*our cool stuff...

On Tuesday, April 26, 2022 at 4:39:07 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 26, 2022 at 4:58:30 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
> > On Monday April 25, 2022, at 7:44:18 PM Whiut3rd wrote:
> > > On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 12:13:12 AM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
> <snip>
> > > > Zelensky got his own people in a war with absolutely NOTHING to gain. His
> > > > ego and foolishness blinded him nearly provoking a World War. He should go
> > > > back to the negotiating table, talk and resolve matters NOW
> > >
> > >Oh, you forgot the Nazis did it, AGAIN. That impugns the credibility of the Nazi scare, if even sycophants like John Doe point at a Jew and say"he did it". Get back to the Putin talking points quick, or he might put you on his list.
> >
> > Those were Fox News viewers' comments, down until the "and on and on and on..."
> >
> > I don't necessarily agree with all of them.
> John Doe snipped all the context from his post. I had to go to eternal september to find out what he had tagged his post onto.
>
> He clearly wasn't reacting to Whit3rd's post. When he claims that the idiot responses that he did post were "Fox News viewers' comments" he seems to be thinking that re-posting other people's idiocies absolves the poster from any responsibility for the stupid ideas expressed.It doesn't work that way. If a right wing idiot collects and reposts idiocies from other right-wing idiots, he just looks like any other right-wing idiot.
>
> And John Doe looks very like the archetype of right-wing idiot. Flyguy is even more idiotic, but not quite so reliably right-wing.
>
> --
> SNIPPERMAN, Sydney

LOL! SNIPPERMAN complains about someone else SNIPPING their post!! SWEET!!!

On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 9:53:03 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 1:56:47 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
> > Jasen Betts <use...@revmaps.no-ip.org> wrote:
> > > John Doe wrote:
> <snip>
> > I'm learning an awful lot about Hillary Clinton's Deep State lawyers and high-tech allies.
> He means that he is being spoon fed a lot of nonsense by people whose business it is to try to drum up support amongst idiots.

Hardly, SNIPPERMAN. There is MUCH detail in the Sussman indictment.

> > I am a PC techie since the beginning.
> The personal computer showed up in the early 1980's. In the beginning computers were built with valves, and the first ones I used were built with discrete transistors, like the PDP8 I was using around 1967. That got up-dated as the PDP8I which did use some integrated circuits.
>
> Whatever "beginning" John Doe thinks he was in on, he's still a Johnny-lately, and too dim to realise it.

Did you ever hear of the ALWAC III-E, SNIPPERMAN? I used it.

> > But people need to be aware that revolts among common people can happen, and all their cool stuff gets taken away. Never underestimate stupid people in large numbers.
> Nobody does. But machine guns make mincemeat of them. Donald Trump managed to mobilise a lot of morons to invade the Capitol building. They didn't achieve anything. beyond showing up Donald Trump as the irresponsible moron that he's always been.

Not those that are armed - hunters make excellent snipers, fool.
>
> --
> SNIPPERMAN, Sydney

Flyguy wrote:

> SNIPPERMAN complains about someone else SNIPPING their post!!

Besides, the prior post had snipped the context, quoting it was
counterproductive.

Bozo thinks its "right to reply" trolling matters.

On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 10:12:24 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 3:42:37 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
> > On Tuesday, April 26, 2022 at 4:39:07 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, April 26, 2022 at 4:58:30 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
> > > > On Monday April 25, 2022, at 7:44:18 PM Whiut3rd wrote:
> > > > > On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 12:13:12 AM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
> > > <snip>
> > > > > > Zelensky got his own people in a war with absolutely NOTHING to gain. His
> > > > > > ego and foolishness blinded him nearly provoking a World War. He should go
> > > > > > back to the negotiating table, talk and resolve matters NOW
> > > > >
> > > > >Oh, you forgot the Nazis did it, AGAIN. That impugns the credibility of the Nazi scare, if even sycophants like John Doe point at a Jew and say"he did it". Get back to the Putin talking points quick, or he might put you on his list.
> > > >
> > > > Those were Fox News viewers' comments, down until the "and on and on and on..."
> > > >
> > > > I don't necessarily agree with all of them.
> > > John Doe snipped all the context from his post. I had to go to eternal september to find out what he had tagged his post onto.
> > >
> > > He clearly wasn't reacting to Whit3rd's post. When he claims that the idiot responses that he did post were "Fox News viewers' comments" he seems to be thinking that re-posting other people's idiocies absolves the poster from any responsibility for the stupid ideas expressed.It doesn't work that way. If a right wing idiot collects and reposts idiocies from other right-wing idiots, he just looks like any other right-wing idiot.
> > >
> > > And John Doe looks very like the archetype of right-wing idiot. Flyguy is even more idiotic, but not quite so reliably right-wing.
> >
> > LOL! Sloman complains about someone else SNIPPING their post!! SWEET!!!
>
> Flyguy misses the point by the usual country mile.
>
> When I went to eternal september I could see exactly which post in the thread John Doe had tagged his post onto.
>
> The joke was that John Doe clearly wasn't reacting to that post. This wasn't any kind of snipping. He was just too idle to find the post he did want to react to, and tagged his reaction onto a different part of the thread and snipped the comment to which he was formally responding.
>
> This forum is supposed to be about conversations. John Doe doesn't understand this at all.
>
> Flyguy sort of does, but since he's too dim to understand what he's reacting to, the effect is much the same.
>
> --
> SNIPPERMAN, Sydney

Nope, SNIPPERMAN, you're complaining about being snipped, your favorite tactic.

