On 4/03/2022 7:45 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 4/03/2022 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 23:28:49 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/03/2022 6:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 3/03/2022 3:50 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>> The words burnt and evaporated have completely different meanings,
>>>>>> and burnt does not mean converted to a gaseous state.
>>>>>
>>>>> it was what I meant by it
>>>> Then why didn't you say so? You can squirm as much as you like, but you
>>>> showed a total lack of knowledge about basic physical processes.
>>> Of course he did. All he's doing now is shifting the goalposts in trying
>>> to cover his pig ignorant arse. Can you imagine the shellacking I'd be
>>> copping right now if I'd said one thing but then later claimed that I
>>> meant something else when the original inference was wrong? The entire
>>> FLC would be dancing around their burning crucifix with their pitchforks
>>> calling for blood, yet Felix makes a monumental ignoramus out of himself
>>> (yet again) and all you get is stunned silence.
>> Hopeless Fraudster. You are just hopeless.
>>
>> Your attempts to equate felix's poor expression with your monstrous
>> history
>> of lies, hypocrisy and abuse will never ever fly. All you're achieving
>> with
>> this latest inept attempted diversion is to make yourself look even more
>> desperate, deranged and pathetic.
>>
>
> I was thinking today of some of the things the fraudster has posted
> photos of.. (in no particular order) a blown tractor tyre, cable ties, a
> Lotus incorrectly hoisted, his rusty cars endlessly awaiting
> restoration, his solar panels, his old ford car, his new Nissan car, the
> vice on his bench, his workshop, car parts he made shiny, more car
> parts, seat belts he won't use for his son, an old pickup truck he
> bought, and much much more, my memory fails me. anyone notice something
> missing? hint: the one thing most asked for.
>
>

Indeed... and no amount useless photos and rabid vein bulging white
noise from him in protest (supported by his truly brain dead enablers)
is going drag his credibility back out of the gutter.

The only thing that could, which can be verified as being true because
those records exist, he won't post.

There is only one logical conclusion to draw from this.

--
keith on the 7 Oct 2021 wrote;
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if
it is unproven, he is lying."

On 4/03/2022 11:42 am, Xeno wrote:
> On 4/3/22 01:58, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 3/03/2022 11:51 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 3/03/2022 11:13 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 3/03/2022 9:18 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Some ads mostly from China, but how many buyers?
>>>>>>
>>>>> The fact that the ads exist tells you there is likely a market for
>>>>> them.
>>>>
>>>> Not necessarily, it only costs on eBay if you actually sell the
>>>> product.
>>>
>>> Not quite true. There are listing fees,
>>
>>
>> only for certain categories, not for most
>>
>>
>>> but they're relatively minor for the average user.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> If you look at the EBay ads, many will state how many have been sold
> thus far. Ipso facto, any number greater than zero indicates they are
> actually selling for the indicated prices hence even a 10 year old i7
> processor has a value in excess of what I paid for the entire computer.
>

definitely. I'm using an i5 so an i7 would be an upgrade for me. hmmm...
I might think about doing an upgrade.

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam

FUCK PUTIN!!

"His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
"He came, he saw, he got pummelled" - Alvey on Keefy
"What a pair! Not a single word of rebuttal or reason,
just cretinous abuse" - Alvey on jonz and noddy
"His self serving ego pumping comments just
read like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy
"your opinion isn't worth 2 knobs of goat shit"
- Xeno on Grubby Tech

On 4/03/2022 11:55 am, keithr0 wrote:
> On 4/03/2022 9:49 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 4/03/2022 10:39 am, Xeno wrote:
>>> On 4/3/22 01:57, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 3/03/2022 11:44 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>> On 3/03/2022 6:19 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/03/2022 4:06 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> but if you build yourself you could build a better computer
>>>>>>> cheaper than what you would pay for commercial 'cheap shit'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Commercial entities can buy the parts much cheaper than you can,
>>>>>> 10 years or more ago, building your own was a good way to go but
>>>>>> the world has changed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Absolutely.
>>>>>
>>>>> I used to always build my own PCs
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> of course you did noddy. we believe you, honest we do...
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Q: What's the difference between Darren and a battery?
>>>
>>> A: A battery has a positive side!
>>>
>>> (Apologies to SOLS)
>>>
>>
>> LOL
>>
> Suck suck suck, a pathetic response to a pathetic "Joke"

a pathetic post by a pathetic poster.

HTH

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam

FUCK PUTIN!!

"His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
"He came, he saw, he got pummelled" - Alvey on Keefy
"What a pair! Not a single word of rebuttal or reason,
just cretinous abuse" - Alvey on jonz and noddy
"His self serving ego pumping comments just
read like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy
"your opinion isn't worth 2 knobs of goat shit"
- Xeno on Grubby Tech

On 4/03/2022 11:56 am, Clocky wrote:
> On 4/03/2022 7:45 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 4/03/2022 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>> On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 23:28:49 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/03/2022 6:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 3/03/2022 3:50 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>> The words burnt and evaporated have completely different meanings,
>>>>>>> and burnt does not mean converted to a gaseous state.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> it was what I meant by it
>>>>> Then why didn't you say so? You can squirm as much as you like,
>>>>> but you
>>>>> showed a total lack of knowledge about basic physical processes.
>>>> Of course he did. All he's doing now is shifting the goalposts in
>>>> trying
>>>> to cover his pig ignorant arse. Can you imagine the shellacking I'd be
>>>> copping right now if I'd said one thing but then later claimed that I
>>>> meant something else when the original inference was wrong? The entire
>>>> FLC would be dancing around their burning crucifix with their
>>>> pitchforks
>>>> calling for blood, yet Felix makes a monumental ignoramus out of
>>>> himself
>>>> (yet again) and all you get is stunned silence.
>>> Hopeless Fraudster. You are just hopeless.
>>>
>>> Your attempts to equate felix's poor expression with your monstrous
>>> history
>>> of lies, hypocrisy and abuse will never ever fly. All you're
>>> achieving with
>>> this latest inept attempted diversion is to make yourself look even
>>> more
>>> desperate, deranged and pathetic.
>>>
>>
>> I was thinking today of some of the things the fraudster has posted
>> photos of.. (in no particular order) a blown tractor tyre, cable
>> ties, a Lotus incorrectly hoisted, his rusty cars endlessly awaiting
>> restoration, his solar panels, his old ford car, his new Nissan car,
>> the vice on his bench, his workshop, car parts he made shiny, more
>> car parts, seat belts he won't use for his son, an old pickup truck
>> he bought, and much much more, my memory fails me. anyone notice
>> something missing? hint: the one thing most asked for.
>>
>>
>
> Indeed... and no amount useless photos and rabid vein bulging white
> noise from him in protest (supported by his truly brain dead enablers)
> is going drag his credibility back out of the gutter.
>
> The only thing that could, which can be verified as being true because
> those records exist, he won't post.
>
> There is only one logical conclusion to draw from this.
>

