On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:58:55 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KWills" <a@d.c> wrote in message
>news:94jvogl43u5n73cmlddda7bnq1da7j8qqe@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 05:28:57 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
>
>
>Kwills, why can't you get it through your head that you are not welcome
>here. If you want to be considered to be reinstated, here is the procedure
>you MUST follow.

And Lying Jenny responds to someone he claims to have filtered.

Wonder how many other lies we'll see in the upcoming paragraphs?

>A.) you have my permission to right me a personal email to request to be
>reinstated. This email must contain a apology for everything you done/said
>in the past.

He doesn't need your permission. You have no such authority.

See the FAQ. http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/a.f.f-f_FAQ.html

>B.) and you must beg for me to be considered. Make sure you actually use
>the word "beg" just so everytone is clear what is happeneing.

See above.

>C.) you are not required to aknowledge me as leader of the group, but it
>wouldn't hurt.

That's good-- since you're not, and never have been.

>D.) Use a valid email address, that will be the one you use on the newsgroup
>IF you are reinstated. You must notify me if it's one that been previously
>killfiled, so I knowq if I have to take it out of the killifle.

You should leave him in your kill file, as to avoid any more mental
stress.

>E.) IF I ACCEPT THE LETTER, and there is only a 20% chance that I will.
>
>F.) I will post the letter to the newsgroup, and open for public discussion.
>NOTE: the letter may be edited at this point by me. You will still be
>killfiled at t his point, so you will not be allowed to participate in the
>discussion.
>
>G.) After discussion, I AND I ALONE WILL MAKE THE FINAL DECISION TO
>REINSTATE OR NOT.
>
> H.) there is only a 5% chance that all these steps will be followed
>properly and you actually will be reinstated. So if i were you I would just
>plan on re-resuming your foading state.
>
>I) In teh meantime,
>
>*********PLONK************

And Jenny gives a fake plonk AGAIN.

Pretty pathetic.

On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:46:16 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:q7tamg5p2pso2ecc80g3pd6v31e2fil8qb@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 02:05:12 -0700, KWills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 04:18:26 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>>><klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>[...]
>>>
>>>>>>(b) you didn't ban it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes I did. And the people responded to my ban, nobody has been
>>>>> posting
>>>>>webp link's for quite some time now. PROVING that people respect me as
>>>>>leader of this newsgroup.
>>>>
>>>>No, liar.
>>>>
>>>>NOBODY responded to your imagined "ban," since NOBODY has posted any
>>>>pictures of fast food.
>>>>
>>>>https://insanelygoodrecipes.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Hamburger-with-Fresh-Vegetables-683x1024.webp
>>>>https://thebustedoven.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Air-Fryer-Burgers-6-of-11-720x720.jpg.webp
>>>>https://makeyourmeals.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/air-fryer-burger.jpg.webp
>>>>https://3boysandadog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Best-Ever-Easy-Hamburger-Patty-Recipe.png.webp
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>As I have just shown, you have no power or authority to "ban"
>>>>anything.
>>>>
>>>>[crickets]
>>>
>>> Jenny will grant you "special dispensation" so that he can
>>>maintain his LIE that he's the leader of the group.
>>
>> That's his only way out now. He has to admit that his rules don't
>> apply to me.
>
>That wasn't the point. The POINT was, nobody in this newsgroup gives a shit
>about what you post, so you are free to post as many meaningless webp pics
>you want.

TRANSLATION: Jenny admits he has zero control, authority, or influence
ANYWHERE on Usenet.

> And since you only post them to spite me, you will QUICKLY get
>bored of that and it will become a non-issue very quickly.

Someone else already posted some, demonstrating your impotence.

On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:58:55 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KWills" <a@d.c> wrote in message
>news:94jvogl43u5n73cmlddda7bnq1da7j8qqe@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 05:28:57 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
>
>
>Kwills, why can't you get it through your head that you are not welcome
>here. If you want to be considered to be reinstated, here is the procedure
>you MUST follow.
>

Reinstated? Since I've never been banned from posting, your LIE
about reinstated has failed.
Please seek professional mental health care regarding your NEED
to lie.

>
>A.) you have my permission to right me a personal email to request to be
>reinstated. This email must contain a apology for everything you done/said
>in the past.
>

I would have to do something that warrants an apology. Proving
your every claim to be a lie isn't something anyone would ever
apologize for.

>B.) and you must beg for me to be considered. Make sure you actually use
>the word "beg" just so everytone is clear what is happeneing.

Since you lack the authority to ban anyone, there is nothing for
me to beg from you.

>
>C.) you are not required to aknowledge me as leader of the group, but it
>wouldn't hurt.
>

There is no leader. Read the FAQ

http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/a.f.f-f_FAQ.html

>D.) Use a valid email address, that will be the one you use on the newsgroup
>IF you are reinstated. You must notify me if it's one that been previously
>killfiled, so I knowq if I have to take it out of the killifle.

You never put me in. You've PROVED this truth more than once. You
really shouldn't constantly claim you're kill filing me. It only
serves to PROVE you LIED about doing so in the past.