On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 10:38:26 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 3:47:47 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
> > On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 9:53:03 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 1:56:47 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
> > > > Jasen Betts <use...@revmaps.no-ip.org> wrote:
> > > > > John Doe wrote:
> > > <snip>
> > > > I'm learning an awful lot about Hillary Clinton's Deep State lawyers and high-tech allies.
> > >
> > > He means that he is being spoon fed a lot of nonsense by people whose business it is to try to drum up support amongst idiots.
> >
> > Hardly, SNIPPERMAN. There is MUCH detail in the Sussman indictment.
> But none of it means what John Doe claims that it means.
> > > > I am a PC techie since the beginning.
> > >
> > > The personal computer showed up in the early 1980's. In the beginning computers were built with valves, and the first ones I used were built with discrete transistors, like the PDP8 I was using around 1967. That got up-dated as the PDP8I which did use some integrated circuits.
> > >
> > > Whatever "beginning" John Doe thinks he was in on, he's still a Johnny-come-lately, and too dim to realise it.
> >
> > Did you ever hear of the ALWAC III-E? I used it.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ALWAC_III-E
>
> Can't say I ever heard of it. It sounds like a bunch of other first generation computers. If you used it, it would have been to run a program somebody else wrote for you.

LOL! More lies from the SNIPPERMAN!

> ?
> I wrote 800 lines of code for the PDP8 I used, and it is in my Ph.D. thesis, with a fairly detailed description of what it was doing (and why).

And I designed and built interfaces for the PDP8 and PDP9, as well as programmed them - SO WHAT?

>
> The previous generation of computers were total swines to program, which didn't matter much because there were so few of them that you could find enough to people like
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_von_Neumann
>
> to write all the program that you had machine time to run. You were never one of the people who wrote the programs, nor even the PC techie that John Doe claims to have been.

Yet EVEN MORE LIES from the liar SNIPPERMAN!

> > > > But people need to be aware that revolts among common people can happen, and all their cool stuff gets taken away. Never underestimate stupid people in large numbers.
> > >
> > > Nobody does. But machine guns make mincemeat of them. Donald Trump managed to mobilise a lot of morons to invade the Capitol building. They didn't achieve anything. beyond showing up Donald Trump as the irresponsible moron that he's always been.
> >
> > Not those that are armed - hunters make excellent snipers, fool.
> But they tend to shoot the wrong people. As the Russians have been demonstrating in the Ukraine. You do make a habit of missing the point.

The HELL THEY DO! You can't even find a SINGLE case of this happening, yet there are thousands of hunters in the woods each season. Of course, some are better than others, but if someone is firing a machine gun at you - as you claim - mistaken identity is not an issue.

>
> --
> Bil Sloman, Sydney

LOL! SNIPPERMAN can't even SPELL HIS OWN NAME!!

Anthony William Sloman wrote:

> Bil Sloman, Sydney

Misspelled "Bozo"

On 24/04/2022 11:26 am, John Doe wrote:
.... (snip - who cares?)

did Hitler teach you nothing?

First invade all those "ethnically" friendly regions like donbast,
austria, moldova, sudaten lands, crimea and Slovakia, Georgia. (don't
mention that Putin needs a bigger economy so his country isn't swallowed
up by the Chinese)

Then hold "elections" with an opposition unable to campaign, the
population bloated by trucked in "patriots" and everyone else under the
gun.

Announce the righteousness of your actions and move on to your next
conflict.

Easy.

Can you see how Putin's approach can be seen as similar to Hitler's?

And all it needs to succeed is for everyone else to do nothing. Or if
that is not happening threaten everyone else with nuclear weapons.

Putin is as mad as a cut snake but only half as smart. He probably will
pop a nuke at some point despite lack of viable targets.

Ukraine doesn't have dense concentrations of troops or supplies. So that
is a pretty crap target with only temporary advantages for nuke popping
and lots of long term bad.

Attack supplies in a country that is supplying Ukraine means attacking a
NATO country and hence activating clause 5 of the NATO alliance (an
attack against one is an attack against against all -paraphrased). Lots
of very long term bad.

Bomb Kiev. Which risks killing leader of the EU or UN and would in any
case be seen as a massive escalation and is a war crime of the highest
order.

The most likely is some poor schmuck Russian general will be given a
tactical nuke and a conventional force with orders to attack and make
sure his attack succeeds. Then if the nuke does not do what Putin wants
the General can be given a Soviet style trial (you know the ones with
the body bags and firing squad already assembled before the trial
begins), and Putin can claim he is really for peace and had nothing to
do with it.