indeed there is

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam

FUCK PUTIN!!

"His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
"He came, he saw, he got pummelled" - Alvey on Keefy
"What a pair! Not a single word of rebuttal or reason,
just cretinous abuse" - Alvey on jonz and noddy
"His self serving ego pumping comments just
read like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy
"your opinion isn't worth 2 knobs of goat shit"
- Xeno on Grubby Tech

On Thursday, 3 March 2022 at 19:08:55 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 3/03/2022 6:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> > On 3/03/2022 3:50 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >> On 3/03/2022 4:21 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>> On 3/03/2022 2:28 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>>> On 3/03/2022 3:08 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>> On 3/03/2022 3:33 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>>>>> On 2/03/2022 11:25 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 2/03/2022 5:36 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 1/03/2022 8:43 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On 1/03/2022 4:18 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> yes I thought water vapor (can) increase air density, and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> also water vapor burns when in the cylinder, iirc.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Water vapour burns? I'd like to see that.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, so would I :)
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> here's a clue for noddy and keefy.. water is H20
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Yes and?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> and.. what happens to it in the cylinder during ignition and
> >>>>>>>> combustion
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> And you call Jonz a "Village idiot", he's an intellectual giant
> >>>>>>> compared to you.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If water burns, why do the fire brigade pour it on burning
> >>>>>>> buildings? It is because it's cheaper than petrol and they can
> >>>>>>> dance around the fire as the water burns up chanting "Burn baby
> >>>>>>> burn"?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Anyway the next bit may be hard for you as it contains science,
> >>>>>>> I'll type it slowly, you can stick your tongue out if it helps
> >>>>>>> you to concentrate.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Most substances (not all but including water) have 3 states,
> >>>>>>> solid, liquid, and gaseous, with water these are called ice,
> >>>>>>> water, and water vapour. Transitioning between these states
> >>>>>>> involves latent energy, e.g. going from liquid to gaseous,
> >>>>>>> (latent) heat of vaporization or heat of evaporation, is the
> >>>>>>> amount of energy (enthalpy) that must be added to a liquid
> >>>>>>> substance to transform a quantity of that substance into a gas.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> So when water is converted into vapor in the induction system of
> >>>>>>> an IC engine it absorbs energy cooling the mixture and
> >>>>>>> preventing pre-detonation (Knocking). This allows a higher
> >>>>>>> compression ratio or a higher level of boost.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thus water is evaporated not burnt, AFAIK, the only way that
> >>>>>>> water would be "Burnt" would be in a thermo-nuclear reaction.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thus endeth the lesson.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> duh! you really are a pretentious conceited asshole, arn't you.
> >>>>>> (rhetorical question). of course it's evaporated. that's what I
> >>>>>> meant by simply saying it's 'burnt'. it cannot remain in it's
> >>>>>> liquid state. noddy can't see beyond the end of his nose, and you
> >>>>>> can't see beyond your ego.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> Burnt and evaporated are completely different things. You're
> >>>>> backing up faster than an Italian tank, and trying to blame others
> >>>>> for your fuckup. You were given adequate chance to change your
> >>>>> story but doubled down on it - so take it like a man and admit
> >>>>> that you didn't know what you were talking about.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> by saying 'burnt' I meant it changes to a gaseous state by the
> >>>> intense heat. that's exctly what I meant. being pedantic about my
> >>>> choice of words won't cut it for you. shirly you can't really
> >>>> believe I thought water is a flammable liquid? or are you really
> >>>> that stupid? but maybe you are because you thought it was necessary
> >>>> to explain the three states that water can exist in above.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> Nothing pedantic about it, if something can be burnt, then it is
> >>> inflammable.
> >>
> >>
> >> and you noddy and deryl were the only ppl stupid enough to think I
> >> believed water was flammable. (grubby and the village idiot were
> >> probably too busy trying to tie their shoelaces to post)
> >>
> >>
> >>> The words burnt and evaporated have completely different meanings,
> >>> and burnt does not mean converted to a gaseous state.
> >>
> >>
> >> it was what I meant by it
> >
> > Then why didn't you say so?
> poor choice of words.
> > You can squirm as much as you like,
> i'm not squirming. as usual your ego is your problem. you think because
> you're trying to make me squirm, it must be happening
> > but you showed a total lack of knowledge about basic physical processes..
> >
> >>> Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged, 12th Edition 2014
> >>>
> >>> burn (bɜrn)
> >>>
> >>> v. burned burnt, burn•ing, v.i.
> >>> 1. to consume fuel and give off heat, gases, and usu. light; be on
> >>> fire.
> >>> 2.
> >>> a. to undergo combustion; oxidize.
> >>> b. to undergo fission or fusion.
> >>>
> >>> I explained it at length because you didn't seem to have a clue
> >>> about it, and needed some education. You may notice that something
> >>> burnt has given off heat whereas something evaporated has absorbed
> >>> heat, that is a major distinction. Maybe science just isn't your thing.
> >>
> >>
> >> maybe not being a pompas ass just isn't your thing
> >
> > Maybe
> >
> yes, I think so
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Pompasity, pompasity (sic)......It`s *everywhere*........ HAhahahaha. :))))
> --
> https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
>
> FUCK PUTIN!!