>
>E.) IF I ACCEPT THE LETTER, and there is only a 20% chance that I will.
>
>F.) I will post the letter to the newsgroup, and open for public discussion.
>NOTE: the letter may be edited at this point by me. You will still be
>killfiled at t his point, so you will not be allowed to participate in the
>discussion.
>

You have already PROVED, multiple times, that you will never kill
file me.

>G.) After discussion, I AND I ALONE WILL MAKE THE FINAL DECISION TO
>REINSTATE OR NOT.
>

Again with the reinstate lie.
You really NEED professional mental health care.

> H.) there is only a 5% chance that all these steps will be followed
>properly and you actually will be reinstated. So if i were you I would just
>plan on re-resuming your foading state.
>

I will continue to prove you the mentally ill, and intellectually
limits, person you are. No amount of your whining, crying and
pretending to be in a leadership position will ever change this.

>I) In teh meantime,
>
>*********PLONK************
>

See, this is why everyone reading can KNOW you are actually
UNABLE to be honest unless you make a mistake. You constantly claim
you are putting me in your kill file, but you NEVER do.
If you were the leader, you would actually do SOMETHING other
than lie about the matter every chance you get. But since you LIED,
and LIE, about being the leader, you can't do anything.

--
Aspire to inspire before you expire.

On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:36:27 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:58:55 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KWills" <a@d.c> wrote in message
>>news:94jvogl43u5n73cmlddda7bnq1da7j8qqe@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 05:28:57 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
>>
>>
>>Kwills, why can't you get it through your head that you are not welcome
>>here. If you want to be considered to be reinstated, here is the procedure
>>you MUST follow.
>
>And Lying Jenny responds to someone he claims to have filtered.
>
>Wonder how many other lies we'll see in the upcoming paragraphs?
>
>
>>A.) you have my permission to right me a personal email to request to be
>>reinstated. This email must contain a apology for everything you done/said
>>in the past.
>
>He doesn't need your permission. You have no such authority.
>
>See the FAQ. http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/a.f.f-f_FAQ.html
>

It's almost sad how the gasbag is COMPELLED to PROVE he cannot be
honest except when he makes a mistake.

>
>>B.) and you must beg for me to be considered. Make sure you actually use
>>the word "beg" just so everytone is clear what is happeneing.
>
>See above.
>
>>C.) you are not required to aknowledge me as leader of the group, but it
>>wouldn't hurt.
>
>That's good-- since you're not, and never have been.
>

There never has been an actual leader. And there never will be.

>>D.) Use a valid email address, that will be the one you use on the newsgroup
>>IF you are reinstated. You must notify me if it's one that been previously
>>killfiled, so I knowq if I have to take it out of the killifle.
>
>You should leave him in your kill file, as to avoid any more mental
>stress.
>

The dullard would need to put me in first. He's never done so. A
TRUTH he's accidentally proved more times than I am willing to count.

>
>>E.) IF I ACCEPT THE LETTER, and there is only a 20% chance that I will.
>>
>>F.) I will post the letter to the newsgroup, and open for public discussion.
>>NOTE: the letter may be edited at this point by me. You will still be
>>killfiled at t his point, so you will not be allowed to participate in the
>>discussion.
>>
>>G.) After discussion, I AND I ALONE WILL MAKE THE FINAL DECISION TO
>>REINSTATE OR NOT.
>>
>> H.) there is only a 5% chance that all these steps will be followed
>>properly and you actually will be reinstated. So if i were you I would just
>>plan on re-resuming your foading state.
>>
>>I) In teh meantime,
>>
>>*********PLONK************
>
>And Jenny gives a fake plonk AGAIN.
>
>Pretty pathetic.

Such is the Gasbag's life.

--
Bless me, Father, for I have committed an original sin.
I poked a badger with a spoon.

On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:37:39 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

[...]

>>>>>https://insanelygoodrecipes.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Hamburger-with-Fresh-Vegetables-683x1024.webp
>>>>>https://thebustedoven.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Air-Fryer-Burgers-6-of-11-720x720.jpg.webp
>>>>>https://makeyourmeals.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/air-fryer-burger.jpg.webp
>>>>>https://3boysandadog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Best-Ever-Easy-Hamburger-Patty-Recipe.png.webp
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>As I have just shown, you have no power or authority to "ban"
>>>>>anything.
>>>>>
>>>>>[crickets]
>>>>
>>>> Jenny will grant you "special dispensation" so that he can
>>>>maintain his LIE that he's the leader of the group.
>>>
>>> That's his only way out now. He has to admit that his rules don't
>>> apply to me.
>>
>>That wasn't the point. The POINT was, nobody in this newsgroup gives a shit
>>about what you post, so you are free to post as many meaningless webp pics
>>you want.
>
>TRANSLATION: Jenny admits he has zero control, authority, or influence
>ANYWHERE on Usenet.
>

Yep.

>> And since you only post them to spite me, you will QUICKLY get
>>bored of that and it will become a non-issue very quickly.
>
>Someone else already posted some, demonstrating your impotence.

Two others of us have.
The Gasbag, aka Jenny, will need to come to terms with the
reality that he has NO authority. Anywhere.