On Friday, April 29, 2022 at 7:18:28 PM UTC-7, David Eather wrote:
> On 24/04/2022 11:26 am, John Doe wrote:
> ... (snip - who cares?)
>
> did Hitler teach you nothing?
>
> First invade all those "ethnically" friendly regions like donbast,
> austria, moldova, sudaten lands, crimea and Slovakia, Georgia. (don't
> mention that Putin needs a bigger economy so his country isn't swallowed
> up by the Chinese)
>
> Then hold "elections" with an opposition unable to campaign, the
> population bloated by trucked in "patriots" and everyone else under the
> gun.
>
> Announce the righteousness of your actions and move on to your next
> conflict.
>
> Easy.
>
> Can you see how Putin's approach can be seen as similar to Hitler's?
>
> And all it needs to succeed is for everyone else to do nothing. Or if
> that is not happening threaten everyone else with nuclear weapons.
>
> Putin is as mad as a cut snake but only half as smart. He probably will
> pop a nuke at some point despite lack of viable targets.
>
> Ukraine doesn't have dense concentrations of troops or supplies. So that
> is a pretty crap target with only temporary advantages for nuke popping
> and lots of long term bad.
>
> Attack supplies in a country that is supplying Ukraine means attacking a
> NATO country and hence activating clause 5 of the NATO alliance (an
> attack against one is an attack against against all -paraphrased). Lots
> of very long term bad.
>
> Bomb Kiev. Which risks killing leader of the EU or UN and would in any
> case be seen as a massive escalation and is a war crime of the highest
> order.
>
> The most likely is some poor schmuck Russian general will be given a
> tactical nuke and a conventional force with orders to attack and make
> sure his attack succeeds. Then if the nuke does not do what Putin wants
> the General can be given a Soviet style trial (you know the ones with
> the body bags and firing squad already assembled before the trial
> begins), and Putin can claim he is really for peace and had nothing to
> do with it.

On Friday, April 29, 2022 at 7:18:28 PM UTC-7, David Eather wrote:
> On 24/04/2022 11:26 am, John Doe wrote:
> ... (snip - who cares?)
>
> did Hitler teach you nothing?
>
> First invade all those "ethnically" friendly regions like donbast,
> austria, moldova, sudaten lands, crimea and Slovakia, Georgia. (don't
> mention that Putin needs a bigger economy so his country isn't swallowed
> up by the Chinese)
>
> Then hold "elections" with an opposition unable to campaign, the
> population bloated by trucked in "patriots" and everyone else under the
> gun.
>
> Announce the righteousness of your actions and move on to your next
> conflict.
>
> Easy.
>
> Can you see how Putin's approach can be seen as similar to Hitler's?
>
> And all it needs to succeed is for everyone else to do nothing. Or if
> that is not happening threaten everyone else with nuclear weapons.
>
> Putin is as mad as a cut snake but only half as smart. He probably will
> pop a nuke at some point despite lack of viable targets.
>
> Ukraine doesn't have dense concentrations of troops or supplies. So that
> is a pretty crap target with only temporary advantages for nuke popping
> and lots of long term bad.
>
> Attack supplies in a country that is supplying Ukraine means attacking a
> NATO country and hence activating clause 5 of the NATO alliance (an
> attack against one is an attack against against all -paraphrased). Lots
> of very long term bad.
>
> Bomb Kiev. Which risks killing leader of the EU or UN and would in any
> case be seen as a massive escalation and is a war crime of the highest
> order.
>
> The most likely is some poor schmuck Russian general will be given a
> tactical nuke and a conventional force with orders to attack and make
> sure his attack succeeds. Then if the nuke does not do what Putin wants
> the General can be given a Soviet style trial (you know the ones with
> the body bags and firing squad already assembled before the trial
> begins), and Putin can claim he is really for peace and had nothing to
> do with it.

You hear a lot about "fairness" these days: Republicans aren't paying their fair share of taxes (although Dems such as Jeff Bezos are), transgender old people aren't being treated fairly according to Lyin' Biden, it isn't fair that Elon Musk bought Twitter (which blocked all speech they deemed unfair, i.e. not progressive ideology), etc.

Well, dictators don't play fair and they don't even pretend to play fair - they just do what they perceive to be in their best interests. People who object to this often end up dead. End of story. So it should not be surprising that Putin absorbed the successful parts of Hitler's strategies. Unfortunately for Putin, he also seems to be adopting some of the disastrous parts as well, like assuming he would have a quick victory in Ukraine.

On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 9:22:44 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Friday, April 29, 2022 at 9:12:36 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
> > On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 10:38:26 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 3:47:47 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 9:53:03 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 1:56:47 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
> > > > > > Jasen Betts <use...@revmaps.no-ip.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > John Doe wrote:
> > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > I'm learning an awful lot about Hillary Clinton's Deep State lawyers and high-tech allies.
> > > > >
> > > > > He means that he is being spoon fed a lot of nonsense by people whose business it is to try to drum up support amongst idiots.
> > > >
> > > > Hardly, Sloman. There is MUCH detail in the Sussman indictment.
> >
> > > But none of it means what John Doe claims that it means.
> >
> > > > > > I am a PC techie since the beginning.
> > > > >
> > > > > The personal computer showed up in the early 1980's. In the beginning computers were built with valves, and the first ones I used were built with discrete transistors, like the PDP8 I was using around 1967. That got up-dated as the PDP8I which did use some integrated circuits.
> > > > >
> > > > > Whatever "beginning" John Doe thinks he was in on, he's still a Johnny-come-lately, and too dim to realise it.
> > > >
> > > > Did you ever hear of the ALWAC III-E? I used it.
> > >
> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ALWAC_III-E
> > >
> > > Can't say I ever heard of it. It sounds like a bunch of other first generation computers. If you used it, it would have been to run a program somebody else wrote for you.
> >
> > LOL! More lies from the Sloman!
>
> So post your program. It will have been short enough to post here. I could scan mine and post it, but 800 lines plus comments is a bit too bulky to fit here. John Doe is willing to post pages of text here, but I mark it as spam when he does.

