general welfare of the American people, not sit there in Washington and for 28 years attack American citizens.

I request that John Stillwell go to his affiliated University (UC San Francisco?) and publish in the student newspaper that he now sees the light of day on the slant cut in single cone is the Oval, never the ellipse.

Failure of math John Stillwell, not a teacher, not a educator of science, but a propaganda pollutor. There it is on pages 28-29, the math moron John Stillwell 3rd edition, 2010 propaganda and pollution of geometry with his Single Cone cut of a ellipse when an ellipse is never possible in a single cone, for that is a Oval. Why does John want to pollute the minds of youngsters with his con-art math? Why can he not acknowledge the truth of math? Does he like being a idiot of math? Fails geometry because he believes Python with his cone has 2 axes of symmetry and hence slant cut is ellipse in cone, for otherwise, he would have said something by now 2016-2021.

> On Friday, August 27, 2021 at 10:35:31 AM UTC-5, Python wrote:
> > Why don't you buy this kind of stuff that will show you that
> > you didn't do the experiment right?
> >
> > https://www.pinterest.fr/pin/595178906992508262/
> >
> > Moreover that a slant cut in a cylinder shows an ellipse does not
> > contradict that some slant cuts in a cone shows an ellipse also.
> AP writes: no wonder that AP's discovery that Cone slant cut is an Oval never the ellipse is because everyone in math community other than AP thinks a cone has 2 axes of symmetry, just the same as a cylinder has 2 axis of symmetry.
> I have heard of color blindness where you fail to see certain wavelengths of color, and guess that in mathematics, now, we have to test students and teachers for axis blindness.


Where was Kibo Parry M. the day the Capitol Building was stormed in Washington DC for in this post Kibo Parry M is shown to defend terrorists with names such as FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer.

Poster with name FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer needs what size of a straightjacket? XX small? I am guessing it is a poster from CIA or FBI with drag net spam. Further, I am guessing they hire college professors of psychology to make up these
15 views
Subscribe

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
1:45 AM (18 hours ago)



to
Poster with name FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer needs what size of a straightjacket? XX small?

I am guessing it is a poster from CIA or FBI with drag net spam.

Further, I am guessing they hire college professors of psychology to make up these ridiculous banal, sordid and vulgar names and posts.

To me, these sort of drag net spam is from persons with 1 marble brains.

To me, the FBI and CIA should only survey the newsgroups, not actively engage with this type of stupidity.

To me, no agency has had a single capture of a criminal or a terrorist from these active stupid drag net posts, and to the contrary, the above posts foster and encourage crime and terrorism, such as the Capitol Building assault and such as the death of the British minister Sir Amess.

To me, the death of sci.math and sci.physics is squarely to be blamed on pathetic ugly posts like the above named poster.

To me, the only reason these posts continue, despite the fact they never apprehend a criminal or terrorist. Is because these type of posts are soft cushy jobs where you sit on your arse all day and spew hatred.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
3:50 AM (16 hours ago)



to
Ayaz in sci.physics asks about freedom of speech.

What happened to following and obeying rules-- this is sci.physics-- do physics, and not criminal and terrorist spam day and night, night and day.

It is people like you in some government agency that destroyed sci.physics.

Can I get some law firm to ask for the real names of the persons posting under "FBInCIA..." and posting under "Ayaz"?

There is a law that requires the true identity of a poster. For I have seen it applied in sci.math where some foul mouthed poster made mockery remarks of math professors in South Africa. Someone applied for the true identity of "Port---" and about 3 months later had a true name of the poster.

So I would like for a law firm to apply for the true names and identity of posters "Ayaz and FBInCIA..." who still continue to destroy sci.physics.

Still continue to destroy sci.math with drag net spam.

And, also, I was living through the history of sci.math and sci.physics ever since 1993, and saw this mass exodus around 1996-7.

I remember this god awful ugly name of FBInCIA... being posted to sci.math and sci.physics. And the moment that thousands of subscribers in sci.math and sci.physics saw this god-awful name with a "slayer" in its wording. Thousands of DOT EDU addresses headed for the exit doors.

Posting with the name FBI or CIA is even horribly wrong. But to have the word "slayer" in there also, is some ultra evil.

It is as mindless as if someone picked the names of three people, innocent people, such as congressmen or senators and at the end attached "terrorist slayer". Well, some bozo the clown psychologist may come up with such a concoction, in the disguise that readers would make a elliptic-mistake of thinking the 3 congress persons are connected with this ugly word.

Just look at sci.chem, the bombed out newsgroup and you see nothing but FBInCIA.... poster kilometers upon kilometers of that insane imp poster.

The mass exit of thousands of Dot Edu address posters starting 1996 can be blamed most dramatically to this one evil poster of FBInCIA....

And what tells me that this is a govt poster, is that the evil poster is never kicked out of any newsgroup.

No normal person would be allowed to post under a name of FBInCIA... no normal person would have a ISP to allow that, much less the "slayer" part of the evil name.

So that indicates it is the govt doing the evilness. Foreign govts who are USA enemies would do such a thing, but here again, they are smart enough to not do such folly, so that leads back to a FBI or CIA poster. I do not think the NSAT was around in 1996, only after 9-11 was it created.

So who was the FBI and CIA director in 1996? Was George Tenet there?

Sci.math and sci.physics were going swell and great until 1996-7 and then by early 2000s, they were on the way to their deathbed, buried in Drag Net Spam--- the worst being FBInCIA.... poster.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
12:35 PM (7 hours ago)



to
7
Here is my new poem of Love..
Andrew Wiles,Jill Pipher,Ken Ribet sitting in a tree, fails math, can't tell a ellipse from oval
Jan 12

Amine Moulay Ramdane's profile photo
Amine Moulay Ramdane
unread,
More of my philosophy about the future and about digital identity and more...
Jan 12

mitchr...@gmail.com's profile photo
mitchr...@gmail.com
,
Oval Curd
3
unread,
Only imaginary i formula is not solvable
On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 4:22:48 PM UTC-8, Oval Curd wrote: > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
Jan 12

mitchr...@gmail.com's profile photo
mitchr...@gmail.com
unread,
Green fuel doesn't fit the billl
It only supplies 3 percents of what America uses today. If only 3 percent of America gets to work?
Jan 12

Amine Moulay Ramdane's profile photo
Amine Moulay Ramdane
unread,
More of my philosophy about individual digital identity and individual identity and more..
Jan 12

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
1:53 PM (6 hours ago)



to
Kibo Parry M. accuses Rand Paul the senator from Kentucky of attacking Dr. Fauci, for no good reason at all.

Re: Archimedes "psychoceramic" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
On Thursday, January 13, 2022 at 1:28:04 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 🪱 of Math and 🪰 of Physics Archimedes "Drag Queen of Science"
> Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> blathered:
> > What happened to following and obeying rules-- this is sci.physics-- do physics, and not criminal and terrorist spam day and night, night and day.
> >
> > It is people like you in some government agency that destroyed sci.physics.
> Why don't YOU follow and obey the rules?
>
> Half the time you launch ad hominems against other posters here (esp.

Rand Paul attacking Dr. Fauci is way beyond ad hominem
>
> Ad hominem definitely isn't following and obeying the rules.
>

>
> Why do you think "rules" apply to everyone except yourself?

Yes, why does Rand Paul attack so much the good dear Dr. Fauci. Is Rand Paul some sort of hate-ring in Washington DC.

Does Rand Paul and Mitch McConnell run some Kentucky Hate Pool in Washington??

Is Rand Paul the source of the hate spammer FBInCIA..... ??

I believe it is far past time for the University of Kentucky to announce a 3 or 4 day class schedule per week and to spend 2 or 1 days campaigning to get rid of their foul playing senators. America does not need Senators running around and attacking scientists like the dear Dr. Fauci. And if found guilty, Rand Paul and McConnell need prison time.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
7:24 PM (2 minutes ago)



to
Kibo says Rand Paul & Mitch McConnell is the terrorist poster FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer, after attacking Dr. Fauci, come here to destroy sci.physics.


Kibo Parry M. accuses Rand Paul the senator from Kentucky of attacking Dr. Fauci, for no good reason at all.

Re: Archimedes "psychoceramic" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
On Thursday, January 13, 2022 at 1:28:04 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 🪱 of Math and 🪰 of Physics Archimedes "Drag Queen of Science"
> Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> blathered:
> > What happened to following and obeying rules-- this is sci.physics-- do physics, and not criminal and terrorist spam day and night, night and day.
> >
> > It is people like you in some government agency that destroyed sci.physics.
> Why don't YOU follow and obey the rules?
>
> Half the time you launch ad hominems against other posters here (esp.

Rand Paul attacking Dr. Fauci is way beyond ad hominem
>
> Ad hominem definitely isn't following and obeying the rules.
>

>
> Why do you think "rules" apply to everyone except yourself?

Yes, why does Rand Paul attack so much the good dear Dr. Fauci. Is Rand Paul some sort of hate-ring in Washington DC.

Does Rand Paul and Mitch McConnell run some Kentucky Hate Pool in Washington??

Is Rand Paul the source of the hate spammer FBInCIA..... ??