--
Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons...
for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

On Sun, 10 Oct 2021 19:27:11 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:

> "KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
> message news:o8lvjgp47bpo6d5g5brr3d99skv59nkcu7@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 13 Sep 2021 14:31:07 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message news:p4nshg5o68mt96ui2ig1o1i93sihatg7js@4ax.com...
>>>> On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 14:21:16 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>message news:jj11ggh0h092v3roi0a9pe8kttc4ainkvv@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 14:15:11 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>message news:ak80fglqqri2c08evr5hjcd2cbnjd9hola@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 03:41:50 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>>>>>in message news:9jl8eg5cckn6i0l19nb7c1ug6p6a3mhkvr@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 17:26:07 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>news:n44sdgple9fpicacpm7f2871iam5ddfvif@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:52:34 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:i49fcghjpsqmspi0kk7nt5qjbt9qhqutts@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Back in the day, fast food restaurants didn't necessarily
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> offer the laundry list of items they do now. That's why
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people are bugging out over a recently released photo of a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> McDonald's menu snapped in 1973,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as ABC 10 News reports. Patrons who are used to choosing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from about 145 menu items (via Marketplace) were shocked by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the slimmed-down offerings - at least in quantity, if not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in nutritional value -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shown in the photo. Let's take a look at the retro menu,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shall we?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.mashed.com/img/gallery/people-cant-believe-this-70s-mcdonalds-
menu/just-the-basics-1623264345.webp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As explained by Insider, the original McDonald's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restaurants,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the first of which opened in 1955, had bare-bones menus,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> featuring just hamburgers, cheeseburgers, fries, sodas, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> milkshakes. Over the years, franchises have added a steady
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stream of then-new,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now-beloved items: the Filet-O-Fish in 1965, the Big Mac in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1968, and Chicken McNuggets in 1983. Today, most McDonald's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> locations boast more than 130 menu items, providing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something for everyone.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As for us, we'd be happy with a cheeseburger, fries, and a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chocolate shake. Take us back to 1973?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Read More:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.mashed.com/433078/people-cant-believe-this-70s-mcdonalds-
menu/?utm_campaign=clip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Wouldn't bother me one bit, but there are some modern item's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>I woul dmiss like the Mcflurry.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Oh and BTW shame on you klous for posting in webp format.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> WebP is an image format employing both lossy and lossless
>>>>>>>>>>>> compression,
>>>>>>>>>>>> and supports animation and alpha transparency. Developed by
>>>>>>>>>>>> Google,
>>>>>>>>>>>> it is designed to create files that are smaller for the same
>>>>>>>>>>>> quality,
>>>>>>>>>>>> or of higher quality for the same size, than JPEG, PNG, and
>>>>>>>>>>>> GIF image formats. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebP
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It is obvious now that you are foolishly and ignorantly
>>>>>>>>>>>> blaming me for posting a link to this picture
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.mashed.com/img/gallery/people-cant-believe-this-70s-mcdonalds-
menu/just-the-basics-1623264345.webp
>>>>>>>>>>>> as you think I own mashed.com and have control over the
>>>>>>>>>>>> format they use to post graphics.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Oh really klous? Well if you didn't post it, then just whose
>>>>>>>>>>> name is up
>>>>>>>>>>>there who posted that message?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>The POINT is, you should have posted a link to a more
>>>>>>>>>>>universally accepted format. This is Usenet. You will be
>>>>>>>>>>>forgiven this time, but next time,
>>>>>>>>>>>WATCH IT.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The point is, you ignorant pup, that the webp format is as
>>>>>>>>>> acceptable as jpg or png, and you *will* accept it, and there
>>>>>>>>>> is nothing you can do about it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Fine. I refuse to argue this point with you, so I'm giving in.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> TRANSLATION: Jenny just realized that webp is a web standard.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No, I never said anything that could be translated like that. What
>>>>>>>I said was, it wasn't worth taking the time to argue this fact with
>>>>>>>an idiot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of COURSE it is, which is why I'm discussing it with a.f.f-f's
>>>>>> resident idiot.
>>>>>
>>>>>Listen Klous, I don't need any lesson's from YOU.
>>>>
>>>> Of course you do, Jenny. You're woefully ignorant in any subject
>>>> we've ever discussed.
>>>>
>>>>> I obviously was the one
>>>>>more smart about Webp,
>>>>
>>>> Obviously, you had no idea what it was, because you cried like a
>>>> school girl when I used a link with it.
>>>>
>>>> "Oh and BTW shame on you klous for posting in webp format." you
>>>> whined.
>>>>
>>>>>First of all becouse I KNEW IT EXISTED BEFORE YOU DID and already new
>>>>>it's many disadvantage's.
>>>>
>>>> You knew nothing about it then, and you know what I taught you now.
>>>
>>>
>>>Lies, obvious lie's. If I knew nothing about it, then how would I know
>>>how traoublesome it was, and make a decision to ban it?
>>
>> You wouldn't, because (a) it's not troublesome
>
> THEY (not it) are EXTREMELY troublesome, and
>
>>(b) you didn't ban it.
>
>
> Yes I did. And the people responded to my ban, nobody has been
> posting
> webp link's for quite some time now. PROVING that people respect me as
> leader of this newsgroup.

On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 22:56:48 -0000 (UTC), vallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
wrote:

[...]