So you won't, but expect me to?

> > > I wrote 800 lines of code for the PDP8 I used, and it is in my Ph.D. thesis, with a fairly detailed description of what it was doing (and why).
> >
> > And I designed and built interfaces for the PDP8 and PDP9, as well as programmed them - SO WHAT?
> "Interfaces?" A relay that opened and closed?

LOL! You CLEARLY are NOT an engineer!!!

> > > The previous generation of computers were total swines to program, which didn't matter much because there were so few of them that you could find enough to people like
> > >
> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_von_Neumann
> > >
> > > to write all the program that you had machine time to run. You were never one of the people who wrote the programs, nor even the PC techie that John Doe claims to have been.
> >
> > Yet EVEN MORE LIES from the liar Sloman!
>
> If I were wrong you could post the evidence. You won't. Probably because you are too incompetent now to do it, even if you had been more competent then (which seems unlikely).

But you WON'T! Spare me your condescension.

> > > > > > But people need to be aware that revolts among common people can happen, and all their cool stuff gets taken away. Never underestimate stupid people in large numbers.
> > > > >
> > > > > Nobody does. But machine guns make mincemeat of them. Donald Trump managed to mobilise a lot of morons to invade the Capitol building. They didn't achieve anything. beyond showing up Donald Trump as the irresponsible moron that he's always been.
> > > >
> > > > Not those that are armed - hunters make excellent snipers, fool.
> > >
> > > But they tend to shoot the wrong people. As the Russians have been demonstrating in the Ukraine. You do make a habit of missing the point.
> >
> > The HELL THEY DO! You can't even find a SINGLE case of this happening, yet there are thousands of hunters in the woods each season.
> And they shoot one another quite frequently.

And you won't post a SINGLE case of this, let alone statistics that clearly present the extent.

>
> https://genius.com/Tom-lehrer-the-hunting-song-lyrics
> > Of course, some are better than others, but if someone is firing a machine gun at you - as you claim - mistaken identity is not an issue.
> > Machine guns are effective weapons. Snipers don't seem to be an effective defense against them.

Ukraine snippers have killed several Russian generals - sounds PRETTY DAMN EFFECTIVE to me!

>
> --
> Bil Sloman, Sydney

On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 8:59:37 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Sunday, May 1, 2022 at 4:25:58 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
> > On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 9:22:44 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > On Friday, April 29, 2022 at 9:12:36 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 10:38:26 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 3:47:47 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
> > > > > > On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 9:53:03 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee..org wrote:
> > > > > > > On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 1:56:47 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
> > > > > > > > Jasen Betts <use...@revmaps.no-ip.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > John Doe wrote:
>
> <snip>
> > > > LOL! More lies from the Sloman!
> > >
> > > So post your program. It will have been short enough to post here. I could scan mine and post it, but 800 lines plus comments is a bit too bulky to fit here. John Doe is willing to post pages of text here, but I mark it as spam when he does.
> >
> > So you won't, but expect me to?
> It's pages 226 to 251 of my Ph.D. thesis. You could go to the University of Melbourne and read it in the library there. Twenty six pages of A4 text is too much to post here.

I could also slide down a mile-long razor blade, but I won't.

>
> Your program s going to be a lot shorter. You could do it if it existed.

After you, fool.

> > > > > I wrote 800 lines of code for the PDP8 I used, and it is in my Ph..D. thesis, with a fairly detailed description of what it was doing (and why).
> > > >
> > > > And I designed and built interfaces for the PDP8 and PDP9, as well as programmed them - SO WHAT?
> > >
> > > "Interfaces?" A relay that opened and closed?
> >
> > LOL! You CLEARLY are NOT an engineer!!!
> I'm enough of an engineer to know that getting a computer to monitor whether a relay contact was opened or closed was a frequently used mechanism to keep a computer program informed about the state4 of the world outside. It only provied one bit of information, but it did offer good galvanic isolation.

No, you are NO KIND of engineer.

>
> If you did anything more sophisticated - my PDP8 came with a 12- bit A/D converter - do tell us about it.

I did and I won't.

>
> <snip>
> > > > > You were never one of the people who wrote the programs, nor even the PC techie that John Doe claims to have been.
> > > >
> > > > Yet EVEN MORE LIES from the liar Sloman!
> > >
> > > If I were wrong you could post the evidence. You won't. Probably because you are too incompetent now to do it, even if you had been more competent then (which seems unlikely).
> >
> > But you WON'T! Spare me your condescension.
> I won't foul up this forum with 800 lines of text. You clearly haven't got the same excuse. If you had you'd tell us about it. The condescension is entirely appropriate.

And I won't respond to your fucking condescension.