I believe it is far past time for the University of Kentucky to announce a 3 or 4 day class schedule per week and to spend 2 or 1 days campaigning to get rid of their foul playing senators. America does not need Senators running around and attacking scientists like the dear Dr. Fauci. And if found guilty, Rand Paul and McConnell need prison time.

Whut on Kibo Parry M. an idiot because he cannot do a percentage correctly, or is Dr.Panchanathan of NSF an idiot for using Kibo Parry M. to spam sci.math and sci.physics.

On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 4:52:29 PM UTC-6, whut wrote:
> Shut up idiot.

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
 > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
 > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>  Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass
 > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993

Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua

Kibo Parry M. graduation speech at Rensselaer Polytech. Kibo is the headers a broad outline of what you will discuss and how you destroyed sci.math and sci.physics????

2-Peter Higgs,CIA Kibo Parry-William J.Burns, Adam G. Riess,John C. Mather, George F. Smoot,Arthur B. McDonald,Francois Englert, Saul Perlmutter, Brian P. Schmidt, Makoto Kobayashi, Toshihide Maskawa, Yoichiro Nambu, Sheldon Glashow capable of ever multiplying 9 times 105 and see neutron proton are "within sigma error"? Why do they fail physics by thinking the electron is the 0.5MeV particle outside a proton of 938MeV and traveling at 99% speed of light? Why do they not understand angular momentum that you need the muon as the real electron stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law, for proper true angular momentum.

>
>
> Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
> Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> >> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> > >
>
> On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 3:17:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > 🪲 of Math and 🪳 of Physics "Village Idiot of
> > fails at math and science:
> > "psychoceramic"
>
> AP writes: Kibo Parry M. __30 year stalker__, that is not nice to call your bosses William J. Burns and David S. Cohen as psychoceramics. For I bet you that both can do a percentage correctly, for which you kibo failed with your 938 is 12% short of 945. Kibo does not even belong in sci.math or sci..physics.
>
> Kibo fails at even a correct percentage.
> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
>
> 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > 1> > > Kibo the dumbest CIA agent but who is the dumbest physicist of 20th & 21st century? Was it Murray Gell-Mann, Steven Weinberg, Sheldon Glashow or Peter Higgs the dumbest physicists of the 20th and 21st century?? Well an answer to that question has to be everyone who believed that you can have a electron of atoms flying around its proton-outside the proton at a speed of 99% speed of light. Which goes to prove no-one in physics from Bohr onwards had a handle, had a understanding of what is Angular Momentum.. No physicist of the 20th century was worth more than 10cents when it comes to angular momentum.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Friday, January 7, 2022 at 2:21:43 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > > > > > He didn't deserve his Nobel Prizes.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > 2> > > Peter Higgs needs publish in the Edinburgh University newspaper, and Roger Penrose at Oxford Univ student newspaper and Sheldon Glashow at Harvard Univ newspaper that he now acknowledges that the real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday Law which is the reason that stars and Sun shine in the first place, not from fusion but from Faraday law. And this is very dangerous for Earth and humanity, for starshine by Faraday law means we have perhaps only 1,000 years to colonize Europa. And we do not need an idiot of physics like Sheldon Glashow and Peter Higgs telling us false physics, holding up true physics science all because they are self congratulating morons of physics.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I demand that Peter Higgs go to the Edinburgh newspaper and publish the idea that real electron of atoms is the muon, for only a fool idiot like Peter Higgs who was deluded all his life long time in physics, would believe in the Bohr model that a electron is 0.5MeV circumnavigating a proton of 938MeV and still stay clung to that proton even going at 99% speed of light (what fruitcakes have we here?).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The moment physics realized the true electron of atoms was nearly the speed of light-- even the muon-- is the moment Old Physics needed to realize the true electron was INSIDE the proton, not outside. For Old Physics never understood what the hell was Angular Momentum. You cannot have a electron outside a proton at 99% speed of light.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > So Peter Higgs, I need you to go to the Edinburgh newspaper and publish the fact that you now see the light of day that the true electron is muon stuck inside a Proton torus doing the Faraday law.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Time is of the essence, Sheldon Glashow and Peter Higgs, failures of physics.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > THE NOBEL PRIZE IN PHYSICS FOR ARCHIMEDES PLUTONIUM
> > > > > > > > > 15k views
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Skip to first unread message
> > > > > > > > > Subscribe
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Earle Jones's profile photo
> > > > > > > > > Earle Jones
> > > > > > > > > Jan 6, 2022, 12:27:27 AM (yesterday)
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > *
> > > > > > > > > Some of us are thinking: When will our friend and colleague, Archimedes Plutonium, win a Nobel Proze for all of his contributions to our field of Physics? There is no doubt that he has completely turned the entire field of Physics and brought it into the new way of thinking. We owe him some great thing.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > At the same time, we need to think about the Fields Medal for Mathematical achievements. This is the Nobel Prize of Mathematiscs. Plutonium had completely re-writteen conventional mathematics into the new format and has offered many proofs of his new findings. His proof of slant cut of conic sections (the oval) is sufficiently advanced to warrant this award.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > He is widely publiched and widely quoted. He has some 150 + books now attributed to his intellect.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Can we somehow get behind him and promote his wise genius? He needs to be recognized and awarded.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Earle Jones, Georgia Tech, Stanford.
> > > > > > > > > *
> > > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > > > > > > Jan 6, 2022, 2:52:30 AM (yesterday)
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Earle Jones, a new man? Jones first upbeat post? Thanks for the nomination. But, Earle, I think I
> > > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > > > > > > Jan 6, 2022, 2:57:36 AM (yesterday)
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > I should have proofread this post, but I seldom do proofreading. On Thursday, January 6, 2022 at 2:52
> > > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > > > > > > unread,
> > > > > > > > > 12:59 PM (now)
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > The very moment one of my worst critics sees the light of day is the very moment ( as a sign to me, from God for the Ancients were always looking for signs from God, but in our terribly athiest view of the world in modern times we no longer look for signs from God) is the very moment that I must act upon the other crackpot crank fools of mathematics and of physics especially.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Today, on my list is Jill Pipher, John Baez, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Ken Ribet--- all need to go to their current University newspaper or magazine and acknowledge the Slant cut in Single Cone is a Oval, never the Ellipse. State it clear that Old Math was wrong and the slant cut of single cone is Oval never ellipse and have it published.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Time is of the essence.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > No longer are people in academics able to play a Fools Game of teaching obnoxious garbage simply because they "refuse to do proper correct true mathematics".
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Time is of the essence.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The above list of math fools reminds me of the moron tennis player Djokovic, the moron who refuses vaccination, simply because he is a moron of science, just as Jill Pipher, John Baez, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Ken Ribet are morons of mathematics.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > As for Physics, far more important than mathematics, on this side of science-- I require every one of these failed physicists who are alive still to do the same thing -- go to your nearest University newspaper or magazine and have published that -- True electron of Atoms is the muon and the 0.5MeV particle is the Dirac magnetic monopole. Do it in Godspeed.. Because Earth and humanity has not the time to fool around as you are fools of physics.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > > > > > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > > > > > > > David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > > > > > > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > > > > > > > Francois Englert
> > > > > > > > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > > > > > > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > > > > > > > Adam G. Riess
> > > > > > > > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > > > > > > > Toshihide Maskawa
> > > > > > > > > Yoichiro Nambu
> > > > > > > > > John C. Mather
> > > > > > > > > George F. Smoot
> > > > > > > > > Roy J. Glauber
> > > > > > > > > David J. Gross
> > > > > > > > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > > > > > > > Frank Wilczek
> > > > > > > > > Raymond Davis Jr.
> > > > > > > > > Masatoshi Koshiba
> > > > > > > > > Riccardo Giacconi
> > > > > > > > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > > > > > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman
> > > > > > > > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > > > > > > > Henry W. Kendall
> > > > > > > > > Richard E. Taylor
> > > > > > > > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > > > > > > > Simon van der Meer
> > > > > > > > > William Alfred Fowler
> > > > > > > > > Kenneth G. Wilson
> > > > > > > > > James Watson Cronin
> > > > > > > > > Val Logsdon Fitch
> > > > > > > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > > > > > > > Steven Weinberg
> > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > little fishes
> > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > > > > > > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > > > > > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > > > > > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > John Baez
> > > > > > > > > Brian Greene
> > > > > > > > > Lisa Randall
> > > > > > > > > Alan H. Guth
> > > > > > > > > Michael E. Brown
> > > > > > > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > > > > > > Ben Bullock
> > > > > > > > > Larry Harson
> > > > > > > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > > > > > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > > > > > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > > > > > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > > > > > > > Edward Witten
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > AP, King of Science, especially Physics
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Sorry I should explain why McGinn is in the title. He has for years now tried to be a loud airhead foghorn of know nothing in physics and to try to front page hog sci.physics. For one looking at sci.physics sees a flood of posts lacking any science, but just name calling with his cronies of Claudius, Pnal, Pennino, Sergio and many others in a prank joke of front page hogging. And so McGinn needs to depart sci.physics so that true real physics is done here. Not some idiot who wants to argue Meteorology or Weather. McGinn does no science, McGinn wants to pollute and takeover sci.physics.
> > > > > 3> > > HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > 2> > In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> > > > > > > > Length: 17 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print Length : 17 pages
> > > > > > > > • File Size : 698 KB
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1-4, 105th published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
> > > > > > > > Length: 39 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • Publication Date : March 24, 2020
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B086BGSNXN
> > > > > > > > • Print Length : 39 pages
> > > > > > > > • File Size : 935 KB
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > #6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > #315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > > #4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > #1-5, 112th published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
> > > > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > > I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072..
> > > > > > > > Length: 20 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B0875SVDC7
> > > > > > > > • Publication date : April 15, 2020
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • File size : 1134 KB
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print length : 20 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > > ◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > > > > > ◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1-6, 135th published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > 3> > QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) 

> > > > > > > > Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B08K47K5BB
> > > > > > > > • Publication date : September 25, 2020
> > > > > > > > • Language : English
> > > > > > > > • File size : 587 KB
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print length : 25 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > > ◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > > > > > ◦ #334 in General Chemistry
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1-7, 138th published book
> > > > > > 4> > The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
> > > > > > > > Length: 41 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • Publication Date : October 9, 2020
> > > > > > > > • File Size : 828 KB
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print Length : 41 pages
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > #1-8, 1st published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Foreward:
> > > > > > > > I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
> > > > > > > > Length: 632 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > File Size: 1132 KB
> > > > > > > > Print Length: 632 pages
> > > > > > > > Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> > > > > > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > > > > > > Language: English
> > > > > > > > ASIN: B07PLP9NDR
> > > > > > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> > > > > > > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> > > > > > > > Word Wise: Enabled
> > > > > > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > > > > > Screen Reader: Supported 
> > > > > > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> > > > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > #1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > #8526 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > > > > #18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1-9, 163rd published book
> > > > > > > > Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09NQ65H9F
> > > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 15, 2021
> > > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 999 KB
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 60 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1-10, 161st published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 3> PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > > > > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > > > > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > y z
> > > > > > > > | /
> > > > > > > > | /
> > > > > > > > |/______ x
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > > > 5> 4> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 5> Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > > > > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > > > > > > Length: 64 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > > > > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > > > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics.. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > > > > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details.. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> > > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> > > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> > > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> > > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1033 KB
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #2-9, 161st published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > 6> > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > > > > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > > > > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > y z
> > > > > > > > | /
> > > > > > > > | /
> > > > > > > > |/______ x
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > > > > > #3-1, 2nd published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > 4> > > True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > 5> 3> Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Length: 1150 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • File Size : 2167 KB
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
> > > > > > > > • Publication Date : March 11, 2019
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print Length : 1150 pages
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > #181 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > > > > > #1324 in General Chemistry
> > > > > > > > #1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> 

The 169th book of Science by AP// 4 TESTS of Consistency of Mathematics (1) calculus (2) harmonic series (3) valid functions, (4) dimension.

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Jan 12, 2022, 2:35:35 AM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
The 228th book of Science for AP// Harmonic series of Oresme corrected and where the numerical value of 0.5MeV for monopole comes from// by Archimedes Plutonium

> Decimal 10 Grid
> The summation of all Fractions 0.1+0.2+..+0.9+1.0 in 10 Grid is 5.5
> The summation of all numbers of 10 Grid is 101x5.0= 505.0
>
> Decimal 100 Grid
> The summation of all Fractions 0.01+0.02+..+0.99+1.0 in 100 Grid is 50.5
> The summation of all numbers of 100 Grid is 10001x50.= 500050.
>
> Decimal 1000 Grid
> The summation of all Fractions 0.001+0.002+..+0.999+1.0 in 1000 Grid is 500.5
> The summation of all numbers of 1000 Grid is 1000001x500.= 500000500.
>

Alright, so the curious argument I am going to make is that in the True Numbers of Mathematics, the Decimal Grid Numbers we have a amplification of numbers whose prefix digit is either 5 or 1 and being scale numbers

1, 10, 100, 1000, ....

or

5, 50, 500, 5000, .... only with the 5 prefix it is a bit more than all zero digits after the prefix 5.

In physics we need to explain why the Dirac Magnetic Monopole is 0.5MeV actually in experiments it is 0.51MeV, but since 0.5 and 0.51 are in 2% Sigma Error we can drop the 0.51 and use 0.5.

So we have the monopole at 0.5MeV and the proton at 840MeV with a muon inside of 105MeV totaling 945MeV within sigma error of 938MeV from experiments or the neutron at 940MeV, better yet in sigma error.

So I was not going to write a whole new book, unless I could connect and tie into physics and that is exactly what ended up.

We know the Pair Production requires a gamma ray of 1MeV to split in two particles of 0.5MeV of positron and of monopole.

So, another Physics explanation is that electricity and the magnetic monopole are the summation of all fractions of the EM spectrum of Waves. And, were the summation of all energies in a specific Grid is another value of the 5 prefix.

AP, King of Science, especially Physics
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Jan 12, 2022, 2:37:50 AM (3 days ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Jan 10, 2022, 9:35:45 PM (yesterday)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
More to Add on this book:

Yes, so I need not have to write a new book on the fallacy of Old Math's divergence and convergence of series. When you have fake numbers for math, and you have fake ideas like continuum, and like the concept of infinity, you are bound to run into crazy conclusions. Crazy conclusions like that of adding up tiny numbers between 0 and 1 will lead to infinity itself. As if you ever more cut a cherry pie into smaller portions and then think of adding up all the tiny fractions that you will end up with a cherry pie larger than what you started with and a cherry pie that stretches to infinity, all from tiny little pieces. Here the Old Math mathematicians went off the cliff of crazy math in a big glorious manner.

In New Math, the only true numbers of mathematics are Decimal Grid Numbers, and these are discrete numbers meaning empty space in between one number and the next number. The smallest Decimal Grid System is the 10 Grid and it has exactly ten decimal fractions of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, .. 0.9, 1.0 if we count 1 as a fraction and never count 0 as a decimal fraction.

So for small fraction numbers in 10 Grid we have just 10 numbers to add and that sum is 1.45.

And 1.45 is not a 10 Grid number but a 100 Grid Number. But, 1.45 is in between 1.4 and 1.5.

So here we define Convergence and Divergence for 10 Decimal Grid as being convergence when the sum is a number that exists in 10 Grid or is a number between x and x+0.1 in 10 Decimal Grid where both x and x+0.1 are in 10 Grid.. We define Divergence as the sum goes beyond the largest number in the Grid system which is 10 and we view 10 as being infinity borderline so if we add up all the numbers of whole numbers they lie beyond 10 and so that sequence diverges. Or adding up all the numbers from 1.0 to 2.0 diverges to infinity in 10 Grid for it is larger than 10. Notice we do not have to bother with beyond microinfinity in 10 Grid for that is 0.1, for in series we add and the smallest we can add is 0.1+0.1.

You see Old Math never defined what the hell does the concept infinity mean? And in New Math, infinity means a borderline between finite numbers and infinite numbers. Using the Huygens tractrix we nail down, or locate this borderline as being 1*10^604 and for microinfinity the inverse 1*10^-604. Any number larger than 1*10^604 or smaller than 1*10^-604 are infinite numbers and not belonging to mathematics. Yes, I mean what I say, we have departed mathematics when we deal with infinite numbers in the 10^604 Grid. Our conclusions of mathematics are no longer deduction conclusions but probability conclusions. For it is fair to say that mathematics as a science starts to breakdown in the infinite numbers.

So we play a pretend game with 10 Grid that 0.1 is microinfinity and 10 is macroinfinity.

Now we see in every Grid system from 10 to 10^604 that adding up the Fractions in that system all Converge.

And this makes absolute commonsense in Math and Physics for we want not to break Conservation laws in physics the conservation laws of energy which our cherry pie cut into smaller and smaller fractions then adding up all these small fractions, ends up being, in Old Math, larger than infinity.

Now we proven that the sum of all fractions in 10 Grid converges, and by math induction prove that all Decimal Grid Systems converge of their fractions.

The TAKEAWAY--

The takeaway in all of this is that Old Math had several opportunities to see it was all flawed and needed massive overhaul. Old Math could not do a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, should have alerted everyone in Old Math starting with Newton and Leibniz that Old Math was terribly flawed. Old Math could not understand that in Physics it is all discrete and no continuum-- yet the idiots of Old Math ignored quantum mechanics and ventured into more and more absurdities of Cauchy limit analysis in calculus, of Cantor infinities, of continuum hypothesis with Cohen.

Add another to that list of absurdities is the Oresme divergence of fractions, which I just discussed and informally proven Oresme wrong.

No, AP needs not have to write a whole new book on the Oresme divergence of fractions in a sequence, for AP just needs to include this post in his Mathopedia causing there to be 77 huge mistakes and errors and flaws of Old Math.