>
> "His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
> the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
> "He came, he saw, he got pummelled" - Alvey on Keefy
> "What a pair! Not a single word of rebuttal or reason,
> just cretinous abuse" - Alvey on jonz and noddy
> "His self serving ego pumping comments just
> read like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy
> "your opinion isn't worth 2 knobs of goat shit"
> - Xeno on Grubby Tech
New South Wales

On Thursday, 3 March 2022 at 20:39:53 UTC+11, keithr0 wrote:
> On 3/03/2022 6:09 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> > On 3/03/2022 6:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >> On 3/03/2022 3:50 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>> On 3/03/2022 4:21 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>> On 3/03/2022 2:28 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>>>> On 3/03/2022 3:08 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>> On 3/03/2022 3:33 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 2/03/2022 11:25 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 2/03/2022 5:36 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On 1/03/2022 8:43 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On 1/03/2022 4:18 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yes I thought water vapor (can) increase air density, and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also water vapor burns when in the cylinder, iirc.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Water vapour burns? I'd like to see that.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, so would I :)
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> here's a clue for noddy and keefy.. water is H20
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Yes and?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> and.. what happens to it in the cylinder during ignition and
> >>>>>>>>> combustion
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> And you call Jonz a "Village idiot", he's an intellectual giant
> >>>>>>>> compared to you.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If water burns, why do the fire brigade pour it on burning
> >>>>>>>> buildings? It is because it's cheaper than petrol and they can
> >>>>>>>> dance around the fire as the water burns up chanting "Burn baby
> >>>>>>>> burn"?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Anyway the next bit may be hard for you as it contains science,
> >>>>>>>> I'll type it slowly, you can stick your tongue out if it helps
> >>>>>>>> you to concentrate.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Most substances (not all but including water) have 3 states,
> >>>>>>>> solid, liquid, and gaseous, with water these are called ice,
> >>>>>>>> water, and water vapour. Transitioning between these states
> >>>>>>>> involves latent energy, e.g. going from liquid to gaseous,
> >>>>>>>> (latent) heat of vaporization or heat of evaporation, is the
> >>>>>>>> amount of energy (enthalpy) that must be added to a liquid
> >>>>>>>> substance to transform a quantity of that substance into a gas.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> So when water is converted into vapor in the induction system of
> >>>>>>>> an IC engine it absorbs energy cooling the mixture and
> >>>>>>>> preventing pre-detonation (Knocking). This allows a higher
> >>>>>>>> compression ratio or a higher level of boost.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thus water is evaporated not burnt, AFAIK, the only way that
> >>>>>>>> water would be "Burnt" would be in a thermo-nuclear reaction.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thus endeth the lesson.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> duh! you really are a pretentious conceited asshole, arn't you.
> >>>>>>> (rhetorical question). of course it's evaporated. that's what I
> >>>>>>> meant by simply saying it's 'burnt'. it cannot remain in it's
> >>>>>>> liquid state. noddy can't see beyond the end of his nose, and you
> >>>>>>> can't see beyond your ego.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> Burnt and evaporated are completely different things. You're
> >>>>>> backing up faster than an Italian tank, and trying to blame others
> >>>>>> for your fuckup. You were given adequate chance to change your
> >>>>>> story but doubled down on it - so take it like a man and admit
> >>>>>> that you didn't know what you were talking about.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> by saying 'burnt' I meant it changes to a gaseous state by the
> >>>>> intense heat. that's exctly what I meant. being pedantic about my
> >>>>> choice of words won't cut it for you. shirly you can't really
> >>>>> believe I thought water is a flammable liquid? or are you really
> >>>>> that stupid? but maybe you are because you thought it was necessary
> >>>>> to explain the three states that water can exist in above.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> Nothing pedantic about it, if something can be burnt, then it is
> >>>> inflammable.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> and you noddy and deryl were the only ppl stupid enough to think I
> >>> believed water was flammable. (grubby and the village idiot were
> >>> probably too busy trying to tie their shoelaces to post)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> The words burnt and evaporated have completely different meanings,
> >>>> and burnt does not mean converted to a gaseous state.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> it was what I meant by it
> >>
> >> Then why didn't you say so?
> >
> >
> > poor choice of words.
> >
> >
> >> You can squirm as much as you like,
> >
> >
> > i'm not squirming. as usual your ego is your problem. you think because
> > you're trying to make me squirm, it must be happening
> >
> >
> >> but you showed a total lack of knowledge about basic physical processes.
> >>
> >>>> Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged, 12th Edition 2014
> >>>>
> >>>> burn (bɜrn)
> >>>>
> >>>> v. burned burnt, burn•ing, v.i.
> >>>> 1. to consume fuel and give off heat, gases, and usu. light; be on
> >>>> fire.
> >>>> 2.
> >>>> a. to undergo combustion; oxidize.
> >>>> b. to undergo fission or fusion.
> >>>>
> >>>> I explained it at length because you didn't seem to have a clue
> >>>> about it, and needed some education. You may notice that something
> >>>> burnt has given off heat whereas something evaporated has absorbed
> >>>> heat, that is a major distinction. Maybe science just isn't your thing.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> maybe not being a pompas ass just isn't your thing
> >>
> >> Maybe being a scientific simpleton is yours.
> >>
> >
> > yes, I think so
> >
> >
> Selective snipping is reckoned to be about as low as you can go on Usenet..
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The weapon of choice for the dullards.