> > > > > > > > But people need to be aware that revolts among common people can happen, and all their cool stuff gets taken away. Never underestimate stupid people in large numbers.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Nobody does. But machine guns make mincemeat of them. Donald Trump managed to mobilise a lot of morons to invade the Capitol building. They didn't achieve anything. beyond showing up Donald Trump as the irresponsible moron that he's always been.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Not those that are armed - hunters make excellent snipers, fool..
> > > > >
> > > > > But they tend to shoot the wrong people. As the Russians have been demonstrating in the Ukraine. You do make a habit of missing the point.
> > > >
> > > > The HELL THEY DO! You can't even find a SINGLE case of this happening, yet there are thousands of hunters in the woods each season.
> > > And they shoot one another quite frequently.
> >
> > And you won't post a SINGLE case of this, let alone statistics that clearly present the extent.
> Who needs to bother - Tom Lehrer would never have written his song is it wasn't a cliche - but
>
> https://www.bridgemi.com/quality-life/michigan-hunters-thought-they-shot-deer-squirrels-they-hit-other-hunters

And that's the BEST you can come up with when there are thousands of hunters in the woods annually, all camouflaged with high-powered rifles.
> > > https://genius.com/Tom-lehrer-the-hunting-song-lyrics
> >
> > > > Of course, some are better than others, but if someone is firing a machine gun at you - as you claim - mistaken identity is not an issue.
> > > > Machine guns are effective weapons. Snipers don't seem to be an effective defense against them.
> >
> > Ukraine snippers have killed several Russian generals - sounds PRETTY DAMN EFFECTIVE to me!
> Generals don't spend their time firing machine guns. The Russian army does seem to be something of a mess, but I doubt that it is enough of a mess for field officers to find themselves firing a machine gun. Perhaps you should think harder about what might constitute relevant evidence.

No, they are protected by multiple layers and are not exposing themselves like a machine gunner is. You just can't accept the fact that a hunter IS a sniper, and would be effective as such in war.

>
> --
> Bill Sloman, Sydney

On Sunday, May 1, 2022 at 12:03:03 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Sunday, May 1, 2022 at 2:48:44 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
> > On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 8:59:37 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > On Sunday, May 1, 2022 at 4:25:58 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 9:22:44 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > > > On Friday, April 29, 2022 at 9:12:36 AM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
> > > > > > On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 10:38:26 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee..org wrote:
> > > > > > > On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 3:47:47 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 9:53:03 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 1:56:47 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Jasen Betts <use...@revmaps.no-ip.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > John Doe wrote:
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > > > > > LOL! More lies from the Sloman!
> > > > >
> > > > > So post your program. It will have been short enough to post here.. I could scan mine and post it, but 800 lines plus comments is a bit too bulky to fit here. John Doe is willing to post pages of text here, but I mark it as spam when he does.
> > > >
> > > > So you won't, but expect me to?
> > >
> > > It's pages 226 to 251 of my Ph.D. thesis. You could go to the University of Melbourne and read it in the library there. Twenty six pages of A4 text is too much to post here.
> >
> > I could also slide down a mile-long razor blade, but I won't.
> You'd have to find one first. The University of Melbourne does exist, and so does it's library.
> > > Your program s going to be a lot shorter. You could do it if it existed.
> >
> > After you, fool.
> Translation: it doesn't exist.
> > > > > > > I wrote 800 lines of code for the PDP8 I used, and it is in my Ph.D. thesis, with a fairly detailed description of what it was doing (and why).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And I designed and built interfaces for the PDP8 and PDP9, as well as programmed them - SO WHAT?
> > > > >
> > > > > "Interfaces?" A relay that opened and closed?
> > > >
> > > > LOL! You CLEARLY are NOT an engineer!!!
> >
> > > I'm enough of an engineer to know that getting a computer to monitor whether a relay contact was opened or closed was a frequently used mechanism to keep a computer program informed about the state4 of the world outside.. It only provied one bit of information, but it did offer good galvanic isolation.
> >
> > No, you are NO KIND of engineer.
> Good enough to fool the IEEE amongst others, but apparently not good enough to foil Flyguy's piercing insight. Or whatever it is that he has that he confuses with piercing insight.

Not good enough to fool REAL engineers, fool.

> > > If you did anything more sophisticated - my PDP8 came with a 12- bit A/D converter - do tell us about it.
>
> > I did and I won't.
> Translation: he didn't.

Translation: SNIPPERMAN is LYING yet again.

> > > <snip>
>
> > > > > > > You were never one of the people who wrote the programs, nor even the PC techie that John Doe claims to have been.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yet EVEN MORE LIES from the liar Sloman!
> > > > >
> > > > > If I were wrong you could post the evidence. You won't. Probably because you are too incompetent now to do it, even if you had been more competent then (which seems unlikely).
> > > >
> > > > But you WON'T! Spare me your condescension.
> >
> > > I won't foul up this forum with 800 lines of text. You clearly haven't got the same excuse. If you had you'd tell us about it. The condescension is entirely appropriate.
> >
> > And I won't respond to your fucking condescension.
> You just did.
No, I didn't.
>
> <snipped the rest>
>
> --
> SNIPPERMAN, Sydney

Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

> foreign sanctions presiding over a plummeting Russian ruble

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=Price+of+ruble

The ruble is at a two-year high.