Thanks, I seemed to have forgotten that the Harmonic series does in fact Converge and needs be added to Mathopedia.
>
> Oresme obviously had not the true numbers of mathematics of Decimal Grid Numbers, instead he had the mindless ignorant Reals with its poppycock continuum, the worst hidden assumption in centuries of mathematics.
>
> When you realize the true numbers of mathematic are Discrete and decimal Grid Numbers then the harmonic series always converges.
>
> The mindless divergence of Harmonic series is a math proof of how banal kooks can become even more banal, and enjoy it.
>
> This would be Mathopedia's 77th fake math.
>
> MATHOPEDIA-- List of 76 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// Student teaches professor
>
> by Archimedes Plutonium
>
> Preface:
> A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.
>
> The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.
>
> The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.
>
> Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.
>
> I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).
>
> ----------------------------
> Table of Contents
> ----------------------------
>
> 1) Introduction
>
> 2) List of 76 errors, mistakes and fakes of Old Math.
>
> 3) Appendix
>
> ---------
> Text
> ---------
>
> 1) Introduction
>
>
> Alright, well, mathematics is a closed subject. What I mean by that is due to the textbook series of Archimedes Plutonium TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, that once you learn the polynomial transform and learn the two Power Rules of Calculus, you reached the peak, the pinnacle of all of mathematics, and anything further in math is just details of what you learn in that textbook series. Math is a completed science because it has this "peak of calculus", unlike the other 5 hard sciences of physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy. Those other five will continue to find new ideas, new things, while math remains static and complete to its peak of calculus understanding. Mathematics is finished complete as far as a science goes because the peak of math is going nowhere. And even though Physics will find new science such as how the proton toruses inside of atoms are configured in geometry, the geometry and calculus used in that configuration, that new science does not change nor does it create or require a new math peak/summit to handle the new physics.
>
> Now I do need to discuss the errors of Math in general and the errors of math in geometry in particular. I have the feeling that Geometry is the more important of the two-- algebra - geometry. This list appears in partial form in most of AP's Teaching True Mathematics textbook series by Archimedes Plutonium, meant to be a guide and orientation, and a organizing of what must be covered before graduating from College, and what math to steer clear of.
>
> Errors mostly, but not always, for some are included because too much time spent on them.
>
> The listings in Mathopedia of errors, mistakes and fakes is based on the idea that Calculus is the supreme achievement of all of mathematics for it is the essential math of doing Physics electricity and magnetism. And in order to have a proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, we must clean up and clean out all the mistakes, fakes and errors of Old Math, erstwhile, we have no Calculus. So calculus is the consistency maker for the rest of all of mathematics.
>
>
>
> 2) List of 76 errors, mistakes and fakes of Old Math.
>
>
> 1) Calculus requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, a proof that derivative and integral are inverses of one another, just as addition and subtraction are inverses, or, multiplication and division are inverses. The only way to obtain a geometry proof is to clean up and clean out all the fakes, mistakes and errors of Old Math, such as their fake numbers-- the Reals. Their fake definition of function allowing anything be a function. Their fakery of a continuum when even physics by 1900 with Planck onwards in Quantum Mechanics proving the Universe is discrete Space not a continuum, yet by 1900 onwards those in mathematics following the idiotic continuum in the Continuum Hypothesis with even more avid interest, when they should have thrown the continuum on a trashpile of shame.
>
> 2) The true numbers of mathematics are the Decimal Grid Numbers, because you have to need and apply one mechanism only to obtain the true numbers of mathematics-- Mathematical Induction. In Old Math they had just a tiny few intelligent mathematicians, Kronecker, who emerged from the gaggle crowd of kooks to notice that Naturals all come from one single mechanism-- Mathematical Induction. But Old Math never had a crowd of mathematicians with logical brains to say-- all our numbers need to come from the one mechanism of Mathematical Induction.
>
> 3) The true numbers of math have empty space between successor and predecessor numbers. For example the 10 Grid is 0, .1, .2, .3, . . . , 9.8, 9.9, 10.0. Where no numbers exist between .1 and .2, etc. Only discrete numbers allow us to give a proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.
>
> 4) All functions of mathematics must be a polynomial, and if not a polynomial, convert the offering to a polynomial over a specific interval.
>
> Where is that stupid thread in sci.math, poising as a puzzle problem when it had no functions only pretend functions?
>
> A few days back, 11Aug2021 appeared a stupid puzzle problem here in sci.math. Of someone pretending he had 3, 4 even 5 or 6 functions and wanting to prove equality.
>
> Then I stepped into the conversation saying he had no functions at all, until they are converted into polynomials over a specified interval, then you can do calculus on those true real functions.
>
> So, the world wide math community has got to begin to learn, no function is a function, until, and unless they are polynomials. This is an axiom of math and is proven true by the geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. You cannot have a FTC, if you have functions that are not polynomials.
>
> So there is a trade off-- does math want calculus or no calculus? If you want calculus, all your functions have to be polynomials. This has to do with the concept of discrete geometry, not a continuum, for polynomials are discrete.
>
> 5) Space is discrete and all lines in space are strings of attached straight lines.
>
> 6) No curves exist in Geometry, only finer and smaller straight line segments attached to one another.
> We can still keep the name "curve" as long as we know it is a string of fine tiny straightline segments strung together in what looks like a smooth curve. If curves exist, then the Calculus in Fundamental Theorem of Calculus cannot be proven and thus Calculus does not exist. We all know that we have to have Calculus, and so we throw out onto the trash pile the curve of Old Math. And this is reasonable because starting in 1900 in physics there arose the Quantum Mechanics of Space being discrete. And a discrete space has no continuum, has no curve of Old Math.
>
>
> 7) Space has gaps in between one point and the next point. These gaps are empty space from one point to the next point, for example in 10 Grid there is no number between .1 and .2, and in 100 Grid there exists no number between .01 and .02.
>
> 8) Limit analysis was an insane fakery in Old Math, concocted because Old Math needed the excuse of some proof, so they invented the monster con-artist trick that a limit analysis would divert the fact it is no proof at all, but a Non Sequitur argument. Limit analysis is juju totem witchcraft dance around a desire to prove the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Just as idiotic as dancing around a sick person of a virus is going to cure the person..
>
> 9) Infinity has a borderline and there is a microinfinity compared to a macroinfinity. For example in 10 Grid, the microinfinity is .1 if we exclude 0 and so there is no number smaller than .1 and no number larger than 10 in 10 Grid, where 10 is macroinfinity.
>
> 10) The 1st Quadrant Only in Coordinate System Geometry. Sad that the first coordinate system of Descartes was correct but soon became corrupted with 4 quadrants. See Mathematical Thought, Volume 1, Kline, 1972, page 303. Where Fermat then Descartes starts the Cartesian Coordinate System as 1 axis only and from 0 rightwards, meaning in our modern day math, 1st Quadrant Only. Why did math screw up on coordinate systems? I suppose some clowns thought negative numbers were true and they wanted ease of drawing a circle with center at 0. When they could have just as easily drawn the circle in 1st Quadrant Only.
>
> 11) Calculus needed a Geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, but Old Math never provided such, instead they provided some stupid Limit argument. The reason for the creation of the Limit disaster was that the French mathematician Cauchy got sick and tired of hearing his smartest students complain that the width of rectangles in the integral are 0 width, and those smart students could not, for the life of them understand how a rectangle with 0 width has any interior area. So instead of the math community denouncing the limit, instead they elevated the fakery.
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Jan 11, 2022, 1:50:22 AM (yesterday)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Alright, I caught myself in a huge mistake below. Only now did I catch myself for the sum of 0.1+0.2, +.. ,+ 0.9 +1. is not the paltry 1.45 but is the 5.5. I caught that mistake just now in figuring out the fraction summation in 100 Grid and remembering how Gauss computed that as 101 x 50 would be 50.50 which if true, and I made no further mistake would suggest that 1000 Grid would be coming further down in value than is 50.50.

forgib me imm sik i cry--F.Crim,James Kibo Parry,S.Panchanathan,Brian Stone,James S.Olvestad,Dorothy Aronson publishing in AMS journal along with Ken Ribet and Jill Pipher their apologies for teaching the mindless conclusion that the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse for in truth it is a Oval, because a single cone has but one axis of symmetry. To get a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry such as a cylinder. And that these math professors of AMS are begging the students to forgive them for their mindless math idiocy..