On 4/03/2022 7:39 am, Xeno wrote:
> On 4/3/22 01:57, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 3/03/2022 11:44 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 3/03/2022 6:19 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 3/03/2022 4:06 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>
>>>>> but if you build yourself you could build a better computer cheaper
>>>>> than what you would pay for commercial 'cheap shit'
>>>>
>>>> Commercial entities can buy the parts much cheaper than you can, 10
>>>> years or more ago, building your own was a good way to go but the
>>>> world has changed.
>>>
>>> Absolutely.
>>>
>>> I used to always build my own PCs
>>
>>
>> of course you did noddy. we believe you, honest we do...
>>
>>

Back in 1981, September to be precise he had already taken delivery of
an IBM PC that the rest of the world was still waiting to take delivery on.

No, that's his story and it's true because he says "I was there".
Clearly not all there just as he isn't now but hey, but that's his claim.

My memory of events, IBM's own timeline and all the historical articles
and evidence be damned. He was there...

> Q: What's the difference between Darren and a battery?
>
> A: A battery has a positive side!
>
> (Apologies to SOLS)
>

There are still very sound reasons for building your own PC to your own
requirements just as there ever were. NoddyLiar doesn't do anything
beyond post hateful abuse and lies on usenet - so his requirements are
met with *cheap*, for others it's still a question of being fit for purpose.

--
keith on the 7 Oct 2021 wrote;
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if
it is unproven, he is lying."

On 4/03/2022 11:17 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> On Thursday, 3 March 2022 at 13:12:33 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 3/03/2022 11:55 am, Noddy wrote:
>>> someone who is so utterly ignorant of the world in general as he
>>> *clearly* is
>> here we have a good example of a little trick you employ when
>> commenting. you make a statement that is nothing more than opinion, but
>> is proffered as fact, followed by another statement in support that
>> appears to be factually based, but in reality is nothing more than more
>> opinion, so that together both remarks appear as as if you're stating a
>> fact. it's never worked for you, and it never will.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
> All that meat, and no potato`s!..
> Typical.

Very typical "Felix" comment in that it made no sense whatsoever :)

There is no "trick" involved here. Me offering my opinion does not make
anything "fact", and nor is it presented as such. That's Felix's spin,
and given his ongoing problems in differentiating between opinion and
fact it's not hard to see how he falls over himself in this regard.

However, that opinion is *based* on fact, and that "fact" has been
demonstrated many times by none other than Felix himself. This a man who
thought that changing a rear axle ratio gave him an "overdrive". This is
a man who couldn't buy the correct coolant for his own car even *after*
reading the suitable models list on the back of the bottle. This is a
man who thought a dob of silicone on a hole in his muffler was a "fix".
This is a man who thought the regular changing of timing belts was a
"con job" that didn't really need to be done. This is a man who
presented CGI videos of a plane flying with a wing missing and a truck
defying gravity as it passed over a cliff edge and couldn't tell that
they were *not* real, and very recently this is a man who thought that
water vapour was "burnt" when it made it's way into an engine's cylinder.

This is a fairly incomplete list with *many* more examples to be found
if one could be bothered, but it is certainly enough to establish the
*fact* that Felix is not a bright man, and has is largely ignorant of
the real world around him.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On Friday, 4 March 2022 at 01:54:46 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 3/03/2022 11:28 pm, Noddy wrote:
> > On 3/03/2022 6:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >> On 3/03/2022 3:50 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >
> >>>> The words burnt and evaporated have completely different meanings,
> >>>> and burnt does not mean converted to a gaseous state.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> it was what I meant by it
> >>
> >> Then why didn't you say so? You can squirm as much as you like, but
> >> you showed a total lack of knowledge about basic physical processes.
> >
> > Of course he did. All he's doing now is shifting the goalposts in
> > trying to cover his pig ignorant arse. Can you imagine the shellacking
> > I'd be copping right now if I'd said one thing but then later claimed
> > that I meant something else when the original inference was wrong? The
> > entire FLC would be dancing around their burning crucifix with their
> > pitchforks calling for blood, yet Felix makes a monumental ignoramus
> > out of himself (yet again) and all you get is stunned silence.
> >
> > The clue was "H2O" he said, with the *clear* inference that it related
> > to combustibility.
> it related to it's capacity to change state you dumbass. but if you
> really think I believed water can burn you really are dumber than I
> thought, and that would make you monumentally stupendously dumb!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

*The lady doth protest too much, methinks*....... <FBG>

> >
> > He wants to watch himself next time he's making a cup of tea, as the
> > steam coming out of his kettle might spontaneously combust and blow
> > his house to Mars :)
> >
> well I once had milk that was being heated in a cup in a microwave erupt
> like a volcano when I removed the cup and put a spoon in it. perhaps you
> can explain why? but then i'm rather sure not without googling
> furiously. or maybe you could just ask our resident scientific genius to
> do so for you?
> --
> https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
>
> FUCK PUTIN!!
>
> "His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
> the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
> "He came, he saw, he got pummelled" - Alvey on Keefy
> "What a pair! Not a single word of rebuttal or reason,
> just cretinous abuse" - Alvey on jonz and noddy
> "His self serving ego pumping comments just
> read like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy
> "your opinion isn't worth 2 knobs of goat shit"
> - Xeno on Grubby Tech