>>>>Lies, obvious lie's. If I knew nothing about it, then how would I know
>>>>how traoublesome it was, and make a decision to ban it?
>>>
>>> You wouldn't, because (a) it's not troublesome
>>
>> THEY (not it) are EXTREMELY troublesome, and
>>
>>>(b) you didn't ban it.
>>
>>
>> Yes I did. And the people responded to my ban, nobody has been
>> posting
>> webp link's for quite some time now. PROVING that people respect me as
>> leader of this newsgroup.
>
>It "proves" Jenny is delusional.
>
>Why is Jenny working so hard to get people to post
>webp's to the froup? Is she invested in webp stock?
>Isn't there an entry in the FAQ that discusses posting binaries
>to this text group?

Actually, only links to webp images have been posted. Which is
allowed. Jenny just isn't smart enough to understand the difference.
That's not intended as an insult, though it certainly can appear
to be. It's an honest and accurate observation of Jenny's intellect as
displayed on the group.

--
I suffer from chronic apathy.
I was going to go see a doctor about it, but I didn't really care.

On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 01:34:01 -0800, KWills <a@b.c> wrote:

>On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:37:39 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
><klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>>>>>https://insanelygoodrecipes.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Hamburger-with-Fresh-Vegetables-683x1024.webp
>>>>>>https://thebustedoven.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Air-Fryer-Burgers-6-of-11-720x720.jpg.webp
>>>>>>https://makeyourmeals.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/air-fryer-burger.jpg.webp
>>>>>>https://3boysandadog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Best-Ever-Easy-Hamburger-Patty-Recipe.png.webp
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>As I have just shown, you have no power or authority to "ban"
>>>>>>anything.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>[crickets]
>>>>>
>>>>> Jenny will grant you "special dispensation" so that he can
>>>>>maintain his LIE that he's the leader of the group.
>>>>
>>>> That's his only way out now. He has to admit that his rules don't
>>>> apply to me.
>>>
>>>That wasn't the point. The POINT was, nobody in this newsgroup gives a shit
>>>about what you post, so you are free to post as many meaningless webp pics
>>>you want.
>>
>>TRANSLATION: Jenny admits he has zero control, authority, or influence
>>ANYWHERE on Usenet.
>>
>
> Yep.
>
>>> And since you only post them to spite me, you will QUICKLY get
>>>bored of that and it will become a non-issue very quickly.
>>
>>Someone else already posted some, demonstrating your impotence.
>
> Two others of us have.
> The Gasbag, aka Jenny, will need to come to terms with the
>reality that he has NO authority. Anywhere.

Over a week has gone by with nothing but

>
>
>
[crickets.wav] (© 2021 All Rights Reserved)
>
>
>

On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 14:08:41 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

[...]

>>>> And since you only post them to spite me, you will QUICKLY get
>>>>bored of that and it will become a non-issue very quickly.
>>>
>>>Someone else already posted some, demonstrating your impotence.
>>
>> Two others of us have.
>> The Gasbag, aka Jenny, will need to come to terms with the
>>reality that he has NO authority. Anywhere.
>
>Over a week has gone by with nothing but
>
>>
>>
>>
> [crickets.wav] (© 2021 All Rights Reserved)

Exactly. He likes to pretend (LIE) and claim he's the leader, but
knows he has none.

--
"Hail imp," shouted Vlad, the Imp Hailer.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8qqsogdgq28ibfunoocpqjhvj4nhsa64vj@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 23:10:42 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> As I have just shown, you have no power or authority to "ban"
>>> anything.
>>>
>>> [crickets]
>>
>>THE FACT THAT NOBODY POSTED WEBP LINKS PROVES THEY ARE FOLLOWING THE BAN.
>
> Wrong Jenny. It proves nothing.

Yes klous, it proves EVERYTHING. Becouse if the ban weren't in place, this
newsgroup would be filled with WEPB links, cousing much hardship and
trouble. And we aren't seeing any of that right now, are we?

On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 13:22:08 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:8qqsogdgq28ibfunoocpqjhvj4nhsa64vj@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 23:10:42 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> As I have just shown, you have no power or authority to "ban"
>>>> anything.
>>>>
>>>> [crickets]
>>>
>>>THE FACT THAT NOBODY POSTED WEBP LINKS PROVES THEY ARE FOLLOWING THE BAN.
>>
>> Wrong Jenny. It proves nothing.
>
>Yes klous, it proves EVERYTHING. Becouse if the ban weren't in place, this
>newsgroup would be filled with WEPB links, cousing much hardship and
>trouble. And we aren't seeing any of that right now, are we?

It proves nothing. People have posted WEPB links since you imagined
you had the authority to ban them. People rarely post links to
pictures to begin with.

And, as I have repeatedly said, you have zero authority to "ban"
anything here. You have already demonstrated your compete impotence in
this regard.

On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 13:22:08 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:8qqsogdgq28ibfunoocpqjhvj4nhsa64vj@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 23:10:42 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> As I have just shown, you have no power or authority to "ban"
>>>> anything.
>>>>
>>>> [crickets]
>>>
>>>THE FACT THAT NOBODY POSTED WEBP LINKS PROVES THEY ARE FOLLOWING THE BAN.
>>
>> Wrong Jenny. It proves nothing.
>
>Yes klous, it proves EVERYTHING. Becouse if the ban weren't in place, this
>newsgroup would be filled with WEPB links, cousing much hardship and
>trouble. And we aren't seeing any of that right now, are we?