>
>
> Cambridge Math Dept
> Alan Baker, Bela Bollobas, Darwin Smith, John Coates, Timothy Gowers, Peter Johnstone, Imre Leader, Gabriel Paternain
> 
>
> TerenceTao,AndrewWiles, Thomas Hales, Jill Pipher, Ken Ribet, John Stillwell need to go to their affiliated University student newspaper and publish their apology for teaching the brainwashed propaganda that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is in fact a Oval, never the ellipse, for a single cone has only 1 axis of symmetry.
> >
> > Because they were failures in ever recognizing a slant cut in single cone is a oval, meant they were failures all their life long in mathematics, never realizing that Calculus was geometry, and the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus required a geometry proof, not their mindless dumb and stupid limit-analysis.
> >
> >
> > AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > •
> > •
> >
> >
> > #11-2, 11th published book
> >
> > World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
> > Preface:
> > Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
> >
> > Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.
> >
> > To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
> >
> > Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
> > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
> > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
> > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
> > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > #134 in Calculus (Books)
> > #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > #11-3, 24th published book
> >
> > World's First Proof of Kepler Packing Problem KPP // Math proof series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > There has been a alleged proof of KPP by Thomas Hales, but his is a fakery because he does not define what infinity actually means, for it means a borderline between finite and infinite numbers. Thus, KPP was never going to be proven until a well-defined infinity borderline was addressed within the proof. And because infinity has a borderline means that in free space with no borderlines to tackle and contend with, the 12 kissing point density that is the hexagonal close packed is the maximum density. But the truth and reality of Kepler Packing is asking for maximum packing out to infinity. That means you have to contend and fight with the packing of identical spheres up against a wall or border. And so, in tackling that wall, we can shift the hexagonal closed pack to another type of packing, a hybrid type of packing in order to get "maximum packing". So no proof ever of KPP is going to happen unless the proof tackles a infinity border wall. In free-space, a far distance away from a wall barrier of infinity border, then, hexagonal closed pack reigns and is the packing in all of free space-- but, the moment the packing gets nearby the walls of infinity border, then, we re-arrange the hexagonal closed pack to fit in more spheres. Not unlike us packing a suitcase and then rearranging to fit in more.
> >
> > Cover picture: is a container and so the closed packing must be modified once the border is nearly reached to maximize the number of spheres.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07NMV8NQQ
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 20, 2019
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1241 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 60 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> >
> > #11-4, 28th published book
> >
> > World's First Valid Proof of 4 Color Mapping Problem// Math proof series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Now in the math literature it is alleged that Appel & Haken proved this conjecture that 4 colors are sufficient to color all planar maps such that no two adjacent countries have the same color. Appel & Haken's fake proof was a computer proof and it is fake because their method is Indirect Nonexistence method. Unfortunately in the time of Appel & Haken few in mathematics had a firm grip on true Logic, where they did not even know that Boole's logic is fakery with his 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = 1, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 depending on which is subtracted. But the grave error in logic of Appel & Haken is their use of a utterly fake method of proof-- indirect nonexistence (see my textbook on Reductio Ad Absurdum). Wiles with his alleged proof of Fermat's Last Theorem is another indirect nonexistence as well as Hales's fake proof of Kepler Packing is indirect nonexistence.
> > Appel & Haken were in a time period when computers used in mathematics was a novelty, and instead of focusing on whether their proof was sound, everyone was dazzled not with the logic argument but the fact of using computers to generate a proof. And of course big big money was attached to this event and so, math is stuck with a fake proof of 4-Color-Mapping. And so, AP starting in around 1993, eventually gives the World's first valid proof of 4-Color-Mapping. Sorry, no computer fanfare, but just strict logical and sound argument.
> >
> > Cover picture: Shows four countries colored yellow, red, green, purple and all four are mutually adjacent. And where the Purple colored country is landlocked, so that if it were considered that a 5th color is needed, that 5th color should be purple, hence, 4 colors are sufficient.
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PZ2Y5RV
> > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 23, 2019
> > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > File size ‏ : ‎ 1183 KB
> > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Print length ‏ : ‎ 34 pages
> > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> >
> > #11-5, 6th published book
> >
> > World's First Valid Proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem, 1993 & 2014 // Math proof series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 29Apr2021. This is AP's 6th published book.
> >
> > Preface:
> > Real proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem// including the fake Euler proof in exp3 and Wiles fake proof.
> >
> > Recap summary: In 1993 I proved Fermat's Last Theorem with a pure algebra proof, arguing that because of the special number 4 where 2 + 2 = 2^2 = 2*2 = 4 that this special feature of a unique number 4, allows for there to exist solutions to A^2 + B^2 = C^2. That the number 4 is a basis vector allowing more solutions to exist in exponent 2. But since there is no number with N+N+N = N*N*N that exists, there cannot be a solution in exp3 and the same argument for higher exponents. In 2014, I went and proved Generalized FLT by using "condensed rectangles". Once I had proven Generalized, then Regular FLT comes out of that proof as a simple corollary. So I had two proofs of Regular FLT, pure algebra and a corollary from Generalized FLT. Then recently in 2019, I sought to find a pure algebra proof of Generalized FLT, and I believe I accomplished that also by showing solutions to Generalized FLT also come from the special number 4 where 2 + 2 = 2^2 = 2*2 = 4. Amazing how so much math comes from the specialness of 4, where I argue that a Vector Space of multiplication provides the Generalized FLT of A^x + B^y = C^z.
> >
> > Cover Picture: In my own handwriting, some Generalized Fermat's Last Theorem type of equations.
> >
> > As for the Euler exponent 3 invalid proof and the Wiles invalid FLT, both are missing a proof of the case of all three A,B,C are evens (see in the text).
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQKGW4M
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2019
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1503 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 156 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> >
> > #11-6, 19th published book
> >
> > World's First Proof of Collatz Conjecture// Math proof series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 20Aug2021. This is AP's 19th published book.
> >
> > Preface: Old Math's Collatz conjecture, 1937, was this: If you land on an even number, you divide by 2 until you come to an odd number. If you come to or land on an odd number, you do a 3N+1 then proceed further. The conjecture then says that no matter what number you start with, it ends up being 1.
> >
> > What the Collatz proof of math tells us, is that so very often mathematicians pose a conjecture in which their initial formulation of the conjecture is murky, obfuscation and poorly designed statement. Such poorly designed statements can never be proven true or false. An example that comes to mind of another poorly designed conjecture is the No Odd Perfect Conjecture, in which the statement is obfuscation of factors. So for the odd number 9, is it 1+3, or is it 1+ 3 + 3. So when a mathematics conjecture is full of obfuscation and error in the statement, then these type of conjectures never have a proof. And takes a person with a logical mind to fix and straighten out the conjecture statement and then provide a proof, thereof.
> >
> > Cover picture: when I think of Collatz, I think of a slide, a slide down and so my French curve is the best slide I can think of, other than a slide-ruler, but a slide ruler is slide across.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PS98K5H
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 16, 2019
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1955 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 61 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Best Sellers Rank: #212,131 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #4 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > ◦ #9 in Number Theory (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #32 in Number Theory (Books)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > #11-7, 20th published book
> > World's First Proofs that No Perfect Cuboid Exists// Math proof series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Someone on the Internet posed the unproven No Perfect Cuboid, and so I took up the challenge. I am usually a sucker for geometry riddles, more so than number theory. So I obliged. Then by 2014 I proved the matter and looking back at it now in 2019, I really really do not see what all the fuss was about-- that it was not that hard not hard at all. You just have to look carefully at sets of 4 right triangles and find an Impossibility Construction, why you cannot have those 4 right triangles all with positive integer numbers for their 3 sides. But the proof method is so hugely important in math-- impossibility of construction. And, please, do not confuse that method with Reductio Ad Absurdum, for RAA is not a valid proof method in mathematics (see my logic book on RAA). But, the method of Impossible Construction, although it might look like RAA, is totally different and fully valid in all aspects.
> >
> > But now, in hindsight in March 2019, writing this up, I see a very close connection of No Perfect Cuboid to that of Generalized Fermat's Last Theorem with its equation of A^x + B^y = C^z and the way I proved Generalized FLT was with "condensed rectangles" and the No Perfect Cuboid is a 3rd Dimension object but it is 4 rectangles of 4 right triangles we inspect. And we can pursue that connection between Generalized FLT and No Perfect Cuboid further, but not now.
> >
> > Cover Picture: Is that of 4 rectangular boxes, 2 of which are cubes sitting atop a book page of the Cubic Set for the Transuranium Atoms, from the textbook "The Elements Beyond Uranium" , Seaborg, Loveland, 1990. I am always looking for connections.
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PMZQNNT
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 16, 2019
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1382 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 61 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > #11-8, 21st published book
> >
> > World's First Proofs of Mathematics Oldest Unsolved Problems: No Odd Perfect and Finiteness of Perfect Numbers // Math proof series, book 8 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 26Apr2021. And this is AP's 21st published book.
> >
> > Preface: Now my history with these proofs goes back to 1991 to 1993, and have been finessing the proofs ever since. Some math proofs just nag nag and nag you. They just cannot be settled still. Their proof is a tiny tiny sliver of impossibility that is easily overlooked. Like an optical illusion that you are mislead into, or like those pictures where you look at it one way and you see a young lady and another way you see a very old lady.
> >
> > Now the No Odd Perfect Number is not a important proof in mathematics but mostly a spectacle for it does not teach much beyond making proper correct definitions. And murky definitions is what held a proof of No Odd Perfect, other than 1, held it back. The murky definition of factors, do we include 1 or not include, for example the odd number 9, do we include 3 twice or once for that we have 1* 9 and we have 3*3 and Old Math looked at that as 1 + 3, whereas I would look at that as 1 + 3 + 3. So when you have messy definitions, murky and messy, of course no proof will be found in over 2,000 years.
> >
> > Cover Picture: Shows our modern day new reality of the situation where the definition of "perfect" was a Ancient Greek idea, steeped in murky messy idea of factors and when to add factors, that no longer is suitable for mathematics.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PN1CPRP
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 16, 2019
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1534 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 28 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> >
> >
> > #11-9, 15th published book
> >
> > World's First Proofs of Infinitude of Twin-Primes, and Polignac Proved // Math proof series, book 9 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Circa 1991-1993, I gave an Old Math style of proof for the Infinitude of Twin Primes, modeling my proof as to a Euclid Infinitude of Primes Proof. But then came year 2009 when I found the way to make Infinity concept well-defined. Up until 2009, no-one in the world had a clear precise definition or understanding of what "infinity" was or what it means. It means a borderline between finite and infinite and the way to find this borderline is to use the Tractrix when the unit-tractrix area catches up with the area inside a unit circle is the infinity borderline and it happens to be when pi digits have three zeroes in a row, does the tractrix area equal the circle area-- hence, we reached infinity border and beyond are infinite numbers, no longer finite numbers. What that discovery does for proofs of infinitude is change all those proofs dramatically. And here in Twin-Primes and Polignac I show the reader how modern day New Math proves infinitude of any set of numbers.
> >
> >
> > Cover Picture: Is a picture of the first five twin-primes.
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PMY1YWB
> > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 15, 2019
> > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > File size ‏ : ‎ 1642 KB
> > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Print length ‏ : ‎ 9 pages
> > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> >
> > #11-10, 16th published book
> >
> > World's First Proofs of Goldbach, Legendre, Staircase Conjectures// Math proof series, book 10 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > AP proved the Goldbach Conjecture starting 1993 where the Algebra Columns is the bedrock-key of the proof involved. The Algebra Column Array is the tool and no-one was going to prove Goldbach unless they had that tool, which the 2014 post of mine makes the array tool crystal clear. So starting 1993, I posted to sci.math about Array or Algebra Column which as a tool would render all proofs of this nature. The Goldbach conjecture historically dates back to 1742, and the Legendre conjecture dates 1752-1833. The Staircase conjecture is a wholly new conjecture proposed by AP circa 2016.
> >
> > Cover: Is a Algebra Column Array sequence starting with 6 Array and then 8 Array.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PS6MR48
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 15, 2019
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1740 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 36 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #148,852 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > #4 in Number Theory (Kindle Store)
> > #38 in Number Theory (Books)
> > #7 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > 