On Friday, 4 March 2022 at 06:28:41 UTC+11, alvey wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 23:44:02 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>
> > On 3/03/2022 6:19 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >> On 3/03/2022 4:06 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >
> >>> but if you build yourself you could build a better computer cheaper
> >>> than what you would pay for commercial 'cheap shit'
> >>
> >> Commercial entities can buy the parts much cheaper than you can, 10
> >> years or more ago, building your own was a good way to go but the world
> >> has changed.
> >
> > Absolutely.
> >
> > I used to always build my own PCs ...
>
> Phew! Someone open a window.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
'Kenoath, it happens every time you poast. Fuck off and let the air clear.
> alvey
>
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Friday, 4 March 2022 at 12:07:37 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 4/03/2022 11:55 am, keithr0 wrote:
> > On 4/03/2022 9:49 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >> On 4/03/2022 10:39 am, Xeno wrote:
> >>> On 4/3/22 01:57, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>>> On 3/03/2022 11:44 pm, Noddy wrote:
> >>>>> On 3/03/2022 6:19 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>>>>> On 3/03/2022 4:06 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> but if you build yourself you could build a better computer
> >>>>>>> cheaper than what you would pay for commercial 'cheap shit'
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Commercial entities can buy the parts much cheaper than you can,
> >>>>>> 10 years or more ago, building your own was a good way to go but
> >>>>>> the world has changed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Absolutely.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I used to always build my own PCs
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> of course you did noddy. we believe you, honest we do...
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> Q: What's the difference between Darren and a battery?
> >>>
> >>> A: A battery has a positive side!
> >>>
> >>> (Apologies to SOLS)
> >>>
> >>
> >> LOL
> >>
> > Suck suck suck, a pathetic response to a pathetic "Joke"
> a pathetic post by a pathetic poster'
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mirror.
>
>
> HTH
> --
> https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
>
> FUCK PUTIN!!
>
> "His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
> the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
> "He came, he saw, he got pummelled" - Alvey on Keefy
> "What a pair! Not a single word of rebuttal or reason,
> just cretinous abuse" - Alvey on jonz and noddy
> "His self serving ego pumping comments just
> read like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy
> "your opinion isn't worth 2 knobs of goat shit"
> - Xeno on Grubby Tech

On 4/03/2022 12:26 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 4/03/2022 11:17 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Thursday, 3 March 2022 at 13:12:33 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 3/03/2022 11:55 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>> someone who is so utterly ignorant of the world in general as he
>>>> *clearly* is
>>> here we have a good example of a  little trick you employ when
>>> commenting. you make a statement that is nothing more than opinion, but
>>> is proffered as fact, followed by another statement in support that
>>> appears to be factually based, but in reality is nothing more than more
>>> opinion, so that together both remarks appear as as if you're stating a
>>> fact. it's never worked for you, and it never will.
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
>>   All that meat, and no potato`s!..
>>          Typical.
>
> Very typical "Felix" comment in that it made no sense whatsoever :)
>
> There is no "trick" involved here.

yes there was. read on..

> Me offering my opinion does not make anything "fact",

correct

> and nor is it presented as such.

bzzzt! wrong! "someone who is so utterly ignorant of the world in
general as he *clearly* is" is presentation as fact. opinion would have
been "I think" or "IMO" felix is etc., or "someone who I would suggest
is.. etc"

> That's Felix's spin, and given his ongoing problems in differentiating
> between opinion and fact

and there you go again, presenting your (unworthy) opinion as fact. i
rest my case!

> it's not hard to see how he falls over himself in this regard.
>
> However, that opinion is *based* on fact, and that "fact" has been
> demonstrated many times by none other than Felix himself. This a man
> who thought that changing a rear axle ratio gave him an "overdrive".

it changed the gear ratios.

> This is a man who couldn't buy the correct coolant for his own car
> even *after* reading the suitable models list on the back of the bottle.

when did I say I read the label on the back of the bottle? oh, that
would be never. just another of your lies.

> This is a man who thought a dob of silicone on a hole in his muffler
> was a "fix".

yes it was. it stopped the noise. and I never said it was a permanent
fix, in fact I stated the opposite, a temporary fix

> This is a man who thought the regular changing of timing belts was a
> "con job" that didn't really need to be done.

i queried whether it needed to be done as often as specified, if at all.
this is a ng for car related questions and comments, is it not?

> This is a man who presented CGI videos of a plane flying with a wing
> missing

to ask if planes can fly with one wing, and they can

> and a truck defying gravity as it passed over a cliff edge and
> couldn't tell that they were *not* real,

it was a low res video. hard to tell.

> and very recently this is a man who thought that water vapour was
> "burnt" when it made it's way into an engine's cylinder.

wrong, as I've explained ad nauseaum

>
> This is a fairly incomplete list with *many* more examples to be found
> if one could be bothered, but it is certainly enough to establish the
> *fact* that Felix is not a bright man,

your lies and BS only establish that you're a liar and bullshit artist

> and has is largely ignorant of the real world around him.
>
>

what has any of this to do with 'the real world'.? this is the real world..

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/03/03/world/russian-forces-intensify-attacks-across-ukraine-civilians-flee-country-safety/

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/03/03/russia-ukraine-live-updates.html

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam

FUCK PUTIN!!

"His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
"He came, he saw, he got pummelled" - Alvey on Keefy
"What a pair! Not a single word of rebuttal or reason,
just cretinous abuse" - Alvey on jonz and noddy
"His self serving ego pumping comments just
read like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy
"your opinion isn't worth 2 knobs of goat shit"
- Xeno on Grubby Tech

On Thursday, 3 March 2022 at 23:57:43 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
> On 3/3/22 23:44, Noddy wrote:
> > On 3/03/2022 6:19 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >> On 3/03/2022 4:06 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >
> >>> but if you build yourself you could build a better computer cheaper
> >>> than what you would pay for commercial 'cheap shit'
> >>
> >> Commercial entities can buy the parts much cheaper than you can, 10
> >> years or more ago, building your own was a good way to go but the
> >> world has changed.
> >
> > Absolutely.
> >
> > I used to always build my own PCs as it was not only cheaper but you
> > could pick and choose exactly what you wanted without having to pay a
> > premium to do so, but those days are long gone. These days there's no
> WFM, that's what I was doing - since the early 80s.
> > advantage to doing it yourself anymore when the price difference between
> > buying the individual components and buying the assembled machine is
> > often a hundred bucks or less, and for that extra hundred bucks you not
> > only get the machine built for you but run tested and the software &
> > drivers installed and set up.
> >
> > Why would you want to waste time doing anything else?
> The challenge Darren, the challenge!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There`s a *challenge* in computer *assembling*?? since when.?

