In article <jd57teFrqaqU1@mid.individual.net>,
JNugent <jennings&co@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> But your view seems to be that bereaved families aren't due any
> compensation because human life cannot be valued. You have rejected the
> possibility of monetary compensation in several posts, including the
> very post I am responding to.

Carry on putting words in other's mouths. Just like a good Tory.

--
*Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines *

Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

In article <jd57teFrqaqU1@mid.individual.net>,
JNugent <jennings&co@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> But... if you don't accept that the highway outside your house
It's not a highway. Look up the definition.
> (on which
> you are allowed to park and everyone else is forbidden to do so)

No one is forbidden from parking there. You really really don't have a
clue about how such things work. You seem to equate it to your private
driveway. No susprise there.

> has any
> value, then you could not possibly complain if the scheme were
> abolished. After all, if you lose something with no value, you cannot be
> said to have lost anything. Can you?

I'd be very happy if it were abolished. But since you don't understand how
it works, you'll not understand that either.

--
*A snooze button is a poor substitute for no alarm clock at all *

Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

On 27/04/2022 16:54, JNugent wrote:

> But garages can still be sold or rented out and they have a value. All
> land has a value.

But with planning for housing it has the highest value. Even in
Liverpool.

On 25/04/2022 12:23, Richard wrote:
> On 25/04/2022 12:17, JNugent wrote:
>> On 24/04/2022 09:23 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
> <snip>
>
>>> No such village. If it had lots of adjacent streets with multi story
>>> terraces with no front yards at all, built before there were any cars
>>> at all, it wouldn't be a village.
>>
>> Have you ever actually been to England? You haven't been to this village.
>
> You are not obliged to have an idiot.

But Nugent's village definitely has at least one

On 25/04/2022 21:52, charles wrote:
> In article <op.1k66wranbyq249@pvr2.lan>,
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> But if it is actually a VILLAGE it would be possible to walk to where
>> there is a car park.
>
> our village is long and thin. About 3 miles long.
>

Street (Somerset) is a town. Work that one out.

On 30/04/2022 17:54, JNugent wrote:

> But your view seems to be that bereaved families aren't due any
> compensation because human life cannot be valued. You have rejected the
> possibility of monetary compensation in several posts, including the
> very post I am responding to.
>

Compensation for what ?.

If already retired, for all the pension and free NHS that said person
*might* have received if he/she lived to 95 ?. Dream on.

On 01/05/2022 02:01 pm, Andrew wrote:
> On 30/04/2022 17:54, JNugent wrote:
>
>> But your view seems to be that bereaved families aren't due any
>> compensation because human life cannot be valued. You have rejected
>> the possibility of monetary compensation in several posts, including
>> the very post I am responding to.
>>
>
> Compensation for what ?.
>
> If already retired, for all the pension and free NHS that said person
> *might* have received if he/she lived to 95 ?. Dream on.

Hello, Rod.

How many more socks do you have?

On 01/05/2022 14:05, JNugent wrote:
> On 01/05/2022 02:01 pm, Andrew wrote:
>> On 30/04/2022 17:54, JNugent wrote:
>>
>>> But your view seems to be that bereaved families aren't due any
>>> compensation because human life cannot be valued. You have rejected
>>> the possibility of monetary compensation in several posts, including
>>> the very post I am responding to.
>>>
>>
>> Compensation for what ?.
>>
>> If already retired, for all the pension and free NHS that said person
>> *might* have received if he/she lived to 95 ?. Dream on.
>
> Hello, Rod.
>
> How many more socks do you have?

So, not too clever at checking the source of posts then ?.

On 01/05/2022 01:50 pm, Andrew wrote:

> On 27/04/2022 16:54, JNugent wrote:
>
>> But garages can still be sold or rented out and they have a value. All
>> land has a value.

> But with planning for housing it has the highest value. Even in
> Liverpool.

True.

....and?

On 01 May 2022 at 14:05:06 BST, JNugent <jennings&co@fastmail.fm> wrote:

> On 01/05/2022 02:01 pm, Andrew wrote:
>> On 30/04/2022 17:54, JNugent wrote:
>>
>>> But your view seems to be that bereaved families aren't due any
>>> compensation because human life cannot be valued. You have rejected
>>> the possibility of monetary compensation in several posts, including
>>> the very post I am responding to.
>>>
>>
>> Compensation for what ?.
>>
>> If already retired, for all the pension and free NHS that said person
>> *might* have received if he/she lived to 95 ?. Dream on.
>
> Hello, Rod.
>
> How many more socks do you have?

He only has odd ones because of his strine washing machine.

--
"I am enclosing two tickets to the first night of my new play; bring a friend.... if you have one." - GB Shaw to Churchill. "Cannot possibly attend first night, will attend second... if there is one." - Winston Churchill, in response.

JNugent <jennings&co@fastmail.fm> wrote
> Andrew wrote
>> JNugent wrote

>>> But your view seems to be that bereaved families aren't due any
>>> compensation because human life cannot be valued. You have rejected
>>> the possibility of monetary compensation in several posts, including
>>> the very post I am responding to.

>> Compensation for what ?.
>> If already retired, for all the pension and free NHS that said person
>> *might* have received if he/she lived to 95 ?. Dream on.

> Hello, Rod.

There you go, face down in the mud, yet again.