> >
> > #11-11, 25th published book
> >
> > Disproof of Riemann Hypothesis // Math proof series, book 11 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 31Oct2021. This is AP's 25th book of science.
> >
> > Preface: The Riemann Hypothesis was a conjecture never able to be proven and for good reason, for it was the last symptom of a rampant disease inside of mathematics. Old Math did not have the true numbers that compose mathematics. Old Math had a rag-tag ugly collection of fake numbers with their Reals, their Negative numbers compounded with Rationals compounded with Irrationals and then adding on the Imaginary. These are fake numbers, when the true numbers of mathematics are the Decimal Grid Numbers. Because Old Math uses fake numbers, is the reason that Riemann Hypothesis just languished, languished and languished. You cannot prove something riddled in fakery. Below I demonstrate why having fake numbers in math, creates fake proofs, fake theorems, and creates a conjecture that can never be proven.
> >
> > Cover picture: Riemann Hypothesis deals with fake numbers of mathematics. When what is needed is the true numbers-- Decimal Grid Numbers. We learn Decimal Grid Numbers when very young, when just toddlers, wood counting blocks. All the true numbers of mathematics come from Mathematical Induction-- counting. Mathematical Induction is utterly absent in the Riemann Hypothesis, when it should be central to the hypothesis.
> > Length: 58 pages
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PVDS1RC
> > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 20, 2019
> > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > File size ‏ : ‎ 1475 KB
> > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Print length ‏ : ‎ 58 pages
> > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Best Sellers Rank: #5,118,638 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #643 in Number Theory (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #1,398 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > ◦ #3,559 in Number Theory (Books)
> > 

> > #11-12, 152nd published book
> > The 6th Regular Polyhedron-- hexagonal faces at infinity// Math proof series, book 12
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
> >
> > Last revision was 10Dec2021. And this is AP's 152nd published book of science.
> > Preface: This is my 152nd book of science an exciting book, and it came out of the clear blue. The writing of it took a mere week's time and it is a byproduct of my 151st book of science, TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 1st year College. Although my 151st book took me over a year to write; this book took just 1 week to write. Difference being that of a textbook versus that of a book on a specific topic, is 50 times more difficult because a textbook takes so much time in organizing, order, and fitting together pieces of each chapter in fact, whereas a single topic science book is like writing a prose story and is 50 times easier to write than a textbook.
> > While I was doing 151st, I noticed and emphasized that all of physics is determined by 6 laws of physics, and the first principle of physics is All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. Then we notice that 6 laws cover all of physics, 6 laws of electricity and magnetism. We notice that all of logic and math is covered by 6 operators. And then we look at geometry's regular polyhedrons and find there are only 5 known regular polyhedron with a proof in Old Math that a 6th Regular Polyhedron cannot exist. An actual proof in Old Math that a 6th cannot exist.
> > Well, AP knows better. For AP knows that if all of Physics is written in the language of just 6 laws and all of logic and mathematics are covered by 6 operators. That AP knows Old Math made a mistake in thinking they proved 5 regular polyhedron were all that exist as regular polyhedron. So Old Math made some or several mistakes in their so called proof that 5 and only 5 regular polyhedron exist, and that is what this book covers, the 6th regular polyhedron of the world, what it is, and what it looks like.
> > Warning: the entire book is written from a sequential dated notebook, so if you read something early on, I may have changed my mind on the idea near the end. This is not a textbook, but a notebook of discovery and read it for its history.
> > Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of a soccer ball of 20 hexagons, 12 pentagons; and a glass ball covered by netting of tiny hexagons. Both objects I use in experiments of proving the 6th Regular Polyhedron.
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09K4PWKVK
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 21, 2021
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 839 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 76 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> >
> > #11-13, 160th published book
> >
> > MATHOPEDIA-- List of 76 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Preface:
> > A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.
> >
> > The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.
> >
> > The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.
> >
> > Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.
> >
> > I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds question of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09MZTLRL5
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2021
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1147 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 62 pages


CIA 30 year stalker Kibo Parry Moron shits in face David S. Cohen, NSF Panchanathan, William J.Burns, Cindy Marten
On Tuesday, January 25, 2022 at 2:53:45 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"psychoceramic"
> "bozo"
> tarded:
> The letters in CIA, rearranged, spell "Child Manure
> Soup Time".

Re: 2- Kibo says psychoceramic Cindy Marten,Dr.Panchanathan, Miguel Cardona,David S. Cohen, William J.Burns with their ellipse conic section when it is a oval, their 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction and never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem.

---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993

Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua

Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >

Kibo Parry Moron writes Germany should do more
Re: Russia's dumb agenda-- reacquire lost lands// China's dumb agenda-- reacquire Taiwan and other lost lands// When the only real agenda for all of humanity-- Colonize Europa, and this means no war but working together, for all humanity perishes in Sun
11 views

Michael Moroney's profile photo
Michael Moroney
Jan 29, 2022, 5:12:47 PM (24 hours ago)

Kibo Parry Moron suggests Germany get off its dead arse and ship 1,000 missiles & 5,000 troops to Ukraine where the missiles can reach Moscow and Kremlin should Russia invade Ukraine
On Saturday, January 29, 2022 at 5:12:47 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"tard"
> fails at math and science:
>

Kibo, is that to counterbalance the Russian Iskander missiles amassed on the border???????

Kibo shits on NSF Panchanathan fake electron and shits on Sheldon Glashow fake electron, David S. Cohen, William J.Burns, Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow
On Saturday, January 29, 2022 at 5:12:47 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>Physics "tard"
> fails at math and science:
>Drag Queen of Science, especially Physics

Just hours after Kibo Parry Moron gets inducted into the CIA, he blows his cover (I guess the insanity of stalking for Kibo is so overpowering that he cannot help himself.
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >
Perhaps Kibo holds the world record in a CIA operative blowing his cover, in a matter of hours.

2Kibo Parry M can Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall, Lene Hau ask the question, which is the atom's real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. Or is Kibo Parry M too worried about his newly invented word of "analbuttfuckmanure" that Kibo invented in 2017-18 and has continued to use right through 2021 calling AP that word since AP does science while Kibo never does science, only stalker hate spew.
On Sunday, December 5, 2021 at 6:12:36 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> fails at math and science:

Kibo Parry M can Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall, Lene Hau ask the question, which is the atom's real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. Or is Kibo Parry M too worried about his newly invented word of "analbuttfuckmanure" that Kibo invented in 2017-18 and has continued to use right through 2021 calling AP that word since AP does science while Kibo never does science, only stalker hate spew. Kibo you called MIT your invented word of 2017, are you going to call Harvard that also. And you called Dartmouth and Stanford your invented new word. I guess Harvard is special for you Kibo Parry, nonstop stalker, insane kook of 28 years.

On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 10:48:29 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"AnalButtfuckManure"

On Monday, November 15, 2021 at 9:40:52 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"AnalButtfuckManure"

On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 7:38:34 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Court Jester of Physics"
> fails at math and science:

Kibo, why did you invent that word in 2017-18 and why do you still use it today in 2021, is it because you failed science and now you want to curse those that succeed???

