On Sat, 02 Sep 2023 15:40:48 +1000, Keithr0 wrote:

> On 31/08/2023 6:12 pm, Xeno wrote:

>>>>> --
>>>>> Note to Clasener: There is no need for you to reply to this post. I
>>>>> won't see it, and no one else seems to give a fuck about anything
>>>>> you have to say :)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> But you are, and you will, you just proved it!
>>>
>>> OK, just show your proof of that statement.
>>>
>> The mere fact he felt he had to make that statement is proof enough.
>>
> OK here is a task that should be easy if you are right, just show a
> message where he has replied directly to one of your posts.

Like the QANTAS building, that's just bad on sooo many levels Richo. That
you can't, or won't, see any of them is just further confirmation of your
positions' abject weakness.

hth

alvey

On Sat, 02 Sep 2023 15:39:10 +1000, Keithr0 wrote:

> On 2/09/2023 1:54 pm, Xeno wrote:
>> On 1/9/2023 7:37 am, alvey wrote:
>>> On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 18:03:31 +1000, Keithr0 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 31/08/2023 10:07 am, Xeno wrote:
>>>>> Noddy <me@home.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 31/08/2023 9:18 am, Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 17/08/2023 10:54 am, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Honda and Merc may take notice.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Let's hope. Well, not that I give a shit, because I won't be
>>>>>>>> buying a Merc anytime soon and Honda don't have anything that
>>>>>>>> interests me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mercedes dealers lose their case for compensation over the change
>>>>>>> to the agency model.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.carexpert.com.au/car-news/mercedes-benz-australia-wins-
>>> landmark-court-case-against-its-dealers
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't have much sympathy for "stealerships" to be honest. They've
>>>>>> made a comfortable living out of ripping the shit out of people and
>>>>>> preying on their ignorance, and manufacturers are sick of it.
>>>>>> Manufacturers have also learned from the Tesla model in that if
>>>>>> people really want something they're happy to go straight to the
>>>>>> source.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The next decade is going to see a very interesting period in the
>>>>>> automotive world. Probably more interesting that at any time
>>>>>> previously.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Note to Clasener: There is no need for you to reply to this post. I
>>>>>> won't see it, and no one else seems to give a fuck about anything
>>>>>> you have to say :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> But you are, and you will, you just proved it!
>>>>
>>>> OK, just show your proof of that statement.
>>>
>>> Another PKB moment from Richo...
>>
>> Keith is becoming just like Darren - asking, nay, demanding proof of
>> anything and everything other posters say or claim but never stumping
>> up anything in the way of proof themselves. Sad.
>
> Nope,

Yep.

"sad", but a bit of a chuckle too. That Richo and the Fraudster were
unable to forsee the consequence of their refusals to answer relevant
questions makes their high opinions of themselves look pretty silly.

alvey
"I could wipe my arse with Alvey with one hand tied behind my back, and
all I ever needed to do to show him up as the fucktard that he is was to
ignore him and let him have his head." Fraudster, 04Jul18

On Sat, 02 Sep 2023 17:14:14 +1000, Noddy wrote:

> On 2/09/2023 3:42 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>> On 2/09/2023 1:41 pm, Xeno wrote:
>
>>> Yep, I'm really getting under his skin. He is reminded of me every
>>> time he thinks of his middle name. Ah, the agony!   ;-)
>>>
>>>
>> Delusional much? The pair of you.
>
> They're total fucking whackjobs with zero grasp on reality.
>
> I named by son Tom. It's a traditional name on my father's side for all
> first born males, but I didn't care too much about that considering that
> my mother saw fit to break that tradition with me. I named him after my
> Dad who's name was Thomas. His father, my grandfather, was also named
> Thomas. *His* father was named Thomas, and so on etc. Those males who
> weren't first born got "Thomas" as part of their name, such as my
> father's younger brother who was Norman Thomas Gibbens.

"The sins of the father are to be laid upon the children." The Merchant of
Venice.

So, if Fraudster is to believed, then I wonder how Young Gibbens would
feel if he knew he was named after a wife-beating, alcoholic, audulterous
failed tradie?

alvey

On 2/09/2023 3:14 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 2/09/2023 3:42 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>> On 2/09/2023 1:41 pm, Xeno wrote:
>
>>> Yep, I'm really getting under his skin. He is reminded of me every
>>> time he thinks of his middle name. Ah, the agony!   ;-)
>>>
>>>
>> Delusional much? The pair of you.
>
> They're total fucking whackjobs with zero grasp on reality.
>

The reality is that several people have asked you to prove your claims
of qualifications et al.

<snip boring irrelevant waffle nobody asked for>

--
In thread "May need to buy petrol soon" Sept 23 2021 11:15:59am
Keithr0 wrote: "He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a
proven liar."

On Sept 23 2021 3:16:29pm Keithr0 wrote:
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying."

On 3/9/2023 8:54 am, Clocky wrote:
> On 2/09/2023 3:14 pm, Noddy wrote:
>> On 2/09/2023 3:42 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 2/09/2023 1:41 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>
>>>> Yep, I'm really getting under his skin. He is reminded of me every
>>>> time he thinks of his middle name. Ah, the agony!   ;-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Delusional much? The pair of you.
>>
>> They're total fucking whackjobs with zero grasp on reality.
>>
>
> The reality is that several people have asked you to prove your claims
> of qualifications et al.
>
> <snip boring irrelevant waffle nobody asked for>
>
Darren could *slap me down* once and for all *if only* he would present
the one thing that would do it - those *trade registration numbers*. You
know, the ones that can be *independently verified* because, amongst
other details, they are *public information*. Can't fake them because
they are held in a *national register* against a person's name. Been
there, made the phone call, checked that, nothing in Darren's name at
all - yet he claims two trade qualifications. Went to PROV, checked for
Darren's name, nada, nix, zilch! No apprentice registrations, no TAFE
college attendance cards, no trade registrations, at all. Not a single
one. Aviation apprenticeship training is conducted at RMIT, nothing in
PROV from RMIT in Darren's name. Motor mechanics training is conducted
at several TAFE colleges, Richmond included. Nothing at PROV in Darren's
name for any of them. Residential proximity would ensure Richmond TAFE
came up trumps for Darren in motor mechanic apprentice training, but no,
he never attended. Darren also claims he did his auto machining
apprenticeship in-house at Repco. Guess what! Nothing in Darren's name
at PROV for Repco. Sadly for Darren, had he actually done an auto
machining apprenticeship at Repco, he would still have had to attend
*Richmond TAFE's* brand new auto machining training facility in Gwynne
Street, Richmond, built at the *behest of Repco* et al.

When one hasn't any knowledge of the details of apprenticeships, as
Darren most certainly doesn't, then it's best not to attempt to
fabricate a fake chronology of employment. There are those of us who
actually have *experience* in the field of apprenticeships, both as a
participant and in apprentice training, and the bullshit Darren's trying
to pass off as fact stands out like dog's balls!

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)