Hey, year 9 was too much of a
> challenge for you so I get where you're coming from. There's also the
> *learning experience*. Hmmm, learning's a challenge for you, a challenge
> too far, it would seem.
>
>
> --
> Xeno

On 4/03/2022 1:45 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 3/03/2022 11:20 pm, lindsay wrote:
>> On 3/03/2022 10:15 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 3/03/2022 8:49 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 3/03/2022 6:40 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>> On 3/3/22 19:19, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> online shopping is a big thing these days keefy. apparently you
>>>>>> haven't noticed
>>>>>
>>>>> It would seem so. Lots of ads for the Core i7 970 at around the
>>>>> $100 mark. So my point is made.
>>>>
>>>> Some ads mostly from China, but how many buyers?
>>>>
>>>
>>> keefy posts a whole page of text to add just nine words. sheesh!
>>
>> and yet another valuable post form the chop who can burn water....Your
>> memory must be fucked, felix, or you like making a fool of yourself...
>>
>> 28/02/22 felix adds 2 lines to 415.
>>
>> 27/02/22 felix adds one line to 396.
>>
>> 27/02/22 felix adds one line to 255
>>
>> 27/02/22 felix adds a massive *3 whole letters* to 226 lines
>>
>> 27/02/22 felix adds 1 line to 239
>
>
> wow! you went to all that trouble just to pick on lil ol me.

Wasn't a lot of trouble at all. You make it easy.
You're a hypocrite, as I said. It's still right there above....

> I'm flattered, but haven't you got anything better to do?

Lots. But life can't be all toil, and watching you fuckwits fall over
yourselves to attack your enemies is nearly humorous. You especially, as
you purport to be intelligent, but just keep showing *everyone* how
fucking moronic a sycophant you really are.

>> and so on, and so on....
>>
>> and now whines like a ford diff about excessive quoting? Really, Pete?
>
>
> I commented once you idiot.

Thats all you need, Spazpecker.

> hardly constitutes 'whining like a ford diff'

Ford diffs only need to whine once to be known as a whining ford diff,
Fetid.

>> The mindless hypocrisy of the FLC knows no bounds.
>>
>
> you mean like yours in targeting just me?

Oh, i'm not "targeting" you, spazpecker. Others like Clocky and Alvey
have done the same thing, *BUT* , they didn't *whine* about excessive
quoting a couple of days after doing the exact same thing (multiple
times, see above) you're whining about. *You did*. Hypocrite.

Just another fail, right Spazpecker the Dull ?

On 4/03/2022 1:47 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 4/03/2022 12:26 pm, Noddy wrote:
>
>> However, that opinion is *based* on fact, and that "fact" has been
>> demonstrated many times by none other than Felix himself. This a
>> man who thought that changing a rear axle ratio gave him an
>> "overdrive".
>
>
> it changed the gear ratios.

>> This is a man who presented CGI videos of a plane flying with a
>> wing missing
>
>
> to ask if planes can fly with one wing, and they can

Show me. Show everyone. C'mon Felix. Show everyone how a plane can dent
the laws of gravity and fly with one wing missing. A real plane, not a
cgi... I'm looking forward to it... again.

I've asked you several times to prove this statement, and you ran away
several times. And before you ask, I can prove it. So, Wanna try again?
Plane flying with one wing? Not a toy, not a plane with only 1.2m of
wingtip missing. Not an f-15 with half a wing missing...

you make the statement, you get to prove it, spazpecker. :-D

>> and a truck defying gravity as it passed over a cliff edge and
>> couldn't tell that they were *not* real,
>
>
> it was a low res video. hard to tell.

LOL. it was only YOU that had the difficulty... ***EVERYONE*** else
could see it for what it was... a very poor quality cgi. And you fell
for it yet again. sucker.

On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 12:26:06 +1100, Noddy wrote:

> On 4/03/2022 11:17 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>> On Thursday, 3 March 2022 at 13:12:33 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 3/03/2022 11:55 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>> someone who is so utterly ignorant of the world in general as he
>>>> *clearly* is
>>> here we have a good example of a little trick you employ when
>>> commenting. you make a statement that is nothing more than opinion, but
>>> is proffered as fact, followed by another statement in support that
>>> appears to be factually based, but in reality is nothing more than more
>>> opinion, so that together both remarks appear as as if you're stating a
>>> fact. it's never worked for you, and it never will.
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
>> All that meat, and no potato`s!..
>> Typical.
>
> Very typical "Felix" comment in that it made no sense whatsoever :)
>
> There is no "trick" involved here. Me offering my opinion does not make
> anything "fact" <snip dribble>

The "fact" Fraudster is that there is *nothing* you offer up which can be
taken as "fact".

hth

alvey
“I'm a qualified Motor Mechanic and Automotive Machinist. I *know* these
things are true. I was there and did it. It is factual.” Fraudster, 02Jun18

