On 4/4/2024 12:27 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2024-04-04 9:25 a.m., D wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, Bruce wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> A relationship where 2 partners are putting weight requirements on
>>> each other? No, thanks.
>>>
>>
>> Bruce, let's book a time together. I think you need to work on your
>> reading comprehension. On the other hand, maybe turning the text
>> upside down might work for you? ;)
>
>
> Bruce's reading comprehension is good enough for his purposes. He reads
> only enough to spark some an idea of what he thinks is a witty remark.
> You are new here and seem to get some enjoyment out of his sniping. It
> got tiresome a long time ago.
>
I saw a reply from 'D' to Carol not long ago saying yes, he does reply
with trolling remarks to Bruce. D sometimes talks about food (butter!)
but admitting he's also replying in kind with trollish remarks to Bruce
and others is rather telling.

Jill

jmcquown wrote:

> On 4/4/2024 12:27 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>> On 2024-04-04 9:25 a.m., D wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, Bruce wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> A relationship where 2 partners are putting weight requirements on
>>>> each other? No, thanks.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Bruce, let's book a time together. I think you need to work on your
>>> reading comprehension. On the other hand, maybe turning the text
>>> upside down might work for you? ;)
>>
>>
>> Bruce's reading comprehension is good enough for his purposes. He reads
>> only enough to spark some an idea of what he thinks is a witty remark.
>> You are new here and seem to get some enjoyment out of his sniping. It
>> got tiresome a long time ago.
>>
> I saw a reply from 'D' to Carol not long ago saying yes, he does reply
> with trolling remarks to Bruce. D sometimes talks about food (butter!)
> but admitting he's also replying in kind with trollish remarks to Bruce
> and others is rather telling.

Shucks, Princess, the fact that you don't mention me by name above makes me feel "slighted"...

Have I fallen out of your Royal Favour...???

8-(

<sniff>

--
GM

On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 18:00:25 -0400, jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net>
wrote:

>On 4/4/2024 12:27 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>> On 2024-04-04 9:25 a.m., D wrote:
>>>
>>> Bruce, let's book a time together. I think you need to work on your
>>> reading comprehension. On the other hand, maybe turning the text
>>> upside down might work for you? ;)
>>
>>
>> Bruce's reading comprehension is good enough for his purposes. He reads
>> only enough to spark some an idea of what he thinks is a witty remark.
>> You are new here and seem to get some enjoyment out of his sniping. It
>> got tiresome a long time ago.
>>
>I saw a reply from 'D' to Carol not long ago saying yes, he does reply
>with trolling remarks to Bruce. D sometimes talks about food (butter!)
>but admitting he's also replying in kind with trollish remarks to Bruce
>and others is rather telling.

"in kind"

jmcquown wrote:
> On 4/4/2024 12:27 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>> On 2024-04-04 9:25 a.m., D wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, Bruce wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> A relationship where 2 partners are putting weight requirements on
>>>> each other? No, thanks.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Bruce, let's book a time together. I think you need to work on your
>>> reading comprehension. On the other hand, maybe turning the text upside
>>> down might work for you? ;)
>>
>>
>> Bruce's reading comprehension is good enough for his purposes. He reads
>> only enough to spark some an idea of what he thinks is a witty remark.
>> You are new here and seem to get some enjoyment out of his sniping. It
>> got tiresome a long time ago.
>>
> I saw a reply from 'D' to Carol not long ago saying yes, he does reply with
> trolling remarks to Bruce.  D sometimes talks about food (butter!) but
> admitting he's also replying in kind with trollish remarks to Bruce and
> others is rather telling.
>
> Jill

Yes, and why has your highness not banned this evil troll?

I'm beginning to think your majesty is full of shit. Big mouth, but no
follow up.

Get rid of (BAN) these bastards, or at least quit interacting with them,
and showing your royal ass.

Folks may start to think your highness has a deep seated psychological need
for these evil trolls.

Think about it your majesty.

GM wrote:
> jmcquown wrote:
>
>> On 4/4/2024 12:27 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>> On 2024-04-04 9:25 a.m., D wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, Bruce wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A relationship where 2 partners are putting weight requirements on
>>>>> each other? No, thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bruce, let's book a time together. I think you need to work on your
>>>> reading comprehension. On the other hand, maybe turning the text upside
>>>> down might work for you? ;)
>>>
>>>
>>> Bruce's reading comprehension is good enough for his purposes. He reads
>>> only enough to spark some an idea of what he thinks is a witty remark.
>>> You are new here and seem to get some enjoyment out of his sniping. It
>>> got tiresome a long time ago.
>>>
>> I saw a reply from 'D' to Carol not long ago saying yes, he does reply
>> with trolling remarks to Bruce.  D sometimes talks about food (butter!)
>> but admitting he's also replying in kind with trollish remarks to Bruce
>> and others is rather telling.
>
> Shucks, Princess, the fact that you don't mention me by name above makes me
> feel "slighted"...
>
> Have I fallen out of your Royal Favour...???
>
> 8-(
>
> <sniff>
>

You deserve it.