We aren't seeing much in the way of ANY image formats being
posted. But Klaus and I both posted links to WEBP images and nothing
happened. Outside of your inability to be honest, unless you make a
mistake, WEBP format is 100% acceptable here.
Here is more PROOF that you LIED about the ban:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a1/Johnrogershousemay2020.webp

Are you going to LIE about kill filing me again? Or will you "run
away" from the truth you fear so much? Time will tell.

--
Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2773pghvv006109h380cunl63sepufp4hu@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:58:55 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KWills" <a@d.c> wrote in message
>>news:94jvogl43u5n73cmlddda7bnq1da7j8qqe@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 05:28:57 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
>>
>>
>>Kwills, why can't you get it through your head that you are not welcome
>>here. If you want to be considered to be reinstated, here is the
>>procedure
>>you MUST follow.
>
> And Lying Jenny responds to someone he claims to have filtered.

Becouse he's obvioulsy used a fake email, Klous.

> You should leave him in your kill file, as to avoid any more mental
> stress.

Already done. Including any futre fake-emails he uses. HE had a chance to
reinstate himself, and he failed horribly.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4c73pg931bkqsmcvkmopgg720frvdi13ef@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:46:16 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:q7tamg5p2pso2ecc80g3pd6v31e2fil8qb@4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 02:05:12 -0700, KWills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 04:18:26 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>>>><klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>[...]
>>>>
>>>>>>>(b) you didn't ban it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes I did. And the people responded to my ban, nobody has been
>>>>>> posting
>>>>>>webp link's for quite some time now. PROVING that people respect me
>>>>>>as
>>>>>>leader of this newsgroup.
>>>>>
>>>>>No, liar.
>>>>>
>>>>>NOBODY responded to your imagined "ban," since NOBODY has posted any
>>>>>pictures of fast food.
>>>>>
>>>>>https://insanelygoodrecipes.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Hamburger-with-Fresh-Vegetables-683x1024.webp
>>>>>https://thebustedoven.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Air-Fryer-Burgers-6-of-11-720x720.jpg.webp
>>>>>https://makeyourmeals.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/air-fryer-burger.jpg.webp
>>>>>https://3boysandadog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Best-Ever-Easy-Hamburger-Patty-Recipe.png.webp
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>As I have just shown, you have no power or authority to "ban"
>>>>>anything.
>>>>>
>>>>>[crickets]
>>>>
>>>> Jenny will grant you "special dispensation" so that he can
>>>>maintain his LIE that he's the leader of the group.
>>>
>>> That's his only way out now. He has to admit that his rules don't
>>> apply to me.
>>
>>That wasn't the point. The POINT was, nobody in this newsgroup gives a
>>shit
>>about what you post, so you are free to post as many meaningless webp pics
>>you want.
>
> TRANSLATION: Jenny admits he has zero control, authority, or influence
> ANYWHERE on Usenet.

Not even close to what I said. A better translation would be, "I let the
baby have his bottle" becosue im' the bigger man. An my plan is working
just fine since you haven't posted and WEBP since.

On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 00:56:18 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:2773pghvv006109h380cunl63sepufp4hu@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:58:55 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"KWills" <a@d.c> wrote in message
>>>news:94jvogl43u5n73cmlddda7bnq1da7j8qqe@4ax.com...
>>>> On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 05:28:57 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
>>>
>>>
>>>Kwills, why can't you get it through your head that you are not welcome
>>>here. If you want to be considered to be reinstated, here is the
>>>procedure
>>>you MUST follow.
>>
>> And Lying Jenny responds to someone he claims to have filtered.
>
>Becouse he's obvioulsy used a fake email, Klous.

You can filter a fake email, dolt.

Obviously, you lied when you claimed you filtered him.

Nobody is surprised.

>> You should leave him in your kill file, as to avoid any more mental
>> stress.
>
>Already done. Including any futre fake-emails he uses. HE had a chance to
>reinstate himself, and he failed horribly.

You no longer see his posts. So you say. Of course, we already know
you're a liar, so......