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Friday, 4 March 2022 at 01:54:46 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 3/03/2022 11:28 pm, Noddy wrote:
> > On 3/03/2022 6:40 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >> On 3/03/2022 3:50 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >
> >>>> The words burnt and evaporated have completely different meanings,
> >>>> and burnt does not mean converted to a gaseous state.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> it was what I meant by it
> >>
> >> Then why didn't you say so? You can squirm as much as you like, but
> >> you showed a total lack of knowledge about basic physical processes.
> >
> > Of course he did. All he's doing now is shifting the goalposts in
> > trying to cover his pig ignorant arse. Can you imagine the shellacking
> > I'd be copping right now if I'd said one thing but then later claimed
> > that I meant something else when the original inference was wrong? The
> > entire FLC would be dancing around their burning crucifix with their
> > pitchforks calling for blood, yet Felix makes a monumental ignoramus
> > out of himself (yet again) and all you get is stunned silence.
> >
> > The clue was "H2O" he said, with the *clear* inference that it related
> > to combustibility.
> it related to it's capacity to change state you dumbass. but if you
> really think I believed water can burn you really are dumber than I
> thought, and that would make you monumentally stupendously dumb!
> >
> > He wants to watch himself next time he's making a cup of tea, as the
> > steam coming out of his kettle might spontaneously combust and blow
> > his house to Mars :)
> >
> well I once had milk that was being heated in a cup in a microwave erupt
> like a volcano when I removed the cup and put a spoon in it. perhaps you
> can explain why? but then i'm rather sure not without googling
> furiously. or maybe you could just ask our resident scientific genius to
> do so for you?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nothing to do with yer belief re: burning H2o nitwit. <G>
> --
> https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
>
> FUCK PUTIN!!
>
> "His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
> the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
> "He came, he saw, he got pummelled" - Alvey on Keefy
> "What a pair! Not a single word of rebuttal or reason,
> just cretinous abuse" - Alvey on jonz and noddy
> "His self serving ego pumping comments just
> read like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy
> "your opinion isn't worth 2 knobs of goat shit"
> - Xeno on Grubby Tech
> 'Water is flammable squarkkk' ffelix da ffool.

On 4/3/22 18:13, alvey wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 12:26:06 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>
>> On 4/03/2022 11:17 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>> On Thursday, 3 March 2022 at 13:12:33 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 3/03/2022 11:55 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>> someone who is so utterly ignorant of the world in general as he
>>>>> *clearly* is
>>>> here we have a good example of a little trick you employ when
>>>> commenting. you make a statement that is nothing more than opinion, but
>>>> is proffered as fact, followed by another statement in support that
>>>> appears to be factually based, but in reality is nothing more than more
>>>> opinion, so that together both remarks appear as as if you're stating a
>>>> fact. it's never worked for you, and it never will.
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
>>> All that meat, and no potato`s!..
>>> Typical.
>>
>> Very typical "Felix" comment in that it made no sense whatsoever :)
>>
>> There is no "trick" involved here. Me offering my opinion does not make
>> anything "fact" <snip dribble>
>
> The "fact" Fraudster is that there is *nothing* you offer up which can be
> taken as "fact".
>
> hth
>
>
> alvey
> “I'm a qualified Motor Mechanic and Automotive Machinist. I *know* these
> things are true. I was there and did it. It is factual.” Fraudster, 02Jun18
>
Poor Darren! Had he actually and factually *been there and done that*,
there would be *hard evidence* to show for it, but there is no evidence
and that's a fact! It fact, that's the only fact that matters.

--
Xeno

On Friday, 4 March 2022 at 10:39:54 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
> On 4/3/22 01:57, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> > On 3/03/2022 11:44 pm, Noddy wrote:
> >> On 3/03/2022 6:19 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> >>> On 3/03/2022 4:06 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> >>
> >>>> but if you build yourself you could build a better computer cheaper
> >>>> than what you would pay for commercial 'cheap shit'
> >>>
> >>> Commercial entities can buy the parts much cheaper than you can, 10
> >>> years or more ago, building your own was a good way to go but the
> >>> world has changed.
> >>
> >> Absolutely.
> >>
> >> I used to always build my own PCs
> >
> >
> > of course you did noddy. we believe you, honest we do...
> >
> >
> Q: What's the difference between Darren and a battery?
>
> A: A battery has a positive side!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From *todays* newspapers no less.......With zero relevance to *anything* (excepting that it includes that sulphated dead cunt yevla.)

>
> (Apologies to SOLS)
>
> --
> Xeno

On 4/03/2022 6:47 pm, Xeno wrote:
> On 4/3/22 18:13, alvey wrote:
>> On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 12:26:06 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/03/2022 11:17 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>>> On Thursday, 3 March 2022 at 13:12:33 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 3/03/2022 11:55 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>> someone who is so utterly ignorant of the world in general as he
>>>>>> *clearly* is
>>>>> here we have a good example of a  little trick you employ when
>>>>> commenting. you make a statement that is nothing more than opinion,
>>>>> but
>>>>> is proffered as fact, followed by another statement in support that
>>>>> appears to be factually based, but in reality is nothing more than
>>>>> more
>>>>> opinion, so that together both remarks appear as as if you're
>>>>> stating a
>>>>> fact. it's never worked for you, and it never will.
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
>>>>    All that meat, and no potato`s!..
>>>>           Typical.
>>>
>>> Very typical "Felix" comment in that it made no sense whatsoever :)
>>>
>>> There is no "trick" involved here. Me offering my opinion does not make
>>> anything "fact" <snip dribble>
>>
>> The "fact" Fraudster is that there is *nothing* you offer up which can be
>> taken as "fact".
>>
>> hth
>>
>>
>> alvey
>> “I'm a qualified Motor Mechanic and Automotive Machinist. I *know* these
>> things are true. I was there and did it. It is factual.” Fraudster,
>> 02Jun18
>>
> Poor Darren! Had he actually and factually *been there and done that*,

well, shit -fer- brains, we (All reading this) know you just big
yourself with lines like this: "If you haven't "done it", don't mention
it. I've BTDT,"

Of course you have, Tomas Clasener.... You designed the Space Shuttle,
and piloted it: you built the Eiffel tower, and you designed your
partners gimp mask. And then had lunch. On Jupiter.

You couldn't lie straight in bed, shit fer brains.

> there would be *hard evidence* to show for it, but there is no evidence
> and that's a fact! It fact, that's the only fact that matters.

Any evidence that "he deleted them"? No? Perhaps "he wasn't involved in
the incident"? No? Maybe something so simple to prove: "wedge type
woodsplitters throw the wood at the operator. Yes, they do that."