Her majesty has a few problems, as you do. She has a small chance to
recover. I don't think you have much of a chance. Hang on to MAGA for dear
life.

On Fri, 5 Apr 2024, cshenk wrote:

> D wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 3 Apr 2024, cshenk wrote:
>>
>>> D wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 2 Apr 2024, cshenk wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> D wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 1 Apr 2024, cshenk wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> D wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 31 Mar 2024, ItsJoanNotJoAnn wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> D wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> When I was young, for some reason, we used margarine,
>>>>>>>>>> but somewhere along the way my grandfather set me
>>>>>>>>>> straight and after that, only real butter.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here in the USA margarine was touted for y-e-a-r-s to be
>>>>>>>>> soooooo much healthier for you than butter. And of
>>>>>>>>> course it was cheaper at 79¢, 89¢, or a $1 per pound
>>>>>>>>> than at $2 (or less) per pound for butter.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is interesting to note how often the government or
>>>>>>>> scientists change their minds about what is good and not
>>>>>>>> so good. Then you can add quantity into the mix. If you
>>>>>>>> consume something up to X it is good or neutral, and at
>>>>>>>> X+1 bad. Add to that all the nr of fad diets as well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh don't get me started on all the fad diets. Someplace in
>>>>>>> my 30's they kicked in with a bang. The current ones are
>>>>>>> starch/wheat/gluten make you fat. No it doesn't. Over
>>>>>>> eating makes you fat.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll stick with my meat, butter and regular fat milk until the
>>>>>> end of my days, no matter what the scientists say. =)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Strangely enough, without knowing it, apparently I've been
>>>>>> following something called the 14:10 diet for a big part of my
>>>>>> life. Don't ask me if I benefit from it, have no idea.
>>>>>
>>>>> Humm. Intermittant fasting of short durations. Me, I just make
>>>>> sure there's plenty of fresh veggies and seafood and the rest
>>>>> sorts itself out. Neither of us are overweight. We never have
>>>>> been.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That is another aspect. Both my parents and grandparents were all
>>>> slim, so I guess I have the same genes as well.
>>>
>>> Runs in mine too. My sister is 5ft11 and weighs 132. Brother is
>>> 6ft1 and weighs about 146. Don is 5ft9 and weighs 152. Charlotte
>>> is 5ft3 and weighs 131-134 (bounces a bit). Then you get shrimpy
>>> little me at 5ft1 and trying to gain up to 105 but bouncing from
>>> 99-102 these days.
>>>
>>
>> My wife complained that I was too skinny at 53 kg, so what can a
>> husband do but try and solve the problem? ;)
>>
>> After about 4 years of body weight training, adding lunch and
>> proteinshakes after the 2:nd year I've now managed to reach a stable
>> 61 kg with abs included. I'm 178 cm.
>>
>> The problem is that I don't enjoy it, but as long as she trains to
>> keep fit for me, I feel that I should reciprocate. =)
>>
>> Sadly she won't let me buy russian steroids, so I think I'm stuck at
>> 61 unless I start going to the gym which I loathe, so 61 it is!
>
> That's wickedly thin. 134.5lbs and 5ft10?
>

If you think that is thin, you should have seen me before. ;) But yes, my
boxing weight class was light weight, and I have good reach for my weight.
=)

On Fri, 5 Apr 2024, jmcquown wrote:

> On 4/4/2024 12:27 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>> On 2024-04-04 9:25 a.m., D wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, Bruce wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> A relationship where 2 partners are putting weight requirements on
>>>> each other? No, thanks.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Bruce, let's book a time together. I think you need to work on your
>>> reading comprehension. On the other hand, maybe turning the text upside
>>> down might work for you? ;)
>>
>>
>> Bruce's reading comprehension is good enough for his purposes. He reads
>> only enough to spark some an idea of what he thinks is a witty remark. You
>> are new here and seem to get some enjoyment out of his sniping. It got
>> tiresome a long time ago.
>>
> I saw a reply from 'D' to Carol not long ago saying yes, he does reply with
> trolling remarks to Bruce. D sometimes talks about food (butter!) but
> admitting he's also replying in kind with trollish remarks to Bruce and
> others is rather telling.
>
> Jill