Anybody can do a little research.

allintext:"Henry Kissinger" NATO Ukraine

This is a bunch of baseless idiotic opinions...

--
David Eather <eatREMOVEher@tpg.com.au> wrote:

> Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 12:18:18 +1000
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1
> Subject: Re: OT: Russian collapse
> Content-Language: en-US
> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
> References: <t41stt$v7p$1@dont-email.me> <t428ve$bsl$1@dont-email.me>
> From: David Eather <eatREMOVEher@tpg.com.au>
> In-Reply-To: <t428ve$bsl$1@dont-email.me>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 47
> Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 02:18:22 +0000
> X-Received-Bytes: 2459
> Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
> Message-ID: <16ea8b0d33e864fc$3$3266748$c2465acb@news.newsdemon.com>
> Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:667802
>
> On 24/04/2022 11:26 am, John Doe wrote:
> ... (snip - who cares?)
>
> did Hitler teach you nothing?
>
> First invade all those "ethnically" friendly regions like donbast,
> austria, moldova, sudaten lands, crimea and Slovakia, Georgia. (don't
> mention that Putin needs a bigger economy so his country isn't swallowed
> up by the Chinese)
>
> Then hold "elections" with an opposition unable to campaign, the
> population bloated by trucked in "patriots" and everyone else under the
> gun.
>
> Announce the righteousness of your actions and move on to your next
> conflict.
>
> Easy.
>
> Can you see how Putin's approach can be seen as similar to Hitler's?
>
> And all it needs to succeed is for everyone else to do nothing. Or if
> that is not happening threaten everyone else with nuclear weapons.
>
> Putin is as mad as a cut snake but only half as smart. He probably will
> pop a nuke at some point despite lack of viable targets.
>
> Ukraine doesn't have dense concentrations of troops or supplies. So that
> is a pretty crap target with only temporary advantages for nuke popping
> and lots of long term bad.
>
> Attack supplies in a country that is supplying Ukraine means attacking a
> NATO country and hence activating clause 5 of the NATO alliance (an
> attack against one is an attack against against all -paraphrased). Lots
> of very long term bad.
>
> Bomb Kiev. Which risks killing leader of the EU or UN and would in any
> case be seen as a massive escalation and is a war crime of the highest
> order.
>
> The most likely is some poor schmuck Russian general will be given a
> tactical nuke and a conventional force with orders to attack and make
> sure his attack succeeds. Then if the nuke does not do what Putin wants
> the General can be given a Soviet style trial (you know the ones with
> the body bags and firing squad already assembled before the trial
> begins), and Putin can claim he is really for peace and had nothing to
> do with it.
>

John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote in news:t4nqgd$1fq$2@dont-
email.me:

> Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:
>
>> foreign sanctions presiding over a plummeting Russian ruble
>
> https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=Price+of+ruble
>
> The ruble is at a two-year high.
>

And still only worth 1.4 cents each.

Whereas the Mexican Peso is worth 4 times what the Russian Ruble is
worth, AND Russian citizens have a hard time getting cash because all
the banks shut down.

Dancing around at the bottom of the barrel is still only dancing at
the bottom of the barrel.

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
> breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
> CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another
incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Mon, 2 May 2022 05:38:56 -0000
(UTC) in message-id <t4nqpg$1fq$3@dont-email.me>.

Further, John Doe stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
(UTC):

> Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
> except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe's post ratio to
USENET (**) has been 57.6% of its posts contributing "nothing except
insults" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe has posted at
least 1179 articles to USENET. Of which 139 have been pure insults and
540 have been John Doe "troll format" postings.

s3ohOCi8Qkg+

DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

> John Doe wrote:
>> Don Y wrote:
>>
>>> foreign sanctions presiding over a plummeting Russian ruble
>>
>> https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=Price+of+ruble
>>
>> The ruble is at a two-year high.
>
> And still only worth 1.4 cents each.

And still nothing like "plummeting".

> Whereas the Mexican Peso is worth 4 times what the Russian Ruble is
> worth

So what? What does that prove except the relative value of currency is
more than meets the eye.

Mexico is a great place if you like cockfights, but what's Mexico's space
program like? Russia has been taking our astronauts to the space station
for the last fifteen years. If Russia were suffering from "brain drain" as
some foolishly claim, why does our government constantly warn us about
Russian hackers?

Eddie wants so badly to nym-shift. That's a no-no here, Eddie!

Eddie has never posted anything NORMAL except when it got a spanking...

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.electronics.repair/c/MesPLcGU4BE

See also...
John Doe <always.look@message.header> (astraweb)
Peter Weiner <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
Edward H. <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>

Eddie is an example for all newbies. Don't get spanked!

Spanked Eddie...