On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 00:57:52 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:4c73pg931bkqsmcvkmopgg720frvdi13ef@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:46:16 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:q7tamg5p2pso2ecc80g3pd6v31e2fil8qb@4ax.com...
>>>> On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 02:05:12 -0700, KWills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 04:18:26 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>>>>><klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>[...]
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>(b) you didn't ban it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes I did. And the people responded to my ban, nobody has been
>>>>>>> posting
>>>>>>>webp link's for quite some time now. PROVING that people respect me
>>>>>>>as
>>>>>>>leader of this newsgroup.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No, liar.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>NOBODY responded to your imagined "ban," since NOBODY has posted any
>>>>>>pictures of fast food.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>https://insanelygoodrecipes.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Hamburger-with-Fresh-Vegetables-683x1024.webp
>>>>>>https://thebustedoven.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Air-Fryer-Burgers-6-of-11-720x720.jpg.webp
>>>>>>https://makeyourmeals.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/air-fryer-burger.jpg.webp
>>>>>>https://3boysandadog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Best-Ever-Easy-Hamburger-Patty-Recipe.png.webp
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>As I have just shown, you have no power or authority to "ban"
>>>>>>anything.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>[crickets]
>>>>>
>>>>> Jenny will grant you "special dispensation" so that he can
>>>>>maintain his LIE that he's the leader of the group.
>>>>
>>>> That's his only way out now. He has to admit that his rules don't
>>>> apply to me.
>>>
>>>That wasn't the point. The POINT was, nobody in this newsgroup gives a
>>>shit
>>>about what you post, so you are free to post as many meaningless webp pics
>>>you want.
>>
>> TRANSLATION: Jenny admits he has zero control, authority, or influence
>> ANYWHERE on Usenet.
>
>
>Not even close to what I said. A better translation would be, "I let the
>baby have his bottle" becosue im' the bigger man. An my plan is working
>just fine since you haven't posted and WEBP since.

Your plan hasn't worked, since I have posted a webp, and so have
others.

Your "plan" failed miserably.

As I said, you have zero authority here or anywhere else.

You can't even make SUGGESTIONS-- that's how impotent you are.

On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 00:56:18 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:2773pghvv006109h380cunl63sepufp4hu@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:58:55 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"KWills" <a@d.c> wrote in message
>>>news:94jvogl43u5n73cmlddda7bnq1da7j8qqe@4ax.com...
>>>> On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 05:28:57 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
>>>
>>>
>>>Kwills, why can't you get it through your head that you are not welcome
>>>here. If you want to be considered to be reinstated, here is the
>>>procedure
>>>you MUST follow.
>>
>> And Lying Jenny responds to someone he claims to have filtered.
>
>Becouse he's obvioulsy used a fake email, Klous.

a@b.c is obviously not a real E-mail address. Duh.
Not that it matters. Who kill files based on an E-mail address? I
suppose someone who has a profound learning disability would.

>
>> You should leave him in your kill file, as to avoid any more mental
>> stress.
>
>Already done. Including any futre fake-emails he uses. HE had a chance to
>reinstate himself, and he failed horribly.

Since you've never kill filed me, something you have PROVED
multiple times, your lie has failed.
I don't need to "reinstate" myself. There is no means to ban
anyone with access and desire from posting. And no amount of you
PROVING you have a very real NEED to lie will change this.

--
When the world ends, there'll be no more air.
That's why it's important to pollute the air now. Before it's too
late. :)

On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 00:57:52 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:4c73pg931bkqsmcvkmopgg720frvdi13ef@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:46:16 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message news:q7tamg5p2pso2ecc80g3pd6v31e2fil8qb@4ax.com...
>>>> On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 02:05:12 -0700, KWills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 04:18:26 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
>>>>><klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>[...]
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>(b) you didn't ban it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes I did. And the people responded to my ban, nobody has been
>>>>>>> posting
>>>>>>>webp link's for quite some time now. PROVING that people respect me
>>>>>>>as leader of this newsgroup.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No, liar.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>NOBODY responded to your imagined "ban," since NOBODY has posted any
>>>>>>pictures of fast food.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>https://insanelygoodrecipes.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Hamburger-with-Fresh-Vegetables-683x1024.webp
>>>>>>https://thebustedoven.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Air-Fryer-Burgers-6-of-11-720x720.jpg.webp
>>>>>>https://makeyourmeals.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/air-fryer-burger.jpg.webp
>>>>>>https://3boysandadog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Best-Ever-Easy-Hamburger-Patty-Recipe.png.webp
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>As I have just shown, you have no power or authority to "ban"
>>>>>>anything.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>[crickets]
>>>>>
>>>>> Jenny will grant you "special dispensation" so that he can
>>>>>maintain his LIE that he's the leader of the group.
>>>>
>>>> That's his only way out now. He has to admit that his rules don't
>>>> apply to me.
>>>
>>>That wasn't the point. The POINT was, nobody in this newsgroup gives a
>>>shit
>>>about what you post, so you are free to post as many meaningless webp pics
>>>you want.
>>
>> TRANSLATION: Jenny admits he has zero control, authority, or influence
>> ANYWHERE on Usenet.
>
>
>Not even close to what I said. A better translation would be, "I let the
>baby have his bottle" becosue im' the bigger man. An my plan is working
>just fine since you haven't posted and WEBP since.
>

Please get professional help for your NEED to lie.

--
Aspire to inspire before you expire.

On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 04:39:32 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 00:56:18 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:2773pghvv006109h380cunl63sepufp4hu@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:58:55 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"KWills" <a@d.c> wrote in message
>>>>news:94jvogl43u5n73cmlddda7bnq1da7j8qqe@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 05:28:57 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Kwills, why can't you get it through your head that you are not welcome
>>>>here. If you want to be considered to be reinstated, here is the
>>>>procedure
>>>>you MUST follow.
>>>
>>> And Lying Jenny responds to someone he claims to have filtered.
>>
>>Becouse he's obvioulsy used a fake email, Klous.
>
>You can filter a fake email, dolt.
>
>Obviously, you lied when you claimed you filtered him.
>

He has proved, more times than I am willing to count, that the
mere idea of honesty causes him so much anxiety, he is actually unable
to be honest except when he makes a mistake.