I do... but Bruce did get boring when he started to comment on the wife.
=(

On Fri, 5 Apr 2024, GM wrote:

> jmcquown wrote:
>
>> On 4/4/2024 12:27 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>> On 2024-04-04 9:25 a.m., D wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, Bruce wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A relationship where 2 partners are putting weight requirements on
>>>>> each other? No, thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bruce, let's book a time together. I think you need to work on your
>>>> reading comprehension. On the other hand, maybe turning the text upside
>>>> down might work for you? ;)
>>>
>>>
>>> Bruce's reading comprehension is good enough for his purposes. He reads
>>> only enough to spark some an idea of what he thinks is a witty remark. You
>>> are new here and seem to get some enjoyment out of his sniping. It got
>>> tiresome a long time ago.
>>>
>> I saw a reply from 'D' to Carol not long ago saying yes, he does reply with
>> trolling remarks to Bruce. D sometimes talks about food (butter!) but
>> admitting he's also replying in kind with trollish remarks to Bruce and
>> others is rather telling.
>
> Shucks, Princess, the fact that you don't mention me by name above makes me
> feel "slighted"...
>
> Have I fallen out of your Royal Favour...???
>
> 8-(
>
> <sniff>

Don't you worry, let me help you get back on top! ;)

On Fri, 5 Apr 2024, Hank Rogers wrote:

> jmcquown wrote:
>> On 4/4/2024 12:27 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>> On 2024-04-04 9:25 a.m., D wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, Bruce wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A relationship where 2 partners are putting weight requirements on
>>>>> each other? No, thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bruce, let's book a time together. I think you need to work on your
>>>> reading comprehension. On the other hand, maybe turning the text upside
>>>> down might work for you? ;)
>>>
>>>
>>> Bruce's reading comprehension is good enough for his purposes. He reads
>>> only enough to spark some an idea of what he thinks is a witty remark. You
>>> are new here and seem to get some enjoyment out of his sniping. It got
>>> tiresome a long time ago.
>>>
>> I saw a reply from 'D' to Carol not long ago saying yes, he does reply with
>> trolling remarks to Bruce.  D sometimes talks about food (butter!) but
>> admitting he's also replying in kind with trollish remarks to Bruce and
>> others is rather telling.
>>
>> Jill
>
> Yes, and why has your highness not banned this evil troll?
>
> I'm beginning to think your majesty is full of shit. Big mouth, but no follow
> up.
>
> Get rid of (BAN) these bastards, or at least quit interacting with them, and
> showing your royal ass.
>
> Folks may start to think your highness has a deep seated psychological need
> for these evil trolls.
>
> Think about it your majesty.

Why not burn them? That's what monty python would do!

D wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2024, Hank Rogers wrote:
>
>> jmcquown wrote:
>>> On 4/4/2024 12:27 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>> On 2024-04-04 9:25 a.m., D wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, Bruce wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A relationship where 2 partners are putting weight requirements on
>>>>>> each other? No, thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bruce, let's book a time together. I think you need to work on your
>>>>> reading comprehension. On the other hand, maybe turning the text
>>>>> upside down might work for you? ;)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bruce's reading comprehension is good enough for his purposes. He reads
>>>> only enough to spark some an idea of what he thinks is a witty remark.
>>>> You are new here and seem to get some enjoyment out of his sniping. It
>>>> got tiresome a long time ago.
>>>>
>>> I saw a reply from 'D' to Carol not long ago saying yes, he does reply
>>> with trolling remarks to Bruce.  D sometimes talks about food (butter!)
>>> but admitting he's also replying in kind with trollish remarks to Bruce
>>> and others is rather telling.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> Yes, and why has your highness not banned this evil troll?
>>
>> I'm beginning to think your majesty is full of shit. Big mouth, but no
>> follow up.
>>
>> Get rid of (BAN) these bastards, or at least quit interacting with them,
>> and showing your royal ass.
>>
>> Folks may start to think your highness has a deep seated psychological
>> need for these evil trolls.
>>
>> Think about it your majesty.
>
> Why not burn them? That's what monty python would do!

That's a great idea.

D wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2024, Hank Rogers wrote:
>
>> jmcquown wrote:
>>> On 4/4/2024 12:27 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>> On 2024-04-04 9:25 a.m., D wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, Bruce wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A relationship where 2 partners are putting weight requirements on
>>>>>> each other? No, thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bruce, let's book a time together. I think you need to work on your
>>>>> reading comprehension. On the other hand, maybe turning the text
>>>>> upside down might work for you? ;)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bruce's reading comprehension is good enough for his purposes. He
>>>> reads only enough to spark some an idea of what he thinks is a witty
>>>> remark. You are new here and seem to get some enjoyment out of his
>>>> sniping. It got tiresome a long time ago.
>>>>
>>> I saw a reply from 'D' to Carol not long ago saying yes, he does
>>> reply with trolling remarks to Bruce.  D sometimes talks about food
>>> (butter!) but admitting he's also replying in kind with trollish
>>> remarks to Bruce and others is rather telling.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> Yes, and why has your highness not banned this evil troll?
>>
>> I'm beginning to think your majesty is full of shit. Big mouth, but no
>> follow up.
>>
>> Get rid of (BAN) these bastards, or at least quit interacting with
>> them, and showing your royal ass.
>>
>> Folks may start to think your highness has a deep seated psychological
>> need for these evil trolls.
>>
>> Think about it your majesty.
>
> Why not burn them? That's what monty python would do!
>
>
Your mother was a hamster, and your father smelt of elderberries?

On 2024-04-06, D wrote:
> [...] I have good reach for my weight.

Unfortunatley, I have a good weight for my reach.

On 2024-04-06, D wrote:

> Bruce did get boring when he started to comment on the wife.

I missed that! The only thing he ever said about her is
that she's part Japanese, but he never said which part.

On Sat, 6 Apr 2024, William Price wrote:

> D wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 5 Apr 2024, Hank Rogers wrote:
>>
>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>> On 4/4/2024 12:27 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-04-04 9:25 a.m., D wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, Bruce wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A relationship where 2 partners are putting weight requirements on
>>>>>>> each other? No, thanks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bruce, let's book a time together. I think you need to work on your
>>>>>> reading comprehension. On the other hand, maybe turning the text upside
>>>>>> down might work for you? ;)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bruce's reading comprehension is good enough for his purposes. He reads
>>>>> only enough to spark some an idea of what he thinks is a witty remark.
>>>>> You are new here and seem to get some enjoyment out of his sniping. It
>>>>> got tiresome a long time ago.
>>>>>
>>>> I saw a reply from 'D' to Carol not long ago saying yes, he does reply
>>>> with trolling remarks to Bruce.  D sometimes talks about food (butter!)
>>>> but admitting he's also replying in kind with trollish remarks to Bruce
>>>> and others is rather telling.
>>>>
>>>> Jill
>>>
>>> Yes, and why has your highness not banned this evil troll?
>>>
>>> I'm beginning to think your majesty is full of shit. Big mouth, but no
>>> follow up.
>>>
>>> Get rid of (BAN) these bastards, or at least quit interacting with them,
>>> and showing your royal ass.
>>>
>>> Folks may start to think your highness has a deep seated psychological
>>> need for these evil trolls.
>>>
>>> Think about it your majesty.
>>
>> Why not burn them? That's what monty python would do!
>>
>>
> Your mother was a hamster, and your father smelt of elderberries?
>
I fart in your general direction!

On Sun, 7 Apr 2024, Mike Duffy wrote:

> On 2024-04-06, D wrote:
>
>> [...] I have good reach for my weight.
>
> Unfortunatley, I have a good weight for my reach.
>
>
Wrestling for you then! ;)

On Sun, 7 Apr 2024, Mike Duffy wrote:

> On 2024-04-06, D wrote:
>
>> Bruce did get boring when he started to comment on the wife.
>
> I missed that! The only thing he ever said about her is
> that she's part Japanese, but he never said which part.

Well, maybe I'll let him back in some time. Let's see! ;)

On Sun, 7 Apr 2024 12:10:25 +0200, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

>
>
>On Sun, 7 Apr 2024, Mike Duffy wrote:
>
>> On 2024-04-06, D wrote:
>>
>>> Bruce did get boring when he started to comment on the wife.
>>
>> I missed that! The only thing he ever said about her is
>> that she's part Japanese, but he never said which part.
>
>Well, maybe I'll let him back in some time. Let's see! ;)

So the troll killfiled me. Haha, what a weakling. Classic.

On 2024-04-07 6:06 a.m., D wrote:
>

>>> Why not burn them? That's what monty python would do!
>>>
>>>
>> Your mother was a hamster, and your father smelt of elderberries?
>>
> I fart in your general direction!

LOL I watched that movie just a few days ago. I have seen it many times
over the years and it is still funny.

Mike Duffy wrote:

> On 2024-04-06, D wrote:
>
> > [...] I have good reach for my weight.
>
> Unfortunatley, I have a good weight for my reach.

LOL, true of most.