--
Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com> wrote:

> Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx13.ams4.POSTED!not-for-mail
> From: Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: OT: Russian collapse
> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,free.spam
> References: <t41stt$v7p$1@dont-email.me> <t428ve$bsl$1@dont-email.me> <16ea8b0d33e864fc$3$3266748$c2465acb@news.newsdemon.com> <t4nqpg$1fq$3@dont-email.me>
> Lines: 33
> Message-ID: <5CKbK.1536047$5u1.365995@usenetxs.com>
> X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 02 May 2022 06:11:13 UTC
> Date: Mon, 02 May 2022 06:11:13 GMT
> X-Received-Bytes: 1825
> Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:668019 free.spam:18081
>
> The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
> <sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:
>
>> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...
>
> And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
> <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:
>
>> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
>> breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
>> CLUELESS...
>
> And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another
> incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Mon, 2 May 2022 05:38:56 -0000
> (UTC) in message-id <t4nqpg$1fq$3@dont-email.me>.
>
> Further, John Doe stated the following in message-id
> <svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
> (UTC):
>
>> Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
>> except insults to this group.
>
> Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe's post ratio to
> USENET (**) has been 57.6% of its posts contributing "nothing except
> insults" to USENET.
>
> ** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe has posted at
> least 1179 articles to USENET. Of which 139 have been pure insults and
> 540 have been John Doe "troll format" postings.
>
> s3ohOCi8Qkg+
>
>
>

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
> breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
> CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly
formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
Mon, 2 May 2022 06:31:45 -0000 (UTC) in message-id
<t4ntsg$1fq$9@dont-email.me>).

NOBODY likes the John Doe troll's contentless spam.

Further, Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
(UTC):

> Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
> except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe's post ratio
to USENET (**) has been 57.7% of its posts contributing "nothing except
insults" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe has posted at
least 1184 articles to USENET. Of which 139 have been pure insults and
544 have been Troll Doe "troll format" postings.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.

v6VVlq1Jjw2C

Henry Kissinger is not the only world-renowned diplomat who has warned
against aggressive NATO expansion to Russia's border countries.

More baseless idiotic opinions, as always from Bill "Bozo" Sloman...

--
Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

> X-Received: by 2002:a37:4454:0:b0:69f:c339:e2dc with SMTP id r81-20020a374454000000b0069fc339e2dcmr6271600qka.771.1651473473047; Sun, 01 May 2022 23:37:53 -0700 (PDT)
> X-Received: by 2002:a25:d1c8:0:b0:648:a463:f2ca with SMTP id i191-20020a25d1c8000000b00648a463f2camr9689920ybg.620.1651473472775; Sun, 01 May 2022 23:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
> Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
> Date: Sun, 1 May 2022 23:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
> In-Reply-To: <t4nqpg$1fq$3@dont-email.me>
> Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=118.208.108.19; posting-account=SJ46pgoAAABuUDuHc5uDiXN30ATE-zi-
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 118.208.108.19
> References: <t41stt$v7p$1@dont-email.me> <t428ve$bsl$1@dont-email.me> <16ea8b0d33e864fc$3$3266748$c2465acb@news.newsdemon.com> <t4nqpg$1fq$3@dont-email.me>
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Message-ID: <cfa68306-1a7c-4a47-9f03-abe76a0487aan@googlegroups.com>
> Subject: Re: OT: Russian collapse
> From: Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
> Injection-Date: Mon, 02 May 2022 06:37:53 +0000
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Lines: 81
> Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:668031
>
> On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 3:39:03 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
>> David Eather <eatREM...@tpg.com.au> wrote:
>> > On 24/04/2022 11:26 am, John Doe wrote:
>> > ... (snip - who cares?)
>> >
>> > did Hitler teach you nothing?
>> >
>> > First invade all those "ethnically" friendly regions like donbast, aus
> tria, moldova, sudaten lands, crimea and Slovakia, Georgia. (don't mention that Putin needs a bigger economy so his country isn't swallowed up by the Chinese)
>> >
>> > Then hold "elections" with an opposition unable to campaign, the
>> > population bloated by trucked in "patriots" and everyone else under the
>
>> > gun.
>> >
>> > Announce the righteousness of your actions and move on to your next
>> > conflict.
>> >
>> > Easy.
>> >
>> > Can you see how Putin's approach can be seen as similar to Hitler's?
>> >
>> > And all it needs to succeed is for everyone else to do nothing. Or if
>
>> > that is not happening threaten everyone else with nuclear weapons.
>> >
>> > Putin is as mad as a cut snake but only half as smart. He probably will
>
>> > pop a nuke at some point despite lack of viable targets.
>> >
>> > Ukraine doesn't have dense concentrations of troops or supplies. So tha
> t
>> > is a pretty crap target with only temporary advantages for nuke popping
>
>> > and lots of long term bad.
>> >
>> > Attack supplies in a country that is supplying Ukraine means attacking
> a
>> > NATO country and hence activating clause 5 of the NATO alliance (an
>> > attack against one is an attack against against all -paraphrased). Lots
>
>> > of very long term bad.
>> >
>> > Bomb Kiev. Which risks killing leader of the EU or UN and would in any
>
>> > case be seen as a massive escalation and is a war crime of the highest
>
>> > order.
>> >
>> > The most likely is some poor schmuck Russian general will be given a
>> > tactical nuke and a conventional force with orders to attack and make
>
>> > sure his attack succeeds. Then if the nuke does not do what Putin wants
>
>> > the General can be given a Soviet style trial (you know the ones with
>
>> > the body bags and firing squad already assembled before the trial
>> > begins), and Putin can claim he is really for peace and had nothing to
>
>> > do with it.
>>
>> Anybody can do a little research.
>>
>> allintext:"Henry Kissinger" NATO Ukraine
>
> Which happens to be way out of date - because it sounds like stuff that John Doe would like statesmen to be saying now, he neglects the fact that Kissinger isn't saying it now.
>
>> This is a bunch of baseless idiotic opinions...
>
> John Doe is an expert on posting baseless idiotic opinions. Clearly, he isn't good at recognising opinions which are actually baseless and idiotic.He might not espouse them quite so enthusiastically if he were, but that leads to questions about his moral character, which is unpleasant to the point of criminal deviance.
>
> --
> Bill Sloman, Sydney
>
>

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
> breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
> CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly
formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
Mon, 2 May 2022 06:43:45 -0000 (UTC) in message-id
<t4nuj0$1fq$14@dont-email.me>).