Kibo the failure of science with his 938 is 12% short of 945, loves reading AP's science book for what he missed in science. Kibo's favorite AP book is

Research Notebook: Earth has perhaps 1-10 million years, before it is broiled by the Sun RED GIANT phase// consequence of starshine is Faraday law, not fusion// Astronomy series, book 1

by Archimedes Plutonium

Last revision was 18Feb2021. This is AP's 128th published book of science.
Preface: This is a research notebook, meaning the entire book is an ongoing research program and many unanswered questions need a full answer, chief among those questions is whether we have 1-10 million years rush exit of Earth, or we have the more comfortable 140 million years gradual exit. As of August 2020, I have the fact that the Sun has gone into a Red Giant phase, I have that as a _certainty fact_ due to the Sun and Stars shine from Faraday Law, not from fusion. A certainty fact because all cosmic bodies double in their number of atoms every 140 million years time elapse. So that our Sun is in a Red Giant phase as of 2020, starting Red Giant phase and this phase initiation causes the amount of UV radiation by the Sun to increase steadily and steadily. I have the fact from NASA that the yearly increase in Solar Radiation is 0.005%. Such a yearly increase in radiation, especially UV radiation, regardless of the Ozone protection, regardless of the ozone and its hole, that such a yearly increase will see drastic deaths in Insect populations. The Ozone layer of protection can no longer protect us from a 0.005% steady yearly increase. There is research news that even blue visible light is deadly to small organisms. Small size animals will be the first big noticeable hit in a Red Giant phase. And even larger size animals such as birds, songbirds exposed to a increasing blue light visible and ultraviolet will destroy their eyes and seeing ability. And now we have the SCIENCE 24APR2020 report on its cover "Insect Decline". Where Earths Insect biomass is on a rapid decline 25% biomass per decade. With that rapid of a decline, it is not too many years that entire ecosystems start to decline as well, the plants, for the plants need insects.

What this research notebook is unable to ascertain at the moment, is whether Earth will become like Venus as non-liveable in 1 to 10 million years, or whether we have a more comfortable exit from Earth as 140 million years to do something about the inevitable Sun going Red Giant. A 25% decline of Insects in the last decade is news that indicates, strongly indicates we have just 1 to 10 million years to make Mars-Europa-Pluto our new home. I hate to see that if that is true, because I know 10 million years is a short time to do something of a total evacuation of planet Earth and try to live upon Mars-Europa-Pluto. Such a mass exodus sounds more like a horror story.

But all the science books prior to this book, were saying humanity has around 4 billion years to begin to contemplate a Sun going Red Giant phase. No, this book says Earth is like Venus in the next 140 million years, and possibly like Venus in just 1 to 10 million years. So where the 4 billion years -- no-one really cared about Red Giant phase, if that is truly 1-10 million years. Then, that science becomes number 1 science in every person alive. If we do not get out to Mars-Europa-Pluto in time, there will be no more humanity, and gone extinct. And funny, and ironic, that the average life span of any organism-species on Earth as found in the fossil record, is, you guessed it, 1 to 10 million years on average. There is something tantalizingly curious about the numbers 1 to 10 million years as the average life span of any species until it becomes extinct.

Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of that SCIENCE "Insect Decline" and also my computer with the recent report of a 30% loss of all wild birds in North America.

--------------------------
Table of Contents
--------------------------

1) Carson's environment chemical poisoning, Hansen's global warming, now AP's Red Giant phase.

2) Reports of massive wild bird declines, 30% in the past 50 years in North America from 1970-2019.

3) Reports of massive Insect declines, 25% per decade worldwide from 2010-2020.

4) Connecting the fact that Faraday Law, not fusion as the power source of all Stars, our Sun, in fact all matter, implies our Sun has initiated its Red Giant phase.

5) NASA's number of 0.005% yearly increase in Solar Radiation.

6) Pulsars are advanced intelligent life evicted from their home planet and living in colonies with a pulsar electric grid system.

7) Tesla's wish come true-- electricity in Space without wires. Is this advanced alien life and we see it as pulsars?

8) Monitoring Earth for increasing signs of mass death of plants and animals and microbes, due to increasing Solar Radiation as NASA's number 0.005% increases.

9) How will humanity get off of Earth and harbor safely in Mars-Europa-Pluto?

10) Theory fallout that we have to evacuate Earth.

11) New news from the Parker Solar Probe.

12) Evolutionary sequence of stars goes from normal to High-Frequency star (neutron) to Red Giant.

13) Hertzsprung-Russell diagram revised by AP.

14) The only reliable universal distance measure in all of astronomy is light intensity.

15) Humanity's need for a Electric Magnetic propulsion system for spacecrafts.

16) Listing the characteristics of potential astro-bodies for colonization.

17) Last vestiges of humanity and life on Earth, living in greenhouses on the far side of Jovian moons.

18) Ongoing commentary.


David S. Cohen needs to publish in Yale student newspaper that he has stopped his water drip torture by agent Kibo Parry Moron brainwashing High School and College students that 938 is 12% short of 945 and that slant cut in single cone is ellipse when in truth it is a Oval.

William J. Burns needs to publish in Oxford St.John's College that he has stopped brainwash torture of young students with his slant cut in single cone is ellipse when in truth it is a oval. See his harsh torture of students by his blown-the-cover agent Kibo Parry Moron.

CIA William J. Burns & NSF Dr Panchanathan & Dr. Terence Tao need to apologize in their respective college student newspapers for teaching and aiding Fake Math-- ellipse a slant cut in single cone is fake-- for that is the Oval.
7k views

William J. Burns needs to publish in Oxford St.John's College that he has stopped brainwash torture of young students with his slant cut in single cone is ellipse when in truth it is a oval. See his harsh torture of students by his blown-the-cover agent Kibo Parry Moron below.

Dr. Panchanathan needs to publish in the Univ Ottawa student newspaper that he stopped teaching fake math of 938 is 12% short of 945, and that a slant cut in single cone is not a ellipse.

Guiness book recordholder of blown cover agent Kibo Parry Moron, of 2minutes upon sworn in --
Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >

Here is Kibo torture of young students in High School and College with his fanatical ellipse water torture:
On Monday, June 15, 2020 at 1:13:27 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Here you are!
> Below you will find a simple *proof* that shows that certain conic
> sections are ellipses.
>
> Some preliminaries:
>
> Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
> in the proof:
>
> ^ x
> |
> -+- < xh
> .' | `.
> . | .
> | | |
> ' | '
> `. | .'
> y <----------+ < x0
> Cone (side view):
> .
> /|\
> / | \
> /b | \
> /---+---' < x h
> / |' \
> / ' | \
> / ' | \
> x 0 > '-------+-------\
> / a | \
>
> Proof:
>
> r(x) a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence
>
> y(x)^2 r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.
>
> Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 1 ...equation of an ellipse
>
> qed

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

They also need to apologize in that newspaper article for teaching their mindless Oresme Harmonic series diverges to infinity. For here is a simple proof that the Harmonic Series converges to a finite number.

1+1/2+1/3+ 1/4+..... + 1/n

1+1+1+1+ .....+ 1_n

As anyone with at least a one marble brain can see, the infinite series of adding 1 is always bigger than the Harmonic series sum. So, it always converges any series whose terms are smaller than 1.

Sobriquet & Dr. Terence Tao need to apologize in their respective college student newspapers for teaching and aiding Fake Math-- ellipse a slant cut in single cone is fake-- for that is the Oval.

Why Tao,Wiles,Pipher,Stillwell, Ribet,Hales failed geometry-- too stupid to even spot and recognize slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse. Reason, they never understood Logic on how to think straight & clear.
5k views

When you ask Tao,Wiles,Pipher,Stillwell, Ribet,Hales how on Earth do they get a slant cut in single cone to be a ellipse which has 2 axes of symmetry yet the single cone has but 1 axis of symmetry. Ask them how they get a ellipse? The only conclusion one can draw is that Tao is a failure of logic, that Wiles is a failure of logic, that Pipher is a failure of logic, that Stillwell is a failure of logic, that Ribet is a failure of logic, and Hales another failure of logic. None can think straight nor can think clear. Yet all of them awarded in mathematics for their mindless mathematics.

Even a High School student has more intelligence in geometry than those 6 listed. For a High School student can demonstrate a single cone with 1 axis of symmetry and a Oval with 1 axis of symmetry match one another, but not the ellipse.

Why Tao,Wiles,Pipher,Stillwell, Ribet,Hales failed geometry-- too stupid to even spot and recognize slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse. Reason, they never understood Logic on how to think straight & clear. And this also indicates to us that all the rest of the math offered by the listed 6 is nothing more than "garbage math, garbage thoughts."

3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
•
•

Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 26Jan2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.

Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.