But you're not a useless dumb lying cunt looking for flogs to fawn over
you, because you think your a teacher of sorts.. Useless dead cunt you
are, Tomas Clasener, half man of scruples.... what a failure.

>

On 4/03/2022 5:48 pm, lindsay wrote:
> On 4/03/2022 1:47 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 4/03/2022 12:26 pm, Noddy wrote:

>> it was a low res video. hard to tell.
>
> LOL. it was only YOU that had the difficulty... ***EVERYONE*** else
> could see it for what it was... a very poor quality cgi. And you fell
> for it yet again. sucker.

Yep. Ray Charles and Stevie Wonder could have been tag-teaming Helen
Keller and the moment Felix posted that vid they all would have looked
up and said "Even we can see that's fake".

Not Felix though apparently. He can see the difference with Monster
cables, but apparently something like that was too difficult for him to
tell :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 4/03/2022 3:37 pm, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
> On Thursday, 3 March 2022 at 23:57:43 UTC+11, Xeno wrote:
>> On 3/3/22 23:44, Noddy wrote:

>>> I used to always build my own PCs as it was not only cheaper but you
>>> could pick and choose exactly what you wanted without having to pay a
>>> premium to do so, but those days are long gone. These days there's no
>> WFM, that's what I was doing - since the early 80s.
>>> advantage to doing it yourself anymore when the price difference between
>>> buying the individual components and buying the assembled machine is
>>> often a hundred bucks or less, and for that extra hundred bucks you not
>>> only get the machine built for you but run tested and the software &
>>> drivers installed and set up.
>>>
>>> Why would you want to waste time doing anything else?
>> The challenge Darren, the challenge!

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> There`s a *challenge* in computer *assembling*?? since when.?

ROTFL :)

Might be a challenge for him, but not for anyone else. It's a menial
task that any kid can comfortably do.

For fuck's sake. He pushes a couple of cards into some slots and he
thinks he's a network admin :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 4/03/2022 5:29 pm, lindsay wrote:
> On 4/03/2022 1:45 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 3/03/2022 11:20 pm, lindsay wrote:
>>> On 3/03/2022 10:15 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 3/03/2022 8:49 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 3/03/2022 6:40 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/3/22 19:19, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> online shopping is a big thing these days keefy. apparently you
>>>>>>> haven't noticed
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It would seem so. Lots of ads for the Core i7 970 at around the
>>>>>> $100 mark. So my point is made.
>>>>>
>>>>> Some ads mostly from China, but how many buyers?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> keefy posts a whole page of text to add just nine words. sheesh!

I knew I shouldn't have replied to noddy. it's just drawn the scumbags
out of the woodwork

<snip>

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam

FUCK PUTIN!!

"His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
"He came, he saw, he got pummelled" - Alvey on Keefy
"What a pair! Not a single word of rebuttal or reason,
just cretinous abuse" - Alvey on jonz and noddy
"His self serving ego pumping comments just
read like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy
"your opinion isn't worth 2 knobs of goat shit"
- Xeno on Grubby Tech

On 4/03/2022 6:13 pm, alvey wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 12:26:06 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>
>> On 4/03/2022 11:17 am, jonz@ nothere.com wrote:
>>> On Thursday, 3 March 2022 at 13:12:33 UTC+11, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 3/03/2022 11:55 am, Noddy wrote:
>>>>> someone who is so utterly ignorant of the world in general as he
>>>>> *clearly* is
>>>> here we have a good example of a little trick you employ when
>>>> commenting. you make a statement that is nothing more than opinion, but
>>>> is proffered as fact, followed by another statement in support that
>>>> appears to be factually based, but in reality is nothing more than more
>>>> opinion, so that together both remarks appear as as if you're stating a
>>>> fact. it's never worked for you, and it never will.
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
>>> All that meat, and no potato`s!..
>>> Typical.
>> Very typical "Felix" comment in that it made no sense whatsoever :)
>>
>> There is no "trick" involved here. Me offering my opinion does not make
>> anything "fact" <snip dribble>
> The "fact" Fraudster is that there is *nothing* you offer up which can be
> taken as "fact".
>
> hth

it's a fact that we can't believe anything he says. and it's all his own
doing.

>
> alvey
> “I'm a qualified Motor Mechanic and Automotive Machinist. I *know* these
> things are true. I was there and did it. It is factual.” Fraudster, 02Jun18
>

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam

FUCK PUTIN!!

"His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
"He came, he saw, he got pummelled" - Alvey on Keefy
"What a pair! Not a single word of rebuttal or reason,
just cretinous abuse" - Alvey on jonz and noddy
"His self serving ego pumping comments just
read like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy
"your opinion isn't worth 2 knobs of goat shit"
- Xeno on Grubby Tech

On 4/3/22 22:08, Noddy wrote:

>
> Yep. Ray Charles and Stevie Wonder could have been tag-teaming Helen
> Keller and the moment Felix posted that vid they all would have looked
> up and said "Even we can see that's fake".
>
> Not Felix though apparently. He can see the difference with Monster
> cables, but apparently something like that was too difficult for him to
> tell :)
>
Didn't take much at all to see that all your claims of business
ownership, multiple apprenticeships and dual qualifications were as fake
as you are. Narcissists, you always overstep the bounds of common sense.
Any *real person* would claim just one (1) apprenticeship and just one
(1) trade qualification. But you, no, that wasn't enough to stroke your
narcissistic ego. You had to go over the top and claim not one, not two
but *three (3)* apprenticeships. Such a pity for your ego that it wasn't
legally possible to do more than one apprenticeship in the era concerned
but, worse, you didn't even meet the minimum educational standard to
even sign up to *one* apprenticeship, especially the one you claimed you
did first. Remember, that was the one that had an entry standard of
*year 10*. You were well short of the mark with your *failed year 9*.
That's what you get when you skip out on completing year 9.

--
Xeno