>Nobody is surprised.
>

If only the Gasbag could be honest, intentionally.

>>> You should leave him in your kill file, as to avoid any more mental
>>> stress.
>>
>>Already done. Including any futre fake-emails he uses. HE had a chance to
>>reinstate himself, and he failed horribly.
>
>You no longer see his posts. So you say. Of course, we already know
>you're a liar, so......

He will screw up and reply to me again, eventually.

--
"Hail imp," shouted Vlad, the Imp Hailer.

"vallor" <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote in message
news:snh77g$hkv$5@dont-email.me...
> On Sun, 10 Oct 2021 19:27:11 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
>> "KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>> message news:o8lvjgp47bpo6d5g5brr3d99skv59nkcu7@4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 13 Sep 2021 14:31:07 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>message news:p4nshg5o68mt96ui2ig1o1i93sihatg7js@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 14:21:16 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>message news:jj11ggh0h092v3roi0a9pe8kttc4ainkvv@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 14:15:11 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>message news:ak80fglqqri2c08evr5hjcd2cbnjd9hola@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 03:41:50 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>in message news:9jl8eg5cckn6i0l19nb7c1ug6p6a3mhkvr@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 17:26:07 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>news:n44sdgple9fpicacpm7f2871iam5ddfvif@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:52:34 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:i49fcghjpsqmspi0kk7nt5qjbt9qhqutts@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Back in the day, fast food restaurants didn't necessarily
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> offer the laundry list of items they do now. That's why
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people are bugging out over a recently released photo of a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> McDonald's menu snapped in 1973,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as ABC 10 News reports. Patrons who are used to choosing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from about 145 menu items (via Marketplace) were shocked by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the slimmed-down offerings - at least in quantity, if not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in nutritional value -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shown in the photo. Let's take a look at the retro menu,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shall we?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.mashed.com/img/gallery/people-cant-believe-this-70s-mcdonalds-
> menu/just-the-basics-1623264345.webp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As explained by Insider, the original McDonald's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restaurants,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the first of which opened in 1955, had bare-bones menus,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> featuring just hamburgers, cheeseburgers, fries, sodas, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> milkshakes. Over the years, franchises have added a steady
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stream of then-new,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now-beloved items: the Filet-O-Fish in 1965, the Big Mac in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1968, and Chicken McNuggets in 1983. Today, most McDonald's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> locations boast more than 130 menu items, providing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something for everyone.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As for us, we'd be happy with a cheeseburger, fries, and a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chocolate shake. Take us back to 1973?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Read More:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.mashed.com/433078/people-cant-believe-this-70s-mcdonalds-
> menu/?utm_campaign=clip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Wouldn't bother me one bit, but there are some modern item's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I woul dmiss like the Mcflurry.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Oh and BTW shame on you klous for posting in webp format.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> WebP is an image format employing both lossy and lossless
>>>>>>>>>>>>> compression,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and supports animation and alpha transparency. Developed by
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is designed to create files that are smaller for the same
>>>>>>>>>>>>> quality,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> or of higher quality for the same size, than JPEG, PNG, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> GIF image formats. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is obvious now that you are foolishly and ignorantly
>>>>>>>>>>>>> blaming me for posting a link to this picture
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.mashed.com/img/gallery/people-cant-believe-this-70s-mcdonalds-
> menu/just-the-basics-1623264345.webp
>>>>>>>>>>>>> as you think I own mashed.com and have control over the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> format they use to post graphics.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh really klous? Well if you didn't post it, then just whose
>>>>>>>>>>>> name is up
>>>>>>>>>>>>there who posted that message?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>The POINT is, you should have posted a link to a more
>>>>>>>>>>>>universally accepted format. This is Usenet. You will be
>>>>>>>>>>>>forgiven this time, but next time,
>>>>>>>>>>>>WATCH IT.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The point is, you ignorant pup, that the webp format is as
>>>>>>>>>>> acceptable as jpg or png, and you *will* accept it, and there
>>>>>>>>>>> is nothing you can do about it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Fine. I refuse to argue this point with you, so I'm giving in.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> TRANSLATION: Jenny just realized that webp is a web standard.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>No, I never said anything that could be translated like that. What
>>>>>>>>I said was, it wasn't worth taking the time to argue this fact with
>>>>>>>>an idiot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Of COURSE it is, which is why I'm discussing it with a.f.f-f's
>>>>>>> resident idiot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Listen Klous, I don't need any lesson's from YOU.
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course you do, Jenny. You're woefully ignorant in any subject
>>>>> we've ever discussed.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I obviously was the one
>>>>>>more smart about Webp,
>>>>>
>>>>> Obviously, you had no idea what it was, because you cried like a
>>>>> school girl when I used a link with it.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Oh and BTW shame on you klous for posting in webp format." you
>>>>> whined.
>>>>>
>>>>>>First of all becouse I KNEW IT EXISTED BEFORE YOU DID and already new
>>>>>>it's many disadvantage's.
>>>>>
>>>>> You knew nothing about it then, and you know what I taught you now.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Lies, obvious lie's. If I knew nothing about it, then how would I know
>>>>how traoublesome it was, and make a decision to ban it?
>>>
>>> You wouldn't, because (a) it's not troublesome
>>
>> THEY (not it) are EXTREMELY troublesome, and
>>
>>>(b) you didn't ban it.
>>
>>
>> Yes I did. And the people responded to my ban, nobody has been
>> posting
>> webp link's for quite some time now. PROVING that people respect me as
>> leader of this newsgroup.
>
> It "proves" Jenny is delusional.