NOBODY likes the John Doe troll's contentless spam.

Further, Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
(UTC):

> Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
> except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe's post ratio
to USENET (**) has been 57.8% of its posts contributing "nothing except
insults" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe has posted at
least 1192 articles to USENET. Of which 139 have been pure insults and
550 have been Troll Doe "troll format" postings.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.

2QkNd4ZUy9Cg

Eddie wants so badly to nym-shift. That's a no-no here, Eddie!

Eddie has never posted anything NORMAL except when it got a spanking...

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.electronics.repair/c/MesPLcGU4BE

See also...
John Doe <always.look@message.header> (astraweb)
Peter Weiner <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
Edward H. <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>

Eddie is an example for all newbies. Don't get spanked!

Spanked Eddie...

--
Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com> wrote:

> Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx03.ams4.POSTED!not-for-mail
> From: Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: OT: Russian collapse
> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,free.spam
> References: <t41stt$v7p$1@dont-email.me> <t428ve$bsl$1@dont-email.me> <16ea8b0d33e864fc$3$3266748$c2465acb@news.newsdemon.com> <t4nqpg$1fq$3@dont-email.me> <cfa68306-1a7c-4a47-9f03-abe76a0487aan@googlegroups.com> <t4nuj0$1fq$14@dont-email.me>
> Lines: 40
> Message-ID: <j5LbK.1799489$Z91.219172@usenetxs.com>
> X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 02 May 2022 06:44:31 UTC
> Date: Mon, 02 May 2022 06:44:31 GMT
> X-Received-Bytes: 2205
> Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:668035 free.spam:18092
>
> The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
> <sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:
>
>> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...
>
> And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
> <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:
>
>> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
>> breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
>> CLUELESS...
>
> And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly
> formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
> Mon, 2 May 2022 06:43:45 -0000 (UTC) in message-id
> <t4nuj0$1fq$14@dont-email.me>).
>
> NOBODY likes the John Doe troll's contentless spam.
>
> Further, Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
> <svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
> (UTC):
>
>> Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
>> except insults to this group.
>
> Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe's post ratio
> to USENET (**) has been 57.8% of its posts contributing "nothing except
> insults" to USENET.
>
> ** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe has posted at
> least 1192 articles to USENET. Of which 139 have been pure insults and
> 550 have been Troll Doe "troll format" postings.
>
> This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
> readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
> follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.
>
> 2QkNd4ZUy9Cg
>
>
>

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

> The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
> breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
> CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly
formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
Mon, 2 May 2022 06:45:32 -0000 (UTC) in message-id
<t4numb$1fq$15@dont-email.me>).

NOBODY likes the John Doe troll's contentless spam.

Further, Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
(UTC):

> Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
> except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe's post ratio
to USENET (**) has been 57.9% of its posts contributing "nothing except
insults" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe has posted at
least 1194 articles to USENET. Of which 139 have been pure insults and
552 have been Troll Doe "troll format" postings.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.

mYKnz85YEwFe

John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote in
news:t4ntmv$1fq$7@dont-email.me:

> DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:
>
>> John Doe wrote:
>>> Don Y wrote:
>>>
>>>> foreign sanctions presiding over a plummeting Russian ruble
>>>
>>> https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=Price+of+rub
>>> le
>>>
>>> The ruble is at a two-year high.
>>
>> And still only worth 1.4 cents each.
>
> And still nothing like "plummeting".

It most certainly did plummet from what it was before Putin pulled
his stupid move.
>
>> Whereas the Mexican Peso is worth 4 times what the Russian Ruble
>> is worth
>
> So what? What does that prove except the relative value of
> currency is more than meets the eye.

You ain't real bright.

> Mexico is a great place if you like cockfights,

Oh boy! More retarded RatThugLeTard stupid shit.

> but what's
> Mexico's space program like?

You wouldn't know. You are too busy watching Fox news and Trump
rally reruns.

> Russia has been taking our astronauts
> to the space station for the last fifteen years.

Yep, ever since we ended the Shuttle Program we had no heavy
booster capable. They have been popping up private satellites too.
Nothing new.

> If Russia were
> suffering from "brain drain" as some foolishly claim,

You are an idiot.

> why does our
> government constantly warn us about Russian hackers?

Hackers are good at hacking, but are typically pretty stupid in
nearly all other areas. And the fact that a nation has large numbers
of hackers points mpore toward bad criminal law policy and bad
policing of any existing laws than it would toward a tech or science
savvy realm. Same reason bootleg DVDs were rampant in Thailand for
so long. And this nation actually encourages the hacking. Again,
that doesn't make them smart.