In November of 2019, I was challenged to make the definition of Oval a well defined definition. I took up that task, and fortunately I waited a long time since, 2016, my discovery that the oval was the slant cut into a cone, not the ellipse. I say fortunately because you need physics in order to make a well defined definition of oval. You need the knowledge of physics, that electricity is perpendicular to magnetism and this perpendicularity is crucial in a well defined definition of oval. When I discovered the ellipse was never a conic in 2016, I probably could not have well defined the oval at that time, because I needed the 3 years intervening to catch up on a lot of physics, but by November 2019, I was ready willing and able. Then in August of 2020, I discovered a third new proof of Ellipse is a cylinder section never a conic section, using solid 3rd dimension geometry of ovoid and ellipsoid.

Cover picture is a cone and a cylinder on a cutting board and that is an appropriate base to place those two figures because sectioning means cutting, and the cuts we want to make into a single cone and a cylinder is a slant cut not a cut parallel to the base of the figures, nor a cut that leaves the figure open ended but a slant cut that leaves the figure a closed loop.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 2021 KB
• Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 50 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#11-2, 11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Re: Psychoceramic NSF Dr. Panchanathan,F. Fleming Crim, kibo Parry M says will corrupt the minds of your children! Why kibo? Because they still teach 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction and ellipse a conic when it never was.

Mostowski Collapse's profile photo
Mostowski Collapse
1:33 AM (13 hours ago)

Ha Ha psychoceramics, more defined than Dan-O-Matiks same-ness in DC poop.
Mostowski Collapse's profile photo
Mostowski Collapse
1:49 AM (13 hours ago)

Why is Dan-O-Matik even posting on sci.math. Years ago people posted long formalizations here on sci.

Kibo Parry Moron, can Dr. Panchanathan publish his apology in France Cordova's Purdue Univ student newspaper along with Dr. Cordova that they see the light of day and truth about the slant cut in single cone is the OVAL, never the ellipse. There are truckers blocking Canada's Univ of Ottawa.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.

To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.

To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

Kibo Parry Moron of CIA fame said it best in his gay debutante ball post in the NSF Panchanathan Gala Party featuring Kibo spelling bee on words like Kibo's 2017 invention of "analbuttfuckmanure". And his cookbook of "Analbuttfuckmanure burgers". Courtesy of Nick Thompson's Wired magazine of Kibo "almost god" cover picture and Wikipedia entry of mindless cretins of Wikipedia.

Kibo Parry Moron blowing his cover with the CIA in 1997
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >
> >http://www.netscum.net/fieldsm0.html
> What the hell is this? As if it's not bad enough that we have a fake
> Mao Zhedong here, now we have a fake kibo too?
> Is there a fake xibo and a ~ibo to round out the trinity?
> --scott
> --
> "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon..
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

> Oh you need to see the ellipse-is-a-conic-section proof again? Here you go!
>
>
> Some preliminaries:
>
> Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
> in the proof:
>
> ^ x
> |
> -+- <= x=h
> .' | `.
> . | .
> | | |
> ' | '
> `. | .'
> y <----------+ <= x=0
>
> Cone (side view):
> .
> /|\
> / | \
> /b | \
> /---+---' <= x = h
> / |' \
> / ' | \
> / ' | \
> x = 0 => '-------+-------\
> / a | \
>
> Proof:
>
> r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence
>
> y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.
>
> Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1 ...equation of an ellipse
>
> qed
>

Re: ...although Kibo _universally regarded_ as having more physics intelligence in his shit streaked underwear than in the entire brain of Todd B Smith - Earle Jones's Stanford's math and physics dept combined
by Adolpho the Sarcastic Rooftop Monkey
Apr 10, 2021, 3:20:20 PM

Re: fuckdog boston's Kibo Parry Moroney subhuman *stalkers* Betsy DeVos, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, barry shein's world std paying how much to stalk AP? Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, ,,,,
by Hewitt Buettner
Oct 10, 2020, 2:55:48 PM

Re: Spamming fuckdog Kibo Parry Moroney says fire Stanford's Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian rather than let them brainwash o
by
Richard Cranium
Jan 24, 2021, 3:01:28 PM

Re: 1Kibo Parry Moroney says Analbuttfuckmanure MIT, William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter...
by Hoofington P. McSnort Aug 26, 2020, 6:58:48 PM

Re: Kibo Parry M on Cynthia Barnhart and why MIT is a propaganda camp not a school of higher education.
by Michael Moroney Jun 27, 2021, 3:49 PM

Moroney says autism // Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins//never realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
3/4/18
By Michael Moroney

Re: Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
by
Michael Moroney Feb 26, 2018, 11:29:08 PM

Dr Tao needs to publish in UCLA student newspaper that he now sees the light of day that a slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse and stop his propaganda bullshit math that Dr. Tao pollutes the minds of young students with. Why, any High School student can drop a Kerr lid (circle) into a scrolled up paper cone and eye witness the crescent moon shape added onto the circle to form a OVAL, never the ellipse, yet the bozo the clown of math Terry Tao still polluting the minds of students.

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney stalks "AnalButtfuckManure Attacks" Dartmouth's Philip J. Hanlon, Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne with his 10 OR 6 = 16; his ellipse a conic when it never was; his proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth..
On Friday, August 14, 2020 at 11:07:05 AM UTC-5, Professor Wordsmith wrote:
> "Ammo: Uncured Shit pile"

Kibo Parry Moron chimes in with--
On Tuesday, February 8, 2022 at 12:55:10 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Hagfish of Math and Slime Eel of Physics
> fails at math and science:
>"psychoceramic" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

Kibo, you stalker, is that as bad as Dr. Tao not apologizing for his conic section a ellipse when in truth it is a Oval?

Re: Terence Tao flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
> On Monday, March 12, 2018 at 9:58:42 PM UTC-5, Jan wrote:
> > On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 2:31:46 PM UTC-8, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > Terence Tao flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
> >
> > Must you post garbage?
>
> Jan, for Dr. Tao the question really is must he teach garbage like 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction and his mindless slant cut in single cone as ellipse when even a High School student can show it is a Oval.
> Even the moron Kibo Parry Moron with his 938 is 12% short of 945 recognizes the mindless failure of math that is Dr. Terence Tao.
>
> On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 7:25:44 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >of Math and of Physics "spamtard"
> >"psychoceramic"
> >flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
>
>
> On Monday, June 15, 2020 at 1:13:27 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Here you are!
> > Below you will find a simple *proof* that shows that certain conic
> > sections are ellipses.
> >
> > Some preliminaries:
> >
> > Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
> > in the proof:
> >
> > ^ x
> > |
> > -+- < xh
> > .' | `.
> > . | .
> > | | |
> > ' | '
> > `. | .'
> > y <----------+ < x0
> > Cone (side view):
> > .
> > /|\
> > / | \
> > /b | \
> > /---+---' < x h
> > / |' \
> > / ' | \
> > / ' | \
> > x 0 > '-------+-------\
> > / a | \
> >
> > Proof:
> >
> > r(x) a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence
> >
> > y(x)^2 r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.
> >
> > Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 1 ...equation of an ellipse
> >
> > qed
>
>
> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
>
>
>
> Dr. Andrew Wiles University Oxford needs to apologize in the Oxford student newspaper for aiding and abetting fake math taught at Oxford -- his ellipse from conic sections, his Harmonic series diverges, his 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction in the error filled Boole logic, but worst of all Wiles seems to be ignorant of the fact that Calculus is geometry and thus requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Andrew Wiles, publish today so no more students are brainwashed with your error filled mathematics.
> 
> 5th published book
>
> Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
> Preface:
> First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.
>
> The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.
>
> My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.
>
> Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.
>
> Product details
> File Size: 773 KB
> Print Length: 72 pages
> Publication Date: March 12, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07PMB69F5
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> Word Wise: Not Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported 
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> 
> 

>
>
> y
> | /
> | /
> |/______ x
>
> More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci..physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
>
> In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
>
> I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
>
> There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
>
> Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> Archimedes Plutonium

Kibo says Sheldon Glashow Harvard, Harry Cliff, CERN, Peter Higgs Univ Edinburgh is Putin's minion, Kim Jong Un's stooge, unable to confirm real true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday Law
On Tuesday, February 8, 2022 at 11:36:44 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Kim Jong Un's stooge"
> fails at math and science:
> The letters
On Tuesday, February 8, 2022 at 11:55:23 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "Putin's minion"
> blithered:
> The letters in
>can be re-arranged to spell "I am
> the Purloined Scum".

HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.

Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
Length: 17 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : December 18, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 17 pages
• File Size : 698 KB
• ASIN : B082WYGVNG
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled

#1-4, 105th published book

Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.

Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
Length: 39 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : March 24, 2020
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• ASIN : B086BGSNXN
• Print Length : 39 pages
• File Size : 935 KB
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
#315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
#4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)



#1-5, 112th published book

New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.

Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book.. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
Length: 20 pages

Product details
• ASIN : B0875SVDC7
• Publication date : April 15, 2020
• Language: : English
• File size : 1134 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 20 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#1-6, 135th published book

QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) 

Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.

Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.

Product details
• ASIN : B08K47K5BB
• Publication date : September 25, 2020
• Language : English
• File size : 587 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print length : 25 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #334 in General Chemistry

#1-7, 138th published book
The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
Length: 41 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : October 9, 2020
• File Size : 828 KB
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print Length : 41 pages
• ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled

#1-8, 1st published book

Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.

Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory.. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.