On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 19:32:25 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

[...]

>>>>>Lies, obvious lie's. If I knew nothing about it, then how would I know
>>>>>how traoublesome it was, and make a decision to ban it?
>>>>
>>>> You wouldn't, because (a) it's not troublesome
>>>
>>> THEY (not it) are EXTREMELY troublesome, and
>>>
>>>>(b) you didn't ban it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes I did. And the people responded to my ban, nobody has been
>>> posting
>>> webp link's for quite some time now. PROVING that people respect me as
>>> leader of this newsgroup.
>>
>> It "proves" Jenny is delusional.
>
>WRONG, vallor, as you can see in the newsgroup, Peaople STOPPED posting webp
>links shortly after the ban went into effect..
>
>> Why is Jenny working so hard to get people to post
>> webp's to the froup?
>
>I trying to get them to NOT post webp links you
>fucktard!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Klaus and I posted several webp links after your delusional "ban"
was set in place. Your running away, metaphorically speaking, to hide
in fear does not change this.

--
There's no place like 127.0.0.1

On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 19:32:25 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> It "proves" Jenny is delusional.
>
>WRONG, vallor, as you can see in the newsgroup, Peaople STOPPED posting webp
>links shortly after the ban went into effect..

====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========

[ ] Provide the Message ID proving your claim
[ x ] You are lying, as usual
[ ] Typical racist Jenny response
[ ] Incorrect-- this has already been explained to you
[ ] Repeat your statement using standard, American English, please
[ ] Yes, it *is* private property
[ ] Yes, salt and pepper *are* ingredients
[ ] No, the sauce contains no alcohol
[ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet

======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========

On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 02:58:28 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 19:32:25 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> It "proves" Jenny is delusional.
>>
>>WRONG, vallor, as you can see in the newsgroup, Peaople STOPPED posting webp
>>links shortly after the ban went into effect..
>
>====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>
>[ ] Provide the Message ID proving your claim
>[ x ] You are lying, as usual
>[ ] Typical racist Jenny response
>[ ] Incorrect-- this has already been explained to you
>[ ] Repeat your statement using standard, American English, please
>[ ] Yes, it *is* private property
>[ ] Yes, salt and pepper *are* ingredients
>[ ] No, the sauce contains no alcohol
>[ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet
>
>======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========

You and I posted a number of links to webp images.

--
Aspire to inspire before you expire.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:b132rg9aavnmvmv8lvljgkf783neim48tr@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 13:22:08 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:8qqsogdgq28ibfunoocpqjhvj4nhsa64vj@4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 23:10:42 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> As I have just shown, you have no power or authority to "ban"
>>>>> anything.
>>>>>
>>>>> [crickets]
>>>>
>>>>THE FACT THAT NOBODY POSTED WEBP LINKS PROVES THEY ARE FOLLOWING THE
>>>>BAN.
>>>
>>> Wrong Jenny. It proves nothing.
>>
>>Yes klous, it proves EVERYTHING. Becouse if the ban weren't in place,
>>this
>>newsgroup would be filled with WEPB links, cousing much hardship and
>>trouble. And we aren't seeing any of that right now, are we?
>
> It proves nothing. People have posted WEPB links since you imagined
> you had the authority to ban them.

Yes. YOU have. One person. And the only reason you did it, was to
troll. Then you got bored with it, and we never saw any more from you.

> And, as I have repeatedly said, you have zero authority to "ban"
> anything here.

And As I repeatedly said, I AM THE LEADER of this newsgroup. I can make any
rule I wish. If you don't like it, GO TO ANOTHER NEWSGROUP. There are
plenty of dead newsgroups that have died out due to lack of leadership.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:thi6rglt7b5167o3s9mhphjoi1juk68u93@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 00:56:18 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:2773pghvv006109h380cunl63sepufp4hu@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:58:55 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"KWills" <a@d.c> wrote in message
>>>>news:94jvogl43u5n73cmlddda7bnq1da7j8qqe@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 05:28:57 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Kwills, why can't you get it through your head that you are not welcome
>>>>here. If you want to be considered to be reinstated, here is the
>>>>procedure
>>>>you MUST follow.
>>>
>>> And Lying Jenny responds to someone he claims to have filtered.
>>
>>Becouse he's obvioulsy used a fake email, Klous.
>
> You can filter a fake email, dolt.

Yes I know I can, klous. That wasn't the point. The whole reason why I
require a valid email is so once a person is killfiled, they can't return
with a new, fake email becouse the fake email is automotatically killfiled
once discovered.

DON'T QUESTION MY WAY'S, the program has a extremely positive success rate
and I'm very pleased with it.